Empresa de Transporte Aéreocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a Aerocargo del Sur Transportation Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR; Avenida Intercomunal, Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3, Maiquetia Distrito Federal, Venezuela; Avenida Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso 49, Libertador Caracas, Venezuela; Order Renewing Temporary Denial of Export Privileges, 6231-6233 [2023-01984]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Empresa de Transporte Ae´reocargo
del Sur, S.A., a/k/a Aerocargo del Sur
Transportation Company, a/k/a
EMTRASUR; Avenida Intercomunal,
Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3, Maiquetia
Distrito Federal, Venezuela; Avenida
Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso 49, Libertador
Caracas, Venezuela; Order Renewing
Temporary Denial of Export Privileges
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the
Export Administration Regulations, 15
CFR parts 730–774 (2021) (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘the Regulations’’),1 I hereby grant the
request of the Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. Department of
Commerce, through its Office of Export
Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’), to renew the
temporary denial order (‘‘TDO’’) issued
in this matter on August 2, 2022. I find
that renewal of this order is necessary
in the public interest to prevent an
imminent violation of the Regulations.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Procedural History
On August 2, 2022, I signed an order
denying the export privileges of
Venezuela-based cargo airline Empresa
de Transporte Ae´reocargo del Sur, S.A.,
a/k/a Aerocargo del Sur Transportation
Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR
(‘‘EMTRASUR’’) for a period of 180 days
on the ground that issuance of the order
was necessary in the public interest to
prevent an imminent violation of the
Regulations. The order was issued ex
parte pursuant to Section 766.24(a) of
the Regulations and was effective upon
issuance.2
On January 8, 2023, BIS, through OEE,
submitted a written request for renewal
of the TDO that issued on August 2,
2022. The written request was made
more than 20 days before the TDO’s
1 On August 13, 2018, the President signed into
law the John S. McCain National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which
includes the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50
U.S.C. 4801–4852 (‘‘ECRA’’). While Section 1766 of
ECRA repeals the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. App. § 2401 et seq.
(‘‘EAA’’), (except for three sections which are
inapplicable here), Section 1768 of ECRA provides,
in pertinent part, that all orders, rules, regulations,
and other forms of administrative action that were
made or issued under the EAA, including as
continued in effect pursuant to the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701
et seq. (‘‘IEEPA’’), and were in effect as of ECRA’s
date of enactment (August 13, 2018), shall continue
in effect according to their terms until modified,
superseded, set aside, or revoked through action
undertaken pursuant to the authority provided
under ECRA. Moreover, Section 1761(a)(5) of ECRA
authorizes the issuance of temporary denial orders.
50 U.S.C. 4820(a)(5).
2 The TDO was published in the Federal Register
on August 5, 2022. See 87 FR 47964 (August 5,
2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jan 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
scheduled expiration. A copy of the
renewal request was sent to EMTRASUR
in accordance with Sections 766.5 and
766.24(d) of the Regulations. No
opposition to the renewal of the TDO
has been received.
II. Renewal of the TDO
A. Legal Standard
Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may
issue an order temporarily denying a
respondent’s export privileges upon a
showing that the order is necessary in
the public interest to prevent an
‘‘imminent violation’’ of the
Regulations, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder. 15 CFR
766.24(b)(1) and 766.24(d). ‘‘A violation
may be ‘imminent’ either in time or
degree of likelihood.’’ 15 CFR
766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ‘‘either that
a violation is about to occur, or that the
general circumstances of the matter
under investigation or case under
criminal or administrative charges
demonstrate a likelihood of future
violations.’’ Id. As to the likelihood of
future violations, BIS may show that the
violation under investigation or charge
‘‘is significant, deliberate, covert and/or
likely to occur again, rather than
technical or negligent[.]’’ Id. A ‘‘lack of
information establishing the precise
time a violation may occur does not
preclude a finding that a violation is
imminent, so long as there is sufficient
reason to believe the likelihood of a
violation.’’ Id.
B. The TDO and BIS’s Request for
Renewal
OEE’s request for renewal is based
upon the facts underlying the issuance
of the initial TDO and evidence
developed over the course of this
investigation, which indicate a blatant
disregard for U.S. export controls and
the terms of a preexisting TDO. As
noted in OEE’s initial request for a
temporary denial order, EMTRASUR is
a subsidiary of Consorcio Venezolano de
Industrias Aeronauticas Y Servicios
Aereos, S.A., a/k/a CONVIASA
(‘‘CONVIASA’’), a Venezuelan stateowned airline. On or about February 7,
2020, U.S. Department of the Treasury’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control
(‘‘OFAC’’) added CONVIASA to the list
of Specially Designated Nationals
(‘‘SDN’’) pursuant to Executive Order
(E.O.) 13884.3
The initial TDO, issued on August 2,
2022, was based on evidence that
EMTRASUR engaged in conduct
prohibited by a TDO that had been
previously issued against Iranian airline
3 See https://home.treasury.gov/news/pressreleases/sm903.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6231
Mahan Air a/k/a Mahan Airlines a/k/a
Mahan Airways (‘‘Mahan Air’’) and the
Regulations when EMTRASUR, through
its parent company, acquired custody
and/or control from Mahan Air of a U.Sorigin Boeing 747 aircraft bearing
manufacturer’s serial number 23413
(‘‘MSN 23413’’), an item subject to the
EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991,
in or around October 2021.4 Moreover,
the initial TDO, issued on August 2,
2022, was also based on evidence that
EMTRASUR had continued to use MSN
23413 on flights into Iran and Russia in
violation of General Prohibition 10,
which (among other restrictions)
prohibits the continued use of an item
that was known to have been exported
or reexported in violation of the
EAR.5 See General Prohibition 10 of the
EAR at 15 CFR 736.2(b)(10). There are
no license exceptions available for this
General Prohibition.6 As also noted in
OEE’s initial request, MSN 23413 was
detained by Argentinian authorities on
or about June 8, 2022, where it presently
remains. On or about August 2, 2022,
the United States Department of Justice
transmitted a request to Argentinian
authorities for the seizure of MSN 23413
following the unsealing of a seizure
warrant in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia.
In its January 8, 2023, request for
renewal of the TDO, BIS has provided
additional evidence that EMTRASUR’s
acquisition of MSN 23413 from Mahan
Air was in violation of the TDO
previously issued against Mahan Air
4 Mahan Air’s status as a denied person was most
recently renewed by BIS through a TDO issued on
November 8, 2022. See 87 FR 68123 (November 14,
2022). The November 8, 2022, renewal order
summarizes the initial TDO issued against Mahan
in March 2008 and the other renewal orders issued
prior to November 8, 2022. See id.
5 Publicly available flight tracking information
demonstrates, for instance, that EMTRASUR
operated MSN 23413 on multiple flights between
Caracas, Venezuela and Tehran, Iran between
February 19, 2022 and May 25, 2022. In addition,
EMTRASUR operated MSN 23413 on flights
between Tehran, Iran and Moscow, Russia on May
24, 2022 and May 25, 2022.
6 Section 736.2(b)(10) of the EAR provides:
General Prohibition Ten—Proceeding with
transactions with knowledge that a violation has
occurred or is about to occur (Knowledge Violation
to Occur). You may not sell, transfer, export,
reexport, finance, order, buy, remove, conceal,
store, use, loan, dispose of, transport, forward, or
otherwise service, in whole or in part, any item
subject to the EAR and exported or to be exported
with knowledge that a violation of the Export
Administration Regulations, the Export
Administration Act or any order, license, License
Exception, or other authorization issued thereunder
has occurred, is about to occur, or is intended to
occur in connection with the item. Nor may you
rely upon any license or License Exception after
notice to you of the suspension or revocation of that
license or exception. There are no License
Exceptions to this General Prohibition Ten in part
740 of the EAR.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
6232
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2023 / Notices
and the Regulations. BIS has also
provided evidence that EMTRASUR, in
addition to the Venezuelan government,
are actively seeking the return of the
aircraft from Argentina in potential
violation of General Prohibition 10.
Specifically, BIS’s ongoing investigation
has uncovered evidence that certain of
MSN 23413’s parts, including spare
parts which appear to be U.S-origin,
bear the markings and logos of Mahan
and/or CONVIASA. This evidence
further demonstrates that EMTRASUR’s
acquisition and operation of the aircraft
violated the TDO issued against Mahan
Air; as a result, any attempts by
EMTRASUR to operate the aircraft or to
return it to Venezuela, as well as any
efforts EMTRASUR may take to
maintain it, would violate General
Prohibition 10.
Moreover, BIS’s evidence indicates
that, after the issuance of the August 2,
2022 TDO against EMTRASUR, efforts
have been affirmatively undertaken to
secure the release of the aircraft from its
detention in Argentina. For instance, on
or about August 3, 2022, Nicolas
Maduro, previous president of
Venezuela, personally asked for the
return of MSN 23413 to Venezuela.
BIS’s request for a renewal indicates
that Maduro is affirmatively seeking the
release of the aircraft and has also sent
others to petition Argentinian
authorities for its release. Additionally,
after Argentinian authorities released all
of MSN 23413’s crew members, which
included both Iranian and Venezuelan
citizens, Venezuelan news media
reported that the release of the aircraft
is expected immediately. Any such
return of the aircraft to Venezuela, or
operation of it in any manner, would
constitute a violation of General
Prohibition 10 because the aircraft was
obtained in violation of the Regulations
and the TDO issued against Mahan Air.
Based upon the violations by
EMTRASUR, its disregard for the
Regulations and the previously-issued
TDO against Mahan Air, and the
potential release of the MSN 23413 from
detention, there are concerns of future
violations of the EAR. These concerns
are heightened because any subsequent
actions taken with regard to MSN 23413
may violate the EAR, including, but not
limited to, its refueling, maintenance,
repair, or the provision of spare parts or
services.
III. Findings
Under the applicable standard set
forth in Section 766.24 of the
Regulations and my review of the entire
record, I find that the evidence
presented by BIS convincingly
demonstrates that EMTRASUR has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jan 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
acted in violation of the Regulations and
the TDO; that such violations have been
significant, deliberate and covert; and
that given the foregoing and the nature
of the matters under investigation, there
is a likelihood of imminent violations.
Therefore, renewal of the TDO is
necessary in the public interest to
prevent imminent violation of the
Regulations and to give notice to
companies and individuals in the
United States and abroad that they
should avoid dealing with EMTRASUR
in connection with export and reexport
transactions involving items subject to
the Regulations and in connection with
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
This Order is being issued on an ex
parte basis without a hearing based
upon BIS’s showing of an imminent
violation in accordance with Section
766.24 and 766.23(b) of the Regulations.
IV. Order
It is therefore ordered:
First, Empresa de Transporte
Ae´reocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a
Aerocargo del Sur Transportation
Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR, Avenida
Intercomunal, Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3,
Maiquetia, Distrito Federal, Venezuela,
and Avenida Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso
49, Libertador, Caracas, Venezuela, and
when acting for or on its behalf, any
successors or assigns, agents, or
employees may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR,
or in any other activity subject to the
EAR including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license (except directly related to
safety of flight), license exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized
by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of
the Regulations, or engaging in any
other activity subject to the EAR except
directly related to safety of flight and
authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the EAR, or from any
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
other activity subject to the EAR except
directly related to safety of flight and
authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of EMTRASUR
any item subject to the EAR except
directly related to safety of flight and
authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
EMTRASUR of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby EMTRASUR acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized
by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of
the Regulations;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from EMTRASUR of any
item subject to the EAR that has been
exported from the United States except
directly related to safety of flight and
authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations;
D. Obtain from EMTRASUR in the
United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States
except directly related to safety of flight
and authorized by BIS pursuant to
Section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by EMTRASUR,
or service any item, of whatever origin,
that is owned, possessed or controlled
by EMTRASUR if such service involves
the use of any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from
the United States except directly related
to safety of flight and authorized by BIS
pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the
Regulations. For purposes of this
paragraph, servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification, or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to EMTRASUR by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2023 / Notices
In accordance with the provisions of
Sections 766.24(e) of the EAR,
EMTRASUR may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. A renewal
request may be opposed by EMTRASUR
as provided in Section 766.24(d), by
filing a written submission with the
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days
before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided
to EMTRASUR and shall be published
in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Dated: January 26, 2023.
Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023–01984 Filed 1–30–23; 8:45 am]
6233
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Background
International Trade Administration
Based upon timely requests for
review, Commerce initiated
administrative reviews of certain
companies for the periods of review and
the AD and CVD orders listed in the
table below, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).1 All requests for these
reviews have been timely withdrawn.2
Rescission of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Based upon the timely
withdrawal of all review requests, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce) is
rescinding the administrative reviews
covering the periods of review and the
antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD) orders
identified in the table below.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable January 31, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations,
Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone:
(202) 482–4735.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the parties that requested the
review withdraw their review requests
within 90 days of the date of publication
of the notice of initiation for the
requested review. All parties withdrew
their requests for the reviews listed in
the table below within the 90-day
deadline. No other parties requested
administrative reviews of these AD/CVD
orders for the periods noted in the table.
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), Commerce is rescinding,
in their entirety, the administrative
reviews listed in the table below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
Period of review
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
AD Proceedings
Germany:
Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–428–845 .......................................................
Seamless Line and Pressure Pipe, A–428–820 ..........................................................................................................
Italy:
Certain Pasta, A–475–818 ...........................................................................................................................................
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–475–843 ................................................................................................
Japan:
Certain Tin Mill Products, A–588–854 .........................................................................................................................
Mexico:
Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs, A–201–849 ................................................................................................................
Republic of Korea:
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe, A–580–909 3 .................................................
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A–580–834 ..................................................................................................
Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Utility Scale Wind Towers, A–552–825 4 ......................................................................................................................
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube, A–552–831 ..............................................................................................
Spain:
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, A–469–821 ................................................................................................
Utility Scale Wind Towers, A–469–823 ........................................................................................................................
Switzerland:
Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel, A–441–801 .......................................................
Taiwan:
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires, A–583–869 ...............................................................................................
The People’s Republic of China:
Boltless Steel Shelving Units Prepackaged for Sale, A–570–018 5 ............................................................................
Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and Parts Thereof, A–570–129 ..........................................................................
Steel Propane Cylinders, A–570–086 ..........................................................................................................................
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
48459 (August 9, 2022); see also Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 54463 (September 6,
2022); Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jan 30, 2023
Jkt 259001
61278 (October 11, 2022); Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,
87 FR 74404 (December 5, 2022).
2 The letters withdrawing the review requests
may be found in Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6/1/2021–5/31/2022
8/1/2021–7/31/2022
7/1/2021–6/30/2022
11/19/2020–5/31/2022
8/1/2021–7/31/2022
10/1/2021–9/30/2022
2/10/21–7/31/2022
7/1/2021–6/30/2022
8/1/2021–7/31/2022
2/1/2021–7/31/2022
11/19/2020–5/31/2022
4/2/2021–7/31/2022
6/1/2021–5/31/2022
1/6/2021–6/30/2022
10/1/2021–9/30/2022
12/30/2020–6/30/2022
8/1/2021–7/31/2022
available to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov.
3 In the quarterly rescission notice that published
on October 26, 2022 (87 FR 64763), Commerce
inadvertently listed the wrong period of review for
the case above. The correct period of review is
listed in this notice.
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6231-6233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01984]
[[Page 6231]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Empresa de Transporte A[eacute]reocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a
Aerocargo del Sur Transportation Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR; Avenida
Intercomunal, Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3, Maiquetia Distrito Federal,
Venezuela; Avenida Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso 49, Libertador Caracas,
Venezuela; Order Renewing Temporary Denial of Export Privileges
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration
Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2021) (``EAR'' or ``the
Regulations''),\1\ I hereby grant the request of the Bureau of Industry
and Security (``BIS''), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office
of Export Enforcement (``OEE''), to renew the temporary denial order
(``TDO'') issued in this matter on August 2, 2022. I find that renewal
of this order is necessary in the public interest to prevent an
imminent violation of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John
S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019,
which includes the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C.
4801-4852 (``ECRA''). While Section 1766 of ECRA repeals the
provisions of the Export Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. App. Sec.
2401 et seq. (``EAA''), (except for three sections which are
inapplicable here), Section 1768 of ECRA provides, in pertinent
part, that all orders, rules, regulations, and other forms of
administrative action that were made or issued under the EAA,
including as continued in effect pursuant to the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (``IEEPA''),
and were in effect as of ECRA's date of enactment (August 13, 2018),
shall continue in effect according to their terms until modified,
superseded, set aside, or revoked through action undertaken pursuant
to the authority provided under ECRA. Moreover, Section 1761(a)(5)
of ECRA authorizes the issuance of temporary denial orders. 50
U.S.C. 4820(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Procedural History
On August 2, 2022, I signed an order denying the export privileges
of Venezuela-based cargo airline Empresa de Transporte
A[eacute]reocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a Aerocargo del Sur Transportation
Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR (``EMTRASUR'') for a period of 180 days on the
ground that issuance of the order was necessary in the public interest
to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations. The order was
issued ex parte pursuant to Section 766.24(a) of the Regulations and
was effective upon issuance.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The TDO was published in the Federal Register on August 5,
2022. See 87 FR 47964 (August 5, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 8, 2023, BIS, through OEE, submitted a written request
for renewal of the TDO that issued on August 2, 2022. The written
request was made more than 20 days before the TDO's scheduled
expiration. A copy of the renewal request was sent to EMTRASUR in
accordance with Sections 766.5 and 766.24(d) of the Regulations. No
opposition to the renewal of the TDO has been received.
II. Renewal of the TDO
A. Legal Standard
Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may issue an order temporarily
denying a respondent's export privileges upon a showing that the order
is necessary in the public interest to prevent an ``imminent
violation'' of the Regulations, or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and 766.24(d). ``A violation may
be `imminent' either in time or degree of likelihood.'' 15 CFR
766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ``either that a violation is about to occur,
or that the general circumstances of the matter under investigation or
case under criminal or administrative charges demonstrate a likelihood
of future violations.'' Id. As to the likelihood of future violations,
BIS may show that the violation under investigation or charge ``is
significant, deliberate, covert and/or likely to occur again, rather
than technical or negligent[.]'' Id. A ``lack of information
establishing the precise time a violation may occur does not preclude a
finding that a violation is imminent, so long as there is sufficient
reason to believe the likelihood of a violation.'' Id.
B. The TDO and BIS's Request for Renewal
OEE's request for renewal is based upon the facts underlying the
issuance of the initial TDO and evidence developed over the course of
this investigation, which indicate a blatant disregard for U.S. export
controls and the terms of a preexisting TDO. As noted in OEE's initial
request for a temporary denial order, EMTRASUR is a subsidiary of
Consorcio Venezolano de Industrias Aeronauticas Y Servicios Aereos,
S.A., a/k/a CONVIASA (``CONVIASA''), a Venezuelan state-owned airline.
On or about February 7, 2020, U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office
of Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC'') added CONVIASA to the list of
Specially Designated Nationals (``SDN'') pursuant to Executive Order
(E.O.) 13884.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm903.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The initial TDO, issued on August 2, 2022, was based on evidence
that EMTRASUR engaged in conduct prohibited by a TDO that had been
previously issued against Iranian airline Mahan Air a/k/a Mahan
Airlines a/k/a Mahan Airways (``Mahan Air'') and the Regulations when
EMTRASUR, through its parent company, acquired custody and/or control
from Mahan Air of a U.S-origin Boeing 747 aircraft bearing
manufacturer's serial number 23413 (``MSN 23413''), an item subject to
the EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991, in or around October 2021.\4\
Moreover, the initial TDO, issued on August 2, 2022, was also based on
evidence that EMTRASUR had continued to use MSN 23413 on flights into
Iran and Russia in violation of General Prohibition 10, which (among
other restrictions) prohibits the continued use of an item that was
known to have been exported or reexported in violation of the EAR.\5\
See General Prohibition 10 of the EAR at 15 CFR 736.2(b)(10). There are
no license exceptions available for this General Prohibition.\6\ As
also noted in OEE's initial request, MSN 23413 was detained by
Argentinian authorities on or about June 8, 2022, where it presently
remains. On or about August 2, 2022, the United States Department of
Justice transmitted a request to Argentinian authorities for the
seizure of MSN 23413 following the unsealing of a seizure warrant in
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Mahan Air's status as a denied person was most recently
renewed by BIS through a TDO issued on November 8, 2022. See 87 FR
68123 (November 14, 2022). The November 8, 2022, renewal order
summarizes the initial TDO issued against Mahan in March 2008 and
the other renewal orders issued prior to November 8, 2022. See id.
\5\ Publicly available flight tracking information demonstrates,
for instance, that EMTRASUR operated MSN 23413 on multiple flights
between Caracas, Venezuela and Tehran, Iran between February 19,
2022 and May 25, 2022. In addition, EMTRASUR operated MSN 23413 on
flights between Tehran, Iran and Moscow, Russia on May 24, 2022 and
May 25, 2022.
\6\ Section 736.2(b)(10) of the EAR provides: General
Prohibition Ten--Proceeding with transactions with knowledge that a
violation has occurred or is about to occur (Knowledge Violation to
Occur). You may not sell, transfer, export, reexport, finance,
order, buy, remove, conceal, store, use, loan, dispose of,
transport, forward, or otherwise service, in whole or in part, any
item subject to the EAR and exported or to be exported with
knowledge that a violation of the Export Administration Regulations,
the Export Administration Act or any order, license, License
Exception, or other authorization issued thereunder has occurred, is
about to occur, or is intended to occur in connection with the item.
Nor may you rely upon any license or License Exception after notice
to you of the suspension or revocation of that license or exception.
There are no License Exceptions to this General Prohibition Ten in
part 740 of the EAR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its January 8, 2023, request for renewal of the TDO, BIS has
provided additional evidence that EMTRASUR's acquisition of MSN 23413
from Mahan Air was in violation of the TDO previously issued against
Mahan Air
[[Page 6232]]
and the Regulations. BIS has also provided evidence that EMTRASUR, in
addition to the Venezuelan government, are actively seeking the return
of the aircraft from Argentina in potential violation of General
Prohibition 10. Specifically, BIS's ongoing investigation has uncovered
evidence that certain of MSN 23413's parts, including spare parts which
appear to be U.S-origin, bear the markings and logos of Mahan and/or
CONVIASA. This evidence further demonstrates that EMTRASUR's
acquisition and operation of the aircraft violated the TDO issued
against Mahan Air; as a result, any attempts by EMTRASUR to operate the
aircraft or to return it to Venezuela, as well as any efforts EMTRASUR
may take to maintain it, would violate General Prohibition 10.
Moreover, BIS's evidence indicates that, after the issuance of the
August 2, 2022 TDO against EMTRASUR, efforts have been affirmatively
undertaken to secure the release of the aircraft from its detention in
Argentina. For instance, on or about August 3, 2022, Nicolas Maduro,
previous president of Venezuela, personally asked for the return of MSN
23413 to Venezuela. BIS's request for a renewal indicates that Maduro
is affirmatively seeking the release of the aircraft and has also sent
others to petition Argentinian authorities for its release.
Additionally, after Argentinian authorities released all of MSN 23413's
crew members, which included both Iranian and Venezuelan citizens,
Venezuelan news media reported that the release of the aircraft is
expected immediately. Any such return of the aircraft to Venezuela, or
operation of it in any manner, would constitute a violation of General
Prohibition 10 because the aircraft was obtained in violation of the
Regulations and the TDO issued against Mahan Air.
Based upon the violations by EMTRASUR, its disregard for the
Regulations and the previously-issued TDO against Mahan Air, and the
potential release of the MSN 23413 from detention, there are concerns
of future violations of the EAR. These concerns are heightened because
any subsequent actions taken with regard to MSN 23413 may violate the
EAR, including, but not limited to, its refueling, maintenance, repair,
or the provision of spare parts or services.
III. Findings
Under the applicable standard set forth in Section 766.24 of the
Regulations and my review of the entire record, I find that the
evidence presented by BIS convincingly demonstrates that EMTRASUR has
acted in violation of the Regulations and the TDO; that such violations
have been significant, deliberate and covert; and that given the
foregoing and the nature of the matters under investigation, there is a
likelihood of imminent violations. Therefore, renewal of the TDO is
necessary in the public interest to prevent imminent violation of the
Regulations and to give notice to companies and individuals in the
United States and abroad that they should avoid dealing with EMTRASUR
in connection with export and reexport transactions involving items
subject to the Regulations and in connection with any other activity
subject to the Regulations.
This Order is being issued on an ex parte basis without a hearing
based upon BIS's showing of an imminent violation in accordance with
Section 766.24 and 766.23(b) of the Regulations.
IV. Order
It is therefore ordered:
First, Empresa de Transporte A[eacute]reocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a
Aerocargo del Sur Transportation Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR, Avenida
Intercomunal, Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3, Maiquetia, Distrito Federal,
Venezuela, and Avenida Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso 49, Libertador, Caracas,
Venezuela, and when acting for or on its behalf, any successors or
assigns, agents, or employees may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR
including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license (except directly
related to safety of flight), license exception, or export control
document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR except directly related to
safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2)
of the Regulations, or engaging in any other activity subject to the
EAR except directly related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS
pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the EAR, or from any other activity subject to the EAR except directly
related to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) to or on behalf of
EMTRASUR any item subject to the EAR except directly related to safety
of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the
Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by EMTRASUR of the ownership, possession, or control of any
item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from the
United States, including financing or other support activities related
to a transaction whereby EMTRASUR acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control except directly related to safety of
flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section 764.3(a)(2) of the
Regulations;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from EMTRASUR of any item subject to the EAR
that has been exported from the United States except directly related
to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations;
D. Obtain from EMTRASUR in the United States any item subject to
the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the United States except directly related
to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is
owned, possessed or controlled by EMTRASUR, or service any item, of
whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by EMTRASUR if
such service involves the use of any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the United States except directly related
to safety of flight and authorized by BIS pursuant to Section
764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification, or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to EMTRASUR by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the
conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order.
[[Page 6233]]
In accordance with the provisions of Sections 766.24(e) of the EAR,
EMTRASUR may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR,
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not
later than 20 days before the expiration date. A renewal request may be
opposed by EMTRASUR as provided in Section 766.24(d), by filing a
written submission with the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement, which must be received not later than seven days before
the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided to EMTRASUR and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect for
180 days.
Dated: January 26, 2023.
Matthew S. Axelrod,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023-01984 Filed 1-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P