Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment, 2239-2241 [2023-00579]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
including diluents, condensates,
petroleum, or natural gas products.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(4). Except as
authorized pursuant to the Iranian
Transactions Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR
part 560, or otherwise exempt, U.S. persons,
wherever located, remain prohibited from
engaging in any transaction or dealing in or
related to goods or services of Iranian origin,
including the purchase or import of Iranianorigin diluents, condensates, petroleum, or
natural gas.
(b) This general license does not
authorize:
(1) The payment of any taxes or
royalties to the Government of
Venezuela;
(2) The payment of any dividends,
including a dividend in kind, to PdVSA,
or any entity in which PdVSA owns,
directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or
greater interest;
(3) The sale of petroleum or
petroleum products produced by or
through the Chevron JVs for the
exportation to any jurisdiction other
than the United States;
(4) Any transaction involving an
entity located in Venezuela that is
owned or controlled by an entity located
in the Russian Federation;
(5) Any expansion of the Chevron JVs
into new fields in Venezuela beyond
what was in place on January 28, 2019;
or
(6) Any transactions otherwise
prohibited by the VSR, including
transactions involving any person
blocked pursuant to the VSR other than
the blocked persons described in
paragraph (a) of this general license,
unless separately authorized.
(c) This authorization automatically
renews on the first day of each month
and is valid for a period of six months
from the effective date of General
License No. 41 or the date of any
subsequent renewal of General License
No. 41, whichever is later.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Note 2 to General License No. 41. Nothing
in this general license relieves any person
from compliance with the requirements of
other Federal agencies, including the
Department of Commerce’s Bureau of
Industry and Security.
Andrea M. Gacki, Director, Office of Foreign
Assets Control,
Dated: November 26, 2022.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2023–00515 Filed 1–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jan 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 269
[Docket ID: DOD–2016–OS–0045]
RIN 0790–AL58
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller), Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The DoD is issuing this final
rule to adjust each of its statutory civil
monetary penalties (CMP) to account for
inflation. The Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as
amended by the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996 and the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (the 2015 Act), requires the head
of each agency to adjust for inflation its
CMP levels in effect as of November 2,
2015, under a revised methodology that
was effective for 2016 and for each year
thereafter.
DATES: This rule is effective January 13,
2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dzenana Dzanic, 703–508–9277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law
101–410, codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461,
note, as amended, requires agencies to
annually adjust the level of CMPs for
inflation to improve their effectiveness
and maintain their deterrent effect.
Section 2461 requires that not later than
July 1, 2016, and not later than January
15 of every year thereafter, the head of
each agency must adjust each CMP
within its jurisdiction by the inflation
adjustment set forth therein. The
inflation adjustment is determined by
increasing the maximum CMP or the
range of minimum and maximum CMPs,
as applicable, for each CMP by the costof-living adjustment, rounded to the
nearest multiple of $1. The cost-ofliving adjustment is the percentage (if
any) for each CMP by which the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the
month of October preceding the date of
the adjustment exceeds the CPI for the
month of October in the previous
calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for
inflation to the DoD’s CMPs were
published as an interim final rule in the
Federal Register on May 26, 2016 (81
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2239
FR 33389–33391) and became effective
on that date. The interim final rule was
published as a final rule without change
on September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629–
62631), effective that date. The revised
methodology for agencies for 2017 and
each year thereafter provides for the
improvement of the effectiveness of
CMPs to maintain their deterrent effect.
The DoD is adjusting the level of all
civil monetary penalties under its
jurisdiction by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
directed cost-of-living adjustment
multiplier for 2023 of 1.07745
prescribed in OMB Memorandum M–
23–05, ‘‘Implementation of Penalty
Inflation Adjustments for 2023,
Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015.’’ The DoD’s 2023
adjustments for inflation to CMPs apply
only to those CMPs, including those
whose associated violation predated
such adjustment, which are assessed by
the DoD after the effective date of the
new CMP level.
Statement of Authority and Costs and
Benefits
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)B, there is
good cause to issue this rule without
prior public notice or opportunity for
public comment because it would be
impracticable and unnecessary. The
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (Section 2461) requires agencies,
effective 2017, to make annual
adjustments for inflation to CMPs
notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 553.
Additionally, the methodology used,
effective 2017, for adjusting CMPs for
inflation is established in statute, with
no discretion provided to agencies
regarding the substance of the
adjustments for inflation to CMPs. The
DoD is charged only with performing
ministerial computations to determine
the dollar amount of adjustments for
inflation to CMPs. Accordingly, prior
public notice and an opportunity to
comment are not required for this rule.
For the same reasons, there is good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive
the 30-day delay in effective date.
Further, there are no significant costs
associated with the regulatory revisions
that would impose any mandates on the
DoD, Federal, State or local
governments, or the private sector.
Accordingly, prior public notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule. The benefit of this
rule is the DoD anticipates that civil
monetary penalty collections may
increase in the future due to new
penalty authorities and other changes in
this rule. However, it is difficult to
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2240
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
accurately predict the extent of any
increase, if any, due to a variety of
factors, such as budget and staff
resources, the number and quality of
civil penalty referrals or leads, and the
length of time needed to investigate and
resolve a case.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
These Executive Orders direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distribute impacts,
and equity). These Executive Orders
also emphasize the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated ‘‘not significant’’,
under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not
been reviewed by the OMB under these
Executive Orders.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
804(2)
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. A major rule may
take effect no earlier than 60 calendar
days after Congress receives the rule
report or the rule is published in the
Federal Register, whichever is later.
This rule is not a major rule, as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to
assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule the mandates of
which require spending in any year of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. This rule will not
mandate any requirements for State,
local, or tribal governments, nor will it
affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Under Secretary of Defense
(Comptroller) certified that this rule is
not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not,
if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
does not require DoD to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act was
enacted to minimize the paperwork
burden for individuals; small
businesses; educational and nonprofit
institutions; Federal contractors; State,
local and tribal governments; and other
persons resulting from the collection of
information by or for the Federal
government. The Act requires agencies
obtain approval from the OMB before
using identical questions to collect
information from ten or more persons.
This rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the
public.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This final rule will not have a
substantial effect on State and local
governments.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
It has been determined that this rule
will not have a substantial effect on
Indian tribal governments. This rule
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on one or more Indian
tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 269
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 269 is
amended as follows.
PART 269—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 269 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
2. In § 269.4, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 269.4 Cost of living adjustments of civil
monetary penalties.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Inflation adjustment. Maximum
civil monetary penalties within the
jurisdiction of the Department are
adjusted for inflation as follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)
United States Code
Civil monetary penalty description
National Defense Authorization Act
for FY 2005, 10 U.S.C 113, note.
10 U.S.C. 1094(c)(1) .......................
10 U.S.C. 1102(k) ............................
Unauthorized Activities Directed at or Possession of Sunken Military
Craft.
Unlawful Provision of Health Care ............................................................
Wrongful Disclosure—Medical Records: ...................................................
First Offense ..............................................................................................
Subsequent Offense ..................................................................................
Violation of the Pentagon Reservation Operation and Parking of Motor
Vehicles Rules and Regulations.
Violation Involving False Claim .................................................................
Violation Involving False Statement ..........................................................
False claims ..............................................................................................
10 U.S.C. 2674(c)(2) .......................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Maximum
penalty
amount
as of 2022
($)
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(1) .......................
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(2) .......................
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Jan 12, 2023
Claims submitted with a false certification of physician license ...............
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
New adjusted
maximum
penalty
amount
($)
144,887
156,108
12,722
........................
7,523
50,152
2,073
13,707
........................
8,106
54,036
2,234
12,537
12,537
22,426
13,508
13,508
24,163
22,426
24,163
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
2241
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (D)—Continued
United States Code
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(2); (b)(2)(ii).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(5).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(4).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(6).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.210(a)(3).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a);
200.310(a).
Civil monetary penalty description
Claims presented by excluded party .........................................................
22,426
24,163
32 CFR
Employing or contracting with an excluded individual ..............................
22,426
24,163
32 CFR
Pattern of claims for medically unnecessary services/supplies ................
22,426
24,163
32 CFR
Ordering or prescribing while excluded ....................................................
22,426
24,163
32 CFR
Known retention of an overpayment .........................................................
22,426
24,163
32 CFR
Making or using a false record or statement that is material to a false or
fraudulent claim.
Failure to grant timely access to OIG for audits, investigations, evaluations, or other statutory functions of OIG.
Making false statements, omissions, misrepresentations in an enrollment application.
Unlawfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for the referral of business in violation of 1128B(b)
of the Social Security Act.
112,131
120,816
33,640
36,245
112,131
120,816
112,131
120,816
32 CFR
32 CFR
32 CFR
Sector Corpus Christi or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from January 13, 2023
through 4 a.m. on January 15, 2023. For
the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from 8 p.m. on
January 9, 2023 until January 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Anthony
Garofalo, Sector Corpus Christi
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 361–939–5130,
email CCWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2023–00579 Filed 1–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0037]
RIN 1625–AA00
I. Table of Abbreviations
Safety Zone; Corpus Christi Shipping
Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Corpus
Christi Shipping Channel in a zone
defined by the following coordinates;
27°50′31.28″ N, 97°04′17.23″ W;
27°50′31.73″ N, 97°04′15.44″ W;
27°50′29.06″ N, 97°04′16.61″ W;
27°50′29.32″ N, 97°04′14.82″ W. The
safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by pipelines that will be
removed from the floor of the Corpus
Christi Shipping Channel. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
New adjusted
maximum
penalty
amount
($)
32 CFR
Dated: January 10, 2023.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
ACTION:
Maximum
penalty
amount
as of 2022
($)
16:24 Jan 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. We must establish this
safety zone immediately to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards
created by pipeline removal operations
and lack sufficient time to provide a
reasonable comment period and then to
consider those comments before issuing
the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest because immediate action is
needed to respond to the potential
safety hazards associated with pipeline
removal operations in the Corpus
Christi Shipping Channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Sector Corpus
Christi (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with
pipeline removal operations occurring
from 8 p.m. on January 9, 2023 through
4 a.m. on January 15, 2023 will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
Corpus Christi Shipping Channel in a
zone defined by the following
coordinates; 27°50′31.28″ N,
97°04′17.23″ W; 27°50′31.73″ N,
97°04′15.44″ W; 27°50′29.06″ N,
97°04′16.61″ W; 27°50′29.32″ N,
97°04′14.82″ W. The purpose of this rule
is to ensure safety of vessels and
persons on these navigable waters in the
safety zone while pipelines are removed
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2239-2241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00579]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 269
[Docket ID: DOD-2016-OS-0045]
RIN 0790-AL58
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller),
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The DoD is issuing this final rule to adjust each of its
statutory civil monetary penalties (CMP) to account for inflation. The
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
Act), requires the head of each agency to adjust for inflation its CMP
levels in effect as of November 2, 2015, under a revised methodology
that was effective for 2016 and for each year thereafter.
DATES: This rule is effective January 13, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dzenana Dzanic, 703-508-9277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990,
Public Law 101-410, codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461, note, as amended,
requires agencies to annually adjust the level of CMPs for inflation to
improve their effectiveness and maintain their deterrent effect.
Section 2461 requires that not later than July 1, 2016, and not later
than January 15 of every year thereafter, the head of each agency must
adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction by the inflation adjustment set
forth therein. The inflation adjustment is determined by increasing the
maximum CMP or the range of minimum and maximum CMPs, as applicable,
for each CMP by the cost-of-living adjustment, rounded to the nearest
multiple of $1. The cost-of-living adjustment is the percentage (if
any) for each CMP by which the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the month
of October preceding the date of the adjustment exceeds the CPI for the
month of October in the previous calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for inflation to the DoD's CMPs
were published as an interim final rule in the Federal Register on May
26, 2016 (81 FR 33389-33391) and became effective on that date. The
interim final rule was published as a final rule without change on
September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629-62631), effective that date. The
revised methodology for agencies for 2017 and each year thereafter
provides for the improvement of the effectiveness of CMPs to maintain
their deterrent effect. The DoD is adjusting the level of all civil
monetary penalties under its jurisdiction by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) directed cost-of-living adjustment multiplier for 2023
of 1.07745 prescribed in OMB Memorandum M-23-05, ``Implementation of
Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2023, Pursuant to the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015.'' The
DoD's 2023 adjustments for inflation to CMPs apply only to those CMPs,
including those whose associated violation predated such adjustment,
which are assessed by the DoD after the effective date of the new CMP
level.
Statement of Authority and Costs and Benefits
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)B, there is good cause to issue this
rule without prior public notice or opportunity for public comment
because it would be impracticable and unnecessary. The Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Section
2461) requires agencies, effective 2017, to make annual adjustments for
inflation to CMPs notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 553. Additionally, the
methodology used, effective 2017, for adjusting CMPs for inflation is
established in statute, with no discretion provided to agencies
regarding the substance of the adjustments for inflation to CMPs. The
DoD is charged only with performing ministerial computations to
determine the dollar amount of adjustments for inflation to CMPs.
Accordingly, prior public notice and an opportunity to comment are not
required for this rule. For the same reasons, there is good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to waive the 30-day delay in effective date.
Further, there are no significant costs associated with the
regulatory revisions that would impose any mandates on the DoD,
Federal, State or local governments, or the private sector.
Accordingly, prior public notice and an opportunity for public comment
are not required for this rule. The benefit of this rule is the DoD
anticipates that civil monetary penalty collections may increase in the
future due to new penalty authorities and other changes in this rule.
However, it is difficult to
[[Page 2240]]
accurately predict the extent of any increase, if any, due to a variety
of factors, such as budget and staff resources, the number and quality
of civil penalty referrals or leads, and the length of time needed to
investigate and resolve a case.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
These Executive Orders direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity). These Executive Orders also
emphasize the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule has been designated ``not significant'', under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed
by the OMB under these Executive Orders.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2)
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. A major rule may take effect no earlier than 60 calendar
days after Congress receives the rule report or the rule is published
in the Federal Register, whichever is later. This rule is not a major
rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule the mandates of which require spending in any
year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation.
This rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal
governments, nor will it affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) certified that this
rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601)
because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require DoD to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act was enacted to minimize the paperwork
burden for individuals; small businesses; educational and nonprofit
institutions; Federal contractors; State, local and tribal governments;
and other persons resulting from the collection of information by or
for the Federal government. The Act requires agencies obtain approval
from the OMB before using identical questions to collect information
from ten or more persons. This rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the public.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State
law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and local governments.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
It has been determined that this rule will not have a substantial
effect on Indian tribal governments. This rule does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes,
preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 269
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 269 is amended as follows.
PART 269--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 269 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. In Sec. 269.4, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 269.4 Cost of living adjustments of civil monetary penalties.
* * * * *
(d) Inflation adjustment. Maximum civil monetary penalties within
the jurisdiction of the Department are adjusted for inflation as
follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New adjusted
Maximum maximum
United States Code Civil monetary penalty description penalty amount penalty amount
as of 2022 ($) ($)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Defense Authorization Act for FY Unauthorized Activities Directed at 144,887 156,108
2005, 10 U.S.C 113, note. or Possession of Sunken Military
Craft.
10 U.S.C. 1094(c)(1)....................... Unlawful Provision of Health Care.. 12,722 13,707
10 U.S.C. 1102(k).......................... Wrongful Disclosure--Medical .............. ..............
Records:.
First Offense...................... 7,523 8,106
Subsequent Offense................. 50,152 54,036
10 U.S.C. 2674(c)(2)....................... Violation of the Pentagon 2,073 2,234
Reservation Operation and Parking
of Motor Vehicles Rules and
Regulations.
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(1)....................... Violation Involving False Claim.... 12,537 13,508
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(2)....................... Violation Involving False Statement 12,537 13,508
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(1) False claims....................... 22,426 24,163
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(1) Claims submitted with a false 22,426 24,163
certification of physician license.
[[Page 2241]]
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(2) Claims presented by excluded party. 22,426 24,163
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Employing or contracting with an 22,426 24,163
200.210(a)(2); (b)(2)(ii). excluded individual.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(1) Pattern of claims for medically 22,426 24,163
unnecessary services/supplies.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(2) Ordering or prescribing while 22,426 24,163
excluded.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(5) Known retention of an overpayment.. 22,426 24,163
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(4) Making or using a false record or 112,131 120,816
statement that is material to a
false or fraudulent claim.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(6) Failure to grant timely access to 33,640 36,245
OIG for audits, investigations,
evaluations, or other statutory
functions of OIG.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.210(a)(3) Making false statements, omissions, 112,131 120,816
misrepresentations in an
enrollment application.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR 200.310(a)... Unlawfully offering, paying, 112,131 120,816
soliciting, or receiving
remuneration to induce or in
return for the referral of
business in violation of 1128B(b)
of the Social Security Act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: January 10, 2023.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2023-00579 Filed 1-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P