Notice of Extension of Temporary Suspension of Dogs Entering the United States From Countries With a High Risk of Rabies, 5348-5357 [2023-01688]
Download as PDF
5348
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
30329–4027; Telephone: 404–639–6270;
Email: CDCeval@cdc.gov.
On
November 29, 2022, CDC published a
notice requesting public comment and
suggestions to update the CDC
Evaluation Framework (87 FR 73311).
The comment period was scheduled to
close on January 30, 2023. CDC has
received requests from the public to
extend the comment period. With this
notice, CDC is extending the comment
period through February 17, 2023, to
accommodate those requests. Comments
received after February 17, 2023, will
not be considered.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Background
The flexibility and simplicity of the
CDC Evaluation Framework have led to
its wide adoption and use beyond CDC
and public health. The CDC Evaluation
Framework has guided CDC and other
evaluators over two decades, as
evidenced by more than 300 citations in
peer-reviewed articles and use in
projects reaching more than 50
countries on six continents. However,
evaluation has evolved since
publication of the framework in 1999; 1
therefore, CDC seeks to update the
framework to align with changes in
evaluation, public health, and federal
policies and practices.
The comments from this request for
information, along with input gathered
through other mechanisms (e.g.,
townhall with CDC, interviews with key
federal evaluators, surveys with federal
evaluation staff and leaders), will help
identify how the framework may have
been adapted and used in different
settings, what aspects of the framework
have been useful, any challenges in
using the framework across different
contexts, and gaps that may need to be
addressed. CDC is gathering input from
a variety of audiences, such as federal
evaluators, CDC staff, and CDC funded
partners. Feedback from these sources
will be considered in determining
priority areas to update and revise in the
CDC Evaluation Framework to continue
its valuable use and service to the
evaluation field and public health. The
relevant feedback along with tools,
evidence, and resources in the field and
literature will also be considered in
determining whether to update, revise,
or create new content for the CDC
Evaluation Framework and supporting
resources (e.g., checklists, tools).
1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Framework for program evaluation in public health.
MMWR 1999;48 (No. RR–11).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
Request for Information
Interested persons or organizations
are invited to submit written views,
information, and recommendations.
CDC invites comments specifically on
the following questions, along with
suggestions for improving the CDC
Evaluation Framework:
1. How has the current CDC
Evaluation Framework assisted or not
assisted the public health community in
planning and conducting high-quality
program evaluations? What specifically
helped or did not help?
2. Which contexts has the current
CDC Evaluation Framework worked
well for and for which contexts has it
not worked well? What specifically did
or did not work and why?
3. How does the current CDC
Evaluation Framework promote or
inhibit the conduct of evaluations that
are culturally responsive and address
health equity? What opportunities for
improvement exist?
Please be clear and specific in the
comments so that CDC can consider the
feedback provided in determining
whether to change or keep specific
aspects of the CDC Evaluation
Framework. The CDC Evaluation
Framework and associated resources
can be found here in the Supporting
Materials tab of the docket and at
https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/
framework/index.htm.
Please note that comments received,
including attachments and other
supporting materials, are part of the
public record and are subject to public
disclosure. Comments will be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
do not include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure. If
you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be on
public display. CDC will review all
submissions and may choose to redact,
or withhold submissions containing
private or proprietary information such
as Social Security numbers, medical
information, inappropriate language, or
duplicate/near duplicate examples of a
mass-mail campaign.
Tiffany Brown,
Acting Executive Secretary, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023–01695 Filed 1–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Notice of Extension of Temporary
Suspension of Dogs Entering the
United States From Countries With a
High Risk of Rabies
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), within
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), announces an extension
of the current temporary suspension of
the importation into the United States of
dogs from high-risk rabies-enzootic
countries (high-risk countries). This
suspension includes dogs that have
been in any high-risk countries during
the previous six months.
DATES: The extension of the temporary
suspension of the importation of dogs
into the United States from high-risk
countries will be implemented on
February 1, 2023, when the current
suspension expires, and will remain in
effect through July 31, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley C. Altenburger, J.D., Division of
Global Migration and Quarantine,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS
H16–4, Atlanta, GA 30329. Telephone:
1–800–232–4636. For information
regarding CDC regulations for the
importation of dogs: Dr. Emily Pieracci,
D.V.M., Division of Global Migration
and Quarantine, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, MS H16–4, Atlanta, GA
30329. Telephone: 1–800–232–4636.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CDC is
extending, but not modifying, the terms
of the current temporary suspension. A
suspension remains necessary to protect
the public’s health against the
reintroduction of the dog-maintained
rabies virus variant (DMRVV) into the
United States. There is a continued
threat posed by unvaccinated or
inadequately vaccinated dogs from highrisk countries due to various factors.
These include insufficient veterinary
controls in high-risk countries to
prevent the export of inadequately
vaccinated dogs, and veterinary supply
chain and workforce capacity shortages
that have persisted since the global
COVID–19 pandemic. These factors
result in challenges to efforts to ensure
dogs imported into the United States do
not pose a public health threat. CDC
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
I. Background and Authority
Rabies, one of the deadliest zoonotic
diseases, accounts for an estimated
59,000 human deaths globally each
year.1 This equates to one human death
every nine minutes.2 DMRVV is
responsible for 98 percent of these
deaths.2 The rabies virus can infect any
mammal, and once clinical signs
appear, the disease is almost always
fatal.3 In September 2007, at the
Inaugural World Rabies Day
Symposium, CDC declared the United
States to be free of DMRVV.4 However,
DMRVV is still a serious public health
threat in the more than 100 countries
where it remains enzootic. Preventing
the entry of animals infected with
DMRVV into the United States is a
public health priority.
Under section 361 of the Public
Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42 U.S.C.
264), the Secretary of Health and
Human Services may make and enforce
such regulations as in the Secretary’s
judgment are necessary to prevent the
introduction, transmission, or spread of
communicable diseases from foreign
countries into the United States and
from one state or possession into any
other state or possession.5 Such
regulations may provide for inspection,
fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest
extermination, destruction of animals or
articles found to be sources of
dangerous infection to human beings,
and other measures. Under section 362
of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 265), the
Secretary, and by delegation the
Director of CDC (CDC Director),6 may
prohibit entries and imports from
foreign countries into the United States
‘‘in whole or in part’’ if there is a serious
risk of introducing communicable
disease and when required in the
interest of public health.
Under 42 CFR 71.51, all dogs
admitted into the United States must be
accompanied by a valid rabies
vaccination certificate,7 unless the dogs’
owners or importers submit satisfactory
evidence that dogs under six months of
age have not been in a high-risk country
or dogs older than six months have not
been in a high-risk country for the six
months before arrival.8 CDC maintains a
publicly available list of high-risk
countries 9 and provides guidance for
dog entry requirements based on the
dog’s country of origin.
CDC subject matter experts review
publicly available data and conduct an
annual assessment to determine which
countries have high risk of DMRVV.10
This assessment considers the following
factors: presence or prevalence of
domestically acquired cases of DMRVV
in humans and animals; efforts towards
control of DMRVV in dogs (such as dog
vaccination coverage, dog population
management, and existence and
enforcement of legal codes to limit
rabies transmission in dogs); and the
quality of rabies surveillance systems,
rate of testing, and laboratory capacity.
If data are not available, the most
conservative determination is applied,
and the country is not considered to
have a robust rabies control program. If
a country has provided additional
substantial data to support a DMRVVfree or low-risk status, CDC can review
that information and re-assess the
country’s status.
Under 42 CFR 71.51(e), dogs may be
subject to ‘‘additional requirements as
may be deemed necessary’’ or ‘‘to
exclusion if coming from areas which
the [CDC] Director has determined to
have high rates of rabies.’’ Based on the
previously described criteria, CDC
1 World Health Organization (2018). WHO Expert
Consultation on Rabies (WHO Technical Report
Series 1012). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/
publications/i/item/WHO-TRS-1012.
2 Id.
3 Fooks, A.R., Banyard, A.C., Horton, D.L.,
Johnson, N., McElhinney, L.M., and Jackson, A.C.
(2014) Current status of rabies and prospects for
elimination. Lancet, 384(9951), 1389–1399. doi:
10.1016/S0140–6736(13)62707–5.
4 Velasco-Villa, A., Mauldin, M., Shi, M., Escobar,
L., Gallardo-Romero, N., Damon, I., Emerson, G.
(2017) The history of rabies in the Western
Hemisphere. Antiviral Res, 146, 221–232.
doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.013.
5 Although the statute assigns authority to the
Surgeon General, all statutory powers and functions
of the Surgeon General were transferred to the
Secretary of HHS in 1966, 31 FR 8855, 80 Stat. 1610
(June 25, 1966), see also Public Law 96–88, 509(b),
October 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695 (codified at 20 U.S.C.
3508(b)). The Secretary has retained these
authorities despite the reestablishment of the Office
of the Surgeon General in 1987.
6 See 42 CFR 71.51(e), 71.63.
7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2022). What is a valid rabies vaccination
certificate? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-unitedstates/vaccine-certificate.html.
8 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2019). Guidance Regarding Agency Interpretation
of ‘‘Rabies-Free’’ as It Relates to the Importation of
Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register, Vol.
84,724–730. Retrieved from https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/
2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agencyinterpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-theimportation-of-dogs.
9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2022). What is a valid rabies vaccination
certificate? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-unitedstates/rabies-vaccine.html.
10 Henry RE, Blanton JD, Angelo KM, Pieracci EG,
Stauffer K, Jentes ES, Allen J, Glynn M, Brown CM,
Friedman CR, Wallace R. A country classification
system to inform rabies prevention guidelines and
regulations. J Travel Med. 2022 Jul 14;29(4):taac046.
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac046. PMID: 35348741.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
anticipates that these factors are likely
to continue through July 31, 2023.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5349
determined that high-risk countries
constitute areas that have high rates of
DMRVV, and dogs imported from these
countries are thus subject to additional
requirements and/or exclusion.11
Under 42 CFR 71.63, CDC may also
temporarily suspend the entry of
animals, articles, or things from
designated foreign countries and places
into the United States when it
determines there exists in a foreign
country a communicable disease that
threatens the public health of the United
States and the entry of imports from that
country increases the risk that the
communicable disease may be
introduced. When such a suspension is
issued, CDC designates the period of
time or conditions under which imports
into the United States are suspended.
CDC likewise determined that DMRVV
exists in countries designated as highrisk countries and that, if reintroduced
into the United States, DMRVV would
threaten the public health of the United
States.
Based on these legal authorities and
determinations, on June 16, 2021,12 CDC
announced a temporary suspension of
the importation of dogs from high-risk
countries into the United States (86 FR
32041) (the temporary suspension). The
temporary suspension went into effect
on July 14, 2021. CDC issued the
temporary suspension to protect the
public health against the reintroduction
of DMRVV into the United States at a
time when resources were being
diverted to the agency-wide response to
the global COVID–19 pandemic.
At the time the temporary suspension
was issued, CDC noted an increase in
importers circumventing dog import
regulations. Despite a decrease in
international travel volumes due to the
global COVID–19 pandemic, there was a
52 percent increase in dogs ineligible for
entry in 2020 as compared to 2018 and
2019. Additionally, four rabid dogs were
imported into the United States between
2015 and 2021.
The limited availability of public
health resources due to the
unprecedented global response to the
COVID–19 pandemic resulted in
reduced capacity at the Federal, state,
and local levels to address the increased
risk of the reintroduction of DMRVV.
For these reasons, CDC implemented a
temporary suspension prohibiting the
11 Henry RE, Blanton JD, Angelo KM, Pieracci EG,
Stauffer K, Jentes ES, Allen J, Glynn M, Brown CM,
Friedman CR, Wallace R. A country classification
system to inform rabies prevention guidelines and
regulations. J Travel Med. 2022 Jul 14;29(4):taac046.
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac046. PMID: 35348741.
12 Temporary Suspension of Dogs Entering the
United States from High-Risk Rabies Countries.
Federal Register, 86 FR 32041, June 16, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
5350
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
importation of dogs from high-risk
countries for rabies in July 2021. In
addition, CDC implemented a CDC Dog
Import Permit 13 [(OMB Control Number
0920–0134 Foreign Quarantine
Regulations (exp. 12/31/2022), or as
revised] during the temporary
suspension to verify the documentation
of imported dogs before they are flown
to the United States.
On June 10, 2022, CDC modified and
extended the temporary suspension
through January 31, 2023.14 Per the
Federal Register notice announcing the
extension and modification of the
temporary suspension, all categories of
importers are currently eligible to
import dogs from high-risk countries.
Commercially imported dogs are
required to enter the United States at a
port of entry with a live animal care
facility 15 with a Facilities Information
and Resource Management System
(FIRMS) code issued by U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP). CDC also
expanded the list of the approved ports
of entry to include 18 airports 16 with a
CDC quarantine station for importers
with a valid U.S.-issued rabies
vaccination certificate or a CDC Dog
Import Permit.
Prior to modifying and extending the
temporary suspension on June 10, 2022,
CDC also evaluated the latest scientific
information on rabies serologic titer test
results. Based on this evaluation, CDC
reduced the waiting period requirement,
which is the number of days between
when a dog’s sample is taken for a
serologic titer test and when the dog can
be imported into the United States, from
90 days to 45 days.
Lastly, the June 10, 2022, extension
and modification of the temporary
suspension allowed importers whose
dogs are at least six months old, have a
microchip, and have a valid U.S.-issued
rabies vaccination certificate to enter the
United States without a CDC Dog Import
Permit at one of the 18 airports with a
CDC quarantine station provided the
dog appears healthy upon arrival. CDC
made this change because of the
reliability of the United States’ rabies
vaccine supply and to ease the burden
on these importers.
At this time, CDC is extending the
temporary suspension through July 31,
14 87
FR 33158 (June 1, 2022).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
15 https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-
animal-into-the-united-states/approved-carefacilities.html.
16 The 18 approved ports of entry are: Anchorage
(ANC), Atlanta (ATL), Boston (BOS), Chicago
(ORD), Dallas (DFW), Detroit (DTW), Honolulu
(HNL), Houston (IAH), Los Angeles (LAX), Miami
(MIA), Minneapolis (MSP), New York (JFK),
Newark (EWR), Philadelphia (PHL), San Francisco
(SFO), San Juan (SJU), Seattle (SEA), and
Washington DC (IAD).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
2023, because of the continued risk for
the reintroduction of DMRVV into the
United States. This extension is based
on the disruption of rabies vaccination
campaigns globally that occurred due to
the COVID–19 pandemic. Since CDC
anticipates the timeline needed for
global vaccination campaigns to recover
will extend through July 31, 2023, the
risk of a rabid dog being imported into
the United States is increased during
that time. Additionally, constraints on
the global veterinary workforce capacity
and veterinary supply chain shortages
that were exacerbated by the COVID–19
pandemic have led to delayed or
disrupted care for dogs, which increases
the likelihood dogs imported into the
United States may pose a public health
threat.17 18 19 20 Federal, state and local
public health partners continue to
respond to the global COVID–19
pandemic, which remains a Public
Health Emergency of International
Concern according to the World Health
Organization (WHO) 21 and a U.S.
public health emergency per the HHS
declaration.22 An imported rabid dog
would potentially divert limited public
health resources away from other
critical ongoing public health responses.
CDC will regularly review the terms of
this notice to ensure that the terms
remain necessary and that importers are
not overly burdened while the public
health of the United States remains
protected from the reintroduction of
DMRVV. In conducting this review,
CDC will consider high-risk countries’
rabies control programs, the latest
scientific data, and international
recommendations for rabies control.
Additionally, CDC previously
announced that it is developing a
proposed rule that will outline
requirements regarding an importation
system to reduce fraud and improve the
U.S. government’s ability to verify U.S.
entry requirements and mitigate the
17 https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/
2022/07/not-enough-veterinarians-animals/
661497/.
18 https://www.agcanada.com/2021/07/is-theveterinarian-shortage-real-or-regional#:∼:text=A
%20perceived%20global%20shortage%20of
%20veterinarians%20is%20creating,for%20
the%20quality%20of%20care%20
they%20can%20offer.
19 https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.
com/report/companion-animal-veterinary-vaccinesglobal-market-report.
20 https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/pets/aussie-dogowners-warned-of-national-vaccine-shortage-asdeadly-bacterial-disease-spreads-c-8568550.
21 https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/19-102022-statement-on-the-thirteenth-meeting-of-theinternational-health-regulations-(2005)-emergencycommittee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease(covid-19)-pandemic.
22 https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PHE/Pages/covid1913Oct2022.aspx.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
introduction of dogs infected with
rabies and other communicable diseases
of public health concern.23
Development of this proposed rule is
ongoing.
II. Public Health Rationale
A. Dog Importation Into the United
States
The United States was declared
DMRVV-free in 2007. Importing dogs
from high-risk countries involves a
significant public health risk. The
importation of just one dog infected
with DMRVV risks re-introduction of
the virus into the United States,
resulting in a potential public health
risk with consequent monetary cost and
potential loss of human and animal
life.24 25 26 DMRVV has been highly
successful at adapting to new host
species, particularly wildlife.27 One
DMRVV-infected dog could result in
transmission to humans, domestic pets,
or wildlife. In 2019, the importation of
a single dog with rabies cost more than
$400,000 for the public health
investigations and rabies post-exposure
prophylaxis (PEP) of exposed
persons.28 29 To mitigate the risk of
importing dogs with DMRVV, CDC
requires compliance with its public
health entry requirements.
Although the U.S. Government does
not track the total number of dogs
imported each year, it is estimated that
approximately 1 million dogs are
imported into the United States
annually, of which 100,000 dogs are
23 See https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
eAgendaViewRule?pubId=202204&RIN=0920AA82.
24 World Bank (2012). People, Pathogens and Our
Planet: The Economics of One Health. Retrieved
from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/
10986/11892.
25 Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed,
F., Moore, S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies
in a dog imported from Egypt-Kansas, 2019.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374–1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
26 Jeon, S., Cleaton, J., Meltzer, M., Kahn, E.,
Pieracci, E., Blanton, J., Wallace, R. (2019).
Determining the post-elimination level of
vaccination needed to prevent re-establishment of
dog rabies. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases,
13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pntd.0007869.
27 Velasco-Villa, A., Mauldin, M., Shi, M.,
Escobar, L., Gallardo-Romero, N., Damon, I.,
Emerson, G. (2017). The history of rabies in the
Western Hemisphere. Antiviral Research, 146, 221–
232.doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.013.
28 Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed,
F., Moore, S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies
in a dog imported from Egypt-Kansas, 2019.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374–1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
29 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2022). Rabies Postexposure Prophylaxis. Retrieved
from https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/medical_care/
index.html.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
from high-risk countries.30 This
estimate was based on information
provided by airlines, CBP staff, and a
study conducted at a U.S.-Mexico land
border crossing.31
CBP does record, by country, the
number of dogs imported with formal
entry under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule (HTS) code 0106199120 and
HTS description: Other live animals,
other, dogs. The total number of dogs
imported into the United States from all
countries under this HTS category
varied from 25,232 in 2018 to 58,540 in
2020. The number of dogs from highrisk countries under this HTS category
averaged 16,390 per year and varied
from 9,966 to 24,031 over this three-year
period. The number of dogs reported
under this HTS category does not
include dogs imported as checked
baggage, hand-carried in airplane
cabins, or crossing at land borders
without formal entry. Thus, the number
underestimates the true number of dogs
imported into the United States.
Since 2015, there have been four
known rabid dogs imported into the
United States. All four dogs were
imported by rescue organizations for the
purposes of adoption. These four cases,
discussed below, highlight the immense
public health resources required to
investigate, respond to, and mitigate the
public health threat posed by the
importation of a rabid dog.
In 2015, a rabid dog was part of a
group of eight dogs and 27 cats
imported from Egypt by a rescue group.
The dog had an unhealed leg fracture
and began showing signs of rabies four
days after arrival. Following the rabies
diagnosis, the rescue workers in Egypt
admitted that the dog’s rabies
vaccination certificate had been
intentionally falsified to evade CDC
entry requirements.32 Eighteen people
were recommended to receive rabies
PEP, seven dogs underwent a six-month
quarantine, and eight additional dogs
housed in the same home as the rabid
30 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2019). Guidance Regarding Agency Interpretation
of ‘‘Rabies-Free’’ as It Relates to the Importation of
Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register, Vol.
84, 724–730. Retrieved from https://www.federal
register.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/
guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabiesfree-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
31 McQuiston, J.H., Wilson, T., Harris, S., Bacon,
R.M., Shapiro, S., Trevino, J., Marano, N. (2008.)
Importation of dogs into the United States: risks
from rabies and other zoonotic diseases. Zoonoses
Public Health, 55(8–10), 421–6. doi:10.1111/j.1863–
2378.2008.01117.
32 Sinclair J., Wallace, R., Gruszynski K., Bibbs
Freeman, M., Campbell, C., Semple, S., Murphy, J.
(2015). Rabies in a dog imported from Egypt with
a falsified rabies vaccination certificate—Virginia.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64, 1359–
62. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6449a2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
dog had to receive rabies booster
vaccinations and undergo a 45-day
monitoring period.
In 2017, a ‘‘flight parent’’ (a person
typically solicited through social media,
often not affiliated with the rescue
organization, and usually compensated
with an airline ticket) imported four
dogs on behalf of a rescue organization.
One of the dogs appeared agitated at the
airport and bit the flight parent prior to
the flight. A U.S. veterinarian examined
the dog one day after its arrival and then
euthanized and tested the dog for rabies.
A post-mortem rabies test showed that
the dog was positive for the virus.
Public health officials recommended
that at least four people receive rabies
PEP, and the remaining three dogs
underwent quarantine periods ranging
from 30 days to six months. An
investigation revealed the possibility of
falsified rabies vaccination
documentation presented on entry to
the United States.33
In 2019, a rescue group imported 26
dogs, all of which had rabies
vaccination certificates and serologic
documentation, indicating the
development of rabies antibodies (in
response to immunization), based on
results from an Egyptian Governmentaffiliated rabies laboratory. However,
one dog developed signs of rabies three
weeks after arrival and had to be
euthanized. The dog tested positive for
rabies. Forty-four people received PEP,
and the 25 dogs imported on the same
flight underwent re-vaccination and
quarantines of four to six months. An
additional 12 dogs had contact with the
rabid dog and had to be re-vaccinated
and undergo quarantine periods ranging
from 45 days to six months based on
their previous vaccination status.34
On June 10, 2021, shortly before CDC
published the temporary suspension, 33
dogs were imported into the United
States from Azerbaijan by a rescue
organization. All dogs had rabies
vaccination certificates that appeared
valid upon arrival in the United States.
One dog developed signs of rabies three
days after arrival and was euthanized.
CDC confirmed the dog was infected
with a variant of DMRVV known to
circulate in the Caucus Mountain region
of Azerbaijan. The remaining rescue
animals exposed to the rabid dog during
33 Hercules, Y., Bryant, N., Wallace, R., Nelson,
R., Palumbo, G., Williams, J., Brown, C. (2018).
Rabies in a dog imported from Egypt—Connecticut,
2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 67,
1388–91. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6750a3.
34 Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed,
F., Moore, S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies
in a dog imported from Egypt-Kansas, 2019.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374–1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5351
travel were dispersed across nine states,
leading to what is believed to be the
largest, multi-state, imported rabid dog
investigation in U.S. history.35
Eighteen people received PEP to
prevent rabies as a result of exposure to
this one rabid dog. Post-vaccination
serologic monitoring of the remaining
dogs and the public health investigation
revealed that improper vaccination
practices by the veterinarian in
Azerbaijan likely contributed to the
inadequate vaccination response
documented in 48 percent of the
imported animals, including the rabid
dog.36 The 33 exposed animals were
placed in quarantine periods ranging
from 45 days to six months based on
individual serologic titer test results and
local jurisdictional requirements.37
CDC estimates that costs for public
health investigations and subsequent
cost of care for people exposed to rabid
dogs range from $220,897 to $521,828
per importation event, as summarized in
an economic analysis found on CDC’s
website.38 39 40 This cost estimate does
not account for the worst-case
outcomes, which include: (1)
transmission of rabies to a person who
dies from the disease; and (2) ongoing
transmission to other domestic animals
and wildlife species in the United
States. A previous campaign to
eliminate domestic dog-coyote rabies
virus variant jointly with gray fox
(Texas fox) rabies virus variant in Texas
over the period from 1995 through 2003
cost $34 million,41 42 or $48 million in
35 Whitehill F, Bonaparte S, Hartloge C, et al.
Rabies in a Dog Imported from AzerbaijanPennsylvania, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2022; 71: 686–689.
36 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2021). CDC responds to a case of rabies in an
imported dog. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
worldrabiesday/disease-detectives/rabies-importeddog.html.
37 Whitehill F, Bonaparte S, Hartloge C, et al.
Rabies in a Dog Imported from AzerbaijanPennsylvania, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2022; 71: 686–689.
38 Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed,
F., Moore, S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies
in a dog imported from Egypt-Kansas, 2019. MMWR
Morb Mort Wkly Rep, 69(38), 1374–1377. Retrieved
from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/
pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
39 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2019). Guidance Regarding Agency Interpretation
of ‘‘Rabies-Free’’ as It Relates to the Importation of
Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register, Vol.
84, 724–730. Retrieved from https://www.federal
register.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/
guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabiesfree-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
40 https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-ananimal-into-the-united-states/vaccinecertificate.html.
41 Thomas, S., Wilson, P., Moore, G., Oertli, E.,
Hicks, B., Rohde, R., Johnston, D. (2005). Evaluation
of oral rabies vaccination programs for control of
rabies epizootics in coyotes and gray foxes: 1995–
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
Continued
27JAN1
5352
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
2020 U.S. dollars. Re-establishment of
DMRVV into the United States could
result in costly efforts over several years
to eliminate the virus again.
B. Ongoing COVID–19 Response
Activities
Since January 2020, public health
resources globally have been dedicated
to responding to the COVID–19
pandemic, which remains a public
health emergency as declared by the
HHS Secretary and a Public Health
Emergency of International Concern as
declared by WHO. This context caused
a lapse in canine rabies vaccination
efforts in high-risk countries.43 44 In the
United States, the public health
response to combatting the emergence of
SARS–CoV–2 variants has required
sustained Federal, state, and local
public health resources.
The importation of a rabid dog on
June 10, 2021, diverted public health
resources from CDC, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), and
nine states away from critical COVID–19
response activities. Any increase in the
number of dogs with inadequate or
falsified rabies vaccination certificates
arriving in the United States increases
the likelihood of a DMRVV-importation
event and threatens the diversion of
critical public health resources.45
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
C. Insufficient Canine Vaccination Rates
and Veterinary Controls in High-Risk
Countries To Prevent the Export of
Inadequately Vaccinated Dogs
Historically, approximately 60 to 70
percent of CDC’s dog entry denials (or
about 200 cases annually) have been
based on fraudulent, incomplete, or
inaccurate paperwork.46 This number is
2003. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine
Association, 227(5), 785–92. doi: 10.2460/
javma.2005.227.785.
42 Sterner, R., Meltzer, M., Shwiff, S., Slate, D.
(2009). Tactics and Economics of Wildlife Oral
Rabies Vaccination, Canada and the United States.
Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15(8), 1176–1184.
doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081061.
43 Kunkel, A., Jeon, S., Joseph, H., Dilius, P.,
Crowdis, K., Meltzer, M., Wallace, R. (2021). The
urgency of resuming disrupted dog rabies
vaccination campaigns: a modeling and costeffectiveness analysis. Scientific Reports, 11, 12476.
doi:10.1038/s41598–021–92067–5.
44 Raynor, B., Dı
´az, E., Shinnick, J., Zegarra, E.,
Monroy, Y., Mena. C., . . . Castillo-Neyra, R.(2021).
The impact of the COVID–19 pandemic on rabies
reemergence in Latin America: The case of
Arequipa, Peru. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases,
15(5), e0009414. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009414.
45 Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R.,
Kalapura, C., Brown, C. U.S. dog importations
during the COVID–19 pandemic: Do we have an
erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0254287.
46 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2021). Quarantine Activity Reporting System
(version 4.9.8.8.2.2A). Dog Importation data, 2010–
2019. Accessed 1 October 2022.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
less than one percent of dog
importations. However, between
January and December 2020 (i.e., during
the global COVID–19 pandemic), CDC
documented more than 450 instances of
incomplete, inadequate, or fraudulent
rabies vaccination certificates for dogs
arriving from high-risk countries. This
number increased for the first six
months of 2021, during which time CDC
documented more than 560 instances of
incomplete, inadequate, or fraudulent
rabies vaccination certificates for dogs
arriving from high-risk countries.47
These cases resulted in dogs being
denied entry into the United States and
ultimately returned to their country of
origin.
During the global COVID–19
pandemic, canine rabies vaccination
campaigns were suspended in many
high-risk countries, which resulted in
an increase in canine and human rabies
cases.48 49 The pause in canine
vaccination campaigns and the delay in
re-establishing pre-COVID rabies
vaccination rates in dogs in many highrisk countries, combined with
insufficient veterinary controls in place
to prevent the exportation of
inadequately vaccinated dogs with
fraudulent rabies vaccination
certificates, presents a significant public
health risk.
A survey of global, regional, national,
and local rabies working partners from
the network of the United Against
Rabies Forum 50 and rabies practitioners
found that the global COVID–19
pandemic impacted rabies control
efforts in many high-risk countries
during 2020. The study authors reported
that dog vaccinations were administered
as planned in just four percent of the
countries for which data were available.
Around half of respondents reported
47 Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R.,
Kalapura, C., Brown, C. U.S. dog importations
during the COVID–19 pandemic: Do we have an
erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0254287.
48 Kunkel, A., Jeon, S., Joseph, H., Dilius, P.,
Crowdis, K., Meltzer, M., Wallace, R. (2021). The
urgency of resuming disrupted dog rabies
vaccination campaigns: a modeling and costeffectiveness analysis. Scientific Reports, 11, 12476.
doi:10.1038/s41598–021–92067–5.
49 Raynor, B., Dı
´az, E., Shinnick, J., Zegarra, E.,
Monroy, Y., Mena. C., . . . Castillo-Neyra, R.(2021).
The impact of the COVID–19 pandemic on rabies
reemergence in Latin America: The case of
Arequipa, Peru. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases,
15(5), e0009414. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009414.
50 A forum supported by the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the
World Organisation for Animal Health, and the
World Health Organization (the Tripartite), which
takes a multi-sectoral, One Health approach
bringing together governments, vaccine producers,
researchers, non-governmental organizations and
development partners to end human deaths from
dog-mediated rabies.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that funds for rabies control were
diverted to global COVID–19 activities.
However, even in countries where funds
were not diverted, it was reported that
funding for rabies control was
insufficient and unpredictable even
before the global COVID–19 pandemic.
Among respondents who reported
diversion of rabies control funds to
global COVID–19 responses, they
reported that animal rabies vaccines and
dog vaccination campaigns were often
the first rabies control activities to be
cut.51
Additionally, there are global
veterinary workforce capacity and
veterinary supply chain shortages,
exacerbated by the COVID–19
pandemic, that have led to delayed or
disrupted care for dogs (and other pets)
globally. The lack of veterinarians,
veterinary technicians, and other animal
care staff who are available to provide
care for dogs prior to travel, combined
with a lack of veterinary supplies such
as drugs and vaccines, increase the
likelihood dogs imported into the
United States may pose a public health
threat.52 53 54 55
D. Potentially Unsafe Conditions for
Dogs Arriving From High-Risk Countries
Without Appropriate Rabies
Vaccination Certificates
Prior to the implementation of the
suspension, dogs arriving from high-risk
countries without appropriate rabies
vaccination certificates were denied
entry and returned to the country of
origin on the next available flight.56
Airlines were required to house dogs
awaiting return to their country of origin
51 Nadal D, Abela-Ridder B, Beeching S,
Cleaveland S, Cronin K, Steenson R and Hampson
K (2022). The Impact of the First Year of the
COVID–19 Pandemic on Canine Rabies Control
Efforts: A Mixed-Methods Study of Observations
About the Present and Lessons for the Future. Front
Trop Dis 3:866811.doi: 10.3389/fitd.2022.866811.
52 https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/
2022/07/not-enough-veterinarians-animals/
661497/.
53 https://www.agcanada.com/2021/07/is-theveterinarian-shortage-real-orregional#:∼:text=A%20perceived%20
global%20shortage%20of%20veterinarians%20
is%20creating,for%20the%20quality%20of%20
care%20they%20can%20offer.
54 https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.
com/report/companion-animal-veterinary-vaccinesglobal-market-report.
55 https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/pets/aussie-dogowners-warned-of-national-vaccine-shortage-asdeadly-bacterial-disease-spreads-c-8568550.
56 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2019). Guidance Regarding Agency Interpretation
of ‘‘Rabies-Free’’ as It Relates to the Importation of
Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register, Vol.
84 724–730. Retrieved from https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/
2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agencyinterpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-theimportation-of-dogs.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
at a facility that meets the USDA’s
Animal Welfare Act standards,
preferably a live animal care facility
with an active custodial bond and a
FIRMS code issued by CBP. If a live
animal care facility with a CBP-issued
FIRMS code was not available, the
airline was required, at a minimum, to
provide accommodation meeting the
USDA’s Animal Welfare Act
standards.57
Some airlines housed dogs in cargo
warehouses that created an unsafe
environment for dogs due to the
prolonged periods of time between
flights, inadequate cooling and heating,
poor cleaning and sanitization of crates,
and inability to physically separate the
animals from areas of the warehouse
where other equipment, machinery, and
goods are used and stored. Cargo
warehouse staff who are not trained to
house, clean, and care for live animals
with appropriate personal protective
equipment were at risk of bites,
scratches, and exposures to potentially
infectious bodily fluids from dogs left in
cargo warehouses.
During 2020, due to the global
COVID–19 pandemic, there were fewer
international flights worldwide,58 59
resulting in delayed returns for dogs
denied entry. While international flights
in 2022 increased compared to 2020–
2021, the number of flights remained
somewhat below pre-pandemic levels
with uncertainty regarding how quickly
international passenger traffic will fully
recover to pre-pandemic levels.60 In
August 2020, a dog denied entry based
on falsified rabies vaccination
certificates later died while in the
custody of an airline at Chicago O’Hare
International Airport. Despite CDC’s
request to find appropriate housing at a
57 U.S. Department of Agriculture (2020). Animal
Welfare Regulations; Part 3, Subpart A:
Transportation Standards. Sections 3.14–3.20.
Retrieved from https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
animal_welfare/downloads/AC_BlueBook_AWA_
508_comp_version.pdf.
58 Josephs, L. (2020). American Airlines cutting
international summer schedule by 60% as
coronavirus drives down demand. CNBC. Retrieved
from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/02/
coronavirus-update-american-airlines-cutssummer-international-flights-by-60percent-asdemand-suffers.html.
59 American Airlines (2020). American Airlines
announces additional schedule changes in response
to customer demand related to COVID–19.
American Airlines Newsroom. Retrieved from
https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2020/
American-Airlines-Announces-AdditionalSchedule-Changes-in-Response-to-CustomerDemand-Related-to-COVID-19-031420-OPS-DIS-03/
default.aspx.
60 International Civil Aviation Organization
(2022). Effects of novel coronavirus (COVID–19) on
civil aviation: economic impact analysis. Retrieved
from https://www.icao.int/sustainability/
Documents/Covid-19/ICAO_coronavirus_Econ_
Impact.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
local kennel or veterinary clinic, the
airline left the dog, along with 17 other
dogs, in a cargo warehouse without food
and water for more than 48 hours.61
While costs associated with housing,
caring for, and returning dogs are the
responsibility of the importer (or airline
if the importer abandons the dog), some
importers and airlines are reluctant to
pay these costs, requiring the U.S.
Government to find appropriate interim
housing facilities and veterinary care.
The cost for housing, care, and returning
improperly vaccinated dogs ranges
between $1,000 and $4,000 per dog,
depending on the location and time
required until the next available return
flight. Because there is no
reimbursement system in place, and
seeking reimbursement is
administratively challenging, the U.S.
Government is left to bear these costs
when airlines and importers do not.
From May through December 2020, CDC
spent more than 3,000 personnel-hours
at an estimated cost of $270,000 to
respond to the attempted importation of
unvaccinated or inadequately
vaccinated dogs from high-risk
countries. The time spent represented a
substantial increase from previous years
due to (1) the increase in dogs with
inadequate documentation; and (2) the
additional time spent identifying
interim accommodations for the dogs
because of the reduced outbound
international flight schedules due to the
pandemic.
During 2020, CDC observed a 52
percent increase (from an average of 300
to 450) in the number of dogs ineligible
for entry compared to 2018 and 2019.62
The trend continued in the first half of
2021 when there was a 24 percent
increase (from 450 to 560) in the
number of dogs ineligible for entry
compared to the whole of 2020.63 From
January 1, 2021, to July 13, 2021, prior
to CDC’s suspension taking effect, there
were 16 sick dogs and 18 dead dogs
reported to CDC upon arrival in the
United States. From July 14, 2021, when
the suspension was implemented, to
September 30, 2022, CDC has denied
entry to 145 dogs, and eight sick dogs
61 CBS Broadcasting (2020). Dog dies at O’Hare
Airport warehouse, 17 others saved after being left
without food or water for 3 days. CBS Chicago.
Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/
news/dog-dies-at-ohare-airport-warehouse-17others-saved-after-being-left-without-food-or-waterfor-3-days.
62 Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R.,
Kalapura, C., Brown, C. U.S. dog importations
during the COVID–19 pandemic: Do we have an
erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0254287.
63 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Quarantine Activity Reporting System (version
4.9.8.8.2.2A). Dog Importation data, January 1,
2021–July 14, 2021. Accessed: 04 January 2022.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5353
and 26 deaths have been reported to
CDC. This substantial decrease in the
number of dogs denied entry since the
implementation of the suspension and
limited number of sick and dead dogs
arriving in the United States has
resulted in an estimated $55,000 to
$190,000 in cost savings to importers
and $3,400 to $170,000 in cost savings
to Federal and state public health and
animal health agencies when comparing
the two periods.
During the timeframe of the current
suspension, the number of dogs denied
entry and the number of sick and dead
dogs has substantially decreased despite
the increased communicable disease
risk due to disruptions to vaccination
programs in high-risk countries and
veterinary supply chain and staffing
shortages worldwide. This constitutes
strong evidence that the suspension has
been effective at preventing the
importation of dogs that present a
communicable disease risk that would
otherwise require significant U.S.
resources to address. There was an
increasing number of dogs denied entry
in 2020 and 2021, prior to the
suspension, and there were fewer
international flights in 2020 and 2021
compared to 2022.64 If the increase in
number of flights in 2022 corresponded
with numbers of dogs denied entry per
flight in 2021 and 2022, lifting the
suspension at this time could result in
a return to pre-suspension or greater
numbers of dogs denied entry along
with an associated large increase of sick,
dead, or inadequately vaccinated dogs
arriving in the United States that could
quickly overwhelm already strained
public health and veterinary healthcare
systems.
Since there remains an elevated level
of risk of a rabid dog being imported
into the United States compared to
before the global COVID–19 pandemic
and because responding to imports of
potentially rabid dogs or dogs with
other communicable illnesses of public
health concern requires significant
veterinary and public health resources,
lifting the suspension would be
unwarranted at this time.
Instead, CDC is extending the
temporary suspension for dogs arriving
into the United States from high-risk
countries. Given that the conditions for
dog importations under the suspension
have prevented the reintroduction of
DMRVV into the United States and have
decreased the number of issues with
imported dogs (suspected fraudulent
64 U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2022)
August 2022 U.S. Airline Traffic Data. https://
www.bts.gov/newsroom/august-2022-us-airlinetraffic-data.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
5354
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
documentation, dogs abandoned by
importers, sick and dead dogs arriving
in the United States) compared to the
period prior to the suspension,
maintaining the current requirements
for dog importation should not result in
an increased need for veterinary and
public health resources to address dog
importation issues.
III. Conditions for Dog Importation
Under the July 10, 2021, Temporary
Suspension
During the temporary suspension of
dogs arriving from countries at high risk
for dog rabies, eligible importers,
including owners of service dogs, U.S.
and foreign-government personnel, and
persons permanently relocating to the
United States, could apply to import
their personally owned pet dogs. People
were also permitted to import dogs for
science, education, exhibition, or bona
fide law enforcement purposes. To
receive a CDC Dog Import Permit,
eligible importers had to provide a
rabies vaccination certificate prior to the
dog arriving in the United States that
met the criteria outlined below, as well
as rabies serologic titers from a CDCapproved laboratory if the dog was
vaccinated outside the United States.
Dogs were also required to be at least six
months of age and have a microchip
implanted prior to arrival in the United
States.
For dogs arriving from high-risk
countries, the rabies vaccination
certificates had to include the following
information to be considered complete
and accurate:
• Name and address of owner;
• Breed, sex, date of birth
(approximate age if date of birth
unknown), color, markings, and other
identifying information for the dog;
• Microchip number;
• Date of rabies vaccination and
vaccine product information;
• Date the vaccination expires; and
• Name, license number, address, and
signature of veterinarian who
administered the vaccination.
For a rabies vaccine to be effective, a
dog must be at least 12 weeks (84 days)
of age at the time of administration. A
dog’s initial vaccine must also be
administered at least four weeks (28
days) before arrival in the United States
for the dog to be considered adequately
vaccinated against rabies.
A. Extension of the Temporary
Suspension Enacted June 10, 2022
On June 10, 2022, CDC extended and
modified the temporary suspension to
allow a pathway for all importers to
import dogs into the United States
utilizing one of the three options listed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
in sections IV–VII below. CDC is now
extending the suspension through July
31, 2023. Although CDC is providing
clarifying language to the entry
requirements in section IV–VI below, it
is not modifying the terms of the current
suspension itself. CDC will be
implementing the use of a standardized
rabies vaccination form to reduce errors
and omissions frequently documented
on rabies vaccination certificates. This
form will not require any new
information to be submitted to CDC but
will assist importers in ensuring the
rabies vaccination form they submit
includes all required information. This
will help to reduce wait times for
importers applying for CDC dog import
permits.
IV. Conditions for Entry of U.S.Vaccinated Dogs During the Extension
Through this notice, CDC is
continuing the current requirements for
entry of U.S.-vaccinated dogs. Dogs
returning to the United States from
high-risk countries with a valid U.S.issued rabies vaccination certificate will
be allowed to enter the United States
without a CDC Dog Import Permit, if the
dog:
• Is six-months of age or older;
• Has an ISO-compatible
microchip; 65
• Arrives at one of 18 CDC-approved
ports of entry with CDC-staffed
quarantine stations; and
• Has a valid U.S. rabies vaccination
certificate documenting that the dog was
vaccinated against rabies by a U.S.licensed veterinarian in the United
States on or after the date the dog was
12 weeks (84 days) of age and at least
four weeks (28 days) before the date of
arrival in the United States if it was the
dog’s first rabies vaccine. The rabies
vaccination certificate must include:
Æ Name and address of owner;
Æ Breed, sex, date of birth
(approximate age if date of birth
unknown), color, markings, and other
identifying information for the dog;
Æ Microchip number;
Æ Date of rabies vaccination and date
next vaccine is due (i.e., date the
vaccination expires);
Æ Vaccine manufacturer, product
name, lot number and product
expiration date; and
Æ Name, license number, address,
and signature of veterinarian who
administered the vaccination.
U.S. veterinarians, at their option,
may choose to include the above
information on the CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record
65 ISO means international standards
organization.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(OMB No. 0920–1383) for U.S.vaccinated dogs prior to traveling
outside the United States, but
completion of the form is not required
for a U.S.-vaccinated dog’s re-entry into
the United States if all other necessary
information has been provided. The
form is available for download online at:
www.cdc.gov/dogpermit.
U.S.-vaccinated dogs with expired
U.S. rabies vaccination certificates must
meet the requirements for foreignvaccinated dogs after being revaccinated
prior to U.S. entry.
There is no limit on the number of
U.S.-vaccinated dogs with valid U.S.issued rabies vaccination certificates
that an importer can import.
These requirements are consistent
with CDC’s practices as of December 1,
2021, and are a continuation of the
terms of the modified temporary
suspension announced in the June 2022
Federal Register notice (87 FR 33158,
June 1, 2022).
V. Conditions for Entry of ForeignVaccinated Dogs With a CDC Dog
Import Permit During the Extension
CDC is continuing to require foreignvaccinated dogs to meet the terms of the
modified temporary suspension
published in the June 2022 Federal
Register notice (87 FR 33158, June 1,
2022). Importers of personal pet dogs
may receive up to two CDC Dog Import
Permits (i.e., permits for two dogs)
during the suspension period.
Commercial importers and personal pet
owners who do not have serologic titer
results for their dogs will also continue
to have an alternate pathway for
importation.
All importers of personal pet dogs
(defined for the purpose of this notice
as owners or importers attempting to
import fewer than three dogs total
during the suspension and not intended
for resale, rescue, or adoption) from
high-risk countries are eligible to apply
for a CDC Dog Import Permit.
Commercial dog importers (defined for
the purpose of this notice as importing
three or more dogs during the
suspension or those being imported for
resale, rescue, or adoption) are not
eligible to apply for a CDC Dog Import
Permit and their dogs must meet the
requirements for entry outlined in
Section VI below.
Foreign-vaccinated dogs arriving from
high-risk countries with a valid CDC
Dog Import Permit will be allowed to
enter the United States if the dogs:
• Are six-months of age or older
(photographs of the dog’s teeth are
required for age verification);
• Have an ISO-compatible microchip;
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
• Have a CDC Rabies Vaccination and
Microchip Record ([approved under
OMB Control Number 0920–1383
Importation Regulations (42 CFR 71
Subpart F) (exp. 1/31/2026, or as
revised)]) completed by the veterinarian
who administered the rabies vaccine.
The record must state that the vaccine
was administered on or after the date
the dog was 12 weeks (84 days) of age.
The record must be in English;
• Have serologic evidence of rabies
vaccination (titer) from an approved
rabies serology laboratory 66 (serologic
titer results ≥0.5 IU/mL are required)
with the sample collected at least 45
days prior to entry and no greater than
365 days before entry; and
• Arrive at one of the 18 CDCapproved ports of entry with CDCstaffed quarantine stations.
In order to reduce the time to review
applications and issue CDC Dog Import
Permits, CDC is requiring that importers
of foreign-vaccinated dogs submit the
rabies vaccination and microchip
information via the form CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record
(OMB No. 0920–1383). As of October
31, 2022, almost half of CDC Dog Import
Permit applicants submitted an
incomplete application with
information pertaining to the rabies
vaccination certificate constituting the
majority of the missing information.
Requiring importers to submit the CDC
Rabies Vaccination and Microchip
Record form will help ensure they
submit all required information and will
reduce the burden on importers by
reducing the time it takes for them to
receive a permit. Additionally, CDC has
included a description on the form to
clarify for veterinarians the information
to which they are attesting when they
sign the form on behalf of an importer.
The form is available for download
online at: www.cdc.gov/dogpermit.
To apply for a CDC Dog Import
Permit, importers whose dogs meet the
entry requirements listed above must
submit the Application for Special
Exemption for a Permitted Dog Import,
[approved under OMB Control Number
0920–1383 Importation Regulations (42
CFR 71 Subpart F) (exp. 1/31/2026), or
as revised]. The permit application is
available online at www.cdc.gov/
dogpermit.
The importer’s application, with all
supporting documentation, must be
submitted at least 30 business days (i.e.,
excluding weekends and U.S. federal
holidays) before the date on which the
66 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2022). Approved Rabies Serology Laboratories for
Testing Dogs. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/
importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-unitedstates/approved-labs.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
dog will enter the United States.
Importers may submit an application
electronically at www.cdc.gov/
dogpermit. An application cannot be
made at the port of entry upon the dogs’
arrival in the United States; dogs that
arrive without a CDC Dog Import Permit
will be returned to their country of
departure on the next available flight or
quarantined at the importer’s expense at
a CDC-approved animal care facility (if
one is available at the port of entry
where the dog arrived) pending
availability and payment of all
associated examination, vaccination,
and quarantine fees upfront (see Section
VI).
Within 10 days of arrival, foreignvaccinated dogs with a CDC Dog Import
Permit must receive a USDA-licensed
rabies booster vaccination administered
by a U.S. veterinarian.
VI. Conditions for Entry of ForeignVaccinated Dogs Without a CDC Dog
Import Permit During the Extension
CDC is continuing the requirements of
the temporary suspension published in
the June 2022 Federal Register notice
(87 FR 33158, June 1, 2022) that provide
a pathway for commercial dog importers
to import dogs. While importers of
commercial shipments of dogs cannot
apply for a CDC Dog Import Permit, a
separate entry process, as outlined
below, has been established. All
commercial dog importers from highrisk countries may import dogs
provided that the dogs, upon entering
the United States, are examined,
revaccinated, and have proof of an
adequate titer from a CDC-approved
laboratory upon arrival or are held in
quarantine at a CDC-approved animal
facility until they meet CDC entry
requirements. Importers of personally
owned pets may also choose to use this
pathway in lieu of obtaining a CDC Dog
Import Permit.
Foreign-vaccinated dogs without a
valid CDC Dog Import Permit must meet
all other entry requirements (sections
VI–VII) prior to arrival and must also
meet the following requirements:
• Dogs must enter at a port of entry
with a CDC-approved animal facility; 67
• Dogs must be six months of age or
older at the time of entry;
• Dogs must have an ISO-compatible
microchip; and
• Dogs must have a CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record
[approved under OMB Control Number
0920–1383 Importation Regulations (42
CFR 71 Subpart F) (exp. 1/31/2026, or
67 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2022). Bringing a dog into the United States.
Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/dogtravel.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5355
as revised)]) completed by the
veterinarian who administered the
rabies vaccine. The record must state
that the vaccine was administered on or
after the date the dog was 12 weeks (84
days) of age. The record must be in
English;
• Importers must provide all required
entry documents (CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record,
serologic titer results if available, photos
of dogs’ teeth) to the CDC-approved
animal care facility at least 10 days
before the dogs’ arrival;
• Importers must arrange for an
examination date and time and reserve
space with a CDC-approved animal
facility;
• Importers must arrange for
transportation by a CBP-bonded
transporter (i.e., provided by the airline
carrier or a CDC-approved animal
facility) to a CDC-approved animal
facility immediately upon the dogs’
arrival to the United States; and
• Dogs must undergo veterinary
examination and revaccination against
rabies at a CDC-approved animal facility
upon arrival at the importer’s expense.
In order to reduce the time for facility
operators to review the documents
required to request a reservation at a
CDC-approved animal care facility, CDC
is requiring that importers of foreignvaccinated dogs submit the rabies
vaccination and microchip information
via the form CDC Rabies Vaccination
and Microchip Record. Requiring
importers to submit the CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record
(OMB NO. 0920–1383) form will help
ensure they submit all required
information and will reduce the burden
on importers and the CDC-approved
animal care facilities by reducing the
time it takes for facility operators to
review all required documents.
Additionally, CDC has included a
description on the form to clarify for
veterinarians that to which they are
attesting when they sign the form for an
importer.
Dogs must also be held at the CDCapproved animal facility until the
following entry requirements are
completed:
• Veterinary health examination by a
USDA-accredited veterinarian for signs
of illness, including zoonotic or foreign
animal diseases. Suspected or
confirmed zoonotic or foreign animal
diseases must be reported to CDC,
USDA, the state or territorial public
health veterinarian, and the state or
territorial veterinarian. The CDCapproved animal care facility must not
release the dog without the written
approval of CDC;
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
5356
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
• Vaccination against rabies with a
USDA-licensed rabies vaccine and
administered by a USDA-accredited
veterinarian;
• Confirmation of microchip number;
• Confirmation of age through dental
examination by a USDA-accredited
veterinarian; and
• Verification of adequate rabies titer
from a CDC-approved laboratory.68
Serologic titer results of ≥0.5IU/mL are
required from a CDC-approved
laboratory, with the sample collected at
least 45 days prior to entry and no
greater than 365 days before entry. Dogs
that arrive without documentation of an
adequate rabies titer from an approved
laboratory must be housed at the CDCapproved animal facility for a 28-day
quarantine at the expense of the
importer following administration of the
U.S. rabies vaccine in addition to
meeting the criteria listed above. Dogs
cannot be released from quarantine
unless all requirements have been met.
Importers are responsible for all fees
associated with the importation of dogs
into the United States, including
transportation, examination,
vaccination, and quarantine fees.
Foreign-vaccinated dogs arriving
without a CDC Dog Import Permit must
enter the United States through a CDCapproved port of entry with a CDCapproved animal care facility. As of
December 2022, these facilities are
located at: Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson
International Airport, John F. Kennedy
International Airport (New York), Los
Angeles International Airport, Miami
International Airport, and Washington
Dulles International Airport (outside
Washington, DC). Importers are
responsible for reserving examination
times and space at the CDC-approved
animal care facility prior to arrival in
the United States. Dogs that arrive at
unapproved ports of entry or without
reservations at a CDC-approved animal
care facility will be denied entry and
returned to the country of departure.
VII. Continued Conditions for All Dogs
From High-Risk Countries During the
Extension
Consistent with the terms of the
original temporary suspension
published in the June 2021 Federal
Register notice (86 FR 32041, June 16,
2021), all dogs arriving from high-risk
countries must be microchipped prior to
arrival in the United States. The
microchip can be administered in any
country and does not need to be a U.S.issued microchip. The microchip
number must be listed on the rabies
vaccination certificate. The microchip
must be ISO-compatible.
Any dog from a high-risk country will
be excluded from entering the United
States and returned to its country of
departure on the next available flight,
regardless of carrier or route, if the dog
arrives under any of the following
circumstances:
• A dog arrives in the United States
and does not meet the minimum prearrival requirements (i.e., age greater
than six months, microchip, and either
valid U.S.-issued rabies vaccination
certificate or complete and accurate
CDC Rabies Vaccination and Microchip
Record);
• A dog presented does not match the
description of the animal listed on the
permit (if required), U.S. rabies
vaccination certificate, or CDC Rabies
Vaccination and Microchip Record;
• A dog arrives at an unapproved port
of entry;
• A dog arrives at an airport with a
CDC-approved animal care facility
without a reservation and no space at
the facility is available; or
• Importer refuses transportation to,
or receipt of or payment for services at,
a CDC-approved animal care facility (if
required). CDC may consider the dog
abandoned and transfer custody of the
dog to the airline carrier for final
disposition.
The importer shall be financially
responsible for all housing, care, and
return costs. If an importer abandons a
dog while it is at a CDC-approved
animal care facility, the carrier shall
become responsible for all costs
associated with the care, housing, and
return of the dog to the country of
departure. In keeping with current
practice, importers should continue to
check with Federal, state, and local
government officials regarding
additional requirements of the final
destination prior to entry or re-entry
into the United States.
VIII. Additional Determinations
Relating to This Notice
Pursuant to the terms of this notice,
CDC is extending the temporary
suspension for the importation of dogs
from high-risk countries. This
suspension includes dogs originating in
DMRVV low-risk or DMRVV-free
countries that have been in a high-risk
country in the previous six months (not
including animals transiting through
high-risk countries).
To enter the United States, dogs
imported from a high-risk country must
meet certain entry requirements as
described in Sections IV through VII of
this notice.
TABLE 1—ENTRY CONDITIONS FOR DOGS UNDER EXTENDED SUSPENSION
Dogs with valid U.S. Rabies
Vaccination certificate (RVC)
At least six months of age .............
Microchip ........................................
Entry allowed at 18 ports of entry
with CDC quarantine station.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Titer not needed ............................
No quarantine ................................
Dogs with valid
CDC Dog Import Permit
(fewer than three dogs being
imported with titer)
Dogs with valid
CDC Rabies Vaccination and
Microchip Record without titer
Dogs with valid
CDC Rabies Vaccination and
Microchip Record with titer
At least six months of age ............
Microchip ......................................
Entry allowed at 18 ports of entry
with CDC quarantine station
with valid CDC Dog Import Permit issued prior to arrival.
Serologic titer (≥0.5 IU/mL) from a
CDC-approved laboratory.
Titer drawn at least 45 days before entry and not more than
365 days before entry.
No quarantine ...............................
At least six months of age ............
Microchip ......................................
Entry allowed at five ports of entry
with CDC-approved animal care
facility.
At least six months of age.
Microchip.
Entry allowed at five ports of entry
with CDC-approved animal care
facility.
Not applicable* .............................
Serologic titer (≥0.5 IU/mL) from a
CDC-approved laboratory.
Titer drawn at least 45 days before entry and not more than
365 days before entry.
No quarantine.
28-day quarantine at CDC-approved animal care facility.
68 Approved laboratories can be found at:
www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-intothe-united-states/approved-labs.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices
5357
TABLE 1—ENTRY CONDITIONS FOR DOGS UNDER EXTENDED SUSPENSION—Continued
Dogs with valid U.S. Rabies
Vaccination certificate (RVC)
Dogs with valid
CDC Dog Import Permit
(fewer than three dogs being
imported with titer)
Veterinary exam, booster vaccination or quarantine not required
unless the animal appears ill
upon arrival.
Veterinary exam or quarantine not
required with valid CDC Dog
Import Permit unless the animal
appears ill upon arrival.
Dogs with valid
CDC Rabies Vaccination and
Microchip Record without titer
Dogs with valid
CDC Rabies Vaccination and
Microchip Record with titer
Veterinary examination, booster
vaccination, and paperwork
verification at CDC-approved
animal care facility required
upon arrival.
Veterinary examination, booster
vaccination, and paperwork
verification at CDC-approved
animal care facility required
upon arrival.
Booster vaccination is required
within 10 days of arrival by U.S.
veterinarian.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
* This is an alternate pathway for importation in the event documentation of an adequate titer is not available upon arrival.
The suspension will continue to
reduce the risk of importation of
DMRVV, ensure public health
safeguards are in place for the
importation of dogs from high-risk
countries, and preserve public health
resources. The terms of the suspension
allow for sufficient safeguards to
mitigate the public health risk. The
suspension will also allow CDC to
continue to work with Federal, state,
territorial and local partners, airlines,
and other affected parties to consider
options for a more streamlined and
efficient dog importation process that
will be safer for pets. Most importantly,
it will ensure that U.S. public health
remains protected.
Therefore, pursuant to 42 CFR
71.51(e) and 42 CFR 71.63, CDC hereby
excludes the entry and suspends
(subject to the terms and conditions
outlined in this notice) the importation
of dogs from high-risk countries,
including dogs from DMRVV low-risk
and DMRVV-free countries if the dogs
have been present in a high-risk country
in the previous six months.
Additionally, under 42 CFR 71.63,
CDC continues to find that DMRVV
exists in countries designated as highrisk countries and that, if reintroduced
into the United States, DMRVV would
threaten the public health of the United
States. The continued entry of dogs from
high-risk countries in the context of
rabies vaccination campaign disruptions
and veterinary supply and veterinary
workforce shortages as a result of the
global COVID–19 pandemic as well as
the insufficient safeguards in place to
prevent the exportation of inadequately
vaccinated dogs from high-risk
countries further increases the risk that
DMRVV may be introduced,
transmitted, or spread into the United
States. CDC has coordinated in advance
with other Federal agencies as necessary
to implement and enforce this notice.
CDC further clarifies through this
notice that there is no agency policy of
using the ‘‘least restrictive means’’ (as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jan 26, 2023
Jkt 259001
that concept is typically understood and
applied in cases involving interests
protected by the U.S. Constitution) in
regard to animal importations under 42
CFR part 71. ‘‘The Due Process Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment imposes
procedural constraints on governmental
decisions that deprive individuals of
liberty or property interests.’’ Nozzi v.
Hous. Auth. of City of Los Angeles, 806
F.3d 1178, 1190 (9th Cir. 2015).
However, ‘‘[d]ue process protections
extend only to deprivations of protected
interests.’’ Shinault v. Hawks, 782 F.3d
1053, 1057 (9th Cir. 2015). Because
individuals have no protected property
or liberty interest in importing dogs into
the United States, it is CDC’s policy to
not employ a constitutional analysis of
‘‘least restrictive means’’ in regard to
animal imports under 42 CFR part 71.
See Ganadera Ind. v. Block, 727 F.2d
1156, 1160 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (‘‘no
constitutionally-protected right to
import into the United States’’); see also
Arjay Assoc. v. Bush, 891 F.2d. 894, 896
(Fed. Cir. 1989) (‘‘It is beyond cavil that
no one has a constitutional right to
conduct foreign commerce in products
excluded by Congress.’’).
Notwithstanding, to the extent that
any court determines that an analysis of
‘‘least restrictive means’’ is necessary,
CDC finds and asserts that the measures
contained in this notice constitute the
least restrictive means of protecting the
public’s health from the reintroduction
of DMRVV. Although a complete ban on
all dog imports would arguably provide
a greater level of public health
protection, it would deprive individuals
of the many benefits arising from dog
imports including the companionship
offered by pet dogs. Similarly, removing
all restrictions at this time (as has been
explained in this notice) would
endanger the public’s health and risk
the reintroduction of DMRVV based on,
among other things, the lack of
veterinary controls in foreign countries.
Accordingly, in establishing the terms
and conditions of this notice, CDC has
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
carefully balanced the need to protect
the public’s health against the potential
burden on importers and determined
that the measures in this notice
constitute the least restrictive means.
This notice is not a legislative rule
within the meaning of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
but rather a notice of an exclusion and
temporary suspension taken under the
existing authority of 42 CFR 71.51(e)
and 42 CFR 71.63, which were
previously promulgated with full notice
and comment. If this notice qualifies as
a legislative rule under the APA, notice
and comment and a delay in effective
date are not required because there is
good cause to dispense with prior
public notice and the opportunity to
comment on this notice. Considering the
insufficient safeguards in place to
prevent the exportation of inadequately
vaccinated dogs from high-risk
countries, and the risk of reintroduction
of DMRVV from dogs being imported
from high-risk countries, it would be
impractical and contrary to the public’s
health, and by extension the public’s
interest, to delay the issuance and
effective date of this notice.
Notwithstanding, CDC is publishing this
notice in advance of its effective date, to
allow potential dog importers and other
interested parties sufficient time to
adjust their practices in accordance with
the terms of this temporary suspension.
This temporary suspension will enter
into effect on February 1, 2023, and
remain in effect through July 31, 2023,
unless modified or rescinded by the
CDC Director based on public health or
other considerations.
Dated: January 24, 2023.
Sherri Berger,
Chief of Staff, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023–01688 Filed 1–24–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5348-5357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01688]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Notice of Extension of Temporary Suspension of Dogs Entering the
United States From Countries With a High Risk of Rabies
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces an
extension of the current temporary suspension of the importation into
the United States of dogs from high-risk rabies-enzootic countries
(high-risk countries). This suspension includes dogs that have been in
any high-risk countries during the previous six months.
DATES: The extension of the temporary suspension of the importation of
dogs into the United States from high-risk countries will be
implemented on February 1, 2023, when the current suspension expires,
and will remain in effect through July 31, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley C. Altenburger, J.D., Division
of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS H16-4, Atlanta, GA 30329.
Telephone: 1-800-232-4636. For information regarding CDC regulations
for the importation of dogs: Dr. Emily Pieracci, D.V.M., Division of
Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS H16-4, Atlanta, GA 30329.
Telephone: 1-800-232-4636.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CDC is extending, but not modifying, the
terms of the current temporary suspension. A suspension remains
necessary to protect the public's health against the reintroduction of
the dog-maintained rabies virus variant (DMRVV) into the United States.
There is a continued threat posed by unvaccinated or inadequately
vaccinated dogs from high-risk countries due to various factors. These
include insufficient veterinary controls in high-risk countries to
prevent the export of inadequately vaccinated dogs, and veterinary
supply chain and workforce capacity shortages that have persisted since
the global COVID-19 pandemic. These factors result in challenges to
efforts to ensure dogs imported into the United States do not pose a
public health threat. CDC
[[Page 5349]]
anticipates that these factors are likely to continue through July 31,
2023.
I. Background and Authority
Rabies, one of the deadliest zoonotic diseases, accounts for an
estimated 59,000 human deaths globally each year.\1\ This equates to
one human death every nine minutes.\2\ DMRVV is responsible for 98
percent of these deaths.\2\ The rabies virus can infect any mammal, and
once clinical signs appear, the disease is almost always fatal.\3\ In
September 2007, at the Inaugural World Rabies Day Symposium, CDC
declared the United States to be free of DMRVV.\4\ However, DMRVV is
still a serious public health threat in the more than 100 countries
where it remains enzootic. Preventing the entry of animals infected
with DMRVV into the United States is a public health priority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ World Health Organization (2018). WHO Expert Consultation on
Rabies (WHO Technical Report Series 1012). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-TRS-1012.
\2\ Id.
\3\ Fooks, A.R., Banyard, A.C., Horton, D.L., Johnson, N.,
McElhinney, L.M., and Jackson, A.C. (2014) Current status of rabies
and prospects for elimination. Lancet, 384(9951), 1389-1399. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62707-5.
\4\ Velasco-Villa, A., Mauldin, M., Shi, M., Escobar, L.,
Gallardo-Romero, N., Damon, I., Emerson, G. (2017) The history of
rabies in the Western Hemisphere. Antiviral Res, 146, 221-232.
doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) (42
U.S.C. 264), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may make and
enforce such regulations as in the Secretary's judgment are necessary
to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable
diseases from foreign countries into the United States and from one
state or possession into any other state or possession.\5\ Such
regulations may provide for inspection, fumigation, disinfection,
sanitation, pest extermination, destruction of animals or articles
found to be sources of dangerous infection to human beings, and other
measures. Under section 362 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 265), the
Secretary, and by delegation the Director of CDC (CDC Director),\6\ may
prohibit entries and imports from foreign countries into the United
States ``in whole or in part'' if there is a serious risk of
introducing communicable disease and when required in the interest of
public health.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Although the statute assigns authority to the Surgeon
General, all statutory powers and functions of the Surgeon General
were transferred to the Secretary of HHS in 1966, 31 FR 8855, 80
Stat. 1610 (June 25, 1966), see also Public Law 96-88, 509(b),
October 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695 (codified at 20 U.S.C. 3508(b)). The
Secretary has retained these authorities despite the reestablishment
of the Office of the Surgeon General in 1987.
\6\ See 42 CFR 71.51(e), 71.63.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 42 CFR 71.51, all dogs admitted into the United States must
be accompanied by a valid rabies vaccination certificate,\7\ unless the
dogs' owners or importers submit satisfactory evidence that dogs under
six months of age have not been in a high-risk country or dogs older
than six months have not been in a high-risk country for the six months
before arrival.\8\ CDC maintains a publicly available list of high-risk
countries \9\ and provides guidance for dog entry requirements based on
the dog's country of origin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). What is a
valid rabies vaccination certificate? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-united-states/vaccine-certificate.html.
\8\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Guidance
Regarding Agency Interpretation of ``Rabies-Free'' as It Relates to
the Importation of Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register,
Vol. 84,724-730. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
\9\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). What is a
valid rabies vaccination certificate? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-united-states/rabies-vaccine.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDC subject matter experts review publicly available data and
conduct an annual assessment to determine which countries have high
risk of DMRVV.\10\ This assessment considers the following factors:
presence or prevalence of domestically acquired cases of DMRVV in
humans and animals; efforts towards control of DMRVV in dogs (such as
dog vaccination coverage, dog population management, and existence and
enforcement of legal codes to limit rabies transmission in dogs); and
the quality of rabies surveillance systems, rate of testing, and
laboratory capacity. If data are not available, the most conservative
determination is applied, and the country is not considered to have a
robust rabies control program. If a country has provided additional
substantial data to support a DMRVV-free or low-risk status, CDC can
review that information and re-assess the country's status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Henry RE, Blanton JD, Angelo KM, Pieracci EG, Stauffer K,
Jentes ES, Allen J, Glynn M, Brown CM, Friedman CR, Wallace R. A
country classification system to inform rabies prevention guidelines
and regulations. J Travel Med. 2022 Jul 14;29(4):taac046. doi:
10.1093/jtm/taac046. PMID: 35348741.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 42 CFR 71.51(e), dogs may be subject to ``additional
requirements as may be deemed necessary'' or ``to exclusion if coming
from areas which the [CDC] Director has determined to have high rates
of rabies.'' Based on the previously described criteria, CDC determined
that high-risk countries constitute areas that have high rates of
DMRVV, and dogs imported from these countries are thus subject to
additional requirements and/or exclusion.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Henry RE, Blanton JD, Angelo KM, Pieracci EG, Stauffer K,
Jentes ES, Allen J, Glynn M, Brown CM, Friedman CR, Wallace R. A
country classification system to inform rabies prevention guidelines
and regulations. J Travel Med. 2022 Jul 14;29(4):taac046. doi:
10.1093/jtm/taac046. PMID: 35348741.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 42 CFR 71.63, CDC may also temporarily suspend the entry of
animals, articles, or things from designated foreign countries and
places into the United States when it determines there exists in a
foreign country a communicable disease that threatens the public health
of the United States and the entry of imports from that country
increases the risk that the communicable disease may be introduced.
When such a suspension is issued, CDC designates the period of time or
conditions under which imports into the United States are suspended.
CDC likewise determined that DMRVV exists in countries designated as
high-risk countries and that, if reintroduced into the United States,
DMRVV would threaten the public health of the United States.
Based on these legal authorities and determinations, on June 16,
2021,\12\ CDC announced a temporary suspension of the importation of
dogs from high-risk countries into the United States (86 FR 32041) (the
temporary suspension). The temporary suspension went into effect on
July 14, 2021. CDC issued the temporary suspension to protect the
public health against the reintroduction of DMRVV into the United
States at a time when resources were being diverted to the agency-wide
response to the global COVID-19 pandemic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Temporary Suspension of Dogs Entering the United States
from High-Risk Rabies Countries. Federal Register, 86 FR 32041, June
16, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the time the temporary suspension was issued, CDC noted an
increase in importers circumventing dog import regulations. Despite a
decrease in international travel volumes due to the global COVID-19
pandemic, there was a 52 percent increase in dogs ineligible for entry
in 2020 as compared to 2018 and 2019. Additionally, four rabid dogs
were imported into the United States between 2015 and 2021.
The limited availability of public health resources due to the
unprecedented global response to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in
reduced capacity at the Federal, state, and local levels to address the
increased risk of the reintroduction of DMRVV. For these reasons, CDC
implemented a temporary suspension prohibiting the
[[Page 5350]]
importation of dogs from high-risk countries for rabies in July 2021.
In addition, CDC implemented a CDC Dog Import Permit 13
[(OMB Control Number 0920-0134 Foreign Quarantine Regulations (exp. 12/
31/2022), or as revised] during the temporary suspension to verify the
documentation of imported dogs before they are flown to the United
States.
On June 10, 2022, CDC modified and extended the temporary
suspension through January 31, 2023.\14\ Per the Federal Register
notice announcing the extension and modification of the temporary
suspension, all categories of importers are currently eligible to
import dogs from high-risk countries. Commercially imported dogs are
required to enter the United States at a port of entry with a live
animal care facility \15\ with a Facilities Information and Resource
Management System (FIRMS) code issued by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP). CDC also expanded the list of the approved ports of
entry to include 18 airports \16\ with a CDC quarantine station for
importers with a valid U.S.-issued rabies vaccination certificate or a
CDC Dog Import Permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 87 FR 33158 (June 1, 2022).
\15\ https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-united-states/approved-care-facilities.html.
\16\ The 18 approved ports of entry are: Anchorage (ANC),
Atlanta (ATL), Boston (BOS), Chicago (ORD), Dallas (DFW), Detroit
(DTW), Honolulu (HNL), Houston (IAH), Los Angeles (LAX), Miami
(MIA), Minneapolis (MSP), New York (JFK), Newark (EWR), Philadelphia
(PHL), San Francisco (SFO), San Juan (SJU), Seattle (SEA), and
Washington DC (IAD).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to modifying and extending the temporary suspension on June
10, 2022, CDC also evaluated the latest scientific information on
rabies serologic titer test results. Based on this evaluation, CDC
reduced the waiting period requirement, which is the number of days
between when a dog's sample is taken for a serologic titer test and
when the dog can be imported into the United States, from 90 days to 45
days.
Lastly, the June 10, 2022, extension and modification of the
temporary suspension allowed importers whose dogs are at least six
months old, have a microchip, and have a valid U.S.-issued rabies
vaccination certificate to enter the United States without a CDC Dog
Import Permit at one of the 18 airports with a CDC quarantine station
provided the dog appears healthy upon arrival. CDC made this change
because of the reliability of the United States' rabies vaccine supply
and to ease the burden on these importers.
At this time, CDC is extending the temporary suspension through
July 31, 2023, because of the continued risk for the reintroduction of
DMRVV into the United States. This extension is based on the disruption
of rabies vaccination campaigns globally that occurred due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Since CDC anticipates the timeline needed for global
vaccination campaigns to recover will extend through July 31, 2023, the
risk of a rabid dog being imported into the United States is increased
during that time. Additionally, constraints on the global veterinary
workforce capacity and veterinary supply chain shortages that were
exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to delayed or disrupted
care for dogs, which increases the likelihood dogs imported into the
United States may pose a public health threat.17 18 19 20
Federal, state and local public health partners continue to respond to
the global COVID-19 pandemic, which remains a Public Health Emergency
of International Concern according to the World Health Organization
(WHO) \21\ and a U.S. public health emergency per the HHS
declaration.\22\ An imported rabid dog would potentially divert limited
public health resources away from other critical ongoing public health
responses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/07/not-enough-veterinarians-animals/661497/ 661497/.
\18\ https://www.agcanada.com/2021/07/is-the-veterinarian-
shortage-real-or-
regional#:~:text=A%20perceived%20global%20shortage%20of%20veterinaria
ns%20is%20creating,for%20the%20quality%20of%20care%20they%20can%20off
er.
\19\ https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/
companion-animal-veterinary-vaccines-global-market-report.
\20\ https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/pets/aussie-dog-owners-warned-of-national-vaccine-shortage-as-deadly-bacterial-disease-spreads-c-8568550.
\21\ https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/19-10-2022-statement-on-the-thirteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-
(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-
19)-pandemic.
\22\ https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PHE/Pages/covid19-13Oct2022.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDC will regularly review the terms of this notice to ensure that
the terms remain necessary and that importers are not overly burdened
while the public health of the United States remains protected from the
reintroduction of DMRVV. In conducting this review, CDC will consider
high-risk countries' rabies control programs, the latest scientific
data, and international recommendations for rabies control.
Additionally, CDC previously announced that it is developing a proposed
rule that will outline requirements regarding an importation system to
reduce fraud and improve the U.S. government's ability to verify U.S.
entry requirements and mitigate the introduction of dogs infected with
rabies and other communicable diseases of public health concern.\23\
Development of this proposed rule is ongoing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=202204&RIN=0920-AA82.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Public Health Rationale
A. Dog Importation Into the United States
The United States was declared DMRVV-free in 2007. Importing dogs
from high-risk countries involves a significant public health risk. The
importation of just one dog infected with DMRVV risks re-introduction
of the virus into the United States, resulting in a potential public
health risk with consequent monetary cost and potential loss of human
and animal life.24 25 26 DMRVV has been highly successful at
adapting to new host species, particularly wildlife.\27\ One DMRVV-
infected dog could result in transmission to humans, domestic pets, or
wildlife. In 2019, the importation of a single dog with rabies cost
more than $400,000 for the public health investigations and rabies
post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of exposed persons.28 29 To
mitigate the risk of importing dogs with DMRVV, CDC requires compliance
with its public health entry requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ World Bank (2012). People, Pathogens and Our Planet: The
Economics of One Health. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11892.
\25\ Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed, F., Moore,
S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies in a dog imported from
Egypt-Kansas, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374-1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
\26\ Jeon, S., Cleaton, J., Meltzer, M., Kahn, E., Pieracci, E.,
Blanton, J., Wallace, R. (2019). Determining the post-elimination
level of vaccination needed to prevent re-establishment of dog
rabies. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007869.
\27\ Velasco-Villa, A., Mauldin, M., Shi, M., Escobar, L.,
Gallardo-Romero, N., Damon, I., Emerson, G. (2017). The history of
rabies in the Western Hemisphere. Antiviral Research, 146, 221-
232.doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.013.
\28\ Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed, F., Moore,
S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies in a dog imported from
Egypt-Kansas, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374-1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
\29\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Rabies
Postexposure Prophylaxis. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/medical_care/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the U.S. Government does not track the total number of
dogs imported each year, it is estimated that approximately 1 million
dogs are imported into the United States annually, of which 100,000
dogs are
[[Page 5351]]
from high-risk countries.\30\ This estimate was based on information
provided by airlines, CBP staff, and a study conducted at a U.S.-Mexico
land border crossing.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Guidance
Regarding Agency Interpretation of ``Rabies-Free'' as It Relates to
the Importation of Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register,
Vol. 84, 724-730. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
\31\ McQuiston, J.H., Wilson, T., Harris, S., Bacon, R.M.,
Shapiro, S., Trevino, J., Marano, N. (2008.) Importation of dogs
into the United States: risks from rabies and other zoonotic
diseases. Zoonoses Public Health, 55(8-10), 421-6. doi:10.1111/
j.1863-2378.2008.01117.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP does record, by country, the number of dogs imported with
formal entry under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) code 0106199120 and
HTS description: Other live animals, other, dogs. The total number of
dogs imported into the United States from all countries under this HTS
category varied from 25,232 in 2018 to 58,540 in 2020. The number of
dogs from high-risk countries under this HTS category averaged 16,390
per year and varied from 9,966 to 24,031 over this three-year period.
The number of dogs reported under this HTS category does not include
dogs imported as checked baggage, hand-carried in airplane cabins, or
crossing at land borders without formal entry. Thus, the number
underestimates the true number of dogs imported into the United States.
Since 2015, there have been four known rabid dogs imported into the
United States. All four dogs were imported by rescue organizations for
the purposes of adoption. These four cases, discussed below, highlight
the immense public health resources required to investigate, respond
to, and mitigate the public health threat posed by the importation of a
rabid dog.
In 2015, a rabid dog was part of a group of eight dogs and 27 cats
imported from Egypt by a rescue group. The dog had an unhealed leg
fracture and began showing signs of rabies four days after arrival.
Following the rabies diagnosis, the rescue workers in Egypt admitted
that the dog's rabies vaccination certificate had been intentionally
falsified to evade CDC entry requirements.\32\ Eighteen people were
recommended to receive rabies PEP, seven dogs underwent a six-month
quarantine, and eight additional dogs housed in the same home as the
rabid dog had to receive rabies booster vaccinations and undergo a 45-
day monitoring period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Sinclair J., Wallace, R., Gruszynski K., Bibbs Freeman, M.,
Campbell, C., Semple, S., Murphy, J. (2015). Rabies in a dog
imported from Egypt with a falsified rabies vaccination
certificate--Virginia. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64,
1359-62. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6449a2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2017, a ``flight parent'' (a person typically solicited through
social media, often not affiliated with the rescue organization, and
usually compensated with an airline ticket) imported four dogs on
behalf of a rescue organization. One of the dogs appeared agitated at
the airport and bit the flight parent prior to the flight. A U.S.
veterinarian examined the dog one day after its arrival and then
euthanized and tested the dog for rabies. A post-mortem rabies test
showed that the dog was positive for the virus. Public health officials
recommended that at least four people receive rabies PEP, and the
remaining three dogs underwent quarantine periods ranging from 30 days
to six months. An investigation revealed the possibility of falsified
rabies vaccination documentation presented on entry to the United
States.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ Hercules, Y., Bryant, N., Wallace, R., Nelson, R., Palumbo,
G., Williams, J., Brown, C. (2018). Rabies in a dog imported from
Egypt--Connecticut, 2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 67,
1388-91. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6750a3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2019, a rescue group imported 26 dogs, all of which had rabies
vaccination certificates and serologic documentation, indicating the
development of rabies antibodies (in response to immunization), based
on results from an Egyptian Government-affiliated rabies laboratory.
However, one dog developed signs of rabies three weeks after arrival
and had to be euthanized. The dog tested positive for rabies. Forty-
four people received PEP, and the 25 dogs imported on the same flight
underwent re-vaccination and quarantines of four to six months. An
additional 12 dogs had contact with the rabid dog and had to be re-
vaccinated and undergo quarantine periods ranging from 45 days to six
months based on their previous vaccination status.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed, F., Moore,
S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies in a dog imported from
Egypt-Kansas, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(38),
1374-1377. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 10, 2021, shortly before CDC published the temporary
suspension, 33 dogs were imported into the United States from
Azerbaijan by a rescue organization. All dogs had rabies vaccination
certificates that appeared valid upon arrival in the United States. One
dog developed signs of rabies three days after arrival and was
euthanized. CDC confirmed the dog was infected with a variant of DMRVV
known to circulate in the Caucus Mountain region of Azerbaijan. The
remaining rescue animals exposed to the rabid dog during travel were
dispersed across nine states, leading to what is believed to be the
largest, multi-state, imported rabid dog investigation in U.S.
history.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ Whitehill F, Bonaparte S, Hartloge C, et al. Rabies in a
Dog Imported from Azerbaijan-Pennsylvania, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 686-689.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eighteen people received PEP to prevent rabies as a result of
exposure to this one rabid dog. Post-vaccination serologic monitoring
of the remaining dogs and the public health investigation revealed that
improper vaccination practices by the veterinarian in Azerbaijan likely
contributed to the inadequate vaccination response documented in 48
percent of the imported animals, including the rabid dog.\36\ The 33
exposed animals were placed in quarantine periods ranging from 45 days
to six months based on individual serologic titer test results and
local jurisdictional requirements.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021). CDC
responds to a case of rabies in an imported dog. Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/worldrabiesday/disease-detectives/rabies-imported-dog.html.
\37\ Whitehill F, Bonaparte S, Hartloge C, et al. Rabies in a
Dog Imported from Azerbaijan-Pennsylvania, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 686-689.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDC estimates that costs for public health investigations and
subsequent cost of care for people exposed to rabid dogs range from
$220,897 to $521,828 per importation event, as summarized in an
economic analysis found on CDC's website.38 39 40 This cost
estimate does not account for the worst-case outcomes, which include:
(1) transmission of rabies to a person who dies from the disease; and
(2) ongoing transmission to other domestic animals and wildlife species
in the United States. A previous campaign to eliminate domestic dog-
coyote rabies virus variant jointly with gray fox (Texas fox) rabies
virus variant in Texas over the period from 1995 through 2003 cost $34
million,41 42 or $48 million in
[[Page 5352]]
2020 U.S. dollars. Re-establishment of DMRVV into the United States
could result in costly efforts over several years to eliminate the
virus again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ Raybern, C., Zaldivar, A., Tubach, S., Ahmed, F., Moore,
S., Kintner, C., Garrison, I. (2020) Rabies in a dog imported from
Egypt-Kansas, 2019. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep, 69(38), 1374-1377.
Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6938a5-H.pdf.
\39\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Guidance
Regarding Agency Interpretation of ``Rabies-Free'' as It Relates to
the Importation of Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register,
Vol. 84, 724-730. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
\40\ https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-united-states/vaccine-certificate.html.
\41\ Thomas, S., Wilson, P., Moore, G., Oertli, E., Hicks, B.,
Rohde, R., Johnston, D. (2005). Evaluation of oral rabies
vaccination programs for control of rabies epizootics in coyotes and
gray foxes: 1995-2003. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine
Association, 227(5), 785-92. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.785.
\42\ Sterner, R., Meltzer, M., Shwiff, S., Slate, D. (2009).
Tactics and Economics of Wildlife Oral Rabies Vaccination, Canada
and the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15(8), 1176-
1184. doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081061.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Ongoing COVID-19 Response Activities
Since January 2020, public health resources globally have been
dedicated to responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, which remains a
public health emergency as declared by the HHS Secretary and a Public
Health Emergency of International Concern as declared by WHO. This
context caused a lapse in canine rabies vaccination efforts in high-
risk countries.43 44 In the United States, the public health
response to combatting the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has
required sustained Federal, state, and local public health resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ Kunkel, A., Jeon, S., Joseph, H., Dilius, P., Crowdis, K.,
Meltzer, M., Wallace, R. (2021). The urgency of resuming disrupted
dog rabies vaccination campaigns: a modeling and cost-effectiveness
analysis. Scientific Reports, 11, 12476. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-
92067-5.
\44\ Raynor, B., D[iacute]az, E., Shinnick, J., Zegarra, E.,
Monroy, Y., Mena. C., . . . Castillo-Neyra, R.(2021). The impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on rabies reemergence in Latin America: The
case of Arequipa, Peru. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 15(5),
e0009414. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009414.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The importation of a rabid dog on June 10, 2021, diverted public
health resources from CDC, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
and nine states away from critical COVID-19 response activities. Any
increase in the number of dogs with inadequate or falsified rabies
vaccination certificates arriving in the United States increases the
likelihood of a DMRVV-importation event and threatens the diversion of
critical public health resources.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R., Kalapura, C.,
Brown, C. U.S. dog importations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Do we
have an erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0254287.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Insufficient Canine Vaccination Rates and Veterinary Controls in
High-Risk Countries To Prevent the Export of Inadequately Vaccinated
Dogs
Historically, approximately 60 to 70 percent of CDC's dog entry
denials (or about 200 cases annually) have been based on fraudulent,
incomplete, or inaccurate paperwork.\46\ This number is less than one
percent of dog importations. However, between January and December 2020
(i.e., during the global COVID-19 pandemic), CDC documented more than
450 instances of incomplete, inadequate, or fraudulent rabies
vaccination certificates for dogs arriving from high-risk countries.
This number increased for the first six months of 2021, during which
time CDC documented more than 560 instances of incomplete, inadequate,
or fraudulent rabies vaccination certificates for dogs arriving from
high-risk countries.\47\ These cases resulted in dogs being denied
entry into the United States and ultimately returned to their country
of origin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021).
Quarantine Activity Reporting System (version 4.9.8.8.2.2A). Dog
Importation data, 2010-2019. Accessed 1 October 2022.
\47\ Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R., Kalapura, C.,
Brown, C. U.S. dog importations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Do we
have an erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0254287.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the global COVID-19 pandemic, canine rabies vaccination
campaigns were suspended in many high-risk countries, which resulted in
an increase in canine and human rabies cases.48 49 The pause
in canine vaccination campaigns and the delay in re-establishing pre-
COVID rabies vaccination rates in dogs in many high-risk countries,
combined with insufficient veterinary controls in place to prevent the
exportation of inadequately vaccinated dogs with fraudulent rabies
vaccination certificates, presents a significant public health risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ Kunkel, A., Jeon, S., Joseph, H., Dilius, P., Crowdis, K.,
Meltzer, M., Wallace, R. (2021). The urgency of resuming disrupted
dog rabies vaccination campaigns: a modeling and cost-effectiveness
analysis. Scientific Reports, 11, 12476. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-
92067-5.
\49\ Raynor, B., D[iacute]az, E., Shinnick, J., Zegarra, E.,
Monroy, Y., Mena. C., . . . Castillo-Neyra, R.(2021). The impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on rabies reemergence in Latin America: The
case of Arequipa, Peru. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 15(5),
e0009414. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009414.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A survey of global, regional, national, and local rabies working
partners from the network of the United Against Rabies Forum \50\ and
rabies practitioners found that the global COVID-19 pandemic impacted
rabies control efforts in many high-risk countries during 2020. The
study authors reported that dog vaccinations were administered as
planned in just four percent of the countries for which data were
available. Around half of respondents reported that funds for rabies
control were diverted to global COVID-19 activities. However, even in
countries where funds were not diverted, it was reported that funding
for rabies control was insufficient and unpredictable even before the
global COVID-19 pandemic. Among respondents who reported diversion of
rabies control funds to global COVID-19 responses, they reported that
animal rabies vaccines and dog vaccination campaigns were often the
first rabies control activities to be cut.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ A forum supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health, and
the World Health Organization (the Tripartite), which takes a multi-
sectoral, One Health approach bringing together governments, vaccine
producers, researchers, non-governmental organizations and
development partners to end human deaths from dog-mediated rabies.
\51\ Nadal D, Abela-Ridder B, Beeching S, Cleaveland S, Cronin
K, Steenson R and Hampson K (2022). The Impact of the First Year of
the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canine Rabies Control Efforts: A Mixed-
Methods Study of Observations About the Present and Lessons for the
Future. Front Trop Dis 3:866811.doi: 10.3389/fitd.2022.866811.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, there are global veterinary workforce capacity and
veterinary supply chain shortages, exacerbated by the COVID-19
pandemic, that have led to delayed or disrupted care for dogs (and
other pets) globally. The lack of veterinarians, veterinary
technicians, and other animal care staff who are available to provide
care for dogs prior to travel, combined with a lack of veterinary
supplies such as drugs and vaccines, increase the likelihood dogs
imported into the United States may pose a public health
threat.52 53 54 55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/07/not-enough-veterinarians-animals/661497/ 661497/.
\53\ https://www.agcanada.com/2021/07/is-the-veterinarian-
shortage-real-or-
regional#:~:text=A%20perceived%20global%20shortage%20of%20veterinaria
ns%20is%20creating,for%20the%20quality%20of%20care%20they%20can%20off
er.
\54\ https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany. com/report/
companion-animal-veterinary-vaccines-global-market-report.
\55\ https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/pets/aussie-dog-owners-warned-of-national-vaccine-shortage-as-deadly-bacterial-disease-spreads-c-8568550.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Potentially Unsafe Conditions for Dogs Arriving From High-Risk
Countries Without Appropriate Rabies Vaccination Certificates
Prior to the implementation of the suspension, dogs arriving from
high-risk countries without appropriate rabies vaccination certificates
were denied entry and returned to the country of origin on the next
available flight.\56\ Airlines were required to house dogs awaiting
return to their country of origin
[[Page 5353]]
at a facility that meets the USDA's Animal Welfare Act standards,
preferably a live animal care facility with an active custodial bond
and a FIRMS code issued by CBP. If a live animal care facility with a
CBP-issued FIRMS code was not available, the airline was required, at a
minimum, to provide accommodation meeting the USDA's Animal Welfare Act
standards.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Guidance
Regarding Agency Interpretation of ``Rabies-Free'' as It Relates to
the Importation of Dogs Into the United States. Federal Register,
Vol. 84 724-730. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/01/31/2019-00506/guidance-regarding-agency-interpretation-of-rabies-free-as-it-relates-to-the-importation-of-dogs.
\57\ U.S. Department of Agriculture (2020). Animal Welfare
Regulations; Part 3, Subpart A: Transportation Standards. Sections
3.14-3.20. Retrieved from https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/AC_BlueBook_AWA_508_comp_version.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some airlines housed dogs in cargo warehouses that created an
unsafe environment for dogs due to the prolonged periods of time
between flights, inadequate cooling and heating, poor cleaning and
sanitization of crates, and inability to physically separate the
animals from areas of the warehouse where other equipment, machinery,
and goods are used and stored. Cargo warehouse staff who are not
trained to house, clean, and care for live animals with appropriate
personal protective equipment were at risk of bites, scratches, and
exposures to potentially infectious bodily fluids from dogs left in
cargo warehouses.
During 2020, due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, there were fewer
international flights worldwide,58 59 resulting in delayed
returns for dogs denied entry. While international flights in 2022
increased compared to 2020-2021, the number of flights remained
somewhat below pre-pandemic levels with uncertainty regarding how
quickly international passenger traffic will fully recover to pre-
pandemic levels.\60\ In August 2020, a dog denied entry based on
falsified rabies vaccination certificates later died while in the
custody of an airline at Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Despite
CDC's request to find appropriate housing at a local kennel or
veterinary clinic, the airline left the dog, along with 17 other dogs,
in a cargo warehouse without food and water for more than 48 hours.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ Josephs, L. (2020). American Airlines cutting international
summer schedule by 60% as coronavirus drives down demand. CNBC.
Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-update-american-airlines-cuts-summer-international-flights-by-60percent-as-demand-suffers.html.
\59\ American Airlines (2020). American Airlines announces
additional schedule changes in response to customer demand related
to COVID-19. American Airlines Newsroom. Retrieved from https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2020/American-Airlines-Announces-Additional-Schedule-Changes-in-Response-to-Customer-Demand-Related-to-COVID-19-031420-OPS-DIS-03/default.aspx.
\60\ International Civil Aviation Organization (2022). Effects
of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) on civil aviation: economic impact
analysis. Retrieved from https://www.icao.int/sustainability/Documents/Covid-19/ICAO_coronavirus_Econ_Impact.pdf.
\61\ CBS Broadcasting (2020). Dog dies at O'Hare Airport
warehouse, 17 others saved after being left without food or water
for 3 days. CBS Chicago. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/dog-dies-at-ohare-airport-warehouse-17-others-saved-after-being-left-without-food-or-water-for-3-days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While costs associated with housing, caring for, and returning dogs
are the responsibility of the importer (or airline if the importer
abandons the dog), some importers and airlines are reluctant to pay
these costs, requiring the U.S. Government to find appropriate interim
housing facilities and veterinary care. The cost for housing, care, and
returning improperly vaccinated dogs ranges between $1,000 and $4,000
per dog, depending on the location and time required until the next
available return flight. Because there is no reimbursement system in
place, and seeking reimbursement is administratively challenging, the
U.S. Government is left to bear these costs when airlines and importers
do not. From May through December 2020, CDC spent more than 3,000
personnel-hours at an estimated cost of $270,000 to respond to the
attempted importation of unvaccinated or inadequately vaccinated dogs
from high-risk countries. The time spent represented a substantial
increase from previous years due to (1) the increase in dogs with
inadequate documentation; and (2) the additional time spent identifying
interim accommodations for the dogs because of the reduced outbound
international flight schedules due to the pandemic.
During 2020, CDC observed a 52 percent increase (from an average of
300 to 450) in the number of dogs ineligible for entry compared to 2018
and 2019.\62\ The trend continued in the first half of 2021 when there
was a 24 percent increase (from 450 to 560) in the number of dogs
ineligible for entry compared to the whole of 2020.\63\ From January 1,
2021, to July 13, 2021, prior to CDC's suspension taking effect, there
were 16 sick dogs and 18 dead dogs reported to CDC upon arrival in the
United States. From July 14, 2021, when the suspension was implemented,
to September 30, 2022, CDC has denied entry to 145 dogs, and eight sick
dogs and 26 deaths have been reported to CDC. This substantial decrease
in the number of dogs denied entry since the implementation of the
suspension and limited number of sick and dead dogs arriving in the
United States has resulted in an estimated $55,000 to $190,000 in cost
savings to importers and $3,400 to $170,000 in cost savings to Federal
and state public health and animal health agencies when comparing the
two periods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ Pieracci, E., Williams, C., Wallace, R., Kalapura, C.,
Brown, C. U.S. dog importations during the COVID-19 pandemic: Do we
have an erupting problem? PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0254287. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0254287.
\63\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Quarantine
Activity Reporting System (version 4.9.8.8.2.2A). Dog Importation
data, January 1, 2021-July 14, 2021. Accessed: 04 January 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the timeframe of the current suspension, the number of dogs
denied entry and the number of sick and dead dogs has substantially
decreased despite the increased communicable disease risk due to
disruptions to vaccination programs in high-risk countries and
veterinary supply chain and staffing shortages worldwide. This
constitutes strong evidence that the suspension has been effective at
preventing the importation of dogs that present a communicable disease
risk that would otherwise require significant U.S. resources to
address. There was an increasing number of dogs denied entry in 2020
and 2021, prior to the suspension, and there were fewer international
flights in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2022.\64\ If the increase in
number of flights in 2022 corresponded with numbers of dogs denied
entry per flight in 2021 and 2022, lifting the suspension at this time
could result in a return to pre-suspension or greater numbers of dogs
denied entry along with an associated large increase of sick, dead, or
inadequately vaccinated dogs arriving in the United States that could
quickly overwhelm already strained public health and veterinary
healthcare systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2022) August
2022 U.S. Airline Traffic Data. https://www.bts.gov/newsroom/august-2022-us-airline-traffic-data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since there remains an elevated level of risk of a rabid dog being
imported into the United States compared to before the global COVID-19
pandemic and because responding to imports of potentially rabid dogs or
dogs with other communicable illnesses of public health concern
requires significant veterinary and public health resources, lifting
the suspension would be unwarranted at this time.
Instead, CDC is extending the temporary suspension for dogs
arriving into the United States from high-risk countries. Given that
the conditions for dog importations under the suspension have prevented
the reintroduction of DMRVV into the United States and have decreased
the number of issues with imported dogs (suspected fraudulent
[[Page 5354]]
documentation, dogs abandoned by importers, sick and dead dogs arriving
in the United States) compared to the period prior to the suspension,
maintaining the current requirements for dog importation should not
result in an increased need for veterinary and public health resources
to address dog importation issues.
III. Conditions for Dog Importation Under the July 10, 2021, Temporary
Suspension
During the temporary suspension of dogs arriving from countries at
high risk for dog rabies, eligible importers, including owners of
service dogs, U.S. and foreign-government personnel, and persons
permanently relocating to the United States, could apply to import
their personally owned pet dogs. People were also permitted to import
dogs for science, education, exhibition, or bona fide law enforcement
purposes. To receive a CDC Dog Import Permit, eligible importers had to
provide a rabies vaccination certificate prior to the dog arriving in
the United States that met the criteria outlined below, as well as
rabies serologic titers from a CDC-approved laboratory if the dog was
vaccinated outside the United States. Dogs were also required to be at
least six months of age and have a microchip implanted prior to arrival
in the United States.
For dogs arriving from high-risk countries, the rabies vaccination
certificates had to include the following information to be considered
complete and accurate:
Name and address of owner;
Breed, sex, date of birth (approximate age if date of
birth unknown), color, markings, and other identifying information for
the dog;
Microchip number;
Date of rabies vaccination and vaccine product
information;
Date the vaccination expires; and
Name, license number, address, and signature of
veterinarian who administered the vaccination.
For a rabies vaccine to be effective, a dog must be at least 12
weeks (84 days) of age at the time of administration. A dog's initial
vaccine must also be administered at least four weeks (28 days) before
arrival in the United States for the dog to be considered adequately
vaccinated against rabies.
A. Extension of the Temporary Suspension Enacted June 10, 2022
On June 10, 2022, CDC extended and modified the temporary
suspension to allow a pathway for all importers to import dogs into the
United States utilizing one of the three options listed in sections IV-
VII below. CDC is now extending the suspension through July 31, 2023.
Although CDC is providing clarifying language to the entry requirements
in section IV-VI below, it is not modifying the terms of the current
suspension itself. CDC will be implementing the use of a standardized
rabies vaccination form to reduce errors and omissions frequently
documented on rabies vaccination certificates. This form will not
require any new information to be submitted to CDC but will assist
importers in ensuring the rabies vaccination form they submit includes
all required information. This will help to reduce wait times for
importers applying for CDC dog import permits.
IV. Conditions for Entry of U.S.-Vaccinated Dogs During the Extension
Through this notice, CDC is continuing the current requirements for
entry of U.S.-vaccinated dogs. Dogs returning to the United States from
high-risk countries with a valid U.S.-issued rabies vaccination
certificate will be allowed to enter the United States without a CDC
Dog Import Permit, if the dog:
Is six-months of age or older;
Has an ISO-compatible microchip; \65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ ISO means international standards organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrives at one of 18 CDC-approved ports of entry with CDC-
staffed quarantine stations; and
Has a valid U.S. rabies vaccination certificate
documenting that the dog was vaccinated against rabies by a U.S.-
licensed veterinarian in the United States on or after the date the dog
was 12 weeks (84 days) of age and at least four weeks (28 days) before
the date of arrival in the United States if it was the dog's first
rabies vaccine. The rabies vaccination certificate must include:
[cir] Name and address of owner;
[cir] Breed, sex, date of birth (approximate age if date of birth
unknown), color, markings, and other identifying information for the
dog;
[cir] Microchip number;
[cir] Date of rabies vaccination and date next vaccine is due
(i.e., date the vaccination expires);
[cir] Vaccine manufacturer, product name, lot number and product
expiration date; and
[cir] Name, license number, address, and signature of veterinarian
who administered the vaccination.
U.S. veterinarians, at their option, may choose to include the
above information on the CDC Rabies Vaccination and Microchip Record
(OMB No. 0920-1383) for U.S.-vaccinated dogs prior to traveling outside
the United States, but completion of the form is not required for a
U.S.-vaccinated dog's re-entry into the United States if all other
necessary information has been provided. The form is available for
download online at: www.cdc.gov/dogpermit.
U.S.-vaccinated dogs with expired U.S. rabies vaccination
certificates must meet the requirements for foreign-vaccinated dogs
after being revaccinated prior to U.S. entry.
There is no limit on the number of U.S.-vaccinated dogs with valid
U.S.-issued rabies vaccination certificates that an importer can
import.
These requirements are consistent with CDC's practices as of
December 1, 2021, and are a continuation of the terms of the modified
temporary suspension announced in the June 2022 Federal Register notice
(87 FR 33158, June 1, 2022).
V. Conditions for Entry of Foreign-Vaccinated Dogs With a CDC Dog
Import Permit During the Extension
CDC is continuing to require foreign-vaccinated dogs to meet the
terms of the modified temporary suspension published in the June 2022
Federal Register notice (87 FR 33158, June 1, 2022). Importers of
personal pet dogs may receive up to two CDC Dog Import Permits (i.e.,
permits for two dogs) during the suspension period. Commercial
importers and personal pet owners who do not have serologic titer
results for their dogs will also continue to have an alternate pathway
for importation.
All importers of personal pet dogs (defined for the purpose of this
notice as owners or importers attempting to import fewer than three
dogs total during the suspension and not intended for resale, rescue,
or adoption) from high-risk countries are eligible to apply for a CDC
Dog Import Permit. Commercial dog importers (defined for the purpose of
this notice as importing three or more dogs during the suspension or
those being imported for resale, rescue, or adoption) are not eligible
to apply for a CDC Dog Import Permit and their dogs must meet the
requirements for entry outlined in Section VI below.
Foreign-vaccinated dogs arriving from high-risk countries with a
valid CDC Dog Import Permit will be allowed to enter the United States
if the dogs:
Are six-months of age or older (photographs of the dog's
teeth are required for age verification);
Have an ISO-compatible microchip;
[[Page 5355]]
Have a CDC Rabies Vaccination and Microchip Record
([approved under OMB Control Number 0920-1383 Importation Regulations
(42 CFR 71 Subpart F) (exp. 1/31/2026, or as revised)]) completed by
the veterinarian who administered the rabies vaccine. The record must
state that the vaccine was administered on or after the date the dog
was 12 weeks (84 days) of age. The record must be in English;
Have serologic evidence of rabies vaccination (titer) from
an approved rabies serology laboratory \66\ (serologic titer results
>=0.5 IU/mL are required) with the sample collected at least 45 days
prior to entry and no greater than 365 days before entry; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Approved
Rabies Serology Laboratories for Testing Dogs. Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/importation/bringing-an-animal-into-the-united-states/approved-labs.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrive at one of the 18 CDC-approved ports of entry with
CDC-staffed quarantine stations.
In order to reduce the time to review applications and issue CDC
Dog Import Permits, CDC is requiring that importers of foreign-
vaccinated dogs submit the rabies vaccination and microchip information
via the form CDC Rabies Vaccination and Microchip Record (OMB No. 0920-
1383). As of October 31, 2022, almost half of CDC Dog Import Permit
applicants submitted an incomplete application with information
pertaining to the rabies vaccination certificate constituting the
majority of the missing information. Requiring importers to submit the
CDC Rabies Vaccination and Microchip Record form will help ensure they
submit all required information and will reduce the burden on importers
by reducing the time it takes for them to receive a permit.
Additionally, CDC has included a description on the form to clarify for
veterinarians the information to which they are attesting when they
sign the form on behalf of an importer. The form is available for
download online at: www.cdc.gov/dogpermit.
To apply for a CDC Dog Import Permit, importers whose dogs meet the
entry requirements listed above must submit the Application for Special
Exemption for a Permitted Dog Import, [approved under OMB Control
Number 0920-1383 Importation Regulations (42 CFR 71 Subpart F) (exp. 1/
31/2026), or as revised]. The permit application is available online at
www.cdc.gov/dogpermit.
The importer's application, with all supporting documentation, must
be submitted at least 30 business days (i.e., excluding weekends and
U.S. federal holidays) before the date on which the dog will enter the
United States. Importers may submit an application electronically at
www.cdc.gov/dogpermit. An application cannot be made at the port of
entry upon the dogs' arrival in the United States; dogs that arrive
without a CDC Dog Import Permit will be returned to their country of
departure on the next available flight or quarantined at the importer's
expense at a CDC-approved animal care facility (if one is available at
the port of entry where the dog arrived) pending availability and
payment of all associated examination, vaccination, and quarantine fees
upfront (see Section VI).
Within 10 days of arrival, foreign-vaccinated dogs with a CDC Dog
Import Permit must receive a USDA-licensed rabies booster vaccination
administered by a U.S. veterinarian.
VI. Conditions for Entry of Foreign-Vaccinated Dogs Without a CDC Dog
Import Permit During the Extension
CDC is continuing the requirements of the temporary suspension
published in the June 2022 Federal Register notice (87 FR 33158, June
1, 2022) that provide a pathway for commercial dog importers to import
dogs. While importers of commercial shipments of dogs cannot apply for
a CDC Dog Import Permit, a separate entry process, as outlined below,
has been established. All commercial dog importers from high-risk
countries may import dogs provided that the dogs, upon entering the
United States, are examined, revaccinated, and have proof of an
adequate titer from a CDC-approved laboratory upon arrival or are held
in quarantine at a CDC-approved animal facility until they meet CDC
entry requirements. Importers of personally owned pets may also choose
to use this pathway in lieu of obtaining a CDC Dog Import Permit.
Foreign-vaccinated dogs without a valid CDC Dog Import Permit must
meet all other entry requirements (sections VI-VII) prior to arrival
and must also meet the following requirements:
Dogs must enter at a port of entry with a CDC-approved
animal facility; \67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\67\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Bringing
a dog into the United States. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/dogtravel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dogs must be six months of age or older at the time of
entry;
Dogs must have an