Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision to Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits, 79261-79263 [2022-28147]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen System. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by reports of passenger oxygen mask dispensing units installed in the affected airplanes with lanyards that are too long to meet the proper length specifications of the airplane. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the inability to initiate flow of oxygen to the mask. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in no indication to the passenger that they are not receiving oxygen in an emergency situation. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS (g) Inspection and Replacement Within 5 years after the effective date of this AD, determine the part number of the drop-down oxygen box, in accordance with Section 2.B. of the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD. (1) If any drop-down oxygen box part number (P/N) installed on the airplane matches any P/N listed in Table 1 of Section 2.B. of the applicable service information: Before further flight, perform drop-down oxygen mask reach testing in accordance with Section 2.B.(2) of the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD. (i) If the test result is PASS: Before further flight, replace the drop-down oxygen box assembly in accordance with Section 2.C., and test the passenger oxygen supply system in accordance with Section 2.D.(2), of the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD. (ii) If the test result is FAIL for any individual seat: Before further flight, mark the failed seat as inoperative in accordance with Section 2.B.(3) of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD. (2) If the part number of any drop-down oxygen box assembly installed on the airplane is not found in Table 1 of Section 2.B. of the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD: Before further flight, do actions to correct the unsafe condition using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. (h) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–1109, dated December 13, 2021; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–35–007, dated December 13, 2021; as applicable. (i) Additional AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:06 Dec 23, 2022 Jkt 259001 Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the New York ACO Branch, mail it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, at the address identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD or email to: 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. If mailing information, also submit information by email. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier, Inc.’s Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature. (j) Additional Information (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF– 2022–50, dated August 25, 2022, for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–2022–1654. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Elizabeth M. Dowling, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–361–8046; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@ faa.gov. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 600–0777, dated December 13, 2022. (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–1109, Revision 01, dated May 6, 2022. (iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–35– 007, Revision 01, dated May 6, 2022. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–2999; email ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; website bombardier.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 79261 email fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued on December 20, 2022. Christina Underwood, Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2022–28063 Filed 12–23–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0727; FRL–10421– 01–R4] Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision to Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) on June 15, 2022. The changes were submitted by the Cabinet on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District, also referred to herein as Jefferson County). The District’s revision modifies the permit application timing requirements in the Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits (FEDOOP) rule in the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP (Jefferson County Local Implementation Plan, or LIP). EPA is proposing to approve these changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 26, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2022–0727 at regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1 79262 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams-Miles, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone number is (404) 562– 9144. Ms. Williams-Miles can also be reached via electronic mail at williamsmiles.pearlene@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview On June 15, 2022, the Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted changes to the Jefferson County LIP for EPA approval.1 2 EPA is proposing to approve changes to Section 4—Permit Applications, of the District’s Regulation 2.17—Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits.3 Under Regulation 2.17, Section 1.1, a FEDOOP is an operating permit that contains a federally enforceable condition, limit, or provision that is issued to a stationary source that is not, or would not subsequently be, required to obtain a permit under Regulation 2.16—Title V Operating Permits. The changes in the June 15, 2022, submission add timing requirements for sources applying for FEDOOP permits that are similar to those in Regulation 2.16—Section II of the preamble of this document provides EPA’s analysis and rationale for proposed approval of this revision. TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS II. Analysis of Kentucky’s SIP Revision The June 15, 2022, submission revises Regulation 2.17 by adding four timing 1 The EPA received this submission on June 13, 2022, in a letter dated June 15, 2022. Throughout this notice of proposed rulemaking, this submission will be referred to as the June 15, 2022, submission. 2 In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson County governments merged, and the ‘‘Jefferson County Air Pollution Control District’’ was renamed the ‘‘Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District.’’ However, to be consistent with the terminology used in the subheading in Table 2 of 40 CFR 52.920(c), throughout this notice we refer to regulations contained in the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ‘‘Jefferson County’’ regulations. 3 The June 15, 2022, submittal contains changes to other Kentucky SIP-approved rules that are not addressed in this notice. EPA will act on those rules in separate actions. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:06 Dec 23, 2022 Jkt 259001 requirements under Section 4—Permit Applications, adding new prefatory language in Section 4.2, and renumbering the remaining subsections within Section 4. Turning to the four new timing requirements, first, subsection 4.2.1 is added to require that sources not previously required to obtain a permit under Regulation 2.17 but that become subject to an applicable requirement after the effective date of the regulation must submit a permit application within 12 months from the time at which it became subject to Regulation 2.17. Second, subsection 4.2.2 is added to require that a source ‘‘constructing, reconstructing, or modifying,’’ shall submit a complete FEDOOP permit application within 12 months after commencing operation. If an existing permit would prohibit construction or a change in operation, the source would be required to obtain a permit revision before commencing operation. Third, subsection 4.2.3 is added to state that a source that is required to reopen an existing permit pursuant to the requirements of Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 must submit a complete application for a permit revision within six months after notification by the District that the permit must be reopened. Finally, subsection 4.2.4 is added to require that a complete permit application must be submitted to the District at least six months prior to the date of permit expiration and in accordance with Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 for permit renewal. These changes to Regulation 2.17 merely add timing requirements for submitting complete FEDOOP applications similar to the timing requirements in Regulation 2.16. As such, EPA has preliminarily determined that these changes do not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment of the national ambient air quality standards and reasonable further progress or any other applicable requirement of the Act. For these reasons, EPA is proposing to approve the changes to the Jefferson County LIP. III. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, and as described in Section II of this preamble, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Jefferson County’s Regulation 2.17—Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits, version 5, with a local-effective date of March 16, 2022, which adds timing requirements PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 to the permit application process. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to Regulation 2.17—Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits, with a localeffective date of March 16, 2022, into the Jefferson County LIP. EPA is proposing to approve these changes because they are consistent with the CAA. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2022 / Proposed Rules Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 20, 2022. Daniel Blackmon, Regional Administrator, Region 4. I. Synopsis [FR Doc. 2022–28147 Filed 12–23–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 4 [PS Docket Nos. 21–346; 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35; DA 22–1343; FR ID 119958] Resilient Networks; Disruptions to Communications Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Petition for clarification and partial reconsideration; extension of filing replies to oppositions. AGENCY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) extends the deadline for filing replies to oppositions to the October 31, 2022 Petition for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration (Petition) filed in the above-captioned proceeding. DATES: The deadline for filing replies to oppositions in response to the Petition is extended to January 10, 2023. TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:06 Dec 23, 2022 Jkt 259001 Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Saswat Misra of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Cybersecurity and Communications Reliability Division, at (202) 418–0944 or Saswat.Misra@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Order Granting Extension of Time (Order) in PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and 15–80 and ET Docket No. 04–35; DA 22–1343, adopted and released on December 19, 2022. For the full text of this document, visit FCC’s website at https:// www.fcc.gov/document/pshsb-extendsopposition-reply-deadline-resiliencyproceeding or obtain access via the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) website at https:// www.fcc.gov/ecfs. (Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) Alternative formats are available for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), by sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or calling the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). ADDRESSES: 1. By this Order, the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB) grants a joint request filed by the Competitive Carriers Association (CCA) and CTIA (collectively, Requestors) seeking an extension of 14 days to file Replies to Oppositions in connection with their Petition for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration (Petition) filed in the above-captioned proceeding. See CCA and CTIA Joint Request for Extension of Time to Reply to Oppositions to Petition For Reconsideration, PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and 15–80, ET Docket No. 04–35 (filed Dec. 7, 2022) (Request). For the reasons stated below, PSHSB finds that Requestors’ request is warranted, and accordingly extends the deadline for filing Replies to Oppositions to January 10, 2023. 2. On June 27, 2022, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) adopted a Report and Order addressing improvements to communications reliability during disasters. See Resilient Networks; Amendments to Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules Concerning Disruptions to Communications; New Part 4 of the Commission’s Rules Concerns Disruptions to Communications, PS Docket Nos. 21– PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 79263 346 and 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Report and Order), 87 FR 59329 (Sept. 30, 2022). Requestors filed their Petition on October 31, 2022. See CTIA and Competitive Carriers Association Petition for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration, PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35 (filed Oct. 31, 2022). 3. On December 2, 2022, the Office of the Federal Register published notice of the Petition in the Federal Register indicating that Oppositions to the Petition would be due on December 19, 2022 and Replies to Oppositions would be due on December 27, 2022. See 87 FR 74102 (Dec. 2, 2022); see also Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Announces Filing Deadlines for Oppositions and Opposition Replies to the Petition for Clarification and Partial Reconsideration filed by CTIA and CCA Regarding the Resilient Networks Report and Order, PS Docket Nos. 21–346 and 15–80; ET Docket No. 04–35, Public Notice (PSHSB Dec. 2, 2022); 47 CFR 1.429(f) and (g). 4. On December 7, 2022, Requestors filed the Request seeking a 14-day extension of the deadline for Replies to Oppositions, from December 27, 2022 to January 10, 2023. In doing so, Requestors note that the current schedule provides only eight days, rather than the typical 10 days, between the filing deadlines for Oppositions and Replies to the Oppositions and that the December 26, 2022 federal holiday for Christmas also falls within this time window. Requestors state that the deadline for Replies to Oppositions should be extended to provide sufficient time for Requestors and other parties to ‘‘review the record, prepare potential oppositions in this complex proceeding, and develop a complete record for the Commission’s consideration.’’ Requestors further remark that the current schedule ‘‘creates significant challenges to the parties’ ability to review any oppositions, formulate positions with constituents and member companies, and draft replies that substantively respond to the oppositions to the Petition.’’ Requestors contend that the requested extension would be consistent with past instances where the Commission has granted extensions of time. No objections to the Request have been filed. 5. As set forth in § 1.46 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission does not routinely grant extensions of time for such filings. In this case, however, the requested extension is unopposed, limited to only 14 days, and will allow commenters sufficient time to E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79261-79263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0727; FRL-10421-01-R4]


Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Revision to Federally Enforceable 
District Origin Operating Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a revision to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) 
on June 15, 2022. The changes were submitted by the Cabinet on behalf 
of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District, also 
referred to herein as Jefferson County). The District's revision 
modifies the permit application timing requirements in the Federally 
Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits (FEDOOP) rule in the 
Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP (Jefferson County Local 
Implementation Plan, or LIP). EPA is proposing to approve these changes 
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 26, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2022-0727 at regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for 
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or 
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to 
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to

[[Page 79262]]

make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents 
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams-Miles, Air 
Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, 
Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The 
telephone number is (404) 562-9144. Ms. Williams-Miles can also be 
reached via electronic mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Overview

    On June 15, 2022, the Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted changes to 
the Jefferson County LIP for EPA approval.1 2 EPA is 
proposing to approve changes to Section 4--Permit Applications, of the 
District's Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin 
Operating Permits.\3\ Under Regulation 2.17, Section 1.1, a FEDOOP is 
an operating permit that contains a federally enforceable condition, 
limit, or provision that is issued to a stationary source that is not, 
or would not subsequently be, required to obtain a permit under 
Regulation 2.16--Title V Operating Permits. The changes in the June 15, 
2022, submission add timing requirements for sources applying for 
FEDOOP permits that are similar to those in Regulation 2.16--Section II 
of the preamble of this document provides EPA's analysis and rationale 
for proposed approval of this revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The EPA received this submission on June 13, 2022, in a 
letter dated June 15, 2022. Throughout this notice of proposed 
rulemaking, this submission will be referred to as the June 15, 
2022, submission.
    \2\ In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson County 
governments merged, and the ``Jefferson County Air Pollution Control 
District'' was renamed the ``Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control 
District.'' However, to be consistent with the terminology used in 
the subheading in Table 2 of 40 CFR 52.920(c), throughout this 
notice we refer to regulations contained in the Jefferson County 
portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ``Jefferson County'' regulations.
    \3\ The June 15, 2022, submittal contains changes to other 
Kentucky SIP-approved rules that are not addressed in this notice. 
EPA will act on those rules in separate actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Analysis of Kentucky's SIP Revision

    The June 15, 2022, submission revises Regulation 2.17 by adding 
four timing requirements under Section 4--Permit Applications, adding 
new prefatory language in Section 4.2, and renumbering the remaining 
subsections within Section 4. Turning to the four new timing 
requirements, first, subsection 4.2.1 is added to require that sources 
not previously required to obtain a permit under Regulation 2.17 but 
that become subject to an applicable requirement after the effective 
date of the regulation must submit a permit application within 12 
months from the time at which it became subject to Regulation 2.17.
    Second, subsection 4.2.2 is added to require that a source 
``constructing, reconstructing, or modifying,'' shall submit a complete 
FEDOOP permit application within 12 months after commencing operation. 
If an existing permit would prohibit construction or a change in 
operation, the source would be required to obtain a permit revision 
before commencing operation.
    Third, subsection 4.2.3 is added to state that a source that is 
required to reopen an existing permit pursuant to the requirements of 
Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 must submit a complete application for a 
permit revision within six months after notification by the District 
that the permit must be reopened.
    Finally, subsection 4.2.4 is added to require that a complete 
permit application must be submitted to the District at least six 
months prior to the date of permit expiration and in accordance with 
Section 6 of Regulation 2.17 for permit renewal.
    These changes to Regulation 2.17 merely add timing requirements for 
submitting complete FEDOOP applications similar to the timing 
requirements in Regulation 2.16. As such, EPA has preliminarily 
determined that these changes do not interfere with any applicable 
requirement concerning attainment of the national ambient air quality 
standards and reasonable further progress or any other applicable 
requirement of the Act. For these reasons, EPA is proposing to approve 
the changes to the Jefferson County LIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, and as described in Section II of 
this preamble, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Jefferson 
County's Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin 
Operating Permits, version 5, with a local-effective date of March 16, 
2022, which adds timing requirements to the permit application process. 
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally 
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office 
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to 
Regulation 2.17--Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating 
Permits, with a local-effective date of March 16, 2022, into the 
Jefferson County LIP. EPA is proposing to approve these changes because 
they are consistent with the CAA.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes 
to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not 
impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For 
that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National

[[Page 79263]]

Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with 
the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed 
rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial 
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic 
compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: December 20, 2022.
Daniel Blackmon,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2022-28147 Filed 12-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.