Air Plan Approval; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 76171-76173 [2022-26763]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2022 / Proposed Rules Confidentiality All submitted comments and attachments are part of the public record and subject to disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you consider to be confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. You may inspect and photocopy all written comments, by appointment only, at USPS® Headquarters Library, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, 11th Floor North, Washington, DC, 20260. These records are available for review on Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.–4 p.m., by calling 202–268–2906. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phong T. Quang at (202) 268–2857 or Garry Rodriguez at (202) 268–7281. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Currently, the Postal Service has no provision for providing a refund to customers who were eligible for Group E (free) P.O. BoxTM service under DMM 508.4.5.2 and paid for P.O. Box service. Informal policies were established to refund customers who paid for P.O. Box service despite their eligibility for Group E P.O. Box service on an ad hoc basis but were inconsistent. To ensure uniform treatment of customers who were not provided Group E P.O. Box service, the Postal Service is proposing to provide a refund policy if it has been determined that a customer paying for P.O. Box service is entitled to Group E P.O. Box service. A refund of prorated fees may be issued for each full consecutive month preceding the determination, up to a maximum of 24 months. Interest will not be paid on the amount refunded. The Postal Service is also proposing to make a minor revision to the text in 508.4.5.2c for clarity in the standard. We believe the proposed revisions will provide customers with a more efficient mailing experience. Although exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b), (c)) regarding proposed rulemaking by 39 U.S.C. 410(a), the Postal Service invites public comment on the following proposed revisions to Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1. We will publish an appropriate amendment to 39 CFR part 111 to reflect these changes. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111 Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service. Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is proposed to be amended as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Dec 12, 2022 Jkt 259001 PART 111—[AMENDED] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301– 307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101, 401–404, 414, 416, 3001–3018, 3201–3220, 3401–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3629, 3631– 3633, 3641, 3681–3685, and 5001. 2. Revise the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) as follows: ■ Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) * * * 500 Additional Services * * 508 Recipient Services * * 4.0 Post Office Box Service * * 4.5 Fee Group Assignments * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4.5.2 Fee Group E—Free P.O. Box Service Customers may qualify for Group E (free) P.O. Box service at a Post Office if their physical address location meets all of the following criteria: * * * * * [Revise the first sentence of item c to read as follows:] c. USPS does not provide carrier delivery to a mail receptacle at or near a physical address for reasons other than those in 4.5.3b. * * * * * * * * 4.6 * Fee Refund * * * * [Add new 4.6.3 to read as follows:] 4.6.3 Group E P.O. Box Service Refund If a postmaster determines that a customer paying for P.O. Box service was entitled to Group E (free) P.O. Box service under 4.5.2, a refund of prorated fees may be issued for each full consecutive month preceding the determination, up to a maximum of 24 months. Interest is not paid on the amount refunded. * * * * * Ruth B. Stevenson, Chief Counsel, Ethics and Legal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–26968 Filed 12–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 76171 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2022–0795; FRL–10217– 01–R9] Air Plan Approval; California; YoloSolano Air Quality Management District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing an approval of a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. We are proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 12, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2022–0795 at https:// www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 76172 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2022 / Proposed Rules contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of this rule? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision? II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? C. Proposed Action and Public Comment III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State’s Submittal A. What rule did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE Local agency Rule No. YSAQMD .......... Rule title 2.31 Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing ............................................................... On September 30, 2022, the submittal for YSAQMD Rule 2.31 was determined to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of this rule? There is a previous version of Rule 2.31 in the SIP, revised on April 12, 2017, submitted to us by CARB on August 9, 2017, and finalized with a limited approval and limited disapproval into the SIP on July 30, 2021 (86 FR 40959). If we take final action to approve the July 18, 2022 version of Rule 2.31, this version will replace the previously approved version of this rule in the SIP. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision? VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog, and particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control emissions of VOCs. The purpose of Rule 2.31 is to limit the emissions of VOCs from solvent cleaning operations and solvent degreasing operations, and from the storage and disposal of materials used for such operations. The EPA’s technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule. II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule? Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Dec 12, 2022 Revised Jkt 259001 Generally, SIP rules must require reasonably available control technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The YSAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 and 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); 1 and Moderate nonattainment for the 2015 8hour ozone NAAQS.2 Therefore, this rule must implement RACT. Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). 3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning,’’ EPA–450/2–77–022, November 1977. 5. ‘‘Control Technique Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents’’ EPA–453/ R–06–001, September 2006. 6. ‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace manufacturing and Rework Operations’’ EPA–453/R– 97–004, December 1997. 1 (40 CFR 81.305). 2 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 07/14/2021 Submitted 07/18/22 7. ‘‘Control Technique Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing’’ EPA 453/R– 06–003, September 2006. B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria? Rule 2.31 improves the SIP by eliminating an exemption that was not approvable. The rule is largely consistent with CAA requirements and with relevant guidance regarding enforceability and SIP revisions. The EPA’s TSD has more information regarding the EPA’s analysis of this rule. C. Proposed Action and Public Comment As authorized in sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is proposing a full approval of the submitted rule. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until January 12, 2023. If finalized, this action would incorporate the submitted rule into the SIP. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the YSAQMD Rule 2.31, which regulates VOC emissions from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2022 / Proposed Rules lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:31 Dec 12, 2022 Jkt 259001 affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goals of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and indigenous peoples. PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 76173 In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 4, 2022. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2022–26763 Filed 12–12–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1

Agencies

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76171-76173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0795; FRL-10217-01-R9]


Air Plan Approval; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management 
District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing an 
approval of a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management 
District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan 
(SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds 
(VOCs) from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. We are 
proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources 
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on 
this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 12, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2022-0795 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at 
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public 
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and 
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a 
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities 
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please

[[Page 76172]]

contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 
972-3024, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
    B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date 
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Local agency                Rule No.              Rule title               Revised        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD............................            2.31  Solvent Cleaning and              07/14/2021        07/18/22
                                                     Degreasing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On September 30, 2022, the submittal for YSAQMD Rule 2.31 was 
determined to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix 
V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of this rule?

    There is a previous version of Rule 2.31 in the SIP, revised on 
April 12, 2017, submitted to us by CARB on August 9, 2017, and 
finalized with a limited approval and limited disapproval into the SIP 
on July 30, 2021 (86 FR 40959). If we take final action to approve the 
July 18, 2022 version of Rule 2.31, this version will replace the 
previously approved version of this rule in the SIP.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?

    VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog, and 
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment. 
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that 
control emissions of VOCs. The purpose of Rule 2.31 is to limit the 
emissions of VOCs from solvent cleaning operations and solvent 
degreasing operations, and from the storage and disposal of materials 
used for such operations. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) 
has more information about this rule.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?

    Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), 
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment 
and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA 
section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements 
in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions 
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Generally, SIP rules must require reasonably available control 
technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control 
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of 
VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see 
CAA section 182(b)(2)). The YSAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment 
area classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 and 1997 8-hour 
ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS); \1\ and Moderate 
nonattainment for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\2\ Therefore, this rule 
must implement RACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ (40 CFR 81.305).
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate 
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements 
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the 
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 
1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule 
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal 
Cleaning,'' EPA-450/2-77-022, November 1977.
    5. ``Control Technique Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning 
Solvents'' EPA-453/R-06-001, September 2006.
    6. ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating 
Operations at Aerospace manufacturing and Rework Operations'' EPA-453/
R-97-004, December 1997.
    7. ``Control Technique Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing'' 
EPA 453/R-06-003, September 2006.

B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

    Rule 2.31 improves the SIP by eliminating an exemption that was not 
approvable. The rule is largely consistent with CAA requirements and 
with relevant guidance regarding enforceability and SIP revisions. The 
EPA's TSD has more information regarding the EPA's analysis of this 
rule.

C. Proposed Action and Public Comment

    As authorized in sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA 
is proposing a full approval of the submitted rule. We will accept 
comments from the public on this proposal until January 12, 2023. If 
finalized, this action would incorporate the submitted rule into the 
SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference the YSAQMD Rule 2.31, which regulates VOC emissions from 
solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. The EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these materials available through www.regulations.gov 
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for 
more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).

[[Page 76173]]

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 
this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting 
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond 
those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     The State did not evaluate environmental justice 
considerations as part of its SIP submittal. There is no information in 
the record inconsistent with the stated goals of E.O. 12898 of 
achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income 
populations, and indigenous peoples.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and 
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or 
preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: December 4, 2022.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2022-26763 Filed 12-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.