Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision to Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits, 79261-79263 [2022-28147]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 35, Oxygen System.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
passenger oxygen mask dispensing units
installed in the affected airplanes with
lanyards that are too long to meet the proper
length specifications of the airplane. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the
inability to initiate flow of oxygen to the
mask. The unsafe condition, if not addressed,
could result in no indication to the passenger
that they are not receiving oxygen in an
emergency situation.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Inspection and Replacement
Within 5 years after the effective date of
this AD, determine the part number of the
drop-down oxygen box, in accordance with
Section 2.B. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service
information identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD.
(1) If any drop-down oxygen box part
number (P/N) installed on the airplane
matches any P/N listed in Table 1 of Section
2.B. of the applicable service information:
Before further flight, perform drop-down
oxygen mask reach testing in accordance
with Section 2.B.(2) of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service
information identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD.
(i) If the test result is PASS: Before further
flight, replace the drop-down oxygen box
assembly in accordance with Section 2.C.,
and test the passenger oxygen supply system
in accordance with Section 2.D.(2), of the
applicable service information identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD.
(ii) If the test result is FAIL for any
individual seat: Before further flight, mark
the failed seat as inoperative in accordance
with Section 2.B.(3) of the applicable service
information specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD.
(2) If the part number of any drop-down
oxygen box assembly installed on the
airplane is not found in Table 1 of Section
2.B. of the applicable service information
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of
this AD: Before further flight, do actions to
correct the unsafe condition using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601–1109, dated December 13, 2021;
or Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–35–007,
dated December 13, 2021; as applicable.
(i) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:06 Dec 23, 2022
Jkt 259001
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the New York ACO Branch,
mail it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, at the address
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD or
email to: 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. If mailing
information, also submit information by
email. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier,
Inc.’s Transport Canada Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(j) Additional Information
(1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF–
2022–50, dated August 25, 2022, for related
information. This Transport Canada AD may
be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov
under Docket No. FAA–2022–1654.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Elizabeth M. Dowling, Aerospace
Engineer, Mechanical Systems and
Administrative Services Section, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–361–8046; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@
faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 600–0777,
dated December 13, 2022.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–1109,
Revision 01, dated May 6, 2022.
(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–35–
007, Revision 01, dated May 6, 2022.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier Business
Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–2999; email
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; website
bombardier.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79261
email fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on December 20, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–28063 Filed 12–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0727; FRL–10421–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision
to Federally Enforceable District Origin
Operating Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky through
the Kentucky Energy and Environment
Cabinet (Cabinet) on June 15, 2022. The
changes were submitted by the Cabinet
on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air
Pollution Control District (District, also
referred to herein as Jefferson County).
The District’s revision modifies the
permit application timing requirements
in the Federally Enforceable District
Origin Operating Permits (FEDOOP)
rule in the Jefferson County portion of
the Kentucky SIP (Jefferson County
Local Implementation Plan, or LIP). EPA
is proposing to approve these changes
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2022–0727 at regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
79262
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pearlene Williams-Miles, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9144. Ms. Williams-Miles can also be
reached via electronic mail at
williamsmiles.pearlene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
On June 15, 2022, the Commonwealth
of Kentucky submitted changes to the
Jefferson County LIP for EPA
approval.1 2 EPA is proposing to approve
changes to Section 4—Permit
Applications, of the District’s
Regulation 2.17—Federally Enforceable
District Origin Operating Permits.3
Under Regulation 2.17, Section 1.1, a
FEDOOP is an operating permit that
contains a federally enforceable
condition, limit, or provision that is
issued to a stationary source that is not,
or would not subsequently be, required
to obtain a permit under Regulation
2.16—Title V Operating Permits. The
changes in the June 15, 2022,
submission add timing requirements for
sources applying for FEDOOP permits
that are similar to those in Regulation
2.16—Section II of the preamble of this
document provides EPA’s analysis and
rationale for proposed approval of this
revision.
TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Analysis of Kentucky’s SIP Revision
The June 15, 2022, submission revises
Regulation 2.17 by adding four timing
1 The EPA received this submission on June 13,
2022, in a letter dated June 15, 2022. Throughout
this notice of proposed rulemaking, this submission
will be referred to as the June 15, 2022, submission.
2 In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson
County governments merged, and the ‘‘Jefferson
County Air Pollution Control District’’ was renamed
the ‘‘Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District.’’ However, to be consistent with the
terminology used in the subheading in Table 2 of
40 CFR 52.920(c), throughout this notice we refer
to regulations contained in the Jefferson County
portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ‘‘Jefferson
County’’ regulations.
3 The June 15, 2022, submittal contains changes
to other Kentucky SIP-approved rules that are not
addressed in this notice. EPA will act on those rules
in separate actions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:06 Dec 23, 2022
Jkt 259001
requirements under Section 4—Permit
Applications, adding new prefatory
language in Section 4.2, and
renumbering the remaining subsections
within Section 4. Turning to the four
new timing requirements, first,
subsection 4.2.1 is added to require that
sources not previously required to
obtain a permit under Regulation 2.17
but that become subject to an applicable
requirement after the effective date of
the regulation must submit a permit
application within 12 months from the
time at which it became subject to
Regulation 2.17.
Second, subsection 4.2.2 is added to
require that a source ‘‘constructing,
reconstructing, or modifying,’’ shall
submit a complete FEDOOP permit
application within 12 months after
commencing operation. If an existing
permit would prohibit construction or a
change in operation, the source would
be required to obtain a permit revision
before commencing operation.
Third, subsection 4.2.3 is added to
state that a source that is required to
reopen an existing permit pursuant to
the requirements of Section 6 of
Regulation 2.17 must submit a complete
application for a permit revision within
six months after notification by the
District that the permit must be
reopened.
Finally, subsection 4.2.4 is added to
require that a complete permit
application must be submitted to the
District at least six months prior to the
date of permit expiration and in
accordance with Section 6 of Regulation
2.17 for permit renewal.
These changes to Regulation 2.17
merely add timing requirements for
submitting complete FEDOOP
applications similar to the timing
requirements in Regulation 2.16. As
such, EPA has preliminarily determined
that these changes do not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment of the national ambient air
quality standards and reasonable further
progress or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. For these
reasons, EPA is proposing to approve
the changes to the Jefferson County LIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, and as
described in Section II of this preamble,
EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Jefferson County’s Regulation
2.17—Federally Enforceable District
Origin Operating Permits, version 5,
with a local-effective date of March 16,
2022, which adds timing requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to the permit application process. EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
aforementioned changes to Regulation
2.17—Federally Enforceable District
Origin Operating Permits, with a localeffective date of March 16, 2022, into
the Jefferson County LIP. EPA is
proposing to approve these changes
because they are consistent with the
CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the
CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not
have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2022.
Daniel Blackmon,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
I. Synopsis
[FR Doc. 2022–28147 Filed 12–23–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 4
[PS Docket Nos. 21–346; 15–80; ET Docket
No. 04–35; DA 22–1343; FR ID 119958]
Resilient Networks; Disruptions to
Communications
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for clarification and
partial reconsideration; extension of
filing replies to oppositions.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) extends the deadline for
filing replies to oppositions to the
October 31, 2022 Petition for
Clarification and Partial
Reconsideration (Petition) filed in the
above-captioned proceeding.
DATES: The deadline for filing replies to
oppositions in response to the Petition
is extended to January 10, 2023.
TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:06 Dec 23, 2022
Jkt 259001
Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Saswat Misra of the Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau,
Cybersecurity and Communications
Reliability Division, at (202) 418–0944
or Saswat.Misra@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Order
Granting Extension of Time (Order) in
PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and 15–80 and
ET Docket No. 04–35; DA 22–1343,
adopted and released on December 19,
2022. For the full text of this document,
visit FCC’s website at https://
www.fcc.gov/document/pshsb-extendsopposition-reply-deadline-resiliencyproceeding or obtain access via the
FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing
System (ECFS) website at https://
www.fcc.gov/ecfs. (Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.)
Alternative formats are available for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format), by
sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
calling the Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
ADDRESSES:
1. By this Order, the Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB)
grants a joint request filed by the
Competitive Carriers Association (CCA)
and CTIA (collectively, Requestors)
seeking an extension of 14 days to file
Replies to Oppositions in connection
with their Petition for Clarification and
Partial Reconsideration (Petition) filed
in the above-captioned proceeding. See
CCA and CTIA Joint Request for
Extension of Time to Reply to
Oppositions to Petition For
Reconsideration, PS Docket Nos. 21–346
and 15–80, ET Docket No. 04–35 (filed
Dec. 7, 2022) (Request). For the reasons
stated below, PSHSB finds that
Requestors’ request is warranted, and
accordingly extends the deadline for
filing Replies to Oppositions to January
10, 2023.
2. On June 27, 2022, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) adopted a Report and
Order addressing improvements to
communications reliability during
disasters. See Resilient Networks;
Amendments to Part 4 of the
Commission’s Rules Concerning
Disruptions to Communications; New
Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules
Concerns Disruptions to
Communications, PS Docket Nos. 21–
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79263
346 and 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35,
Report and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Report and
Order), 87 FR 59329 (Sept. 30, 2022).
Requestors filed their Petition on
October 31, 2022. See CTIA and
Competitive Carriers Association
Petition for Clarification and Partial
Reconsideration, PS Docket Nos. 21–346
and 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35 (filed
Oct. 31, 2022).
3. On December 2, 2022, the Office of
the Federal Register published notice of
the Petition in the Federal Register
indicating that Oppositions to the
Petition would be due on December 19,
2022 and Replies to Oppositions would
be due on December 27, 2022. See 87 FR
74102 (Dec. 2, 2022); see also Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
Announces Filing Deadlines for
Oppositions and Opposition Replies to
the Petition for Clarification and Partial
Reconsideration filed by CTIA and CCA
Regarding the Resilient Networks Report
and Order, PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and
15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35, Public
Notice (PSHSB Dec. 2, 2022); 47 CFR
1.429(f) and (g).
4. On December 7, 2022, Requestors
filed the Request seeking a 14-day
extension of the deadline for Replies to
Oppositions, from December 27, 2022 to
January 10, 2023. In doing so,
Requestors note that the current
schedule provides only eight days,
rather than the typical 10 days, between
the filing deadlines for Oppositions and
Replies to the Oppositions and that the
December 26, 2022 federal holiday for
Christmas also falls within this time
window. Requestors state that the
deadline for Replies to Oppositions
should be extended to provide sufficient
time for Requestors and other parties to
‘‘review the record, prepare potential
oppositions in this complex proceeding,
and develop a complete record for the
Commission’s consideration.’’
Requestors further remark that the
current schedule ‘‘creates significant
challenges to the parties’ ability to
review any oppositions, formulate
positions with constituents and member
companies, and draft replies that
substantively respond to the oppositions
to the Petition.’’ Requestors contend that
the requested extension would be
consistent with past instances where the
Commission has granted extensions of
time. No objections to the Request have
been filed.
5. As set forth in § 1.46 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
does not routinely grant extensions of
time for such filings. In this case,
however, the requested extension is
unopposed, limited to only 14 days, and
will allow commenters sufficient time to
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79261-79263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28147]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0727; FRL-10421-01-R4]
Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision to Federally Enforceable
District Origin Operating Permits
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of
Kentucky through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet)
on June 15, 2022. The changes were submitted by the Cabinet on behalf
of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District, also
referred to herein as Jefferson County). The District's revision
modifies the permit application timing requirements in the Federally
Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits (FEDOOP) rule in the
Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP (Jefferson County Local
Implementation Plan, or LIP). EPA is proposing to approve these changes
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2022-0727 at regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to
[[Page 79262]]
make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams-Miles, Air
Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch,
Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562-9144. Ms. Williams-Miles can also be
reached via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
On June 15, 2022, the Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted changes to
the Jefferson County LIP for EPA approval.1 2 EPA is
proposing to approve changes to Section 4--Permit Applications, of the
District's Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin
Operating Permits.\3\ Under Regulation 2.17, Section 1.1, a FEDOOP is
an operating permit that contains a federally enforceable condition,
limit, or provision that is issued to a stationary source that is not,
or would not subsequently be, required to obtain a permit under
Regulation 2.16--Title V Operating Permits. The changes in the June 15,
2022, submission add timing requirements for sources applying for
FEDOOP permits that are similar to those in Regulation 2.16--Section II
of the preamble of this document provides EPA's analysis and rationale
for proposed approval of this revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA received this submission on June 13, 2022, in a
letter dated June 15, 2022. Throughout this notice of proposed
rulemaking, this submission will be referred to as the June 15,
2022, submission.
\2\ In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson County
governments merged, and the ``Jefferson County Air Pollution Control
District'' was renamed the ``Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District.'' However, to be consistent with the terminology used in
the subheading in Table 2 of 40 CFR 52.920(c), throughout this
notice we refer to regulations contained in the Jefferson County
portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ``Jefferson County'' regulations.
\3\ The June 15, 2022, submittal contains changes to other
Kentucky SIP-approved rules that are not addressed in this notice.
EPA will act on those rules in separate actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Analysis of Kentucky's SIP Revision
The June 15, 2022, submission revises Regulation 2.17 by adding
four timing requirements under Section 4--Permit Applications, adding
new prefatory language in Section 4.2, and renumbering the remaining
subsections within Section 4. Turning to the four new timing
requirements, first, subsection 4.2.1 is added to require that sources
not previously required to obtain a permit under Regulation 2.17 but
that become subject to an applicable requirement after the effective
date of the regulation must submit a permit application within 12
months from the time at which it became subject to Regulation 2.17.
Second, subsection 4.2.2 is added to require that a source
``constructing, reconstructing, or modifying,'' shall submit a complete
FEDOOP permit application within 12 months after commencing operation.
If an existing permit would prohibit construction or a change in
operation, the source would be required to obtain a permit revision
before commencing operation.
Third, subsection 4.2.3 is added to state that a source that is
required to reopen an existing permit pursuant to the requirements of
Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 must submit a complete application for a
permit revision within six months after notification by the District
that the permit must be reopened.
Finally, subsection 4.2.4 is added to require that a complete
permit application must be submitted to the District at least six
months prior to the date of permit expiration and in accordance with
Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 for permit renewal.
These changes to Regulation 2.17 merely add timing requirements for
submitting complete FEDOOP applications similar to the timing
requirements in Regulation 2.16. As such, EPA has preliminarily
determined that these changes do not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment of the national ambient air quality
standards and reasonable further progress or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. For these reasons, EPA is proposing to approve
the changes to the Jefferson County LIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, and as described in Section II of
this preamble, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Jefferson
County's Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin
Operating Permits, version 5, with a local-effective date of March 16,
2022, which adds timing requirements to the permit application process.
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to
Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating
Permits, with a local-effective date of March 16, 2022, into the
Jefferson County LIP. EPA is proposing to approve these changes because
they are consistent with the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes
to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National
[[Page 79263]]
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with
the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed
rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2022.
Daniel Blackmon,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2022-28147 Filed 12-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P