Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the Archer Aviation Inc. Model M001 Powered-Lift, 77749-77763 [2022-27445]
Download as PDF
77749
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 87, No. 243
Tuesday, December 20, 2022
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1548]
Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class
Airworthiness Criteria for the Archer
Aviation Inc. Model M001 Powered-Lift
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed
airworthiness criteria.
AGENCY:
The FAA announces the
availability of, and requests comments
on, the proposed airworthiness criteria
for the Archer Aviation Inc. (Archer)
Model M001 powered-lift. This
document proposes airworthiness
criteria the FAA finds to be appropriate
and applicable for the powered-lift
design.
SUMMARY:
The FAA must receive comments
by January 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2022–1548
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery of Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 8
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
function of the docket website, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Primozich, Center for
Emerging Concepts and Innovation
(CECI) Branch, AIR–650, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 S 216th Street,
Des Moines, WA 98198–6547; telephone
and fax 206–231–3014; email
anthony.j.primozich@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in the development of
proposed airworthiness criteria for the
Archer Model M001 powered-lift by
sending written comments, data, or
views. Please identify the Archer Model
M001 and Docket No. FAA–2022–1548
on all submitted correspondence. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the airworthiness
criteria, explain the reason for a
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
Except for Confidential Business
Information as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all
comments received, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
these proposed airworthiness criteria.
Before acting on this proposal, the FAA
will consider all comments received on
or before the closing date for comments.
The FAA will consider comments filed
late if it is possible to do so without
incurring delay. The FAA may change
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these airworthiness criteria based on
received comments.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this notice
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this notice, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
notice. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to the individual listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Any commentary that the FAA
receives that is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this notice.
Background
On March 30, 2022, Archer applied
for a type certificate for the Model M001
powered-lift. The Archer Model M001
powered-lift has a maximum gross
takeoff weight of 6,500 lbs. and is
capable of carrying a pilot and four
passengers. The aircraft has a high-wing
and V-tail 1 configuration with fixed
tricycle landing gear. The aircraft uses
12 electric engines powered by onboard
batteries for propulsion instead of
conventional air and fuel combustion.
Six engines with five-bladed variablepitch propellers are mounted on the
forward edge of the main wing, three to
each side, which are capable of tilting
to provide both vertical and forward
thrust. The other six electric engines
drive two-bladed fixed-pitch propellers
and are mounted on the aft edge of the
main wing, three to each side; they are
fixed in place to provide only vertical
thrust. The aft-mounted engines operate
only during thrust-borne or semi-thrust1 A V-Tail aircraft design incorporates two slanted
tail surfaces instead of the horizontal and vertical
fins of a conventional aircraft empennage. The two
fixed tail surfaces of a V-Tail act as both horizontal
and vertical stabilizers and each has a moveable
flight-control surface referred to as a ruddervator.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77750
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
borne flight; in wing-borne forward
flight, these engines are switched off
and the propellers are faired in line with
the aircraft fuselage. The aircraft
structure and propellers are constructed
of composite materials. The Archer
Model M001 powered-lift is intended to
be used for part 91 and part 135
operations, with a single pilot onboard,
under visual flight rules.
Discussion
Because the FAA has not yet
established powered-lift airworthiness
standards in 14 CFR, the FAA type
certificates powered-lift as special class
aircraft. Under the procedures in 14 CFR
21.17(b), the airworthiness requirements
for special class aircraft are the portions
of the requirements in 14 CFR parts 23,
25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35 found by the
FAA to be appropriate and applicable to
the specific type design and any other
airworthiness criteria found by the FAA
to provide an equivalent level of safety
to the existing standards. This notice
announces the applicable regulations
and other airworthiness criteria
developed, under § 21.17(b), for type
certification of the Archer Model M001
powered-lift.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift
has characteristics of both a rotorcraft
and an airplane. It is designed to
function as a helicopter for takeoff and
landing and as an airplane cruising at
higher speeds than a helicopter during
the en-route portion of flight operations.
Accordingly, the Archer Model M001
powered-lift proposed airworthiness
criteria contain standards from parts 23,
33, and 35 as well as other proposed
airworthiness criteria specific for a
powered-lift with electric engines.
For the existing regulations that are
included without modification, these
proposed airworthiness criteria include
all amendments to the existing part 23,
33, and 35 airworthiness standards in
effect as of the application date of
March 30, 2022. These are part 23,
amendment 23–64, part 33, amendment
33–34, and part 35, amendment 35–10.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift
proposed airworthiness criteria also
include new performance-based criteria
consisting of part 23 standards at
amendment 23–64, modified as
necessary to capture the powered-lift’s
transitional flight modes. The FAA
developed these criteria because no
existing standard captures the poweredlift’s transitional flight modes. The
proposed criteria also contain
definitions specific for a powered-lift,
such as flight modes, configurations,
speeds, and terminology. Additionally,
electric-engine and related propeller
airworthiness criteria are proposed. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
new requirements specific to the Archer
Model M001 powered-lift use an
‘‘AM1.xxxx’’ section-numbering
scheme.
The FAA selected and designed the
particular airworthiness criteria
proposed in this notice for the following
reasons:
Aircraft-Level Requirements
The proposed installation
requirements for cockpit voice and
flight data recorders remain unchanged
from the normal category airplane
airworthiness standards in part 23. The
proposed requirement to prepare
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness accounts for the
applicant’s option to install type
certificated engines and propellers or to
seek approval of the engines and
propellers under the aircraft type
certificate.
General
The proposed airworthiness criteria
include new or modified definitions to
explain the unique capabilities and
flight phases of the Archer Model M001
powered-lift and the meaning of certain
terms used in regulations that have been
incorporated by reference. In the event
of a loss of engine power, airplanes and
rotorcraft inherently have the ability to
glide or autorotate, respectively.
Although the aircraft may sustain
damage, the ability to glide or autorotate
allows the aircraft to reasonably protect
the occupants. However, not all
powered-lift have these capabilities. To
address this, the FAA proposes a
definition for ‘‘continued safe flight and
landing,’’ unique for the Archer Model
M001 powered-lift, that modifies
language from the existing definition in
§ 23.2000; the FAA also proposes a new
definition for ‘‘controlled emergency
landing’’ to capture the level of
performance the Archer Model M001
powered-lift must meet, equivalent to a
glide or autorotation.
In addition, because many of the
proposed airworthiness criteria are
performance-based, like the regulations
found in part 23, the FAA has proposed
to adopt § 23.2010 by reference, which
would require that the means of
compliance used to comply with these
proposed airworthiness criteria be
accepted by the Administrator. Because
no powered-lift consensus standards are
currently accepted by the
Administrator, the means of compliance
for the Archer Model M001 powered-lift
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will be accepted through the issue paper
process.2
Flight
Although part 23 replaced
prescriptive design requirements with
performance-based rules that are more
easily adaptable to new and novel
technology, these performance-based
rules were written for conventionally
configured airplanes equipped with
reversible flight controls for fixed-wing
takeoff and landing operations. To
accommodate Archer’s ability to engage
in vertical takeoff and landing
operations, these proposed
airworthiness criteria adopt language
from parts 27 and 29, where
appropriate, with changes to allow for
safe operation of the powered-lift below
the stall speed of the wing. The FAA
developed proposed criteria to address
the integration of alternating sources of
lift: thrust-borne, semi-thrust-borne, and
wing-borne. While the FAA has
experience certifying indirect flightcontrol systems such as fly-by-wire
systems, Archer’s design uses a unique,
integrated flight- and propulsion-control
system that requires new airworthiness
criteria.
In addition, the FAA proposes a new
AM1.2105, which incorporates all of
§ 23.2105 and adds criteria in new
paragraphs (f) and (g). Proposed
AM1.2105(f) and (g) would ensure the
pilot is capable of executing a controlled
emergency landing in the event of a loss
of power or thrust, whether by the
aircraft’s ability to glide or autorotate, or
through an equivalent means that
reasonably protects occupants.
Powerplant
Part 23 (amendment 23–64) addresses
electric propulsion, but only for
conventionally configured airplanes that
use propulsion for forward thrust.
Archer’s new and novel design uses a
distributed propulsion system to
provide forward thrust, lift, and control.
While some of these design features can
be addressed by existing airworthiness
standards in parts 23 and 27, other
features require the development of new
airworthiness criteria. The proposed
airworthiness criteria address the
following unique and novel powerplant
installation features:
• multi-engine isolation in a
distributed propulsion system,
• simplified control of distributed
propulsion,
• integration of a propulsion system
into aircraft flight controls, and
2 See Order 8110.112A, Standardized Procedures
for Usage of Issue Papers and Development of
Equivalent Levels of Safety Memorandums.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
• energy-system crashworthiness
associated with vertical takeoff and
landing capability.
The proposed airworthiness criteria in
AM1.2405 combine engine and
propeller control functions from
§§ 23.2405 and 23.2425, and revise the
application to capture all powerplant
control functions including engine
control, propeller control, and nacelle
rotation. Energy system airworthiness
criteria in proposed AM1.2430 would
include a requirement to address energy
system crashworthiness to capture the
intent of § 27.952 and would delete
requirements specific to liquid fuel
systems. The powerplant fire-protection
airworthiness criteria in proposed
AM1.2440 would replace prescriptive
language from § 23.2440 for designated
fire zones, with generalized fire-zone
language to address all powerplantrelated fire threats. Electric propulsion
systems introduce new fire threats from
high-voltage electrical power and
battery systems. Designated fire zones
assume a kerosene-based fire threat,
which is inconsistent with fire threats
from electric powerplant installations.
These proposed criteria are intended to
allow for safe operation of the poweredlift using an all-electric distributed
propulsion system for thrust-borne,
semi-thrust-borne, and wing-borne
flight.
Structures
The flight and ground loads for
powered-lift are generally comprised of
three types of flight configurations:
vertical, transition, and forward. The
proposed airworthiness criteria are not
taken solely from the forward-flight
requirements of part 23 (for airplanes) or
the vertical-flight requirements of part
27 (for rotorcraft). Powered-lift also rely
on a transitional type of lift, which may
include a combination of forward and
vertical flight loads. The aerodynamic
flow field around the powered-lift
during transitional type of lift can be
considerably different from what is
traditionally observed during forward
and vertical flight. In some flight
configurations, the powered-lift may
experience a combination of forward
and vertical flight loads (forces). In
other configurations, the aircraft may
undergo a completely new type of
aerodynamic flow field, not experienced
during strictly forward or vertical flight.
Traditional existing airworthiness
standards do not adequately represent
the aerodynamic loads, used for
structural design, of a powered-lift.
Therefore, the FAA finds that additional
airworthiness criteria are necessary for
structural design. The FAA created
AM1.2200 and AM1.2225 by revising
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
§§ 23.2200 and 23.2225 to address the
powered-lift structural design envelope.
The FAA created AM1.2240 by revising
§ 23.2240 to remove level 4 airplane
requirements, because the Archer Model
M001 powered-lift is not a level 4
airplane.
In addition, the FAA proposes a new
AM1.2320, which incorporates all of
§ 23.2320 except for § 23.2320(b).
Proposed AM1.2320(b) contains a new
bird strike requirement specific for the
applicant’s design. The FAA recognizes
the threat from bird strikes in the
environment in which these aircraft are
intended to operate is more severe than
the environment that rotorcraft or part
23 fixed-wing aircraft operate in today.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift
has inherent design features and
expected operations that potentially
expose the aircraft to a higher
probability of impact with birds.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift
will operate at altitudes similar to
rotorcraft, and the FAA expects it will
cruise at airspeeds that are the same as
or greater than rotorcraft. However, the
FAA expects the Archer Model M001
powered-lift will spend less time in
hover compared to rotorcraft, increasing
high-speed flight time. The FAA also
recognizes that the Archer Model M001
powered-lift will be much quieter than
conventional helicopter turboshaft
engines and rotors. As a result, birds
will have fewer cues to the existence of
the vehicle due to quiet approach
environments.
All of these factors combined increase
the aircraft’s exposure to birds.
Accordingly, the FAA proposes a more
comprehensive bird strike requirement
for the Archer Model M001 poweredlift. As cited in the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) Rotorcraft
Bird Strike Working Group (RBSWG)
report,3 an analysis of bird strike threats
against rotorcraft showed the median
bird size for birds involved in damaging
strikes was 1.125 kg (2.5 lb). Based on
that research, the FAA proposes a bird
impact size of 1.0 kg (2.2-lb), consistent
with rotorcraft industry testing. The
applicant must perform an evaluation at
the aircraft level to determine what
parts of the aircraft are exposed to
potential bird strikes.
The FAA also proposes a requirement
for bird deterrence devices to reduce the
potential for bird strikes. Research,
testing, and use of bird-deterrence
technology has shown to be effective in
3 ARAC RBSWG Report, Rev. B, May 8, 2019,
page 15, Section ‘‘Bird Mass’’ (ARAC RBSWG
Report), https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/
rulemaking/committees/documents/index.cfm/
document/information?documentID=3964.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77751
reducing bird strikes.4 Alerting birds to
the presence of the aircraft allows birds
to avoid striking the aircraft. Bird
deterrence systems may include, for
example, light technology to aid birds in
detecting and avoiding the aircraft.
Electric Engines
The electric engines proposed for
installation on the Archer Model M001
powered-lift use electric power instead
of air-and-fuel combustion to propel the
aircraft. These electric engines are
designed, manufactured, and controlled
differently than aircraft engines that
operate using aviation fuel. These
engines are built with an electric motor,
a controller, and a high-voltage system
that draws energy from electrical storage
or generating systems. The engines in
the Archer Model M001 powered-lift are
devices that convert electrical energy
into mechanical energy; electric current
flowing through wire coils in the motor
produces a magnetic field that interacts
with magnets on the rotating armature
shaft. The controller is a system that
consists of two main functional
elements: the motor controller and an
electric-power inverter to drive the
motor associated with an electric
engine. The high-voltage system is a
combination of wires, powerconditioning components, and
connectors that couple an energy source
to an electric engine, associated motor,
and a controller.
The technology required to provide
energy through these high-voltage and
high-current electronic components
introduces potential hazards that do not
exist in aircraft engines that operate
using aviation fuel. For example, highvoltage transmission lines,
electromagnetic fields, magnetic
materials, and high-speed electrical
switches form the electric engine’s
physical properties. Operating at these
high power levels also exposes the
electric engines to potential failures,
which could adversely affect safety, and
that are not common to aircraft engines
that operate using aviation fuel.
Propellers
Part 35 contains airworthiness
standards to ensure that uninstalled
propellers meet the minimum level of
safety that the FAA deems acceptable.
Part 35 requirements are appropriate for
propellers that are installed on
conventional airplanes, type certificated
under part 23 or part 25, that have
construction and blade-pitch actuation
methods typically found on such
airplanes.
4 ARAC
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
RBSWG Report, pages 48–50.
20DEP1
77752
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Emerging electric-powered and hybrid
electric-powered aircraft, especially
electric powered-lift that are intended
for ‘‘air taxi’’ type operations in and
near urban areas and capable of vertical
and short takeoff and landing, often
feature propellers designed for both
horizontal thrust and vertical lift. In
addition, propeller blade-pitch
actuation for such aircraft typically is
performed electrically, and is more
extensively integrated into the aircraft’s
propulsion and flight-control system
compared to conventional airplanes
type certificated under part 23 or part
25.
Propellers are integral parts of a
variety of airplane propulsion systems
and, until the advent of electric engines,
have been subjected to the forces of
fossil-fuel-powered reciprocating and
turbine combustion engines. Electric
engines present different considerations
due to the increased torque and
potentially higher revolutions per
minute.
The most basic requirement, for all
conventional part 23 and 25 aircraft as
well as the Archer Model M001
powered-lift, is to reduce the risk of
propeller failure or release of debris to
the occupants and critical aircraft
structures and components to an
acceptable level. Features and
characteristics of propellers must ensure
that they are safe for the certification
application requested.
These proposed airworthiness criteria
would require functional engine
demonstrations, including feathering,
negative torque, negative thrust, and
reverse-thrust operations, as
appropriate, using a representative
propeller. The applicant may conduct
these demonstrations as part of the
endurance and durability
demonstrations.
Applicability
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
These airworthiness criteria,
established under the provisions of
§ 21.17(b), are applicable to the Archer
Model M001 powered-lift. Should
Archer wish to apply these
airworthiness criteria to other poweredlift models, it must submit a new
application for a type certificate.
The Proposed Airworthiness Criteria
The FAA proposes to establish the
following airworthiness criteria for type
certification of the Archer Model M001
powered-lift. The FAA proposes that
compliance with the following criteria
will provide an equivalent level of
safety to existing rules.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
Aircraft–Level Requirements
§ 23.1457
Cockpit voice recorders.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.1459
Flight data recorders.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.1529 Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness
The applicant must prepare
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA), in accordance with
Appendices A, A1, and A2, that are
acceptable to the Administrator. ICA for
the aircraft, engines, and propellers may
be shown in a single aircraft ICA
manual if the engine and propeller
approvals are sought through the aircraft
certification program. Alternatively, the
applicant may provide individual ICA
for the aircraft, engines, and propellers.
The instructions may be incomplete at
the time of type certification if a
program exists to ensure their
completion prior to delivery of the first
aircraft, or issuance of a standard
certificate of airworthiness, whichever
occurs later.
SUBPART A—General
AM1.2000 Applicability and
Definitions
(a) These airworthiness criteria
prescribe airworthiness standards for
the issuance of a type certificate, and
changes to that type certificate, for the
Archer Aviation Inc. Model M001
powered-lift.
(b) For purposes of these
airworthiness criteria, the following
definitions apply:
(1) Continued safe flight and landing
means an aircraft is capable of
continued controlled flight and landing,
possibly using emergency procedures,
without requiring exceptional pilot skill
or strength.
(2) Phases of flight means ground
operations, takeoff, climb, cruise,
descent, approach, hover, and landing.
(3) Source of lift means one of three
sources of lift: thrust-borne, wing-borne,
and semi-thrust-borne. Thrust-borne is
defined as when the powered-lift is
maneuvering in the vertical plane and
lift is predominately from downward
thrust. Wing-borne is defined as when
the powered-lift is maneuvering in the
horizontal plane and lift is
predominately from fixed airfoil
surfaces. Semi-thrust-borne is the
combination of thrust-borne and wingborne, where both forms of lift are
applied.
(4) Loss of power/thrust means a
condition when the aircraft can no
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
longer provide the commanded power
or thrust required for continued safe
flight and landing.
(5) Controlled emergency landing
means the pilot is capable of choosing
the direction and area of touchdown,
and the aircraft is capable of reasonably
protecting occupants. Upon landing,
some damage to the aircraft may be
acceptable.
(c) Terms used in the part 23
provisions that are adopted in these
airworthiness criteria are interpreted as
follows:
‘‘Airplane’’ means ‘‘aircraft.’’
‘‘This part’’ means ‘‘these
airworthiness criteria.’’
§ 23.2010
Accepted means of compliance.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
SUBPART B—Flight Performance
§ 23.2100
Weight and center of gravity.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2105
Performance Data
(a) Unless otherwise prescribed, an
aircraft must meet the performance
requirements of this subpart in still air
and standard atmospheric conditions.
(b) Unless otherwise prescribed, the
applicant must develop the performance
data required by this subpart for the
following conditions:
(1) Airport altitudes from sea level to
10,000 feet (3,048 meters); and
(2) Temperatures above and below
standard day temperature that are
within the range of operating
limitations, if those temperatures could
have a negative effect on performance.
(c) The procedures used for
determining takeoff and landing
performance must be executable
consistently by pilots of average skill in
atmospheric conditions expected to be
encountered in service.
(d) Performance data determined in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section must account for losses due to
atmospheric conditions, cooling needs,
installation losses, downwash
considerations, and other demands on
power sources.
(e) The hovering ceiling, in and out of
ground effect, must be determined over
the ranges of weight, altitude, and
temperature, if applicable.
(f) Continued safe flight and landing
must be possible from any point within
the flight envelope following a critical
loss of thrust not shown to be extremely
improbable.
(g) The aircraft must be capable of a
controlled emergency landing, after loss
of power or thrust, by gliding or
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
autorotation, or an equivalent means, to
mitigate the risk of loss of power or
thrust.
AM1.2110
Minimum Safe Speed
The applicant must determine the
aircraft minimum safe speed for each
flight condition encountered in normal
operations, including applicable sources
of lift and phases of flight, to maintain
controlled safe flight. The minimum
safe speed determination must account
for the most adverse conditions for each
flight configuration.
AM1.2115
Takeoff Performance
(a) The applicant must determine
takeoff performance accounting for
flight envelope and obstacle safety
margins.
(b) The applicant must determine
takeoff performance accounting for any
loss of thrust not shown to be extremely
improbable.
AM1.2120
Climb Requirements
(a) The applicant must demonstrate
minimum climb performance at each
weight, altitude, and ambient
temperature within the operating
limitations using the procedures
published in the flight manual.
(b) The applicant must demonstrate
minimum climb performance
accounting for any loss of thrust not
shown to be extremely improbable.
AM1.2125
Climb Information.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Landing
The applicant must determine the
following, for standard temperatures at
critical combinations of weight and
altitude within the operational limits:
(a) The landing performance,
assuming approach paths applicable to
the aircraft.
(b) The approach, transition if
applicable, and landing speeds,
configurations, and procedures, which
allow a pilot of average skill to land
within the published landing
performance consistently and without
causing damage or injury, and which
allow for a safe transition to the balked
landing conditions of these
airworthiness criteria, accounting for
the minimum safe speed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
AM1.2135
Controllability
(a) The aircraft must be controllable
and maneuverable, without requiring
exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or
strength, within the operating
envelope—
(1) At all loading conditions for which
certification is requested;
(2) During all phases of flight while
using applicable sources of lift;
(3) With likely flight-control or
propulsion-system failure;
(4) During configuration changes;
(5) In all degraded flight-controlsystem operating modes not shown to be
extremely improbable; and
(6) In thrust-borne operation, and
must be able to land safely in wind
velocities from zero to a wind limit
appropriate for the aircraft from any
azimuth angle.
(b) The applicant must determine
critical control parameters, such as
limited-control power margins, and if
applicable, account for those parameters
in developing operating limitations.
(c) It must be possible to make a
smooth change from one flight
condition to another (changes in
configuration, and in source of lift and
phase of flight) without exceeding the
approved flight envelope.
AM1.2140
(a) The applicant must determine
climb performance at each weight,
altitude, and ambient temperature
within the operating limitations using
the procedures published in the flight
manual.
(b) The applicant must determine
climb performance accounting for any
loss of thrust not shown to be extremely
improbable.
AM1.2130
FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS
Trim
(a) The aircraft must maintain lateral
and directional trim without further
force upon, or movement of, the primary
flight controls or corresponding trim
controls by the pilot, or the flightcontrol system, under normal phases of
flight while using applicable sources of
lift in cruise.
(b) The aircraft must maintain
longitudinal trim without further force
upon, or movement of, the primary
flight controls or corresponding trim
controls by the pilot, or the flightcontrol system, under the following
conditions:
(1) Climb.
(2) Level flight.
(3) Descent.
(4) Approach.
(c) Residual control forces must not
fatigue or distract the pilot during
normal operations of the aircraft and
likely abnormal or emergency
operations, including loss of thrust not
shown to be extremely improbable on
multi-engine aircraft.
AM1.2145
Stability
(a) Aircraft not certified for aerobatics
must exhibit stable characteristics in
normal operations and after likely
failures of the flight and propulsion
control system.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77753
(b) No aircraft may exhibit any
divergent longitudinal stability
characteristic so unstable as to increase
the pilot’s workload or otherwise
endanger the aircraft and its occupants.
AM1.2150 Minimum Safe Speed
Flight Characteristics, Minimum Safe
Speed Warning, and Spins.
(a) The aircraft must have controllable
minimum safe speed flight
characteristics in straight flight, turning
flight, and accelerated turning flight
with a clear and distinctive minimum
safe speed warning that provides
sufficient margin to prevent inadvertent
slowing below minimum safe speed.
(b) Aircraft not certified for aerobatics
must not have a tendency to
inadvertently depart controlled flight
from thrust asymmetry after a critical
loss of thrust.
(c) Aircraft certified for aerobatics that
include spins must have controllable
stall characteristics and the ability to
recover within one and one-half
additional turns after initiation of the
first control action from any point in a
spin, not exceeding six turns or any
greater number of turns for which
certification is requested, while
remaining within the operating
limitations of the aircraft.
(d) Spin characteristics in aircraft
certified for aerobatics that includes
spins must recover without exceeding
limitations and may not result in
unrecoverable spins—
(1) With any typical use of the flight
or engine-power controls; or
(2) Due to pilot disorientation or
incapacitation.
§ 23.2155 Ground and water handling
characteristics.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 23.2160 Vibration, buffeting, and highspeed characteristics.
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) through (d) [Not applicable to
Model M001]
AM1.2165 Performance and Flight
Characteristics Requirements for Flight
in Atmospheric Icing Conditions
(a) An applicant who requests
certification for flight in atmospheric
icing conditions must show the
following in the icing conditions for
which certification is requested:
(1) Compliance with each requirement
of this subpart, except those applicable
to spins and any that must be
demonstrated at speeds in excess of—
(i) 250 knots calibrated airspeed
(CAS);
(ii) VMO/MMO or VNE; or
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77754
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(iii) A speed at which the applicant
demonstrates the airframe will be free of
ice accretion.
(2) The means by which minimum
safe speed warning is provided to the
pilot for flight in icing conditions and
non-icing conditions is the same.
(b) The applicant must provide a
means to detect icing conditions for
which certification is not requested and
show the aircraft’s ability to avoid or
exit those icing conditions.
(c) The applicant must develop an
operating limitation to prohibit
intentional flight, including takeoff and
landing, into icing conditions for which
the aircraft is not certified to operate.
SUBPART C—Structures
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AM1.2200
Structural Design Envelope
The applicant must determine the
structural design envelope, which
describes the range and limits of aircraft
design and operational parameters for
which the applicant will show
compliance with the requirements of
this subpart. The applicant must
account for all aircraft design and
operational parameters that affect
structural loads, strength, durability,
and aeroelasticity, including:
(a) Structural design airspeeds,
landing-descent speeds, and any other
airspeed limitation at which the
applicant must show compliance to the
requirements of this subpart. The
structural design airspeeds must—
(1) Be sufficiently greater than the
minimum safe speed of the aircraft to
safeguard against loss of control in
turbulent air; and
(2) Provide sufficient margin for the
establishment of practical operational
limiting airspeeds.
(b) Design maneuvering load factors
not less than those, which service
history shows, may occur within the
structural design envelope.
(c) Inertial properties including
weight, center of gravity, and mass
moments of inertia, accounting for—
(1) Each critical weight from the
aircraft empty weight to the maximum
weight; and
(2) The weight and distribution of
occupants, payload, and fuel.
(d) Characteristics of aircraft control
systems, including range of motion and
tolerances for control surfaces, high lift
devices, or other moveable surfaces.
(e) Each critical altitude up to the
maximum altitude.
(f) Engine-driven lifting-device
rotational speed and ranges, and the
maximum rearward and sideward flight
speeds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
§ 23.2205 Interaction of systems and
structures.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Structural Loads
§ 23.2210
Structural design loads.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2215
Flight load conditions.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2220 Ground and water load
conditions.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2225 Component loading
conditions
The applicant must determine the
structural design loads acting on:
(a) Each engine mount and its
supporting structure such that both are
designed to withstand loads resulting
from—
(1) Powerplant operation combined
with flight gust and maneuver loads;
and
(2) For non-reciprocating
powerplants, sudden powerplant
stoppage.
(b) Each flight control and high-lift
surface, their associated system and
supporting structure resulting from—
(1) The inertia of each surface and
mass balance attachment;
(2) Flight gusts and maneuvers;
(3) Pilot or automated system inputs;
(4) System induced conditions,
including jamming and friction; and
(5) Taxi, takeoff, and landing
operations on the applicable surface,
including downwind taxi and gusts
occurring on the applicable surface.
(c) A pressurized cabin resulting from
the pressurization differential—
(1) From zero up to the maximum
relief pressure combined with gust and
maneuver loads;
(2) From zero up to the maximum
relief pressure combined with ground
and water loads if the aircraft may land
with the cabin pressurized; and
(3) At the maximum relief pressure
multiplied by 1.33, omitting all other
loads.
(d) Engine-driven lifting-device
assemblies, considering loads resulting
from flight and ground conditions, as
well limit input torque at any liftingdevice rotational speed.
§ 23.2230
Limit and ultimate loads.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2240
Structural Durability
(a) The applicant must develop and
implement inspections or other
procedures to prevent structural failures
due to foreseeable causes of strength
degradation, which could result in
serious or fatal injuries, or extended
periods of operation with reduced safety
margins. Each of the inspections or
other procedures developed under this
section must be included in the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of
the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness, required by AM1.1529.
(b) For pressurized aircraft:
(1) The aircraft must be capable of
continued safe flight and landing
following a sudden release of cabin
pressure, including sudden releases
caused by door and window failures.
(2) For aircraft with maximum
operating altitude greater than 41,000
feet, the procedures developed for
compliance with paragraph (a) of this
section must be capable of detecting
damage to the pressurized cabin
structure before the damage could result
in rapid decompression that would
result in serious or fatal injuries.
(c) The aircraft must be designed to
minimize hazards to the aircraft due to
structural damage caused by highenergy fragments from an uncontained
engine or rotating machinery failure.
§ 23.2245
Aeroelasticity.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Design
§ 23.2250 Design and construction
principles.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2255
Protection of structure.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2260
Materials and processes.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2265
Special factors of safety.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Structural Occupant Protection
§ 23.2270
Emergency conditions.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Structural Performance
SUBPART D—Design and
Construction
§ 23.2235
AM1.2300
Structural strength.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Flight-control systems
(a) The applicant must design flightcontrol systems to:
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(1) Operate easily, smoothly, and
positively enough to allow proper
performance of their functions; and
(2) Protect against likely hazards.
(b) The applicant must design trim
systems, if installed, to:
(1) Protect against inadvertent,
incorrect, or abrupt trim operation; and
(2) Provide a means to indicate—
(i) The direction of trim control
movement relative to aircraft motion;
(ii) The trim position with respect to
the trim range;
(iii) The neutral position for lateral
and directional trim; and
(iv) The range for takeoff for all
applicant-requested center of gravity
ranges and configurations.
(c) In addition to paragraph (a) and (b)
of this section, for indirect flight-control
systems:
(1) A means must be provided to
indicate to the flightcrew any significant
changes or degradation to the handling
or operational characteristics of the
aircraft during normal and abnormal
system operation; and
(2) Features that protect the aircraft
against loss of control, structural
damage, or exceeding critical limits
must be designed such that—
(i) The onset characteristics of each
protection feature is smooth and
appropriate for the phase of flight and
type of maneuver;
(ii) There are no adverse flight
characteristics in aircraft response to
flight-control inputs, unsteady
atmospheric conditions, and other likely
conditions, including simultaneous
limiting events; and
(iii) The aircraft is capable of
continued safe flight and landing
following failures not shown to be
extremely improbable throughout the
approved flight envelope and expected
operational conditions.
§ 23.2305
Landing gear systems.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2310 Buoyancy for seaplanes and
amphibians.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Occupant System Design Protection
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 23.2315
exits.
Means of egress and emergency
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001, including the ditching exclusion
in (a)(1)]
AM1.2320 Occupant Physical
Environment.
(a) The applicant must design the
aircraft to:
(1) Allow clear communication
between the flightcrew and passengers;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
(2) Protect the pilot and flight controls
from propellers; and
(3) Protect the occupants from serious
injury due to damage to windshields,
windows, and canopies.
(b) The aircraft must be capable of
continued safe flight and landing after a
bird strike with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird. In
addition, the aircraft design must
include bird deterrence devices to
reduce the potential for bird strikes.
(c) The aircraft must provide each
occupant with air at a breathable
pressure, free of hazardous
concentrations of gases, vapors, and
smoke during normal operations and
likely failures.
(d) If a pressurization system is
installed in the aircraft, it must be
designed to protect against:
(1) Decompression to an unsafe level;
and
(2) Excessive differential pressure.
(e) If an oxygen system is installed in
the aircraft, it must—
(1) Effectively provide oxygen to each
user to prevent the effects of hypoxia;
and
(2) Be free from hazards in itself, in
its method of operation, and its effect
upon other components.
Fire and High Energy Protection
§ 23.2325
Fire protection.
(a)(1), (a)(2), (b) through (d), (f)(1), and
(g) through (h) [Applicable to Model
M001]
(a)(3), (e), and (f)(2) [Not applicable to
Model M001]
AM1.2330 Fire Protection in Fire
Zones and Adjacent Areas.
(a) Flight controls, engine mounts,
and other flight structures within or
adjacent to fire zones must be capable
of withstanding the effects of a fire.
(b) Engines in a fire zone must remain
attached to the aircraft in the event of
a fire.
(c) In fire zones, terminals,
equipment, and electrical cables used
during emergency procedures must
perform their intended function in the
event of a fire.
AM1.2335 Lightning and Static
Electricity Protection.
77755
include each component necessary for
propulsion, which affects propulsion
safety, or provides auxiliary power to
the aircraft.
(b) Each aircraft engine and propeller
must have a type certificate or be
approved under the aircraft type
certificate using standards found in
subparts H and I.
(c) The applicant must construct and
arrange each powerplant installation to
account for—
(1) Likely operating conditions,
including foreign-object threats;
(2) Sufficient clearance of moving
parts to other aircraft parts and their
surroundings;
(3) Likely hazards in operation
including hazards to ground personnel;
and
(4) Vibration and fatigue.
(d) Hazardous accumulations of
fluids, vapors, or gases must be isolated
from the aircraft and personnel
compartments and be safely contained
or discharged.
(e) Powerplant components must
comply with their component
limitations and installation instructions
or be shown not to create a hazard.
AM1.2405
Systems.
Power or Thrust Control
(a) Any power or thrust control
system, reverser system, or powerplant
control system must be designed so no
unsafe condition results during normal
operation of the system.
(b) Any single failure or likely
combination of failures or malfunctions
of a power or thrust control system,
reverser system, or powerplant control
system must not prevent continued safe
flight and landing of the aircraft.
(c) Inadvertent flightcrew operation of
a power or thrust control system,
reverser system, or powerplant control
system must be prevented, or if not
prevented, must not prevent continued
safe flight and landing of the aircraft.
(d) Unless the failure of an automatic
power or thrust control system is
extremely remote, the system must—
(1) Provide a means for the flightcrew
to verify the system is in an operating
condition;
(2) Provide a means for the flightcrew
to override the automatic function; and
(3) Prevent inadvertent deactivation of
the system.
(a) The aircraft must be protected
against catastrophic effects from
lightning.
(b) The aircraft must be protected
against hazardous effects caused by an
accumulation of electrostatic charge.
§ 23.2410 Powerplant installation hazard
assessment.
SUBPART E—Powerplant
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2400
§ 23.2415
Powerplant Installation.
(a) For the purpose of this subpart, the
aircraft powerplant installation must
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Powerplant ice protection.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77756
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
§ 23.2435 Powerplant induction and
exhaust systems.
AM1.2425 Powerplant Operational
Characteristics
(a) Each installed powerplant must
operate without any hazardous
characteristics during normal and
emergency operation within the range of
operating limitations for the aircraft and
the engine.
(b) The design must provide for the
shutdown and restart of the powerplant
in flight within an established
operational envelope.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AM1.2430
Energy Systems
(a) Each energy system must—
(1) Be designed and arranged to
provide independence between multiple
energy-storage and supply systems, so
that failure of any one component in
one system will not result in loss of
energy storage or supply of another
system;
(2) Be designed to prevent
catastrophic events due to lightning
strikes, taking into account direct and
indirect effects on the aircraft where the
exposure to lightning is likely;
(3) Provide the energy necessary to
ensure each powerplant and auxiliary
power unit functions properly in all
likely operating conditions;
(4) Provide the flightcrew with a
means to determine the total useable
energy available and provide
uninterrupted supply of that energy
when the system is correctly operated,
accounting for likely energy
fluctuations;
(5) Provide a means to safely remove
or isolate the energy stored in the
system from the aircraft; and
(6) Be designed to retain energy under
all likely operating conditions and to
minimize hazards to occupants
following an emergency landing or
otherwise survivable impact (crash
landing).
(7) [Reserved]
(b) Each energy-storage system must—
(1) Withstand the loads under likely
operating conditions without failure;
and
(2) Be isolated from personnel
compartments and protected from
hazards due to unintended temperature
influences.
(3) [Reserved]
(4) [Reserved]
(c) Each energy-storage refilling or
recharging system must be designed
to—
(1) Prevent improper refilling or
recharging; and
(2) [Reserved]
(3) Prevent the occurrence of hazard
to the aircraft or to persons during
refilling or recharging.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2440 Powerplant Fire Protection
There must be means to isolate and
mitigate hazards to the aircraft in the
event of a powerplant-system fire or
overheat in operation.
SUBPART F—Equipment
§ 23.2500 Airplane level systems
requirements.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2505
Function and installation.
[Applicable to Model M001]
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2515 Electrical- and ElectronicSystem Lightning Protection
(a) Each electrical or electronic system
that performs a function, the failure of
which would prevent the continued safe
flight and landing of the aircraft, must
be designed and installed such that—
(1) The function at the aircraft level is
not adversely affected during and after
the time the aircraft is exposed to
lightning; and
(2) The system recovers normal
operation of that function in a timely
manner after the aircraft is exposed to
lightning unless the system’s recovery
conflicts with other operational or
functional requirements of the system.
(b) For an aircraft approved for
operation under instrument flight rules
(IFR), each electrical and electronic
system that performs a function, the
failure of which would significantly
reduce the capability of the aircraft or
the ability of the flightcrew to respond
to an adverse operating condition, must
be designed and installed such that the
system recovers normal operation of
that function in a timely manner after
the aircraft is exposed to lightning.
§ 23.2520 High-intensity Radiated Fields
(HIRF) protection.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2525 System power generation,
storage, and distribution.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
External and cockpit lighting.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2535
Safety equipment.
[Applicable to Model M001]
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Flight in Icing Conditions
An applicant who requests
certification for flight in icing
conditions must show the following in
the icing conditions for which
certification is requested:
(a) The ice protection system provides
for safe operation; and
(b) The aircraft design must provide
protection from slowing to less than the
minimum safe speed when the autopilot
is operating.
§ 23.2545
Pressurized systems elements.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 23.2550 Equipment containing highenergy rotors.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 23.2510 Equipment, systems, and
installations.
§ 23.2530
AM1.2540
SUBPART G—Flightcrew Interface and
Other Information
AM1.2600
Flightcrew Interface
(a) The pilot compartment, its
equipment, and its arrangement to
include pilot view, must allow each
pilot to perform their duties for all
sources of lift and phases of flight and
perform any maneuvers within the
operating envelope of the aircraft,
without excessive concentration, skill,
alertness, or fatigue.
(b) The applicant must install flight,
navigation, surveillance, and
powerplant controls and displays, as
needed, so qualified flightcrew can
monitor and perform defined tasks
associated with the intended functions
of systems and equipment, without
excessive concentration, skill, alertness,
or fatigue. The system and equipment
design must minimize flightcrew errors,
which could result in additional
hazards.
§ 23.2605
Installation and operation.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 23.2610 Instrument markings, control
markings, and placards.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2615 Flight, Navigation, and
Powerplant Instruments
(a) Installed systems must provide the
flightcrew member who sets or monitors
parameters for the flight, navigation,
and powerplant, the information
necessary to do so during each source of
lift and phase of flight. This information
must—
(1) Be presented in a manner that the
crewmember can monitor the parameter
and determine trends, as needed, to
operate the aircraft; and
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(2) Include limitations, unless the
limitations cannot be exceeded in all
intended operations.
(b) Indication systems that integrate
the display of flight or powerplant
parameters to operate the aircraft, or are
required by the operating rules of title
14, chapter I, must—
(1) Not inhibit the primary display of
flight or powerplant parameters needed
by any flightcrew member in any
normal mode of operation; and
(2) In combination with other
systems, be designed and installed so
information essential for continued safe
flight and landing will be available to
the flightcrew in a timely manner after
any single failure or probable
combination of failures.
AM1.2620
§ 33.8 Selection of engine power and
thrust ratings.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 33.15
Materials.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 33.17
Fire protection.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model
M001]
AM1.2704
Aircraft Flight Manual
The applicant must provide an
Aircraft Flight Manual that must be
delivered with each aircraft.
(a) The Aircraft Flight Manual must
contain the following information—
(1) Aircraft operating limitations;
(2) Aircraft operating procedures;
(3) Performance information;
(4) Loading information; and
(5) Other information that is necessary
for safe operation because of design,
operating, or handling characteristics.
(b) The portions of the Aircraft Flight
Manual containing the information
specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(4) of this section must be approved
by the FAA in a manner specified by the
Administrator.
SUBPART H—Electric Engine
Requirements
§ 33.5 Instruction manual for installing and
operating the engine.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Fire Protection.
High-voltage electrical wiring
interconnect systems must be protected
against arc faults. Non-protected
electrical wiring interconnects must be
analyzed to show that arc faults do not
cause a hazardous engine effect.
AM1.2705
Durability.
The engine design and construction
must minimize the development of an
unsafe condition of the engine between
maintenance intervals, overhaul
periods, or mandatory actions described
in the applicable ICA.
§ 33.21
Engine cooling.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2706
Engine Cooling
If cooling is required to satisfy the
safety analysis as described in
AM1.2717, the cooling-system
monitoring features and usage must be
documented in the engine installation
manual.
§ 33.23 Mounting attachment and
structure.
§ 33.7 Engine ratings and operating
limitations.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) through (d) [Not applicable to
Model M001]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(c) Cooling fluid grade or
specification.
(d) Power-supply requirements.
(e) Any other ratings or limitations
that are necessary for the safe operation
of the engine.
§ 33.25
Accessory attachments.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2702 Engine Ratings and
Operating Limits
AM1.2709
Ratings and operating limits must be
established and included in the type
certificate data sheet based on:
(a) Shaft power, torque, rotational
speed, and temperature for:
(1) Rated takeoff power;
(2) Rated maximum continuous
power; and
(3) Rated maximum temporary power
and associated time limit.
(b) Duty Cycle and the rating at that
duty cycle. The duty cycle must be
declared in the type certificate data
sheet.
(a) A rotor overspeed must not result
in a burst, rotor growth, or damage that
results in a hazardous engine effect, as
defined in AM1.2717(d)(2). Compliance
with this paragraph must be shown by
test, validated analysis, or a
combination of both. Applicable
assumed rotor speeds must be declared
and justified.
(b) Rotors must possess sufficient
strength with a margin to burst above
certified operating conditions and above
failure conditions leading to rotor
overspeed. The margin to burst must be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Overspeed
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77757
shown by test, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof.
(c) The engine must not exceed the
rotor-speed operational limitations that
could affect rotor structural integrity.
§ 33.28
Engine control systems.
(b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii), and (b)(1)(iv)
[Applicable to Model M001]
(a), (b)(1)(ii), (b)(2) through (m) [Not
applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2710 Engine Control Systems
(a) Applicability.
These requirements apply to any
system or device that is part of the
engine type design that controls, limits,
monitors, or protects engine operation
and is necessary for the continued
airworthiness of the engine.
(b) Engine control.
The engine control system must
ensure the engine does not experience
any unacceptable operating
characteristics or exceed its operating
limits, including in failure conditions
where the fault or failure results in a
change from one control mode to
another, from one channel to another, or
from the primary system to the back-up
system, if applicable.
(c) Design assurance.
The software and complex electronic
hardware, including programmable
logic devices, must be—
(1) Designed and developed using a
structured and systematic approach that
provides a level of assurance for the
logic commensurate with the hazard
associated with the failure or
malfunction of the systems in which the
devices are located; and
(2) Substantiated by a verification
methodology acceptable to the
Administrator.
(d) Validation.
All functional aspects of the control
system must be substantiated by test,
analysis, or a combination thereof, to
show that the engine control system
performs the intended functions
throughout the declared operational
envelope.
(e) Environmental limits.
Environmental limits that cannot be
adequately substantiated by endurance
demonstration, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof must be
demonstrated by the system and
component tests in AM1.2727.
(f) Engine control system failures.
The engine control system must—
(1) Have a maximum rate of Loss of
Power Control (LOPC) that is suitable
for the intended aircraft application;
(2) When in the full-up configuration,
be single fault tolerant, as determined
by the Administrator, for electrical,
electrically detectable, and electronic
failures involving LOPC events;
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
77758
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(3) Not have any single failure that
results in hazardous engine effects; and
(4) Not have any likely failures or
malfunctions that lead to local events in
the intended aircraft application.
(g) System-safety assessment.
The applicant must perform a systemsafety assessment. This assessment must
identify faults or failures that affect
normal operation, together with the
predicted frequency of occurrence of
these faults or failures. The intended
aircraft application must be taken into
account to assure the assessment of the
engine control system safety is valid.
(h) Protection systems.
The engine control devices and
systems’ design and function, together
with engine instruments, operating
instructions, and maintenance
instructions, must ensure that engine
operating limits will not be exceeded inservice.
(i) Aircraft-supplied data.
Any single failure leading to loss,
interruption, or corruption of aircraftsupplied data (other than power
command signals from the aircraft), or
aircraft-supplied data shared between
engine systems within a single engine or
between fully independent engine
systems, must—
(1) Not result in a hazardous engine
effect, as defined in AM1.2717(d)(2), for
any engine installed on the aircraft; and
(2) Be able to be detected and
accommodated by the control system.
(j) Engine control system electrical
power.
(1) The engine control system must be
designed such that the loss,
malfunction, or interruption of the
control system electrical power source
will not result in a hazardous engine
effect, as defined in AM1.2717(d)(2), the
unacceptable transmission of erroneous
data, or continued engine operation in
the absence of the control function. The
engine control system must be capable
of resuming normal operation when
aircraft-supplied power returns to
within the declared limits.
(2) The applicant must identify and
declare, in the engine installation
manual, the characteristics of any
electrical power supplied from the
aircraft to the engine control system for
starting and operating the engine,
including transient and steady-state
voltage limits, or electrical power
supplied from the engine to the aircraft
via energy regeneration, and any other
characteristics necessary for safe
operation of the engine.
§ 33.29
Instrument connection.
(a), (e), and (g) [Applicable to Model
M001]
(b) through (d) and (h) [Not applicable
to the Model M001]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
AM1.2711 Instrument Connection
(a) In addition, as part of the systemsafety assessment of AM1.2710(g) and
AM1.2733(g), the applicant must assess
the possibility and subsequent effect of
incorrect fit of instruments, sensors, or
connectors. Where practicable, the
applicant must take design precautions
to prevent incorrect configuration of the
system.
(b) The applicant must provide
instrumentation enabling the flightcrew
to monitor the functioning of the engine
cooling system unless evidence shows
that:
(1) Other existing instrumentation
provides adequate warning of failure or
impending failure;
(2) Failure of the cooling system
would not lead to hazardous engine
effects before detection; or
(3) The probability of failure of the
cooling system is extremely remote.
applicant must provide to the
Administrator the following three plans
for approval: an engineering plan, a
manufacturing plan, and a servicemanagement plan, as defined in § 33.70.
AM1.2712 Stress Analysis
(a) A mechanical, thermal, and
electromagnetic stress analysis must
show a sufficient design margin to
prevent unacceptable operating
characteristics and hazardous engine
effects.
(b) Maximum stresses in the engine
must be determined by test, validated
analysis, or a combination thereof, and
must be shown not to exceed minimum
material properties.
AM1.2715
AM1.2713 Critical and Life-Limited
Parts
(a) The applicant must show, by a
safety analysis or means acceptable to
the Administrator, whether rotating or
moving components, bearings, shafts,
static parts, and non-redundant mount
components should be classified,
designed, manufactured, and managed
throughout their service life as critical
or life-limited parts.
(1) Critical part means a part that
must meet prescribed integrity
specifications to avoid its primary
failure, which is likely to result in a
hazardous engine effect as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) Life-limited parts may include but
are not limited to a rotor and major
structural static part, the failure of
which can result in a hazardous engine
effect due to low-cycle fatigue (LCF)
mechanism or any LCF-driven
mechanism coupled with creep, or other
failure mode. A life limit is an
operational limitation that specifies the
maximum allowable number of flight
cycles that a part can endure before the
applicant must remove it from the
engine.
(b) In establishing the integrity of each
critical part or life-limited part, the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AM1.2714
Lubrication System
(a) The lubrication system must be
designed and constructed to function
properly between scheduled
maintenance intervals in all flight
attitudes and atmospheric conditions in
which the engine is expected to operate.
(b) The lubrication system must be
designed to prevent contamination of
the engine bearings and lubrication
system components.
(c) The applicant must demonstrate
by test, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof, the unique
lubrication attributes and functional
capability of paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section.
Power Response
The design and construction of the
engine, including its control system,
must enable an increase—
(a) From the minimum power setting
to the highest rated power without
detrimental engine effects;
(b) From the minimum obtainable
power while in flight, and while on the
ground, to the highest rated power
within a time interval determined to be
safe for aircraft operation; and
(c) From the minimum torque to the
highest rated torque without detrimental
engine or aircraft effects, to ensure
aircraft structural integrity or aircraft
aerodynamic characteristics are not
exceeded.
AM1.2716
Continued Rotation
If the design allows any of the engine
main rotating systems to continue to
rotate after the engine is shut down
while in-flight, this continued rotation
must not result in hazardous engine
effects, as specified in AM1.2717(d)(2).
§ 33.75
Safety analysis.
(a)(1) through (a)(2), (d), (e), and (g)(2)
[Applicable to Model M001]
(a)(3) through (c), (f), (g)(1), and (g)(3)
[Not applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2717
Safety Analysis
(a) The applicant must comply with
§ 33.75(a)(2) using the failure definitions
in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) If the failure of such elements is
likely to result in hazardous engine
effects, then the applicant may show
compliance by reliance on the
prescribed integrity requirements such
as § 33.15, AM1.2709, AM1.2713, or
combinations thereof, as applicable. The
failure of such elements and associated
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
prescribed integrity requirements must
be stated in the safety analysis.
(c) The applicant must comply with
§ 33.75(d) and (e) using the failure
definitions in paragraph (d) of this
section.
(d) Unless otherwise approved by the
Administrator, the following definitions
apply to the engine effects when
showing compliance with this
condition:
(1) A minor engine effect does not
prohibit the engine from meeting its
type-design requirements and the
intended functions in a manner
consistent with § 33.28(b)(1)(i),
(b)(1)(iii), and (b)(1)(iv), and the engine
complies with the operability
requirements such as AM1.2715,
AM1.2725, and AM1.2731, as
appropriate.
(2) The engine effects in § 33.75(g)(2)
are hazardous engine effects with the
addition of:
(i) Electrocution of the crew,
passengers, operators, maintainers, or
others; and
(ii) Blockage of cooling systems that
are required for the engine to operate
within temperature limits.
(3) Any other engine effect is a major
engine effect.
(e) The intended aircraft application
must be taken into account to assure
that the analysis of the engine system
safety is valid.
AM1.2718
Ingestion
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(a) Ingestion from likely sources
(foreign objects, birds, ice, hail) must
not result in hazardous engine effects
defined by AM1.2717(d)(2), or
unacceptable power loss.
(b) Rain ingestion must not result in
an abnormal operation such as
shutdown, power loss, erratic operation,
or power oscillations throughout the
engine operating range.
(c) If the design of the engine relies on
features, attachments, or systems that
the installer may supply, for the
prevention of unacceptable power loss
or hazardous engine effects following
potential ingestion, then the features,
attachments, or systems must be
documented in the engine installation
manual.
(d) Ingestion sources that are not
evaluated must be declared in the
engine installation manual.
AM1.2719
Liquid Systems
(a) Each liquid system used for
lubrication or cooling of engine
components must be designed and
constructed to function properly in all
flight attitudes and atmospheric
conditions in which the engine is
expected to operate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
77759
(b) If a liquid system used for
lubrication or cooling of engine
components is not self-contained, the
interfaces to that system must be
defined in the engine installation
manual.
(c) The applicant must establish by
test, validated analysis, or a
combination of both, that all static parts
subject to significant gas or liquid
pressure loads will not:
(1) Exhibit permanent distortion
beyond serviceable limits or exhibit
leakage that could create a hazardous
condition when subjected to normal and
maximum working pressure with
margin.
(2) Exhibit fracture or burst when
subjected to the greater of maximum
possible pressures with margin.
(d) Compliance with paragraph (c) of
this section must take into account:
(1) The operating temperature of the
part;
(2) Any other significant static loads
in addition to pressure loads;
(3) Minimum properties
representative of both the material and
the processes used in the construction
of the part; and
(4) Any adverse physical geometry
conditions allowed by the type design,
such as minimum material and
minimum radii.
(e) Approved coolants and lubricants
must be listed in the engine installation
manual.
operation after operating at the
maximum engine overtorque condition
without maintenance action. Upon
conclusion of overtorque tests
conducted to show compliance with
this subpart, or any other tests that are
conducted in combination with the
overtorque test, each engine part or
individual groups of components must
meet the requirements of AM1.2729.
AM1.2720 Vibration Demonstration
(a) The engine must be designed and
constructed to function throughout its
normal operating range of rotor speeds
and engine output power, including
defined exceedances, without inducing
excessive stress in any of the engine
parts because of vibration and without
imparting excessive vibration forces to
the aircraft structure.
(b) Each engine design must undergo
a vibration survey to establish that the
vibration characteristics of those
components that may be subject to
induced vibration are acceptable
throughout the declared flight envelope
and engine operating range for the
specific installation configuration. The
possible sources of the induced
vibration that the survey must assess are
mechanical, aerodynamic, acoustical, or
electromagnetic. This survey must be
shown by test, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof.
AM1.2724 Temperature Limit
The engine design must demonstrate
its capability to endure operation at its
temperature limits plus an acceptable
margin. The applicant must quantify
and justify to the Administrator the
margin at each rated condition. The
demonstration must be repeated for all
declared duty cycles and associated
ratings, and operating environments,
that would impact temperature limits.
AM1.2721 Overtorque
When approval is sought for a
transient maximum engine overtorque,
the applicant must demonstrate by test,
validated analysis, or a combination
thereof, that the engine can continue
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AM1.2722 Calibration Assurance
Each engine must be subjected to
calibration tests to establish its power
characteristics and the conditions both
before and after the endurance and
durability demonstrations specified in
AM1.2723 and AM1.2726.
AM1.2723 Endurance Demonstration
(a) The applicant must subject the
engine to an endurance demonstration,
acceptable to the Administrator, to
demonstrate the engine’s limit
capabilities.
(b) The endurance demonstration
must include increases and decreases of
the engine’s power settings, energy
regeneration, and dwellings at the
power settings or energy regeneration
for durations that produce the extreme
physical conditions the engine
experiences at rated performance levels,
operational limits, and at any other
conditions or power settings that are
required to verify the limit capabilities
of the engine.
AM1.2725 Operation Demonstration
The engine design must demonstrate
safe operating characteristics, including
but not limited to power cycling,
starting, acceleration, and overspeeding
throughout its declared flight envelope
and operating range. The declared
engine operational characteristics must
account for installation loads and
effects.
AM1.2726 Durability Demonstration
The engine must be subjected to a
durability demonstration to show that
each part of the engine has been
designed and constructed to minimize
any unsafe condition of the system
between overhaul periods or between
engine replacement intervals if the
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77760
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
overhaul is not defined. This test must
simulate the conditions in which the
engine is expected to operate in-service,
including typical start-stop cycles.
AM1.2727
Tests
System and Component
The applicant must show that systems
and components will perform their
intended functions in all declared
environmental and operating
conditions.
AM1.2728 Rotor Locking
Demonstration
If shaft rotation is prevented by
locking the rotor(s), the engine must
demonstrate:
(a) Reliable rotor locking performance;
(b) Reliable unlocking performance;
and
(c) That no hazardous engine effects,
as specified in AM1.2717(d)(2), will
occur.
AM1.2729
Teardown Inspection
The applicant must comply with
either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section
as follows:
(a) Teardown evaluation.
(1) After the endurance and durability
demonstrations have been completed,
the engine must be completely
disassembled. Each engine component
and lubricant must be within service
limits and eligible for continued
operation in accordance with the
information submitted for showing
compliance with AM1.1529.
(2) Each engine component having an
adjustment setting and a functioning
characteristic that can be established
independent of installation on or in the
engine must retain each setting and
functioning characteristic within the
established and recorded limits at the
beginning of the endurance and
durability demonstrations.
(b) Non-Teardown evaluation.
If a teardown is not performed for all
engine components, then the life limits
for these components and lubricants
must be established based on the
endurance and durability
demonstrations and documented in the
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness in accordance with
AM1.1529.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AM1.2730
Containment
The engine must provide containment
features that protect against likely
hazards from rotating components as
follows—
(a) The design of the case surrounding
rotating components must provide for
the containment of the rotating
components in the event of failure,
unless the applicant shows that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
margin to rotor burst precludes the
possibility of a rotor burst.
(b) If the margin to rotor burst shows
that the case must have containment
features in the event of failure, the case
must provide for the containment of the
failed rotating components. The
applicant must define by test, validated
analysis, or a combination thereof, and
document in the engine installation
manual, the energy level, trajectory, and
size of fragments released from damage
caused by the rotor failure, and that pass
forward or aft of the surrounding case.
AM1.2731 Operation With a VariablePitch Propeller
The applicant must conduct
functional demonstrations including
feathering, negative torque, negative
thrust, and reverse thrust operations, as
applicable, with a representative
propeller. These demonstrations may be
conducted in a manner acceptable to the
Administrator as part of the endurance,
durability, and operation
demonstrations.
AM1.2732 General Conduct of Tests
(a) Maintenance of the engine may be
made during the tests in accordance
with the service and maintenance
instructions submitted in compliance
with AM1.1529.
(b) The applicant must subject the
engine or its parts to maintenance and
additional tests that the Administrator
finds necessary if—
(1) The frequency of the service is
excessive;
(2) The number of stops due to engine
malfunction is excessive;
(3) Major repairs are needed; or
(4) Replacement of a part is found
necessary during the tests or due to the
teardown inspection findings.
(c) Upon completion of all
demonstrations and testing specified in
these airworthiness criteria, the engine
and its components must be—
(1) Within serviceable limits;
(2) Safe for continued operation; and
(3) Capable of operating at declared
ratings while remaining within limits.
AM1.2733 Engine Electrical Systems
(a) Applicability.
Any system or device that provides,
uses, conditions, or distributes electrical
power, and is part of the engine type
design, must provide for the continued
airworthiness of the engine and
maintain electric engine ratings.
(b) Electrical systems.
The electrical system must ensure the
safe generation and transmission of
power, electrical load shedding, and the
engine does not experience any
unacceptable operating characteristics
or exceed its operating limits.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(c) Electrical-power distribution.
(1) The engine electrical-power
distribution system must be designed to
provide the safe transfer of electrical
energy throughout the electrical power
plant. The system must be designed to
provide electrical power so that the loss,
malfunction, or interruption of the
electrical power source will not result in
a hazardous engine effect, as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) The system must be designed and
maintained to withstand normal and
abnormal conditions during all ground
and flight operations.
(3) The system must provide
mechanical or automatic means of
isolating a faulted electrical-energy
generation or storage device from
affecting the safe transmission of
electric energy to the electric engine.
(d) Protection systems.
The engine electrical devices and
systems must interrupt transmission of
electrical power when power conditions
exceed design limits.
(1) The engine electrical system must
be designed such that the loss,
malfunction, or interruption of the
electrical power source will not result in
a hazardous engine effect, as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) The applicant must identify and
declare, in the engine installation
manual, the characteristics of any
electrical power supplied from the
aircraft to the engine, or electrical power
supplied to the aircraft from the engine
from energy regeneration, systems for
starting and operating the engine,
including transient and steady-state
voltage limits, and any other
characteristics necessary for safe
operation of the engine.
(e) Environmental limits.
Environmental limits that cannot be
adequately substantiated by endurance
demonstration, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof must be
demonstrated by the system and
component tests in AM1.2727.
(f) Electrical-system failures.
The engine electrical system must—
(1) Have a maximum rate of Loss of
Power Control (LOPC) that is suitable
for the intended aircraft application;
(2) When in the full-up configuration,
be single fault tolerant, as determined
by the Administrator, for electrical,
electrically detectable, and electronic
failures involving LOPC events;
(3) Not have any single failure that
results in hazardous engine effects; and
(4) Not have any likely failure or
malfunction that leads to local events in
the intended aircraft application.
(g) System-safety assessment.
The applicant must perform a systemsafety assessment. This assessment must
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
identify faults or failures that affect
normal operation, together with the
predicted frequency of occurrence of
these faults or failures. The intended
aircraft application must be taken into
account to assure the assessment of the
engine system safety is valid.
SUBPART I—Propeller Requirements
AM1.2805 Propeller Ratings and
Operating Limitations
Propeller ratings and operating
limitations must be established by the
applicant and approved by the
Administrator, including ratings and
limitations based on the operating
conditions and information specified in
this subpart, as applicable, and any
other information found necessary for
safe operation of the propeller.
§ 35.7
Features and characteristics.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AM1.2815
Safety Analysis
(a) The applicant must:
(1) Analyze the propeller system to
assess the likely consequences of all
failures that can reasonably be expected
to occur. This analysis will take into
account, if applicable:
(i) The propeller system when
installed on the aircraft. When the
analysis depends on representative
components, assumed interfaces, or
assumed installed conditions, the
assumptions must be stated in the
analysis.
(ii) Consequential secondary failures
and dormant failures.
(iii) Multiple failures referred to in
paragraph (d) of this section, or that
result in the hazardous propeller effects
defined in paragraph (g)(1) of this
section.
(2) Summarize those failures that
could result in major propeller effects or
hazardous propeller effects defined in
paragraph (g) of this section, and
estimate the probability of occurrence of
those effects.
(3) Show that hazardous propeller
effects are not predicted to occur at a
rate in excess of that defined as
extremely remote (probability of 10¥7 or
less per propeller flight hour). Because
the estimated probability for individual
failures may be insufficiently precise to
enable the applicant to assess the total
rate for hazardous propeller effects,
compliance may be shown by
demonstrating that the probability of a
hazardous propeller effect arising from
an individual failure can be predicted to
be not greater than 10¥8 per propeller
flight hour. In dealing with probabilities
of this low order of magnitude, absolute
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
proof is not possible, and reliance must
be placed on engineering judgment and
previous experience, combined with
sound design and test philosophies.
(b) If significant doubt exists as to the
effects of failures or likely combination
of failures, the Administrator may
require assumptions used in the
analysis to be verified by test.
(c) The primary failures of certain
single propeller elements (for example,
blades) cannot be sensibly estimated in
numerical terms. If the failure of such
elements is likely to result in hazardous
propeller effects, those elements must
be identified as propeller critical parts.
For propeller critical parts, the
applicant must meet the prescribed
integrity specifications of AM1.2816.
These instances must be stated in the
safety analysis.
(d) If reliance is placed on a safety
system to prevent a failure progressing
to hazardous propeller effects, the
possibility of a safety system failure, in
combination with a basic propeller
failure, must be included in the
analysis. Such a safety system may
include safety devices, instrumentation,
early warning devices, maintenance
checks, and other similar equipment or
procedures.
(e) If the safety analysis depends on
one or more of the following items,
those items must be identified in the
analysis and appropriately
substantiated.
(1) Maintenance actions being carried
out at stated intervals. This includes
verifying that items that could fail in a
latent manner are functioning properly.
When necessary to prevent hazardous
propeller effects, these maintenance
actions and intervals must be published
in the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness required under
AM1.1529. Additionally, if errors in
maintenance of the propeller system
could lead to hazardous propeller
effects, the appropriate maintenance
procedures must be included in the
relevant propeller manuals.
(2) Verification of the satisfactory
functioning of safety or other devices at
pre-flight or other stated periods. The
details of this satisfactory functioning
must be published in the appropriate
manual.
(3) The provision of specific
instrumentation not otherwise required.
Such instrumentation must be
published in the appropriate
documentation.
(4) A fatigue assessment.
(f) If applicable, the safety analysis
must include, but not be limited to,
assessment of indicating equipment,
manual and automatic controls,
governors and propeller-control
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77761
systems, synchrophasers, synchronizers,
and propeller thrust reversal systems.
(g) Unless otherwise approved by the
Administrator and stated in the safety
analysis, the following failure
definitions apply to compliance with
these airworthiness criteria.
(1) The following are regarded as
hazardous propeller effects:
(i) The development of excessive drag.
(ii) A significant thrust in the opposite
direction to that commanded by the
pilot.
(iii) The release of the propeller or
any major portion of the propeller.
(iv) A failure that results in excessive
unbalance.
(2) The following are regarded as
major propeller effects for variable-pitch
propellers:
(i) An inability to feather the propeller
for feathering propellers.
(ii) An inability to change propeller
pitch when commanded.
(iii) A significant uncommanded
change in pitch.
(iv) A significant uncontrollable
torque or speed fluctuation.
AM1.2816 Propeller Critical Parts
The integrity of each propeller critical
part identified by the safety analysis
required by AM1.2815 must be
established by:
(a) A defined engineering process for
ensuring the integrity of the propeller
critical part throughout its service life,
(b) A defined manufacturing process
that identifies the requirements to
consistently produce the propeller
critical part as required by the
engineering process, and
(c) A defined service-management
process that identifies the continued
airworthiness requirements of the
propeller critical part as required by the
engineering process.
§ 35.17 Materials and manufacturing
methods.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 35.19
Durability.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2821 Variable- and ReversiblePitch Propellers
(a) No single failure or malfunction in
the propeller system will result in
unintended travel of the propeller
blades to a position below the in-flight
low-pitch position. The extent of any
intended travel below the in-flight lowpitch position must be documented by
the applicant in the appropriate
manuals. Failure of structural elements
need not be considered if the occurrence
of such a failure is shown to be
extremely remote under AM1.2815.
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
77762
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(b) For propellers incorporating a
method to select blade pitch below the
in-flight low-pitch position, provisions
must be made to sense and indicate to
the flightcrew that the propeller blades
are below that position by an amount
defined in the installation instructions.
The method for sensing and indicating
the propeller blade pitch position must
be such that its failure does not affect
the control of the propeller.
§ 35.22
Feathering propellers.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
§ 35.24
Strength.
§ 35.33
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Centrifugal load tests.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 35.36
Bird impact.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 35.37
Fatigue limits and evaluation.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001, except replace the reference to
§ 35.15 with AM1.2815, and the
reference to ‘‘§ 23.2400(c) or § 25.907’’
with AM1.2400(c)]
§ 35.38
Lightning strike.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 35.39
Endurance test.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001, except replace the reference to
‘‘part 33’’ with ‘‘these airworthiness
criteria’’]
AM1.2840
Functional Test
The variable-pitch propeller system
must be subjected to the applicable
functional tests of this section. The
same propeller system used in the
endurance test of § 35.39 must be used
in the functional tests and must be
driven by a representative engine on a
test stand or on the aircraft. The
propeller must complete these tests
without evidence of failure or
malfunction. This test may be combined
with the endurance test for
accumulation of cycles.
(a) Governing and reversible-pitch
propellers. Thirteen-hundred complete
cycles must be made across the range of
forward pitch and rotational speed. In
addition, 200 complete cycles of control
must be made from lowest normal pitch
to maximum reverse pitch. During each
cycle, the propeller must run for 30
seconds at the maximum power and
rotational speed selected by the
applicant for maximum reverse pitch.
(b) Feathering propellers. Fifty cycles
of feather and unfeather operation must
be made.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
§ 35.41
Overspeed and overtorque.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
[Applicable to Model M001]
General.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model
M001]
§ 35.35
(c) An analysis based on tests of
propellers of similar design may be used
in place of the tests of this section.
§ 35.42 Components of the propeller
control system.
[Applicable to Model M001]
§ 35.34 Inspections, adjustments, and
repairs.
AM1.2823 Propeller Control System
The requirements of this section
apply to any system or component that
controls, limits, or monitors propeller
functions.
(a) The propeller control system must
be designed, constructed and validated
to show that:
(1) The propeller control system,
operating in normal and alternative
operating modes and in transition
between operating modes, performs the
functions defined by the applicant
throughout the declared operating
conditions and flight envelope.
(2) The propeller control system
functionality is not adversely affected
by the declared environmental
conditions, including temperature,
electromagnetic interference (EMI), high
intensity radiated fields (HIRF), and
lightning. The environmental limits to
which the system has been satisfactorily
validated must be documented in the
appropriate propeller manuals.
(3) A method is provided to indicate
that an operating mode change has
occurred if flightcrew action is required.
In such an event, operating instructions
must be provided in the appropriate
manuals.
(b) The propeller control system must
be designed and constructed so that, in
addition to compliance with AM1.2815:
(1) No single failure results in a
hazardous propeller effect; and
(2) No likely failures or malfunctions
lead to local events in the intended
aircraft installation.
(c) Electronic propeller-controlsystem embedded software must be
designed and implemented by a method
approved by the Administrator that is
consistent with the criticality of the
performed functions and that minimizes
the existence of software errors.
(d) The propeller control system must
be designed and constructed so that the
failure or corruption of aircraft-supplied
data does not result in hazardous
propeller effects.
(e) The propeller control system must
be designed and constructed so that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
loss, interruption, or abnormal
characteristic of aircraft-supplied
electrical power does not result in
hazardous propeller effects. The power
quality requirements must be described
in the appropriate manuals.
Sfmt 4702
§ 35.43
Propeller hydraulic components.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model
M001]
Appendix A to Part 23—Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness
A23.1 through A23.3(g) and A23.4
[Applicable to Model M001]
A23.3(h) [Not applicable to Model M001]
Appendix A1—Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (Electric
Engine)
AAM1.2701 General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements
for the preparation of Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness for the engines as
required by AM1.1529.
(b) The Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness for the engine must include
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
for all engine parts.
(c) The applicant must submit to the FAA
a program to show how the applicant’s
changes to the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness will be distributed, if
applicable.
A33.2 Format
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
A33.3 Content
(a) and (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
(c) [Not applicable to Model M001]
A33.4 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) [Not applicable to Model M001]
Appendix A2—Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness (Propellers)
AAM1.2801 General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements
for the preparation of Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness for the propellers
as required by AM1.1529.
(b) The Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness for the propeller must include
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
for all propeller parts.
(c) The applicant must submit to the FAA
a program to show how changes to the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
made by the applicant or by the
manufacturers of propeller parts will be
distributed, if applicable.
A35.2 Format
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
A35.3 Content
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 / Proposed Rules
A35.4 Airworthiness Limitations Section
[Applicable to Model M001]
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
12, 2022.
Victor W. Wicklund,
Acting Director, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–27445 Filed 12–19–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1650; Project
Identifier MCAI–2022–00210–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership (Type
Certificate Previously Held by C Series
Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP);
Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership Model BD–500–1A11
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report that the nose
radome lightning diverter strips on
certain aircraft were painted in
production; paint on the diverter strips
can compromise the nose radome
lightning protection. This proposed AD
would require inspecting for paint on
the diverter strips on the nose radome,
and replacing the nose radome if
necessary, as specified in a Transport
Canada AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by February 3,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 19, 2022
Jkt 259001
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2022–1650; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For material that is proposed for
IBR in this NPRM, contact Transport
Canada, Transport Canada National
Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra
Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5,
Canada; telephone 888–663–3639; email
AD-CN@tc.gc.ca; website tc.canada.ca/
en/aviation. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2022–1650.
• For service information identified
in this NPRM, contact Airbus Canada
Limited Partnership, 13100 Henri-Fabre
Boulevard, Mirabel, Que´bec, J7N 3C6,
Canada; telephone 450–476–7676; email
a220lcrc@abc.airbus; website
a220world.airbus.com.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace
Engineer, Avionics and Electrical
Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7367; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2022–1650; Project Identifier
MCAI–2022–00210–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77763
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Steven Dzierzynski,
Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and
Electrical Systems Section, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 516–228–7367; email
9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
Transport Canada, which is the
aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Transport Canada AD CF–2022–
04, dated February 14, 2022 (Transport
Canada AD CF–2022–04) (also referred
to as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus Canada
Limited Partnership Model BD–500–
1A11 airplanes. The MCAI states that
the radome lightning diverter strips on
certain aircraft were painted in
production; paint on the diverter strips
can compromise the radome lightning
protection. Reduced effectiveness of the
diverter strips can lead to the puncture
of the nose radome by lightning and
potential arc attachment to antennas,
structures, and other equipment in the
area of the radome. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result
in damage to the localizer or glideslope
antennas, and consequent loss of
instrument landing system localizer
inputs or deviation information.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products. You may examine the MCAI
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77749-77763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27445]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2022 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 77749]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FAA-2022-1548]
Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for
the Archer Aviation Inc. Model M001 Powered-Lift
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed airworthiness criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA announces the availability of, and requests comments
on, the proposed airworthiness criteria for the Archer Aviation Inc.
(Archer) Model M001 powered-lift. This document proposes airworthiness
criteria the FAA finds to be appropriate and applicable for the
powered-lift design.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments by January 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2022-1548
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Primozich, Center for Emerging
Concepts and Innovation (CECI) Branch, AIR-650, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198-6547;
telephone and fax 206-231-3014; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in the development
of proposed airworthiness criteria for the Archer Model M001 powered-
lift by sending written comments, data, or views. Please identify the
Archer Model M001 and Docket No. FAA-2022-1548 on all submitted
correspondence. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the airworthiness criteria, explain the reason for a recommended
change, and include supporting data.
Except for Confidential Business Information as described in the
following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all comments received, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning these proposed airworthiness criteria. Before
acting on this proposal, the FAA will consider all comments received on
or before the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so without incurring delay. The FAA
may change these airworthiness criteria based on received comments.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552),
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to
this notice contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this notice, it is important that you
clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page
of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat
such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will
not be placed in the public docket of this notice. Submissions
containing CBI should be sent to the individual listed under For
Further Information Contact. Any commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public
docket for this notice.
Background
On March 30, 2022, Archer applied for a type certificate for the
Model M001 powered-lift. The Archer Model M001 powered-lift has a
maximum gross takeoff weight of 6,500 lbs. and is capable of carrying a
pilot and four passengers. The aircraft has a high-wing and V-tail \1\
configuration with fixed tricycle landing gear. The aircraft uses 12
electric engines powered by onboard batteries for propulsion instead of
conventional air and fuel combustion. Six engines with five-bladed
variable-pitch propellers are mounted on the forward edge of the main
wing, three to each side, which are capable of tilting to provide both
vertical and forward thrust. The other six electric engines drive two-
bladed fixed-pitch propellers and are mounted on the aft edge of the
main wing, three to each side; they are fixed in place to provide only
vertical thrust. The aft-mounted engines operate only during thrust-
borne or semi-thrust-
[[Page 77750]]
borne flight; in wing-borne forward flight, these engines are switched
off and the propellers are faired in line with the aircraft fuselage.
The aircraft structure and propellers are constructed of composite
materials. The Archer Model M001 powered-lift is intended to be used
for part 91 and part 135 operations, with a single pilot onboard, under
visual flight rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A V-Tail aircraft design incorporates two slanted tail
surfaces instead of the horizontal and vertical fins of a
conventional aircraft empennage. The two fixed tail surfaces of a V-
Tail act as both horizontal and vertical stabilizers and each has a
moveable flight-control surface referred to as a ruddervator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion
Because the FAA has not yet established powered-lift airworthiness
standards in 14 CFR, the FAA type certificates powered-lift as special
class aircraft. Under the procedures in 14 CFR 21.17(b), the
airworthiness requirements for special class aircraft are the portions
of the requirements in 14 CFR parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, and 35
found by the FAA to be appropriate and applicable to the specific type
design and any other airworthiness criteria found by the FAA to provide
an equivalent level of safety to the existing standards. This notice
announces the applicable regulations and other airworthiness criteria
developed, under Sec. 21.17(b), for type certification of the Archer
Model M001 powered-lift.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift has characteristics of both a
rotorcraft and an airplane. It is designed to function as a helicopter
for takeoff and landing and as an airplane cruising at higher speeds
than a helicopter during the en-route portion of flight operations.
Accordingly, the Archer Model M001 powered-lift proposed airworthiness
criteria contain standards from parts 23, 33, and 35 as well as other
proposed airworthiness criteria specific for a powered-lift with
electric engines.
For the existing regulations that are included without
modification, these proposed airworthiness criteria include all
amendments to the existing part 23, 33, and 35 airworthiness standards
in effect as of the application date of March 30, 2022. These are part
23, amendment 23-64, part 33, amendment 33-34, and part 35, amendment
35-10.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift proposed airworthiness criteria
also include new performance-based criteria consisting of part 23
standards at amendment 23-64, modified as necessary to capture the
powered-lift's transitional flight modes. The FAA developed these
criteria because no existing standard captures the powered-lift's
transitional flight modes. The proposed criteria also contain
definitions specific for a powered-lift, such as flight modes,
configurations, speeds, and terminology. Additionally, electric-engine
and related propeller airworthiness criteria are proposed. The new
requirements specific to the Archer Model M001 powered-lift use an
``AM1.xxxx'' section-numbering scheme.
The FAA selected and designed the particular airworthiness criteria
proposed in this notice for the following reasons:
Aircraft-Level Requirements
The proposed installation requirements for cockpit voice and flight
data recorders remain unchanged from the normal category airplane
airworthiness standards in part 23. The proposed requirement to prepare
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness accounts for the applicant's
option to install type certificated engines and propellers or to seek
approval of the engines and propellers under the aircraft type
certificate.
General
The proposed airworthiness criteria include new or modified
definitions to explain the unique capabilities and flight phases of the
Archer Model M001 powered-lift and the meaning of certain terms used in
regulations that have been incorporated by reference. In the event of a
loss of engine power, airplanes and rotorcraft inherently have the
ability to glide or autorotate, respectively. Although the aircraft may
sustain damage, the ability to glide or autorotate allows the aircraft
to reasonably protect the occupants. However, not all powered-lift have
these capabilities. To address this, the FAA proposes a definition for
``continued safe flight and landing,'' unique for the Archer Model M001
powered-lift, that modifies language from the existing definition in
Sec. 23.2000; the FAA also proposes a new definition for ``controlled
emergency landing'' to capture the level of performance the Archer
Model M001 powered-lift must meet, equivalent to a glide or
autorotation.
In addition, because many of the proposed airworthiness criteria
are performance-based, like the regulations found in part 23, the FAA
has proposed to adopt Sec. 23.2010 by reference, which would require
that the means of compliance used to comply with these proposed
airworthiness criteria be accepted by the Administrator. Because no
powered-lift consensus standards are currently accepted by the
Administrator, the means of compliance for the Archer Model M001
powered-lift will be accepted through the issue paper process.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Order 8110.112A, Standardized Procedures for Usage of
Issue Papers and Development of Equivalent Levels of Safety
Memorandums.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flight
Although part 23 replaced prescriptive design requirements with
performance-based rules that are more easily adaptable to new and novel
technology, these performance-based rules were written for
conventionally configured airplanes equipped with reversible flight
controls for fixed-wing takeoff and landing operations. To accommodate
Archer's ability to engage in vertical takeoff and landing operations,
these proposed airworthiness criteria adopt language from parts 27 and
29, where appropriate, with changes to allow for safe operation of the
powered-lift below the stall speed of the wing. The FAA developed
proposed criteria to address the integration of alternating sources of
lift: thrust-borne, semi-thrust-borne, and wing-borne. While the FAA
has experience certifying indirect flight-control systems such as fly-
by-wire systems, Archer's design uses a unique, integrated flight- and
propulsion-control system that requires new airworthiness criteria.
In addition, the FAA proposes a new AM1.2105, which incorporates
all of Sec. 23.2105 and adds criteria in new paragraphs (f) and (g).
Proposed AM1.2105(f) and (g) would ensure the pilot is capable of
executing a controlled emergency landing in the event of a loss of
power or thrust, whether by the aircraft's ability to glide or
autorotate, or through an equivalent means that reasonably protects
occupants.
Powerplant
Part 23 (amendment 23-64) addresses electric propulsion, but only
for conventionally configured airplanes that use propulsion for forward
thrust. Archer's new and novel design uses a distributed propulsion
system to provide forward thrust, lift, and control. While some of
these design features can be addressed by existing airworthiness
standards in parts 23 and 27, other features require the development of
new airworthiness criteria. The proposed airworthiness criteria address
the following unique and novel powerplant installation features:
multi-engine isolation in a distributed propulsion system,
simplified control of distributed propulsion,
integration of a propulsion system into aircraft flight
controls, and
[[Page 77751]]
energy-system crashworthiness associated with vertical
takeoff and landing capability.
The proposed airworthiness criteria in AM1.2405 combine engine and
propeller control functions from Sec. Sec. 23.2405 and 23.2425, and
revise the application to capture all powerplant control functions
including engine control, propeller control, and nacelle rotation.
Energy system airworthiness criteria in proposed AM1.2430 would include
a requirement to address energy system crashworthiness to capture the
intent of Sec. 27.952 and would delete requirements specific to liquid
fuel systems. The powerplant fire-protection airworthiness criteria in
proposed AM1.2440 would replace prescriptive language from Sec.
23.2440 for designated fire zones, with generalized fire-zone language
to address all powerplant-related fire threats. Electric propulsion
systems introduce new fire threats from high-voltage electrical power
and battery systems. Designated fire zones assume a kerosene-based fire
threat, which is inconsistent with fire threats from electric
powerplant installations. These proposed criteria are intended to allow
for safe operation of the powered-lift using an all-electric
distributed propulsion system for thrust-borne, semi-thrust-borne, and
wing-borne flight.
Structures
The flight and ground loads for powered-lift are generally
comprised of three types of flight configurations: vertical,
transition, and forward. The proposed airworthiness criteria are not
taken solely from the forward-flight requirements of part 23 (for
airplanes) or the vertical-flight requirements of part 27 (for
rotorcraft). Powered-lift also rely on a transitional type of lift,
which may include a combination of forward and vertical flight loads.
The aerodynamic flow field around the powered-lift during transitional
type of lift can be considerably different from what is traditionally
observed during forward and vertical flight. In some flight
configurations, the powered-lift may experience a combination of
forward and vertical flight loads (forces). In other configurations,
the aircraft may undergo a completely new type of aerodynamic flow
field, not experienced during strictly forward or vertical flight.
Traditional existing airworthiness standards do not adequately
represent the aerodynamic loads, used for structural design, of a
powered-lift. Therefore, the FAA finds that additional airworthiness
criteria are necessary for structural design. The FAA created AM1.2200
and AM1.2225 by revising Sec. Sec. 23.2200 and 23.2225 to address the
powered-lift structural design envelope. The FAA created AM1.2240 by
revising Sec. 23.2240 to remove level 4 airplane requirements, because
the Archer Model M001 powered-lift is not a level 4 airplane.
In addition, the FAA proposes a new AM1.2320, which incorporates
all of Sec. 23.2320 except for Sec. 23.2320(b). Proposed AM1.2320(b)
contains a new bird strike requirement specific for the applicant's
design. The FAA recognizes the threat from bird strikes in the
environment in which these aircraft are intended to operate is more
severe than the environment that rotorcraft or part 23 fixed-wing
aircraft operate in today. The Archer Model M001 powered-lift has
inherent design features and expected operations that potentially
expose the aircraft to a higher probability of impact with birds.
The Archer Model M001 powered-lift will operate at altitudes
similar to rotorcraft, and the FAA expects it will cruise at airspeeds
that are the same as or greater than rotorcraft. However, the FAA
expects the Archer Model M001 powered-lift will spend less time in
hover compared to rotorcraft, increasing high-speed flight time. The
FAA also recognizes that the Archer Model M001 powered-lift will be
much quieter than conventional helicopter turboshaft engines and
rotors. As a result, birds will have fewer cues to the existence of the
vehicle due to quiet approach environments.
All of these factors combined increase the aircraft's exposure to
birds. Accordingly, the FAA proposes a more comprehensive bird strike
requirement for the Archer Model M001 powered-lift. As cited in the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Rotorcraft Bird Strike
Working Group (RBSWG) report,\3\ an analysis of bird strike threats
against rotorcraft showed the median bird size for birds involved in
damaging strikes was 1.125 kg (2.5 lb). Based on that research, the FAA
proposes a bird impact size of 1.0 kg (2.2-lb), consistent with
rotorcraft industry testing. The applicant must perform an evaluation
at the aircraft level to determine what parts of the aircraft are
exposed to potential bird strikes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ARAC RBSWG Report, Rev. B, May 8, 2019, page 15, Section
``Bird Mass'' (ARAC RBSWG Report), https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/index.cfm/document/information?documentID=3964.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA also proposes a requirement for bird deterrence devices to
reduce the potential for bird strikes. Research, testing, and use of
bird-deterrence technology has shown to be effective in reducing bird
strikes.\4\ Alerting birds to the presence of the aircraft allows birds
to avoid striking the aircraft. Bird deterrence systems may include,
for example, light technology to aid birds in detecting and avoiding
the aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ARAC RBSWG Report, pages 48-50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric Engines
The electric engines proposed for installation on the Archer Model
M001 powered-lift use electric power instead of air-and-fuel combustion
to propel the aircraft. These electric engines are designed,
manufactured, and controlled differently than aircraft engines that
operate using aviation fuel. These engines are built with an electric
motor, a controller, and a high-voltage system that draws energy from
electrical storage or generating systems. The engines in the Archer
Model M001 powered-lift are devices that convert electrical energy into
mechanical energy; electric current flowing through wire coils in the
motor produces a magnetic field that interacts with magnets on the
rotating armature shaft. The controller is a system that consists of
two main functional elements: the motor controller and an electric-
power inverter to drive the motor associated with an electric engine.
The high-voltage system is a combination of wires, power-conditioning
components, and connectors that couple an energy source to an electric
engine, associated motor, and a controller.
The technology required to provide energy through these high-
voltage and high-current electronic components introduces potential
hazards that do not exist in aircraft engines that operate using
aviation fuel. For example, high-voltage transmission lines,
electromagnetic fields, magnetic materials, and high-speed electrical
switches form the electric engine's physical properties. Operating at
these high power levels also exposes the electric engines to potential
failures, which could adversely affect safety, and that are not common
to aircraft engines that operate using aviation fuel.
Propellers
Part 35 contains airworthiness standards to ensure that uninstalled
propellers meet the minimum level of safety that the FAA deems
acceptable. Part 35 requirements are appropriate for propellers that
are installed on conventional airplanes, type certificated under part
23 or part 25, that have construction and blade-pitch actuation methods
typically found on such airplanes.
[[Page 77752]]
Emerging electric-powered and hybrid electric-powered aircraft,
especially electric powered-lift that are intended for ``air taxi''
type operations in and near urban areas and capable of vertical and
short takeoff and landing, often feature propellers designed for both
horizontal thrust and vertical lift. In addition, propeller blade-pitch
actuation for such aircraft typically is performed electrically, and is
more extensively integrated into the aircraft's propulsion and flight-
control system compared to conventional airplanes type certificated
under part 23 or part 25.
Propellers are integral parts of a variety of airplane propulsion
systems and, until the advent of electric engines, have been subjected
to the forces of fossil-fuel-powered reciprocating and turbine
combustion engines. Electric engines present different considerations
due to the increased torque and potentially higher revolutions per
minute.
The most basic requirement, for all conventional part 23 and 25
aircraft as well as the Archer Model M001 powered-lift, is to reduce
the risk of propeller failure or release of debris to the occupants and
critical aircraft structures and components to an acceptable level.
Features and characteristics of propellers must ensure that they are
safe for the certification application requested.
These proposed airworthiness criteria would require functional
engine demonstrations, including feathering, negative torque, negative
thrust, and reverse-thrust operations, as appropriate, using a
representative propeller. The applicant may conduct these
demonstrations as part of the endurance and durability demonstrations.
Applicability
These airworthiness criteria, established under the provisions of
Sec. 21.17(b), are applicable to the Archer Model M001 powered-lift.
Should Archer wish to apply these airworthiness criteria to other
powered-lift models, it must submit a new application for a type
certificate.
The Proposed Airworthiness Criteria
The FAA proposes to establish the following airworthiness criteria
for type certification of the Archer Model M001 powered-lift. The FAA
proposes that compliance with the following criteria will provide an
equivalent level of safety to existing rules.
Aircraft-Level Requirements
Sec. 23.1457 Cockpit voice recorders.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.1459 Flight data recorders.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.1529 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
(ICA), in accordance with Appendices A, A1, and A2, that are acceptable
to the Administrator. ICA for the aircraft, engines, and propellers may
be shown in a single aircraft ICA manual if the engine and propeller
approvals are sought through the aircraft certification program.
Alternatively, the applicant may provide individual ICA for the
aircraft, engines, and propellers. The instructions may be incomplete
at the time of type certification if a program exists to ensure their
completion prior to delivery of the first aircraft, or issuance of a
standard certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs later.
SUBPART A--General
AM1.2000 Applicability and Definitions
(a) These airworthiness criteria prescribe airworthiness standards
for the issuance of a type certificate, and changes to that type
certificate, for the Archer Aviation Inc. Model M001 powered-lift.
(b) For purposes of these airworthiness criteria, the following
definitions apply:
(1) Continued safe flight and landing means an aircraft is capable
of continued controlled flight and landing, possibly using emergency
procedures, without requiring exceptional pilot skill or strength.
(2) Phases of flight means ground operations, takeoff, climb,
cruise, descent, approach, hover, and landing.
(3) Source of lift means one of three sources of lift: thrust-
borne, wing-borne, and semi-thrust-borne. Thrust-borne is defined as
when the powered-lift is maneuvering in the vertical plane and lift is
predominately from downward thrust. Wing-borne is defined as when the
powered-lift is maneuvering in the horizontal plane and lift is
predominately from fixed airfoil surfaces. Semi-thrust-borne is the
combination of thrust-borne and wing-borne, where both forms of lift
are applied.
(4) Loss of power/thrust means a condition when the aircraft can no
longer provide the commanded power or thrust required for continued
safe flight and landing.
(5) Controlled emergency landing means the pilot is capable of
choosing the direction and area of touchdown, and the aircraft is
capable of reasonably protecting occupants. Upon landing, some damage
to the aircraft may be acceptable.
(c) Terms used in the part 23 provisions that are adopted in these
airworthiness criteria are interpreted as follows:
``Airplane'' means ``aircraft.''
``This part'' means ``these airworthiness criteria.''
Sec. 23.2010 Accepted means of compliance.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
SUBPART B--Flight Performance
Sec. 23.2100 Weight and center of gravity.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2105 Performance Data
(a) Unless otherwise prescribed, an aircraft must meet the
performance requirements of this subpart in still air and standard
atmospheric conditions.
(b) Unless otherwise prescribed, the applicant must develop the
performance data required by this subpart for the following conditions:
(1) Airport altitudes from sea level to 10,000 feet (3,048 meters);
and
(2) Temperatures above and below standard day temperature that are
within the range of operating limitations, if those temperatures could
have a negative effect on performance.
(c) The procedures used for determining takeoff and landing
performance must be executable consistently by pilots of average skill
in atmospheric conditions expected to be encountered in service.
(d) Performance data determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this section must account for losses due to atmospheric conditions,
cooling needs, installation losses, downwash considerations, and other
demands on power sources.
(e) The hovering ceiling, in and out of ground effect, must be
determined over the ranges of weight, altitude, and temperature, if
applicable.
(f) Continued safe flight and landing must be possible from any
point within the flight envelope following a critical loss of thrust
not shown to be extremely improbable.
(g) The aircraft must be capable of a controlled emergency landing,
after loss of power or thrust, by gliding or
[[Page 77753]]
autorotation, or an equivalent means, to mitigate the risk of loss of
power or thrust.
AM1.2110 Minimum Safe Speed
The applicant must determine the aircraft minimum safe speed for
each flight condition encountered in normal operations, including
applicable sources of lift and phases of flight, to maintain controlled
safe flight. The minimum safe speed determination must account for the
most adverse conditions for each flight configuration.
AM1.2115 Takeoff Performance
(a) The applicant must determine takeoff performance accounting for
flight envelope and obstacle safety margins.
(b) The applicant must determine takeoff performance accounting for
any loss of thrust not shown to be extremely improbable.
AM1.2120 Climb Requirements
(a) The applicant must demonstrate minimum climb performance at
each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature within the operating
limitations using the procedures published in the flight manual.
(b) The applicant must demonstrate minimum climb performance
accounting for any loss of thrust not shown to be extremely improbable.
AM1.2125 Climb Information.
(a) The applicant must determine climb performance at each weight,
altitude, and ambient temperature within the operating limitations
using the procedures published in the flight manual.
(b) The applicant must determine climb performance accounting for
any loss of thrust not shown to be extremely improbable.
AM1.2130 Landing
The applicant must determine the following, for standard
temperatures at critical combinations of weight and altitude within the
operational limits:
(a) The landing performance, assuming approach paths applicable to
the aircraft.
(b) The approach, transition if applicable, and landing speeds,
configurations, and procedures, which allow a pilot of average skill to
land within the published landing performance consistently and without
causing damage or injury, and which allow for a safe transition to the
balked landing conditions of these airworthiness criteria, accounting
for the minimum safe speed.
FLIGHT CHARACTERISTICS
AM1.2135 Controllability
(a) The aircraft must be controllable and maneuverable, without
requiring exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, within
the operating envelope--
(1) At all loading conditions for which certification is requested;
(2) During all phases of flight while using applicable sources of
lift;
(3) With likely flight-control or propulsion-system failure;
(4) During configuration changes;
(5) In all degraded flight-control-system operating modes not shown
to be extremely improbable; and
(6) In thrust-borne operation, and must be able to land safely in
wind velocities from zero to a wind limit appropriate for the aircraft
from any azimuth angle.
(b) The applicant must determine critical control parameters, such
as limited-control power margins, and if applicable, account for those
parameters in developing operating limitations.
(c) It must be possible to make a smooth change from one flight
condition to another (changes in configuration, and in source of lift
and phase of flight) without exceeding the approved flight envelope.
AM1.2140 Trim
(a) The aircraft must maintain lateral and directional trim without
further force upon, or movement of, the primary flight controls or
corresponding trim controls by the pilot, or the flight-control system,
under normal phases of flight while using applicable sources of lift in
cruise.
(b) The aircraft must maintain longitudinal trim without further
force upon, or movement of, the primary flight controls or
corresponding trim controls by the pilot, or the flight-control system,
under the following conditions:
(1) Climb.
(2) Level flight.
(3) Descent.
(4) Approach.
(c) Residual control forces must not fatigue or distract the pilot
during normal operations of the aircraft and likely abnormal or
emergency operations, including loss of thrust not shown to be
extremely improbable on multi-engine aircraft.
AM1.2145 Stability
(a) Aircraft not certified for aerobatics must exhibit stable
characteristics in normal operations and after likely failures of the
flight and propulsion control system.
(b) No aircraft may exhibit any divergent longitudinal stability
characteristic so unstable as to increase the pilot's workload or
otherwise endanger the aircraft and its occupants.
AM1.2150 Minimum Safe Speed Flight Characteristics, Minimum Safe Speed
Warning, and Spins.
(a) The aircraft must have controllable minimum safe speed flight
characteristics in straight flight, turning flight, and accelerated
turning flight with a clear and distinctive minimum safe speed warning
that provides sufficient margin to prevent inadvertent slowing below
minimum safe speed.
(b) Aircraft not certified for aerobatics must not have a tendency
to inadvertently depart controlled flight from thrust asymmetry after a
critical loss of thrust.
(c) Aircraft certified for aerobatics that include spins must have
controllable stall characteristics and the ability to recover within
one and one-half additional turns after initiation of the first control
action from any point in a spin, not exceeding six turns or any greater
number of turns for which certification is requested, while remaining
within the operating limitations of the aircraft.
(d) Spin characteristics in aircraft certified for aerobatics that
includes spins must recover without exceeding limitations and may not
result in unrecoverable spins--
(1) With any typical use of the flight or engine-power controls; or
(2) Due to pilot disorientation or incapacitation.
Sec. 23.2155 Ground and water handling characteristics.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2160 Vibration, buffeting, and high-speed characteristics.
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) through (d) [Not applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2165 Performance and Flight Characteristics Requirements for Flight
in Atmospheric Icing Conditions
(a) An applicant who requests certification for flight in
atmospheric icing conditions must show the following in the icing
conditions for which certification is requested:
(1) Compliance with each requirement of this subpart, except those
applicable to spins and any that must be demonstrated at speeds in
excess of--
(i) 250 knots calibrated airspeed (CAS);
(ii) VMO/MMO or VNE; or
[[Page 77754]]
(iii) A speed at which the applicant demonstrates the airframe will
be free of ice accretion.
(2) The means by which minimum safe speed warning is provided to
the pilot for flight in icing conditions and non-icing conditions is
the same.
(b) The applicant must provide a means to detect icing conditions
for which certification is not requested and show the aircraft's
ability to avoid or exit those icing conditions.
(c) The applicant must develop an operating limitation to prohibit
intentional flight, including takeoff and landing, into icing
conditions for which the aircraft is not certified to operate.
SUBPART C--Structures
AM1.2200 Structural Design Envelope
The applicant must determine the structural design envelope, which
describes the range and limits of aircraft design and operational
parameters for which the applicant will show compliance with the
requirements of this subpart. The applicant must account for all
aircraft design and operational parameters that affect structural
loads, strength, durability, and aeroelasticity, including:
(a) Structural design airspeeds, landing-descent speeds, and any
other airspeed limitation at which the applicant must show compliance
to the requirements of this subpart. The structural design airspeeds
must--
(1) Be sufficiently greater than the minimum safe speed of the
aircraft to safeguard against loss of control in turbulent air; and
(2) Provide sufficient margin for the establishment of practical
operational limiting airspeeds.
(b) Design maneuvering load factors not less than those, which
service history shows, may occur within the structural design envelope.
(c) Inertial properties including weight, center of gravity, and
mass moments of inertia, accounting for--
(1) Each critical weight from the aircraft empty weight to the
maximum weight; and
(2) The weight and distribution of occupants, payload, and fuel.
(d) Characteristics of aircraft control systems, including range of
motion and tolerances for control surfaces, high lift devices, or other
moveable surfaces.
(e) Each critical altitude up to the maximum altitude.
(f) Engine-driven lifting-device rotational speed and ranges, and
the maximum rearward and sideward flight speeds.
Sec. 23.2205 Interaction of systems and structures.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Structural Loads
Sec. 23.2210 Structural design loads.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2215 Flight load conditions.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2220 Ground and water load conditions.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2225 Component loading conditions
The applicant must determine the structural design loads acting on:
(a) Each engine mount and its supporting structure such that both
are designed to withstand loads resulting from--
(1) Powerplant operation combined with flight gust and maneuver
loads; and
(2) For non-reciprocating powerplants, sudden powerplant stoppage.
(b) Each flight control and high-lift surface, their associated
system and supporting structure resulting from--
(1) The inertia of each surface and mass balance attachment;
(2) Flight gusts and maneuvers;
(3) Pilot or automated system inputs;
(4) System induced conditions, including jamming and friction; and
(5) Taxi, takeoff, and landing operations on the applicable
surface, including downwind taxi and gusts occurring on the applicable
surface.
(c) A pressurized cabin resulting from the pressurization
differential--
(1) From zero up to the maximum relief pressure combined with gust
and maneuver loads;
(2) From zero up to the maximum relief pressure combined with
ground and water loads if the aircraft may land with the cabin
pressurized; and
(3) At the maximum relief pressure multiplied by 1.33, omitting all
other loads.
(d) Engine-driven lifting-device assemblies, considering loads
resulting from flight and ground conditions, as well limit input torque
at any lifting-device rotational speed.
Sec. 23.2230 Limit and ultimate loads.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Structural Performance
Sec. 23.2235 Structural strength.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2240 Structural Durability
(a) The applicant must develop and implement inspections or other
procedures to prevent structural failures due to foreseeable causes of
strength degradation, which could result in serious or fatal injuries,
or extended periods of operation with reduced safety margins. Each of
the inspections or other procedures developed under this section must
be included in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, required by AM1.1529.
(b) For pressurized aircraft:
(1) The aircraft must be capable of continued safe flight and
landing following a sudden release of cabin pressure, including sudden
releases caused by door and window failures.
(2) For aircraft with maximum operating altitude greater than
41,000 feet, the procedures developed for compliance with paragraph (a)
of this section must be capable of detecting damage to the pressurized
cabin structure before the damage could result in rapid decompression
that would result in serious or fatal injuries.
(c) The aircraft must be designed to minimize hazards to the
aircraft due to structural damage caused by high-energy fragments from
an uncontained engine or rotating machinery failure.
Sec. 23.2245 Aeroelasticity.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Design
Sec. 23.2250 Design and construction principles.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2255 Protection of structure.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2260 Materials and processes.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2265 Special factors of safety.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Structural Occupant Protection
Sec. 23.2270 Emergency conditions.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model M001]
SUBPART D--Design and Construction
AM1.2300 Flight-control systems
(a) The applicant must design flight-control systems to:
[[Page 77755]]
(1) Operate easily, smoothly, and positively enough to allow proper
performance of their functions; and
(2) Protect against likely hazards.
(b) The applicant must design trim systems, if installed, to:
(1) Protect against inadvertent, incorrect, or abrupt trim
operation; and
(2) Provide a means to indicate--
(i) The direction of trim control movement relative to aircraft
motion;
(ii) The trim position with respect to the trim range;
(iii) The neutral position for lateral and directional trim; and
(iv) The range for takeoff for all applicant-requested center of
gravity ranges and configurations.
(c) In addition to paragraph (a) and (b) of this section, for
indirect flight-control systems:
(1) A means must be provided to indicate to the flightcrew any
significant changes or degradation to the handling or operational
characteristics of the aircraft during normal and abnormal system
operation; and
(2) Features that protect the aircraft against loss of control,
structural damage, or exceeding critical limits must be designed such
that--
(i) The onset characteristics of each protection feature is smooth
and appropriate for the phase of flight and type of maneuver;
(ii) There are no adverse flight characteristics in aircraft
response to flight-control inputs, unsteady atmospheric conditions, and
other likely conditions, including simultaneous limiting events; and
(iii) The aircraft is capable of continued safe flight and landing
following failures not shown to be extremely improbable throughout the
approved flight envelope and expected operational conditions.
Sec. 23.2305 Landing gear systems.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2310 Buoyancy for seaplanes and amphibians.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Occupant System Design Protection
Sec. 23.2315 Means of egress and emergency exits.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001, including the ditching
exclusion in (a)(1)]
AM1.2320 Occupant Physical Environment.
(a) The applicant must design the aircraft to:
(1) Allow clear communication between the flightcrew and
passengers;
(2) Protect the pilot and flight controls from propellers; and
(3) Protect the occupants from serious injury due to damage to
windshields, windows, and canopies.
(b) The aircraft must be capable of continued safe flight and
landing after a bird strike with a 2.2-lb (1.0 kg) bird. In addition,
the aircraft design must include bird deterrence devices to reduce the
potential for bird strikes.
(c) The aircraft must provide each occupant with air at a
breathable pressure, free of hazardous concentrations of gases, vapors,
and smoke during normal operations and likely failures.
(d) If a pressurization system is installed in the aircraft, it
must be designed to protect against:
(1) Decompression to an unsafe level; and
(2) Excessive differential pressure.
(e) If an oxygen system is installed in the aircraft, it must--
(1) Effectively provide oxygen to each user to prevent the effects
of hypoxia; and
(2) Be free from hazards in itself, in its method of operation, and
its effect upon other components.
Fire and High Energy Protection
Sec. 23.2325 Fire protection.
(a)(1), (a)(2), (b) through (d), (f)(1), and (g) through (h)
[Applicable to Model M001]
(a)(3), (e), and (f)(2) [Not applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2330 Fire Protection in Fire Zones and Adjacent Areas.
(a) Flight controls, engine mounts, and other flight structures
within or adjacent to fire zones must be capable of withstanding the
effects of a fire.
(b) Engines in a fire zone must remain attached to the aircraft in
the event of a fire.
(c) In fire zones, terminals, equipment, and electrical cables used
during emergency procedures must perform their intended function in the
event of a fire.
AM1.2335 Lightning and Static Electricity Protection.
(a) The aircraft must be protected against catastrophic effects
from lightning.
(b) The aircraft must be protected against hazardous effects caused
by an accumulation of electrostatic charge.
SUBPART E--Powerplant
AM1.2400 Powerplant Installation.
(a) For the purpose of this subpart, the aircraft powerplant
installation must include each component necessary for propulsion,
which affects propulsion safety, or provides auxiliary power to the
aircraft.
(b) Each aircraft engine and propeller must have a type certificate
or be approved under the aircraft type certificate using standards
found in subparts H and I.
(c) The applicant must construct and arrange each powerplant
installation to account for--
(1) Likely operating conditions, including foreign-object threats;
(2) Sufficient clearance of moving parts to other aircraft parts
and their surroundings;
(3) Likely hazards in operation including hazards to ground
personnel; and
(4) Vibration and fatigue.
(d) Hazardous accumulations of fluids, vapors, or gases must be
isolated from the aircraft and personnel compartments and be safely
contained or discharged.
(e) Powerplant components must comply with their component
limitations and installation instructions or be shown not to create a
hazard.
AM1.2405 Power or Thrust Control Systems.
(a) Any power or thrust control system, reverser system, or
powerplant control system must be designed so no unsafe condition
results during normal operation of the system.
(b) Any single failure or likely combination of failures or
malfunctions of a power or thrust control system, reverser system, or
powerplant control system must not prevent continued safe flight and
landing of the aircraft.
(c) Inadvertent flightcrew operation of a power or thrust control
system, reverser system, or powerplant control system must be
prevented, or if not prevented, must not prevent continued safe flight
and landing of the aircraft.
(d) Unless the failure of an automatic power or thrust control
system is extremely remote, the system must--
(1) Provide a means for the flightcrew to verify the system is in
an operating condition;
(2) Provide a means for the flightcrew to override the automatic
function; and
(3) Prevent inadvertent deactivation of the system.
Sec. 23.2410 Powerplant installation hazard assessment.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2415 Powerplant ice protection.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
[[Page 77756]]
AM1.2425 Powerplant Operational Characteristics
(a) Each installed powerplant must operate without any hazardous
characteristics during normal and emergency operation within the range
of operating limitations for the aircraft and the engine.
(b) The design must provide for the shutdown and restart of the
powerplant in flight within an established operational envelope.
AM1.2430 Energy Systems
(a) Each energy system must--
(1) Be designed and arranged to provide independence between
multiple energy-storage and supply systems, so that failure of any one
component in one system will not result in loss of energy storage or
supply of another system;
(2) Be designed to prevent catastrophic events due to lightning
strikes, taking into account direct and indirect effects on the
aircraft where the exposure to lightning is likely;
(3) Provide the energy necessary to ensure each powerplant and
auxiliary power unit functions properly in all likely operating
conditions;
(4) Provide the flightcrew with a means to determine the total
useable energy available and provide uninterrupted supply of that
energy when the system is correctly operated, accounting for likely
energy fluctuations;
(5) Provide a means to safely remove or isolate the energy stored
in the system from the aircraft; and
(6) Be designed to retain energy under all likely operating
conditions and to minimize hazards to occupants following an emergency
landing or otherwise survivable impact (crash landing).
(7) [Reserved]
(b) Each energy-storage system must--
(1) Withstand the loads under likely operating conditions without
failure; and
(2) Be isolated from personnel compartments and protected from
hazards due to unintended temperature influences.
(3) [Reserved]
(4) [Reserved]
(c) Each energy-storage refilling or recharging system must be
designed to--
(1) Prevent improper refilling or recharging; and
(2) [Reserved]
(3) Prevent the occurrence of hazard to the aircraft or to persons
during refilling or recharging.
Sec. 23.2435 Powerplant induction and exhaust systems.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2440 Powerplant Fire Protection
There must be means to isolate and mitigate hazards to the aircraft
in the event of a powerplant-system fire or overheat in operation.
SUBPART F--Equipment
Sec. 23.2500 Airplane level systems requirements.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2505 Function and installation.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2510 Equipment, systems, and installations.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2515 Electrical- and Electronic-System Lightning Protection
(a) Each electrical or electronic system that performs a function,
the failure of which would prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the aircraft, must be designed and installed such that--
(1) The function at the aircraft level is not adversely affected
during and after the time the aircraft is exposed to lightning; and
(2) The system recovers normal operation of that function in a
timely manner after the aircraft is exposed to lightning unless the
system's recovery conflicts with other operational or functional
requirements of the system.
(b) For an aircraft approved for operation under instrument flight
rules (IFR), each electrical and electronic system that performs a
function, the failure of which would significantly reduce the
capability of the aircraft or the ability of the flightcrew to respond
to an adverse operating condition, must be designed and installed such
that the system recovers normal operation of that function in a timely
manner after the aircraft is exposed to lightning.
Sec. 23.2520 High-intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) protection.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2525 System power generation, storage, and distribution.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2530 External and cockpit lighting.
(a) through (e) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2535 Safety equipment.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2540 Flight in Icing Conditions
An applicant who requests certification for flight in icing
conditions must show the following in the icing conditions for which
certification is requested:
(a) The ice protection system provides for safe operation; and
(b) The aircraft design must provide protection from slowing to
less than the minimum safe speed when the autopilot is operating.
Sec. 23.2545 Pressurized systems elements.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2550 Equipment containing high-energy rotors.
[Applicable to Model M001]
SUBPART G--Flightcrew Interface and Other Information
AM1.2600 Flightcrew Interface
(a) The pilot compartment, its equipment, and its arrangement to
include pilot view, must allow each pilot to perform their duties for
all sources of lift and phases of flight and perform any maneuvers
within the operating envelope of the aircraft, without excessive
concentration, skill, alertness, or fatigue.
(b) The applicant must install flight, navigation, surveillance,
and powerplant controls and displays, as needed, so qualified
flightcrew can monitor and perform defined tasks associated with the
intended functions of systems and equipment, without excessive
concentration, skill, alertness, or fatigue. The system and equipment
design must minimize flightcrew errors, which could result in
additional hazards.
Sec. 23.2605 Installation and operation.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 23.2610 Instrument markings, control markings, and placards.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2615 Flight, Navigation, and Powerplant Instruments
(a) Installed systems must provide the flightcrew member who sets
or monitors parameters for the flight, navigation, and powerplant, the
information necessary to do so during each source of lift and phase of
flight. This information must--
(1) Be presented in a manner that the crewmember can monitor the
parameter and determine trends, as needed, to operate the aircraft; and
[[Page 77757]]
(2) Include limitations, unless the limitations cannot be exceeded
in all intended operations.
(b) Indication systems that integrate the display of flight or
powerplant parameters to operate the aircraft, or are required by the
operating rules of title 14, chapter I, must--
(1) Not inhibit the primary display of flight or powerplant
parameters needed by any flightcrew member in any normal mode of
operation; and
(2) In combination with other systems, be designed and installed so
information essential for continued safe flight and landing will be
available to the flightcrew in a timely manner after any single failure
or probable combination of failures.
AM1.2620 Aircraft Flight Manual
The applicant must provide an Aircraft Flight Manual that must be
delivered with each aircraft.
(a) The Aircraft Flight Manual must contain the following
information--
(1) Aircraft operating limitations;
(2) Aircraft operating procedures;
(3) Performance information;
(4) Loading information; and
(5) Other information that is necessary for safe operation because
of design, operating, or handling characteristics.
(b) The portions of the Aircraft Flight Manual containing the
information specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this
section must be approved by the FAA in a manner specified by the
Administrator.
SUBPART H--Electric Engine Requirements
Sec. 33.5 Instruction manual for installing and operating the engine.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 33.7 Engine ratings and operating limitations.
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) through (d) [Not applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2702 Engine Ratings and Operating Limits
Ratings and operating limits must be established and included in
the type certificate data sheet based on:
(a) Shaft power, torque, rotational speed, and temperature for:
(1) Rated takeoff power;
(2) Rated maximum continuous power; and
(3) Rated maximum temporary power and associated time limit.
(b) Duty Cycle and the rating at that duty cycle. The duty cycle
must be declared in the type certificate data sheet.
(c) Cooling fluid grade or specification.
(d) Power-supply requirements.
(e) Any other ratings or limitations that are necessary for the
safe operation of the engine.
Sec. 33.8 Selection of engine power and thrust ratings.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 33.15 Materials.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 33.17 Fire protection.
(a) through (g) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2704 Fire Protection.
High-voltage electrical wiring interconnect systems must be
protected against arc faults. Non-protected electrical wiring
interconnects must be analyzed to show that arc faults do not cause a
hazardous engine effect.
AM1.2705 Durability.
The engine design and construction must minimize the development of
an unsafe condition of the engine between maintenance intervals,
overhaul periods, or mandatory actions described in the applicable ICA.
Sec. 33.21 Engine cooling.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2706 Engine Cooling
If cooling is required to satisfy the safety analysis as described
in AM1.2717, the cooling-system monitoring features and usage must be
documented in the engine installation manual.
Sec. 33.23 Mounting attachment and structure.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 33.25 Accessory attachments.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2709 Overspeed
(a) A rotor overspeed must not result in a burst, rotor growth, or
damage that results in a hazardous engine effect, as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2). Compliance with this paragraph must be shown by test,
validated analysis, or a combination of both. Applicable assumed rotor
speeds must be declared and justified.
(b) Rotors must possess sufficient strength with a margin to burst
above certified operating conditions and above failure conditions
leading to rotor overspeed. The margin to burst must be shown by test,
validated analysis, or a combination thereof.
(c) The engine must not exceed the rotor-speed operational
limitations that could affect rotor structural integrity.
Sec. 33.28 Engine control systems.
(b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii), and (b)(1)(iv) [Applicable to Model M001]
(a), (b)(1)(ii), (b)(2) through (m) [Not applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2710 Engine Control Systems
(a) Applicability.
These requirements apply to any system or device that is part of
the engine type design that controls, limits, monitors, or protects
engine operation and is necessary for the continued airworthiness of
the engine.
(b) Engine control.
The engine control system must ensure the engine does not
experience any unacceptable operating characteristics or exceed its
operating limits, including in failure conditions where the fault or
failure results in a change from one control mode to another, from one
channel to another, or from the primary system to the back-up system,
if applicable.
(c) Design assurance.
The software and complex electronic hardware, including
programmable logic devices, must be--
(1) Designed and developed using a structured and systematic
approach that provides a level of assurance for the logic commensurate
with the hazard associated with the failure or malfunction of the
systems in which the devices are located; and
(2) Substantiated by a verification methodology acceptable to the
Administrator.
(d) Validation.
All functional aspects of the control system must be substantiated
by test, analysis, or a combination thereof, to show that the engine
control system performs the intended functions throughout the declared
operational envelope.
(e) Environmental limits.
Environmental limits that cannot be adequately substantiated by
endurance demonstration, validated analysis, or a combination thereof
must be demonstrated by the system and component tests in AM1.2727.
(f) Engine control system failures.
The engine control system must--
(1) Have a maximum rate of Loss of Power Control (LOPC) that is
suitable for the intended aircraft application;
(2) When in the full-up configuration, be single fault tolerant, as
determined by the Administrator, for electrical, electrically
detectable, and electronic failures involving LOPC events;
[[Page 77758]]
(3) Not have any single failure that results in hazardous engine
effects; and
(4) Not have any likely failures or malfunctions that lead to local
events in the intended aircraft application.
(g) System-safety assessment.
The applicant must perform a system-safety assessment. This
assessment must identify faults or failures that affect normal
operation, together with the predicted frequency of occurrence of these
faults or failures. The intended aircraft application must be taken
into account to assure the assessment of the engine control system
safety is valid.
(h) Protection systems.
The engine control devices and systems' design and function,
together with engine instruments, operating instructions, and
maintenance instructions, must ensure that engine operating limits will
not be exceeded in-service.
(i) Aircraft-supplied data.
Any single failure leading to loss, interruption, or corruption of
aircraft-supplied data (other than power command signals from the
aircraft), or aircraft-supplied data shared between engine systems
within a single engine or between fully independent engine systems,
must--
(1) Not result in a hazardous engine effect, as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2), for any engine installed on the aircraft; and
(2) Be able to be detected and accommodated by the control system.
(j) Engine control system electrical power.
(1) The engine control system must be designed such that the loss,
malfunction, or interruption of the control system electrical power
source will not result in a hazardous engine effect, as defined in
AM1.2717(d)(2), the unacceptable transmission of erroneous data, or
continued engine operation in the absence of the control function. The
engine control system must be capable of resuming normal operation when
aircraft-supplied power returns to within the declared limits.
(2) The applicant must identify and declare, in the engine
installation manual, the characteristics of any electrical power
supplied from the aircraft to the engine control system for starting
and operating the engine, including transient and steady-state voltage
limits, or electrical power supplied from the engine to the aircraft
via energy regeneration, and any other characteristics necessary for
safe operation of the engine.
Sec. 33.29 Instrument connection.
(a), (e), and (g) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) through (d) and (h) [Not applicable to the Model M001]
AM1.2711 Instrument Connection
(a) In addition, as part of the system-safety assessment of
AM1.2710(g) and AM1.2733(g), the applicant must assess the possibility
and subsequent effect of incorrect fit of instruments, sensors, or
connectors. Where practicable, the applicant must take design
precautions to prevent incorrect configuration of the system.
(b) The applicant must provide instrumentation enabling the
flightcrew to monitor the functioning of the engine cooling system
unless evidence shows that:
(1) Other existing instrumentation provides adequate warning of
failure or impending failure;
(2) Failure of the cooling system would not lead to hazardous
engine effects before detection; or
(3) The probability of failure of the cooling system is extremely
remote.
AM1.2712 Stress Analysis
(a) A mechanical, thermal, and electromagnetic stress analysis must
show a sufficient design margin to prevent unacceptable operating
characteristics and hazardous engine effects.
(b) Maximum stresses in the engine must be determined by test,
validated analysis, or a combination thereof, and must be shown not to
exceed minimum material properties.
AM1.2713 Critical and Life-Limited Parts
(a) The applicant must show, by a safety analysis or means
acceptable to the Administrator, whether rotating or moving components,
bearings, shafts, static parts, and non-redundant mount components
should be classified, designed, manufactured, and managed throughout
their service life as critical or life-limited parts.
(1) Critical part means a part that must meet prescribed integrity
specifications to avoid its primary failure, which is likely to result
in a hazardous engine effect as defined in AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) Life-limited parts may include but are not limited to a rotor
and major structural static part, the failure of which can result in a
hazardous engine effect due to low-cycle fatigue (LCF) mechanism or any
LCF-driven mechanism coupled with creep, or other failure mode. A life
limit is an operational limitation that specifies the maximum allowable
number of flight cycles that a part can endure before the applicant
must remove it from the engine.
(b) In establishing the integrity of each critical part or life-
limited part, the applicant must provide to the Administrator the
following three plans for approval: an engineering plan, a
manufacturing plan, and a service-management plan, as defined in Sec.
33.70.
AM1.2714 Lubrication System
(a) The lubrication system must be designed and constructed to
function properly between scheduled maintenance intervals in all flight
attitudes and atmospheric conditions in which the engine is expected to
operate.
(b) The lubrication system must be designed to prevent
contamination of the engine bearings and lubrication system components.
(c) The applicant must demonstrate by test, validated analysis, or
a combination thereof, the unique lubrication attributes and functional
capability of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
AM1.2715 Power Response
The design and construction of the engine, including its control
system, must enable an increase--
(a) From the minimum power setting to the highest rated power
without detrimental engine effects;
(b) From the minimum obtainable power while in flight, and while on
the ground, to the highest rated power within a time interval
determined to be safe for aircraft operation; and
(c) From the minimum torque to the highest rated torque without
detrimental engine or aircraft effects, to ensure aircraft structural
integrity or aircraft aerodynamic characteristics are not exceeded.
AM1.2716 Continued Rotation
If the design allows any of the engine main rotating systems to
continue to rotate after the engine is shut down while in-flight, this
continued rotation must not result in hazardous engine effects, as
specified in AM1.2717(d)(2).
Sec. 33.75 Safety analysis.
(a)(1) through (a)(2), (d), (e), and (g)(2) [Applicable to Model
M001]
(a)(3) through (c), (f), (g)(1), and (g)(3) [Not applicable to
Model M001]
AM1.2717 Safety Analysis
(a) The applicant must comply with Sec. 33.75(a)(2) using the
failure definitions in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) If the failure of such elements is likely to result in
hazardous engine effects, then the applicant may show compliance by
reliance on the prescribed integrity requirements such as Sec. 33.15,
AM1.2709, AM1.2713, or combinations thereof, as applicable. The failure
of such elements and associated
[[Page 77759]]
prescribed integrity requirements must be stated in the safety
analysis.
(c) The applicant must comply with Sec. 33.75(d) and (e) using the
failure definitions in paragraph (d) of this section.
(d) Unless otherwise approved by the Administrator, the following
definitions apply to the engine effects when showing compliance with
this condition:
(1) A minor engine effect does not prohibit the engine from meeting
its type-design requirements and the intended functions in a manner
consistent with Sec. 33.28(b)(1)(i), (b)(1)(iii), and (b)(1)(iv), and
the engine complies with the operability requirements such as AM1.2715,
AM1.2725, and AM1.2731, as appropriate.
(2) The engine effects in Sec. 33.75(g)(2) are hazardous engine
effects with the addition of:
(i) Electrocution of the crew, passengers, operators, maintainers,
or others; and
(ii) Blockage of cooling systems that are required for the engine
to operate within temperature limits.
(3) Any other engine effect is a major engine effect.
(e) The intended aircraft application must be taken into account to
assure that the analysis of the engine system safety is valid.
AM1.2718 Ingestion
(a) Ingestion from likely sources (foreign objects, birds, ice,
hail) must not result in hazardous engine effects defined by
AM1.2717(d)(2), or unacceptable power loss.
(b) Rain ingestion must not result in an abnormal operation such as
shutdown, power loss, erratic operation, or power oscillations
throughout the engine operating range.
(c) If the design of the engine relies on features, attachments, or
systems that the installer may supply, for the prevention of
unacceptable power loss or hazardous engine effects following potential
ingestion, then the features, attachments, or systems must be
documented in the engine installation manual.
(d) Ingestion sources that are not evaluated must be declared in
the engine installation manual.
AM1.2719 Liquid Systems
(a) Each liquid system used for lubrication or cooling of engine
components must be designed and constructed to function properly in all
flight attitudes and atmospheric conditions in which the engine is
expected to operate.
(b) If a liquid system used for lubrication or cooling of engine
components is not self-contained, the interfaces to that system must be
defined in the engine installation manual.
(c) The applicant must establish by test, validated analysis, or a
combination of both, that all static parts subject to significant gas
or liquid pressure loads will not:
(1) Exhibit permanent distortion beyond serviceable limits or
exhibit leakage that could create a hazardous condition when subjected
to normal and maximum working pressure with margin.
(2) Exhibit fracture or burst when subjected to the greater of
maximum possible pressures with margin.
(d) Compliance with paragraph (c) of this section must take into
account:
(1) The operating temperature of the part;
(2) Any other significant static loads in addition to pressure
loads;
(3) Minimum properties representative of both the material and the
processes used in the construction of the part; and
(4) Any adverse physical geometry conditions allowed by the type
design, such as minimum material and minimum radii.
(e) Approved coolants and lubricants must be listed in the engine
installation manual.
AM1.2720 Vibration Demonstration
(a) The engine must be designed and constructed to function
throughout its normal operating range of rotor speeds and engine output
power, including defined exceedances, without inducing excessive stress
in any of the engine parts because of vibration and without imparting
excessive vibration forces to the aircraft structure.
(b) Each engine design must undergo a vibration survey to establish
that the vibration characteristics of those components that may be
subject to induced vibration are acceptable throughout the declared
flight envelope and engine operating range for the specific
installation configuration. The possible sources of the induced
vibration that the survey must assess are mechanical, aerodynamic,
acoustical, or electromagnetic. This survey must be shown by test,
validated analysis, or a combination thereof.
AM1.2721 Overtorque
When approval is sought for a transient maximum engine overtorque,
the applicant must demonstrate by test, validated analysis, or a
combination thereof, that the engine can continue operation after
operating at the maximum engine overtorque condition without
maintenance action. Upon conclusion of overtorque tests conducted to
show compliance with this subpart, or any other tests that are
conducted in combination with the overtorque test, each engine part or
individual groups of components must meet the requirements of AM1.2729.
AM1.2722 Calibration Assurance
Each engine must be subjected to calibration tests to establish its
power characteristics and the conditions both before and after the
endurance and durability demonstrations specified in AM1.2723 and
AM1.2726.
AM1.2723 Endurance Demonstration
(a) The applicant must subject the engine to an endurance
demonstration, acceptable to the Administrator, to demonstrate the
engine's limit capabilities.
(b) The endurance demonstration must include increases and
decreases of the engine's power settings, energy regeneration, and
dwellings at the power settings or energy regeneration for durations
that produce the extreme physical conditions the engine experiences at
rated performance levels, operational limits, and at any other
conditions or power settings that are required to verify the limit
capabilities of the engine.
AM1.2724 Temperature Limit
The engine design must demonstrate its capability to endure
operation at its temperature limits plus an acceptable margin. The
applicant must quantify and justify to the Administrator the margin at
each rated condition. The demonstration must be repeated for all
declared duty cycles and associated ratings, and operating
environments, that would impact temperature limits.
AM1.2725 Operation Demonstration
The engine design must demonstrate safe operating characteristics,
including but not limited to power cycling, starting, acceleration, and
overspeeding throughout its declared flight envelope and operating
range. The declared engine operational characteristics must account for
installation loads and effects.
AM1.2726 Durability Demonstration
The engine must be subjected to a durability demonstration to show
that each part of the engine has been designed and constructed to
minimize any unsafe condition of the system between overhaul periods or
between engine replacement intervals if the
[[Page 77760]]
overhaul is not defined. This test must simulate the conditions in
which the engine is expected to operate in-service, including typical
start-stop cycles.
AM1.2727 System and Component Tests
The applicant must show that systems and components will perform
their intended functions in all declared environmental and operating
conditions.
AM1.2728 Rotor Locking Demonstration
If shaft rotation is prevented by locking the rotor(s), the engine
must demonstrate:
(a) Reliable rotor locking performance;
(b) Reliable unlocking performance; and
(c) That no hazardous engine effects, as specified in
AM1.2717(d)(2), will occur.
AM1.2729 Teardown Inspection
The applicant must comply with either paragraph (a) or (b) of this
section as follows:
(a) Teardown evaluation.
(1) After the endurance and durability demonstrations have been
completed, the engine must be completely disassembled. Each engine
component and lubricant must be within service limits and eligible for
continued operation in accordance with the information submitted for
showing compliance with AM1.1529.
(2) Each engine component having an adjustment setting and a
functioning characteristic that can be established independent of
installation on or in the engine must retain each setting and
functioning characteristic within the established and recorded limits
at the beginning of the endurance and durability demonstrations.
(b) Non-Teardown evaluation.
If a teardown is not performed for all engine components, then the
life limits for these components and lubricants must be established
based on the endurance and durability demonstrations and documented in
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness in accordance with
AM1.1529.
AM1.2730 Containment
The engine must provide containment features that protect against
likely hazards from rotating components as follows--
(a) The design of the case surrounding rotating components must
provide for the containment of the rotating components in the event of
failure, unless the applicant shows that the margin to rotor burst
precludes the possibility of a rotor burst.
(b) If the margin to rotor burst shows that the case must have
containment features in the event of failure, the case must provide for
the containment of the failed rotating components. The applicant must
define by test, validated analysis, or a combination thereof, and
document in the engine installation manual, the energy level,
trajectory, and size of fragments released from damage caused by the
rotor failure, and that pass forward or aft of the surrounding case.
AM1.2731 Operation With a Variable-Pitch Propeller
The applicant must conduct functional demonstrations including
feathering, negative torque, negative thrust, and reverse thrust
operations, as applicable, with a representative propeller. These
demonstrations may be conducted in a manner acceptable to the
Administrator as part of the endurance, durability, and operation
demonstrations.
AM1.2732 General Conduct of Tests
(a) Maintenance of the engine may be made during the tests in
accordance with the service and maintenance instructions submitted in
compliance with AM1.1529.
(b) The applicant must subject the engine or its parts to
maintenance and additional tests that the Administrator finds necessary
if--
(1) The frequency of the service is excessive;
(2) The number of stops due to engine malfunction is excessive;
(3) Major repairs are needed; or
(4) Replacement of a part is found necessary during the tests or
due to the teardown inspection findings.
(c) Upon completion of all demonstrations and testing specified in
these airworthiness criteria, the engine and its components must be--
(1) Within serviceable limits;
(2) Safe for continued operation; and
(3) Capable of operating at declared ratings while remaining within
limits.
AM1.2733 Engine Electrical Systems
(a) Applicability.
Any system or device that provides, uses, conditions, or
distributes electrical power, and is part of the engine type design,
must provide for the continued airworthiness of the engine and maintain
electric engine ratings.
(b) Electrical systems.
The electrical system must ensure the safe generation and
transmission of power, electrical load shedding, and the engine does
not experience any unacceptable operating characteristics or exceed its
operating limits.
(c) Electrical-power distribution.
(1) The engine electrical-power distribution system must be
designed to provide the safe transfer of electrical energy throughout
the electrical power plant. The system must be designed to provide
electrical power so that the loss, malfunction, or interruption of the
electrical power source will not result in a hazardous engine effect,
as defined in AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) The system must be designed and maintained to withstand normal
and abnormal conditions during all ground and flight operations.
(3) The system must provide mechanical or automatic means of
isolating a faulted electrical-energy generation or storage device from
affecting the safe transmission of electric energy to the electric
engine.
(d) Protection systems.
The engine electrical devices and systems must interrupt
transmission of electrical power when power conditions exceed design
limits.
(1) The engine electrical system must be designed such that the
loss, malfunction, or interruption of the electrical power source will
not result in a hazardous engine effect, as defined in AM1.2717(d)(2).
(2) The applicant must identify and declare, in the engine
installation manual, the characteristics of any electrical power
supplied from the aircraft to the engine, or electrical power supplied
to the aircraft from the engine from energy regeneration, systems for
starting and operating the engine, including transient and steady-state
voltage limits, and any other characteristics necessary for safe
operation of the engine.
(e) Environmental limits.
Environmental limits that cannot be adequately substantiated by
endurance demonstration, validated analysis, or a combination thereof
must be demonstrated by the system and component tests in AM1.2727.
(f) Electrical-system failures.
The engine electrical system must--
(1) Have a maximum rate of Loss of Power Control (LOPC) that is
suitable for the intended aircraft application;
(2) When in the full-up configuration, be single fault tolerant, as
determined by the Administrator, for electrical, electrically
detectable, and electronic failures involving LOPC events;
(3) Not have any single failure that results in hazardous engine
effects; and
(4) Not have any likely failure or malfunction that leads to local
events in the intended aircraft application.
(g) System-safety assessment.
The applicant must perform a system-safety assessment. This
assessment must
[[Page 77761]]
identify faults or failures that affect normal operation, together with
the predicted frequency of occurrence of these faults or failures. The
intended aircraft application must be taken into account to assure the
assessment of the engine system safety is valid.
SUBPART I--Propeller Requirements
AM1.2805 Propeller Ratings and Operating Limitations
Propeller ratings and operating limitations must be established by
the applicant and approved by the Administrator, including ratings and
limitations based on the operating conditions and information specified
in this subpart, as applicable, and any other information found
necessary for safe operation of the propeller.
Sec. 35.7 Features and characteristics.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2815 Safety Analysis
(a) The applicant must:
(1) Analyze the propeller system to assess the likely consequences
of all failures that can reasonably be expected to occur. This analysis
will take into account, if applicable:
(i) The propeller system when installed on the aircraft. When the
analysis depends on representative components, assumed interfaces, or
assumed installed conditions, the assumptions must be stated in the
analysis.
(ii) Consequential secondary failures and dormant failures.
(iii) Multiple failures referred to in paragraph (d) of this
section, or that result in the hazardous propeller effects defined in
paragraph (g)(1) of this section.
(2) Summarize those failures that could result in major propeller
effects or hazardous propeller effects defined in paragraph (g) of this
section, and estimate the probability of occurrence of those effects.
(3) Show that hazardous propeller effects are not predicted to
occur at a rate in excess of that defined as extremely remote
(probability of 10-7 or less per propeller flight hour).
Because the estimated probability for individual failures may be
insufficiently precise to enable the applicant to assess the total rate
for hazardous propeller effects, compliance may be shown by
demonstrating that the probability of a hazardous propeller effect
arising from an individual failure can be predicted to be not greater
than 10-8 per propeller flight hour. In dealing with
probabilities of this low order of magnitude, absolute proof is not
possible, and reliance must be placed on engineering judgment and
previous experience, combined with sound design and test philosophies.
(b) If significant doubt exists as to the effects of failures or
likely combination of failures, the Administrator may require
assumptions used in the analysis to be verified by test.
(c) The primary failures of certain single propeller elements (for
example, blades) cannot be sensibly estimated in numerical terms. If
the failure of such elements is likely to result in hazardous propeller
effects, those elements must be identified as propeller critical parts.
For propeller critical parts, the applicant must meet the prescribed
integrity specifications of AM1.2816. These instances must be stated in
the safety analysis.
(d) If reliance is placed on a safety system to prevent a failure
progressing to hazardous propeller effects, the possibility of a safety
system failure, in combination with a basic propeller failure, must be
included in the analysis. Such a safety system may include safety
devices, instrumentation, early warning devices, maintenance checks,
and other similar equipment or procedures.
(e) If the safety analysis depends on one or more of the following
items, those items must be identified in the analysis and appropriately
substantiated.
(1) Maintenance actions being carried out at stated intervals. This
includes verifying that items that could fail in a latent manner are
functioning properly. When necessary to prevent hazardous propeller
effects, these maintenance actions and intervals must be published in
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness required under AM1.1529.
Additionally, if errors in maintenance of the propeller system could
lead to hazardous propeller effects, the appropriate maintenance
procedures must be included in the relevant propeller manuals.
(2) Verification of the satisfactory functioning of safety or other
devices at pre-flight or other stated periods. The details of this
satisfactory functioning must be published in the appropriate manual.
(3) The provision of specific instrumentation not otherwise
required. Such instrumentation must be published in the appropriate
documentation.
(4) A fatigue assessment.
(f) If applicable, the safety analysis must include, but not be
limited to, assessment of indicating equipment, manual and automatic
controls, governors and propeller-control systems, synchrophasers,
synchronizers, and propeller thrust reversal systems.
(g) Unless otherwise approved by the Administrator and stated in
the safety analysis, the following failure definitions apply to
compliance with these airworthiness criteria.
(1) The following are regarded as hazardous propeller effects:
(i) The development of excessive drag.
(ii) A significant thrust in the opposite direction to that
commanded by the pilot.
(iii) The release of the propeller or any major portion of the
propeller.
(iv) A failure that results in excessive unbalance.
(2) The following are regarded as major propeller effects for
variable-pitch propellers:
(i) An inability to feather the propeller for feathering
propellers.
(ii) An inability to change propeller pitch when commanded.
(iii) A significant uncommanded change in pitch.
(iv) A significant uncontrollable torque or speed fluctuation.
AM1.2816 Propeller Critical Parts
The integrity of each propeller critical part identified by the
safety analysis required by AM1.2815 must be established by:
(a) A defined engineering process for ensuring the integrity of the
propeller critical part throughout its service life,
(b) A defined manufacturing process that identifies the
requirements to consistently produce the propeller critical part as
required by the engineering process, and
(c) A defined service-management process that identifies the
continued airworthiness requirements of the propeller critical part as
required by the engineering process.
Sec. 35.17 Materials and manufacturing methods.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.19 Durability.
[Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2821 Variable- and Reversible-Pitch Propellers
(a) No single failure or malfunction in the propeller system will
result in unintended travel of the propeller blades to a position below
the in-flight low-pitch position. The extent of any intended travel
below the in-flight low-pitch position must be documented by the
applicant in the appropriate manuals. Failure of structural elements
need not be considered if the occurrence of such a failure is shown to
be extremely remote under AM1.2815.
[[Page 77762]]
(b) For propellers incorporating a method to select blade pitch
below the in-flight low-pitch position, provisions must be made to
sense and indicate to the flightcrew that the propeller blades are
below that position by an amount defined in the installation
instructions. The method for sensing and indicating the propeller blade
pitch position must be such that its failure does not affect the
control of the propeller.
Sec. 35.22 Feathering propellers.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
AM1.2823 Propeller Control System
The requirements of this section apply to any system or component
that controls, limits, or monitors propeller functions.
(a) The propeller control system must be designed, constructed and
validated to show that:
(1) The propeller control system, operating in normal and
alternative operating modes and in transition between operating modes,
performs the functions defined by the applicant throughout the declared
operating conditions and flight envelope.
(2) The propeller control system functionality is not adversely
affected by the declared environmental conditions, including
temperature, electromagnetic interference (EMI), high intensity
radiated fields (HIRF), and lightning. The environmental limits to
which the system has been satisfactorily validated must be documented
in the appropriate propeller manuals.
(3) A method is provided to indicate that an operating mode change
has occurred if flightcrew action is required. In such an event,
operating instructions must be provided in the appropriate manuals.
(b) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed
so that, in addition to compliance with AM1.2815:
(1) No single failure results in a hazardous propeller effect; and
(2) No likely failures or malfunctions lead to local events in the
intended aircraft installation.
(c) Electronic propeller-control-system embedded software must be
designed and implemented by a method approved by the Administrator that
is consistent with the criticality of the performed functions and that
minimizes the existence of software errors.
(d) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed
so that the failure or corruption of aircraft-supplied data does not
result in hazardous propeller effects.
(e) The propeller control system must be designed and constructed
so that the loss, interruption, or abnormal characteristic of aircraft-
supplied electrical power does not result in hazardous propeller
effects. The power quality requirements must be described in the
appropriate manuals.
Sec. 35.24 Strength.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.33 General.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.34 Inspections, adjustments, and repairs.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.35 Centrifugal load tests.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.36 Bird impact.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.37 Fatigue limits and evaluation.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001, except replace the
reference to Sec. 35.15 with AM1.2815, and the reference to ``Sec.
23.2400(c) or Sec. 25.907'' with AM1.2400(c)]
Sec. 35.38 Lightning strike.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.39 Endurance test.
(a) through (c) [Applicable to Model M001, except replace the
reference to ``part 33'' with ``these airworthiness criteria'']
AM1.2840 Functional Test
The variable-pitch propeller system must be subjected to the
applicable functional tests of this section. The same propeller system
used in the endurance test of Sec. 35.39 must be used in the
functional tests and must be driven by a representative engine on a
test stand or on the aircraft. The propeller must complete these tests
without evidence of failure or malfunction. This test may be combined
with the endurance test for accumulation of cycles.
(a) Governing and reversible-pitch propellers. Thirteen-hundred
complete cycles must be made across the range of forward pitch and
rotational speed. In addition, 200 complete cycles of control must be
made from lowest normal pitch to maximum reverse pitch. During each
cycle, the propeller must run for 30 seconds at the maximum power and
rotational speed selected by the applicant for maximum reverse pitch.
(b) Feathering propellers. Fifty cycles of feather and unfeather
operation must be made.
(c) An analysis based on tests of propellers of similar design may
be used in place of the tests of this section.
Sec. 35.41 Overspeed and overtorque.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.42 Components of the propeller control system.
[Applicable to Model M001]
Sec. 35.43 Propeller hydraulic components.
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
Appendix A to Part 23--Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
A23.1 through A23.3(g) and A23.4 [Applicable to Model M001]
A23.3(h) [Not applicable to Model M001]
Appendix A1--Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (Electric Engine)
AAM1.2701 General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements for the preparation of
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for the engines as required
by AM1.1529.
(b) The Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for the engine
must include the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for all
engine parts.
(c) The applicant must submit to the FAA a program to show how
the applicant's changes to the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness will be distributed, if applicable.
A33.2 Format
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
A33.3 Content
(a) and (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
(c) [Not applicable to Model M001]
A33.4 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(a) [Applicable to Model M001]
(b) [Not applicable to Model M001]
Appendix A2--Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (Propellers)
AAM1.2801 General
(a) This appendix specifies requirements for the preparation of
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for the propellers as
required by AM1.1529.
(b) The Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for the
propeller must include the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
for all propeller parts.
(c) The applicant must submit to the FAA a program to show how
changes to the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness made by the
applicant or by the manufacturers of propeller parts will be
distributed, if applicable.
A35.2 Format
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
A35.3 Content
(a) through (b) [Applicable to Model M001]
[[Page 77763]]
A35.4 Airworthiness Limitations Section
[Applicable to Model M001]
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 12, 2022.
Victor W. Wicklund,
Acting Director, Policy and Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-27445 Filed 12-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P