Collection or Recovery by VA for Humanitarian Care or Services and for Certain Other Care and Services, 73268-73275 [2022-25701]
Download as PDF
73268
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vincent de Jesus, Office of Nutrition and
Food Labeling, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration, 5001 Campus Dr.,
College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–1450,
vincent.dejesus@fda.hhs.gov.
In the
Federal Register of September 29, 2022
(87 FR 59168), we published a proposed
rule entitled ‘‘Food Labeling: Nutrient
Content Claims; Definition of Term
‘Healthy’.’’ This action opened a docket
with a 90-day comment period to
receive information and comments
related to the definition for the implied
nutrient content claim ‘‘healthy.’’
FDA has received a request for a 90day extension for this comment period
in order to allow additional time for
interested persons to develop and
submit comments. The request
conveyed concern that the current 90day comment period does not allow
sufficient time to develop meaningful
comments to the proposed rule. In the
interest of balancing the public health
importance of the nutrient content claim
and definition of the term ‘‘healthy’’ and
granting additional time to submit
comments before we finalize the
proposed rule, we have concluded that
it is reasonable to extend the comment
period for 50 days, until February 16,
2023. We believe that this extension
allows adequate time for interested
persons to submit comments.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Dated: November 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–26002 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ58
Collection or Recovery by VA for
Humanitarian Care or Services and for
Certain Other Care and Services
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to revise its
regulations concerning reimbursement
rates for health care that VA provides to
individuals who are not otherwise
eligible for such care as veterans or
other VA beneficiaries. Specifically, this
rulemaking would revise provisions of
VA regulations and make them
consistent with applicable law along
with removing obsolete provisions.
These revisions would clarify VA
regulations related to the provision of
VA health care to individuals who are
not otherwise eligible for such care as
veterans or other VA beneficiaries, and
it would not substantively affect the
provision of health care to eligible
veterans or other VA beneficiaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before January 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. Comments received before
the close of the comment period on
www.regulations.gov will be posted as
soon as possible after they have been
received. VA will not post public
comments that make threats to
individuals or institutions or suggest
that the individual will take actions to
harm the individual. VA encourages
individuals not to submit duplicative
comments. We will post acceptable
comments from multiple unique
commenters even if the content is
identical or nearly identical to other
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra Vatthauer, Office of Finance,
Revenue Operations, Payer Relations
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and Services, Rates and Charges
(104RO1), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 128 Bingham Road, Suite 1000,
Asheville, NC 28806; telephone: 608–
821–7346 (this is not a toll-free
number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
primary purpose of this rulemaking is to
clear up internal confusion related to
ineligible Civilian Health and Medical
Program of VA (CHAMPVA)
beneficiaries not being billed for
services and this rulemaking will also
clarify the applicable regulations
organization, authority and any cross
references. There are several statutory
authorities that allow for VA to provide
care to individuals who would not
generally be eligible to receive VA
health care. While these authorities
allow VA to provide the care, these
authorities also require VA to charge for
the vital services it provides Section 205
of the appropriations act does not allow
appropriations for hospitalization or
examination of ineligible individuals,
unless reimbursement of the costs of
their care is made at a rate determined
by VA. Several VA authorities, as
codified in title 38 also require VA to
charge for care at rates prescribed by the
Secretary. Notably, under section 1784
of title 38, United States Code (U.S.C.),
VA provides medical care or services as
a humanitarian service in emergency
cases to individuals not generally
eligible to receive such care or services
from VA, but is also required to charge
for those care and services at rates
prescribed by the Secretary. Under 38
U.S.C. 1785, during and in the
immediate aftermath of an emergency or
natural disaster, VA may furnish
hospital care and medical services to
individuals responding to, involved in,
or otherwise affected by that disaster or
emergency, but is required to charge the
recipient. Under 38 U.S.C. 8111, VA is
authorized to enter into sharing
agreements with the Department of
Defense (DoD) for the use or exchange
of use of health care resources, and VA
may bill DoD for certain medical
services obtained from VA. VA may also
provide medical care to certain
discharged members of allied forces
consistent with 38 U.S.C. 109 and must
enter into agreements for cash
reimbursement of incurred expenses at
such rates and under such regulations as
the Secretary may prescribe. Section
17.102 of title 38, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) addresses when and
how it determines the rate VA will
charge for medical care and services
provided to individuals under all four
authorities described above.
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
During the COVID–19 pandemic VA
has provided significant amounts of care
to individuals under the Stafford Act via
Mission Assignments from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) within the Department of
Homeland Security which is distinct
from care VA provides under our
authority in 38 U.S.C. 1785 described
above. The care provided under the
Stafford Act via Mission Assignments
would not be impacted by the changes
made to 38 CFR 17.102 in this
rulemaking.
VA is generally required by law,
however, to charge for care provided to
otherwise ineligible individuals
generally at rates determined by the
Secretary. VA has been charging for this
care in accordance with 38 CFR 17.102
for many years. This rulemaking
updates and clarifies when individuals
will be charged for this care.
This proposed rule would primarily
reorganize for clarity 38 CFR 17.102,
which lists instances when VA provides
health care based on various changes in
the determination of veteran eligibility
and based on VA’s authorities to
provide certain health care to
individuals who are not otherwise
eligible to receive such care from VA.
Section 17.102 also establishes rates VA
charges for the care. However, § 17.102,
did not reference the specific authorities
for VA to provide health care in each
circumstance, and this section does not
include all circumstances when VA
provides care, to individuals who are
otherwise ineligible to receive care from
VA. This proposed rule would revise
§ 17.102 to add citations to and
harmonize these authorities. Also, the
proposed rule would remove
unnecessary provisions in § 17.102, and
it would establish a new data source to
calculate the rates charged for the care
provided pursuant to this regulation.
This proposed rule would similarly
revise regulations that relate to or
reference § 17.102, or otherwise relate to
certain health care VA provides to
individuals who are not eligible to
receive the care as veterans or other VA
health care beneficiaries. We first
discuss proposed changes to § 17.102.
Section 17.102
Services
73269
Charges for Care or
This proposed rule would revise 38
CFR 17.102 to include additional
categories of normally ineligible
individuals who may receive health care
services from VA, remove provisions
that have become obsolete, and update
the authorities for VA to provide the
health care services. The proposed rule
would also clarify the difference
between the two types of rates charged
under this section: the Cost-Based Rates
and the Inter-Agency Rates. In so doing,
we propose to reorganize the structure
of § 17.102 for clarity.
The table below reflects proposed
changes to the structure of § 17.102. The
current section and paragraph are noted
in the left column, with the proposed
new location in column three.
Paragraphs that we propose to remove
are listed in column two. We will
discuss the rationale for removing
specific paragraphs, as well as any
proposed revisions and additions to
current regulatory language.
Current 17.102
Proposed to
be removed
Proposed
17.102
17.102(a) ..................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(b)(1) .............................................................................................................................................................
17.102(b)(2) .............................................................................................................................................................
17.102(c) ..................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(d) ..................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(e) ..................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(f) ...................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(g) ..................................................................................................................................................................
17.102(h) ..................................................................................................................................................................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
17.102(b)(1)
17.102(a)(1)
........................
17.102(a)(5)
17.102(b)(2)
17.102(b)(3)
17.102(a)(6)
........................
17.102(c)
The introductory language of 38 CFR
17.102 currently states that ‘‘[e]xcept as
provided in § 17.101, charges at the
indicated rates shall be made for
Department of Veterans Affairs hospital
care or medical services (including, but
not limited to, dental services, supplies,
medicines, orthopedic and prosthetic
appliances, and domiciliary or nursing
home care) as follows.’’ First, we would
amend the introductory language to
reference proposed § 17.102(c) which
would establish the reimbursement
rates. Current reimbursement rates are
established in § 17.102(h). We explain
the proposed changes to the data source
used to develop the rates and redesignating from paragraph (h) to
paragraph (c) later in this rulemaking.
Next, we would amend the
introductory language to indicate that
the rates established in § 17.102 would
apply ‘‘notwithstanding’’ the rates
established in § 17.101. This would
clarify that the rate structures in
§§ 17.101 and 17.102 are mutually
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
exclusive. While the rates under
§ 17.102 are used to recover costs of VA
care provided to individuals who are
otherwise ineligible for the care, the
rates in § 17.101 implement VA’s
authority in 38 U.S.C. 1729 to recover
reasonable charges from a third party for
non-service connected VA care
provided to an eligible veteran who is
also a beneficiary under a health-plan
contract, workers compensation law, or
automobile accident reparations
insurance.
We would also amend the
introductory language in § 17.102 to
replace the current list of examples of
medical services (i.e., ‘‘. . . dental
services, supplies, medicines,
orthopedic and prosthetic appliances,
and domiciliary or nursing home care
. . . ’’) and would state instead that VA
will charge for ‘‘care and services.’’ VA
is making this change to avoid the
potential misinterpretation of this list as
exhaustive. Substituting the list of
examples for ‘‘care and services’’ allows
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for change in the future and is in line
with current Veterans Health
Administration (VHA) regulation
drafting tenets. Other proposed
revisions to § 17.102 would further
distinguish whether ‘‘hospital care and
medical services’’ could be provided
and charged to certain individuals,
versus the broader scope of ‘‘hospital
care, medical services, domiciliary care,
or nursing home care.’’ This change
would make the introductory language
to § 17.102 more consistent with VA
authorities to provide and charge for
only certain health care to individuals
not otherwise eligible to receive such
care as VA beneficiaries.
Lastly, we would amend the
introductory language in § 17.102 to
indicate clearly that this section relates
to care and services provided in the
circumstances listed in paragraphs (a)
and (b).
Current paragraphs (a) through (g) list
instances when care and services are
furnished to non-veterans and non-VA
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
73270
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
beneficiaries. We would modify the
organization of paragraphs (a) through
(g) for clarity and would remove
obsolete or unnecessary paragraphs as
explained.
Generally, proposed paragraph (a)
would describe charges that arise from
the provision of ‘‘hospital care or
medical services,’’ and proposed
paragraph (b) would describe charges
that arise from the provision of the
broader scope of ‘‘hospital care, medical
services, domiciliary care, or nursing
home care.’’ We believe this would be
consistent with how distinct these four
terms are from one another as defined
in 38 U.S.C. 101 and 1701, and it also
would be consistent with current VA
authorities. For example, VA only has
the authority to provide ‘‘hospital care
and medical services’’ as a humanitarian
service in emergency cases and not
domiciliary or nursing home care. 38
U.S.C. 1784. The instances when VA
provides each type of care would be
listed following paragraphs (a) and (b),
respectively.
Proposed paragraph (a)(1) would state
that VA would charge for hospital care
and medical services that could be
provided to individuals as a
humanitarian service. This proposed
revision would re-designate current
paragraph (b) as paragraph (a)(1). We
would remove references to § 17.41(b)(1)
or § 17.95 and would instead reference
the underlying statutory authority 38
U.S.C. 1784 and 1784A. Section 1784
provides the statutory authority for VA
to provide care as a humanitarian
service. Section 1784A provides the
statutory authority for VA to provide
care for examination and treatment for
emergency medical conditions and
women in labor. We note that section
1784A was not previously referenced in
this regulation because it had not been
enacted at the time of the most recent
previous revision of § 17.102. However,
we believe that this care broadly falls
under the category of humanitarian care.
Therefore, it is appropriate to list it
together with the care provided under
section 1784.
Proposed paragraph (a)(1) would not
retain the language from current
paragraph (b)(2) related to emergency
medical care provided separately to VA
employees or their family members. We
would not retain this language since
there is no general distinction in the
statute between individuals or VA
employees and their families. The
inclusion of a separate category for VA
employees and their families has been
included in the CFR since 1967 and the
Federal Register notice creating it, 32
FR 11382, offers no explanation for why
it was originally included. VA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
employees and their families are
subsumed in the class of individuals for
whom VA may provide humanitarian
care under section 1784. VA believes it
is unnecessary to distinguish between
the two groups of individuals under this
section. VA charges for the provision of
care as humanitarian care under 38
U.S.C. 1784 and 1784A, so we would
not reference any other authority in
proposed paragraph (a)(1). We note that
the charges for care under this
paragraph would be VA’s Cost-Based
Rates as described in paragraph (c),
discussed in detail below.
Proposed paragraph (a)(2) would state
that VA would charge for hospital care
and medical services that would be
provided to individuals during and
immediately following a disaster or
emergency. This is in accordance with
38 U.S.C. 1785 and the corresponding
implementing regulation at 38 CFR
17.86. Proposed paragraph (a)(2) would
add a new type of VA care to § 17.102
for which VA seeks reimbursement, but
VA does not view this as a substantive
change. Section 17.86 already requires
reimbursement for this care and
references § 17.102 to determine the rate
for reimbursement. We are also
proposing to amend § 17.86(e), as
discussed in further detail below, to
clarify the rates of reimbursement
pursuant to section 1785 and to update
the reference to § 17.102 considering its
proposed reorganization. We note that
the rates VA would charge for this care
are based on either the Cost-Based or the
Inter-Agency Rate depending on
whether the beneficiary of the care was
authorized by a Federal agency to
receive care. Proposed § 17.86(e) would
provide a detailed description of all the
charges. Proposed paragraph (a)(2)
would reference 38 U.S.C. 1785 and 38
CFR 17.86.
Proposed paragraph (a)(3) would state
that VA would charge for emergency
medical treatment provided to an
individual attending a national
conference in accordance with 38 U.S.C.
1711. VA would charge, either the
individual or the organization, pursuant
to a contract. The organization must be
recognized under 38 U.S.C. 5902. VA’s
authority to provide this care to
individuals at such a national
conference, under 38 U.S.C. 1711, was
first promulgated in regulation in 1982,
then designated as 38 CFR 17.62(i) [47
FR 58249 (December 30, 1982)]. This
provision remained in annual print
editions of the CFR from 1982 through
1999, at which time § 17.62 was
redesignated as § 17.101 (see 61 FR
21964, where § 17.62(i) became
§ 17.101(i)). Later § 17.101 was
redesignated as § 17.102 (see 64 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22676, where § 17.101(i) became
§ 17.102(i)). VA did not remove this
provision since we first promulgated it
in 1982. However, the provision
regarding hospital care and medical
services provided to an individual
attending a national conference of an
organization recognized under 38 U.S.C.
5902 failed to appear in the annual print
editions of the CFR after 1999, although
VA never instituted any type of
rulemaking to remove it. Proposed
paragraph (a)(3) would correct the
inadvertent removal of this provision, as
the underlying statutory authority at 38
U.S.C. 1711(c)(1) is still in effect. We
note that 38 U.S.C. 1711 mandates that
VA be reimbursed for such care as
prescribed by the Secretary. The care
provided under this section would be
charged for at VA’s Cost-Based Rates.
Proposed paragraph (a)(4) would state
that VA will charge for hospital care and
medical services provided to an
individual, in error, on the basis of
eligibility as a non-veteran recipient of
VA health care and services under title
38 of the United States Code. This
would permit VA to collect charges for
care provided in VA facilities to
individuals who were thought to have
been eligible to receive health care and
services as non-veterans under
particular VA authorities, such as care
of allied beneficiaries as permitted by 38
U.S.C. 109, caregiver services as
permitted by 38 U.S.C. 1720G, the
CHAMPVA services as permitted by 38
U.S.C. 1781, mental health services as
permitted by 38 U.S.C. 1782, and
newborn care as permitted by 38 U.S.C.
1786. The authority for this substantive
change is 31 U.S.C. 3711, which allows
the head of an executive agency to
collect a claim of the United States
Government for money or property
arising out of the activities of the
agency. Additionally, section 205 of the
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs,
and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act of 2022 states that, ‘‘No
appropriations in this title shall be
available for hospitalization or
examination of any persons (except
beneficiaries entitled to such
hospitalization or examination under
the laws providing such benefits to
veterans, and persons receiving such
treatment under sections 7901 through
7904 of title 5, United States Code, or
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act (42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.)), unless
reimbursement of the cost of such
hospitalization or examination is made
to the ‘‘Medical Services’’ account at
such rates as may be fixed by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.’’
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Proposed paragraph (a)(5) would state
that VA would charge for medical care
or services authorized for a beneficiary
of the Department of Defense, or other
Federal agency. This proposed revision
would re-designate current 38 CFR
17.102(c) as paragraph (a)(5). Current
§ 17.102(c) provides that the rates for
certain care in this paragraph would be
prescribed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). We propose to
remove this reference because VA began
prescribing the rates in January 2004 [69
FR 1059 (January 7, 2004)]. We also
propose removing the references to the
specific rates that we would charge for
care provided to an active service
member or beneficiary of a Federal
agency and former members of a
uniformed service who are entitled to
retired, retainer, or equivalent pay. We
would make this change because all
identified individuals are authorized
beneficiaries, and all such care would
be charged at the Inter-Agency Rate
determined in proposed paragraph (c).
We note that the rates as described in
this section would only be used if the
care is not covered under the active
duty member’s or veteran’s TRICARE or
under a valid sharing agreement.
Finally, we would remove the reference
in current § 17.102(c) to paragraph (f)
related to care furnished for military
retirees with chronic disabilities. We
would make this change because, as
explained below, care furnished for
military retirees with chronic
disabilities would be charged at the
same rates as the care furnished in
proposed paragraph (a)(5). Therefore, it
is not necessary to make the distinction.
Proposed paragraph (a)(6) would state
that VA would charge for hospital care
for certain retirees of the uniformed
services with a chronic disability, as
described in Executive Orders 10122,
10400, and 11733, and 38 CFR 17.44.
This proposed revision would redesignate current paragraph (f) as
paragraph (a)(6) and would make the
paragraph more consistent with its
authorities. Current paragraph (f) states
that charges under this section are for
subsistence at rates prescribed by the
Under Secretary for Health under
§ 17.47(b)(2) and (c)(2) for hospital care
and in effect during the time VA renders
the care. We propose to change the rate
that would be charged from the
subsistence rate to a rate prescribed by
the Secretary (i.e., the Inter-Agency
rate). VA does not currently have a
subsistence rate and believes that
charging the Inter-Agency Rate is more
consistent with the way VA generally
charges for health care services.
Furthermore, we propose to remove the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
reference to § 17.47. Instead, we would
reference the more relevant authorities
of Executive Orders 10122, 10400,
11733, and 38 CFR 17.44. Executive
orders and § 17.44 directly authorize the
care provided. Comparatively,
§ 17.47(b)(2) merely defines the phrase
‘‘no adequate means of support’’ for the
purpose of determining eligibility for
domiciliary care and there is no
§ 17.47(c)(2) (the information in
§ 17.47(c)(2) has already been
consolidated into § 17.47(c)). 51 FR
25064 (July 10, 1986).
As previously stated, proposed
paragraph (b) would list instances when
hospital care, medical services,
domiciliary care, or nursing home care
are provided. Proposed paragraph (b)(1)
would state that VA would charge for
hospital care, medical services,
domiciliary care, or nursing home care
provided to an individual, in error, on
the basis of veteran eligibility for such
care and services under 38 CFR 17.34,
17.36, or 17.37, and such an individual
was subsequently determined not to
have been eligible for such care or
services. This proposed revision would
re-designate paragraph (a) as paragraph
(b)(1), and it would revise the references
to veteran eligibility for health care.
Care provided under these
circumstances would be charged at the
Cost-Based Rates.
Proposed paragraph (b)(2) would state
that VA would charge for hospital care,
medical services, domiciliary care, or
nursing home care provided to a
discharged member of the armed forces
of a nation allied with the United States
in World War I or World War II in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 109. This
proposed revision would re-designate
paragraph (d) as paragraph (b)(2). It
would add a reference to 38 U.S.C. 109,
which is VA’s statutory authority to
provide and receive reimbursement for
hospital care, medical services, and
domiciliary care for allied beneficiaries.
We note that section 109 does not
expressly authorize the provision of
nursing home services to allied
beneficiaries, so the language ‘‘in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 109’’ in
proposed paragraph (b)(2) should be
sufficiently limiting without having to
propose a separate paragraph in § 17.102
to address provision of hospital care,
medical services, and domiciliary care
but not nursing home care. Proposed
paragraph (b)(2) would apply to care
that is authorized to be provided under
section 109, while proposed paragraph
(a)(4) would apply if care was provided
in error based on a finding of eligibility
under section 109, but the individual
was subsequently found not to be
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73271
eligible. We note that the rates for this
care would be the Cost-Based Rates.
Proposed paragraph (b)(3) would state
that VA would charge for hospital care,
medical services, domiciliary care, or
nursing home care provided under a
sharing agreement in accordance with
38 U.S.C. 8111 or 8153 and 38 CFR
17.240. This proposed revision would
re-designate current paragraph (e) as
proposed paragraph (b)(3), and it would
more succinctly restate the language in
paragraph (e) by referring if only to the
authorities related to VA sharing
agreements and VA sharing of medical
resources under 38 U.S.C. 8111 and
8153, respectively, as well as
implementing VA regulation at 38 CFR
17.240. This paragraph would likely be
used when VA enters into a sharing
agreement with another federal entity,
such as the Department of Defense, or
participates in the sharing of medical
resources between entities.
Proposed paragraph (b)(4) would state
that VA would charge the rates
established in paragraph (c), the CostBased or the Inter-Agency Rates, for any
other care that VA is authorized to
provide, at a cost, to an individual who
is otherwise ineligible for VA care. This
new paragraph would instruct how VA
would charge for care when VA has
authority to provide such care at a cost
but does not have guidance on how to
charge for the care. This paragraph
would likely be used when Congress
authorizes VA to provide care under
new circumstances.
Current paragraph (g) in § 17.102
would be removed because VA
examined the regulatory history and
found that the requirement was obsolete
and unnecessary. Specifically, current
paragraph (g) establishes that VA must
reimburse its medical care
appropriation fund out of its research
appropriation fund when VA provides
treatment to research study participants
who are otherwise ineligible for that
care as veterans. The management of
VA’s appropriations, such as
reimbursement of one fund from
another, is an internal fiscal procedure
and does not require authorization in
regulation unless otherwise specified in
law. To date, there is no law that
specifies that VA must regulate the
transfer of these funds. We, therefore,
propose to remove paragraph (g).
Current paragraph (h) establishes the
rates that VA charges for care provided
under § 17.102, unless the rates are
otherwise established under a sharing
agreement or contract. Current
§ 17.102(h) would be redesignated as
proposed paragraph (c), and we would
revise it to refer to a different VA data
source and data report that we use to
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
73272
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
establish the rates under § 17.102. These
slight revisions would state that rates
charged for care provided under
§ 17.102 would be based on ‘‘VHA
Office of Finance Managerial Cost
Accounting (MCA) Cost Reports,’’ as
opposed to being based on the ‘‘Monthly
Program Cost Report’’ as stated in
current paragraph (h). Proposed
paragraph (c) would also remove the
stated rate methodology in current
paragraph (h), as this information is
published with the rate tables. VA
publishes the rate table for § 17.101 on
its website and for consistency, and ease
of access, VA would publish the
§ 17.102 rates on a website where the
public could access the rates, OMB has
not been involved in publishing these
rates since 2014 and we would remove
reference to the option of OMB
publishing the rates. Therefore, we
believe this would be a non-substantive
change because the public understands
these annually published rates.
Proposed paragraph (c) would also
include the methodology to determine
the rates for prescription drugs that VA
furnishes which are not administered
during treatment. The costs would be
based on the actual cost of the drug plus
a national average of VA administrative
costs as described in 38 CFR 17.101(m).
Section 17.43 Persons Entitled to
Hospital or Domiciliary Care
This section lists persons entitled to
hospital or domiciliary care.
Specifically, § 17.43(b) lists the three
categories of persons entitled to
emergency hospital care. Paragraph
(b)(1) includes persons having no
eligibility, as a humanitarian service.
Paragraph (b)(2) includes persons
admitted because of presumed discharge
or retirement from the Armed Forces,
but subsequently found to be ineligible
as such. Paragraph (b)(3) includes
employees (not potentially eligible as
ex-members of the Armed Forces) and
members of their families, when
residing on reservations of VA field
facilities, and when they cannot feasibly
obtain emergency treatment from
private facilities. We propose to remove
paragraph (b)(3) because it places an
unnecessary restriction on VA
employees and their families’ ability to
receive hospital care at a VA facility
during an emergency.
VA has authority to provide hospital
care in an emergency to all VA
employees and their families. Section
1784 of title 38 of the United States
Code provides that VA may furnish
hospital care or medical services as a
humanitarian service in emergency
cases so long as the Secretary charges
for such care and services. In addition,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
38 U.S.C. 1784A provides that if any
individual comes to the hospital or the
campus of the hospital and a request is
made on behalf of the individual for
examination or treatment for a medical
condition, then the hospital must
provide for an appropriate medical
screening examination within the
capability of the emergency department.
This medical screening examination
would include ancillary services
routinely available to the emergency
department to determine whether an
emergency medical condition exists.
Further, the implementing regulation at
38 CFR 17.43(b)(1) provides that
emergency hospital care may be
provided for persons having no
eligibility as a humanitarian service.
Therefore, we believe that 38 U.S.C.
1784, as implemented by 38 CFR
17.43(b)(1), provides VA authority to
provide hospital care to all individuals
in an emergency, including VA
employees and their families, regardless
of whether they are residing on a field
reservation or can feasibly obtain
emergency treatment from private
facilities.
We note that 38 CFR 17.95, whose
authority also stems from 38 U.S.C.
1784, provides that outpatient medical
services (as opposed to hospital care)
may be authorized for VA employees,
their families, and the general public in
emergencies. There are no restrictions
placed on VA employees and their
families when seeking VA outpatient
care in an emergency.
Therefore, we propose to remove
paragraph (b)(3) as the individuals
covered under this paragraph are
subsumed within paragraph (b)(1), and
VA believes it is inequitable and
unjustified that VA employees and their
families who are not covered under
paragraph (b)(3) should be prohibited
from receiving VA hospital services in
emergencies when VA has clear
authority under 38 U.S.C. 1784 to
provide such care.
Section 17.44 Hospital Care for
Certain Retirees With Chronic
Disability (Executive Orders 10122,
10400 and 11733)
This section provides that hospital
care may be furnished, when beds are
available, to members or former
members of the uniformed services who
are temporarily or permanently retired
for physical disability or receiving
disability retirement pay who require
hospital care for chronic diseases and
who have no eligibility for hospital care
under laws governing the Department of
Veterans Affairs, or who having
eligibility do not elect hospitalization as
Department of Veterans Affairs
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
beneficiaries. Care under this section is
subject to three conditions. The first
condition described in paragraph (a),
which is most pertinent here, requires
persons who are members or former
members of the United States Armed
Forces to agree to pay the subsistence
rate set by VA, except that no
subsistence charge would be made for
those persons who are members or
former members of the Public Health
Service, Coast Guard, Coast and
Geodetic Survey (now the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration). This also applies to
enlisted personnel of the Army, Navy,
Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space
Force.
This regulation was originally enacted
in 1969 (34 FR 9340 June 13, 1969), and
it has not been substantively revised
since that time. This subsistence rate
language seems to be a hold over from
earlier practice of charging a subsistence
rate for daily food/incidentals for
certain members during a
hospitalization if that member is
receiving Basic Allowance for
Subsistence (BAS). BAS is a Department
of Defense (DOD) program meant to
offset costs for a member’s meals. This
allowance is based in the historic
origins of the military in which the
military provided room and board (or
rations) as part of a member’s pay. VA
does not currently use, nor does the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs set
subsistence rates. Therefore, the
regulation is inconsistent with current
practice. Due to this, we propose to
remove the word ‘‘subsistence’’ from
paragraph (a), and we would require
persons defined in this section to agree
to pay a rate set by VA, as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c). VA believes that using the
rates established in § 17.102(c) (the VHA
Office of Finance MCA Cost Report) is
consistent with the authority to provide
care as described in Executive Orders
10122, 10400, and 11733. In the
Executive Orders, the President
authorized VA to provide the care and
charge for the care, but the Executive
Orders do not specify the rate VA
should charge. VA believes that it has
the authority to determine the most
appropriate rates to charge for this care,
and we find that charging the rate that
is used for other otherwise ineligible
veterans and non-veteran beneficiaries
is appropriate.
Section 17.86 Provision of Hospital
Care and Medical Services During
Certain Disasters and Emergencies
Under 38 U.S.C. 1785
We propose to revise paragraph (e) for
clarity and to update the reference to
§ 17.102 to conform to the proposed
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
revisions of § 17.102 previously
described. As the authorizing statute, 38
U.S.C. 1785, describes how VA should
be reimbursed in various instances, we
propose to revise paragraph (e) by
listing each category of person
identified in section 1785 and state how
VA would charge for their care. The
proposed changes are technical in
nature, and we are not proposing any
substantive revisions to this section.
Proposed paragraph (e) would state
that the cost of medical care and
services provided under this section
would be determined by the situations
described below. Proposed paragraph
(e)(1) would state that if care is provided
to an officer or employee of a non-VA
department or agency of the United
States, VA will charge the rate agreed
upon by the Secretary and the head of
such department or agency or the
Secretary concerned. If no such rate has
been agreed to, VA would charge the
Inter-Agency Rates as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c). VA believes that the InterAgency Rate is the most appropriate rate
in this context and complies with 38
U.S.C. 1785. In § 1785(d), Congress
directs that the cost of care or services
furnished under this section to an
officer or employee of a department or
agency of the United States shall be
reimbursed at such rates as may be
agreed upon by the Secretary and the
head of such department or agency of
the Secretary concerned. The InterAgency Rates are the generally agreed
upon rates between VA and other
Federal agencies.
Although current § 17.86 includes
member of the Armed Forces in the
same sentence as an officer or employee
of a non-VA department or agency of the
United States, to more closely follow the
authority in 38 U.S.C. 1785(d), we
propose to have separate paragraphs to
describe the rates for care provided to
an officer or employee of a department
or agency of the United States and the
rates for care for members of the Armed
Forces, as these individuals are referred
to separately in the statute. Therefore,
even though the Inter-Agency Rate
would be charged in both
circumstances, the regulation would
more closely follow the statute to have
separate paragraphs for each group
identified by statute.
Proposed paragraph (e)(2) would state
that if care is provided to a member of
the Armed Forces, then VA would
charge the rate agreed upon by the
Secretary and the head of the branch of
the Armed Forces or the Secretary
concerned. If no rate has been agreed to,
VA would be reimbursed at the InterAgency Rates as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c). VA believes that the Inter-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Agency Rates are the most appropriate
rates to charge for these individuals. Per
38 U.S.C. 1785(d) VA may be
reimbursed based on the cost of the care
or service furnished to members of the
Armed Forces. The Inter-Agency Rate is
based on VA cost that is specifically
used to determine reimbursable charges
from other Federal agencies, such as the
Department of Defense.
Proposed paragraph (e)(3) would state
that if the care is authorized under a
sharing agreement as described in 38
U.S.C. 8111 or 8153 and 38 CFR 17.240,
VA would be reimbursed at the rate
determined in accordance with the
terms of the sharing agreement.
Proposed paragraph (e)(4) would state
that if the care is provided to an
individual who is responsible for the
cost of the care, VA would charge the
Cost-Based Rate as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c). We would note that
individuals would be responsible for the
cost of care or services if mandated by
Federal law (including applicable
appropriations acts) or when the cost of
care or services is not reimbursed by
other-than-VA Federal departments or
agencies. We believe that the Cost-Based
Rates are the most appropriate for these
individuals because the Cost-Based
Rates are generally charged for care
provided to individuals who are not
beneficiaries of other Federal agencies
or otherwise eligible for care from VA,
as is required by the intent of
appropriations act 205. The Cost Based
Rate reflects the cost to VA to provide
care to this non eligible individual and
is explained in the yearly rate update.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would affect only
individuals and other Federal agencies.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73273
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
determined that this proposed rule is a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Assistance Listing
The Assistance Listing program
numbers and titles for the programs
affected by this document are Veterans
Domiciliary Care; 64.011—Veterans
Dental Care; 64.012—Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013—Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014—
Veterans State Domiciliary Care;
64.015—Veterans State Nursing Home
Care; 64.026—Veterans State Adult Day
Health Care; 64.029—Purchase Care
Program; 64.033—VA Supportive
Services for Veteran Families Program;
64.039—CHAMPVA; 64.040—VHA
Inpatient Medicine; 64.041—VHA
Outpatient Specialty Care; 64.042—
VHA Inpatient Surgery; 64.043—VHA
Mental Health Residential; 64.044—
VHA Home Care; 64.045—VHA
Outpatient Ancillary Services; 64.046—
VHA Inpatient Psychiatry; 64.047—
VHA Primary Care; 64.048—VHA
Mental Health clinics; 64.049—VHA
Community Living Center; 64.050—
VHA Diagnostic Care; 64.053.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant
programs-veterans, Health care, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
73274
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
records, Homeless, Medical and dental
schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs,
Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 27, 2022, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part
17 as follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17 is
amended by adding entries for §§ 17.43,
17.44, 17.86, and 17.102 in numerical
order to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.43 also issued under 38 U.S.C.
109, 1784, 8111, and 8153.
Section 17.44 also issued under E.O.
10122, 15 FR 2173, 3 CFR, 1949–1953 Comp.,
p. 313, E.O. 10400, 17 FR 8648, 3 CFR, 1949–
1953 Comp., p. 900, and E.O. 11733, 38 FR
20431, 3 CFR, 1971–1975 Comp., p. 792.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.86 also issued under 38 U.S.C.
1785.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 17.102 also issued under 38 U.S.C.
109, 1711, 1729, 1784, 1784A, 1785, 8111,
8153.
*
*
§ 17.43
*
*
*
[Amended]
2. Amend § 17.43 by removing
paragraph (b)(3).
■ 3. Amend § 17.44 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 17.44 Hospital care for certain retirees
with chronic disability (Executive Orders
10122, 10400 and 11733).
*
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
The revision reads as follows:
§ 17.86 Provision of hospital care and
medical services during certain disasters
and emergencies under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The cost of care for medical care
and services provided under this section
will be determined in accordance with
the following:
(1) If the care is provided to an officer
or employee of a non-VA Federal agency
VA will charge the rate agreed upon by
the Secretary and the head of such
department or agency or the Secretary
concerned. If no such rate has been
agreed to, VA will charge the InterAgency Rate as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c).
(2) If the care is provided to a member
of the Armed Forces VA will charge the
rate agreed upon by the Secretary and
the head of such branch or the Secretary
concerned. If no such rate has been
agreed to, VA will charge the InterAgency Rate as prescribed in
§ 17.102(c).
(3) If the care is authorized under a
sharing agreement as described in 38
U.S.C. 8111 or 8153 or § 17.240, VA will
charge the rate determined in
accordance with the sharing agreement.
(4) If the care is provided to an
individual who is responsible for the
cost of the care, VA will charge the CostBased Rate as prescribed in § 17.102(c).
Individuals will be responsible for the
cost of care or services if mandated by
Federal law (including applicable
Appropriations Acts) or when the cost
of care or services is not reimbursed by
other-than-VA Federal departments or
agencies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Revise § 17.102 to read as follows:
§ 17.102
*
*
*
*
(a) Persons defined in this section
who are members or former members of
the active United States Armed Forces
must agree to pay the rate set by the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs as
prescribed in § 17.102(c), except that no
charge will be made for those persons
VerDate Sep<11>2014
who are members of the Public Health
Service, Coast Guard, Coast and
Geodetic Survey now NOAA, and
enlisted personnel of the Army, Navy,
Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space
Force.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 17.86 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (e); and
■ b. Removing the parenthetical
authority citation at the end of the
section.
Charges for care or services.
Subject to the methodology set forth
in paragraph (c) of this section, and
notwithstanding the provisions of
§ 17.101, VA shall charge for VA care
and services provided in the
circumstances described in this section.
(a) For hospital care or medical
services provided:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) As a humanitarian service in a
medical emergency in accordance with
38 U.S.C. 1784 or 38 U.S.C. 1784A;
(2) During and immediately following
a disaster or emergency in accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 1785 and § 17.86;
(3) While attending a national
convention of an organization
recognized under 38 U.S.C. 5902, for
emergency medical treatment, in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1711;
(4) In error, on the basis of eligibility
as a non-veteran recipient of VA
hospital care and medical services
under title 38 U.S.C., and such an
individual subsequently is determined
not to have been eligible for such care
or services;
(5) To a beneficiary of the Department
of Defense or other Federal agency, to
include for inpatient or outpatient care
or services authorized for a member of
the Armed Forces on active duty, a
beneficiary or designee of any other
Federal agency, and members or former
members of a uniformed service who are
entitled to retired or retainer pay, or
equivalent pay; or
(6) To a retiree of the uniformed
services with a chronic disability for
hospital care identified in Executive
Orders 10122, 10400, and 11733 as well
as § 17.44.
(b) For hospital care, medical services,
domiciliary care, or nursing home care
provided:
(1) In error, on the basis of eligibility
for such care and services as a veteran
under § 17.34, § 17.36, or § 17.37, and
such an individual was subsequently
determined not to have been eligible for
such care or services.
(2) To a discharged member of the
armed forces of a nation allied with the
United States in World War I or World
War II in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 109.
(3) Under a sharing agreement in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8111 or 8153
and § 17.240.
(4) Under any other provision of law
that authorizes VA to provide care.
(c) Unless rates or charges are
otherwise established in contract, in a
sharing agreement, or under Federal
law, VA will charge under this section
at rates based on the Veterans Health
Administration (VHA) Office of Finance
Managerial Cost Accounting (MCA) Cost
Reports, which sets forth the actual
basic costs and per diem rates by type
of inpatient care, and actual basic costs
and rates for outpatient care visits.
Factors for depreciation of buildings
and equipment and Central Office
overhead are added, based on
accounting manual instructions.
Additional factors are added for interest
on capital investment and for standard
fringe benefit costs covering government
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 29, 2022 / Proposed Rules
employee retirement and disability
costs. The VHA Office of Finance MCA
Cost Reports are used to determine two
separate rates: one rate is the general
Cost-Based Rate and the other rate is the
Inter-Agency Rate. These rates are
published annually by VA on the
internet site of the Veterans Health
Administration Office of Community
Care’s website at https://www.va.gov/
communitycare/revenue_ops/payer_
rates.asp.
(d) The rates for prescription drugs
that VA furnishes not administered
during treatment are based on the actual
cost of the drug plus a national average
of VA administrative costs as described
in § 17.101(m).
[FR Doc. 2022–25701 Filed 11–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
www.blm.gov/cotoni-coast-dairies, and
in the Central Coast Field Office.
Sky
Murphy, Planning and Environmental
Coordinator, BLM Central Coast Field
Office; telephone: (831) 582–2200,
email: smurphy@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Sky Murphy. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8360
[LLCAC09000 L12200000 NU0000 21X]
Notice of Proposed Supplementary
Rule for Public Lands in the CotoniCoast Dairies Unit of the California
Coastal National Monument in Santa
Cruz County, CA
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed supplementary rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is proposing a
supplementary rule for all public lands
within the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of
the California Coastal National
Monument in Santa Cruz County,
California. The proposed supplementary
rule would allow the BLM to manage
recreation, address public safety, and
provide resource protection on BLMadministered public lands within the
Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit of the
California Coastal National Monument.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
supplementary rule must be received or
postmarked by January 30, 2023 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
proposed supplementary rule can be
delivered to the Bureau of Land
Management, BLM Central Coast Field
Office, 940 2nd Ave., Marina, CA 93933,
or emailed to: blm_ca_cotoni_coast_
dairies@blm.gov.
A link to this notice and a map
depicting the area that would be
affected by the proposed supplementary
rule will be available to the public for
review on the BLM website at https://
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Nov 28, 2022
Jkt 259001
Written comments on the proposed
supplementary rule should be specific,
confined to issues pertinent to the
proposed supplementary rule, and
should explain the reason for any
recommended change. Where possible,
comments should reference the specific
section or paragraph of the rule that the
comment is addressing. The BLM need
not consider comments that the BLM
receives after the close of the comment
period (see DATES), unless they are
postmarked or electronically dated
before the deadline, or comments
delivered to an address other than those
listed earlier (see ADDRESSES).
Before including your address,
telephone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, be advised that your
entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. All submissions from
organizations and businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Upon its completion, the final
supplementary rule will be available for
inspection in the Central Coast Field
Office (see ADDRESSES). The BLM will
announce the publication of the final
rule broadly through the news media
and direct mail to the constituents
included on the BLM mail list. The BLM
will also provide information to
interested agencies and organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73275
II. Background
The BLM establishes supplementary
rules under the authority of 43 CFR
8365.1–6, which allows BLM State
Directors to establish such rules for the
protection of persons, property, and
public lands and resources. This
regulatory provision allows the BLM to
issue rules of less than national effect
without codifying the rules in the Code
of Federal Regulations.
III. Discussion of Proposed
Supplementary Rule
The BLM completed the Cotoni-Coast
Dairies Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment on June 23, 2021, to
establish land use decisions that protect
the objects and values of the CotoniCoast Dairies unit of the California
Coastal National Monument and
support responsible recreation
opportunities. Public participation
during planning for use and enjoyment
of the Cotoni-Coast Dairies unit
indicates that it will be a popular area
and a supplementary rule is needed to
allow for law enforcement to enforce
decisions to manage recreation and
protect cultural and natural resources.
Thus, the proposed supplementary
rule would apply to all the BLMadministered lands in the Cotoni-Coast
Dairies unit. Persons performing
essential operations central to the BLM’s
mission would be exempt. Such persons
would include, for example, members of
any organized law enforcement, rescue,
or fire-fighting force.
The proposed supplementary rule is
needed to provide consistency and
uniformity for visitors to BLMadministered lands, prevent resource
damage and user conflicts, and provide
greater safety to the visiting public.
Therefore, a supplementary rule is
necessary to address the following
issues and concerns:
Resource Damage: Presidential
Proclamation 9563 added the CotoniCoast Dairies unit to the California
Coastal National Monument and
identified resource objects and values to
be protected. A supplementary rule is
needed to ensure protection of these
resources, particularly biological and
cultural resources.
Public Safety: As visitation increases
among all types of recreational users, so
do the conflicts between user groups. In
crowded areas, conflicts among users
increase risk to visitor safety. Other
recreationists and nearby landowners
also have concerns for their personal
safety, as well as damage to property. A
supplementary rule is needed to avoid
or minimize such conflicts.
At present, no supplementary rules
are in effect for BLM-administered lands
E:\FR\FM\29NOP1.SGM
29NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 29, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73268-73275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25701]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AQ58
Collection or Recovery by VA for Humanitarian Care or Services
and for Certain Other Care and Services
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to revise its
regulations concerning reimbursement rates for health care that VA
provides to individuals who are not otherwise eligible for such care as
veterans or other VA beneficiaries. Specifically, this rulemaking would
revise provisions of VA regulations and make them consistent with
applicable law along with removing obsolete provisions. These revisions
would clarify VA regulations related to the provision of VA health care
to individuals who are not otherwise eligible for such care as veterans
or other VA beneficiaries, and it would not substantively affect the
provision of health care to eligible veterans or other VA
beneficiaries.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before January 30, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments received before the close of the
comment period will be available at www.regulations.gov for public
viewing, inspection, or copying, including any personally identifiable
or confidential business information that is included in a comment.
Comments received before the close of the comment period on
www.regulations.gov will be posted as soon as possible after they have
been received. VA will not post public comments that make threats to
individuals or institutions or suggest that the individual will take
actions to harm the individual. VA encourages individuals not to submit
duplicative comments. We will post acceptable comments from multiple
unique commenters even if the content is identical or nearly identical
to other comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Vatthauer, Office of Finance,
Revenue Operations, Payer Relations and Services, Rates and Charges
(104RO1), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 128 Bingham Road, Suite 1000, Asheville, NC 28806; telephone:
608-821-7346 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of this rulemaking is to
clear up internal confusion related to ineligible Civilian Health and
Medical Program of VA (CHAMPVA) beneficiaries not being billed for
services and this rulemaking will also clarify the applicable
regulations organization, authority and any cross references. There are
several statutory authorities that allow for VA to provide care to
individuals who would not generally be eligible to receive VA health
care. While these authorities allow VA to provide the care, these
authorities also require VA to charge for the vital services it
provides Section 205 of the appropriations act does not allow
appropriations for hospitalization or examination of ineligible
individuals, unless reimbursement of the costs of their care is made at
a rate determined by VA. Several VA authorities, as codified in title
38 also require VA to charge for care at rates prescribed by the
Secretary. Notably, under section 1784 of title 38, United States Code
(U.S.C.), VA provides medical care or services as a humanitarian
service in emergency cases to individuals not generally eligible to
receive such care or services from VA, but is also required to charge
for those care and services at rates prescribed by the Secretary. Under
38 U.S.C. 1785, during and in the immediate aftermath of an emergency
or natural disaster, VA may furnish hospital care and medical services
to individuals responding to, involved in, or otherwise affected by
that disaster or emergency, but is required to charge the recipient.
Under 38 U.S.C. 8111, VA is authorized to enter into sharing agreements
with the Department of Defense (DoD) for the use or exchange of use of
health care resources, and VA may bill DoD for certain medical services
obtained from VA. VA may also provide medical care to certain
discharged members of allied forces consistent with 38 U.S.C. 109 and
must enter into agreements for cash reimbursement of incurred expenses
at such rates and under such regulations as the Secretary may
prescribe. Section 17.102 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) addresses when and how it determines the rate VA will charge for
medical care and services provided to individuals under all four
authorities described above.
[[Page 73269]]
During the COVID-19 pandemic VA has provided significant amounts of
care to individuals under the Stafford Act via Mission Assignments from
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) within the Department of
Homeland Security which is distinct from care VA provides under our
authority in 38 U.S.C. 1785 described above. The care provided under
the Stafford Act via Mission Assignments would not be impacted by the
changes made to 38 CFR 17.102 in this rulemaking.
VA is generally required by law, however, to charge for care
provided to otherwise ineligible individuals generally at rates
determined by the Secretary. VA has been charging for this care in
accordance with 38 CFR 17.102 for many years. This rulemaking updates
and clarifies when individuals will be charged for this care.
This proposed rule would primarily reorganize for clarity 38 CFR
17.102, which lists instances when VA provides health care based on
various changes in the determination of veteran eligibility and based
on VA's authorities to provide certain health care to individuals who
are not otherwise eligible to receive such care from VA. Section 17.102
also establishes rates VA charges for the care. However, Sec. 17.102,
did not reference the specific authorities for VA to provide health
care in each circumstance, and this section does not include all
circumstances when VA provides care, to individuals who are otherwise
ineligible to receive care from VA. This proposed rule would revise
Sec. 17.102 to add citations to and harmonize these authorities. Also,
the proposed rule would remove unnecessary provisions in Sec. 17.102,
and it would establish a new data source to calculate the rates charged
for the care provided pursuant to this regulation. This proposed rule
would similarly revise regulations that relate to or reference Sec.
17.102, or otherwise relate to certain health care VA provides to
individuals who are not eligible to receive the care as veterans or
other VA health care beneficiaries. We first discuss proposed changes
to Sec. 17.102.
Section 17.102 Charges for Care or Services
This proposed rule would revise 38 CFR 17.102 to include additional
categories of normally ineligible individuals who may receive health
care services from VA, remove provisions that have become obsolete, and
update the authorities for VA to provide the health care services. The
proposed rule would also clarify the difference between the two types
of rates charged under this section: the Cost-Based Rates and the
Inter-Agency Rates. In so doing, we propose to reorganize the structure
of Sec. 17.102 for clarity.
The table below reflects proposed changes to the structure of Sec.
17.102. The current section and paragraph are noted in the left column,
with the proposed new location in column three. Paragraphs that we
propose to remove are listed in column two. We will discuss the
rationale for removing specific paragraphs, as well as any proposed
revisions and additions to current regulatory language.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed to be Proposed
Current 17.102 removed 17.102
------------------------------------------------------------------------
17.102(a).............................. ............... 17.102(b)(1)
17.102(b)(1)........................... ............... 17.102(a)(1)
17.102(b)(2)........................... X ..............
17.102(c).............................. ............... 17.102(a)(5)
17.102(d).............................. ............... 17.102(b)(2)
17.102(e).............................. ............... 17.102(b)(3)
17.102(f).............................. ............... 17.102(a)(6)
17.102(g).............................. X ..............
17.102(h).............................. ............... 17.102(c)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The introductory language of 38 CFR 17.102 currently states that
``[e]xcept as provided in Sec. 17.101, charges at the indicated rates
shall be made for Department of Veterans Affairs hospital care or
medical services (including, but not limited to, dental services,
supplies, medicines, orthopedic and prosthetic appliances, and
domiciliary or nursing home care) as follows.'' First, we would amend
the introductory language to reference proposed Sec. 17.102(c) which
would establish the reimbursement rates. Current reimbursement rates
are established in Sec. 17.102(h). We explain the proposed changes to
the data source used to develop the rates and re-designating from
paragraph (h) to paragraph (c) later in this rulemaking.
Next, we would amend the introductory language to indicate that the
rates established in Sec. 17.102 would apply ``notwithstanding'' the
rates established in Sec. 17.101. This would clarify that the rate
structures in Sec. Sec. 17.101 and 17.102 are mutually exclusive.
While the rates under Sec. 17.102 are used to recover costs of VA care
provided to individuals who are otherwise ineligible for the care, the
rates in Sec. 17.101 implement VA's authority in 38 U.S.C. 1729 to
recover reasonable charges from a third party for non-service connected
VA care provided to an eligible veteran who is also a beneficiary under
a health-plan contract, workers compensation law, or automobile
accident reparations insurance.
We would also amend the introductory language in Sec. 17.102 to
replace the current list of examples of medical services (i.e., ``. . .
dental services, supplies, medicines, orthopedic and prosthetic
appliances, and domiciliary or nursing home care . . . '') and would
state instead that VA will charge for ``care and services.'' VA is
making this change to avoid the potential misinterpretation of this
list as exhaustive. Substituting the list of examples for ``care and
services'' allows for change in the future and is in line with current
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) regulation drafting tenets. Other
proposed revisions to Sec. 17.102 would further distinguish whether
``hospital care and medical services'' could be provided and charged to
certain individuals, versus the broader scope of ``hospital care,
medical services, domiciliary care, or nursing home care.'' This change
would make the introductory language to Sec. 17.102 more consistent
with VA authorities to provide and charge for only certain health care
to individuals not otherwise eligible to receive such care as VA
beneficiaries.
Lastly, we would amend the introductory language in Sec. 17.102 to
indicate clearly that this section relates to care and services
provided in the circumstances listed in paragraphs (a) and (b).
Current paragraphs (a) through (g) list instances when care and
services are furnished to non-veterans and non-VA
[[Page 73270]]
beneficiaries. We would modify the organization of paragraphs (a)
through (g) for clarity and would remove obsolete or unnecessary
paragraphs as explained.
Generally, proposed paragraph (a) would describe charges that arise
from the provision of ``hospital care or medical services,'' and
proposed paragraph (b) would describe charges that arise from the
provision of the broader scope of ``hospital care, medical services,
domiciliary care, or nursing home care.'' We believe this would be
consistent with how distinct these four terms are from one another as
defined in 38 U.S.C. 101 and 1701, and it also would be consistent with
current VA authorities. For example, VA only has the authority to
provide ``hospital care and medical services'' as a humanitarian
service in emergency cases and not domiciliary or nursing home care. 38
U.S.C. 1784. The instances when VA provides each type of care would be
listed following paragraphs (a) and (b), respectively.
Proposed paragraph (a)(1) would state that VA would charge for
hospital care and medical services that could be provided to
individuals as a humanitarian service. This proposed revision would re-
designate current paragraph (b) as paragraph (a)(1). We would remove
references to Sec. 17.41(b)(1) or Sec. 17.95 and would instead
reference the underlying statutory authority 38 U.S.C. 1784 and 1784A.
Section 1784 provides the statutory authority for VA to provide care as
a humanitarian service. Section 1784A provides the statutory authority
for VA to provide care for examination and treatment for emergency
medical conditions and women in labor. We note that section 1784A was
not previously referenced in this regulation because it had not been
enacted at the time of the most recent previous revision of Sec.
17.102. However, we believe that this care broadly falls under the
category of humanitarian care. Therefore, it is appropriate to list it
together with the care provided under section 1784.
Proposed paragraph (a)(1) would not retain the language from
current paragraph (b)(2) related to emergency medical care provided
separately to VA employees or their family members. We would not retain
this language since there is no general distinction in the statute
between individuals or VA employees and their families. The inclusion
of a separate category for VA employees and their families has been
included in the CFR since 1967 and the Federal Register notice creating
it, 32 FR 11382, offers no explanation for why it was originally
included. VA employees and their families are subsumed in the class of
individuals for whom VA may provide humanitarian care under section
1784. VA believes it is unnecessary to distinguish between the two
groups of individuals under this section. VA charges for the provision
of care as humanitarian care under 38 U.S.C. 1784 and 1784A, so we
would not reference any other authority in proposed paragraph (a)(1).
We note that the charges for care under this paragraph would be VA's
Cost-Based Rates as described in paragraph (c), discussed in detail
below.
Proposed paragraph (a)(2) would state that VA would charge for
hospital care and medical services that would be provided to
individuals during and immediately following a disaster or emergency.
This is in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1785 and the corresponding
implementing regulation at 38 CFR 17.86. Proposed paragraph (a)(2)
would add a new type of VA care to Sec. 17.102 for which VA seeks
reimbursement, but VA does not view this as a substantive change.
Section 17.86 already requires reimbursement for this care and
references Sec. 17.102 to determine the rate for reimbursement. We are
also proposing to amend Sec. 17.86(e), as discussed in further detail
below, to clarify the rates of reimbursement pursuant to section 1785
and to update the reference to Sec. 17.102 considering its proposed
reorganization. We note that the rates VA would charge for this care
are based on either the Cost-Based or the Inter-Agency Rate depending
on whether the beneficiary of the care was authorized by a Federal
agency to receive care. Proposed Sec. 17.86(e) would provide a
detailed description of all the charges. Proposed paragraph (a)(2)
would reference 38 U.S.C. 1785 and 38 CFR 17.86.
Proposed paragraph (a)(3) would state that VA would charge for
emergency medical treatment provided to an individual attending a
national conference in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1711. VA would charge,
either the individual or the organization, pursuant to a contract. The
organization must be recognized under 38 U.S.C. 5902. VA's authority to
provide this care to individuals at such a national conference, under
38 U.S.C. 1711, was first promulgated in regulation in 1982, then
designated as 38 CFR 17.62(i) [47 FR 58249 (December 30, 1982)]. This
provision remained in annual print editions of the CFR from 1982
through 1999, at which time Sec. 17.62 was redesignated as Sec.
17.101 (see 61 FR 21964, where Sec. 17.62(i) became Sec. 17.101(i)).
Later Sec. 17.101 was redesignated as Sec. 17.102 (see 64 FR 22676,
where Sec. 17.101(i) became Sec. 17.102(i)). VA did not remove this
provision since we first promulgated it in 1982. However, the provision
regarding hospital care and medical services provided to an individual
attending a national conference of an organization recognized under 38
U.S.C. 5902 failed to appear in the annual print editions of the CFR
after 1999, although VA never instituted any type of rulemaking to
remove it. Proposed paragraph (a)(3) would correct the inadvertent
removal of this provision, as the underlying statutory authority at 38
U.S.C. 1711(c)(1) is still in effect. We note that 38 U.S.C. 1711
mandates that VA be reimbursed for such care as prescribed by the
Secretary. The care provided under this section would be charged for at
VA's Cost-Based Rates.
Proposed paragraph (a)(4) would state that VA will charge for
hospital care and medical services provided to an individual, in error,
on the basis of eligibility as a non-veteran recipient of VA health
care and services under title 38 of the United States Code. This would
permit VA to collect charges for care provided in VA facilities to
individuals who were thought to have been eligible to receive health
care and services as non-veterans under particular VA authorities, such
as care of allied beneficiaries as permitted by 38 U.S.C. 109,
caregiver services as permitted by 38 U.S.C. 1720G, the CHAMPVA
services as permitted by 38 U.S.C. 1781, mental health services as
permitted by 38 U.S.C. 1782, and newborn care as permitted by 38 U.S.C.
1786. The authority for this substantive change is 31 U.S.C. 3711,
which allows the head of an executive agency to collect a claim of the
United States Government for money or property arising out of the
activities of the agency. Additionally, section 205 of the Military
Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act
of 2022 states that, ``No appropriations in this title shall be
available for hospitalization or examination of any persons (except
beneficiaries entitled to such hospitalization or examination under the
laws providing such benefits to veterans, and persons receiving such
treatment under sections 7901 through 7904 of title 5, United States
Code, or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.)), unless reimbursement of the
cost of such hospitalization or examination is made to the ``Medical
Services'' account at such rates as may be fixed by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs.''
[[Page 73271]]
Proposed paragraph (a)(5) would state that VA would charge for
medical care or services authorized for a beneficiary of the Department
of Defense, or other Federal agency. This proposed revision would re-
designate current 38 CFR 17.102(c) as paragraph (a)(5). Current Sec.
17.102(c) provides that the rates for certain care in this paragraph
would be prescribed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). We
propose to remove this reference because VA began prescribing the rates
in January 2004 [69 FR 1059 (January 7, 2004)]. We also propose
removing the references to the specific rates that we would charge for
care provided to an active service member or beneficiary of a Federal
agency and former members of a uniformed service who are entitled to
retired, retainer, or equivalent pay. We would make this change because
all identified individuals are authorized beneficiaries, and all such
care would be charged at the Inter-Agency Rate determined in proposed
paragraph (c). We note that the rates as described in this section
would only be used if the care is not covered under the active duty
member's or veteran's TRICARE or under a valid sharing agreement.
Finally, we would remove the reference in current Sec. 17.102(c) to
paragraph (f) related to care furnished for military retirees with
chronic disabilities. We would make this change because, as explained
below, care furnished for military retirees with chronic disabilities
would be charged at the same rates as the care furnished in proposed
paragraph (a)(5). Therefore, it is not necessary to make the
distinction.
Proposed paragraph (a)(6) would state that VA would charge for
hospital care for certain retirees of the uniformed services with a
chronic disability, as described in Executive Orders 10122, 10400, and
11733, and 38 CFR 17.44. This proposed revision would re-designate
current paragraph (f) as paragraph (a)(6) and would make the paragraph
more consistent with its authorities. Current paragraph (f) states that
charges under this section are for subsistence at rates prescribed by
the Under Secretary for Health under Sec. 17.47(b)(2) and (c)(2) for
hospital care and in effect during the time VA renders the care. We
propose to change the rate that would be charged from the subsistence
rate to a rate prescribed by the Secretary (i.e., the Inter-Agency
rate). VA does not currently have a subsistence rate and believes that
charging the Inter-Agency Rate is more consistent with the way VA
generally charges for health care services. Furthermore, we propose to
remove the reference to Sec. 17.47. Instead, we would reference the
more relevant authorities of Executive Orders 10122, 10400, 11733, and
38 CFR 17.44. Executive orders and Sec. 17.44 directly authorize the
care provided. Comparatively, Sec. 17.47(b)(2) merely defines the
phrase ``no adequate means of support'' for the purpose of determining
eligibility for domiciliary care and there is no Sec. 17.47(c)(2) (the
information in Sec. 17.47(c)(2) has already been consolidated into
Sec. 17.47(c)). 51 FR 25064 (July 10, 1986).
As previously stated, proposed paragraph (b) would list instances
when hospital care, medical services, domiciliary care, or nursing home
care are provided. Proposed paragraph (b)(1) would state that VA would
charge for hospital care, medical services, domiciliary care, or
nursing home care provided to an individual, in error, on the basis of
veteran eligibility for such care and services under 38 CFR 17.34,
17.36, or 17.37, and such an individual was subsequently determined not
to have been eligible for such care or services. This proposed revision
would re-designate paragraph (a) as paragraph (b)(1), and it would
revise the references to veteran eligibility for health care. Care
provided under these circumstances would be charged at the Cost-Based
Rates.
Proposed paragraph (b)(2) would state that VA would charge for
hospital care, medical services, domiciliary care, or nursing home care
provided to a discharged member of the armed forces of a nation allied
with the United States in World War I or World War II in accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 109. This proposed revision would re-designate paragraph
(d) as paragraph (b)(2). It would add a reference to 38 U.S.C. 109,
which is VA's statutory authority to provide and receive reimbursement
for hospital care, medical services, and domiciliary care for allied
beneficiaries. We note that section 109 does not expressly authorize
the provision of nursing home services to allied beneficiaries, so the
language ``in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 109'' in proposed paragraph
(b)(2) should be sufficiently limiting without having to propose a
separate paragraph in Sec. 17.102 to address provision of hospital
care, medical services, and domiciliary care but not nursing home care.
Proposed paragraph (b)(2) would apply to care that is authorized to be
provided under section 109, while proposed paragraph (a)(4) would apply
if care was provided in error based on a finding of eligibility under
section 109, but the individual was subsequently found not to be
eligible. We note that the rates for this care would be the Cost-Based
Rates.
Proposed paragraph (b)(3) would state that VA would charge for
hospital care, medical services, domiciliary care, or nursing home care
provided under a sharing agreement in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8111 or
8153 and 38 CFR 17.240. This proposed revision would re-designate
current paragraph (e) as proposed paragraph (b)(3), and it would more
succinctly restate the language in paragraph (e) by referring if only
to the authorities related to VA sharing agreements and VA sharing of
medical resources under 38 U.S.C. 8111 and 8153, respectively, as well
as implementing VA regulation at 38 CFR 17.240. This paragraph would
likely be used when VA enters into a sharing agreement with another
federal entity, such as the Department of Defense, or participates in
the sharing of medical resources between entities.
Proposed paragraph (b)(4) would state that VA would charge the
rates established in paragraph (c), the Cost-Based or the Inter-Agency
Rates, for any other care that VA is authorized to provide, at a cost,
to an individual who is otherwise ineligible for VA care. This new
paragraph would instruct how VA would charge for care when VA has
authority to provide such care at a cost but does not have guidance on
how to charge for the care. This paragraph would likely be used when
Congress authorizes VA to provide care under new circumstances.
Current paragraph (g) in Sec. 17.102 would be removed because VA
examined the regulatory history and found that the requirement was
obsolete and unnecessary. Specifically, current paragraph (g)
establishes that VA must reimburse its medical care appropriation fund
out of its research appropriation fund when VA provides treatment to
research study participants who are otherwise ineligible for that care
as veterans. The management of VA's appropriations, such as
reimbursement of one fund from another, is an internal fiscal procedure
and does not require authorization in regulation unless otherwise
specified in law. To date, there is no law that specifies that VA must
regulate the transfer of these funds. We, therefore, propose to remove
paragraph (g).
Current paragraph (h) establishes the rates that VA charges for
care provided under Sec. 17.102, unless the rates are otherwise
established under a sharing agreement or contract. Current Sec.
17.102(h) would be redesignated as proposed paragraph (c), and we would
revise it to refer to a different VA data source and data report that
we use to
[[Page 73272]]
establish the rates under Sec. 17.102. These slight revisions would
state that rates charged for care provided under Sec. 17.102 would be
based on ``VHA Office of Finance Managerial Cost Accounting (MCA) Cost
Reports,'' as opposed to being based on the ``Monthly Program Cost
Report'' as stated in current paragraph (h). Proposed paragraph (c)
would also remove the stated rate methodology in current paragraph (h),
as this information is published with the rate tables. VA publishes the
rate table for Sec. 17.101 on its website and for consistency, and
ease of access, VA would publish the Sec. 17.102 rates on a website
where the public could access the rates, OMB has not been involved in
publishing these rates since 2014 and we would remove reference to the
option of OMB publishing the rates. Therefore, we believe this would be
a non-substantive change because the public understands these annually
published rates.
Proposed paragraph (c) would also include the methodology to
determine the rates for prescription drugs that VA furnishes which are
not administered during treatment. The costs would be based on the
actual cost of the drug plus a national average of VA administrative
costs as described in 38 CFR 17.101(m).
Section 17.43 Persons Entitled to Hospital or Domiciliary Care
This section lists persons entitled to hospital or domiciliary
care. Specifically, Sec. 17.43(b) lists the three categories of
persons entitled to emergency hospital care. Paragraph (b)(1) includes
persons having no eligibility, as a humanitarian service. Paragraph
(b)(2) includes persons admitted because of presumed discharge or
retirement from the Armed Forces, but subsequently found to be
ineligible as such. Paragraph (b)(3) includes employees (not
potentially eligible as ex-members of the Armed Forces) and members of
their families, when residing on reservations of VA field facilities,
and when they cannot feasibly obtain emergency treatment from private
facilities. We propose to remove paragraph (b)(3) because it places an
unnecessary restriction on VA employees and their families' ability to
receive hospital care at a VA facility during an emergency.
VA has authority to provide hospital care in an emergency to all VA
employees and their families. Section 1784 of title 38 of the United
States Code provides that VA may furnish hospital care or medical
services as a humanitarian service in emergency cases so long as the
Secretary charges for such care and services. In addition, 38 U.S.C.
1784A provides that if any individual comes to the hospital or the
campus of the hospital and a request is made on behalf of the
individual for examination or treatment for a medical condition, then
the hospital must provide for an appropriate medical screening
examination within the capability of the emergency department. This
medical screening examination would include ancillary services
routinely available to the emergency department to determine whether an
emergency medical condition exists. Further, the implementing
regulation at 38 CFR 17.43(b)(1) provides that emergency hospital care
may be provided for persons having no eligibility as a humanitarian
service. Therefore, we believe that 38 U.S.C. 1784, as implemented by
38 CFR 17.43(b)(1), provides VA authority to provide hospital care to
all individuals in an emergency, including VA employees and their
families, regardless of whether they are residing on a field
reservation or can feasibly obtain emergency treatment from private
facilities.
We note that 38 CFR 17.95, whose authority also stems from 38
U.S.C. 1784, provides that outpatient medical services (as opposed to
hospital care) may be authorized for VA employees, their families, and
the general public in emergencies. There are no restrictions placed on
VA employees and their families when seeking VA outpatient care in an
emergency.
Therefore, we propose to remove paragraph (b)(3) as the individuals
covered under this paragraph are subsumed within paragraph (b)(1), and
VA believes it is inequitable and unjustified that VA employees and
their families who are not covered under paragraph (b)(3) should be
prohibited from receiving VA hospital services in emergencies when VA
has clear authority under 38 U.S.C. 1784 to provide such care.
Section 17.44 Hospital Care for Certain Retirees With Chronic
Disability (Executive Orders 10122, 10400 and 11733)
This section provides that hospital care may be furnished, when
beds are available, to members or former members of the uniformed
services who are temporarily or permanently retired for physical
disability or receiving disability retirement pay who require hospital
care for chronic diseases and who have no eligibility for hospital care
under laws governing the Department of Veterans Affairs, or who having
eligibility do not elect hospitalization as Department of Veterans
Affairs beneficiaries. Care under this section is subject to three
conditions. The first condition described in paragraph (a), which is
most pertinent here, requires persons who are members or former members
of the United States Armed Forces to agree to pay the subsistence rate
set by VA, except that no subsistence charge would be made for those
persons who are members or former members of the Public Health Service,
Coast Guard, Coast and Geodetic Survey (now the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration). This also applies to enlisted personnel of
the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force.
This regulation was originally enacted in 1969 (34 FR 9340 June 13,
1969), and it has not been substantively revised since that time. This
subsistence rate language seems to be a hold over from earlier practice
of charging a subsistence rate for daily food/incidentals for certain
members during a hospitalization if that member is receiving Basic
Allowance for Subsistence (BAS). BAS is a Department of Defense (DOD)
program meant to offset costs for a member's meals. This allowance is
based in the historic origins of the military in which the military
provided room and board (or rations) as part of a member's pay. VA does
not currently use, nor does the Secretary of Veterans Affairs set
subsistence rates. Therefore, the regulation is inconsistent with
current practice. Due to this, we propose to remove the word
``subsistence'' from paragraph (a), and we would require persons
defined in this section to agree to pay a rate set by VA, as prescribed
in Sec. 17.102(c). VA believes that using the rates established in
Sec. 17.102(c) (the VHA Office of Finance MCA Cost Report) is
consistent with the authority to provide care as described in Executive
Orders 10122, 10400, and 11733. In the Executive Orders, the President
authorized VA to provide the care and charge for the care, but the
Executive Orders do not specify the rate VA should charge. VA believes
that it has the authority to determine the most appropriate rates to
charge for this care, and we find that charging the rate that is used
for other otherwise ineligible veterans and non-veteran beneficiaries
is appropriate.
Section 17.86 Provision of Hospital Care and Medical Services During
Certain Disasters and Emergencies Under 38 U.S.C. 1785
We propose to revise paragraph (e) for clarity and to update the
reference to Sec. 17.102 to conform to the proposed
[[Page 73273]]
revisions of Sec. 17.102 previously described. As the authorizing
statute, 38 U.S.C. 1785, describes how VA should be reimbursed in
various instances, we propose to revise paragraph (e) by listing each
category of person identified in section 1785 and state how VA would
charge for their care. The proposed changes are technical in nature,
and we are not proposing any substantive revisions to this section.
Proposed paragraph (e) would state that the cost of medical care
and services provided under this section would be determined by the
situations described below. Proposed paragraph (e)(1) would state that
if care is provided to an officer or employee of a non-VA department or
agency of the United States, VA will charge the rate agreed upon by the
Secretary and the head of such department or agency or the Secretary
concerned. If no such rate has been agreed to, VA would charge the
Inter-Agency Rates as prescribed in Sec. 17.102(c). VA believes that
the Inter-Agency Rate is the most appropriate rate in this context and
complies with 38 U.S.C. 1785. In Sec. 1785(d), Congress directs that
the cost of care or services furnished under this section to an officer
or employee of a department or agency of the United States shall be
reimbursed at such rates as may be agreed upon by the Secretary and the
head of such department or agency of the Secretary concerned. The
Inter-Agency Rates are the generally agreed upon rates between VA and
other Federal agencies.
Although current Sec. 17.86 includes member of the Armed Forces in
the same sentence as an officer or employee of a non-VA department or
agency of the United States, to more closely follow the authority in 38
U.S.C. 1785(d), we propose to have separate paragraphs to describe the
rates for care provided to an officer or employee of a department or
agency of the United States and the rates for care for members of the
Armed Forces, as these individuals are referred to separately in the
statute. Therefore, even though the Inter-Agency Rate would be charged
in both circumstances, the regulation would more closely follow the
statute to have separate paragraphs for each group identified by
statute.
Proposed paragraph (e)(2) would state that if care is provided to a
member of the Armed Forces, then VA would charge the rate agreed upon
by the Secretary and the head of the branch of the Armed Forces or the
Secretary concerned. If no rate has been agreed to, VA would be
reimbursed at the Inter-Agency Rates as prescribed in Sec. 17.102(c).
VA believes that the Inter-Agency Rates are the most appropriate rates
to charge for these individuals. Per 38 U.S.C. 1785(d) VA may be
reimbursed based on the cost of the care or service furnished to
members of the Armed Forces. The Inter-Agency Rate is based on VA cost
that is specifically used to determine reimbursable charges from other
Federal agencies, such as the Department of Defense.
Proposed paragraph (e)(3) would state that if the care is
authorized under a sharing agreement as described in 38 U.S.C. 8111 or
8153 and 38 CFR 17.240, VA would be reimbursed at the rate determined
in accordance with the terms of the sharing agreement.
Proposed paragraph (e)(4) would state that if the care is provided
to an individual who is responsible for the cost of the care, VA would
charge the Cost-Based Rate as prescribed in Sec. 17.102(c). We would
note that individuals would be responsible for the cost of care or
services if mandated by Federal law (including applicable
appropriations acts) or when the cost of care or services is not
reimbursed by other-than-VA Federal departments or agencies. We believe
that the Cost-Based Rates are the most appropriate for these
individuals because the Cost-Based Rates are generally charged for care
provided to individuals who are not beneficiaries of other Federal
agencies or otherwise eligible for care from VA, as is required by the
intent of appropriations act 205. The Cost Based Rate reflects the cost
to VA to provide care to this non eligible individual and is explained
in the yearly rate update.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no collections of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would affect only individuals and
other Federal agencies. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs determined that this
proposed rule is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking
can be found as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Assistance Listing
The Assistance Listing program numbers and titles for the programs
affected by this document are Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.011--
Veterans Dental Care; 64.012--Veterans Prescription Service; 64.013--
Veterans Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014--Veterans State Domiciliary
Care; 64.015--Veterans State Nursing Home Care; 64.026--Veterans State
Adult Day Health Care; 64.029--Purchase Care Program; 64.033--VA
Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program; 64.039--CHAMPVA;
64.040--VHA Inpatient Medicine; 64.041--VHA Outpatient Specialty Care;
64.042--VHA Inpatient Surgery; 64.043--VHA Mental Health Residential;
64.044--VHA Home Care; 64.045--VHA Outpatient Ancillary Services;
64.046--VHA Inpatient Psychiatry; 64.047--VHA Primary Care; 64.048--VHA
Mental Health clinics; 64.049--VHA Community Living Center; 64.050--VHA
Diagnostic Care; 64.053.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant programs-veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health
[[Page 73274]]
records, Homeless, Medical and dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on February 27, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign
and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of
Veterans Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 is amended by adding entries for
Sec. Sec. 17.43, 17.44, 17.86, and 17.102 in numerical order to read
in part as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
* * * * *
Section 17.43 also issued under 38 U.S.C. 109, 1784, 8111, and
8153.
Section 17.44 also issued under E.O. 10122, 15 FR 2173, 3 CFR,
1949-1953 Comp., p. 313, E.O. 10400, 17 FR 8648, 3 CFR, 1949-1953
Comp., p. 900, and E.O. 11733, 38 FR 20431, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp.,
p. 792.
* * * * *
Section 17.86 also issued under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
* * * * *
Section 17.102 also issued under 38 U.S.C. 109, 1711, 1729,
1784, 1784A, 1785, 8111, 8153.
* * * * *
Sec. 17.43 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.43 by removing paragraph (b)(3).
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.44 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.44 Hospital care for certain retirees with chronic disability
(Executive Orders 10122, 10400 and 11733).
* * * * *
(a) Persons defined in this section who are members or former
members of the active United States Armed Forces must agree to pay the
rate set by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as prescribed in Sec.
17.102(c), except that no charge will be made for those persons who are
members of the Public Health Service, Coast Guard, Coast and Geodetic
Survey now NOAA, and enlisted personnel of the Army, Navy, Marine
Corps, Air Force, and Space Force.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.86 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (e); and
0
b. Removing the parenthetical authority citation at the end of the
section.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 17.86 Provision of hospital care and medical services during
certain disasters and emergencies under 38 U.S.C. 1785.
* * * * *
(e) The cost of care for medical care and services provided under
this section will be determined in accordance with the following:
(1) If the care is provided to an officer or employee of a non-VA
Federal agency VA will charge the rate agreed upon by the Secretary and
the head of such department or agency or the Secretary concerned. If no
such rate has been agreed to, VA will charge the Inter-Agency Rate as
prescribed in Sec. 17.102(c).
(2) If the care is provided to a member of the Armed Forces VA will
charge the rate agreed upon by the Secretary and the head of such
branch or the Secretary concerned. If no such rate has been agreed to,
VA will charge the Inter-Agency Rate as prescribed in Sec. 17.102(c).
(3) If the care is authorized under a sharing agreement as
described in 38 U.S.C. 8111 or 8153 or Sec. 17.240, VA will charge the
rate determined in accordance with the sharing agreement.
(4) If the care is provided to an individual who is responsible for
the cost of the care, VA will charge the Cost-Based Rate as prescribed
in Sec. 17.102(c). Individuals will be responsible for the cost of
care or services if mandated by Federal law (including applicable
Appropriations Acts) or when the cost of care or services is not
reimbursed by other-than-VA Federal departments or agencies.
* * * * *
0
5. Revise Sec. 17.102 to read as follows:
Sec. 17.102 Charges for care or services.
Subject to the methodology set forth in paragraph (c) of this
section, and notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 17.101, VA shall
charge for VA care and services provided in the circumstances described
in this section.
(a) For hospital care or medical services provided:
(1) As a humanitarian service in a medical emergency in accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 1784 or 38 U.S.C. 1784A;
(2) During and immediately following a disaster or emergency in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1785 and Sec. 17.86;
(3) While attending a national convention of an organization
recognized under 38 U.S.C. 5902, for emergency medical treatment, in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1711;
(4) In error, on the basis of eligibility as a non-veteran
recipient of VA hospital care and medical services under title 38
U.S.C., and such an individual subsequently is determined not to have
been eligible for such care or services;
(5) To a beneficiary of the Department of Defense or other Federal
agency, to include for inpatient or outpatient care or services
authorized for a member of the Armed Forces on active duty, a
beneficiary or designee of any other Federal agency, and members or
former members of a uniformed service who are entitled to retired or
retainer pay, or equivalent pay; or
(6) To a retiree of the uniformed services with a chronic
disability for hospital care identified in Executive Orders 10122,
10400, and 11733 as well as Sec. 17.44.
(b) For hospital care, medical services, domiciliary care, or
nursing home care provided:
(1) In error, on the basis of eligibility for such care and
services as a veteran under Sec. 17.34, Sec. 17.36, or Sec. 17.37,
and such an individual was subsequently determined not to have been
eligible for such care or services.
(2) To a discharged member of the armed forces of a nation allied
with the United States in World War I or World War II in accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 109.
(3) Under a sharing agreement in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8111 or
8153 and Sec. 17.240.
(4) Under any other provision of law that authorizes VA to provide
care.
(c) Unless rates or charges are otherwise established in contract,
in a sharing agreement, or under Federal law, VA will charge under this
section at rates based on the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Office of Finance Managerial Cost Accounting (MCA) Cost Reports, which
sets forth the actual basic costs and per diem rates by type of
inpatient care, and actual basic costs and rates for outpatient care
visits. Factors for depreciation of buildings and equipment and Central
Office overhead are added, based on accounting manual instructions.
Additional factors are added for interest on capital investment and for
standard fringe benefit costs covering government
[[Page 73275]]
employee retirement and disability costs. The VHA Office of Finance MCA
Cost Reports are used to determine two separate rates: one rate is the
general Cost-Based Rate and the other rate is the Inter-Agency Rate.
These rates are published annually by VA on the internet site of the
Veterans Health Administration Office of Community Care's website at
https://www.va.gov/communitycare/revenue_ops/payer_rates.asp.
(d) The rates for prescription drugs that VA furnishes not
administered during treatment are based on the actual cost of the drug
plus a national average of VA administrative costs as described in
Sec. 17.101(m).
[FR Doc. 2022-25701 Filed 11-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P