National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Washington, 74319-74322 [2022-26343]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
The State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal. There is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goals of Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994)
of achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Dec 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 3, 2023.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 28, 2022.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(590) to read as
follows:
■
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(590) The following new regulation
was submitted on October 5, 2022 by
the Governor’s designee as an
attachment to a letter dated October 5,
2022.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District.
(1) Rule 210.1A, Major New and
Modified Stationary Source Review
(MNSR), adopted on August 4, 2022.
(2) [Reserved]
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.281 is amended by
revising paragraphs (d)(1) through (6)
and adding paragraph (d)(7) to read as
follows:
§ 52.281
Visibility protection.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Monterey County Air Pollution
Control District.
(2) Sacramento County Air Pollution
Control District.
(3) Calaveras County Air Pollution
Control District.
(4) Mariposa County Air Pollution
Control District.
(5) Northern Sierra Air Pollution
Control District.
(6) San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District.
(7) Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–26361 Filed 12–2–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 61
[EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0374; FRL–9881–02–
R10]
National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation
of Authority to Washington
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
■
§ 52.220
74319
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a delegation
request submitted by the Washington
State Department of Health (WDOH) for
full delegation of authority to
implement and enforce the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for radionuclide air
emissions.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective
January 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2022–0374. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information the disclosure of
which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
74320
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available at https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
McAuley, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
at (206) 553–1987 or mcauley.jim@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Effective July 5, 2006, the EPA
granted WDOH partial approval and
delegation to implement and enforce the
radionuclides National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
in the State of Washington, specifically,
40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H, I, K,
Q, R, T, and W (Radionuclides
NESHAPs) as in effect on July 1, 2004
(71 FR 32276, June 5, 2006). The EPA
granted WDOH partial rather than full
approval and delegation of the
Radionuclides NESHAPs because
WDOH did not at that time have express
authority to recover criminal fines for
certain actions, as required by 40 CFR
70.11(a)(3)(iii) and 40 CFR
63.91(d)(3)(i)(A). The EPA also
approved a streamlined mechanism by
which WDOH could receive partial
approval and delegation of newly
promulgated or revised Radionuclides
NESHAPs as provided in 40 CFR
63.91(a)(1) and (d)(2).
On February 3, 2012, WDOH
submitted a request for full approval
and delegation of the Radionuclides
NESHAPs and submitted updates to its
request in letters dated April 10, 2017,
August 11, 2017, September 18, 2017,
and February 25, 2022.
The EPA proposed to approve
WDOH’s request for full delegation of
the Radionuclides NESHAP on July 21,
2022 (87 FR 43464). The reasons for
proposed approval are included in the
proposed action and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for the
proposed action closed on August 22,
2022, and we received two comments.
Both commenters supported the EPA’s
decision to grant full delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the
Radionuclide NESHAPs to WDOH in
Washington State. One commenter
stated that the delegation authorizes
WDOH to make ‘‘minor changes to this
rule.’’ The EPA notes that the authority
to make minor changes is limited to
those changes discussed in the July 21,
2022, proposal (87 FR 43464 at page
43465) and described in Section II of
this preamble. The second commenter
noted that WDOH will be able to
streamline further delegations through
letter of approvals resulting in
efficiencies between the agencies. As
discussed in the proposal, this action
includes approval of a streamlined
mechanism by which WDOH may
receive partial approval and delegation
of newly promulgated or revised
Radionuclides NESHAPs as provided in
40 CFR 63.91(a)(1) and (d)(2).
II. Final Action
A. Authorities Included From This
Approval and Delegation
Except as provided in Section II.B of
this preamble, the EPA is granting
WDOH full approval and delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the
Radionuclides NESHAPs as in effect on
July 1, 2021. Included in this full
approval and delegation of the
Radionuclide NESHAPs is the authority
to approve: (1) ‘‘Minor changes to
monitoring’’ 1 including the use of the
specified monitoring requirements and
procedures with minor changes in
methodology as described in 40 CFR
61.14(g)(1)(i); (2) ‘‘Intermediate changes
to monitoring;’’ (3) ‘‘Minor changes to
recordkeeping/reporting;’’ (4) ‘‘Minor
changes in test methods,’’ including the
use of a reference method with minor
changes in methodology as described in
40 CFR 61.13(h)(1)(i); and (5) waiver of
the requirement for emission testing
because the owner or operator of a
source has demonstrated by other means
to WDOH’s satisfaction that the source
is in compliance with the standard as
described in 40 CFR 61.13(h)(1)(iii).
Any authorities not addressed in
Section II.B. of this preamble and not
identified in any delegated subpart of
the Radionuclides NESHAPs, including
40 CFR part 61, subpart A, as authorities
that cannot be delegated shall be
considered delegated. See 67 FR 3106,
at page 3109, footnote 3 (January 23,
2002).
B. Authorities Excluded From This
Approval and Delegation
The EPA is not delegating to WDOH
authorities under 40 CFR part 61 that
specifically indicate they cannot be
delegated, that require rulemaking to
implement, that affect the stringency of
the standard, equivalency
determinations, or where national
oversight is the only way to ensure
national consistency. The following
Table 1 identifies specific authorities
within 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B,
H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W, that the EPA
is excluding from this delegation.
ddrumheller on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
TABLE 1—PART 61 AUTHORITIES EXCLUDED FROM APPROVAL AND DELEGATION
Section
Authorities
61.04(b) .....................................................
61.04(c) .....................................................
61.05(c) .....................................................
61.11 .........................................................
61.12(d) .....................................................
61.13(h)(1)(ii) ............................................
61.14(d) .....................................................
61.14(g)(1)(ii) ............................................
Waiver of recordkeeping.
Delegations to state and local agencies.
Waivers/exemptions.
Waiver of compliance.
Approval of alternative means of emission limitation.
Approval of alternatives to test methods (except as provided in 40 CFR 61.13(h)(1)(i)).
Combined effluents.
Approval of alternatives to monitoring that do not qualify as ‘‘Minor changes to monitoring,’’ ‘‘Intermediate changes to monitoring,’’ or ‘‘Minor changes to recordkeeping/reporting’’ 2
Availability of information.
Subpart B—Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines Alternative; compliance demonstration to COMPLY–R.
Subpart H—Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from DOE Facilities.
Subpart I—Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other than NRC Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H.
61.16 .........................................................
61.23(b) .....................................................
61.93(b)(2)(iii), (c)(2)(iii) ............................
61.107(b)(2)(iii), (d)(2)(iii) ..........................
1 For purposes of this paragraph, the terms in
quotations have the meaning assigned to them in 40
CFR 63.90.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Dec 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
2 For purposes of this Table 1, the terms in
quotations have the meaning assigned to them in 40
CFR 63.90.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
74321
TABLE 1—PART 61 AUTHORITIES EXCLUDED FROM APPROVAL AND DELEGATION—Continued
Section
Authorities
61.125(a) ...................................................
61.206(c), (d), and (e) ...............................
Subpart K—Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants.
Subpart R—Radon Emission from Phosphogypsum Stacks.
ddrumheller on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
C. Other Implications of This Action
Under this full delegation and
approval:
1. Sources in Washington subject to
the delegated Radionuclides NESHAPs
should continue to direct questions and
compliance issues to WDOH except
with respect to those authorities that are
not delegated (those noted in Section
II.B. of this preamble). For those
authorities noted in Section II.B. of this
preamble, affected sources should
continue to work with the EPA as their
primary contact and submit materials
directly to the EPA, copying WDOH on
all submittals, questions, and requests.
2. Sources subject to the
Radionuclides NESHAPs continue to be
required to send required notifications,
reports and requests to WDOH for
WDOH’s action and to provide copies to
the EPA. For authorities that are
excluded from this delegation (see
Section II.B. of this preamble), sources
should continue to send required
notifications, reports, and requests to
the EPA and to provide copies to
WDOH.
3. Any records or reports provided to
or otherwise obtained by WDOH
relating to the Radionuclides NESHAPs
should be made available to the EPA
upon request. In accordance with 40
CFR 61.16 and 63.15, the availability to
the public of information provided to or
otherwise obtained by the EPA in
connection with this delegation shall be
governed by 40 CFR part 2. The EPA
may request notifications and reports
from owners/operators and/or WDOH.
4. WDOH must continue to maintain
a record of all approved alternatives to
all monitoring, testing, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements and provide
this list of alternatives to the EPA at
least semi-annually, or at a more
frequent basis if requested by the EPA.
The EPA may audit the WDOHapproved alternatives and disapprove
any that it determines are inappropriate,
after discussion with WDOH. If changes
are disapproved, WDOH must notify the
source that it must revert to the original
applicable monitoring, testing,
recordkeeping, and/or reporting
requirements. Also, in cases where the
source does not maintain the conditions
which prompted the approval of the
alternatives to the monitoring testing,
recordkeeping, and/or reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Dec 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
requirements, WDOH must require the
source to revert to the original
monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and
reporting requirements, or more
stringent requirements, if justified.
5. WDOH shall require affected
facilities to use the methods specified in
40 CFR part 61 in performing source
tests pursuant to the regulations. See 40
CFR 61.7.
6. Enforcement of these delegated
Radionuclides NESHAPs in WDOH’s
jurisdiction will be the primary
responsibility of WDOH. Nevertheless,
the EPA may exercise its concurrent
enforcement authority pursuant to
sections 112(l)(7) and 113 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR 63.90(d)(2)
with respect to sources which are
subject to the Radionuclides NESHAPs.
7. Implementation and enforcement of
the delegated NESHAP are subject to the
Environmental Performance Partnership
Agreement between the State of
Washington and the EPA and its
successor documents. The Agreement
defines roles and responsibilities,
including timely and appropriate
enforcement response and the
maintenance of ICIS-Air via the
Exchange Network. WDOH will ensure
that all relevant source notification and
report information is entered as
provided in the Agreement into the
specified EPA database system to meet
your recordkeeping/reporting
requirements.
8. This full approval and delegation
delegates to WDOH authority to
implement and enforce the
Radionuclides NESHAPs, as in effect on
July 1, 2021. Radionuclides NESHAPs
that that are promulgated or revised
substantively after that date are not
delegated to WDOH.
9. This approval and delegation does
not extend to any additional State
standards or requirements, including
other State standards or requirements
regulating radionuclide air emissions.
Section 116 of the CAA provides that,
with some exceptions not applicable
here, nothing in the CAA precludes or
denies the right of any State or political
subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce
any standard or limitation respecting
emissions of air pollutants or any
requirement respecting control or
abatement of air pollution so long as the
State requirement is not less stringent
than a standard or limitation in effect
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
under an applicable implementation
plan or under section 111 or 112 of the
CAA. Washington State standards that
are more stringent than the
Radionuclides NESHAPs are
enforceable as provided under State
law, but are not enforceable under the
CAA or in any way part of this full
approval and delegation of the
Radionuclides NESHAPs to WDOH.
10. WDOH may receive full approval
and delegation of newly promulgated or
revised Radionuclides NEHAPs by the
following streamlined process: (1)
WDOH will send a letter to the EPA
requesting delegation for such new or
revised Radionuclides NESHAPs which
WDOH has adopted by reference into
Washington regulations, reference its
previous demonstration, and reaffirm
that it still meets the criteria for any full
approval and delegation of the
NESHAPs; (2) the EPA will send a letter
of response back to WDOH granting
approval of the delegation request (or
explaining why the EPA cannot grant
the request), and publish notice of the
EPA’s approval in the Federal Register;
(3) WDOH does not need to send a
response back to the EPA.
11. Although WDOH is not obligated
to request or receive future delegations
of the Radionuclides NESHAPs, the EPA
encourages WDOH, on an annual basis
if the Federal standards have changed,
to revise its rules to incorporate by
reference newly promulgated or revised
Radionuclides NESHAPs and request
updated delegation of those standards.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator
has the authority to approve NESHAP
delegation requests that comply with
CAA section 112(l) and applicable
Federal regulations. In reviewing
NESHAP delegation requests, the EPA’s
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria and
objectives of the CAA and the EPA’s
implementing regulations. Accordingly,
this final action would merely approve
the State’s request as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements under the CAA
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
ddrumheller on DSK30NT082PROD with RULES
74322
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practical and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This full approval and delegation of
the Radionuclides NESHAPs does not
apply to sources or activities located in
Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C.
1151.3 Consistent with previous Federal
program approvals or delegations, the
EPA will continue to implement the
NESHAPs in Indian country in
Washington because WDOH has not
adequately demonstrated authority over
sources and activities located within the
exterior boundaries of Indian
reservations and in other areas of Indian
country. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The one
exception is within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
3 Under this definition, the EPA treats as
reservations trust lands validly set aside for the use
of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been
formally designated as a reservation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Dec 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided State and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area.
This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 3, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Radionuclides, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 29, 2022.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2022–26343 Filed 12–2–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 221129–0251]
RIN 0648–BK93
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Permitting
and Management Regulations for Area
2A Pacific Halibut Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Under the authority of the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982,
this final rule implements a permitting
system for the Pacific halibut
commercial and recreational charter
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
halibut fisheries in International Pacific
Halibut Commission (IPHC) regulatory
Area 2A (Washington, Oregon, and
California). This action also establishes
a regulatory framework for the Area 2A
Pacific halibut directed commercial
fishery that, consistent with the
allocations and coastwide season dates
set by the IPHC, allows NMFS to
annually determine dates and times the
fishery will be open and set harvest
limits for those periods of time. These
permitting and management activities
for Area 2A were previously performed
by the IPHC; through this final rule,
NMFS will now implement these Area
2A-specific permitting and management
activities.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Additional information
regarding this action may be obtained by
contacting the Sustainable Fisheries
Division, NMFS West Coast Region, 501
W Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. For information
regarding all halibut fisheries and
general regulations not contained in this
rule, contact the International Pacific
Halibut Commission, 2320 W
Commodore Way Suite 300, Seattle, WA
98199–1287.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, phone: 562–980–4034,
fax: 562–980–4018, or email:
joshua.lindsay@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982 (Halibut Act), 16 U.S.C. 773–773k,
gives the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) general responsibility for
implementing the provisions of the
Convention between Canada and the
United States for the Preservation of the
Halibut Fishery of the North Pacific
Ocean and Bering Sea (Halibut
Convention), signed at Ottawa, Ontario,
on March 2, 1953, as amended by a
Protocol Amending the Convention,
signed at Washington, DC, on March 29,
1979. The Halibut Act requires that the
Secretary shall adopt regulations as may
be necessary to carry out the purposes
and objectives of the Halibut
Convention and Halibut Act (16 U.S.C.
773c). The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, on behalf of the IPHC,
publishes annual management measures
governing the U.S. Pacific halibut
fishery that have been recommended by
the IPHC and accepted by the Secretary
of State, with concurrence from the
Secretary of Commerce. These
management measures include, but are
not limited to, coastwide and areaspecific mortality limits (also known as
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74319-74322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 61
[EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0374; FRL-9881-02-R10]
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Delegation of Authority to Washington
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
delegation request submitted by the Washington State Department of
Health (WDOH) for full delegation of authority to implement and enforce
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
radionuclide air emissions.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2022-0374. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information or other information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet
[[Page 74320]]
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim McAuley, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-1987 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Effective July 5, 2006, the EPA granted WDOH partial approval and
delegation to implement and enforce the radionuclides National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants in the State of Washington,
specifically, 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W
(Radionuclides NESHAPs) as in effect on July 1, 2004 (71 FR 32276, June
5, 2006). The EPA granted WDOH partial rather than full approval and
delegation of the Radionuclides NESHAPs because WDOH did not at that
time have express authority to recover criminal fines for certain
actions, as required by 40 CFR 70.11(a)(3)(iii) and 40 CFR
63.91(d)(3)(i)(A). The EPA also approved a streamlined mechanism by
which WDOH could receive partial approval and delegation of newly
promulgated or revised Radionuclides NESHAPs as provided in 40 CFR
63.91(a)(1) and (d)(2).
On February 3, 2012, WDOH submitted a request for full approval and
delegation of the Radionuclides NESHAPs and submitted updates to its
request in letters dated April 10, 2017, August 11, 2017, September 18,
2017, and February 25, 2022.
The EPA proposed to approve WDOH's request for full delegation of
the Radionuclides NESHAP on July 21, 2022 (87 FR 43464). The reasons
for proposed approval are included in the proposed action and will not
be restated here. The public comment period for the proposed action
closed on August 22, 2022, and we received two comments. Both
commenters supported the EPA's decision to grant full delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the Radionuclide NESHAPs to WDOH in
Washington State. One commenter stated that the delegation authorizes
WDOH to make ``minor changes to this rule.'' The EPA notes that the
authority to make minor changes is limited to those changes discussed
in the July 21, 2022, proposal (87 FR 43464 at page 43465) and
described in Section II of this preamble. The second commenter noted
that WDOH will be able to streamline further delegations through letter
of approvals resulting in efficiencies between the agencies. As
discussed in the proposal, this action includes approval of a
streamlined mechanism by which WDOH may receive partial approval and
delegation of newly promulgated or revised Radionuclides NESHAPs as
provided in 40 CFR 63.91(a)(1) and (d)(2).
II. Final Action
A. Authorities Included From This Approval and Delegation
Except as provided in Section II.B of this preamble, the EPA is
granting WDOH full approval and delegation of authority to implement
and enforce the Radionuclides NESHAPs as in effect on July 1, 2021.
Included in this full approval and delegation of the Radionuclide
NESHAPs is the authority to approve: (1) ``Minor changes to
monitoring'' \1\ including the use of the specified monitoring
requirements and procedures with minor changes in methodology as
described in 40 CFR 61.14(g)(1)(i); (2) ``Intermediate changes to
monitoring;'' (3) ``Minor changes to recordkeeping/reporting;'' (4)
``Minor changes in test methods,'' including the use of a reference
method with minor changes in methodology as described in 40 CFR
61.13(h)(1)(i); and (5) waiver of the requirement for emission testing
because the owner or operator of a source has demonstrated by other
means to WDOH's satisfaction that the source is in compliance with the
standard as described in 40 CFR 61.13(h)(1)(iii). Any authorities not
addressed in Section II.B. of this preamble and not identified in any
delegated subpart of the Radionuclides NESHAPs, including 40 CFR part
61, subpart A, as authorities that cannot be delegated shall be
considered delegated. See 67 FR 3106, at page 3109, footnote 3 (January
23, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this paragraph, the terms in quotations have
the meaning assigned to them in 40 CFR 63.90.
\2\ For purposes of this Table 1, the terms in quotations have
the meaning assigned to them in 40 CFR 63.90.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Authorities Excluded From This Approval and Delegation
The EPA is not delegating to WDOH authorities under 40 CFR part 61
that specifically indicate they cannot be delegated, that require
rulemaking to implement, that affect the stringency of the standard,
equivalency determinations, or where national oversight is the only way
to ensure national consistency. The following Table 1 identifies
specific authorities within 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H, I, K, Q,
R, T, and W, that the EPA is excluding from this delegation.
Table 1--Part 61 Authorities Excluded From Approval and Delegation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Authorities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
61.04(b).......................................... Waiver of
recordkeeping.
61.04(c).......................................... Delegations to state
and local agencies.
61.05(c).......................................... Waivers/exemptions.
61.11............................................. Waiver of
compliance.
61.12(d).......................................... Approval of
alternative means
of emission
limitation.
61.13(h)(1)(ii)................................... Approval of
alternatives to
test methods
(except as provided
in 40 CFR
61.13(h)(1)(i)).
61.14(d).......................................... Combined effluents.
61.14(g)(1)(ii)................................... Approval of
alternatives to
monitoring that do
not qualify as
``Minor changes to
monitoring,''
``Intermediate
changes to
monitoring,'' or
``Minor changes to
recordkeeping/
reporting'' \2\
61.16............................................. Availability of
information.
61.23(b).......................................... Subpart B--Radon
Emissions from
Underground Uranium
Mines Alternative;
compliance
demonstration to
COMPLY-R.
61.93(b)(2)(iii), (c)(2)(iii)..................... Subpart H--Emissions
of Radionuclides
Other than Radon
from DOE
Facilities.
61.107(b)(2)(iii), (d)(2)(iii).................... Subpart I--
Radionuclide
Emissions from
Federal Facilities
Other than NRC
Licensees and Not
Covered by Subpart
H.
[[Page 74321]]
61.125(a)......................................... Subpart K--
Radionuclide
Emissions from
Elemental
Phosphorus Plants.
61.206(c), (d), and (e)........................... Subpart R--Radon
Emission from
Phosphogypsum
Stacks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Other Implications of This Action
Under this full delegation and approval:
1. Sources in Washington subject to the delegated Radionuclides
NESHAPs should continue to direct questions and compliance issues to
WDOH except with respect to those authorities that are not delegated
(those noted in Section II.B. of this preamble). For those authorities
noted in Section II.B. of this preamble, affected sources should
continue to work with the EPA as their primary contact and submit
materials directly to the EPA, copying WDOH on all submittals,
questions, and requests.
2. Sources subject to the Radionuclides NESHAPs continue to be
required to send required notifications, reports and requests to WDOH
for WDOH's action and to provide copies to the EPA. For authorities
that are excluded from this delegation (see Section II.B. of this
preamble), sources should continue to send required notifications,
reports, and requests to the EPA and to provide copies to WDOH.
3. Any records or reports provided to or otherwise obtained by WDOH
relating to the Radionuclides NESHAPs should be made available to the
EPA upon request. In accordance with 40 CFR 61.16 and 63.15, the
availability to the public of information provided to or otherwise
obtained by the EPA in connection with this delegation shall be
governed by 40 CFR part 2. The EPA may request notifications and
reports from owners/operators and/or WDOH.
4. WDOH must continue to maintain a record of all approved
alternatives to all monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements and provide this list of alternatives to the EPA at least
semi-annually, or at a more frequent basis if requested by the EPA. The
EPA may audit the WDOH-approved alternatives and disapprove any that it
determines are inappropriate, after discussion with WDOH. If changes
are disapproved, WDOH must notify the source that it must revert to the
original applicable monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and/or
reporting requirements. Also, in cases where the source does not
maintain the conditions which prompted the approval of the alternatives
to the monitoring testing, recordkeeping, and/or reporting
requirements, WDOH must require the source to revert to the original
monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements, or more
stringent requirements, if justified.
5. WDOH shall require affected facilities to use the methods
specified in 40 CFR part 61 in performing source tests pursuant to the
regulations. See 40 CFR 61.7.
6. Enforcement of these delegated Radionuclides NESHAPs in WDOH's
jurisdiction will be the primary responsibility of WDOH. Nevertheless,
the EPA may exercise its concurrent enforcement authority pursuant to
sections 112(l)(7) and 113 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR
63.90(d)(2) with respect to sources which are subject to the
Radionuclides NESHAPs.
7. Implementation and enforcement of the delegated NESHAP are
subject to the Environmental Performance Partnership Agreement between
the State of Washington and the EPA and its successor documents. The
Agreement defines roles and responsibilities, including timely and
appropriate enforcement response and the maintenance of ICIS-Air via
the Exchange Network. WDOH will ensure that all relevant source
notification and report information is entered as provided in the
Agreement into the specified EPA database system to meet your
recordkeeping/reporting requirements.
8. This full approval and delegation delegates to WDOH authority to
implement and enforce the Radionuclides NESHAPs, as in effect on July
1, 2021. Radionuclides NESHAPs that that are promulgated or revised
substantively after that date are not delegated to WDOH.
9. This approval and delegation does not extend to any additional
State standards or requirements, including other State standards or
requirements regulating radionuclide air emissions. Section 116 of the
CAA provides that, with some exceptions not applicable here, nothing in
the CAA precludes or denies the right of any State or political
subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce any standard or limitation
respecting emissions of air pollutants or any requirement respecting
control or abatement of air pollution so long as the State requirement
is not less stringent than a standard or limitation in effect under an
applicable implementation plan or under section 111 or 112 of the CAA.
Washington State standards that are more stringent than the
Radionuclides NESHAPs are enforceable as provided under State law, but
are not enforceable under the CAA or in any way part of this full
approval and delegation of the Radionuclides NESHAPs to WDOH.
10. WDOH may receive full approval and delegation of newly
promulgated or revised Radionuclides NEHAPs by the following
streamlined process: (1) WDOH will send a letter to the EPA requesting
delegation for such new or revised Radionuclides NESHAPs which WDOH has
adopted by reference into Washington regulations, reference its
previous demonstration, and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria
for any full approval and delegation of the NESHAPs; (2) the EPA will
send a letter of response back to WDOH granting approval of the
delegation request (or explaining why the EPA cannot grant the
request), and publish notice of the EPA's approval in the Federal
Register; (3) WDOH does not need to send a response back to the EPA.
11. Although WDOH is not obligated to request or receive future
delegations of the Radionuclides NESHAPs, the EPA encourages WDOH, on
an annual basis if the Federal standards have changed, to revise its
rules to incorporate by reference newly promulgated or revised
Radionuclides NESHAPs and request updated delegation of those
standards.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator has the authority to approve
NESHAP delegation requests that comply with CAA section 112(l) and
applicable Federal regulations. In reviewing NESHAP delegation
requests, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that
they meet the criteria and objectives of the CAA and the EPA's
implementing regulations. Accordingly, this final action would merely
approve the State's request as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements under the CAA beyond those imposed
by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under
[[Page 74322]]
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practical and legally permissible methods,
under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This full approval and delegation of the Radionuclides NESHAPs does
not apply to sources or activities located in Indian country, as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.\3\ Consistent with previous Federal program
approvals or delegations, the EPA will continue to implement the
NESHAPs in Indian country in Washington because WDOH has not adequately
demonstrated authority over sources and activities located within the
exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and in other areas of Indian
country. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The one exception is
within the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also
known as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians
Settlement Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided
State and local agencies in Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under this definition, the EPA treats as reservations trust
lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust
lands have not been formally designated as a reservation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 3, 2023. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Radionuclides, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 29, 2022.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2022-26343 Filed 12-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P