Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Macon Area Limited Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, 79830-79836 [2022-28169]
Download as PDF
79830
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed priorities,
requirements, and definitions contain
information collection requirements that
are approved by OMB under OMB
control number 1894–0006; the
proposed priorities, requirements, and
definitions do not affect the currently
approved data collection.
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that this
proposed regulatory action would not
have a substantial economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration
Size Standards define proprietary
institutions as small businesses if they
are independently owned and operated,
are not dominant in their field of
operation, and have total annual
revenue below $7,000,000. Nonprofit
institutions are defined as small entities
if they are independently owned and
operated and not dominant in their field
of operation. Public institutions are
defined as small organizations if they
are operated by a government
overseeing a population below 50,000.
Although some of the Alaska Native
Organizations, LEAs, and other entities
that receive STEP program funds qualify
as small entities under this definition,
the proposed priorities, definitions, and
requirements would not have a
significant economic impact on these
small entities. The Department believes
that the costs imposed on an applicant
by the proposed priorities,
requirements, and definitions would be
limited to the costs related to providing
the documentation outlined in the
proposed priorities, definitions, and
requirements when preparing an
application and that those costs would
not be significant. Participation in the
STEP program is voluntary. We expect
that in determining whether to apply for
STEP funds, an eligible entity would
evaluate the requirements of preparing
an application and any associated costs
and weigh them against the benefits
likely to be achieved by receiving a
STEP grant. An eligible entity will
probably apply only if it determines that
the likely benefits exceed the costs of
preparing an application.
We invite comments from small
entities as to whether they believe the
proposed priorities, requirements, and
definitions would have a significant
economic impact on them and, if so, we
request evidence to support that belief.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance. This
document provides early notification of
our specific plans and actions for this
program.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or another accessible
format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF, you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
James F. Lane,
Senior Advisor, Office of the Secretary,
Delegated the Authority to Perform the
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary, Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022–28222 Filed 12–27–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0203; FRL–10510–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Macon
Area Limited Maintenance Plan for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Georgia,
through the Georgia Environmental
Protection Division (EPD), via a letter
dated October 20, 2021. The SIP
revision includes a Limited
Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the Macon
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS)
maintenance area (hereinafter referred
to as the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS Area or Macon Area or Area).
The Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS
Area consists of all of Bibb County and
a portion of Monroe County located in
middle Georgia. EPA is proposing to
approve the Macon Area LMP because
it provides for the maintenance of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the
Area through the end of the second 10year portion of the maintenance period.
The effect of this action would be to
make certain commitments related to
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Macon Area federally
enforceable as part of the Georgia SIP.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 27, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2022–0203 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tiereny Bell, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. The telephone number is (404)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
562–9088. Ms. Bell can also be reached
via electronic mail at bell.tiereny@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Summary of EPA’s Proposed Action
II. Background
III. Georgia’s SIP Submittal
IV. EPA’s Evaluation of Georgia’s SIP
Submittal
A. Attainment Emissions Inventory
B. Maintenance Demonstration
C. Monitoring Network and Verification of
Continued Attainment
D. Contingency Plan
E. Conclusion
V. Transportation Conformity and General
Conformity
VI. Proposed Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Summary of EPA’s Proposed Action
In accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act), EPA is proposing to
approve the Macon Area LMP for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, which was
adopted by Georgia EPD on October 12,
2021, and submitted to EPA as a
revision to the Georgia SIP under a letter
dated October 20, 2021.1 The Macon
LMP is designed to maintain the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS within the Macon
Area through the end of the second 10year portion of the maintenance period
beyond redesignation. As a general
matter, the Macon Area LMP relies on
the same control measures and
applicable contingency provisions to
maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
during the second 10-year portion of the
maintenance period as the maintenance
plan submitted by Georgia EPD for the
first 10-year period. EPA is proposing to
approve the plan because it meets all
applicable requirements under CAA
sections 110 and 175A.
II. Background
Ground-level ozone is formed when
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and volatile
organic compounds (VOC) react in the
presence of sunlight. These two
pollutants, referred to as ozone
precursors, are emitted by many types of
pollution sources, including on- and offroad motor vehicles and engines, power
plants and industrial facilities, and
smaller area sources such as lawn and
garden equipment and paints. Scientific
evidence indicates that adverse public
health effects occur following exposure
to ozone, particularly in children and in
adults with lung disease. Breathing air
containing ozone can reduce lung
function and inflame airways, which
can increase respiratory symptoms and
1 EPA received Georgia’s SIP submission on
October 20, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
aggravate asthma and other lung
diseases.
Ozone exposure also has been
associated with increased susceptibility
to respiratory infections, increased
medication use, doctor visits, and
emergency department visits, and
increased hospital admissions for
individuals with lung disease. Children
are at increased risk from exposure to
ozone because their lungs are still
developing and they are more likely to
be active outdoors, which increases
their exposure.2
In 1979, under section 109 of the
CAA, EPA established primary and
secondary NAAQS for ozone at 0.12
parts per million (ppm), averaged over
a 1-hour period. See 44 FR 8202
(February 8, 1979). On July 18, 1997,
EPA revised the primary and secondary
NAAQS for ozone to set the acceptable
level of ozone in the ambient air at 0.08
ppm, averaged over an 8-hour period.
See 62 FR 38856 (July 18, 1997).3 EPA
set the 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on
scientific evidence demonstrating that
ozone causes adverse health effects at
lower concentrations and over longer
periods of time than was understood
when the pre-existing 1-hour ozone
NAAQS was set. EPA determined that
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS would be
more protective of human health,
especially for children and adults who
are active outdoors and for individuals
with a pre-existing respiratory disease,
such as asthma.
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the
CAA to designate areas throughout the
nation as attaining or not attaining the
NAAQS. On April 30, 2004, EPA
designated the Macon 1997 8-hour
Ozone NAAQS Area, which consists of
all of Bibb County and a portion of
Monroe County in Georgia, as
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The designation became
effective on June 15, 2004. See 69 FR
23858 (April 30, 2004). Subsequently, in
2007, EPA redesignated the Macon 1997
8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area to
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and approved the first
maintenance plan demonstrating
attainment through the initial 10-year
period.
2 See ‘‘Fact Sheet, Proposal to Revise the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone,’’ January
6, 2010, and 75 FR 2938 (January 19, 2010).
3 In March 2008, EPA completed another review
of the primary and secondary ozone NAAQS and
tightened them further by lowering the level for
both to 0.075 ppm. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27,
2008). Additionally, in October 2015, EPA
completed another review of the primary and
secondary ozone NAAQS and tightened them by
lowering the level for both to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR
65292 (October 26, 2015).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79831
EPA has revised the ozone NAAQS
twice since the 1997 standards were
finalized. On July 20, 2012, EPA
designated areas as unclassifiable/
attainment or nonattainment for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Macon
Area was designated as attainment for
that standard with an effective date of
July 20, 2012. See 77 FR 30088 (May 21,
2012). On November 16, 2017, EPA
designated areas for the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The Macon Area was
designated attainment for that standard
with an effective date of January 16,
2018. See 82 FR 54232 (November 16,
2017).
A state may submit a request to
redesignate a nonattainment area that is
attaining a NAAQS to attainment, and,
if the area has met the criteria described
in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA, EPA
may approve the redesignation request.4
One of the criteria for redesignation is
for the area to have an approved
maintenance plan under CAA section
175A. The maintenance plan must
demonstrate that the area will continue
to maintain the NAAQS for the period
extending ten years after redesignation,
and it must contain such additional
measures as necessary to ensure
maintenance and such contingency
provisions as necessary to assure that
violations of the NAAQS will be
promptly corrected. Eight years after the
effective date of redesignation, the state
must also submit a second maintenance
plan to ensure ongoing maintenance of
the NAAQS for an additional ten years
pursuant to CAA section 175A(b) (i.e.,
ensuring maintenance for 20 years after
redesignation).
EPA has published long-standing
guidance for states on developing
maintenance plans, beginning with a
1992 memo referred to as the Calcagni
memo. The Calcagni memo 5 provides
that states may generally demonstrate
maintenance by either performing air
quality modeling to show that the future
mix of sources and emission rates will
not cause a violation of the NAAQS or
by showing that projected future
emissions of a pollutant and its
precursors will not exceed the level of
4 Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA sets out the
requirements for redesignating a nonattainment area
to attainment. They include attainment of the
NAAQS, full approval of the applicable SIP
pursuant to CAA section 110(k), determination that
improvement in air quality is a result of permanent
and enforceable reductions in emissions,
demonstration that the state has met all applicable
section 110 and part D requirements, and a fully
approved maintenance plan under CAA section
175A.
5 John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, EPA Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS), ‘‘Procedures for
Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,’’ September 4, 1992 (Calcagni memo).
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
79832
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
emissions during a year when the area
was attaining the NAAQS (i.e.,
attainment year inventory).6 EPA
clarified in three subsequent guidance
memos that certain areas can meet the
CAA section 175A requirement to
provide for maintenance by showing
that they are unlikely to violate the
NAAQS in the future, using information
such as the area design values 7 when
they are significantly below the
standard and have been historically
stable.8 EPA refers to a maintenance
plan containing this streamlined
demonstration as a limited maintenance
plan, or LMP.
EPA has interpreted CAA section
175A as permitting the LMP option
because section 175A of the Act does
not define how areas may demonstrate
maintenance, and in EPA’s experience
implementing the various NAAQS,
areas that qualify for an LMP and have
approved LMPs have rarely, if ever,
experienced subsequent violations of
the NAAQS. As noted in the LMP
guidance memoranda, states seeking an
LMP must still submit the other
maintenance plan elements outlined in
the Calcagni memo, including an
attainment emissions inventory,
provisions for the continued operation
of the ambient air quality monitoring
network, verification of continued
attainment, and a contingency plan in
the event of a future violation of the
NAAQS. Moreover, a state seeking an
LMP must still submit its section 175A
maintenance plan as a revision to its
SIP, with all attendant notice and
comment procedures. While the LMP
guidance memoranda were originally
written with respect to certain NAAQS,9
EPA has extended the LMP
interpretation of section 175A to other
NAAQS and pollutants not specifically
6 See
Calcagni memo at 9.
ozone design value for a monitoring site is
the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations.
The design value for an ozone area is the highest
design value of any monitoring site in the area.
8 See ‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable Ozone Nonattainment Areas’’ from
Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated November 16, 1994;
‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas’’ from
Joseph Paisie, OAQPS, dated October 6, 1995; and
‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Moderate
PM10 Nonattainment Areas’’ from Lydia Wegman,
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these
guidance memoranda can be found in the docket for
this proposed rulemaking.
9 The prior memos addressed: unclassifiable areas
under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, nonattainment
areas for the PM10 (particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns)
NAAQS, and nonattainment areas for the carbon
monoxide (CO) NAAQS.
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
7 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
covered by the previous guidance
memos.10
EPA is proposing to approve the
Macon LMP because Georgia has made
a showing, consistent with EPA’s prior
LMP guidance, that the Macon 1997 8hour Ozone NAAQS Area’s ozone
concentrations are well below the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS and have been
historically stable and that the State has
met the other maintenance plan
requirements. Georgia EPD submitted
this LMP for the Macon Area to fulfill
the CAA’s second maintenance plan
requirement. EPA’s evaluation of the
Macon Area LMP is presented in section
IV below.
In June 2007, Georgia EPD submitted
to EPA a request to redesignate the
Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area
to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. This submittal contained a
plan, for inclusion in the Georgia SIP, to
provide for maintenance of the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS in the Macon 1997
8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area through
2018. EPA approved Georgia’s Macon
1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area
maintenance plan and the State’s
request to redesignate the Area to
attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS effective October 19, 2007.11
Section 175A(b) of the CAA requires
states to submit a revision to the first
maintenance plan eight years after
redesignation to provide for
maintenance of the NAAQS for ten
additional years following the end of the
first 10-year period. However, EPA’s
final implementation rule for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS revoked the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS and stated that
one result of the revocation was that
areas that had been redesignated to
attainment (i.e., maintenance areas) for
the 1997 NAAQS no longer needed to
submit second 10-year maintenance
plans under CAA section 175A(b).12 In
South Coast Air Quality Management
District v. EPA, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated EPA’s
interpretation that, because of the
revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, second maintenance plans
were not required for ‘‘orphan
maintenance areas,’’ i.e., areas that had
been redesignated to attainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(maintenance areas) and were
designated attainment for the 2008
ozone NAAQS. South Coast, 882 F.3d
1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018). Thus, states with
10 See, e.g., 79 FR 41900 (July 18, 2014) (approval
of the second ten-year LMP for the Grant County
1971 SO2 maintenance area).
11 See 72 FR 53432 (September 19, 2007).
12 See 80 FR 12264, 12315 (March 6, 2015).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these ‘‘orphan maintenance areas’’
under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
must submit maintenance plans for the
second maintenance period.
Accordingly, through a letter dated
October 20, 2021, Georgia submitted a
second maintenance plan covering the
Macon Area that provides for attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through 2027.
In recognition of the continuing
record of air quality monitoring data
showing ambient 8-hour ozone
concentrations in the Macon 1997 8hour Ozone NAAQS Area well below
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, Georgia
EPD chose the LMP option for the
development of its second 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS maintenance plan for the
Macon Area. On October 20, 2021,
Georgia EPD adopted this second 10year 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance
plan, and subsequently submitted the
Macon LMP to EPA as a revision to the
Georgia SIP.
III. Georgia’s SIP Submittal
Georgia’s October 20, 2021, submittal
includes the LMP, air quality data, a
summary of the previous emissions
inventory and a conclusion regarding
future emission levels, and attachments,
as well as certification of adoption of
the plan by Georgia EPD. Attachments
to the plan include documentation of
notice, opportunity for hearing and
public participation prior to adoption of
the plan by Georgia EPD on October 20,
2021, and state legal authority. The LMP
notes that Georgia’s LMP submittal for
the remainder of the 20-year
maintenance period for the Macon Area
is in response to the D.C. Circuit’s
decision overturning aspects of EPA’s
implementation rule for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The Macon Area LMP
does not include any additional
emissions reduction measures but relies
on the same emissions reduction
strategy as the first 10-year maintenance
plan that provides for the maintenance
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through 2018. Prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) requirements and
control measures contained in the SIP
will continue to apply, and federal
measures (e.g., federal motor vehicle
control programs) will continue to be
implemented in the Macon Area.
IV. EPA’s Evaluation of Georgia’s SIP
Submittal
EPA has reviewed the Macon Area
LMP, which is designed to maintain the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the
Macon Area through the end of the 20year period beyond redesignation, as
required under CAA section 175A(b).
The following is a more detailed
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
summary of EPA’s interpretation of the
section 175A requirements 13 and EPA’s
evaluation of how each requirement is
met.
A. Attainment Emissions Inventory
For maintenance plans, a state should
develop a comprehensive, accurate
inventory of actual emissions for an
attainment year to identify the level of
emissions which is sufficient to
maintain the NAAQS. A state should
develop this inventory consistent with
EPA’s most recent guidance on
emissions inventory development. For
ozone, the inventory should be based on
typical summer day emissions of VOC
and NOX, as these pollutants are
precursors to ozone formation. The
Macon LMP includes an ozone
attainment inventory for the Bibb
County portion and the partial Monroe
County portion of the Macon Area
generated from the data EPA made
79833
available from the 2014 National
Emissions Inventory (NEI) and that
Georgia represents as 2014 summer
tons.14 Table 1 presents a summary of
the inventory for 2014 contained in the
LMP for the Bibb County portion of the
Macon Area. Table 2 presents a
summary of the inventory for 2014
contained in the LMP for the partial
Monroe County portion of the Macon
Area.
TABLE 1—2014 VOC AND NOX EMISSIONS (SUMMER TONS) FOR THE BIBB COUNTY PORTION OF THE MACON AREA
Point source
VOC .....................................................................................
NOX ......................................................................................
Nonpoint
source
509
899
Onroad mobile
source
Nonroad
mobile source
841
1,492
406
170
1,063
180
Total
2,819
2,741
TABLE 2—2014 VOC AND NOX EMISSIONS (SUMMER TONS) FOR THE PARTIAL MONROE COUNTY PORTION OF THE
MACON AREA
Point source
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
VOC .........................................................
NOX ..........................................................
167
3,160
The Attainment Emissions Inventory
section of the Macon Area LMP
describes the methods, models, and
assumptions used to develop the
attainment inventory and notes that
Georgia EPD relied on version 2 of the
2014 NEI.15 Point source emissions were
calculated from data collected annually
from the sources and reported to the
State or local air agencies. Nonpoint
source emissions were estimated by
multiplying an emission factor by some
known indicator of collective activity,
such as fuel usage, and were estimated
on the county level. Nonroad mobile
source emissions in the 2014NEIv2, in
part, were estimated using the latest
version of the EPA’s motor vehicles
emission model, MOVES (which
includes estimates nonroad emissions
like agriculture, commercial and
mining, industrial and recreational
equipment, and commercial and
residential lawn and garden equipment).
Locomotives, aircraft, and marine
nonroad sources are not included in
MOVES, and Georgia EPD relied on
EPA-generated emissions for these
sectors.16 Onroad mobile sources in the
13 See
Calcagni memo.
defines summer tons as the total
cumulative emissions from May through
September.
15 Documentation and data for the 2014 NEIv2
can be accessed via the following website: https://
www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2014national-emissions-inventory-nei-data.
14 Georgia
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
Nonpoint
source
Onroad mobile
source
Nonroad
mobile source
251
910
103
25
225
116
2014NEIv2 were estimated using
MOVES and the latest planning
assumptions regarding vehicle type,
vehicle activity, and vehicle speeds to
estimate vehicular emissions for 2014.
Georgia EPD’s estimates for vehicle
emissions reflect emissions inventories
and ancillary data files used for
emissions modeling, as well as the
meteorological, initial condition, and
boundary condition files need to run the
air quality model.
Based on our review of the methods,
models, and assumptions used by
Georgia to develop the inventory, EPA
proposes to find that the Macon 1997
ozone NAAQS LMP includes a
comprehensive, reasonably accurate
inventory of actual ozone precursor
emissions in attainment year 2014 and
proposes to conclude that this is
acceptable for the purposes of a
subsequent maintenance plan under
CAA section 175A(b).
Fire
Total
9
4
755
4,215
the area is well below the level of the
NAAQS, that past air quality trends
have been shown to be stable, and that
the probability of the area experiencing
a violation over the second 10-year
maintenance period is low.17 These
criteria are evaluated below.
1. Evaluation of Ozone Concentrations
B. Maintenance Demonstration
The maintenance demonstration
requirement is satisfied in a LMP if the
state can provide sufficient weight of
evidence indicating that air quality in
To attain the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, the three-year average of the
fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour
average ozone concentrations (design
value) at each monitor within an area
must not exceed 0.08 ppm. Based on the
rounding convention described in 40
CFR part 50, Appendix I, the NAAQS is
attained if the design value is 0.084 ppm
or below. EPA evaluated quality assured
and certified 2018–2020 monitoring
data (which was the most recent quality
assured and certified data at the time of
submission) and determined that the
design value for the Macon Area was
0.061 ppm, or 73 percent of the level of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as
measured at the Macon-Forestry
monitor located in Bibb County, Georgia
(AQS ID: 13–021–0012). Based on
16 EPA developed emissions for these sectors
based on AP–42 emissions factor, and information
supplied by the Eastern Regional Technical
Advisory Committee for locomotives and Federal
Aviation Administration’s Emissions and
Dispersion Modeling System (since replaced by the
Aviation Environmental Design Tool).
17 See ‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable Ozone Nonattainment Areas’’ from
Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated November 16, 1994;
‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas’’ from
Joseph Paisie, OAQPS, dated October 6, 1995; and
‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Moderate
PM10 Nonattainment Areas’’ from Lydia Wegman,
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these
guidance memoranda can be found in the docket for
this proposed rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
79834
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
quality assured and certified monitoring
data for 2019–2021 (the most recent
quality assured and certified data), the
current the design value for the Macon
Area is 0.061 ppm, or 73 percent of the
level of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
as measured in Bibb County, Georgia
(AQS ID: 13–021–0012). Consistent with
prior guidance, EPA believes that if the
most recent air quality design value for
the area is at a level that is well below
the NAAQS (e.g., below 85 percent of
consistent with section 110(l) that such
measures are not necessary to assure
maintenance.
Table 3 presents the design values for
the monitor in the Macon Area over the
2010–2021 period. As shown, the site
has been below the level of the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS during this time,
and the most current design value is
below the level of 85 percent of the
NAAQS, consistent with prior LMP
guidance.
the NAAQS, or in this case below 0.071
ppm), then EPA considers the state to
have met the section 175A requirement
for a demonstration that the area will
maintain the NAAQS for the requisite
period. Such a demonstration assumes
continued applicability of PSD
requirements and any control measures
already in the SIP and that Federal
measures will remain in place through
the end of the second 10-year
maintenance period, absent a showing
TABLE 3—1997 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS DESIGN VALUES (DV) (PPB) AT THE MONITORING SITE IN THE MACON 1997
OZONE NAAQS AREA FOR THE 2010–2021 TIME PERIOD
Location
* Macon-Forestry Monitor.
County
(State)/tribal
land
AQS site ID
Bibb County
(Georgia).
2008–
2010
DV
13–021–
0012
73
2009–
2011
DV
2010–
2012
DV
73
2011–
2013
DV
73
71
2012–
2014
DV
2013–
2015
DV
67
2014–
2016
DV
63
2015–
2017
DV
65
65
2016–
2018
DV
65
2017–
2019
DV
64
2018–
2020
DV
61
2019–
2021
DV
61
* The ozone monitor located in Bibb County within the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area at Macon-Forestry (AQS Site ID 13–021–0012) began operation in
1997 and provided data for the 1997 8-hour ozone designation finalized in 2004.
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
Therefore, the Macon Area is eligible
for the LMP option, and EPA proposes
to find that the long record of monitored
ozone concentrations that attain the
NAAQS, together with the continuation
of existing VOC and NOX emissions
control programs in the Macon Area,
adequately provide for the maintenance
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the
Area through the second 10-year
maintenance period and beyond.
2. Stability of Ozone Levels
As discussed above, the Macon Area
has maintained air quality below the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS over the
past fifteen design values.18
Additionally, the design value data
shown in Table 3 illustrates that ozone
levels have been relatively stable over
this timeframe, with a modest
downward trend. For example, the data
in Table 3 indicates that the largest yearover-year change in design value at any
one monitor during these twelve design
value years was 4 ppb, which occurred
between the 2013 design value and the
2014 design value and between the 2014
design value and the 2015 design value,
representing approximately a 6 percent
decrease at monitor 13–021–0012
(Macon-Forestry). At this monitor, the
design values between the 2016 design
value through the 2018 design value
remained steady at 65 ppb.
Furthermore, there is an overall
downward trend in design values for the
Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS
18 The Macon Area has maintained ozone
concentrations below the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS since 2007, when the Area was
redesignated to attainment. See Air Quality Design
Values, Previous Design Value Reports, https://
www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values#
previous.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
Area. This downward trend in ozone
levels, coupled with the relatively
small, year-over-year variation in ozone
design values, makes it reasonable to
conclude that the Macon Area will not
exceed the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
during the second 10-year maintenance
period.
C. Monitoring Network and Verification
of Continued Attainment
EPA periodically reviews the ozone
monitoring networks operated and
maintained by the states in accordance
with 40 CFR part 58. The network plans,
which are submitted annually to EPA,
are consistent with the ambient air
quality monitoring network assessment.
It is important to note that the Macon
Area was designated nonattainment due
to ozone concentrations at the monitor
located at Macon-Forestry.19 Georgia
operates a network plan that includes
the ambient ozone monitoring station
within the Macon Area. The annual
network plan developed by Georgia
follows a public notification and review
process. EPA has reviewed and
approved Georgia’s 2021 Ambient Air
Monitoring Network Plan (‘‘2021
Annual Network Plan’’) which
addresses the monitor used to determine
attainment for the Macon Area.20
19 See 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004) for the final
designation action for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and https://www.epa.gov/ground-levelozone-pollution/1997-ozone-national-ambient-airquality-standards-naaqs-nonattainment for the
monitoring data associated with the designation for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
20 See October 19, 2021, letter and approval from
Caroline Freeman, Director, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA Region 4 to Karen Hays, Chief,
Environmental Protection Division, Georgia
Department of Natural Resources, available in the
docket for this proposed action.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Separately, Georgia has committed to
maintaining the monitor within the
Macon Area.21 Under a CAA section 103
grant agreement with EPA, Georgia has
operated the Macon Area monitoring
network since 1997, the year EPA
promulgated the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, and has operated the MaconForestry monitor in its current location
since 2001. EPA provides oversight of
Georgia’s operation of this monitor on
an annual basis through normal grant
monitoring activities.
To verify the attainment status of the
Area over the maintenance period, the
maintenance plan should contain
provisions for continued operation of an
appropriate, EPA-approved monitoring
network in accordance with 40 CFR part
58. As noted above, Georgia’s 2021
Annual Network Plan, which covers the
monitor within the Macon Area, has
been approved by EPA in accordance
with 40 CFR part 58, and Georgia has
committed to continue operating of this
monitor and to consulting with EPA
prior to making changes to it. The State
also acknowledges the obligation to
meet monitoring requirements in
compliance with 40 CFR part 58.22 EPA
proposes to find that there is an
adequate ambient air quality monitoring
network in the Macon Area to verify
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
D. Contingency Plan
Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires
that a maintenance plan include
contingency provisions. The purpose of
such contingency provisions is to
21 See
72 FR 42354 (August 2, 2007).
Georgia’s October 20, 2021, SIP submittal
at page 9.
22 See
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
prevent future violations of the NAAQS
or to promptly remedy any NAAQS
violations that might occur during the
maintenance period.
The Macon Area LMP contingency
plan includes tracking and triggering
mechanisms to determine when control
measures are needed, and a process for
developing and adopting appropriate
control measures. There are two
potential triggers for the contingency
plan. The Tier I trigger will be any 8hour ozone monitoring reading
exceeding 84 ppb at the ambient
monitoring station located within the
Macon Area or periodic emissions
inventory updates 23 that reveal
excessive or unanticipated growth
greater than 10 percent in either NOX or
VOC emissions over the attainment
inventory for the Macon Area. The Tier
II trigger will be any recorded violation
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the
Bibb County ambient monitoring station
in the Macon Area. Upon either the Tier
I or Tier II triggers being activated,
Georgia EPD will commence analyses to
determine what additional measures, if
any, will be necessary to attain or
maintain the ozone standard. If
activation of either trigger occurs, the
plan provides a regulatory adoption
process for revising emission control
strategies. If Georgia’s analysis
determines that the Macon Area is the
source of emissions that contribute to a
violation, the State will evaluate those
measures as specified in section 172 of
the CAA for control options as well as
other available measures. Georgia will
implement necessary controls as
expeditiously as possible, and at least
one contingency measure will be
implemented within 24 months after the
determination, based on quality-assured
ambient data, that a violation has
occurred. The Georgia EPD will begin
initial analysis of possible contingency
measures within 6 months of the trigger
occurring.24 EPA proposes to find that
the contingency provisions in Georgia’s
second maintenance plan for the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS meet the
requirements of CAA section 175A(d).
E. Conclusion
EPA proposes to find that the Macon
Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS includes an approvable update
of various elements of the initial EPA23 The Air Emissions Reporting Rule (AERR)
requires state and local agencies to collect and
submit criteria pollutant emissions data to EPA’s
Emissions Inventory System (EIS) according to the
schedule in 40 CFR 51.30.
24 See the Contingency Plan Section of the LMP
for further information regarding the contingency
plan, including measures that Georgia will consider
for adoption if any of the triggers are activated.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
approved maintenance plan for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA also
proposes to find that the Macon Area
qualifies for the LMP option and
adequately demonstrates maintenance
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through the documentation of
monitoring data showing maximum
1997 8-hour ozone levels well below the
NAAQS and historically stable design
values.
EPA believes the Macon Area LMP,
which retains existing control measures
in the SIP, is sufficient to provide for
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Macon Area over the
second maintenance period (i.e.,
through 2027) and thereby satisfies the
requirements for such a plan under CAA
section 175A(b). EPA is therefore
proposing to approve Georgia’s October
20, 2021, submission of the Macon Area
LMP as a revision to the Georgia SIP.
V. Transportation Conformity and
General Conformity
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the CAA.
Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the NAAQS. See
CAA 176(c)(1)(A) and (B). EPA’s
transportation conformity rule at 40 CFR
part 93, subpart A requires that
transportation plans, programs, and
projects conform to SIPs and establishes
the criteria and procedures for
determining whether they conform. The
conformity rule generally requires a
demonstration that emissions from the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and
the Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) are consistent with the
motor vehicles emissions budget
(MVEB) contained in the control
strategy SIP revision or maintenance
plan. See 40 CFR 93.101, 93.118, and
93.124. A MVEB is defined as ‘‘the
portion of the total allowable emissions
defined in the submitted or approved
control strategy implementation plan
revision or maintenance plan for a
certain date for the purpose of meeting
reasonable further progress milestones
or demonstrating attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS, for any
criteria pollutant or its precursors,
allocated to highway and transit vehicle
use and emissions.’’ See 40 CFR 93.101.
Under the conformity rule, LMP areas
may demonstrate conformity without a
regional emissions analysis. See 40 CFR
93.109(e). On October 16, 2007, EPA
made a finding that the MVEBs for the
first 10 years of the 1997 8-hour ozone
maintenance plan for the Macon 1997 8hour Ozone NAAQS Area were
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79835
adequate for transportation conformity
purposes. In a Federal Register notice
dated September 19, 2007, EPA notified
the public of that finding. See 72 FR
53432. This adequacy determination
became effective on October 19, 2007.
After approval of this LMP or an
adequacy finding for this LMP, there is
no requirement to meet the budget test
pursuant to the transportation
conformity rule for the Macon Area. All
actions that would require a
transportation conformity determination
for the Macon Area under EPA’s
transportation conformity rule
provisions are considered to have
already satisfied the regional emissions
analysis and ‘‘budget test’’ requirements
in 40 CFR 93.118 as a result of EPA’s
adequacy finding for this LMP. See 69
FR 40004 (July 1, 2004).
However, because LMP areas are still
maintenance areas, certain aspects of
transportation conformity
determinations still will be required for
transportation plans, programs, and
projects. Specifically, for such
determinations, RTPs, TIPs, and
transportation projects still will have to
demonstrate that they are fiscally
constrained (40 CFR 93.108) and meet
the criteria for consultation (40 CFR
93.105) and Transportation Control
Measure implementation in the
conformity rule provisions (40 CFR
93.113) as well as meet the hot-spot
requirements for projects (40 CFR
93.116).25 Additionally, conformity
determinations for RTPs and TIPs must
be determined no less frequently than
every four years, and conformity of plan
and TIP amendments and transportation
projects is demonstrated in accordance
with the timing requirements specified
in 40 CFR 93.104. In addition, in order
for projects to be approved they must
come from a currently conforming RTP
and TIP. See 40 CFR 93.114 and 40 CFR
93.115.
VI. Proposed Action
Under sections 110(k) and 175A of the
CAA and for the reasons set forth above,
EPA is proposing to approve the Macon
Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, submitted by Georgia EPD on
October 20, 2021, as a revision to the
Georgia SIP. EPA is proposing to
approve the Macon Area LMP because
it includes an acceptable update of
various elements of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS maintenance plan
approved by EPA for the first 10-year
25 A conformity determination that meets other
applicable criteria in Table 1 of paragraph (b) of this
section (93.109(e)) is still required, including the
hot-spot requirements for projects in CO, PM10, and
PM2.5 areas.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
79836
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK6VXHR33PROD with PROPOSALS
period and retains the relevant
provisions of the SIP.
EPA also finds that the Macon Area
qualifies for the LMP option and that
the Macon Area LMP adequately
demonstrates maintenance of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS through
documentation of monitoring data
showing maximum 1997 8-hour ozone
levels well below the NAAQS and
continuation of existing control
measures. EPA believes the Macon
Area’s 1997 8-Hour Ozone LMP to be
sufficient to provide for maintenance of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the
Macon Area over the second 10-year
maintenance period, through 2027, and
thereby satisfies the requirements for
such a plan under CAA section 175A(b).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Dec 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not
have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental Protection, Air
Pollution Control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental Relations,
Nitrogen Oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements, Volatile
Organic Compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2022.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2022–28169 Filed 12–27–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 300 and 600
[Docket No. 221215–0273]
RIN 0648–BK85
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act;
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would add
species or groups of species to the
Seafood Import Monitoring Program
(SIMP) established pursuant to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA). In addition, this proposed rule
would amend SIMP regulations to
clarify the responsibilities of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
importer of record; amend the definition
of importer of record to more closely
align with the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) definition; amend the
language requiring chain of custody
records to be made available for audit or
inspection to add a requirement that
such records be made available through
digital means if requested by NMFS;
clarify the Aggregated Harvest Report
criteria; and clarify the application of
SIMP requirements to imports into the
Pacific Insular Areas.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed rule must be received on or
before March 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2022–0119, by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
NOAA–NMFS–2022–0119 in the Search
box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to
Rachael Confair, Office of International
Affairs, Trade, and Commerce, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway (F/IS5), Silver Spring,
MD 20910.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
The draft Regulatory Impact Review
and Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Assessment supplementing this
proposed rule are available on
www.regulations.gov. Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
this proposed rule may be submitted to
the Office of International Affairs,
Trade, and Commerce and by
submission to Information Collection
Review (https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachael Confair, Office of International
Affairs, Trade, and Commerce, National
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79830-79836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28169]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0203; FRL-10510-01-R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Macon Area Limited Maintenance Plan
for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Georgia, through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division
(EPD), via a letter dated October 20, 2021. The SIP revision includes a
Limited Maintenance Plan (LMP) for the Macon 1997 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) maintenance area (hereinafter
referred to as the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area or Macon Area or
Area). The Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area consists of all of Bibb
County and a portion of Monroe County located in middle Georgia. EPA is
proposing to approve the Macon Area LMP because it provides for the
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the Area through the
end of the second 10-year portion of the maintenance period. The effect
of this action would be to make certain commitments related to
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Macon Area federally
enforceable as part of the Georgia SIP.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 27, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2022-0203 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tiereny Bell, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404)
[[Page 79831]]
562-9088. Ms. Bell can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Summary of EPA's Proposed Action
II. Background
III. Georgia's SIP Submittal
IV. EPA's Evaluation of Georgia's SIP Submittal
A. Attainment Emissions Inventory
B. Maintenance Demonstration
C. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment
D. Contingency Plan
E. Conclusion
V. Transportation Conformity and General Conformity
VI. Proposed Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of EPA's Proposed Action
In accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), EPA is proposing
to approve the Macon Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, which
was adopted by Georgia EPD on October 12, 2021, and submitted to EPA as
a revision to the Georgia SIP under a letter dated October 20, 2021.\1\
The Macon LMP is designed to maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
within the Macon Area through the end of the second 10-year portion of
the maintenance period beyond redesignation. As a general matter, the
Macon Area LMP relies on the same control measures and applicable
contingency provisions to maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS during
the second 10-year portion of the maintenance period as the maintenance
plan submitted by Georgia EPD for the first 10-year period. EPA is
proposing to approve the plan because it meets all applicable
requirements under CAA sections 110 and 175A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA received Georgia's SIP submission on October 20, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
Ground-level ozone is formed when oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) react in the
presence of sunlight. These two pollutants, referred to as ozone
precursors, are emitted by many types of pollution sources, including
on- and off-road motor vehicles and engines, power plants and
industrial facilities, and smaller area sources such as lawn and garden
equipment and paints. Scientific evidence indicates that adverse public
health effects occur following exposure to ozone, particularly in
children and in adults with lung disease. Breathing air containing
ozone can reduce lung function and inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma and other lung diseases.
Ozone exposure also has been associated with increased
susceptibility to respiratory infections, increased medication use,
doctor visits, and emergency department visits, and increased hospital
admissions for individuals with lung disease. Children are at increased
risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing
and they are more likely to be active outdoors, which increases their
exposure.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See ``Fact Sheet, Proposal to Revise the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards for Ozone,'' January 6, 2010, and 75 FR 2938
(January 19, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1979, under section 109 of the CAA, EPA established primary and
secondary NAAQS for ozone at 0.12 parts per million (ppm), averaged
over a 1-hour period. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). On July 18,
1997, EPA revised the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to set the
acceptable level of ozone in the ambient air at 0.08 ppm, averaged over
an 8-hour period. See 62 FR 38856 (July 18, 1997).\3\ EPA set the 8-
hour ozone NAAQS based on scientific evidence demonstrating that ozone
causes adverse health effects at lower concentrations and over longer
periods of time than was understood when the pre-existing 1-hour ozone
NAAQS was set. EPA determined that the 8-hour ozone NAAQS would be more
protective of human health, especially for children and adults who are
active outdoors and for individuals with a pre-existing respiratory
disease, such as asthma.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In March 2008, EPA completed another review of the primary
and secondary ozone NAAQS and tightened them further by lowering the
level for both to 0.075 ppm. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).
Additionally, in October 2015, EPA completed another review of the
primary and secondary ozone NAAQS and tightened them by lowering the
level for both to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas throughout the nation as attaining or not
attaining the NAAQS. On April 30, 2004, EPA designated the Macon 1997
8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area, which consists of all of Bibb County and a
portion of Monroe County in Georgia, as nonattainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. The designation became effective on June 15, 2004.
See 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004). Subsequently, in 2007, EPA
redesignated the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area to attainment for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and approved the first maintenance plan
demonstrating attainment through the initial 10-year period.
EPA has revised the ozone NAAQS twice since the 1997 standards were
finalized. On July 20, 2012, EPA designated areas as unclassifiable/
attainment or nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Macon
Area was designated as attainment for that standard with an effective
date of July 20, 2012. See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). On November 16,
2017, EPA designated areas for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The Macon
Area was designated attainment for that standard with an effective date
of January 16, 2018. See 82 FR 54232 (November 16, 2017).
A state may submit a request to redesignate a nonattainment area
that is attaining a NAAQS to attainment, and, if the area has met the
criteria described in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA, EPA may approve
the redesignation request.\4\ One of the criteria for redesignation is
for the area to have an approved maintenance plan under CAA section
175A. The maintenance plan must demonstrate that the area will continue
to maintain the NAAQS for the period extending ten years after
redesignation, and it must contain such additional measures as
necessary to ensure maintenance and such contingency provisions as
necessary to assure that violations of the NAAQS will be promptly
corrected. Eight years after the effective date of redesignation, the
state must also submit a second maintenance plan to ensure ongoing
maintenance of the NAAQS for an additional ten years pursuant to CAA
section 175A(b) (i.e., ensuring maintenance for 20 years after
redesignation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA sets out the requirements
for redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment. They include
attainment of the NAAQS, full approval of the applicable SIP
pursuant to CAA section 110(k), determination that improvement in
air quality is a result of permanent and enforceable reductions in
emissions, demonstration that the state has met all applicable
section 110 and part D requirements, and a fully approved
maintenance plan under CAA section 175A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has published long-standing guidance for states on developing
maintenance plans, beginning with a 1992 memo referred to as the
Calcagni memo. The Calcagni memo \5\ provides that states may generally
demonstrate maintenance by either performing air quality modeling to
show that the future mix of sources and emission rates will not cause a
violation of the NAAQS or by showing that projected future emissions of
a pollutant and its precursors will not exceed the level of
[[Page 79832]]
emissions during a year when the area was attaining the NAAQS (i.e.,
attainment year inventory).\6\ EPA clarified in three subsequent
guidance memos that certain areas can meet the CAA section 175A
requirement to provide for maintenance by showing that they are
unlikely to violate the NAAQS in the future, using information such as
the area design values \7\ when they are significantly below the
standard and have been historically stable.\8\ EPA refers to a
maintenance plan containing this streamlined demonstration as a limited
maintenance plan, or LMP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division,
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS),
``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,'' September 4, 1992 (Calcagni memo).
\6\ See Calcagni memo at 9.
\7\ The ozone design value for a monitoring site is the 3-year
average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ozone concentrations. The design value for an ozone area is the
highest design value of any monitoring site in the area.
\8\ See ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable
Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' from Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated
November 16, 1994; ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas'' from Joseph Paisie, OAQPS,
dated October 6, 1995; and ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Moderate PM10 Nonattainment Areas'' from Lydia Wegman,
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these guidance memoranda can
be found in the docket for this proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has interpreted CAA section 175A as permitting the LMP option
because section 175A of the Act does not define how areas may
demonstrate maintenance, and in EPA's experience implementing the
various NAAQS, areas that qualify for an LMP and have approved LMPs
have rarely, if ever, experienced subsequent violations of the NAAQS.
As noted in the LMP guidance memoranda, states seeking an LMP must
still submit the other maintenance plan elements outlined in the
Calcagni memo, including an attainment emissions inventory, provisions
for the continued operation of the ambient air quality monitoring
network, verification of continued attainment, and a contingency plan
in the event of a future violation of the NAAQS. Moreover, a state
seeking an LMP must still submit its section 175A maintenance plan as a
revision to its SIP, with all attendant notice and comment procedures.
While the LMP guidance memoranda were originally written with respect
to certain NAAQS,\9\ EPA has extended the LMP interpretation of section
175A to other NAAQS and pollutants not specifically covered by the
previous guidance memos.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The prior memos addressed: unclassifiable areas under the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS, nonattainment areas for the PM10
(particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10
microns) NAAQS, and nonattainment areas for the carbon monoxide (CO)
NAAQS.
\10\ See, e.g., 79 FR 41900 (July 18, 2014) (approval of the
second ten-year LMP for the Grant County 1971 SO2
maintenance area).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is proposing to approve the Macon LMP because Georgia has made
a showing, consistent with EPA's prior LMP guidance, that the Macon
1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area's ozone concentrations are well below the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and have been historically stable and that the
State has met the other maintenance plan requirements. Georgia EPD
submitted this LMP for the Macon Area to fulfill the CAA's second
maintenance plan requirement. EPA's evaluation of the Macon Area LMP is
presented in section IV below.
In June 2007, Georgia EPD submitted to EPA a request to redesignate
the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area to attainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. This submittal contained a plan, for inclusion in the
Georgia SIP, to provide for maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
in the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area through 2018. EPA approved
Georgia's Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area maintenance plan and the
State's request to redesignate the Area to attainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS effective October 19, 2007.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 72 FR 53432 (September 19, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 175A(b) of the CAA requires states to submit a revision to
the first maintenance plan eight years after redesignation to provide
for maintenance of the NAAQS for ten additional years following the end
of the first 10-year period. However, EPA's final implementation rule
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS revoked the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and
stated that one result of the revocation was that areas that had been
redesignated to attainment (i.e., maintenance areas) for the 1997 NAAQS
no longer needed to submit second 10-year maintenance plans under CAA
section 175A(b).\12\ In South Coast Air Quality Management District v.
EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated EPA's interpretation that, because of
the revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, second maintenance plans
were not required for ``orphan maintenance areas,'' i.e., areas that
had been redesignated to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(maintenance areas) and were designated attainment for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. South Coast, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018). Thus, states with
these ``orphan maintenance areas'' under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
must submit maintenance plans for the second maintenance period.
Accordingly, through a letter dated October 20, 2021, Georgia submitted
a second maintenance plan covering the Macon Area that provides for
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through 2027.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 80 FR 12264, 12315 (March 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In recognition of the continuing record of air quality monitoring
data showing ambient 8-hour ozone concentrations in the Macon 1997 8-
hour Ozone NAAQS Area well below the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, Georgia
EPD chose the LMP option for the development of its second 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS maintenance plan for the Macon Area. On October 20, 2021,
Georgia EPD adopted this second 10-year 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance
plan, and subsequently submitted the Macon LMP to EPA as a revision to
the Georgia SIP.
III. Georgia's SIP Submittal
Georgia's October 20, 2021, submittal includes the LMP, air quality
data, a summary of the previous emissions inventory and a conclusion
regarding future emission levels, and attachments, as well as
certification of adoption of the plan by Georgia EPD. Attachments to
the plan include documentation of notice, opportunity for hearing and
public participation prior to adoption of the plan by Georgia EPD on
October 20, 2021, and state legal authority. The LMP notes that
Georgia's LMP submittal for the remainder of the 20-year maintenance
period for the Macon Area is in response to the D.C. Circuit's decision
overturning aspects of EPA's implementation rule for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The Macon Area LMP does not include any additional
emissions reduction measures but relies on the same emissions reduction
strategy as the first 10-year maintenance plan that provides for the
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through 2018. Prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) requirements and control measures
contained in the SIP will continue to apply, and federal measures
(e.g., federal motor vehicle control programs) will continue to be
implemented in the Macon Area.
IV. EPA's Evaluation of Georgia's SIP Submittal
EPA has reviewed the Macon Area LMP, which is designed to maintain
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the Macon Area through the end of
the 20-year period beyond redesignation, as required under CAA section
175A(b). The following is a more detailed
[[Page 79833]]
summary of EPA's interpretation of the section 175A requirements \13\
and EPA's evaluation of how each requirement is met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Calcagni memo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Attainment Emissions Inventory
For maintenance plans, a state should develop a comprehensive,
accurate inventory of actual emissions for an attainment year to
identify the level of emissions which is sufficient to maintain the
NAAQS. A state should develop this inventory consistent with EPA's most
recent guidance on emissions inventory development. For ozone, the
inventory should be based on typical summer day emissions of VOC and
NOX, as these pollutants are precursors to ozone formation.
The Macon LMP includes an ozone attainment inventory for the Bibb
County portion and the partial Monroe County portion of the Macon Area
generated from the data EPA made available from the 2014 National
Emissions Inventory (NEI) and that Georgia represents as 2014 summer
tons.\14\ Table 1 presents a summary of the inventory for 2014
contained in the LMP for the Bibb County portion of the Macon Area.
Table 2 presents a summary of the inventory for 2014 contained in the
LMP for the partial Monroe County portion of the Macon Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Georgia defines summer tons as the total cumulative
emissions from May through September.
Table 1--2014 VOC and NOX Emissions (summer tons) for the Bibb County Portion of the Macon Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonpoint Onroad mobile Nonroad
Point source source source mobile source Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC............................. 509 1,063 841 406 2,819
NOX............................. 899 180 1,492 170 2,741
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--2014 VOC and NOX Emissions (summer tons) for the Partial Monroe County Portion of the Macon Area
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonpoint Onroad mobile Nonroad
Point source source source mobile source Fire Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC..................................................... 167 225 251 103 9 755
NOX..................................................... 3,160 116 910 25 4 4,215
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Attainment Emissions Inventory section of the Macon Area LMP
describes the methods, models, and assumptions used to develop the
attainment inventory and notes that Georgia EPD relied on version 2 of
the 2014 NEI.\15\ Point source emissions were calculated from data
collected annually from the sources and reported to the State or local
air agencies. Nonpoint source emissions were estimated by multiplying
an emission factor by some known indicator of collective activity, such
as fuel usage, and were estimated on the county level. Nonroad mobile
source emissions in the 2014NEIv2, in part, were estimated using the
latest version of the EPA's motor vehicles emission model, MOVES (which
includes estimates nonroad emissions like agriculture, commercial and
mining, industrial and recreational equipment, and commercial and
residential lawn and garden equipment). Locomotives, aircraft, and
marine nonroad sources are not included in MOVES, and Georgia EPD
relied on EPA-generated emissions for these sectors.\16\ Onroad mobile
sources in the 2014NEIv2 were estimated using MOVES and the latest
planning assumptions regarding vehicle type, vehicle activity, and
vehicle speeds to estimate vehicular emissions for 2014. Georgia EPD's
estimates for vehicle emissions reflect emissions inventories and
ancillary data files used for emissions modeling, as well as the
meteorological, initial condition, and boundary condition files need to
run the air quality model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Documentation and data for the 2014 NEIv2 can be accessed
via the following website: https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2014-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data.
\16\ EPA developed emissions for these sectors based on AP-42
emissions factor, and information supplied by the Eastern Regional
Technical Advisory Committee for locomotives and Federal Aviation
Administration's Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System (since
replaced by the Aviation Environmental Design Tool).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on our review of the methods, models, and assumptions used by
Georgia to develop the inventory, EPA proposes to find that the Macon
1997 ozone NAAQS LMP includes a comprehensive, reasonably accurate
inventory of actual ozone precursor emissions in attainment year 2014
and proposes to conclude that this is acceptable for the purposes of a
subsequent maintenance plan under CAA section 175A(b).
B. Maintenance Demonstration
The maintenance demonstration requirement is satisfied in a LMP if
the state can provide sufficient weight of evidence indicating that air
quality in the area is well below the level of the NAAQS, that past air
quality trends have been shown to be stable, and that the probability
of the area experiencing a violation over the second 10-year
maintenance period is low.\17\ These criteria are evaluated below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable
Ozone Nonattainment Areas'' from Sally L. Shaver, OAQPS, dated
November 16, 1994; ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Nonclassifiable CO Nonattainment Areas'' from Joseph Paisie, OAQPS,
dated October 6, 1995; and ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for
Moderate PM10 Nonattainment Areas'' from Lydia Wegman,
OAQPS, dated August 9, 2001. Copies of these guidance memoranda can
be found in the docket for this proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Evaluation of Ozone Concentrations
To attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the three-year average of
the fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations
(design value) at each monitor within an area must not exceed 0.08 ppm.
Based on the rounding convention described in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix
I, the NAAQS is attained if the design value is 0.084 ppm or below. EPA
evaluated quality assured and certified 2018-2020 monitoring data
(which was the most recent quality assured and certified data at the
time of submission) and determined that the design value for the Macon
Area was 0.061 ppm, or 73 percent of the level of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, as measured at the Macon-Forestry monitor located in Bibb
County, Georgia (AQS ID: 13-021-0012). Based on
[[Page 79834]]
quality assured and certified monitoring data for 2019-2021 (the most
recent quality assured and certified data), the current the design
value for the Macon Area is 0.061 ppm, or 73 percent of the level of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as measured in Bibb County, Georgia (AQS
ID: 13-021-0012). Consistent with prior guidance, EPA believes that if
the most recent air quality design value for the area is at a level
that is well below the NAAQS (e.g., below 85 percent of the NAAQS, or
in this case below 0.071 ppm), then EPA considers the state to have met
the section 175A requirement for a demonstration that the area will
maintain the NAAQS for the requisite period. Such a demonstration
assumes continued applicability of PSD requirements and any control
measures already in the SIP and that Federal measures will remain in
place through the end of the second 10-year maintenance period, absent
a showing consistent with section 110(l) that such measures are not
necessary to assure maintenance.
Table 3 presents the design values for the monitor in the Macon
Area over the 2010-2021 period. As shown, the site has been below the
level of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS during this time, and the most
current design value is below the level of 85 percent of the NAAQS,
consistent with prior LMP guidance.
Table 3--1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Design Values (DV) (ppb) at the Monitoring Site in the Macon 1997 Ozone NAAQS Area for the 2010-2021 Time Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
County (State)/ 2008-2010 2009-2011 2010-2012 2011-2013 2012-2014 2013-2015 2014-2016 2015-2017 2016-2018 2017-2019 2018-2020 2019-2021
Location tribal land AQS site ID DV DV DV DV DV DV DV DV DV DV DV DV
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Macon-Forestry Monitor..... Bibb County 13-021-0012 73 73 73 71 67 63 65 65 65 64 61 61
(Georgia).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The ozone monitor located in Bibb County within the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Area at Macon-Forestry (AQS Site ID 13-021-0012) began operation in 1997 and provided data for the 1997 8-
hour ozone designation finalized in 2004.
Therefore, the Macon Area is eligible for the LMP option, and EPA
proposes to find that the long record of monitored ozone concentrations
that attain the NAAQS, together with the continuation of existing VOC
and NOX emissions control programs in the Macon Area,
adequately provide for the maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
in the Area through the second 10-year maintenance period and beyond.
2. Stability of Ozone Levels
As discussed above, the Macon Area has maintained air quality below
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS over the past fifteen design values.\18\
Additionally, the design value data shown in Table 3 illustrates that
ozone levels have been relatively stable over this timeframe, with a
modest downward trend. For example, the data in Table 3 indicates that
the largest year-over-year change in design value at any one monitor
during these twelve design value years was 4 ppb, which occurred
between the 2013 design value and the 2014 design value and between the
2014 design value and the 2015 design value, representing approximately
a 6 percent decrease at monitor 13-021-0012 (Macon-Forestry). At this
monitor, the design values between the 2016 design value through the
2018 design value remained steady at 65 ppb. Furthermore, there is an
overall downward trend in design values for the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS Area. This downward trend in ozone levels, coupled with the
relatively small, year-over-year variation in ozone design values,
makes it reasonable to conclude that the Macon Area will not exceed the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS during the second 10-year maintenance period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The Macon Area has maintained ozone concentrations below
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS since 2007, when the Area was
redesignated to attainment. See Air Quality Design Values, Previous
Design Value Reports, https://www.epa.gov/air-trends/air-quality-design-values#previous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment
EPA periodically reviews the ozone monitoring networks operated and
maintained by the states in accordance with 40 CFR part 58. The network
plans, which are submitted annually to EPA, are consistent with the
ambient air quality monitoring network assessment. It is important to
note that the Macon Area was designated nonattainment due to ozone
concentrations at the monitor located at Macon-Forestry.\19\ Georgia
operates a network plan that includes the ambient ozone monitoring
station within the Macon Area. The annual network plan developed by
Georgia follows a public notification and review process. EPA has
reviewed and approved Georgia's 2021 Ambient Air Monitoring Network
Plan (``2021 Annual Network Plan'') which addresses the monitor used to
determine attainment for the Macon Area.\20\ Separately, Georgia has
committed to maintaining the monitor within the Macon Area.\21\ Under a
CAA section 103 grant agreement with EPA, Georgia has operated the
Macon Area monitoring network since 1997, the year EPA promulgated the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and has operated the Macon-Forestry monitor in
its current location since 2001. EPA provides oversight of Georgia's
operation of this monitor on an annual basis through normal grant
monitoring activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004) for the final designation
action for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/1997-ozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-nonattainment for the monitoring data
associated with the designation for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
\20\ See October 19, 2021, letter and approval from Caroline
Freeman, Director, Air and Radiation Division, EPA Region 4 to Karen
Hays, Chief, Environmental Protection Division, Georgia Department
of Natural Resources, available in the docket for this proposed
action.
\21\ See 72 FR 42354 (August 2, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To verify the attainment status of the Area over the maintenance
period, the maintenance plan should contain provisions for continued
operation of an appropriate, EPA-approved monitoring network in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58. As noted above, Georgia's 2021 Annual
Network Plan, which covers the monitor within the Macon Area, has been
approved by EPA in accordance with 40 CFR part 58, and Georgia has
committed to continue operating of this monitor and to consulting with
EPA prior to making changes to it. The State also acknowledges the
obligation to meet monitoring requirements in compliance with 40 CFR
part 58.\22\ EPA proposes to find that there is an adequate ambient air
quality monitoring network in the Macon Area to verify continued
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Georgia's October 20, 2021, SIP submittal at page 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Contingency Plan
Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires that a maintenance plan include
contingency provisions. The purpose of such contingency provisions is
to
[[Page 79835]]
prevent future violations of the NAAQS or to promptly remedy any NAAQS
violations that might occur during the maintenance period.
The Macon Area LMP contingency plan includes tracking and
triggering mechanisms to determine when control measures are needed,
and a process for developing and adopting appropriate control measures.
There are two potential triggers for the contingency plan. The Tier I
trigger will be any 8-hour ozone monitoring reading exceeding 84 ppb at
the ambient monitoring station located within the Macon Area or
periodic emissions inventory updates \23\ that reveal excessive or
unanticipated growth greater than 10 percent in either NOX
or VOC emissions over the attainment inventory for the Macon Area. The
Tier II trigger will be any recorded violation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS at the Bibb County ambient monitoring station in the Macon Area.
Upon either the Tier I or Tier II triggers being activated, Georgia EPD
will commence analyses to determine what additional measures, if any,
will be necessary to attain or maintain the ozone standard. If
activation of either trigger occurs, the plan provides a regulatory
adoption process for revising emission control strategies. If Georgia's
analysis determines that the Macon Area is the source of emissions that
contribute to a violation, the State will evaluate those measures as
specified in section 172 of the CAA for control options as well as
other available measures. Georgia will implement necessary controls as
expeditiously as possible, and at least one contingency measure will be
implemented within 24 months after the determination, based on quality-
assured ambient data, that a violation has occurred. The Georgia EPD
will begin initial analysis of possible contingency measures within 6
months of the trigger occurring.\24\ EPA proposes to find that the
contingency provisions in Georgia's second maintenance plan for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS meet the requirements of CAA section 175A(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The Air Emissions Reporting Rule (AERR) requires state and
local agencies to collect and submit criteria pollutant emissions
data to EPA's Emissions Inventory System (EIS) according to the
schedule in 40 CFR 51.30.
\24\ See the Contingency Plan Section of the LMP for further
information regarding the contingency plan, including measures that
Georgia will consider for adoption if any of the triggers are
activated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Conclusion
EPA proposes to find that the Macon Area LMP for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS includes an approvable update of various elements of the
initial EPA-approved maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
EPA also proposes to find that the Macon Area qualifies for the LMP
option and adequately demonstrates maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS through the documentation of monitoring data showing maximum 1997
8-hour ozone levels well below the NAAQS and historically stable design
values.
EPA believes the Macon Area LMP, which retains existing control
measures in the SIP, is sufficient to provide for maintenance of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Macon Area over the second maintenance
period (i.e., through 2027) and thereby satisfies the requirements for
such a plan under CAA section 175A(b). EPA is therefore proposing to
approve Georgia's October 20, 2021, submission of the Macon Area LMP as
a revision to the Georgia SIP.
V. Transportation Conformity and General Conformity
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the CAA.
Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. See CAA 176(c)(1)(A) and (B).
EPA's transportation conformity rule at 40 CFR part 93, subpart A
requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to
SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining
whether they conform. The conformity rule generally requires a
demonstration that emissions from the Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) are consistent
with the motor vehicles emissions budget (MVEB) contained in the
control strategy SIP revision or maintenance plan. See 40 CFR 93.101,
93.118, and 93.124. A MVEB is defined as ``the portion of the total
allowable emissions defined in the submitted or approved control
strategy implementation plan revision or maintenance plan for a certain
date for the purpose of meeting reasonable further progress milestones
or demonstrating attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS, for any
criteria pollutant or its precursors, allocated to highway and transit
vehicle use and emissions.'' See 40 CFR 93.101.
Under the conformity rule, LMP areas may demonstrate conformity
without a regional emissions analysis. See 40 CFR 93.109(e). On October
16, 2007, EPA made a finding that the MVEBs for the first 10 years of
the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Macon 1997 8-hour Ozone
NAAQS Area were adequate for transportation conformity purposes. In a
Federal Register notice dated September 19, 2007, EPA notified the
public of that finding. See 72 FR 53432. This adequacy determination
became effective on October 19, 2007. After approval of this LMP or an
adequacy finding for this LMP, there is no requirement to meet the
budget test pursuant to the transportation conformity rule for the
Macon Area. All actions that would require a transportation conformity
determination for the Macon Area under EPA's transportation conformity
rule provisions are considered to have already satisfied the regional
emissions analysis and ``budget test'' requirements in 40 CFR 93.118 as
a result of EPA's adequacy finding for this LMP. See 69 FR 40004 (July
1, 2004).
However, because LMP areas are still maintenance areas, certain
aspects of transportation conformity determinations still will be
required for transportation plans, programs, and projects.
Specifically, for such determinations, RTPs, TIPs, and transportation
projects still will have to demonstrate that they are fiscally
constrained (40 CFR 93.108) and meet the criteria for consultation (40
CFR 93.105) and Transportation Control Measure implementation in the
conformity rule provisions (40 CFR 93.113) as well as meet the hot-spot
requirements for projects (40 CFR 93.116).\25\ Additionally, conformity
determinations for RTPs and TIPs must be determined no less frequently
than every four years, and conformity of plan and TIP amendments and
transportation projects is demonstrated in accordance with the timing
requirements specified in 40 CFR 93.104. In addition, in order for
projects to be approved they must come from a currently conforming RTP
and TIP. See 40 CFR 93.114 and 40 CFR 93.115.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ A conformity determination that meets other applicable
criteria in Table 1 of paragraph (b) of this section (93.109(e)) is
still required, including the hot-spot requirements for projects in
CO, PM10, and PM2.5 areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Proposed Action
Under sections 110(k) and 175A of the CAA and for the reasons set
forth above, EPA is proposing to approve the Macon Area LMP for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, submitted by Georgia EPD on October 20, 2021,
as a revision to the Georgia SIP. EPA is proposing to approve the Macon
Area LMP because it includes an acceptable update of various elements
of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plan approved by EPA for the
first 10-year
[[Page 79836]]
period and retains the relevant provisions of the SIP.
EPA also finds that the Macon Area qualifies for the LMP option and
that the Macon Area LMP adequately demonstrates maintenance of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS through documentation of monitoring data showing
maximum 1997 8-hour ozone levels well below the NAAQS and continuation
of existing control measures. EPA believes the Macon Area's 1997 8-Hour
Ozone LMP to be sufficient to provide for maintenance of the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS in the Macon Area over the second 10-year maintenance
period, through 2027, and thereby satisfies the requirements for such a
plan under CAA section 175A(b).
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed
rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental Protection, Air Pollution Control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental Relations, Nitrogen Oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, Volatile Organic Compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2022.
Daniel Blackman,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2022-28169 Filed 12-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P