Military Ocean Terminal Concord, California; Restricted Area, 1532-1533 [2023-00380]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
1532
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel; Coast Guard
Representatives in the Merrill
Operations Center; and other officers
designated by the Sector Commander of
Coast Guard Sector Mobile.
Sector Commander means
Commander of Coast Guard Sector
Mobile.
Reentry Services means (1) activities
involved in the preparation of a reentry
vehicle and payload, crew (including
crew training), government astronaut, or
space flight participant, if any, for
reentry; and (2) the conduct of a reentry.
Reentry vehicle means a vehicle
designed to return from Earth orbit or
outer space to Earth, or a reusable
launch vehicle designed to return from
Earth orbit or outer space to Earth,
substantially intact.
Space Support Vessel means any
vessel engaged in the support of space
activities. These vessels are typically
approximately 170 feet in length, have
a forward wheelhouse, and are
equipped with a helicopter pad and
lifting crane.
Splashdown means the landing of a
reentry vehicle into a body of water.
(c) Regulations. (1) Because the safety
zones described in paragraph (a) of this
section are within the U.S. Exclusive
Economic Zone, only U.S.-flagged
vessels are subject to enforcement. All
foreign-flagged vessels are encouraged
to remain outside the safety zones.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165, subpart
C, no U.S.-flagged vessel may enter the
safety zones described in paragraph (a)
of this section unless authorized by the
Sector Commander or a designated
representative, except as provided in
paragraph (d)(3).
(d) Notification of Enforcement. (1) To
the extent feasible, the Sector
Commander or a designated
representative will inform the public of
the activation of the three safety zones
described in paragraph (a) of this
section by Notice of Enforcement
published in the Federal Register at
least two days before the splashdown.
(2) To the extent possible, twenty-four
hours before a reentry vehicle
splashdown, the Sector Commander or
designated representative will inform
the public that only one of the three
safety zones described in paragraph (a)
will remain activated until announced
by Broadcast Notice to Mariners on
VHF–FM channel 16, and/or Marine
Safety Information Bulletin (as
appropriate) that the safety zone is no
longer subject to enforcement.
(3) After a reentry vehicle
splashdown, the Sector Commander or
a designated representative will grant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jan 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
general permission to come no closer
than 3 nautical miles of any reentry
vehicle or space support vessel engaged
in the recovery operations, within the
activated safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(4) Once a reentry vehicle, and any
personnel involved in reentry service,
are removed from the water and secured
onboard a space support vessel, the
Sector Commander or designated
representative will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners on VHF–FM channel
16 announcing the activated safety zone
is no longer subject to enforcement.
(e) Effective period. This section is
effective from [EFFECTIVE DATE OF
FINAL RULE] through February 4, 2024.
Dated: January 5, 2023.
Ulysses S. Mullins,
Captain, Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Mobile, Captain of the Port Mobile.
[FR Doc. 2023–00354 Filed 1–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Military Ocean Terminal Concord,
California; Restricted Area
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for comments.
ACTION:
The U.S. Army Military
Surface Deployment and Distribution
Command (SDDC) requested that the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
revise the restricted area boundaries for
the Military Ocean Terminal Concord
(MOTCO). The MOTCO restricted area
is located along the south shore of
Suisun Bay, north of the City of
Concord, Contra Costa County,
California. The request to revise the
boundaries of the MOTCO restricted
area is due to the need to provide a
more sufficient security buffer distance
in navigable waters next to critical
MOTCO shoreline infrastructure.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 10,
2023.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number COE–
2022–0012, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Email: david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
Include the docket number COE–2022–
0012 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Attn: CECW–CO (David B. Olson), 441
G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to
security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or
courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket number COE–2022–0012. All
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the
commenter indicates that the comment
includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI,
or otherwise protected, through
regulations.gov or email. The
regulations.gov website is an
anonymous access system, which means
we will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email directly to the Corps
without going through regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any compact disk
you submit. If we cannot read your
comment because of technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic
comments should avoid the use of any
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed. Although listed in
the index, some information is not
publicly available, such as CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form.
Mr.
David Olson, Headquarters, Operations
and Regulatory Community of Practice,
Washington, DC at 202–761–4922.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1533
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2023 / Proposed Rules
In
response to this request by the SDDC,
and pursuant to its authorities in
Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1917 (40 Stat 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and
Chapter XIX of the Army
Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat 892;
33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is proposing to
amend its regulations at 33 CFR
334.1110(a) by revising the restricted
area boundaries and making additional
editorial changes to clarify the
description of the new boundaries. The
existing restricted area boundary at the
western terminus would be shifted
approximately 700 yards west along the
shoreline so that it encompasses the
mouth of Hastings Slough and
eliminates a potential route of
unauthorized encroachment into the
MOTCO installment. Along the central
and eastern parts of the restricted area,
the existing restricted area boundary
would be shifted bayward to the
existing ship channel, in order to
provide an adequate security buffer
around MOTCO’s piers. The revised
eastern boundary of the restricted area
would follow the southern edge of the
ship channel, and would therefore not
impact vessel traffic in the ship channel.
The eastern shoreline terminus of the
restricted area would remain at its
current location.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Procedural Requirements
a. Regulatory Planning and Review.
This proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and Executive Order 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011) and it was not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review.
b. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This proposed rule has
been reviewed under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354). The
Regulatory Flexibility Act generally
requires an agency to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule
subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (i.e., small
businesses and small governments). The
proposed change to the restricted area
boundaries is necessary to eliminate a
potential route of unauthorized
encroachment into the MOTCO
installation. Small entities can utilize
navigable waters outside of the
restricted area. Unless information is
obtained to the contrary during the
public notice comment period, the
Corps expects that the modification of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Jan 10, 2023
Jkt 259001
the boundaries of this restricted area
would have practically no economic
impact on the public, no anticipated
navigational hazard, or interference
with existing waterway traffic. Unless
information is obtained to the contrary
during the comment period, the Corps
certifies that the proposed rule would
have no significant economic impact on
the public.
c. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act. The Corps
expects that the proposed rule will not
have a significant impact to the quality
of the human environment and,
therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement will
not be required. An environmental
assessment will be prepared after the
public notice period is closed and all
comments have been received and
considered. If no adverse comments are
received, the environmental assessment
will be prepared for the decisionmaking for the final rule. After the
environmental assessment is prepared,
it may be reviewed by contacting the
Corps’ San Francisco District office at
415–503–6795 or by email at CESPNRG-Info@usace.army.mil.
d. Unfunded Mandates Act. The
proposed rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private
sector and, therefore, is not a federal
private sector mandate and is not
subject to the requirements of Section
202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). The Corps has
also found, under Section 203 of the
Act, that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this
rulemaking.
e. Congressional Review Act. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The Corps will submit a
report containing the final rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States. A major
rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal
Register. This proposed rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Navigation (water),
Restricted areas, Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Corps is proposing to
amend 33 CFR part 334 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND
RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR
part 334 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and
40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3).
2. Amend § 334.1110 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 334.1110 Military Ocean Terminal
Concord; restricted area.
(a) The area. Beginning at point A on
the shore west of the mouth of a small
slough (known as Hastings Slough) and
passing east of buoy R ‘‘6’’ bearing
60°30′ for 2,860 yards, through Point B
on the eastern end of the two Seal
Islands, to point C on the southern edge
of the Roe Island Channel near buoy R
‘‘16A’’; thence in a generally easterly
direction running along the southern
edge of the Roe Island Channel, Port
Chicago Reach and Middle Ground West
Reach (points D and E) to point F
directly north of the eastern shore
boundary (point G); thence 180° to point
G on the shore line; thence following
the high water shore line in a general
westerly direction to the point of
beginning.
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
A (shoreline) ..
B ....................
C ....................
D ....................
E ....................
F ....................
G (shoreline)
Latitude
Longitude
38.0513
38.0579
38.063
38.0612
38.0594
38.0594
38.0521
¥122.0576
¥122.043
¥122.0307
¥122.0204
¥122.001
¥121.9882
¥121.9882
The datum for these coordinates is
North Atlantic Datum (NAD) 83.
*
*
*
*
*
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–00380 Filed 1–10–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0158; FRL–10541–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Tennessee;
Eastman Chemical Company Nitrogen
Oxides SIP Call Alternative Monitoring
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to
conditionally approve a source-specific
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1532-1533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00380]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, California; Restricted Area
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Military Surface Deployment and Distribution
Command (SDDC) requested that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
revise the restricted area boundaries for the Military Ocean Terminal
Concord (MOTCO). The MOTCO restricted area is located along the south
shore of Suisun Bay, north of the City of Concord, Contra Costa County,
California. The request to revise the boundaries of the MOTCO
restricted area is due to the need to provide a more sufficient
security buffer distance in navigable waters next to critical MOTCO
shoreline infrastructure.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before February 10,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number COE-
2022-0012, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include the docket number COE-
2022-0012 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO (David B. Olson),
441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket number COE-2022-0012.
All comments received will be included in the public docket without
change and may be made available on-line at https://regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the commenter
indicates that the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov website is an anonymous access system, which
means we will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email directly
to the Corps without going through regulations.gov, your email address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, we recommend that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any compact disk you submit. If we cannot read your comment because of
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, we may
not be able to consider your comment. Electronic comments should avoid
the use of any special characters, any form of encryption, and be free
of any defects or viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, such as CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson, Headquarters,
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-
761-4922.
[[Page 1533]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to this request by the SDDC, and
pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1917 (40 Stat 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the Army
Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is
proposing to amend its regulations at 33 CFR 334.1110(a) by revising
the restricted area boundaries and making additional editorial changes
to clarify the description of the new boundaries. The existing
restricted area boundary at the western terminus would be shifted
approximately 700 yards west along the shoreline so that it encompasses
the mouth of Hastings Slough and eliminates a potential route of
unauthorized encroachment into the MOTCO installment. Along the central
and eastern parts of the restricted area, the existing restricted area
boundary would be shifted bayward to the existing ship channel, in
order to provide an adequate security buffer around MOTCO's piers. The
revised eastern boundary of the restricted area would follow the
southern edge of the ship channel, and would therefore not impact
vessel traffic in the ship channel. The eastern shoreline terminus of
the restricted area would remain at its current location.
Procedural Requirements
a. Regulatory Planning and Review. This proposed rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011) and it was not submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget for review.
b. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule
has been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-
354). The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (i.e., small businesses and small
governments). The proposed change to the restricted area boundaries is
necessary to eliminate a potential route of unauthorized encroachment
into the MOTCO installation. Small entities can utilize navigable
waters outside of the restricted area. Unless information is obtained
to the contrary during the public notice comment period, the Corps
expects that the modification of the boundaries of this restricted area
would have practically no economic impact on the public, no anticipated
navigational hazard, or interference with existing waterway traffic.
Unless information is obtained to the contrary during the comment
period, the Corps certifies that the proposed rule would have no
significant economic impact on the public.
c. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act. The Corps
expects that the proposed rule will not have a significant impact to
the quality of the human environment and, therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement will not be required. An environmental
assessment will be prepared after the public notice period is closed
and all comments have been received and considered. If no adverse
comments are received, the environmental assessment will be prepared
for the decision-making for the final rule. After the environmental
assessment is prepared, it may be reviewed by contacting the Corps' San
Francisco District office at 415-503-6795 or by email at [email protected].
d. Unfunded Mandates Act. The proposed rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private sector and, therefore, is not a
federal private sector mandate and is not subject to the requirements
of Section 202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-
4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). The Corps has also found,
under Section 203 of the Act, that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this rulemaking.
e. Congressional Review Act. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. The Corps will submit a
report containing the final rule and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal Register. This proposed rule
is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Navigation (water), Restricted areas, Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Corps is proposing to
amend 33 CFR part 334 as follows:
PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR part 334 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33
U.S.C. 3).
0
2. Amend Sec. 334.1110 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 334.1110 Military Ocean Terminal Concord; restricted area.
(a) The area. Beginning at point A on the shore west of the mouth
of a small slough (known as Hastings Slough) and passing east of buoy R
``6'' bearing 60[deg]30' for 2,860 yards, through Point B on the
eastern end of the two Seal Islands, to point C on the southern edge of
the Roe Island Channel near buoy R ``16A''; thence in a generally
easterly direction running along the southern edge of the Roe Island
Channel, Port Chicago Reach and Middle Ground West Reach (points D and
E) to point F directly north of the eastern shore boundary (point G);
thence 180[deg] to point G on the shore line; thence following the high
water shore line in a general westerly direction to the point of
beginning.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point A (shoreline).............................. 38.0513 -122.0576
Point B.......................................... 38.0579 -122.043
Point C.......................................... 38.063 -122.0307
Point D.......................................... 38.0612 -122.0204
Point E.......................................... 38.0594 -122.001
Point F.......................................... 38.0594 -121.9882
Point G (shoreline).............................. 38.0521 -121.9882
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The datum for these coordinates is North Atlantic Datum (NAD) 83.
* * * * *
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-00380 Filed 1-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P