Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 80472-80474 [2022-28318]

Download as PDF 80472 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 87, No. 250 Friday, December 30, 2022 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 532 RIN 3206–AO49 Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the following appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas for paysetting purposes: HagerstownMartinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC. The proposed rule would redefine the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. This change is based on a recent consensus recommendation of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC). DATES: Send comments on or before January 30, 2023. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method: • Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 29, 2022 Jkt 259001 2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@ opm.gov. OPM is proposing a rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of the following appropriated fund FWS wage areas: Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC. This proposed rule would redefine the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. Shenandoah National Park would become consolidated under the Washington, DC, FWS wage area so that the installation would be defined to a single wage area. This change is based on a recent recommendation of FPRAC, the statutory national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted. As provided by 5 CFR 532.211, this regulation allows consideration of the following criteria when defining wage area boundaries: distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; commuting patterns; and similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. The Shenandoah National Park (approximately 105 miles long) is currently split among four FWS areas. When the FWS was first established, most of Shenandoah National Park was in the Hagerstown-MartinsburgChambersburg wage area. Over time, as a result of changes in Office of Management and Budget defined metropolitan statistical areas, the wage area definitions for some counties that comprise the Shenandoah National Park have been changed by OPM based on recommendations of FPRAC. Presently, portions of the Shenandoah National Park are defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and Washington, DC, FWS wage areas as follows: (1) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Albemarle and Greene Counties, VA, is defined to the Richmond wage area; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (2) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Augusta County, VA, is defined to the Roanoke wage area; (3) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison, Rappahannock, and Warren Counties, VA, is defined to the Washington, DC, wage area; and (4) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Page and Rockingham Counties, VA, is defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, wage area. Albemarle and Greene Counties, except for the Shenandoah National Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Richmond, VA, wage area. Augusta County, except for the Shenandoah National Park portion, continues to be appropriately defined to the Roanoke, VA, wage area. Page and Rockingham Counties, except for the Shenandoah National Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Hagerstown-MartinsburgChambersburg, MD, wage area. Madison, Rappahannock, and Warren Counties continue to be appropriately defined to the Washington, DC, wage area. There are 14 FWS National Park Service (NPS) employees working in the Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison County and 17 FWS NPS employees working in the Shenandoah National Park portion of Page County. So that the FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park are not split among four wage areas, OPM proposes that the Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and Rockingham Counties be redefined to the Washington, DC, wage area. Shenandoah National Park would then be entirely defined to the Washington, DC, wage area. This change would provide equal pay treatment for FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park. FPRAC, the national labormanagement committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations. Regulatory Impact Analysis This action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM 30DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules Definitions of Wage and Wage Survey Areas Regulatory Flexibility Act * OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. District of Columbia Federalism We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments. Civil Justice Reform This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. Office of Personnel Management. Stephen Hickman, Federal Register Liaison. * Baltimore Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. 2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area listings for the District of Columbia and the States of Maryland and Virginia to read as follows: Jkt 259001 * * * * Maryland 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: 16:22 Dec 29, 2022 * District of Columbia: Washington, DC Maryland: Charles Frederick Montgomery Prince George’s Virginia (cities): Alexandria Fairfax Falls Church Manassas Manassas Park Virginia (counties): Arlington Fairfax Loudoun Prince William Area of Application. Survey area plus: Maryland: Calvert St. Mary’s Virginia (city): Fredericksburg Virginia (counties): Albemarle (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion) Augusta (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion) Clarke Culpeper Fauquier Greene (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion) King George Madison Page (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion) Rappahannock Rockingham (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion) Spotsylvania Stafford Warren West Virginia: Jefferson PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS VerDate Sep<11>2014 * Survey Area * ■ * Washington, DC Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: ■ khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532— Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Survey Area Maryland (city): Baltimore Maryland (counties): Anne Arundel Baltimore Carroll Harford Howard Area of Application. Survey area plus: Maryland: Queen Anne’s PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 80473 Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg Survey Area Maryland: Washington Pennsylvania: Franklin West Virginia: Berkeley Area of Application. Survey area plus: Maryland: Allegany Garrett Pennsylvania: Fulton Virginia (cities): Harrisonburg Winchester Virginia (counties): Frederick Page (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion) Rockingham (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion) Shenandoah West Virginia: Hampshire Hardy Mineral Morgan * * * * * Virginia Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport NewsHampton Survey Area Virginia (cities): Chesapeake Hampton Newport News Norfolk Poquoson Portsmouth Suffolk Virginia Beach Williamsburg Virginia (counties): Gloucester James City York North Carolina: Currituck Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia (city): Franklin Virginia (counties): Accomack Isle of Wight Mathews Northampton Southampton Surry North Carolina: Camden Chowan Gates Pasquotank Perquimans Maryland: Assateague Island part of Worcester Richmond Survey Area Virginia (cities): E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM 30DEP1 80474 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules Colonial Heights Hopewell Petersburg Richmond Virginia (counties): Charles City Chesterfield Dinwiddie Goochland Hanover Henrico New Kent Powhatan Prince George Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia (cities): Charlottesville Emporia Virginia (counties): Albemarle (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion) Amelia Brunswick Buckingham Caroline Charlotte Cumberland Essex Fluvanna Greene (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion) Greensville King and Queen King William Lancaster Louisa Lunenberg Mecklenburg Middlesex Nelson Northumberland Nottoway Orange Prince Edward Richmond Sussex Westmoreland khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Roanoke Survey Area Virginia (cities): Radford Roanoke Salem Virginia (counties): Botetourt Craig Montgomery Roanoke Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia (cities): Bedford Buena Vista Clifton Forge Covington Danville Galax Lexington Lynchburg Martinsville South Boston Staunton Waynesboro Virginia (counties): Alleghany VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 29, 2022 Jkt 259001 Amherst Appomattox Augusta (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion) Bath Bedford Bland Campbell Carroll Floyd Franklin Giles Halifax Henry Patrick Pittsburgh Pulaski Rockbridge Wythe * * * * * [FR Doc. 2022–28318 Filed 12–29–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 35 [Docket No. PRM–35–22; NRC–2020–0141] Reporting Nuclear Medicine Injection Extravasations as Medical Events Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; consideration in the rulemaking process. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will consider in its rulemaking process issues raised in a petition for rulemaking (PRM), PRM– 35–22, submitted by Ronald K. Lattanze on behalf of Lucerno Dynamics, LLC. The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations to require reporting of certain nuclear medicine injection extravasations as medical events. DATES: The docket for the petition for rulemaking, PRM–35–22, is closed on December 30, 2022. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2020–0141 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly available information related to this action by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2020–0141. Address questions about NRC dockets to Dawn Forder; telephone: 301–415–3407; or email: Dawn.Forder@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at 301–415–4737, or by email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. For the convenience of the reader, instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are provided in the ‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents, by appointment, at the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), Room P1 B35, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to PDR.Resource@ nrc.gov or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301– 415–4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (ET), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Carrera, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–1078, email: Andrew.Carrera@ nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. The Petition A. Background B. Issues Raised in the Petition II. Public Comments on the Petition A. Overview of Public Comments B. Comments Received to Specific Questions in the Docketing Request for Comment C. NRC Response to Additional Public Comments III. Reasons for Consideration IV. Availability of Documents V. Conclusion I. The Petition The NRC received and docketed a PRM (ADAMS Accession No. ML20157A266) dated May 18, 2020, filed by Ronald K. Lattanze on behalf of Lucerno Dynamics, LLC. On September 15, 2020, the NRC published a notice of docketing and request for public comment on the petition (85 FR 57148). The petitioner requested that the NRC amend its regulations in part 35 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Medical Use of Byproduct Material,’’ to require reporting of certain nuclear medicine injection extravasations as medical events. Extravasation is the infiltration of E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM 30DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 250 (Friday, December 30, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 80472-80474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28318]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 250 / Friday, December 30, 2022 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 80472]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AO49


Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated 
Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule 
to redefine the geographic boundaries of the following appropriated 
fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas for pay-setting purposes: 
Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; and 
Washington, DC. The proposed rule would redefine the Shenandoah 
National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and 
Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. This change 
is based on a recent consensus recommendation of the Federal Prevailing 
Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC).

DATES: Send comments on or before January 30, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or 
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and docket 
number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and 
other submissions from members of the public is to make these 
submissions available for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov 
as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers 
or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 
606-2858 or by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is proposing a rule to redefine the 
geographic boundaries of the following appropriated fund FWS wage 
areas: Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, 
VA; and Washington, DC. This proposed rule would redefine the 
Shenandoah National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, 
and Rockingham Counties, VA, to the Washington, DC, wage area. 
Shenandoah National Park would become consolidated under the 
Washington, DC, FWS wage area so that the installation would be defined 
to a single wage area. This change is based on a recent recommendation 
of FPRAC, the statutory national labor-management committee responsible 
for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From 
time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides 
OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that 
changes are warranted.
    As provided by 5 CFR 532.211, this regulation allows consideration 
of the following criteria when defining wage area boundaries: distance, 
transportation facilities, and geographic features; commuting patterns; 
and similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and 
sizes of private industrial establishments.
    The Shenandoah National Park (approximately 105 miles long) is 
currently split among four FWS areas. When the FWS was first 
established, most of Shenandoah National Park was in the Hagerstown-
Martinsburg-Chambersburg wage area. Over time, as a result of changes 
in Office of Management and Budget defined metropolitan statistical 
areas, the wage area definitions for some counties that comprise the 
Shenandoah National Park have been changed by OPM based on 
recommendations of FPRAC.
    Presently, portions of the Shenandoah National Park are defined to 
the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Richmond, VA; Roanoke, VA; 
and Washington, DC, FWS wage areas as follows:
    (1) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Albemarle and Greene 
Counties, VA, is defined to the Richmond wage area;
    (2) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Augusta County, VA, is 
defined to the Roanoke wage area;
    (3) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison, Rappahannock, 
and Warren Counties, VA, is defined to the Washington, DC, wage area; 
and
    (4) The Shenandoah National Park portion of Page and Rockingham 
Counties, VA, is defined to the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, 
MD, wage area.
    Albemarle and Greene Counties, except for the Shenandoah National 
Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Richmond, 
VA, wage area. Augusta County, except for the Shenandoah National Park 
portion, continues to be appropriately defined to the Roanoke, VA, wage 
area. Page and Rockingham Counties, except for the Shenandoah National 
Park portions, continue to be appropriately defined to the Hagerstown-
Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, wage area. Madison, Rappahannock, and 
Warren Counties continue to be appropriately defined to the Washington, 
DC, wage area.
    There are 14 FWS National Park Service (NPS) employees working in 
the Shenandoah National Park portion of Madison County and 17 FWS NPS 
employees working in the Shenandoah National Park portion of Page 
County. So that the FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park 
are not split among four wage areas, OPM proposes that the Shenandoah 
National Park portions of Albemarle, Augusta, Greene, Page, and 
Rockingham Counties be redefined to the Washington, DC, wage area. 
Shenandoah National Park would then be entirely defined to the 
Washington, DC, wage area. This change would provide equal pay 
treatment for FWS employees working at Shenandoah National Park.
    FPRAC, the national labor-management committee responsible for 
advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, 
recommended this change by consensus. This change would be effective on 
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 
30 days following publication of the final regulations.

Regulatory Impact Analysis

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the 
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR

[[Page 80473]]

51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under 
E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Federalism

    We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 
13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any 
negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, 
local, or tribal governments.

Civil Justice Reform

    This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in 
Executive Order 12988.

Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 
million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely 
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary 
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

Office of Personnel Management.
Stephen Hickman,
Federal Register Liaison.

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec.  532.707 also issued under 
5 U.S.C. 552.

0
2. In Appendix C to subpart B amend the table by revising the wage area 
listings for the District of Columbia and the States of Maryland and 
Virginia to read as follows:

Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey 
Areas

Definitions of Wage and Wage Survey Areas

* * * * *

District of Columbia

Washington, DC

Survey Area

District of Columbia:
    Washington, DC
Maryland:
    Charles
    Frederick
    Montgomery
    Prince George's
Virginia (cities):
    Alexandria
    Fairfax
    Falls Church
    Manassas
    Manassas Park
Virginia (counties):
    Arlington
    Fairfax
    Loudoun
    Prince William

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Maryland:
    Calvert
    St. Mary's
Virginia (city):
    Fredericksburg
Virginia (counties):
    Albemarle (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Augusta (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Clarke
    Culpeper
    Fauquier
    Greene (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    King George
    Madison
    Page (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Rappahannock
    Rockingham (Only includes the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Spotsylvania
    Stafford
    Warren
West Virginia:
    Jefferson
* * * * *

Maryland

Baltimore

Survey Area

Maryland (city):
    Baltimore
Maryland (counties):
    Anne Arundel
    Baltimore
    Carroll
    Harford
    Howard

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Maryland:
    Queen Anne's

Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg

Survey Area

Maryland:
    Washington
Pennsylvania:
    Franklin
West Virginia:
    Berkeley

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Maryland:
    Allegany
    Garrett
Pennsylvania:
    Fulton
Virginia (cities):
    Harrisonburg
    Winchester
Virginia (counties):
    Frederick
    Page (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Rockingham (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park 
portion)
    Shenandoah
West Virginia:
    Hampshire
    Hardy
    Mineral
    Morgan
* * * * *

Virginia

Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News-Hampton

Survey Area

Virginia (cities):
    Chesapeake
    Hampton
    Newport News
    Norfolk
    Poquoson
    Portsmouth
    Suffolk
    Virginia Beach
    Williamsburg
Virginia (counties):
    Gloucester
    James City
    York
North Carolina:
    Currituck

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Virginia (city):
    Franklin
    Virginia (counties):
    Accomack
    Isle of Wight
    Mathews
    Northampton
    Southampton
    Surry
North Carolina:
    Camden
    Chowan
    Gates
    Pasquotank
    Perquimans
Maryland:
    Assateague Island part of Worcester

Richmond

Survey Area

Virginia (cities):

[[Page 80474]]

    Colonial Heights
    Hopewell
    Petersburg
    Richmond
Virginia (counties):
    Charles City
    Chesterfield
    Dinwiddie
    Goochland
    Hanover
    Henrico
    New Kent
    Powhatan
    Prince George

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Virginia (cities):
    Charlottesville
    Emporia
Virginia (counties):
    Albemarle (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park 
portion)
    Amelia
    Brunswick
    Buckingham
    Caroline
    Charlotte
    Cumberland
    Essex
    Fluvanna
    Greene (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Greensville
    King and Queen
    King William
    Lancaster
    Louisa
    Lunenberg
    Mecklenburg
    Middlesex
    Nelson
    Northumberland
    Nottoway
    Orange
    Prince Edward
    Richmond
    Sussex
    Westmoreland

Roanoke

Survey Area

Virginia (cities):
    Radford
    Roanoke
    Salem
Virginia (counties):
    Botetourt
    Craig
    Montgomery
    Roanoke

    Area of Application. Survey area plus:

    Virginia (cities):
    Bedford
    Buena Vista
    Clifton Forge
    Covington
    Danville
    Galax
    Lexington
    Lynchburg
    Martinsville
    South Boston
    Staunton
    Waynesboro
Virginia (counties):
    Alleghany
    Amherst
    Appomattox
    Augusta (Does not include the Shenandoah National Park portion)
    Bath
    Bedford
    Bland
    Campbell
    Carroll
    Floyd
    Franklin
    Giles
    Halifax
    Henry
    Patrick
    Pittsburgh
    Pulaski
    Rockbridge
    Wythe
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-28318 Filed 12-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.