Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Whiting Utilization in the At-Sea Sectors, 77000-77007 [2022-27117]
Download as PDF
77000
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
all (1) snapper; (2) tarakihi; (3) spotted
dogfish; (4) trevally; (5) warehou; (6)
hoki; (7) barracouta; (8) mullet; and (9)
gurnard derived from the fisheries of the
West Coast North Island are subject to
the ban. The court also ordered NMFS
to submit notice of the ban for
publication in the Federal Register
within 15 days. By granting this
preliminary injunction and requiring
the imposition of import restrictions
and a comparability finding
determination for the export fisheries
operating on the West Coast North
Island within the Ma¯ui dolphin’s range,
the judge’s order effectively removes the
currently operative exemption under 50
CFR 216.24 (h)(2)(ii) for these fisheries.
Implementing Import Restrictions Under
the Court Order
The CIT order stipulates that specific
fish products deriving from West Coast
North Island multi-species set-net and
trawl fisheries are prohibited from entry
into the U.S market. Several of these
fish species are not imported into the
United States under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule (HTS) codes that are specific
to the type of fish. Instead, these fish are
imported under non-specific fish and
marine fish codes. Consequently, the list
of affected HTS codes has been
determined by NMFS and is available
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
foreign/marine-mammal-protection/
seafood-import-restrictions. The list
includes those non-specific HTS codes
necessary to encompass the possible
codes used for products subject to the
trade restriction.
However, NMFS acknowledges that
fish species harvested in the West Coast
North Island fisheries are also harvested
elsewhere in New Zealand and
harvested with other fishing gear not
subject to the court-ordered embargo.
Consequently, further steps are needed
to enforce an import restriction focused
on fish harvested in the affected
fisheries and included in the court order
while not affecting trade in products not
subject to embargo. NMFS must collect
additional information from importers
during the entry process to identify
products not subject to an import
restriction. To that end, NMFS has
identified tariff codes for the fish and
fish products that require Certification
of Admissibility to validate that the fish
and fish products from New Zealand
being offered for entry into the United
States do not originate from West Coast
North Island set-net and trawl fisheries.
On December 5, 2022, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) transmitted
a user-defined rule to inspectors at
affected ports of entry with instructions
for port inspectors to examine entry
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
filings from New Zealand under the
specified tariff codes. Fish or fish
products imported to the United States
from New Zealand under the designated
HTS codes that are not subject to the
import prohibition must be
accompanied by Certification of
Admissibility. The Certification of
Admissibility form and accompanying
instructions for its use in entry filing are
available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/foreign/marinemammal-protection/seafood-importrestrictions. The Certification of
Admissibility is an information
collection subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act and has
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under control
number 0648–0651.
Absent Certification of Admissibility,
entry filings under the specified tariff
codes will be rejected. Implementing
this process will require notice to the
trade community (importers and
customs brokers) and CBP inspectors.
NMFS is working with CBP to use its
internal and external messaging systems
for such notification. Also,
consultations with the GNZ are needed
to identify those officials authorized to
certify shipments bound for the United
States. NMFS initiated these steps prior
to the effective date of the embargo.
Importers are advised to determine if
other NMFS program requirements (e.g.,
Tuna Tracking and Verification
Program, Seafood Import Monitoring
Program) or other agency requirements
(e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
State Department, Food and Drug
Administration) have Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) data
reporting requirements applicable to the
designated HTS codes subject to
certification under the MMPA import
provisions. In such cases, the other
reporting requirements still pertain in
addition to the Certification of
Admissibility requirements imposed to
implement the CIT order.
Until such time as the CIT (or other
court of competent jurisdiction) lifts the
preliminary injunction, trade
restrictions on the fish products
harvested by set-nets and trawls
operating off the West Coast North
Island within the Ma¯ui dolphin’s range
will continue and Certification of
Admissibility will be required for the
HTS codes designated under this notice.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: December 9, 2022.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–27155 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 221208–0265]
RIN 0648–BL41
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Whiting Utilization in the At-Sea
Sectors
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
regulatory amendments that apply to the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Trawl
Rationalization Program participants
that operate in the non-tribal Pacific
whiting fishery. This rulemaking adjusts
the primary Pacific whiting season start
date for all sectors of the Pacific whiting
fishery north of 40°30′ N latitude (lat.)
from May 15 to May 1, removes from
regulation the mothership catcher vessel
(MSCV) processor obligation deadline of
November 30, removes from regulation
the Mothership (MS) processor cap of 45
percent, and provides the ability to
operate as a Catcher/Processor (CP) and
an MS in the same year. This action is
necessary to provide MS sector
participants with greater operational
flexibility by modifying specific
regulations that have been identified as
potentially contributing to lower
attainment of the Pacific whiting
allocation compared to the CP and
shoreside Pacific whiting sectors. This
final rule is intended to promote the
goals and objectives of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan,
and other applicable laws.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: This rule is accessible via
the Office of the Federal Register
website at https://
www.federalregister.gov/. Background
information and analytical documents
(Analysis) are available at the NMFS
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
West Coast Region website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/westcoast and at the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s website at
https://www.pcouncil.org.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this final rule
may be submitted to NMFS and to
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Abbie Moyer, phone: 206–305–9601, or
email: abbie.moyer@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) manage
the groundfish fisheries in the exclusive
economic zone seaward of California,
Oregon, and Washington under the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The Council
prepared the FMP under the authority of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMP appear at 50
CFR parts 660.
Background
This purpose of this final rule is to
revise regulations that may be
unnecessarily constraining, in order to
provide increased operational flexibility
in the Pacific whiting fishery and
increase the Mothership (MS) sector’s
ability to utilize its Pacific whiting
allocation, while maintaining fair and
equitable access to Pacific whiting by all
sectors of the program. The following
sections of this preamble provide (1) a
description of the non-tribal Pacific
whiting fishery; (2) the need for action;
and (3) the final regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
A Description of the Non-Tribal Pacific
Whiting Fishery
Pacific Whiting Fishery
In January 2011, NMFS implemented
a trawl rationalization program, a catch
share system, for the Pacific coast
groundfish fishery’s trawl fleet. The
program was adopted through
Amendment 20 to the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) (75 FR 78344, December 15,
2010) and is a type of limited access
privilege program under the MSA. Many
of the specific provisions of the
program, including those modified
through this rulemaking, are in
regulation at 50 CFR 660, but were not
included in the Amendment 20 changes
to the FMP. The trawl rationalization
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
program is intended to increase net
economic benefits, create individual
economic stability, provide full
utilization of the trawl sector allocation,
consider environmental impacts, and
achieve individual accountability of
catch and bycatch. The program consists
of cooperatives for the at-sea MS and CP
fleets that target and process Pacific
whiting (or the at-sea trawl fleet), and an
individual fishing quota (IFQ) program
for the shorebased trawl fleet that targets
both Pacific whiting and a wide range
of other groundfish species (or the
Shorebased IFQ Program).
The at-sea trawl fleet consists of
fishery participants harvesting and
processing Pacific whiting and is further
divided as follows: (1) The Pacific
whiting CP sector, which has been
operating under the Pacific Whiting
Conservation Cooperative (PWCC) since
1997 and was formalized for
management with the implementation
of Amendment 20 (the CP Co-op
Program); and (2) the Pacific whiting
MS sector (MS Co-op Program). The MS
sector is made up of mothership catcher
vessels (MSCVs), which harvest fish,
and motherships, which process the fish
at-sea. The MS sector program may
include multiple co-ops where vessels
pool their harvest together to form
fishing cooperatives, as well as vessels
not associated with a co-op (i.e., the
‘‘non-co-op’’ segment of the MS fishery).
In March of 2011, the owners of all 37
MSCV permits formed a co-op called the
‘‘Whiting Mothership Cooperative
(WMC)’’. Every year since then, all
participants in the sector have operated
in the co-op. One of the primary
purposes of the WMC is to minimize the
bycatch of constraining rockfish species
and Chinook salmon.
The shoreside Pacific whiting sector
was grouped into the Shorebased IFQ
Program during the development of
Amendment 20. Vessels in this fishery
target Pacific whiting with midwater
trawl gear. Fishery participants must
have quota pounds to harvest Pacific
whiting catch and associated bycatch.
About half of the shoreside Pacific
whiting vessels also cross-participate in
the MS fishery (i.e., MSCV). Within the
shoreside Pacific whiting fishery, there
is the Shoreside Whiting Cooperative,
which is voluntarily made up of
participating vessels, and is not formally
recognized in the groundfish
regulations. Historically, approximately
two-thirds of shoreside Pacific whiting
vessels have participated in the co-op
between 2012–2018.
Catch allocations for these subsectors
are based on formulas set in
Amendment 21 to the FMP, or are
determined during the biennial
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77001
management process. The total
allowable catch (TAC) for Pacific
whiting is set annually outside of the
Council’s harvest specifications process.
The TAC is set through a bilateral
process with Canada, consistent with
the Agreement Between the Government
of the United States of America and the
Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/
Whiting of 2003 (commonly known as
the Pacific Hake/Whiting Treaty) where
73.88 percent of the TAC is allocated to
U.S. fisheries, of which 17.5 percent is
allocated to the Tribal sector. In the fall
of each fishing year, an unused portion
of the Tribal allocation may be
reapportioned to the non-Tribal sectors.
This often results in an initial allocation
to the non-tribal sectors and then a postreapportionment allocation. Species in
the Groundfish FMP are managed
differently between the at-sea sectors
and the shoreside fishery. For the
shoreside Pacific whiting fishery,
participants must have quota pounds
(QPs) to cover all catch of any IFQ
species and some non-IFQ species are
managed with trip limits. For the at-sea
fisheries, set asides are established for
select groundfish species within the
biennial harvest specifications process.
Set asides are managed on an annual
basis unless there is a risk of exceeding
a harvest specification, an unforeseen
impact on other fisheries, or a
conservation concern.
The recent management programs
affected by this final rule are described
in greater detail in the proposed rule (87
FR 55979, September 13, 2022).
Need for Action
The MS sector has experienced lower
than average attainment than the other
non-tribal commercial Pacific whiting
sectors since the start of the trawl catch
share program, particularly since 2017.
Causes of under-attainment have been
attributed to the limited availability of
motherships for delivery of catch due to
seasonal overlap with the Alaskan
Eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock
fishery. In addition, existing regulations
have been identified as hindering some
catcher vessels’ opportunity to harvest
or deliver fish to MS processors, by
limiting the ability for available
processors to accept fish from catcher
vessels. These obstacles to harvesting
and processing in the MS sector have
led to reduced economic opportunity for
participants.
Section 2.2.1 of the Analysis (see
ADDRESSES) found that from 2017–2019,
the shoreside sector averaged attainment
of 92 percent of the initial Pacific
whiting allocations while the MS sector
averaged 71 percent and the CP sector
100 percent (83, 64, and 90 percent of
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
77002
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
the post-tribal reapportionment
allocation, respectively). Additionally,
from 2017–2019, the MS sector is
estimated to have not achieved potential
economic opportunity of $14.5–$27.3
million in production value from
unharvested Pacific whiting from the
initial allocations and $21.5 to $31.8
million compared to the postreapportionment allocations (section
5.4.1.0 of the Analysis).
In an informational report submitted
by the Council’s Groundfish Advisory
Subpanel (GAP), the GAP reported
during the previous five seasons, more
than 350 million pounds of Pacific
whiting worth more than $28 million in
ex-vessel revenue had been left
unharvested in the MS sector. Some
catcher vessels had been unable to
harvest and deliver their full MS sector
allocations and, in certain cases, catcher
vessels had been stranded without a MS
processor to deliver to in a season or
year. The GAP also reported that many
MS sector participants, including all six
MS processor vessels and several MS
catcher vessels, participate in the Alaska
pollock fishery where record high catch
limits in recent years had limited the
availability of processor vessels and
some catcher vessels to participate in
the Pacific whiting fishery during the
primary Pacific whiting season, between
May 15 and December 31.
The Council considered this action
over a number of meetings and made its
final recommendation in March 2022.
Final Action
This final rule revises existing
regulations that apply to the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Trawl Rationalization
Program participants while operating in
the non-tribal Pacific whiting fishery in
order to provide increased operational
flexibility and harvesting capabilities in
the Pacific whiting fishery and increase
the MS sector’s ability to utilize its
Pacific whiting allocation. The revisions
include: (1) adjusting the primary
Pacific whiting season start date for all
sectors of the Pacific whiting fishery
north of 40°30′ N lat. from May 15 to
May 1, and adjusting administrative
dates associated with the start of the
season; (2) removing from regulation the
MSCV processor obligation deadline of
November 30; (3) removing from
regulation the MS processor cap of 45
percent; and (4) removing restrictions
prohibiting an at-sea Pacific whiting
processing vessel from operating as a
MS or CP in the same calendar year.
The Council recommended and
NMFS is implementing these changes
based on information in the Analysis
indicating that these measures will: (1)
increase utilization of available MS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
quota that has previously been
unrealized; (2) increase opportunities in
the MS sector by providing participants
with an additional 15 days to participate
in the Pacific whiting fishery, providing
up to a month of Pacific whiting harvest
opportunities between the Alaska
pollock seasons; and (3) increase overall
attainment leading to economic benefits
for all sectors.
Season Start Date
This final rule amends regulations at
50 CFR 660.131(b)(2)(iii) to allow all
sectors of the Pacific whiting fishery
north of 40°30′ N lat. to begin operating
May 1. Currently, there are reporting
requirements due 45 days prior to the
current season start date of May 15. This
final rule aligns all of these
administrative dates to 45 days prior to
the new season start date of May 1,
which would be March 17. Specifically,
these date changes apply to the annual
MS co-op and CP co-op reports (50 CFR
660.113(c)(3) and (d)(3), respectively),
the deadline for proposed salmon
mitigation plans (SMPs) (50 CFR
660.113(e)(3)), the submission deadline
for post season SMP reports (50 CFR
660.113(e)(6)(i)), the deadline for
declaring into the MS co-op or non-coop fishery (50 CFR 660.150(g)(2)(i)), and
the MS co-op and CP co-op permit
annual registration deadlines (50 CFR
660.150(d)(1)(ii) and 660.160(d)(1)(ii),
respectively). Additionally, this final
rule moves up an Electronic Monitoring
(EM) application due date (50 CFR
660.604(e)) and an EM renewal date (50
CFR 660.604(i)) from February 15 to
February 1 to align with the new season
start date of May 1.
The Council recommended and
NMFS is implementing this earlier
season start date to provide vessels with
an additional 15 days to participate in
the Pacific whiting fishery and provide
even more opportunity to harvest the
Pacific whiting quota. The new season
start date applies to all non-tribal
sectors participating in the Pacific
whiting fishery north of 40°30′ N lat. As
noted in section 2.2.1 of the Analysis,
many vessels that fish in the Pacific
whiting fishery earn the majority of
their revenue in the Alaska fisheries and
are likely incentivized to prioritize
higher price of pollock above Pacific
whiting. Therefore, this final rule
provides vessels with an additional 15
days to participate in the Pacific whiting
fishery, providing up to a month of
Pacific whiting harvest opportunities
between the Alaskan Eastern Bering Sea
walleye pollock seasons.
This final rule is expected to
considerably increase attainment for the
MS sector, leading to economic benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for all participants. According to section
2.2.1 of the Analysis, the potential
additional catch that could have
occurred in the additional two weeks of
fishing in the 2016–2020 period could
have been associated with $8.4 to $20.3
million in production revenue for the
MS sector (assuming market conditions,
weather, and other factors). The
additional catch would have resulted in
an estimated $10.5–$22.8 million in
income impacts and 159 to 345
associated jobs.
As described in the proposed rule (87
FR 55979, September 13, 2022), no
additional biological impacts to Pacific
whiting and other groundfish species
are expected under this final rule.
Additionally, overall estimates of
Pacific salmon bycatch are still within
the estimates analyzed in the 2017
Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section
7(a)(2) Biological Opinion (F/WCR–
2017–7552) regarding the effects of the
PFMC’s Groundfish FMP on listed
salmonids (2017 Biological Opinion).
MS Obligation Deadline
This final rule removes regulations at
50 CFR 660.150(c)(7) that require
MSCVs to obligate their catch history
assignment (CHA) to a MS permit by
November 30 during the limited entry
permit (LEP) renewal process (50 CFR
660.25(b)(4)(i)(A)). Under this final rule,
there is no longer a requirement for
MSCV-endorsed permit owners to notify
NMFS of a mutual agreement exception
(MAE) nor a requirement for NMFS to
track the obligations (50 CFR
660.150(c)(7)(iv)). Additionally, the
requirement for notification of a MS
permit withdrawal at 50 CFR
660.150(c)(7)(v) is no longer required.
MSCVs are still required to renew their
limited entry permits each year, which
includes the co-op declaration for the
following year (50 CFR 660.150(g)(2)(i)),
and co-op(s) are still required to submit
their annual application per 50 CFR
660.150(d)(1)(iii).
The Council recommended and
NMFS is implementing the removal of
the MS obligation requirement from
regulations to provide MSCVs
additional flexibility to change
processors inseason without regulatory
delay. Removal of the obligation
deadline will provide a more flexible
management regime whereby
participants may continue to balance
individual needs of each entity to
optimally harvest fish through private
contracts and still provide consistent
revenue. This final rule is expected to
reduce administrative costs due to
MSCVs not needing to notify NMFS of
MAEs inseason and is expected to
remove a regulatory and administrative
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
burden to NMFS and members of the
MS sector. Current enforcement costs,
the capability to monitor fishing activity
(i.e., area closures, gear requirements,
safety standards) and monitoring of the
fishery through electronic monitoring or
observers, including catch and discard
accounting, will not change.
MS Processor Cap
This final rule removes the MS usage
limit (i.e., processor cap) of 45 percent
from regulation (§ 660.150(f)(3)(i)), and
there are no longer restrictions on the
amount of the MS sector allocation that
an entity could process. MS permit
holders are no longer required to submit
to NMFS a trawl identification of
ownership interest (OI) form in order to
verify compliance of the MS processor
cap, as per § 660.150(f)(3)(iv). MSCVs
are still held to a 20 percent
accumulation limit of the Pacific
whiting CHA (50 CFR 660.150(g)(3)(i))
and a catch limit of 30 percent of the
allocation (50 CFR 660.150(g)(3)(ii)).
The Council recommended and
NMFS is implementing the removal of
the MS processor cap to provide MS
permit holders additional flexibility and
to prevent occurrences of MSCVs not
being able to deliver to a MS processor
that had exceeded or was close to
exceeding the 45 percent processing
cap. Removal of the MS processor cap
is expected to provide positive benefits
to the MS sector through increased
harvesting capabilities and increased
flexibility in management of the MS
sector. This in turn may provide an
increase in revenue for the fishery as a
whole and for fishing communities.
Additionally, this final rule will
eliminate the need for the industry or
NMFS to monitor compliance with the
accumulation limit and will provide the
industry with the ability to harvest more
fish when fish are present on the
grounds and optimize the efficiencies
built into the fishery (i.e., available
crew, scheduled landings to
motherships and processing capacity).
As discussed in the proposed rule, the
Council set the processing cap for the
MS sector at 45 percent to inhibit
consolidation. Section 3.1.4 of The
Analysis, however, shows it is likely
that more than one MS would continue
to participate in the fishery under the
this final rule. Several factors, including
Alaska pollock fishery opportunities
and actual capacity of a single MS
vessel, suggest that it would be unlikely
and probably not feasible for one vessel
to process the entire allocation. In
addition, the Analysis shows even if an
entity was able to process the entirety of
the MS allocation under this final rule,
there would still be competition from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
other owners across the other whiting
sectors and other fisheries that produce
whitefish.
MS Processor & CP Permit Transfer
This final rule removes restrictions
prohibiting an at-sea Pacific whiting
processing vessel from operating as a
MS or CP in the same calendar year (50
CFR 660.112(d)(3) and (e)(3)). This
action allows a processing vessel to
operate as both an MS and CP in the
same calendar year, but not on the same
trip. Owners of processing vessels that
intend to operate as both an MS and a
CP during the Pacific whiting season are
required to register the processing vessel
under valid MS and CP permits per
regulations at 50 CFR 660.25(b). The
vessel may be registered under both an
MS permit and a CP endorsed permit
simultaneously. Additionally, this final
rule includes some administrative
changes to allow additional transfers of
limited entry MS permits and limited
entry permits with a CP endorsement so
that these permits may be transferred
more than twice within a calendar year.
Current requirements for operating as
a MS or CP continue to apply. To
operate in the MS fishery (i.e., receive
deliveries of catch from MS catcher
vessel and process MS sector allocations
at-sea) the vessel must be included in
the MS co-op agreement. To operate in
the CP fishery (i.e., catch and process CP
sector allocations at-sea) the vessel must
be included in the CP co-op agreement.
Including a new vessel in either the MS
or CP co-op agreement constitutes a
material change to the co-op agreement.
Within 7 calendar days of the new
processing vessel operating for the first
time in either the MS co-op fishery or
the CP co-op fishery, the respective coop manager must notify NMFS in
writing of such change to the co-op
agreement as required in regulations at
50 CFR 660.150(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4) and
660.160(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4).
Consistent with current regulations at
50 CFR 660.150(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4) and
660.160(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4), within 30 days
of a new vessel participating in a co-op
fishery, the MS or CP co-op manager
must submit a revised co-op agreement
to NMFS that lists all vessels and/or
processing vessels operating in the
respective co-op and include the new
processing vessel, along with a letter
describing the change to the co-op
agreement.
For each trip, the vessel is still
required to update its vessel monitoring
system (VMS) declaration to reflect its
activity for that trip prior to departure
as specified in existing groundfish
regulations at 50 CFR
660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77003
A separate economic data collection
(EDC) form is required for the owner,
lessee, charterer of a mothership vessel
registered to an MS permit as well as
owner, lessee, charterer of a catcher
processor vessel registered to a CPendorsed limited entry permit. If a
vessel holds both types of permit in one
calendar year, two EDC forms must be
submitted as specified at 50 CFR
660.114. Additionally, separate cost
recovery requirements apply to each
sector, as described at 50 CFR 660.115.
The Council recommended and
NMFS is lifting the restriction on MS
and CP permit transfers to increase the
likelihood that MSCVs have markets to
which to deliver catch throughout the
fishing season. The operational
flexibility provided in this action would
provide significant additional economic
opportunity to at-sea Pacific whiting
fishery participants and fishing
communities. These measures will
allow catcher vessels to harvest MS
sector allocations and provide catch
revenue to the respective vessel crews.
In the event that additional processing
vessels cannot commit to taking
deliveries from catcher vessels (due to
changes in business plans, for example)
this action will provide additional
harvesting and processing opportunities
for at-sea Pacific whiting fishery
participants.
Summary of Anticipated Effects of This
Final Rule
Overall, this final rule is expected to
increase attainment across all three nontribal Pacific whiting sectors, with the
largest change expected in the MS
sector. While the movement of the
primary season start date is likely to
provide the most benefit in terms of
harvest opportunities when both MS
and MSCVs can be on the fishing
grounds, the increased flexibility to
have more processors (via the unlimited
permit transfer) or have processors
accept and potentially process higher
amounts of catch (removal of the
processor cap) may, in combination,
provide the most opportunity to
increase attainment and economic
benefits for all sectors. Increased
attainment of the Pacific whiting
allocation, through additional fishing
opportunity, processing capacity, and
flexibility, will result in positive
benefits to the fleet and the
communities in which participants
reside. There are expected to be no
biological impacts outside of those
previously disclosed in harvest
specifications processes for both
groundfish and Pacific whiting or those
in the 2017 Biological Opinion for
salmonids.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
77004
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Other Actions Included in This Final
Rule
NMFS is also implementing
additional administrative changes in
this rule. This final rule adjusts cost
recovery regulation language to state
that the value of ‘‘Pacific whiting’’
instead of ‘‘all groundfish’’ will be used
in the annual cost recovery fee
calculations for the at-sea sectors to
reflect the current practice of using
Pacific whiting only in the cost recovery
fee calculations. While the cost recovery
regulations state that all groundfish
harvested should be used to calculate
ex-vessel value, it is current practice to
use Pacific whiting only when
calculating the ex-vessel value of the
MS and CP sectors. Only Pacific whiting
is used because there is insufficient data
available on the value of non-whiting
species encountered by the MS and CP
sectors. This change reflects the original
intention of the Council in their 2011
cost recovery recommendations. The
Council recommended this change to
NMFS at the April 2021 meeting.
This final rule makes some technical,
non-substantive changes to improve
comprehensibility of the regulations by
removing outdated regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Comments and Responses
NMFS held a public comment period
on the proposed rule (87 FR 55979,
September 13, 2022) from September 13,
2022, to October 13, 2022. NMFS
received a total of four public comment
submissions. Three of the public
comments were from private citizens,
and one of the public comments was
from a commercial fishing entity that
participates in one of the affected
sectors. All expressed general support of
the proposed rule with the exception of
one commenter not supporting the
change of the season start date. This
comment and response is summarized
below.
Comment: A private citizen
commented that they are concerned
about moving the season start date
forward two weeks due to the possible
impacts on other fish populations,
particularly Pacific salmon. That private
citizen does not believe there is
sufficient evidence to support moving
the season start date forward, but is in
favor of the other components of the
rule.
Response: This final rule
appropriately balances NMFS’s duties
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act to
conserve marine resources while
simultaneously creating opportunities to
achieve optimum yield and extends
gratitude for the engagement of the
public during this process. As detailed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
in the proposed rule (87 FR 55979,
September 13, 2022) and in the
Analysis, NMFS evaluated the potential
impact of the season date change on
salmon bycatch in the whiting sectors
and determined that this action is
unlikely to either increase the total
amount of catch or change the
composition of the bycatch.
Specifically, the Analysis indicates the
anticipated impacts would be within the
effects considered in the 2017 Biological
Opinion. NMFS is aware of the
uncertainty in salmon bycatch and stock
compositions since the fishery has not
occurred during early May since the
1990s. However, the fishery continues
to operate under the reasonable and
prudent measures described in the
incidental take statement (ITS) of the
2017 Biological Opinion to limit
bycatch, and inseason management
tools to reduce listed bycatch, therefore
we have the ability to act to reduce
bycatch if an issue does arise.
Classification
NMFS is issuing this rule pursuant to
section 304(b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, which provides
specific authority and procedure for
implementing this action. The majority
of this rulemaking is promulgated
pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A); the
Council recommended this action at its
April 2021 and March 2022 meetings.
This rulemaking also includes minor
regulatory changes promulgated
pursuant to section 305(d). This action
is necessary to improve
comprehensibility of the regulations by
removing outdated regulations.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined this final rule is
consistent with the FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification. As a result, a
regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required and none was prepared.
This final rule contains a collectionof-information requirement subject to
review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule extends the existing
requirements for the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Trawl Rationalization
Program Permit and License Information
Collection OMB Control Number 0648–
0620 and revises the existing
requirements by removing the
requirement for the owner of the MSCVendorsed permit to submit a copy of a
MAE to NMFS that includes the MS
permit owner’s acknowledgement of
termination of the catcher vessel’s
obligation to the permitted MS vessel. If
a MS permit withdraws from the fishery
before Pacific whiting has been
allocated to the MS sector, this rule
removes the requirement of the MS
permit owner withdrawing from the
fishery to provide written notification to
NMFS and all owners of MSCVendorsed permits with CHA obligated to
the MS permit withdrawing.
Additionally, this rule removes the
requirement for a MS to submit an
ownership interest (OI) form. This rule
removes 3 hours and 18 burden minutes
per year for the fishery. Public reporting
burden for removing the requirements of
submitting a MAE, a MS permit
withdrawal and removing the
requirement of a MS submitting an OI
form is estimated to result in a reduced
average cost of $5.34 per year for
participants of the fishery.
The existing collection of information
requirements continue to apply under
the following OMB Control Number
0648–0573: Expanded Vessel
Monitoring System (VMS) Requirements
for the Pacific Groundfish Fishery.
We invite the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. Written comments
and recommendations for this
information collection should be
submitted on the following website:
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by using the
search function and entering either the
title of the collection or the OMB
Control Number 0648–0620.
Notwithstanding any other provisions
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 9, 2022.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
660 as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. Amend § 660.25 by:
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(4)(i)(E),
(b)(4)(v)(A), and (b)(4)(vii)(C);
■ b. Add paragraph (b)(4)(vii)(D); and
■ c. Revise paragraph (b)(4)(viii)(C).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 660.25
Permits.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Limited entry permits with an MS/
catcher vessel (CV) endorsement will
not be renewed until SFD has received
complete documentation of permit
ownership as required under
§ 660.150(g).
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * *
(A) General. Change in permit owner
and/or vessel owner applications must
be submitted to NMFS with the
appropriate documentation described at
paragraphs (b)(4)(viii) and (ix) of this
section. The permit owner may convey
the limited entry permit to a different
person. The new permit owner will not
be authorized to use the permit until the
change in permit owner has been
registered with and approved by NMFS.
NMFS will not approve a change in
permit owner for a limited entry permit
with a sablefish endorsement that does
not meet the ownership requirements
for such permit described at paragraph
(b)(3)(iv)(B) of this section. NMFS will
not approve a change in permit owner
for a limited entry permit with an MS/
CV endorsement that does not meet the
ownership requirements for such permit
described at § 660.150(g)(3). NMFS
considers the following as a change in
permit owner that would require
registering with and approval by NMFS,
including but not limited to: Selling the
permit to another individual or entity;
adding an individual or entity to the
legal name on the permit; or removing
an individual or entity from the legal
name on the permit. A change in vessel
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
owner includes any changes to the
name(s) of any or all vessel owners, as
registered with U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG) or a state. The new owner(s) of
a vessel registered to a limited entry
permit must report any change in vessel
ownership to NMFS within 30 calendar
days after such change has been
registered with the USCG or a state
licensing agency.
*
*
*
*
*
(vii) * * *
(C) Limited entry permits with an MS/
CV endorsement. Limited entry permits
with an MS/CV endorsement may be
registered to another vessel up to two
times during the calendar year as long
as the second change in vessel
registration is back to the original
vessel. The original vessel is either the
vessel registered to the permit as of
January 1, or if no vessel is registered to
the permit as of January 1, the original
vessel is the first vessel to which the
permit is registered after January 1.
After the original vessel has been
established, the first change in vessel
registration would be to another vessel,
but any second change in vessel
registration must be back to the original
vessel. On the second change in vessel
registration back to the original vessel,
that vessel must be used to fish
exclusively in the MS Co-op Program
described at § 660.150 for the remainder
of the calendar year, and declare into
the limited entry mid water trawl,
Pacific whiting mothership sector as
specified at § 660.13(d)(4)(iv).
(D) Limited entry MS permits and
limited entry permits with a catcher/
processor (C/P) endorsement. Vessels
registered to both a MS permit and a C/
P endorsed permit may operate in both
the at-sea MS sector and C/P sector
during the same calendar year, but not
on the same trip. Prior to leaving port,
a vessel registered under both a MS
permit and a C/P endorsed permit must
declare through VMS the sector in
which it will participate for the duration
of the trip, as specified at
§ 660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A).
(viii) * * *
(C) For a request to change a vessel
registration and/or change a permit
owner or vessel owner for a MS/CVendorsed limited entry permit, an
Identification of Ownership Interest
Form must be completed and included
with the application form.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 660.111 by:
■ a. Under the definition
‘‘Accumulation limits’’, remove
paragraph (2)(i) and redesignate
paragraphs (2)(ii) and (iii) as paragraphs
(2)(i) and (ii);
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77005
b. Under the definition ‘‘Ex-vessel
value’’, revise paragraphs (2) and (3);
and
■ c. Remove the definitions of ‘‘Mutual
agreement exception’’ and ‘‘Processor
obligation’’.
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 660.111
Trawl fishery—definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Ex-vessel value * * *
(2) For the MS Co-op Program, the
value of Pacific whiting delivered by a
catcher vessel to an MS-permitted
vessel.
(3) For the C/P Co-op Program, the
value as determined by the aggregate
pounds of Pacific whiting retained on
board by the vessel registered to a C/Pendorsed limited entry trawl permit,
multiplied by the MS Co-op Program
average price per pound as announced
pursuant to § 660.115(b)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
§ 660.112
[Amended]
4. Amend § 660.112 by:
a. Remove paragraph (d)(3);
b. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(4)
through (6) as paragraphs (d)(3) through
(5);
■ c. Remove paragraph (d)(7);
■ d. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(8)
through (16) as paragraphs (d)(6)
through (14);
■ e. Remove paragraph (e)(3); and
■ f. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(4)
through (10) as paragraphs (e)(3)
through (9).
■ 5. Amend § 660.113 by revising
paragraphs (c)(3) introductory text,
(c)(5)(ii)(A) introductory text,
(c)(5)(ii)(A)(3), (5), (6), and (9), (d)(3)
introductory text, (d)(5)(ii)(A)
introductory text, (d)(5)(ii)(A)(2), (4), (5),
and (6), (e)(3), and (e)(6)(i) to read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 660.113 Trawl fishery—recordkeeping
and reporting.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Annual co-op report. The
designated co-op manager for the
mothership co-op must submit an
annual report to NMFS and the Council
by March 17 each year, before a co-op
permit is issued for that year. The
annual co-op report will contain
information about the previous year’s
fishery, including:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) For all deliveries of Pacific
whiting that the fish buyer buys from
each fish seller:
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
77006
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The weight of Pacific whiting
delivered;
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The ex-vessel value of Pacific
whiting;
(6) The net ex-vessel value of Pacific
whiting;
*
*
*
*
*
(9) The total fee amount collected as
a result of all Pacific whiting.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) Annual co-op report. The
designated co-op manager for the C/P
co-op must submit an annual report to
NMFS and the Council by March 17
each year, before a co-op permit is
issued for that year. The annual co-op
report will contain information about
the previous year’s fishery, including:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) For all Pacific whiting:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The weight of Pacific whiting
retained on board;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) The ex-vessel value of Pacific
whiting retained on board;
(5) The net ex-vessel value of Pacific
whiting retained on board; and
(6) The total fee amount collected as
a result of all Pacific whiting.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Deadline for proposed SMP. A
proposed SMP must be submitted
between February 1 and March 17 of the
year in which it intends to be in effect
to NMFS at: NMFS, West Coast Region,
ATTN: Fisheries Permit Office, Bldg. 1,
7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA
98115.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(i) Submission deadline. The SMP
postseason report must be received by
NMFS and the Council no later than
March 17 of the year following that in
which the SMP was approved.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 660.131 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (b)(2)(iii)(A) and
(B), and (b)(2)(iii)(C)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 660.131 Pacific whiting fishery
management measures.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Criteria. The start of a Pacific
whiting primary season may be changed
based on a recommendation from the
Council and consideration of the
following factors, if applicable: Size of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
the harvest guidelines for whiting and
bycatch species; age/size structure of the
whiting population; expected harvest of
bycatch and prohibited species;
availability and stock status of
prohibited species; expected
participation by catchers and
processors; environmental conditions;
timing of alternate or competing
fisheries; industry agreement; fishing or
processing rates; and other relevant
information.
(iii) * * *
(A) Catcher/processor sector—May 1.
(B) Mothership sector—May 1.
(C) * * *
(1) North of 40°30′ N lat.—May 1; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 660.150 by:
■ a. Revise the section heading;
■ b. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), add the
word ‘‘and’’ following the semicolon at
the end of paragraph;
■ c. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(B), remove ‘‘;
and’’ and add a period in its place;
■ d. Remove paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(C) and
(b)(2)(i)(A)(3);
■ e. Redesignate paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A)(4) as paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A)(3);
■ f. Revise paragraph (c)(6)(i)(A);
■ g. Remove paragraph (c)(7);
■ h. Revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii) and the
introductory text of paragraph (d)(1)(iii);
■ i. Remove paragraph
(d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iii);
■ j. Redesignate paragraphs
(d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iv) through (xii) as
paragraphs (d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iii) through
(xi);
■ k. Remove paragraph (f)(3);
■ l. Redesignate paragraphs (f)(4)
through (6) as paragraphs (f)(3) through
(5); and
■ m. Revise paragraph (g)(2)(i)
introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 660.150
Mothership (MS) Co-op Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Through an inter-co-op agreement,
the designated co-op managers of
permitted MS co-ops may distribute
Pacific whiting allocations among one
or more permitted MS co-ops.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Annual registration and deadline.
Each year, a co-op entity intending to
participate as a co-op under the MS Coop Program must submit an application
for a MS co-op permit between January
17 and March 17 of the year in which
it intends to fish. NMFS will not
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
consider any applications received after
March 17. An MS co-op permit expires
on December 31 of the year in which it
was issued.
(iii) Application for MS co-op permit.
The designated co-op manager, on
behalf of the co-op entity, must submit
a complete application form and
include each of the items listed in
paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(A) of this section.
Only complete applications will be
considered for issuance of a MS co-op
permit. An application will not be
considered complete if any required
application fees and annual co-op
reports have not been received by
NMFS. NMFS may request additional
supplemental documentation as
necessary to make a determination of
whether to approve or disapprove the
application. Application forms and
instruction are available on the NMFS
West Coast Region (WCR) website
(https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/
groundfish-mothership-cooperativepermit) or by request from NMFS. The
designated co-op manager must sign the
application acknowledging the
responsibilities of a designated co-op
manager defined in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section. For permit owners with
more than one MS/CV endorsement and
associated CHA, paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(D)
of this section specifies how to join an
MS co-op(s).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Renewal. An MS/CV-endorsed
permit must be renewed annually
consistent with the limited entry permit
regulations given at § 660.25(b)(4).
During renewal, all MS/CV-endorsed
limited entry permit owners must make
a preliminary declaration regarding
their intent to participate in the co-op or
non-co-op portion of the MS Co-op
Program for the following year. MS/CVendorsed permits not obligated to a
permitted MS co-op by March 17 of the
fishing year will be assigned to the nonco-op fishery. For an MS/CV-endorsed
permit that is not renewed, the
following occurs:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 660.160 by:
■ a. Remove paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C); and
■ b. Revise paragraphs (d)(1)(ii),
(e)(1)(iii), and (e)(2)(i).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 660.160 Catcher/processor (C/P) Co-op
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Annual registration and deadline.
Each year, the co-op entity must submit
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
a complete application to NMFS for a C/
P co-op permit. The application must be
submitted to NMFS by between January
17 and March 17 of the year in which
it intends to participate. NMFS will not
consider any applications received after
March 17. A C/P co-op permit expires
on December 31 of the year in which it
was issued.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Restriction on C/P vessel
operating as mothership. A vessel
registered to a C/P-endorsed permit may
operate as a mothership during the same
calendar year it participates in the C/P
sector but not on the same trip.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) Renewal. A C/P-endorsed permit
must be renewed annually consistent
with the limited entry permit
regulations given at § 660.25(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 660.604 by revising
paragraph (e) introductory text and
paragraph (i) to read as follows:
§ 660.604 Vessel and first receiver
responsibilities.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Electronic Monitoring (EM)
Authorization. To obtain an EM
Authorization, a vessel owner must
submit an initial application to the
NMFS West Coast Region Fisheries
Permit Office, and then a final
application that includes an EM system
certification and a vessel monitoring
plan (VMP). NMFS will only review
complete applications. NMFS will issue
a public notice at least 90 calendar days
prior to when it will begin accepting
applications for EM Authorizations for
the first year of the Program. Once
NMFS begins accepting applications,
vessel owners that want to have their
EM Authorizations effective for January
1 of the following calendar year must
submit their complete application to
NMFS by October 1. Vessel owners that
want to have their EM Authorizations
effective for the primary whiting season
start date must submit their complete
application to NMFS by February 1 of
the same year.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Renewing an EM Authorization. To
maintain a valid EM Authorization,
vessel owners must renew annually
prior to the permit expiration date.
NMFS will mail EM Authorization
renewal forms to existing EM
Authorization holders each year on or
about: September 1 for non-trawl
shorebased IFQ vessels and January 1
for Pacific whiting IFQ and MS/CV
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Dec 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
vessels. Vessel owners who want to
have their EM Authorizations effective
for January 1 of the following calendar
year must submit their complete
renewal form to NMFS by October 15.
Vessel owners who want to have their
EM Authorizations effective for the
primary whiting season start date of the
following calendar year must submit
their complete renewal form to NMFS
by February 1.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–27117 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 221206–0261]
RIN 0648–BL48
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan; Amendment 30;
2023–24 Biennial Specifications and
Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule establishes the
2023–24 harvest specifications for
groundfish caught in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone seaward of Washington,
Oregon, and California, consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan. This final rule also
revises management measures intended
to keep the total annual catch of each
groundfish stock or stock complex
within the annual catch limits. These
measures are intended to help prevent
overfishing, rebuild overfished stocks,
achieve optimum yield, and ensure
management measures are based on the
best scientific information available.
This final rule also makes minor
corrections to the regulations. This
action also implements portions of
Amendment 30 to the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan,
which specifies a shortbelly rockfish
catch threshold to initiate Council
review; extends the length of the limited
entry fixed gear sablefish primary
season; changes the use of Rockfish
Conservation Area boundaries; expands
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77007
the use of Block Area Closures to
control catch of groundfish; and corrects
the definition of Block Area Closures.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 1, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) which
addresses the National Environmental
Policy Act, Presidential Executive Order
12866, and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, is accessible via the internet at the
NMFS West Coast Region website at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/
west-coast. Background information and
documents including an analysis for
this action (Analysis), which addresses
the statutory requirements of the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MagnusonStevens Act) are available from the
Pacific Fishery Management Council’s
website at https://www.pcouncil.org. The
final 2022 Stock Assessment and
Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for
Pacific Coast groundfish, as well as the
SAFE reports for previous years, are
available from the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s website at https://
www.pcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gretchen Hanshew, Fishery
Management Specialist, at 206–526–
6147 or gretchen.hanshew@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Harvest Specifications
This final rule sets 2023–24 harvest
specifications and management
measures for 127 of the 128 groundfish
stocks or management units which
currently have ACLs or ACL
contributions to stock complexes
managed under the PCGFMP, except for
Pacific whiting. Pacific whiting harvest
specifications are established annually
through a separate bilateral process with
Canada.
The OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs are based
on the best available biological and
socioeconomic data, including projected
biomass trends, information on assumed
distribution of stock biomass, and
revised technical methods used to
calculate stock biomass. See Tables 1a
and 2a to Part 660, Subpart C in the
regulatory text supporting this rule for
the 2023–24 OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs for
each stock or stock complex.
A detailed description of each stock
and stock complex for which the
Council establishes harvest
specifications set through this rule can
be found in the 2022 SAFE document
posted on the Council’s website at
https://www.pcouncil.org/stockassessments-star-reports-stat-reportsrebuilding-analyses-terms-of-reference/
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77000-77007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27117]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 221208-0265]
RIN 0648-BL41
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Whiting Utilization in the At-Sea Sectors
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements regulatory amendments that apply to
the Pacific Coast Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program participants
that operate in the non-tribal Pacific whiting fishery. This rulemaking
adjusts the primary Pacific whiting season start date for all sectors
of the Pacific whiting fishery north of 40[deg]30' N latitude (lat.)
from May 15 to May 1, removes from regulation the mothership catcher
vessel (MSCV) processor obligation deadline of November 30, removes
from regulation the Mothership (MS) processor cap of 45 percent, and
provides the ability to operate as a Catcher/Processor (CP) and an MS
in the same year. This action is necessary to provide MS sector
participants with greater operational flexibility by modifying specific
regulations that have been identified as potentially contributing to
lower attainment of the Pacific whiting allocation compared to the CP
and shoreside Pacific whiting sectors. This final rule is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan, and other applicable laws.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: This rule is accessible via the Office of the Federal
Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov/. Background
information and analytical documents (Analysis) are available at the
NMFS
[[Page 77001]]
West Coast Region website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/west-coast and at the Pacific Fishery Management Council's website at
https://www.pcouncil.org.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
final rule may be submitted to NMFS and to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abbie Moyer, phone: 206-305-9601, or
email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) manage
the groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic zone seaward of
California, Oregon, and Washington under the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The Council prepared the FMP under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.). Regulations governing U.S. fisheries
and implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR parts 660.
Background
This purpose of this final rule is to revise regulations that may
be unnecessarily constraining, in order to provide increased
operational flexibility in the Pacific whiting fishery and increase the
Mothership (MS) sector's ability to utilize its Pacific whiting
allocation, while maintaining fair and equitable access to Pacific
whiting by all sectors of the program. The following sections of this
preamble provide (1) a description of the non-tribal Pacific whiting
fishery; (2) the need for action; and (3) the final regulations.
A Description of the Non-Tribal Pacific Whiting Fishery
Pacific Whiting Fishery
In January 2011, NMFS implemented a trawl rationalization program,
a catch share system, for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery's trawl
fleet. The program was adopted through Amendment 20 to the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) (75 FR 78344, December
15, 2010) and is a type of limited access privilege program under the
MSA. Many of the specific provisions of the program, including those
modified through this rulemaking, are in regulation at 50 CFR 660, but
were not included in the Amendment 20 changes to the FMP. The trawl
rationalization program is intended to increase net economic benefits,
create individual economic stability, provide full utilization of the
trawl sector allocation, consider environmental impacts, and achieve
individual accountability of catch and bycatch. The program consists of
cooperatives for the at-sea MS and CP fleets that target and process
Pacific whiting (or the at-sea trawl fleet), and an individual fishing
quota (IFQ) program for the shorebased trawl fleet that targets both
Pacific whiting and a wide range of other groundfish species (or the
Shorebased IFQ Program).
The at-sea trawl fleet consists of fishery participants harvesting
and processing Pacific whiting and is further divided as follows: (1)
The Pacific whiting CP sector, which has been operating under the
Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative (PWCC) since 1997 and was
formalized for management with the implementation of Amendment 20 (the
CP Co-op Program); and (2) the Pacific whiting MS sector (MS Co-op
Program). The MS sector is made up of mothership catcher vessels
(MSCVs), which harvest fish, and motherships, which process the fish
at-sea. The MS sector program may include multiple co-ops where vessels
pool their harvest together to form fishing cooperatives, as well as
vessels not associated with a co-op (i.e., the ``non-co-op'' segment of
the MS fishery). In March of 2011, the owners of all 37 MSCV permits
formed a co-op called the ``Whiting Mothership Cooperative (WMC)''.
Every year since then, all participants in the sector have operated in
the co-op. One of the primary purposes of the WMC is to minimize the
bycatch of constraining rockfish species and Chinook salmon.
The shoreside Pacific whiting sector was grouped into the
Shorebased IFQ Program during the development of Amendment 20. Vessels
in this fishery target Pacific whiting with midwater trawl gear.
Fishery participants must have quota pounds to harvest Pacific whiting
catch and associated bycatch. About half of the shoreside Pacific
whiting vessels also cross-participate in the MS fishery (i.e., MSCV).
Within the shoreside Pacific whiting fishery, there is the Shoreside
Whiting Cooperative, which is voluntarily made up of participating
vessels, and is not formally recognized in the groundfish regulations.
Historically, approximately two-thirds of shoreside Pacific whiting
vessels have participated in the co-op between 2012-2018.
Catch allocations for these subsectors are based on formulas set in
Amendment 21 to the FMP, or are determined during the biennial
management process. The total allowable catch (TAC) for Pacific whiting
is set annually outside of the Council's harvest specifications
process. The TAC is set through a bilateral process with Canada,
consistent with the Agreement Between the Government of the United
States of America and the Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting
of 2003 (commonly known as the Pacific Hake/Whiting Treaty) where 73.88
percent of the TAC is allocated to U.S. fisheries, of which 17.5
percent is allocated to the Tribal sector. In the fall of each fishing
year, an unused portion of the Tribal allocation may be reapportioned
to the non-Tribal sectors. This often results in an initial allocation
to the non-tribal sectors and then a post-reapportionment allocation.
Species in the Groundfish FMP are managed differently between the at-
sea sectors and the shoreside fishery. For the shoreside Pacific
whiting fishery, participants must have quota pounds (QPs) to cover all
catch of any IFQ species and some non-IFQ species are managed with trip
limits. For the at-sea fisheries, set asides are established for select
groundfish species within the biennial harvest specifications process.
Set asides are managed on an annual basis unless there is a risk of
exceeding a harvest specification, an unforeseen impact on other
fisheries, or a conservation concern.
The recent management programs affected by this final rule are
described in greater detail in the proposed rule (87 FR 55979,
September 13, 2022).
Need for Action
The MS sector has experienced lower than average attainment than
the other non-tribal commercial Pacific whiting sectors since the start
of the trawl catch share program, particularly since 2017. Causes of
under-attainment have been attributed to the limited availability of
motherships for delivery of catch due to seasonal overlap with the
Alaskan Eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock fishery. In addition,
existing regulations have been identified as hindering some catcher
vessels' opportunity to harvest or deliver fish to MS processors, by
limiting the ability for available processors to accept fish from
catcher vessels. These obstacles to harvesting and processing in the MS
sector have led to reduced economic opportunity for participants.
Section 2.2.1 of the Analysis (see ADDRESSES) found that from 2017-
2019, the shoreside sector averaged attainment of 92 percent of the
initial Pacific whiting allocations while the MS sector averaged 71
percent and the CP sector 100 percent (83, 64, and 90 percent of
[[Page 77002]]
the post-tribal reapportionment allocation, respectively).
Additionally, from 2017-2019, the MS sector is estimated to have not
achieved potential economic opportunity of $14.5-$27.3 million in
production value from unharvested Pacific whiting from the initial
allocations and $21.5 to $31.8 million compared to the post-
reapportionment allocations (section 5.4.1.0 of the Analysis).
In an informational report submitted by the Council's Groundfish
Advisory Subpanel (GAP), the GAP reported during the previous five
seasons, more than 350 million pounds of Pacific whiting worth more
than $28 million in ex-vessel revenue had been left unharvested in the
MS sector. Some catcher vessels had been unable to harvest and deliver
their full MS sector allocations and, in certain cases, catcher vessels
had been stranded without a MS processor to deliver to in a season or
year. The GAP also reported that many MS sector participants, including
all six MS processor vessels and several MS catcher vessels,
participate in the Alaska pollock fishery where record high catch
limits in recent years had limited the availability of processor
vessels and some catcher vessels to participate in the Pacific whiting
fishery during the primary Pacific whiting season, between May 15 and
December 31.
The Council considered this action over a number of meetings and
made its final recommendation in March 2022.
Final Action
This final rule revises existing regulations that apply to the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program participants
while operating in the non-tribal Pacific whiting fishery in order to
provide increased operational flexibility and harvesting capabilities
in the Pacific whiting fishery and increase the MS sector's ability to
utilize its Pacific whiting allocation. The revisions include: (1)
adjusting the primary Pacific whiting season start date for all sectors
of the Pacific whiting fishery north of 40[deg]30' N lat. from May 15
to May 1, and adjusting administrative dates associated with the start
of the season; (2) removing from regulation the MSCV processor
obligation deadline of November 30; (3) removing from regulation the MS
processor cap of 45 percent; and (4) removing restrictions prohibiting
an at-sea Pacific whiting processing vessel from operating as a MS or
CP in the same calendar year.
The Council recommended and NMFS is implementing these changes
based on information in the Analysis indicating that these measures
will: (1) increase utilization of available MS quota that has
previously been unrealized; (2) increase opportunities in the MS sector
by providing participants with an additional 15 days to participate in
the Pacific whiting fishery, providing up to a month of Pacific whiting
harvest opportunities between the Alaska pollock seasons; and (3)
increase overall attainment leading to economic benefits for all
sectors.
Season Start Date
This final rule amends regulations at 50 CFR 660.131(b)(2)(iii) to
allow all sectors of the Pacific whiting fishery north of 40[deg]30' N
lat. to begin operating May 1. Currently, there are reporting
requirements due 45 days prior to the current season start date of May
15. This final rule aligns all of these administrative dates to 45 days
prior to the new season start date of May 1, which would be March 17.
Specifically, these date changes apply to the annual MS co-op and CP
co-op reports (50 CFR 660.113(c)(3) and (d)(3), respectively), the
deadline for proposed salmon mitigation plans (SMPs) (50 CFR
660.113(e)(3)), the submission deadline for post season SMP reports (50
CFR 660.113(e)(6)(i)), the deadline for declaring into the MS co-op or
non-co-op fishery (50 CFR 660.150(g)(2)(i)), and the MS co-op and CP
co-op permit annual registration deadlines (50 CFR 660.150(d)(1)(ii)
and 660.160(d)(1)(ii), respectively). Additionally, this final rule
moves up an Electronic Monitoring (EM) application due date (50 CFR
660.604(e)) and an EM renewal date (50 CFR 660.604(i)) from February 15
to February 1 to align with the new season start date of May 1.
The Council recommended and NMFS is implementing this earlier
season start date to provide vessels with an additional 15 days to
participate in the Pacific whiting fishery and provide even more
opportunity to harvest the Pacific whiting quota. The new season start
date applies to all non-tribal sectors participating in the Pacific
whiting fishery north of 40[deg]30' N lat. As noted in section 2.2.1 of
the Analysis, many vessels that fish in the Pacific whiting fishery
earn the majority of their revenue in the Alaska fisheries and are
likely incentivized to prioritize higher price of pollock above Pacific
whiting. Therefore, this final rule provides vessels with an additional
15 days to participate in the Pacific whiting fishery, providing up to
a month of Pacific whiting harvest opportunities between the Alaskan
Eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock seasons.
This final rule is expected to considerably increase attainment for
the MS sector, leading to economic benefits for all participants.
According to section 2.2.1 of the Analysis, the potential additional
catch that could have occurred in the additional two weeks of fishing
in the 2016-2020 period could have been associated with $8.4 to $20.3
million in production revenue for the MS sector (assuming market
conditions, weather, and other factors). The additional catch would
have resulted in an estimated $10.5-$22.8 million in income impacts and
159 to 345 associated jobs.
As described in the proposed rule (87 FR 55979, September 13,
2022), no additional biological impacts to Pacific whiting and other
groundfish species are expected under this final rule. Additionally,
overall estimates of Pacific salmon bycatch are still within the
estimates analyzed in the 2017 Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section
7(a)(2) Biological Opinion (F/WCR-2017-7552) regarding the effects of
the PFMC's Groundfish FMP on listed salmonids (2017 Biological
Opinion).
MS Obligation Deadline
This final rule removes regulations at 50 CFR 660.150(c)(7) that
require MSCVs to obligate their catch history assignment (CHA) to a MS
permit by November 30 during the limited entry permit (LEP) renewal
process (50 CFR 660.25(b)(4)(i)(A)). Under this final rule, there is no
longer a requirement for MSCV-endorsed permit owners to notify NMFS of
a mutual agreement exception (MAE) nor a requirement for NMFS to track
the obligations (50 CFR 660.150(c)(7)(iv)). Additionally, the
requirement for notification of a MS permit withdrawal at 50 CFR
660.150(c)(7)(v) is no longer required. MSCVs are still required to
renew their limited entry permits each year, which includes the co-op
declaration for the following year (50 CFR 660.150(g)(2)(i)), and co-
op(s) are still required to submit their annual application per 50 CFR
660.150(d)(1)(iii).
The Council recommended and NMFS is implementing the removal of the
MS obligation requirement from regulations to provide MSCVs additional
flexibility to change processors inseason without regulatory delay.
Removal of the obligation deadline will provide a more flexible
management regime whereby participants may continue to balance
individual needs of each entity to optimally harvest fish through
private contracts and still provide consistent revenue. This final rule
is expected to reduce administrative costs due to MSCVs not needing to
notify NMFS of MAEs inseason and is expected to remove a regulatory and
administrative
[[Page 77003]]
burden to NMFS and members of the MS sector. Current enforcement costs,
the capability to monitor fishing activity (i.e., area closures, gear
requirements, safety standards) and monitoring of the fishery through
electronic monitoring or observers, including catch and discard
accounting, will not change.
MS Processor Cap
This final rule removes the MS usage limit (i.e., processor cap) of
45 percent from regulation (Sec. 660.150(f)(3)(i)), and there are no
longer restrictions on the amount of the MS sector allocation that an
entity could process. MS permit holders are no longer required to
submit to NMFS a trawl identification of ownership interest (OI) form
in order to verify compliance of the MS processor cap, as per Sec.
660.150(f)(3)(iv). MSCVs are still held to a 20 percent accumulation
limit of the Pacific whiting CHA (50 CFR 660.150(g)(3)(i)) and a catch
limit of 30 percent of the allocation (50 CFR 660.150(g)(3)(ii)).
The Council recommended and NMFS is implementing the removal of the
MS processor cap to provide MS permit holders additional flexibility
and to prevent occurrences of MSCVs not being able to deliver to a MS
processor that had exceeded or was close to exceeding the 45 percent
processing cap. Removal of the MS processor cap is expected to provide
positive benefits to the MS sector through increased harvesting
capabilities and increased flexibility in management of the MS sector.
This in turn may provide an increase in revenue for the fishery as a
whole and for fishing communities.
Additionally, this final rule will eliminate the need for the
industry or NMFS to monitor compliance with the accumulation limit and
will provide the industry with the ability to harvest more fish when
fish are present on the grounds and optimize the efficiencies built
into the fishery (i.e., available crew, scheduled landings to
motherships and processing capacity). As discussed in the proposed
rule, the Council set the processing cap for the MS sector at 45
percent to inhibit consolidation. Section 3.1.4 of The Analysis,
however, shows it is likely that more than one MS would continue to
participate in the fishery under the this final rule. Several factors,
including Alaska pollock fishery opportunities and actual capacity of a
single MS vessel, suggest that it would be unlikely and probably not
feasible for one vessel to process the entire allocation. In addition,
the Analysis shows even if an entity was able to process the entirety
of the MS allocation under this final rule, there would still be
competition from other owners across the other whiting sectors and
other fisheries that produce whitefish.
MS Processor & CP Permit Transfer
This final rule removes restrictions prohibiting an at-sea Pacific
whiting processing vessel from operating as a MS or CP in the same
calendar year (50 CFR 660.112(d)(3) and (e)(3)). This action allows a
processing vessel to operate as both an MS and CP in the same calendar
year, but not on the same trip. Owners of processing vessels that
intend to operate as both an MS and a CP during the Pacific whiting
season are required to register the processing vessel under valid MS
and CP permits per regulations at 50 CFR 660.25(b). The vessel may be
registered under both an MS permit and a CP endorsed permit
simultaneously. Additionally, this final rule includes some
administrative changes to allow additional transfers of limited entry
MS permits and limited entry permits with a CP endorsement so that
these permits may be transferred more than twice within a calendar
year.
Current requirements for operating as a MS or CP continue to apply.
To operate in the MS fishery (i.e., receive deliveries of catch from MS
catcher vessel and process MS sector allocations at-sea) the vessel
must be included in the MS co-op agreement. To operate in the CP
fishery (i.e., catch and process CP sector allocations at-sea) the
vessel must be included in the CP co-op agreement. Including a new
vessel in either the MS or CP co-op agreement constitutes a material
change to the co-op agreement. Within 7 calendar days of the new
processing vessel operating for the first time in either the MS co-op
fishery or the CP co-op fishery, the respective co-op manager must
notify NMFS in writing of such change to the co-op agreement as
required in regulations at 50 CFR 660.150(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4) and
660.160(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4).
Consistent with current regulations at 50 CFR
660.150(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4) and 660.160(d)(1)(iii)(B)(4), within 30 days
of a new vessel participating in a co-op fishery, the MS or CP co-op
manager must submit a revised co-op agreement to NMFS that lists all
vessels and/or processing vessels operating in the respective co-op and
include the new processing vessel, along with a letter describing the
change to the co-op agreement.
For each trip, the vessel is still required to update its vessel
monitoring system (VMS) declaration to reflect its activity for that
trip prior to departure as specified in existing groundfish regulations
at 50 CFR 660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A).
A separate economic data collection (EDC) form is required for the
owner, lessee, charterer of a mothership vessel registered to an MS
permit as well as owner, lessee, charterer of a catcher processor
vessel registered to a CP-endorsed limited entry permit. If a vessel
holds both types of permit in one calendar year, two EDC forms must be
submitted as specified at 50 CFR 660.114. Additionally, separate cost
recovery requirements apply to each sector, as described at 50 CFR
660.115.
The Council recommended and NMFS is lifting the restriction on MS
and CP permit transfers to increase the likelihood that MSCVs have
markets to which to deliver catch throughout the fishing season. The
operational flexibility provided in this action would provide
significant additional economic opportunity to at-sea Pacific whiting
fishery participants and fishing communities. These measures will allow
catcher vessels to harvest MS sector allocations and provide catch
revenue to the respective vessel crews. In the event that additional
processing vessels cannot commit to taking deliveries from catcher
vessels (due to changes in business plans, for example) this action
will provide additional harvesting and processing opportunities for at-
sea Pacific whiting fishery participants.
Summary of Anticipated Effects of This Final Rule
Overall, this final rule is expected to increase attainment across
all three non-tribal Pacific whiting sectors, with the largest change
expected in the MS sector. While the movement of the primary season
start date is likely to provide the most benefit in terms of harvest
opportunities when both MS and MSCVs can be on the fishing grounds, the
increased flexibility to have more processors (via the unlimited permit
transfer) or have processors accept and potentially process higher
amounts of catch (removal of the processor cap) may, in combination,
provide the most opportunity to increase attainment and economic
benefits for all sectors. Increased attainment of the Pacific whiting
allocation, through additional fishing opportunity, processing
capacity, and flexibility, will result in positive benefits to the
fleet and the communities in which participants reside. There are
expected to be no biological impacts outside of those previously
disclosed in harvest specifications processes for both groundfish and
Pacific whiting or those in the 2017 Biological Opinion for salmonids.
[[Page 77004]]
Other Actions Included in This Final Rule
NMFS is also implementing additional administrative changes in this
rule. This final rule adjusts cost recovery regulation language to
state that the value of ``Pacific whiting'' instead of ``all
groundfish'' will be used in the annual cost recovery fee calculations
for the at-sea sectors to reflect the current practice of using Pacific
whiting only in the cost recovery fee calculations. While the cost
recovery regulations state that all groundfish harvested should be used
to calculate ex-vessel value, it is current practice to use Pacific
whiting only when calculating the ex-vessel value of the MS and CP
sectors. Only Pacific whiting is used because there is insufficient
data available on the value of non-whiting species encountered by the
MS and CP sectors. This change reflects the original intention of the
Council in their 2011 cost recovery recommendations. The Council
recommended this change to NMFS at the April 2021 meeting.
This final rule makes some technical, non-substantive changes to
improve comprehensibility of the regulations by removing outdated
regulations.
Comments and Responses
NMFS held a public comment period on the proposed rule (87 FR
55979, September 13, 2022) from September 13, 2022, to October 13,
2022. NMFS received a total of four public comment submissions. Three
of the public comments were from private citizens, and one of the
public comments was from a commercial fishing entity that participates
in one of the affected sectors. All expressed general support of the
proposed rule with the exception of one commenter not supporting the
change of the season start date. This comment and response is
summarized below.
Comment: A private citizen commented that they are concerned about
moving the season start date forward two weeks due to the possible
impacts on other fish populations, particularly Pacific salmon. That
private citizen does not believe there is sufficient evidence to
support moving the season start date forward, but is in favor of the
other components of the rule.
Response: This final rule appropriately balances NMFS's duties
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act to conserve marine resources while
simultaneously creating opportunities to achieve optimum yield and
extends gratitude for the engagement of the public during this process.
As detailed in the proposed rule (87 FR 55979, September 13, 2022) and
in the Analysis, NMFS evaluated the potential impact of the season date
change on salmon bycatch in the whiting sectors and determined that
this action is unlikely to either increase the total amount of catch or
change the composition of the bycatch. Specifically, the Analysis
indicates the anticipated impacts would be within the effects
considered in the 2017 Biological Opinion. NMFS is aware of the
uncertainty in salmon bycatch and stock compositions since the fishery
has not occurred during early May since the 1990s. However, the fishery
continues to operate under the reasonable and prudent measures
described in the incidental take statement (ITS) of the 2017 Biological
Opinion to limit bycatch, and inseason management tools to reduce
listed bycatch, therefore we have the ability to act to reduce bycatch
if an issue does arise.
Classification
NMFS is issuing this rule pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) and
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which provides specific authority
and procedure for implementing this action. The majority of this
rulemaking is promulgated pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A); the Council
recommended this action at its April 2021 and March 2022 meetings. This
rulemaking also includes minor regulatory changes promulgated pursuant
to section 305(d). This action is necessary to improve
comprehensibility of the regulations by removing outdated regulations.
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined this final rule is
consistent with the FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification. As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis was not required and none was prepared.
This final rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This rule extends the
existing requirements for the Pacific Coast Groundfish Trawl
Rationalization Program Permit and License Information Collection OMB
Control Number 0648-0620 and revises the existing requirements by
removing the requirement for the owner of the MSCV-endorsed permit to
submit a copy of a MAE to NMFS that includes the MS permit owner's
acknowledgement of termination of the catcher vessel's obligation to
the permitted MS vessel. If a MS permit withdraws from the fishery
before Pacific whiting has been allocated to the MS sector, this rule
removes the requirement of the MS permit owner withdrawing from the
fishery to provide written notification to NMFS and all owners of MSCV-
endorsed permits with CHA obligated to the MS permit withdrawing.
Additionally, this rule removes the requirement for a MS to submit an
ownership interest (OI) form. This rule removes 3 hours and 18 burden
minutes per year for the fishery. Public reporting burden for removing
the requirements of submitting a MAE, a MS permit withdrawal and
removing the requirement of a MS submitting an OI form is estimated to
result in a reduced average cost of $5.34 per year for participants of
the fishery.
The existing collection of information requirements continue to
apply under the following OMB Control Number 0648-0573: Expanded Vessel
Monitoring System (VMS) Requirements for the Pacific Groundfish
Fishery.
We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment
on proposed and continuing information collections, which helps us
assess the impact of our information collection requirements and
minimize the public's reporting burden. Written comments and
recommendations for this information collection should be submitted on
the following website: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find
this particular information collection by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number
0648-0620.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
[[Page 77005]]
Dated: December 9, 2022.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
660 as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16
U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 660.25 by:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(4)(i)(E), (b)(4)(v)(A), and (b)(4)(vii)(C);
0
b. Add paragraph (b)(4)(vii)(D); and
0
c. Revise paragraph (b)(4)(viii)(C).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 660.25 Permits.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Limited entry permits with an MS/catcher vessel (CV)
endorsement will not be renewed until SFD has received complete
documentation of permit ownership as required under Sec. 660.150(g).
* * * * *
(v) * * *
(A) General. Change in permit owner and/or vessel owner
applications must be submitted to NMFS with the appropriate
documentation described at paragraphs (b)(4)(viii) and (ix) of this
section. The permit owner may convey the limited entry permit to a
different person. The new permit owner will not be authorized to use
the permit until the change in permit owner has been registered with
and approved by NMFS. NMFS will not approve a change in permit owner
for a limited entry permit with a sablefish endorsement that does not
meet the ownership requirements for such permit described at paragraph
(b)(3)(iv)(B) of this section. NMFS will not approve a change in permit
owner for a limited entry permit with an MS/CV endorsement that does
not meet the ownership requirements for such permit described at Sec.
660.150(g)(3). NMFS considers the following as a change in permit owner
that would require registering with and approval by NMFS, including but
not limited to: Selling the permit to another individual or entity;
adding an individual or entity to the legal name on the permit; or
removing an individual or entity from the legal name on the permit. A
change in vessel owner includes any changes to the name(s) of any or
all vessel owners, as registered with U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) or a
state. The new owner(s) of a vessel registered to a limited entry
permit must report any change in vessel ownership to NMFS within 30
calendar days after such change has been registered with the USCG or a
state licensing agency.
* * * * *
(vii) * * *
(C) Limited entry permits with an MS/CV endorsement. Limited entry
permits with an MS/CV endorsement may be registered to another vessel
up to two times during the calendar year as long as the second change
in vessel registration is back to the original vessel. The original
vessel is either the vessel registered to the permit as of January 1,
or if no vessel is registered to the permit as of January 1, the
original vessel is the first vessel to which the permit is registered
after January 1. After the original vessel has been established, the
first change in vessel registration would be to another vessel, but any
second change in vessel registration must be back to the original
vessel. On the second change in vessel registration back to the
original vessel, that vessel must be used to fish exclusively in the MS
Co-op Program described at Sec. 660.150 for the remainder of the
calendar year, and declare into the limited entry mid water trawl,
Pacific whiting mothership sector as specified at Sec.
660.13(d)(4)(iv).
(D) Limited entry MS permits and limited entry permits with a
catcher/processor (C/P) endorsement. Vessels registered to both a MS
permit and a C/P endorsed permit may operate in both the at-sea MS
sector and C/P sector during the same calendar year, but not on the
same trip. Prior to leaving port, a vessel registered under both a MS
permit and a C/P endorsed permit must declare through VMS the sector in
which it will participate for the duration of the trip, as specified at
Sec. 660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A).
(viii) * * *
(C) For a request to change a vessel registration and/or change a
permit owner or vessel owner for a MS/CV-endorsed limited entry permit,
an Identification of Ownership Interest Form must be completed and
included with the application form.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 660.111 by:
0
a. Under the definition ``Accumulation limits'', remove paragraph
(2)(i) and redesignate paragraphs (2)(ii) and (iii) as paragraphs
(2)(i) and (ii);
0
b. Under the definition ``Ex-vessel value'', revise paragraphs (2) and
(3); and
0
c. Remove the definitions of ``Mutual agreement exception'' and
``Processor obligation''.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 660.111 Trawl fishery--definitions.
* * * * *
Ex-vessel value * * *
(2) For the MS Co-op Program, the value of Pacific whiting
delivered by a catcher vessel to an MS-permitted vessel.
(3) For the C/P Co-op Program, the value as determined by the
aggregate pounds of Pacific whiting retained on board by the vessel
registered to a C/P-endorsed limited entry trawl permit, multiplied by
the MS Co-op Program average price per pound as announced pursuant to
Sec. 660.115(b)(2).
* * * * *
Sec. 660.112 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 660.112 by:
0
a. Remove paragraph (d)(3);
0
b. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(4) through (6) as paragraphs (d)(3)
through (5);
0
c. Remove paragraph (d)(7);
0
d. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(8) through (16) as paragraphs (d)(6)
through (14);
0
e. Remove paragraph (e)(3); and
0
f. Redesignate paragraphs (e)(4) through (10) as paragraphs (e)(3)
through (9).
0
5. Amend Sec. 660.113 by revising paragraphs (c)(3) introductory text,
(c)(5)(ii)(A) introductory text, (c)(5)(ii)(A)(3), (5), (6), and (9),
(d)(3) introductory text, (d)(5)(ii)(A) introductory text,
(d)(5)(ii)(A)(2), (4), (5), and (6), (e)(3), and (e)(6)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 660.113 Trawl fishery--recordkeeping and reporting.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Annual co-op report. The designated co-op manager for the
mothership co-op must submit an annual report to NMFS and the Council
by March 17 each year, before a co-op permit is issued for that year.
The annual co-op report will contain information about the previous
year's fishery, including:
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) For all deliveries of Pacific whiting that the fish buyer buys
from each fish seller:
* * * * *
[[Page 77006]]
(3) The weight of Pacific whiting delivered;
* * * * *
(5) The ex-vessel value of Pacific whiting;
(6) The net ex-vessel value of Pacific whiting;
* * * * *
(9) The total fee amount collected as a result of all Pacific
whiting.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Annual co-op report. The designated co-op manager for the C/P
co-op must submit an annual report to NMFS and the Council by March 17
each year, before a co-op permit is issued for that year. The annual
co-op report will contain information about the previous year's
fishery, including:
* * * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) For all Pacific whiting:
* * * * *
(2) The weight of Pacific whiting retained on board;
* * * * *
(4) The ex-vessel value of Pacific whiting retained on board;
(5) The net ex-vessel value of Pacific whiting retained on board;
and
(6) The total fee amount collected as a result of all Pacific
whiting.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) Deadline for proposed SMP. A proposed SMP must be submitted
between February 1 and March 17 of the year in which it intends to be
in effect to NMFS at: NMFS, West Coast Region, ATTN: Fisheries Permit
Office, Bldg. 1, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115.
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(i) Submission deadline. The SMP postseason report must be received
by NMFS and the Council no later than March 17 of the year following
that in which the SMP was approved.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 660.131 by revising paragraphs (b)(2)(ii),
(b)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), and (b)(2)(iii)(C)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.131 Pacific whiting fishery management measures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Criteria. The start of a Pacific whiting primary season may be
changed based on a recommendation from the Council and consideration of
the following factors, if applicable: Size of the harvest guidelines
for whiting and bycatch species; age/size structure of the whiting
population; expected harvest of bycatch and prohibited species;
availability and stock status of prohibited species; expected
participation by catchers and processors; environmental conditions;
timing of alternate or competing fisheries; industry agreement; fishing
or processing rates; and other relevant information.
(iii) * * *
(A) Catcher/processor sector--May 1.
(B) Mothership sector--May 1.
(C) * * *
(1) North of 40[deg]30' N lat.--May 1; and
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 660.150 by:
0
a. Revise the section heading;
0
b. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A), add the word ``and'' following the
semicolon at the end of paragraph;
0
c. In paragraph (b)(1)(i)(B), remove ``; and'' and add a period in its
place;
0
d. Remove paragraphs (b)(1)(i)(C) and (b)(2)(i)(A)(3);
0
e. Redesignate paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A)(4) as paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A)(3);
0
f. Revise paragraph (c)(6)(i)(A);
0
g. Remove paragraph (c)(7);
0
h. Revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii) and the introductory text of paragraph
(d)(1)(iii);
0
i. Remove paragraph (d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iii);
0
j. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iv) through (xii) as
paragraphs (d)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(iii) through (xi);
0
k. Remove paragraph (f)(3);
0
l. Redesignate paragraphs (f)(4) through (6) as paragraphs (f)(3)
through (5); and
0
m. Revise paragraph (g)(2)(i) introductory text.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 660.150 Mothership (MS) Co-op Program.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Through an inter-co-op agreement, the designated co-op managers
of permitted MS co-ops may distribute Pacific whiting allocations among
one or more permitted MS co-ops.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Annual registration and deadline. Each year, a co-op entity
intending to participate as a co-op under the MS Co-op Program must
submit an application for a MS co-op permit between January 17 and
March 17 of the year in which it intends to fish. NMFS will not
consider any applications received after March 17. An MS co-op permit
expires on December 31 of the year in which it was issued.
(iii) Application for MS co-op permit. The designated co-op
manager, on behalf of the co-op entity, must submit a complete
application form and include each of the items listed in paragraph
(d)(1)(iii)(A) of this section. Only complete applications will be
considered for issuance of a MS co-op permit. An application will not
be considered complete if any required application fees and annual co-
op reports have not been received by NMFS. NMFS may request additional
supplemental documentation as necessary to make a determination of
whether to approve or disapprove the application. Application forms and
instruction are available on the NMFS West Coast Region (WCR) website
(https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/groundfish-mothership-cooperative-permit) or by request from NMFS. The designated co-op
manager must sign the application acknowledging the responsibilities of
a designated co-op manager defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
For permit owners with more than one MS/CV endorsement and associated
CHA, paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(D) of this section specifies how to join an
MS co-op(s).
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Renewal. An MS/CV-endorsed permit must be renewed annually
consistent with the limited entry permit regulations given at Sec.
660.25(b)(4). During renewal, all MS/CV-endorsed limited entry permit
owners must make a preliminary declaration regarding their intent to
participate in the co-op or non-co-op portion of the MS Co-op Program
for the following year. MS/CV-endorsed permits not obligated to a
permitted MS co-op by March 17 of the fishing year will be assigned to
the non-co-op fishery. For an MS/CV-endorsed permit that is not
renewed, the following occurs:
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 660.160 by:
0
a. Remove paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C); and
0
b. Revise paragraphs (d)(1)(ii), (e)(1)(iii), and (e)(2)(i).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 660.160 Catcher/processor (C/P) Co-op Program.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Annual registration and deadline. Each year, the co-op entity
must submit
[[Page 77007]]
a complete application to NMFS for a C/P co-op permit. The application
must be submitted to NMFS by between January 17 and March 17 of the
year in which it intends to participate. NMFS will not consider any
applications received after March 17. A C/P co-op permit expires on
December 31 of the year in which it was issued.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Restriction on C/P vessel operating as mothership. A vessel
registered to a C/P-endorsed permit may operate as a mothership during
the same calendar year it participates in the C/P sector but not on the
same trip.
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Renewal. A C/P-endorsed permit must be renewed annually
consistent with the limited entry permit regulations given at Sec.
660.25(b)(4).
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 660.604 by revising paragraph (e) introductory text and
paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.604 Vessel and first receiver responsibilities.
* * * * *
(e) Electronic Monitoring (EM) Authorization. To obtain an EM
Authorization, a vessel owner must submit an initial application to the
NMFS West Coast Region Fisheries Permit Office, and then a final
application that includes an EM system certification and a vessel
monitoring plan (VMP). NMFS will only review complete applications.
NMFS will issue a public notice at least 90 calendar days prior to when
it will begin accepting applications for EM Authorizations for the
first year of the Program. Once NMFS begins accepting applications,
vessel owners that want to have their EM Authorizations effective for
January 1 of the following calendar year must submit their complete
application to NMFS by October 1. Vessel owners that want to have their
EM Authorizations effective for the primary whiting season start date
must submit their complete application to NMFS by February 1 of the
same year.
* * * * *
(i) Renewing an EM Authorization. To maintain a valid EM
Authorization, vessel owners must renew annually prior to the permit
expiration date. NMFS will mail EM Authorization renewal forms to
existing EM Authorization holders each year on or about: September 1
for non-trawl shorebased IFQ vessels and January 1 for Pacific whiting
IFQ and MS/CV vessels. Vessel owners who want to have their EM
Authorizations effective for January 1 of the following calendar year
must submit their complete renewal form to NMFS by October 15. Vessel
owners who want to have their EM Authorizations effective for the
primary whiting season start date of the following calendar year must
submit their complete renewal form to NMFS by February 1.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-27117 Filed 12-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P