Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Digital Therapy Device To Reduce Sleep Disturbance for Psychiatric Conditions, 2222-2224 [2023-00497]
Download as PDF
2222
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
2022
Agency
Law
Name/description
OWCP ...
Black Lung Benefits Act.
Black Lung Benefits Act.
Black Lung Benefits Act.
Failure to secure payment of benefits
after 10th day of notice.
Failure to secure payment of benefits for
repeat offenders.
Failure to secure payment of benefits ......
OWCP ...
OWCP ...
[FR Doc. 2023–00271 Filed 1–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–HL–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–3240]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the Digital
Therapy Device To Reduce Sleep
Disturbance for Psychiatric Conditions
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final amendment; final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the digital therapy device to
reduce sleep disturbance for psychiatric
conditions into class II (special
controls). The special controls that
apply to the device type are identified
in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the digital therapy
device to reduce sleep disturbance for
psychiatric conditions’ classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective January
13, 2023. The classification was
applicable on November 6, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Antkowiak, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4118, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–3705,
Patrick.Antkowiak@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
digital therapy device to reduce sleep
disturbance for psychiatric conditions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jan 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
CFR citation
Min penalty
(rounded to
nearest dollar)
Max penalty
(rounded to
nearest dollar)
Min penalty
(rounded to
nearest dollar)
20 CFR
726.302(c)(4).
20 CFR
726.302(c)(5).
20 CFR
726.302(c)(5).
157
.......................
169
468
.......................
504
........................
$3,198 ...........
........................
as class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe
this action will enhance patients’ access
to beneficial innovation, in part by
placing the device into a lower device
class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
device by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 (Pub. L. 105–115) established
the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144)
modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure.
A device sponsor may utilize either
procedure for De Novo classification.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
2023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Max penalty
(rounded to
nearest dollar)
$3,446.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into
class I or II via the De Novo process, the
device can serve as a predicate for
future devices of that type, including for
510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device
sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval
application to market a substantially
equivalent device (see section 513(i) of
the FD&C Act, defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On May 27, 2020, FDA received
NightWare, Inc’s request for De Novo
classification of the NightWare Kit
(Apple iPhone, Apple Watch, Apple
iPhone Charging Cable, Apple Watch
Charging Cable). FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on November 6, 2020, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In
this final order, FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21
CFR 882.5705.1 We have named the
generic type of device digital therapy
device to reduce sleep disturbance for
psychiatric conditions, and it is
identified as a prescription device that
2223
is intended to provide stimulation using
a general purpose computing platform
to reduce sleep disturbance in patients
who experience this symptom due to
psychiatric conditions such as
nightmare disorder or post-traumatic
stress disorder.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—DIGITAL THERAPY DEVICE TO REDUCE SLEEP DISTURBANCE FOR PSYCHIATRIC CONDITIONS RISKS AND
MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Ineffective treatment leading to worsening sleep .....................................
Ineffective treatment leading to worsening condition-specific symptoms
Device software failure leading to delayed access and treatment ..........
Improper device use leading to worsening sleep ....................................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, digital
therapy devices to reduce sleep
disturbance for psychiatric conditions
are for prescription use only.
Prescription devices are exempt from
the requirement for adequate directions
for use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as
the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are
met.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
1 FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this
final order is styled as ‘‘Final amendment; final
order,’’ rather than ‘‘Final order.’’ Beginning in
December 2019, this editorial change was made to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jan 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
Clinical performance testing.
Clinical performance testing.
Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
Labeling.
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0844; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814, subparts A through E,
regarding premarket approval, have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 820, regarding quality system
regulation, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0073; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
parts 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is
amended as follows:
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 882
continues to read as follows:
■
indicate that the document ‘‘amends’’ the Code of
Federal Regulations. The change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 882.5705 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 882.5705 Digital therapy device to reduce
sleep disturbance for psychiatric
conditions.
(a) Identification. A digital therapy
device to reduce sleep disturbance for
psychiatric conditions is a prescription
device that is intended to provide
stimulation using a general purpose
computing platform to reduce sleep
disturbance in patients who experience
this symptom due to psychiatric
conditions such as nightmare disorder
or post-traumatic stress disorder.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing under
the labeled conditions for use must
evaluate the following:
(i) The ability of the device to provide
therapy for patients with sleep
disturbance due to psychiatric
conditions, using a validated measure;
(ii) Worsening of any conditionspecific symptoms using a validated
measure for assessment of the particular
condition; and
(iii) Increase in symptoms of
disturbed sleep or sleepiness using a
validated measure.
(2) Software must clearly describe all
features and functions of the software
implementing the digital therapy.
Software verification, validation, and
hazard analysis must also be provided.
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2224
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The labeling must include the
following:
(i) Patient and physician labeling
must include instructions for use,
including images that demonstrate how
to interact with the device;
(ii) Patient and physician labeling
must list the minimum operating system
and general purpose computing
requirements that support the software
of the device;
(iii) Patient and physician labeling
must include a warning that the digital
therapy device is not intended for use
as a stand-alone therapeutic device;
(iv) Patient and physician labeling
must include a warning that the digital
therapy device does not represent a
substitution for the patient’s
medication; and
(v) Physician labeling must include a
summary of the clinical performance
testing conducted with the device.
Dated: January 9, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–00497 Filed 1–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), codified
in the United States Code at 27 U.S.C.
205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury (the Secretary) to prescribe
regulations relating to the labeling of
containers of alcohol beverages that will
prohibit consumer deception and
provide the consumer with adequate
information as to the identity and
quality of the product contained therein.
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). In addition,
the Secretary has delegated certain
administrative and enforcement
authorities to TTB through Treasury
Department Order 120–01.
The TTB regulations in 27 CFR part
5 implement those provisions of section
105(e) of the FAA Act as they pertain to
distilled spirits.
Certificates of Label Approval
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. TTB–2021–0008; T.D. TTB–187;
Re: Notice No. 205]
RIN 1513–AC61
Addition of Singani to the Standards of
Identity for Distilled Spirits
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau regulations that set forth the
standards of identity for distilled spirits
to include ‘‘Singani’’ as a type of brandy
that is a distinctive product of Bolivia.
This amendment follows a joint petition
submitted by the Plurinational State of
Bolivia and Singani 63, Inc., and
subsequent discussions with the Office
of the United States Trade
Representative.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective
February 13, 2023.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trevar D. Kolodny, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
telephone 202–453–2226.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jan 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
TTB’s regulations at 27 CFR 5.24
prohibit the release of bottled distilled
spirits from customs custody for
consumption unless the person
removing the distilled spirits has
obtained and is in possession of a
Certificate of Label Approval (COLA)
covering the product. The bottles must
bear labels identical to the labels
appearing on the face of the certificate,
or labels with changes authorized by
TTB. The TTB regulations at 27 CFR
5.22 also generally prohibit the bottling
or removal of distilled spirits from a
distilled spirits plant unless the
proprietor possesses a COLA covering
the labels on the bottle.
Classes and Types of Spirits
The TTB regulations establish
standards of identity for distilled spirits
products and categorize these products
according to various classes and types.
See 27 CFR part 5, subpart I. As defined
in 27 CFR 5.141(a), the term ‘‘class’’
refers to a general category of spirits.
Subpart I sets out the various classes of
distilled spirits, such as whisky, rum,
gin, and brandy. As used in § 5.141(a),
the term ‘‘type’’ refers to a subcategory
within a class of spirits. For example,
‘‘Cognac’’ and ‘‘Pisco’’ are types of
brandy, and ‘‘Cachac
¸a’’ is a type of rum.
The TTB labeling regulations at 27
CFR 5.63(a)(2) require that the class,
type, or other appropriate designation
appear on the distilled spirits labels. If
a class or type does not appear on the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
label, 27 CFR 5.156 and 5.166 require
that such products be designated in
accordance with trade and consumer
understanding thereof, or, if no such
understanding exists, with a distinctive
or fanciful name appearing in the same
field of vision as a statement of
composition.
Classification of Singani
‘‘Singani’’ is a term recognized by the
Plurinational State of Bolivia (Bolivia)
as a designation for an alcohol beverage
product that is distilled from grape wine
or grape pomace and produced in
certain delimited parts of Bolivia. Under
current TTB distilled spirits labeling
regulations, Singani products are
generally classified as brandies. TTB’s
regulations at 27 CFR 5.145(a) provide
that ‘‘brandy’’ is a spirit distilled from
the fermented juice, mash, or wine of
fruit, or from the residue thereof. For
this purpose, brandy must be distilled at
less than 95 percent alcohol by volume
(190° proof) and be bottled at not less
than 40 percent alcohol by volume (80°
proof). Under § 5.145(b), brandies
generally must be labeled with their
applicable type name as specified in the
regulations, or, if the brandy does not
conform to a specified type, must be
labeled as ‘‘brandy’’ followed
immediately by a truthful and adequate
statement of composition.
Section 5.145(c) sets out the specific
types of brandy and the standards for
each type. As described by petitioners
Singani 63, Inc. (Singani 63) and
Bolivia, Singani may meet the criteria of
several of these types of brandy, such as
‘‘fruit brandy’’ under § 5.145(c)(1) or
‘‘pomace brandy’’ (including ‘‘grappa
brandy’’) under § 5.145(c)(9), depending
on the amount of pomace used.
Section 5.145(c)(1) states that fruit
brandy derived solely from grapes and
stored for at least 2 years in oak
containers must be designated as ‘‘grape
brandy’’ or ‘‘brandy.’’ That regulation
also generally requires that such grape
brandy must be labeled as ‘‘immature
grape brandy’’ or ‘‘immature brandy’’ if
it has been stored in oak barrels for
fewer than two years. However, this
labeling requirement does not apply to
other types of brandy derived from
grapes specified in § 5.145(c). The
Bolivian standards submitted by
petitioners contain no minimum aging
requirements, and petitioners’
submissions suggest that, unlike many
grape brandies, Singani is generally not
aged in wood. Under current TTB
regulations, a Singani product classified
as a grape brandy under paragraph (c)(1)
would need to be labeled as an
immature brandy unless it was aged in
oak barrels for at least two years.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2222-2224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00497]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-3240]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the
Digital Therapy Device To Reduce Sleep Disturbance for Psychiatric
Conditions
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is
classifying the digital therapy device to reduce sleep disturbance for
psychiatric conditions into class II (special controls). The special
controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and
will be part of the codified language for the digital therapy device to
reduce sleep disturbance for psychiatric conditions' classification. We
are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this
action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative
devices.
DATES: This order is effective January 13, 2023. The classification was
applicable on November 6, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Antkowiak, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4118, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-3705, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the digital therapy device to
reduce sleep disturbance for psychiatric conditions as class II
(special controls), which we have determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In addition, we believe this
action will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part
by placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic
class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of
the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De
Novo classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo
application process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo
process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that
type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C
Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De
Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On May 27, 2020, FDA received NightWare, Inc's request for De Novo
classification of the NightWare Kit (Apple iPhone, Apple Watch, Apple
iPhone Charging Cable, Apple Watch Charging Cable). FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness,
[[Page 2223]]
but there is sufficient information to establish special controls that,
in combination with the general controls, provide reasonable assurance
of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use (see
21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the information submitted in
the request, we determined that the device can be classified into class
II with the establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that
these special controls, in addition to the general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device.
Therefore, on November 6, 2020, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order,
FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
882.5705.\1\ We have named the generic type of device digital therapy
device to reduce sleep disturbance for psychiatric conditions, and it
is identified as a prescription device that is intended to provide
stimulation using a general purpose computing platform to reduce sleep
disturbance in patients who experience this symptom due to psychiatric
conditions such as nightmare disorder or post-traumatic stress
disorder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ACTION caption for this final order is
styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Digital Therapy Device To Reduce Sleep Disturbance for
Psychiatric Conditions Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ineffective treatment leading to Clinical performance testing.
worsening sleep.
Ineffective treatment leading to Clinical performance testing.
worsening condition-specific symptoms.
Device software failure leading to Software verification,
delayed access and treatment. validation, and hazard
analysis.
Improper device use leading to Labeling.
worsening sleep.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, digital therapy devices to reduce
sleep disturbance for psychiatric conditions are for prescription use
only. Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate
directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the
conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo
classification have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844;
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through
E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart
E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in
21 CFR part 820, regarding quality system regulation, have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of
information in 21 CFR parts 801, regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
882 is amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 882.5705 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5705 Digital therapy device to reduce sleep disturbance for
psychiatric conditions.
(a) Identification. A digital therapy device to reduce sleep
disturbance for psychiatric conditions is a prescription device that is
intended to provide stimulation using a general purpose computing
platform to reduce sleep disturbance in patients who experience this
symptom due to psychiatric conditions such as nightmare disorder or
post-traumatic stress disorder.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing under the labeled conditions for
use must evaluate the following:
(i) The ability of the device to provide therapy for patients with
sleep disturbance due to psychiatric conditions, using a validated
measure;
(ii) Worsening of any condition-specific symptoms using a validated
measure for assessment of the particular condition; and
(iii) Increase in symptoms of disturbed sleep or sleepiness using a
validated measure.
(2) Software must clearly describe all features and functions of
the software implementing the digital therapy. Software verification,
validation, and hazard analysis must also be provided.
[[Page 2224]]
(3) The labeling must include the following:
(i) Patient and physician labeling must include instructions for
use, including images that demonstrate how to interact with the device;
(ii) Patient and physician labeling must list the minimum operating
system and general purpose computing requirements that support the
software of the device;
(iii) Patient and physician labeling must include a warning that
the digital therapy device is not intended for use as a stand-alone
therapeutic device;
(iv) Patient and physician labeling must include a warning that the
digital therapy device does not represent a substitution for the
patient's medication; and
(v) Physician labeling must include a summary of the clinical
performance testing conducted with the device.
Dated: January 9, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-00497 Filed 1-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P