Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing, 3659-3664 [2022-27483]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
§ 165.T11–120 Safety Zone; Coast Guard
PSU–312 Training Exercise South Bay, San
Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA.
(a) Location. The following is a safety
zone: The safety zone encompasses the
navigable waters, from surface to
bottom, within a circle formed by
connecting all points 1,000 yards from
the circle center at approximate position
37°49′15.3″ N, 122°21′38.5″ W (NAD
83); or as announced via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel, or an officer designated by
or assisting the Captain of the Port
Sector San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart B of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone on VHF–23A or through
the 24-hour Command Center at
telephone (415) 399–3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced on January 21, 2023,
from 9 a.m. through 6:30 p.m.
(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative
will notify the maritime community of
periods during which the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced in accordance
with § 165.7, including but not limited
to Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Dated: January 17, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023–01194 Filed 1–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS–MORA–34555; Docket No. NPS–2022–
0002; PPPWMORAS1 PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024–AE66
Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
removes from the Code of Federal
Regulations special fishing regulations
for Mount Rainier National Park,
including those that restrict the take of
nonnative species. Instead, the National
Park Service will publish closures and
restrictions related to fishing in the
Superintendent’s Compendium for the
park. This action helps implement a
2018 Fish Management Plan that aims to
conserve native fish populations and
restore aquatic ecosystems by reducing
or eliminating nonnative fish.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
21, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
‘‘1024–AE66.’’
Document Availability: The Mount
Rainier National Park Fish Management
Plan Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
provide information and context for this
rule and are available online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking
the link entitled ‘‘Archived Projects’’
and then clicking the link entitled
‘‘2018 Mount Rainier National Park
Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact’’ and then
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Skerl, Deputy Superintendent,
Mount Rainier National Park, National
Park Service; phone: (360) 569–2211;
email: kevin_skerl@nps.gov. Individuals
in the United States who are deaf,
deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Significance of the Park
Mount Rainier National Park
encompasses 236,381 acres in west
central Washington, on the western and
eastern slopes of the Cascade Range.
About 83 percent of the park is located
in Pierce County and 17 percent is
located in Lewis County. The park’s
northern boundary is approximately 65
miles southeast of the Seattle-Tacoma
metropolitan area and 65 miles west of
Yakima. The elevations of the park
range from about 1,400 feet at the
Tahoma Woods Administrative Site to
14,410 feet at the summit of Mount
Rainier. About two million people visit
the park annually, with most visitation
(75 percent) occurring between June and
September. In 1988, Congress
designated approximately 97 percent
(228,480 acres) of the park as wilderness
under the Washington Park Wilderness
Act.
The focal point of the park is Mount
Rainier, a towering snow- and icecovered volcano that is a prominent
landmark in the Pacific Northwest.
Mount Rainier is the second most
seismically active and the most
hazardous volcano in the Cascade
Range. The 26 major glaciers that flank
the upper mountain cover 35 square
miles. Steep glaciated valleys and icecarved peaks dominate the park
landscape. The Carbon, Mowich, White,
West Fork White, Nisqually, South
Puyallup, and North Puyallup rivers
and their tributaries carry water from
Mount Rainier to Puget Sound. The
Ohanapecosh and Muddy Fork Cowlitz
flow into the Cowlitz River and on into
the Columbia River. There are
approximately 470 mapped rivers and
streams, including approximately 383
perennial streams and 84 intermittent
streams. With very few exceptions, park
rivers and streams originate within the
park. There are approximately 382 lakes
and ponds, and over 3,000 acres of other
wetland types (e.g., mineral geothermal
springs, waterfalls) in the park.
Fish Resources in the Park
The following 15 fish species are
present in the rivers, streams and lakes
within the park. Of these, eight are
native and seven are nonnative.
No.
Scientific name
Common name
1 .........
2 .........
Oncorhynchus mykiss ..........................................
Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii .................................
rainbow trout ........................................................
coastal cutthroat trout ..........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3659
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
Occurrence
20JAR1
Native (in some locations).
Native.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
3660
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
No.
Scientific name
Common name
3 .........
4 .........
5 .........
6 .........
7 .........
8 .........
9 .........
10 .......
11 .......
12 .......
13 .......
14 .......
15 .......
Salvelinus confluentus .........................................
Oncorhynchus kisutch ..........................................
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha .................................
Oncorhynchus gorbuscha ....................................
Prosopium williamsoni ..........................................
Cottus confusus ...................................................
Cottus cognatus ...................................................
Cottus rhotheus ....................................................
Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri ..............................
Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi ..................................
Salvelinus fontinalis ..............................................
Gasterosteus aculeatus .......................................
Oncorhynchus nerka ............................................
bull trout ...............................................................
coho salmon .........................................................
chinook salmon ....................................................
pink salmon ..........................................................
mountain whitefish ...............................................
shorthead sculpin .................................................
slimy sculpin .........................................................
torrent sculpin .......................................................
Yellowstone cutthroat trout ..................................
westslope cutthroat trout ......................................
brook trout ............................................................
Alaskan stickleback, threespined stickleback ......
kokanee salmon ...................................................
Fish populations naturally occur
within the park in the nine large valley
bottom rivers and their tributary
junctions up to natural fish barriers.
These rivers bear native fish
populations of rainbow (steelhead) trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss), coastal
cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii
clarkii), bull trout (Salvelinus
confluentus), coho salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch), chinook
salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha),
pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha),
mountain whitefish (Prosopium
williamsoni) and shorthead sculpin
(Cottus confusus). Nonnative sculpins
present in the rivers include slimy
sculpin (C. cognatus) and torrent
sculpin (Cottus rhotheus).
Prior to stocking efforts, there were no
naturally occurring fish populations in
any of the approximately 382 mapped
lakes and ponds in the park. With the
exception of those mentioned above,
most of the mapped streams were also
originally fishless. Early in the park’s
history, the National Park Service (NPS)
and others, including the State of
Washington, introduced nonnative
stocks of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus
mykiss), Yellowstone cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarkii bouvieri),
westslope cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi), brook
trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and kokanee
salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to
enhance recreational fishing. According
to unpublished NPS records, official
stocking occurred from 1915 through
1964 (49 years) in 38 streams, and from
1915 through 1972 (57 years) in 44
lakes. Stocking fish resulted in
reproducing populations of nonnative
fish in naturally fishless lakes. It also
resulted in reproducing populations of
nonnative fish in some rivers and
streams where they compete with native
fish. Additional unauthorized
introductions of nonnative fish,
including threespined stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus), have occurred
since stocking ended. Reproducing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
populations of nonnative fish are now
present in approximately 35 lakes and
all of the park watersheds, including
many streams and the nine major rivers.
All lakes with reproducing nonnative
fish populations are in designated
wilderness with the exception of
Littorals Pond (White River watershed)
and Tipsoo Lake.
The presence of nonnative fish in the
park has had widespread adverse effects
on the distribution, abundance, age
structure, genetics, and behavior of
native fish species, amphibians, and
other aquatic life. Nonnative fish prey
on and compete with native fish,
particularly bull trout. As a result, over
time, populations of native fish within
and outside the park have likely
diminished where brook trout and other
nonnative fish populations have been
established. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) have listed
populations of bull trout, chinook
salmon, and steelhead within the park
as threatened under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). In 2010, the USFWS
designated approximately 30 miles of
streams in the park as bull trout critical
habitat. In 2015, the USFWS issued a
Bull Trout Recovery Plan that identified
actions the NPS should take to protect
bull trout within the park.
NPS Authority To Manage Fishing
The NPS has sole and exclusive
jurisdiction over the lands and waters
within Mount Rainier National Park. 16
U.S.C. 95. The park’s enabling act
directs the Secretary of the Interior,
acting through the NPS, to make such
regulations as the Secretary deems
necessary or proper to care for the park,
including regulations that provide
against the wanton destruction of the
fish and game found within the park,
and against their capture or destruction
for the purposes of merchandise or
profit. 16 U.S.C. 92. The NPS
administers the park as a unit of the
National Park System and has the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Occurrence
Native.
Native.
Native.
Native.
Native.
Native.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
Nonnative.
authority to regulate the use of the park
as it considers necessary or proper. 54
U.S.C. 100751(a). This includes the
authority to regulate activities on water
located within the park that is subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States. 54
U.S.C. 100751(b).
NPS Management Framework for
Fishing
General NPS fishing regulations are
found in 36 CFR 2.3 and apply to all
units of the National Park System. For
example, section 2.3(d)(4) prohibits
commercial fishing in System units,
except where specifically authorized by
Federal statute. Recreational fishing is
allowed within the System in
accordance with state law, provided that
the state law does not conflict with NPS
fishing regulations. 36 CFR 2.3(a).
Special fishing regulations are found in
36 CFR part 7 and apply only in specific
System units that have promulgated
special regulations for this purpose.
Other closures and restrictions related
to fishing are established by the
Superintendent under his or her
discretionary authority in 36 CFR 1.5.
This authority allows Superintendents
to close all or a portion of a park area
to a specific use or activity or impose
conditions or restrictions on a use or
activity. Pursuant to 36 CFR 1.7(b),
these actions do not appear in 36 CFR,
but are compiled and maintained in
what is commonly known as the
Superintendent’s Compendium. The
Superintendent’s Compendium is
typically available on the System unit’s
website. Actions taken by the
Superintendent under the authority in
36 CFR 1.5 may not conflict with
regulations found in the CFR, including
the general fishing regulations in section
2.3.
NPS Management of Fishing in the Park
Special fishing regulations for the
park are found in 36 CFR 7.5(a). The
NPS promulgated these regulations in
1969 (34 FR 17520) and last amended
them in 1976 (41 FR 14863). The
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
regulations close the following areas to
all fishing: (i) Tipsoo Lake; (ii) Shadow
Lake; (iii) Klickitat Creek above the
White River entrance water supply
intake; (iv) Laughingwater Creek above
the Ohanapecosh water supply intake;
(v) Frozen Lake; (vi) Reflection Lakes;
and (vii) Ipsut Creek above the Ipsut
Creek Campground water supply intake.
36 CFR 7.5(a)(1). The special regulations
also close the Ohanapecosh River and
its tributaries to all fishing except for
fishing with artificial flies. 36 CFR
7.5(a)(2). The regulations state that there
shall be no minimum size limit on fish
that may be possessed. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(3).
The regulations state that the daily catch
and possession limit for fish taken from
park waters shall be six pounds and one
fish, not to exceed 12 fish. 36 CFR
7.5(a)(4).
Other closures and restrictions related
to fishing appear in the
Superintendent’s Compendium for the
park, which is available on the park’s
website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/
learn/management/lawsandpolicies.
htm. Several of these closures and
restrictions are intended to conserve
native fish species and reduce or
eliminate nonnative species. The
Compendium states that all native fish
species caught in rivers and streams
must be released, but that kokanee and
brook trout (both nonnative species)
may be retained with no limit. The
purpose of this Compendium action is
to protect native fish species by
requiring catch-and-release and to
reduce populations of nonnative species
by allowing them to be removed from
the park. The Compendium prohibits
multipoint hooks with barbs in rivers
and streams to cause less injury to
native species that will be released. The
Compendium prohibits lead fishing
tackle anywhere in the park to avoid
poisoning aquatic biota and humans.
The Compendium closes Fryingpan
Creek above the confluence of the White
River to all fishing. This closure protects
native fish species (bull trout, chinook
salmon, and steelhead) that are listed as
threatened under the ESA. The
Compendium also closes Ghost Lake
and Edith Creek Basin above the
Paradise water supply to protect the
potable water supply for White River
and Paradise. The Compendium
establishes fishing seasons for rivers and
streams to protect the spawning season
of listed, native species. Where fishing
is allowed in lakes, there are no
seasonal closures or limits on retaining
any fish species because, as noted
above, fish are not native to lakes within
the park.
In September 2017, the NPS
published a Fish Management Plan/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
Environmental Assessment (the Plan).
The purpose of the Plan is to direct
long-term management for fish within
lakes, rivers and streams within the
park. During the development of the
Plan, the NPS solicited information
from the USFWS, the NMFS, the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW), the Washington State
Historic Preservation Office, and six
affiliated American Indian tribes: the
Nisqually Tribe of Indians, the
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, the Cowlitz
Indian Tribe, the Puyallup Tribe of
Indians, the Squaxin Island Tribe, and
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of
the Yakama Nation. The U.S. Forest
Service, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie
National Forest, also submitted
comments during the public scoping
period that occurred before the Plan was
published. The Plan was open for a 30day public comment period.
On August 28, 2018, the Regional
Director for Department of the Interior
Unified Regions 8, 9, and 10 (formerly
the Pacific West Region) approved a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) selecting Alternative 2 in the
Plan for implementation. This
alternative calls for site-specific
management actions to encourage
recreational fishing opportunities for
nonnative species and to protect native
fish and habitat. In addition to
increasing recreational angling
opportunities for nonnative species, the
alternative calls for suppressing or
eradicating nonnative fish populations
through administrative actions such as
gillnetting, seining, electrofishing, and
piscicides in selected locations. The
selected alternative is consistent with
actions required by the 2015 Bull Trout
Recovery Plan issued by the USFWS.
The NPS expects the eradication or
suppression of nonnative fish to result
in the increased survival and abundance
of threatened and endangered species
(bull trout, chinook salmon and
steelhead) and improved habitat for
native species. The Plan, which
contains a full description of the
purpose and need for taking action, the
alternatives considered, and the
environmental impacts associated with
the considered alternatives, and the
FONSI may be viewed on the park’s
planning website at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘Archived Projects’’
and then clicking the link entitled
‘‘2018 Mount Rainier National Park
Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact’’ and then
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3661
Final Rule
This rule removes special fishing
regulations for the park that interfere
with the successful implementation of
the fish management strategy identified
in the FONSI. These include the
following closures and restrictions that
limit the take of nonnative fish: (1)
closures at Ipsut Creek and (except for
artificial flyfishing) the Ohanapecosh
River; and (2) a daily catch and
possession limit of six pounds and one
fish, not to exceed 12 fish. Removing
these closures and restrictions will
create new angling opportunities for
nonnative species that are currently not
authorized by 36 CFR 7.5. The other
closures and restrictions currently
codified in the special regulations will
be relocated to and maintained in the
Superintendent’s Compendium because
either they are necessary to protect the
domestic potable water supply for
White River, Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and
Paradise (the closures of Frozen Lake
and streams with identified water
supply intakes); or to protect fragile
riparian vegetation (the closures of
Tipsoo Lake, Shadow Lake and
Reflection Lakes). Closures and
restrictions in the special regulations
also apply to the take of native fish
species. These will be retained or
modified in the Superintendent’s
Compendium, consistent with the
selected alternative in the FONSI, to
help restore the natural abundance,
diversity, dynamics, distribution,
habitats and behaviors of native fish
populations that were present in the
park prior to the introduction of
nonnative fish. The administrative
flexibility offered by the
Superintendent’s Compendium, which
in most circumstances can be modified
without notice and comment
rulemaking (see 36 CFR 1.5(b)), provides
a feasible and responsive method to
meet the strategic goals identified in the
FONSI to utilize adaptive management
to alter management activities when
needed based on monitoring and best
available science. NPS regulations at 36
CFR 1.7(b) require the Superintendent
to update the Compendium at least
annually. The NPS will ensure that the
public has an opportunity to provide
meaningful input prior to updating any
closures or restrictions related to fishing
in the Compendium.
Consolidating all fishing closures and
restrictions in the Compendium will
make them more accessible and userfriendly for the public. Instead of having
to look in two different places (the
special regulations in 36 CFR 7.5 and
the Superintendent’s Compendium on
the park’s website), the public will be
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
3662
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
able to find all closures and restrictions
related to fishing in one place. The NPS
has already done this, informally, by
producing a fishing pamphlet that is
available at the park’s website at https://
www.nps.gov/mora/planyourvisit/
fishing-and-boating.htm. Moving all of
the closures and restrictions related to
fishing into the Compendium will
consolidate the official versions of them
in one place for legal purposes.
Centralizing them in the Compendium
will increase compliance, strengthen
enforcement, and decrease public
confusion and frustration. The NPS
routinely responds to inquiries and
requests for clarification from the State
of Washington and members of the
public regarding fishing opportunities
and rules within the park. Placing all
fishing closures and restrictions in the
Compendium will help visitors
understand the rules and become better
stewards of fishery resource at the park.
In order to direct the public to the
Compendium, the NPS is replacing the
existing language in paragraph (a) of
section 7.5 with a general statement that
the Superintendent will establish
fishing closures and restrictions, based
on management objectives described in
the park’s resource management plans,
in accordance with the criteria and
procedures in 36 CFR 1.5 and 1.7,
including publication in the
Superintendent’s Compendium. The
rule also states that fishing in closed
waters or violating a fishing restriction
established by the Superintendent is
prohibited. Similar language is used in
the special regulations for other NPS
units, including Glacier National Park
(36 CFR 7.3) and Rocky Mountain
National Park (36 CFR 7.7).
Summary of Public Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule in
the Federal Register on January 11,
2022 (87 FR 1374). The NPS accepted
public comments on the proposed rule
for 60 days via the mail, hand delivery,
and the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
were accepted through March 14, 2022.
A total of 27 comments were submitted
and reviewed. Many commenters
supported the proposed rule and did not
raise any issues or suggest any changes.
Some commenters raised concerns or
questions about the proposed rule that
the NPS summarizes and responds to
below. After considering the public
comments and after additional review,
the NPS did not make any changes in
the final rule.
1. Comment: One commenter asked if
there is oversight of management
decisions implemented through the
Superintendent’s Compendium and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
whether the WDFW would be involved
in such management decisions to ensure
the protection of native fish species.
NPS Response: NPS regulations at 36
CFR 1.5 require the Superintendent to
follow specific procedures and
requirements in order to use
discretionary authority to implement
closures and restrictions related to
visitor use of park areas. The
Superintendent must prepare a written
determination justifying each action and
use appropriate methods to notify the
public of any such closures or
restrictions. All such actions must be
listed in the Compendium, which must
be available to the public and updated
at least annually. Compendium actions
must be consistent with federal law and
policy and may not be highly
controversial or otherwise significant
without going through a public notice
and comment review process.
A primary purpose of the Plan is to
promote the recovery of native fish
species in the park. The NPS will
continue to collaborate with the WDFW
as it implements the selected alternative
in the FONSI to achieve this goal.
Continued collaboration may include
identifying barriers to restoration of
native fish species and ecosystem
recovery within the park and, where
possible, addressing issues outside the
park such as fish stocking practices and
barriers to fish migration downstream of
the park. The NPS will ensure that the
public and its partners, including
WDFW, have an opportunity to provide
meaningful input prior to updating any
closures or restrictions related to fishing
in the Compendium.
2. Comment: Several commenters
questioned how the NPS will enforce
requirements to release native species
that are incidentally caught in rivers
and streams as bycatch. One commenter
suggested that dynamic closures of park
areas would more effectively reduce
bycatch and be more easily enforced.
NPS Response: In some situations,
catch and release requirements may be
more difficult to enforce than closures
that prohibit all fishing in certain
locations; however, enforcing catch and
release requirements is not unique and
occurs in many park areas with
recreational fishing. The NPS believes
that placing all closures and restrictions
related to fishing in the Compendium
will increase compliance and strengthen
enforcement because it will be easier for
the public understand what is allowed.
The NPS has implemented closures in
areas where the probability of ESAprotected bycatch is high (e.g.,
Fryingpan) and also seasonal
restrictions to protect spawning native
species. The NPS will evaluate and
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
modify management actions as needed
if monitoring shows unanticipated
adverse effects on native fish species.
3. Comment: Several commenters
emphasized the importance of educating
anglers to increase compliance with
fishing closures and restrictions. One
commenter suggested the NPS develop
and promote interactive educational
classes and activities to inform visitors
about fishing rules and aquatic
resources in the park.
NPS Response: The NPS agrees that
educating anglers is critical to
compliance and has developed a robust
educational strategy to communicate
how closures and restrictions will help
achieve the purpose and goals of the
Plan. In addition to the continued use
and distribution of the fishing
pamphlet, the NPS is developing a
software application and a fishing guide
that will provide information about
fishing in the park and the status of fish
species and habitats. The NPS will also
send roving interpreters throughout the
park to provide information directly to
recreational anglers.
4. Comment: One commenter asked
whether the rule would adversely affect
recreational fishing if less fish are
present in the park.
NPS Response: Catch and release
fishing opportunities will continue to be
available in most rivers and streams for
some time during implementation of the
Plan. A few small lakes with small fish
populations may be fished out by
anglers. At the same time, there will be
widespread benefits to native fish and
amphibian populations in areas where
nonnative fish are removed, which will
increase the ability of anglers and other
visitors to see and to interact with
native fish, amphibians and other
species in their habitats throughout the
park. Because it will likely take decades
before the NPS can implement fish
removal programs throughout the park,
diminished fishing opportunities would
occur in stages over time, reducing the
overall impact of this recreational loss.
Because fishing has consistently been
rated low on the scale of recreational
activities that visitors engage in during
visitor surveys, this loss would likely be
imperceptible to most park visitors.
5. Comment: One commenter asked
the NPS to support local businesses and
restaurants by giving them preferential
rights to fish in the park or allowing
them to use nonnative fish that are
removed through administrative actions
such as gillnetting, seining and
electrofishing.
NPS Response: NPS regulations at 36
CFR 2.3(d)(4) prohibit commercial
fishing in National Park System units,
except where specifically authorized by
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Federal statute The park’s enabling act
does not authorize commercial fishing.
Instead, it directs the NPS to prohibit
the capture of fish for merchandise or
profit. As a result, the NPS cannot allow
local businesses or restaurants to take
fish in the park for commercial
purposes. Most administrative actions
capturing nonnative fish occur in
backcountry locations where
transportation of the fish outside of the
park is not feasible. In most cases, the
fish are too small to have value for local
businesses and restaurants.
6. Comment: One commenter stated
native fish populations could be
restored more quickly if there are no
catch limits on nonnative fish species
except those that are vital for
maintaining potable water in the White
River, Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and
Paradise waterways.
NPS Response: The NPS agrees that
through the capture of nonnative
species, anglers can play an important
role in the conservation and recovery of
native species in the park. In many
lakes, rivers and streams in the park,
anglers are essential for suppressing
nonnative species. For these reasons,
the rule would remove the daily catch
limit in the special regulations in order
to allow the retention of brook trout and
kokanee salmon from rivers and streams
and all nonnative fish from lakes that
are open to recreational fishing. Except
for brook trout and kokanee salmon,
anglers may not retain other nonnative
species from rivers and streams because
those species are too difficult to
distinguish from native species that
must be released. The Compendium will
continue to close Tipsoo Lake, Shadow
Lake and Reflection Lakes to all fishing
in order to protect fragile riparian
vegetation.
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders and Department
Policy
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This certification is based on
information contained in the economic
analyses found in the report entitled
‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
Threshold Analyses: Proposed Rule to
Remove Special Regulations for Fishing
at Mount Rainier National Park.’’ The
document may be viewed on the park’s
planning website at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking
on the link entitled ‘‘Archived Projects’’
and then clicking the link entitled
‘‘2018 Mount Rainier National Park
Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact’’ and then
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Document
List’’ and then clicking on the link
entitled ‘‘Fish Management Plan
FONSI.’’
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule will not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. It
addresses public use of national park
lands and imposes no requirements on
other agencies or governments. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3663
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
takings implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule will not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
This rule only affects use of federally
administered lands and waters. It has no
outside effects on other areas. A
federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
a. Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
b. Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and
Department Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. The
NPS has evaluated this rule under the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 and
under the Department’s tribal
consultation policy and has determined
that tribal consultation is not required
because the rule will have no
substantial direct effect on federally
recognized Indian tribes. During scoping
for the Plan, the NPS solicited
comments from six affiliated American
Indian tribes: the Nisqually Tribe of
Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe,
the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the Puyallup
Tribe of Indians, the Squaxin Island
Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes and
Bands of the Yakama Nation. The NPS
will continue to work with these tribes
throughout the implementation of the
selected alternative in the FONSI.
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
3664
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act
§ 7.5
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required. The NPS may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
(a) Fishing. (1) Fishing closures and
restrictions are established by the
Superintendent based on management
objectives for the preservation of the
park’s natural resources.
(2) The Superintendent may establish
closures and restrictions, in accordance
with the criteria and procedures of § 1.5
of this chapter, on any activity
pertaining to fishing, including, but not
limited to species of fish that may be
taken, seasons and hours during which
fishing may take place, methods of
taking, and size, creel, and possession
limits.
(3) Except in emergency situations,
the Superintendent will notify the
public of any such closures or
restrictions through one or more
methods listed in § 1.7 of this chapter,
including publication in the
Superintendent’s Compendium (or
written compilation) of discretionary
actions referred to § 1.7(b).
(4) Fishing in closed waters or
violating a condition or restriction
established by the Superintendent
under this paragraph (a) is prohibited.
*
*
*
*
*
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The NPS has prepared the Plan to
determine whether this rule will have a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment under the NEPA.
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is
not required because of the FONSI. A
copy of the Plan and FONSI may be
viewed on the park’s planning website
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora
by clicking on the link entitled
‘‘Archived Projects’’ and then clicking
the link entitled ‘‘2018 Mount Rainier
National Park Fisheries Management
Plan Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact’’ and
then clicking the link entitled
‘‘Document List.’’
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rulemaking is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
Executive Order 13211; the rule is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy, and the rule has not otherwise
been designated by the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs as a significant energy action. A
Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Shannon Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022–27483 Filed 1–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AR50
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
Emergent Suicide Care
National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service amends 36 CFR
part 7 as follows:
Correction
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 7
continues to read as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Mount Rainier National Park
In rule document 2023–00298
appearing on pages 2526–2537 in the
issue of Tuesday, January 17, 2023,
make the following correction:
On page 2526, in the second column,
after the DATES heading, in the Effective
date section, in the second line, ‘‘March
20, 2023’’ should read ‘‘January 17,
2023’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2023–00298 Filed 1–18–23; 4:15 pm]
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751,
320102; Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C.
Code 10–137 and D.C. Code 50–2201.07.
BILLING CODE 0099–10–P
2. In § 7.5, revise paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jan 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0787; FRL–10504–01–
OCSPP]
Fluridone; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of fluridone in or
on multiple commodities which are
identified and discussed later in this
document. SePRO Corporation
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
January 20, 2023. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before March 21, 2023, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0787, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room and the OPP
Docket is (202) 566–1744. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services
and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration Division
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(202) 566–2875; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3659-3664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27483]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS-MORA-34555; Docket No. NPS-2022-0002; PPPWMORAS1 PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]
RIN 1024-AE66
Mount Rainier National Park; Fishing
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service removes from the Code of Federal
Regulations special fishing regulations for Mount Rainier National
Park, including those that restrict the take of nonnative species.
Instead, the National Park Service will publish closures and
restrictions related to fishing in the Superintendent's Compendium for
the park. This action helps implement a 2018 Fish Management Plan that
aims to conserve native fish populations and restore aquatic ecosystems
by reducing or eliminating nonnative fish.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 21, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for
``1024-AE66.''
Document Availability: The Mount Rainier National Park Fish
Management Plan Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant
Impact provide information and context for this rule and are available
online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking the link
entitled ``Archived Projects'' and then clicking the link entitled
``2018 Mount Rainier National Park Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' and
then clicking the link entitled ``Document List.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Skerl, Deputy Superintendent,
Mount Rainier National Park, National Park Service; phone: (360) 569-
2211; email: [email protected]. Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may
dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay
services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay
services offered within their country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Significance of the Park
Mount Rainier National Park encompasses 236,381 acres in west
central Washington, on the western and eastern slopes of the Cascade
Range. About 83 percent of the park is located in Pierce County and 17
percent is located in Lewis County. The park's northern boundary is
approximately 65 miles southeast of the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan
area and 65 miles west of Yakima. The elevations of the park range from
about 1,400 feet at the Tahoma Woods Administrative Site to 14,410 feet
at the summit of Mount Rainier. About two million people visit the park
annually, with most visitation (75 percent) occurring between June and
September. In 1988, Congress designated approximately 97 percent
(228,480 acres) of the park as wilderness under the Washington Park
Wilderness Act.
The focal point of the park is Mount Rainier, a towering snow- and
ice-covered volcano that is a prominent landmark in the Pacific
Northwest. Mount Rainier is the second most seismically active and the
most hazardous volcano in the Cascade Range. The 26 major glaciers that
flank the upper mountain cover 35 square miles. Steep glaciated valleys
and ice-carved peaks dominate the park landscape. The Carbon, Mowich,
White, West Fork White, Nisqually, South Puyallup, and North Puyallup
rivers and their tributaries carry water from Mount Rainier to Puget
Sound. The Ohanapecosh and Muddy Fork Cowlitz flow into the Cowlitz
River and on into the Columbia River. There are approximately 470
mapped rivers and streams, including approximately 383 perennial
streams and 84 intermittent streams. With very few exceptions, park
rivers and streams originate within the park. There are approximately
382 lakes and ponds, and over 3,000 acres of other wetland types (e.g.,
mineral geothermal springs, waterfalls) in the park.
Fish Resources in the Park
The following 15 fish species are present in the rivers, streams
and lakes within the park. Of these, eight are native and seven are
nonnative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Scientific name Common name Occurrence
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... Oncorhynchus mykiss.... rainbow trout.......... Native (in some
locations).
2.................................... Oncorhynchus clarkii coastal cutthroat trout Native.
clarkii.
[[Page 3660]]
3.................................... Salvelinus confluentus. bull trout............. Native.
4.................................... Oncorhynchus kisutch... coho salmon............ Native.
5.................................... Oncorhynchus chinook salmon......... Native.
tshawytscha.
6.................................... Oncorhynchus gorbuscha. pink salmon............ Native.
7.................................... Prosopium williamsoni.. mountain whitefish..... Native.
8.................................... Cottus confusus........ shorthead sculpin...... Native.
9.................................... Cottus cognatus........ slimy sculpin.......... Nonnative.
10................................... Cottus rhotheus........ torrent sculpin........ Nonnative.
11................................... Oncorhynchus clarkii Yellowstone cutthroat Nonnative.
bouvieri. trout.
12................................... Oncorhynchus clarkii westslope cutthroat Nonnative.
lewisi. trout.
13................................... Salvelinus fontinalis.. brook trout............ Nonnative.
14................................... Gasterosteus aculeatus. Alaskan stickleback, Nonnative.
threespined
stickleback.
15................................... Oncorhynchus nerka..... kokanee salmon......... Nonnative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish populations naturally occur within the park in the nine large
valley bottom rivers and their tributary junctions up to natural fish
barriers. These rivers bear native fish populations of rainbow
(steelhead) trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), coastal cutthroat trout
(Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii), bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus),
coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha), pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), mountain whitefish
(Prosopium williamsoni) and shorthead sculpin (Cottus confusus).
Nonnative sculpins present in the rivers include slimy sculpin (C.
cognatus) and torrent sculpin (Cottus rhotheus).
Prior to stocking efforts, there were no naturally occurring fish
populations in any of the approximately 382 mapped lakes and ponds in
the park. With the exception of those mentioned above, most of the
mapped streams were also originally fishless. Early in the park's
history, the National Park Service (NPS) and others, including the
State of Washington, introduced nonnative stocks of rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss), Yellowstone cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus
clarkii bouvieri), westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii
lewisi), brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and kokanee salmon
(Oncorhynchus nerka) to enhance recreational fishing. According to
unpublished NPS records, official stocking occurred from 1915 through
1964 (49 years) in 38 streams, and from 1915 through 1972 (57 years) in
44 lakes. Stocking fish resulted in reproducing populations of
nonnative fish in naturally fishless lakes. It also resulted in
reproducing populations of nonnative fish in some rivers and streams
where they compete with native fish. Additional unauthorized
introductions of nonnative fish, including threespined stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus), have occurred since stocking ended.
Reproducing populations of nonnative fish are now present in
approximately 35 lakes and all of the park watersheds, including many
streams and the nine major rivers. All lakes with reproducing nonnative
fish populations are in designated wilderness with the exception of
Littorals Pond (White River watershed) and Tipsoo Lake.
The presence of nonnative fish in the park has had widespread
adverse effects on the distribution, abundance, age structure,
genetics, and behavior of native fish species, amphibians, and other
aquatic life. Nonnative fish prey on and compete with native fish,
particularly bull trout. As a result, over time, populations of native
fish within and outside the park have likely diminished where brook
trout and other nonnative fish populations have been established. The
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) have listed populations of bull trout, chinook salmon,
and steelhead within the park as threatened under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). In 2010, the USFWS designated approximately 30 miles
of streams in the park as bull trout critical habitat. In 2015, the
USFWS issued a Bull Trout Recovery Plan that identified actions the NPS
should take to protect bull trout within the park.
NPS Authority To Manage Fishing
The NPS has sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the lands and
waters within Mount Rainier National Park. 16 U.S.C. 95. The park's
enabling act directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the
NPS, to make such regulations as the Secretary deems necessary or
proper to care for the park, including regulations that provide against
the wanton destruction of the fish and game found within the park, and
against their capture or destruction for the purposes of merchandise or
profit. 16 U.S.C. 92. The NPS administers the park as a unit of the
National Park System and has the authority to regulate the use of the
park as it considers necessary or proper. 54 U.S.C. 100751(a). This
includes the authority to regulate activities on water located within
the park that is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. 54
U.S.C. 100751(b).
NPS Management Framework for Fishing
General NPS fishing regulations are found in 36 CFR 2.3 and apply
to all units of the National Park System. For example, section
2.3(d)(4) prohibits commercial fishing in System units, except where
specifically authorized by Federal statute. Recreational fishing is
allowed within the System in accordance with state law, provided that
the state law does not conflict with NPS fishing regulations. 36 CFR
2.3(a). Special fishing regulations are found in 36 CFR part 7 and
apply only in specific System units that have promulgated special
regulations for this purpose. Other closures and restrictions related
to fishing are established by the Superintendent under his or her
discretionary authority in 36 CFR 1.5. This authority allows
Superintendents to close all or a portion of a park area to a specific
use or activity or impose conditions or restrictions on a use or
activity. Pursuant to 36 CFR 1.7(b), these actions do not appear in 36
CFR, but are compiled and maintained in what is commonly known as the
Superintendent's Compendium. The Superintendent's Compendium is
typically available on the System unit's website. Actions taken by the
Superintendent under the authority in 36 CFR 1.5 may not conflict with
regulations found in the CFR, including the general fishing regulations
in section 2.3.
NPS Management of Fishing in the Park
Special fishing regulations for the park are found in 36 CFR
7.5(a). The NPS promulgated these regulations in 1969 (34 FR 17520) and
last amended them in 1976 (41 FR 14863). The
[[Page 3661]]
regulations close the following areas to all fishing: (i) Tipsoo Lake;
(ii) Shadow Lake; (iii) Klickitat Creek above the White River entrance
water supply intake; (iv) Laughingwater Creek above the Ohanapecosh
water supply intake; (v) Frozen Lake; (vi) Reflection Lakes; and (vii)
Ipsut Creek above the Ipsut Creek Campground water supply intake. 36
CFR 7.5(a)(1). The special regulations also close the Ohanapecosh River
and its tributaries to all fishing except for fishing with artificial
flies. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(2). The regulations state that there shall be no
minimum size limit on fish that may be possessed. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(3). The
regulations state that the daily catch and possession limit for fish
taken from park waters shall be six pounds and one fish, not to exceed
12 fish. 36 CFR 7.5(a)(4).
Other closures and restrictions related to fishing appear in the
Superintendent's Compendium for the park, which is available on the
park's website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/learn/management/lawsandpolicies.htm. Several of these closures and restrictions are
intended to conserve native fish species and reduce or eliminate
nonnative species. The Compendium states that all native fish species
caught in rivers and streams must be released, but that kokanee and
brook trout (both nonnative species) may be retained with no limit. The
purpose of this Compendium action is to protect native fish species by
requiring catch-and-release and to reduce populations of nonnative
species by allowing them to be removed from the park. The Compendium
prohibits multipoint hooks with barbs in rivers and streams to cause
less injury to native species that will be released. The Compendium
prohibits lead fishing tackle anywhere in the park to avoid poisoning
aquatic biota and humans. The Compendium closes Fryingpan Creek above
the confluence of the White River to all fishing. This closure protects
native fish species (bull trout, chinook salmon, and steelhead) that
are listed as threatened under the ESA. The Compendium also closes
Ghost Lake and Edith Creek Basin above the Paradise water supply to
protect the potable water supply for White River and Paradise. The
Compendium establishes fishing seasons for rivers and streams to
protect the spawning season of listed, native species. Where fishing is
allowed in lakes, there are no seasonal closures or limits on retaining
any fish species because, as noted above, fish are not native to lakes
within the park.
In September 2017, the NPS published a Fish Management Plan/
Environmental Assessment (the Plan). The purpose of the Plan is to
direct long-term management for fish within lakes, rivers and streams
within the park. During the development of the Plan, the NPS solicited
information from the USFWS, the NMFS, the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife (WDFW), the Washington State Historic Preservation Office,
and six affiliated American Indian tribes: the Nisqually Tribe of
Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the
Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the Squaxin Island Tribe, and the
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. The U.S. Forest
Service, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, also submitted
comments during the public scoping period that occurred before the Plan
was published. The Plan was open for a 30-day public comment period.
On August 28, 2018, the Regional Director for Department of the
Interior Unified Regions 8, 9, and 10 (formerly the Pacific West
Region) approved a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) selecting
Alternative 2 in the Plan for implementation. This alternative calls
for site-specific management actions to encourage recreational fishing
opportunities for nonnative species and to protect native fish and
habitat. In addition to increasing recreational angling opportunities
for nonnative species, the alternative calls for suppressing or
eradicating nonnative fish populations through administrative actions
such as gillnetting, seining, electrofishing, and piscicides in
selected locations. The selected alternative is consistent with actions
required by the 2015 Bull Trout Recovery Plan issued by the USFWS. The
NPS expects the eradication or suppression of nonnative fish to result
in the increased survival and abundance of threatened and endangered
species (bull trout, chinook salmon and steelhead) and improved habitat
for native species. The Plan, which contains a full description of the
purpose and need for taking action, the alternatives considered, and
the environmental impacts associated with the considered alternatives,
and the FONSI may be viewed on the park's planning website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link entitled ``Archived
Projects'' and then clicking the link entitled ``2018 Mount Rainier
National Park Fisheries Management Plan Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact'' and then clicking the link entitled
``Document List.''
Final Rule
This rule removes special fishing regulations for the park that
interfere with the successful implementation of the fish management
strategy identified in the FONSI. These include the following closures
and restrictions that limit the take of nonnative fish: (1) closures at
Ipsut Creek and (except for artificial flyfishing) the Ohanapecosh
River; and (2) a daily catch and possession limit of six pounds and one
fish, not to exceed 12 fish. Removing these closures and restrictions
will create new angling opportunities for nonnative species that are
currently not authorized by 36 CFR 7.5. The other closures and
restrictions currently codified in the special regulations will be
relocated to and maintained in the Superintendent's Compendium because
either they are necessary to protect the domestic potable water supply
for White River, Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and Paradise (the closures of
Frozen Lake and streams with identified water supply intakes); or to
protect fragile riparian vegetation (the closures of Tipsoo Lake,
Shadow Lake and Reflection Lakes). Closures and restrictions in the
special regulations also apply to the take of native fish species.
These will be retained or modified in the Superintendent's Compendium,
consistent with the selected alternative in the FONSI, to help restore
the natural abundance, diversity, dynamics, distribution, habitats and
behaviors of native fish populations that were present in the park
prior to the introduction of nonnative fish. The administrative
flexibility offered by the Superintendent's Compendium, which in most
circumstances can be modified without notice and comment rulemaking
(see 36 CFR 1.5(b)), provides a feasible and responsive method to meet
the strategic goals identified in the FONSI to utilize adaptive
management to alter management activities when needed based on
monitoring and best available science. NPS regulations at 36 CFR 1.7(b)
require the Superintendent to update the Compendium at least annually.
The NPS will ensure that the public has an opportunity to provide
meaningful input prior to updating any closures or restrictions related
to fishing in the Compendium.
Consolidating all fishing closures and restrictions in the
Compendium will make them more accessible and user-friendly for the
public. Instead of having to look in two different places (the special
regulations in 36 CFR 7.5 and the Superintendent's Compendium on the
park's website), the public will be
[[Page 3662]]
able to find all closures and restrictions related to fishing in one
place. The NPS has already done this, informally, by producing a
fishing pamphlet that is available at the park's website at https://www.nps.gov/mora/planyourvisit/fishing-and-boating.htm. Moving all of
the closures and restrictions related to fishing into the Compendium
will consolidate the official versions of them in one place for legal
purposes. Centralizing them in the Compendium will increase compliance,
strengthen enforcement, and decrease public confusion and frustration.
The NPS routinely responds to inquiries and requests for clarification
from the State of Washington and members of the public regarding
fishing opportunities and rules within the park. Placing all fishing
closures and restrictions in the Compendium will help visitors
understand the rules and become better stewards of fishery resource at
the park. In order to direct the public to the Compendium, the NPS is
replacing the existing language in paragraph (a) of section 7.5 with a
general statement that the Superintendent will establish fishing
closures and restrictions, based on management objectives described in
the park's resource management plans, in accordance with the criteria
and procedures in 36 CFR 1.5 and 1.7, including publication in the
Superintendent's Compendium. The rule also states that fishing in
closed waters or violating a fishing restriction established by the
Superintendent is prohibited. Similar language is used in the special
regulations for other NPS units, including Glacier National Park (36
CFR 7.3) and Rocky Mountain National Park (36 CFR 7.7).
Summary of Public Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on
January 11, 2022 (87 FR 1374). The NPS accepted public comments on the
proposed rule for 60 days via the mail, hand delivery, and the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments were
accepted through March 14, 2022. A total of 27 comments were submitted
and reviewed. Many commenters supported the proposed rule and did not
raise any issues or suggest any changes. Some commenters raised
concerns or questions about the proposed rule that the NPS summarizes
and responds to below. After considering the public comments and after
additional review, the NPS did not make any changes in the final rule.
1. Comment: One commenter asked if there is oversight of management
decisions implemented through the Superintendent's Compendium and
whether the WDFW would be involved in such management decisions to
ensure the protection of native fish species.
NPS Response: NPS regulations at 36 CFR 1.5 require the
Superintendent to follow specific procedures and requirements in order
to use discretionary authority to implement closures and restrictions
related to visitor use of park areas. The Superintendent must prepare a
written determination justifying each action and use appropriate
methods to notify the public of any such closures or restrictions. All
such actions must be listed in the Compendium, which must be available
to the public and updated at least annually. Compendium actions must be
consistent with federal law and policy and may not be highly
controversial or otherwise significant without going through a public
notice and comment review process.
A primary purpose of the Plan is to promote the recovery of native
fish species in the park. The NPS will continue to collaborate with the
WDFW as it implements the selected alternative in the FONSI to achieve
this goal. Continued collaboration may include identifying barriers to
restoration of native fish species and ecosystem recovery within the
park and, where possible, addressing issues outside the park such as
fish stocking practices and barriers to fish migration downstream of
the park. The NPS will ensure that the public and its partners,
including WDFW, have an opportunity to provide meaningful input prior
to updating any closures or restrictions related to fishing in the
Compendium.
2. Comment: Several commenters questioned how the NPS will enforce
requirements to release native species that are incidentally caught in
rivers and streams as bycatch. One commenter suggested that dynamic
closures of park areas would more effectively reduce bycatch and be
more easily enforced.
NPS Response: In some situations, catch and release requirements
may be more difficult to enforce than closures that prohibit all
fishing in certain locations; however, enforcing catch and release
requirements is not unique and occurs in many park areas with
recreational fishing. The NPS believes that placing all closures and
restrictions related to fishing in the Compendium will increase
compliance and strengthen enforcement because it will be easier for the
public understand what is allowed. The NPS has implemented closures in
areas where the probability of ESA-protected bycatch is high (e.g.,
Fryingpan) and also seasonal restrictions to protect spawning native
species. The NPS will evaluate and modify management actions as needed
if monitoring shows unanticipated adverse effects on native fish
species.
3. Comment: Several commenters emphasized the importance of
educating anglers to increase compliance with fishing closures and
restrictions. One commenter suggested the NPS develop and promote
interactive educational classes and activities to inform visitors about
fishing rules and aquatic resources in the park.
NPS Response: The NPS agrees that educating anglers is critical to
compliance and has developed a robust educational strategy to
communicate how closures and restrictions will help achieve the purpose
and goals of the Plan. In addition to the continued use and
distribution of the fishing pamphlet, the NPS is developing a software
application and a fishing guide that will provide information about
fishing in the park and the status of fish species and habitats. The
NPS will also send roving interpreters throughout the park to provide
information directly to recreational anglers.
4. Comment: One commenter asked whether the rule would adversely
affect recreational fishing if less fish are present in the park.
NPS Response: Catch and release fishing opportunities will continue
to be available in most rivers and streams for some time during
implementation of the Plan. A few small lakes with small fish
populations may be fished out by anglers. At the same time, there will
be widespread benefits to native fish and amphibian populations in
areas where nonnative fish are removed, which will increase the ability
of anglers and other visitors to see and to interact with native fish,
amphibians and other species in their habitats throughout the park.
Because it will likely take decades before the NPS can implement fish
removal programs throughout the park, diminished fishing opportunities
would occur in stages over time, reducing the overall impact of this
recreational loss. Because fishing has consistently been rated low on
the scale of recreational activities that visitors engage in during
visitor surveys, this loss would likely be imperceptible to most park
visitors.
5. Comment: One commenter asked the NPS to support local businesses
and restaurants by giving them preferential rights to fish in the park
or allowing them to use nonnative fish that are removed through
administrative actions such as gillnetting, seining and electrofishing.
NPS Response: NPS regulations at 36 CFR 2.3(d)(4) prohibit
commercial fishing in National Park System units, except where
specifically authorized by
[[Page 3663]]
Federal statute The park's enabling act does not authorize commercial
fishing. Instead, it directs the NPS to prohibit the capture of fish
for merchandise or profit. As a result, the NPS cannot allow local
businesses or restaurants to take fish in the park for commercial
purposes. Most administrative actions capturing nonnative fish occur in
backcountry locations where transportation of the fish outside of the
park is not feasible. In most cases, the fish are too small to have
value for local businesses and restaurants.
6. Comment: One commenter stated native fish populations could be
restored more quickly if there are no catch limits on nonnative fish
species except those that are vital for maintaining potable water in
the White River, Sunrise, Ohanapecosh, and Paradise waterways.
NPS Response: The NPS agrees that through the capture of nonnative
species, anglers can play an important role in the conservation and
recovery of native species in the park. In many lakes, rivers and
streams in the park, anglers are essential for suppressing nonnative
species. For these reasons, the rule would remove the daily catch limit
in the special regulations in order to allow the retention of brook
trout and kokanee salmon from rivers and streams and all nonnative fish
from lakes that are open to recreational fishing. Except for brook
trout and kokanee salmon, anglers may not retain other nonnative
species from rivers and streams because those species are too difficult
to distinguish from native species that must be released. The
Compendium will continue to close Tipsoo Lake, Shadow Lake and
Reflection Lakes to all fishing in order to protect fragile riparian
vegetation.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information
contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled ``Cost-
Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Threshold Analyses: Proposed Rule to
Remove Special Regulations for Fishing at Mount Rainier National
Park.'' The document may be viewed on the park's planning website at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link entitled
``Archived Projects'' and then clicking the link entitled ``2018 Mount
Rainier National Park Fisheries Management Plan Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' and then clicking the
link entitled ``Document List'' and then clicking on the link entitled
``Fish Management Plan FONSI.''
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is
not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This rule only
affects use of federally administered lands and waters. It has no
outside effects on other areas. A federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
a. Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
b. Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. The NPS has evaluated
this rule under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the
Department's tribal consultation policy and has determined that tribal
consultation is not required because the rule will have no substantial
direct effect on federally recognized Indian tribes. During scoping for
the Plan, the NPS solicited comments from six affiliated American
Indian tribes: the Nisqually Tribe of Indians, the Muckleshoot Indian
Tribe, the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, the
Squaxin Island Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the
Yakama Nation. The NPS will continue to work with these tribes
throughout the implementation of the selected alternative in the FONSI.
[[Page 3664]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act is not required. The NPS may not conduct or sponsor and
you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The NPS has prepared the Plan to determine whether this rule will
have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment under
the NEPA. This rule does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the NEPA is not required because of the FONSI.
A copy of the Plan and FONSI may be viewed on the park's planning
website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/mora by clicking on the link
entitled ``Archived Projects'' and then clicking the link entitled
``2018 Mount Rainier National Park Fisheries Management Plan
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' and
then clicking the link entitled ``Document List.''
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rulemaking is not a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211; the rule is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy, and the rule has not otherwise been designated by the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a
significant energy action. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service amends
36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102; Sec. 7.96 also
issued under D.C. Code 10-137 and D.C. Code 50-2201.07.
0
2. In Sec. 7.5, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.5 Mount Rainier National Park
(a) Fishing. (1) Fishing closures and restrictions are established
by the Superintendent based on management objectives for the
preservation of the park's natural resources.
(2) The Superintendent may establish closures and restrictions, in
accordance with the criteria and procedures of Sec. 1.5 of this
chapter, on any activity pertaining to fishing, including, but not
limited to species of fish that may be taken, seasons and hours during
which fishing may take place, methods of taking, and size, creel, and
possession limits.
(3) Except in emergency situations, the Superintendent will notify
the public of any such closures or restrictions through one or more
methods listed in Sec. 1.7 of this chapter, including publication in
the Superintendent's Compendium (or written compilation) of
discretionary actions referred to Sec. 1.7(b).
(4) Fishing in closed waters or violating a condition or
restriction established by the Superintendent under this paragraph (a)
is prohibited.
* * * * *
Shannon Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2022-27483 Filed 1-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P