Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplane; Flight-Envelope Protection Functions-General, 68942-68944 [2022-24772]
Download as PDF
68942
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Issue 1: DOE requests comment on its
tentative decision to exclude gas lights
and portable propane products from the
current analysis. DOE also requests
comment on an appropriate definition
for gas lights in order to distinguish
them from other miscellaneous gas
products. DOE also requests comment
on whether any other products should
be excluded from the current
rulemaking.
Issue 2: DOE requests comment
regarding these four representative
product groups.
Issue 3: DOE requests comment on the
OEMs identified for each representative
group: indoor vented gas log sets; other
indoor vented decorative hearths;
outdoor patio heaters; and outdoor
decorative hearths. Additionally, DOE
requests data on the number of OEMs
with domestic production facilities for
each group. DOE also requests comment
on names of OEMs of MGPs that DOE
did not identify in Table III.1.
Issue 4: DOE seeks comment
regarding whether there are any ignition
methods that are not captured in this
section, or if any of the listed methods
are not applicable to MGPs. DOE also
seeks comment on whether the above
descriptions for each ignition method
accurately reflect the industry’s
understanding.
Issue 5: DOE seeks comment
regarding whether there are any pilot
light technologies that are not captured
in this section, or if any of the listed
technologies are not applicable to
MGPs. DOE also requests comment
about any subsets of MGPs in which it
would not be feasible to implement the
aforementioned technologies. DOE also
seeks comment on whether the above
descriptions for each pilot light
technology accurately reflect the
industry’s understanding. Finally, DOE
seeks comment on the potential
combinations of ignition systems and
pilot lights that are available on the
market, and on the prevalence of these
combinations in each product group.
Issue 6: DOE requests comment
regarding whether these technology
options would impact the energy
efficiency and/or energy use of MGPs. In
addition, DOE requests comment on
whether any other technologies are
available to reduce the energy
consumption of MGPs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
Issue 7: DOE seeks comment
regarding its tentative conclusion that
only intermittent pilot ignition and ondemand ignition pass the screening
criteria. DOE also requests comment on
whether any other technology options
should pass the screening analysis.
Issue 8: DOE requests comment
regarding the baseline design
characteristics identified for each
product group. DOE also requests
comment regarding whether additional
clarity is needed regarding the baseline
design characteristics and the
components in each design.
Issue 9: DOE requests comment
regarding the alternate design
characteristics identified for each
product group.
Issue 10: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated MPCs for each
product group. Further, DOE seeks
specific cost information and data about
MGP ignition system components.
These components include the gas
valves, the pilot assembly, the power
supply, and the battery pack.
Issue 11: DOE seeks feedback
regarding the average production
volumes used in this analysis, and
whether these values are representative
of the MGP market.
Issue 12: DOE requests feedback on
the industry average manufacturer
markup of 1.5 and whether this value is
representative of the MGP market.
Additionally, DOE requests feedback on
whether the average manufacturer
markups varies significantly across four
groups: indoor vented gas log sets, other
indoor vented decorative hearths,
outdoor patio heaters; and outdoor
decorative hearths.
Issue 13: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated MGP operating
hours for standing pilots.
Issue 14: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated MGP lifetime,
particularly if there are differences
among product categories (such as
indoor/outdoor products).
Issue 15: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated MGP repair
costs.
Issue 16: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated distribution of
ignition types among MGPs and the
estimated fraction of products with
main burners that are manually lit.
Issue 17: DOE seeks comment
regarding the estimated shipments of
MGPs and the market shares of different
MGP product categories. In particular,
DOE requests comment on the market
share of portable propane outdoor units
so that they may be excluded from the
analysis.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
V. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this notification of the
availability of the preliminary technical
support document and request for
comment.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on November 7,
2022, by Francisco Alejandro Moreno,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on November
10, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2022–24925 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2022–0349; Notice No. 25–
22–05–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A321neo XLR Airplane; FlightEnvelope Protection Functions—
General
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplanes. These airplanes
will have a novel or unusual design
feature when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is an electronic flight-control system
that provides flight-envelope
protections. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These proposed
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
January 3, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2022–0349 using
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington,
DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: Except for Confidential
Business Information (CBI) as described
in the following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information:
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
is commercial or financial information
that is both customarily and actually
treated as private by its owner. Under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
(5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments
responsive to these special conditions
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these special
conditions. Send submissions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
containing CBI to Troy Brown,
Performance and Environment Section,
AIR–625, Technical Innovation Policy
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S.
Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209–2190;
telephone and fax 405–666–1050; email
troy.a.brown@faa.gov. Comments the
FAA receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the
public docket for these special
conditions.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any
time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Brown, Performance and Environment
Section, AIR–625, Technical Innovation
Policy Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 1801
S. Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209–2190;
telephone and fax 405–666–1050; email
troy.a.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these
special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On September 16, 2019, Airbus
applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. A28NM to include the
new Model A321neo XLR airplanes,
which include the Model A321–271NY
and A321–253NY airplanes. These
airplanes are twin-engine, transportcategory airplanes with seating for 244
passengers and a maximum takeoff
weight of 222,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, Airbus must show that the
Model A321neo XLR airplanes meet the
applicable provisions of the regulations
listed in Type Certificate No. A28NM, or
the applicable regulations in effect on
the date of application for the change,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68943
except for earlier amendments as agreed
upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR
airplanes because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A321neo
XLR airplanes must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, in accordance with
§ 11.38, and they become part of the
type certification basis under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A321neo XLR
airplanes will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature:
An electronic flight-control system
that provides flight envelope
protections.
Discussion
Many new transport-category
airplanes use advanced electronic flightcontrol systems (EFCS), which
incorporate flight-envelope protection
(limiting) designed to prevent the pilot
from inadvertently or intentionally
exceeding any number of flightenvelope parameters. Depending on a
particular EFCS design, these limiting
features may or may not be active in all
normal and alternate flight-control
modes, and may or may not be capable
of being overridden by the pilot.
The FAA currently applies 14 CFR
25.143 to airplanes incorporating EFCS.
The purpose of § 25.143 is to verify that
operational maneuvers conducted
within the operational envelope can be
accomplished smoothly with average
piloting skill, and without encountering
a stall warning or other characteristics
that might interfere with normal
maneuvering, or without exceeding
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
68944
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
structural limits. The airplane response
to control input should be predictable to
the pilot. However, § 25.143 does not
adequately ensure that airplanes
incorporating EFCS with flight-envelope
protections will have a level of safety
equivalent to that of existing standards.
Envelope-protection functions are
intended to reduce the likelihood of
excursions, either commanded or
uncommanded, to unintended or
potentially hazardous airplane operating
states. As a consequence of preventing
excursions, these functions can also
restrict aircraft maneuverability, and
may introduce non-traditional behavior.
The proposed special conditions will
ensure that flight-envelope protection
functions support safe operation, and do
not interfere with required maneuvering
in normal and emergency operations,
and in forseeable atmospheric
conditions.
The FAA previously issued separate
special conditions for general limiting,
normal load-factor limiting, high-speed
limiting, and pitch and roll limiting for
airplanes incorporating flight-envelope
protection features. However, the FAA
tasked the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) in April
2014 (79 FR 20295) to develop
recommended standards for fly-by-wire
flight controls for general flightenvelope protection (limiting) similar to
those provided for conventional control
functions in 14 CFR 25.143. The ARAC
recommended,1 among other things,
performance-based requirements that
would encompass general limiting,
normal load-factor limiting, high-speed
limiting, and pitch and roll limiting
which the FAA previously issued as
separate special conditions. These
proposed special conditions are based
on that ARAC recommendation.
These proposed special conditions
provide the same level of safety as the
prescriptive, design-specific special
conditions the FAA has issued in the
past for general limiting, normal loadfactor limiting, high-speed limiting, and
pitch and roll limiting, thus the FAA
need not issue separate special
conditions to address each of these
areas.
These proposed special conditions are
in addition to the requirements of
§ 25.143. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
1 FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee,
FTHWG Topic 1 Envelope Protection,
Recommendation Report–Rev. A, March, 2017,
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/
rulemaking/committees/documents/media/09%20%20FTHWG_Final_Report_Phase_2_RevA__Apr_
2017.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed
special conditions apply to Airbus
Model A321neo XLR airplanes. Should
Airbus apply later for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
series of airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus
Model A321neo XLR airplanes
equipped with EFCS.
In addition to § 25.143, the following
requirements apply:
(a) Envelope protection functions
must not unduly limit the maneuvering
capability of the airplane, nor interfere
with its ability to perform maneuvers
required for normal and emergency
operations.
(b) Onset characteristics of each flightenvelope protection function must be
appropriate to the phase of flight and
type of maneuver, and must not conflict
with the ability of the pilot to
satisfactorily control the airplane flight
path, speed, and attitude.
(c) Excursions of a limited flight
parameter beyond its nominal designlimit value due to dynamic
maneuvering, airframe and system
tolerances, and non-steady atmospheric
conditions must not result in unsafe
flight characteristics or conditions.
(d) Operation of flight-envelope
protection functions must not adversely
affect aircraft control during expected
levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor
impede the application of recovery
procedures in case of wind shear.
(e) Simultaneous action of flightenvelope protection functions must not
result in adverse coupling or adverse
priority.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(f) In case of abnormal attitude or
excursion of flight parameters outside
the protected boundaries, operation of
flight-envelope protection functions
must not hinder airplane recovery.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
November 8, 2022.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Innovation Policy
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–24772 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Parts 259, 260, 399
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2022–0089]
RIN 2105–AF04
Airline Ticket Refunds and Consumer
Protections
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation (DOT or
the Department).
ACTION: Extension of comment period on
proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Transportation (Department or DOT) is
extending through December 16, 2022,
the period for interested persons to
submit comments to its proposed rule
on Airline Ticket Refunds and
Consumer Protections.
DATES: Comments should be filed by
December 16, 2022. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable. Petitions for a hearing
pursuant to 14 CFR 399.75(b)(1) must
also be filed by December 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2022–0089 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2022–0089 or the Regulatory
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68942-68944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24772]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2022-0349; Notice No. 25-22-05-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplane; Flight-
Envelope Protection Functions--General
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the the Airbus
Model A321neo XLR airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport-category
airplanes. This design feature is an electronic flight-control system
that provides flight-envelope protections. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain
[[Page 68943]]
adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These
proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before January 3, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2022-0349 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as
described in the following paragraph, and other information as
described in title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the
FAA will post all comments received without change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special conditions.
Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to these special conditions, it is
important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.''
The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the
FOIA, and the indicated comments will not be placed in the public
docket of these special conditions. Send submissions containing CBI to
Troy Brown, Performance and Environment Section, AIR-625, Technical
Innovation Policy Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 1801 S. Airport
Rd., Wichita, KS 67209-2190; telephone and fax 405-666-1050; email
[email protected]. Comments the FAA receives, which are not
specifically designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket for
these special conditions.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy Brown, Performance and
Environment Section, AIR-625, Technical Innovation Policy Branch,
Policy and Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S. Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209-2190;
telephone and fax 405-666-1050; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these special conditions based on the
comments received.
Background
On September 16, 2019, Airbus applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. A28NM to include the new Model A321neo XLR airplanes,
which include the Model A321-271NY and A321-253NY airplanes. These
airplanes are twin-engine, transport-category airplanes with seating
for 244 passengers and a maximum takeoff weight of 222,000 pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Airbus must show that the
Model A321neo XLR airplanes meet the applicable provisions of the
regulations listed in Type Certificate No. A28NM, or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except
for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature:
An electronic flight-control system that provides flight envelope
protections.
Discussion
Many new transport-category airplanes use advanced electronic
flight-control systems (EFCS), which incorporate flight-envelope
protection (limiting) designed to prevent the pilot from inadvertently
or intentionally exceeding any number of flight-envelope parameters.
Depending on a particular EFCS design, these limiting features may or
may not be active in all normal and alternate flight-control modes, and
may or may not be capable of being overridden by the pilot.
The FAA currently applies 14 CFR 25.143 to airplanes incorporating
EFCS. The purpose of Sec. 25.143 is to verify that operational
maneuvers conducted within the operational envelope can be accomplished
smoothly with average piloting skill, and without encountering a stall
warning or other characteristics that might interfere with normal
maneuvering, or without exceeding
[[Page 68944]]
structural limits. The airplane response to control input should be
predictable to the pilot. However, Sec. 25.143 does not adequately
ensure that airplanes incorporating EFCS with flight-envelope
protections will have a level of safety equivalent to that of existing
standards.
Envelope-protection functions are intended to reduce the likelihood
of excursions, either commanded or uncommanded, to unintended or
potentially hazardous airplane operating states. As a consequence of
preventing excursions, these functions can also restrict aircraft
maneuverability, and may introduce non-traditional behavior. The
proposed special conditions will ensure that flight-envelope protection
functions support safe operation, and do not interfere with required
maneuvering in normal and emergency operations, and in forseeable
atmospheric conditions.
The FAA previously issued separate special conditions for general
limiting, normal load-factor limiting, high-speed limiting, and pitch
and roll limiting for airplanes incorporating flight-envelope
protection features. However, the FAA tasked the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) in April 2014 (79 FR 20295) to develop
recommended standards for fly-by-wire flight controls for general
flight-envelope protection (limiting) similar to those provided for
conventional control functions in 14 CFR 25.143. The ARAC
recommended,\1\ among other things, performance-based requirements that
would encompass general limiting, normal load-factor limiting, high-
speed limiting, and pitch and roll limiting which the FAA previously
issued as separate special conditions. These proposed special
conditions are based on that ARAC recommendation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, FTHWG Topic 1
Envelope Protection, Recommendation Report-Rev. A, March, 2017,
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/09%20-%20FTHWG_Final_Report_Phase_2_RevA__Apr_2017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These proposed special conditions provide the same level of safety
as the prescriptive, design-specific special conditions the FAA has
issued in the past for general limiting, normal load-factor limiting,
high-speed limiting, and pitch and roll limiting, thus the FAA need not
issue separate special conditions to address each of these areas.
These proposed special conditions are in addition to the
requirements of Sec. 25.143. These proposed special conditions contain
the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these proposed special conditions apply to
Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702,
44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes equipped with EFCS.
In addition to Sec. 25.143, the following requirements apply:
(a) Envelope protection functions must not unduly limit the
maneuvering capability of the airplane, nor interfere with its ability
to perform maneuvers required for normal and emergency operations.
(b) Onset characteristics of each flight-envelope protection
function must be appropriate to the phase of flight and type of
maneuver, and must not conflict with the ability of the pilot to
satisfactorily control the airplane flight path, speed, and attitude.
(c) Excursions of a limited flight parameter beyond its nominal
design-limit value due to dynamic maneuvering, airframe and system
tolerances, and non-steady atmospheric conditions must not result in
unsafe flight characteristics or conditions.
(d) Operation of flight-envelope protection functions must not
adversely affect aircraft control during expected levels of atmospheric
disturbances, nor impede the application of recovery procedures in case
of wind shear.
(e) Simultaneous action of flight-envelope protection functions
must not result in adverse coupling or adverse priority.
(f) In case of abnormal attitude or excursion of flight parameters
outside the protected boundaries, operation of flight-envelope
protection functions must not hinder airplane recovery.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 8, 2022.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Innovation Policy Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-24772 Filed 11-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P