National Institute of Standards and Technology; National Bureau of Standards Test Reactor, 69056-69059 [2022-24985]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69056
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Notices
request: 74,043 hours (1,557 reporting +
23,989 recordkeeping + 48,497 thirdparty disclosure).
10. Abstract: Part 37 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
contains security requirements for the
use of category 1 and category 2
quantities of radioactive material.
Licensees are required to: (1) Develop
procedures for the implementation of
the security provisions; (2) develop a
security plan that describes how
security is being implemented; (3)
implement security measures for the
protection of the radioactive material;
(4) conduct training on the procedures
and security plan; (5) conduct
background investigations for those
individuals permitted unescorted access
to category 1 or category 2 quantities of
radioactive material; (6) coordinate with
Local Law Enforcement Agencies
(LLEAs) so the LLEAs would be better
prepared to respond in an emergency;
and (7) conduct coordination activities
before shipping category 2 radioactive
material, and preplanning and
coordination activities before shipping
category 1 radioactive material.
Licensees are required to promptly
report any attempted or actual theft or
diversion of the radioactive material.
Licensees are required to keep copies of
the security plan, procedures,
background investigation records,
training records, and documentation
associated with implementation of the
security program. The NRC uses the
information required by 10 CFR part 37
to fulfill its responsibilities to respond
to, investigate, and correct situations
that have the potential to adversely
affect public health and safety or the
common defense and security.
Dated: November 10, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David C. Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022–24996 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–184; NRC–2022–0194]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
National Institute of Standards and
Technology; National Bureau of
Standards Test Reactor
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application;
opportunity to comment, request a
hearing, and petition for leave to
intervene.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment
to Renewed Facility Operating License
No. TR–5, issued to the U.S. Department
of Commerce, National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), for
operation of the National Bureau of
Standards test reactor (NBSR). The
proposed amendment would revise the
NBSR Safety Analysis Report (SAR) to
allow reactor operation with the debris
that remains in the reactor primary
coolant system from the February 3,
2021, fuel damage event and after the
subsequent cleaning operations. The
proposed amendment would not
authorize the restart of the NBSR.
DATES: Submit comments by December
19, 2022. Requests for a hearing or
petitions for leave to intervene must be
filed by January 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods;
however, the NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2022–0194. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, ATTN: Program Management,
Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Boyle, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–3936; email:
Patrick.Boyle@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2022–
0194 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2022–0194.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The license
amendment request dated October 19,
2022, is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML22293B808.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents,
by appointment, at the NRC’s PDR,
Room P1 B35, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://
www.regulations.gov). Please include
Docket ID NRC–2022–0194 in your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an
amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License No. TR–5, issued to
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
NIST, for operation of the NBSR, located
in Montgomery County, MD.
The proposed license amendment
would revise the NBSR SAR to allow
reactor operation with the debris that
remains in the reactor primary coolant
system from the February 3, 2021, fuel
damage event and after the subsequent
cleaning operations. NIST stated that its
calculations determined that the
maximum possible quantity of debris in
the system was initially 66 grams and
that not all of this debris had been
removed via the cleaning operations of
retrieval and filtering. To operate with
the remaining debris in the system,
NIST proposed changes to Chapter 5,
‘‘Reactor Coolant Systems,’’ and Chapter
11, ‘‘Radiation Protection and Waste
Management,’’ of the SAR. Specifically,
Section 5.2.2.4.4 would be added to the
SAR to address the impact of the
remaining debris on the primary system
pumps, valves, piping, heat exchangers,
and instrumentation and Section
11.1.1.4.3.1 would be added to the SAR
to address the potential impact of small
amounts of debris remaining in the
reactor on the fission product monitor
and other effluent monitors. The
proposed license amendment would not
authorize the restart of the NBSR.
Before any issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the NRC will need
to make the findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and NRC’s regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed
determination that the license
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Under
the NRC’s regulations in § 50.92 of title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), this means that operation of
the facility in accordance with the
proposed amendment would not (1)
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration, which is
presented below:
1. Does the proposed change involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
None of the accidents analyzed in the
FSAR would be more than minimally
affected by the presence of fuel particles in
the primary system, as (a) the mass and size
of fuel material is too insignificant to cause
any reactivity effects in the reactor, cause
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
flow blockage effects in the system, or limit
mechanical devices (i.e. shim arms) if it were
to be dislodged and (b) the presence of this
material has no effect on normal operating
parameters. Only two accidents analyzed in
Chapter 13 of the [SAR] show results of
release of radioactivity: the loss of coolant
accident (LOCA) and the maximum
hypothetical accident (MHA). The presence
of fission products in the primary system has
no effect on the consequences of any of the
other accidents analyzed.
The MHA considers melting of an entire 8cycle fuel element. The addition of-at mosta few grams of fuel would be insignificant in
comparison. Both the MHA and LOCA
accidents result in a total dose of less than
6.5 mrem at the site boundary. By contrast,
it is estimated that the presence of the largest
piece of remaining fuel material being lodged
in the core (which is too large to be carried
into the core by normal primary flow
velocities) would result in a site boundary
dose being at most 0.13 mrem/day, which
also conservatively assumes the reactor
continues to operate. Thus, there is no more
than a minimal increase in the consequences
of accidents previously analyzed.
Also, once a LOCA occurs it makes no
significant difference if the fission products
are laid out on the floor of the process room
(submerged in the heavily tritiated primary
water) or held in the plumbing. The dose
effects of the fission products are
insignificant compared to the dose effects of
the heavy water that is exposed via the
LOCA.
Calculations have shown that that debris
larger than 0.093 [inches] will not be
transported into the core with the liquid
velocity range present in the NBSR inlet and
outlet plena leading to the core. Smaller
particles have been largely removed by
filtration. Thus, remaining debris in the
primary system is unlikely to be dislodged
into the core.
Therefore, the proposed [SAR] amendment
allowing operation with debris in the
primary system will not involve a significant
increase in the probability or consequences
of an accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed change create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
Because of the limited amount and size of
material present in the primary system and
the limited primary flow velocity, there is no
credible scenario whereby the release of
material present in the primary system would
cause significant flow blockage, mechanical
interference, heating, or reactivity effects.
Any introduction of the small amount of
material into the core would fall into the
realm of (and be easily bounded by) the
maximum hypothetical accident, which
assumes melting of an entire fuel element. No
other changes to reactor parameters or
operations are being proposed. The proposed
amendment to the SAR will not change the
operations, process variables or reactor
structures, systems, or components.
Therefore, the proposed amendment for
operation with small amounts of debris from
the February 3, 2021, event will not create
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69057
the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve a
significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed license amendment is to
modify the NBSR SAR to allow operations
with a small amount of debris from the
February 3, 2021, incident in the primary
system. Calculations have shown that that
debris larger than 0.093 [inches] will not be
transported into the core with the liquid
velocity range present in the NBSR inlet and
outlet plena leading to the core. Smaller
particles have been largely removed by
filtration. Thus, because of the limited
amount and size of material present in the
primary system and the limited primary flow
velocity, there is no credible scenario
whereby the release of material present in the
primary system would cause significant flow
blockage, mechanical interference, heating,
or reactivity effects, and is insufficient to
cause a significant reduction in any margin
of safety. Therefore, the proposed
amendment of the SAR in allowing this
operation does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s analysis and based on this
review, it appears that the three
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
proposes to determine that the license
amendment request involves a no
significant hazards consideration.
The NRC is seeking public comments
on this proposed determination that the
license amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Any
comments received within 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice
will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license
amendment before expiration of the 60day notice period if the Commission
concludes the amendment involves no
significant hazards consideration. In
addition, the Commission may issue the
amendment prior to the expiration of
the 30-day comment period if
circumstances change during the 30-day
comment period such that failure to act
in a timely way would result, for
example, in prevention of resumption of
reactor operation. If the Commission
takes action prior to the expiration of
either the comment period or the notice
period, it will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of issuance. If the
Commission makes a final no significant
hazards consideration determination,
any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
69058
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
the need to take this action will occur
very infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing
and Petition for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any person
(petitioner) whose interest may be
affected by this action may file a request
for a hearing and petition for leave to
intervene (petition) with respect to the
action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission’s
‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested
persons should consult 10 CFR 2.309. If
a petition is filed, the presiding officer
will rule on the petition and, if
appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be
issued.
Petitions must be filed no later than
60 days from the date of publication of
this notice in accordance with the filing
instructions in the ‘‘Electronic
Submissions (E-Filing)’’ section of this
document. Petitions and motions for
leave to file new or amended
contentions that are filed after the
deadline will not be entertained absent
a determination by the presiding officer
that the filing demonstrates good cause
by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii).
If a hearing is requested and the
Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, which
will serve to establish when the hearing
is held. If the final determination is that
the amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission may issue the amendment
and make it immediately effective,
notwithstanding the request for a
hearing. Any hearing would take place
after issuance of the amendment. If the
final determination is that the
amendment request involves a
significant hazards consideration, then
any hearing held would take place
before the issuance of the amendment
unless the Commission finds an
imminent danger to the health or safety
of the public, in which case it will issue
an appropriate order or rule under 10
CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body,
Federally recognized Indian Tribe, or
designated agency thereof, may submit
a petition to the Commission to
participate as a party under 10 CFR
2.309(h) no later than 60 days from the
date of publication of this notice.
Alternatively, a State, local
governmental body, Federally
recognized Indian Tribe, or agency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
thereof may participate as a non-party
under 10 CFR 2.315(c).
For information about filing a petition
and about participation by a person not
a party under 10 CFR 2.315, see ADAMS
Accession No. ML20340A053 (https://
adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/
main.jsp?AccessionNumber=
ML20340A053) and on the NRC’s public
website at https://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/
hearing.html#participate.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings including
documents filed by an interested State,
local governmental body, Federally
recognized Indian Tribe, or designated
agency thereof that requests to
participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must
be filed in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302. The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve all
adjudicatory documents over the
internet, or in some cases, to mail copies
on electronic storage media, unless an
exemption permitting an alternative
filing method, as further discussed, is
granted. Detailed guidance on electronic
submissions is located in the ‘‘Guidance
for Electronic Submissions to the NRC’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13031A056)
and on the NRC’s public website at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at 301–415–1677, to (1)
request a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant
(or its counsel or representative) to
digitally sign submissions and access
the E-Filing system for any proceeding
in which it is participating; and (2)
advise the Secretary that the participant
will be submitting a petition or other
adjudicatory document (even in
instances in which the participant, or its
counsel or representative, already holds
an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
getting-started.html. After a digital ID
certificate is obtained and a docket
created, the participant must submit
adjudicatory documents in Portable
Document Format. Guidance on
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submissions is available on the NRC’s
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A
filing is considered complete at the time
the document is submitted through the
NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to
the E-Filing system no later than 11:59
p.m. ET on the due date. Upon receipt
of a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email confirming
receipt of the document. The E-Filing
system also distributes an email that
provides access to the document to the
NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and
any others who have advised the Office
of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the
filer need not serve the document on
those participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before adjudicatory
documents are filed to obtain access to
the documents via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system
may seek assistance by contacting the
NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk
through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located
on the NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available
between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing stating why there is good cause for
not filing electronically and requesting
authorization to continue to submit
documents in paper format. Such filings
must be submitted in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(b)–(d). Participants filing
adjudicatory documents in this manner
are responsible for serving their
documents on all other participants.
Participants granted an exemption
under 10 CFR 2.302(g)(2) must still meet
the electronic formatting requirement in
10 CFR 2.302(g)(1), unless the
participant also seeks and is granted an
exemption from 10 CFR 2.302(g)(1).
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket, which is
publicly available at https://
adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the presiding
officer. If you do not have an NRCissued digital ID certificate as
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Notices
previously described, click ‘‘cancel’’
when the link requests certificates and
you will be automatically directed to the
NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where
you will be able to access any publicly
available documents in a particular
hearing docket. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
personal phone numbers in their filings
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants should not include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for license
amendment dated October 19, 2022.
Attorney for licensee: Henry N.
Wixon, Chief of Counsel, National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 1052,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1052.
NRC Branch Chief: Joshua Borromeo.
Dated: November 10, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patrick Boyle,
Project Manager, Non-Power Production and
Utilization Facility Licensing Branch, Division
of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power
Production and Utilization Facilities, Office
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2022–24985 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Information; Sustainability
of Microgravity R&D During and
Beyond ISS Transition
Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Notice of Request for
Information.
AGENCY:
The White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
requests input to help inform the
development of a National Strategy for
Microgravity Research and Development
(R&D) to ensure sustainability of spacebased research during and beyond
microgravity platform transition—from
the International Space Station (ISS) to
future commercial platforms. This
particular request seeks information
regarding the future vision of a robust
research ecosystem in low-earth orbit
(LEO) and the role of the U.S.
government in enabling that future.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
Interested persons and
organizations are invited to submit
comments on or before 5:00 p.m. ET,
December 2, 2022 to be considered.
ADDRESSES: Due to time constraints,
mailed paper submissions will not be
accepted, and electronic submissions
received after the deadline may not be
taken into consideration. You may
submit comments by email:
• Email: microgravity@ostp.eop.gov,
include Microgravity RFI in the subject
line of the message.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is
voluntary. Email submissions should be
machine-readable [PDF, Word] and
should not be copy-protected.
Respondents need not reply to all
questions listed. Each individual or
institution is requested to submit only
one response, in English. Electronic
responses must be provided as
attachments to an email. It is
recommended that attachments with file
sizes exceeding 25MB be compressed
(i.e., zipped) to ensure message delivery.
Please identify your answers by
responding to a specific question or
topic if possible. Respondents may
answer as many or as few questions as
they wish. Comments of seven pages or
fewer (2,500 words) are requested;
longer responses will not be considered.
Responses should include the name of
the person(s) or organization(s) filing
the response.
Information obtained from this RFI
may be used by the Government on a
non-attribution basis for planning and
strategy development. OSTP will not
respond to individual submissions. A
response to this RFI will not be viewed
as a binding commitment to develop or
pursue the project or ideas discussed.
This RFI is not accepting applications
for financial assistance or financial
incentives.
Responses containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published
should include copies of or electronic
links to the referenced materials.
Responses containing profanity,
vulgarity, threats, or other inappropriate
language or content will not be
considered.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice are subject to the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). Responses to
this RFI may be posted without change
online. OSTP therefore requests that no
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information be submitted in response to
this RFI. Please note that the United
States Government will not pay for
response preparation, or for the use of
any information contained in a
response.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69059
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ezinne Uzo-Okoro; tel: 202–456–4444.
Pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 6617, OSTP is soliciting
public input through an RFI to obtain
feedback from a wide variety of
stakeholders, including individuals,
industry, academia, research
laboratories, nonprofits, and think
tanks. OSTP is specifically interested in
public input to inform the development
and release of a national strategy to
ensure sustainability of space-based
research in the decades to come. For the
purpose of this RFI, microgravity R&D
refers to any research or experimental
development activities in LEO that
leverage the unique environment of
space, including altered gravity, thermal
extremes, radiation, micrometeoroids,
and the vacuum environment. OSTP
seeks response to any or all of the
following questions:
1. What should be the United States’
vision for the future of microgravity
research?
2. What should be the long-term
microgravity research goals for U.S.
presence in LEO?
3. What are the top critical research,
development, or operational needs
required to ensure a smooth transition
between the International Space Station
and future commercial LEO
microgravity platforms and realize the
ideal future of microgravity research?
4. What would be the most effective
role of the U.S. government to ensure
sustained LEO microgravity R&D
following the retirement of the ISS?
5. Should the U.S. government
continue to sponsor a national lab in
LEO after ISS transition? If so, what
would be the best model(s) for a LEO
national lab?
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: November 10, 2022.
Rachel Wallace,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022–24999 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270–F1–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #17644 and #17645;
Florida Disaster Number FL–00178]
Presidential Declaration Amendment of
a Major Disaster for the State of Florida
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 7.
AGENCY:
This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA–
4673–DR), dated 09/29/2022.
Incident: Hurricane Ian.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69056-69059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-184; NRC-2022-0194]
National Institute of Standards and Technology; National Bureau
of Standards Test Reactor
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application; opportunity to comment, request
a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission)
is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating
License No. TR-5, issued to the U.S. Department of Commerce, National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), for operation of the
National Bureau of Standards test reactor (NBSR). The proposed
amendment would revise the NBSR Safety Analysis Report (SAR) to allow
reactor operation with the debris that remains in the reactor primary
coolant system from the February 3, 2021, fuel damage event and after
the subsequent cleaning operations. The proposed amendment would not
authorize the restart of the NBSR.
DATES: Submit comments by December 19, 2022. Requests for a hearing or
petitions for leave to intervene must be filed by January 17, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods;
however, the NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2022-0194. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the For Further Information
Contact section of this document.
Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Boyle, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3936; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2022-0194 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2022-0194.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The license amendment request dated
October 19, 2022, is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML22293B808.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents, by appointment, at the NRC's PDR, Room P1 B35, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. To make
an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between
8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://www.regulations.gov). Please
include Docket ID NRC-2022-0194 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions
into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License No. TR-5, issued to
[[Page 69057]]
NIST, for operation of the NBSR, located in Montgomery County, MD.
The proposed license amendment would revise the NBSR SAR to allow
reactor operation with the debris that remains in the reactor primary
coolant system from the February 3, 2021, fuel damage event and after
the subsequent cleaning operations. NIST stated that its calculations
determined that the maximum possible quantity of debris in the system
was initially 66 grams and that not all of this debris had been removed
via the cleaning operations of retrieval and filtering. To operate with
the remaining debris in the system, NIST proposed changes to Chapter 5,
``Reactor Coolant Systems,'' and Chapter 11, ``Radiation Protection and
Waste Management,'' of the SAR. Specifically, Section 5.2.2.4.4 would
be added to the SAR to address the impact of the remaining debris on
the primary system pumps, valves, piping, heat exchangers, and
instrumentation and Section 11.1.1.4.3.1 would be added to the SAR to
address the potential impact of small amounts of debris remaining in
the reactor on the fission product monitor and other effluent monitors.
The proposed license amendment would not authorize the restart of the
NBSR.
Before any issuance of the proposed license amendment, the NRC will
need to make the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and NRC's regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed determination that the license
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under
the NRC's regulations in Sec. 50.92 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility in
accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required
by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue
of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
None of the accidents analyzed in the FSAR would be more than
minimally affected by the presence of fuel particles in the primary
system, as (a) the mass and size of fuel material is too
insignificant to cause any reactivity effects in the reactor, cause
flow blockage effects in the system, or limit mechanical devices
(i.e. shim arms) if it were to be dislodged and (b) the presence of
this material has no effect on normal operating parameters. Only two
accidents analyzed in Chapter 13 of the [SAR] show results of
release of radioactivity: the loss of coolant accident (LOCA) and
the maximum hypothetical accident (MHA). The presence of fission
products in the primary system has no effect on the consequences of
any of the other accidents analyzed.
The MHA considers melting of an entire 8-cycle fuel element. The
addition of-at most-a few grams of fuel would be insignificant in
comparison. Both the MHA and LOCA accidents result in a total dose
of less than 6.5 mrem at the site boundary. By contrast, it is
estimated that the presence of the largest piece of remaining fuel
material being lodged in the core (which is too large to be carried
into the core by normal primary flow velocities) would result in a
site boundary dose being at most 0.13 mrem/day, which also
conservatively assumes the reactor continues to operate. Thus, there
is no more than a minimal increase in the consequences of accidents
previously analyzed.
Also, once a LOCA occurs it makes no significant difference if
the fission products are laid out on the floor of the process room
(submerged in the heavily tritiated primary water) or held in the
plumbing. The dose effects of the fission products are insignificant
compared to the dose effects of the heavy water that is exposed via
the LOCA.
Calculations have shown that that debris larger than 0.093
[inches] will not be transported into the core with the liquid
velocity range present in the NBSR inlet and outlet plena leading to
the core. Smaller particles have been largely removed by filtration.
Thus, remaining debris in the primary system is unlikely to be
dislodged into the core.
Therefore, the proposed [SAR] amendment allowing operation with
debris in the primary system will not involve a significant increase
in the probability or consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
Because of the limited amount and size of material present in
the primary system and the limited primary flow velocity, there is
no credible scenario whereby the release of material present in the
primary system would cause significant flow blockage, mechanical
interference, heating, or reactivity effects. Any introduction of
the small amount of material into the core would fall into the realm
of (and be easily bounded by) the maximum hypothetical accident,
which assumes melting of an entire fuel element. No other changes to
reactor parameters or operations are being proposed. The proposed
amendment to the SAR will not change the operations, process
variables or reactor structures, systems, or components.
Therefore, the proposed amendment for operation with small
amounts of debris from the February 3, 2021, event will not create
the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed license amendment is to modify the NBSR SAR to
allow operations with a small amount of debris from the February 3,
2021, incident in the primary system. Calculations have shown that
that debris larger than 0.093 [inches] will not be transported into
the core with the liquid velocity range present in the NBSR inlet
and outlet plena leading to the core. Smaller particles have been
largely removed by filtration. Thus, because of the limited amount
and size of material present in the primary system and the limited
primary flow velocity, there is no credible scenario whereby the
release of material present in the primary system would cause
significant flow blockage, mechanical interference, heating, or
reactivity effects, and is insufficient to cause a significant
reduction in any margin of safety. Therefore, the proposed amendment
of the SAR in allowing this operation does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and based on
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the
license amendment request involves a no significant hazards
consideration.
The NRC is seeking public comments on this proposed determination
that the license amendment request involves no significant hazards
consideration. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day notice period if the Commission concludes the amendment involves no
significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may
issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment
period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such
that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in
prevention of resumption of reactor operation. If the Commission takes
action prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the
notice period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
issuance. If the Commission makes a final no significant hazards
consideration determination, any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that
[[Page 69058]]
the need to take this action will occur very infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To
Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any
person (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action may
file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene
(petition) with respect to the action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission's ``Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested persons should consult 10 CFR
2.309. If a petition is filed, the presiding officer will rule on the
petition and, if appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be issued.
Petitions must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with the filing instructions
in the ``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document.
Petitions and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that
are filed after the deadline will not be entertained absent a
determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates
good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)
through (iii).
If a hearing is requested and the Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, which will serve to establish when
the hearing is held. If the final determination is that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission
may issue the amendment and make it immediately effective,
notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing would take place
after issuance of the amendment. If the final determination is that the
amendment request involves a significant hazards consideration, then
any hearing held would take place before the issuance of the amendment
unless the Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety
of the public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule
under 10 CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body, Federally recognized Indian
Tribe, or designated agency thereof, may submit a petition to the
Commission to participate as a party under 10 CFR 2.309(h) no later
than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice.
Alternatively, a State, local governmental body, Federally recognized
Indian Tribe, or agency thereof may participate as a non-party under 10
CFR 2.315(c).
For information about filing a petition and about participation by
a person not a party under 10 CFR 2.315, see ADAMS Accession No.
ML20340A053 (https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.jsp?AccessionNumber=ML20340A053) and on the NRC's public website
at https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html#participate.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings including
documents filed by an interested State, local governmental body,
Federally recognized Indian Tribe, or designated agency thereof that
requests to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302. The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the
internet, or in some cases, to mail copies on electronic storage media,
unless an exemption permitting an alternative filing method, as further
discussed, is granted. Detailed guidance on electronic submissions is
located in the ``Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC''
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13031A056) and on the NRC's public website at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by
telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign submissions and access the E-Filing
system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or
other adjudicatory document (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. After a digital ID certificate is
obtained and a docket created, the participant must submit adjudicatory
documents in Portable Document Format. Guidance on submissions is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the document is submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. ET on the due date. Upon receipt of a
transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing
system also distributes an email that provides access to the document
to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any others who have
advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in
the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those
participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants
(or their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a
digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed to
obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC's Electronic
Filing Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by
email to [email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-
7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9:00
a.m. and 6:00 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Participants who believe that they have good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(b)-(d). Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner
are responsible for serving their documents on all other participants.
Participants granted an exemption under 10 CFR 2.302(g)(2) must still
meet the electronic formatting requirement in 10 CFR 2.302(g)(1),
unless the participant also seeks and is granted an exemption from 10
CFR 2.302(g)(1).
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket, which is publicly available at https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate as
[[Page 69059]]
previously described, click ``cancel'' when the link requests
certificates and you will be automatically directed to the NRC's
electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access any
publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket.
Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information
such as social security numbers, home addresses, or personal phone
numbers in their filings unless an NRC regulation or other law requires
submission of such information. With respect to copyrighted works,
except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants
should not include copyrighted materials in their submission.
For further details with respect to this action, see the
application for license amendment dated October 19, 2022.
Attorney for licensee: Henry N. Wixon, Chief of Counsel, National
Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 1052,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1052.
NRC Branch Chief: Joshua Borromeo.
Dated: November 10, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patrick Boyle,
Project Manager, Non-Power Production and Utilization Facility
Licensing Branch, Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power
Production and Utilization Facilities, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2022-24985 Filed 11-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
