TMI-2 Solutions, LLC; Three Mile Island Station, Unit No. 2, 66757-66762 [2022-23975]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
Thursday, November 10, 2022
10:00 a.m. Briefing on NRC
International Activities (Public
Meeting). (Contact: Jen Holzman, 301–
287–9090)
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
Week of November 14, 2022—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 14, 2022.
Week of November 21, 2022—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 21, 2022.
Week of November 28, 2022—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 28, 2022.
Week of December 5, 2022—Tentative
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
10:00 a.m. Meeting with the Advisory
Committee on the Medical Uses of
Isotopes (Public Meeting). (Contact:
Celimar Valentin-Rodriguez: 301–
415–7124)
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
Dated: November 2, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Wesley W. Held,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–24175 Filed 11–2–22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–320; NRC–2022–0193]
TMI–2 Solutions, LLC; Three Mile
Island Station, Unit No. 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
9:00 a.m. Overview of Advanced
Reactor Fuel Activities (Public
Meeting). (Contact: Stephanie DevlinGill, 301–415–5301)
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing partial
exemptions, with a conforming
amendment, from several of the record
keeping requirements in its regulations
in response to a request from TMI–2
Solutions, LLC. Specifically, the
licensee requested partial exemptions
for certain NRC regulations which
require certain records to be retained for
the period specified by the appropriate
regulation, license condition, or
technical specifications (TS), or until
termination of the license if not
otherwise specified. In response to the
licensee’s requests, the NRC also issued
a conforming amendment that revised
the license to reflect the specific
exemptions and associated changes in
the TS.
DATES: The exemption was issued on
and was effective on September 16,
2022.
Week of December 12, 2022—Tentative
ADDRESSES:
Thursday, December 8, 2022
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Additional Information: The meeting
will be held in the Commissioners’
Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The public is
invited to attend the Commission’s
meeting in person or watch live via
webcast at the Web address—https://
video.nrc.gov/.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For more information or to verify the
status of meetings, contact Wesley Held
at 301–287–3591 or via email at
Wesley.Held@nrc.gov.
The NRC is holding the meetings
under the authority of the Government
in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
Wednesday, December 14, 2022
10:00 a.m. Briefing on Equal
Employment Opportunity,
Affirmative Employment, and Small
Business (Public Meeting). (Contact:
Larniece McKoy Moore: 301–415–
1942)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
SUMMARY:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2022–0193 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66757
for Docket ID NRC–2022–0193. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents,
by appointment, at the NRC’s PDR,
Room P1 B35, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy M. Snyder, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone:
301–415–6822, email: Amy.Snyder@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the exemption is attached.
Dated: October 31, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Shaun M. Anderson,
Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch,
Division of Decommissioning, Uranium
Recovery, and Waste Programs, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
Attachment—Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Docket No. 50–320
TMI–2 Solutions, LLC
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit
No. 2
Partial Exemptions and Conforming
Amendment
I. Background
TMl-2 Solutions, LLC, (TMI–2
Solutions or the licensee) is the holder
of Possession Only License (POL) No.
DPR–73 for Three Mile Island Nuclear
Station, Unit No. 2 (TMI–2). The license
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
66758
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
provides, among other things, that the
facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
On March 28, 1979, the unit
experienced an accident initiated by
interruption of secondary feedwater
flow. This led to a core heat up that
caused fuel damage. Most of the fuel
material travelled down through the
region of the southeastern assemblies
and into the core bypass region. A
portion of the fuel material passed
around the bypass region and migrated
down into the lower internals and lower
head region, but overall reactor vessel
integrity was maintained throughout the
accident. As a result of this accident,
small quantities of spent nuclear fuel,
damaged core material, and high-level
waste (collectively referred to as ‘‘Debris
Material’’) were transported through the
reactor coolant system and the Reactor
Building. In addition, a small quantity
of Debris Material was transported to
the auxiliary and fuel handling
buildings (AFHB). Further spread of the
Debris also occurred as part of the postaccident water processing cleanup
activities.
The quantity of fuel remaining at
TMI–2 is a small fraction of the initial
fuel load; approximately 99 percent was
successfully removed in the defueling.
Additionally, large quantities of
radioactive fission products that were
released into various systems and
structures were removed as part of the
waste processing activities during the
TMI–2 Cleanup Program. The cleanup
to meet the NRC post-accident safe
storage criteria was completed and
accepted by the NRC with TMI–2
entering into Postdefueling Monitored
Storage (PDMS) in 1993.
In a letter dated February 13, 2013,
(Agencywide Documents and Access
Management System Accession No.
ML12349A291), the NRC stated that
September 14, 1993, is considered the
date of TMI–2’s cessation of operations.
The September 14, 1993, date coincides
with the issuance of License
Amendment No. 45, which converted
the TMI–2 operating license into a POL
(ML20029E532).
Approximately 99 percent of the fuel
was removed and shipped to the Idaho
National Engineering and
Environmental Laboratory (INEEL)
under the responsibility of the U.S.
Department of Energy. The reactor
coolant system was decontaminated to
the extent practical to reduce radiation
levels to as low as is reasonably
achievable. As part of the
decontamination effort, water was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
removed to the extent practical from the
reactor coolant system and the fuel
transfer canal, and the fuel transfer
tubes were isolated. Radioactive wastes
from the major cleanup activities have
been shipped off-site or have been
packaged and staged for shipment offsite. Following the decontamination
activities, only the Reactor Building and
a few areas in the AFHB continued to
have general area radiation levels higher
than those of an undamaged reactor
facility nearing the end of its operating
life.
With the accident cleanup completed
and the spent fuel moved to INEEL,
there is no facility function related to
the safe storage and management of
irradiated fuel.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated October 5, 2021
(ML21279A278), as supplemented on
December 15, 2021 (ML21354A027),
TMI–2 Solutions submitted an
exemption request asking for permanent
partial exemptions from: (1) Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion
XVII, ‘‘Quality Assurance Criteria for
Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel
Reprocessing Plants,’’ which requires
certain records to be retained consistent
with applicable regulatory requirements
for a duration established by the
licensee; (2) 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3),
‘‘Changes, tests, and experiments,’’
which requires certain records to be
maintained until ‘‘termination of an
operating license issued under this
part;’’ and (3) 10 CFR 50.71(c),
‘‘Maintenance of records, making of
reports,’’ which requires certain records
to be retained for the period specified by
the appropriate regulation, license
condition, or Technical Specifications
(TS), or until termination of the license
if not otherwise specified.
The licensee also submitted a license
amendment request, which would
revise the license to reflect the specific
exemptions and associated changes in
the TS, should the NRC approve the
partial exemption request.
The licensee requests these
exemptions to eliminate the
requirement to maintain records that are
no longer necessary or applicable due to
the permanently defueled condition and
decommissioning status of the station.
Specifically, TMI–2 Solutions states that
the following records would no longer
be retained: Records associated with
structures, systems, and components
(SSCs), and activities that were
applicable to the nuclear unit, which are
no longer required by the Part 50
licensing basis (e.g., removed from the
Decommissioning Final Safety Analysis
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Report and/or Technical Specifications
by appropriate change mechanisms).
Such partial exemptions would
eliminate the associated, unnecessary
regulatory and economic burdens of
retaining records for SSCs and activities
that are no longer part of the TMI–2
licensing basis.
TMI–2 Solutions, in its December 15,
2021, supplement, committed to
preserve all records pertaining to the
1979 Records Preservation Order,
published in the Federal Register (FR)
on May 29, 1979, ((44 FR 30788, and
Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021
submittal (ML21354A027)). TMI–2
Solutions notes that an inventory of
such records for the period from March
27, 1979, through May 1, 1979, was
submitted to the NRC on November 18,
2021, to assist the NRC Historian in
determining if the NRC document
collection for the TMI–2 accident was
missing any needed documents.
In the exemption request, TMI–2
Solutions cites record retention partial
exemptions granted consistent with
similar exemption requests that have
been approved recently by the NRC for
other nuclear power reactor facilities
beginning decommissioning.
Specifically, TMI–2 Solutions notes that
the NRC granted similar partial
exemptions to Three Mile Island, Unit
No. 1 (ML20107J648), Oyster Creek
Nuclear Generating Station
(ML18122A306), Millstone Power
Station, Unit No. 1, (ML070110567);
Zion Nuclear Power Station, Unit Nos.
1 and 2 (ML111260277); Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Station
(ML15344A243), San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and
3 (ML15355A055); Kewaunee Power
Station (ML17069A394); and Fort
Calhoun Station (ML17172A730).
Records associated with residual
radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to
support decommissioning, such as
security and quality assurance, are not
affected by the exemption request
because they will be retained as
decommissioning records, as required
by 10 CFR part 50, ‘‘Domestic Licensing
of Production and Utilization
Facilities,’’ until the termination of the
TMI–2 license. No exemption was
requested from the decommissioning
records retention requirements of 10
CFR 50.75, ‘‘Reporting and
recordkeeping for decommissioning
planning,’’ or any other requirements of
10 CFR part 50 applicable to
decommissioning and dismantlement.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, ‘‘Specific
exemptions,’’ the Commission may,
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 50 when the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an
undue risk to public health or safety,
and are consistent with the common
defense and security. However, the
Commission will not consider granting
an exemption unless special
circumstances are present. Special
circumstances are described in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2).
TMI–2 Solutions states in its
application that decommissioning of the
TMl-2 and the nuclear reactor and
essentially all associated SSCs in the
nuclear steam supply system and
balance of plant that supported the
generation of power have been retired in
place and are being prepared for
removal. SSCs that remain operable are
associated with the Reactor Building
and effluent monitoring, are needed to
meet other regulatory requirements, or
are needed to support other site
facilities (e.g., radwaste handling,
heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning). There are no SSCs
classified as safety-related. SSCs related
to safe storage of the remaining Debris
Material are designated as Important to
Safety by the current licensing basis.
The licensee also states in its
application that TMI–2 Solutions is
progressively removing these SSCs
related to safe storage of the remaining
Debris Material from the licensing basis
where necessary through appropriate
change mechanisms (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59
or NRC approved TS changes, as
applicable); revising the Final Safety
Analysis Report (FSAR) for PDMS, as
necessary; and, then proceeding with an
orderly dismantlement.
In its October 5, 2021, exemption
request, the TMI–2 Solutions indicates
that the basis for eliminating records
associated with reactor facility SSCs and
activities is that these SSCs have been
(or will be) removed from service per
regulatory change processes, dismantled
or demolished, and no longer have any
function regulated by the NRC.
The licensee recognizes that some
records related to the nuclear unit will
continue to be under NRC regulation
primarily due to residual radioactivity.
The radiological and other necessary
programmatic controls (such as security,
quality assurance, etc.) for the facility
and the implementation of controls for
the defueled condition and the
decommissioning activities are and will
continue to be appropriately addressed
through the license and current plant
documents such as the FSAR for PDMS
and the TS. Through a license
application request dated February 19,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
2021 (ML21057A046), TMI–2 Solutions
requested that certain Technical
Specification records requirements be
relocated to the Decommissioning
Quality Assurance Plan. This action is
currently under review. TMI–2
Solutions indicated in its exemption
request that future changes to the
Technical Specifications will be made
through the applicable change processes
defined in the regulations (e.g., 10 CFR
50.48(f), ‘‘Fire protection,’’ 10 CFR
50.59, 10 CFR 50.54(a), ‘‘Conditions of
licenses,’’ 10 CFR 50.54(p), 10 CFR
50.54(q)). The NRC staff notes that
except for future changes made through
the applicable change process defined
in the regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 50.48(f),
10 CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.90,
‘‘Application for amendment of license,
construction permit, or early site
permit,’’ 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR
50.54(p), 10 CFR 50.54(q)), these
programmatic elements and their
associated records are unaffected by the
requested exemptions.
TMI–2 Solutions justifies the
elimination of records associated with
TMI–2 SSCs for retired equipment that
have been removed from service and
have been or will be physically
removed, dismantled, or demolished,
because it believes these SSCs now and
will not in the future serve any TMI–2
functions regulated by the NRC. For
example, the primarily coolant system is
currently not in service and will never
be in service again nor are there any
vital areas that will be used for their
intended purposes. Maintaining
decommissioning records on the SSC
associated with the primarily coolant
system will not serve any TMI–2
function regulated by the NRC. TMI–2
Solutions decommissioning plans for
TMI–2 are described in the PostShutdown Decommissioning Activities
Report dated March 17, 2021
(ML21084A229). The licensee’s
decommissioning process involves
evaluating SSCs with respect to the
current facility safety analysis;
progressively removing them from the
licensing basis where necessary through
appropriate change mechanisms (e.g., 10
CFR 50.59 or by NRC approved TS
changes, as applicable); revising the
FSAR, as necessary; and then
proceeding with an orderly
dismantlement.
TMI–2 Solutions intends to retain the
records required by its license as the
state of the facility transitions through
decommissioning. However, equipment
abandonment will obviate the regulatory
and business needs for maintenance of
most records. As the SSCs are removed
from the licensing basis, TMI–2
Solutions asserts that the need for its
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66759
records is, on a practical basis,
eliminated. Therefore, TMI–2 Solutions
is requesting partial exemptions from
the associated records retention
requirements for SSCs for retired
equipment that have been removed from
service and have been or will be
physically removed and historical
activities that are no longer relevant,
except it has committed to preserve all
records pertaining to the 1979 Records
Preservation Order ((44 FR 30788, dated
May 29, 1979 and Attachment 1 of
December 15, 2021 submittal
(ML21354A027)).
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows
the NRC to grant exemptions from 10
CFR part 50 requirements if it makes
certain findings. As described here and
in the sections below, the NRC staff has
determined that special circumstances
exist to grant the partial exemptions. In
addition, granting the licensee’s
proposed exemptions will not result in
a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended; other laws; or the
Commission’s regulations. Therefore,
the granting of the exemption request
from the recordkeeping requirements of
10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue
Risk to Public Health and Safety
As SSCs are prepared for safe storage
and eventual decommissioning and
dismantlement, they will be removed
from NRC licensing basis documents
through appropriate change
mechanisms, such as through the 10
CFR 50.59 process or through a license
amendment request approved by the
NRC. These change processes involve
either a determination by the licensee or
an approval from the NRC that the
affected SSCs no longer serve any safety
purpose regulated by the NRC.
Therefore, the removal of the SSCs
would not present an undue risk to
public health and safety. In turn,
elimination of records associated with
these removed SSCs would not cause
any additional impact to public health
and safety.
The granting of the exemption request
from the recordkeeping requirements of
10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) for the records described is
administrative in nature and will have
no impact on any remaining
decommissioning activities or on
radiological effluents. The granting of
the exemption request will only
advance the schedule for disposition of
the specified records. Because these
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
66760
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
records contain information about SSCs
associated with reactor operation and
contain no information needed to
maintain the facility in a safe condition
when the facility is eventually
decommissioned through approved NRC
licensing proceedings and the SSCs are
dismantled, the elimination of these
records on an advanced timetable will
have no reasonable possibility of
presenting any undue risk to the public
health and safety. TMI–2 Solutions is
not requesting any exemption associated
with retention of spent fuel debris
related records required by 10 CFR part
50 and 10 CFR part 72, ‘‘Licensing
Requirements for the Independent
Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, HighLevel Radioactive Waste, and ReactorRelated Greater Than Class C Waste.’’
C. The Exemption is Consistent With the
Common Defense and Security
The elimination of the recordkeeping
requirements does not involve
information or activities that could
potentially impact the common defense
and security of the United States. Upon
dismantlement of the affected SSCs, the
records have no functional purpose
relative to maintaining the safe
operation of the SSCs, maintaining
conditions that would affect the ongoing
health and safety of workers or the
public, or informing decisions related to
nuclear security.
Rather, the exemptions requested are
administrative in nature and would only
advance the current schedule for
disposition of the specified records.
Therefore, the exemption request from
the recordkeeping requirements of 10
CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) for the types of records
described is consistent with the
common defense and security.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
D. Special Circumstances
Paragraph 50.12(a)(2) of 10 CFR states,
in part:
The Commission will not consider granting
an exemption unless special circumstances
are present. Special circumstances are
present whenever—. . .
(ii) Application of the regulation in the
particular circumstances would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the underlying purpose
of the rule; or
(iii) Compliance would result in undue
hardship or other costs that are significantly
in excess of those contemplated when the
regulation was adopted . . .
Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10
CFR part 50 states, in part: ‘‘Sufficient
records shall be maintained to furnish
evidence of activities affecting quality.’’
Paragraph 50.59(d)(3) of 10 CFR
states, in part: ‘‘The records of changes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
in the facility must be maintained until
the termination of an operating license
issued under this part . . .’’
Paragraph 50.71(c) of 10 CFR, states,
in part:
Records that are required by the
regulations in this part or part 52 of this
chapter, by license condition, or by
Technical Specifications must be retained for
the period specified by the appropriate
regulation, license condition, or Technical
Specification. If a retention period is not
otherwise specified, these records must be
retained until the Commission terminates the
facility license. . . .
In the statement of considerations for
the final rulemaking, ‘‘Retention Periods
for Records’’ (53 FR 19240, dated May
27, 1988), in response to public
comments received during the
rulemaking process, the NRC stated that
records must be retained ‘‘for NRC to
ensure compliance with the safety and
health aspects of the nuclear
environment and for the NRC to
accomplish its mission to protect the
public health and safety.’’ In the
statement of considerations, the
Commission also explained that
requiring licensees to maintain adequate
records assists the NRC ‘‘in judging
compliance and noncompliance, to act
on possible noncompliance, and to
examine facts as necessary following
any incident.’’
These regulations apply to licensees
in decommissioning. During the
decommissioning process, safety-related
SSCs are retired or disabled and
subsequently removed from NRC
licensing basis documents by
appropriate change mechanisms.
Appropriate removal of an SSC from the
licensing basis requires either a
determination by the licensee or an
approval from the NRC that the SSC no
longer has the potential to cause an
accident, event, or other problem that
would adversely impact public health
and safety.
The records subject to removal under
this exemption request are associated
with SSCs that had been important to
safety during power operation or
operation of the spent fuel pool, but are
no longer capable of causing an event,
incident, or condition that would
adversely impact public health and
safety, as evidenced by their appropriate
removal from the licensing basis
documents. If the SSCs no longer have
the potential to cause these scenarios,
then it is reasonable to conclude that the
records associated with these SSCs
would not reasonably be necessary to
assist the NRC in determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, or
examining facts following an incident.
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Therefore, their retention would not
serve the underlying purpose of the
rule.
In addition, once removed from the
licensing basis documents (e.g., FSAR or
TS), SSCs are no longer governed by the
NRC’s regulations, and therefore, are not
subject to compliance with the safety
and health aspects of the nuclear
environment. As such, retention of
records associated with SSCs that are or
will no longer be part of the facility
serves no safety or regulatory purpose,
nor does it serve the underlying purpose
of the rule of maintaining compliance
with the safety and health aspects of the
nuclear environment in order to
accomplish the NRC’s mission.
Therefore, special circumstances are
present that the NRC may consider,
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), to
grant the exemption request.
Records that continue to serve the
underlying purpose of the rule, that is,
to maintain compliance and to protect
public health and safety in support of
the NRC’s mission, will continue to be
retained pursuant to other regulations in
10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72.
Retained records that are not subject to
the proposed exemption include those
associated with programmatic controls,
such as those pertaining to residual
radioactivity, security, and quality
assurance, as well as records associated
with the ISFSI and spent fuel debris.
The retention of records required by
10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) provides assurance that
records associated with SSCs will be
captured, indexed, and stored in an
environmentally suitable and retrievable
condition. Given the volume of records
associated with the SSCs, compliance
with the records retention rule results in
a considerable cost to the licensee.
Retention of the volume of records
associated with the SSCs during the
operational phase is appropriate to serve
the underlying purpose of determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and
examining facts following an incident,
as discussed.
However, the cost effect of retaining
operational phase records beyond the
operations phase until the termination
of the license was not fully considered
or understood when the records
retention rule was put in place. For
example, existing records storage
facilities are eliminated as
decommissioning progresses. Retaining
records associated with SSCs and
activities that no longer serve a safety or
regulatory purpose would, therefore,
result in an unnecessary financial and
administrative burden. As such,
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
compliance with the rule would result
in an undue cost in excess of that
contemplated when the rule was
adopted. Therefore, special
circumstances are present that the NRC
may consider, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii), to grant the exemption
request. The licensee has committed to
preserve all records pertaining to the
1979 Records Preservation Order ((44
FR 30788, dated May 29, 1979 and
Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021
submittal (ML21354A027)). TMI–2
Solutions is not requesting any
exemption associated with retention of
spent fuel debris related records
required by 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR
part 72.
E. Environmental Considerations
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and
(c)(25), ‘‘Criterion for categorical
exclusion; identification of licensing
and regulatory actions eligible for
categorical exclusion or otherwise not
requiring environmental review,’’ the
granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation in
Chapter I of 10 CFR part 50 meets the
eligibility criteria for categorical
exclusion provided that: (1) there is no
significant hazards consideration; (2)
there is no significant change in the
types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released off-site; (3) there is no
significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure; (4) there is no
significant construction impact; (5)
there is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (6) the
requirements from which an exemption
is sought are among those identified in
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The exemption request is
administrative in nature. The exemption
request has no effect on SSCs and no
effect on the capability of any plant SSC
to perform its design function. The
exemption request would not increase
the likelihood of the malfunction of any
plant SSC.
The probability of occurrence of
previously evaluated accidents is not
increased since most previously
analyzed accidents will no longer be
able to occur, and the probability and
consequences of the remaining fuel
handling accident are unaffected by the
exemption request. Therefore, the
exemption request does not involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
The exemption request does not
involve a physical alteration of the
plant. No new or different types of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
equipment will be installed, and there
are no physical modifications to existing
equipment associated with the
exemption request. Similarly, the
exemption request will not physically
change any SSCs involved in the
mitigation of any accidents. Thus, no
new initiators or precursors of a new or
different kind of accident are created.
Furthermore, the exemption request
does not create the possibility of a new
accident as a result of new failure
modes associated with any equipment
or personnel failures. No changes are
being made to parameters within which
the plant is normally operated or in the
setpoints that initiate protective or
mitigative actions, and no new failure
modes are being introduced. Therefore,
the exemption request does not create
the possibility of a new or different kind
of accident from any accident
previously evaluated.
The exemption request does not alter
the design basis or any safety limits for
the plant. The exemption request does
not impact station operation or any
plant SSC that is relied upon for
accident mitigation. Therefore, the
exemption request does not involve a
significant reduction in a margin of
safety.
For these reasons, the NRC staff has
determined that approval of the
exemption request involves no
significant hazards consideration
because granting the licensee’s
exemption request from the
recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix B,
Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3)
at TMI–2 does not: (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated, or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety (10 CFR 50.92(c),
‘‘Issuance of Amendment.’’) Likewise,
there is no significant change in the
types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released off-site and no significant
increase in individual or cumulative
public or occupational radiation
exposure.
The exempted regulations are not
associated with construction, so there is
no significant construction impact. The
exempted regulations do not concern
the source term (i.e., potential amount
of radiation involved for an accident) or
accident mitigation; therefore, there is
no significant increase in the potential
for, or consequences from, radiological
accidents. Allowing the licensee
exemption from the record retention
requirements for which the partial
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66761
exemption is sought involves
recordkeeping requirements, as well as
reporting requirements of an
administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR
51.22(b), 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and 10
CFR 51.22(c)(ii), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in
connection with the approval of this
exemption request or conforming
amendment.
IV. Conclusions
The NRC staff has determined that the
granting of the exemption request from
the recordkeeping requirements of 10
CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety. The
destruction of the identified records
related to SSCs that have been removed
from service and have been or will be
physically removed will not impact
remaining decommissioning activities;
plant operations, configuration, and/or
radiological effluents; operational and/
or installed SSCs that are quality-related
or important to safety; or nuclear
security. The NRC staff has determined
that the destruction of the identified
records at that time is administrative in
nature and does not involve information
or activities that could potentially
impact the common defense and
security of the United States.
The purpose for the recordkeeping
regulations is to assist the NRC in
carrying out its mission to protect the
public health and safety by ensuring
that the licensing and design basis of the
facility are understood, documented,
preserved, and retrievable in such a way
that will aid the NRC in determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and
examining facts following an incident.
Since the TMI–2 SSCs for retired
equipment have been removed from
service and have been or will be
physically removed, the NRC staff has
determined that the records identified
in the exemption request will no longer
be required to achieve the underlying
purpose of the records retention rule.
TMI–2 Solutions has committed to
preserve all records pertaining to the
1979 Records Preservation Order ((44
FR 30788, dated May 29, 1979 and
Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021
submittal (ML21354A027)).
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the partial exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an
undue risk to the public health and
safety, and are consistent with the
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
66762
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 213 / Friday, November 4, 2022 / Notices
common defense and security. Also,
special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
grants TMI–2 Solutions partial
exemptions from the recordkeeping
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and
10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for TMI–2 only to
the extent necessary to allow the
licensee to advance the schedule to
remove records associated with retired
SSCs that have been removed from
service and have been or will be
physically removed by appropriate
change mechanisms (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59
or by NRC approved license amendment
request, as applicable). Again, the
licensee has committed to preserve all
records pertaining to the 1979 Records
Preservation Order ((44 FR 30788, dated
May 29, 1979 and Attachment 1 of
December 15, 2021 submittal
(ML21354A027)).TMI–2 Solutions is not
requesting any exemption associated
with retention of spent fuel debris
related records required by 10 CFR part
50 and 10 CFR part 72.
These exemptions are effective upon
issuance.
Dated: September 16, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA September 16, 2022/
Jane E. Marshall,
Director, Division of Decommissioning,
Uranium Recovery, and Waste Programs
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2022–23975 Filed 11–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Submission of Information Collection
for OMB Review; Comment Request;
Annual Reporting (Form 5500 Series)
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of request for extension
of OMB approval of information
collection.
AGENCY:
The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) is requesting that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) extend approval, with
modifications, under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, of a collection of
information for Annual Reporting under
OMB control number 1212–0057, which
expires on June 30, 2025. This notice
informs the public of PBGC’s request
and solicits public comment on the
collection of information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before December 5, 2022.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Nov 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function. A copy of the request will be
posted on PBGC’s website at https://
www.pbgc.gov/prac/laws-andregulation/federal-registernotices-openfor-comment. It may also be obtained
without charge by writing to the
Disclosure Division of the Office of the
General Counsel of PBGC, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20024–2101;
or, calling 202–229–4040 during normal
business hours. If you are deaf or hard
of hearing or have a speech disability,
please dial 7–1–1 to access
telecommunications relay services.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Levin (levin.karen@pbgc.gov),
Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Division,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20024–2101;
202–229–3559. If you are deaf or hard
of hearing or have a speech disability,
please dial 7–1–1 to access
telecommunications relay services.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Annual
reporting to the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), the Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA), and
the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) is required by law
for most employee benefit plans. For
example, section 4065 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) requires annual reporting to
PBGC for pension plans covered by title
IV of ERISA. To accommodate these
filing requirements, IRS, EBSA, and
PBGC have jointly promulgated the
Form 5500 Series, which includes the
Form 5500 Annual Return/Report of
Employee Benefit Plan and the Form
5500–SF Short Form Annual Return/
Report of Small Employee Benefit Plan.
The existing collection of information
was approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 1212–0057
(expires June 30, 2025). On August 29,
2022, PBGC published in the Federal
Register (at 87 FR 52821), a notice
informing the public of its intent to
request an extension of this collection of
information, as modified. PBGC
received one comment in support of the
collection of information. PBGC is
requesting that OMB extend approval of
the collection, with modifications, for
three years. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
PBGC is proposing modifications to
the 2023 Schedule R (Retirement Plan
Information) and to the 2023 Schedule
SB (Single-Employer Defined Benefit
Plan Actuarial Information), and to their
related instructions, as described below.
Schedule R
PBGC is proposing modifications to
line 19 of Schedule R and its
instructions, a line that applies to all
defined benefit plans (except DFEs) that
have 1,000 or more participants at the
beginning of the plan year. Currently,
such plans must provide a breakdown of
plan assets in line 19a by reporting the
percent of assets held in five categories
of investments. PBGC is proposing to
reconfigure the categories as shown
below:
Current
Stock ...............................
Investment-Grade Debt ..
High-Yield Debt ..............
Real Estate .....................
Other ...............................
Proposed
Public Equity.
Private Equity.
Investment-Grade Debt
and Interest Rate
Hedging Assets.
High-Yield Debt.
Real Assets.
Cash or Cash Equivalents.
Other.
In addition, for certain investments,
PBGC is proposing to modify the
instructions to clarify how certain
atypical investments should be
categorized for this purpose. For
example, as currently drafted, it is not
clear whether cash equivalents should
be included in ‘‘Investment-Grade Debt’’
or in ‘‘Other.’’ Similarly, it is not clear
whether infrastructure investments
should be included in the ‘‘Real Estate’’
or the ‘‘Other’’ category. By expanding
the list of categories and modifying the
instructions, the more detailed
information should be reported
consistently which will enable PBGC to
better model important characteristics of
plan portfolios.
PBGC is also proposing to modify the
instructions for line 19a so that the
percentages reported reflect the asset
allocation as of the end of the plan year
instead of the beginning of the plan
year. Having more recent information
will lead to better projections and more
accurate analysis by PBGC, and because
the Form 5500 isn’t due until several
months after the end of the plan year,
this change should not create any timing
issues for filers.
In addition, PBGC is proposing
changes to line 19b (average duration for
certain investments) and its instructions
and to eliminate line 19c (method used
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 213 (Friday, November 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66757-66762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23975]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-320; NRC-2022-0193]
TMI-2 Solutions, LLC; Three Mile Island Station, Unit No. 2
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing
partial exemptions, with a conforming amendment, from several of the
record keeping requirements in its regulations in response to a request
from TMI-2 Solutions, LLC. Specifically, the licensee requested partial
exemptions for certain NRC regulations which require certain records to
be retained for the period specified by the appropriate regulation,
license condition, or technical specifications (TS), or until
termination of the license if not otherwise specified. In response to
the licensee's requests, the NRC also issued a conforming amendment
that revised the license to reflect the specific exemptions and
associated changes in the TS.
DATES: The exemption was issued on and was effective on September 16,
2022.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2022-0193 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2022-0193. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the For Further Information
Contact section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected].
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents, by appointment, at the NRC's PDR, Room P1 B35, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. To make
an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between
8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy M. Snyder, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-6822, email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.
Dated: October 31, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Shaun M. Anderson,
Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Branch, Division of Decommissioning,
Uranium Recovery, and Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
Attachment--Exemption
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket No. 50-320
TMI-2 Solutions, LLC
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2
Partial Exemptions and Conforming Amendment
I. Background
TMl-2 Solutions, LLC, (TMI-2 Solutions or the licensee) is the
holder of Possession Only License (POL) No. DPR-73 for Three Mile
Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2 (TMI-2). The license
[[Page 66758]]
provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
On March 28, 1979, the unit experienced an accident initiated by
interruption of secondary feedwater flow. This led to a core heat up
that caused fuel damage. Most of the fuel material travelled down
through the region of the southeastern assemblies and into the core
bypass region. A portion of the fuel material passed around the bypass
region and migrated down into the lower internals and lower head
region, but overall reactor vessel integrity was maintained throughout
the accident. As a result of this accident, small quantities of spent
nuclear fuel, damaged core material, and high-level waste (collectively
referred to as ``Debris Material'') were transported through the
reactor coolant system and the Reactor Building. In addition, a small
quantity of Debris Material was transported to the auxiliary and fuel
handling buildings (AFHB). Further spread of the Debris also occurred
as part of the post-accident water processing cleanup activities.
The quantity of fuel remaining at TMI-2 is a small fraction of the
initial fuel load; approximately 99 percent was successfully removed in
the defueling. Additionally, large quantities of radioactive fission
products that were released into various systems and structures were
removed as part of the waste processing activities during the TMI-2
Cleanup Program. The cleanup to meet the NRC post-accident safe storage
criteria was completed and accepted by the NRC with TMI-2 entering into
Postdefueling Monitored Storage (PDMS) in 1993.
In a letter dated February 13, 2013, (Agencywide Documents and
Access Management System Accession No. ML12349A291), the NRC stated
that September 14, 1993, is considered the date of TMI-2's cessation of
operations. The September 14, 1993, date coincides with the issuance of
License Amendment No. 45, which converted the TMI-2 operating license
into a POL (ML20029E532).
Approximately 99 percent of the fuel was removed and shipped to the
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) under
the responsibility of the U.S. Department of Energy. The reactor
coolant system was decontaminated to the extent practical to reduce
radiation levels to as low as is reasonably achievable. As part of the
decontamination effort, water was removed to the extent practical from
the reactor coolant system and the fuel transfer canal, and the fuel
transfer tubes were isolated. Radioactive wastes from the major cleanup
activities have been shipped off-site or have been packaged and staged
for shipment off-site. Following the decontamination activities, only
the Reactor Building and a few areas in the AFHB continued to have
general area radiation levels higher than those of an undamaged reactor
facility nearing the end of its operating life.
With the accident cleanup completed and the spent fuel moved to
INEEL, there is no facility function related to the safe storage and
management of irradiated fuel.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated October 5, 2021 (ML21279A278), as supplemented on
December 15, 2021 (ML21354A027), TMI-2 Solutions submitted an exemption
request asking for permanent partial exemptions from: (1) Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion
XVII, ``Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel
Reprocessing Plants,'' which requires certain records to be retained
consistent with applicable regulatory requirements for a duration
established by the licensee; (2) 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3), ``Changes, tests,
and experiments,'' which requires certain records to be maintained
until ``termination of an operating license issued under this part;''
and (3) 10 CFR 50.71(c), ``Maintenance of records, making of reports,''
which requires certain records to be retained for the period specified
by the appropriate regulation, license condition, or Technical
Specifications (TS), or until termination of the license if not
otherwise specified.
The licensee also submitted a license amendment request, which
would revise the license to reflect the specific exemptions and
associated changes in the TS, should the NRC approve the partial
exemption request.
The licensee requests these exemptions to eliminate the requirement
to maintain records that are no longer necessary or applicable due to
the permanently defueled condition and decommissioning status of the
station. Specifically, TMI-2 Solutions states that the following
records would no longer be retained: Records associated with
structures, systems, and components (SSCs), and activities that were
applicable to the nuclear unit, which are no longer required by the
Part 50 licensing basis (e.g., removed from the Decommissioning Final
Safety Analysis Report and/or Technical Specifications by appropriate
change mechanisms). Such partial exemptions would eliminate the
associated, unnecessary regulatory and economic burdens of retaining
records for SSCs and activities that are no longer part of the TMI-2
licensing basis.
TMI-2 Solutions, in its December 15, 2021, supplement, committed to
preserve all records pertaining to the 1979 Records Preservation Order,
published in the Federal Register (FR) on May 29, 1979, ((44 FR 30788,
and Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021 submittal (ML21354A027)). TMI-2
Solutions notes that an inventory of such records for the period from
March 27, 1979, through May 1, 1979, was submitted to the NRC on
November 18, 2021, to assist the NRC Historian in determining if the
NRC document collection for the TMI-2 accident was missing any needed
documents.
In the exemption request, TMI-2 Solutions cites record retention
partial exemptions granted consistent with similar exemption requests
that have been approved recently by the NRC for other nuclear power
reactor facilities beginning decommissioning. Specifically, TMI-2
Solutions notes that the NRC granted similar partial exemptions to
Three Mile Island, Unit No. 1 (ML20107J648), Oyster Creek Nuclear
Generating Station (ML18122A306), Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 1,
(ML070110567); Zion Nuclear Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
(ML111260277); Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (ML15344A243), San
Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (ML15355A055);
Kewaunee Power Station (ML17069A394); and Fort Calhoun Station
(ML17172A730).
Records associated with residual radiological activity and with
programmatic controls necessary to support decommissioning, such as
security and quality assurance, are not affected by the exemption
request because they will be retained as decommissioning records, as
required by 10 CFR part 50, ``Domestic Licensing of Production and
Utilization Facilities,'' until the termination of the TMI-2 license.
No exemption was requested from the decommissioning records retention
requirements of 10 CFR 50.75, ``Reporting and recordkeeping for
decommissioning planning,'' or any other requirements of 10 CFR part 50
applicable to decommissioning and dismantlement.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, ``Specific exemptions,'' the Commission
may,
[[Page 66759]]
upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative,
grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when the
exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to
public health or safety, and are consistent with the common defense and
security. However, the Commission will not consider granting an
exemption unless special circumstances are present. Special
circumstances are described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2).
TMI-2 Solutions states in its application that decommissioning of
the TMl-2 and the nuclear reactor and essentially all associated SSCs
in the nuclear steam supply system and balance of plant that supported
the generation of power have been retired in place and are being
prepared for removal. SSCs that remain operable are associated with the
Reactor Building and effluent monitoring, are needed to meet other
regulatory requirements, or are needed to support other site facilities
(e.g., radwaste handling, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning).
There are no SSCs classified as safety-related. SSCs related to safe
storage of the remaining Debris Material are designated as Important to
Safety by the current licensing basis. The licensee also states in its
application that TMI-2 Solutions is progressively removing these SSCs
related to safe storage of the remaining Debris Material from the
licensing basis where necessary through appropriate change mechanisms
(e.g., 10 CFR 50.59 or NRC approved TS changes, as applicable);
revising the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for PDMS, as
necessary; and, then proceeding with an orderly dismantlement.
In its October 5, 2021, exemption request, the TMI-2 Solutions
indicates that the basis for eliminating records associated with
reactor facility SSCs and activities is that these SSCs have been (or
will be) removed from service per regulatory change processes,
dismantled or demolished, and no longer have any function regulated by
the NRC.
The licensee recognizes that some records related to the nuclear
unit will continue to be under NRC regulation primarily due to residual
radioactivity. The radiological and other necessary programmatic
controls (such as security, quality assurance, etc.) for the facility
and the implementation of controls for the defueled condition and the
decommissioning activities are and will continue to be appropriately
addressed through the license and current plant documents such as the
FSAR for PDMS and the TS. Through a license application request dated
February 19, 2021 (ML21057A046), TMI-2 Solutions requested that certain
Technical Specification records requirements be relocated to the
Decommissioning Quality Assurance Plan. This action is currently under
review. TMI-2 Solutions indicated in its exemption request that future
changes to the Technical Specifications will be made through the
applicable change processes defined in the regulations (e.g., 10 CFR
50.48(f), ``Fire protection,'' 10 CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.54(a),
``Conditions of licenses,'' 10 CFR 50.54(p), 10 CFR 50.54(q)). The NRC
staff notes that except for future changes made through the applicable
change process defined in the regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 50.48(f), 10
CFR 50.59, 10 CFR 50.90, ``Application for amendment of license,
construction permit, or early site permit,'' 10 CFR 50.54(a), 10 CFR
50.54(p), 10 CFR 50.54(q)), these programmatic elements and their
associated records are unaffected by the requested exemptions.
TMI-2 Solutions justifies the elimination of records associated
with TMI-2 SSCs for retired equipment that have been removed from
service and have been or will be physically removed, dismantled, or
demolished, because it believes these SSCs now and will not in the
future serve any TMI-2 functions regulated by the NRC. For example, the
primarily coolant system is currently not in service and will never be
in service again nor are there any vital areas that will be used for
their intended purposes. Maintaining decommissioning records on the SSC
associated with the primarily coolant system will not serve any TMI-2
function regulated by the NRC. TMI-2 Solutions decommissioning plans
for TMI-2 are described in the Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities
Report dated March 17, 2021 (ML21084A229). The licensee's
decommissioning process involves evaluating SSCs with respect to the
current facility safety analysis; progressively removing them from the
licensing basis where necessary through appropriate change mechanisms
(e.g., 10 CFR 50.59 or by NRC approved TS changes, as applicable);
revising the FSAR, as necessary; and then proceeding with an orderly
dismantlement.
TMI-2 Solutions intends to retain the records required by its
license as the state of the facility transitions through
decommissioning. However, equipment abandonment will obviate the
regulatory and business needs for maintenance of most records. As the
SSCs are removed from the licensing basis, TMI-2 Solutions asserts that
the need for its records is, on a practical basis, eliminated.
Therefore, TMI-2 Solutions is requesting partial exemptions from the
associated records retention requirements for SSCs for retired
equipment that have been removed from service and have been or will be
physically removed and historical activities that are no longer
relevant, except it has committed to preserve all records pertaining to
the 1979 Records Preservation Order ((44 FR 30788, dated May 29, 1979
and Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021 submittal (ML21354A027)).
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions
from 10 CFR part 50 requirements if it makes certain findings. As
described here and in the sections below, the NRC staff has determined
that special circumstances exist to grant the partial exemptions. In
addition, granting the licensee's proposed exemptions will not result
in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; other
laws; or the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the granting of the
exemption request from the recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR
50.59(d)(3) is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
As SSCs are prepared for safe storage and eventual decommissioning
and dismantlement, they will be removed from NRC licensing basis
documents through appropriate change mechanisms, such as through the 10
CFR 50.59 process or through a license amendment request approved by
the NRC. These change processes involve either a determination by the
licensee or an approval from the NRC that the affected SSCs no longer
serve any safety purpose regulated by the NRC. Therefore, the removal
of the SSCs would not present an undue risk to public health and
safety. In turn, elimination of records associated with these removed
SSCs would not cause any additional impact to public health and safety.
The granting of the exemption request from the recordkeeping
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix B, Criterion
XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for the records described is
administrative in nature and will have no impact on any remaining
decommissioning activities or on radiological effluents. The granting
of the exemption request will only advance the schedule for disposition
of the specified records. Because these
[[Page 66760]]
records contain information about SSCs associated with reactor
operation and contain no information needed to maintain the facility in
a safe condition when the facility is eventually decommissioned through
approved NRC licensing proceedings and the SSCs are dismantled, the
elimination of these records on an advanced timetable will have no
reasonable possibility of presenting any undue risk to the public
health and safety. TMI-2 Solutions is not requesting any exemption
associated with retention of spent fuel debris related records required
by 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72, ``Licensing Requirements for the
Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive
Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.''
C. The Exemption is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
The elimination of the recordkeeping requirements does not involve
information or activities that could potentially impact the common
defense and security of the United States. Upon dismantlement of the
affected SSCs, the records have no functional purpose relative to
maintaining the safe operation of the SSCs, maintaining conditions that
would affect the ongoing health and safety of workers or the public, or
informing decisions related to nuclear security.
Rather, the exemptions requested are administrative in nature and
would only advance the current schedule for disposition of the
specified records. Therefore, the exemption request from the
recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for the types of records
described is consistent with the common defense and security.
D. Special Circumstances
Paragraph 50.12(a)(2) of 10 CFR states, in part:
The Commission will not consider granting an exemption unless
special circumstances are present. Special circumstances are present
whenever--. . .
(ii) Application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or
is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule; or
(iii) Compliance would result in undue hardship or other costs
that are significantly in excess of those contemplated when the
regulation was adopted . . .
Criterion XVII of Appendix B to 10 CFR part 50 states, in part:
``Sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of
activities affecting quality.''
Paragraph 50.59(d)(3) of 10 CFR states, in part: ``The records of
changes in the facility must be maintained until the termination of an
operating license issued under this part . . .''
Paragraph 50.71(c) of 10 CFR, states, in part:
Records that are required by the regulations in this part or
part 52 of this chapter, by license condition, or by Technical
Specifications must be retained for the period specified by the
appropriate regulation, license condition, or Technical
Specification. If a retention period is not otherwise specified,
these records must be retained until the Commission terminates the
facility license. . . .
In the statement of considerations for the final rulemaking,
``Retention Periods for Records'' (53 FR 19240, dated May 27, 1988), in
response to public comments received during the rulemaking process, the
NRC stated that records must be retained ``for NRC to ensure compliance
with the safety and health aspects of the nuclear environment and for
the NRC to accomplish its mission to protect the public health and
safety.'' In the statement of considerations, the Commission also
explained that requiring licensees to maintain adequate records assists
the NRC ``in judging compliance and noncompliance, to act on possible
noncompliance, and to examine facts as necessary following any
incident.''
These regulations apply to licensees in decommissioning. During the
decommissioning process, safety-related SSCs are retired or disabled
and subsequently removed from NRC licensing basis documents by
appropriate change mechanisms. Appropriate removal of an SSC from the
licensing basis requires either a determination by the licensee or an
approval from the NRC that the SSC no longer has the potential to cause
an accident, event, or other problem that would adversely impact public
health and safety.
The records subject to removal under this exemption request are
associated with SSCs that had been important to safety during power
operation or operation of the spent fuel pool, but are no longer
capable of causing an event, incident, or condition that would
adversely impact public health and safety, as evidenced by their
appropriate removal from the licensing basis documents. If the SSCs no
longer have the potential to cause these scenarios, then it is
reasonable to conclude that the records associated with these SSCs
would not reasonably be necessary to assist the NRC in determining
compliance and noncompliance, taking action on possible noncompliance,
or examining facts following an incident. Therefore, their retention
would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule.
In addition, once removed from the licensing basis documents (e.g.,
FSAR or TS), SSCs are no longer governed by the NRC's regulations, and
therefore, are not subject to compliance with the safety and health
aspects of the nuclear environment. As such, retention of records
associated with SSCs that are or will no longer be part of the facility
serves no safety or regulatory purpose, nor does it serve the
underlying purpose of the rule of maintaining compliance with the
safety and health aspects of the nuclear environment in order to
accomplish the NRC's mission. Therefore, special circumstances are
present that the NRC may consider, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii),
to grant the exemption request.
Records that continue to serve the underlying purpose of the rule,
that is, to maintain compliance and to protect public health and safety
in support of the NRC's mission, will continue to be retained pursuant
to other regulations in 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72. Retained
records that are not subject to the proposed exemption include those
associated with programmatic controls, such as those pertaining to
residual radioactivity, security, and quality assurance, as well as
records associated with the ISFSI and spent fuel debris.
The retention of records required by 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part
50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) provides
assurance that records associated with SSCs will be captured, indexed,
and stored in an environmentally suitable and retrievable condition.
Given the volume of records associated with the SSCs, compliance with
the records retention rule results in a considerable cost to the
licensee. Retention of the volume of records associated with the SSCs
during the operational phase is appropriate to serve the underlying
purpose of determining compliance and noncompliance, taking action on
possible noncompliance, and examining facts following an incident, as
discussed.
However, the cost effect of retaining operational phase records
beyond the operations phase until the termination of the license was
not fully considered or understood when the records retention rule was
put in place. For example, existing records storage facilities are
eliminated as decommissioning progresses. Retaining records associated
with SSCs and activities that no longer serve a safety or regulatory
purpose would, therefore, result in an unnecessary financial and
administrative burden. As such,
[[Page 66761]]
compliance with the rule would result in an undue cost in excess of
that contemplated when the rule was adopted. Therefore, special
circumstances are present that the NRC may consider, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(iii), to grant the exemption request. The licensee has
committed to preserve all records pertaining to the 1979 Records
Preservation Order ((44 FR 30788, dated May 29, 1979 and Attachment 1
of December 15, 2021 submittal (ML21354A027)). TMI-2 Solutions is not
requesting any exemption associated with retention of spent fuel debris
related records required by 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72.
E. Environmental Considerations
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) and (c)(25), ``Criterion for
categorical exclusion; identification of licensing and regulatory
actions eligible for categorical exclusion or otherwise not requiring
environmental review,'' the granting of an exemption from the
requirements of any regulation in Chapter I of 10 CFR part 50 meets the
eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion provided that: (1) there
is no significant hazards consideration; (2) there is no significant
change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any
effluents that may be released off-site; (3) there is no significant
increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation
exposure; (4) there is no significant construction impact; (5) there is
no significant increase in the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and (6) the requirements from which an
exemption is sought are among those identified in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The exemption request is administrative in nature. The exemption
request has no effect on SSCs and no effect on the capability of any
plant SSC to perform its design function. The exemption request would
not increase the likelihood of the malfunction of any plant SSC.
The probability of occurrence of previously evaluated accidents is
not increased since most previously analyzed accidents will no longer
be able to occur, and the probability and consequences of the remaining
fuel handling accident are unaffected by the exemption request.
Therefore, the exemption request does not involve a significant
increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
The exemption request does not involve a physical alteration of the
plant. No new or different types of equipment will be installed, and
there are no physical modifications to existing equipment associated
with the exemption request. Similarly, the exemption request will not
physically change any SSCs involved in the mitigation of any accidents.
Thus, no new initiators or precursors of a new or different kind of
accident are created. Furthermore, the exemption request does not
create the possibility of a new accident as a result of new failure
modes associated with any equipment or personnel failures. No changes
are being made to parameters within which the plant is normally
operated or in the setpoints that initiate protective or mitigative
actions, and no new failure modes are being introduced. Therefore, the
exemption request does not create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The exemption request does not alter the design basis or any safety
limits for the plant. The exemption request does not impact station
operation or any plant SSC that is relied upon for accident mitigation.
Therefore, the exemption request does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
For these reasons, the NRC staff has determined that approval of
the exemption request involves no significant hazards consideration
because granting the licensee's exemption request from the
recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR part 50, Appendix
B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) at TMI-2 does not: (1)
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated, (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety (10 CFR
50.92(c), ``Issuance of Amendment.'') Likewise, there is no significant
change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any
effluents that may be released off-site and no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure.
The exempted regulations are not associated with construction, so
there is no significant construction impact. The exempted regulations
do not concern the source term (i.e., potential amount of radiation
involved for an accident) or accident mitigation; therefore, there is
no significant increase in the potential for, or consequences from,
radiological accidents. Allowing the licensee exemption from the record
retention requirements for which the partial exemption is sought
involves recordkeeping requirements, as well as reporting requirements
of an administrative, managerial, or organizational nature.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and 10
CFR 51.22(c)(ii), no environmental impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared in connection with the approval of this
exemption request or conforming amendment.
IV. Conclusions
The NRC staff has determined that the granting of the exemption
request from the recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10 CFR
part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) will not
present an undue risk to the public health and safety. The destruction
of the identified records related to SSCs that have been removed from
service and have been or will be physically removed will not impact
remaining decommissioning activities; plant operations, configuration,
and/or radiological effluents; operational and/or installed SSCs that
are quality-related or important to safety; or nuclear security. The
NRC staff has determined that the destruction of the identified records
at that time is administrative in nature and does not involve
information or activities that could potentially impact the common
defense and security of the United States.
The purpose for the recordkeeping regulations is to assist the NRC
in carrying out its mission to protect the public health and safety by
ensuring that the licensing and design basis of the facility are
understood, documented, preserved, and retrievable in such a way that
will aid the NRC in determining compliance and noncompliance, taking
action on possible noncompliance, and examining facts following an
incident. Since the TMI-2 SSCs for retired equipment have been removed
from service and have been or will be physically removed, the NRC staff
has determined that the records identified in the exemption request
will no longer be required to achieve the underlying purpose of the
records retention rule. TMI-2 Solutions has committed to preserve all
records pertaining to the 1979 Records Preservation Order ((44 FR
30788, dated May 29, 1979 and Attachment 1 of December 15, 2021
submittal (ML21354A027)).
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12, the partial exemptions are authorized by law, will not present
an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with
the
[[Page 66762]]
common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present.
Therefore, the Commission hereby grants TMI-2 Solutions partial
exemptions from the recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(c); 10
CFR part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII; and 10 CFR 50.59(d)(3) for
TMI-2 only to the extent necessary to allow the licensee to advance the
schedule to remove records associated with retired SSCs that have been
removed from service and have been or will be physically removed by
appropriate change mechanisms (e.g., 10 CFR 50.59 or by NRC approved
license amendment request, as applicable). Again, the licensee has
committed to preserve all records pertaining to the 1979 Records
Preservation Order ((44 FR 30788, dated May 29, 1979 and Attachment 1
of December 15, 2021 submittal (ML21354A027)).TMI-2 Solutions is not
requesting any exemption associated with retention of spent fuel debris
related records required by 10 CFR part 50 and 10 CFR part 72.
These exemptions are effective upon issuance.
Dated: September 16, 2022.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA September 16, 2022/
Jane E. Marshall,
Director, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and Waste
Programs Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2022-23975 Filed 11-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P