Changes Related to Reserve Account Administration in Multi-Family Housing (MFH) Direct Loan Programs, 1149-1151 [2023-00140]
Download as PDF
1149
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 5
Monday, January 9, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR 3560
[Docket No. RHS–22–MFH–0005]
RIN 0575–AD23
Changes Related to Reserve Account
Administration in Multi-Family Housing
(MFH) Direct Loan Programs
Rural Housing Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Rural Housing Service
(RHS or Agency), a Rural Development
(RD) agency of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
proposes to amend its regulation to
implement changes related to the
administration of property reserve
accounts under the Multi-Family
Housing (MFH) section 515, Rural
Rental Housing, and section 514 Farm
Labor Housing programs. The intent of
this proposed rule is to increase
flexibility in project refinancing for
additional capital improvements needed
at MFH section 515, Rural Rental
Housing, and section 514 Farm Labor
Housing properties.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received on or before March 10,
2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically by the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the
‘‘Search Field’’ box, labeled ‘‘Search for
Rules, Proposed Rules, Notices, or
Supporting Documents,’’ enter the
following docket number: (RHS–22–
MFH–0005) or the RIN# 0575–AD23. To
submit or view public comments, click
the ‘‘Search’’ button, select the
‘‘Documents’’ tab, then select the
following document title: (Changes
Related to Reserve Account
Administration in Multi-Family
Housing (MFH) Direct Loan Programs)
from the ‘‘Search Results,’’ and select
the ‘‘Comment’’ button. Before inputting
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
your comments, you may also review
the ‘‘Commenter’s Checklist’’ (optional).
Insert your comments under the
‘‘Comment’’ title, click ‘‘Browse’’ to
attach files (if available). Input your
email address and select ‘‘Submit
Comment.’’ Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions
for accessing documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is
available through the site’s ‘‘FAQ’’ link.
Other Information: Additional
information about Rural Development
(RD) and its programs is available on the
internet at https://www.rd.usda.gov/.
All comments will be available online
for public inspection at the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (https://
www.regulations.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Larson, Multi-Family Housing
Portfolio Management Division, Rural
Housing Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington DC 20250–
0782, Telephone: (202) 720–1615;
Email: jennifer.larson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The RHS, an agency of the USDA,
offers a variety of programs to build or
improve housing and essential
community facilities in rural areas. RHS
offers loans, grants, and loan guarantees
for single- and multi-family housing,
childcare centers, fire and police
stations, hospitals, libraries, nursing
homes, schools, first responder vehicles
and equipment, and housing for farm
laborers. RHS also provides technical
assistance loans and grants in
partnership with non-profit
organizations, Indian tribes, state and
Federal government agencies, and local
communities.
Title V of the Housing Act of 1949
(Act) authorized the USDA to make
housing loans to farmers to enable them
to provide habitable dwellings for
themselves or their tenants, lessees,
sharecroppers, and laborers. The USDA
then expanded opportunities in rural
areas, making housing loans and grants
to rural residents through the SingleFamily Housing (SFH) and Multi-Family
Housing (MFH) Programs.
The RHS operates the MFH section
515 Rural Rental Housing direct loan
program. The Section 515 program
employs a public-private partnership by
providing subsidized loans at an interest
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rate of one percent to developers to
construct or renovate affordable rental
complexes in rural areas. This one
percent loan keeps the debt service on
the property sufficiently low to support
below-market rents affordable to lowincome tenants. Many of these projects
also utilize low-income housing tax
credit proceeds.
The RHS also operates the MFH Farm
Labor Housing direct loan and grant
programs under sections 514 and 516
which provide low interest loans and
grants to provide housing for
farmworkers. These eligible
farmworkers may work either at the
borrower’s farm (‘‘on-farm’’) or at any
other farm (‘‘off-farm’’).
II. Purpose of This Regulatory Action
On March 1, 2022, RHS published a
final rule in the Federal Register (87 FR
11275) requiring MFH direct loan
housing projects to maintain a reserve
account, subject to the requirements of
7 CFR part 1902, subpart A, regarding
supervised bank accounts. The final rule
also stipulated that a MFH housing
project’s reserve account may
alternatively be escrowed by the Agency
when the Agency deems necessary. In
addition, the March 1, 2022, rule
allowed for an annual U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development
Operating Cost Adjustment Factor
(OCAF) increase in contributions to a
MFH project reserve account. The
borrower may choose the option for
annual incremental OCAF increases in a
project’s reserve account contributions,
which may improve property
preparedness to address capital needs
over the life of the project.
Amendments proposed in this rule
are designed to increase flexibility in
project refinancing for additional capital
improvements needed for a section 515
or 514 MFH property. The MFH direct
loan project’s general operating account
is deemed to contain surplus funds
when the balance at the end of the
housing project’s fiscal year, after all
payables, exceeds 20 percent of the
operating and maintenance expenses.
When a MFH property’s Agencyapproved budget results in surplus cash
at the end of the year, this proposed
change to the current regulation will
allow the borrower to use surplus cash
to fund Agency-approved soft debt.
MFH-approved soft debt, such as ‘‘cash
flow notes,’’ are often provided by state
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
1150
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Proposed Rules
or local government as vital, additional
sources of MFH direct loan property
rehabilitation funding. The changes will
allow owners the flexibility to access
surplus cash notes as a new source of
capital for property improvements, and
to implement operating cost increases in
property reserve contributions.
III. Summary of Changes
The proposed changes would amend
7 CFR 3560.306 to include reducing
debt service on other third-party debt, as
an allowable use of funds, including
payments toward cash flow notes.
Allowing borrowers to use surplus
funds to repay third-party debt would
allow those borrowers to access state
and local government funding available
as a capital source for property
improvements. Acceptable third-party
debt, including cash flow notes, will
take the form of a written agreement for
the payment of an Agency-approved
debt obligation, with or without interest.
Payments may occur only after approval
has been granted by the Agency. These
changes are designed to improve
property condition and increase tools
available to borrowers to preserve
properties as affordable housing
resources. This proposed rule no longer
includes the reduction in rents as an
allowable use of surplus funds, as rentsetting is part of the annual proposed
budget process and should not be
included in the reserve account section
of this regulation. These changes are
designed to improve property condition
and increase tools available to
borrowers to preserve properties as
affordable housing resources.
IV. Regulatory Information
Statutory Authority
The Rural Rental Housing program is
authorized under sections 514, 515, 516
of title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as
amended; 42 U.S.C. 1480 et seq.; and
implemented under 7 CFR part 3560.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs
These loans are subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental
consultation with state and local
officials. RHS conducts
intergovernmental consultations for
each loan in accordance with 2 CFR part
415, subpart C.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
This proposed rule has been
determined to be non-significant and,
therefore, was not reviewed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
is not required.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988. In
accordance with this rulemaking: (1)
Unless otherwise specifically provided,
all state and local laws that conflict with
this rulemaking will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this
rulemaking except as specifically
prescribed in the rule; and (3)
administrative proceedings of the
National Appeals Division of the
Department of Agriculture (7 CFR part
11) must be exhausted before suing in
court that challenges action taken under
this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
with regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The undersigned has
determined and certified by signature
on this document that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities since this
rulemaking action does not involve a
new or expanded program nor does it
require any more action on the part of
a small business than required of a large
entity.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this
proposed rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This proposed
rule does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments; therefore, consultation
with States is not required.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes
requirements on RHS in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications or preempt
tribal laws. RHS has determined that the
proposed rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribe(s) or on either the
relationship or the distribution of
powers and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Thus, this proposed rule is not subject
to the requirements of Executive Order
13175. If tribal leaders are interested in
consulting with RHS on this
rulemaking, they are encouraged to
contact USDA’s Office of Tribal
Relations or RD’s Tribal Coordinator at:
AIAN@usda.gov to request such a
consultation.
National Environmental Policy Act
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1970,
subpart A, ‘‘Environmental Policies.’’
RHS determined that this action does
not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
environment. In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, Public Law 91–190, an
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act
(UMRA)
Title II of the UMRA, Public Law 104–
4, establishes requirements for Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments and on the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
Federal agencies generally must prepare
a written statement, including costbenefit analysis, for proposed and Final
Rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that
may result in expenditures to state,
local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
When such a statement is needed for a
rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires a Federal agency to identify
and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, more cost-effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of title II of the UMRA) for
state, local, and tribal governments or
for the private sector. Therefore, this
proposed rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by OMB
and have been assigned OMB control
number 0575–0189. This proposed rule
contains no new reporting and
recordkeeping requirements that would
require approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
E-Government Act Compliance
RHS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act by promoting the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 / Proposed Rules
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information,
services, and other purposes.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
Rural Development has reviewed this
proposed rule in accordance with USDA
Regulation 4300–4, Civil Rights Impact
Analysis, to identify any major civil
rights impacts the proposed rule might
have on program participants on the
basis of age, race, color, national origin,
sex, or disability. After review and
analysis of the proposed rule and
available data, it has been determined
that implementation of the rulemaking
will not adversely or disproportionately
impact very low, low- and moderateincome populations, minority
populations, women, Indian tribes, or
persons with disability by virtue of their
race, color, national origin, sex, age,
disability, or marital or familial status.
No major civil rights impact is likely to
result from this proposed rule.
Assistance Listing
The program affected by this
regulation is listed in the Assistance
Listing Catalog (formerly Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance) under
number 10.415-Rural Rental Housing
Loans.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
In accordance with Federal civil
rights laws and U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Remedies and
complaint filing deadlines vary by
program or incident.
Program information may be made
available in languages other than
English. Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means of
communication to obtain program
information (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, American Sign Language)
should contact the responsible Mission
Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA
TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, a complainant should
complete a Form AD–3027, USDA
Program Discrimination Complaint
Form, which can be obtained online at
https://www.ocio.usda.gov/document/
ad-3027, from any USDA office, by
calling (866) 632–9992, or by writing a
letter addressed to USDA. The letter
must contain the complainant’s name,
address, telephone number, and a
written description of the alleged
discriminatory action in sufficient detail
to inform the Assistant Secretary for
Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature
and date of an alleged civil rights
17:06 Jan 06, 2023
Jkt 259001
change the future required contributions
to the reserve account.
*
*
*
*
*
Joaquin Altoro,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–00140 Filed 1–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
List of Subjects in 7 CFR 3560
Accounting, Administrative practice
and procedure, Aged, Conflicts of
interest, Government property
management, Grant programs-housing
and community development,
Insurance, Loan programs-agriculture,
Loan programs-housing and community
development, Low and moderateincome housing, Migrant labor,
Mortgages, Nonprofit organizations,
Public housing, Rent-subsidies,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rural areas.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, Rural Housing Service
proposes to amend 7 CFR part 3560 as
follows:
Non-Discrimination Statement Policy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
violation. The completed AD–3027 form
or letter must be submitted to USDA by:
(1) Mail: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410; or
(2) Fax: (833) 256–1665 or (202) 690–
7442; or
(3) Email: program.intake@usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
1151
PART 3560—DIRECT MULTI-FAMILY
HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
1. The authority citation for part 3560
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart G—Financial Management
2. Amend § 3560.306 by revising
paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 3560.306
Reserve account.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) If a housing project’s general
operating account has surplus funds at
the end of the housing project’s fiscal
year per paragraph (d)(1) of this section,
the borrower will be required to use
such surplus for one of the following
(not in priority order): use the surplus
funds to address capital needs, make a
deposit in the reserve account or reduce
the debt service on the borrower’s loans,
including Agency-approved third-party
debt. The prior written consent of the
Agency must be obtained before surplus
funds may be used to pay debt service
on third-party debt. At the end of the
borrower’s fiscal year, if the borrower is
required to transfer surplus funds from
the general operating account to the
reserve account, the transfer does not
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9 CFR Parts 1, 2, and 3
[Docket No. APHIS–2022–0022]
RIN 0579–AE69
Wild and Exotic Animal Handling,
Training of Personnel Involved With
Public Handling of Wild and Exotic
Animals, and Environmental
Enrichment for Species
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking and request for comments.
AGENCY:
We are soliciting public
comment on our plan to strengthen
regulations regarding the handling of
wild and exotic animals for exhibition,
as well as the training of personnel
involved in the handling of wild and
exotic animals, and to establish
standards addressing environmental
enrichment for all regulated animals.
The changes we are considering would
help ensure the humane handling and
treatment of exhibited animals, as well
as the health and well-being of all
animals covered under the Animal
Welfare Act.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before March 10,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter APHIS–
2022–0022 in the Search field. Select
the Documents tab, then select the
Comment button in the list of
documents.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2022–0022, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.10, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at www.regulations.gov
or in our reading room, which is located
in room 1620 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1149-1151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00140]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 5 / Monday, January 9, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1149]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR 3560
[Docket No. RHS-22-MFH-0005]
RIN 0575-AD23
Changes Related to Reserve Account Administration in Multi-Family
Housing (MFH) Direct Loan Programs
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Housing Service (RHS or Agency), a Rural Development
(RD) agency of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA),
proposes to amend its regulation to implement changes related to the
administration of property reserve accounts under the Multi-Family
Housing (MFH) section 515, Rural Rental Housing, and section 514 Farm
Labor Housing programs. The intent of this proposed rule is to increase
flexibility in project refinancing for additional capital improvements
needed at MFH section 515, Rural Rental Housing, and section 514 Farm
Labor Housing properties.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before
March 10, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically by the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
``Search Field'' box, labeled ``Search for Rules, Proposed Rules,
Notices, or Supporting Documents,'' enter the following docket number:
(RHS-22-MFH-0005) or the RIN# 0575-AD23. To submit or view public
comments, click the ``Search'' button, select the ``Documents'' tab,
then select the following document title: (Changes Related to Reserve
Account Administration in Multi-Family Housing (MFH) Direct Loan
Programs) from the ``Search Results,'' and select the ``Comment''
button. Before inputting your comments, you may also review the
``Commenter's Checklist'' (optional). Insert your comments under the
``Comment'' title, click ``Browse'' to attach files (if available).
Input your email address and select ``Submit Comment.'' Information on
using Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the
comment period, is available through the site's ``FAQ'' link.
Other Information: Additional information about Rural Development
(RD) and its programs is available on the internet at https://www.rd.usda.gov/.
All comments will be available online for public inspection at the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Larson, Multi-Family Housing
Portfolio Management Division, Rural Housing Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington DC 20250-0782, Telephone: (202) 720-1615; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The RHS, an agency of the USDA, offers a variety of programs to
build or improve housing and essential community facilities in rural
areas. RHS offers loans, grants, and loan guarantees for single- and
multi-family housing, childcare centers, fire and police stations,
hospitals, libraries, nursing homes, schools, first responder vehicles
and equipment, and housing for farm laborers. RHS also provides
technical assistance loans and grants in partnership with non-profit
organizations, Indian tribes, state and Federal government agencies,
and local communities.
Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (Act) authorized the USDA to
make housing loans to farmers to enable them to provide habitable
dwellings for themselves or their tenants, lessees, sharecroppers, and
laborers. The USDA then expanded opportunities in rural areas, making
housing loans and grants to rural residents through the Single-Family
Housing (SFH) and Multi-Family Housing (MFH) Programs.
The RHS operates the MFH section 515 Rural Rental Housing direct
loan program. The Section 515 program employs a public-private
partnership by providing subsidized loans at an interest rate of one
percent to developers to construct or renovate affordable rental
complexes in rural areas. This one percent loan keeps the debt service
on the property sufficiently low to support below-market rents
affordable to low-income tenants. Many of these projects also utilize
low-income housing tax credit proceeds.
The RHS also operates the MFH Farm Labor Housing direct loan and
grant programs under sections 514 and 516 which provide low interest
loans and grants to provide housing for farmworkers. These eligible
farmworkers may work either at the borrower's farm (``on-farm'') or at
any other farm (``off-farm'').
II. Purpose of This Regulatory Action
On March 1, 2022, RHS published a final rule in the Federal
Register (87 FR 11275) requiring MFH direct loan housing projects to
maintain a reserve account, subject to the requirements of 7 CFR part
1902, subpart A, regarding supervised bank accounts. The final rule
also stipulated that a MFH housing project's reserve account may
alternatively be escrowed by the Agency when the Agency deems
necessary. In addition, the March 1, 2022, rule allowed for an annual
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Operating Cost
Adjustment Factor (OCAF) increase in contributions to a MFH project
reserve account. The borrower may choose the option for annual
incremental OCAF increases in a project's reserve account
contributions, which may improve property preparedness to address
capital needs over the life of the project.
Amendments proposed in this rule are designed to increase
flexibility in project refinancing for additional capital improvements
needed for a section 515 or 514 MFH property. The MFH direct loan
project's general operating account is deemed to contain surplus funds
when the balance at the end of the housing project's fiscal year, after
all payables, exceeds 20 percent of the operating and maintenance
expenses. When a MFH property's Agency-approved budget results in
surplus cash at the end of the year, this proposed change to the
current regulation will allow the borrower to use surplus cash to fund
Agency-approved soft debt. MFH-approved soft debt, such as ``cash flow
notes,'' are often provided by state
[[Page 1150]]
or local government as vital, additional sources of MFH direct loan
property rehabilitation funding. The changes will allow owners the
flexibility to access surplus cash notes as a new source of capital for
property improvements, and to implement operating cost increases in
property reserve contributions.
III. Summary of Changes
The proposed changes would amend 7 CFR 3560.306 to include reducing
debt service on other third-party debt, as an allowable use of funds,
including payments toward cash flow notes. Allowing borrowers to use
surplus funds to repay third-party debt would allow those borrowers to
access state and local government funding available as a capital source
for property improvements. Acceptable third-party debt, including cash
flow notes, will take the form of a written agreement for the payment
of an Agency-approved debt obligation, with or without interest.
Payments may occur only after approval has been granted by the Agency.
These changes are designed to improve property condition and increase
tools available to borrowers to preserve properties as affordable
housing resources. This proposed rule no longer includes the reduction
in rents as an allowable use of surplus funds, as rent-setting is part
of the annual proposed budget process and should not be included in the
reserve account section of this regulation. These changes are designed
to improve property condition and increase tools available to borrowers
to preserve properties as affordable housing resources.
IV. Regulatory Information
Statutory Authority
The Rural Rental Housing program is authorized under sections 514,
515, 516 of title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; 42 U.S.C.
1480 et seq.; and implemented under 7 CFR part 3560.
Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
These loans are subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with state and local
officials. RHS conducts intergovernmental consultations for each loan
in accordance with 2 CFR part 415, subpart C.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant and,
therefore, was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988.
In accordance with this rulemaking: (1) Unless otherwise specifically
provided, all state and local laws that conflict with this rulemaking
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rulemaking except as specifically prescribed in the rule; and (3)
administrative proceedings of the National Appeals Division of the
Department of Agriculture (7 CFR part 11) must be exhausted before
suing in court that challenges action taken under this rulemaking.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this proposed rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. This proposed
rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and
local governments; therefore, consultation with States is not required.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes requirements on RHS in the development
of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or preempt tribal
laws. RHS has determined that the proposed rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribe(s) or on either
the relationship or the distribution of powers and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, this proposed
rule is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order 13175. If
tribal leaders are interested in consulting with RHS on this
rulemaking, they are encouraged to contact USDA's Office of Tribal
Relations or RD's Tribal Coordinator at: [email protected] to request such
a consultation.
National Environmental Policy Act
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970,
subpart A, ``Environmental Policies.'' RHS determined that this action
does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the environment. In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91-190, an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed with regard to the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The
undersigned has determined and certified by signature on this document
that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities since this rulemaking action
does not involve a new or expanded program nor does it require any more
action on the part of a small business than required of a large entity.
Unfunded Mandate Reform Act (UMRA)
Title II of the UMRA, Public Law 104-4, establishes requirements
for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions
on state, local, and tribal governments and on the private sector.
Under section 202 of the UMRA, Federal agencies generally must prepare
a written statement, including cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and
Final Rules with ``Federal mandates'' that may result in expenditures
to state, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of the UMRA generally
requires a Federal agency to identify and consider a reasonable number
of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost-
effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for state, local, and
tribal governments or for the private sector. Therefore, this proposed
rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the
UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by OMB and have been assigned OMB control
number 0575-0189. This proposed rule contains no new reporting and
recordkeeping requirements that would require approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
E-Government Act Compliance
RHS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act by
promoting the use of the internet and other information technologies to
provide
[[Page 1151]]
increased opportunities for citizen access to government information,
services, and other purposes.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
Rural Development has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance
with USDA Regulation 4300-4, Civil Rights Impact Analysis, to identify
any major civil rights impacts the proposed rule might have on program
participants on the basis of age, race, color, national origin, sex, or
disability. After review and analysis of the proposed rule and
available data, it has been determined that implementation of the
rulemaking will not adversely or disproportionately impact very low,
low- and moderate-income populations, minority populations, women,
Indian tribes, or persons with disability by virtue of their race,
color, national origin, sex, age, disability, or marital or familial
status. No major civil rights impact is likely to result from this
proposed rule.
Assistance Listing
The program affected by this regulation is listed in the Assistance
Listing Catalog (formerly Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) under
number 10.415-Rural Rental Housing Loans.
Non-Discrimination Statement Policy
In accordance with Federal civil rights laws and U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by
program or incident.
Program information may be made available in languages other than
English. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of
communication to obtain program information (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign Language) should contact the
responsible Mission Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA TARGET
Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay Service
at (800) 877-8339.
To file a program discrimination complaint, a complainant should
complete a Form AD-3027, USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form,
which can be obtained online at https://www.ocio.usda.gov/document/ad-3027, from any USDA office, by calling (866) 632-9992, or by writing a
letter addressed to USDA. The letter must contain the complainant's
name, address, telephone number, and a written description of the
alleged discriminatory action in sufficient detail to inform the
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature and date
of an alleged civil rights violation. The completed AD-3027 form or
letter must be submitted to USDA by:
(1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20250-9410; or
(2) Fax: (833) 256-1665 or (202) 690-7442; or
(3) Email: [email protected].
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR 3560
Accounting, Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Conflicts
of interest, Government property management, Grant programs-housing and
community development, Insurance, Loan programs-agriculture, Loan
programs-housing and community development, Low and moderate-income
housing, Migrant labor, Mortgages, Nonprofit organizations, Public
housing, Rent-subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Rural areas.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Rural Housing Service
proposes to amend 7 CFR part 3560 as follows:
PART 3560--DIRECT MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3560 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart G--Financial Management
0
2. Amend Sec. 3560.306 by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 3560.306 Reserve account.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) If a housing project's general operating account has surplus
funds at the end of the housing project's fiscal year per paragraph
(d)(1) of this section, the borrower will be required to use such
surplus for one of the following (not in priority order): use the
surplus funds to address capital needs, make a deposit in the reserve
account or reduce the debt service on the borrower's loans, including
Agency-approved third-party debt. The prior written consent of the
Agency must be obtained before surplus funds may be used to pay debt
service on third-party debt. At the end of the borrower's fiscal year,
if the borrower is required to transfer surplus funds from the general
operating account to the reserve account, the transfer does not change
the future required contributions to the reserve account.
* * * * *
Joaquin Altoro,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-00140 Filed 1-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P