Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations, 2525-2526 [2023-00538]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves two
safety zones to protect waterway users
that would prohibit entry within 250
yards of dredging operations and will
close only one side of the main
navigation channel. Vessels can request
permission to enter the channel. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jan 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T05–1004, to read as
follows.
■
§ 165.T05–1004 Safety Zones, Delaware
River Dredging; Marcus Hook, PA.
(a) Location. The following areas are
safety zones: (1) Safety zone one
includes all waters within 250 yards of
the dredge displaying lights and shapes
for vessels restricted in ability to
maneuver as described in 33 CFR 83.27,
as well as all related dredge equipment,
while the dredge is operating in Marcus
Hook Range. For enforcement purposes
Marcus Hook Range includes all
navigable waters of the Delaware River
shoreline to shoreline, bound by a line
drawn perpendicular to the center line
of the channel at the farthest upriver
point of the range to a line drawn
perpendicular to the center line of the
channel at the farthest downriver point
of the range.
(2) Safety zone two includes all the
waters of Anchorage 7 off Marcus Hook
Range, as described in 33 CFR
110.157(a)(8) and depicted on U.S.
Nautical Chart 12312.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been authorized
by the Captain of the Port to assist with
enforcement of the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) Regulations. (1) Entry into or
transiting within the safety zone one is
prohibited unless vessels obtain
permission from the Captain of the Port
via VHF–FM channel 16 or 215–271–
4807, or make satisfactory passing
arrangements via VHF–FM channel 13
or 16 with the operating dredge per this
section and the rules of the Road (33
CFR subchapter E). Vessels requesting to
transit shall contact the operating
dredge via VHF–FM channel 13 or 16 at
least 1 hour prior to arrival.
(2) Vessels desiring to anchor in safety
zone two, Anchorage 7 off Marcus Hook
Range, must obtain permission from the
COTP at least 24 hours in advance by
calling (215) 271–4807. The COTP will
permit, at maximum, one vessel at a
time to anchor on a ‘‘first-come, firstserved’’ basis. Vessels will only be
allowed to anchor for a 12 hour period.
Vessels that require an examination by
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2525
the Public Health Service, Customs, or
Immigration authorities will be directed
to an anchorage for the required
inspection by the COTP.
(3) Vessels desiring to anchor in safety
zone two, Anchorage 7 off Marcus Hook
Range, must be at least 650 feet in
length overall.
(4) This section applies to all vessels
except those engaged in the following
operations: enforcement of laws, service
of aids to navigation, and emergency
response.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted by federal, state
and local agencies in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone.
(e) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from January 10, 2023,
through April 15, 2023, unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: January 10, 2023.
Jonathan D. Theel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2023–00665 Filed 1–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 277
[COE–2020–0012]
RIN 0710–AB35
Water Resources Policies and
Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost
Apportionment of Bridge Alterations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule removes the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ part
titled Water Resources Policies and
Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost
Apportionment of Bridge Alterations.
Each removed section of this part is outof-date and otherwise covers internal
agency operations that have no public
compliance component or adverse
public impact. Therefore, this part can
be removed from the CFR.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Department of the Army,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN:
CECW–EC (Mr. Robert Bank), 441 G
Street NW, Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
SUMMARY:
Ms.
Amy K. Frantz at (202) 761–0106 or by
email at Amy.K.Frantz@usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
2526
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
This final
rule removes 33 CFR part 277, Water
Resources Policies and Authorities:
Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment
of Bridge Alterations. The rule was
initially published in the Federal
Register on May 30, 1979 (44 FR 31129).
The regulation was promulgated to
adapt Coast Guard procedures under the
Truman-Hobbs Act in 33 U.S.C. 516 to
Corps navigation project feasibility plan
formulation, with regard to
apportionment of costs between Bridge
Owners and the Government, when the
Government requires bridge alteration to
avoid obstruction of navigation. The
underlying Coast Guard procedures for
bridge alteration cost apportionment at
33 CFR 116.50 were updated in 1995 (60
FR 20902) while the Corps’ regulation
was never subsequently amended. The
calculations for the cost apportionment
are the responsibility of the Coast Guard
and the Corps uses the current Coast
Guard calculations in planning
formulations for new projects when they
involve bridges falling under the
Truman-Hobbs Act. The rule was
published, at that time, in the Federal
Register to aid public accessibility. The
solicitation of public comment for this
removal is unnecessary because the rule
is out-of-date and otherwise covers
internal agency operations that have no
public compliance component or
adverse public impact. Applicable
guidance on bridge alteration cost
apportionment is found in current Coast
Guard procedures at 33 CFR 116.50,
Apportionment of costs under the
Truman-Hobbs Act. For current public
accessibility purposes, the internal
implementing process for the applicable
guidance is in Engineer Regulation
1165–2–25, ‘‘Navigation Policy: Cost
Apportionment of Bridge Alterations’’
(available at https://
www.publications.usace.army.mil/
Portals/76/Publications/
EngineerRegulations/ER_1165-225.pdf?ver=2013-09-08-233442-167).
The agency policy is only applicable to
field operating activities having Civil
Works responsibilities and provides
guidance specific to the Corps’ policies
and guidelines for the apportionment of
bridge alteration costs required in
connection with navigation
improvements recommended in reports
transmitted to the Chief of Engineers for
approval or submitted to Congress for
authorization.
This rule removal is being conducted
to reduce confusion for the public as
well as for the Corps regarding the
current policy which governs the Corps’
cost apportionment of bridge alterations.
Because the regulation does not place a
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Jan 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
burden on the public, its removal does
not provide a reduction in public
burden or costs.
This rule is not significant under
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review.’’
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 277
Bridges, Coast Guard, Navigation
(water).
PART 277—[REMOVED]
Accordingly, by the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301, 33 CFR part 277 is removed.
■
Approved by:
Michael L. Connor,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works).
[FR Doc. 2023–00538 Filed 1–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AR50
Emergent Suicide Care
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) amends its medical
regulations to implement section 201 of
the Veterans Comprehensive
Prevention, Access to Care, and
Treatment Act of 2020, which directs
VA to furnish, reimburse, and pay for
emergent suicide care for certain
individuals, to include the provision of
emergency transportation necessary for
such care.
DATES:
Effective date: This interim final rule
is effective on March 20, 2023.
Comments: Comments must be
received on or before March 20, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post the comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following
website as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. VA will not post
on Regulations.gov public comments
that make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the
commenter will take actions to harm the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
individual. VA encourages individuals
not to submit duplicative comments. We
will post acceptable comments from
multiple unique commenters even if the
content is identical or nearly identical
to other comments. Any public
comment received after the comment
period’s closing date is considered late
and will not be considered in the final
rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Duran, Office of Integrated
Veteran Care (16EO3), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Ptarmigan at Cherry Creek,
Denver, CO 80209; (303) 370–1637.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 5, 2020, the Veterans
Comprehensive Preventions, Access to
Care and Treatment Act of 2020, Public
Law (Pub. L.) 116–214 (the Act), was
enacted into law. Section 201 of the Act
created a new section 1720J in title 38,
United States Code (U.S.C.), to authorize
VA to provide emergent suicide care to
certain individuals. Section 1720J(b) of
38 U.S.C. provides that an individual is
eligible for emergent suicide care if they
are in acute suicidal crisis and are either
(1) a veteran as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101,
or (2) an individual described in 38
U.S.C. 1720I(b). Individuals described
in section 1720I(b) are (1) former
members of the Armed Forces,
including the reserve components; who,
(2) while serving in the active military,
naval, air, or space services, were
discharged or released therefrom under
a condition that is not honorable but is
also not (A) a dishonorable discharge or
(B) a discharge by court-martial; who (3)
is not enrolled in the health care system
established by section 1705 of title 38
U.S.C.; and (4)(A)(i) served in the
Armed Forces for a period of more than
100 cumulative days; and (ii) was
deployed in a theater of combat
operations, in support of a contingency
operation, or in an area at a time during
which hostilities are occurring in that
area during such service, including by
controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle
from a location other than such theater
or area; or (B) while serving in the
Armed Forces, was the victim of a
physical assault of a sexual nature, a
battery of a sexual nature, or sexual
harassment (as defined in section
1720D(f) of title 38 U.S.C.).
Section 1720J(a) requires VA to (1)
furnish emergent suicide care to an
eligible individual at a medical facility
of the Department; (2) pay for emergent
suicide care provided to an eligible
individual at a non-Department facility;
and (3) reimburse an eligible individual
for emergent suicide care provided to
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2525-2526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00538]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 277
[COE-2020-0012]
RIN 0710-AB35
Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost
Apportionment of Bridge Alterations
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule removes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' part
titled Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy:
Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations. Each removed section of this
part is out-of-date and otherwise covers internal agency operations
that have no public compliance component or adverse public impact.
Therefore, this part can be removed from the CFR.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN:
CECW-EC (Mr. Robert Bank), 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy K. Frantz at (202) 761-0106 or
by email at [email protected].
[[Page 2526]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule removes 33 CFR part 277,
Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost
Apportionment of Bridge Alterations. The rule was initially published
in the Federal Register on May 30, 1979 (44 FR 31129). The regulation
was promulgated to adapt Coast Guard procedures under the Truman-Hobbs
Act in 33 U.S.C. 516 to Corps navigation project feasibility plan
formulation, with regard to apportionment of costs between Bridge
Owners and the Government, when the Government requires bridge
alteration to avoid obstruction of navigation. The underlying Coast
Guard procedures for bridge alteration cost apportionment at 33 CFR
116.50 were updated in 1995 (60 FR 20902) while the Corps' regulation
was never subsequently amended. The calculations for the cost
apportionment are the responsibility of the Coast Guard and the Corps
uses the current Coast Guard calculations in planning formulations for
new projects when they involve bridges falling under the Truman-Hobbs
Act. The rule was published, at that time, in the Federal Register to
aid public accessibility. The solicitation of public comment for this
removal is unnecessary because the rule is out-of-date and otherwise
covers internal agency operations that have no public compliance
component or adverse public impact. Applicable guidance on bridge
alteration cost apportionment is found in current Coast Guard
procedures at 33 CFR 116.50, Apportionment of costs under the Truman-
Hobbs Act. For current public accessibility purposes, the internal
implementing process for the applicable guidance is in Engineer
Regulation 1165-2-25, ``Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge
Alterations'' (available at https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_1165-2-25.pdf?ver=2013-09-08-233442-167). The agency policy is only applicable to field
operating activities having Civil Works responsibilities and provides
guidance specific to the Corps' policies and guidelines for the
apportionment of bridge alteration costs required in connection with
navigation improvements recommended in reports transmitted to the Chief
of Engineers for approval or submitted to Congress for authorization.
This rule removal is being conducted to reduce confusion for the
public as well as for the Corps regarding the current policy which
governs the Corps' cost apportionment of bridge alterations. Because
the regulation does not place a burden on the public, its removal does
not provide a reduction in public burden or costs.
This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
``Regulatory Planning and Review.''
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 277
Bridges, Coast Guard, Navigation (water).
PART 277--[REMOVED]
0
Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 33 CFR part 277 is
removed.
Approved by:
Michael L. Connor,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works).
[FR Doc. 2023-00538 Filed 1-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P