International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Amendment to the Definition of Activities That Are Not Exports, Reexports, Retransfers, or Temporary Imports, 77046-77047 [2022-27156]
Download as PDF
77046
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Proposed Rules
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 2,700 feet MSL
within a 5.4-mile radius of the airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as a Surface Area.
*
*
*
AWP CA E2
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as an Extension to a Class D or
Class E Surface Area.
*
*
*
AWP CA E4
*
*
Lemoore NAS, CA [Removed]
Lemoore NAS (Reeves Field), CA
(Lat. 36°19′59″ N, long. 119°57′08″ W)
Lemoore TACAN
(Lat. 36°20′39″ N, long. 119°57′59″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within 1.8 miles each side of the
Lemoore TACAN 335° and 357° radials,
extending from the 5.2-mile radius of
Lemoore NAS (Reeves Field) to 7 miles
northwest and north of the TACAN, and
within 1.8 miles each side of the Lemoore
TACAN 155° radial, extending from the 5.2mile radius to 7 miles southeast of the
TACAN.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
AWP CA E5
*
*
Lemoore, CA [Amended]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Lemoore NAS (Reeves Field), CA
(Lat. 36°19′59″ N, long. 119°57′08″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.9-mile
radius of the airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
December 8, 2022.
B.G. Chew,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022–27250 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
[Public Notice: 11801]
RIN 1400–AF26
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Amendment to the
Definition of Activities That Are Not
Exports, Reexports, Retransfers, or
Temporary Imports
ACTION:
Lemoore, CA [Amended]
*
22 CFR Part 120
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
*
Lemoore NAS (Reeves Field), CA
(Lat. 36°19′59″ N, long. 119°57′08″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 5.4-mile radius of the
airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
*
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
The Department of State
proposes to add two new entries to the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to expand the
definition of ‘‘activities that are not
exports, reexports, retransfers, or
temporary imports.’’ First, subject to
certain conditions, the taking of defense
articles outside a previously approved
country by the armed forces of a foreign
government or United Nations
personnel on a deployment or training
exercise is not an export, reexport,
retransfer, or temporary import. Second,
a foreign defense article that enters the
United States, either permanently or
temporarily, and that is subsequently
exported from the United States
pursuant to a license or other approval
under this subchapter, is not subject to
the reexport and retransfer requirements
of this subchapter, provided it has not
been modified, enhanced, upgraded, or
otherwise altered or improved or had a
U.S.-origin defense article integrated
into it.
DATES: Send comments on or before
February 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
D Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov with the subject line, ‘‘ITAR
Amendment—120.54 Additions.’’
D Internet: at www.regulations.gov,
search for this notice, Docket DOS–
2022–0031.
Comments received after that date
may be considered if feasible, but
consideration cannot be assured. Those
submitting comments should not
include any personally identifying
information they do not desire to be
made public or any information for
which a claim of confidentiality is
asserted, because comments and/or
transmittal emails will be made
available for public inspection and
copying after the close of the comment
period via the Directorate of Defense
Trade Control website at
www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving the fields
that would identify the commenter
blank and including no identifying
information in the comment itself.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dilan Wickrema, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, U.S. Department
of State, telephone (202) 634–4981, or
email DDTCCustomerService@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR 120.54
additions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State,
administers the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts
120 through 130). The items subject to
the jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., defense
articles and defense services, are
identified on the ITAR’s U.S. Munitions
List (USML) (22 CFR 121.1). The ITAR
imposes license requirements for
exports and reexports of controlled
items.
On March 25, 2020, the Department
added a new ITAR section (§ 120.54) to
clarify and consolidate activities that do
not require authorization from the
Department (84 FR 70887). This
proposed rule would add to ITAR
§ 120.54 two activities that are not
controlled events (defined herein, and
in the previous rule, to mean ‘‘an
export, reexport, retransfer, or
temporary import’’) and therefore do not
require authorization from the
Department. While previously not
specified in the ITAR, the Department’s
long-standing policy is that these two
proposed activities are not controlled
events.
The first of the two new proposed
additions to ITAR § 120.54 is a new
paragraph (a)(6) making explicit that the
taking of defense articles outside a
previously approved country by the
armed forces of a foreign government or
United Nations personnel on a
deployment or training exercise is not a
controlled event, provided there is no
change in end-use or end-user. The
Department proposes this new provision
to ensure interoperability between and
among the United States and partner
countries’ armed forces when deployed
and to provide assurances to partner
countries that have requested a clearer
statement of the long-standing
Department policy articulated in this
proposed rule. This policy is noted in
DDTC’s ‘‘Guidelines for Preparing
Agreements’’ and this proposed
provision would codify this longstanding understanding in the ITAR.
The second addition to ITAR § 120.54
would state in a new paragraph (a)(7)
that the transfer of a foreign defense
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Proposed Rules
article originally imported into the
United States that has since been
exported out of the United States, is not
a controlled event, unless certain
enumerated circumstances have
occurred.
The Department proposes this new
provision to eliminate any
misperception that foreign defense
articles which originally entered the
United States and have since been
exported out of the United States always
will require Department authorization
for subsequent transfers. The
Department assesses this proposed
provision will address concerns raised
by partners and allies and avoid the
need for unnecessary requests for
authorization on the part of domestic
and foreign defense companies.
Request for Comments: The
Department welcomes public comment
on any of the proposed changes set forth
in this rule. In particular, we invite
comments from foreign government
end-users on the application of these
provisions.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States government and rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Notwithstanding the
assertion of the foreign affairs
exemption, the Department is
solicitating comment on this proposed
rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Notwithstanding the Department’s
publication of this rulemaking as a
proposed rule, this rule is exempt from
the notice-and-comment rulemaking
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 as a foreign
affairs function. Therefore, it does not
require analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions are deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed
amendment does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this
rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
This rule’s scope does not impose
additional regulatory requirements or
obligations; therefore, the Department
believes costs associated with this rule
will be minimal. Although the
Department cannot determine based on
available data how many fewer licenses
will be submitted as a result of this rule,
the amendments to the definition of
activities that are not exports, reexports,
retransfers, or temporary imports will
relieve licensing burdens for some
exporters. This rule is consistent with
Executive Order 13563, which
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ although not
economically significant, by the Office
and Information and Regulatory Affairs
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed rulemaking in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish
clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State determined
that this proposed rule will not have
tribal implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
77047
preempt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
or revise any information collections
subject to 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 120
Arms and munitions, Classified
information, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, the
Department of State proposes to amend
title 22, chapter I, subchapter M, part
120 as follows:
PART 120—PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2752, 2753,
2776, 2778, 2779, 2779a, 2785, 2794, 2797;
E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp.,
p. 223.
2. Amend § 120.54 by adding
paragraphs (a)(6) and (7) to read as
follows:
■
§ 120.54 Activities that are not exports,
reexports, retransfers, or temporary
imports.
(a) * * *
(6) The taking of a defense article
subject to the reexport or retransfer
requirements of this subchapter on a
deployment or training exercise outside
a previously approved country,
provided:
(i) the defense article is transported by
and remains in the possession of the
armed forces of a foreign government or
United Nations personnel; and
(ii) there is no change in end-use or
end-user with respect to the subject
defense article.
(7) The transfer of a foreign defense
article previously imported into the
United States that has since been
exported from the United States
pursuant to a license or other approval
under this subchapter, provided:
(i) the foreign defense article was not
modified, enhanced, upgraded or
otherwise altered or improved in a
manner that changed the basic
performance of the item prior to its
return to the country from which it was
imported or a third country; and
(ii) a U.S.-origin defense article was
not incorporated into the foreign
defense article.
*
*
*
*
*
Bonnie Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022–27156 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77046-77047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27156]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 120
[Public Notice: 11801]
RIN 1400-AF26
International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Amendment to the
Definition of Activities That Are Not Exports, Reexports, Retransfers,
or Temporary Imports
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State proposes to add two new entries to the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to expand the
definition of ``activities that are not exports, reexports,
retransfers, or temporary imports.'' First, subject to certain
conditions, the taking of defense articles outside a previously
approved country by the armed forces of a foreign government or United
Nations personnel on a deployment or training exercise is not an
export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import. Second, a foreign
defense article that enters the United States, either permanently or
temporarily, and that is subsequently exported from the United States
pursuant to a license or other approval under this subchapter, is not
subject to the reexport and retransfer requirements of this subchapter,
provided it has not been modified, enhanced, upgraded, or otherwise
altered or improved or had a U.S.-origin defense article integrated
into it.
DATES: Send comments on or before February 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by one of the
following methods:
[ssquf] Email: [email protected] with the subject line,
``ITAR Amendment--120.54 Additions.''
[ssquf] Internet: at www.regulations.gov, search for this notice,
Docket DOS-2022-0031.
Comments received after that date may be considered if feasible,
but consideration cannot be assured. Those submitting comments should
not include any personally identifying information they do not desire
to be made public or any information for which a claim of
confidentiality is asserted, because comments and/or transmittal emails
will be made available for public inspection and copying after the
close of the comment period via the Directorate of Defense Trade
Control website at www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who wish to comment
anonymously may submit comments via www.regulations.gov, leaving the
fields that would identify the commenter blank and including no
identifying information in the comment itself.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dilan Wickrema, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, U.S. Department of State, telephone (202) 634-
4981, or email [email protected]. ATTN: Regulatory Change,
ITAR 120.54 additions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State, administers the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120 through 130). The items
subject to the jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., defense articles and
defense services, are identified on the ITAR's U.S. Munitions List
(USML) (22 CFR 121.1). The ITAR imposes license requirements for
exports and reexports of controlled items.
On March 25, 2020, the Department added a new ITAR section (Sec.
120.54) to clarify and consolidate activities that do not require
authorization from the Department (84 FR 70887). This proposed rule
would add to ITAR Sec. 120.54 two activities that are not controlled
events (defined herein, and in the previous rule, to mean ``an export,
reexport, retransfer, or temporary import'') and therefore do not
require authorization from the Department. While previously not
specified in the ITAR, the Department's long-standing policy is that
these two proposed activities are not controlled events.
The first of the two new proposed additions to ITAR Sec. 120.54 is
a new paragraph (a)(6) making explicit that the taking of defense
articles outside a previously approved country by the armed forces of a
foreign government or United Nations personnel on a deployment or
training exercise is not a controlled event, provided there is no
change in end-use or end-user. The Department proposes this new
provision to ensure interoperability between and among the United
States and partner countries' armed forces when deployed and to provide
assurances to partner countries that have requested a clearer statement
of the long-standing Department policy articulated in this proposed
rule. This policy is noted in DDTC's ``Guidelines for Preparing
Agreements'' and this proposed provision would codify this long-
standing understanding in the ITAR.
The second addition to ITAR Sec. 120.54 would state in a new
paragraph (a)(7) that the transfer of a foreign defense
[[Page 77047]]
article originally imported into the United States that has since been
exported out of the United States, is not a controlled event, unless
certain enumerated circumstances have occurred.
The Department proposes this new provision to eliminate any
misperception that foreign defense articles which originally entered
the United States and have since been exported out of the United States
always will require Department authorization for subsequent transfers.
The Department assesses this proposed provision will address concerns
raised by partners and allies and avoid the need for unnecessary
requests for authorization on the part of domestic and foreign defense
companies.
Request for Comments: The Department welcomes public comment on any
of the proposed changes set forth in this rule. In particular, we
invite comments from foreign government end-users on the application of
these provisions.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States government and rules implementing this
function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Notwithstanding the assertion of the foreign
affairs exemption, the Department is solicitating comment on this
proposed rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Notwithstanding the Department's publication of this rulemaking as
a proposed rule, this rule is exempt from the notice-and-comment
rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 as a foreign affairs function.
Therefore, it does not require analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions are deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed amendment does not
have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributed impacts, and equity). This
rule's scope does not impose additional regulatory requirements or
obligations; therefore, the Department believes costs associated with
this rule will be minimal. Although the Department cannot determine
based on available data how many fewer licenses will be submitted as a
result of this rule, the amendments to the definition of activities
that are not exports, reexports, retransfers, or temporary imports will
relieve licensing burdens for some exporters. This rule is consistent
with Executive Order 13563, which emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' although not economically
significant, by the Office and Information and Regulatory Affairs under
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the proposed rulemaking in
light of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State determined that this proposed rule will not
have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose or revise any information
collections subject to 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 120
Arms and munitions, Classified information, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, the Department of State proposes
to amend title 22, chapter I, subchapter M, part 120 as follows:
PART 120--PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 2752, 2753, 2776, 2778, 2779,
2779a, 2785, 2794, 2797; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp.,
p. 223.
0
2. Amend Sec. 120.54 by adding paragraphs (a)(6) and (7) to read as
follows:
Sec. 120.54 Activities that are not exports, reexports, retransfers,
or temporary imports.
(a) * * *
(6) The taking of a defense article subject to the reexport or
retransfer requirements of this subchapter on a deployment or training
exercise outside a previously approved country, provided:
(i) the defense article is transported by and remains in the
possession of the armed forces of a foreign government or United
Nations personnel; and
(ii) there is no change in end-use or end-user with respect to the
subject defense article.
(7) The transfer of a foreign defense article previously imported
into the United States that has since been exported from the United
States pursuant to a license or other approval under this subchapter,
provided:
(i) the foreign defense article was not modified, enhanced,
upgraded or otherwise altered or improved in a manner that changed the
basic performance of the item prior to its return to the country from
which it was imported or a third country; and
(ii) a U.S.-origin defense article was not incorporated into the
foreign defense article.
* * * * *
Bonnie Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2022-27156 Filed 12-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P