Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update; Phase II, 68946-68958 [2022-24678]
Download as PDF
68946
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
II. Does this action apply to me?
III. Scope of This Action
IV. Background
V. Proposals for Clarity
VI. 2019 Phase I FOIA Regulations
VII. General Processing Changes
VIII. Environmental Justice Expedited
Processing Criteria
IX. Fee-Related Changes
X. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 2
[OGC–2022–0885; FRL 5630–02–OGC]
RIN 2025–AA38
Freedom of Information Act
Regulations Update; Phase II
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or agency) proposes
revisions to the agency’s regulations
under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA or Act). This action supports the
agency’s mission by updating the
process by which the public may access
information about EPA actions and
activities.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before December 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. OGC–2022–
0885, by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov/ (our
preferred method). Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center,
Office of General Counsel Docket, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA
Docket Center, WJC West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket
Center’s hours of operations are 8:30
a.m.–4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except Federal Holidays).
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received may be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher T. Creech, Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, (2310A), Washington, DC 20460;
telephone, 202–564–4286; email,
creech.christopher@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
DATES:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
I. Public Participation
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. OGC–2022–0885, at
https://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or the other methods
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from the docket. The
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit to
EPA’s docket at https://
www.regulations.gov any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), Proprietary
Business Information (PBI), or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). Please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets for additional
submission methods; the full EPA
public comment policy; information
about CBI, PBI, or multimedia
submissions; and general guidance on
making effective comments.
II. Does this action apply to me?
This discussion is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. This discussion
includes the types of entities that the
EPA is now aware could potentially be
regulated by this action. Other types of
entities not included could also be
regulated. To determine whether your
entity is regulated by this action, you
should carefully examine the
applicability criteria found in 40 CFR
part 2. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
III. Scope of This Action
This action proposes changes to EPA’s
FOIA regulations at 40 CFR part 2. The
proposed changes would alter the
process by which individuals and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities request records from EPA under
the Act. EPA proposes changes to clarify
certain provisions and align with the
FOIA and with EPA and governmentwide policy.
In the 2019 ‘‘Freedom of Information
Act Regulations Update,’’ 84 FR 30028,
July 26, 2019 (Phase I Rule), EPA stated
its intention to propose a second
rulemaking phase to make discretionary
and modernizing changes. Consistent
with that statement, EPA is seeking
public comment on the changes
proposed in this document.
IV. Background
This action is the second phase in a
two-phase process to update the
agency’s FOIA regulations. On July 26,
2019, EPA issued the Phase I Rule to
‘‘bring EPA’s regulations into
compliance with nondiscretionary
provisions of the amended statute and
reflect changes in the agency’s
organization, procedure, or practice.’’ 84
FR 30028.
V. Proposals for Clarity
A. Clarifying Reasonably Described
Requests
EPA proposes to modify existing
section 2.102(c) and move it to section
2.102(b), first, to define more clearly
what it means for a FOIA request to
reasonably describe the records sought
and, second, to clarify how EPA would
treat a FOIA request that does not
reasonably describe the records sought.
For the latter, this includes providing a
clear timeline during which a requester
may modify a submission that does not
reasonably describe the records sought.
First, EPA proposes replacing ‘‘A
request should reasonably describe the
records the requester seeks in a way that
will permit EPA employees to identify
and locate them’’ with ‘‘Requesters
should reasonably describe the records
sought in sufficient detail to enable
agency personnel to locate them with a
reasonable amount of effort’’ to more
clearly define a request that is
reasonably described. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(3)(A) requires agencies to
respond to ‘‘any request for records
which (i) reasonably describes such
records.’’ The D.C. Circuit has
recognized that a FOIA request
reasonably describes the records sought
‘‘if it enabled a professional employee of
the agency who was familiar with the
subject area of the request to locate the
record with a reasonable amount of
effort.’’ Truitt v. Department of State,
897 F.2d 540, 545 n.36 (D.C. Cir. 1990),
quoting H.R. Rep. No. 93–876, 93d
Cong., 2d Sess. 5–6 (1974).
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Incorporating this definition, which is
used in legislative history and
supported in caselaw, would provide
clarity to FOIA requesters about how
EPA reviews FOIA requests and applies
the FOIA’s requirements. EPA does not
intend that this proposal would affect
the EPA’s existing processes or alter the
FOIA’s requirements.
Request for Comment 1: EPA seeks
comment on whether the addition to
2.102(c) provides sufficient clarity.
Second, EPA proposes 20 calendar
days as the time in section 2.102(c) a
requester would be given to respond to
EPA’s notice that the requester has not
reasonably described the records sought.
The existing regulations state that EPA
will afford a requester with an
opportunity to modify the request if
EPA determines that the submission did
not reasonably describe the records
sought. However, the existing
regulations do not specify how long a
requester may take to modify their
request before EPA closes the request.
See 40 CFR 2.102(c) (‘‘A request should
reasonably describe the records the
requester seeks in a way that will permit
EPA employees to identify and locate
them.’’). The agency believes that this
change would provide requesters with
additional guidance during this process,
facilitate cooperation between the EPA
and the requester, and clarify EPA’s
process for reviewing FOIA requests.
Based on EPA’s experience, the
proposed 20 calendar days timeline
would be sufficient for requesters to
review and modify their requests as
appropriate. Although not required by
the FOIA, EPA’s regulations allow
requesters an opportunity to modify a
request that does not reasonably
describe the records sought. EPA further
notes that a requester may resubmit a
new request reasonably describing the
records sought, even after EPA closes a
request upon the aforementioned 20-day
deadline expiring.
Request for Comment 2: EPA seeks
comments on providing a 20 calendar
day timeline for a requester to modify
their request after EPA has provided
notice that EPA has determined that
their request does not reasonably
describe the records sought.
B. Readability and Useful Information
EPA also proposes and seeks
comment on several provisions that EPA
believes would enhance the readability,
clarity, and usability of EPA’s FOIA
regulations.
First, EPA proposes reorganizing, but
not making substantive changes to, 40
CFR 2.100(a) by moving to separate
paragraphs the sentences describing
other regulations relevant to the release
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
of information. Those sentences relate to
the access to confidential business
information and requests made under
the Privacy Act of 1974. Both sentences
are purely informational. EPA believes
this change would improve readability
by separately listing information that is
useful but unrelated to each other. This
proposal would not change EPA’s
processing of records under the FOIA.
Second, EPA proposes to create a new
paragraph (f) in section 2.100 to direct
the public to the agency’s website
(epa.gov/foia) for records made publicly
available in compliance with 5 U.S.C.
522(a)(2)(D)(ii)(II). This change would
inform the public where they may
access publicly available information.
EPA notes that this change would not
alter the agency’s practices or
responsibilities under the FOIA.
Third, EPA proposes to consolidate
the provisions in EPA’s FOIA
regulations that discuss the timing of
EPA’s response to FOIA requests to
simplify and accurately represent EPA’s
obligations under the FOIA. This change
would combine into section 2.104(a)
existing sections 2.101(c) and 2.102(a),
and EPA proposes to directly
incorporate into 2.104(a), the FOIA’s
language on timing of response from 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)(i). EPA believes that
allowing the statutory language to speak
for itself is the clearest statement of
EPA’s obligations and clarifies
ambiguities in the regulatory text. EPA
also proposes to highlight in the
regulatory text that EPA will work with
requesters to come to an agreement
regarding alternative timeframes for
processing the request when EPA
provides notice pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(i) and (ii).
In addition, EPA proposes to add to
section 2.104(a)(2) that requests
submitted after 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
would be considered received on the
next business day. Existing section
2.101(d) says that ‘‘Requesters
submitting requests electronically must
do so before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time for
the agency to consider the request as
received on that date.’’ EPA would add
on to this existing sentence, explaining
how EPA would treat a request a request
submitted at or after 5:00 p.m. EPA is
not seeking feedback and does not
propose to make changes to the existing
language regarding requests and appeals
received before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
This addition is intended to clarify the
existing regulatory language and
provide additional transparency to the
public. Parallel to this proposal, EPA
proposes modifying section 2.108(b) to
state that appeals submitted after 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time would be considered
received on the next business day.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68947
Request for Comment 3: EPA seeks
comment on whether the proposed
reorganization, informational addition,
and consolidation is clear.
C. Consistency With Government-Wide
Policy
EPA proposes three changes that are
intended to more closely align with the
Department of Justice’s Template for
Agency FOIA Regulations. See
Department of Justice, Template for
Agency FOIA Regulations at sections
VIII and IX, https://www.justice.gov/oip/
template-agency-foia-regulations (last
updated February 22, 2017). These
proposed changes are found at sections
2.106, 2.108(d)(3), and 2.108(e)(1),
which discuss the preservation of
records, handling appeals after FOIA
litigation, and the contents of adverse
administrative appeals decisions. EPA
does not intend that these proposals
would make any substantive changes to
EPA’s practices or the regulatory
requirements in those provisions. These
proposed changes are intended to reflect
existing best practices and ensure clarity
of EPA’s processes.
EPA proposes correcting 40 CFR
2.107(b), which discusses how
requesters make fee payments. The
existing regulations state that checks or
money orders should be made out to the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The updated language would say that
requesters should make checks and
money orders out to the Treasury of the
United States. This proposal would only
affect where FOIA requesters make
certain FOIA fee payments and is purely
administrative in nature.
Finally, EPA also proposes revising
all references to EPA’s electronic
submission website, FOIAonline
(www.FOIAonline.gov), to a more
general location, EPA’s FOIA website
(www.epa.gov/foia). EPA proposes this
change to ensure that the location of the
platform to receive FOIA submissions
remains clear even after the
decommissioning of FOIA Online.
Instead, EPA proposes to use its FOIA
web page (epa.gov/foia) to identify for
requesters the new electronic FOIA
request submission platform, providing
a prominent and easily accessible link.
Please note also that the sunsetting of
FOIA online is not a part of this
rulemaking, and EPA is neither
proposing nor asking for comments on
that process here.
Request for Comment 4: EPA seeks
comment on whether the changes
detailed above improve the readability,
usefulness, and clarity of those
provisions.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
68948
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
VI. 2019 Phase I FOIA Regulations
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics
in Washington (CREW) and Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD) filed lawsuits
against EPA challenging aspects of the
2019 FOIA Regulations Update. Citizens
for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington v. EPA, 1:19–cv–02181. As
part of the agreement to settle those
claims, EPA agreed to seek comment on
40 CFR 2.103(b) and on whether to
reinstate methods of submissions
previously listed at 40 CFR 2.101(a).
A. Description of Determinations Under
the FOIA
EPA proposes and seeks comment on
removing the clause in 40 CFR 2.103(b)
describing the term ‘‘determinations
required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A).’’
Existing section 2.103(b) states, ‘‘[Listed
positions within the EPA] are
authorized to make determinations
required by 5 U.S.C. 522(a)(6)(A),
including to issue final determinations
whether to release or withhold a record
or a portion of a record on the basis of
responsiveness or under one or more of
the exemptions under the FOIA, and to
issue ‘no records’ responses.’’ There has
been some confusion regarding the
meaning of this clause, which has led to
inaccurate understandings of EPA’s
authority regarding FOIA determination.
EPA believes that removing this clause
would ensure clarity and allow the Act
to speak for itself.
Request for Comment 5: EPA seeks
comment on whether to remove the
explanatory clause in 40 CFR 2.103(b)
that begins with ‘‘including’’ and ends
with ‘‘responses.’’
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
B. Previous Methods of Submission
EPA seeks comment on whether to
reinstate any methods of FOIA request
submission that the EPA removed
through the issuance of the 2019 FOIA
Regulations Update. See 2019 FOIA
Regulations Update, 84 FR 30028 at
30030. EPA does not propose changes to
40 CFR 2.101(a).
The 2019 FOIA rule removed
submission methods previously allowed
via U.S. mail and email to the Regions,
and email requests to EPA headquarters.
Id. The 2019 FOIA Rule removed those
methods of submission to ‘‘reduce the
number of misdirected requests’’
because the ‘‘2007 Amendments also
decreased the amount of time an agency
may take to route a request to the
appropriate component . . . .’’ 2019
FOIA Regulations Update, 84 FR 30028
at 30030. The 2019 FOIA Rule
designated the National FOIA Office as
the location to which mailed FOIA
requests must be submitted; the Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
did not centralize FOIA processing in
that office.
Since the 2019 FOIA Regulations
Update was implemented, EPA’s
National FOIA Office has efficiently
implemented centralized intake of FOIA
requests providing enhanced
transparency and clarity to requesters.
As a result, EPA more fully realized its
goal to provide first-rate service and
communication to the FOIA requester
community.
Request for Comment 6: EPA requests
comment on whether EPA should
reinstate any of the methods of
submission, located at 40 CFR 2.101(a),
that were removed by the 2019 FOIA
Rule.
‘‘Each agency may promulgate
regulations . . . providing for the
aggregation of certain requests . . . if
the agency reasonably believes that such
requests actually constitute a single
request[.]’’ Mirroring the Act, EPA
would only aggregate requests that are
submitted by the same requester or
group of requesters and the requests
involve related manners. EPA is not
proposing changes to the existing
provision at 40 CFR 2.107(i), which
allows for aggregation for fee-avoidance
reasons.
Request for Comment 8: EPA requests
comment on whether to add the request
aggregation provision allowed for in 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(iv).
VII. General Processing Changes
C. Assigning Tracking Numbers
EPA proposes a provision stating that
EPA may assign multiple tracking
numbers to a request with distinct parts
that will be processed by separate
regions or program offices. EPA would
notify the requester of the separate
tracking numbers for the distinct parts
of the request, which thereafter would
be processed and responded to
separately.
This provision would reduce
unnecessary coordination on unrelated
records among different EPA offices and
regions when processing a single
request with multiple unrelated parts.
This includes communicating with the
requester to clarify the request, seeking
fee assurance, conducting the records
search and review, and issuing interim
and final responses.
A. Ordinary Search Cut-Off Date
EPA proposes to change the
‘‘ordinary’’ search cut-off date identified
in section 2.103(a) from the date ‘‘the
request was received’’ to ‘‘the Agency
begins its search for responsive
records.’’ A ‘‘cut-off’’ date delineates the
scope of a FOIA request by treating
records created after that date as not
responsive to the FOIA request. See
Bonner v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 928 F.2d
1148, 1152 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (observing
that ‘‘[t]o require an agency to adjust or
modify its FOIA responses based on
post-response occurrences could create
an endless cycle of judicially mandated
reprocessing’’). Under EPA’s FOIA
regulations, the ordinary cut-off date
identified in 40 CFR 2.103(a) informs
requesters of the cut-off date that the
agency most typically uses. ‘‘The
Agency will inform the requester if any
other date is used.’’ 40 C.F.R 2.103(a).
Nothing in the existing or proposed
FOIA regulations precludes the agency
from evaluating the FOIA request for the
most appropriate cut-off date or a FOIA
requester from identifying a date range
for the records sought.
Request for Comment 7: EPA seeks
comment on whether to change the
ordinary search cut-off date from the
date the FOIA request is received to the
date the agency begins the search for
responsive records.
B. Aggregation of Requests
EPA proposes adding a provision
stating that EPA may aggregate FOIA
requests when EPA reasonably believes
that multiple requests—submitted either
by a requester or by a group of
requesters acting in concert—constitute
a single request that would otherwise
give rise to unusual circumstances and
the requests involve related matters.
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(iv) provides
authority for such a provision, stating
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
D. Revised Methods of Submission of
Administrative Appeals
EPA proposes modifying the methods
of submission of FOIA appeals, located
in the existing regulations at 40 CFR
2.104(j) and 2.108(a) in the proposed
regulations, to match the methods of
submission of FOIA requests. This
change would streamline EPA’s receipt
and handling of FOIA appeals.
VIII. Environmental Justice Expedited
Processing Criteria
EPA proposes a provision to allow
requesters to seek expedited processing
of their request if the records sought
pertain to an environmental justicerelated need and will be used to inform
an affected community. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(E)(i) provides that EPA may
issue regulations ‘‘providing for
expedited processing of requests for
records (I) in cases in which the person
requesting the records demonstrates a
compelling need; and (II) in other cases
determined by the agency.’’ (emphasis
added). The Act defines what
constitutes a ‘‘compelling need,’’ id. at
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
section 552(a)(6)(E)(v), and does not
limit the ‘‘other cases’’ that they agency
may determine merit expedited
processing.
EPA has recognized environmental
justice concerns for many decades and
has defined Environmental justice (EJ)
as the fair treatment and meaningful
involvement of all people regardless of
race, color, national origin, or income
with respect to the development,
implementation and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. EPA recognizes the role timely
access to information contained in EPA
records may play in the opportunity for
meaningful involvement by
communities that potentially experience
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects.
This provision would be in addition
to and not modify the expedited
processing for requests demonstrating a
‘‘compelling need,’’ which the FOIA
provides at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(i)(I).
This proposed new expedited
processing category would target an
understood need for timely access for
communities with environmental justice
concerns to information, which may not
be met by the statutorily provided
‘‘compelling need’’ categories.
Request for Comment 9: EPA seeks
comment on whether to include a new
expedited processing category for
requests seeking environmental justicerelated information and whether there is
an unmet need for prompt access to
information in communities affected by
environment justice concerns. For
example, EPA requests comment on the
frequency and types of contact that
occur with members of communities
affected by environmental justice
concerns and how information for
which there is a pressing need is
typically utilized by members of those
communities.
EPA proposes narrowly tailored
criteria to achieve the intended goal. To
qualify for expedited processing under
this proposed provision, a requester
would need to show: (1) a pressing
need; (2) to inform a community
potentially experiencing
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects;
(3) about those effects; (4) affecting, or
potentially affecting, that community.
Request for Comment 10: EPA seeks
comment on whether EPA should
further define or use another definition
or term to more accurately identify
communities for which there is a need
for more rapid access to EPA records
containing information regarding
environmental harms affecting those
communities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
In evaluating requests for expedited
processing under this expedited
processing category, EPA would
consider the requester’s intent to
effectively convey the information to
members of the community that is
potentially experiencing
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects.
EPA would not require that a requester
be a member of the affected community,
although membership in the community
may be relevant to the requester’s intent
and ability to convey the information to
the community. EPA would consider
the requester’s ability to effectively
convey the information received about
the community back to the community
within a timeframe sufficient to meet
the identified pressing need. EPA
proposes that a requester would not
have to be a formal member of the news
media to qualify for this expedited
processing category.
EPA further proposes that the need to
inform the affected community would
not include a request where the
disclosure is primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
EPA intends that this criterion would
help tailor the provision by focusing on
requests for which the purpose of the
request is to share information with
members of the affected community.
Request for Comment 11: EPA seeks
feedback on whether the proposed
criteria properly target EPA’s stated
intent.
To implement this provision, EPA
could use EJScreen’s ‘‘Supplemental
Indexes’’ tool to assess a requester’s
claim that a particular community may
be experiencing disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects. EJScreen is an
environmental justice mapping and
screening tool that provides EPA with a
nationally consistent dataset and
approach for combining environmental
and demographic indicators. EJScreen
provides a way to display this
information and includes a method for
combining environmental and
demographic indicators into EJ indexes.
EJScreen’s ‘‘Supplemental Indexes’’ are
twelve indexes calculated by combing
twelve environmental indicators and a
five-factor demographic index. The five
socioeconomic indicators considered
are percent low-income, percent limited
English-speaking, percent less than high
school education, percent unemployed,
and low life expectancy. EJScreen may
also be a valuable tool for requesters to
assess whether the community about
which they are seeking records may be
affected by disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects. More information regarding
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68949
EJScreen is available here: https://
www.epa.gov/ejscreen/environmentaljustice-indexes-ejscreen.
Request for Comment 12: EPA seeks
comment on whether EPA should
require requesters to identify in a
particular manner the relevant
community with environmental justice
concerns. EPA also seeks comment on
methods and approaches to evaluating
whether a particular community is
potentially experiencing
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects.
EPA also proposes that if the agency
grants a request for expedited
processing under the environmental
justice expedited processing category,
the agency will also grant the requester
a fee waiver for the request under 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii), and EPA’s FOIA
regulations, at section 2.107(l) of the
existing regulations and section 2.107(n)
of the proposed regulations. EPA
believes that meeting the standard and
factors provided in the proposed new
expedited processing criteria would
result in the requester having met the
burden set forth by the FOIA to qualify
for a waiver of fees. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(iii) (‘‘[D]isclosure of the
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.’’).
EPA also recognizes the potential
efficiencies for both requesters and the
agency in this approach.
Request for Comment 13: EPA seeks
comment on whether EPA should
provide fee waivers to requests that
qualify for the proposed environmental
justice expedited processing provision.
IX. Fee-Related Changes
A. Fee Rates Update
EPA proposes modernizing its fee
rates by establishing fee rates tied to the
U.S. Office of Personnel and
Management’s General Schedule (GS)
scale. EPA proposes two rates for agency
personnel time spent processing FOIA
requests, with one rate for grades GS–12
and below and a second rate for those
with grades GS–13 and above, both
adjusted for the value of benefits,
expressed in quarter-hour rates, and
rounded to the nearest $1 increment. As
of the date of signature, the proposed
rates would be calculated as such:
Employees GS–12 and Below
Average Quarter-Hour Rate for GS–9
to 12 ($8.83) + Benefits (16% or
$1.41) = $10.24 = (rounded to the
nearest $1 increment) $10.00/
quarter hour
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
68950
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Employees GS–13 and Above
Average Quarter-Hour Rate for GS–13
to 15 ($15.24) + Benefits (16% or
$2.43) = $17.67 = (rounded to the
nearest $1 increment) $18.00/
quarter-hour
The FOIA directs agencies to issue
FOIA regulations ‘‘specifying the
schedule of fees applicable to the
processing of requests[.]’’ 5 U.S.C.
522(a)(4)(A)(i). The Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) Fee
Guidelines provide that agencies may
charge for the direct costs of
expenditures that the agency incurs,
including staff time spent on search,
duplication, and review of records. See
OMB, Uniform Freedom of Information
Act Fee Schedule Guidelines, 52 FR
10012, 10017, March 27, 1987
(hereinafter OMB Fee Guidelines). The
OMB Fee Guidelines also provide that
staff time can be quantified by using the
salary of the employee plus 16% to
cover benefits. Id.
Raising the fee rates and tying them
to the GS-scale will more accurately
reflect the EPA’s costs and align with
the OMB Fee Guidelines. Id. at 10018
(‘‘Agencies should charge fees that
recoup the full allowable direct costs
they incur.’’). Fee rates in existing EPA’s
regulations include three categories:
clerical ($4/quarter-hour); professional
($7/quarter-hour); and managerial
($10.25/quarter-hour). See 40 CFR
2.107(c)(2)(i)(B). EPA’s existing fee rates
have not been updated since at least
2002. Consequently, the existing rates
no longer recoup the cost of processing
a FOIA request and the clerical rate is
obsolete as it is rarely used given the
substantial transition to digital records
and electronic processing and response
mechanisms.
EPA proposes that its fee rates would
automatically update with OPM’s
publication in the Federal Register of
new GS-scale rates. See OPM, January
2022 Pay Schedules, 87 FR 26376, May
4, 2022. This practice is consistent with
the OMB Fee Schedule and the practices
of other Federal agencies. EPA
anticipates that this approach would be
a predictable and efficient approach to
establishing a fee rate. Alternatively,
EPA could set a stagnant rate that would
not automatically update with changes
to the GS-scale. EPA expects that the
stagnant rate alternative would be more
burdensome than the proposed
approach because EPA would need to
update its FOIA regulations regularly to
ensure that it is charging FOIA fees to
recoup its costs. EPA recognizes that the
stagnant rate approach may provide
more clarity for requesters by not
requiring a calculation of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
adjustment. To mitigate this, if it
finalizes the automatically adjusting rate
as proposed, EPA intends to publish the
current fee rate on its FOIA website
(epa.gov/foia) and will update that
publication as the GS-scale changes.
Request for Comment 14: EPA
requests comment on whether to
modernize the fee schedule to two
categories based on average GS levels.
$252 = (rounded to the nearest $5
increment) $250
Request for Comment 15: EPA
requests comment on whether to
increase the minimum fee threshold to
an amount calculated by formula,
which, as of the publication of this
rulemaking is $250.
B. Minimum Fee Threshold
EPA proposes removing the automatic
agreement to pay fees provision from
the EPA’s FOIA regulations. Submission
of a request is considered an agreement
to pay fees up to $25 in the existing EPA
FOIA regulations. Because of the
proposal to raise the minimum fee
threshold to an amount calculated by
formula, which, as of the publication of
this rulemaking is $250, EPA would also
need to adjust the existing automatic
agreement to pay fees threshold.
EPA proposes to remove the
automatic agreement to pay fees
provision and instead seek assurance of
payments from requesters if the actual
or anticipated fees for the request equal
or exceed the minimum fee threshold.
EPA notes that the FOIA does not
require agency FOIA regulations to
include an automatic agreement to pay
fees provision.
Alternatively, EPA could consider the
submission of a FOIA request an
automatic agreement to pay fees up to
some amount above $250. EPA
recognizes that an automatic agreement
to pay $250 or some higher amount may
be a deterrent to submitting a FOIA
request for some members of the public,
whether or not they are ultimately
charged fees, and that a better practice
will be for EPA to notify requesters
when EPA’s chargeable costs are
anticipated to go above the minimum
fee threshold and to seek an assurance
of payment as described below.
Request for Comment 16: EPA
requests comment on whether to remove
the automatic agreement to pay fees
provision from the FOIA regulations.
EPA also requests comment on whether
to increase the automatic agreement to
pay fees commensurate with the
minimum fee threshold.
EPA proposes increasing the
minimum fee threshold to an amount
calculated by formula, which, as of the
publication of this rulemaking is $250.
The formula would enable the
minimum fee threshold to reflect EPA’s
costs as they increase in the futures.
FOIA prohibits collection of fees if
processing the payment is costlier than
the fee itself. See 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(iv)(I). Existing EPA
regulations, section 2.107(d)(4), have a
minimum fee threshold of $14, meaning
that EPA will charge FOIA fees if the
total chargeable fees sum to more than
$14. However, EPA calculates that the
existing cost to process a payment is
around $90. Thus, raising the minimum
fee threshold will ensure that EPA is
only charging for fees that are more than
EPA’s cost to process the fees.
Raising the minimum fee threshold to
$250 would reduce the burden and tasks
associated with processing fees and
seeking assurance of payment and
advanced payment. Alternatively, EPA
could set a minimum fee threshold to an
amount calculated by formula, which,
as of the publication of this rulemaking
is $90, the estimated cost of processing
payment.
To achieve an automatically adjusting
minimum fee threshold, which is
currently calculated as $250, EPA
proposes to utilize a formula that
applies a fourteen (14) times multiplier
to the rate set in 40 CFR
2.107(e)(2)(ii)(B). This ties the minimum
fee threshold to the fee rate, which is
itself based on the GS-scale. OPM
adjusts the GS-scale annually. This
proposal would allow for a minimum
fee threshold that is sustainable and
remains effective as fee rates and
personnel costs increase, without the
need to publish updates to the
regulations. This number will be on the
EPA website and updated as there are
increases to the GS-scale. For more
information about how the fee rate is
calculated see section VII.A. of this
preamble. As of the date of signature,
the proposed minimum fee threshold
would be calculated as follows:
Fee rate listed in 40 CFR
2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) ($18.00) × 14 =
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Automatic Agreement To Pay Fees
D. Assurance of Payment Threshold
EPA proposes raising the assurance of
payment threshold to an amount
calculated by formula, which, as of the
publication of this rulemaking is $250.
When EPA estimates fees or
accumulates actual fees equaling or
exceeding the assurance of payment
threshold, EPA seeks from a requester
an assurance that the requester will pay
the fees associated with the FOIA
request.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Existing EPA regulations require
assurance of payment when the
estimated or actual fees are at or above
$25. As noted above, EPA also proposes
to raise the minimum fee threshold to
$250. As such, keeping an assurance of
payment threshold of $25 would be
inconsistent with that proposal.
EPA proposes tying the assurance of
payment threshold to the minimum fee
threshold. EPA would directly
referencing the minimum fee threshold
citation to accomplish this. The intent
of this approach would be to ensure
that, as explained above, the assurance
of payment threshold rises
commensurate with the minimum fee
threshold and the fee rate. This proposal
could reduce confusion for the requester
and set clear steps and guideposts for
assessing fees.
Request for Comment 17: EPA
requests comment on whether to set the
assurance of payment threshold to the
same amount as the minimum fee
threshold.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Advanced Payment Threshold
EPA proposes increasing the
advanced payment threshold to an
amount that would currently calculate
to $425 and proposes a formula for
calculating the advance payment
threshold that will be self-escalating as
EPA’s costs increase in future years.
When EPA estimates fees or
accumulates actual fees equaling or
exceeding the advanced payment
threshold, EPA may seek advanced
payment from a requester of the
estimated or actual fees associated with
the FOIA request.
The FOIA provides that agencies can
establish guidelines for when and
describes when agencies can require
advanced payment of fees from
requesters. See 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(v)(c). The FOIA specifies
two situations in which an agency may
require advanced payment: ‘‘the
requester has previously failed to pay
fees in a timely fashion, or the agency
has determined that the fee will exceed
$250.’’ Id. The advanced payment
threshold, as described here, references
that second criteria, the estimated or
actual fee. EPA is not proposing
modification to the advanced payment
requirements for requesters who have
failed to pay fees in a timely fashion.
Similar to the minimum fee threshold,
EPA would tie the advanced payment
threshold to the fee rate and round that
amount to the nearest $5 increment.
This means that the advance payment
threshold would be calculated based on
the fee rate, which is itself based on the
GS-scale that is adjusted annually.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
EPA chose a twenty-five (25) times
multiplier to achieve an initial
advanced payment threshold of $450.
$450 represents a proportional increase
with the fee rate. The fee rate, as
explained above, reflects agency
personnel costs. The proposed advanced
payment threshold thus represents a
level at which EPA believes it would
begin to see administrative burdens in
processing a request that continues to
accumulate uncollected fees.
As of the date of signature, the
proposed advanced payment threshold
would be calculated as follows:
Fee rate listed in proposed 40 CFR
2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) ($18.00) × 25 =
$450
Request for Comment 18: EPA
requests comment on whether to
increase the minimum fee threshold to
an amount calculated by formula,
which, as of the publication of this
rulemaking is $450, and automatically
adjusting with the proposed fee rate.
EPA proposes to reorganize the 40
CFR 2.107. EPA does not intend that
this reorganization make any
substantive modifications to the
regulatory or statutory requirements.
The intent of these changes is to
consolidate duplicative information and
place related provisions in close
proximity to improve readability and
provide clarity. For example, EPA’s
proposal would move information
regarding the type of fees, the types of
requests, what fees the agency may
assess for types of requests, and how
EPA calculates those fees into two
subsections: (1) types of requests and
types of fees that may be assessed to
those requests and (2) types of fees and
how EPA calculates those fees.
Request for Comment 19: EPA
requests comment on reorganizing and
removing duplicative information from
EPA’s FOIA regulations.
F. Estimated or Actual Fee Assessment
EPA proposes adding language stating
that EPA’s reassessment of actual or
estimated fees may result in EPA reseeking assurance of payment or
advanced payment. Adding this
provision would provide clarity and
inform the public regarding EPA’s
practices. The intent of this proposal is
to describe a scenario where EPA has
previously informed the requester of the
amount of actual or estimated fees and,
after further processing, EPA has
updated its actual or estimated fee
assessment.
EPA notes that providing a requester
with the most up-to-date fee
calculations leads to transparency for
the requester. Advancement through
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68951
processing steps may result in new or
revised circumstances. For example,
EPA may perform a search that returns
more or less records than initially
estimated. If this is the case, EPA would
inform the requester of the changed
circumstances and latest information
and accordingly, if appropriate, seek
additional fee guarantees from the
requester.
Request for Comment 20: EPA
requests comment on whether to state
that a reassessment of actual or
estimated fees may trigger a need for
advanced payment or assurance of
payment.
G. Failure To Pay Charged Fees
EPA proposes editing for clarity and
revising the provisions applicable to
delinquent requesters. Existing EPA
regulations discuss failure to pay fees in
several separate locations. EPA would
consolidate these provisions into 40
CFR 2.107(k). EPA would also add a
sentence stating that the agency may
share information regarding delinquent
requesters with other Federal agencies.
Request for Comment 21: EPA
requests comments on editing for clarity
and revising the provisions applicable
to delinquent requesters.
H. Requests for Waiver and Reduction of
Fees
EPA proposes to incorporate a
requirement that a requester must
submit a statement, certified to be true
and correct to the best of the requester’s
knowledge and belief, explaining in
detail the basis for the fee waiver
request. Existing EPA regulations
require that requests for expedited
processing must be made through a
statement certified to be true and
correct. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(vi).
Aligning these requirements could
streamline the practice and ensure the
information a requester submits to EPA
presents an accurate representation.
Request for Comment 22: EPA
requests comments on incorporating a
requirement that a requester must
submit a statement, certified to be true
and correct to the best of the requester’s
knowledge and believe, explaining in
detail the basis for the fee waiver
request.
X. Statutory and Executive Orders
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
68952
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. Submission of a FOIA request
is a voluntary action that any member
of the public, including small entities,
can elect to do and the rule relates to the
procedures for submitting and
processing a FOIA request for EPA
records.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandates as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. It will not have substantial
direct effects on Indian Tribal
governments or on the relationship
between the national government and
the Indian Tribal governments. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
Freedom of information, Government
employees.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 2, is proposed to be
amended as follows.
PART 2—PUBLIC INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a, 553; 28
U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Subpart A—Procedures for Disclosure of
Records Under the Freedom of Information
Act
Sec.
2.100 General provisions.
2.101 Where to file requests for records.
2.102 Procedures for making requests.
2.103 Responsibility for responding to
requests.
2.104 Responses to requests.
2.105 [Reserved]
2.106 Preservation of records.
2.107 Fees.
2.108 Administrative appeals.
2.109 Other rights and services.
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations (people of color) and lowincome populations.
The EPA believes that this type of
action does not concern human health
or environmental conditions and
therefore cannot be evaluated with
respect to potentially disproportionate
and adverse effects on people of color,
low-income populations and/or
Indigenous peoples. Although this
action does not concern human health
or environmental conditions, the EPA
identifies and addresses environmental
justice concerns by proposing a
provision to allow requesters to seek
expedited processing of their request if
the records sought pertain to an
environmental justice-related need and
will be used to inform an affected
community. See section VII of this
preamble.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 2
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Subpart A of Part 2 is revised to
read as follows:
■
Subpart A—Procedures for Disclosure
of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
§ 2.100
General provisions.
(a) General. This Subpart contains the
rules that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) follows in
processing requests for records under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely
provided to the public as part of a
regular EPA activity may be provided to
the public without following this
Subpart.
(b) Other Regulatory Provisions. (1) 40
CFR Subpart B contains requirements
pertaining to the confidentiality of
business information.
(2) 40 CFR part 16 contains
requirements pertaining to Privacy Act
requests.
(c) Statutory-based fee schedule
programs. EPA will inform the requester
of the steps necessary to obtain records
from agencies operating statutory-based
fee schedule programs, such as, but not
limited to, the Government Printing
Office or the National Technical
Information Service.
(d) National FOIA Office. The Chief
FOIA Officer designates the office that
performs the duties of the National
FOIA Office. The National FOIA Office
reports to the Chief FOIA Officer.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(e) FOIA Public Liaison. The Chief
FOIA Officer designates the FOIA
Public Liaisons. The FOIA Public
Liaisons report to the Chief FOIA
Officer. A FOIA Public Liaison is
responsible for assisting in reducing
delays, increasing transparency and
understanding of the status of requests,
and assisting in the resolution of
disputes. A FOIA Public Liaison is an
official to whom a requester can raise
concerns about the service the requester
received from the FOIA Requester
Service Center. The public can find
more information about the FOIA Public
Liaisons at EPA’s website.
(f) Other record availability. Records
required by FOIA to be made available
for public inspection and copying are
accessible through EPA’s FOIA website,
https://www.epa.gov/foia. EPA also
proactively discloses records and
information through the Agency’s
website, www.epa.gov.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 2.101
Where to file requests for records.
(a) Requesters must submit all
requests for records from EPA under the
FOIA in writing and by one of the
following methods:
(1) EPA’s FOIA submission website,
linked to at www.epa.gov/foia;
(2) An electronic government
submission website established
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(m), such as
FOIA.gov;
(3) U.S. Mail sent to the following
address: National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW (2310A),
Washington, DC 20460; or
(4) Overnight delivery service to
National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania NW, Room 7309C,
Washington, DC 20460.
(b) EPA will not treat a request
submitted by any method other than
those listed in § 2.101(a) as a FOIA
request, and the Agency will not reroute such a request.
(c) The requester or requester
organization must include the full name
of their point of contact and their
mailing address for EPA to process the
request. For all requests, requesters
should provide an email address and
daytime telephone number whenever
possible. For requests submitted
through EPA’s FOIA submission website
or as provided by an electronic
government submission website
established pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(m),
requesters must include an email
address. For requests submitted through
U.S. Mail, the requester must mark both
the request letter and envelope
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Request.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
(d) EPA provides access to all records
that the FOIA requires an agency to
make regularly available for public
inspection and copying. Each office is
responsible for determining which of
the records it generates are required to
be made publicly available and for
providing access by the public to them.
The Agency will also maintain and
make available for public inspection
and copying a current subject matter
index of such records and provide a
copy or a link to the respective website
for Headquarters or the Regions. Each
index will be updated regularly, at least
quarterly, with respect to newlyincluded records.
(e) All records created by EPA on or
after November 1, 1996, which the FOIA
requires an agency to make regularly
available for public inspection and
copying, will be made available
electronically through EPA’s website,
located at https://www.epa.gov, or, upon
request, through other electronic means.
EPA will also include on its website the
current subject matter index of all such
records.
§ 2.102
Procedures for making requests.
(a) EPA employees may attempt in
good faith to comply with oral requests
for inspection or disclosure of EPA
records that are publicly available under
§ 2.201(a) and (b), but such requests are
not subject to the FOIA or this Part.
(b)(1) Requesters should reasonably
describe the records sought in sufficient
detail to enable agency personnel to
locate them with a reasonable amount of
effort.
(2) If EPA determines that the request
does not reasonably describe the
requested records, EPA will tell the
requester either what additional
information the requester needs to
provide or why the request is otherwise
insufficient. EPA will also give the
requester an opportunity to discuss and
modify the request to meet the
requirements of § 2.102(b)(1). If the
requester fails to modify the request to
reasonably describe the requested
records sought within 20 calendar days,
EPA will not process the submission
and close the request. If the requester
does modify the submission to
reasonably describe the requested
records, EPA will consider the request
received as of the date the modification
is received by EPA.
(3) Whenever possible, a request
should include specific information
about each record sought, such as the
date, title or name, author, recipient,
and subject matter. If known, the
requester should include any file
designations or descriptions for the
records that the requester wants. The
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68953
more specific the requester is about the
records or type of records that the
requester wants, the more likely EPA
will be able to identify and locate
records responsive to the request.
§ 2.103 Responsibility for responding to
requests.
(a) In general. Upon receipt of a FOIA
request under § 2.101(a), the National
FOIA Office will assign the request to an
appropriate office within the Agency for
processing. To determine which records
are within the scope of a request, an
office will ordinarily include only those
records in the Agency’s possession as of
the date that the Agency begins its
search. The Agency will inform the
requester if any other date is used.
(b) Authority to issue final
determinations. The Administrator,
Deputy Administrators, Assistant
Administrators, Deputy Assistant
Administrators, Regional
Administrators, Deputy Regional
Administrators, General Counsel,
Deputy General Counsels, Regional
Counsels, Deputy Regional Counsels,
and Inspector General or those
individuals’ delegates, are authorized to
make determinations required by 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A).
(c) Authority to grant or deny fee
waivers or requests for expedited
processing. EPA’s Chief FOIA Officer or
EPA’s Chief FOIA Officer’s delegates are
authorized to grant or deny requests for
fee waivers or requests for expedited
processing.
(d) Consultations and referrals. When
a request to EPA seeks records in EPA’s
possession that originated with another
Federal agency, the EPA office assigned
to process the request shall either:
(1) In coordination with the National
FOIA Office, consult with the Federal
agency where the record or portion
thereof originated and then respond to
the request, or
(2) With the concurrence of the
National FOIA Office, refer any record
to the Federal agency where the record
or portion thereof originated. The
National FOIA Office will notify the
requester whenever all or any part of the
responsibility for responding to a
request has been referred to another
agency.
(e) Law enforcement information.
Whenever a requester makes a request
for a record containing information that
relates to an investigation of a possible
violation of law and the investigation
originated with another agency, the
assigned office, with the concurrence of
the National FOIA Office, will refer the
record to that other agency or consult
with that other agency prior to making
any release determination.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
68954
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(f) Assigning tracking numbers. EPA
may assign multiple tracking numbers
to a FOIA request that contains
unrelated parts that will be processed
separately by multiple regions or
headquarters program offices.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 2.104
Responses to requests.
(a) Timing of response. (1) Consistent
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A) and upon any
request for records made pursuant to
this subpart, EPA shall determine
within 20 working days after receipt of
any such request whether to comply
with such request and shall
immediately notify the person according
to this section.
(2) A requester submitting a request
electronically must do so before 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time for the Agency to
consider the request as received on that
date, and a request submitted
electronically at or after 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time will be considered
received by the National FOIA Office on
the next business day.
(3) The timeframe for response may be
extended if unusual circumstances exist
per paragraph (f) of this section,
including when EPA asserts unusual
circumstances and arranges an
alternative timeframe with the
requester, or exceptional circumstances
exist per paragraph (g) of this section.
The timeframe for response may be
tolled per paragraph (e) of this section.
(b) Agency failure to respond. If EPA
fails to respond to the request within the
statutory time-period, or any authorized
extension of time, the requester may
seek judicial review to obtain the
records without first making an
administrative appeal.
(c) Acknowledgment of request. On
receipt of a request, the National FOIA
Office ordinarily will send a written
acknowledgment advising the requester
of the date the Agency received the
request and of the processing number
assigned to the request for future
reference.
(d) Multitrack processing. The Agency
uses three or more processing tracks by
distinguishing between simple and
complex requests based on the amount
of work, time needed to process the
request, or both, including limits based
on the number of pages involved. The
Agency will advise the requester of the
processing track in which the Agency
placed the request and the limits of the
different processing tracks. The Agency
may place the request in a slower track
while providing the requester with the
opportunity to limit the scope of the
request to qualify for faster processing
within the specified limits of a faster
track. If the Agency places the request
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
in a slower track, the Agency will
contact the requester.
(e) Tolling the request. EPA shall not
toll the processing time-period except:
(1) The Agency may toll the
processing time-period one time while
seeking clarification from the requester;
or
(2) The Agency may toll the
processing time-period as many times as
necessary to resolve fee issues.
(f) Unusual circumstances. (1) When
the Agency cannot meet statutory time
limits for processing a request because
of ‘‘unusual circumstances,’’ as defined
in the FOIA, and the time limits are
extended on that basis, the Agency will
notify the requester in writing, as soon
as practicable, of the unusual
circumstances and of the date by which
processing of the request should be
completed.
(2) If the 20 working-day period is
extended, EPA will give the requester an
opportunity to limit the scope of the
request, modify the request, or agree to
an alternative time-period for
processing, as described by the FOIA.
(3) EPA will provide contact
information for its FOIA Public Liaison
to assist in the resolution of any
disputes between the requester and the
Agency, and the Agency will notify the
requester of their right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Office of
Government Information Services
within the National Archives and
Records Administration.
(g) Expedited processing. (1) EPA will
take requests or appeals out of order and
give expedited treatment whenever EPA
determines that such requests or appeals
involve a compelling need, an
environmental justice-related need, or
both.
(i) A compelling need is defined as
either:
(A) Circumstances in which the lack
of expedited treatment could reasonably
be expected to pose an imminent threat
to the life or physical safety of an
individual; or
(B) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged Federal
government activity, if the information
is requested by a person primarily
engaged in disseminating information to
the public.
(ii) For purposes of this provision, an
environmental justice-related need
means a pressing need to inform a
community that is potentially
experiencing disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects.
(A) The Agency will consider whether
the requested records relate to actual or
alleged Federal government activity,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
including environmental information or
data.
(B) The Agency will consider the
requester’s ability and intention to
effectively convey the information to
members of the affected community,
taking into account, for example, the
requester’s relationship to the
community or its members, expertise in
the subject matter, or other relevant
knowledge and experiences.
(C) A pressing need to inform an
affected community does not include
requests where the disclosure is
primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.
(D) If the Agency grants a request for
expedited processing under paragraph
(g)(1)(ii) of this section, the Agency will
also waive fees established under
§ 2.107(f) for the request.
(2) Requesters must make a written
request for expedited processing at the
time of the initial request for records or
at the time of appeal.
(3) If the requester seeks expedited
processing, the requester must submit a
statement, certified to be true and
correct to the best of the requester’s
knowledge and belief, explaining in
detail the basis for the request.
(i) For example, if the requester fits
within the category described in
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B) of this section and
is not a full-time member of the news
media, the requester must establish that
they are a person whose primary
professional activity or occupation is
information dissemination, although it
need not be the requester’s sole
occupation.
(ii) If the requester fits within the
category described in paragraph
(g)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the requester
must also establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the
request, beyond the public’s right to
know about government activity
generally.
(4) Within 10 calendar days from the
date of the request for expedited
processing, the Chief FOIA Officer, or
the Chief FOIA Officer’s delegates, will
decide whether to grant the request and
will notify the requester of the decision.
If the Agency grants the request for
expedited processing, the Agency will
give the request priority and will
process the request as soon as
practicable. If the Agency denies the
request for expedited processing, the
Agency will act on any appeal of that
decision expeditiously.
(h) Grants of requests. Once the
Agency determines to grant a request in
whole or in part, it will release the
records or parts of records to the
requester and notify the requester of any
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
applicable fee charged under § 2.107.
The office will annotate records released
in part, whenever technically feasible,
with the applicable FOIA exemption or
exemptions at that part of the record
from which the exempt information was
deleted.
(i) Adverse determinations of
requests. When the Agency makes an
adverse determination, the Agency will
notify the requester of that
determination in writing. Adverse
determinations include:
(1) A decision that the requested
record is exempt from disclosure, in
whole or in part;
(2) A decision that the information
requested is not a record subject to the
FOIA;
(3) A decision that the requested
record does not exist or cannot be
located;
(4) A decision that the requested
record is not readily reproducible in the
form or format sought by the requester;
(5) A determination on any disputed
fee matter, including a denial of a
request for a fee waiver; or
(6) A denial of a request for expedited
processing.
(j) Content of final determination
letter. The appropriate official will issue
the final determination letter in
accordance with § 2.103(b) and will
include:
(1) The name and title or position of
the person responsible for the
determination;
(2) A brief statement of the reason or
reasons for the denial, including an
identification of records being withheld
(either individually or, if a large number
of similar records are being denied,
described by category) and any FOIA
exemption applied by the office in
denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of
records or information withheld, in
number of pages or in some other
reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided
if the volume is otherwise indicated
through annotated deletions on records
disclosed in part, or if providing an
estimate would harm an interest
protected by an applicable exemption;
(4) A statement that an adverse
determination may be appealed under
§ 2.108 and description of the
requirements for submitting an
administrative appeal; and
(5) A statement that the requester has
the right to seek dispute resolution
services from an EPA FOIA Public
Liaison or the Office of Government
Information Service.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
§ 2.105
[Reserved]
§ 2.106
Preservation of records.
The Agency will preserve all
correspondence pertaining to the FOIA
requests that it receives, as well as
copies of all requested records, until
disposition or destruction is authorized
pursuant to title 44 of the United States
Code or the National Archives and
Records Administration’s General
Records Schedule 4.2. Records shall not
be disposed of while they are the subject
of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit
under the FOIA.
§ 2.107
Fees.
(a) In general. The Agency will charge
for processing requests under the FOIA
in accordance with this section, except
where fees are limited under paragraph
(g) of this section or where a waiver or
reduction of fees is granted under
paragraph (n) of this section.
(b) How to pay fees. Requesters must
pay fees electronically at https://
www.pay.gov/ by check or money order
made payable to the Treasury of the
United States.
(c) Contractor rates. When any search,
review, or duplication task is performed
by a contractor, EPA will charge for staff
time at the contractor’s actual pay rate,
but not exceeding the rates set under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(d) Rounding staff time. Billable staff
time is calculated by rounding to the
nearest quarter-hour.
(e) Types of requests for fee purposes.
For purposes of this section, the five
types of request categories are defined
in paragraphs (e)(1) through (5) of this
section. These request categories will be
charged for the types of fees as noted,
subject to the restrictions in paragraph
(g) of this section and unless a fee
waiver has been granted under
paragraph (n) of this section. Paragraph
(f) of this section defines and explains
how the Agency calculates each type of
fee.
(1) Commercial-use Request. (i)
Commercial use request means a request
from or on behalf of a person who seeks
information for a use or purpose that
furthers the requester’s commercial,
trade, or profit interests, which can
include furthering those interests
through litigation. The Agency will
determine, whenever reasonably
possible, the use to which a requester
will put the requested records. When it
appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either
because of the nature of the request
itself or because the Agency has
reasonable cause to doubt a requester’s
stated use, the Agency will provide the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68955
requester a reasonable opportunity to
submit further clarification.
(ii) For a commercial-use request, the
Agency will charge the requester for
search, review, and duplication.
(2) Educational institution request. (i)
Educational institution means a
preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education, that operates a
program of scholarly research. To be in
this category, a requester must show
that the request is authorized by, and is
made under the auspices of, a qualifying
institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use but are
sought to further scholarly research.
(ii) For an educational institution
request, the Agency will charge the
requester for duplication, except that
the Agency will furnish the first 100
pages of duplication at no charge.
(3) Noncommercial scientific
institution request. (i) Noncommercial
scientific institution means an
institution not operated on a
‘‘commercial’’ basis, as defined in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section, and that
is operated solely for conducting
scientific research that is not intended
to promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a
requester must show that a qualifying
institution authorizes the request, that
the requester makes the request under
the auspices of the qualifying
institution, and that the requester does
not seek the records for a commercial
use but to further scientific research.
(ii) For a noncommercial scientific
institution request, the Agency will
charge the requester for duplication,
except that the Agency will furnish the
first 100 pages of duplication at no
charge.
(4) Representative of the news media
requests. (i) Representative of the news
media has the meaning provided at 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(ii).
(ii) For representative of the news
media requests, the Agency will charge
a requester for duplication, except that
the Agency will furnish the first 100
pages of duplication at no charge.
(5) Other requests. (i) Other requesters
are requesters that are not commercialuse requesters, educational institutions,
noncommercial scientific institutions,
or representatives of the news media.
(ii) The Agency will charge other
requesters for search and duplication,
except that the Agency will furnish
without charge the first two hours of
search time and the first 100 pages of
duplication.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
68956
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(f) Types of fees. Paragraphs (f)(1)
through (4) of this section are
definitions of the types of fees and
explanations of how the Agency
calculates each type of fee.
(1) Direct costs. Direct costs means
those expenses that the Agency actually
incurs in searching for and duplicating
(and, in the case of commercial use
requests, reviewing) records to respond
to a FOIA request. Direct costs include,
for example, the salary of the employee
performing the work and the cost of
operating duplication equipment. Not
included in direct costs are overhead
expenses such as the costs of space and
heating or lighting of the facility in
which the records are kept.
(2) Search. (i) Search means the
process of looking for and retrieving
records or information responsive to a
request. It includes page-by-page or lineby-line identification of information
within records and includes reasonable
efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in electronic
form or format. Offices will ensure that
searches are done in the most efficient
and least expensive manner reasonably
possible. For example, offices will not
search line-by-line where duplicating an
entire document would be quicker and
less expensive. The Agency will charge
for time spent searching even if no
responsive records are found or if the
records are located but are determined
to be exempt from disclosure.
(ii) Search fees will equal the direct
costs of search. Personnel will bill their
time at the following rates using the
current Office of Personnel Management
General Schedule (GS) pay table for
Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC–
MD–VA–WV–PA. The current
calculations of these rates may be found
at www.epa.gov/foia.
(A) GS–12 level or below (or
equivalent pay scale): The average of
GS–9 to GS–12 (Step 5), plus 16 percent,
rounded to the nearest $1 increment per
quarter hour.
(B) GS–13 level or above (or
equivalent pay scale): The average of
GS–13 to GS–15 (Step 5), plus 16
percent, rounded to the nearest $1
increment per quarter hour.
(iii) For requests that require the
retrieval of records stored by an agency
at a Federal Records Center operated by
NARA, additional costs will be charged
in accordance with the Transactional
Billing Rate Schedule established by
NARA.
(3) Review. (i) Review means the
examination of a record located in
response to a request to determine
whether any portion of it is exempt from
disclosure. It also includes processing
any record for disclosure (for example,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
doing all that is necessary to redact it
and prepare it for disclosure). Review
costs are recoverable even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time
includes time spent considering any
formal objection to disclosure made by
a business submitter requesting
confidential treatment but does not
include time spent resolving general
legal or policy issues regarding the
application of exemptions.
(ii) The Agency will charge review
fees only for the initial record review
(that is, the review done when an office
is deciding whether an exemption
applies to a particular record or portion
of a record at the initial request level).
The Agency will not charge for review
at the administrative appeal level for an
exemption already applied. However,
the Agency may again review records or
portions of records withheld under an
exemption that the Agency
subsequently determines not to apply to
determine whether any other exemption
not previously considered applies; the
Agency will charge costs of that review
when a change of circumstances makes
it necessary. The Agency will charge
review fees at the same rates as those
charged for a search under paragraph
(f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(4) Duplication. (i) Duplication means
the making of a copy of a record, or of
the information contained in it,
necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Copies can take the form of paper,
microform, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records (for example,
magnetic tape, disk, or compact disk),
among others. The Agency will honor a
requester’s specified preference of form
or format of disclosure if the record is
readily reproducible with reasonable
efforts in the requested form or format.
(ii) For either a photocopy or a
computer-generated printout of a record
(no more than one copy of which need
be supplied), the fee will be fifteen (15)
cents per page. For electronic forms of
duplication, other than a computergenerated printout, offices will charge
the direct costs of that duplication. Such
direct costs will include the costs of the
requested electronic medium on which
the copy is to be made and the actual
operator time and computer resource
usage required to produce the copy, to
the extent they can be determined. The
Agency will charge operator time at the
same rates as those charged for search
under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(g) Limitations on charging fees.
(1) The Agency will charge no fee
when a total fee calculated under
paragraph (c) of this section is less than
fourteen times the rate in paragraph
(f)(2)(ii)(B) of this section rounded to the
nearest $5.00 increment for any request.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The current calculation of this threshold
may be found at www.epa.gov/foia.
(2) The restrictions in paragraphs
(e)(1)(ii), (2)(ii), (3)(ii), (4)(ii), and (5)(ii)
and minimum fee threshold in (g)(1) of
this section work together. This means
that for requesters other than those
seeking records for a commercial use,
the Agency will charge no fee unless the
cost of search more than two hours plus
the cost of duplication in excess of 100
pages totals more than fourteen times
the rate in paragraph 2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) of
this section rounded to the nearest $5.00
increment. The current calculation of
this threshold may be found at
www.epa.gov/foia.
(3) If EPA fails to comply with the
FOIA’s time limits for responding to a
request, EPA will not charge search fees,
or, in the instance of requesters
described in paragraphs (e)(1) through
(5) of this section, duplication fees,
except as follows:
(i) If EPA determined that unusual
circumstances as defined by the FOIA
apply and the Agency provided timely
written notice to the requester in
accordance with the FOIA, a failure to
comply with the time limit shall be
excused for an additional 10 working
days;
(ii) If EPA determined that unusual
circumstances as defined by the FOIA
apply and more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request, EPA
may charge search fees, or, in the case
of requesters described in paragraphs
(e)(1) through (5) of this section, may
charge duplication fees, if the following
steps are taken: EPA must have
provided timely written notice of
unusual circumstances to the requester
in accordance with the FOIA and the
EPA must have discussed with the
requester by written mail, email, or
telephone (or made not less than three
good-faith attempts to do so) how the
requester could effectively limit the
scope of the request in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii), which includes
notification to the requester of the
availability of the FOIA Public Liaison
and the right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Office of Government
Information Services. If this exception is
satisfied, EPA may charge all applicable
fees incurred in the processing of the
request; or
(iii) If a court determines that
exceptional circumstances exist, as
defined by the FOIA, a failure to comply
with the time limits shall be excused for
the length of time provided by the court
order.
(h) Assurance of payment and
advanced payment of fees. (1) If EPA
determines that the actual or estimated
fees exceed the amount in paragraph
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(g)(1) of this section, the Agency will
notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount, toll the processing
clock, and will do no further work on
the request until the requester agrees in
writing to pay the anticipated total fee.
(2) If EPA determines that the actual
or estimated fees exceed twenty-five
times the amount in paragraph
(f)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, the Agency
will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount, and may toll the
processing clock and do no further work
on the request until the requester pays
the estimated or actual fee. The current
calculation of this amount may be found
at www.epa.gov/foia.
(3) After providing the requester with
estimated fee amounts, EPA will
provide the requester with an
opportunity to discuss with the Agency
how to modify the request to meet the
requester’s needs at a lower cost.
(4) EPA calculates the estimated or
actual fee cumulatively for multicomponent requests. If only a part of the
fee can be estimated readily, the Agency
will advise the requester that the
estimated fee may be only a portion of
the total fee.
(5) If, after the requester provided an
assurance of payment or paid an
initially estimated or actual amount of
fees, the Agency increases the estimated
or actual amount of fees, the Agency
will notify the requester, stop further
processing of the request, and toll any
deadline for responding to the request.
Once the requester provides assurance
of payment or pays the fees, the time to
respond to the request will resume from
where it was at the date of the tolling
notification.
(i) Charges for other services.
Although not required to provide
special services, if EPA chooses to do so
as a matter of administrative discretion,
the direct costs of providing the service
will be charged to the requester.
Examples of such services include
certifying that records are true copies,
sending records by other than EPA’s
electronic FOIA management system or
U.S. Mail, or providing multiple copies
of the same document.
(j) Charging interest. EPA may charge
interest on any unpaid bill starting on
the 31st day following the date of billing
the requester. The Agency will assess
interest charges at the rate provided in
31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the
date of the billing until the Agency
receives payment. EPA will follow the
provisions of the Debt Collection Act of
1982 (Pub. L. 97–365), as amended, and
its administrative procedures, including
the use of consumer reporting agencies,
collection agencies, and offset. The
Agency will assess no penalty against
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
FOIA requesters for exercising their
statutory right to ask the Agency to
waive or reduce a fee or to dispute a
billing. If a fee is in dispute, the Agency
will suspend penalties upon
notification.
(k) Delinquent requesters. (1) If a
requester fails to pay all fees charged to
the requester under the FOIA by EPA or
any other Federal agency within 60
calendar days of the date the fees were
billed, the Agency will treat the
requester as delinquent. The Agency
may share information regarding
delinquent requesters with other
Federal agencies.
(2) Before EPA continues processing a
pending FOIA request or begins
processing any new FOIA requests from
a delinquent requester, the delinquent
requester must pay the full amount due,
plus any applicable interest, on that
prior request and make an advance
payment of the full amount of any
anticipated fee.
(3) When the Agency requires
payment under paragraph (h)(2) of this
section, the request will not be
considered received until the required
payment is made. If the requester does
not pay the outstanding balance and the
advance payment within 30 calendar
days after the date of EPA’s fee
determination, the request will be
closed.
(l) Aggregating requests. If a requester
or a group of requesters acting in
concert submit two or more requests
that involve related matters and
paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), or both of this
section, apply then the Agency may
aggregate those requests and charge fees
accordingly, Multiple FOIA requests
involving unrelated matters shall not be
aggregated. An aggregated group of
FOIA requests will be treated as a single
FOIA request under this subpart,
including evaluation of whether
unusual circumstances exist.
(1) The Agency reasonably believes
that if the requests constituted a single
request, such a request would result in
unusual circumstances pursuant to
§ 2.104(f); or
(2) The Agency reasonably believes
that the requester or requesters acting
together are attempting to divide a
request into a series of requests for the
purpose of avoiding fees. The Agency
may presume that such requests have
been submitted to avoid fees if
submitted within a 30-day period. When
requests are submitted by a period
greater than 30 days, the Agency will
aggregate them only if there exists a
solid basis for determining that
aggregation is warranted under all the
circumstances involved.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68957
(m) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any other statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. When records responsive to
requests are maintained for distribution
by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, EPA will
inform requesters of the steps for
obtaining records from those sources so
that they may do so most economically.
(n) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) A
request for a waiver or reduction of
FOIA fees must be made at the time of
the initial submission of a FOIA request.
An untimely request for a waiver or
reduction of fees will be denied. If the
requester seeks a waiver or reduction of
fees, the requester must submit a
statement, certified to be true and
correct to the best of the requester’s
knowledge and belief, explaining in
detail the basis for making the request
for such a fee waiver or reduction.
(2) Requests for the waiver or
reduction of fees must address the
factors listed in paragraphs (n)(4)
through (6) of this section, as far as they
apply to each request. EPA components
will exercise their discretion to consider
the cost-effectiveness of their
investment of administrative resources
in deciding whether to grant waivers or
reductions of fees and will consult the
appropriate EPA components as needed.
Requesters must submit requests for the
waiver or reduction of fees along with
the request.
(3) When only some of the requested
records satisfy the requirements for a
waiver of fees, the Agency will grant a
waiver for only those records.
(4) Records responsive to a request
will be furnished without charge or at
a charge reduced below that established
under paragraph (c) of this section when
the Agency determines, based on all
available information, that disclosure of
the requested information is in the
public interest because it is:
(i) Likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of the operations
or activities of the government, and
(ii) Is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester.
(5) To determine whether the request
meets the first fee waiver requirement,
the Agency will consider the following
factors:
(i) The subject of the request. Whether
the subject of the requested records
concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of
the government.’’ The subject of the
requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the Federal government, with a
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
68958
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 221 / Thursday, November 17, 2022 / Proposed Rules
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote.
(ii) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed. Whether
the disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’
to an understanding of government
operations or activities. The disclosable
portions of the requested records must
be meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities in
order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either a duplicative or
a substantially identical form, would
not be as likely to contribute to such
understanding when nothing new
would be added to the public’s
understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
public is likely to result from the
disclosure. Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to
‘‘public understanding.’’ The disclosure
must contribute to the understanding of
a reasonably broad audience of persons
interested in the subject, as opposed to
the individual understanding of the
requester. The Agency will consider a
requester’s expertise in the subject area
and ability and intention to effectively
convey information to the public. The
Agency presumes that a representative
of the news media will satisfy this
consideration.
(iv) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding.
Whether the disclosure is likely to
contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question, as compared
to the level of public understanding
existing prior to the disclosure, must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a
significant extent. The Agency will not
make value judgments about whether
information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government is ‘‘important’’ enough to be
made public.
(6) To determine whether the request
meets the second fee waiver
requirement, the Agency will consider
the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest. Whether the
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. The Agency will consider
any commercial interest of the requester
(with reference to the definition of
‘‘commercial use request’’ in paragraph
(e)(1) of this section), or of any person
on whose behalf the requester may be
acting, that would be furthered by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Nov 16, 2022
Jkt 259001
requested disclosure. The Agency will
give the requester an opportunity in the
administrative process to provide
explanatory information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure.
Whether any identified commercial
interest of the requester is sufficiently
large, in comparison with the public
interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.’’ A fee waiver or
reduction is justified where the public
interest standard is satisfied and that
public interest is greater in magnitude
than that of any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. The Agency
ordinarily will presume that when a
news media requester has satisfied the
public interest standard, the public
interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester.
The Agency will not presume that
disclosure to data brokers or others who
merely compile and market government
information for direct economic return
is to primarily serve the public interest.
§ 2.108
Administrative appeals.
(a) Appeals of adverse
determinations. To appeal an adverse
determination, a requester must submit
an appeal in writing within 90-calendar
days from the date of the letter
communicating the Agency’s adverse
determination, and by one of the
following methods:
(1) EPA’s FOIA submission website,
linked to at www.epa.gov/foia;
(2) U.S. Mail sent to the following
address: National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW (2310A),
Washington, DC 20460; or
(3) Overnight delivery service to
National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania NW, Room 7309C,
Washington, DC 20460.
(b) Requesters submitting appeals
electronically must do so before 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time for the Agency to
consider the appeal as received on that
date, and appeals submitted
electronically at or after 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time will be considered
received by the National FOIA Office on
the next business day.
(c) The appeal letter may include as
much or as little related information as
the requester wishes. The appeal letter
must clearly identify the office’s
determination that is being appealed
and the assigned request tracking
number. For quickest handling, the
requester must mark their appeal letter
and its envelope with ‘‘Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(d) Authority to make decision on
appeal. Unless the Administrator
directs otherwise, the General Counsel
or the General Counsel’s delegate will
act on behalf of the Administrator on all
appeals under this section, except that:
(1) The Counsel to the Inspector
General will act on any appeal where
the Inspector General or the Inspector
General’s delegate has made the final
adverse determination; however, if the
Counsel to the Inspector General has
signed the final adverse determination,
the General Counsel or the General
Counsel’s delegate will act on the
appeal;
(2) An adverse determination by the
Administrator on an initial request will
serve as the final action of the Agency;
and
(3) An appeal ordinarily will not be
adjudicated if the request becomes a
matter of FOIA litigation.
(e) Timing of decision on appeal. EPA
will make the decision on the appeal in
writing, normally within 20 working
days of its receipt by the National FOIA
Office.
(1) A decision affirming an adverse
determination in whole or in part will
contain a statement of the reason or
reasons for the decision, including any
FOIA exemption or exemptions applied,
inform the requester of dispute
resolution services offered by the Office
of Government Information Service of
the National Archives and Records
Administration, and inform the
requester of the FOIA provisions for
judicial review of the decision.
(2) If the Agency reverses or modifies
the adverse determination on appeal,
the Agency will attach the requested
information that the Agency determined
on appeal to be releasable, or the
Agency will return the request to the
appropriate office so that the office may
reprocess the request in accordance
with the appeal decision.
(f) When appeal is required. If the
requester wishes to seek judicial review
of any adverse determination, the
requester must first appeal that adverse
determination under this section, except
when EPA has not responded to the
request within the applicable timeperiod. In such cases, the requester may
seek judicial review without making an
administrative appeal.
§ 2.109
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this Subpart shall be
construed to entitle any person, as a
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
[FR Doc. 2022–24678 Filed 11–16–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 221 (Thursday, November 17, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68946-68958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24678]
[[Page 68946]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 2
[OGC-2022-0885; FRL 5630-02-OGC]
RIN 2025-AA38
Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update; Phase II
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or agency) proposes
revisions to the agency's regulations under the Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA or Act). This action supports the agency's mission by
updating the process by which the public may access information about
EPA actions and activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. OGC-2022-
0885, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, Office of General Counsel Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA Docket Center, WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
The Docket Center's hours of operations are 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except Federal Holidays).
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Participation''
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher T. Creech, Office of
General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, (2310A), Washington, DC 20460; telephone, 202-
564-4286; email, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation
II. Does this action apply to me?
III. Scope of This Action
IV. Background
V. Proposals for Clarity
VI. 2019 Phase I FOIA Regulations
VII. General Processing Changes
VIII. Environmental Justice Expedited Processing Criteria
IX. Fee-Related Changes
X. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
I. Public Participation
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. OGC-2022-0885, at
https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or the other
methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at
https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business
Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets for additional submission methods; the
full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI, PBI, or
multimedia submissions; and general guidance on making effective
comments.
II. Does this action apply to me?
This discussion is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated
by this action. This discussion includes the types of entities that the
EPA is now aware could potentially be regulated by this action. Other
types of entities not included could also be regulated. To determine
whether your entity is regulated by this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability criteria found in 40 CFR part 2. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
III. Scope of This Action
This action proposes changes to EPA's FOIA regulations at 40 CFR
part 2. The proposed changes would alter the process by which
individuals and entities request records from EPA under the Act. EPA
proposes changes to clarify certain provisions and align with the FOIA
and with EPA and government-wide policy.
In the 2019 ``Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update,'' 84
FR 30028, July 26, 2019 (Phase I Rule), EPA stated its intention to
propose a second rulemaking phase to make discretionary and modernizing
changes. Consistent with that statement, EPA is seeking public comment
on the changes proposed in this document.
IV. Background
This action is the second phase in a two-phase process to update
the agency's FOIA regulations. On July 26, 2019, EPA issued the Phase I
Rule to ``bring EPA's regulations into compliance with nondiscretionary
provisions of the amended statute and reflect changes in the agency's
organization, procedure, or practice.'' 84 FR 30028.
V. Proposals for Clarity
A. Clarifying Reasonably Described Requests
EPA proposes to modify existing section 2.102(c) and move it to
section 2.102(b), first, to define more clearly what it means for a
FOIA request to reasonably describe the records sought and, second, to
clarify how EPA would treat a FOIA request that does not reasonably
describe the records sought. For the latter, this includes providing a
clear timeline during which a requester may modify a submission that
does not reasonably describe the records sought.
First, EPA proposes replacing ``A request should reasonably
describe the records the requester seeks in a way that will permit EPA
employees to identify and locate them'' with ``Requesters should
reasonably describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable
agency personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort'' to
more clearly define a request that is reasonably described. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(3)(A) requires agencies to respond to ``any request for records
which (i) reasonably describes such records.'' The D.C. Circuit has
recognized that a FOIA request reasonably describes the records sought
``if it enabled a professional employee of the agency who was familiar
with the subject area of the request to locate the record with a
reasonable amount of effort.'' Truitt v. Department of State, 897 F.2d
540, 545 n.36 (D.C. Cir. 1990), quoting H.R. Rep. No. 93-876, 93d
Cong., 2d Sess. 5-6 (1974).
[[Page 68947]]
Incorporating this definition, which is used in legislative history
and supported in caselaw, would provide clarity to FOIA requesters
about how EPA reviews FOIA requests and applies the FOIA's
requirements. EPA does not intend that this proposal would affect the
EPA's existing processes or alter the FOIA's requirements.
Request for Comment 1: EPA seeks comment on whether the addition to
2.102(c) provides sufficient clarity.
Second, EPA proposes 20 calendar days as the time in section
2.102(c) a requester would be given to respond to EPA's notice that the
requester has not reasonably described the records sought. The existing
regulations state that EPA will afford a requester with an opportunity
to modify the request if EPA determines that the submission did not
reasonably describe the records sought. However, the existing
regulations do not specify how long a requester may take to modify
their request before EPA closes the request. See 40 CFR 2.102(c) (``A
request should reasonably describe the records the requester seeks in a
way that will permit EPA employees to identify and locate them.''). The
agency believes that this change would provide requesters with
additional guidance during this process, facilitate cooperation between
the EPA and the requester, and clarify EPA's process for reviewing FOIA
requests.
Based on EPA's experience, the proposed 20 calendar days timeline
would be sufficient for requesters to review and modify their requests
as appropriate. Although not required by the FOIA, EPA's regulations
allow requesters an opportunity to modify a request that does not
reasonably describe the records sought. EPA further notes that a
requester may resubmit a new request reasonably describing the records
sought, even after EPA closes a request upon the aforementioned 20-day
deadline expiring.
Request for Comment 2: EPA seeks comments on providing a 20
calendar day timeline for a requester to modify their request after EPA
has provided notice that EPA has determined that their request does not
reasonably describe the records sought.
B. Readability and Useful Information
EPA also proposes and seeks comment on several provisions that EPA
believes would enhance the readability, clarity, and usability of EPA's
FOIA regulations.
First, EPA proposes reorganizing, but not making substantive
changes to, 40 CFR 2.100(a) by moving to separate paragraphs the
sentences describing other regulations relevant to the release of
information. Those sentences relate to the access to confidential
business information and requests made under the Privacy Act of 1974.
Both sentences are purely informational. EPA believes this change would
improve readability by separately listing information that is useful
but unrelated to each other. This proposal would not change EPA's
processing of records under the FOIA.
Second, EPA proposes to create a new paragraph (f) in section 2.100
to direct the public to the agency's website (epa.gov/foia) for records
made publicly available in compliance with 5 U.S.C.
522(a)(2)(D)(ii)(II). This change would inform the public where they
may access publicly available information. EPA notes that this change
would not alter the agency's practices or responsibilities under the
FOIA.
Third, EPA proposes to consolidate the provisions in EPA's FOIA
regulations that discuss the timing of EPA's response to FOIA requests
to simplify and accurately represent EPA's obligations under the FOIA.
This change would combine into section 2.104(a) existing sections
2.101(c) and 2.102(a), and EPA proposes to directly incorporate into
2.104(a), the FOIA's language on timing of response from 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A)(i). EPA believes that allowing the statutory language to
speak for itself is the clearest statement of EPA's obligations and
clarifies ambiguities in the regulatory text. EPA also proposes to
highlight in the regulatory text that EPA will work with requesters to
come to an agreement regarding alternative timeframes for processing
the request when EPA provides notice pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(i) and (ii).
In addition, EPA proposes to add to section 2.104(a)(2) that
requests submitted after 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time would be considered
received on the next business day. Existing section 2.101(d) says that
``Requesters submitting requests electronically must do so before 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time for the agency to consider the request as received on
that date.'' EPA would add on to this existing sentence, explaining how
EPA would treat a request a request submitted at or after 5:00 p.m. EPA
is not seeking feedback and does not propose to make changes to the
existing language regarding requests and appeals received before 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time. This addition is intended to clarify the existing
regulatory language and provide additional transparency to the public.
Parallel to this proposal, EPA proposes modifying section 2.108(b) to
state that appeals submitted after 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time would be
considered received on the next business day.
Request for Comment 3: EPA seeks comment on whether the proposed
reorganization, informational addition, and consolidation is clear.
C. Consistency With Government-Wide Policy
EPA proposes three changes that are intended to more closely align
with the Department of Justice's Template for Agency FOIA Regulations.
See Department of Justice, Template for Agency FOIA Regulations at
sections VIII and IX, https://www.justice.gov/oip/template-agency-foia-regulations (last updated February 22, 2017). These proposed changes
are found at sections 2.106, 2.108(d)(3), and 2.108(e)(1), which
discuss the preservation of records, handling appeals after FOIA
litigation, and the contents of adverse administrative appeals
decisions. EPA does not intend that these proposals would make any
substantive changes to EPA's practices or the regulatory requirements
in those provisions. These proposed changes are intended to reflect
existing best practices and ensure clarity of EPA's processes.
EPA proposes correcting 40 CFR 2.107(b), which discusses how
requesters make fee payments. The existing regulations state that
checks or money orders should be made out to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. The updated language would say that requesters
should make checks and money orders out to the Treasury of the United
States. This proposal would only affect where FOIA requesters make
certain FOIA fee payments and is purely administrative in nature.
Finally, EPA also proposes revising all references to EPA's
electronic submission website, FOIAonline (www.FOIAonline.gov), to a
more general location, EPA's FOIA website (www.epa.gov/foia). EPA
proposes this change to ensure that the location of the platform to
receive FOIA submissions remains clear even after the decommissioning
of FOIA Online. Instead, EPA proposes to use its FOIA web page
(epa.gov/foia) to identify for requesters the new electronic FOIA
request submission platform, providing a prominent and easily
accessible link. Please note also that the sunsetting of FOIA online is
not a part of this rulemaking, and EPA is neither proposing nor asking
for comments on that process here.
Request for Comment 4: EPA seeks comment on whether the changes
detailed above improve the readability, usefulness, and clarity of
those provisions.
[[Page 68948]]
VI. 2019 Phase I FOIA Regulations
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) filed lawsuits against EPA
challenging aspects of the 2019 FOIA Regulations Update. Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. EPA, 1:19-cv-02181. As part
of the agreement to settle those claims, EPA agreed to seek comment on
40 CFR 2.103(b) and on whether to reinstate methods of submissions
previously listed at 40 CFR 2.101(a).
A. Description of Determinations Under the FOIA
EPA proposes and seeks comment on removing the clause in 40 CFR
2.103(b) describing the term ``determinations required by 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(A).'' Existing section 2.103(b) states, ``[Listed positions
within the EPA] are authorized to make determinations required by 5
U.S.C. 522(a)(6)(A), including to issue final determinations whether to
release or withhold a record or a portion of a record on the basis of
responsiveness or under one or more of the exemptions under the FOIA,
and to issue `no records' responses.'' There has been some confusion
regarding the meaning of this clause, which has led to inaccurate
understandings of EPA's authority regarding FOIA determination. EPA
believes that removing this clause would ensure clarity and allow the
Act to speak for itself.
Request for Comment 5: EPA seeks comment on whether to remove the
explanatory clause in 40 CFR 2.103(b) that begins with ``including''
and ends with ``responses.''
B. Previous Methods of Submission
EPA seeks comment on whether to reinstate any methods of FOIA
request submission that the EPA removed through the issuance of the
2019 FOIA Regulations Update. See 2019 FOIA Regulations Update, 84 FR
30028 at 30030. EPA does not propose changes to 40 CFR 2.101(a).
The 2019 FOIA rule removed submission methods previously allowed
via U.S. mail and email to the Regions, and email requests to EPA
headquarters. Id. The 2019 FOIA Rule removed those methods of
submission to ``reduce the number of misdirected requests'' because the
``2007 Amendments also decreased the amount of time an agency may take
to route a request to the appropriate component . . . .'' 2019 FOIA
Regulations Update, 84 FR 30028 at 30030. The 2019 FOIA Rule designated
the National FOIA Office as the location to which mailed FOIA requests
must be submitted; the Rule did not centralize FOIA processing in that
office.
Since the 2019 FOIA Regulations Update was implemented, EPA's
National FOIA Office has efficiently implemented centralized intake of
FOIA requests providing enhanced transparency and clarity to
requesters. As a result, EPA more fully realized its goal to provide
first-rate service and communication to the FOIA requester community.
Request for Comment 6: EPA requests comment on whether EPA should
reinstate any of the methods of submission, located at 40 CFR 2.101(a),
that were removed by the 2019 FOIA Rule.
VII. General Processing Changes
A. Ordinary Search Cut-Off Date
EPA proposes to change the ``ordinary'' search cut-off date
identified in section 2.103(a) from the date ``the request was
received'' to ``the Agency begins its search for responsive records.''
A ``cut-off'' date delineates the scope of a FOIA request by treating
records created after that date as not responsive to the FOIA request.
See Bonner v. U.S. Dep't of State, 928 F.2d 1148, 1152 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
(observing that ``[t]o require an agency to adjust or modify its FOIA
responses based on post-response occurrences could create an endless
cycle of judicially mandated reprocessing''). Under EPA's FOIA
regulations, the ordinary cut-off date identified in 40 CFR 2.103(a)
informs requesters of the cut-off date that the agency most typically
uses. ``The Agency will inform the requester if any other date is
used.'' 40 C.F.R 2.103(a).
Nothing in the existing or proposed FOIA regulations precludes the
agency from evaluating the FOIA request for the most appropriate cut-
off date or a FOIA requester from identifying a date range for the
records sought.
Request for Comment 7: EPA seeks comment on whether to change the
ordinary search cut-off date from the date the FOIA request is received
to the date the agency begins the search for responsive records.
B. Aggregation of Requests
EPA proposes adding a provision stating that EPA may aggregate FOIA
requests when EPA reasonably believes that multiple requests--submitted
either by a requester or by a group of requesters acting in concert--
constitute a single request that would otherwise give rise to unusual
circumstances and the requests involve related matters.
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(iv) provides authority for such a provision,
stating ``Each agency may promulgate regulations . . . providing for
the aggregation of certain requests . . . if the agency reasonably
believes that such requests actually constitute a single request[.]''
Mirroring the Act, EPA would only aggregate requests that are submitted
by the same requester or group of requesters and the requests involve
related manners. EPA is not proposing changes to the existing provision
at 40 CFR 2.107(i), which allows for aggregation for fee-avoidance
reasons.
Request for Comment 8: EPA requests comment on whether to add the
request aggregation provision allowed for in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(iv).
C. Assigning Tracking Numbers
EPA proposes a provision stating that EPA may assign multiple
tracking numbers to a request with distinct parts that will be
processed by separate regions or program offices. EPA would notify the
requester of the separate tracking numbers for the distinct parts of
the request, which thereafter would be processed and responded to
separately.
This provision would reduce unnecessary coordination on unrelated
records among different EPA offices and regions when processing a
single request with multiple unrelated parts. This includes
communicating with the requester to clarify the request, seeking fee
assurance, conducting the records search and review, and issuing
interim and final responses.
D. Revised Methods of Submission of Administrative Appeals
EPA proposes modifying the methods of submission of FOIA appeals,
located in the existing regulations at 40 CFR 2.104(j) and 2.108(a) in
the proposed regulations, to match the methods of submission of FOIA
requests. This change would streamline EPA's receipt and handling of
FOIA appeals.
VIII. Environmental Justice Expedited Processing Criteria
EPA proposes a provision to allow requesters to seek expedited
processing of their request if the records sought pertain to an
environmental justice-related need and will be used to inform an
affected community. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(i) provides that EPA may
issue regulations ``providing for expedited processing of requests for
records (I) in cases in which the person requesting the records
demonstrates a compelling need; and (II) in other cases determined by
the agency.'' (emphasis added). The Act defines what constitutes a
``compelling need,'' id. at
[[Page 68949]]
section 552(a)(6)(E)(v), and does not limit the ``other cases'' that
they agency may determine merit expedited processing.
EPA has recognized environmental justice concerns for many decades
and has defined Environmental justice (EJ) as the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. EPA recognizes the role timely access to information
contained in EPA records may play in the opportunity for meaningful
involvement by communities that potentially experience
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects.
This provision would be in addition to and not modify the expedited
processing for requests demonstrating a ``compelling need,'' which the
FOIA provides at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(i)(I). This proposed new
expedited processing category would target an understood need for
timely access for communities with environmental justice concerns to
information, which may not be met by the statutorily provided
``compelling need'' categories.
Request for Comment 9: EPA seeks comment on whether to include a
new expedited processing category for requests seeking environmental
justice-related information and whether there is an unmet need for
prompt access to information in communities affected by environment
justice concerns. For example, EPA requests comment on the frequency
and types of contact that occur with members of communities affected by
environmental justice concerns and how information for which there is a
pressing need is typically utilized by members of those communities.
EPA proposes narrowly tailored criteria to achieve the intended
goal. To qualify for expedited processing under this proposed
provision, a requester would need to show: (1) a pressing need; (2) to
inform a community potentially experiencing disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects; (3) about those effects;
(4) affecting, or potentially affecting, that community.
Request for Comment 10: EPA seeks comment on whether EPA should
further define or use another definition or term to more accurately
identify communities for which there is a need for more rapid access to
EPA records containing information regarding environmental harms
affecting those communities.
In evaluating requests for expedited processing under this
expedited processing category, EPA would consider the requester's
intent to effectively convey the information to members of the
community that is potentially experiencing disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects. EPA would not require
that a requester be a member of the affected community, although
membership in the community may be relevant to the requester's intent
and ability to convey the information to the community. EPA would
consider the requester's ability to effectively convey the information
received about the community back to the community within a timeframe
sufficient to meet the identified pressing need. EPA proposes that a
requester would not have to be a formal member of the news media to
qualify for this expedited processing category.
EPA further proposes that the need to inform the affected community
would not include a request where the disclosure is primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester. EPA intends that this criterion
would help tailor the provision by focusing on requests for which the
purpose of the request is to share information with members of the
affected community.
Request for Comment 11: EPA seeks feedback on whether the proposed
criteria properly target EPA's stated intent.
To implement this provision, EPA could use EJScreen's
``Supplemental Indexes'' tool to assess a requester's claim that a
particular community may be experiencing disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects. EJScreen is an
environmental justice mapping and screening tool that provides EPA with
a nationally consistent dataset and approach for combining
environmental and demographic indicators. EJScreen provides a way to
display this information and includes a method for combining
environmental and demographic indicators into EJ indexes. EJScreen's
``Supplemental Indexes'' are twelve indexes calculated by combing
twelve environmental indicators and a five-factor demographic index.
The five socioeconomic indicators considered are percent low-income,
percent limited English-speaking, percent less than high school
education, percent unemployed, and low life expectancy. EJScreen may
also be a valuable tool for requesters to assess whether the community
about which they are seeking records may be affected by
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects. More information regarding EJScreen is available here: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen/environmental-justice-indexes-ejscreen.
Request for Comment 12: EPA seeks comment on whether EPA should
require requesters to identify in a particular manner the relevant
community with environmental justice concerns. EPA also seeks comment
on methods and approaches to evaluating whether a particular community
is potentially experiencing disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects.
EPA also proposes that if the agency grants a request for expedited
processing under the environmental justice expedited processing
category, the agency will also grant the requester a fee waiver for the
request under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii), and EPA's FOIA regulations,
at section 2.107(l) of the existing regulations and section 2.107(n) of
the proposed regulations. EPA believes that meeting the standard and
factors provided in the proposed new expedited processing criteria
would result in the requester having met the burden set forth by the
FOIA to qualify for a waiver of fees. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii)
(``[D]isclosure of the information is in the public interest because it
is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the
operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.''). EPA also recognizes the
potential efficiencies for both requesters and the agency in this
approach.
Request for Comment 13: EPA seeks comment on whether EPA should
provide fee waivers to requests that qualify for the proposed
environmental justice expedited processing provision.
IX. Fee-Related Changes
A. Fee Rates Update
EPA proposes modernizing its fee rates by establishing fee rates
tied to the U.S. Office of Personnel and Management's General Schedule
(GS) scale. EPA proposes two rates for agency personnel time spent
processing FOIA requests, with one rate for grades GS-12 and below and
a second rate for those with grades GS-13 and above, both adjusted for
the value of benefits, expressed in quarter-hour rates, and rounded to
the nearest $1 increment. As of the date of signature, the proposed
rates would be calculated as such:
Employees GS-12 and Below
Average Quarter-Hour Rate for GS-9 to 12 ($8.83) + Benefits (16% or
$1.41) = $10.24 = (rounded to the nearest $1 increment) $10.00/quarter
hour
[[Page 68950]]
Employees GS-13 and Above
Average Quarter-Hour Rate for GS-13 to 15 ($15.24) + Benefits (16%
or $2.43) = $17.67 = (rounded to the nearest $1 increment) $18.00/
quarter-hour
The FOIA directs agencies to issue FOIA regulations ``specifying
the schedule of fees applicable to the processing of requests[.]'' 5
U.S.C. 522(a)(4)(A)(i). The Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's)
Fee Guidelines provide that agencies may charge for the direct costs of
expenditures that the agency incurs, including staff time spent on
search, duplication, and review of records. See OMB, Uniform Freedom of
Information Act Fee Schedule Guidelines, 52 FR 10012, 10017, March 27,
1987 (hereinafter OMB Fee Guidelines). The OMB Fee Guidelines also
provide that staff time can be quantified by using the salary of the
employee plus 16% to cover benefits. Id.
Raising the fee rates and tying them to the GS-scale will more
accurately reflect the EPA's costs and align with the OMB Fee
Guidelines. Id. at 10018 (``Agencies should charge fees that recoup the
full allowable direct costs they incur.''). Fee rates in existing EPA's
regulations include three categories: clerical ($4/quarter-hour);
professional ($7/quarter-hour); and managerial ($10.25/quarter-hour).
See 40 CFR 2.107(c)(2)(i)(B). EPA's existing fee rates have not been
updated since at least 2002. Consequently, the existing rates no longer
recoup the cost of processing a FOIA request and the clerical rate is
obsolete as it is rarely used given the substantial transition to
digital records and electronic processing and response mechanisms.
EPA proposes that its fee rates would automatically update with
OPM's publication in the Federal Register of new GS-scale rates. See
OPM, January 2022 Pay Schedules, 87 FR 26376, May 4, 2022. This
practice is consistent with the OMB Fee Schedule and the practices of
other Federal agencies. EPA anticipates that this approach would be a
predictable and efficient approach to establishing a fee rate.
Alternatively, EPA could set a stagnant rate that would not
automatically update with changes to the GS-scale. EPA expects that the
stagnant rate alternative would be more burdensome than the proposed
approach because EPA would need to update its FOIA regulations
regularly to ensure that it is charging FOIA fees to recoup its costs.
EPA recognizes that the stagnant rate approach may provide more clarity
for requesters by not requiring a calculation of the adjustment. To
mitigate this, if it finalizes the automatically adjusting rate as
proposed, EPA intends to publish the current fee rate on its FOIA
website (epa.gov/foia) and will update that publication as the GS-scale
changes.
Request for Comment 14: EPA requests comment on whether to
modernize the fee schedule to two categories based on average GS
levels.
B. Minimum Fee Threshold
EPA proposes increasing the minimum fee threshold to an amount
calculated by formula, which, as of the publication of this rulemaking
is $250. The formula would enable the minimum fee threshold to reflect
EPA's costs as they increase in the futures. FOIA prohibits collection
of fees if processing the payment is costlier than the fee itself. See
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iv)(I). Existing EPA regulations, section
2.107(d)(4), have a minimum fee threshold of $14, meaning that EPA will
charge FOIA fees if the total chargeable fees sum to more than $14.
However, EPA calculates that the existing cost to process a payment is
around $90. Thus, raising the minimum fee threshold will ensure that
EPA is only charging for fees that are more than EPA's cost to process
the fees.
Raising the minimum fee threshold to $250 would reduce the burden
and tasks associated with processing fees and seeking assurance of
payment and advanced payment. Alternatively, EPA could set a minimum
fee threshold to an amount calculated by formula, which, as of the
publication of this rulemaking is $90, the estimated cost of processing
payment.
To achieve an automatically adjusting minimum fee threshold, which
is currently calculated as $250, EPA proposes to utilize a formula that
applies a fourteen (14) times multiplier to the rate set in 40 CFR
2.107(e)(2)(ii)(B). This ties the minimum fee threshold to the fee
rate, which is itself based on the GS-scale. OPM adjusts the GS-scale
annually. This proposal would allow for a minimum fee threshold that is
sustainable and remains effective as fee rates and personnel costs
increase, without the need to publish updates to the regulations. This
number will be on the EPA website and updated as there are increases to
the GS-scale. For more information about how the fee rate is calculated
see section VII.A. of this preamble. As of the date of signature, the
proposed minimum fee threshold would be calculated as follows:
Fee rate listed in 40 CFR 2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) ($18.00) x 14 = $252 =
(rounded to the nearest $5 increment) $250
Request for Comment 15: EPA requests comment on whether to increase
the minimum fee threshold to an amount calculated by formula, which, as
of the publication of this rulemaking is $250.
C. Automatic Agreement To Pay Fees
EPA proposes removing the automatic agreement to pay fees provision
from the EPA's FOIA regulations. Submission of a request is considered
an agreement to pay fees up to $25 in the existing EPA FOIA
regulations. Because of the proposal to raise the minimum fee threshold
to an amount calculated by formula, which, as of the publication of
this rulemaking is $250, EPA would also need to adjust the existing
automatic agreement to pay fees threshold.
EPA proposes to remove the automatic agreement to pay fees
provision and instead seek assurance of payments from requesters if the
actual or anticipated fees for the request equal or exceed the minimum
fee threshold. EPA notes that the FOIA does not require agency FOIA
regulations to include an automatic agreement to pay fees provision.
Alternatively, EPA could consider the submission of a FOIA request
an automatic agreement to pay fees up to some amount above $250. EPA
recognizes that an automatic agreement to pay $250 or some higher
amount may be a deterrent to submitting a FOIA request for some members
of the public, whether or not they are ultimately charged fees, and
that a better practice will be for EPA to notify requesters when EPA's
chargeable costs are anticipated to go above the minimum fee threshold
and to seek an assurance of payment as described below.
Request for Comment 16: EPA requests comment on whether to remove
the automatic agreement to pay fees provision from the FOIA
regulations. EPA also requests comment on whether to increase the
automatic agreement to pay fees commensurate with the minimum fee
threshold.
D. Assurance of Payment Threshold
EPA proposes raising the assurance of payment threshold to an
amount calculated by formula, which, as of the publication of this
rulemaking is $250. When EPA estimates fees or accumulates actual fees
equaling or exceeding the assurance of payment threshold, EPA seeks
from a requester an assurance that the requester will pay the fees
associated with the FOIA request.
[[Page 68951]]
Existing EPA regulations require assurance of payment when the
estimated or actual fees are at or above $25. As noted above, EPA also
proposes to raise the minimum fee threshold to $250. As such, keeping
an assurance of payment threshold of $25 would be inconsistent with
that proposal.
EPA proposes tying the assurance of payment threshold to the
minimum fee threshold. EPA would directly referencing the minimum fee
threshold citation to accomplish this. The intent of this approach
would be to ensure that, as explained above, the assurance of payment
threshold rises commensurate with the minimum fee threshold and the fee
rate. This proposal could reduce confusion for the requester and set
clear steps and guideposts for assessing fees.
Request for Comment 17: EPA requests comment on whether to set the
assurance of payment threshold to the same amount as the minimum fee
threshold.
E. Advanced Payment Threshold
EPA proposes increasing the advanced payment threshold to an amount
that would currently calculate to $425 and proposes a formula for
calculating the advance payment threshold that will be self-escalating
as EPA's costs increase in future years. When EPA estimates fees or
accumulates actual fees equaling or exceeding the advanced payment
threshold, EPA may seek advanced payment from a requester of the
estimated or actual fees associated with the FOIA request.
The FOIA provides that agencies can establish guidelines for when
and describes when agencies can require advanced payment of fees from
requesters. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(v)(c). The FOIA specifies two
situations in which an agency may require advanced payment: ``the
requester has previously failed to pay fees in a timely fashion, or the
agency has determined that the fee will exceed $250.'' Id. The advanced
payment threshold, as described here, references that second criteria,
the estimated or actual fee. EPA is not proposing modification to the
advanced payment requirements for requesters who have failed to pay
fees in a timely fashion.
Similar to the minimum fee threshold, EPA would tie the advanced
payment threshold to the fee rate and round that amount to the nearest
$5 increment. This means that the advance payment threshold would be
calculated based on the fee rate, which is itself based on the GS-scale
that is adjusted annually.
EPA chose a twenty-five (25) times multiplier to achieve an initial
advanced payment threshold of $450. $450 represents a proportional
increase with the fee rate. The fee rate, as explained above, reflects
agency personnel costs. The proposed advanced payment threshold thus
represents a level at which EPA believes it would begin to see
administrative burdens in processing a request that continues to
accumulate uncollected fees.
As of the date of signature, the proposed advanced payment
threshold would be calculated as follows:
Fee rate listed in proposed 40 CFR 2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) ($18.00) x 25 =
$450
Request for Comment 18: EPA requests comment on whether to increase
the minimum fee threshold to an amount calculated by formula, which, as
of the publication of this rulemaking is $450, and automatically
adjusting with the proposed fee rate.
EPA proposes to reorganize the 40 CFR 2.107. EPA does not intend
that this reorganization make any substantive modifications to the
regulatory or statutory requirements. The intent of these changes is to
consolidate duplicative information and place related provisions in
close proximity to improve readability and provide clarity. For
example, EPA's proposal would move information regarding the type of
fees, the types of requests, what fees the agency may assess for types
of requests, and how EPA calculates those fees into two subsections:
(1) types of requests and types of fees that may be assessed to those
requests and (2) types of fees and how EPA calculates those fees.
Request for Comment 19: EPA requests comment on reorganizing and
removing duplicative information from EPA's FOIA regulations.
F. Estimated or Actual Fee Assessment
EPA proposes adding language stating that EPA's reassessment of
actual or estimated fees may result in EPA re-seeking assurance of
payment or advanced payment. Adding this provision would provide
clarity and inform the public regarding EPA's practices. The intent of
this proposal is to describe a scenario where EPA has previously
informed the requester of the amount of actual or estimated fees and,
after further processing, EPA has updated its actual or estimated fee
assessment.
EPA notes that providing a requester with the most up-to-date fee
calculations leads to transparency for the requester. Advancement
through processing steps may result in new or revised circumstances.
For example, EPA may perform a search that returns more or less records
than initially estimated. If this is the case, EPA would inform the
requester of the changed circumstances and latest information and
accordingly, if appropriate, seek additional fee guarantees from the
requester.
Request for Comment 20: EPA requests comment on whether to state
that a reassessment of actual or estimated fees may trigger a need for
advanced payment or assurance of payment.
G. Failure To Pay Charged Fees
EPA proposes editing for clarity and revising the provisions
applicable to delinquent requesters. Existing EPA regulations discuss
failure to pay fees in several separate locations. EPA would
consolidate these provisions into 40 CFR 2.107(k). EPA would also add a
sentence stating that the agency may share information regarding
delinquent requesters with other Federal agencies.
Request for Comment 21: EPA requests comments on editing for
clarity and revising the provisions applicable to delinquent
requesters.
H. Requests for Waiver and Reduction of Fees
EPA proposes to incorporate a requirement that a requester must
submit a statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of the
requester's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for
the fee waiver request. Existing EPA regulations require that requests
for expedited processing must be made through a statement certified to
be true and correct. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(vi). Aligning these
requirements could streamline the practice and ensure the information a
requester submits to EPA presents an accurate representation.
Request for Comment 22: EPA requests comments on incorporating a
requirement that a requester must submit a statement, certified to be
true and correct to the best of the requester's knowledge and believe,
explaining in detail the basis for the fee waiver request.
X. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
[[Page 68952]]
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because it does not contain any information collection
activities.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. Submission
of a FOIA request is a voluntary action that any member of the public,
including small entities, can elect to do and the rule relates to the
procedures for submitting and processing a FOIA request for EPA
records.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandates as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have substantial direct effects on
Indian Tribal governments or on the relationship between the national
government and the Indian Tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children,
per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of
the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order
13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or
safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations (people of color) and low-income
populations.
The EPA believes that this type of action does not concern human
health or environmental conditions and therefore cannot be evaluated
with respect to potentially disproportionate and adverse effects on
people of color, low-income populations and/or Indigenous peoples.
Although this action does not concern human health or environmental
conditions, the EPA identifies and addresses environmental justice
concerns by proposing a provision to allow requesters to seek expedited
processing of their request if the records sought pertain to an
environmental justice-related need and will be used to inform an
affected community. See section VII of this preamble.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 2
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Freedom of information, Government
employees.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 2, is proposed to be amended as follows.
PART 2--PUBLIC INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 552a, 553; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31
U.S.C. 3717.
0
2. Subpart A of Part 2 is revised to read as follows:
Subpart A--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
Sec.
2.100 General provisions.
2.101 Where to file requests for records.
2.102 Procedures for making requests.
2.103 Responsibility for responding to requests.
2.104 Responses to requests.
2.105 [Reserved]
2.106 Preservation of records.
2.107 Fees.
2.108 Administrative appeals.
2.109 Other rights and services.
Subpart A--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom
of Information Act
Sec. 2.100 General provisions.
(a) General. This Subpart contains the rules that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) follows in processing requests for
records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552.
Information routinely provided to the public as part of a regular EPA
activity may be provided to the public without following this Subpart.
(b) Other Regulatory Provisions. (1) 40 CFR Subpart B contains
requirements pertaining to the confidentiality of business information.
(2) 40 CFR part 16 contains requirements pertaining to Privacy Act
requests.
(c) Statutory-based fee schedule programs. EPA will inform the
requester of the steps necessary to obtain records from agencies
operating statutory-based fee schedule programs, such as, but not
limited to, the Government Printing Office or the National Technical
Information Service.
(d) National FOIA Office. The Chief FOIA Officer designates the
office that performs the duties of the National FOIA Office. The
National FOIA Office reports to the Chief FOIA Officer.
[[Page 68953]]
(e) FOIA Public Liaison. The Chief FOIA Officer designates the FOIA
Public Liaisons. The FOIA Public Liaisons report to the Chief FOIA
Officer. A FOIA Public Liaison is responsible for assisting in reducing
delays, increasing transparency and understanding of the status of
requests, and assisting in the resolution of disputes. A FOIA Public
Liaison is an official to whom a requester can raise concerns about the
service the requester received from the FOIA Requester Service Center.
The public can find more information about the FOIA Public Liaisons at
EPA's website.
(f) Other record availability. Records required by FOIA to be made
available for public inspection and copying are accessible through
EPA's FOIA website, https://www.epa.gov/foia. EPA also proactively
discloses records and information through the Agency's website,
www.epa.gov.
Sec. 2.101 Where to file requests for records.
(a) Requesters must submit all requests for records from EPA under
the FOIA in writing and by one of the following methods:
(1) EPA's FOIA submission website, linked to at www.epa.gov/foia;
(2) An electronic government submission website established
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(m), such as FOIA.gov;
(3) U.S. Mail sent to the following address: National FOIA Office,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
(2310A), Washington, DC 20460; or
(4) Overnight delivery service to National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania NW, Room 7309C,
Washington, DC 20460.
(b) EPA will not treat a request submitted by any method other than
those listed in Sec. 2.101(a) as a FOIA request, and the Agency will
not re-route such a request.
(c) The requester or requester organization must include the full
name of their point of contact and their mailing address for EPA to
process the request. For all requests, requesters should provide an
email address and daytime telephone number whenever possible. For
requests submitted through EPA's FOIA submission website or as provided
by an electronic government submission website established pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552(m), requesters must include an email address. For requests
submitted through U.S. Mail, the requester must mark both the request
letter and envelope ``Freedom of Information Act Request.''
(d) EPA provides access to all records that the FOIA requires an
agency to make regularly available for public inspection and copying.
Each office is responsible for determining which of the records it
generates are required to be made publicly available and for providing
access by the public to them. The Agency will also maintain and make
available for public inspection and copying a current subject matter
index of such records and provide a copy or a link to the respective
website for Headquarters or the Regions. Each index will be updated
regularly, at least quarterly, with respect to newly-included records.
(e) All records created by EPA on or after November 1, 1996, which
the FOIA requires an agency to make regularly available for public
inspection and copying, will be made available electronically through
EPA's website, located at https://www.epa.gov, or, upon request, through
other electronic means. EPA will also include on its website the
current subject matter index of all such records.
Sec. 2.102 Procedures for making requests.
(a) EPA employees may attempt in good faith to comply with oral
requests for inspection or disclosure of EPA records that are publicly
available under Sec. 2.201(a) and (b), but such requests are not
subject to the FOIA or this Part.
(b)(1) Requesters should reasonably describe the records sought in
sufficient detail to enable agency personnel to locate them with a
reasonable amount of effort.
(2) If EPA determines that the request does not reasonably describe
the requested records, EPA will tell the requester either what
additional information the requester needs to provide or why the
request is otherwise insufficient. EPA will also give the requester an
opportunity to discuss and modify the request to meet the requirements
of Sec. 2.102(b)(1). If the requester fails to modify the request to
reasonably describe the requested records sought within 20 calendar
days, EPA will not process the submission and close the request. If the
requester does modify the submission to reasonably describe the
requested records, EPA will consider the request received as of the
date the modification is received by EPA.
(3) Whenever possible, a request should include specific
information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name,
author, recipient, and subject matter. If known, the requester should
include any file designations or descriptions for the records that the
requester wants. The more specific the requester is about the records
or type of records that the requester wants, the more likely EPA will
be able to identify and locate records responsive to the request.
Sec. 2.103 Responsibility for responding to requests.
(a) In general. Upon receipt of a FOIA request under Sec.
2.101(a), the National FOIA Office will assign the request to an
appropriate office within the Agency for processing. To determine which
records are within the scope of a request, an office will ordinarily
include only those records in the Agency's possession as of the date
that the Agency begins its search. The Agency will inform the requester
if any other date is used.
(b) Authority to issue final determinations. The Administrator,
Deputy Administrators, Assistant Administrators, Deputy Assistant
Administrators, Regional Administrators, Deputy Regional
Administrators, General Counsel, Deputy General Counsels, Regional
Counsels, Deputy Regional Counsels, and Inspector General or those
individuals' delegates, are authorized to make determinations required
by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A).
(c) Authority to grant or deny fee waivers or requests for
expedited processing. EPA's Chief FOIA Officer or EPA's Chief FOIA
Officer's delegates are authorized to grant or deny requests for fee
waivers or requests for expedited processing.
(d) Consultations and referrals. When a request to EPA seeks
records in EPA's possession that originated with another Federal
agency, the EPA office assigned to process the request shall either:
(1) In coordination with the National FOIA Office, consult with the
Federal agency where the record or portion thereof originated and then
respond to the request, or
(2) With the concurrence of the National FOIA Office, refer any
record to the Federal agency where the record or portion thereof
originated. The National FOIA Office will notify the requester whenever
all or any part of the responsibility for responding to a request has
been referred to another agency.
(e) Law enforcement information. Whenever a requester makes a
request for a record containing information that relates to an
investigation of a possible violation of law and the investigation
originated with another agency, the assigned office, with the
concurrence of the National FOIA Office, will refer the record to that
other agency or consult with that other agency prior to making any
release determination.
[[Page 68954]]
(f) Assigning tracking numbers. EPA may assign multiple tracking
numbers to a FOIA request that contains unrelated parts that will be
processed separately by multiple regions or headquarters program
offices.
Sec. 2.104 Responses to requests.
(a) Timing of response. (1) Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(A)
and upon any request for records made pursuant to this subpart, EPA
shall determine within 20 working days after receipt of any such
request whether to comply with such request and shall immediately
notify the person according to this section.
(2) A requester submitting a request electronically must do so
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time for the Agency to consider the request as
received on that date, and a request submitted electronically at or
after 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time will be considered received by the
National FOIA Office on the next business day.
(3) The timeframe for response may be extended if unusual
circumstances exist per paragraph (f) of this section, including when
EPA asserts unusual circumstances and arranges an alternative timeframe
with the requester, or exceptional circumstances exist per paragraph
(g) of this section. The timeframe for response may be tolled per
paragraph (e) of this section.
(b) Agency failure to respond. If EPA fails to respond to the
request within the statutory time-period, or any authorized extension
of time, the requester may seek judicial review to obtain the records
without first making an administrative appeal.
(c) Acknowledgment of request. On receipt of a request, the
National FOIA Office ordinarily will send a written acknowledgment
advising the requester of the date the Agency received the request and
of the processing number assigned to the request for future reference.
(d) Multitrack processing. The Agency uses three or more processing
tracks by distinguishing between simple and complex requests based on
the amount of work, time needed to process the request, or both,
including limits based on the number of pages involved. The Agency will
advise the requester of the processing track in which the Agency placed
the request and the limits of the different processing tracks. The
Agency may place the request in a slower track while providing the
requester with the opportunity to limit the scope of the request to
qualify for faster processing within the specified limits of a faster
track. If the Agency places the request in a slower track, the Agency
will contact the requester.
(e) Tolling the request. EPA shall not toll the processing time-
period except:
(1) The Agency may toll the processing time-period one time while
seeking clarification from the requester; or
(2) The Agency may toll the processing time-period as many times as
necessary to resolve fee issues.
(f) Unusual circumstances. (1) When the Agency cannot meet
statutory time limits for processing a request because of ``unusual
circumstances,'' as defined in the FOIA, and the time limits are
extended on that basis, the Agency will notify the requester in
writing, as soon as practicable, of the unusual circumstances and of
the date by which processing of the request should be completed.
(2) If the 20 working-day period is extended, EPA will give the
requester an opportunity to limit the scope of the request, modify the
request, or agree to an alternative time-period for processing, as
described by the FOIA.
(3) EPA will provide contact information for its FOIA Public
Liaison to assist in the resolution of any disputes between the
requester and the Agency, and the Agency will notify the requester of
their right to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of
Government Information Services within the National Archives and
Records Administration.
(g) Expedited processing. (1) EPA will take requests or appeals out
of order and give expedited treatment whenever EPA determines that such
requests or appeals involve a compelling need, an environmental
justice-related need, or both.
(i) A compelling need is defined as either:
(A) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual; or
(B) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
Federal government activity, if the information is requested by a
person primarily engaged in disseminating information to the public.
(ii) For purposes of this provision, an environmental justice-
related need means a pressing need to inform a community that is
potentially experiencing disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects.
(A) The Agency will consider whether the requested records relate
to actual or alleged Federal government activity, including
environmental information or data.
(B) The Agency will consider the requester's ability and intention
to effectively convey the information to members of the affected
community, taking into account, for example, the requester's
relationship to the community or its members, expertise in the subject
matter, or other relevant knowledge and experiences.
(C) A pressing need to inform an affected community does not
include requests where the disclosure is primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester.
(D) If the Agency grants a request for expedited processing under
paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section, the Agency will also waive fees
established under Sec. 2.107(f) for the request.
(2) Requesters must make a written request for expedited processing
at the time of the initial request for records or at the time of
appeal.
(3) If the requester seeks expedited processing, the requester must
submit a statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of the
requester's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for
the request.
(i) For example, if the requester fits within the category
described in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B) of this section and is not a full-
time member of the news media, the requester must establish that they
are a person whose primary professional activity or occupation is
information dissemination, although it need not be the requester's sole
occupation.
(ii) If the requester fits within the category described in
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the requester must also
establish a particular urgency to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the request, beyond the public's right
to know about government activity generally.
(4) Within 10 calendar days from the date of the request for
expedited processing, the Chief FOIA Officer, or the Chief FOIA
Officer's delegates, will decide whether to grant the request and will
notify the requester of the decision. If the Agency grants the request
for expedited processing, the Agency will give the request priority and
will process the request as soon as practicable. If the Agency denies
the request for expedited processing, the Agency will act on any appeal
of that decision expeditiously.
(h) Grants of requests. Once the Agency determines to grant a
request in whole or in part, it will release the records or parts of
records to the requester and notify the requester of any
[[Page 68955]]
applicable fee charged under Sec. 2.107. The office will annotate
records released in part, whenever technically feasible, with the
applicable FOIA exemption or exemptions at that part of the record from
which the exempt information was deleted.
(i) Adverse determinations of requests. When the Agency makes an
adverse determination, the Agency will notify the requester of that
determination in writing. Adverse determinations include:
(1) A decision that the requested record is exempt from disclosure,
in whole or in part;
(2) A decision that the information requested is not a record
subject to the FOIA;
(3) A decision that the requested record does not exist or cannot
be located;
(4) A decision that the requested record is not readily
reproducible in the form or format sought by the requester;
(5) A determination on any disputed fee matter, including a denial
of a request for a fee waiver; or
(6) A denial of a request for expedited processing.
(j) Content of final determination letter. The appropriate official
will issue the final determination letter in accordance with Sec.
2.103(b) and will include:
(1) The name and title or position of the person responsible for
the determination;
(2) A brief statement of the reason or reasons for the denial,
including an identification of records being withheld (either
individually or, if a large number of similar records are being denied,
described by category) and any FOIA exemption applied by the office in
denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of records or information withheld,
in number of pages or in some other reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided if the volume is otherwise
indicated through annotated deletions on records disclosed in part, or
if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption;
(4) A statement that an adverse determination may be appealed under
Sec. 2.108 and description of the requirements for submitting an
administrative appeal; and
(5) A statement that the requester has the right to seek dispute
resolution services from an EPA FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Service.
Sec. 2.105 [Reserved]
Sec. 2.106 Preservation of records.
The Agency will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the FOIA
requests that it receives, as well as copies of all requested records,
until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of
the United States Code or the National Archives and Records
Administration's General Records Schedule 4.2. Records shall not be
disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or
lawsuit under the FOIA.
Sec. 2.107 Fees.
(a) In general. The Agency will charge for processing requests
under the FOIA in accordance with this section, except where fees are
limited under paragraph (g) of this section or where a waiver or
reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (n) of this section.
(b) How to pay fees. Requesters must pay fees electronically at
https://www.pay.gov/ by check or money order made payable to the
Treasury of the United States.
(c) Contractor rates. When any search, review, or duplication task
is performed by a contractor, EPA will charge for staff time at the
contractor's actual pay rate, but not exceeding the rates set under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(d) Rounding staff time. Billable staff time is calculated by
rounding to the nearest quarter-hour.
(e) Types of requests for fee purposes. For purposes of this
section, the five types of request categories are defined in paragraphs
(e)(1) through (5) of this section. These request categories will be
charged for the types of fees as noted, subject to the restrictions in
paragraph (g) of this section and unless a fee waiver has been granted
under paragraph (n) of this section. Paragraph (f) of this section
defines and explains how the Agency calculates each type of fee.
(1) Commercial-use Request. (i) Commercial use request means a
request from or on behalf of a person who seeks information for a use
or purpose that furthers the requester's commercial, trade, or profit
interests, which can include furthering those interests through
litigation. The Agency will determine, whenever reasonably possible,
the use to which a requester will put the requested records. When it
appears that the requester will put the records to a commercial use,
either because of the nature of the request itself or because the
Agency has reasonable cause to doubt a requester's stated use, the
Agency will provide the requester a reasonable opportunity to submit
further clarification.
(ii) For a commercial-use request, the Agency will charge the
requester for search, review, and duplication.
(2) Educational institution request. (i) Educational institution
means a preschool, a public or private elementary or secondary school,
an institution of undergraduate higher education, an institution of
graduate higher education, an institution of professional education, or
an institution of vocational education, that operates a program of
scholarly research. To be in this category, a requester must show that
the request is authorized by, and is made under the auspices of, a
qualifying institution and that the records are not sought for a
commercial use but are sought to further scholarly research.
(ii) For an educational institution request, the Agency will charge
the requester for duplication, except that the Agency will furnish the
first 100 pages of duplication at no charge.
(3) Noncommercial scientific institution request. (i) Noncommercial
scientific institution means an institution not operated on a
``commercial'' basis, as defined in paragraph (e)(1) of this section,
and that is operated solely for conducting scientific research that is
not intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in
this category, a requester must show that a qualifying institution
authorizes the request, that the requester makes the request under the
auspices of the qualifying institution, and that the requester does not
seek the records for a commercial use but to further scientific
research.
(ii) For a noncommercial scientific institution request, the Agency
will charge the requester for duplication, except that the Agency will
furnish the first 100 pages of duplication at no charge.
(4) Representative of the news media requests. (i) Representative
of the news media has the meaning provided at 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(ii).
(ii) For representative of the news media requests, the Agency will
charge a requester for duplication, except that the Agency will furnish
the first 100 pages of duplication at no charge.
(5) Other requests. (i) Other requesters are requesters that are
not commercial-use requesters, educational institutions, noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media.
(ii) The Agency will charge other requesters for search and
duplication, except that the Agency will furnish without charge the
first two hours of search time and the first 100 pages of duplication.
[[Page 68956]]
(f) Types of fees. Paragraphs (f)(1) through (4) of this section
are definitions of the types of fees and explanations of how the Agency
calculates each type of fee.
(1) Direct costs. Direct costs means those expenses that the Agency
actually incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA
request. Direct costs include, for example, the salary of the employee
performing the work and the cost of operating duplication equipment.
Not included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as the costs of
space and heating or lighting of the facility in which the records are
kept.
(2) Search. (i) Search means the process of looking for and
retrieving records or information responsive to a request. It includes
page-by-page or line-by-line identification of information within
records and includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve
information from records maintained in electronic form or format.
Offices will ensure that searches are done in the most efficient and
least expensive manner reasonably possible. For example, offices will
not search line-by-line where duplicating an entire document would be
quicker and less expensive. The Agency will charge for time spent
searching even if no responsive records are found or if the records are
located but are determined to be exempt from disclosure.
(ii) Search fees will equal the direct costs of search. Personnel
will bill their time at the following rates using the current Office of
Personnel Management General Schedule (GS) pay table for Washington-
Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA. The current calculations of these
rates may be found at www.epa.gov/foia.
(A) GS-12 level or below (or equivalent pay scale): The average of
GS-9 to GS-12 (Step 5), plus 16 percent, rounded to the nearest $1
increment per quarter hour.
(B) GS-13 level or above (or equivalent pay scale): The average of
GS-13 to GS-15 (Step 5), plus 16 percent, rounded to the nearest $1
increment per quarter hour.
(iii) For requests that require the retrieval of records stored by
an agency at a Federal Records Center operated by NARA, additional
costs will be charged in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate
Schedule established by NARA.
(3) Review. (i) Review means the examination of a record located in
response to a request to determine whether any portion of it is exempt
from disclosure. It also includes processing any record for disclosure
(for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and prepare it
for disclosure). Review costs are recoverable even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent
considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business
submitter requesting confidential treatment but does not include time
spent resolving general legal or policy issues regarding the
application of exemptions.
(ii) The Agency will charge review fees only for the initial record
review (that is, the review done when an office is deciding whether an
exemption applies to a particular record or portion of a record at the
initial request level). The Agency will not charge for review at the
administrative appeal level for an exemption already applied. However,
the Agency may again review records or portions of records withheld
under an exemption that the Agency subsequently determines not to apply
to determine whether any other exemption not previously considered
applies; the Agency will charge costs of that review when a change of
circumstances makes it necessary. The Agency will charge review fees at
the same rates as those charged for a search under paragraph (f)(2)(ii)
of this section.
(4) Duplication. (i) Duplication means the making of a copy of a
record, or of the information contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the form of paper, microform,
audiovisual materials, or electronic records (for example, magnetic
tape, disk, or compact disk), among others. The Agency will honor a
requester's specified preference of form or format of disclosure if the
record is readily reproducible with reasonable efforts in the requested
form or format.
(ii) For either a photocopy or a computer-generated printout of a
record (no more than one copy of which need be supplied), the fee will
be fifteen (15) cents per page. For electronic forms of duplication,
other than a computer-generated printout, offices will charge the
direct costs of that duplication. Such direct costs will include the
costs of the requested electronic medium on which the copy is to be
made and the actual operator time and computer resource usage required
to produce the copy, to the extent they can be determined. The Agency
will charge operator time at the same rates as those charged for search
under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section.
(g) Limitations on charging fees.
(1) The Agency will charge no fee when a total fee calculated under
paragraph (c) of this section is less than fourteen times the rate in
paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(B) of this section rounded to the nearest $5.00
increment for any request. The current calculation of this threshold
may be found at www.epa.gov/foia.
(2) The restrictions in paragraphs (e)(1)(ii), (2)(ii), (3)(ii),
(4)(ii), and (5)(ii) and minimum fee threshold in (g)(1) of this
section work together. This means that for requesters other than those
seeking records for a commercial use, the Agency will charge no fee
unless the cost of search more than two hours plus the cost of
duplication in excess of 100 pages totals more than fourteen times the
rate in paragraph 2.107(f)(2)(ii)(B) of this section rounded to the
nearest $5.00 increment. The current calculation of this threshold may
be found at www.epa.gov/foia.
(3) If EPA fails to comply with the FOIA's time limits for
responding to a request, EPA will not charge search fees, or, in the
instance of requesters described in paragraphs (e)(1) through (5) of
this section, duplication fees, except as follows:
(i) If EPA determined that unusual circumstances as defined by the
FOIA apply and the Agency provided timely written notice to the
requester in accordance with the FOIA, a failure to comply with the
time limit shall be excused for an additional 10 working days;
(ii) If EPA determined that unusual circumstances as defined by the
FOIA apply and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the
request, EPA may charge search fees, or, in the case of requesters
described in paragraphs (e)(1) through (5) of this section, may charge
duplication fees, if the following steps are taken: EPA must have
provided timely written notice of unusual circumstances to the
requester in accordance with the FOIA and the EPA must have discussed
with the requester by written mail, email, or telephone (or made not
less than three good-faith attempts to do so) how the requester could
effectively limit the scope of the request in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii), which includes notification to the requester of the
availability of the FOIA Public Liaison and the right to seek dispute
resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services.
If this exception is satisfied, EPA may charge all applicable fees
incurred in the processing of the request; or
(iii) If a court determines that exceptional circumstances exist,
as defined by the FOIA, a failure to comply with the time limits shall
be excused for the length of time provided by the court order.
(h) Assurance of payment and advanced payment of fees. (1) If EPA
determines that the actual or estimated fees exceed the amount in
paragraph
[[Page 68957]]
(g)(1) of this section, the Agency will notify the requester of the
actual or estimated amount, toll the processing clock, and will do no
further work on the request until the requester agrees in writing to
pay the anticipated total fee.
(2) If EPA determines that the actual or estimated fees exceed
twenty-five times the amount in paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(B) of this
section, the Agency will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount, and may toll the processing clock and do no further
work on the request until the requester pays the estimated or actual
fee. The current calculation of this amount may be found at
www.epa.gov/foia.
(3) After providing the requester with estimated fee amounts, EPA
will provide the requester with an opportunity to discuss with the
Agency how to modify the request to meet the requester's needs at a
lower cost.
(4) EPA calculates the estimated or actual fee cumulatively for
multi-component requests. If only a part of the fee can be estimated
readily, the Agency will advise the requester that the estimated fee
may be only a portion of the total fee.
(5) If, after the requester provided an assurance of payment or
paid an initially estimated or actual amount of fees, the Agency
increases the estimated or actual amount of fees, the Agency will
notify the requester, stop further processing of the request, and toll
any deadline for responding to the request. Once the requester provides
assurance of payment or pays the fees, the time to respond to the
request will resume from where it was at the date of the tolling
notification.
(i) Charges for other services. Although not required to provide
special services, if EPA chooses to do so as a matter of administrative
discretion, the direct costs of providing the service will be charged
to the requester. Examples of such services include certifying that
records are true copies, sending records by other than EPA's electronic
FOIA management system or U.S. Mail, or providing multiple copies of
the same document.
(j) Charging interest. EPA may charge interest on any unpaid bill
starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the requester.
The Agency will assess interest charges at the rate provided in 31
U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until the
Agency receives payment. EPA will follow the provisions of the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365), as amended, and its
administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting
agencies, collection agencies, and offset. The Agency will assess no
penalty against FOIA requesters for exercising their statutory right to
ask the Agency to waive or reduce a fee or to dispute a billing. If a
fee is in dispute, the Agency will suspend penalties upon notification.
(k) Delinquent requesters. (1) If a requester fails to pay all fees
charged to the requester under the FOIA by EPA or any other Federal
agency within 60 calendar days of the date the fees were billed, the
Agency will treat the requester as delinquent. The Agency may share
information regarding delinquent requesters with other Federal
agencies.
(2) Before EPA continues processing a pending FOIA request or
begins processing any new FOIA requests from a delinquent requester,
the delinquent requester must pay the full amount due, plus any
applicable interest, on that prior request and make an advance payment
of the full amount of any anticipated fee.
(3) When the Agency requires payment under paragraph (h)(2) of this
section, the request will not be considered received until the required
payment is made. If the requester does not pay the outstanding balance
and the advance payment within 30 calendar days after the date of EPA's
fee determination, the request will be closed.
(l) Aggregating requests. If a requester or a group of requesters
acting in concert submit two or more requests that involve related
matters and paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), or both of this section, apply
then the Agency may aggregate those requests and charge fees
accordingly, Multiple FOIA requests involving unrelated matters shall
not be aggregated. An aggregated group of FOIA requests will be treated
as a single FOIA request under this subpart, including evaluation of
whether unusual circumstances exist.
(1) The Agency reasonably believes that if the requests constituted
a single request, such a request would result in unusual circumstances
pursuant to Sec. 2.104(f); or
(2) The Agency reasonably believes that the requester or requesters
acting together are attempting to divide a request into a series of
requests for the purpose of avoiding fees. The Agency may presume that
such requests have been submitted to avoid fees if submitted within a
30-day period. When requests are submitted by a period greater than 30
days, the Agency will aggregate them only if there exists a solid basis
for determining that aggregation is warranted under all the
circumstances involved.
(m) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any other
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees
for particular types of records. When records responsive to requests
are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, EPA will inform requesters of the steps
for obtaining records from those sources so that they may do so most
economically.
(n) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) A request for a waiver or
reduction of FOIA fees must be made at the time of the initial
submission of a FOIA request. An untimely request for a waiver or
reduction of fees will be denied. If the requester seeks a waiver or
reduction of fees, the requester must submit a statement, certified to
be true and correct to the best of the requester's knowledge and
belief, explaining in detail the basis for making the request for such
a fee waiver or reduction.
(2) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees must address the
factors listed in paragraphs (n)(4) through (6) of this section, as far
as they apply to each request. EPA components will exercise their
discretion to consider the cost-effectiveness of their investment of
administrative resources in deciding whether to grant waivers or
reductions of fees and will consult the appropriate EPA components as
needed. Requesters must submit requests for the waiver or reduction of
fees along with the request.
(3) When only some of the requested records satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, the Agency will grant a waiver for
only those records.
(4) Records responsive to a request will be furnished without
charge or at a charge reduced below that established under paragraph
(c) of this section when the Agency determines, based on all available
information, that disclosure of the requested information is in the
public interest because it is:
(i) Likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the government, and
(ii) Is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
(5) To determine whether the request meets the first fee waiver
requirement, the Agency will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request. Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the Federal government, with a
[[Page 68958]]
connection that is direct and clear, not remote.
(ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed.
Whether the disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding
of government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an
increased public understanding of those operations or activities. The
disclosure of information that already is in the public domain, in
either a duplicative or a substantially identical form, would not be as
likely to contribute to such understanding when nothing new would be
added to the public's understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
public is likely to result from the disclosure. Whether disclosure of
the requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.''
The disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably
broad audience of persons interested in the subject, as opposed to the
individual understanding of the requester. The Agency will consider a
requester's expertise in the subject area and ability and intention to
effectively convey information to the public. The Agency presumes that
a representative of the news media will satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding.
Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to
public understanding of government operations or activities. The
public's understanding of the subject in question, as compared to the
level of public understanding existing prior to the disclosure, must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a significant extent. The Agency will not
make value judgments about whether information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities
of the government is ``important'' enough to be made public.
(6) To determine whether the request meets the second fee waiver
requirement, the Agency will consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest. Whether
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. The Agency will consider any commercial interest
of the requester (with reference to the definition of ``commercial use
request'' in paragraph (e)(1) of this section), or of any person on
whose behalf the requester may be acting, that would be furthered by
the requested disclosure. The Agency will give the requester an
opportunity in the administrative process to provide explanatory
information regarding this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure. Whether any identified
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. The Agency ordinarily
will presume that when a news media requester has satisfied the public
interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester. The Agency will not presume
that disclosure to data brokers or others who merely compile and market
government information for direct economic return is to primarily serve
the public interest.
Sec. 2.108 Administrative appeals.
(a) Appeals of adverse determinations. To appeal an adverse
determination, a requester must submit an appeal in writing within 90-
calendar days from the date of the letter communicating the Agency's
adverse determination, and by one of the following methods:
(1) EPA's FOIA submission website, linked to at www.epa.gov/foia;
(2) U.S. Mail sent to the following address: National FOIA Office,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
(2310A), Washington, DC 20460; or
(3) Overnight delivery service to National FOIA Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania NW, Room 7309C,
Washington, DC 20460.
(b) Requesters submitting appeals electronically must do so before
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time for the Agency to consider the appeal as
received on that date, and appeals submitted electronically at or after
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time will be considered received by the National FOIA
Office on the next business day.
(c) The appeal letter may include as much or as little related
information as the requester wishes. The appeal letter must clearly
identify the office's determination that is being appealed and the
assigned request tracking number. For quickest handling, the requester
must mark their appeal letter and its envelope with ``Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.''
(d) Authority to make decision on appeal. Unless the Administrator
directs otherwise, the General Counsel or the General Counsel's
delegate will act on behalf of the Administrator on all appeals under
this section, except that:
(1) The Counsel to the Inspector General will act on any appeal
where the Inspector General or the Inspector General's delegate has
made the final adverse determination; however, if the Counsel to the
Inspector General has signed the final adverse determination, the
General Counsel or the General Counsel's delegate will act on the
appeal;
(2) An adverse determination by the Administrator on an initial
request will serve as the final action of the Agency; and
(3) An appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request
becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
(e) Timing of decision on appeal. EPA will make the decision on the
appeal in writing, normally within 20 working days of its receipt by
the National FOIA Office.
(1) A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole or in
part will contain a statement of the reason or reasons for the
decision, including any FOIA exemption or exemptions applied, inform
the requester of dispute resolution services offered by the Office of
Government Information Service of the National Archives and Records
Administration, and inform the requester of the FOIA provisions for
judicial review of the decision.
(2) If the Agency reverses or modifies the adverse determination on
appeal, the Agency will attach the requested information that the
Agency determined on appeal to be releasable, or the Agency will return
the request to the appropriate office so that the office may reprocess
the request in accordance with the appeal decision.
(f) When appeal is required. If the requester wishes to seek
judicial review of any adverse determination, the requester must first
appeal that adverse determination under this section, except when EPA
has not responded to the request within the applicable time-period. In
such cases, the requester may seek judicial review without making an
administrative appeal.
Sec. 2.109 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this Subpart shall be construed to entitle any person,
as a right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which
such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
[FR Doc. 2022-24678 Filed 11-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P