Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances, 76946-76949 [2022-26994]

Download as PDF 76946 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Dated: December 8, 2022. Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. In § 180.317, revise the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows: ■ § 180.317 Propyzamide; tolerances for residues. * * * (b) * * * * * TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (b) Commodity Parts per million Expiration/ revocation date Cranberry .......... 1 12/31/2025 * * * * * [FR Doc. 2022–27105 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0624; FRL–10296–01– OCSPP] Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of tetraniliprole in or on the grain, cereal, group 15, except rice; and grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn, and sweet corn. Bayer CropScience requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). DATES: This regulation is effective December 16, 2022. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before February 14, 2023, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0624, is lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Dec 15, 2022 Jkt 259001 available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room and the OPP Docket is (202) 566–1744. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (202) 566– 2875; email address: RDFRNotices@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA’s tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register’s eCFR site at the https://www.ecfr.gov/ current/title-40. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2021–0624 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before February 14, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2021–0624, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance In the Federal Register of October 21, 2021 (86 FR 58239) (FRL–8792–04– OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP #1F8930) by Bayer CropScience LP, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167. The petition requested to establish tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide, tetraniliprole [1-(3-chloro-2pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide], in or on Crop Group 15; cereal grains, except rice at 0.01 parts per million (ppm); and Crop Group 16; forage, fodder, and straw of cereal grains group, except field corn, popcorn, and sweet E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM 16DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 corn at 0.1 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition, which is available in the docket, https:// www.regulations.gov. No comments were received in response to the notice of filing. III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’ Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for tetraniliprole including exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks associated with tetraniliprole follows. In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been previously published for tolerance rulemaking of the same pesticide chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between tolerance rulemaking, and EPA considers referral back to those sections as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking. On February 24, 2021, EPA published a tolerance rulemaking for tetraniliprole in which EPA concluded, based on the available information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would result from aggregate exposure to tetraniliprole and established tolerances for residues of that pesticide chemical. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Dec 15, 2022 Jkt 259001 EPA is incorporating previously published sections from the February 24, 2021, rulemaking as described further in this rulemaking, as they remain unchanged. A. Toxicological Profile For a discussion of the Toxicological Profile of tetraniliprole, see Unit III.A. of the tetraniliprole tolerance rulemaking published in the Federal Register of February 24, 2021 (86 FR 11133) (FRL– 10005–77). B. Toxicological Points of Departure/ Levels of Concern Based on a thorough analysis of the toxicology database of tetraniliprole, the Agency has determined that a qualitative risk assessment is more appropriate for tetraniliprole than a quantitative risk assessment. For more details, please reference Unit III.B. of the February 24, 2021, rulemaking. C. Exposure Assessment There is potential for exposure to tetraniliprole via food and feed based on the proposed uses. However, no adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological studies for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure. Thus, no quantitative dietary exposure assessments are needed for EPA to conclude with reasonable certainty that dietary exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human health risk. Drinking water and non-occupational exposures. There are no residues of toxicological concern expected in drinking water from the use of tetraniliprole. Thus, no drinking water exposure assessments are needed for the Agency to conclude with reasonable certainty that drinking water exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human health risk. Tetraniliprole is registered for use on golf course turf and sports fields that could result in residential postapplication exposures. However, no adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological studies for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure; therefore, a quantitative residential post-application exposure assessment was not conducted. Thus, no residential exposure assessments are needed for the Agency to conclude with reasonable certainty that residential exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human health risk. Cumulative exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 76947 effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to tetraniliprole and any other substances. Tetraniliprole does not also appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that tetraniliprole has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children EPA has not identified any toxicological endpoints of concern associated with any threshold effects and conducted a qualitative assessment. That qualitative assessment showed no risk of concern for infants and children and does not use safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is needed for assessing risk to infants and children. EPA has also evaluated the available data and concluded that there are no residual uncertainties concerning the potential risks to infants and children that would impact its conclusions about threshold effects. E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the acute populationadjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population-adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure. No adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological studies at doses relevant to human health pesticide risk assessment for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure. Effects observed in the data base (e.g., decreased body weight) were both marginal, and only seen at doses not expected to occur daily or over an extended period. Based on a lack of toxicity at exposure levels expected from approved application rates and an expectation that aggregate exposures to residues of tetraniliprole will not reach the levels E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM 16DER1 76948 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations required to cause any adverse effects, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to tetraniliprole residues. More detailed information on this action can be found in the document titled ‘‘Tetraniliprole: Human Health Risk Assessment for Registration for Uses on Cereal Grains, Except Rice, Crop Group 15; and Forage, Fodder, and Straw of Cereal Grains Group, except Field Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn Crop Group 16’’ in docket ID EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0624. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method, see Unit IV.A. of the February 24, 2021, rulemaking. B. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). There are no Codex MRLs for tetraniliprole on the commodities covered in this document. V. Conclusion Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of tetraniliprole in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm; and grain, cereal, group 15, except rice at 0.01 ppm. In addition, EPA is removing the tolerance for indirect or inadvertent residues of tetraniliprole in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm, which is no longer needed with the changes described above. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 7, 2022. Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter 1 as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Amend § 180.709 by: a. In Table 1 to paraph (a) adding in alphabetical order entries for ‘‘Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn’’; and ‘‘Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice’’; and ■ b. In Table 2 to paragraph (d) by removing the entry ‘‘Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn’’. The additions read as follows: ■ ■ § 180.709 Tetraniliprole; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * Parts per million Commodity * * * * * * Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn ............................................................ VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Dec 15, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM 16DER1 * 0.1 76949 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Parts per million Commodity Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice ........................................................................................................................................................ * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. 2022–26994 Filed 12–15–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [WC Docket Nos. 19–195, 11–10, FCC 22– 93, FR ID 118659] Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection, Modernizing the Form 477 Data Collection Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: In this document the Commission sunsets the collection of broadband deployment data through Form 477 effective upon publication in the Federal Register. The Commission will continue to collect broadband and voice subscription data using Form 477 but filers will submit the data through the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) system. The Commission also delegates authority to various Commission staff to take other actions related to the collection and use of Form 477 data. DATES: Effective December 16, 2022. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Holloway at William.Holloway@fcc.gov, (202) 418– 2334, Broadband Policy Task Force. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s document, Order, FCC 22–93, in WC Docket Nos. 19–195, 11–10, released on Dec. 9, 2022. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and can be downloaded at https://www.fcc.gov/document/fccsunsets-form-477-broadband-datacollection. People With Disabilities. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Government Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 418–0432 (tty). Paperwork Reduction Act. This document does not contain new or lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Dec 15, 2022 Jkt 259001 * * modified information collection(s) subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13, as the requirements adopted in this document are statutorily exempted from the requirements of the PRA. As a result, the document will not be submitted to OMB for review under Section 3507(d) of the PRA. Congressional Review Act. The Commission has determined, and the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, concurs, that these rules are ‘‘nonmajor’’ under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The Commission will send a copy of this document to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). Synopsis In this document, the Commission takes another step in its efforts to implement the Broadband Data Collection (BDC) and modernize the FCC Form 477 data program. Consistent with the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act (the Broadband DATA Act or the Act) and the Third Report and Order (85 FR 18124, April 7, 2021), the Commission sunsets the collection of broadband deployment data through FCC Form 477 effective upon publication of this document in the Federal Register. I. Discussion 1. Sunsetting the Collection of Broadband Deployment Data through Form 477. In this document, we sunset the collection of broadband deployment data through Form 477 effective upon publication of this document in the Federal Register. The Commission sought comment on sunsetting the Form 477 broadband deployment data collection in 2019 and again in 2020, and indicated that it expected the new broadband data collection being developed would largely displace the Form 477 process, particularly with respect to the collection of more precise deployment data. 2. Since the 2019 Order and Second Further Notice (84 FR 43705, Sept. 23, 2019) and the Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice (85 FR 50886, Aug. 18, 2020), we have made PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * 0.01 * significant efforts to improve the quality of the broadband deployment data it collects. The Broadband DATA Act was enacted in 2020 and required the Commission to take steps to develop more granular broadband maps. The Commission has implemented the Act by adopting orders establishing the BDC and requiring broadband providers to file broadband availability data based on standardized and precise parameters, developing the Fabric as a common dataset of all locations where fixed broadband services can be installed, and establishing processes for the verification of data submitted by filers and for members of the public and other entities to challenge the accuracy of providers’ data. To implement these processes, we have designed, developed, and launched the necessary information technology systems to support the BDC, including a new filing interface for BDC data, a BDC help center to provide technical assistance, and online video tutorials and webinars explaining, among other things, the BDC availability data and challenge submission processes. Based on this effort, the first broadband data collection under the BDC was launched on June 30, 2022 and, on September 1, 2022, the first filing window for the BDC closed. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) subsequently published the new data on November 18, 2022. At the same time, broadband providers were required to submit Form 477 data as of June 30, 2022 in the Form 477 filing interface which was also due no later than September 1, 2022. 3. We find that it is now appropriate to sunset the collection of broadband deployment data through Form 477. We have made significant progress in implementing the BDC including the completion of the first BDC collection of broadband availability data and resulting publication of updated maps and data. We therefore now have a process in place for collecting more precise location-specific data from fixed broadband service providers and using more uniform standards for mobile broadband providers than the processes and standards used for the Form 477 process. Having to file concurrent Form 477 data in addition to their BDC data imposes significant burdens on providers, and we find it is unnecessary E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM 16DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76946-76949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0624; FRL-10296-01-OCSPP]


Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of 
tetraniliprole in or on the grain, cereal, group 15, except rice; and 
grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, 
popcorn, and sweet corn. Bayer CropScience requested these tolerances 
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective December 16, 2022. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 14, 2023, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0624, is available at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection 
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., 
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The 
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room and the OPP Docket is (202) 566-1744. For the latest 
status information on EPA/DC services, docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Rosenblatt, Acting Director, 
Registration Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (202) 566-2875; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's 
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Office of the 
Federal Register's e-CFR site at the https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0624 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
February 14, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0624, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of October 21, 2021 (86 FR 58239) (FRL-
8792-04-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide 
petition (PP #1F8930) by Bayer CropScience LP, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., 
St. Louis, MO 63167. The petition requested to establish tolerances in 
40 CFR part 180 for residues of the insecticide, tetraniliprole [1-(3-
chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2-
yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide], in or on Crop Group 15; cereal 
grains, except rice at 0.01 parts per million (ppm); and Crop Group 16; 
forage, fodder, and straw of cereal grains group, except field corn, 
popcorn, and sweet

[[Page 76947]]

corn at 0.1 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition, 
which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. No 
comments were received in response to the notice of filing.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a 
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a 
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure 
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary 
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable 
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in 
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. 
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors 
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and 
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has 
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on 
aggregate exposure for tetraniliprole including exposure resulting from 
the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of 
exposures and risks associated with tetraniliprole follows.
    In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal 
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been 
previously published for tolerance rulemaking of the same pesticide 
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical 
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between 
tolerance rulemaking, and EPA considers referral back to those sections 
as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA 
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
    On February 24, 2021, EPA published a tolerance rulemaking for 
tetraniliprole in which EPA concluded, based on the available 
information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would 
result from aggregate exposure to tetraniliprole and established 
tolerances for residues of that pesticide chemical. EPA is 
incorporating previously published sections from the February 24, 2021, 
rulemaking as described further in this rulemaking, as they remain 
unchanged.

A. Toxicological Profile

    For a discussion of the Toxicological Profile of tetraniliprole, 
see Unit III.A. of the tetraniliprole tolerance rulemaking published in 
the Federal Register of February 24, 2021 (86 FR 11133) (FRL-10005-77).

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Based on a thorough analysis of the toxicology database of 
tetraniliprole, the Agency has determined that a qualitative risk 
assessment is more appropriate for tetraniliprole than a quantitative 
risk assessment. For more details, please reference Unit III.B. of the 
February 24, 2021, rulemaking.

C. Exposure Assessment

    There is potential for exposure to tetraniliprole via food and feed 
based on the proposed uses. However, no adverse effects were observed 
in the submitted toxicological studies for tetraniliprole regardless of 
the route of exposure. Thus, no quantitative dietary exposure 
assessments are needed for EPA to conclude with reasonable certainty 
that dietary exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant 
human health risk.
    Drinking water and non-occupational exposures. There are no 
residues of toxicological concern expected in drinking water from the 
use of tetraniliprole. Thus, no drinking water exposure assessments are 
needed for the Agency to conclude with reasonable certainty that 
drinking water exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant 
human health risk.
    Tetraniliprole is registered for use on golf course turf and sports 
fields that could result in residential post-application exposures. 
However, no adverse effects were observed in the submitted 
toxicological studies for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of 
exposure; therefore, a quantitative residential post-application 
exposure assessment was not conducted. Thus, no residential exposure 
assessments are needed for the Agency to conclude with reasonable 
certainty that residential exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a 
significant human health risk.
    Cumulative exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires 
that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a 
tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the 
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other 
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' Unlike other 
pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based 
on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism 
of toxicity finding as to tetraniliprole and any other substances. 
Tetraniliprole does not also appear to produce a toxic metabolite 
produced by other substances. For the purposes of this action, 
therefore, EPA has not assumed that tetraniliprole has a common 
mechanism of toxicity with other substances.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    EPA has not identified any toxicological endpoints of concern 
associated with any threshold effects and conducted a qualitative 
assessment. That qualitative assessment showed no risk of concern for 
infants and children and does not use safety factors for assessing 
risk, and no additional safety factor is needed for assessing risk to 
infants and children. EPA has also evaluated the available data and 
concluded that there are no residual uncertainties concerning the 
potential risks to infants and children that would impact its 
conclusions about threshold effects.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide 
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the 
acute population-adjusted dose (aPAD) and chronic population-adjusted 
dose (cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are 
evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and 
residential exposure to the appropriate points of departure to ensure 
that an adequate margin of exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer 
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer 
given the estimated aggregate exposure.
    No adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological 
studies at doses relevant to human health pesticide risk assessment for 
tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure. Effects observed in 
the data base (e.g., decreased body weight) were both marginal, and 
only seen at doses not expected to occur daily or over an extended 
period.
    Based on a lack of toxicity at exposure levels expected from 
approved application rates and an expectation that aggregate exposures 
to residues of tetraniliprole will not reach the levels

[[Page 76948]]

required to cause any adverse effects, EPA concludes that there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general 
population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to 
tetraniliprole residues. More detailed information on this action can 
be found in the document titled ``Tetraniliprole: Human Health Risk 
Assessment for Registration for Uses on Cereal Grains, Except Rice, 
Crop Group 15; and Forage, Fodder, and Straw of Cereal Grains Group, 
except Field Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn Crop Group 16'' in docket ID 
EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0624.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method, 
see Unit IV.A. of the February 24, 2021, rulemaking.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4).
    There are no Codex MRLs for tetraniliprole on the commodities 
covered in this document.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of 
tetraniliprole in or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 
16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm; and grain, 
cereal, group 15, except rice at 0.01 ppm. In addition, EPA is removing 
the tolerance for indirect or inadvertent residues of tetraniliprole in 
or on grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field 
corn, popcorn and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm, which is no longer needed with 
the changes described above.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045, 
entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and 
Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not 
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it 
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, 
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority 
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 
1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in 
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government 
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 7, 2022.
Daniel Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter 1 as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Amend Sec.  180.709 by:
0
a. In Table 1 to paraph (a) adding in alphabetical order entries for 
``Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, 
popcorn and sweet corn''; and ``Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice''; 
and
0
b. In Table 2 to paragraph (d) by removing the entry ``Grain, cereal, 
forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and 
sweet corn''.
    The additions read as follows:


Sec.  180.709  Tetraniliprole; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Parts per
                         Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except            0.1
 field corn, popcorn and sweet corn........................

[[Page 76949]]

 
Grain, cereal, group 15, except rice.......................         0.01
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-26994 Filed 12-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.