Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program and Announcement of Public Hearings, 77096-77098 [2022-27152]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
77096
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Notices
including environmental justice and
Native American tribal resources.
4. Proposed measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate any adverse
effects.
5. Information on other current or
planned activities in, or in the vicinity
of, the proposed action and their
possible impacts.
6. Other information relevant to the
proposed action and its impacts on the
human environment.
To promote informed decisionmaking, comments should be as specific
as possible and should provide as much
detail as necessary to meaningfully and
fully inform LPO of the commenter’s
position. Comments should explain why
the issues raised are important to the
consideration of potential
environmental impacts affecting the
quality of the human environment.
The draft EIS will include a summary
of all alternatives, information, and
analyses submitted during the scoping
process for consideration by LPO and
any cooperating agencies.
Authority: 42 United States Code
(U.S.C.) 4321 et seq. and 40 CFR 1501.9.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on December 8, 2022,
by Todd Stribley, NEPA Compliance
Officer, Loan Programs Office, pursuant
to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
Signed in Washington, DC, on December 9,
2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022–27099 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Surplus Plutonium Disposition
Program and Announcement of Public
Hearings
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability and public
hearings.
AGENCY:
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
SUMMARY:
Department of Energy (DOE), announces
the availability of a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the Surplus
Plutonium Disposition Program (SPDP
EIS) (DOE/EIS–0549) in compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA). NNSA is also
announcing a 60-day public comment
period and four public hearings to
receive comments on the Draft SPDP
EIS. NNSA prepared the Draft SPDP EIS
to evaluate the potential environmental
impacts of dispositioning 34 metric tons
(MT) of surplus plutonium.
NNSA invites Federal and state
agencies, Native American tribes, state
and local governments, industry, other
organizations, and members of the
public to review and submit comments
on the Draft SPDP EIS through February
14, 2023. NNSA will hold four public
hearings (three in-person hearings and
one online virtual hearing) to present
information and receive comments on
the Draft SPDP EIS. This information
will also be published in local New
Mexico and South Carolina newspapers
in advance of the hearings. Any changes
to the public hearing dates or locations
will be announced in the local media
and posted on the following website at
least 15 days before the hearing date:
https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsanepa-reading-room.
The four public hearings on the Draft
SPDP EIS will be at the following dates,
times, and locations:
DATES:
Date
Time
Location
January 19, 2023 .................
Thursday; 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time .............
January 24, 2023 .................
Tuesday; 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Mountain Time ...........
January 26, 2023 .................
Thursday; 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Mountain Time ..........
January 30, 2023 .................
Monday; 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 6:00
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Central Time. 5:00 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. Mountain Time. 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Pacific
Time.
North Augusta Municipal Building, 100 Georgia Avenue,
North Augusta, SC 29841.
Carousel House at Pecos River Village Conference
Center, 711 Muscatel Drive, Carlsbad, NM 88220.
Duane Smith Auditorium, Los Alamos High School,
1300 Diamond Drive, Los Alamos, NM 87544.
Online Virtual Hearing.
NNSA will post the link before the hearing at https://
www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room.
Written and oral comments
will be given equal weight and NNSA
will consider all comments received or
postmarked by the end of the comment
period in preparing the Final SPDP EIS.
Comments received or postmarked after
the comment period will be considered
to the extent practicable. Written
comments on the Draft SPDP EIS or
requests for information related to the
Draft SPDP EIS should be sent by email
to SPDP-EIS@nnsa.doe.gov or to Ms.
Maxcine Maxted, NEPA Document
Manager, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Office of Material
Management and Minimization, P.O.
ADDRESSES:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication as an official document of
DOE. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
Box A, Aiken, SC 29802. You may also
comment by phone by leaving a message
at (803) 952–7434. Before including
your address, phone number, email
address, or other personally identifiable
information in your comment, please be
advised that your entire comment—
including your personally identifiable
information—may be made publicly
available. If you wish for NNSA to
withhold your name and/or other
personally identifiable information,
please state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. You may
also submit comments anonymously.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Draft SPDP EIS is available online
at: https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsanepa-reading-room and https://
www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0549surplus-plutonium-disposition-program.
For
further information about this notice,
please contact Ms. Maxcine Maxted,
NEPA Document Manager, National
Nuclear Security Administration, Office
of Material Management and
Minimization, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC
29802; email: SPDP-EIS@nnsa.doe.gov;
or call (803) 952–7434 to leave a
message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NNSA prepared the Draft SPDP EIS
pursuant to NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality’s NEPA regulations (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508) and the DOE NEPA
implementing procedures (10 CFR part
1021). NNSA’s previous NEPA reviews
and decisions regarding the disposition
of surplus plutonium are summarized in
section 1.1 of the SPDP EIS. The
following paragraphs describe recent
developments relevant to the scope of
the SPDP EIS.
In 2015, NNSA completed the Surplus
Plutonium Disposition Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SPD
Supplemental EIS) (DOE/EIS–0283–S2).
In the SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA
evaluated the environmental impacts of
alternatives for dispositioning 13.1 MT
of surplus plutonium (7.1 MT of pit and
6 MT of non-pit) for which a disposition
path had not been assigned. The
alternatives evaluated in the 2015 SPD
Supplemental EIS included the Mixed
Oxide (MOX) Fuel Alternative, the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
Alternative, and two variations of waste
immobilization. In addition, NNSA
evaluated four options for pit
disassembly and conversion (pit
disassembly and conversion is
equivalent to pit disassembly and
processing [PDP] as used in this Notice
and the Draft SPDP EIS) using facilities
at the Savannah River Site (SRS) and
Los Alamos National Laboratory
(LANL). In 2015, NNSA announced its
preferred alternative for the 6 MT of
non-pit surplus plutonium evaluated in
the SPD Supplemental EIS was to
prepare this plutonium for eventual
disposal at the WIPP facility in
Carlsbad, New Mexico (80 FR 80348,
December 24, 2015). In a 2016 Record of
Decision (ROD), NNSA announced a
decision to disposition the 6 MT of nonpit surplus plutonium by downblending
it with an adulterant (downblending is
a process equivalent to dilution in the
dilute and dispose strategy in the Draft
SPDP EIS), packaging it as contacthandled transuranic (CH–TRU) waste,
and shipping it to the WIPP facility for
disposal (81 FR 19588). In the 2016
ROD, NNSA did not make a decision
about the disposition of the 7.1 MT of
pit plutonium or about the various
options for pit disassembly and
conversion that were analyzed in the
2015 SPD Supplemental EIS.
In 2016, NNSA, partnering with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
developed an independent cost estimate
for the MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility
(MFFF) project, and concluded that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
cost of the project, upon completion of
construction, would be approximately
$17 billion, and construction would not
be complete until 2048. Congress
directed NNSA to prepare a lifecycle
cost estimate for disposal of surplus
plutonium using the same approach
announced for the 6 MT, now referred
to as the dilute and dispose strategy.
The completed cost estimate indicated
that the estimate-to-complete lifecycle
cost of the dilute and dispose strategy
would be substantially lower than the
cost to complete the MOX project. In
response, the Secretary of Energy halted
construction of the MOX fuel project in
May 2018 by waiving the requirement to
use funds for construction and support
activities for the MFFF per the National
Defense Authorization Act. In a letter
dated May 10, 2018, the Secretary of
Energy certified that ‘‘the remaining
lifecycle cost for the dilute and dispose
approach will be less than
approximately half of the estimated
remaining lifecycle cost of the MOX fuel
program.’’ On October 10, 2018, NNSA
issued a notice of terminating the
contract for construction of MFFF. On
February 8, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
terminated the construction license for
MFFF (NRC 2019). NNSA is preparing
this SPDP EIS to evaluate alternatives
for disposition of the 34 MT of surplus
plutonium previously designated for
disposition using the MOX fuel program
that no longer has a disposition path.
In 2020 NNSA prepared a
Supplement Analysis (SA) based on the
analysis presented in the 2015 SPD
Supplemental EIS. NNSA determined
that disposition of 7.1 MT of non-pit
surplus plutonium was not a substantial
change in the action analyzed in the
2015 SPD Supplemental EIS to
disposition 7.1 MT of pit plutonium via
the WIPP Alternative, and that the
environmental impacts had been
sufficiently analyzed. NNSA
subsequently issued an Amended ROD
(AROD) to include preparation of an
additional 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus
plutonium for disposal as CH–TRU
waste at the WIPP facility (85 FR 53350,
August 28, 2020). The SA and AROD are
available online at https://
www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepareading-room.
The 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus
plutonium to be sent to the WIPP
facility as CH–TRU waste is part of the
34 MT of surplus plutonium that NNSA
had decided to disposition by
fabricating it into MOX fuel for use in
commercial reactors. In the same 2020
AROD, NNSA also decided that non-pit
metal processing (NPMP) may be
performed at either LANL or SRS.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77097
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
Since the end of the Cold War in the
early 1990s and the Presidential
declarations of surplus fissile materials,
DOE has been charged with the
disposition of surplus plutonium.
NNSA’s purpose in taking action is to
support safe and secure disposition of
34 MT of plutonium that is surplus to
the Nation’s defense needs, in a
reasonable time frame and at a
reasonable cost, so that it is not readily
usable in nuclear weapons. To achieve
this, NNSA must use mature methods
and proven technologies that are based
on processes requiring minimal research
and engineering development.
Proposed Action and Alternatives
Both the Preferred Alternative and the
No Action Alternative in the Draft SPDP
EIS use the dilute and dispose strategy
and both address up to 7.1 MT of nonpit surplus plutonium that NNSA
previously decided to dispose of using
the dilute and dispose strategy (85 FR
53350). The dilute and dispose strategy
includes processing surplus plutonium
to plutonium oxide, diluting it with an
adulterant to inhibit plutonium
recovery, and disposing the resulting
CH–TRU waste at the WIPP facility.
Preferred Alternative
NNSA’s Preferred Alternative is to use
the dilute and dispose strategy for 34
MT of surplus plutonium comprised of
both surplus pit and non-pit surplus
plutonium. The exact amounts of pit
and non-pit forms of plutonium that
compose the 34 MT are safeguarded, so
they cannot be delineated further.
Therefore, to bound the impacts, the
analysis in the SPDP EIS evaluates the
impacts of dispositioning 34 MT of
surplus plutonium in pit form and the
impacts of dispositioning 7.1 MT of
non-pit surplus plutonium. However,
the SPDP mission involves only 34 MT
of surplus plutonium. The activities that
are part of the Preferred Alternative
would occur at five DOE sites—Pantex
in Texas, LANL in New Mexico, SRS in
South Carolina, the Y–12 National
Security Complex (Y–12) in Tennessee,
and the WIPP facility in New Mexico.
NNSA has developed four subalternatives for the Preferred Alternative
based on the location of activities.
Base Approach Sub-Alternative
Under the Base Approach SubAlternative, NNSA analyzes the impacts
of shipping 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium from Pantex to LANL and
disassembling and processing (i.e., PDP)
the 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium at
LANL with subsequent shipment of the
decontaminated and oxidized highly
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
77098
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Notices
enriched uranium (HEU) to Y–12.
NNSA also analyzes the impacts of
processing 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus
plutonium at LANL, using some of the
same capabilities as PDP. This subalternative would rely on expanding
existing capabilities at LANL in the
Plutonium Facility (PF–4) for PDP and
modifying or building additional
support facilities. The resulting
plutonium oxide from the surplus pit
and non-pit surplus plutonium would
be shipped to K-Area at SRS, where it
would be diluted, characterized, and
packaged for shipment to and disposal
at the WIPP facility.
SRS NPMP Sub-Alternative
The SRS NPMP Sub-Alternative is
similar to the Base Approach SubAlternative. NNSA analyzes the impacts
of shipping 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium from Pantex to LANL and
PDP of the 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium at LANL. The
decontaminated and oxidized HEU
would then be shipped to Y–12. This
sub-alternative would rely on NNSA
expanding existing capabilities at LANL
in PF–4 for PDP and modifying or
building additional support facilities.
Plutonium oxide resulting from PDP
would be shipped to SRS (K-Area).
Unlike the Base Approach SubAlternative, under this sub-alternative,
NNSA does not analyze NPMP at LANL.
Instead, processing of 7.1 MT of non-pit
surplus plutonium would occur in the
SRS K-Area either in Building 105–K or
in a modular system adjacent to the
building. Under this sub-alternative,
NNSA considers the impacts of dilution
and characterization and packaging
(C&P) of the diluted plutonium oxide
CH–TRU waste in SRS’s K-Area for
shipment to and disposal at the WIPP
facility.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
All LANL Sub-Alternative
Under the All LANL Sub-Alternative
NNSA would use only capabilities at
LANL for the entire disposition pathway
prior to shipment to the WIPP facility.
Under this sub-alternative, NNSA
analyzes the impacts of shipping 34 MT
of surplus pit plutonium from Pantex to
LANL, PDP at LANL, and shipment of
the decontaminated and oxidized HEU
to Y–12. NNSA would rely on
expanding existing capabilities at LANL
in PF–4 for PDP and modifying or
building additional support facilities.
NNSA also analyzes the impacts of
processing 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus
plutonium at LANL in PF–4. Under this
sub-alternative, NNSA considers the
impacts of dilution in PF–4 and C&P of
the diluted plutonium oxide CH–TRU
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
waste for shipment to and disposal at
the WIPP facility.
All SRS Sub-Alternative
Under the All SRS Sub-Alternative
NNSA would use only capabilities at
SRS for the entire disposition pathway
prior to shipment to the WIPP facility.
Under this sub-alternative, NNSA
analyzes the impacts of shipping 34 MT
of surplus pit plutonium from Pantex to
SRS and the disassembly and processing
of the 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium
and processing 7.1 MT of non-pit
surplus plutonium in a new capability
installed at SRS in either K-Area or FArea. NNSA analyzes the subsequent
shipment of the decontaminated and
oxidized HEU to Y–12 and the shipment
of by-product material to LANL. Under
this sub-alternative, NNSA considers
the impacts of dilution and C&P of the
diluted plutonium oxide CH–TRU waste
in SRS’s K-Area for shipment to and
disposal at the WIPP facility.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative is the
continued management of 34 MT of
surplus plutonium. This includes (1)
continued storage of surplus pits at
Pantex, (2) continuing the plutonium
mission at LANL to process up to 400
kg of actinides (including surplus
plutonium) per year, and (3) disposition
of up to 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus
plutonium for which the decision to use
the dilute and dispose strategy was
announced in NNSA’s 2020 AROD (85
FR 53350).
Final SPDP EIS
Following this public comment
period on the Draft SPDP EIS, and after
consideration of comments received,
NNSA will prepare a Final SPDP EIS.
NNSA will announce the availability of
the Final SPDP EIS in the Federal
Register and local media outlets. If
warranted, NNSA will issue a ROD no
sooner than 30 days after publication by
the Environmental Protection Agency of
a Notice of Availability of the Final
SPDP EIS.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on December 8, 2022,
by Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for
Nuclear Security and Administrator,
NNSA, pursuant to delegated authority
from the Secretary of Energy. That
document with the original signature
and date is maintained by DOE. For
administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with requirements of the
Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on December 9,
2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022–27152 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings
Take notice that the Commission has
received the following Natural Gas
Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
Filings Instituting Proceedings
Docket Numbers: RP23–274–000.
Applicants: MoGas Pipeline LLC.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing: MoGas
Pipeline LLC Ozark Gas NRA Filing to
be effective 1/1/2023.
Filed Date: 12/9/22.
Accession Number: 20221209–5149.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/22.
Docket Numbers: RP23–275–000.
Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline
LLC.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing: REX
2022–12–09 Negotiated Rate
Agreements and Amendments to be
effective 12/9/2022.
Filed Date: 12/9/22.
Accession Number: 20221209–5176.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/22.
Docket Numbers: RP23–276–000.
Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas
Transmission, LLC.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing: TIGT
2022–12–09 Negotiated Rate Agreement
to be effective 12/10/2022.
Filed Date: 12/9/22.
Accession Number: 20221209–5185.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/22.
Docket Numbers: RP23–277–000.
Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas
Company, L.L.C.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing:
Negotiated Rate Agreement Update
(Mieco) to be effective 12/9/2022.
Filed Date: 12/9/22.
Accession Number: 20221209–5187.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/22.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77096-77098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27152]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program and Announcement of
Public Hearings
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of availability and public hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-
autonomous agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), announces the
availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Surplus
Plutonium Disposition Program (SPDP EIS) (DOE/EIS-0549) in compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). NNSA is also
announcing a 60-day public comment period and four public hearings to
receive comments on the Draft SPDP EIS. NNSA prepared the Draft SPDP
EIS to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of dispositioning
34 metric tons (MT) of surplus plutonium.
DATES: NNSA invites Federal and state agencies, Native American tribes,
state and local governments, industry, other organizations, and members
of the public to review and submit comments on the Draft SPDP EIS
through February 14, 2023. NNSA will hold four public hearings (three
in-person hearings and one online virtual hearing) to present
information and receive comments on the Draft SPDP EIS. This
information will also be published in local New Mexico and South
Carolina newspapers in advance of the hearings. Any changes to the
public hearing dates or locations will be announced in the local media
and posted on the following website at least 15 days before the hearing
date: https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room.
The four public hearings on the Draft SPDP EIS will be at the
following dates, times, and locations:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 19, 2023............ Thursday; 6:00 p.m. North Augusta
to 9:00 p.m. Municipal Building,
Eastern Time. 100 Georgia Avenue,
North Augusta, SC
29841.
January 24, 2023............ Tuesday; 6:00 p.m. Carousel House at
to 9:00 p.m. Pecos River Village
Mountain Time. Conference Center,
711 Muscatel Drive,
Carlsbad, NM 88220.
January 26, 2023............ Thursday; 6:00 p.m. Duane Smith
to 9:00 p.m. Auditorium, Los
Mountain Time. Alamos High School,
1300 Diamond Drive,
Los Alamos, NM
87544.
January 30, 2023............ Monday; 7:00 p.m. to Online Virtual
10:00 p.m. Eastern Hearing.
Time. 6:00 p.m. to NNSA will post the
9:00 p.m. Central link before the
Time. 5:00 p.m. to hearing at https://
8:00 p.m. Mountain www.energy.gov/nnsa/
Time. 4:00 p.m. to nnsa-nepa-reading-
7:00 p.m. Pacific room.
Time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESSES: Written and oral comments will be given equal weight and
NNSA will consider all comments received or postmarked by the end of
the comment period in preparing the Final SPDP EIS. Comments received
or postmarked after the comment period will be considered to the extent
practicable. Written comments on the Draft SPDP EIS or requests for
information related to the Draft SPDP EIS should be sent by email to
[email protected] or to Ms. Maxcine Maxted, NEPA Document Manager,
National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Material Management
and Minimization, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802. You may also comment by
phone by leaving a message at (803) 952-7434. Before including your
address, phone number, email address, or other personally identifiable
information in your comment, please be advised that your entire
comment--including your personally identifiable information--may be
made publicly available. If you wish for NNSA to withhold your name
and/or other personally identifiable information, please state this
prominently at the beginning of your comment. You may also submit
comments anonymously.
The Draft SPDP EIS is available online at: https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room and https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0549-surplus-plutonium-disposition-program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this
notice, please contact Ms. Maxcine Maxted, NEPA Document Manager,
National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Material Management
and Minimization, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802; email: [email protected]; or call (803) 952-7434 to leave a message.
[[Page 77097]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NNSA prepared the Draft SPDP EIS pursuant to NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations (40
CFR parts 1500-1508) and the DOE NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR
part 1021). NNSA's previous NEPA reviews and decisions regarding the
disposition of surplus plutonium are summarized in section 1.1 of the
SPDP EIS. The following paragraphs describe recent developments
relevant to the scope of the SPDP EIS.
In 2015, NNSA completed the Surplus Plutonium Disposition
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS)
(DOE/EIS-0283-S2). In the SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA evaluated the
environmental impacts of alternatives for dispositioning 13.1 MT of
surplus plutonium (7.1 MT of pit and 6 MT of non-pit) for which a
disposition path had not been assigned. The alternatives evaluated in
the 2015 SPD Supplemental EIS included the Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel
Alternative, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Alternative, and
two variations of waste immobilization. In addition, NNSA evaluated
four options for pit disassembly and conversion (pit disassembly and
conversion is equivalent to pit disassembly and processing [PDP] as
used in this Notice and the Draft SPDP EIS) using facilities at the
Savannah River Site (SRS) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). In
2015, NNSA announced its preferred alternative for the 6 MT of non-pit
surplus plutonium evaluated in the SPD Supplemental EIS was to prepare
this plutonium for eventual disposal at the WIPP facility in Carlsbad,
New Mexico (80 FR 80348, December 24, 2015). In a 2016 Record of
Decision (ROD), NNSA announced a decision to disposition the 6 MT of
non-pit surplus plutonium by downblending it with an adulterant
(downblending is a process equivalent to dilution in the dilute and
dispose strategy in the Draft SPDP EIS), packaging it as contact-
handled transuranic (CH-TRU) waste, and shipping it to the WIPP
facility for disposal (81 FR 19588). In the 2016 ROD, NNSA did not make
a decision about the disposition of the 7.1 MT of pit plutonium or
about the various options for pit disassembly and conversion that were
analyzed in the 2015 SPD Supplemental EIS.
In 2016, NNSA, partnering with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
developed an independent cost estimate for the MOX Fuel Fabrication
Facility (MFFF) project, and concluded that the cost of the project,
upon completion of construction, would be approximately $17 billion,
and construction would not be complete until 2048. Congress directed
NNSA to prepare a lifecycle cost estimate for disposal of surplus
plutonium using the same approach announced for the 6 MT, now referred
to as the dilute and dispose strategy. The completed cost estimate
indicated that the estimate-to-complete lifecycle cost of the dilute
and dispose strategy would be substantially lower than the cost to
complete the MOX project. In response, the Secretary of Energy halted
construction of the MOX fuel project in May 2018 by waiving the
requirement to use funds for construction and support activities for
the MFFF per the National Defense Authorization Act. In a letter dated
May 10, 2018, the Secretary of Energy certified that ``the remaining
lifecycle cost for the dilute and dispose approach will be less than
approximately half of the estimated remaining lifecycle cost of the MOX
fuel program.'' On October 10, 2018, NNSA issued a notice of
terminating the contract for construction of MFFF. On February 8, 2019,
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) terminated the
construction license for MFFF (NRC 2019). NNSA is preparing this SPDP
EIS to evaluate alternatives for disposition of the 34 MT of surplus
plutonium previously designated for disposition using the MOX fuel
program that no longer has a disposition path.
In 2020 NNSA prepared a Supplement Analysis (SA) based on the
analysis presented in the 2015 SPD Supplemental EIS. NNSA determined
that disposition of 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium was not a
substantial change in the action analyzed in the 2015 SPD Supplemental
EIS to disposition 7.1 MT of pit plutonium via the WIPP Alternative,
and that the environmental impacts had been sufficiently analyzed. NNSA
subsequently issued an Amended ROD (AROD) to include preparation of an
additional 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium for disposal as CH-TRU
waste at the WIPP facility (85 FR 53350, August 28, 2020). The SA and
AROD are available online at https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room.
The 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium to be sent to the WIPP
facility as CH-TRU waste is part of the 34 MT of surplus plutonium that
NNSA had decided to disposition by fabricating it into MOX fuel for use
in commercial reactors. In the same 2020 AROD, NNSA also decided that
non-pit metal processing (NPMP) may be performed at either LANL or SRS.
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
Since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s and the
Presidential declarations of surplus fissile materials, DOE has been
charged with the disposition of surplus plutonium.
NNSA's purpose in taking action is to support safe and secure
disposition of 34 MT of plutonium that is surplus to the Nation's
defense needs, in a reasonable time frame and at a reasonable cost, so
that it is not readily usable in nuclear weapons. To achieve this, NNSA
must use mature methods and proven technologies that are based on
processes requiring minimal research and engineering development.
Proposed Action and Alternatives
Both the Preferred Alternative and the No Action Alternative in the
Draft SPDP EIS use the dilute and dispose strategy and both address up
to 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium that NNSA previously decided to
dispose of using the dilute and dispose strategy (85 FR 53350). The
dilute and dispose strategy includes processing surplus plutonium to
plutonium oxide, diluting it with an adulterant to inhibit plutonium
recovery, and disposing the resulting CH-TRU waste at the WIPP
facility.
Preferred Alternative
NNSA's Preferred Alternative is to use the dilute and dispose
strategy for 34 MT of surplus plutonium comprised of both surplus pit
and non-pit surplus plutonium. The exact amounts of pit and non-pit
forms of plutonium that compose the 34 MT are safeguarded, so they
cannot be delineated further. Therefore, to bound the impacts, the
analysis in the SPDP EIS evaluates the impacts of dispositioning 34 MT
of surplus plutonium in pit form and the impacts of dispositioning 7.1
MT of non-pit surplus plutonium. However, the SPDP mission involves
only 34 MT of surplus plutonium. The activities that are part of the
Preferred Alternative would occur at five DOE sites--Pantex in Texas,
LANL in New Mexico, SRS in South Carolina, the Y-12 National Security
Complex (Y-12) in Tennessee, and the WIPP facility in New Mexico. NNSA
has developed four sub-alternatives for the Preferred Alternative based
on the location of activities.
Base Approach Sub-Alternative
Under the Base Approach Sub-Alternative, NNSA analyzes the impacts
of shipping 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium from Pantex to LANL and
disassembling and processing (i.e., PDP) the 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium at LANL with subsequent shipment of the decontaminated and
oxidized highly
[[Page 77098]]
enriched uranium (HEU) to Y-12. NNSA also analyzes the impacts of
processing 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium at LANL, using some of
the same capabilities as PDP. This sub-alternative would rely on
expanding existing capabilities at LANL in the Plutonium Facility (PF-
4) for PDP and modifying or building additional support facilities. The
resulting plutonium oxide from the surplus pit and non-pit surplus
plutonium would be shipped to K-Area at SRS, where it would be diluted,
characterized, and packaged for shipment to and disposal at the WIPP
facility.
SRS NPMP Sub-Alternative
The SRS NPMP Sub-Alternative is similar to the Base Approach Sub-
Alternative. NNSA analyzes the impacts of shipping 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium from Pantex to LANL and PDP of the 34 MT of surplus pit
plutonium at LANL. The decontaminated and oxidized HEU would then be
shipped to Y-12. This sub-alternative would rely on NNSA expanding
existing capabilities at LANL in PF-4 for PDP and modifying or building
additional support facilities. Plutonium oxide resulting from PDP would
be shipped to SRS (K-Area). Unlike the Base Approach Sub-Alternative,
under this sub-alternative, NNSA does not analyze NPMP at LANL.
Instead, processing of 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium would occur
in the SRS K-Area either in Building 105-K or in a modular system
adjacent to the building. Under this sub-alternative, NNSA considers
the impacts of dilution and characterization and packaging (C&P) of the
diluted plutonium oxide CH-TRU waste in SRS's K-Area for shipment to
and disposal at the WIPP facility.
All LANL Sub-Alternative
Under the All LANL Sub-Alternative NNSA would use only capabilities
at LANL for the entire disposition pathway prior to shipment to the
WIPP facility. Under this sub-alternative, NNSA analyzes the impacts of
shipping 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium from Pantex to LANL, PDP at
LANL, and shipment of the decontaminated and oxidized HEU to Y-12. NNSA
would rely on expanding existing capabilities at LANL in PF-4 for PDP
and modifying or building additional support facilities. NNSA also
analyzes the impacts of processing 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium
at LANL in PF-4. Under this sub-alternative, NNSA considers the impacts
of dilution in PF-4 and C&P of the diluted plutonium oxide CH-TRU waste
for shipment to and disposal at the WIPP facility.
All SRS Sub-Alternative
Under the All SRS Sub-Alternative NNSA would use only capabilities
at SRS for the entire disposition pathway prior to shipment to the WIPP
facility. Under this sub-alternative, NNSA analyzes the impacts of
shipping 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium from Pantex to SRS and the
disassembly and processing of the 34 MT of surplus pit plutonium and
processing 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium in a new capability
installed at SRS in either K-Area or F-Area. NNSA analyzes the
subsequent shipment of the decontaminated and oxidized HEU to Y-12 and
the shipment of by-product material to LANL. Under this sub-
alternative, NNSA considers the impacts of dilution and C&P of the
diluted plutonium oxide CH-TRU waste in SRS's K-Area for shipment to
and disposal at the WIPP facility.
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative is the continued management of 34 MT of
surplus plutonium. This includes (1) continued storage of surplus pits
at Pantex, (2) continuing the plutonium mission at LANL to process up
to 400 kg of actinides (including surplus plutonium) per year, and (3)
disposition of up to 7.1 MT of non-pit surplus plutonium for which the
decision to use the dilute and dispose strategy was announced in NNSA's
2020 AROD (85 FR 53350).
Final SPDP EIS
Following this public comment period on the Draft SPDP EIS, and
after consideration of comments received, NNSA will prepare a Final
SPDP EIS. NNSA will announce the availability of the Final SPDP EIS in
the Federal Register and local media outlets. If warranted, NNSA will
issue a ROD no sooner than 30 days after publication by the
Environmental Protection Agency of a Notice of Availability of the
Final SPDP EIS.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on December 8,
2022, by Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for Nuclear Security and
Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on December 9, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022-27152 Filed 12-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
