Environmental Impact Statement: El Paso County, Texas, 66355-66357 [2022-23917]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices
Training
Under Sections 12.1 and 12.2 of the
MOU, the DOT&PF committed to
implementing training necessary to
carry out the environmental
responsibilities assumed under the
NEPA Assignment Program. The
DOT&PF also committed to assessing its
need for training, developing a training
plan, and updating the training plan on
an annual basis.
Observation #4: Training Needs
Assessment
Considering ongoing staff turnover, as
discussed in Observation #2, FHWA
encourages DOT&PF to conduct a
detailed statewide training needs
assessment of all environmental staff.
This will help DOT&PF allocate
resources more efficiently to identify
skill and knowledge gaps. The FHWA
also encourages DOT&PF to explore
cross training opportunities with other
agencies (e.g.: SHPO, BLM, USFS) and
engage them in development of their
annual training plan.
Performance Measures
The FHWA and DOT&PF mutually
established a set of performance
measures to evaluate DOT&PF’s
performance in assuming NEPA
Assignment Program responsibilities.
The DOT&PF continues to collect,
maintain, and develop data towards
monitoring its performance as required
by Section 10.1.3 of the MOU. The audit
team noted the following observation
related to Performance Measures.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Successful Practice #3: Relationships
With Agencies
The audit team found that DOT&PF
has very good and positive relationships
with BLM, USFS, and SHPO. The
FHWA has interviewed resource
agencies in previous audits and found
that overall, they had good working
relationships with DOT&PF. The audit
team decided to interview staff from
BLM and the USFS during Audit #4
since Federal Land Management
Agencies had not been interviewed in
past audits and they were included in
DOT&PF’s May 2020 agency poll. The
team also chose to interview SHPO
since they had not been interviewed
since Audit #1. The individuals
interviewed from these three agencies
indicated that overall, their working
relationships with DOT&PF were very
good and positive. This information
correlates well with the overwhelmingly
positive responses DOT&PF received to
their agency poll.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
Legal Sufficiency
Since 2017, the same attorney from
the Alaska Attorney General’s Office,
Transportation Section, has been
assigned to the NEPA Assignment
Program. The assigned attorney has
significant experience with Federal-aid
highway projects and the Federal
environmental process. The attorney
works directly with DOT&PF staff on
project environmental documents.
Based on the interviews, the attorney
becomes involved early in project
development, normally reviewing a
NEPA document before receiving a
formal request for a legal sufficiency
review. During the audit period, the
attorney did not review an
environmental impact statement or a
Section 4(f) evaluation requiring a legal
sufficiency review. Although a legal
sufficiency review is not required for
EAs, the attorney reviewed two EAs
during the audit period. The review
process for an EA is like the review
process for an EIS.
Department of Law Management
stated during the interviews that while
one attorney is currently assigned to the
program, should workload increase
significantly another attorney could be
assigned to NEPA work or litigation,
likely through the utilization of outside
counsel per 23 U.S.C. 327(a)(2)(G).
The audit team finds that DOT&PF
meets the legal sufficiency
determination and staffing requirements
set forth in the DOT&PF Environmental
Procedures Manual.
Status of Observations From Audit #3
Report (April 2020)
This section describes the actions
DOT&PF has taken in response to
observations made during the third
audit.
Observation #1: Self-Assessment
Procedures
The DOT&PF’s 2018 NEPA
Assignment Program Self-Assessment
Procedures require that SEO develop the
preliminary and final Self-Assessment
report through coordination with, and
input from, the Regional Environmental
Managers (REMs). During Audit #3
interviews, the audit team found that
DOT&PF did not develop the January
2020 Self-Assessment report in
accordance with their procedures, nor
distribute the final report to the regions.
For Audit #4, DOT&PF indicated in
their responses to the PAIR that the
draft December 2020 Self-assessment
was sent to the REMs for review and
comment according to their procedures.
Comments were received and addressed
in the final Self-Assessment report,
which was then shared with the regions.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66355
Observation #2: Assessing Resource
Agency Communication
Section 10.2.1 C. of the MOU requires
DOT&PF to ‘‘Assess change in
communication among DOT&PF,
Federal and State agencies, and the
public resulting from assumption of
responsibilities under this MOU’’. The
MOU allows DOT&PF to determine the
method it will use to assess this change.
The DOT&PF selected to use an annual
resource agency poll. The DOT&PF
identified this measure in its DOT&PF
NEPA Assignment Program
Performance Measures document
located on its website. At the time of
Audit #3, DOT&PF had not yet used a
resource agency poll, and FHWA
recommended that DOT&PF consider
changing the method for reporting this
measure.
In May 2020 (prior to Audit #4),
DOT&PF conducted an agency survey to
assess changes in communication
among DOT&PF, State, and Federal
resource agencies. As described in
DOT&PF’s Self-Assessment Report, the
survey consisted of six questions
distributed via an online platform to a
representative cross section of State and
Federal resource Agency staff. Twentyfour responses were received from 11
different resource agencies. The
DOT&PF asked the question: ‘‘Has the
level of communication improved,
declined, or remained the same since
the MOU became effective?’’ Eleven of
the responses indicated that there had
been an improvement in
communication and the remaining
responses indicated there had been no
change.
[FR Doc. 2022–23916 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: El
Paso County, Texas
Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT), Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Federal notice of intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
FHWA, on behalf of TxDOT,
is issuing this notice to advise the
public that an EIS will be prepared for
a proposed transportation project to
study the effects of the project on
Interstate Highway 10 (I–10), known as
the Downtown 10 project. The limits of
the proposed project are from Executive
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
66356
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices
Center Boulevard (Blvd.) to State Loop
(SL) 478 (Copia Street) in El Paso
County, Texas. The proposed project is
approximately 5.7 miles in length.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hugo Hernandez, TxDOT Project
Manager, 13301 Gateway Boulevard
West, El Paso, TX, 79928–5410, (915)
790–4243, Downtown10@txdot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
environmental review, consultation, and
other actions required by applicable
Federal environmental laws for this
project are being, or have been, carriedout by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327
and a Memorandum of Understanding
dated December 9, 2019 and executed
by FHWA and TxDOT.
Purpose and Need
The Downtown 10 project is needed
because of:
• Traffic congestion and mobility
issues
• Concerns surrounding incident
management
• Failure to meet current design
standards
By providing a long-term
transportation solution for the City of El
Paso, El Paso County, and the region,
the purpose of the proposed project is
to:
• Improve mobility and long-term
congestion management
• Improve incident management
• Bring the facility up to current design
standards
Proposed Action
The proposed project would improve
I–10 from Executive Center Blvd. and
SL 478 (Copia Street), a distance of
approximately 5.7 miles. Traveling
through downtown El Paso, the
proposed improvements may include
widening and reconstruction of the
mainlanes, continuous frontage roads,
retaining walls, bridges, ramps, and
cross streets to overcome deterioration
of pavement and bridges to include
bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Alternatives
The EIS will evaluate a range of build
alternatives and a no-build alternative.
Provided below is background
information on alternative analyses
conducted to date. From 2017 through
2019, the TxDOT Reimagine I–10
Corridor Study (study) included
extensive public outreach and highlevel engineering/environmental
evaluations of future needs for the I–10
corridor. The study resulted in a
recommended study alternative for the
entire 55-mile-long corridor. As a result,
the Downtown 10 project (Segment 2 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
the study) was initiated, and the first
Public Meeting was held virtually from
June 25 through July 15, 2020. The
Public Meeting showed the
recommended study alternative and
requested additional public and
stakeholder input in order to create
more detailed conceptual alternatives.
After Public Meeting #1, TxDOT
utilized detailed engineering and
environmental constraint criteria and
the public/stakeholder feedback to
identify 18 build alternatives, which
were narrowed to nine conceptual build
alternatives. The constraint criteria
included mobility, design, multimodal,
and environmental considerations.
The conceptual alternatives were then
screened to three viable build
alternatives (Alternatives D, G, and H).
This process was presented in Public
Meeting #2 (held virtually from
February 24 through March 16, 2021) for
additional public feedback and further
study. The no-build alternative has and
will be carried through the process as a
baseline condition. Possible build
alternatives include the following:
Alternative D
Alternative D proposes reconstruction
and widening of the existing I–10
facility. From Executive Center
Boulevard to University Drive,
Alternative D shifts the I–10 alignment
to the north/east. From University Drive
to Campbell Street, Alternative D
follows the existing alignment. From
Campbell Street to Ange Street,
Alternative D shifts the I–10 alignment
to the north. From Ange Street to
Piedras Street, Alternative D shifts the
I–10 alignment to the south. From
Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia Street),
Alternative D follows the existing
alignment. Alternative D proposes new
eastbound and westbound non-tolled
managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an
additional eastbound and westbound
general purpose lane, a bicycle and
pedestrian bridge at Prospect Street, the
addition of an eastbound one-way
collector roadway between Kansas
Street and Piedras Street, a shared use
path from Executive Center Boulevard
to University Drive and from Santa Fe
Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), and
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations
along cross street bridges. Additional
capacity, operational, and bicycle and
pedestrian accommodations would be
considered for this alternative.
Alternative G
Alternative G proposes reconstruction
and widening of the existing I–10
facility. From Executive Center
Boulevard to Yandell Drive, Alternative
G shifts the I–10 alignment to the north/
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
east. From Yandell Drive to Santa Fe
Street Alternative G follows the existing
alignment. From Santa Fe Street to Ange
Street, Alternative G shifts the I–10
alignment to the north. From Ange
Street to Piedras Street, Alternative G
shifts the I–10 alignment to the south.
From Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia
Street), Alternative G follows the
existing alignment. Alternative G
proposes new eastbound and westbound
non-tolled managed lanes called
adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound
and westbound general purpose lane,
the addition of one-way collector
roadways (eastbound and westbound)
between Executive Center Boulevard
and Santa Fe Street, the addition of an
eastbound one-way collector roadway
between Kansas Street and Piedras
Street, a shared use path from Executive
Center Boulevard to SL 478 (Copia
Street), bi-directional cycle tracks from
Santa Fe Street to Stanton Street, and
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations
along cross street bridges. Additional
capacity, operational, and bicycle and
pedestrian accommodations would be
considered for this alternative.
Alternative H
Alternative H proposes reconstruction
and widening of the existing I–10
facility. From Executive Center
Boulevard to Yandell Drive, Alternative
H shifts the I–10 alignment to the north/
east. From Yandell Drive to Santa Fe
Street, Alternative H follows the
existing alignment. From Santa Fe Street
to Ange Street, Alternative H shifts the
I–10 alignment to the north. From Ange
Street to Piedras Street Alternative H
shifts the I–10 alignment to the south.
From Piedras Street to SL 478 (Copia
Street), Alternative H follows the
existing alignment. Alternative H
proposes new eastbound and westbound
non-tolled managed lanes called
adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound
and westbound general purpose lane,
the addition of one-way collector
roadways (eastbound and westbound)
between Executive Center Boulevard
and Santa Fe Street, the addition of an
eastbound one-way collector roadway
between Kansas Street and Piedras
Street, eastbound and westbound
collector-distributor connectors between
Campbell Street and SL 478 (Copia
Street), a shared use path from
Executive Center Boulevard to SL 478
(Copia Street), bi-directional cycle
tracks from Santa Fe Street to Stanton
Street, and bicycle and pedestrian
accommodations along cross street
bridges. Additional capacity,
operational, and bicycle and pedestrian
accommodations would be considered
for this alternative.
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2022 / Notices
Potential Project Impacts
Section 106 and Section 4(f) Historic
Properties. The proposed build
alternatives will be evaluated for
potential adverse impacts to historic
properties (i.e., properties that are
eligible for or listed in the National
Register of Historic Places) within the
study area.
Environmental Justice (EJ). The
proposed build alternatives will be
evaluated for potential adverse impacts
to EJ communities due to anticipated
relocations as well as other impacts
such as access, noise, and visual
aesthetics. Additional analysis and
public involvement will be conducted
during the National Environmental
Policy Act process to assess if the
project would result in any
disproportionately high and adverse
effects on low-income and minority
communities.
Air Quality. The project is located in
the El Paso Moderate Nonattainment
area for Particulate Matter (PM) 10,
Attainment/Maintenance Area for
Carbon Monoxide (CO), and the 2015
Marginal Nonattainment area for Ozone
(O3). As such, the proposed build
alternatives will be evaluated for
potential adverse impacts to air quality
and will be subject to a project level
conformity determination.
The EIS will evaluate the potential
impacts and benefits to the resources/
communities identified above as well as
the following other subject areas:
Limited English Proficiency
communities, land use, right-of-way,
social and community resources, traffic
noise, wildlife and threatened and
endangered species, water resources,
hazardous materials sites, and visual
resources.
It is anticipated that the following
would be required: Texas Antiquities
Code permit and concurrence, Section
106 historic/archeological resources
concurrence, Section 4(f) evaluation
approval, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers
Nationwide Permit(s), and conformity
determination under the Clean Air Act.
Tentative Schedule
Agency Scoping Meeting: November 30,
2022
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Public Scoping Meeting: November 30,
2022
In addition to the public scoping
meeting, a public hearing will be held
after the Draft EIS is prepared. Public
notice will be given of the time and
place of the hearing. After the public
hearing and end of Draft EIS comment
period, issuance of the Final EIS/Record
of Decision is anticipated. If a build
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 02, 2022
Jkt 259001
alternative is selected, all permits and
authorization decisions would occur
before construction. TxDOT will issue a
single Final EIS and Record of Decision
document pursuant to 23 U.S.C.
139(n)(2), unless TxDOT determines
statutory criteria or practicability
considerations preclude issuance of a
combined document.
In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 139,
cooperating agencies, participating
agencies, and the public will be given
an opportunity for continued input on
project development. An in-person
public scoping meeting is planned for
Wednesday, November 30, 2022, from 4
p.m. to 7 p.m. MT at the El Paso
Convention Center (Juarez Room) One
Civic Center Plaza, El Paso, Texas,
79901. A virtual option will go live at
4 p.m. MT on November 30, 2022.
Additional information on both options
will be provided at https://
www.txdot.gov/ by searching for ‘‘El
Paso Downtown 10—Virtual Public
Scoping Meeting with In-Person
Option’’.
The public scoping meeting will
provide an opportunity for the public to
review and comment on the draft
coordination plan and schedule, the
project’s purpose and need, the range of
alternatives, and methodologies and
level of detail for analyzing alternatives.
It will also allow the public an
opportunity to provide input on any
expected environmental impacts,
anticipated permits or other
authorizations, and any significant
issues that should be analyzed in depth
in the EIS. In addition to the public
scoping meeting, a public hearing will
be held after the draft EIS is prepared.
Public notice will be given of the time
and place of the hearing.
The public meeting will be conducted
in English. If you need an interpreter or
document translator because English is
not your primary language or you have
difficulty communicating effectively in
English, one will be provided to you. If
you have a disability and need
assistance, special arrangements can be
made to accommodate most needs. If
you need interpretation or translation
services or you are a person with a
disability who requires an
accommodation to attend and
participate in the public meeting, please
contact Lauren Macias-Cervantes, Public
Information Officer, El Paso District, at
Lauren.MaciasCervantes@txdot.gov or
please call (915) 790–4341 no later than
4 p.m. MT, Monday, November 21,
2022. Please be aware that advance
notice is required as some services and
accommodations may require time for
TxDOT to arrange.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66357
The public is requested to identify in
writing potential alternatives,
information, and analyses relevant to
this proposed project. Such information
may be provided in writing by mail to
the TxDOT El Paso District Office, Attn:
Downtown 10/Hugo Hernandez, 13301
Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, Texas
79928–5410. Electronic comments may
also be submitted by email to
Downtown10@txdot.gov or through the
virtual site. Additionally, members of
the public may also call (915) 209–0027
and leave recorded comments.
Comments must be received by January
11, 2023.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction.)
Michael T. Leary,
Director, Planning and Program Development,
Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022–23917 Filed 11–2–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2021–0020]
Surface Transportation Project
Delivery Program; Arizona Department
of Transportation Draft FHWA Audit
Report
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice; request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act
established the Surface Transportation
Project Delivery Program that allows a
State to assume FHWA’s environmental
responsibilities for environmental
review, consultation, and compliance
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) for Federal highway
projects. When a State assumes these
Federal responsibilities, the State
becomes solely responsible and liable
for carrying out the responsibilities it
has assumed, in lieu of FHWA. This
program mandates annual audits during
each of the first 4 years of State
participation to ensure compliance with
program requirements. This is the
second audit of the Arizona Department
of Transportation’s (ADOT) performance
of its responsibilities under the Surface
Transportation Project Delivery Program
(NEPA Assignment Program). This
notice announces and solicits comments
on the second audit report for ADOT.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 5, 2022.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 212 (Thursday, November 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66355-66357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23917]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: El Paso County, Texas
AGENCY: Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Federal notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FHWA, on behalf of TxDOT, is issuing this notice to advise the
public that an EIS will be prepared for a proposed transportation
project to study the effects of the project on Interstate Highway 10
(I-10), known as the Downtown 10 project. The limits of the proposed
project are from Executive
[[Page 66356]]
Center Boulevard (Blvd.) to State Loop (SL) 478 (Copia Street) in El
Paso County, Texas. The proposed project is approximately 5.7 miles in
length.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugo Hernandez, TxDOT Project Manager,
13301 Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, TX, 79928-5410, (915) 790-4243,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental review, consultation, and
other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for
this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to
23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 9, 2019
and executed by FHWA and TxDOT.
Purpose and Need
The Downtown 10 project is needed because of:
Traffic congestion and mobility issues
Concerns surrounding incident management
Failure to meet current design standards
By providing a long-term transportation solution for the City of El
Paso, El Paso County, and the region, the purpose of the proposed
project is to:
Improve mobility and long-term congestion management
Improve incident management
Bring the facility up to current design standards
Proposed Action
The proposed project would improve I-10 from Executive Center Blvd.
and SL 478 (Copia Street), a distance of approximately 5.7 miles.
Traveling through downtown El Paso, the proposed improvements may
include widening and reconstruction of the mainlanes, continuous
frontage roads, retaining walls, bridges, ramps, and cross streets to
overcome deterioration of pavement and bridges to include bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.
Alternatives
The EIS will evaluate a range of build alternatives and a no-build
alternative.
Provided below is background information on alternative analyses
conducted to date. From 2017 through 2019, the TxDOT Reimagine I-10
Corridor Study (study) included extensive public outreach and high-
level engineering/environmental evaluations of future needs for the I-
10 corridor. The study resulted in a recommended study alternative for
the entire 55-mile-long corridor. As a result, the Downtown 10 project
(Segment 2 of the study) was initiated, and the first Public Meeting
was held virtually from June 25 through July 15, 2020. The Public
Meeting showed the recommended study alternative and requested
additional public and stakeholder input in order to create more
detailed conceptual alternatives. After Public Meeting #1, TxDOT
utilized detailed engineering and environmental constraint criteria and
the public/stakeholder feedback to identify 18 build alternatives,
which were narrowed to nine conceptual build alternatives. The
constraint criteria included mobility, design, multimodal, and
environmental considerations.
The conceptual alternatives were then screened to three viable
build alternatives (Alternatives D, G, and H). This process was
presented in Public Meeting #2 (held virtually from February 24 through
March 16, 2021) for additional public feedback and further study. The
no-build alternative has and will be carried through the process as a
baseline condition. Possible build alternatives include the following:
Alternative D
Alternative D proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive,
Alternative D shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From
University Drive to Campbell Street, Alternative D follows the existing
alignment. From Campbell Street to Ange Street, Alternative D shifts
the I-10 alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street,
Alternative D shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras
Street to SL 478 (Copia Street), Alternative D follows the existing
alignment. Alternative D proposes new eastbound and westbound non-
tolled managed lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and
westbound general purpose lane, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge at
Prospect Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from
Executive Center Boulevard to University Drive and from Santa Fe Street
to SL 478 (Copia Street), and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations
along cross street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this
alternative.
Alternative G
Alternative G proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive,
Alternative G shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From Yandell
Drive to Santa Fe Street Alternative G follows the existing alignment.
From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative G shifts the I-10
alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street, Alternative
G shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478
(Copia Street), Alternative G follows the existing alignment.
Alternative G proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed
lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound
general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways
(eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa
Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, a shared use path from
Executive Center Boulevard to SL 478 (Copia Street), bi-directional
cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to Stanton Street, and bicycle and
pedestrian accommodations along cross street bridges. Additional
capacity, operational, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations would
be considered for this alternative.
Alternative H
Alternative H proposes reconstruction and widening of the existing
I-10 facility. From Executive Center Boulevard to Yandell Drive,
Alternative H shifts the I-10 alignment to the north/east. From Yandell
Drive to Santa Fe Street, Alternative H follows the existing alignment.
From Santa Fe Street to Ange Street, Alternative H shifts the I-10
alignment to the north. From Ange Street to Piedras Street Alternative
H shifts the I-10 alignment to the south. From Piedras Street to SL 478
(Copia Street), Alternative H follows the existing alignment.
Alternative H proposes new eastbound and westbound non-tolled managed
lanes called adaptive lanes, an additional eastbound and westbound
general purpose lane, the addition of one-way collector roadways
(eastbound and westbound) between Executive Center Boulevard and Santa
Fe Street, the addition of an eastbound one-way collector roadway
between Kansas Street and Piedras Street, eastbound and westbound
collector-distributor connectors between Campbell Street and SL 478
(Copia Street), a shared use path from Executive Center Boulevard to SL
478 (Copia Street), bi-directional cycle tracks from Santa Fe Street to
Stanton Street, and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations along cross
street bridges. Additional capacity, operational, and bicycle and
pedestrian accommodations would be considered for this alternative.
[[Page 66357]]
Potential Project Impacts
Section 106 and Section 4(f) Historic Properties. The proposed
build alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to
historic properties (i.e., properties that are eligible for or listed
in the National Register of Historic Places) within the study area.
Environmental Justice (EJ). The proposed build alternatives will be
evaluated for potential adverse impacts to EJ communities due to
anticipated relocations as well as other impacts such as access, noise,
and visual aesthetics. Additional analysis and public involvement will
be conducted during the National Environmental Policy Act process to
assess if the project would result in any disproportionately high and
adverse effects on low-income and minority communities.
Air Quality. The project is located in the El Paso Moderate
Nonattainment area for Particulate Matter (PM) 10, Attainment/
Maintenance Area for Carbon Monoxide (CO), and the 2015 Marginal
Nonattainment area for Ozone (O3). As such, the proposed build
alternatives will be evaluated for potential adverse impacts to air
quality and will be subject to a project level conformity
determination.
The EIS will evaluate the potential impacts and benefits to the
resources/communities identified above as well as the following other
subject areas: Limited English Proficiency communities, land use,
right-of-way, social and community resources, traffic noise, wildlife
and threatened and endangered species, water resources, hazardous
materials sites, and visual resources.
It is anticipated that the following would be required: Texas
Antiquities Code permit and concurrence, Section 106 historic/
archeological resources concurrence, Section 4(f) evaluation approval,
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Nationwide Permit(s), and conformity
determination under the Clean Air Act.
Tentative Schedule
Agency Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022
Public Scoping Meeting: November 30, 2022
In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public hearing will be
held after the Draft EIS is prepared. Public notice will be given of
the time and place of the hearing. After the public hearing and end of
Draft EIS comment period, issuance of the Final EIS/Record of Decision
is anticipated. If a build alternative is selected, all permits and
authorization decisions would occur before construction. TxDOT will
issue a single Final EIS and Record of Decision document pursuant to 23
U.S.C. 139(n)(2), unless TxDOT determines statutory criteria or
practicability considerations preclude issuance of a combined document.
In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 139, cooperating agencies,
participating agencies, and the public will be given an opportunity for
continued input on project development. An in-person public scoping
meeting is planned for Wednesday, November 30, 2022, from 4 p.m. to 7
p.m. MT at the El Paso Convention Center (Juarez Room) One Civic Center
Plaza, El Paso, Texas, 79901. A virtual option will go live at 4 p.m.
MT on November 30, 2022. Additional information on both options will be
provided at https://www.txdot.gov/ by searching for ``El Paso Downtown
10--Virtual Public Scoping Meeting with In-Person Option''.
The public scoping meeting will provide an opportunity for the
public to review and comment on the draft coordination plan and
schedule, the project's purpose and need, the range of alternatives,
and methodologies and level of detail for analyzing alternatives. It
will also allow the public an opportunity to provide input on any
expected environmental impacts, anticipated permits or other
authorizations, and any significant issues that should be analyzed in
depth in the EIS. In addition to the public scoping meeting, a public
hearing will be held after the draft EIS is prepared. Public notice
will be given of the time and place of the hearing.
The public meeting will be conducted in English. If you need an
interpreter or document translator because English is not your primary
language or you have difficulty communicating effectively in English,
one will be provided to you. If you have a disability and need
assistance, special arrangements can be made to accommodate most needs.
If you need interpretation or translation services or you are a person
with a disability who requires an accommodation to attend and
participate in the public meeting, please contact Lauren Macias-
Cervantes, Public Information Officer, El Paso District, at
[email protected] or please call (915) 790-4341 no later
than 4 p.m. MT, Monday, November 21, 2022. Please be aware that advance
notice is required as some services and accommodations may require time
for TxDOT to arrange.
The public is requested to identify in writing potential
alternatives, information, and analyses relevant to this proposed
project. Such information may be provided in writing by mail to the
TxDOT El Paso District Office, Attn: Downtown 10/Hugo Hernandez, 13301
Gateway Boulevard West, El Paso, Texas 79928-5410. Electronic comments
may also be submitted by email to [email protected] or through the
virtual site. Additionally, members of the public may also call (915)
209-0027 and leave recorded comments. Comments must be received by
January 11, 2023.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction.)
Michael T. Leary,
Director, Planning and Program Development, Federal Highway
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-23917 Filed 11-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P