Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices; Classification of the Intense Pulsed Light Device for Managing Dry Eye, 3636-3638 [2023-01049]
Download as PDF
3636
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 876 is
amended as follows:
PART 876—GASTROENTEROLOGYUROLOGY DEVICES
(v) Physician and patient labeling
must include a summary of the clinical
testing with the device.
Dated: January 17, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–01048 Filed 1–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
1. The authority citation for part 876
continues to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
■
2. Add § 876.5960 to subpart F to read
as follows:
Food and Drug Administration
§ 876.5960 Computerized behavioral
therapy device for treating symptoms of
gastrointestinal conditions.
21 CFR Part 886
(a) Identification. A computerized
behavioral therapy device for treating
symptoms of gastrointestinal conditions
is a prescription device intended to
provide a computerized version of
condition-specific therapy as an adjunct
to standard of care treatments to
patients with gastrointestinal
conditions.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical data must be provided to
fulfill the following:
(i) Describe a model of therapy for the
indicated gastrointestinal conditions;
(ii) Validate the model of therapy as
implemented by the device using a
clinically defined endpoint; and
(iii) Evaluate all adverse events.
(2) Software must be described in
detail in the software requirements
specification and software design
specification. Software verification,
validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed. Software documentation
must demonstrate that the device
effectively implements the behavioral
therapy model.
(3) Usability assessment must
demonstrate that the intended user(s)
can safely and correctly use the device.
(4) Labeling:
(i) Labeling must include instructions
for use, including images that
demonstrate how to interact with the
device;
(ii) Patient and physician labeling
must list the minimum operating system
requirements that support the software
of the device;
(iii) Patient and physician labeling
must include a warning that the device
is not intended for use in lieu of a
standard therapeutic intervention or to
represent a substitution for the patient’s
medication;
(iv) Patient and physician labeling
must include a warning to seek medical
care if a patient has feelings or thoughts
of harming themselves or others; and
Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices;
Classification of the Intense Pulsed
Light Device for Managing Dry Eye
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–3256]
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the intense pulsed light
device for managing dry eye into class
II (special controls). The special controls
that apply to the device type are
identified in this order and will be part
of the codified language for the intense
pulsed light device for managing dry
eye’s classification. We are taking this
action because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective January
20, 2023. The classification was
applicable on February 23, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arkady Kaplan, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1568, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6365,
Morris.Kaplan@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
intense pulsed light device for managing
dry eye as class II (special controls),
which we have determined will provide
a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation, in part by
placing the device into a lower device
class than the automatic class III
assignment.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On April 20, 2020, FDA received
Lumenis’s request for De Novo
classification of the Lumenis Stellar
M22. FDA reviewed the request in order
to classify the device under the criteria
for classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
3637
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on February 23, 2021, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 886.5201.1 We have named the
generic type of device intense pulsed
light device for managing dry eye, and
it is identified as a prescription device
intended for use in the application of
intense pulsed light therapy to the skin.
The device is used in patients with dry
eye disease due to meibomian gland
dysfunction, also known as evaporative
dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—INTENSE PULSED LIGHT DEVICE FOR MANAGING DRY EYE RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Tissue damage due to overheating ..........................................................
Tissue damage or loss of vision due to light radiation ............................
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
Electrical shock or burn ............................................................................
Interference with other devices ................................................................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Pain or discomfort ....................................................................................
Failure to mitigate dry eye signs and/or symptoms .................................
Thermal safety assessment, Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis, and Labeling.
Clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Biocompatibility evaluation.
Thermal safety assessment, Electrical safety testing, Software
verification, validation, and hazard analysis, and Labeling.
Electromagnetic compatibility testing; Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis; and Labeling.
Clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
Clinical performance testing, and Labeling.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, intense
pulsed light device for managing dry
eye is/are for prescription use only.
Prescription devices are exempt from
the requirement for adequate directions
for use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as
the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are
met (referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
1 FDA notes that the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 886
Medical devices, Ophthalmic goods
and services.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
3638
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 886 is
amended as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
PART 886—OPHTHALMIC DEVICES
Food and Drug Administration
1. The authority citation for part 886
continues to read as follows:
21 CFR Parts 1000, 1002, 1010, 1020,
1030 and 1050
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–3303]
■
2. Add § 886.5201 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 886.5201 Intense pulsed light device for
managing dry eye.
(a) Identification. An intense pulsed
light device for managing dry eye is a
prescription device intended for use in
the application of intense pulsed light
therapy to the skin. The device is used
in patients with dry eye disease due to
meibomian gland dysfunction, also
known as evaporative dry eye or lipid
deficiency dry eye.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must
evaluate adverse events and
improvement of dry eye signs and
symptoms under anticipated conditions
of use.
(2) Thermal safety assessment in a
worst-case scenario must be performed
to validate temperature safeguards.
(3) Performance testing must
demonstrate electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of
the device in the intended use
environment.
(4) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(5) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(6) Physician and patient labeling
must include:
(i) Device technical parameters;
(ii) A summary of the clinical
performance testing conducted with the
device;
(iii) A description of the intended
treatment area location;
(iv) Warnings and instructions
regarding the use of safety-protective
eyewear for patient and device operator;
(v) A description of intense pulse
light (IPL) radiation hazards and
protection for patient and operator;
(vi) Instructions for use, including an
explanation of all user interface
components; and
(vii) Instructions on how to clean and
maintain the device and its components.
Dated: January 17, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–01049 Filed 1–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
RIN 0910–AH65
Radiological Health Regulations;
Amendments to Records and Reports
for Radiation Emitting Electronic
Products; Amendments to
Performance Standards for Diagnostic
X-ray, Laser, and Ultrasonic Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
amending and repealing parts of the
radiological health regulations covering
recommendations for radiation
protection during medical procedures,
certain records and reporting for
electronic products, and performance
standards for diagnostic x-ray systems
and their major components, laser
products, and ultrasonic therapy
products. The Agency is taking this
action to clarify and update the
regulations to reduce regulatory
requirements that are outdated and
duplicate other means to better protect
the public health against harmful
exposure to radiation emitting
electronic products and medical
devices.
DATES: This rule is effective February
21, 2023.
ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this final rule into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts,
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Ochs, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3680, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–6661, email:
Robert.Ochs@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Final Rule
B. Summary of Major Provisions of the
Final Rule
C. Legal Authority
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Costs and Benefits of the Final Rule
II. Table of Abbreviations/Commonly Used
Acronyms
III. Background
A. Need for Amendments and Repeal of
Certain Radiological Health Regulations
B. Summary of Comments to the Proposed
Rule
C. General Overview of Final Rule
IV. Legal Authority
V. Comments to the Proposed Rule and
FDA’s Responses
A. General Comments on the Proposed
Rule
B. Radiation Safety Recommendations/
Standards Comments
C. General Format and Edit Comments
D. Records and Reports Comments
E. Reports of Assembly, Forms, and
Guidance Comments
F. Accidental Radiation Occurrences
Comments
G. Laser Comments
VI. Effective Date
VII. Economic Analysis of Impacts
A. Introduction
B. Summary of Costs and Benefits
C. Summary of Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis
VIII. Analysis of Environmental Impact
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
X. Federalism
XI. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
XII. References
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Final Rule
This final rule amends and repeals
certain regulations for radiation emitting
electronic products and medical devices
because the FDA has identified the
regulations as being outdated and
duplicative of other means for reducing
radiation exposure to the public. The
Agency is updating the regulations to
amend or repeal regulations that are
outdated and otherwise clarify
requirements for protecting the public
health against radiation exposure from
specific electronic products and medical
devices. The regulations being finalized
for amendment or repeal are the
radiation protection recommendations
for specific uses, records and reporting
requirements for electronic products,
applications for variances, and
performance standards for diagnostic xray systems and their major
components, laser products, and
ultrasonic therapy products.
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Final Rule
This final rule updates FDA’s
radiological health regulations to amend
or repeal the following provisions:
• Repeal the radiation protection
recommendations that have become
outdated and unnecessary;
• Removing or reducing some of the
annual reports and test record
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3636-3638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01049]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 886
[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-3256]
Medical Devices; Ophthalmic Devices; Classification of the
Intense Pulsed Light Device for Managing Dry Eye
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the intense pulsed light device for managing dry eye into
class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the
device type are identified in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the intense pulsed light device for managing dry
eye's classification. We are taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovative devices.
DATES: This order is effective January 20, 2023. The classification was
applicable on February 23, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arkady Kaplan, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1568, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6365,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the intense pulsed light device
for managing dry eye as class II (special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by placing the
device into a lower device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under
[[Page 3637]]
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was
automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is
considered to be the initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On April 20, 2020, FDA received Lumenis's request for De Novo
classification of the Lumenis Stellar M22. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on February 23, 2021, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order,
FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
886.5201.\1\ We have named the generic type of device intense pulsed
light device for managing dry eye, and it is identified as a
prescription device intended for use in the application of intense
pulsed light therapy to the skin. The device is used in patients with
dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as
evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Intense Pulsed Light Device for Managing Dry Eye Risks and
Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tissue damage due to overheating....... Thermal safety assessment,
Software verification,
validation, and hazard
analysis, and Labeling.
Tissue damage or loss of vision due to Clinical performance testing,
light radiation. and Labeling.
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility evaluation.
Electrical shock or burn............... Thermal safety assessment,
Electrical safety testing,
Software verification,
validation, and hazard
analysis, and Labeling.
Interference with other devices........ Electromagnetic compatibility
testing; Software
verification, validation, and
hazard analysis; and Labeling.
Pain or discomfort..................... Clinical performance testing,
and Labeling.
Failure to mitigate dry eye signs and/ Clinical performance testing,
or symptoms. and Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, intense pulsed light device for
managing dry eye is/are for prescription use only. Prescription devices
are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use for the
layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1))
and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met
(referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part
820, regarding quality system regulation, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 886
Medical devices, Ophthalmic goods and services.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
[[Page 3638]]
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 886 is amended as follows:
PART 886--OPHTHALMIC DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 886 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 886.5201 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 886.5201 Intense pulsed light device for managing dry eye.
(a) Identification. An intense pulsed light device for managing dry
eye is a prescription device intended for use in the application of
intense pulsed light therapy to the skin. The device is used in
patients with dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction, also
known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must evaluate adverse events and
improvement of dry eye signs and symptoms under anticipated conditions
of use.
(2) Thermal safety assessment in a worst-case scenario must be
performed to validate temperature safeguards.
(3) Performance testing must demonstrate electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the device in the intended use
environment.
(4) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed.
(5) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(6) Physician and patient labeling must include:
(i) Device technical parameters;
(ii) A summary of the clinical performance testing conducted with
the device;
(iii) A description of the intended treatment area location;
(iv) Warnings and instructions regarding the use of safety-
protective eyewear for patient and device operator;
(v) A description of intense pulse light (IPL) radiation hazards
and protection for patient and operator;
(vi) Instructions for use, including an explanation of all user
interface components; and
(vii) Instructions on how to clean and maintain the device and its
components.
Dated: January 17, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-01049 Filed 1-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P