Iron Oxide (Fe3, 78558-78561 [2022-27869]
Download as PDF
78558
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
§ 63.7883 When do I have to comply with
this subpart?
Subpart GGGGG—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Site Remediation
§ 63.7881
[Amended]
2. Section 63.7881 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraphs
(b)(2) and (3).
■
3. Section 63.7882 is amended by
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 63.7882 What site remediation sources at
my facility does this subpart affect?
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b)
and (c) of this section:
(1) Each affected source for your site
is considered an existing source if your
site remediation commenced
construction or reconstruction under the
authority of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response and
Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA)
as a remedial action or a non-timecritical removal action on or before May
13, 2016.
(2) Each affected source for your site
is considered an existing source if your
site remediation commenced
construction or reconstruction under a
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) corrective action conducted
at a treatment, storage, and disposal
facility (TSDF) that is either required by
your permit issued by either the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
or a state program authorized by the
EPA under RCRA section 3006; required
by orders authorized under RCRA; or
required by orders authorized under
RCRA section 7003 on or before May 13,
2016.
(3) Each affected source for your site
is considered a new source if your site
remediation commenced construction or
reconstruction under the authority of
CERCLA as a remedial action or a nontime-critical removal action after May
13, 2016.
(4) Each affected source for your site
is considered a new source if your site
remediation commenced construction or
reconstruction under a RCRA corrective
action conducted at a TSDF that is
either required by your permit issued by
either the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) or a State
program authorized by the EPA under
RCRA section 3006; required by orders
authorized under RCRA; or required by
orders authorized under RCRA section
7003 after May 13, 2016.
4. Section 63.7883 is amended by
adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)
through (f) of this section, the following
dates for compliance apply to sources
identified in § 63.7882(d):
(1) Site remediations identified in
§ 63.7882(d)(1) and (2) must comply
with the requirements of this subpart
that apply to you no later than June 24,
2024.
(2) Site remediations identified in
§ 63.7882(d)(3) and (4) must comply
with the requirements of this subpart
that apply to you no later than
December 22, 2022, or upon initial
startup, whichever is later.
[FR Doc. 2022–27523 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0189; FRL–10458–01–
OCSPP]
Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) in Pesticide
Formulations Applied to Animals;
Tolerance Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) when
used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in
pesticide formulations applied to
animals. The United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service submitted a
petition (IN–11661) to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of iron
oxide (Fe3O4), when used in accordance
with the terms of that exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective
December 22, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 21, 2023 and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0189, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room and the OPP
docket is (202) 566–1744. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services,
docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration Division
(7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(202) 506–2875; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Office of the Federal
Register’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2022–0189 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 21, 2023. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2022–0189, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be CBI
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov//where-send-commentsepa-dockets.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of March 22,
2022 (87 FR 16133) (FRL–9410–11–
OCSPP), EPA issued a document
pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP IN–11661) by the
USDA Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, 4700 River Road,
Unit 149, Riverdale, MD 20737. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.930
be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) when
used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in
pesticide formulations at no more than
2,000 parts per million (ppm) (0.2% by
weight) in the final formulation applied
to animals. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by the
USDA Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, the petitioner,
which is available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. When making a
safety determination for an exemption
for the requirement of a tolerance,
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B) directs EPA
to consider the considerations in section
408(b)(2)(C) and (D). Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’ Section
408(b)(2)(D) lists other factors for EPA
consideration making safety
determinations, e.g., the validity,
completeness, and reliability of
available data, nature of toxic effects,
available information concerning the
cumulative effects of the pesticide
chemical and other substances with a
common mechanism of toxicity, and
available information concerning
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78559
aggregate exposure levels to the
pesticide chemical and other related
substances, among others.
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
harm to human health. In order to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide inert ingredients,
the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible
exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water,
and through other exposures that occur
as a result of pesticide use in residential
settings. If EPA is able to determine that
a finite tolerance is not necessary to
ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert
ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be
established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for iron oxide
(Fe3O4) including exposure resulting
from the exemption established by this
action. EPA’s assessment of exposures
and risks associated with iron oxide
(Fe3O4) follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by iron oxide (Fe3O4) as well as the noobserved-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL)
and the lowest-observed-adverse-effectlevel (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit.
The toxicological database of iron
oxide (Fe3O4) is supported by data
regarding iron oxide red and iron oxide
yellow. EPA has determined that it is
appropriate to bridge iron oxide red and
iron oxide yellow data to assess iron
oxide (Fe3O4) due to similarities in
structure, and similarities among the
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
78560
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
available human health toxicity data of
these substances.
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) exhibits low levels
of acute toxicity via the oral and
inhalation routes of exposure and is
anticipated to have low acute dermal
toxicity. It is not a skin or eye irritant
nor a skin sensitizer. No adverse effects
were reported in the 90-day study in
rats. No evidence of neurotoxicity was
observed in the neurotoxicity screening
performed in the 90-day oral rat study,
and no evidence of immunotoxicity was
seen in the available studies. No adverse
reproduction or developmental effects
were reported in the available
reproduction and developmental
toxicity study summaries in rats.
Furthermore, concern for
carcinogenicity is low, based on
negative results in a mutagenicity study,
and the lack of structural alerts for
mutagenicity or carcinogenicity.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide’s toxicological
profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD)
and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human
exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
that have a threshold below which there
is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
POD is used as the basis for derivation
of reference values for risk assessment.
PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the
dose at which no adverse effects are
observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern
are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
safety factors are used in conjunction
with the POD to calculate a safe
exposure level—generally referred to as
a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some
degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of an occurrence of the adverse effect
expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/overview-riskassessment-pesticide-program.
The hazard profile of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) is adequately defined. Overall,
iron oxide (Fe3O4) is of low acute,
subchronic, and developmental toxicity.
No systemic toxicity is observed up to
1,000 mg/kg/day. Since signs of toxicity
were not observed, no toxicological
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
endpoints of concern or PODs were
identified. Therefore, a qualitative risk
assessment for iron oxide (Fe3O4) can be
performed.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses and drinking water. In
evaluating dietary exposure to iron
oxide (Fe3O4), EPA considered exposure
under the proposed exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. EPA
assessed dietary exposures from iron
oxide (Fe3O4) in food as follows:
Dietary exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4)
may occur from consuming game treated
with pesticide formulations (baits)
containing this inert ingredient and
from non-pesticidal uses (food additive
uses and inactive ingredient uses in
FDA-approved drugs). Exposure to iron
oxide (Fe3O4) via drinking water is
expected to be negligible, based on the
limited use pattern (baits). However, no
toxicological endpoints of concern were
selected, and therefore, a quantitative
dietary exposure assessment for iron
oxide (Fe3O4) was not conducted.
2. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables).
No residential exposure is anticipated
from the proposed uses for iron oxide
(Fe3O4) in pesticide formulation applied
to animals. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) may be
present in current pesticide and nonpesticide products that may be used in
and around the home. However, a
quantitative residential exposure
assessment was not conducted since a
toxicological endpoint for risk
assessment was not identified.
3. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Based on the lack of toxicity in the
available database, EPA has not found
iron oxide (Fe3O4) to share a common
mechanism of toxicity with any other
substances, and iron oxide (Fe3O4) does
not appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance exemption,
therefore, EPA has assumed that iron
oxide (Fe3O4) does not have a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
substances. For information regarding
EPA’s efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism
of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals,
see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/cumulativeassessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Additional Safety Factor for the
Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety
for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA)
Safety Factor (SF). In applying this
provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor.
Based on an assessment of available
data for iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA has
concluded that there are no
toxicological endpoints of concern for
the U.S. population, including infants
and children. Because there are no
threshold effects associated with iron
oxide (Fe3O4), EPA conducted a
qualitative assessment. As part of that
assessment, the Agency did not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no
additional safety factor is needed for
assessing risk to infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of
concern were identified, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to iron oxide
(Fe3O4) residues.
V. Other Considerations
Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is not establishing a numerical
tolerance for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) in or on any food commodities.
EPA is establishing a limitation on the
amount of iron oxide (Fe3O4) that may
be used in pesticide formulations
applied to animals. This limitation will
be enforced through the pesticide
registration process under the Federal
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
78561
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. EPA
will not register any pesticide
formulation for food use that exceeds
0.2% iron oxide (Fe3O4) in the final
pesticide formulation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
in 40 CFR 180.930 for residues of iron
oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–
9) when used as an inert ingredient
(colorant) in pesticide formulations at
no more than 0.2% by weight of the
final formulation applied to animals.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemption in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 13, 2022.
Daniel Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.930, amend table 1 by
adding in alphabetical order an entry for
‘‘Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No.
1317–61–9)’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to
animals; exemptions from the requirement
of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO 180.930
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317–61–9) .......................
*
*
*
Not to exceed 0.2% of pesticide formulations ..........................
*
*
*
*
Uses
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–27869 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Dec 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
*
Colorant.
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78558-78561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27869]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189; FRL-10458-01-OCSPP]
Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) in Pesticide Formulations Applied to Animals;
Tolerance Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide (Fe3O4)
(CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in
pesticide formulations applied to animals. The United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
submitted a petition (IN-11661) to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4), when used in accordance with the terms
of that exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective December 22, 2022. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 21, 2023
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room and the OPP docket is (202) 566-1744. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Rosenblatt, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (202) 506-2875; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received
[[Page 78559]]
by the Hearing Clerk on or before February 21, 2023. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0189, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov//where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of March 22, 2022 (87 FR 16133) (FRL-9410-
11-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
11661) by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700
River Road, Unit 149, Riverdale, MD 20737. The petition requested that
40 CFR 180.930 be amended by establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an
inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than
2,000 parts per million (ppm) (0.2% by weight) in the final formulation
applied to animals. That document referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the
petitioner, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. When making a safety determination for an
exemption for the requirement of a tolerance, FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(B) directs EPA to consider the considerations in section
408(b)(2)(C) and (D). Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .'' Section 408(b)(2)(D) lists other factors for EPA
consideration making safety determinations, e.g., the validity,
completeness, and reliability of available data, nature of toxic
effects, available information concerning the cumulative effects of the
pesticide chemical and other substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity, and available information concerning aggregate exposure
levels to the pesticide chemical and other related substances, among
others.
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for iron oxide
(Fe3O4) including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and
risks associated with iron oxide (Fe3O4) follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by iron oxide
(Fe3O4) as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this unit.
The toxicological database of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) is supported by data regarding iron oxide
red and iron oxide yellow. EPA has determined that it is appropriate to
bridge iron oxide red and iron oxide yellow data to assess iron oxide
(Fe3O4) due to similarities in structure, and
similarities among the
[[Page 78560]]
available human health toxicity data of these substances.
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) exhibits low levels of
acute toxicity via the oral and inhalation routes of exposure and is
anticipated to have low acute dermal toxicity. It is not a skin or eye
irritant nor a skin sensitizer. No adverse effects were reported in the
90-day study in rats. No evidence of neurotoxicity was observed in the
neurotoxicity screening performed in the 90-day oral rat study, and no
evidence of immunotoxicity was seen in the available studies. No
adverse reproduction or developmental effects were reported in the
available reproduction and developmental toxicity study summaries in
rats. Furthermore, concern for carcinogenicity is low, based on
negative results in a mutagenicity study, and the lack of structural
alerts for mutagenicity or carcinogenicity.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program.
The hazard profile of iron oxide (Fe3O4) is
adequately defined. Overall, iron oxide (Fe3O4)
is of low acute, subchronic, and developmental toxicity. No systemic
toxicity is observed up to 1,000 mg/kg/day. Since signs of toxicity
were not observed, no toxicological endpoints of concern or PODs were
identified. Therefore, a qualitative risk assessment for iron oxide
(Fe3O4) can be performed.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses and drinking water. In
evaluating dietary exposure to iron oxide
(Fe3O4), EPA considered exposure under the
proposed exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. EPA assessed
dietary exposures from iron oxide (Fe3O4) in food
as follows:
Dietary exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) may
occur from consuming game treated with pesticide formulations (baits)
containing this inert ingredient and from non-pesticidal uses (food
additive uses and inactive ingredient uses in FDA-approved drugs).
Exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) via drinking water
is expected to be negligible, based on the limited use pattern (baits).
However, no toxicological endpoints of concern were selected, and
therefore, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment for iron oxide
(Fe3O4) was not conducted.
2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
No residential exposure is anticipated from the proposed uses for
iron oxide (Fe3O4) in pesticide formulation
applied to animals. Iron oxide (Fe3O4) may be
present in current pesticide and non-pesticide products that may be
used in and around the home. However, a quantitative residential
exposure assessment was not conducted since a toxicological endpoint
for risk assessment was not identified.
3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
Based on the lack of toxicity in the available database, EPA has
not found iron oxide (Fe3O4) to share a common
mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and iron oxide
(Fe3O4) does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance exemption, therefore, EPA has assumed that iron oxide
(Fe3O4) does not have a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts
to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act
(FQPA) Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either
retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety
factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a
different factor.
Based on an assessment of available data for iron oxide
(Fe3O4), EPA has concluded that there are no
toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S. population, including
infants and children. Because there are no threshold effects associated
with iron oxide (Fe3O4), EPA conducted a
qualitative assessment. As part of that assessment, the Agency did not
use safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor
is needed for assessing risk to infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to iron oxide (Fe3O4) residues.
V. Other Considerations
Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of
iron oxide (Fe3O4) in or on any food commodities.
EPA is establishing a limitation on the amount of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) that may be used in pesticide
formulations applied to animals. This limitation will be enforced
through the pesticide registration process under the Federal
[[Page 78561]]
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7 U.S.C. 136
et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for food use
that exceeds 0.2% iron oxide (Fe3O4) in the final
pesticide formulation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established in 40 CFR 180.930 for residues of iron oxide
(Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9) when used as an
inert ingredient (colorant) in pesticide formulations at no more than
0.2% by weight of the final formulation applied to animals.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 13, 2022.
Daniel Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.930, amend table 1 by adding in alphabetical order an
entry for ``Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. No. 1317-61-9)'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
Table 1 to 180.930
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Iron oxide (Fe3O4) (CAS Reg. Not to exceed Colorant.
No. 1317-61-9). 0.2% of
pesticide
formulations.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2022-27869 Filed 12-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P