Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the McGriff Lakes-Sutter Basin Watershed Flood Control and Flood Safety Project Sutter County, California, 76456-76458 [2022-27083]
Download as PDF
76456
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410 or email: OAC@
usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
Mary Podoll,
North Dakota State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–27077 Filed 12–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2022–0017]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the McGriff Lakes—Sutter Basin
Watershed Flood Control and Flood
Safety Project Sutter County,
California
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) California
State Office announces its intent to
prepare an EIS for the McGriff Lakes—
Sutter Basin Watershed Flood Control
and Flood Safety Project, which is
located approximately 30 miles
northwest of Sacramento in the
proximity of Knights Landing,
California. NRCS is requesting
comments to identify significant issues
and alternatives to be addressed in the
EIS from all interested individuals,
Tribes, and Federal, State and local
Agencies and jurisdictions. The EIS
process will examine alternative
solutions to modernize the existing
Karnak Drainage Facility, portions of
which are over 100 years old, to
continue to provide reliable flood
protection for the Reclamation District
No. 1500 (RD 1500) service area. The
Reclamation District service area
includes over 60,000 acres of
agricultural farmland, the community of
Robbins and surrounding rural areas,
and California State Route 113, a
designated emergency route through the
watershed. The primary purpose for this
watershed plan is to provide reliable
and long-term flood prevention and
damage reduction to the RD 1500
service area and improve public safety
and emergency access. Although the
existing Karnak Drainage Facility has
been well maintained, the required
repairs for the pump stations are
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
becoming more costly while the
reliability of the facility is decreasing
because parts needed for repair and
continued operation are no longer
available and must be custom
fabricated. The aging infrastructure and
lack of parts availability puts all land
within the RD1500 service area at risk
in the event of a significant rainfall
event. Without adequate and reliable
flood control, millions of dollars in
agricultural products would be at risk,
the designated emergency route would
be in jeopardy of flood closures, and
substantial property damage and
potential loss of life are possible in the
community of Robbins and surrounding
areas.
DATES: We will consider comments that
we receive within 30 days after date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Comments received after 30
days will be considered to the extent
possible.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments in response to this notice.
You may submit your comments
through one of the methods below:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for docket ID NRCS–2022–0017. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments; or
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Mr. Roger
Cornwell, RD 1500 General Manager, PO
Box 96, Robbins, CA 95676; or
• Email: commentsRD1500@
gmail.com.
For written comments, specify the
docket ID NRCS–2022–0017. All
comments received will be posted
without change and made publicly
available on www.regulation.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ernesto A. De La Riva, telephone: (530)
792–5680; email: Ernesto.delariva@
usda.gov. In addition, for questions
related to submitting comments via RD
1500 General Manager: Mr. Roger
Cornwell at (530) 738–4423, Fax (530)
738–4327, commentsRD1500@
gmail.com, or the project website at:
https://sutterbasinwater.com/floodcontrol-flood-safety-rehabilitationproject/. Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for
communication should contact the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Target Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The watershed project would be
implemented as flood protection, as
authorized under sections 3 and 4 of
Public Law 83–566. The primary
purpose for this watershed plan is to
provide reliable and long-term flood
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prevention and damage reduction to the
RD 1500 service area and improve
public safety and emergency access.
Watershed planning was authorized
under Public Law 83–566, the
Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954, as amended,
and Public Law 78–534, the Flood
Control Act of 1944.
RD 1500, one of the largest
reclamation districts in California, was
created by special act of the State
Legislature in 1913. It provides drainage
and flood control to an area of
approximately 67,850 acres within its
service area, including protecting the
community of Robbins and surrounding
rural residential property from flood
damage, protecting over 60,000 acres of
rural farmland from flooding, and
providing flood protection of SR 113
and other local emergency response
roadways. The project will address
issues at the Karnak Drainage Facility
which was originally built in 1914 with
two additional facilities added in 1929
and 1952. These facilities have
continued to protect the RD1500 for
over 100 years. However, they are all
past their useful service life. While
RD1500 has continued to maintain these
facilities, it has become increasingly
difficult to obtain parts and keep the
facilities functional during storm events.
The Karnak Drainage Facilities
provided flood protection for 70 YearLevel storm events from January to
March of 2017, which were the second
highest precipitation events in the last
144 years record in the northern
California area. Uncharacteristically of
the facilities, all pumping stations were
operational at the time. The Karnak
Drainage Facility was able to provide
flood reduction to approximately 31,200
acres of prime farmland within the
Sutter Basin and the community of
Robbins would have been under 5 to 6
feet of water, completely cutting off
access to SR 113, which at the time was
being use by residence of Oroville,
California as an evacuation route from
the Orville Dam crisis of February 2017.
To meet the purpose of continuing
flood protection for the Sutter Basin,
modernization of the existing Karnak
Facilities will be necessary. A
Preliminary Investigative Report (PIR),
completed by RD1500 in 2021,
investigated and studied possible
solutions to address flood protection in
the Sutter Basin. As a result of the new
information obtained during an EA
process, the level of analysis this
watershed project needs is more
extensive than anticipated during
scoping in 2021. Estimated Federal
funds required for the construction of
the proposed action may exceed $25
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
million and the proposed action will
therefore require congressional approval
per the 2018 Agriculture Appropriations
Act amended funding threshold. In
accordance with 7 CFR 650.7(a)(2), an
EIS is required for projects requiring
congressional approval.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Preliminary Proposed Action and
Alternatives, Including No Action
The objective of the EIS is to
formulate and evaluate alternatives for
flood prevention in the RD 1500 service
area. Three Action Alternatives are
expected to be evaluated in the EIS,
given their anticipated viability of
meeting the purpose and need of the
Watershed Project.
— Proposed Action Alternative—
Modernization. This alternative would
evaluate rehabilitating the existing
antiquated Karnak Facility by
modernizing and repairing the facilities.
The proposed action is to demolish two
facilities on the west side of the levee
and build a new facility. The district
will install temporary cofferdams on the
west side to remove these facilities and
gain access to the existing outlets. The
existing outlets will be reused to
prevent need of disturbing the levee. A
new facility will be built on the west
side to replace the 1929 and 1952
facilities. The 1914 facility will remain
and be rehabilitated with new systems/
pumps. The existing outlet structures
will be reused and relined at all three
existing discharge culvert locations.
This significantly reduces the
environmental impacts from this
project. Temporary cofferdams may
need to be installed on the east side of
the levee next to the East Canal
depending on water level. This may be
necessary to safely finish the
installation of the liners and a fish
barrier. No equipment will be driven
into the East Canal and no permanent
impacts will take place to habitat on the
East Canal. Fill will be about 1,500
cubic yards on the west side for the new
facility, but it will not change the
existing footprint in the watercourse.
This alternative will provide continued
flood protection within the Sutter Basin
and continually allow access to SR 113
for public emergencies.
—Flood Plain Restoration
Alternative—Alternative 2. This
alternative, a nonstructural alternative,
would include purchasing land to
restore the floodplain. This would
include removing the town of Robbins
and removing approximately 31,200
acres of prime farmland within the
Sutter Basin. This alternative would not
allow the continual use of SR 113
during emergencies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
—No Action. Taking no action
alternative would consist of Karnak
Drainage Facility continuing its current
operations while the facility continually
degrades until it becomes impossible to
keep the facility operational during
active storm events. The No Action
Alternative is not expected to meet the
project’s purpose and need.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Initial cost estimates of the proposed
actions have determined that the
Federal contribution to construction
will exceed $25 million, requiring
congressional approval. Per 7 CFR
650.7, an EIS is required when projects
require congressional action. The NRCS
California State Conservationist, has
determined that the preparation of an
EIS is required for this watershed
project. This EIS will be prepared as
required by section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA); the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508); and NRCS
regulations that implement NEPA in 7
CFR part 650.
Resource concerns for scoping were
identified and categorized as relevant or
not relevant to the proposed Project
action. RD 1500 and NRCS evaluated
the current Karnak Drainage Facility
infrastructure along with relevant
resource concerns for each proposed
solution. Environmental resources in
the project area consist of the natural
and man-made environment. Resource
concerns to be identified and addressed
in the Watershed Plan-EIS include
Cultural and Historic Resources; Land
Resources/Prime Farmland; Geology
and Soils; Public Safety;
Socioeconomics/Environmental Justice;
Water Resources; Vegetation/Invasive
and Non-native Plant Species; Wetlands
and Riparian Areas; Fish and Wildlife/
Fish Habitat; and Special Status
Species/Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Species.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The following permits and
authorizations are anticipated to be
required:
• Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404
Permit: Proposed Action may
require permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers
• CWA Section 401 Permit: Project will
require water quality certification
• CWA Section 402 Permit: Project may
require National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System
Permit
• Central Valley Flood Protection Board
(CVFPB): A local dam safety and
flood plain permit may be required
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76457
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ESA
Section 7 Consultation
• National Marine Fisheries Service
ESA Section 7 Consultation
• National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) section 106 Consultation
with the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO), Tribal Historic
Preservation Office (THPO), and
Tribes
• County—Permit: Implementation of
the proposed Federal action may
require permit from Sutter County
Schedule of Decision-Making Process
A Draft EIS (DEIS) will be prepared
and circulated for review and comment
by agencies, Tribes, consulting parties,
and the public for 45 days per 40 CFR
1503.1, 1502.20, 1506.11, and 1502.17,
and 7 CFR 650.13. The DEIS is
anticipated to be published in the
Federal Register in 2023, approximately
6 months after publication of this NOI.
A Final EIS is anticipated to be
published within 6 months of
completion of the public comment
period for the DEIS. NRCS invites
agencies and individuals who have
special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or
interest in the McGriff lakes—Sutter
Basin Watershed to participate and
identify potential alternatives. The
responsible Federal official and decision
maker for the NRCS is the California
NRCS State Conservationist.
Public Scoping Process
A public scoping meeting was held on
March 30, 2021. Comments received,
including the names and addresses of
those who comment, will be part of the
public record. Scoping meeting
presentation materials are available on
the project website: https://
sutterbasinwater.com/flood-controlflood-safety-rehabilitation-project/. The
date, time, and location for a second
meeting will be announced on the
project website.
Federal, State, Tribal, local agencies
and representatives, and the public were
invited to take part in this watershed
plan scoping period. One public scoping
meeting sought input on issues of
economic, environmental, cultural, and
social importance in the watershed. RD
1500 and NRCS organized the public
scoping meeting to provide an
opportunity to review and evaluate the
Project alternatives, express concern or
support, and gain further information
regarding the Project. To determine the
most viable alternatives to carry forward
to the EIS, RD 1500 used input obtained
during public scoping discussions to
focus on relevant resource concerns and
issues and eliminated those that were
not relevant from further detailed study.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
76458
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 14, 2022 / Notices
Identification of Potential Alternatives,
Information, and Analyses
NRCS invites agencies, Tribes,
consulting parties, and individuals who
have special expertise, legal
jurisdiction, or interest in the Watershed
Project to provide comments concerning
the scope of the analysis and
identification of potential alternatives,
information, and analyses relevant to
the Proposed Action.
NRCS will coordinate the scoping
process to correspond with any required
NHPA processes, as allowed in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3) and 800.8 (54 U.S.C.
306108). The information about historic
and cultural resources within the area
potentially affected by the proposed
project will assist NRCS in identifying
and evaluating impacts to such
resources in the context of both NEPA
and NHPA.
NRCS will consult with Native
American tribes on a government-togovernment basis in accordance with 36
CFR 800.2 and 800.3, Executive Order
13175, and other policies. Tribal
concerns, including impacts on Indian
trust assets and potential impacts to
cultural resources and historic
properties, will be given due
consideration.
Authorities
This document is published pursuant
to the NEPA regulations regarding
publication of a notice of intent to issue
an environmental impact statement (40
CFR 1501.9(d)). Watershed planning is
authorized under the Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention Act of
1954, as amended, (Pub. L. 83–566) and
the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Pub. L.
78–534).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
assistance program as found in the
Assistance Listing (formerly referred to
as the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance) to which this document
applies is 10.904 Watershed Protection
and Flood Prevention.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ requires consultation with
State and local officials that would be
directly affected by proposed Federal
financial assistance. The objectives of
the Executive order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism, by relying on
State and local processes for State and
local government coordination and
review of proposed Federal financial
assistance and direct Federal
development. This program is subject to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
USDA Non-Discrimination Policy
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 41—
Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Notification of
Proposed Production Activity; CNH
Industrial America LLC (Tractor
Component Parts and Axle
Subassemblies), Sturtevant, Wisconsin
In accordance with Federal civil
rights law and USDA civil rights
regulations and policies, USDA, its
agencies, offices, and employees, and
institutions participating in or
administering USDA programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on
race, color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity (including gender
expression), sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family or
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior
civil rights activity, in any program or
activity conducted or funded by USDA
(not all bases apply to all programs).
Remedies and complaint filing
deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means of communication for
program information (for example,
braille, large print, audiotape, American
Sign Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA TARGET
Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and
TTY). Additionally, program
information may be made available in
languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination
complaint, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, AD–
3027, found online at: https://
www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-aprogram-discrimination-complaint and
at any USDA office or write a letter
addressed to USDA and provide in the
letter all the information requested in
the form. To request a copy of the
complaint form, call (866) 632 9992.
Submit your completed form or letter to
USDA by mail to: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–9410 or email: OAC@
usda.gov.
USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer, and lender.
Carlos Suarez Oliva,
California State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–27083 Filed 12–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–59–2022]
CNH Industrial America LLC
submitted a notification of proposed
production activity to the FTZ Board
(the Board) for its facility in Sturtevant,
Wisconsin, within FTZ 41. The
notification conforming to the
requirements of the Board’s regulations
(15 CFR 400.22) was received on
December 7, 2022.
Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ
production activity would be limited to
the specific foreign-status material(s)/
component(s) described in the
submitted notification (summarized
below) and subsequently authorized by
the Board. The benefits that may stem
from conducting production activity
under FTZ procedures are explained in
the background section of the Board’s
website—accessible via www.trade.gov/
ftz. The proposed material(s)/
component(s) would be added to the
production authority that the Board
previously approved for the operation,
as reflected on the Board’s website.
The proposed foreign-status materials
and components include: transmission
fluid; thread lockers; diesel exhaust
fluid; vinyl chloride self-adhesive
decals; steel components (tube nuts;
locking tabs; cylindrical spacers);
lanyards with steel clasps; Allen
wrenches; hammers; door locks; iron,
steel, aluminum, or zinc components
(air and gas springs; brackets and
bracket assemblies for motor vehicles;
mounts and mounting plates; supports;
latches, clamps, and handles); belt
tensioners; oil drains; windshield
washer components (spray nozzles;
fluid tanks; motors); various assemblies
(oil pan; tractor and sprayer cab video
display; hitch; hydraulic arm; tractor
hood securing); solenoid valves; tapered
roller bearing cones; solenoids; antenna
brackets; iron or steel components (hood
support brackets; axle mounting plates;
step risers; mounts and mount
assemblies; valve spacer plates;
supports); rubber straps; steel straps;
iron counterweights; and, brake pedals
(duty rate ranges from duty-free to 9.0%
and 84¢/bbl). The request indicates that
certain materials/components are
subject to duties under section 232 of
the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
(section 232) or Section 301 of the Trade
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76456-76458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-27083]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
[Docket No. NRCS-2022-0017]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the McGriff Lakes--Sutter Basin Watershed Flood Control and Flood
Safety Project Sutter County, California
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) California
State Office announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the McGriff
Lakes--Sutter Basin Watershed Flood Control and Flood Safety Project,
which is located approximately 30 miles northwest of Sacramento in the
proximity of Knights Landing, California. NRCS is requesting comments
to identify significant issues and alternatives to be addressed in the
EIS from all interested individuals, Tribes, and Federal, State and
local Agencies and jurisdictions. The EIS process will examine
alternative solutions to modernize the existing Karnak Drainage
Facility, portions of which are over 100 years old, to continue to
provide reliable flood protection for the Reclamation District No. 1500
(RD 1500) service area. The Reclamation District service area includes
over 60,000 acres of agricultural farmland, the community of Robbins
and surrounding rural areas, and California State Route 113, a
designated emergency route through the watershed. The primary purpose
for this watershed plan is to provide reliable and long-term flood
prevention and damage reduction to the RD 1500 service area and improve
public safety and emergency access. Although the existing Karnak
Drainage Facility has been well maintained, the required repairs for
the pump stations are becoming more costly while the reliability of the
facility is decreasing because parts needed for repair and continued
operation are no longer available and must be custom fabricated. The
aging infrastructure and lack of parts availability puts all land
within the RD1500 service area at risk in the event of a significant
rainfall event. Without adequate and reliable flood control, millions
of dollars in agricultural products would be at risk, the designated
emergency route would be in jeopardy of flood closures, and substantial
property damage and potential loss of life are possible in the
community of Robbins and surrounding areas.
DATES: We will consider comments that we receive within 30 days after
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Comments
received after 30 days will be considered to the extent possible.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments in response to this notice.
You may submit your comments through one of the methods below:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket ID NRCS-2022-0017. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments; or
Mail or Hand Delivery: Mr. Roger Cornwell, RD 1500 General
Manager, PO Box 96, Robbins, CA 95676; or
Email: [email protected].
For written comments, specify the docket ID NRCS-2022-0017. All
comments received will be posted without change and made publicly
available on www.regulation.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ernesto A. De La Riva, telephone:
(530) 792-5680; email: Ernesto.dela[email protected]. In addition, for
questions related to submitting comments via RD 1500 General Manager:
Mr. Roger Cornwell at (530) 738-4423, Fax (530) 738-4327,
[email protected], or the project website at: https://sutterbasinwater.com/flood-control-flood-safety-rehabilitation-project/. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication should contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The watershed project would be implemented as flood protection, as
authorized under sections 3 and 4 of Public Law 83-566. The primary
purpose for this watershed plan is to provide reliable and long-term
flood prevention and damage reduction to the RD 1500 service area and
improve public safety and emergency access. Watershed planning was
authorized under Public Law 83-566, the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954, as amended, and Public Law 78-534, the Flood
Control Act of 1944.
RD 1500, one of the largest reclamation districts in California,
was created by special act of the State Legislature in 1913. It
provides drainage and flood control to an area of approximately 67,850
acres within its service area, including protecting the community of
Robbins and surrounding rural residential property from flood damage,
protecting over 60,000 acres of rural farmland from flooding, and
providing flood protection of SR 113 and other local emergency response
roadways. The project will address issues at the Karnak Drainage
Facility which was originally built in 1914 with two additional
facilities added in 1929 and 1952. These facilities have continued to
protect the RD1500 for over 100 years. However, they are all past their
useful service life. While RD1500 has continued to maintain these
facilities, it has become increasingly difficult to obtain parts and
keep the facilities functional during storm events.
The Karnak Drainage Facilities provided flood protection for 70
Year-Level storm events from January to March of 2017, which were the
second highest precipitation events in the last 144 years record in the
northern California area. Uncharacteristically of the facilities, all
pumping stations were operational at the time. The Karnak Drainage
Facility was able to provide flood reduction to approximately 31,200
acres of prime farmland within the Sutter Basin and the community of
Robbins would have been under 5 to 6 feet of water, completely cutting
off access to SR 113, which at the time was being use by residence of
Oroville, California as an evacuation route from the Orville Dam crisis
of February 2017.
To meet the purpose of continuing flood protection for the Sutter
Basin, modernization of the existing Karnak Facilities will be
necessary. A Preliminary Investigative Report (PIR), completed by
RD1500 in 2021, investigated and studied possible solutions to address
flood protection in the Sutter Basin. As a result of the new
information obtained during an EA process, the level of analysis this
watershed project needs is more extensive than anticipated during
scoping in 2021. Estimated Federal funds required for the construction
of the proposed action may exceed $25
[[Page 76457]]
million and the proposed action will therefore require congressional
approval per the 2018 Agriculture Appropriations Act amended funding
threshold. In accordance with 7 CFR 650.7(a)(2), an EIS is required for
projects requiring congressional approval.
Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives, Including No Action
The objective of the EIS is to formulate and evaluate alternatives
for flood prevention in the RD 1500 service area. Three Action
Alternatives are expected to be evaluated in the EIS, given their
anticipated viability of meeting the purpose and need of the Watershed
Project.
-- Proposed Action Alternative--Modernization. This alternative
would evaluate rehabilitating the existing antiquated Karnak Facility
by modernizing and repairing the facilities. The proposed action is to
demolish two facilities on the west side of the levee and build a new
facility. The district will install temporary cofferdams on the west
side to remove these facilities and gain access to the existing
outlets. The existing outlets will be reused to prevent need of
disturbing the levee. A new facility will be built on the west side to
replace the 1929 and 1952 facilities. The 1914 facility will remain and
be rehabilitated with new systems/pumps. The existing outlet structures
will be reused and relined at all three existing discharge culvert
locations. This significantly reduces the environmental impacts from
this project. Temporary cofferdams may need to be installed on the east
side of the levee next to the East Canal depending on water level. This
may be necessary to safely finish the installation of the liners and a
fish barrier. No equipment will be driven into the East Canal and no
permanent impacts will take place to habitat on the East Canal. Fill
will be about 1,500 cubic yards on the west side for the new facility,
but it will not change the existing footprint in the watercourse. This
alternative will provide continued flood protection within the Sutter
Basin and continually allow access to SR 113 for public emergencies.
--Flood Plain Restoration Alternative--Alternative 2. This
alternative, a nonstructural alternative, would include purchasing land
to restore the floodplain. This would include removing the town of
Robbins and removing approximately 31,200 acres of prime farmland
within the Sutter Basin. This alternative would not allow the continual
use of SR 113 during emergencies.
--No Action. Taking no action alternative would consist of Karnak
Drainage Facility continuing its current operations while the facility
continually degrades until it becomes impossible to keep the facility
operational during active storm events. The No Action Alternative is
not expected to meet the project's purpose and need.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Initial cost estimates of the proposed actions have determined that
the Federal contribution to construction will exceed $25 million,
requiring congressional approval. Per 7 CFR 650.7, an EIS is required
when projects require congressional action. The NRCS California State
Conservationist, has determined that the preparation of an EIS is
required for this watershed project. This EIS will be prepared as
required by section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR parts 1500-1508); and NRCS regulations that implement NEPA in 7 CFR
part 650.
Resource concerns for scoping were identified and categorized as
relevant or not relevant to the proposed Project action. RD 1500 and
NRCS evaluated the current Karnak Drainage Facility infrastructure
along with relevant resource concerns for each proposed solution.
Environmental resources in the project area consist of the natural and
man-made environment. Resource concerns to be identified and addressed
in the Watershed Plan-EIS include Cultural and Historic Resources; Land
Resources/Prime Farmland; Geology and Soils; Public Safety;
Socioeconomics/Environmental Justice; Water Resources; Vegetation/
Invasive and Non-native Plant Species; Wetlands and Riparian Areas;
Fish and Wildlife/Fish Habitat; and Special Status Species/Migratory
Bird Treaty Act Species.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The following permits and authorizations are anticipated to be
required:
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit: Proposed Action may
require permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CWA Section 401 Permit: Project will require water quality
certification
CWA Section 402 Permit: Project may require National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit
Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB): A local dam
safety and flood plain permit may be required
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ESA Section 7 Consultation
National Marine Fisheries Service ESA Section 7 Consultation
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) section 106
Consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Tribal
Historic Preservation Office (THPO), and Tribes
County--Permit: Implementation of the proposed Federal action
may require permit from Sutter County
Schedule of Decision-Making Process
A Draft EIS (DEIS) will be prepared and circulated for review and
comment by agencies, Tribes, consulting parties, and the public for 45
days per 40 CFR 1503.1, 1502.20, 1506.11, and 1502.17, and 7 CFR
650.13. The DEIS is anticipated to be published in the Federal Register
in 2023, approximately 6 months after publication of this NOI. A Final
EIS is anticipated to be published within 6 months of completion of the
public comment period for the DEIS. NRCS invites agencies and
individuals who have special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest
in the McGriff lakes--Sutter Basin Watershed to participate and
identify potential alternatives. The responsible Federal official and
decision maker for the NRCS is the California NRCS State
Conservationist.
Public Scoping Process
A public scoping meeting was held on March 30, 2021. Comments
received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record. Scoping meeting presentation materials
are available on the project website: https://sutterbasinwater.com/flood-control-flood-safety-rehabilitation-project/. The date, time, and
location for a second meeting will be announced on the project website.
Federal, State, Tribal, local agencies and representatives, and the
public were invited to take part in this watershed plan scoping period.
One public scoping meeting sought input on issues of economic,
environmental, cultural, and social importance in the watershed. RD
1500 and NRCS organized the public scoping meeting to provide an
opportunity to review and evaluate the Project alternatives, express
concern or support, and gain further information regarding the Project.
To determine the most viable alternatives to carry forward to the EIS,
RD 1500 used input obtained during public scoping discussions to focus
on relevant resource concerns and issues and eliminated those that were
not relevant from further detailed study.
[[Page 76458]]
Identification of Potential Alternatives, Information, and Analyses
NRCS invites agencies, Tribes, consulting parties, and individuals
who have special expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest in the
Watershed Project to provide comments concerning the scope of the
analysis and identification of potential alternatives, information, and
analyses relevant to the Proposed Action.
NRCS will coordinate the scoping process to correspond with any
required NHPA processes, as allowed in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3) and 800.8 (54
U.S.C. 306108). The information about historic and cultural resources
within the area potentially affected by the proposed project will
assist NRCS in identifying and evaluating impacts to such resources in
the context of both NEPA and NHPA.
NRCS will consult with Native American tribes on a government-to-
government basis in accordance with 36 CFR 800.2 and 800.3, Executive
Order 13175, and other policies. Tribal concerns, including impacts on
Indian trust assets and potential impacts to cultural resources and
historic properties, will be given due consideration.
Authorities
This document is published pursuant to the NEPA regulations
regarding publication of a notice of intent to issue an environmental
impact statement (40 CFR 1501.9(d)). Watershed planning is authorized
under the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954, as
amended, (Pub. L. 83-566) and the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Pub. L.
78-534).
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal assistance program as found in
the Assistance Listing (formerly referred to as the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance) to which this document applies is 10.904 Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with State and local officials that
would be directly affected by proposed Federal financial assistance.
The objectives of the Executive order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism, by relying
on State and local processes for State and local government
coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance and
direct Federal development. This program is subject to the provisions
of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials.
USDA Non-Discrimination Policy
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights
regulations and policies, USDA, its agencies, offices, and employees,
and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are
prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin,
religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual
orientation, disability, age, marital status, family or parental
status, income derived from a public assistance program, political
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in
any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases
apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by
program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of
communication for program information (for example, braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and
TTY). Additionally, program information may be made available in
languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA
Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at:
https://www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-a-program-discrimination-complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA
and provide in the letter all the information requested in the form. To
request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632 9992. Submit your
completed form or letter to USDA by mail to: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or email:
[email protected].
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Carlos Suarez Oliva,
California State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-27083 Filed 12-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P