Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 7375-7378 [2023-02191]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
4tvPDqyxiQromM9k%2B%2Bqlq
AUbTKv6s6OSufsShaSSK0U%3D
&reserved=0 for access.
(OATSD(PCLT)), Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Meeting Accessibility/Special
Accommodations
SUMMARY:
Please make requests in advance for
sign language interpreter services,
assistive listening devices, or other
reasonable accommodations. We ask
that you contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice at least seven (7)
business days prior to the meeting to
give DOI sufficient time to process your
request. All reasonable accommodation
requests are managed on a case-by-case
basis.
Public Comments
Depending on the number of people
who want to comment and the time
available, the amount of time for
individual oral comments may be
limited. Requests to address the
Committee during the meeting will be
accommodated in the order the requests
are received. Individuals who wish to
expand upon their oral statements, or
those who had wished to speak but
could not be accommodated on the
agenda, may submit written comments
to the Designated Federal Officer up to
30 days following the meeting. Written
comments may be sent to Vickie Hanvey
listed in the ADDRESSES section above.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, it
cannot be guaranteed.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 10)
Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023–02205 Filed 2–2–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD–2022–OS–0142]
RIN 0790–AL62
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Office of the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil
Liberties, and Transparency
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Feb 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
The OATSD(PCLT) is giving
notice of a proposed rulemaking for an
existing component-wide system of
records pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974 titled CIG–16, ‘‘Inspector General
Administrative Investigation Records,’’
which was modified and reissued on
May 31, 2022. In this rulemaking, the
Department proposes to amend the
existing rule for CIG–16 in order to
exempt portions of this system of
records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act because of national security
and law enforcement requirements; to
avoid interference during the conduct of
criminal, civil, or administrative actions
or investigations; and to protect the
identity of confidential sources incident
to Federal employment, military service,
contract, and security clearance
determinations.
DATES: Send comments on or before
April 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number, Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) and title, by
any of the following methods.
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Assistant to the Secretary of
Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and
Transparency, Regulatory Directorate,
4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox
24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350–
1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rahwa Keleta, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil;
(703) 571–0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, the Office of Inspector General
(OIG) modified and reissued a system of
records titled, ‘‘Defense Case Activity
Tracking System (D–CATS),’’ CIG–16,
on May 31, 2022 (87 FR 32391). The
system of records was retitled,
‘‘Inspector General Administrative
Investigation Records (IGAIR).’’ IGAIR is
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7375
critical to the DoD OIG’s management
and oversight of DoD programs and
activities and is used for managing
cases, storing information, responding
to requests for information, and
fulfilling mandatory reporting
requirements. This system contains
records of DoD OIG mission activities
such as: the identification, referral, and
investigation of DoD Hotline
complaints; administrative
investigations of both military and
civilian senior officials accused of
misconduct; oversight and investigation
of whistleblower reprisal cases against
Service members, DoD contractor
employees, and DoD civilian employees
(appropriated and non-appropriated
fund); and improper command referrals
of Service member mental health
evaluations.
The system consists of both electronic
and paper records and will be used by
the OIG to maintain records about
individuals who are subject and/or
associated with a matter involved in
DoD OIG’s oversight of investigations
referenced above.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act allows Federal
agencies to exempt eligible records in a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Act, including those
that provide individuals with a right to
request access to and amendment of
their own records. If an agency intends
to exempt a particular system of records,
it must first go through the rulemaking
process pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(1)–
(3), (c), and (e). This proposed rule
explains why an exemption is being
claimed for this system of records and
invites public comment, which DoD
will consider before the issuance of a
final rule implementing the exemption.
The DoD OIG previously published a
final rule exempting CIG–16 from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (5) on
June 10, 1992 (57 FR 24547). The
OATSD(PCLT) now proposes to modify
32 CFR part 310 to update the existing
Privacy Act exemption rule for CIG–16
to change the system name and to
exempt portions of this system of
records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act because information in this
system of records may also fall within
the scope of the following Privacy Act
exemptions: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and
(k)(1). As referenced in the CIG–16
system of records notice published on
May 31, 2022 (87 FR 32391), this
rulemaking seeks public comment on (1)
the previously claimed exemption
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) for which a
rulemaking was not completed and (2)
on the addition of an exemption under
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
7376
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1). Additionally, this
rulemaking seeks public comment on
extending the exemptions claimed
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (5) to
additional requirements of the Privacy
Act, specifically, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I),
which requires a description of the
categories of sources of records in the
system of records notice.
The DoD OIG proposes this
exemption because some records may
contain classified national security
information, and as a result, notice,
access, amendment, and disclosure (to
include accounting for those records) to
an individual, and certain
recordkeeping requirements may cause
damage to national security. The
Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), authorizes agencies to claim
an exemption for systems of records that
contain information properly classified
pursuant to Executive order. The DoD
OIG is proposing to claim an exemption
from several provisions of the Privacy
Act, including various access,
amendment, disclosure of accounting,
and certain recordkeeping and notice
requirements pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), to prevent disclosure of any
information properly classified pursuant
to Executive order, as implemented by
DoD Instruction 5200.01 and DoD
Manual 5200.01, Volumes 1 and 3.
The DoD OIG also proposes to exempt
this system of records because these
records support the conduct of criminal
law enforcement activities, and certain
requirements of the Privacy Act may
interfere with the effective execution of
these activities, and undermine good
order and discipline. The Privacy Act,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
authorizes agencies with a principal law
enforcement function pertaining to the
enforcement of criminal laws (including
activities of prosecutors, courts, etc.) to
claim an exemption for systems of
records that contain information
identifying criminal offenders and
alleged offenders, information compiled
for the purpose of criminal
investigation, or reports compiled for
the purpose of criminal law
enforcement proceedings. Additionally,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), agencies
may exempt a system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act if
it contains investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes,
other than materials within the scope of
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). The DoD OIG is
proposing to claim exemptions from
several provisions of the Privacy Act,
including various access, amendment,
disclosure of accounting, and certain
recordkeeping and notice requirements,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Feb 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
552a(k)(2), to prevent the harms
articulated in this rule from occurring.
Records in this system of records are
only exempt from the Privacy Act to the
extent the purposes underlying the
exemption pertain to the record. A
notice of a modified system of records
for CIG–16 was published in the Federal
Register on May 31, 2022 (87 FR 32391).
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. It has been determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory
action under these executive orders.
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2))
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. DoD will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule may take effect no
earlier than 60 calendar days after
Congress receives the rule report or the
rule is published in the Federal
Register, whichever is later. This rule is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a)) requires agencies to
assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule whose mandates
may result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, in
any one year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
governments, nor will it affect private
sector costs.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
The ATSD(PCLT) has certified that
this rule is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
because it would not, if promulgated,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule is concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of
records within the DoD. Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
does not require DoD to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was enacted to
minimize the paperwork burden for
individuals; small businesses;
educational and nonprofit institutions;
Federal contractors; State, local, and
tribal governments; and other persons
resulting from the collection of
information by or for the Federal
Government. The Act requires agencies
obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget before using
identical questions to collect
information from ten or more persons.
This rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the
public.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has federalism implications.
This rule will not have a substantial
effect on State and local governments.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
Executive Order 13175 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on one or more Indian
tribes, preempts tribal law, or affects the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. This rule
will not have a substantial effect on
Indian tribal governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDEMENT
OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 310.28 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 310.28 Office of the Inspector General
(OIG) exemptions.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) System identifier and name. CIG–
16, Inspector General Administrative
Investigation Records (IGAIR).
(i) Exemptions. This system of records
is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and
(4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(2);
(e)(3); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); (e)(5); (e)(8);
(f) and (g) of the Privacy Act pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). This system of
records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G) and (H); and (f) of the Privacy
Act to the extent the records are subject
to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5). This system
of records is also exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4)(I) to the extent the records are
subject to exemption pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(1).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
(k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5).
(iii) Exemption from the particular
subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified for the
following reasons:
(A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and
(d)(2)—(1) Exemption (j)(2). Records in
this system of records may contain
investigatory material compiled for
criminal law enforcement purposes to
include information identifying
criminal offenders and alleged
offenders, information compiled for the
purpose of criminal investigation, or
reports compiled during criminal law
enforcement proceedings. Application
of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary
because access to, amendment of, or
release of the accounting of disclosures
of such records could inform the record
subject of an investigation of the
existence, nature, or scope of an actual
or potential law enforcement or
disciplinary investigation, and thereby
seriously impede law enforcement or
prosecutorial efforts by permitting the
record subject and other persons to
whom he might disclose the records to
avoid criminal penalties or disciplinary
measures; reveal confidential sources
who might not have otherwise come
forward to assist in an investigation and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Feb 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
thereby hinder DoD’s ability to obtain
information from future confidential
sources and result in an unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of others.
(2) Exemption (k)(1). Records in this
system of records may contain
information that is properly classified
pursuant to executive order.
Application of exemption (k)(1) may be
necessary because access to and
amendment of the records, or release of
the accounting of disclosures for such
records, could reveal classified
information. Disclosure of classified
records to an individual may cause
damage to national security.
(3) Exemption (k)(2). Records in this
system of records may contain
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes other than
material within the scope of 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2). Application of exemption
(k)(2) may be necessary because access
to, amendment of, or release of the
accounting of disclosures of such
records could: inform the record subject
of an investigation of the existence,
nature, or scope of an actual or potential
law enforcement or disciplinary
investigation, and thereby seriously
impede law enforcement or
prosecutorial efforts by permitting the
record subject and other persons to
whom he might disclose the records or
the accounting of records to avoid
criminal penalties, civil remedies, or
disciplinary measures; interfere with a
civil or administrative action or
investigation which may impede those
actions or investigations; reveal
confidential sources who might not
have otherwise come forward to assist
in an investigation and thereby hinder
DoD’s ability to obtain information from
future confidential sources; and result
in an unwarranted invasion of the
privacy of others.
(4) Exemption (k)(5). Records in this
system of records may contain
information concerning investigatory
material compiled solely for
determining suitability, eligibility, and
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, military service, Federal
contracts, or access to classified
information. In some cases, such records
may contain information pertaining to
the identity of a source who furnished
information to the Government under an
express promise that the source’s
identity would be held in confidence (or
prior to the effective date of the Privacy
Act, under an implied promise).
Application of exemption (k)(5) may be
necessary because access to, amendment
of, or release of the accounting of
disclosures of such records could
identify these confidential sources who
might not have otherwise come forward
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7377
to assist the Government; hinder the
Government’s ability to obtain
information from future confidential
sources; and result in an unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of others.
Amendment of such records could also
impose a highly impracticable
administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated.
(B) Subsection (c)(4), (d)(3) and (4).
These subsections are inapplicable to
the extent that an exemption is being
claimed from subsections (d)(1) and (2).
Accordingly, exemption from
subsection (c)(4) is claimed pursuant to
(j)(2) and exemptions from subsections
(d)(3) and (d)(4) are claimed pursuant to
(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5).
(C) Subsection (e)(1). In the collection
of information for investigatory and law
enforcement purposes it is not always
possible to conclusively determine the
relevance and necessity of particular
information in the early stages of the
investigation or adjudication. In some
instances, it will be only after the
collected information is evaluated in
light of other information that its
relevance and necessity for effective
investigation and adjudication can be
assessed. Collection of such information
permits more informed decision-making
by the Department when making
required disciplinary and prosecutorial
determinations. Additionally, records
within this system may be properly
classified pursuant to executive order.
Accordingly, application of exemptions
(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5) may be
necessary.
(D) Subsection (e)(2). To collect
information from the subject individual
could serve notice that he or she is the
subject of a criminal investigation and
thereby present a serious impediment to
such investigations. Collection of
information only from the individual
accused of criminal activity or
misconduct could also subvert
discovery of relevant evidence and
subvert the course of justice.
Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(E) Subsection (e)(3). To inform
individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of
a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts.
Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(F) Subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H).
These subsections are inapplicable to
the extent exemption is claimed from
subsections (d)(1) and (2).
(G) Subsection (e)(4)(I). To the extent
that this provision is construed to
require more detailed disclosure than
the broad, generic information currently
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
7378
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 23 / Friday, February 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
published in the system notice, an
exemption from this provision is
necessary to protect the confidentiality
of sources of information and to protect
the privacy and physical safety of
witnesses and informants. Accordingly,
application of exemptions (j)(2) and
(k)(1) may be necessary.
(H) Subsection (e)(5). It is often
impossible to determine in advance if
investigatory records contained in this
system are accurate, relevant, timely
and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement, it is
necessary to retain this information to
maintain an accurate record of the
investigatory activity to preserve the
integrity of the investigation and satisfy
various Constitutional and evidentiary
requirements, such as mandatory
disclosure of potentially exculpatory
information in the investigative file to a
defendant. It is also necessary to retain
this information to aid in establishing
patterns of activity and provide
investigative leads. With the passage of
time, seemingly irrelevant or untimely
information may acquire new
significance as further investigation
brings new details to light and the
accuracy of such information can only
be determined through judicial
processes. Accordingly, application of
exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(I) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice
could give persons sufficient warning to
evade investigative efforts. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be
necessary.
(J) Subsection (f). The agency’s rules
are inapplicable to those portions of the
system that are exempt. Accordingly,
application of exemptions (j)(2), (k)(1),
(k)(2) and (k)(5) may be necessary.
(K) Subsection (g). This subsection is
inapplicable to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act.
Accordingly, an exemption from
subsection (g) is claimed pursuant to
(j)(2).
(iv) Exempt records from other
systems. In the course of carrying out
the overall purpose for this system,
exempt records from other systems of
records may in turn become part of the
records maintained in this system. To
the extent that copies of exempt records
from those other systems of records are
maintained in this system, the DoD
claims the same exemptions for the
records from those other systems that
are entered into this system, as claimed
for the prior system(s) of which they are
a part, provided the reason for the
exemption remains valid and necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 Feb 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
Dated: January 30, 2023.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2023–02191 Filed 2–2–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2016–0674; FRL–10596–
01–R6]
Air Approval Plan; Oklahoma; Excess
Emission and Malfunction Reporting
Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA, the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve a revision to the
Oklahoma State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of
Oklahoma through the Secretary of
Energy & Environment on November 7,
2016. The revision was submitted in
response to a finding of substantial
inadequacy and SIP call published by
EPA on June 12, 2015, which included
certain provisions in the Oklahoma SIP
related to excess emissions during
startup, shutdown, and malfunction
(SSM) events. The submittal requests
the removal of the provisions identified
in the 2015 SIP call from the Oklahoma
SIP. EPA is proposing to determine that
the removal of these substantially
inadequate provisions from the SIP will
correct the deficiencies in the Oklahoma
SIP identified in the June 12, 2015 SIP
call.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 6, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2016–0674 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
Shar.alan@epa.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Mr. Alan Shar, (214) 665–6691,
Shar.alan@epa.gov. For the full EPA
public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm
Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270.
While all documents in the docket are
listed in the index, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly
available at either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alan Shar, Regional Haze and SO2
Section, EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm
Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270,
(214) 665–6691, Shar.Alan@epa.gov.
Out of an abundance of caution for
members of the public and our staff, the
EPA Region 6 office may be closed to
the public to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID–19. We encourage
the public to submit comments via
https://www.regulations.gov, as there
will be a delay in processing mail and
no courier or hand deliveries will be
accepted. Please call or email the
contact listed above if you need
alternative access to material indexed
but not provided in the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. EPA’s 2015 SIP Action
B. Oklahoma’s Subchapter 9 (OAC
252:100–9) Excess Emission and
Malfunction Reporting Requirements
II. Analysis of SIP Submission
III. Impacts on Areas of Indian Country
IV. Proposed Action
V. Environmental Justice Considerations
VI. Incorporation by Reference
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. EPA’s 2015 SIP Action
On February 22, 2013, EPA issued a
Federal Register proposed rulemaking
action outlining EPA’s policy at the time
with respect to SIP provisions related to
periods of SSM. EPA analyzed specific
SSM SIP provisions and explained how
E:\FR\FM\03FEP1.SGM
03FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 23 (Friday, February 3, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7375-7378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02191]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD-2022-OS-0142]
RIN 0790-AL62
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for
Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency (OATSD(PCLT)), Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The OATSD(PCLT) is giving notice of a proposed rulemaking for
an existing component-wide system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 titled CIG-16, ``Inspector General Administrative
Investigation Records,'' which was modified and reissued on May 31,
2022. In this rulemaking, the Department proposes to amend the existing
rule for CIG-16 in order to exempt portions of this system of records
from certain provisions of the Privacy Act because of national security
and law enforcement requirements; to avoid interference during the
conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or
investigations; and to protect the identity of confidential sources
incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations.
DATES: Send comments on or before April 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number,
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) and title, by any of the following
methods.
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency,
Regulatory Directorate, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox 24, Suite
08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rahwa Keleta, [email protected];
(703) 571-0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Office of Inspector
General (OIG) modified and reissued a system of records titled,
``Defense Case Activity Tracking System (D-CATS),'' CIG-16, on May 31,
2022 (87 FR 32391). The system of records was retitled, ``Inspector
General Administrative Investigation Records (IGAIR).'' IGAIR is
critical to the DoD OIG's management and oversight of DoD programs and
activities and is used for managing cases, storing information,
responding to requests for information, and fulfilling mandatory
reporting requirements. This system contains records of DoD OIG mission
activities such as: the identification, referral, and investigation of
DoD Hotline complaints; administrative investigations of both military
and civilian senior officials accused of misconduct; oversight and
investigation of whistleblower reprisal cases against Service members,
DoD contractor employees, and DoD civilian employees (appropriated and
non-appropriated fund); and improper command referrals of Service
member mental health evaluations.
The system consists of both electronic and paper records and will
be used by the OIG to maintain records about individuals who are
subject and/or associated with a matter involved in DoD OIG's oversight
of investigations referenced above.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act allows Federal agencies to exempt eligible records
in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including
those that provide individuals with a right to request access to and
amendment of their own records. If an agency intends to exempt a
particular system of records, it must first go through the rulemaking
process pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(1)-(3), (c), and (e). This proposed
rule explains why an exemption is being claimed for this system of
records and invites public comment, which DoD will consider before the
issuance of a final rule implementing the exemption.
The DoD OIG previously published a final rule exempting CIG-16 from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (5)
on June 10, 1992 (57 FR 24547). The OATSD(PCLT) now proposes to modify
32 CFR part 310 to update the existing Privacy Act exemption rule for
CIG-16 to change the system name and to exempt portions of this system
of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act because
information in this system of records may also fall within the scope of
the following Privacy Act exemptions: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(1).
As referenced in the CIG-16 system of records notice published on May
31, 2022 (87 FR 32391), this rulemaking seeks public comment on (1) the
previously claimed exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) for which a
rulemaking was not completed and (2) on the addition of an exemption
under
[[Page 7376]]
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1). Additionally, this rulemaking seeks public comment
on extending the exemptions claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (5)
to additional requirements of the Privacy Act, specifically, 5 U.S.C.
552a(e)(4)(I), which requires a description of the categories of
sources of records in the system of records notice.
The DoD OIG proposes this exemption because some records may
contain classified national security information, and as a result,
notice, access, amendment, and disclosure (to include accounting for
those records) to an individual, and certain recordkeeping requirements
may cause damage to national security. The Privacy Act, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), authorizes agencies to claim an exemption for
systems of records that contain information properly classified
pursuant to Executive order. The DoD OIG is proposing to claim an
exemption from several provisions of the Privacy Act, including various
access, amendment, disclosure of accounting, and certain recordkeeping
and notice requirements pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), to prevent
disclosure of any information properly classified pursuant to Executive
order, as implemented by DoD Instruction 5200.01 and DoD Manual
5200.01, Volumes 1 and 3.
The DoD OIG also proposes to exempt this system of records because
these records support the conduct of criminal law enforcement
activities, and certain requirements of the Privacy Act may interfere
with the effective execution of these activities, and undermine good
order and discipline. The Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
authorizes agencies with a principal law enforcement function
pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws (including activities of
prosecutors, courts, etc.) to claim an exemption for systems of records
that contain information identifying criminal offenders and alleged
offenders, information compiled for the purpose of criminal
investigation, or reports compiled for the purpose of criminal law
enforcement proceedings. Additionally, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2),
agencies may exempt a system of records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act if it contains investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes, other than materials within the scope of 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2). The DoD OIG is proposing to claim exemptions from several
provisions of the Privacy Act, including various access, amendment,
disclosure of accounting, and certain recordkeeping and notice
requirements, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 552a(k)(2), to
prevent the harms articulated in this rule from occurring.
Records in this system of records are only exempt from the Privacy
Act to the extent the purposes underlying the exemption pertain to the
record. A notice of a modified system of records for CIG-16 was
published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2022 (87 FR 32391).
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action under these executive orders.
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. DoD will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule may take effect no earlier than 60 calendar days after
Congress receives the rule report or the rule is published in the
Federal Register, whichever is later. This rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a)) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, in any one year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation. This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or tribal governments, nor will it
affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.)
The ATSD(PCLT) has certified that this rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because it would not,
if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule is concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require
DoD to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was
enacted to minimize the paperwork burden for individuals; small
businesses; educational and nonprofit institutions; Federal
contractors; State, local, and tribal governments; and other persons
resulting from the collection of information by or for the Federal
Government. The Act requires agencies obtain approval from the Office
of Management and Budget before using identical questions to collect
information from ten or more persons. This rule does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State
law, or otherwise has federalism implications. This rule will not have
a substantial effect on State and local governments.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
Executive Order 13175 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes, preempts tribal
law, or affects the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal government and Indian tribes. This rule will not have a
substantial effect on Indian tribal governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 7377]]
PART 310--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDEMENT OF
INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Section 310.28 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 310.28 Office of the Inspector General (OIG) exemptions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) System identifier and name. CIG-16, Inspector General
Administrative Investigation Records (IGAIR).
(i) Exemptions. This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(2); (e)(3);
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); (e)(5); (e)(8); (f) and (g) of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). This system of records is exempt from
5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G) and
(H); and (f) of the Privacy Act to the extent the records are subject
to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5). This
system of records is also exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I) to the
extent the records are subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5).
(iii) Exemption from the particular subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified for the following reasons:
(A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2)--(1) Exemption (j)(2).
Records in this system of records may contain investigatory material
compiled for criminal law enforcement purposes to include information
identifying criminal offenders and alleged offenders, information
compiled for the purpose of criminal investigation, or reports compiled
during criminal law enforcement proceedings. Application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary because access to, amendment of, or release of
the accounting of disclosures of such records could inform the record
subject of an investigation of the existence, nature, or scope of an
actual or potential law enforcement or disciplinary investigation, and
thereby seriously impede law enforcement or prosecutorial efforts by
permitting the record subject and other persons to whom he might
disclose the records to avoid criminal penalties or disciplinary
measures; reveal confidential sources who might not have otherwise come
forward to assist in an investigation and thereby hinder DoD's ability
to obtain information from future confidential sources and result in an
unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others.
(2) Exemption (k)(1). Records in this system of records may contain
information that is properly classified pursuant to executive order.
Application of exemption (k)(1) may be necessary because access to and
amendment of the records, or release of the accounting of disclosures
for such records, could reveal classified information. Disclosure of
classified records to an individual may cause damage to national
security.
(3) Exemption (k)(2). Records in this system of records may contain
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than
material within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2). Application of
exemption (k)(2) may be necessary because access to, amendment of, or
release of the accounting of disclosures of such records could: inform
the record subject of an investigation of the existence, nature, or
scope of an actual or potential law enforcement or disciplinary
investigation, and thereby seriously impede law enforcement or
prosecutorial efforts by permitting the record subject and other
persons to whom he might disclose the records or the accounting of
records to avoid criminal penalties, civil remedies, or disciplinary
measures; interfere with a civil or administrative action or
investigation which may impede those actions or investigations; reveal
confidential sources who might not have otherwise come forward to
assist in an investigation and thereby hinder DoD's ability to obtain
information from future confidential sources; and result in an
unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others.
(4) Exemption (k)(5). Records in this system of records may contain
information concerning investigatory material compiled solely for
determining suitability, eligibility, and qualifications for Federal
civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts, or access to
classified information. In some cases, such records may contain
information pertaining to the identity of a source who furnished
information to the Government under an express promise that the
source's identity would be held in confidence (or prior to the
effective date of the Privacy Act, under an implied promise).
Application of exemption (k)(5) may be necessary because access to,
amendment of, or release of the accounting of disclosures of such
records could identify these confidential sources who might not have
otherwise come forward to assist the Government; hinder the
Government's ability to obtain information from future confidential
sources; and result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of
others. Amendment of such records could also impose a highly
impracticable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated.
(B) Subsection (c)(4), (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are
inapplicable to the extent that an exemption is being claimed from
subsections (d)(1) and (2). Accordingly, exemption from subsection
(c)(4) is claimed pursuant to (j)(2) and exemptions from subsections
(d)(3) and (d)(4) are claimed pursuant to (j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), and
(k)(5).
(C) Subsection (e)(1). In the collection of information for
investigatory and law enforcement purposes it is not always possible to
conclusively determine the relevance and necessity of particular
information in the early stages of the investigation or adjudication.
In some instances, it will be only after the collected information is
evaluated in light of other information that its relevance and
necessity for effective investigation and adjudication can be assessed.
Collection of such information permits more informed decision-making by
the Department when making required disciplinary and prosecutorial
determinations. Additionally, records within this system may be
properly classified pursuant to executive order. Accordingly,
application of exemptions (j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5) may be
necessary.
(D) Subsection (e)(2). To collect information from the subject
individual could serve notice that he or she is the subject of a
criminal investigation and thereby present a serious impediment to such
investigations. Collection of information only from the individual
accused of criminal activity or misconduct could also subvert discovery
of relevant evidence and subvert the course of justice. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(E) Subsection (e)(3). To inform individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts. Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(F) Subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H). These subsections are
inapplicable to the extent exemption is claimed from subsections (d)(1)
and (2).
(G) Subsection (e)(4)(I). To the extent that this provision is
construed to require more detailed disclosure than the broad, generic
information currently
[[Page 7378]]
published in the system notice, an exemption from this provision is
necessary to protect the confidentiality of sources of information and
to protect the privacy and physical safety of witnesses and informants.
Accordingly, application of exemptions (j)(2) and (k)(1) may be
necessary.
(H) Subsection (e)(5). It is often impossible to determine in
advance if investigatory records contained in this system are accurate,
relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of effective law
enforcement, it is necessary to retain this information to maintain an
accurate record of the investigatory activity to preserve the integrity
of the investigation and satisfy various Constitutional and evidentiary
requirements, such as mandatory disclosure of potentially exculpatory
information in the investigative file to a defendant. It is also
necessary to retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of
activity and provide investigative leads. With the passage of time,
seemingly irrelevant or untimely information may acquire new
significance as further investigation brings new details to light and
the accuracy of such information can only be determined through
judicial processes. Accordingly, application of exemption (j)(2) may be
necessary.
(I) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice could give persons
sufficient warning to evade investigative efforts. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(J) Subsection (f). The agency's rules are inapplicable to those
portions of the system that are exempt. Accordingly, application of
exemptions (j)(2), (k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5) may be necessary.
(K) Subsection (g). This subsection is inapplicable to the extent
that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the
Privacy Act. Accordingly, an exemption from subsection (g) is claimed
pursuant to (j)(2).
(iv) Exempt records from other systems. In the course of carrying
out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other
systems of records may in turn become part of the records maintained in
this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those
other systems of records are maintained in this system, the DoD claims
the same exemptions for the records from those other systems that are
entered into this system, as claimed for the prior system(s) of which
they are a part, provided the reason for the exemption remains valid
and necessary.
* * * * *
Dated: January 30, 2023.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2023-02191 Filed 2-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P