Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities: Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program, 66773-66775 [2022-24068]
Download as PDF
66773
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
TABLE 1—BURDEN ESTIMATES
Annual responses
Estimated
burden per response
(hours)
Average
hourly labor
cost
Labor cost
per response
Total burden hours
Total labor costs
1,030
39.05
$29.89
$1,167.31
40,225
$1,202,325.25
Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$0.
NHTSA estimates that there are no
costs resulting from this collection of
information other than labor costs
associated with the burden hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.
Stephen A. Ridella,
Director, Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2022–24032 Filed 11–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No.: PHMSA–2022–0131; Notice No.
2022–16]
Hazardous Materials: Public Meeting
Notice for the Research, Development
& Technology Virtual Forum
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration’s
(PHMSA) Office of Hazardous Materials
Safety (OHMS) will hold a public
Research, Development & Technology
Forum on December 1, 2022, virtually
on Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
December 1, 2022, from 9 a.m. to
4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
DATES:
The meeting will be held
virtually on MS Teams.
Registration: DOT requests that
attendees pre-register for these meetings
by completing the form, at: https://
forms.office.com/g/NPs7v18VmL.
Conference call-in and ‘‘live meeting’’
capability will be provided.
Specific information about conference
call-in and live meeting access will be
posted at: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/
research-and-development/hazmat/rdmeetings-and-events under ‘‘Upcoming
Events.’’
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Leyder, Research, Development
& Technology, Andrew.Leyder@dot.gov,
(202) 360–0664, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC.
During the
meeting, OHMS will solicit comments
related to new research topics that may
be considered for inclusion in its future
work. OHMS is particularly interested
in the research gaps associated with the
characterization and transportation of
energetic materials (explosives), safe
transportation of energy products (e.g.,
crude oil), safe containment and
transportation of compressed gases, and
safe packaging and transportation of
charge storage devices (e.g., lithium ion
batteries), and how these might aid in
mitigation of climate change. The forum
will also include an opportunity for
stakeholder input that identifies other
research gaps related to the
transportation of hazardous materials.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
SUMMARY:
present the results of recently
completed projects, brief new project
plans, and obtain stakeholder input on
the direction of current and future
research projects on topics including
mitigation of climate change, risk
management and mitigation, packaging
integrity, emerging technology, and
technical analysis to aid risk
assessment.
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31,
2022.
William S. Schoonover,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022–23980 Filed 11–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No: PHMSA–2022–0009]
Pipeline Safety: Information Collection
Activities: Natural Gas Distribution
Infrastructure Safety and
Modernization Grant Program
Notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the information
collection request abstracted below is
being forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. A Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the
information collections was published
on June 16, 2022.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
December 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: The public is invited to
submit comments regarding these
information collection requests,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503. Comments can
also be submitted electronically at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Hill by telephone at 202–680–
2034 or by email at angela.hill@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) section 1320.8(d), requires the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) to provide
interested members of the public and
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
66774
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
affected agencies the opportunity to
comment on information collection and
recordkeeping requests before they are
submitted to OMB for approval. In
accordance with this regulation, on June
16, 2022, PHMSA published a Federal
Register notice (87 FR 36374) with a 60day comment period soliciting
comments on its intent to request
OMB’s three-year approval of an
information collection titled: ‘‘The
Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure
Safety and Modernization Grant
Program’’ under OMB Control No.
2137–0641.
During the 60-day comment period,
PHMSA received comments from the
American Public Gas Association
(APGA), the Distribution Contractors
Association (DCA), and the Plastics Pipe
Institute (PPI). Both DCA and PPI
submitted comments in general support
of the information collection. APGA
likewise expressed support for this
information collection request in that it
facilitates the distribution of allocated
grant dollars. APGA also provided
comments on various aspects of the
information collection request. The
comments, organized by topic, are
summarized and addressed below.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Comment Summary
A summary of comments and PHMSA
responses are detailed below.
A. Estimated Burden
APGA commented that due to the
highly technical and granular data
required to complete the grant
application, the actual burden hours
exceeded PHMSA’s 82-hours’ estimate.
Specifically, APGA stated ‘‘[d]ue to the
quantity of highly technical and
granular data required in this
application, it has been the experience
of APGA members that the application
takes more than 82 hours to complete.
This is especially true during the first
iteration of the application. The
application expands beyond routine
pipeline safety, design, construction,
and integrity management questions to
include areas of less familiarity with the
average applicant. Many have had to
rely upon subject matter experts in the
areas of grant writing, environmental
mitigation strategies, and cyber security
guidelines.’’ APGA estimated that the
average initial application required
nearly 200 hours to complete. PHMSA
agrees that the application requires a
variety of meticulous details that may
take additional time to collect in order
to properly prepare an application that
complies with the Notice of Funding
Opportunity (NOFO). PHMSA also
believes that future rounds of NGDISM
NOFOs will require less time given the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
number of frequently asked questions
(FAQs) that are now available as well as
PHMSA’s intention to incorporate many
of APGA’s suggested edits in future
NOFO iterations. As such, PHMSA has
agreed to increase the estimated burden
to 32,000 hours, for an average of 160
hours per applicant.
2. Project Narrative Cover Letter
B. Technical Issues With Unique Entity
Identifier and Grants.gov
3. Project Location
APGA commented that their members
experienced frustration during the
process of obtaining a Unique Entity
Identifier through SAM.gov and with
changing the settings in Grants.gov to
complete the application. APGA
acknowledged that these areas are
outside of PHMSA’s control. PHMSA
acknowledges that many applicants
experienced technical issues with these
two government sites and recommends
applicants utilize the Grants.gov and
SAM.gov helpdesks to resolve any
future technical issues. For issues with
Grants.gov, applicants can call 1–800–
518–4726 or email support@grants.gov.
For issues with SAM.gov, applicants can
call 866–606–8220 or create an incident
ticket with the Federal Service Desk at
the following website: www.fsd.gov.
Although PHMSA stands ready to
provide any assistance it can, all
applicants are ultimately responsible for
working directly with both SAM.gov
and Grants.gov to resolve technical
issues.
C. Suggestions To Enhance the Quality,
Utility, and Clarity of the Collected
Information
APGA provided PHMSA with specific
comments on various aspects of the
NOFO’s Project Narrative requirements.
In response to APGA, PHMSA will take
their comments into consideration when
drafting future NOFOs for this grant
program. Summaries of the APGA
comments, per section of the NOFO, are
detailed below.
1. Explanation of Evaluation and Select
Criteria Equivalence
APGA suggested that Section 8 of the
Project Narrative either be removed or
modified as it is largely duplicative of
other sections, adds unnecessary burden
on applicants, and further constrains
applicants’ ability to provide complete
answers given the page requirements.
APGA suggested if PHMSA chooses to
keep this section, PHMSA should clarify
whether applicants are expected to go
through each of the 23 elements in
Section E.1 and reiterate their
responses, or whether other content is
being requested.
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
APGA commented that the
‘‘Organization Name’’ section of the
cover letter section requested
information that is confusing given the
goal of the NGDISM Grant Program.
APGA suggested PHMSA modify the
language for clarity.
APGA commented that not all
projects are geospatially specific and
that this element should be broadened
to include the replacement of assets
throughout a service area or the
purchase of equipment.
4. Project Schedule
APGA commented that many
applicants were in the early stages of
project design when applying for a grant
and exact project schedules and
milestones may not have been available
at the time of application. APGA
suggested that PHMSA edit the language
in this section for clarity. APGA also
suggested generally referring to the
period-of-performance to ensure
consistency during future application
years should the period-of-performance
change.
5. Environmental Outputs and
Objectives
APGA commented that applicants
may find it helpful for PHMSA to
provide examples of how applicants
should describe methane mitigation for
their projects, whether in the form of
application instructions or in an FAQ
document.
6. Buy America
APGA commented that there are
many commonly used materials
throughout natural gas distribution
systems that are known to be noncompliant with the Buy America
requirements in Section 70914 of the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,
such as large steel fittings and piping.
APGA encourages PHMSA to explore
creating a specific waiver for those
materials for all NGDISM grant
recipients.1
7. Critical Infrastructure Security and
Resilience
APGA suggested referencing the
Transportation Security
Administration’s Pipeline Security
Guidelines in lieu of the Presidential
Policy Directive. APGA believes these
guidelines are more specific to the
1 While the IIJA’s Buy America requirements
apply to this program, the Buy American Act (41
U.S.C. 8301, et seq.) does not apply to this program.
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
pipeline industry and are more practical
for implementation.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
8. Environmental Analysis
APGA commented that it is unclear if
PHMSA is requesting applicants
provide information concerning the
nine sections of the Tier 2
Questionnaire in their initial
applications. The information appears
to be provided for information and
planning purposes only. Therefore, for
clarity, APGA recommended that it is
moved to a separate section of the
instructions.
III. Summary of Impacted Collections
The following information is provided
for the information collection request:
(1) Title of the information collection;
(2) OMB control number; (3) Current
expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5)
Abstract of the information collection
activity; (6) Description of affected
public; (7) Estimate of total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden;
and (8) Frequency of collection.
PHMSA will request a three-year term
of approval for this information
collection. PHMSA requests comments
on the following information:
Title: Natural Gas Distribution
Infrastructure Safety and Modernization
Grant Program.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0641.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2022.
Type of Request: Extension of an
approved information collection.
Abstract: This information collection
covers the collection of applicant data
from municipality- and communityowned utilities that are interested in
applying to receive funds from the
NGDISM Grant Program. Solicitation for
grants under the NGDISM Grant
Program is voluntary. No eligible entity
is required to apply. To be eligible,
however, municipality- and communityowned utilities must meet all the
requirements set forth in the law.
Therefore, PHMSA must collect certain
information from applicants to
determine eligibility and evaluate
applications. PHMSA must also verify
the accuracy of grant requests from
approved applicants, in accordance
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, and other laws and
regulations governing Federal financial
assistance programs, including (but not
limited to) the Anti-Deficiency Act, the
Federal Funding Accountability and
Transparency Act (FFATA), the
Payment Integrity Information Act of
2019, and 2 CFR part 200, among others.
This information collection also covers
the collection of data from grant
recipients. PHMSA expects to receive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
approximately 200 applications from
potential grantees annually over the
next four years. PHMSA estimates that
it will take the 200 applicants
approximately 160 hours per applicant
to compile and submit the forms
required to complete the application
process for an annual burden of 32,000
hours. PHMSA estimates that 100 grant
recipients will, on eight occasions over
the course of one year, spend 2.5 hours,
or 20 hours annually, submitting postaward reports for an annual burden of
2,000 hours. Therefore, PHMSA
estimates that there will be a total of
1,000 responses (200 applications plus
800 post-award reports) for an aggregate
total annual burden for the information
collection of 34,000 hours (32,000 hours
for applications plus 2,000 hours for
post-award reports).
Affected Public: Municipality- and
Community-owned Utilities.
Annual Burden:
Estimated number of responses:
1,000.
Estimated annual burden hours:
34,000.
Frequency of Collection: One-time
application, grant reports no more than
quarterly, to be followed by
disbursement requests and closeout.
Comments are invited on:
(a) The need for this information
collection for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques; and,
(e) Additional information that would
be appropriate to collect to inform the
reduction in risk to people, property,
and the environment due to excavation
damages.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as
amended.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31,
2022, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2022–24068 Filed 11–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66775
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2019–0028]
Notice of Request for Clearance of a
Revision of a Currently Approved
Information Collection: National
Census of Ferry Operators
Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS), Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Research and Technology
(OST–R), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this notice
announces the intention of the BTS to
request the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB’s) approval for new
iterations of an on-going biennial
information collection related to the
nation’s ferry operations. The
information collected from each Census
will be used to produce a descriptive
database of existing ferry operations. A
summary report of census findings will
also be published by BTS on the BTS
web page: www.bts.gov/ncfo.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before December 5, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clara Reschovsky, (202) 768–4994,
NCFO Program Manager, BTS, OST–R,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Room E36–324,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are
from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., E.T.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National Census of Ferry
Operators (NCFO).
Type of Request: Approval
modifications to an existing information
collection.
Affected Public: There are
approximately 250 ferry operators
nationwide.
Abstract: In 1998, the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–
21) (Pub. L. 105–178), section 1207(c),
directed the Secretary of Transportation
to conduct a study of ferry
transportation in the United States and
its possessions. In 2000, the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) Office
of Intermodal and Statewide Planning
conducted a survey of approximately
250 ferry operators to identify: (1)
existing ferry operations including the
location and routes served; (2) source
and amount, if any, of funds derived
from Federal, State, or local
governments supporting ferry
construction or operations; (3) potential
domestic ferry routes in the United
States and its possessions; and (4)
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66773-66775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No: PHMSA-2022-0009]
Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities: Natural Gas
Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the information collection request abstracted
below is being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and comment. A Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the information collections was published
on June 16, 2022.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
December 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: The public is invited to submit comments regarding these
information collection requests, including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for
the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503. Comments can also be submitted electronically at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hill by telephone at 202-680-
2034 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 1320.8(d),
requires the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) to provide interested members of the public and
[[Page 66774]]
affected agencies the opportunity to comment on information collection
and recordkeeping requests before they are submitted to OMB for
approval. In accordance with this regulation, on June 16, 2022, PHMSA
published a Federal Register notice (87 FR 36374) with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on its intent to request OMB's three-year
approval of an information collection titled: ``The Natural Gas
Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program''
under OMB Control No. 2137-0641.
During the 60-day comment period, PHMSA received comments from the
American Public Gas Association (APGA), the Distribution Contractors
Association (DCA), and the Plastics Pipe Institute (PPI). Both DCA and
PPI submitted comments in general support of the information
collection. APGA likewise expressed support for this information
collection request in that it facilitates the distribution of allocated
grant dollars. APGA also provided comments on various aspects of the
information collection request. The comments, organized by topic, are
summarized and addressed below.
II. Comment Summary
A summary of comments and PHMSA responses are detailed below.
A. Estimated Burden
APGA commented that due to the highly technical and granular data
required to complete the grant application, the actual burden hours
exceeded PHMSA's 82-hours' estimate. Specifically, APGA stated ``[d]ue
to the quantity of highly technical and granular data required in this
application, it has been the experience of APGA members that the
application takes more than 82 hours to complete. This is especially
true during the first iteration of the application. The application
expands beyond routine pipeline safety, design, construction, and
integrity management questions to include areas of less familiarity
with the average applicant. Many have had to rely upon subject matter
experts in the areas of grant writing, environmental mitigation
strategies, and cyber security guidelines.'' APGA estimated that the
average initial application required nearly 200 hours to complete.
PHMSA agrees that the application requires a variety of meticulous
details that may take additional time to collect in order to properly
prepare an application that complies with the Notice of Funding
Opportunity (NOFO). PHMSA also believes that future rounds of NGDISM
NOFOs will require less time given the number of frequently asked
questions (FAQs) that are now available as well as PHMSA's intention to
incorporate many of APGA's suggested edits in future NOFO iterations.
As such, PHMSA has agreed to increase the estimated burden to 32,000
hours, for an average of 160 hours per applicant.
B. Technical Issues With Unique Entity Identifier and Grants.gov
APGA commented that their members experienced frustration during
the process of obtaining a Unique Entity Identifier through SAM.gov and
with changing the settings in Grants.gov to complete the application.
APGA acknowledged that these areas are outside of PHMSA's control.
PHMSA acknowledges that many applicants experienced technical issues
with these two government sites and recommends applicants utilize the
Grants.gov and SAM.gov helpdesks to resolve any future technical
issues. For issues with Grants.gov, applicants can call 1-800-518-4726
or email [email protected]. For issues with SAM.gov, applicants can
call 866-606-8220 or create an incident ticket with the Federal Service
Desk at the following website: www.fsd.gov. Although PHMSA stands ready
to provide any assistance it can, all applicants are ultimately
responsible for working directly with both SAM.gov and Grants.gov to
resolve technical issues.
C. Suggestions To Enhance the Quality, Utility, and Clarity of the
Collected Information
APGA provided PHMSA with specific comments on various aspects of
the NOFO's Project Narrative requirements. In response to APGA, PHMSA
will take their comments into consideration when drafting future NOFOs
for this grant program. Summaries of the APGA comments, per section of
the NOFO, are detailed below.
1. Explanation of Evaluation and Select Criteria Equivalence
APGA suggested that Section 8 of the Project Narrative either be
removed or modified as it is largely duplicative of other sections,
adds unnecessary burden on applicants, and further constrains
applicants' ability to provide complete answers given the page
requirements. APGA suggested if PHMSA chooses to keep this section,
PHMSA should clarify whether applicants are expected to go through each
of the 23 elements in Section E.1 and reiterate their responses, or
whether other content is being requested.
2. Project Narrative Cover Letter
APGA commented that the ``Organization Name'' section of the cover
letter section requested information that is confusing given the goal
of the NGDISM Grant Program. APGA suggested PHMSA modify the language
for clarity.
3. Project Location
APGA commented that not all projects are geospatially specific and
that this element should be broadened to include the replacement of
assets throughout a service area or the purchase of equipment.
4. Project Schedule
APGA commented that many applicants were in the early stages of
project design when applying for a grant and exact project schedules
and milestones may not have been available at the time of application.
APGA suggested that PHMSA edit the language in this section for
clarity. APGA also suggested generally referring to the period-of-
performance to ensure consistency during future application years
should the period-of-performance change.
5. Environmental Outputs and Objectives
APGA commented that applicants may find it helpful for PHMSA to
provide examples of how applicants should describe methane mitigation
for their projects, whether in the form of application instructions or
in an FAQ document.
6. Buy America
APGA commented that there are many commonly used materials
throughout natural gas distribution systems that are known to be non-
compliant with the Buy America requirements in Section 70914 of the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, such as large steel fittings
and piping. APGA encourages PHMSA to explore creating a specific waiver
for those materials for all NGDISM grant recipients.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ While the IIJA's Buy America requirements apply to this
program, the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 8301, et seq.) does not
apply to this program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience
APGA suggested referencing the Transportation Security
Administration's Pipeline Security Guidelines in lieu of the
Presidential Policy Directive. APGA believes these guidelines are more
specific to the
[[Page 66775]]
pipeline industry and are more practical for implementation.
8. Environmental Analysis
APGA commented that it is unclear if PHMSA is requesting applicants
provide information concerning the nine sections of the Tier 2
Questionnaire in their initial applications. The information appears to
be provided for information and planning purposes only. Therefore, for
clarity, APGA recommended that it is moved to a separate section of the
instructions.
III. Summary of Impacted Collections
The following information is provided for the information
collection request: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB
control number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5)
Abstract of the information collection activity; (6) Description of
affected public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden; and (8) Frequency of collection.
PHMSA will request a three-year term of approval for this
information collection. PHMSA requests comments on the following
information:
Title: Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and
Modernization Grant Program.
OMB Control Number: 2137-0641.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2022.
Type of Request: Extension of an approved information collection.
Abstract: This information collection covers the collection of
applicant data from municipality- and community-owned utilities that
are interested in applying to receive funds from the NGDISM Grant
Program. Solicitation for grants under the NGDISM Grant Program is
voluntary. No eligible entity is required to apply. To be eligible,
however, municipality- and community-owned utilities must meet all the
requirements set forth in the law. Therefore, PHMSA must collect
certain information from applicants to determine eligibility and
evaluate applications. PHMSA must also verify the accuracy of grant
requests from approved applicants, in accordance with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, and other laws and regulations governing Federal financial
assistance programs, including (but not limited to) the Anti-Deficiency
Act, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA),
the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019, and 2 CFR part 200,
among others. This information collection also covers the collection of
data from grant recipients. PHMSA expects to receive approximately 200
applications from potential grantees annually over the next four years.
PHMSA estimates that it will take the 200 applicants approximately 160
hours per applicant to compile and submit the forms required to
complete the application process for an annual burden of 32,000 hours.
PHMSA estimates that 100 grant recipients will, on eight occasions over
the course of one year, spend 2.5 hours, or 20 hours annually,
submitting post-award reports for an annual burden of 2,000 hours.
Therefore, PHMSA estimates that there will be a total of 1,000
responses (200 applications plus 800 post-award reports) for an
aggregate total annual burden for the information collection of 34,000
hours (32,000 hours for applications plus 2,000 hours for post-award
reports).
Affected Public: Municipality- and Community-owned Utilities.
Annual Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 1,000.
Estimated annual burden hours: 34,000.
Frequency of Collection: One-time application, grant reports no
more than quarterly, to be followed by disbursement requests and
closeout.
Comments are invited on:
(a) The need for this information collection for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques;
and,
(e) Additional information that would be appropriate to collect to
inform the reduction in risk to people, property, and the environment
due to excavation damages.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31, 2022, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2022-24068 Filed 11-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P