Notice of Proposed Supplementary Rule for Public Lands in the Cotoni-Coast Dairies Unit of the California Coastal National Monument in Santa Cruz County, CA, 73275-73278 [2022-25810]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
employee retirement and disability
costs. The VHA Office of Finance MCA
Cost Reports are used to determine two
separate rates: one rate is the general
Cost-Based Rate and the other rate is the
Inter-Agency Rate. These rates are
published annually by VA on the
internet site of the Veterans Health
Administration Office of Community
Care’s website at https://www.va.gov/
communitycare/revenue_ops/payer_
rates.asp.
(d) The rates for prescription drugs
that VA furnishes not administered
during treatment are based on the actual
cost of the drug plus a national average
of VA administrative costs as described
in § 17.101(m).
[FR Doc. 2022–25701 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
www.blm.gov/cotoni-coast-dairies, and
in the Central Coast Field Office.
Sky
Murphy, Planning and Environmental
Coordinator, BLM Central Coast Field
Office; telephone: (831) 582–2200,
email: smurphy@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Sky Murphy. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8360
[LLCAC09000 L12200000 NU0000 21X]
Notice of Proposed Supplementary
Rule for Public Lands in the CotoniCoast Dairies Unit of the California
Coastal National Monument in Santa
Cruz County, CA
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is proposing a
supplementary rule for all public lands
within the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of
the California Coastal National
Monument in Santa Cruz County,
California. The proposed supplementary
rule would allow the BLM to manage
recreation, address public safety, and
provide resource protection on BLMadministered public lands within the
Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of the
California Coastal National Monument.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
supplementary rule must be received or
postmarked by January 30, 2023 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
proposed supplementary rule can be
delivered to the Bureau of Land
Management, BLM Central Coast Field
Office, 940 2nd Ave., Marina, CA 93933,
or emailed to: blm_ca_cotoni_coast_
dairies@blm.gov.
A link to this notice and a map
depicting the area that would be
affected by the proposed supplementary
rule will be available to the public for
review on the BLM website at https://
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Written comments on the proposed
supplementary rule should be specific,
confined to issues pertinent to the
proposed supplementary rule, and
should explain the reason for any
recommended change. Where possible,
comments should reference the specific
section or paragraph of the rule that the
comment is addressing. The BLM need
not consider comments that the BLM
receives after the close of the comment
period (see DATES), unless they are
postmarked or electronically dated
before the deadline, or comments
delivered to an address other than those
listed earlier (see ADDRESSES).
Before including your address,
telephone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, be advised that your
entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. All submissions from
organizations and businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Upon its completion, the final
supplementary rule will be available for
inspection in the Central Coast Field
Office (see ADDRESSES). The BLM will
announce the publication of the final
rule broadly through the news media
and direct mail to the constituents
included on the BLM mail list. The BLM
will also provide information to
interested agencies and organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73275
II. Background
The BLM establishes supplementary
rules under the authority of 43 CFR
8365.1–6, which allows BLM State
Directors to establish such rules for the
protection of persons, property, and
public lands and resources. This
regulatory provision allows the BLM to
issue rules of less than national effect
without codifying the rules in the Code
of Federal Regulations.
III. Discussion of Proposed
Supplementary Rule
The BLM completed the Cotoni-Coast
Dairies Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment on June 23, 2021, to
establish land use decisions that protect
the objects and values of the CotoniCoast Dairies unit of the California
Coastal National Monument and
support responsible recreation
opportunities. Public participation
during planning for use and enjoyment
of the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit
indicates that it will be a popular area
and a supplementary rule is needed to
allow for law enforcement to enforce
decisions to manage recreation and
protect cultural and natural resources.
Thus, the proposed supplementary
rule would apply to all the BLMadministered lands in the Cotoni-Coast
Dairies unit. Persons performing
essential operations central to the BLM’s
mission would be exempt. Such persons
would include, for example, members of
any organized law enforcement, rescue,
or fire-fighting force.
The proposed supplementary rule is
needed to provide consistency and
uniformity for visitors to BLMadministered lands, prevent resource
damage and user conflicts, and provide
greater safety to the visiting public.
Therefore, a supplementary rule is
necessary to address the following
issues and concerns:
Resource Damage: Presidential
Proclamation 9563 added the CotoniCoast Dairies unit to the California
Coastal National Monument and
identified resource objects and values to
be protected. A supplementary rule is
needed to ensure protection of these
resources, particularly biological and
cultural resources.
Public Safety: As visitation increases
among all types of recreational users, so
do the conflicts between user groups. In
crowded areas, conflicts among users
increase risk to visitor safety. Other
recreationists and nearby landowners
also have concerns for their personal
safety, as well as damage to property. A
supplementary rule is needed to avoid
or minimize such conflicts.
At present, no supplementary rules
are in effect for BLM-administered lands
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
73276
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
in the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit.
Therefore, this supplementary rule is
needed to address management issues
and concerns with respect to public use
of this area.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563—Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review
This proposed supplementary rule is
not a significant regulatory action and is
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866. The proposed
supplementary rule would not have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It is not intended to affect
commercial activity, but rather impose
rules of conduct on recreational visitors
for public safety and resource protection
reasons in a limited area of public lands.
This proposed supplementary rule
would not adversely affect, in a material
way, the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
Tribal governments or communities.
This proposed supplementary rule
would not create a serious inconsistency
or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency.
This proposed supplementary rule
would not materially alter the budgetary
effects of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the right or
obligations of their recipients, nor does
it raise novel legal or policy issues. It
merely strives to protect public safety
and the environment.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612,
to ensure that government regulations
do not unnecessarily or
disproportionately burden small
entities. The RFA requires a regulatory
flexibility analysis if a rule would have
a significant economic impact, either
detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed supplementary rule does
not pertain specifically to commercial or
governmental entities of any size, but to
public recreational use of specific
public lands. Therefore, the BLM has
determined that under the RFA the
proposed supplementary rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This proposed supplementary rule
would not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
proposed supplementary rule merely
contains rules of conduct for
recreational use of public lands. This
proposed supplementary rule would not
affect business, commercial, or
industrial use of the public lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed supplementary rule
would not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of more than $100
million per year; nor would it have a
significant or unique effect on small
governments. This proposed
supplementary rule does not require
anything of state, local, or Tribal
governments. Therefore, the BLM is not
required to prepare a statement
containing the information required by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
This proposed supplementary rule
would not affect a taking of private
property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order
12630. This proposed supplementary
rule would not address property rights
in any form and would not impair any
property rights. Therefore, the BLM has
determined that this proposed
supplementary rule would not cause a
taking of private property or require
further discussion of takings
implications under this Executive
Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This proposed supplementary rule
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the states, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This
proposed supplementary rule would
apply to a limited area of land in only
one state, California. This proposed
supplementary rule contains rules of
conduct for recreational use of BLMadministered public lands to protect
public safety and the environment.
Therefore, the BLM has determined that
this proposed supplementary rule
would not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant preparation of a
federalism assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the
BLM has determined that this proposed
supplementary rule would not unduly
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
burden the judicial system and that the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order are met. More specifically,
this proposed rule meets the criteria of
section 3(a), which requires agencies to
review all regulations to eliminate errors
and ambiguity and to write all
regulations to minimize litigation. This
proposed rule also meets the criteria of
section 3(b)(2), which requires agencies
to write all regulations in clear language
with clear legal standards.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department strives to strengthen
its government-to-government
relationship with Indian Tribes through
a commitment to consultation with
Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal
sovereignty. The BLM evaluated this
proposed rule under the Department’s
consultation policy and under the
criteria in Executive Order 13175 to
identify possible effects of the rule on
federally recognized Indian Tribes. The
BLM has found that this proposed
supplementary rule would have no
substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian Tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
Tribal consultation policy is not
required. This proposed supplementary
rule would not affect lands held in trust
for the benefit of Native American
Tribes, individual Indians, Aleuts, or
others.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed supplementary rule
does not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM’s Cotoni-Coast Dairies RMP
Amendment and Environmental
Assessment, dated September 25, 2020,
states that the BLM will incorporate
rules and regulations to address the
potential impacts of visitor use at
Cotoni-Coast Dairies (p. 59). The
proposed supplementary rule directly
addresses conduct related to the
allowable uses identified in the CotoniCoast Dairies Decision Record for the
Approved Resource Management Plan
Amendment dated June 23, 2021, to
protect the environment and public
safety. As documented in
Environmental Assessment DOI–BLM–
CA–C090–2019–0035–EA, and the
associated Finding of No Significant
Impact, the proposed supplementary
rule does not constitute a major Federal
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment under
Section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C). Therefore,
a detailed statement under NEPA is not
required.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This proposed supplementary rule
would not comprise a significant energy
action. This supplementary rule would
not have an adverse effect on energy
supplies, production, or consumption. It
only addresses rules of conduct for
recreational use of BLM-administered
public lands to protect public safety and
the environment and has no connection
with energy policy.
Clarity of the Proposed Supplementary
Rule
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563 require each agency to
write regulations that are simple and
easy to understand. The BLM invites
your comments on how to make this
proposed supplementary rule easier to
understand, including answers to
questions such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the
proposed supplementary rule clearly
stated?
(2) Does the proposed supplementary
rule contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the proposed
supplementary rule (grouping and order
of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity?
(4) Would the proposed
supplementary rule be easier to
understand if it were divided into more
(but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the proposed
supplementary rule in Section III:
Discussion of the Proposed
Supplementary Rule, helpful in
understanding the proposed
supplementary rule? How could this
description be more helpful in making
the proposed supplementary rule easier
to understand?
Please send any comments you may
have on the clarity of the proposed
supplementary rule to one of the
addresses specified in the ADDRESSES
section before the close of the comment
period specified in the DATES section.
Author
The principal author of the proposed
supplementary rule is Nicholas Lasher,
BLM Law Enforcement Officer for the
Central Coast Field Office, California.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
V. Proposed Rule
For the reasons stated in the Section
III: Discussion of the Proposed
Supplementary Rule, and under the
authority for supplementary rules at 43
U.S.C. 1740 and 43 CFR 8365.1–6, the
California State Director, Bureau of
Land Management, proposes to issue
this supplementary rule that would
apply to all public lands included in the
Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit (Cotoni-Coast
Dairies) of the California Coastal
National Monument to read as follows:
Definitions
Designated roads and trails means
any road or trail that the BLM has
posted as open for public use.
Pet means any domestic animal that is
not classified as a ‘‘service animal’’.
Public lands means any lands or
interest in lands managed by the BLM.
Public road means any road, dirt or
otherwise, on which public motorized
vehicular traffic is permitted.
Recreational target shooting means
shooting a weapon for recreational
purposes when game is not being
pursued. Weapon means any firearm,
cross bow, bow and arrow, paint gun,
fireworks, or explosive device capable
of propelling a projectile either by
means of an explosion or by string or
spring.
Service animal means a dog, or other
animal, that is individually trained to
do work or perform tasks for people
with disabilities as covered under the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
Traffic control devices means
markers, signs, and signal devices used
to inform, guide, and control traffic,
including pedestrians, motorists,
cyclists, or electronic mobility products.
Unattended pet means any pet that is
unaccompanied by an owner or handler,
even if on a tether, within a crate, or
within an unoccupied motor vehicle.
Unmanned aerial vehicle means any
aircraft without a human pilot on board.
Restrictions on Public Lands in the
Cotoni Coast Dairies Unit of the
California Coastal National Monument
1. All public use is restricted to
designated roads and trails.
2. Bicycles and bicycle riding are
prohibited except on designated roads
and trails that are posted as open for
bicycle and bicycle riding use.
3. Class I and Class II electric bicycles,
as defined in 43 CFR 8340.0–5(j), and
riding electric bikes are prohibited
except on designated roads and trails
that are posted as open for their use. All
other electric bicycles and other electric
mobility products are prohibited except
within established parking areas and
public roads.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73277
4. Horseback riding is prohibited
except on designated roads and trails
that are posted as open for horseback
riding use.
5. Violation of any posted sign, rule,
or notification, including any traffic
control devices, is prohibited.
6. Established parking areas are for
the use of visitors to Cotoni-Coast
Dairies unit of the California Coastal
National Monument only.
7. Use and occupancy of all lands
within the Cotoni-Coast Dairies are
prohibited from 1⁄2 hour after sunset to
1⁄2 hour before sunrise.
8. Pets are prohibited except on
designated roads and trails that are
posted as open for their use. Service
animals are exempt from this rule.
9. All pets must be physically
restrained, or on a leash or cord not to
exceed 6 feet in length, at all times.
10. Visitors are prohibited from
leaving a pet unattended.
11. It is unlawful for the owner or
person having custody of any pet to
allow pet feces to remain on CotoniCoast Dairies, either willfully or through
failure to exercise due care or control,
other than within trash receptacles
provided for such purposes.
12. Fires of any kind are prohibited,
including open fire, wood, charcoal, and
gas.
13. Abandoning property or leaving
property unattended for more than 24
hours is prohibited. The BLM may
remove and appropriately dispose of
unattended property.
14. Construction or building of any
structure is prohibited.
15. Placing flagging, markings, or
signs of any kind is prohibited.
16. Possession or use of a mineral or
metal detector, magnetometer, side scan
sonar, other metal detecting device, or
sub-bottom profiler is prohibited.
17. The taking of wildlife, except for
authorized hunting activities in
accordance with California Department
of Fish and Wildlife regulations, and
possessing unlawfully taken wildlife or
portions thereof, is prohibited.
18. Disturbing wildlife with audio
devices, including speakers, air horns,
and musical instruments, is prohibited.
19. Taking off or landing of aircraft,
including unmanned aerial vehicles, is
prohibited.
20. Paragliding, hang-gliding, and
similar recreational uses are prohibited
from taking off or landing within the
Cotoni-Coast unit of the California
Coastal National Monument.
21. Recreational target shooting is
prohibited.
22. The following persons are exempt
from these final supplementary rules:
Any Federal, State, or local officer or
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
73278
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
employee in the scope of their duties;
members of any organized law
enforcement, rescue, or fire-fighting
force in performance of an official duty;
and any person whose activities are
authorized in writing by the BLM.
Enforcement
Any person who violates any of these
supplementary rules may be tried before
a United States Magistrate and fined in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571,
imprisoned no more than 12 months
under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43 CFR
8360.0–7, or both. In accordance with
43 CFR 8365.1–7, State or local officials
may also impose penalties for violations
of California law.
(Authority: 43 CFR 8365.1–6)
Karen Mouritsen,
BLM California State Director.
[FR Doc. 2022–25810 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Part 541
[Docket No. FMC–2022–0066]
RIN 3072–AC90
Demurrage and Detention Billing
Requirements
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
Federal Maritime Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Proposed rule; finding of no
significant impact.
ACTION:
This document announces the
availability of the Federal Maritime
Commission’s (Commission) draft
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) related to the proposed
regulations on Demurrage and Detention
Billing Requirements.
DATES: Petitions for review of the
Commission’s FONSI under NEPA must
be submitted on or before December 9,
2022
ADDRESSES: You may submit petitions
for review by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
FMC–2022–0066, Demurrage and
Detention Billing Requirements.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William
Cody, Secretary; Phone: (202) 523–5908;
Email: secretary@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 14, 2022, the Commission
issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) for new regulations on
demurrage and detention billing
requirements.1 In the NPRM, the
Commission determined that the
proposed rule did not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
within the meaning of the National
SUMMARY:
1 87
PO 00000
FR 62341 (Oct. 14, 2022).
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., and that preparation
of an environmental impact statement is
not required.2 The Commission also
noted that the FONSI and
environmental assessment would be
available for inspection on the docket at
https://www.regulations.gov.
On November 15, 2022, the
Commission issued a notice that the
FONSI was available on the docket.
There was a delay, however, in posting
the FONSI, and it was posted on
November 22, 2022. Therefore, the
Commission is issuing another notice
that the FONSI is now available on the
docket. This Finding of No Significant
Impact will become final within 10 days
of publication of this document in the
Federal Register unless a petition for
review is filed by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov.
By the Commission.
William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–26025 Filed 11–25–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–02–P
2 87
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
FR at 62356.
29NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73275-73278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25810]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8360
[LLCAC09000 L12200000 NU0000 21X]
Notice of Proposed Supplementary Rule for Public Lands in the
Cotoni-Coast Dairies Unit of the California Coastal National Monument
in Santa Cruz County, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing a
supplementary rule for all public lands within the Cotoni-Coast Dairies
unit of the California Coastal National Monument in Santa Cruz County,
California. The proposed supplementary rule would allow the BLM to
manage recreation, address public safety, and provide resource
protection on BLM-administered public lands within the Cotoni-Coast
Dairies unit of the California Coastal National Monument.
DATES: Comments on the proposed supplementary rule must be received or
postmarked by January 30, 2023 to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the proposed supplementary rule can be
delivered to the Bureau of Land Management, BLM Central Coast Field
Office, 940 2nd Ave., Marina, CA 93933, or emailed to:
[email protected].
A link to this notice and a map depicting the area that would be
affected by the proposed supplementary rule will be available to the
public for review on the BLM website at https://www.blm.gov/cotoni-coast-dairies, and in the Central Coast Field Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sky Murphy, Planning and Environmental
Coordinator, BLM Central Coast Field Office; telephone: (831) 582-2200,
email: [email protected].
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services for contacting
Sky Murphy. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay
services offered within their country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments on the proposed supplementary rule should be
specific, confined to issues pertinent to the proposed supplementary
rule, and should explain the reason for any recommended change. Where
possible, comments should reference the specific section or paragraph
of the rule that the comment is addressing. The BLM need not consider
comments that the BLM receives after the close of the comment period
(see DATES), unless they are postmarked or electronically dated before
the deadline, or comments delivered to an address other than those
listed earlier (see ADDRESSES).
Before including your address, telephone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that
your entire comment, including your personal identifying information,
may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in
your comment to withhold from public review your personal identifying
information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. All
submissions from organizations and businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, will be available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Upon its completion, the final supplementary rule will be available
for inspection in the Central Coast Field Office (see ADDRESSES). The
BLM will announce the publication of the final rule broadly through the
news media and direct mail to the constituents included on the BLM mail
list. The BLM will also provide information to interested agencies and
organizations.
II. Background
The BLM establishes supplementary rules under the authority of 43
CFR 8365.1-6, which allows BLM State Directors to establish such rules
for the protection of persons, property, and public lands and
resources. This regulatory provision allows the BLM to issue rules of
less than national effect without codifying the rules in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
III. Discussion of Proposed Supplementary Rule
The BLM completed the Cotoni-Coast Dairies Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment on June 23, 2021, to establish land use decisions that
protect the objects and values of the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of the
California Coastal National Monument and support responsible recreation
opportunities. Public participation during planning for use and
enjoyment of the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit indicates that it will be a
popular area and a supplementary rule is needed to allow for law
enforcement to enforce decisions to manage recreation and protect
cultural and natural resources.
Thus, the proposed supplementary rule would apply to all the BLM-
administered lands in the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit. Persons performing
essential operations central to the BLM's mission would be exempt. Such
persons would include, for example, members of any organized law
enforcement, rescue, or fire-fighting force.
The proposed supplementary rule is needed to provide consistency
and uniformity for visitors to BLM-administered lands, prevent resource
damage and user conflicts, and provide greater safety to the visiting
public. Therefore, a supplementary rule is necessary to address the
following issues and concerns:
Resource Damage: Presidential Proclamation 9563 added the Cotoni-
Coast Dairies unit to the California Coastal National Monument and
identified resource objects and values to be protected. A supplementary
rule is needed to ensure protection of these resources, particularly
biological and cultural resources.
Public Safety: As visitation increases among all types of
recreational users, so do the conflicts between user groups. In crowded
areas, conflicts among users increase risk to visitor safety. Other
recreationists and nearby landowners also have concerns for their
personal safety, as well as damage to property. A supplementary rule is
needed to avoid or minimize such conflicts.
At present, no supplementary rules are in effect for BLM-
administered lands
[[Page 73276]]
in the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit. Therefore, this supplementary rule is
needed to address management issues and concerns with respect to public
use of this area.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This proposed supplementary rule is not a significant regulatory
action and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866. The proposed supplementary rule
would not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy.
It is not intended to affect commercial activity, but rather impose
rules of conduct on recreational visitors for public safety and
resource protection reasons in a limited area of public lands. This
proposed supplementary rule would not adversely affect, in a material
way, the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or Tribal governments or
communities. This proposed supplementary rule would not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency. This proposed supplementary rule would not
materially alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs, or the right or obligations of their
recipients, nor does it raise novel legal or policy issues. It merely
strives to protect public safety and the environment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C.
601-612, to ensure that government regulations do not unnecessarily or
disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA requires a regulatory
flexibility analysis if a rule would have a significant economic
impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial number of
small entities. The proposed supplementary rule does not pertain
specifically to commercial or governmental entities of any size, but to
public recreational use of specific public lands. Therefore, the BLM
has determined that under the RFA the proposed supplementary rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed supplementary rule would not constitute a ``major
rule'' as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This proposed supplementary rule
merely contains rules of conduct for recreational use of public lands.
This proposed supplementary rule would not affect business, commercial,
or industrial use of the public lands.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed supplementary rule would not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of more than $100 million per year; nor would it have a
significant or unique effect on small governments. This proposed
supplementary rule does not require anything of state, local, or Tribal
governments. Therefore, the BLM is not required to prepare a statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act, 2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
This proposed supplementary rule would not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive
Order 12630. This proposed supplementary rule would not address
property rights in any form and would not impair any property rights.
Therefore, the BLM has determined that this proposed supplementary rule
would not cause a taking of private property or require further
discussion of takings implications under this Executive Order.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This proposed supplementary rule would not have a substantial
direct effect on the states, on the relationship between the Federal
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. This proposed
supplementary rule would apply to a limited area of land in only one
state, California. This proposed supplementary rule contains rules of
conduct for recreational use of BLM-administered public lands to
protect public safety and the environment. Therefore, the BLM has
determined that this proposed supplementary rule would not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
federalism assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
Under Executive Order 12988, the BLM has determined that this
proposed supplementary rule would not unduly burden the judicial system
and that the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order are
met. More specifically, this proposed rule meets the criteria of
section 3(a), which requires agencies to review all regulations to
eliminate errors and ambiguity and to write all regulations to minimize
litigation. This proposed rule also meets the criteria of section
3(b)(2), which requires agencies to write all regulations in clear
language with clear legal standards.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department strives to strengthen its government-to-government
relationship with Indian Tribes through a commitment to consultation
with Indian Tribes and recognition of their right to self-governance
and Tribal sovereignty. The BLM evaluated this proposed rule under the
Department's consultation policy and under the criteria in Executive
Order 13175 to identify possible effects of the rule on federally
recognized Indian Tribes. The BLM has found that this proposed
supplementary rule would have no substantial direct effects on
federally recognized Indian Tribes and that consultation under the
Department's Tribal consultation policy is not required. This proposed
supplementary rule would not affect lands held in trust for the benefit
of Native American Tribes, individual Indians, Aleuts, or others.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed supplementary rule does not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
The BLM's Cotoni-Coast Dairies RMP Amendment and Environmental
Assessment, dated September 25, 2020, states that the BLM will
incorporate rules and regulations to address the potential impacts of
visitor use at Cotoni-Coast Dairies (p. 59). The proposed supplementary
rule directly addresses conduct related to the allowable uses
identified in the Cotoni-Coast Dairies Decision Record for the Approved
Resource Management Plan Amendment dated June 23, 2021, to protect the
environment and public safety. As documented in Environmental
Assessment DOI-BLM-CA-C090-2019-0035-EA, and the associated Finding of
No Significant Impact, the proposed supplementary rule does not
constitute a major Federal
[[Page 73277]]
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
under Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C). Therefore, a detailed statement
under NEPA is not required.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This proposed supplementary rule would not comprise a significant
energy action. This supplementary rule would not have an adverse effect
on energy supplies, production, or consumption. It only addresses rules
of conduct for recreational use of BLM-administered public lands to
protect public safety and the environment and has no connection with
energy policy.
Clarity of the Proposed Supplementary Rule
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 require each agency
to write regulations that are simple and easy to understand. The BLM
invites your comments on how to make this proposed supplementary rule
easier to understand, including answers to questions such as the
following:
(1) Are the requirements in the proposed supplementary rule clearly
stated?
(2) Does the proposed supplementary rule contain technical language
or jargon that interferes with its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the proposed supplementary rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity?
(4) Would the proposed supplementary rule be easier to understand
if it were divided into more (but shorter) sections?
(5) Is the description of the proposed supplementary rule in
Section III: Discussion of the Proposed Supplementary Rule, helpful in
understanding the proposed supplementary rule? How could this
description be more helpful in making the proposed supplementary rule
easier to understand?
Please send any comments you may have on the clarity of the
proposed supplementary rule to one of the addresses specified in the
ADDRESSES section before the close of the comment period specified in
the DATES section.
Author
The principal author of the proposed supplementary rule is Nicholas
Lasher, BLM Law Enforcement Officer for the Central Coast Field Office,
California.
V. Proposed Rule
For the reasons stated in the Section III: Discussion of the
Proposed Supplementary Rule, and under the authority for supplementary
rules at 43 U.S.C. 1740 and 43 CFR 8365.1-6, the California State
Director, Bureau of Land Management, proposes to issue this
supplementary rule that would apply to all public lands included in the
Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit (Cotoni-Coast Dairies) of the California
Coastal National Monument to read as follows:
Definitions
Designated roads and trails means any road or trail that the BLM
has posted as open for public use.
Pet means any domestic animal that is not classified as a ``service
animal''.
Public lands means any lands or interest in lands managed by the
BLM.
Public road means any road, dirt or otherwise, on which public
motorized vehicular traffic is permitted.
Recreational target shooting means shooting a weapon for
recreational purposes when game is not being pursued. Weapon means any
firearm, cross bow, bow and arrow, paint gun, fireworks, or explosive
device capable of propelling a projectile either by means of an
explosion or by string or spring.
Service animal means a dog, or other animal, that is individually
trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities as
covered under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Traffic control devices means markers, signs, and signal devices
used to inform, guide, and control traffic, including pedestrians,
motorists, cyclists, or electronic mobility products.
Unattended pet means any pet that is unaccompanied by an owner or
handler, even if on a tether, within a crate, or within an unoccupied
motor vehicle.
Unmanned aerial vehicle means any aircraft without a human pilot on
board.
Restrictions on Public Lands in the Cotoni Coast Dairies Unit of the
California Coastal National Monument
1. All public use is restricted to designated roads and trails.
2. Bicycles and bicycle riding are prohibited except on designated
roads and trails that are posted as open for bicycle and bicycle riding
use.
3. Class I and Class II electric bicycles, as defined in 43 CFR
8340.0-5(j), and riding electric bikes are prohibited except on
designated roads and trails that are posted as open for their use. All
other electric bicycles and other electric mobility products are
prohibited except within established parking areas and public roads.
4. Horseback riding is prohibited except on designated roads and
trails that are posted as open for horseback riding use.
5. Violation of any posted sign, rule, or notification, including
any traffic control devices, is prohibited.
6. Established parking areas are for the use of visitors to Cotoni-
Coast Dairies unit of the California Coastal National Monument only.
7. Use and occupancy of all lands within the Cotoni-Coast Dairies
are prohibited from \1/2\ hour after sunset to \1/2\ hour before
sunrise.
8. Pets are prohibited except on designated roads and trails that
are posted as open for their use. Service animals are exempt from this
rule.
9. All pets must be physically restrained, or on a leash or cord
not to exceed 6 feet in length, at all times.
10. Visitors are prohibited from leaving a pet unattended.
11. It is unlawful for the owner or person having custody of any
pet to allow pet feces to remain on Cotoni-Coast Dairies, either
willfully or through failure to exercise due care or control, other
than within trash receptacles provided for such purposes.
12. Fires of any kind are prohibited, including open fire, wood,
charcoal, and gas.
13. Abandoning property or leaving property unattended for more
than 24 hours is prohibited. The BLM may remove and appropriately
dispose of unattended property.
14. Construction or building of any structure is prohibited.
15. Placing flagging, markings, or signs of any kind is prohibited.
16. Possession or use of a mineral or metal detector, magnetometer,
side scan sonar, other metal detecting device, or sub-bottom profiler
is prohibited.
17. The taking of wildlife, except for authorized hunting
activities in accordance with California Department of Fish and
Wildlife regulations, and possessing unlawfully taken wildlife or
portions thereof, is prohibited.
18. Disturbing wildlife with audio devices, including speakers, air
horns, and musical instruments, is prohibited.
19. Taking off or landing of aircraft, including unmanned aerial
vehicles, is prohibited.
20. Paragliding, hang-gliding, and similar recreational uses are
prohibited from taking off or landing within the Cotoni-Coast unit of
the California Coastal National Monument.
21. Recreational target shooting is prohibited.
22. The following persons are exempt from these final supplementary
rules: Any Federal, State, or local officer or
[[Page 73278]]
employee in the scope of their duties; members of any organized law
enforcement, rescue, or fire-fighting force in performance of an
official duty; and any person whose activities are authorized in
writing by the BLM.
Enforcement
Any person who violates any of these supplementary rules may be
tried before a United States Magistrate and fined in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 3571, imprisoned no more than 12 months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a)
and 43 CFR 8360.0-7, or both. In accordance with 43 CFR 8365.1-7, State
or local officials may also impose penalties for violations of
California law.
(Authority: 43 CFR 8365.1-6)
Karen Mouritsen,
BLM California State Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-25810 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P