Environmental Impact Statement: El Paso County, Texas, 66355-66357 [2022-23917]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices Training Under Sections 12.1 and 12.2 of the MOU, the DOT&PF committed to implementing training necessary to carry out the environmental responsibilities assumed under the NEPA Assignment Program. The DOT&PF also committed to assessing its need for training, developing a training plan, and updating the training plan on an annual basis. Observation #4: Training Needs Assessment Considering ongoing staff turnover, as discussed in Observation #2, FHWA encourages DOT&PF to conduct a detailed statewide training needs assessment of all environmental staff. This will help DOT&PF allocate resources more efficiently to identify skill and knowledge gaps. The FHWA also encourages DOT&PF to explore cross training opportunities with other agencies (e.g.: SHPO, BLM, USFS) and engage them in development of their annual training plan. Performance Measures The FHWA and DOT&PF mutually established a set of performance measures to evaluate DOT&PF’s performance in assuming NEPA Assignment Program responsibilities. The DOT&PF continues to collect, maintain, and develop data towards monitoring its performance as required by Section 10.1.3 of the MOU. The audit team noted the following observation related to Performance Measures. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Successful Practice #3: Relationships With Agencies The audit team found that DOT&PF has very good and positive relationships with BLM, USFS, and SHPO. The FHWA has interviewed resource agencies in previous audits and found that overall, they had good working relationships with DOT&PF. The audit team decided to interview staff from BLM and the USFS during Audit #4 since Federal Land Management Agencies had not been interviewed in past audits and they were included in DOT&PF’s May 2020 agency poll. The team also chose to interview SHPO since they had not been interviewed since Audit #1. The individuals interviewed from these three agencies indicated that overall, their working relationships with DOT&PF were very good and positive. This information correlates well with the overwhelmingly positive responses DOT&PF received to their agency poll. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Nov 02, 2022 Jkt 259001 Legal Sufficiency Since 2017, the same attorney from the Alaska Attorney General’s Office, Transportation Section, has been assigned to the NEPA Assignment Program. The assigned attorney has significant experience with Federal-aid highway projects and the Federal environmental process. The attorney works directly with DOT&PF staff on project environmental documents. Based on the interviews, the attorney becomes involved early in project development, normally reviewing a NEPA document before receiving a formal request for a legal sufficiency review. During the audit period, the attorney did not review an environmental impact statement or a Section 4(f) evaluation requiring a legal sufficiency review. Although a legal sufficiency review is not required for EAs, the attorney reviewed two EAs during the audit period. The review process for an EA is like the review process for an EIS. Department of Law Management stated during the interviews that while one attorney is currently assigned to the program, should workload increase significantly another attorney could be assigned to NEPA work or litigation, likely through the utilization of outside counsel per 23 U.S.C. 327(a)(2)(G). The audit team finds that DOT&PF meets the legal sufficiency determination and staffing requirements set forth in the DOT&PF Environmental Procedures Manual. Status of Observations From Audit #3 Report (April 2020) This section describes the actions DOT&PF has taken in response to observations made during the third audit. Observation #1: Self-Assessment Procedures The DOT&PF’s 2018 NEPA Assignment Program Self-Assessment Procedures require that SEO develop the preliminary and final Self-Assessment report through coordination with, and input from, the Regional Environmental Managers (REMs). During Audit #3 interviews, the audit team found that DOT&PF did not develop the January 2020 Self-Assessment report in accordance with their procedures, nor distribute the final report to the regions. For Audit #4, DOT&PF indicated in their responses to the PAIR that the draft December 2020 Self-assessment was sent to the REMs for review and comment according to their procedures. Comments were received and addressed in the final Self-Assessment report, which was then shared with the regions. PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 66355 Observation #2: Assessing Resource Agency Communication Section 10.2.1 C. of the MOU requires DOT&PF to ‘‘Assess change in communication among DOT&PF, Federal and State agencies, and the public resulting from assumption of responsibilities under this MOU’’. The MOU allows DOT&PF to determine the method it will use to assess this change. The DOT&PF selected to use an annual resource agency poll. The DOT&PF identified this measure in its DOT&PF NEPA Assignment Program Performance Measures document located on its website. At the time of Audit #3, DOT&PF had not yet used a resource agency poll, and FHWA recommended that DOT&PF consider changing the method for reporting this measure. In May 2020 (prior to Audit #4), DOT&PF conducted an agency survey to assess changes in communication among DOT&PF, State, and Federal resource agencies. As described in DOT&PF’s Self-Assessment Report, the survey consisted of six questions distributed via an online platform to a representative cross section of State and Federal resource Agency staff. Twentyfour responses were received from 11 different resource agencies. The DOT&PF asked the question: ‘‘Has the level of communication improved, declined, or remained the same since the MOU became effective?’’ Eleven of the responses indicated that there had been an improvement in communication and the remaining responses indicated there had been no change. [FR Doc. 2022–23916 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Environmental Impact Statement: El Paso County, Texas Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation. ACTION: Federal notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). AGENCY: FHWA, on behalf of TxDOT, is issuing this notice to advise the public that an EIS will be prepared for a proposed transportation project to study the effects of the project on Interstate Highway 10 (I–10), known as the Downtown 10 project. The limits of the proposed project are from Executive SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM 03NON1 66356 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices Center Boulevard (Blvd.) to State Loop (SL) 478 (Copia Street) in El Paso County, Texas. The proposed project is approximately 5.7 miles in length. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugo Hernandez, TxDOT Project Manager, 13301 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, TX, 79928–5410, (915) 790–4243, Downtown10@txdot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carriedout by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019 and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. Purpose and Need The Downtown 10 project is needed because of: • Traffic congestion and mobility issues • Concerns surrounding incident management • Failure to meet current design standards By providing a long-term transportation solution for the City of El Paso, El Paso County, and the region, the purpose of the proposed project is to: • Improve mobility and long-term congestion management • Improve incident management • Bring the facility up to current design standards Proposed Action The proposed project would improve I–10 from Executive Center Blvd. and SL 478 (Copia Street), a distance of approximately 5.7 miles. Traveling through downtown El Paso, the proposed improvements may include widening and reconstruction of the mainlanes, continuous frontage roads, retaining walls, bridges, ramps, and cross streets to overcome deterioration of pavement and bridges to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Alternatives The EIS will evaluate a range of build alternatives and a no-build alternative. Provided below is background information on alternative analyses conducted to date. From 2017 through 2019, the TxDOT Reimagine I–10 Corridor Study (study) included extensive public outreach and highlevel engineering/environmental evaluations of future needs for the I–10 corridor. The study resulted in a recommended study alternative for the entire 55-mile-long corridor. As a result, the Downtown 10 project (Segment 2 of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Nov 02, 2022 Jkt 259001 the study) was initiated, and the first Public Meeting was held virtually from June 25 through July 15, 2020. The Public Meeting showed the recommended study alternative and requested additional public and stakeholder input in order to create more detailed conceptual alternatives. After Public Meeting #1, TxDOT utilized detailed engineering and environmental constraint criteria and the public/stakeholder feedback to identify 18 build alternatives, which were narrowed to nine conceptual build alternatives. The constraint criteria included mobility, design, multimodal, and environmental considerations. The conceptual alternatives were then screened to three viable build alternatives (Alternatives D, G, and H). This process was presented in Public Meeting #2 (held virtually from February 24 through March 16, 2021) for additional public feedback and further study. The no-build alternative has and will be carried through the process as a baseline condition. Possible build alternatives include the following: Alternative D Alternative D proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing I–10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive, Alternative D shifts the I–10 alignment to the north/east. From University Drive to Campbell Street, Alternative D follows the existing alignment. From Campbell Street to Ange Street, Alternative D shifts the I–10 alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street, Alternative D shifts the I–10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), Alternative D follows the existing alignment. Alternative D proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound general purpose lane, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge at Prospect Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive and from Santa Fe Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along cross street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this alternative. Alternative G Alternative G proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing I–10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive, Alternative G shifts the I–10 alignment to the north/ PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 east. From Yandell Drive to Santa Fe Street Alternative G follows the existing alignment. From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative G shifts the I–10 alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street, Alternative G shifts the I–10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), Alternative G follows the existing alignment. Alternative G proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways (eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from Executive Center Boulevard to SL 478 (Copia Street), bi-directional cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to Stanton Street, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along cross street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this alternative. Alternative H Alternative H proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing I–10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive, Alternative H shifts the I–10 alignment to the north/ east. From Yandell Drive to Santa Fe Street, Alternative H follows the existing alignment. From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative H shifts the I–10 alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street Alternative H shifts the I–10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), Alternative H follows the existing alignment. Alternative H proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways (eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, eastbound and westbound collector-distributor connectors between Campbell Street and SL 478 (Copia Street), a shared use path from Executive Center Boulevard to SL 478 (Copia Street), bi-directional cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to Stanton Street, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along cross street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this alternative. E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM 03NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices Potential Project Impacts Section 106 and Section 4(f) Historic Properties. The proposed build alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to historic properties (i.e., properties that are eligible for or listed in the National Register of Historic Places) within the study area. Environmental Justice (EJ). The proposed build alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to EJ communities due to anticipated relocations as well as other impacts such as access, noise, and visual aesthetics. Additional analysis and public involvement will be conducted during the National Environmental Policy Act process to assess if the project would result in any disproportionately high and adverse effects on low-income and minority communities. Air Quality. The project is located in the El Paso Moderate Nonattainment area for Particulate Matter (PM) 10, Attainment/Maintenance Area for Carbon Monoxide (CO), and the 2015 Marginal Nonattainment area for Ozone (O3). As such, the proposed build alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to air quality and will be subject to a project level conformity determination. The EIS will evaluate the potential impacts and benefits to the resources/ communities identified above as well as the following other subject areas: Limited English Proficiency communities, land use, right-of-way, social and community resources, traffic noise, wildlife and threatened and endangered species, water resources, hazardous materials sites, and visual resources. It is anticipated that the following would be required: Texas Antiquities Code permit and concurrence, Section 106 historic/archeological resources concurrence, Section 4(f) evaluation approval, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Nationwide Permit(s), and conformity determination under the Clean Air Act. Tentative Schedule Agency Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Public Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022 In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public hearing will be held after the Draft EIS is prepared. Public notice will be given of the time and place of the hearing. After the public hearing and end of Draft EIS comment period, issuance of the Final EIS/Record of Decision is anticipated. If a build VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Nov 02, 2022 Jkt 259001 alternative is selected, all permits and authorization decisions would occur before construction. TxDOT will issue a single Final EIS and Record of Decision document pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), unless TxDOT determines statutory criteria or practicability considerations preclude issuance of a combined document. In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 139, cooperating agencies, participating agencies, and the public will be given an opportunity for continued input on project development. An in-person public scoping meeting is planned for Wednesday, November 30, 2022, from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. MT at the El Paso Convention Center (Juarez Room) One Civic Center Plaza, El Paso, Texas, 79901. A virtual option will go live at 4 p.m. MT on November 30, 2022. Additional information on both options will be provided at https:// www.txdot.gov/ by searching for ‘‘El Paso Downtown 10—Virtual Public Scoping Meeting with In-Person Option’’. The public scoping meeting will provide an opportunity for the public to review and comment on the draft coordination plan and schedule, the project’s purpose and need, the range of alternatives, and methodologies and level of detail for analyzing alternatives. It will also allow the public an opportunity to provide input on any expected environmental impacts, anticipated permits or other authorizations, and any significant issues that should be analyzed in depth in the EIS. In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public hearing will be held after the draft EIS is prepared. Public notice will be given of the time and place of the hearing. The public meeting will be conducted in English. If you need an interpreter or document translator because English is not your primary language or you have difficulty communicating effectively in English, one will be provided to you. If you have a disability and need assistance, special arrangements can be made to accommodate most needs. If you need interpretation or translation services or you are a person with a disability who requires an accommodation to attend and participate in the public meeting, please contact Lauren Macias-Cervantes, Public Information Officer, El Paso District, at Lauren.MaciasCervantes@txdot.gov or please call (915) 790–4341 no later than 4 p.m. MT, Monday, November 21, 2022. Please be aware that advance notice is required as some services and accommodations may require time for TxDOT to arrange. PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 66357 The public is requested to identify in writing potential alternatives, information, and analyses relevant to this proposed project. Such information may be provided in writing by mail to the TxDOT El Paso District Office, Attn: Downtown 10/Hugo Hernandez, 13301 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, Texas 79928–5410. Electronic comments may also be submitted by email to Downtown10@txdot.gov or through the virtual site. Additionally, members of the public may also call (915) 209–0027 and leave recorded comments. Comments must be received by January 11, 2023. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction.) Michael T. Leary, Director, Planning and Program Development, Federal Highway Administration. [FR Doc. 2022–23917 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–22–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration [FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2021–0020] Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program; Arizona Department of Transportation Draft FHWA Audit Report Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice; request for comment. AGENCY: The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act established the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program that allows a State to assume FHWA’s environmental responsibilities for environmental review, consultation, and compliance under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for Federal highway projects. When a State assumes these Federal responsibilities, the State becomes solely responsible and liable for carrying out the responsibilities it has assumed, in lieu of FHWA. This program mandates annual audits during each of the first 4 years of State participation to ensure compliance with program requirements. This is the second audit of the Arizona Department of Transportation’s (ADOT) performance of its responsibilities under the Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program (NEPA Assignment Program). This notice announces and solicits comments on the second audit report for ADOT. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 5, 2022. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM 03NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66355-66357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: El Paso County, Texas

AGENCY: Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Federal Highway 
Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Federal notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FHWA, on behalf of TxDOT, is issuing this notice to advise the 
public that an EIS will be prepared for a proposed transportation 
project to study the effects of the project on Interstate Highway 10 
(I-10), known as the Downtown 10 project. The limits of the proposed 
project are from Executive

[[Page 66356]]

Center Boulevard (Blvd.) to State Loop (SL) 478 (Copia Street) in El 
Paso County, Texas. The proposed project is approximately 5.7 miles in 
length.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugo Hernandez, TxDOT Project Manager, 
13301 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, TX, 79928-5410, (915) 790-4243, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental review, consultation, and 
other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for 
this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 
23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019 
and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.

Purpose and Need

    The Downtown 10 project is needed because of:

     Traffic congestion and mobility issues
     Concerns surrounding incident management
     Failure to meet current design standards
    By providing a long-term transportation solution for the City of El 
Paso, El Paso County, and the region, the purpose of the proposed 
project is to:

 Improve mobility and long-term congestion management
 Improve incident management
 Bring the facility up to current design standards

Proposed Action

    The proposed project would improve I-10 from Executive Center Blvd. 
and SL 478 (Copia Street), a distance of approximately 5.7 miles. 
Traveling through downtown El Paso, the proposed improvements may 
include widening and reconstruction of the mainlanes, continuous 
frontage roads, retaining walls, bridges, ramps, and cross streets to 
overcome deterioration of pavement and bridges to include bicycle and 
pedestrian facilities.

Alternatives

    The EIS will evaluate a range of build alternatives and a no-build 
alternative.
    Provided below is background information on alternative analyses 
conducted to date. From 2017 through 2019, the TxDOT Reimagine I-10 
Corridor Study (study) included extensive public outreach and high-
level engineering/environmental evaluations of future needs for the I-
10 corridor. The study resulted in a recommended study alternative for 
the entire 55-mile-long corridor. As a result, the Downtown 10 project 
(Segment 2 of the study) was initiated, and the first Public Meeting 
was held virtually from June 25 through July 15, 2020. The Public 
Meeting showed the recommended study alternative and requested 
additional public and stakeholder input in order to create more 
detailed conceptual alternatives. After Public Meeting #1, TxDOT 
utilized detailed engineering and environmental constraint criteria and 
the public/stakeholder feedback to identify 18 build alternatives, 
which were narrowed to nine conceptual build alternatives. The 
constraint criteria included mobility, design, multimodal, and 
environmental considerations.
    The conceptual alternatives were then screened to three viable 
build alternatives (Alternatives D, G, and H). This process was 
presented in Public Meeting #2 (held virtually from February 24 through 
March 16, 2021) for additional public feedback and further study. The 
no-build alternative has and will be carried through the process as a 
baseline condition. Possible build alternatives include the following:

Alternative D

    Alternative D proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing 
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive, 
Alternative D shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From 
University Drive to Campbell Street, Alternative D follows the existing 
alignment. From Campbell Street to Ange Street, Alternative D shifts 
the I-10 alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street, 
Alternative D shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras 
Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), Alternative D follows the existing 
alignment. Alternative D proposes new eastbound and westbound non-
tolled managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and 
westbound general purpose lane, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge at 
Prospect Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway 
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from 
Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive and from Santa Fe Street 
to SL 478 (Copia Street), and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations 
along cross street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and 
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this 
alternative.

Alternative G

    Alternative G proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing 
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive, 
Alternative G shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From Yandell 
Drive to Santa Fe Street Alternative G follows the existing alignment. 
From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative G shifts the I-10 
alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street, Alternative 
G shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478 
(Copia Street), Alternative G follows the existing alignment. 
Alternative G proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed 
lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound 
general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways 
(eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa 
Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway 
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from 
Executive Center Boulevard to SL 478 (Copia Street), bi-directional 
cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to Stanton Street, and bicycle and 
pedestrian accommodations along cross street bridges. Additional 
capacity, operational, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would 
be considered for this alternative.

Alternative H

    Alternative H proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing 
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive, 
Alternative H shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From Yandell 
Drive to Santa Fe Street, Alternative H follows the existing alignment. 
From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative H shifts the I-10 
alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street Alternative 
H shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478 
(Copia Street), Alternative H follows the existing alignment. 
Alternative H proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed 
lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound 
general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways 
(eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa 
Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway 
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, eastbound and westbound 
collector-distributor connectors between Campbell Street and SL 478 
(Copia Street), a shared use path from Executive Center Boulevard to SL 
478 (Copia Street), bi-directional cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to 
Stanton Street, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along cross 
street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and bicycle and 
pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this alternative.

[[Page 66357]]

Potential Project Impacts

    Section 106 and Section 4(f) Historic Properties. The proposed 
build alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to 
historic properties (i.e., properties that are eligible for or listed 
in the National Register of Historic Places) within the study area.
    Environmental Justice (EJ). The proposed build alternatives will be 
evaluated for potential adverse impacts to EJ communities due to 
anticipated relocations as well as other impacts such as access, noise, 
and visual aesthetics. Additional analysis and public involvement will 
be conducted during the National Environmental Policy Act process to 
assess if the project would result in any disproportionately high and 
adverse effects on low-income and minority communities.
    Air Quality. The project is located in the El Paso Moderate 
Nonattainment area for Particulate Matter (PM) 10, Attainment/
Maintenance Area for Carbon Monoxide (CO), and the 2015 Marginal 
Nonattainment area for Ozone (O3). As such, the proposed build 
alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to air 
quality and will be subject to a project level conformity 
determination.
    The EIS will evaluate the potential impacts and benefits to the 
resources/communities identified above as well as the following other 
subject areas: Limited English Proficiency communities, land use, 
right-of-way, social and community resources, traffic noise, wildlife 
and threatened and endangered species, water resources, hazardous 
materials sites, and visual resources.
    It is anticipated that the following would be required: Texas 
Antiquities Code permit and concurrence, Section 106 historic/
archeological resources concurrence, Section 4(f) evaluation approval, 
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Nationwide Permit(s), and conformity 
determination under the Clean Air Act.

Tentative Schedule

Agency Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022
Public Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022
    In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public hearing will be 
held after the Draft EIS is prepared. Public notice will be given of 
the time and place of the hearing. After the public hearing and end of 
Draft EIS comment period, issuance of the Final EIS/Record of Decision 
is anticipated. If a build alternative is selected, all permits and 
authorization decisions would occur before construction. TxDOT will 
issue a single Final EIS and Record of Decision document pursuant to 23 
U.S.C. 139(n)(2), unless TxDOT determines statutory criteria or 
practicability considerations preclude issuance of a combined document.
    In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 139, cooperating agencies, 
participating agencies, and the public will be given an opportunity for 
continued input on project development. An in-person public scoping 
meeting is planned for Wednesday, November 30, 2022, from 4 p.m. to 7 
p.m. MT at the El Paso Convention Center (Juarez Room) One Civic Center 
Plaza, El Paso, Texas, 79901. A virtual option will go live at 4 p.m. 
MT on November 30, 2022. Additional information on both options will be 
provided at https://www.txdot.gov/ by searching for ``El Paso Downtown 
10--Virtual Public Scoping Meeting with In-Person Option''.
    The public scoping meeting will provide an opportunity for the 
public to review and comment on the draft coordination plan and 
schedule, the project's purpose and need, the range of alternatives, 
and methodologies and level of detail for analyzing alternatives. It 
will also allow the public an opportunity to provide input on any 
expected environmental impacts, anticipated permits or other 
authorizations, and any significant issues that should be analyzed in 
depth in the EIS. In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public 
hearing will be held after the draft EIS is prepared. Public notice 
will be given of the time and place of the hearing.
    The public meeting will be conducted in English. If you need an 
interpreter or document translator because English is not your primary 
language or you have difficulty communicating effectively in English, 
one will be provided to you. If you have a disability and need 
assistance, special arrangements can be made to accommodate most needs. 
If you need interpretation or translation services or you are a person 
with a disability who requires an accommodation to attend and 
participate in the public meeting, please contact Lauren Macias-
Cervantes, Public Information Officer, El Paso District, at 
[email protected] or please call (915) 790-4341 no later 
than 4 p.m. MT, Monday, November 21, 2022. Please be aware that advance 
notice is required as some services and accommodations may require time 
for TxDOT to arrange.
    The public is requested to identify in writing potential 
alternatives, information, and analyses relevant to this proposed 
project. Such information may be provided in writing by mail to the 
TxDOT El Paso District Office, Attn: Downtown 10/Hugo Hernandez, 13301 
Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, Texas 79928-5410. Electronic comments 
may also be submitted by email to [email protected] or through the 
virtual site. Additionally, members of the public may also call (915) 
209-0027 and leave recorded comments. Comments must be received by 
January 11, 2023.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction.)

Michael T. Leary,
Director, Planning and Program Development, Federal Highway 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-23917 Filed 11-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.