Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical and Conforming Amendment to Authority Citation, 73254-73256 [2022-25827]
Download as PDF
73254
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2022–0704]
Navigation and Navigable Waters;
Technical and Conforming Amendment
to Authority Citation
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule makes a nonsubstantive conforming amendment to
our authority citations for Coast Guard
regulations that establish safety zones,
security zones, and regulated navigation
areas. This rule would conform our
authority citation to reflect an
amendment introduced by The William
M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.
This rule will have no substantive effect
on the regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket number
USCG–2022–0704, which is available at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this document call or
email Kate Sergent, Coast Guard;
telephone 202–372–3860, email
kate.e.sergent@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Discussion of the Rule
III. Regulatory History
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
OMB Office of Management and Budget
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Discussion of the Rule
This technical amendment final rule
updates the authority citations for part
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
165 within Title 33 of the CFR. This rule
adds the statutory authority 46 U.S.C.
70124 as a regulatory authority for 33
CFR part 165. Specifically, 46 U.S.C.
70124 gives the Secretary authority to
issue regulations necessary to
implement 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701.
Within Chapter 701, the delegated
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70116 authorizes
the Commandant to establish safety and
security zones to prevent or respond to
an act to terrorism, cyber incidents,
transitional organized crime, or foreign
state threats. The Secretary has
delegated this regulatory authority to
the Commandant in Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1(II)(71), Revision No. 01.3.
The Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–
282, (2018)) redesignated several
provisions of the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act into 46 U.S.C. chapters 700
and 701. That Act moved 33 U.S.C. 1226
into section 46 U.S.C. 70016. Section
70116 is a potential statutory authority
we may use to establish safety and
security zones under 33 CFR part 165.
We are adding the general regulatory
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70124 to the
authority citation for part 165 because
46 U.S.C. 70116(c) was amended in
2021 under section 8341 of The William
M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021
(Pub. L. 116–283, Jan. 1, 2021). This
amendment removed the statement
about section 70116 being treated as
part of 46 U.S.C. chapter 700 for
purposes of rulemaking authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034. With that statement
removed, we instead rely on the
regulatory authority in 46 U.S.C. 70124
for the authorities laid out in 46 U.S.C.
70116.
The Coast Guard periodically issues
technical, organizational, and
conforming amendments to existing
regulations in Title 33 of the CFR. These
technical amendments provide the
public with more accurate and current
regulatory information, but do not
change Title 33 of the CFR’s effect on
the public.
III. Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking for this rule.
Under Title 5 of the United States Code
(U.S.C.), Section 553(b)(A), the Coast
Guard finds that this final rule is
exempt from notice and public
comment rulemaking requirements
because these changes involve rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice. This rule only updates the
authority citation where the agency lists
the relevant authorities to issue
regulations in part 165 of the CFR.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In addition, the Coast Guard finds that
notice and comment procedures are
unnecessary for this final rule under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), as this rule consists of
only technical and editorial corrections
and these changes will have no
substantive effect on the public. Under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that, for the same reasons, good cause
exists for making this final rule effective
upon publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this conforming amendment is
unnecessary because the change to our
statutory regulatory authorities is an
agency procedural update and it will
have no impact on the public.
IV. Basis and Purpose
This final rule makes technical and
editorial corrections in 33 CFR part 165.
These changes are necessary to update
the authority citations we rely on for
issuing regulations in 33 CFR part 165.
This rule does not create or change any
substantive requirements for the public.
This final rule is issued under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 553; 14
U.S.C. 102 and 503; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1(II)(71), Revision No. 01.3.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or Executive
Orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by
OMB. This rule involves nonsubstantive changes and internal agency
practices and procedures; it will not
impose any additional costs on the
public or the government. The
qualitative benefit of the nonsubstantive changes is increased clarity
of regulations and their authority. By
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
the adding statutory citations for all of
the relevant authorities we rely on to
issue the regulated navigation area
regulations, we increase the clarity of
the authorities in the CFR.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ is comprised
of small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
A notice of proposed rulemaking does
not precede this rule. Therefore, it is
exempt from the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The Regulatory Flexibility
Act does not apply when notice and
comment rulemaking is not required.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
121, we offer to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520. This final rule will not change any
of the burdens in the collections
currently approved by OMB.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
73255
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under Executive
Order 13132 and have determined that
it is consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies
to use voluntary consensus standards in
their regulatory activities unless the
agency provides Congress, through
OMB, with an explanation of why using
these standards would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods;
sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Although this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 (Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights).
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks). This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
will not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A final Record
of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. This final rule involves nonsubstantive technical, organizational,
and conforming amendments to existing
Coast Guard regulations. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded under
paragraph L54 of Appendix A, Table 1
of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 01. Paragraph L54 pertains
to regulations which are editorial or
procedural.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
73256
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable
Waters
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
Michael Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2022–25827 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0914]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Taylor Bayou Turning
Basin, Port Arthur, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is extending
the period of a temporary safety zone on
the upper reaches of Taylor Bayou
Turning Basin in Port Arthur, TX. This
action is necessary to provide protection
to the levee protection wall located at
the north end of the turning basin until
permanent repairs can be effected. This
rule prohibits persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from
February 1, 2023 through January 31,
2025.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0914 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety
Unit Port Arthur, TX, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 409–719–5086, email
scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
COTP Captain of the Port, Marine Safety
Unit Port Arthur
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On August 14, 2017, the Coast Guard
established a temporary safety zone for
the upper reaches of Taylor Bayou Basin
in Port Arthur, TX.1 That emergency
action was necessary to protect the
damaged flood protection levee and
bulkhead during stabilization efforts.
On April 16, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Taylor Bayou Turning Basin, Port
Arthur, TX (83 FR 16267). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this
temporary safety zone. During the
comment period that ended on June 15,
2018, we received one comment.
On July 18, 2018, the Coast Guard
published the temporary final rule
establishing the safety zone until
January 31, 2023 (83 FR 33842).
In August 2022, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE) informed the
Coast Guard that permanent repairs to
the flood protection wall would not be
completed for another two years.
Therefore, the Coast Guard proposed to
extend the effective period of the
temporary safety zone through January
31, 2025.
On October 5, 2022, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Taylor Bayou Turning Basin, Port
Arthur, TX (87 FR 60363). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action to extend this
temporary safety zone. During the
comment period that ended on
November 4, 2022, we received one
comment.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port (COTP) has
determined that potential damage to
temporary repairs would make the
surrounding community susceptible to
flooding during storm surge or extreme
tide events that may endanger persons
and property in the surrounding
1 See the temporary final rule titled Safety Zone;
Taylor Bayou Turning Basin, Port Arthur, TX,
Docket No. USCG–2017–0797 (83 FR 4843).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
community. The USACE has requested,
and the Coast Guard concurs, that
protection measures must be instituted
until permanent repairs are completed.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received one
comment on our NPRM published
October 5, 2022. The comment
supported the need for the safety but
also commented on the inconvenience
to the public due to a temporary closure
of Texas 124 bridge. This rulemaking
does not require nor discuss the closure
of any bridges in the area, it simply
excludes vessel traffic from the affected
waterway to protect a damaged
floodwall. Therefore, no changes in the
regulatory text were necessary.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration
and entities impacted by the safety
zone. This safety zone affects
approximately 350-yards of Taylor
Bayou Turning Basin north of latitude
29°50′57.45 N. A facility receives
vessels within this zone and that facility
would be permitted to receive vessels
based on previously agreed to
maneuvering calculations and plans.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM
29NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73254-73256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25827]
[[Page 73254]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2022-0704]
Navigation and Navigable Waters; Technical and Conforming
Amendment to Authority Citation
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule makes a non-substantive conforming amendment
to our authority citations for Coast Guard regulations that establish
safety zones, security zones, and regulated navigation areas. This rule
would conform our authority citation to reflect an amendment introduced
by The William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2021. This rule will have no substantive effect on the
regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective November 29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket number USCG-2022-0704, which is available
at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document
call or email Kate Sergent, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-3860, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Discussion of the Rule
III. Regulatory History
IV. Basis and Purpose
V. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
OMB Office of Management and Budget
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Discussion of the Rule
This technical amendment final rule updates the authority citations
for part 165 within Title 33 of the CFR. This rule adds the statutory
authority 46 U.S.C. 70124 as a regulatory authority for 33 CFR part
165. Specifically, 46 U.S.C. 70124 gives the Secretary authority to
issue regulations necessary to implement 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701. Within
Chapter 701, the delegated authority in 46 U.S.C. 70116 authorizes the
Commandant to establish safety and security zones to prevent or respond
to an act to terrorism, cyber incidents, transitional organized crime,
or foreign state threats. The Secretary has delegated this regulatory
authority to the Commandant in Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 00170.1(II)(71), Revision No. 01.3.
The Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L.
115-282, (2018)) redesignated several provisions of the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act into 46 U.S.C. chapters 700 and 701. That Act
moved 33 U.S.C. 1226 into section 46 U.S.C. 70016. Section 70116 is a
potential statutory authority we may use to establish safety and
security zones under 33 CFR part 165.
We are adding the general regulatory authority in 46 U.S.C. 70124
to the authority citation for part 165 because 46 U.S.C. 70116(c) was
amended in 2021 under section 8341 of The William M. (Mac) Thornberry
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-
283, Jan. 1, 2021). This amendment removed the statement about section
70116 being treated as part of 46 U.S.C. chapter 700 for purposes of
rulemaking authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. With that statement removed,
we instead rely on the regulatory authority in 46 U.S.C. 70124 for the
authorities laid out in 46 U.S.C. 70116.
The Coast Guard periodically issues technical, organizational, and
conforming amendments to existing regulations in Title 33 of the CFR.
These technical amendments provide the public with more accurate and
current regulatory information, but do not change Title 33 of the CFR's
effect on the public.
III. Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking for this rule.
Under Title 5 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 553(b)(A),
the Coast Guard finds that this final rule is exempt from notice and
public comment rulemaking requirements because these changes involve
rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. This rule only
updates the authority citation where the agency lists the relevant
authorities to issue regulations in part 165 of the CFR.
In addition, the Coast Guard finds that notice and comment
procedures are unnecessary for this final rule under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), as this rule consists of only technical and editorial
corrections and these changes will have no substantive effect on the
public. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for the
same reasons, good cause exists for making this final rule effective
upon publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date
of this conforming amendment is unnecessary because the change to our
statutory regulatory authorities is an agency procedural update and it
will have no impact on the public.
IV. Basis and Purpose
This final rule makes technical and editorial corrections in 33 CFR
part 165. These changes are necessary to update the authority citations
we rely on for issuing regulations in 33 CFR part 165. This rule does
not create or change any substantive requirements for the public.
This final rule is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 553; 14 U.S.C. 102 and 503; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 00170.1(II)(71), Revision No. 01.3.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or Executive Orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not
been reviewed by OMB. This rule involves non-substantive changes and
internal agency practices and procedures; it will not impose any
additional costs on the public or the government. The qualitative
benefit of the non-substantive changes is increased clarity of
regulations and their authority. By
[[Page 73255]]
the adding statutory citations for all of the relevant authorities we
rely on to issue the regulated navigation area regulations, we increase
the clarity of the authorities in the CFR.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
is comprised of small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
A notice of proposed rulemaking does not precede this rule.
Therefore, it is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply when notice and comment rulemaking is not required.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. This final rule
will not change any of the burdens in the collections currently
approved by OMB.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Although this rule will not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights).
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks). This
rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. A
final Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. This final rule involves non-
substantive technical, organizational, and conforming amendments to
existing Coast Guard regulations. Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded under paragraph L54 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. Paragraph L54 pertains to regulations
which are editorial or procedural.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 73256]]
Title 33--Navigation and Navigable Waters
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
Michael Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-25827 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P