Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Replacement of Pier 302 at Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego, California, 6703-6714 [2023-02107]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
6703
Department contact
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Aluminum Foil from China, C–570–054 (1st Review) ......................................................................................
Suspended Investigations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
No Sunset Review of suspended
investigations is scheduled for initiation
in March 2023.
Commerce’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Review are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review
provides further information regarding
what is required of all parties to
participate in Sunset Review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c),
Commerce will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact Commerce in writing within 10
days of the publication of the Notice of
Initiation.
Please note that if Commerce receives
a Notice of Intent to Participate from a
member of the domestic industry within
15 days of the date of initiation, the
review will continue.
Thereafter, any interested party
wishing to participate in the Sunset
Review must provide substantive
comments in response to the notice of
initiation no later than 30 days after the
date of initiation. Note that Commerce
has modified certain of its requirements
for serving documents containing
business proprietary information, until
further notice.1
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Dated: January 20, 2023.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
[FR Doc. 2023–02084 Filed 1–31–23; 8:45 am]
[RTID 0648–XC585]
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
Specified Activities; Taking Marine
Mammals Incidental to Replacement of
Pier 302 at Naval Base Point Loma,
San Diego, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) to the
U.S. Navy to incidentally harass, by
Level B harassment only, marine
mammals during construction activities
associated with a Pier 302 Replacement
project at Naval Base Point Loma, San
Diego, California.
DATES: This authorization is effective
from October 1, 2023 through
September 30, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
Electronic copies of the application and
supporting documents, as well as a list
of the references cited in this document,
may be obtained online at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/incidentaltake-authorizations-constructionactivities. In case of problems accessing
these documents, please call the contact
listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Background
1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of
marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and
(D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
(as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
are made and either regulations are
proposed or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed IHA
is provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s) and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
taking for subsistence uses (where
relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe
the permissible methods of taking and
other ‘‘means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact’’ on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance, and on the
availability of the species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses
(referred to in shorthand as
‘‘mitigation’’); and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of the takings are set forth.
The definitions of all applicable MMPA
statutory terms cited above are included
in the relevant sections below.
Summary of Request
On July 27, 2022, NMFS received a
request from the U.S. Navy for an IHA
to take marine mammals incidental to
construction activities associated with
replacing Pier 302 at Naval Base Point
Loma (NBPL), San Diego, CA. Following
NMFS’ review of the application, the
U.S. Navy submitted a revised version
on September 22, 2022. The application
was deemed adequate and complete on
October 27, 2022. The U.S. Navy’s
request is for take of six species of
marine mammals by Level B harassment
only. Neither the U.S. Navy nor NMFS
expect serious injury or mortality to
result from this activity, therefore, an
IHA is appropriate. There were no
changes from the proposed to the final
IHA.
NMFS has previously issued IHAs to
the U.S. Navy for similar work over the
past 9 years at NBPL in San Diego Bay
(Bay), including IHAs issued effective
from September 1, 2013, through August
31, 2014 (78 FR 44539, July 24, 2013;
Year 1 Project), October 8, 2014 through
October 7, 2015 (79 FR 65378,
November 4, 2014; Year 2 Project),
October 8, 2015 through October 7, 2016
(80 FR 62032, October 15, 2015; Year 3
Project), October 8, 2016 through
October 7, 2017 (81 FR 66628,
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6704
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
September 28, 2016; Year 4 Project),
October 8, 2017 through October 7, 2018
(82 FR 45811, October 2, 2017; Year 5
Project), September 15, 2020 through
September 14, 2021 (85 FR 33129, June
1, 2020; Floating Dry Dock Project),
October 1, 2021 through September 30,
2022 (86 FR 7993, February 3, 2021; Pier
6 Replacement Project), and January 15,
2022 through January 14, 2023 (86 FR
48986, September 1, 2021; Fuel Pier
Inboard Pile Removal Project). The U.S.
Navy complied with all the
requirements (e.g., mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting) of the
previous IHA and information regarding
their monitoring results specific to
NBPL may be found in the Estimated
Take section.
Description of Activity
The U.S. Navy plans to replace Pier
302 at the Naval Information Warfare
Center (NIWC) Pacific Bayside Complex
on NBPL. Pier 302 houses the U.S. Navy
marine mammal pens and support
vessels. As part of the project, the U.S.
Navy will use vibratory extraction to
remove the existing components of
marine mammal pens, and impact and
vibratory hammers to install new pens.
The purpose of the project is to provide
the U.S. Navy’s marine mammal
program with adequate facilities to
house its marine mammals and provide
a safe working environment for
personnel to support the U.S. Navy’s
overall mission to maintain, train, and
equip combat ready Naval forces.
The Navy’s activity includes impact
and vibratory pile driving, which may
result in the incidental take of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment only.
No Level A harassment is anticipated to
occur, and none is authorized. Due to
mitigation measures, only takes by Level
B harassment are requested. NBPL is
located along the mouth and northern
edge of San Diego Bay, CA. The project
covers an area of 9,061 feet (ft.)2 (842
meters (m)2). Construction activities
will occur over 32 days within a 1 year
window from October 1, 2023 to
September 30, 2024. The Navy states
that it will conduct work only in
daylight hours. A detailed description of
the planned construction project is
provided in the Federal Register notice
for the proposed IHA (87 FR 68442,
November 15, 2022). Since that time, no
changes have been made to the planned
activities. Therefore, a detailed
description is not provided here. Please
refer to that Federal Register notice for
the description of the specific activity.
Mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures are described in detail later in
this document (please see Mitigation
and Monitoring and Reporting).
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS’ proposal to issue
an IHA to the U.S. Navy was published
in the Federal Register on November 15,
2022 (87 FR 68442). That notice
described, in detail, the U.S. Navy’s
activities, the marine mammal species
that may be affected by the activities,
and the anticipated effects on marine
mammals. During the 30-day public
comment period, no public comments
were received.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of Specified Activities
Sections 3 and 4 of the application
summarize available information
regarding status and trends, distribution
and habitat preferences, and behavior
and life history of the potentially
affected species. NMFS fully considered
all of this information, and we refer the
reader to these descriptions,
incorporated here by reference, instead
of reprinting the information.
Additional information regarding
population trends and threats may be
found in NMFS’ Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs; www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/marine-mammal-protection/
marine-mammal-stock-assessments)
and more general information about
these species (e.g., physical and
behavioral descriptions) may be found
on NMFS’ website (https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species).
Table 1 lists all species or stocks for
which take is expected and authorized
for this activity, and summarizes
information related to the population or
stock, including regulatory status under
the MMPA and Endangered Species Act
(ESA) and potential biological removal
(PBR), where known. PBR is defined by
the MMPA as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (as
described in NMFS’ SARs). While no
serious injury or mortality is expected to
occur, PBR and annual serious injury
and mortality from anthropogenic
sources are included here as gross
indicators of the status of the species or
stocks and other threats.
There are six marine mammal species
that are potentially expected to be
present during all or a portion of the inwater work associated with this project
in San Diego Bay, including the
California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus), the northern elephant
seal (Mirounga angustirostris), the
harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), the
bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus),
the Pacific white-sided dolphin
(Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), and the
common dolphin (Delphinus delphis).
The Committee on Taxonomy (https://
marinemammalscience.org/science-andpublications/list-marine-mammalspecies-subspecies/) recently
determined both the long-beaked and
short-beaked common dolphin belong in
the same species and we adopt this
taxonomy. However, the SARs still
describe the two as separate stocks, and
that stock information is presented in
Table 1. Marine mammal abundance
estimates presented in this document
represent the total number of
individuals that make up a given stock
or the total number estimated within a
particular study or survey area. NMFS’
stock abundance estimates. For some
species, this geographic area may extend
beyond U.S. waters. All stocks managed
under the MMPA in this region are
assessed in NMFS’ U.S. Pacific 2021
SARs. All values presented in Table 2
are the most recent available at the time
of publication and are available online
at: www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessments).
TABLE 1—MARINE MAMMAL SPECIES 4 LIKELY IMPACTED BY THE SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Common name
Scientific name
Stock
I
ESA/
MMPA
status;
strategic
(Y/N) 1
I
Stock abundance
(CV, Nmin, most recent
abundance survey) 2
Annual
M/SI 3
PBR
I
I
Order Artiodactyla—Infraorder Cetacea— Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
Family Delphinidae:
Bottlenose dolphin ..............
Short-beaked common dolphin.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Tursiops truncatus ....................
Delphinus delphis delphis .........
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
California Coastal .....................
California/Oregon/Washington ..
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
-, -, N
-, -, N
453 (0.06, 346, 2011) .....
1,056,308 (0.21,
888,971, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
2.7
8889
≥2.0
≥30.5
6705
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
TABLE 1—MARINE MAMMAL SPECIES 4 LIKELY IMPACTED BY THE SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES—Continued
Common name
Long-beaked common dolphin.
Pacific white-sided dolphin
ESA/
MMPA
status;
strategic
(Y/N) 1
Scientific name
Stock
Delphinus delphis capensis ......
California ...................................
-, -, N
Lagenorhynchus obliquidens ....
California/Oregon/Washington ..
-, -, N
Stock abundance
(CV, Nmin, most recent
abundance survey) 2
83,379 (0.216, 69,636,
2018).
34,999 (0.222, 29,090,
2018).
PBR
Annual
M/SI 3
668
≥29.7
279
7
Order Carnivora—Pinnipedia
Family Otariidae (eared seals
and sea lions):
California sea lion ...............
Zalophus californianus ..............
U.S. ...........................................
-, -, N
257,606 (N/A,233,515,
2014).
14011
>320
Family Phocidae (earless seals):
Harbor seal .........................
Phoca vitulina ...........................
California ...................................
-, -, N
1641
43
Northern elephant seal .......
Mirounga angustirostris ............
California breeding ....................
-, -, N
30,968 (N/A, 27,348,
2012).
187,386 (N/A, 85,369,
2013).
5122
13.7
1 Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the
ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or
which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically
designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
2 NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments/. CV is coefficient of variation; Nmin is the minimum estimate of stock abundance.
3 These values, found in NMFS’s SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g., commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated
mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
4 Information on the classification of marine mammal species can be found on the web page for The Society for Marine Mammalogy’s Committee on Taxonomy
(https://marinemammalscience.org/science-and-publications/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/; Committee on Taxonomy (2022)).
As indicated above, all six species
(with seven managed stocks) in Table 1
temporally and spatially co-occur with
the activity to the degree that take is
reasonably likely to occur. While gray
whales, Risso’s dolphins, and Steller sea
lions have been sighted around
California coastal waters in the past,
these species’ general spatial occurrence
is such that take is not expected to occur
as they typically occur more offshore.
Therefore, the Navy did not request, and
NMFS is not authorizing take of these
species.
A detailed description of the species
likely to be affected by the Naval Base
Point Loma Pier 302 Replacement
Project, including brief introductions to
the species and relevant stocks as well
as available information regarding
population trends and threats, and
information regarding local occurrence,
were provided in the Federal Register
notice for the proposed IHA (87 FR
68442, November 15, 2022); since that
time, we are not aware of any changes
in the status of these species and stocks;
therefore, detailed descriptions are not
provided here. Please refer to that
Federal Register notice for these
descriptions. Please also refer to the
NMFS website (https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species) for
generalized species accounts.
Marine Mammal Hearing
Hearing is the most important sensory
modality for marine mammals
underwater, and exposure to
anthropogenic sound can have
deleterious effects. To appropriately
assess the potential effects of exposure
to sound, it is necessary to understand
the frequency ranges marine mammals
are able to hear. Not all marine mammal
species have equal hearing capabilities
(e.g., Richardson et al., 1995; Wartzok
and Ketten, 1999; Au and Hastings,
2008). To reflect this, Southall et al.
(2007, 2019) recommended that marine
mammals be divided into hearing
groups based on directly measured
(behavioral or auditory evoked potential
techniques) or estimated hearing ranges
(behavioral response data, anatomical
modeling, etc.). Note that no direct
measurements of hearing ability have
been successfully completed for
mysticetes (i.e., low-frequency
cetaceans). Subsequently, NMFS (2018)
described generalized hearing ranges for
these marine mammal hearing groups.
Generalized hearing ranges were chosen
based on the approximately 65 decibel
(dB) threshold from the normalized
composite audiograms, with the
exception for lower limits for lowfrequency cetaceans where the lower
bound was deemed to be biologically
implausible and the lower bound from
Southall et al. (2007) retained. Marine
mammal hearing groups and their
associated hearing ranges are provided
in Table 2.
TABLE 2—MARINE MAMMAL HEARING GROUPS
[NMFS, 2018]
Generalized hearing
range *
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Hearing group
Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen whales) .....................................................................................................................
Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans (dolphins, toothed whales, beaked whales, bottlenose whales) ...........................................
High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins, Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus cruciger & L.
australis).
Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) (true seals) ...................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
7 Hz to 35 kHz.
150 Hz to 160 kHz.
275 Hz to 160 kHz.
50 Hz to 86 kHz.
6706
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
TABLE 2—MARINE MAMMAL HEARING GROUPS—Continued
[NMFS, 2018]
Generalized hearing
range *
Hearing group
Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) (sea lions and fur seals) ..............................................................................................
60 Hz to 39 kHz.
* Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a composite (i.e., all species within the group), where individual species’
hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized hearing range chosen based on ∼65 dB threshold from normalized composite audiogram,
with the exception for lower limits for LF cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).
The pinniped functional hearing
group was modified from Southall et al.
(2007) on the basis of data indicating
that phocid species have consistently
demonstrated an extended frequency
range of hearing compared to otariids,
especially in the higher frequency range
(Hemila¨ et al., 2006; Kastelein et al.,
2009; Reichmuth and Holt, 2013).
For more detail concerning these
groups and associated frequency ranges,
please see NMFS (2018) for a review of
available information.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
The effects of underwater noise from
the Navy’s pile driving activities have
the potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammals in the
vicinity of the project area. The notice
of the proposed IHA (87 FR 68442,
November 15, 2022) included a
discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine
mammals and the potential effects of
underwater noise from the Navy’s pile
driving activities on marine mammals
and their habitat. That information and
analysis is incorporated by reference
into this final IHA determination and is
not repeated here; please refer to the
notice of the proposed IHA (87 FR
68442, November 15, 2022).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of
the number of incidental takes
authorized through this IHA, which has
informed both NMFS’ consideration of
‘‘small numbers,’’ and the negligible
impact determinations.
Harassment is the only type of take
expected to result from these activities.
Except with respect to certain activities
not pertinent here, section 3(18) of the
MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as any act
of pursuit, torment, or annoyance,
which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild (Level A harassment);
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild by causing disruption
of behavioral patterns, including, but
not limited to, migration, breathing,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
(Level B harassment).
Authorized takes will be by Level B
harassment only, in the form of
disruption of behavioral patterns for
individual marine mammals resulting
from exposure to the acoustic sources.
Based on the nature of the activity and
the anticipated effectiveness of the
mitigation measures (i.e., vibratory or
impact pile driving and removal)
discussed in detail below in the
Mitigation section. Level A harassment
is neither anticipated nor authorized.
As described previously, no serious
injury or mortality is anticipated or
authorized for this activity. Below we
describe how the authorized take
numbers are estimated.
For acoustic impacts, generally
speaking, we estimate take by
considering: (1) acoustic thresholds
above which NMFS believes the best
available science indicates marine
mammals will be behaviorally harassed
or incur some degree of permanent
hearing impairment; (2) the area or
volume of water that will be ensonified
above these levels in a day; (3) the
density or occurrence of marine
mammals within these ensonified areas;
and, (4) the number of days of activities.
We note that while these factors can
contribute to a basic calculation to
provide an initial prediction of potential
takes, additional information that can
qualitatively inform take estimates is
also sometimes available (e.g., previous
monitoring results or average group
size). Below, we describe the factors
considered here in more detail and
present the authorized take estimates.
Acoustic Thresholds
NMFS recommends the use of
acoustic thresholds that identify the
received level of underwater sound
above which exposed marine mammals
would be reasonably expected to be
behaviorally harassed (equated to Level
B harassment) or to incur permanent
threshold shift (PTS) of some degree
(equated to Level A harassment).
Level B Harassment—Though
significantly driven by received level,
the onset of behavioral disturbance from
anthropogenic noise exposure is also
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
informed to varying degrees by other
factors related to the source or exposure
context (e.g., frequency, predictability,
duty cycle, duration of the exposure,
signal-to-noise ratio, distance to the
source), the environment (e.g.,
bathymetry, other noises in the area,
predators in the area), and the receiving
animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography, life stage,
depth) and can be difficult to predict
(e.g., Southall et al., 2007, 2021; Ellison
et al., 2012). Based on what the
available science indicates and the
practical need to use a threshold based
on a metric that is both predictable and
measurable for most activities, NMFS
typically uses a generalized acoustic
threshold based on received level to
estimate the onset of behavioral
harassment. NMFS generally predicts
that marine mammals are likely to be
behaviorally harassed in a manner
considered to be Level B harassment
when exposed to underwater
anthropogenic noise above root-meansquared pressure received levels (RMS
SPL) of 120 dB (referenced to 1
micropascal (re 1 mPa)) for continuous
(e.g., vibratory pile-driving, drilling) and
above RMS SPL 160 dB re 1 mPa for nonexplosive impulsive (e.g., seismic
airguns) or intermittent (e.g., scientific
sonar) sources. Generally speaking,
Level B harassment take estimates based
on these behavioral harassment
thresholds are expected to include any
likely takes by temporary threshold shift
(TTS) as, in most cases, the likelihood
of TTS occurs at distances from the
source less than those at which
behavioral harassment is likely. TTS of
a sufficient degree can manifest as
behavioral harassment, as reduced
hearing sensitivity and the potential
reduced opportunities to detect
important signals (conspecific
communication, predators, prey) may
result in changes in behavior patterns
that would not otherwise occur.
The Navy’s construction activities
include the use of continuous (vibratory
pile-driving) and impulsive (impact
pile-driving) sources, and therefore the
RMS SPL threshold of 160 dB re 1 mPa
is applicable for impulsive noise. For
continuous noise, the RMS SPL
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6707
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
threshold of 129.6 dB re 1 mPa is
applicable as a de facto harassment
threshold, based upon measured noise
data for San Diego Bay as referenced in
the Description of Activity section in
the notice for the proposed IHA (87 FR
68442, November 15, 2022).
Level A Harassment—NMFS’
Technical Guidance for Assessing the
Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on
Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0)
(Technical Guidance, 2018) identifies
dual criteria to assess auditory injury
(Level A harassment) to five different
marine mammal groups (based on
hearing sensitivity) as a result of
exposure to noise from two different
types of sources (impulsive or nonimpulsive). The Navy’s activity includes
the use of impulsive (impact hammer)
and non-impulsive (vibratory hammer)
sources.
These thresholds are provided in the
table below. The references, analysis,
and methodology used in the
development of the thresholds are
described in NMFS’ 2018 Technical
Guidance, which may be accessed at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-acoustic-technical-guidance.
TABLE 3—THRESHOLDS IDENTIFYING THE ONSET OF PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT
PTS onset thresholds *
(received level)
Hearing group
Impulsive
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans ......................................
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans ......................................
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans .....................................
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) .............................
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) .............................
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
Cell
1:
3:
5:
7:
9:
Lp,0-pk,flat:
Lp,0-pk,flat:
Lp,0-pk,flat:
Lp,0-pk.flat:
Lp,0-pk,flat:
219
230
202
218
232
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
Non-impulsive
LE,p,LF,24h: 183 dB ..................
LE,p,MF,24h: 185 dB .................
LE,p,HF,24h: 155 dB .................
LE,p,PW,24h: 185 dB ................
LE,p,OW,24h: 203 dB ................
Cell 2: LE,p,LF,24h: 199 dB.
Cell 4: LE,p,MF,24h: 198 dB.
Cell 6: LE,p,HF,24h: 173 dB.
Cell 8: LE,p,PW,24h: 201 dB.
Cell 10: LE,p,OW,24h: 219
dB.
* Dual metric thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound
has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds are recommended
for consideration.
Note: Peak sound pressure level (Lp,0-pk) has a reference value of 1 μPa, and weighted cumulative sound exposure level (LE,p) has a reference value of 1μPa2s. In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to be more reflective of International Organization for Standardization standards (ISO, 2017). The subscript ‘‘flat’’ is being included to indicate peak sound pressure are flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized
hearing range of marine mammals (i.e., 7 Hz to 160 kHz). The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates
the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended
accumulation period is 24 hours. The weighted cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways (i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these
thresholds will be exceeded.
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and
environmental parameters of the activity
that are used in estimating the area
ensonified above the acoustic
thresholds, including source levels and
transmission loss coefficient.
The sound field in the project area is
the existing background noise plus
additional construction noise from the
project. Marine mammals are expected
to be affected by sound generated by the
primary components of the project (i.e.,
impact and vibratory pile driving).
In order to calculate distances to the
Level A harassment and Level B
harassment thresholds for the methods
and piles being used in this project, the
Navy used acoustic monitoring data
from various similar locations to
develop source levels for the different
pile types, sizes, and methods planned
for use (Table 4).
TABLE 4—SOURCE LEVELS FOR REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES
Peak sound
pressure
(dB re 1 μPa) 1
Method
Pile size/type
Vibratory Extraction ........................
18″ Octagonal Concrete 2 ...............
18″ Steel Pipe ................................
Mean
maximum
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa) 1
SEL
(dB re 1 μPa2 sec) 1
Source
Pile Removal Activities
3 162
........................
........................
4 156
..................................
..................................
176
166
155
166
154
155
NAVFAC SW, 2022.
Denes et al., 2016.
Pile Installation Activities
Impact Pile Driving ..........................
Vibratory Hammer ...........................
24″ Octagonal Concrete .................
14″ Square Concrete ......................
6″ Round Steel 5 .............................
188
183
171
1 As
measured, or calculated, at 10 m (33 ft).
the absence of information on vibratory extraction of 18-inch octagonal concrete piles, source data from 20-inch concrete square piles NAVFAC SW (2022) was
used as a proxy source level.
3 The maximum mean calculated source value for 20-inch square concrete piles (NAVFAC SW, 2022) was 162 dB RMS based on unpublished data from the Pier 6
Replacement Project.
4 Table 20 in Denes et al. (2016) records a value of 152.4 dB RMS at 17 m (56 ft) for vibratory extraction. This data point, and a transmission loss of 15LogR, was
used to back-calculate a value of 155.9 dB RMS at 10 m (33 ft) (rounded to 156 dB RMS).
5 In the absence of information on vibratory installation of 6-inch round steel piles, source data from 12-inch round steel piles (Illingworth & Rodkin, 2017) was used
as a proxy source level.
Abbreviations: μPa = microPascal; dB = decibel; RMS = root mean square; SPL = sound pressure level; m= meters; SEL = sound exposure level.
2 In
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Caltrans, 2020.
Caltrans, 2020.
Illingworth and Rodkin, 2007.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6708
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
Level B Harassment Zones
Transmission loss (TL) is the decrease
in acoustic intensity as an acoustic
pressure wave propagates out from a
source. TL parameters vary with
frequency, temperature, sea conditions,
current, source and receiver depth,
water depth, water chemistry, and
bottom composition and topography.
The general formula for underwater TL
is:
TL = B * Log10 (R1/R2),
where
TL = transmission loss in dB
B = transmission loss coefficient; for practical
spreading equals 15
R1 = the distance of the modeled SPL from
the driven pile, and
R2 = the distance from the driven pile of the
initial measurement
The recommended TL coefficient for
most nearshore environments is the
practical spreading value of 15. This
value results in an expected propagation
environment that would lie between
spherical and cylindrical spreading loss
conditions, which is the most
appropriate assumption for the Navy’s
activities. The Level B harassment zones
and areas of zones of influence (ZOIs)
for the Navy’s activities are shown in
Table 5.
TABLE 5—DISTANCE TO LEVEL B HARASSMENT THRESHOLDS AND ZOI AREAS
Method
Maximum
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa) 1
Pile size/type
Projected radial distance to
Level B harassment thresholds
and ensonified area 1 2
Distance m
I
Area km2
Pile Removal Activities
Vibratory Extraction ..........................
18″ Octagonal Concrete ...............................................
18″ Steel Pipe ...............................................................
162
156
1,445
575
3.13
0.68
176
166
155
117
25
494
0.041
<0.01
0.45
Pile Installation Activities
3
Impact Pile Driving ........................
Impact Pile Driving ...........................
Vibratory Hammer ............................
24″ Octagonal Concrete ...............................................
14″ Square Concrete ....................................................
6″ Round Steel ..............................................................
1 The Level B ZOIs for continuous pile removal and installation activities are based on the distance for noise to decay to ambient levels (129.6
dB re 1μPa), while 160 dB was used for impulsive sound.
2 Assumes Practical Spreading Loss.
3 With or without High-pressure Water Jetting.
Abbreviations: dB re 1 μPa = decibels referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, km2 = square kilometers, m = meters, ft = feet, RMS = root
mean square, ZOI = Zone of Influence.
Level A Harassment Zones
The ensonified area associated with
Level A harassment is more technically
challenging to predict due to the need
to account for a duration component.
Therefore, NMFS developed an optional
User Spreadsheet tool to accompany the
Technical Guidance that can be used to
relatively simply predict an isopleth
distance for use in conjunction with
marine mammal density or occurrence
to help predict potential takes. We note
that because of some of the assumptions
included in the methods underlying this
optional tool, we anticipate that the
resulting isopleth estimates are typically
going to be overestimates of some
degree, which may result in an
overestimate of potential take by Level
A harassment. However, this optional
tool offers the best way to estimate
isopleth distances when more
sophisticated modeling methods are not
available or practical. For stationary
sources, such as pile installation or
removal, the optional User Spreadsheet
tool predicts the distance at which, if a
marine mammal remained at that
distance for the duration of the activity,
it would be expected to incur PTS. The
isopleths generated by the User
Spreadsheet used the same TL
coefficient as the Level B harassment
zone calculations (i.e., the practical
spreading value of 15). Inputs used in
the User Spreadsheet (e.g., number of
piles per day, duration and/or strikes
per pile) are presented in Table 1 of the
notice for the proposed IHA (87 FR
68442, November 15, 2022). The
maximum RMS SPL/SEL SPL and
resulting isopleths are reported below in
Table 6. The maximum RMS SPL value
was used to calculate Level A
harassment isopleths for vibratory pile
driving and extraction activities, while
the single strike SEL SPL value was
used to calculate Level A isopleths for
impact pile driving activities.
TABLE 6—DISTANCES TO LEVEL A HARASSMENT THRESHOLDS
Method
Maximum
RMS SPL
(dB re 1 μPa) 1
Pile size/type
Single strike
SEL
(dB re 1 μPa2
sec) 1
Project distances to Level A thresholds
(m)
Duration
(hrs/day)
MF
I
PW
I
OW
Pile Removal Activities
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Vibratory Extraction .....................
Concrete 2
18″ Octagonal
...........
18″ Steel Pipe .............................
162
2 156
N/A
N/A
1.25
0.25
0.8
0.1
5.6
0.8
0.4
0.1
166
154
155
1.33
0.25
0.07
4.1
0.2
0.0
3 62.4
4.5
0.2
0.0
Pile Installation Activities
Impact Pile Driving .......................
Vibratory Hammer ........................
1 As
24″ Octagonal Concrete .............
14″ Square Concrete ..................
6″ Round Steel ...........................
176
166
155
measured at 10 m (33 ft.).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
2.5
0.3
6709
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
2 Table 20 in Denes et al. (2016) records a value of 152.4 dB RMS at 17 m (56 ft.) for vibratory extraction. This data point, and a transmission loss of 15LogR, was
used to back-calculate a value of 156 dB RMS at 10 m (33 ft.).
3 Value is greater than the standard shutdown zone of 20 m (see Mitigation section) and will be monitored as shutdown zone to ensure no Level A takes of harbor
seals or northern elephant seals occur during impact pile driving of 24-inch octagonal concrete piles.
Abbreviations: RMS = root mean square, dB re 1 μPa = decibels referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, m = meters, ft = feet, SEL = sound exposure level, MF
= mid-frequency cetaceans, PW = phocid pinnipeds, OW = otariid pinnipeds.
Marine Mammal Occurrence
In this section, we provide
information about the occurrence of
marine mammals, including density or
other relevant information that will
inform the take calculations. Unless
otherwise specified, the term ‘‘pile
driving’’ in this section, and all
following sections, may refer to either
pile installation or removal. NMFS has
carefully reviewed the Navy’s analysis
and concludes that it represents an
appropriate and accurate method for
estimating incidental take that may be
caused by the Navy’s activities.
Daily occurrence estimates of marine
mammals in the project area are based
upon the Year 4 IHA monitoring report
from the Fuel Pier Replacement Project
(NAVFAC SW, 2017b). Year 4 is
expected to be most representative of
typical species occurrences as this
monitoring period had the highest
number of activity days and the highest
average number of animals observed per
day for the three most common species
in the area (California sea lion, harbor
seal, bottlenose dolphin), with the
exception of Year 2. However, Year 2
was an El Nin˜o year and not considered
representative of typical species
occurrences. The Year 2 monitoring
report data was used for any species not
observed in Year 4 (common dolphin,
Pacific white-sided dolphin, northern
elephant seal) (NAVFAC SW, 2015)
(Table 7). Years 1, 3, and 5 included
significantly less monitoring effort than
Years 2 and 4, and may also not be
representative of typical species
richness and occurrences.
TABLE 7—TOTAL AND DAILY SPECIES OCCURRENCES DURING YEARS 2 AND 4 IHA MONITORING
Year 2 IHA
(100 monitoring days;
El Nino year)
Species
Total observed
California sea lion ............................................................................................
Harbor seal ......................................................................................................
Bottlenose dolphin ...........................................................................................
Common dolphin ..............................................................................................
Pacific white-sided dolphin ..............................................................................
Northern elephant seal ....................................................................................
Year 4 IHA
(152 monitoring days)
Average
per day
7,507
248
695
850
27
11
75.1
2.5
7
* 8.5
* 0.3
11
Total observed
2,263
88
67
N/a
N/a
N/a
Average
per day
* 14.9
* 0.6
* 0.4
N/a
N/a
N/a
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
* Mean estimate used for daily occurrences for current analysis.
1 Same individual hauled out each day.
Year 4 monitoring consisted of the
longest effort of all 5 IHA years for the
Navy Fuel Pier Replacement Project,
and daily occurrence estimates for
California sea lions, harbor seals, and
bottlenose dolphins were selected from
this year. Common dolphins, Pacific
white-sided dolphins, and northern
elephant seals were not sighted in Year
4; however, these species were sighted
in Year 2 monitoring. Pacific whitesided dolphins were only sighted during
this year. Daily occurrence estimates for
common dolphins and Pacific whitesided dolphins were selected from Year
2. Only one northern elephant seal was
sighted during the Year 2 monitoring,
and the same individual was hauled out
each day. Using a daily occurrence
estimate from past monitoring was,
therefore, not an accurate approach for
estimating occurrence of northern
elephant seals. Past monitoring efforts,
including the one northern elephant
seal sighted during Year 2 monitoring
and a sighting north of the project area,
(McConchie, 2015; NAVFAC SW, 2015)
documented a total of two juvenile
northern elephant seals in the project
area, as described in the Description of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
Marine Mammals in Areas of Specified
Activities section in the proposed IHA
(87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022). Due
to increasing stock numbers, there is a
reasonable probability that this species
could be sighted in the project area
during construction activities. Instead of
using past monitoring data to estimate
daily occurrence, it is expected that two
northern elephant seals may be
observed in the project area during
construction activities, based upon
previous sighting data. The Navy added
a buffer of five seals to this estimate for
a total of seven expected elephant seals
in the area during construction
activities, and NMFS agrees with this
approach.
Monitoring during Year 4 yielded an
observation of 2,263 California sea lions
over the course of the 152-day
monitoring period. These observations
equate to an average of 14.9 California
sea lions observed per day, and
approximately 15 California sea lions
expected to be in the vicinity of Pier
302, when this estimate is rounded.
Based upon monitoring during Year 4,
88 harbor seals were observed over the
course of the 152-day monitoring
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
period. These observations equate to an
average of 0.6 harbor seals observed per
day, and approximately 1 seal per day
expected to be in the vicinity of Pier 302
when this estimate is rounded.
Monitoring during Year 4 yielded an
observation of 67 bottlenose dolphins in
the project area over the course of the
152-day monitoring period. This
observation equates to an average of 0.4,
or 1 if rounded, bottlenose dolphins
expected to be in the vicinity of Pier 302
each day of the construction activities.
During Year 2 monitoring, 850
common dolphins were sighted in the
project area over the course of the 152day monitoring period. This equates to
an average of 8.5 common dolphins
observed per day. When rounded to the
nearest whole number, 9.0 individuals
are expected to be sighted per day in the
vicinity of Pier 302.
Monitoring during Year 2
documented 7 sightings of Pacific
white-sided dolphins, comprising 27
individuals, with an average of 0.28
individuals sighted per day of
monitoring. Rounding this estimate to
the nearest whole number leads to 1.0
individual per day to be expected to be
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6710
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
in the vicinity of Pier 302 during the
construction activities.
Take Estimation
Here we describe how the information
provided above is synthesized to
produce a quantitative estimate of the
take that is reasonably likely to occur.
Daily occurrence estimates were
multiplied by the number of days of pile
removal and installation (32 days) to
calculate estimated take by Level B
harassment of California sea lions,
harbor seals, bottlenose dolphins,
common dolphins, Pacific white-sided
dolphins, and northern elephant seals
(Table 8).
TABLE 8—AUTHORIZED TAKES BY LEVEL B HARASSMENT AND PERCENT OF STOCK AUTHORIZED FOR TAKE
Expected daily
average
individuals
Species
California sea lion 1 ....................................................................................................
Harbor seal 1 ..............................................................................................................
Bottlenose dolphin 1 ...................................................................................................
Common dolphin (long and short beaked) 2 ..............................................................
Pacific white-sided dolphin 2 ......................................................................................
Northern elephant seal ..............................................................................................
Authorized
take by Level B
harassment
15
1
1
9
1
(3)
480
32
32
288
32
7
Percentage of
stock authorized
for take
0.19
0.10
7.1
* 0.35
0.09
0.004
1 Average
daily counts based on observations during Year 4 Fuel Pier Replacement Project Monitoring (NAVFAC SW, 2017b).
daily counts based on observations during Year 2 Fuel Pier Replacement Project Monitoring (NAVFAC SW, 2015).
potential of two northern elephant seals over the duration of project activity with a +5 buffer for Level B Take.
* Percent population calculated for each stock of common dolphins. Percentage in the table represents the percent of take of long-beaked
common dolphins as this would be a greater percentage than if all take were attributed to short-beaked common dolphins (0.03 percent).
2 Average
3 Expected
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
By using the sighting-based approach,
take values are not affected by the
estimated harassment distances from
Tables 5 and 6. Given the very small
Level A harassment isopleths for all
species and mitigation measures, no
take by Level A harassment is
anticipated or authorized.
Mitigation
In order to issue an IHA under section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must
set forth the permissible methods of
taking pursuant to the activity, and
other means of effecting the least
practicable impact on the species or
stock and its habitat, paying particular
attention to rookeries, mating grounds,
and areas of similar significance, and on
the availability of the species or stock
for taking for certain subsistence uses
(latter not applicable for this action).
NMFS regulations require applicants for
incidental take authorizations to include
information about the availability and
feasibility (economic and technological)
of equipment, methods, and manner of
conducting the activity or other means
of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or
stocks, and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or
may not be appropriate to ensure the
least practicable adverse impact on
species or stocks and their habitat, as
well as subsistence uses where
applicable, NMFS considers two
primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is
expected to reduce impacts to marine
mammals, marine mammal species or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
stocks, and their habitat. This considers
the nature of the potential adverse
impact being mitigated (likelihood,
scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be
effective if implemented (probability of
accomplishing the mitigating result if
implemented as planned), the
likelihood of effective implementation
(probability implemented as planned),
and;
(2) The practicability of the measures
for applicant implementation, which
may consider such things as cost, and
impact on operations.
Shutdown Zones
Before the commencement of in-water
construction activities, the Navy will
establish shutdown zones for all
activities. The purpose of a shutdown
zone is to define an area within which
shutdown of the activity would occur
upon sighting of a marine mammal (or
in anticipation of an animal entering the
defined area). During all in-water
construction activities, the Navy will
implement a standard 20 m (66 ft)
shutdown zone, with the exception of a
70 m (230 ft) zone for phocids during
the use of impact pile driving for the 24inch octagonal concrete piles. These
distances exceed the estimated Level A
harassment distances (Table 10). During
the impact installation of the 24-inch
octagonal concrete piles, the shutdown
zone for phocids will be buffered to 70
m (230 ft) to encompass the Level A
harassment zone. Adherence to this
expanded shutdown zone will avoid the
potential for the take of phocids by
Level A harassment during impact pile
driving. If a marine mammal enters a
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
buffered shutdown zone, in-water
activities will be stopped until visual
confirmation that the animal has left the
zone or the animal is not sighted for 15
minutes.
All marine mammals will be
monitored in the Level B harassment
zones and throughout the area as far as
visual monitoring can take place. If a
marine mammal enters the Level B
harassment zone, in-water activities will
continue and the animal’s presence
within the estimated harassment zone
will be documented.
The Navy will also establish
shutdown zones for all marine
mammals for which take has not been
authorized or for which incidental take
has been authorized, but the authorized
number of takes has been met. These
zones are equivalent to the Level B
harassment zones for each activity. If a
marine mammal species not covered
under this IHA enters the shutdown
zone, all in-water activities will cease
until the animal leaves the zone or has
not been observed for at least 1 hour,
and NMFS will be notified about
species and precautions taken. Pile
removal will proceed if the non-IHA
species is observed to leave the Level B
harassment zone or if 1 hour has passed
since the last observation.
If shutdown and/or clearance
procedures would result in an imminent
safety concern, as determined by the
Navy, the in-water activity will be
allowed to continue until the safety
concern has been addressed, and the
animal will be continuously monitored.
The Navy Point of Contact (POC) will be
consulted before re-commencing
activities.
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6711
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
TABLE 9—SHUTDOWN ZONES AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT ZONES
Method
Shutdown zones m
(ft)
Pile size/type
MF
I
PW
I
OW
Level B
harassment
zones m
(ft)
Pile Removal Activities
Vibratory Extraction ...............
18″ Octagonal Concrete ..............................
18″ Steel Pipe ..............................................
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
1,445 (4,742)
575 (1,888)
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
117 (383)
25 (82)
494 (1,619)
Pile Installation Activities
Impact Pile Driving ................
Vibratory Hammer .................
1 Level
24″ Octagonal Concrete ..............................
14″ Square Concrete ...................................
6″ Round Steel .............................................
1 70
(230)
20 (66)
20 (66)
A ZOI buffered from 62.5 m up to 70 m.
Protected Species Observers
The placement of protected species
observers (PSOs) during all pile driving
activities (described in the Monitoring
and Reporting section) will ensure that
the entire shutdown zone is visible.
Should environmental conditions
deteriorate such that the entire
shutdown zone would not be visible
(e.g., fog, heavy rain), pile driving will
be delayed until the PSO is confident
marine mammals within the shutdown
zone could be detected.
Pre-Activity Monitoring
Prior to the start of daily in-water
construction activity, or whenever a
break in pile driving of 30 minutes or
longer occurs, PSOs will observe the
shutdown and monitoring zones for a
period of 30 minutes. The shutdown
zone will be considered cleared when a
marine mammal has not been observed
within the zone for that 30-minute
period. If a marine mammal is observed
within the shutdown zones listed in
Table 10, pile driving activity will be
delayed or halted. If work ceases for
more than 30 minutes, the pre-activity
monitoring of the shutdown zones will
commence. A determination that the
shutdown zone is clear must be made
during a period of good visibility (i.e.,
the entire shutdown zone and
surrounding waters must be visible to
the naked eye).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
20 (66)
20 (66)
20 (66)
Soft-Start Procedures
Soft-start procedures provide
additional protection to marine
mammals by providing warning and/or
giving marine mammals a chance to
leave the area prior to the hammer
operating at full capacity. For impact
pile driving, contractors will be required
to provide an initial set of three strikes
from the hammer at reduced energy,
followed by a 30-second waiting period,
then two subsequent reduced-energy
strike sets. Soft-start will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
implemented at the start of each day’s
impact pile driving and at any time
following cessation of impact pile
driving for a period of 30 minutes or
longer.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s measures, NMFS has
determined that the mitigation measures
provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on the affected
species or stocks and their habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an IHA for an
activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
The MMPA implementing regulations at
50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that
requests for authorizations must include
the suggested means of accomplishing
the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge
of the species and of the level of taking
or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be
present while conducting the activities.
Effective reporting is critical both to
compliance as well as ensuring that the
most value is obtained from the required
monitoring.
Monitoring and reporting
requirements prescribed by NMFS
should contribute to improved
understanding of one or more of the
following:
• Occurrence of marine mammal
species or stocks in the area in which
take is anticipated (e.g., presence,
abundance, distribution, density);
• Nature, scope, or context of likely
marine mammal exposure to potential
stressors/impacts (individual or
cumulative, acute or chronic), through
better understanding of: (1) action or
environment (e.g., source
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
characterization, propagation, ambient
noise); (2) affected species (e.g., life
history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the
activity; or (4) biological or behavioral
context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or
feeding areas);
• Individual marine mammal
responses (behavioral or physiological)
to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or
cumulative), other stressors, or
cumulative impacts from multiple
stressors;
• How anticipated responses to
stressors impact either: (1) long-term
fitness and survival of individual
marine mammals; or (2) populations,
species, or stocks;
• Effects on marine mammal habitat
(e.g., marine mammal prey species,
acoustic habitat, or other important
physical components of marine
mammal habitat); and,
• Mitigation and monitoring
effectiveness.
Visual Monitoring
Marine mammal monitoring during
pile driving activities will be conducted
by PSOs meeting NMFS’ following
requirements:
• Independent PSOs (i.e., not
construction personnel) who have no
other assigned tasks during monitoring
periods will be used;
• At least one PSO will have prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization;
• Other PSOs may substitute
education (degree in biological science
or related field) or training for prior
experience performing the duties of a
PSO during construction activity
pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental
take authorization; and
• A minimum of two PSOs must be
on duty for all in-water construction
activities. A lead observer or monitoring
coordinator must be designated to
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6712
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
coordinate monitoring and log project
and monitoring activity data. The lead
observer must have prior experience
performing the duties of a PSO during
construction activity pursuant to a
NMFS-issued incidental take
authorization.
• PSOs must be approved by NMFS
prior to beginning any activity subject to
this IHA.
PSOs will have the following
additional qualifications:
• Ability to conduct field
observations and collect data according
to assigned protocols;
• Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals,
including the identification of
behaviors;
• Sufficient training, orientation, or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations;
• Writing skills sufficient to prepare a
report of observations including but not
limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and
times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times,
and reason for implementation of
mitigation (or why mitigation was not
implemented when required); and
marine mammal behavior; and
• Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real-time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
The Navy will have at least two PSOs
stationed at the best possible vantage
points in the project area to monitor
during all pile driving activities. If a
PSO sights a marine mammal in the
shutdown zone, the PSO must alert the
‘‘command’’ PSO to notify the
equipment operator to shut down. If the
‘‘command’’ PSO does not respond, any
PSO has the authority to notify the need
for a shutdown. If the ‘‘command’’ PSO
calls for a shutdown, the ‘‘command’’
PSO will let the contractor know when
activities can re-commence. Additional
PSOs may be employed during periods
of low or obstructed visibility to ensure
the entirety of the shutdown zones are
monitored. A marine mammal
monitoring plan has been submitted to
NMFS for approval.
Reporting
A draft marine mammal monitoring
report will be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days after the completion of
pile driving activities, or 60 days prior
to a requested date of issuance of any
future IHAs for the project, or other
projects at the same location, whichever
comes first. A final report must be
prepared and submitted within 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
calendar days following receipt of any
NMFS comments on the draft report. If
no comments are received from NMFS
within 30 calendar days of receipt of the
draft report, the report shall be
considered final. All draft and final
monitoring reports must be submitted to
PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov
and itp.taylor@noaa.gov. The marine
mammal monitoring report will include
an overall description of work
completed, a narrative regarding marine
mammal sightings, and associated PSO
data sheets. Specifically, the report will
include:
• Dates and times (begin and end) of
all marine mammal monitoring;
• Construction activities occurring
during each daily observation period,
including: (a) How many and what type
of piles were driven or removed and the
method (i.e., impact or vibratory); and
(b) the total duration of time for each
pile (vibratory driving) number of
strikes for each pile (impact driving);
• PSO locations during marine
mammal monitoring; and
• Environmental conditions during
monitoring periods (at beginning and
end of PSO shift and whenever
conditions change significantly),
including Beaufort sea state and any
other relevant weather conditions
including cloud cover, fog, sun glare,
and overall visibility to the horizon, and
estimated observable distance.
PSOs will record all incidents of
marine mammal occurrence, regardless
of distance from activity, and will
document any behavioral reactions in
concert with distance from piles being
driven or removed. Specifically, PSOs
will record the following:
• Name of PSO who sighted the
animal(s) and PSO location and activity
at time of sighting;
• Time of sighting;
• Identification of the animal(s) (e.g.,
genus/species, lowest possible
taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO
confidence in identification, and the
composition of the group if there is a
mix of species;
• Distance and location of each
observed marine mammal relative to the
pile being driven or hole being drilled
for each sighting;
• Estimated number of animals (min/
max/best estimate);
• Estimated number of animals by
cohort (adults, juveniles, neonates,
group composition, etc.);
• Description of any marine mammal
behavioral observations (e.g., observed
behaviors such as feeding or traveling),
including an assessment of behavioral
responses thought to have resulted from
the activity (e.g., no response or changes
in behavioral state such as ceasing
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
feeding, changing direction, flushing, or
breaching).
In the event that personnel involved
in the construction activities discover
an injured or dead marine mammal, the
Navy will report the incident to the
Office of Protected Resources (OPR)
(PR.ITP.MonitoringReports@noaa.gov),
NMFS and to the West Coast regional
stranding network (866–767–6114) as
soon as feasible. If the death or injury
was clearly caused by the specified
activity, the Navy will immediately
cease the specified activities until
NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the incident and
determine what, if any, additional
measures are appropriate to ensure
compliance with the terms of the IHAs.
The Navy will not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS.
The report will include the following
information:
1. Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the first discovery (and
updated location information if known
and applicable);
2. Species identification (if known) or
description of the animal(s) involved;
3. Condition of the animal(s)
(including carcass condition if the
animal is dead);
4. Observed behaviors of the
animal(s), if alive;
5. If available, photographs or video
footage of the animal(s); and
6. General circumstances under which
the animal was discovered.
Negligible Impact Analysis and
Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact
as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival
(50 CFR 216.103). A negligible impact
finding is based on the lack of likely
adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of takes alone is not enough information
on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to
considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ‘‘taken’’
through harassment, NMFS considers
other factors, such as the likely nature
of any impacts or responses (e.g.,
intensity, duration), the context of any
impacts or responses (e.g., critical
reproductive time or location, foraging
impacts affecting energetics), as well as
effects on habitat, and the likely
effectiveness of the mitigation. We also
assess the number, intensity, and
context of estimated takes by evaluating
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
this information relative to population
status. Consistent with the 1989
preamble for NMFS’ implementing
regulations (54 FR 40338, September 29,
1989), the impacts from other past and
ongoing anthropogenic activities are
incorporated into this analysis via their
impacts on the baseline (e.g., as
reflected in the regulatory status of the
species, population size and growth rate
where known, ongoing sources of
human-caused mortality, or ambient
noise levels).
To avoid repetition, the discussion of
our analysis applies to all the species
listed in Table 1, given that the
anticipated effects of this activity on
these different marine mammal stocks
are expected to be similar. There is little
information about the nature or severity
of the impacts, or the size, status, or
structure of any of these species or
stocks that would lead to a different
analysis for this activity.
Level A harassment is extremely
unlikely given the small size of the
Level A harassment isopleths and the
required mitigation measures designed
to minimize the possibility of injury to
marine mammals. No mortality is
anticipated given the nature of the
activity.
Pile installation and removal
activities have the potential to disturb or
displace marine mammals. Specifically,
the project activities may result in take,
in the form of Level A and Level B
harassment from underwater sounds
generated from impact and vibratory
pile installation, and vibratory pile
removal activities. Potential takes could
occur if individuals move into the
ensonified zones when these activities
are underway.
The takes from Level B harassment
will be due to potential behavioral
disturbance. No serious injury or
mortality is anticipated for any stocks
presented in this analysis given the
nature of the activity and mitigation
measures designed to minimize the
possibility of injury. The potential for
harassment is minimized through
construction methods and the
implementation of planned mitigation
strategies (see Mitigation section).
Take will occur within a limited,
confined area of each stock’s range.
Level B harassment will be reduced to
the level of least practicable adverse
impact through use of mitigation
measures described herein. Further, the
amount of take authorized is extremely
small when compared to stock
abundance.
No marine mammal stocks for which
incidental take authorization is
authorized are listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
determined to be strategic or depleted
under the MMPA. The relatively low
marine mammal occurrences in the area,
small shutdown zones, and planned
monitoring make injury takes of marine
mammals unlikely. The shutdown zones
will be thoroughly monitored before the
vibratory pile installation and removal
begins, and construction activities will
be postponed if a marine mammal is
sighted within the shutdown zone.
There is a high likelihood that marine
mammals will be detected by trained
observers under environmental
conditions described for the project.
Limiting construction activities to
daylight hours will also increase
detectability of marine mammals in the
area. Therefore, the mitigation and
monitoring measures are expected to
eliminate the potential for injury and
Level A harassment as well as reduce
the amount and intensity for Level B
behavioral harassment. Furthermore, the
pile installation and removal activities
analyzed here are similar to, or less
impactful than, numerous construction
activities conducted in other similar
locations which have occurred with no
reported injuries or mortality to marine
mammals, and no known long-term
adverse consequences from behavioral
harassment.
Anticipated and authorized takes are
expected to be limited to short-term
Level B harassment (behavioral
disturbance) as construction activities
will occur over the course of 32 weeks.
Effects on individuals taken by Level B
harassment, based upon reports in the
literature as well as monitoring from
other similar activities, may include
increased swimming speeds, increased
surfacing time, or decreased foraging
(e.g., Thorson and Reyff, 2006; NAVFAC
SW, 2018b). Individual animals, even if
taken multiple times, will likely move
away from the sound source and be
temporarily displaced from the area due
to elevated noise level during pile
removal. Marine mammals could also
experience TTS if they move into the
Level B monitoring zone. TTS is a
temporary loss of hearing sensitivity
when exposed to loud sound, and the
hearing threshold is expected to recover
completely within minutes to hours.
Thus, it is not considered an injury.
While TTS could occur, it is not
considered a likely outcome of this
activity. Repeated exposures of
individuals to levels of sounds that
could cause Level B harassment are
unlikely to considerably significantly
disrupt foraging behavior or result in
significant decrease in fitness,
reproduction, or survival for the affected
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6713
individuals. In all, there will be no
adverse impacts to the stock as a whole.
The project is not expected to have
significant adverse effects on marine
mammal habitat. There are no
Biologically Important Areas or ESAdesignated critical habitat within the
project area, and the activities will not
permanently modify existing marine
mammal habitat. The activities may
cause fish to leave the area temporarily.
This could impact marine mammals’
foraging opportunities in a limited
portion of the foraging range, however,
due to the short duration of activities
and the relatively small area of affected
habitat, the impacts to marine mammal
habitat are not expected to cause
significant or long-term negative
consequences.
In combination, we believe that these
factors, as well as the available body of
evidence from other similar activities,
demonstrate that the potential effects of
the specified activities would have only
minor, short-term effects on individuals.
The specified activities are not expected
to impact reproduction or survival of
any individual marine mammals, much
less affect rates of recruitment or
survival and would therefore not result
in population-level impacts.
In summary and as described above,
the following factors primarily support
our determination that the impacts
resulting from this activity are not
expected to adversely affect any of the
species or stocks through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival:
• No serious injury or mortality or
Level A harassment is anticipated or
authorized;
• The specified activity and
associated ensonified areas are very
small relative to the overall habitat
ranges of all species;
• Biologically important areas or
critical habitat have not been identified
within the project area;
• The lack of anticipated significant
or long-term effects to marine mammal
habitat;
• The Navy is required to implement
mitigation measures to minimize
impacts, such as PSO observation and
shutdown zones of 20 m (66 ft); and,
• Monitoring reports from similar
work in San Diego Bay have
documented little to no effect on
individuals of the same species
impacted by the specified activities.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
monitoring and mitigation measures,
NMFS finds that the total marine
mammal take from the authorized
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6714
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2023 / Notices
activity will have a negligible impact on
all affected marine mammal species or
stocks.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Small Numbers
As noted previously, only small
numbers of incidental take may be
authorized under sections 101(a)(5)(A)
and (D) of the MMPA for specified
activities other than military readiness
activities. The MMPA does not define
small numbers and so, in practice,
where estimated numbers are available,
NMFS compares the number of
individuals taken to the most
appropriate estimation of abundance of
the relevant species or stock in our
determination of whether an
authorization is limited to small
numbers of marine mammals. When the
predicted number of individuals to be
taken is fewer than one-third of the
species or stock abundance, the take is
considered to be of small numbers.
Additionally, other qualitative factors
may be considered in the analysis, such
as the temporal or spatial scale of the
activities.
The amount of take NMFS has
authorized is below one-third of the
estimated stock abundances for all
seven species (refer back to Table 8). For
most requested species, the authorized
take of individuals is less than 1 percent
of the abundance of the affected stock
(with exception for bottlenose dolphins
at 7.1 percent). This is likely a
conservative estimate because it
assumes all takes are of different
individual animals, which is likely not
the case. Some individuals may return
multiple times in a day, but PSOs will
count them as separate takes if they
cannot be individually identified.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the authorized activity
(including the mitigation and
monitoring measures) and the
anticipated take of marine mammals,
NMFS finds that small numbers of
marine mammals will be taken relative
to the population size of the affected
species or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis
and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of the affected marine mammal stocks or
species implicated by this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
the total taking of affected species or
stocks would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
such species or stocks for taking for
subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:04 Jan 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal
agency insure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
IHAs, NMFS consults internally
whenever we propose to authorize take
for endangered or threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed
species is authorized or expected to
result from this activity. Therefore,
NMFS has determined that formal
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
is not required for this action.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS must review our action
(i.e., the issuance of an IHA) with
respect to potential impacts on the
human environment.
This action is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no
anticipated serious injury or mortality)
of the Companion Manual for NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6A, which do
not individually or cumulatively have
the potential for significant impacts on
the quality of the human environment
and for which we have not identified
any extraordinary circumstances that
would preclude this categorical
exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has
determined that the issuance of the IHA
qualifies to be categorically excluded
from further NEPA review.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to the U.S.
Navy for the potential harassment of
small numbers of six marine mammal
species incidental to construction
activities associated with the Naval Base
Point Loma Pier 302 Replacement
Project in San Diego, California.,
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are followed.
Dated: January 27, 2023.
Kimberly Damon-Randall,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–02107 Filed 1–31–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2023–SCC–0024]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request;
Borrower Defense to Loan Repayment
Universal Forms
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the Department is proposing a
revision of a currently approved
information collection request (ICR).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before April 3,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2023–SCC–0024. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
the Department will temporarily accept
comments at ICDocketMgr@ed.gov.
Please include the docket ID number
and the title of the information
collection request when requesting
documents or submitting comments.
Please note that comments submitted
after the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Manager of the
Strategic Collections and Clearance
Governance and Strategy Division, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Ave. SW, LBJ, Room 6W203,
Washington, DC 20202–8240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Beth
Grebeldinger, (202) 377–4018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed, revised, and continuing
collections of information. This helps
the Department assess the impact of its
information collection requirements and
minimize the public’s reporting burden.
It also helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6703-6714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02107]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XC585]
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Replacement of Pier 302 at Naval
Base Point Loma, San Diego, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to
the U.S. Navy to incidentally harass, by Level B harassment only,
marine mammals during construction activities associated with a Pier
302 Replacement project at Naval Base Point Loma, San Diego,
California.
DATES: This authorization is effective from October 1, 2023 through
September 30, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401. Electronic copies of the application
and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in
this document, may be obtained online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/incidental-take-authorizations-construction-activities. In case of problems
accessing these documents, please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The MMPA prohibits the ``take'' of marine mammals, with certain
exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361
et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations
are proposed or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed IHA is provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses
(where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods
of taking and other ``means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact'' on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of the species or stocks for
taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as
``mitigation''); and requirements pertaining to the mitigation,
monitoring and reporting of the takings are set forth. The definitions
of all applicable MMPA statutory terms cited above are included in the
relevant sections below.
Summary of Request
On July 27, 2022, NMFS received a request from the U.S. Navy for an
IHA to take marine mammals incidental to construction activities
associated with replacing Pier 302 at Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), San
Diego, CA. Following NMFS' review of the application, the U.S. Navy
submitted a revised version on September 22, 2022. The application was
deemed adequate and complete on October 27, 2022. The U.S. Navy's
request is for take of six species of marine mammals by Level B
harassment only. Neither the U.S. Navy nor NMFS expect serious injury
or mortality to result from this activity, therefore, an IHA is
appropriate. There were no changes from the proposed to the final IHA.
NMFS has previously issued IHAs to the U.S. Navy for similar work
over the past 9 years at NBPL in San Diego Bay (Bay), including IHAs
issued effective from September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2014 (78 FR
44539, July 24, 2013; Year 1 Project), October 8, 2014 through October
7, 2015 (79 FR 65378, November 4, 2014; Year 2 Project), October 8,
2015 through October 7, 2016 (80 FR 62032, October 15, 2015; Year 3
Project), October 8, 2016 through October 7, 2017 (81 FR 66628,
[[Page 6704]]
September 28, 2016; Year 4 Project), October 8, 2017 through October 7,
2018 (82 FR 45811, October 2, 2017; Year 5 Project), September 15, 2020
through September 14, 2021 (85 FR 33129, June 1, 2020; Floating Dry
Dock Project), October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022 (86 FR 7993,
February 3, 2021; Pier 6 Replacement Project), and January 15, 2022
through January 14, 2023 (86 FR 48986, September 1, 2021; Fuel Pier
Inboard Pile Removal Project). The U.S. Navy complied with all the
requirements (e.g., mitigation, monitoring, and reporting) of the
previous IHA and information regarding their monitoring results
specific to NBPL may be found in the Estimated Take section.
Description of Activity
The U.S. Navy plans to replace Pier 302 at the Naval Information
Warfare Center (NIWC) Pacific Bayside Complex on NBPL. Pier 302 houses
the U.S. Navy marine mammal pens and support vessels. As part of the
project, the U.S. Navy will use vibratory extraction to remove the
existing components of marine mammal pens, and impact and vibratory
hammers to install new pens. The purpose of the project is to provide
the U.S. Navy's marine mammal program with adequate facilities to house
its marine mammals and provide a safe working environment for personnel
to support the U.S. Navy's overall mission to maintain, train, and
equip combat ready Naval forces.
The Navy's activity includes impact and vibratory pile driving,
which may result in the incidental take of marine mammals, by Level B
harassment only. No Level A harassment is anticipated to occur, and
none is authorized. Due to mitigation measures, only takes by Level B
harassment are requested. NBPL is located along the mouth and northern
edge of San Diego Bay, CA. The project covers an area of 9,061 feet
(ft.)\2\ (842 meters (m)\2\). Construction activities will occur over
32 days within a 1 year window from October 1, 2023 to September 30,
2024. The Navy states that it will conduct work only in daylight hours.
A detailed description of the planned construction project is provided
in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA (87 FR 68442,
November 15, 2022). Since that time, no changes have been made to the
planned activities. Therefore, a detailed description is not provided
here. Please refer to that Federal Register notice for the description
of the specific activity. Mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures are described in detail later in this document (please see
Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting).
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS' proposal to issue an IHA to the U.S. Navy was
published in the Federal Register on November 15, 2022 (87 FR 68442).
That notice described, in detail, the U.S. Navy's activities, the
marine mammal species that may be affected by the activities, and the
anticipated effects on marine mammals. During the 30-day public comment
period, no public comments were received.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities
Sections 3 and 4 of the application summarize available information
regarding status and trends, distribution and habitat preferences, and
behavior and life history of the potentially affected species. NMFS
fully considered all of this information, and we refer the reader to
these descriptions, incorporated here by reference, instead of
reprinting the information. Additional information regarding population
trends and threats may be found in NMFS' Stock Assessment Reports
(SARs; www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments) and more general information about these
species (e.g., physical and behavioral descriptions) may be found on
NMFS' website (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species).
Table 1 lists all species or stocks for which take is expected and
authorized for this activity, and summarizes information related to the
population or stock, including regulatory status under the MMPA and
Endangered Species Act (ESA) and potential biological removal (PBR),
where known. PBR is defined by the MMPA as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (as described in NMFS' SARs). While no
serious injury or mortality is expected to occur, PBR and annual
serious injury and mortality from anthropogenic sources are included
here as gross indicators of the status of the species or stocks and
other threats.
There are six marine mammal species that are potentially expected
to be present during all or a portion of the in-water work associated
with this project in San Diego Bay, including the California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), the northern elephant seal (Mirounga
angustirostris), the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), the bottlenose
dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), the Pacific white-sided dolphin
(Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), and the common dolphin (Delphinus
delphis). The Committee on Taxonomy (https://marinemammalscience.org/science-and-publications/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/)
recently determined both the long-beaked and short-beaked common
dolphin belong in the same species and we adopt this taxonomy. However,
the SARs still describe the two as separate stocks, and that stock
information is presented in Table 1. Marine mammal abundance estimates
presented in this document represent the total number of individuals
that make up a given stock or the total number estimated within a
particular study or survey area. NMFS' stock abundance estimates. For
some species, this geographic area may extend beyond U.S. waters. All
stocks managed under the MMPA in this region are assessed in NMFS' U.S.
Pacific 2021 SARs. All values presented in Table 2 are the most recent
available at the time of publication and are available online at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments).
Table 1--Marine Mammal Species \4\ Likely Impacted by the Specified Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESA/ MMPA status; Stock abundance (CV,
Common name Scientific name Stock strategic (Y/N) Nmin, most recent PBR Annual M/
\1\ abundance survey) \2\ SI \3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Artiodactyla--Infraorder Cetacea-- Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Delphinidae:
Bottlenose dolphin.............. Tursiops truncatus..... California Coastal..... -, -, N 453 (0.06, 346, 2011). 2.7 >=2.0
Short-beaked common dolphin..... Delphinus delphis California/Oregon/ -, -, N 1,056,308 (0.21, 8889 >=30.5
delphis. Washington. 888,971, 2018).
[[Page 6705]]
Long-beaked common dolphin...... Delphinus delphis California............. -, -, N 83,379 (0.216, 69,636, 668 >=29.7
capensis. 2018).
Pacific white-sided dolphin..... Lagenorhynchus California/Oregon/ -, -, N 34,999 (0.222, 29,090, 279 7
obliquidens. Washington. 2018).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Carnivora--Pinnipedia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Otariidae (eared seals and
sea lions):
California sea lion............. Zalophus californianus. U.S.................... -, -, N 257,606 (N/A,233,515, 14011 >320
2014).
Family Phocidae (earless seals):
Harbor seal..................... Phoca vitulina......... California............. -, -, N 30,968 (N/A, 27,348, 1641 43
2012).
Northern elephant seal.......... Mirounga angustirostris California breeding.... -, -, N 187,386 (N/A, 85,369, 5122 13.7
2013).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed
under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality
exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed
under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
\2\ NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments/ assessments/. CV is coefficient of variation; Nmin is the minimum estimate of stock abundance.
\3\ These values, found in NMFS's SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g.,
commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual M/SI often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV
associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
\4\ Information on the classification of marine mammal species can be found on the web page for The Society for Marine Mammalogy's Committee on Taxonomy
(https://marinemammalscience.org/science-and-publications/list-marine-mammal-species-subspecies/; Committee on Taxonomy (2022)).
As indicated above, all six species (with seven managed stocks) in
Table 1 temporally and spatially co-occur with the activity to the
degree that take is reasonably likely to occur. While gray whales,
Risso's dolphins, and Steller sea lions have been sighted around
California coastal waters in the past, these species' general spatial
occurrence is such that take is not expected to occur as they typically
occur more offshore. Therefore, the Navy did not request, and NMFS is
not authorizing take of these species.
A detailed description of the species likely to be affected by the
Naval Base Point Loma Pier 302 Replacement Project, including brief
introductions to the species and relevant stocks as well as available
information regarding population trends and threats, and information
regarding local occurrence, were provided in the Federal Register
notice for the proposed IHA (87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022); since
that time, we are not aware of any changes in the status of these
species and stocks; therefore, detailed descriptions are not provided
here. Please refer to that Federal Register notice for these
descriptions. Please also refer to the NMFS website (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species) for generalized species accounts.
Marine Mammal Hearing
Hearing is the most important sensory modality for marine mammals
underwater, and exposure to anthropogenic sound can have deleterious
effects. To appropriately assess the potential effects of exposure to
sound, it is necessary to understand the frequency ranges marine
mammals are able to hear. Not all marine mammal species have equal
hearing capabilities (e.g., Richardson et al., 1995; Wartzok and
Ketten, 1999; Au and Hastings, 2008). To reflect this, Southall et al.
(2007, 2019) recommended that marine mammals be divided into hearing
groups based on directly measured (behavioral or auditory evoked
potential techniques) or estimated hearing ranges (behavioral response
data, anatomical modeling, etc.). Note that no direct measurements of
hearing ability have been successfully completed for mysticetes (i.e.,
low-frequency cetaceans). Subsequently, NMFS (2018) described
generalized hearing ranges for these marine mammal hearing groups.
Generalized hearing ranges were chosen based on the approximately 65
decibel (dB) threshold from the normalized composite audiograms, with
the exception for lower limits for low-frequency cetaceans where the
lower bound was deemed to be biologically implausible and the lower
bound from Southall et al. (2007) retained. Marine mammal hearing
groups and their associated hearing ranges are provided in Table 2.
Table 2--Marine Mammal Hearing Groups
[NMFS, 2018]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hearing group Generalized hearing range *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-frequency (LF) cetaceans (baleen 7 Hz to 35 kHz.
whales).
Mid-frequency (MF) cetaceans 150 Hz to 160 kHz.
(dolphins, toothed whales, beaked
whales, bottlenose whales).
High-frequency (HF) cetaceans (true 275 Hz to 160 kHz.
porpoises, Kogia, river dolphins,
Cephalorhynchid, Lagenorhynchus
cruciger & L. australis).
Phocid pinnipeds (PW) (underwater) 50 Hz to 86 kHz.
(true seals).
[[Page 6706]]
Otariid pinnipeds (OW) (underwater) 60 Hz to 39 kHz.
(sea lions and fur seals).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Represents the generalized hearing range for the entire group as a
composite (i.e., all species within the group), where individual
species' hearing ranges are typically not as broad. Generalized
hearing range chosen based on ~65 dB threshold from normalized
composite audiogram, with the exception for lower limits for LF
cetaceans (Southall et al., 2007) and PW pinniped (approximation).
The pinniped functional hearing group was modified from Southall et
al. (2007) on the basis of data indicating that phocid species have
consistently demonstrated an extended frequency range of hearing
compared to otariids, especially in the higher frequency range
(Hemil[auml] et al., 2006; Kastelein et al., 2009; Reichmuth and Holt,
2013).
For more detail concerning these groups and associated frequency
ranges, please see NMFS (2018) for a review of available information.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals and Their
Habitat
The effects of underwater noise from the Navy's pile driving
activities have the potential to result in behavioral harassment of
marine mammals in the vicinity of the project area. The notice of the
proposed IHA (87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022) included a discussion of
the effects of anthropogenic noise on marine mammals and the potential
effects of underwater noise from the Navy's pile driving activities on
marine mammals and their habitat. That information and analysis is
incorporated by reference into this final IHA determination and is not
repeated here; please refer to the notice of the proposed IHA (87 FR
68442, November 15, 2022).
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of the number of incidental takes
authorized through this IHA, which has informed both NMFS'
consideration of ``small numbers,'' and the negligible impact
determinations.
Harassment is the only type of take expected to result from these
activities. Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent
here, section 3(18) of the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance, which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment);
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment).
Authorized takes will be by Level B harassment only, in the form of
disruption of behavioral patterns for individual marine mammals
resulting from exposure to the acoustic sources. Based on the nature of
the activity and the anticipated effectiveness of the mitigation
measures (i.e., vibratory or impact pile driving and removal) discussed
in detail below in the Mitigation section. Level A harassment is
neither anticipated nor authorized.
As described previously, no serious injury or mortality is
anticipated or authorized for this activity. Below we describe how the
authorized take numbers are estimated.
For acoustic impacts, generally speaking, we estimate take by
considering: (1) acoustic thresholds above which NMFS believes the best
available science indicates marine mammals will be behaviorally
harassed or incur some degree of permanent hearing impairment; (2) the
area or volume of water that will be ensonified above these levels in a
day; (3) the density or occurrence of marine mammals within these
ensonified areas; and, (4) the number of days of activities. We note
that while these factors can contribute to a basic calculation to
provide an initial prediction of potential takes, additional
information that can qualitatively inform take estimates is also
sometimes available (e.g., previous monitoring results or average group
size). Below, we describe the factors considered here in more detail
and present the authorized take estimates.
Acoustic Thresholds
NMFS recommends the use of acoustic thresholds that identify the
received level of underwater sound above which exposed marine mammals
would be reasonably expected to be behaviorally harassed (equated to
Level B harassment) or to incur permanent threshold shift (PTS) of some
degree (equated to Level A harassment).
Level B Harassment--Though significantly driven by received level,
the onset of behavioral disturbance from anthropogenic noise exposure
is also informed to varying degrees by other factors related to the
source or exposure context (e.g., frequency, predictability, duty
cycle, duration of the exposure, signal-to-noise ratio, distance to the
source), the environment (e.g., bathymetry, other noises in the area,
predators in the area), and the receiving animals (hearing, motivation,
experience, demography, life stage, depth) and can be difficult to
predict (e.g., Southall et al., 2007, 2021; Ellison et al., 2012).
Based on what the available science indicates and the practical need to
use a threshold based on a metric that is both predictable and
measurable for most activities, NMFS typically uses a generalized
acoustic threshold based on received level to estimate the onset of
behavioral harassment. NMFS generally predicts that marine mammals are
likely to be behaviorally harassed in a manner considered to be Level B
harassment when exposed to underwater anthropogenic noise above root-
mean-squared pressure received levels (RMS SPL) of 120 dB (referenced
to 1 micropascal (re 1 [mu]Pa)) for continuous (e.g., vibratory pile-
driving, drilling) and above RMS SPL 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa for non-
explosive impulsive (e.g., seismic airguns) or intermittent (e.g.,
scientific sonar) sources. Generally speaking, Level B harassment take
estimates based on these behavioral harassment thresholds are expected
to include any likely takes by temporary threshold shift (TTS) as, in
most cases, the likelihood of TTS occurs at distances from the source
less than those at which behavioral harassment is likely. TTS of a
sufficient degree can manifest as behavioral harassment, as reduced
hearing sensitivity and the potential reduced opportunities to detect
important signals (conspecific communication, predators, prey) may
result in changes in behavior patterns that would not otherwise occur.
The Navy's construction activities include the use of continuous
(vibratory pile-driving) and impulsive (impact pile-driving) sources,
and therefore the RMS SPL threshold of 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa is applicable
for impulsive noise. For continuous noise, the RMS SPL
[[Page 6707]]
threshold of 129.6 dB re 1 [mu]Pa is applicable as a de facto
harassment threshold, based upon measured noise data for San Diego Bay
as referenced in the Description of Activity section in the notice for
the proposed IHA (87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022).
Level A Harassment--NMFS' Technical Guidance for Assessing the
Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine Mammal Hearing (Version 2.0)
(Technical Guidance, 2018) identifies dual criteria to assess auditory
injury (Level A harassment) to five different marine mammal groups
(based on hearing sensitivity) as a result of exposure to noise from
two different types of sources (impulsive or non-impulsive). The Navy's
activity includes the use of impulsive (impact hammer) and non-
impulsive (vibratory hammer) sources.
These thresholds are provided in the table below. The references,
analysis, and methodology used in the development of the thresholds are
described in NMFS' 2018 Technical Guidance, which may be accessed at:
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-acoustic-technical-guidance.
Table 3--Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PTS onset thresholds * (received level)
Hearing group ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impulsive Non-impulsive
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans........... Cell 1: L0-pk,flat: 219 Cell 2: LE,LF,24h: 199 dB.
dB; LE,LF,24h: 183 dB.
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans........... Cell 3: L0-pk,flat: 230 Cell 4: LE,MF,24h: 198 dB.
dB; LE,MF,24h: 185 dB.
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans.......... Cell 5: L0-pk,flat: 202 Cell 6: LE,HF,24h: 173 dB.
dB; LE,HF,24h: 155 dB.
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater)..... Cell 7: L0-pk.flat: 218 Cell 8: LE,PW,24h: 201 dB.
dB; LE,PW,24h: 185 dB.
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater).... Cell 9: L0-pk,flat: 232 Cell 10: LE,OW,24h: 219 dB.
dB; LE,OW,24h: 203 dB.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Dual metric thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS
onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds
associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds are recommended for consideration.
Note: Peak sound pressure level (L0-pk) has a reference value of 1 [mu]Pa, and weighted cumulative sound
exposure level (LE,) has a reference value of 1[mu]Pa\2\s. In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to be
more reflective of International Organization for Standardization standards (ISO, 2017). The subscript
``flat'' is being included to indicate peak sound pressure are flat weighted or unweighted within the
generalized hearing range of marine mammals (i.e., 7 Hz to 160 kHz). The subscript associated with cumulative
sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF,
and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The
weighted cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways (i.e., varying
exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to indicate
the conditions under which these thresholds will be exceeded.
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and environmental parameters of the
activity that are used in estimating the area ensonified above the
acoustic thresholds, including source levels and transmission loss
coefficient.
The sound field in the project area is the existing background
noise plus additional construction noise from the project. Marine
mammals are expected to be affected by sound generated by the primary
components of the project (i.e., impact and vibratory pile driving).
In order to calculate distances to the Level A harassment and Level
B harassment thresholds for the methods and piles being used in this
project, the Navy used acoustic monitoring data from various similar
locations to develop source levels for the different pile types, sizes,
and methods planned for use (Table 4).
Table 4--Source Levels for Removal and Installation Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak sound
pressure (dB Mean maximum SEL (dB re 1
Method Pile size/type re 1 [mu]Pa) RMS SPL (dB re [mu]Pa2 sec) \1\ Source
\1\ 1 [mu]Pa) \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Removal Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory Extraction............... 18'' Octagonal .............. \3\ 162 ................... NAVFAC SW, 2022.
Concrete \2\.
18'' Steel Pipe...... .............. \4\ 156 ................... Denes et al., 2016.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Installation Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Pile Driving................ 24'' Octagonal 188 176 166 Caltrans, 2020.
Concrete.
14'' Square Concrete. 183 166 154 Caltrans, 2020.
Vibratory Hammer................... 6'' Round Steel \5\.. 171 155 155 Illingworth and Rodkin, 2007.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As measured, or calculated, at 10 m (33 ft).
\2\ In the absence of information on vibratory extraction of 18-inch octagonal concrete piles, source data from 20-inch concrete square piles NAVFAC SW
(2022) was used as a proxy source level.
\3\ The maximum mean calculated source value for 20-inch square concrete piles (NAVFAC SW, 2022) was 162 dB RMS based on unpublished data from the Pier
6 Replacement Project.
\4\ Table 20 in Denes et al. (2016) records a value of 152.4 dB RMS at 17 m (56 ft) for vibratory extraction. This data point, and a transmission loss
of 15LogR, was used to back-calculate a value of 155.9 dB RMS at 10 m (33 ft) (rounded to 156 dB RMS).
\5\ In the absence of information on vibratory installation of 6-inch round steel piles, source data from 12-inch round steel piles (Illingworth &
Rodkin, 2017) was used as a proxy source level.
Abbreviations: [mu]Pa = microPascal; dB = decibel; RMS = root mean square; SPL = sound pressure level; m= meters; SEL = sound exposure level.
[[Page 6708]]
Level B Harassment Zones
Transmission loss (TL) is the decrease in acoustic intensity as an
acoustic pressure wave propagates out from a source. TL parameters vary
with frequency, temperature, sea conditions, current, source and
receiver depth, water depth, water chemistry, and bottom composition
and topography. The general formula for underwater TL is:
TL = B * Log10 (R1/R2),
where
TL = transmission loss in dB
B = transmission loss coefficient; for practical spreading equals 15
R1 = the distance of the modeled SPL from the driven pile, and
R2 = the distance from the driven pile of the initial measurement
The recommended TL coefficient for most nearshore environments is
the practical spreading value of 15. This value results in an expected
propagation environment that would lie between spherical and
cylindrical spreading loss conditions, which is the most appropriate
assumption for the Navy's activities. The Level B harassment zones and
areas of zones of influence (ZOIs) for the Navy's activities are shown
in Table 5.
Table 5--Distance to Level B Harassment Thresholds and ZOI Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected radial distance to
Maximum RMS Level B harassment thresholds
Method Pile size/type SPL (dB re 1 and ensonified area \1\ \2\
[mu]Pa) \1\ -------------------------------
Distance m Area km\2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Removal Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory Extraction.................. 18'' Octagonal Concrete. 162 1,445 3.13
18'' Steel Pipe......... 156 575 0.68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Installation Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Pile Driving \3\............... 24'' Octagonal Concrete. 176 117 0.041
Impact Pile Driving................... 14'' Square Concrete.... 166 25 <0.01
Vibratory Hammer...................... 6'' Round Steel......... 155 494 0.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Level B ZOIs for continuous pile removal and installation activities are based on the distance for noise
to decay to ambient levels (129.6 dB re 1[mu]Pa), while 160 dB was used for impulsive sound.
\2\ Assumes Practical Spreading Loss.
\3\ With or without High[hyphen]pressure Water Jetting.
Abbreviations: dB re 1 [mu]Pa = decibels referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, km\2\ = square kilometers, m
= meters, ft = feet, RMS = root mean square, ZOI = Zone of Influence.
Level A Harassment Zones
The ensonified area associated with Level A harassment is more
technically challenging to predict due to the need to account for a
duration component. Therefore, NMFS developed an optional User
Spreadsheet tool to accompany the Technical Guidance that can be used
to relatively simply predict an isopleth distance for use in
conjunction with marine mammal density or occurrence to help predict
potential takes. We note that because of some of the assumptions
included in the methods underlying this optional tool, we anticipate
that the resulting isopleth estimates are typically going to be
overestimates of some degree, which may result in an overestimate of
potential take by Level A harassment. However, this optional tool
offers the best way to estimate isopleth distances when more
sophisticated modeling methods are not available or practical. For
stationary sources, such as pile installation or removal, the optional
User Spreadsheet tool predicts the distance at which, if a marine
mammal remained at that distance for the duration of the activity, it
would be expected to incur PTS. The isopleths generated by the User
Spreadsheet used the same TL coefficient as the Level B harassment zone
calculations (i.e., the practical spreading value of 15). Inputs used
in the User Spreadsheet (e.g., number of piles per day, duration and/or
strikes per pile) are presented in Table 1 of the notice for the
proposed IHA (87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022). The maximum RMS SPL/SEL
SPL and resulting isopleths are reported below in Table 6. The maximum
RMS SPL value was used to calculate Level A harassment isopleths for
vibratory pile driving and extraction activities, while the single
strike SEL SPL value was used to calculate Level A isopleths for impact
pile driving activities.
Table 6--Distances to Level A Harassment Thresholds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single strike Project distances to Level A
Maximum RMS SEL (dB re 1 Duration (hrs/ thresholds (m)
Method Pile size/type SPL (dB re 1 [mu]Pa\2\ sec) day) --------------------------------------
[mu]Pa) \1\ \1\ MF PW OW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Removal Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory Extraction.................. 18'' Octagonal Concrete 162 N/A 1.25 0.8 5.6 0.4
\2\.
18'' Steel Pipe.......... \2\ 156 N/A 0.25 0.1 0.8 0.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Installation Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Pile Driving................... 24'' Octagonal Concrete.. 176 166 1.33 4.1 \3\ 62.4 4.5
14'' Square Concrete..... 166 154 0.25 0.2 2.5 0.2
Vibratory Hammer...................... 6'' Round Steel.......... 155 155 0.07 0.0 0.3 0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As measured at 10 m (33 ft.).
[[Page 6709]]
\2\ Table 20 in Denes et al. (2016) records a value of 152.4 dB RMS at 17 m (56 ft.) for vibratory extraction. This data point, and a transmission loss
of 15LogR, was used to back[hyphen]calculate a value of 156 dB RMS at 10 m (33 ft.).
\3\ Value is greater than the standard shutdown zone of 20 m (see Mitigation section) and will be monitored as shutdown zone to ensure no Level A takes
of harbor seals or northern elephant seals occur during impact pile driving of 24-inch octagonal concrete piles.
Abbreviations: RMS = root mean square, dB re 1 [mu]Pa = decibels referenced to a pressure of 1 microPascal, m = meters, ft = feet, SEL = sound exposure
level, MF = mid-frequency cetaceans, PW = phocid pinnipeds, OW = otariid pinnipeds.
Marine Mammal Occurrence
In this section, we provide information about the occurrence of
marine mammals, including density or other relevant information that
will inform the take calculations. Unless otherwise specified, the term
``pile driving'' in this section, and all following sections, may refer
to either pile installation or removal. NMFS has carefully reviewed the
Navy's analysis and concludes that it represents an appropriate and
accurate method for estimating incidental take that may be caused by
the Navy's activities.
Daily occurrence estimates of marine mammals in the project area
are based upon the Year 4 IHA monitoring report from the Fuel Pier
Replacement Project (NAVFAC SW, 2017b). Year 4 is expected to be most
representative of typical species occurrences as this monitoring period
had the highest number of activity days and the highest average number
of animals observed per day for the three most common species in the
area (California sea lion, harbor seal, bottlenose dolphin), with the
exception of Year 2. However, Year 2 was an El Ni[ntilde]o year and not
considered representative of typical species occurrences. The Year 2
monitoring report data was used for any species not observed in Year 4
(common dolphin, Pacific white-sided dolphin, northern elephant seal)
(NAVFAC SW, 2015) (Table 7). Years 1, 3, and 5 included significantly
less monitoring effort than Years 2 and 4, and may also not be
representative of typical species richness and occurrences.
Table 7--Total and Daily Species Occurrences During Years 2 and 4 IHA Monitoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 2 IHA (100 monitoring Year 4 IHA (152 monitoring
days; El Nino year) days)
Species ---------------------------------------------------------------
Average per Average per
Total observed day Total observed day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California sea lion............................. 7,507 75.1 2,263 * 14.9
Harbor seal..................................... 248 2.5 88 * 0.6
Bottlenose dolphin.............................. 695 7 67 * 0.4
Common dolphin.................................. 850 * 8.5 N/a N/a
Pacific white-sided dolphin..................... 27 * 0.3 N/a N/a
Northern elephant seal.......................... \1\ 1 \1\ 1 N/a N/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Mean estimate used for daily occurrences for current analysis.
\1\ Same individual hauled out each day.
Year 4 monitoring consisted of the longest effort of all 5 IHA
years for the Navy Fuel Pier Replacement Project, and daily occurrence
estimates for California sea lions, harbor seals, and bottlenose
dolphins were selected from this year. Common dolphins, Pacific white-
sided dolphins, and northern elephant seals were not sighted in Year 4;
however, these species were sighted in Year 2 monitoring. Pacific
white-sided dolphins were only sighted during this year. Daily
occurrence estimates for common dolphins and Pacific white-sided
dolphins were selected from Year 2. Only one northern elephant seal was
sighted during the Year 2 monitoring, and the same individual was
hauled out each day. Using a daily occurrence estimate from past
monitoring was, therefore, not an accurate approach for estimating
occurrence of northern elephant seals. Past monitoring efforts,
including the one northern elephant seal sighted during Year 2
monitoring and a sighting north of the project area, (McConchie, 2015;
NAVFAC SW, 2015) documented a total of two juvenile northern elephant
seals in the project area, as described in the Description of Marine
Mammals in Areas of Specified Activities section in the proposed IHA
(87 FR 68442, November 15, 2022). Due to increasing stock numbers,
there is a reasonable probability that this species could be sighted in
the project area during construction activities. Instead of using past
monitoring data to estimate daily occurrence, it is expected that two
northern elephant seals may be observed in the project area during
construction activities, based upon previous sighting data. The Navy
added a buffer of five seals to this estimate for a total of seven
expected elephant seals in the area during construction activities, and
NMFS agrees with this approach.
Monitoring during Year 4 yielded an observation of 2,263 California
sea lions over the course of the 152-day monitoring period. These
observations equate to an average of 14.9 California sea lions observed
per day, and approximately 15 California sea lions expected to be in
the vicinity of Pier 302, when this estimate is rounded.
Based upon monitoring during Year 4, 88 harbor seals were observed
over the course of the 152-day monitoring period. These observations
equate to an average of 0.6 harbor seals observed per day, and
approximately 1 seal per day expected to be in the vicinity of Pier 302
when this estimate is rounded.
Monitoring during Year 4 yielded an observation of 67 bottlenose
dolphins in the project area over the course of the 152-day monitoring
period. This observation equates to an average of 0.4, or 1 if rounded,
bottlenose dolphins expected to be in the vicinity of Pier 302 each day
of the construction activities.
During Year 2 monitoring, 850 common dolphins were sighted in the
project area over the course of the 152-day monitoring period. This
equates to an average of 8.5 common dolphins observed per day. When
rounded to the nearest whole number, 9.0 individuals are expected to be
sighted per day in the vicinity of Pier 302.
Monitoring during Year 2 documented 7 sightings of Pacific white-
sided dolphins, comprising 27 individuals, with an average of 0.28
individuals sighted per day of monitoring. Rounding this estimate to
the nearest whole number leads to 1.0 individual per day to be expected
to be
[[Page 6710]]
in the vicinity of Pier 302 during the construction activities.
Take Estimation
Here we describe how the information provided above is synthesized
to produce a quantitative estimate of the take that is reasonably
likely to occur.
Daily occurrence estimates were multiplied by the number of days of
pile removal and installation (32 days) to calculate estimated take by
Level B harassment of California sea lions, harbor seals, bottlenose
dolphins, common dolphins, Pacific white-sided dolphins, and northern
elephant seals (Table 8).
Table 8--Authorized Takes by Level B Harassment and Percent of Stock Authorized for Take
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected daily Authorized take Percentage of
Species average by Level B stock authorized
individuals harassment for take
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California sea lion \1\................................ 15 480 0.19
Harbor seal \1\........................................ 1 32 0.10
Bottlenose dolphin \1\................................. 1 32 7.1
Common dolphin (long and short beaked) \2\............. 9 288 * 0.35
Pacific white-sided dolphin \2\........................ 1 32 0.09
Northern elephant seal................................. (\3\) 7 0.004
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Average daily counts based on observations during Year 4 Fuel Pier Replacement Project Monitoring (NAVFAC
SW, 2017b).
\2\ Average daily counts based on observations during Year 2 Fuel Pier Replacement Project Monitoring (NAVFAC
SW, 2015).
\3\ Expected potential of two northern elephant seals over the duration of project activity with a +5 buffer for
Level B Take.
* Percent population calculated for each stock of common dolphins. Percentage in the table represents the
percent of take of long-beaked common dolphins as this would be a greater percentage than if all take were
attributed to short-beaked common dolphins (0.03 percent).
By using the sighting-based approach, take values are not affected
by the estimated harassment distances from Tables 5 and 6. Given the
very small Level A harassment isopleths for all species and mitigation
measures, no take by Level A harassment is anticipated or authorized.
Mitigation
In order to issue an IHA under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to the
activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable impact on
the species or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on
the availability of the species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses (latter not applicable for this action). NMFS
regulations require applicants for incidental take authorizations to
include information about the availability and feasibility (economic
and technological) of equipment, methods, and manner of conducting the
activity or other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or stocks, and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or may not be appropriate to
ensure the least practicable adverse impact on species or stocks and
their habitat, as well as subsistence uses where applicable, NMFS
considers two primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is expected to reduce impacts to
marine mammals, marine mammal species or stocks, and their habitat.
This considers the nature of the potential adverse impact being
mitigated (likelihood, scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be effective if implemented
(probability of accomplishing the mitigating result if implemented as
planned), the likelihood of effective implementation (probability
implemented as planned), and;
(2) The practicability of the measures for applicant
implementation, which may consider such things as cost, and impact on
operations.
Shutdown Zones
Before the commencement of in-water construction activities, the
Navy will establish shutdown zones for all activities. The purpose of a
shutdown zone is to define an area within which shutdown of the
activity would occur upon sighting of a marine mammal (or in
anticipation of an animal entering the defined area). During all in-
water construction activities, the Navy will implement a standard 20 m
(66 ft) shutdown zone, with the exception of a 70 m (230 ft) zone for
phocids during the use of impact pile driving for the 24-inch octagonal
concrete piles. These distances exceed the estimated Level A harassment
distances (Table 10). During the impact installation of the 24-inch
octagonal concrete piles, the shutdown zone for phocids will be
buffered to 70 m (230 ft) to encompass the Level A harassment zone.
Adherence to this expanded shutdown zone will avoid the potential for
the take of phocids by Level A harassment during impact pile driving.
If a marine mammal enters a buffered shutdown zone, in-water activities
will be stopped until visual confirmation that the animal has left the
zone or the animal is not sighted for 15 minutes.
All marine mammals will be monitored in the Level B harassment
zones and throughout the area as far as visual monitoring can take
place. If a marine mammal enters the Level B harassment zone, in-water
activities will continue and the animal's presence within the estimated
harassment zone will be documented.
The Navy will also establish shutdown zones for all marine mammals
for which take has not been authorized or for which incidental take has
been authorized, but the authorized number of takes has been met. These
zones are equivalent to the Level B harassment zones for each activity.
If a marine mammal species not covered under this IHA enters the
shutdown zone, all in-water activities will cease until the animal
leaves the zone or has not been observed for at least 1 hour, and NMFS
will be notified about species and precautions taken. Pile removal will
proceed if the non-IHA species is observed to leave the Level B
harassment zone or if 1 hour has passed since the last observation.
If shutdown and/or clearance procedures would result in an imminent
safety concern, as determined by the Navy, the in-water activity will
be allowed to continue until the safety concern has been addressed, and
the animal will be continuously monitored. The Navy Point of Contact
(POC) will be consulted before re-commencing activities.
[[Page 6711]]
Table 9--Shutdown Zones and Level B Harassment Zones
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shutdown zones m (ft) Level B
Method Pile size/type ------------------------------------------------ harassment
MF PW OW zones m (ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Removal Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory Extraction.......... 18'' Octagonal 20 (66) 20 (66) 20 (66) 1,445 (4,742)
Concrete.
18'' Steel Pipe. 20 (66) 20 (66) 20 (66) 575 (1,888)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pile Installation Activities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Pile Driving........... 24'' Octagonal 20 (66) \1\ 70 (230) 20 (66) 117 (383)
Concrete.
14'' Square 20 (66) 20 (66) 20 (66) 25 (82)
Concrete.
Vibratory Hammer.............. 6'' Round Steel. 20 (66) 20 (66) 20 (66) 494 (1,619)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Level A ZOI buffered from 62.5 m up to 70 m.
Protected Species Observers
The placement of protected species observers (PSOs) during all pile
driving activities (described in the Monitoring and Reporting section)
will ensure that the entire shutdown zone is visible. Should
environmental conditions deteriorate such that the entire shutdown zone
would not be visible (e.g., fog, heavy rain), pile driving will be
delayed until the PSO is confident marine mammals within the shutdown
zone could be detected.
Pre-Activity Monitoring
Prior to the start of daily in-water construction activity, or
whenever a break in pile driving of 30 minutes or longer occurs, PSOs
will observe the shutdown and monitoring zones for a period of 30
minutes. The shutdown zone will be considered cleared when a marine
mammal has not been observed within the zone for that 30-minute period.
If a marine mammal is observed within the shutdown zones listed in
Table 10, pile driving activity will be delayed or halted. If work
ceases for more than 30 minutes, the pre-activity monitoring of the
shutdown zones will commence. A determination that the shutdown zone is
clear must be made during a period of good visibility (i.e., the entire
shutdown zone and surrounding waters must be visible to the naked eye).
Soft-Start Procedures
Soft-start procedures provide additional protection to marine
mammals by providing warning and/or giving marine mammals a chance to
leave the area prior to the hammer operating at full capacity. For
impact pile driving, contractors will be required to provide an initial
set of three strikes from the hammer at reduced energy, followed by a
30-second waiting period, then two subsequent reduced-energy strike
sets. Soft-start will be implemented at the start of each day's impact
pile driving and at any time following cessation of impact pile driving
for a period of 30 minutes or longer.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's measures, NMFS has
determined that the mitigation measures provide the means of effecting
the least practicable impact on the affected species or stocks and
their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an IHA for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for
authorizations must include the suggested means of accomplishing the
necessary monitoring and reporting that will result in increased
knowledge of the species and of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are expected to be present while
conducting the activities. Effective reporting is critical both to
compliance as well as ensuring that the most value is obtained from the
required monitoring.
Monitoring and reporting requirements prescribed by NMFS should
contribute to improved understanding of one or more of the following:
Occurrence of marine mammal species or stocks in the area
in which take is anticipated (e.g., presence, abundance, distribution,
density);
Nature, scope, or context of likely marine mammal exposure
to potential stressors/impacts (individual or cumulative, acute or
chronic), through better understanding of: (1) action or environment
(e.g., source characterization, propagation, ambient noise); (2)
affected species (e.g., life history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the activity; or (4) biological or
behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or feeding areas);
Individual marine mammal responses (behavioral or
physiological) to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or cumulative),
other stressors, or cumulative impacts from multiple stressors;
How anticipated responses to stressors impact either: (1)
long-term fitness and survival of individual marine mammals; or (2)
populations, species, or stocks;
Effects on marine mammal habitat (e.g., marine mammal prey
species, acoustic habitat, or other important physical components of
marine mammal habitat); and,
Mitigation and monitoring effectiveness.
Visual Monitoring
Marine mammal monitoring during pile driving activities will be
conducted by PSOs meeting NMFS' following requirements:
Independent PSOs (i.e., not construction personnel) who
have no other assigned tasks during monitoring periods will be used;
At least one PSO will have prior experience performing the
duties of a PSO during construction activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued
incidental take authorization;
Other PSOs may substitute education (degree in biological
science or related field) or training for prior experience performing
the duties of a PSO during construction activity pursuant to a NMFS-
issued incidental take authorization; and
A minimum of two PSOs must be on duty for all in-water
construction activities. A lead observer or monitoring coordinator must
be designated to
[[Page 6712]]
coordinate monitoring and log project and monitoring activity data. The
lead observer must have prior experience performing the duties of a PSO
during construction activity pursuant to a NMFS-issued incidental take
authorization.
PSOs must be approved by NMFS prior to beginning any
activity subject to this IHA.
PSOs will have the following additional qualifications:
Ability to conduct field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols;
Experience or training in the field identification of
marine mammals, including the identification of behaviors;
Sufficient training, orientation, or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations;
Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of
observations including but not limited to the number and species of
marine mammals observed; dates and times when in-water construction
activities were conducted; dates, times, and reason for implementation
of mitigation (or why mitigation was not implemented when required);
and marine mammal behavior; and
Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real-time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
The Navy will have at least two PSOs stationed at the best possible
vantage points in the project area to monitor during all pile driving
activities. If a PSO sights a marine mammal in the shutdown zone, the
PSO must alert the ``command'' PSO to notify the equipment operator to
shut down. If the ``command'' PSO does not respond, any PSO has the
authority to notify the need for a shutdown. If the ``command'' PSO
calls for a shutdown, the ``command'' PSO will let the contractor know
when activities can re-commence. Additional PSOs may be employed during
periods of low or obstructed visibility to ensure the entirety of the
shutdown zones are monitored. A marine mammal monitoring plan has been
submitted to NMFS for approval.
Reporting
A draft marine mammal monitoring report will be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days after the completion of pile driving activities, or 60
days prior to a requested date of issuance of any future IHAs for the
project, or other projects at the same location, whichever comes first.
A final report must be prepared and submitted within 30 calendar days
following receipt of any NMFS comments on the draft report. If no
comments are received from NMFS within 30 calendar days of receipt of
the draft report, the report shall be considered final. All draft and
final monitoring reports must be submitted to
[email protected] and [email protected]. The marine
mammal monitoring report will include an overall description of work
completed, a narrative regarding marine mammal sightings, and
associated PSO data sheets. Specifically, the report will include:
Dates and times (begin and end) of all marine mammal
monitoring;
Construction activities occurring during each daily
observation period, including: (a) How many and what type of piles were
driven or removed and the method (i.e., impact or vibratory); and (b)
the total duration of time for each pile (vibratory driving) number of
strikes for each pile (impact driving);
PSO locations during marine mammal monitoring; and
Environmental conditions during monitoring periods (at
beginning and end of PSO shift and whenever conditions change
significantly), including Beaufort sea state and any other relevant
weather conditions including cloud cover, fog, sun glare, and overall
visibility to the horizon, and estimated observable distance.
PSOs will record all incidents of marine mammal occurrence,
regardless of distance from activity, and will document any behavioral
reactions in concert with distance from piles being driven or removed.
Specifically, PSOs will record the following:
Name of PSO who sighted the animal(s) and PSO location and
activity at time of sighting;
Time of sighting;
Identification of the animal(s) (e.g., genus/species,
lowest possible taxonomic level, or unidentified), PSO confidence in
identification, and the composition of the group if there is a mix of
species;
Distance and location of each observed marine mammal
relative to the pile being driven or hole being drilled for each
sighting;
Estimated number of animals (min/max/best estimate);
Estimated number of animals by cohort (adults, juveniles,
neonates, group composition, etc.);
Description of any marine mammal behavioral observations
(e.g., observed behaviors such as feeding or traveling), including an
assessment of behavioral responses thought to have resulted from the
activity (e.g., no response or changes in behavioral state such as
ceasing feeding, changing direction, flushing, or breaching).
In the event that personnel involved in the construction activities
discover an injured or dead marine mammal, the Navy will report the
incident to the Office of Protected Resources (OPR)
([email protected]), NMFS and to the West Coast
regional stranding network (866-767-6114) as soon as feasible. If the
death or injury was clearly caused by the specified activity, the Navy
will immediately cease the specified activities until NMFS is able to
review the circumstances of the incident and determine what, if any,
additional measures are appropriate to ensure compliance with the terms
of the IHAs. The Navy will not resume their activities until notified
by NMFS.
The report will include the following information:
1. Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the first
discovery (and updated location information if known and applicable);
2. Species identification (if known) or description of the
animal(s) involved;
3. Condition of the animal(s) (including carcass condition if the
animal is dead);
4. Observed behaviors of the animal(s), if alive;
5. If available, photographs or video footage of the animal(s); and
6. General circumstances under which the animal was discovered.
Negligible Impact Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (50 CFR 216.103). A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of takes alone is not enough
information on which to base an impact determination. In addition to
considering estimates of the number of marine mammals that might be
``taken'' through harassment, NMFS considers other factors, such as the
likely nature of any impacts or responses (e.g., intensity, duration),
the context of any impacts or responses (e.g., critical reproductive
time or location, foraging impacts affecting energetics), as well as
effects on habitat, and the likely effectiveness of the mitigation. We
also assess the number, intensity, and context of estimated takes by
evaluating
[[Page 6713]]
this information relative to population status. Consistent with the
1989 preamble for NMFS' implementing regulations (54 FR 40338,
September 29, 1989), the impacts from other past and ongoing
anthropogenic activities are incorporated into this analysis via their
impacts on the baseline (e.g., as reflected in the regulatory status of
the species, population size and growth rate where known, ongoing
sources of human-caused mortality, or ambient noise levels).
To avoid repetition, the discussion of our analysis applies to all
the species listed in Table 1, given that the anticipated effects of
this activity on these different marine mammal stocks are expected to
be similar. There is little information about the nature or severity of
the impacts, or the size, status, or structure of any of these species
or stocks that would lead to a different analysis for this activity.
Level A harassment is extremely unlikely given the small size of
the Level A harassment isopleths and the required mitigation measures
designed to minimize the possibility of injury to marine mammals. No
mortality is anticipated given the nature of the activity.
Pile installation and removal activities have the potential to
disturb or displace marine mammals. Specifically, the project
activities may result in take, in the form of Level A and Level B
harassment from underwater sounds generated from impact and vibratory
pile installation, and vibratory pile removal activities. Potential
takes could occur if individuals move into the ensonified zones when
these activities are underway.
The takes from Level B harassment will be due to potential
behavioral disturbance. No serious injury or mortality is anticipated
for any stocks presented in this analysis given the nature of the
activity and mitigation measures designed to minimize the possibility
of injury. The potential for harassment is minimized through
construction methods and the implementation of planned mitigation
strategies (see Mitigation section).
Take will occur within a limited, confined area of each stock's
range. Level B harassment will be reduced to the level of least
practicable adverse impact through use of mitigation measures described
herein. Further, the amount of take authorized is extremely small when
compared to stock abundance.
No marine mammal stocks for which incidental take authorization is
authorized are listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA or
determined to be strategic or depleted under the MMPA. The relatively
low marine mammal occurrences in the area, small shutdown zones, and
planned monitoring make injury takes of marine mammals unlikely. The
shutdown zones will be thoroughly monitored before the vibratory pile
installation and removal begins, and construction activities will be
postponed if a marine mammal is sighted within the shutdown zone. There
is a high likelihood that marine mammals will be detected by trained
observers under environmental conditions described for the project.
Limiting construction activities to daylight hours will also increase
detectability of marine mammals in the area. Therefore, the mitigation
and monitoring measures are expected to eliminate the potential for
injury and Level A harassment as well as reduce the amount and
intensity for Level B behavioral harassment. Furthermore, the pile
installation and removal activities analyzed here are similar to, or
less impactful than, numerous construction activities conducted in
other similar locations which have occurred with no reported injuries
or mortality to marine mammals, and no known long-term adverse
consequences from behavioral harassment.
Anticipated and authorized takes are expected to be limited to
short-term Level B harassment (behavioral disturbance) as construction
activities will occur over the course of 32 weeks. Effects on
individuals taken by Level B harassment, based upon reports in the
literature as well as monitoring from other similar activities, may
include increased swimming speeds, increased surfacing time, or
decreased foraging (e.g., Thorson and Reyff, 2006; NAVFAC SW, 2018b).
Individual animals, even if taken multiple times, will likely move away
from the sound source and be temporarily displaced from the area due to
elevated noise level during pile removal. Marine mammals could also
experience TTS if they move into the Level B monitoring zone. TTS is a
temporary loss of hearing sensitivity when exposed to loud sound, and
the hearing threshold is expected to recover completely within minutes
to hours. Thus, it is not considered an injury. While TTS could occur,
it is not considered a likely outcome of this activity. Repeated
exposures of individuals to levels of sounds that could cause Level B
harassment are unlikely to considerably significantly disrupt foraging
behavior or result in significant decrease in fitness, reproduction, or
survival for the affected individuals. In all, there will be no adverse
impacts to the stock as a whole.
The project is not expected to have significant adverse effects on
marine mammal habitat. There are no Biologically Important Areas or
ESA-designated critical habitat within the project area, and the
activities will not permanently modify existing marine mammal habitat.
The activities may cause fish to leave the area temporarily. This could
impact marine mammals' foraging opportunities in a limited portion of
the foraging range, however, due to the short duration of activities
and the relatively small area of affected habitat, the impacts to
marine mammal habitat are not expected to cause significant or long-
term negative consequences.
In combination, we believe that these factors, as well as the
available body of evidence from other similar activities, demonstrate
that the potential effects of the specified activities would have only
minor, short-term effects on individuals. The specified activities are
not expected to impact reproduction or survival of any individual
marine mammals, much less affect rates of recruitment or survival and
would therefore not result in population-level impacts.
In summary and as described above, the following factors primarily
support our determination that the impacts resulting from this activity
are not expected to adversely affect any of the species or stocks
through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival:
No serious injury or mortality or Level A harassment is
anticipated or authorized;
The specified activity and associated ensonified areas are
very small relative to the overall habitat ranges of all species;
Biologically important areas or critical habitat have not
been identified within the project area;
The lack of anticipated significant or long-term effects
to marine mammal habitat;
The Navy is required to implement mitigation measures to
minimize impacts, such as PSO observation and shutdown zones of 20 m
(66 ft); and,
Monitoring reports from similar work in San Diego Bay have
documented little to no effect on individuals of the same species
impacted by the specified activities.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the monitoring and mitigation
measures, NMFS finds that the total marine mammal take from the
authorized
[[Page 6714]]
activity will have a negligible impact on all affected marine mammal
species or stocks.
Small Numbers
As noted previously, only small numbers of incidental take may be
authorized under sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA for
specified activities other than military readiness activities. The MMPA
does not define small numbers and so, in practice, where estimated
numbers are available, NMFS compares the number of individuals taken to
the most appropriate estimation of abundance of the relevant species or
stock in our determination of whether an authorization is limited to
small numbers of marine mammals. When the predicted number of
individuals to be taken is fewer than one-third of the species or stock
abundance, the take is considered to be of small numbers. Additionally,
other qualitative factors may be considered in the analysis, such as
the temporal or spatial scale of the activities.
The amount of take NMFS has authorized is below one-third of the
estimated stock abundances for all seven species (refer back to Table
8). For most requested species, the authorized take of individuals is
less than 1 percent of the abundance of the affected stock (with
exception for bottlenose dolphins at 7.1 percent). This is likely a
conservative estimate because it assumes all takes are of different
individual animals, which is likely not the case. Some individuals may
return multiple times in a day, but PSOs will count them as separate
takes if they cannot be individually identified.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the authorized activity
(including the mitigation and monitoring measures) and the anticipated
take of marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals
will be taken relative to the population size of the affected species
or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses of the affected marine
mammal stocks or species implicated by this action. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that the total taking of affected species or stocks would
not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such
species or stocks for taking for subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal agency insure that any
action it authorizes, funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated
critical habitat. To ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of IHAs,
NMFS consults internally whenever we propose to authorize take for
endangered or threatened species.
No incidental take of ESA-listed species is authorized or expected
to result from this activity. Therefore, NMFS has determined that
formal consultation under section 7 of the ESA is not required for this
action.
National Environmental Policy Act
To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA;
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6A,
NMFS must review our action (i.e., the issuance of an IHA) with respect
to potential impacts on the human environment.
This action is consistent with categories of activities identified
in Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no anticipated serious injury or
mortality) of the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative Order 216-
6A, which do not individually or cumulatively have the potential for
significant impacts on the quality of the human environment and for
which we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances that would
preclude this categorical exclusion. Accordingly, NMFS has determined
that the issuance of the IHA qualifies to be categorically excluded
from further NEPA review.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to the U.S. Navy for the potential
harassment of small numbers of six marine mammal species incidental to
construction activities associated with the Naval Base Point Loma Pier
302 Replacement Project in San Diego, California., provided the
previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
are followed.
Dated: January 27, 2023.
Kimberly Damon-Randall,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-02107 Filed 1-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P