Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Ameren Sioux Sulfur Dioxide Consent Agreement, 68634-68635 [2022-24789]
Download as PDF
68634
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 52
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Environmental Justice Concerns
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[EPA–R07–OAR–2022–0722; FRL–10156–
02–R7]
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Ameren
Sioux Sulfur Dioxide Consent
Agreement
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri. This final action will
amend the SIP to incorporate an
additional sulfur dioxide (SO2)
emissions limit for the Ameren Missouri
(Ameren)—Sioux Energy Center (Sioux).
Specifically, the EPA is approving into
the SIP an additional SO2 emissions
limit and associated operating
restrictions, monitoring, recordkeeping,
and reporting (referred to as ‘‘MRR’’),
and testing compliance requirements
established in a consent agreement as
permanent and enforceable SO2 control
measures.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2022–0722. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov
or please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section for additional
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Heitman, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7664;
email address: heitman.jason@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:43 Nov 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
The EPA is taking final action to
approve source-specific revisions to the
Missouri SIP. On September 1, 2022, the
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) which proposed to
approve the SIP revisions as submitted
by Missouri on April 21, 2022 (87 FR
53703). The revisions include a specific
SO2 emissions limit and associated
operating restrictions, MRR, and testing
compliance requirements for the
Ameren Sioux Facility as contained in
Consent Agreement number APCP–
2021–018. A copy of the Consent
Agreement is included in the docket for
this rulemaking. More detail on the
EPA’s analysis of the revisions can be
found in the NPRM included in this
docket.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State’s submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
December 27, 2021, to February 3, 2022,
and received one comment. In addition,
as explained above, the revision meets
the substantive SIP requirements of the
Clean Air Act, including section 110
and implementing regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
On September 1, 2022, the EPA
published a NPRM proposing to
approve Missouri’s April 21, 2022, SIP
revision submittal (87 FR 53703). The
EPA sought public comment on the
NPRM and received no comments.
Therefore, the EPA is taking final action
to amend the Missouri SIP to include
source-specific revisions pertaining to
the Ameren Sioux Facility as contained
in Consent Agreement number APCP–
2021–018. Approval of these revisions
will ensure consistency between State
and federally approved rules. As
described in the NPRM, the EPA has
determined that these changes meet the
requirements of the Clean Air Act and
will not adversely impact air quality or
the stringency of the SIP.
IV. Environmental Justice Concerns
When the EPA establishes a new or
revised NAAQS, the CAA requires the
EPA to designate all areas of the U.S. as
either nonattainment, attainment, or
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
unclassifiable. Area designations
address environmental justice concerns
by ensuring that the public is properly
informed about the air quality in an
area. In this action, the EPA is
approving an additional emissions limit
for a source into the Missouri SIP.
The EPA utilized the EJSCREEN tool
to evaluate environmental and
demographic indicators within the area.
The tool outputs report is contained in
the docket for this action. While the
EPA’s EJSCREEN tool demonstrates that
demographic indicators are consistent
or lower than national averages, there
are vulnerable populations in the area
including low-income populations and
persons over 64 years of age.
Based on the information presented in
this document, this proposed action
does not result in disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations
and/or indigenous peoples.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Consent Agreement discussed
in Section I of this preamble and as set
forth below in the amendments to 40
CFR part 52. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the State Implementation Plan, have
been incorporated by reference by the
EPA into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.1
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
1 62
FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
68635
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 16, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
• In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
• This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
• Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 17, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 8, 2022.
Meghan A. McCollister,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by adding an entry for
‘‘(37)’’ in numerical order to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS AND ORDERS
Name of source
Order/permit No.
*
*
(37) Ameren Missouri—Sioux Energy Center.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Consent Agreement No. APCP–
2021–018.
*
State
effective
date
3/31/2022
EPA approval date
*
*
11/16/2022, [insert Federal Register citation].
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[FR Doc. 2022–24789 Filed 11–15–22; 8:45 am]
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
49 CFR Part 371
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
[Docket No. FMCSA–2022–0134]
Definitions of Broker and Bona Fide
Agents
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of interim
guidance; request for comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Nov 15, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanation
*
FMCSA is issuing this interim
guidance to inform the public and
regulated entities about FMCSA’s
interpretation of the definitions of
‘‘broker’’ and ‘‘bona fide agents’’ as it
relates to all brokers of transportation by
motor vehicle. FMCSA is taking this
action to better define the terms in
response to a mandate in the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
(IIJA). After consideration of public
comments received, FMCSA is
providing clarification on its
interpretation of the definitions of
‘‘broker’’ and ‘‘bona fide agents,’’ in
addition to meeting other criteria
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM
16NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68634-68635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24789]
[[Page 68634]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2022-0722; FRL-10156-02-R7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Ameren Sioux Sulfur Dioxide Consent
Agreement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Missouri. This final action will amend the SIP to
incorporate an additional sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions
limit for the Ameren Missouri (Ameren)--Sioux Energy Center (Sioux).
Specifically, the EPA is approving into the SIP an additional
SO2 emissions limit and associated operating restrictions,
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting (referred to as ``MRR''), and
testing compliance requirements established in a consent agreement as
permanent and enforceable SO2 control measures.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2022-0722. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available through www.regulations.gov or
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Heitman, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7664; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is the EPA taking?
IV. Environmental Justice Concerns
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is taking final action to approve source-specific revisions
to the Missouri SIP. On September 1, 2022, the EPA published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) which proposed to approve the SIP
revisions as submitted by Missouri on April 21, 2022 (87 FR 53703). The
revisions include a specific SO2 emissions limit and
associated operating restrictions, MRR, and testing compliance
requirements for the Ameren Sioux Facility as contained in Consent
Agreement number APCP-2021-018. A copy of the Consent Agreement is
included in the docket for this rulemaking. More detail on the EPA's
analysis of the revisions can be found in the NPRM included in this
docket.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State's submission has met the public notice requirements for
SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from December 27,
2021, to February 3, 2022, and received one comment. In addition, as
explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of
the Clean Air Act, including section 110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is the EPA taking?
On September 1, 2022, the EPA published a NPRM proposing to approve
Missouri's April 21, 2022, SIP revision submittal (87 FR 53703). The
EPA sought public comment on the NPRM and received no comments.
Therefore, the EPA is taking final action to amend the Missouri SIP to
include source-specific revisions pertaining to the Ameren Sioux
Facility as contained in Consent Agreement number APCP-2021-018.
Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between State and
federally approved rules. As described in the NPRM, the EPA has
determined that these changes meet the requirements of the Clean Air
Act and will not adversely impact air quality or the stringency of the
SIP.
IV. Environmental Justice Concerns
When the EPA establishes a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires
the EPA to designate all areas of the U.S. as either nonattainment,
attainment, or unclassifiable. Area designations address environmental
justice concerns by ensuring that the public is properly informed about
the air quality in an area. In this action, the EPA is approving an
additional emissions limit for a source into the Missouri SIP.
The EPA utilized the EJSCREEN tool to evaluate environmental and
demographic indicators within the area. The tool outputs report is
contained in the docket for this action. While the EPA's EJSCREEN tool
demonstrates that demographic indicators are consistent or lower than
national averages, there are vulnerable populations in the area
including low-income populations and persons over 64 years of age.
Based on the information presented in this document, this proposed
action does not result in disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects on minority populations, low-income
populations and/or indigenous peoples.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Consent Agreement discussed in Section I of this preamble and
as set forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by
reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968, May 22, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
[[Page 68635]]
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act,
and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and
to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 17, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 8, 2022.
Meghan A. McCollister,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by adding an
entry for ``(37)'' in numerical order to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Source-Specific Permits and Orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of source Order/permit No. effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(37) Ameren Missouri--Sioux Consent Agreement 3/31/2022 11/16/2022, [insert ......................
Energy Center. No. APCP-2021-018. Federal Register
citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-24789 Filed 11-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P