Iron Oxide (Fe3, 78558-78561 [2022-27869]

Download as PDF 78558 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. § 63.7883 When do I have to comply with this subpart? Subpart GGGGG—National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Site Remediation § 63.7881 [Amended] 2. Section 63.7881 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(2) and (3). ■ 3. Section 63.7882 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows: ■ § 63.7882 What site remediation sources at my facility does this subpart affect? lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 * * * * * (d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section: (1) Each affected source for your site is considered an existing source if your site remediation commenced construction or reconstruction under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA) as a remedial action or a non-timecritical removal action on or before May 13, 2016. (2) Each affected source for your site is considered an existing source if your site remediation commenced construction or reconstruction under a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action conducted at a treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) that is either required by your permit issued by either the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state program authorized by the EPA under RCRA section 3006; required by orders authorized under RCRA; or required by orders authorized under RCRA section 7003 on or before May 13, 2016. (3) Each affected source for your site is considered a new source if your site remediation commenced construction or reconstruction under the authority of CERCLA as a remedial action or a nontime-critical removal action after May 13, 2016. (4) Each affected source for your site is considered a new source if your site remediation commenced construction or reconstruction under a RCRA corrective action conducted at a TSDF that is either required by your permit issued by either the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a State program authorized by the EPA under RCRA section 3006; required by orders authorized under RCRA; or required by orders authorized under RCRA section 7003 after May 13, 2016. 4. Section 63.7883 is amended by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows: ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 * * * * * (g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section, the following dates for compliance apply to sources identified in § 63.7882(d): (1) Site remediations identified in § 63.7882(d)(1) and (2) must comply with the requirements of this subpart that apply to you no later than June 24, 2024. (2) Site remediations identified in § 63.7882(d)(3) and (4) must comply with the requirements of this subpart that apply to you no later than December 22, 2022, or upon initial startup, whichever is later. [FR Doc. 2022–27523 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0189; FRL–10458–01– OCSPP] Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) in Pesticide Formulations Applied to Animals; Tolerance Exemption Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations applied to animals. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service submitted a petition (IN–11661) to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4), when used in accordance with the terms of that exemption. DATES: This regulation is effective December 22, 2022. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before February 21, 2023 and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0189, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room and the OPP docket is (202) 566–1744. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (202) 506–2875; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2022–0189 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM 22DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 by the Hearing Clerk on or before February 21, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2022–0189, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov//where-send-commentsepa-dockets. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/. II. Petition for Exemption In the Federal Register of March 22, 2022 (87 FR 16133) (FRL–9410–11– OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN–11661) by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Unit 149, Riverdale, MD 20737. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.930 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than 2,000 parts per million (ppm) (0.2% by weight) in the final formulation applied to animals. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the petitioner, which is available in the docket, https:// www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 III. Inert Ingredient Definition Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents; and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not intended to imply nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active. Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert ingredients. IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. When making a safety determination for an exemption for the requirement of a tolerance, FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B) directs EPA to consider the considerations in section 408(b)(2)(C) and (D). Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’ Section 408(b)(2)(D) lists other factors for EPA consideration making safety determinations, e.g., the validity, completeness, and reliability of available data, nature of toxic effects, available information concerning the cumulative effects of the pesticide chemical and other substances with a common mechanism of toxicity, and available information concerning PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 78559 aggregate exposure levels to the pesticide chemical and other related substances, among others. EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance may be established. Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for iron oxide (Fe3O4) including exposure resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks associated with iron oxide (Fe3O4) follows. A. Toxicological Profile EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the adverse effects caused by iron oxide (Fe3O4) as well as the noobserved-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effectlevel (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this unit. The toxicological database of iron oxide (Fe3O4) is supported by data regarding iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow. EPA has determined that it is appropriate to bridge iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow data to assess iron oxide (Fe3O4) due to similarities in structure, and similarities among the E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM 22DER1 78560 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 available human health toxicity data of these substances. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) exhibits low levels of acute toxicity via the oral and inhalation routes of exposure and is anticipated to have low acute dermal toxicity. It is not a skin or eye irritant nor a skin sensitizer. No adverse effects were reported in the 90-day study in rats. No evidence of neurotoxicity was observed in the neurotoxicity screening performed in the 90-day oral rat study, and no evidence of immunotoxicity was seen in the available studies. No adverse reproduction or developmental effects were reported in the available reproduction and developmental toxicity study summaries in rats. Furthermore, concern for carcinogenicity is low, based on negative results in a mutagenicity study, and the lack of structural alerts for mutagenicity or carcinogenicity. B. Toxicological Points of Departure/ Levels of Concern Once a pesticide’s toxicological profile is determined, EPA identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/ safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure level—generally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see https:// www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/overview-riskassessment-pesticide-program. The hazard profile of iron oxide (Fe3O4) is adequately defined. Overall, iron oxide (Fe3O4) is of low acute, subchronic, and developmental toxicity. No systemic toxicity is observed up to 1,000 mg/kg/day. Since signs of toxicity were not observed, no toxicological VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 endpoints of concern or PODs were identified. Therefore, a qualitative risk assessment for iron oxide (Fe3O4) can be performed. C. Exposure Assessment 1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses and drinking water. In evaluating dietary exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA considered exposure under the proposed exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. EPA assessed dietary exposures from iron oxide (Fe3O4) in food as follows: Dietary exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) may occur from consuming game treated with pesticide formulations (baits) containing this inert ingredient and from non-pesticidal uses (food additive uses and inactive ingredient uses in FDA-approved drugs). Exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) via drinking water is expected to be negligible, based on the limited use pattern (baits). However, no toxicological endpoints of concern were selected, and therefore, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment for iron oxide (Fe3O4) was not conducted. 2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables). No residential exposure is anticipated from the proposed uses for iron oxide (Fe3O4) in pesticide formulation applied to animals. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) may be present in current pesticide and nonpesticide products that may be used in and around the home. However, a quantitative residential exposure assessment was not conducted since a toxicological endpoint for risk assessment was not identified. 3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Based on the lack of toxicity in the available database, EPA has not found iron oxide (Fe3O4) to share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and iron oxide (Fe3O4) does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance exemption, therefore, EPA has assumed that iron oxide (Fe3O4) does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 substances. For information regarding EPA’s efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA’s website at https:// www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/cumulativeassessment-risk-pesticides. D. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. Based on an assessment of available data for iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA has concluded that there are no toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S. population, including infants and children. Because there are no threshold effects associated with iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA conducted a qualitative assessment. As part of that assessment, the Agency did not use safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is needed for assessing risk to infants and children. E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) residues. V. Other Considerations Analytical Enforcement Methodology An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4) in or on any food commodities. EPA is establishing a limitation on the amount of iron oxide (Fe3O4) that may be used in pesticide formulations applied to animals. This limitation will be enforced through the pesticide registration process under the Federal E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM 22DER1 78561 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for food use that exceeds 0.2% iron oxide (Fe3O4) in the final pesticide formulation. VI. Conclusions Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established in 40 CFR 180.930 for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61– 9) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than 0.2% by weight of the final formulation applied to animals. VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VIII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 13, 2022. Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. In § 180.930, amend table 1 by adding in alphabetical order an entry for ‘‘Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9)’’ to read as follows: ■ § 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance. * * * * * TABLE 1 TO 180.930 Inert ingredients Limits * * * Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) ....................... * * * Not to exceed 0.2% of pesticide formulations .......................... * * * * Uses * * [FR Doc. 2022–27869 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am] lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM 22DER1 * Colorant. *

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78558-78561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189; FRL-10458-01-OCSPP]


Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) in Pesticide Formulations Applied to Animals; 
Tolerance Exemption

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4) 
(CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in 
pesticide formulations applied to animals. The United States Department 
of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
submitted a petition (IN-11661) to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from 
the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to 
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of iron oxide 
(Fe3O4), when used in accordance with the terms 
of that exemption.

DATES: This regulation is effective December 22, 2022. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 21, 2023 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection 
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., 
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The 
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room and the OPP docket is (202) 566-1744. For the latest 
status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration 
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (202) 506-2875; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at 
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received

[[Page 78559]]

by the Hearing Clerk on or before February 21, 2023. Addresses for mail 
and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 
CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov//where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/.

II. Petition for Exemption

    In the Federal Register of March 22, 2022 (87 FR 16133) (FRL-9410-
11-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
11661) by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 
River Road, Unit 149, Riverdale, MD 20737. The petition requested that 
40 CFR 180.930 be amended by establishing an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an 
inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than 
2,000 parts per million (ppm) (0.2% by weight) in the final formulation 
applied to animals. That document referenced a summary of the petition 
prepared by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the 
petitioner, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the 
notice of filing.

III. Inert Ingredient Definition

    Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active 
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not 
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a 
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and 
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty 
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as 
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing 
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents; 
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply 
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active. 
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a 
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert 
ingredients.

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. When making a safety determination for an 
exemption for the requirement of a tolerance, FFDCA section 
408(c)(2)(B) directs EPA to consider the considerations in section 
408(b)(2)(C) and (D). Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure 
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to 
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
residue. . . .'' Section 408(b)(2)(D) lists other factors for EPA 
consideration making safety determinations, e.g., the validity, 
completeness, and reliability of available data, nature of toxic 
effects, available information concerning the cumulative effects of the 
pesticide chemical and other substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity, and available information concerning aggregate exposure 
levels to the pesticide chemical and other related substances, among 
others.
    EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only 
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably 
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order 
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert 
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in 
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient 
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as 
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to 
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate 
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of 
a tolerance may be established.
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors 
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available 
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a 
determination on aggregate exposure for iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) including exposure resulting from the 
exemption established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and 
risks associated with iron oxide (Fe3O4) follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their 
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature 
of the adverse effects caused by iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level 
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this unit.
    The toxicological database of iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) is supported by data regarding iron oxide 
red and iron oxide yellow. EPA has determined that it is appropriate to 
bridge iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow data to assess iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) due to similarities in structure, and 
similarities among the

[[Page 78560]]

available human health toxicity data of these substances.
    Iron oxide (Fe3O4) exhibits low levels of 
acute toxicity via the oral and inhalation routes of exposure and is 
anticipated to have low acute dermal toxicity. It is not a skin or eye 
irritant nor a skin sensitizer. No adverse effects were reported in the 
90-day study in rats. No evidence of neurotoxicity was observed in the 
neurotoxicity screening performed in the 90-day oral rat study, and no 
evidence of immunotoxicity was seen in the available studies. No 
adverse reproduction or developmental effects were reported in the 
available reproduction and developmental toxicity study summaries in 
rats. Furthermore, concern for carcinogenicity is low, based on 
negative results in a mutagenicity study, and the lack of structural 
alerts for mutagenicity or carcinogenicity.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA 
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of 
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the 
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no 
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for 
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed 
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to 
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL) 
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified 
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with 
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a 
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe 
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes 
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the 
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of 
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the 
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete 
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program.
    The hazard profile of iron oxide (Fe3O4) is 
adequately defined. Overall, iron oxide (Fe3O4) 
is of low acute, subchronic, and developmental toxicity. No systemic 
toxicity is observed up to 1,000 mg/kg/day. Since signs of toxicity 
were not observed, no toxicological endpoints of concern or PODs were 
identified. Therefore, a qualitative risk assessment for iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) can be performed.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses and drinking water. In 
evaluating dietary exposure to iron oxide 
(Fe3O4), EPA considered exposure under the 
proposed exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. EPA assessed 
dietary exposures from iron oxide (Fe3O4) in food 
as follows:
    Dietary exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) may 
occur from consuming game treated with pesticide formulations (baits) 
containing this inert ingredient and from non-pesticidal uses (food 
additive uses and inactive ingredient uses in FDA-approved drugs). 
Exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) via drinking water 
is expected to be negligible, based on the limited use pattern (baits). 
However, no toxicological endpoints of concern were selected, and 
therefore, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment for iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) was not conducted.
    2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary 
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming 
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
    No residential exposure is anticipated from the proposed uses for 
iron oxide (Fe3O4) in pesticide formulation 
applied to animals. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) may be 
present in current pesticide and non-pesticide products that may be 
used in and around the home. However, a quantitative residential 
exposure assessment was not conducted since a toxicological endpoint 
for risk assessment was not identified.
    3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Based on the lack of toxicity in the available database, EPA has 
not found iron oxide (Fe3O4) to share a common 
mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) does not appear to produce a toxic 
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this 
tolerance exemption, therefore, EPA has assumed that iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) does not have a common mechanism of 
toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts 
to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to 
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at 
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.

D. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children

    Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an 
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in 
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal 
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure 
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of 
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of 
safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act 
(FQPA) Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either 
retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety 
factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a 
different factor.
    Based on an assessment of available data for iron oxide 
(Fe3O4), EPA has concluded that there are no 
toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S. population, including 
infants and children. Because there are no threshold effects associated 
with iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA conducted a 
qualitative assessment. As part of that assessment, the Agency did not 
use safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor 
is needed for assessing risk to infants and children.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA 
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate 
exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) residues.

V. Other Considerations

Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of 
iron oxide (Fe3O4) in or on any food commodities. 
EPA is establishing a limitation on the amount of iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) that may be used in pesticide 
formulations applied to animals. This limitation will be enforced 
through the pesticide registration process under the Federal

[[Page 78561]]

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7 U.S.C. 136 
et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for food use 
that exceeds 0.2% iron oxide (Fe3O4) in the final 
pesticide formulation.

VI. Conclusions

    Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established in 40 CFR 180.930 for residues of iron oxide 
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an 
inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than 
0.2% by weight of the final formulation applied to animals.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition 
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, 
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review 
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive 
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of 
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information 
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special 
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions 
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government 
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VIII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 13, 2022.
Daniel Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. In Sec.  180.930, amend table 1 by adding in alphabetical order an 
entry for ``Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9)'' to read as 
follows:


Sec.  180.930  Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from 
the requirement of a tolerance.

* * * * *

                           Table 1 to 180.930
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Inert ingredients              Limits                Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg.    Not to exceed      Colorant.
 No. 1317-61-9).                 0.2% of
                                 pesticide
                                 formulations.
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-27869 Filed 12-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.