Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Possible Effects of Court Decision on Significant Portion of the Range Analysis for the Northern Distinct Population Segment of the Southern Subspecies of Scarlet Macaw, 66093-66094 [2022-23812]
Download as PDF
66093
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 21, 2022.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Amend § 52.770 by:
a. In paragraph (c), amend the table by
revising the entry for 1–1–3 ‘‘References
to the Code of Federal Regulations’’
under Article 1, Rule 1 ‘‘Provisions
Applicable Throughout Title 326’’.
■
■
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
b. In paragraph (e), amend the table by
adding an entry for ‘‘Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015
Ozone NAAQS’’ after the entry for
‘‘Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone NAAQS’’.
The revision and addition read as
follows:
■
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana
effective
date
Indiana citation
Subject
*
1–1–3 .............
*
*
References to the Code of Federal Regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6/24/2020
EPA approval date
*
*
11/2/2022, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
*
Notes
*
*
(e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Indiana
date
Title
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS.
*
*
*
*
11/2/2018
*
*
*
EPA approval
Explanation
*
11/2/2022, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
*
All CAA infrastructure elements have been approved
except (D)(i)(I) and the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II).
*
*
*
*
Final rule; notification of
additional analysis and request for
comments.
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2022–23335 Filed 11–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), are seeking
public comment on how recent case law
on the Service’s significant portion of
the range (SPR) policy and the plain
language of the Endangered Species Act
(Act) may affect our February 26, 2019,
final rule designating the northern
distinct population segment (DPS) of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw
(Ara macao macao), as a threatened
species under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2022–0134;
FF09E21000 FXES1111090FEDR 232]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
RIN 1018–BG93
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Possible Effects of Court
Decision on Significant Portion of the
Range Analysis for the Northern
Distinct Population Segment of the
Southern Subspecies of Scarlet Macaw
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Nov 01, 2022
Jkt 259001
We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
December 2, 2022. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES,
below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the closing date.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–HQ–ES–2022–0134, which
is the docket number for this
rulemaking. Then, click on the Search
button. You may submit a comment by
clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:
FWS–HQ–ES–2022–0134, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see Request
for Public Comments, below, for more
information).
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
66094
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 211 / Wednesday, November 2, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Bridget Fahey, Chief, Division of
Conservation and Classification,
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, MS: ES, 5275
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803 (telephone 703–358–2171).
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In response to a petition for
rulemaking, on July 6, 2012, we
published in the Federal Register (77
FR 40222) a proposed rule to list as
endangered under the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) the northern subspecies of
scarlet macaw (Ara macao cyanoptera)
and the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies of scarlet macaw (A. m.
macao). That document also announced
our finding that listing the southern DPS
of A. m. macao as endangered or
threatened was not warranted.
On April 7, 2016, we published in the
Federal Register (81 FR 20302) a revised
proposed rule that made changes to the
July 6, 2012, proposed rule. Changes we
proposed in the April 7, 2016, revised
proposed rule included, but were not
limited to, revising our proposed listing
of the northern DPS of A. m. macao
from endangered to threatened and
proposing to treat the southern DPS of
A. m. macao and subspecies crosses (A.
m. macao and A. m. cyanoptera) as
threatened based on similarity of
appearance. The proposed rule also
included a proposed section 4(d) rule
for the northern DPS of A. m. macao,
southern DPS of A. m. macao, and
subspecies crosses.
On February 26, 2019, we published
in the Federal Register (84 FR 6278) a
final rule listing the northern subspecies
of scarlet macaw (A. m. cyanoptera) as
endangered, the northern DPS of the
southern subspecies (A. m. macao) as
threatened, the southern DPS of the
southern subspecies (A. m. macao) and
subspecies crosses (A. m. cyanoptera
and A. m. macao) as threatened due to
similarity of appearance, and finalizing
the section 4(d) rule.
In Center for Biological Diversity v.
Everson, 435 F. Supp. 3d 69 (D.D.C. Jan.
28, 2020) (CBD v. Everson), the Court
vacated the provision of the ‘‘Policy on
Interpretation of the Phrase ‘Significant
Portion of Its Range’ in the ESA’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Nov 01, 2022
Jkt 259001
Definitions of Endangered Species and
Threatened Species’’ (79 FR 37578; July
1, 2014), issued jointly by the Service
and the National Marine Fisheries
Service, which provides that if the
Services determine that a species is
threatened throughout all of its range,
the Services will not analyze whether
the species is endangered in a
significant portion of its range.
This Action
We are reexamining the SPR analysis
for the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies of scarlet macaw (A. m.
macao). On August 29, 2022, the U.S.
District Court for the District of
Columbia granted our motion for
voluntary remand without vacatur of the
threatened finding and section 4(d) rule
for the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies of scarlet macaw (Friends of
Animals v. Williams, No. 1:21–cv–
02081–RC, Doc. 22). As submitted to
and approved by the Court, we will
reconsider our SPR analysis based on
the plain language of the Act and the
implications of CBD v. Everson, and
submit our findings to the Federal
Register by March 28, 2023. If the SPR
analysis determines that there are no
significant portions of the range for the
northern DPS of the southern subspecies
of scarlet macaw, the SPR analysis ends
the process. If the SPR analysis
determines that one or more significant
portions of the range exist but do not
warrant endangered status, the SPR
analysis ends the process. However, if
the SPR analysis finds one or more
significant portions of the range and
finds the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies of scarlet macaw should be
listed as endangered instead of
threatened, we will submit a proposed
rule to the Federal Register by March
28, 2024, seeking public comment on
the proposed reclassification of the
northern DPS of the southern subspecies
of scarlet macaw. Throughout this
process, the February 26, 2019, final
rule (84 FR 6278) remains in effect,
including with respect to the threatened
listing and section 4(d) rule for the
northern DPS of the southern subspecies
of scarlet macaw.
Request for Public Comments
We invite written comments on the
manner in which the plain language of
the Act and CBD v. Everson decision
may affect our February 26, 2019, final
rule designating the northern DPS of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw
(A. m. macao) as a threatened species.
Specifically, we are interested in public
input on whether and how the CBD v.
Everson opinion affects the SPR analysis
in the threatened determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We request comments from any
interested party that pertain to the
issues raised in the preceding paragraph
only.
Public Availability of Comments
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the website. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request that we withhold this
information from public review, but we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will post all hardcopy
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments and
materials we receive will be available
for public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Author
The primary authors of this
announcement are the staff members of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
Branch of Delisting and Foreign Species.
Authority
This document is published under the
authority of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Martha Williams,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–23812 Filed 11–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–MB–2021–0025;
FF09M31000–234–FXMB12320900000]
RIN 1018–BF59
Migratory Bird Permits; Administrative
Updates
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
On January 7, 2022, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
published a final rule to renumber,
rename, and rearrange certain subparts
and sections in our regulations. In that
rule, we incorrectly presented an
amendatory instruction, which
prevented the complete codification of
the regulatory text we set forth for one
section of the regulations. In this
document, we correctly set forth the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66093-66094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23812]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-ES-2022-0134; FF09E21000 FXES1111090FEDR 232]
RIN 1018-BG93
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Possible Effects
of Court Decision on Significant Portion of the Range Analysis for the
Northern Distinct Population Segment of the Southern Subspecies of
Scarlet Macaw
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; notification of additional analysis and request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are seeking
public comment on how recent case law on the Service's significant
portion of the range (SPR) policy and the plain language of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) may affect our February 26, 2019, final
rule designating the northern distinct population segment (DPS) of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw (Ara macao macao), as a threatened
species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
December 2, 2022. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter FWS-HQ-ES-2022-0134,
which is the docket number for this rulemaking. Then, click on the
Search button. You may submit a comment by clicking on ``Comment.''
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS-HQ-ES-2022-0134, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
MS: PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We request that you send comments only by the methods described
above. We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide
us (see Request for Public Comments, below, for more information).
[[Page 66094]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bridget Fahey, Chief, Division of
Conservation and Classification, Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, MS: ES, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA
22041-3803 (telephone 703-358-2171). Individuals in the United States
who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability
may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications
relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their country to make international calls
to the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In response to a petition for rulemaking, on July 6, 2012, we
published in the Federal Register (77 FR 40222) a proposed rule to list
as endangered under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) the northern
subspecies of scarlet macaw (Ara macao cyanoptera) and the northern DPS
of the southern subspecies of scarlet macaw (A. m. macao). That
document also announced our finding that listing the southern DPS of A.
m. macao as endangered or threatened was not warranted.
On April 7, 2016, we published in the Federal Register (81 FR
20302) a revised proposed rule that made changes to the July 6, 2012,
proposed rule. Changes we proposed in the April 7, 2016, revised
proposed rule included, but were not limited to, revising our proposed
listing of the northern DPS of A. m. macao from endangered to
threatened and proposing to treat the southern DPS of A. m. macao and
subspecies crosses (A. m. macao and A. m. cyanoptera) as threatened
based on similarity of appearance. The proposed rule also included a
proposed section 4(d) rule for the northern DPS of A. m. macao,
southern DPS of A. m. macao, and subspecies crosses.
On February 26, 2019, we published in the Federal Register (84 FR
6278) a final rule listing the northern subspecies of scarlet macaw (A.
m. cyanoptera) as endangered, the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies (A. m. macao) as threatened, the southern DPS of the
southern subspecies (A. m. macao) and subspecies crosses (A. m.
cyanoptera and A. m. macao) as threatened due to similarity of
appearance, and finalizing the section 4(d) rule.
In Center for Biological Diversity v. Everson, 435 F. Supp. 3d 69
(D.D.C. Jan. 28, 2020) (CBD v. Everson), the Court vacated the
provision of the ``Policy on Interpretation of the Phrase `Significant
Portion of Its Range' in the ESA's Definitions of Endangered Species
and Threatened Species'' (79 FR 37578; July 1, 2014), issued jointly by
the Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which provides
that if the Services determine that a species is threatened throughout
all of its range, the Services will not analyze whether the species is
endangered in a significant portion of its range.
This Action
We are reexamining the SPR analysis for the northern DPS of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw (A. m. macao). On August 29, 2022,
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted our motion
for voluntary remand without vacatur of the threatened finding and
section 4(d) rule for the northern DPS of the southern subspecies of
scarlet macaw (Friends of Animals v. Williams, No. 1:21-cv-02081-RC,
Doc. 22). As submitted to and approved by the Court, we will reconsider
our SPR analysis based on the plain language of the Act and the
implications of CBD v. Everson, and submit our findings to the Federal
Register by March 28, 2023. If the SPR analysis determines that there
are no significant portions of the range for the northern DPS of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw, the SPR analysis ends the
process. If the SPR analysis determines that one or more significant
portions of the range exist but do not warrant endangered status, the
SPR analysis ends the process. However, if the SPR analysis finds one
or more significant portions of the range and finds the northern DPS of
the southern subspecies of scarlet macaw should be listed as endangered
instead of threatened, we will submit a proposed rule to the Federal
Register by March 28, 2024, seeking public comment on the proposed
reclassification of the northern DPS of the southern subspecies of
scarlet macaw. Throughout this process, the February 26, 2019, final
rule (84 FR 6278) remains in effect, including with respect to the
threatened listing and section 4(d) rule for the northern DPS of the
southern subspecies of scarlet macaw.
Request for Public Comments
We invite written comments on the manner in which the plain
language of the Act and CBD v. Everson decision may affect our February
26, 2019, final rule designating the northern DPS of the southern
subspecies of scarlet macaw (A. m. macao) as a threatened species.
Specifically, we are interested in public input on whether and how the
CBD v. Everson opinion affects the SPR analysis in the threatened
determination.
We request comments from any interested party that pertain to the
issues raised in the preceding paragraph only.
Public Availability of Comments
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your
entire comment--including any personal identifying information--will be
posted on the website. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you may request that we withhold this
information from public review, but we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will post all hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov. Comments and materials we receive will be
available for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov.
Author
The primary authors of this announcement are the staff members of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Branch of Delisting and Foreign
Species.
Authority
This document is published under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Martha Williams,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-23812 Filed 11-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P