Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Undefinitized Contract Actions (DFARS Case 2021-D003), 65507-65509 [2022-23280]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 215, 217, and 252
[Docket DARS–2022–0026]
RIN 0750–AL22
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Undefinitized
Contract Actions (DFARS Case 2021–
D003)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) as
recommended by the DoD Inspector
General to refine the management of
undefinitized contract actions.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
December 27, 2022, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2021–D003,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D003.’’ Select
‘‘Comment’’ and follow the instructions
to submit a comment. Please include
your name, company name (if any), and
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D003’’ on any
attached documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2021–D003 in the subject
line of the message.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately
two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David E. Johnson, telephone 202–913–
5764.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to implement recommendations to
refine management of undefinitized
contract actions (UCAs) as addressed in
the DoD Inspector General Audit of
Military Department Management of
Undefinitized Contract Actions (Report
No. DODIG–2020–084). This report
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:51 Oct 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
recommends changes to the DFARS to
encourage contractors to provide timely
qualifying proposals, including the
possibility of the Government
withholding a percentage of payments
yet to be paid under a UCA until it
receives a qualifying proposal from the
contractor.
This proposed rule reinforces the
contracting officer’s existing authority,
notwithstanding FAR 52.216–26,
Payments of Allowable Costs Before
Definitization, to withhold up to 5
percent of all subsequent financing
requests or take other appropriate
actions when the contractor does not
submit qualifying proposals in
accordance with the contract
definitization schedule. DoD contracting
officers will appropriately document
contract files and apply contract risk
factors on DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines, under this
proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DFARS 215.404–71–3, Contract type
risk and working capital adjustment,
generally regards the contract type risk
to be in the low end of the designated
range when costs have been incurred
prior to definitization. This proposed
rule adds, at 215.404–71–3, paragraph
(d)(2)(i), that when considering the
reduced cost risks associated with
allowable incurred costs on an
undefinitized contract action, it is
appropriate to apply separate contract
risk factors for allowable incurred costs
and estimated costs to complete when
completing the contract risk factors
section of DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines.
DFARS subpart 217.74 prescribes
policies and procedures for the
management and oversight of
undefinitized contract actions and
related approval requirements. DFARS
217.7404–3(b) currently states that if the
contractor does not submit a timely
qualifying proposal, the contracting
officer may suspend or reduce progress
payments or take other appropriate
action. This proposed rule revises the
withholding guidance to specify ‘‘an
amount necessary to protect the
interests of the Government, not to
exceed 5 percent of all subsequent
financing requests,’’ if the qualifying
proposal is not submitted in accordance
with the contract definitization
schedule. This proposed rule provides
examples of other appropriate actions to
include documenting the
noncompliance in the contractor’s past
performance evaluation or terminating
the contract for default. This proposed
rule adds that contracting officers must
ensure contract files are documented
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65507
with justification for withholding or not
withholding payments when the
qualifying proposal was not submitted
in accordance with the contract
definitization schedule.
This proposed rule adds to the clause
at DFARS 252.217–7027, Contract
Definitization, that failure to meet the
qualifying proposal date in the contract
definitization schedule could result in
the Government withholding an amount
of up to 5 percent of all subsequent
requests for financing until the
contracting officer determines that a
proposal is qualifying.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial
Services and Commercial Products,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule amends the clause at DFARS
252.217–7027, Contract Definitization.
However, this rule does not impose any
new requirements on contracts at or
below the SAT or for commercial
services or commercial products,
including COTS items. The clause will
continue to not apply to acquisitions at
or below the SAT and to acquisitions of
commercial services and commercial
products, including COTS items.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule will incentivize
contractors to submit qualifying
proposals according to the contract
definitization schedule to avoid the
withholding of an amount of up to 5
percent of all subsequent financing
requests. DoD contracting officers will
be required to consider applying
separate and differing contract risk
factors to costs incurred and estimated
costs to complete, when completing the
DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted
Guidelines. Contracting officers will
also be required to document the
contract file to show justification for
withholding or not withholding a
portion of financing payment when the
qualifying proposal was not submitted
according to the contract definitization
schedule.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
E:\FR\FM\28OCP2.SGM
28OCP2
65508
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808) before an
interim or final rule takes effect, DoD
will submit a copy of the interim or
final rule with the form, Submission of
Federal Rules under the Congressional
Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule under the
Congressional Review Act cannot take
effect until 60 days after it is published
in the Federal Register. This rule is not
anticipated to be a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because no additional
administrative burdens will be placed
on small entities. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis has been
performed and is summarized as
follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) as recommended
by the DoD Inspector General Audit of
Military Department Management of
Undefinitized Contract Actions (Report
No. DODIG–2020–084) to refine the
management of undefinitized contract
actions. This report recommends
changes to the DFARS to encourage
contractors to provide timely qualifying
proposals, including the possibility of
the Government withholding a
percentage of payments yet to be paid
under an undefinitized contract action
until it receives a qualifying proposal
from the contractor.
This proposed rule incentivizes
contractors to submit qualifying
proposals in accordance with the
contract definitization schedule; and,
notwithstanding FAR 52.216–26,
Payments of Allowable Costs Before
Definitization, allows contracting
officers to withhold an amount
necessary to protect the interests of the
Government, not to exceed 5 percent of
all subsequent financing requests, or
take other appropriate actions if a
qualifying proposal is not submitted in
accordance with the contract
definitization schedule. Contracting
officers will document in the contract
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:51 Oct 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
file the justification for withholding or
not withholding payments if the
qualifying proposal was not submitted
in accordance with the contract
definitization schedule. This proposed
rule clarifies that, when considering the
reduced cost risks associated with
allowable incurred costs on an
undefinitized contract action, it is
appropriate to apply separate and
differing contract risk factors for
allowable incurred costs and estimated
costs to complete when documenting
the contract risk sections of DD Form
1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines.
The objective of the proposed rule is
to implement the recommendations of
the DoD Inspector General. The legal
basis for the rule is 41 U.S.C 1303.
This proposed rule will likely affect
small entities that will be awarded
undefinitized contract actions. Data was
obtained from the Procurement Business
Intelligence Service (PBIS) for all
contracts and modifications containing
DFARS clause 252.217–7027, Contract
Definitization. Data from PBIS revealed
DoD awarded a total of 2,162 contracts
to 971 small businesses from fiscal year
2019 through fiscal year 2021, which
averages out to 324 small businesses per
year. Therefore, this proposed rule may
apply to approximately 324 unique
small entities.
The rule does not impose any new
reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance
requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant
alternatives that would minimize or
reduce the significant economic impact
on small entities, because this proposed
rule is not expected to have a significant
impact on small entities.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021–D003), in
correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215,
217, and 252
Government procurement.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 217, and
252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 215, 217, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
2. Amend section 215.404–71–3 by
revising paragraph (d)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
■
215.404–71–3 Contract type risk and
working capital adjustment.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall assess
the extent to which costs have been
incurred prior to definitization of the
contract action (also see 217.7404–6(a)
and 243.204–70–6). When considering
the reduced cost risks associated with
allowable incurred costs on an
undefinitized contract action, it is
appropriate to apply separate contract
risk factors for allowable incurred costs
and estimated costs to complete when
completing the contract risk sections of
DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted
Guidelines. When costs have been
incurred prior to definitization,
generally regard the contract type risk to
be in the low end of the designated
range. If a substantial portion of the
costs has been incurred prior to
definitization, the contracting officer
may assign a value as low as zero
percent, regardless of contract type.
However, if a contractor submits a
qualifying proposal to definitize an
undefinitized contract action and the
contracting officer for such action
definitizes the contract after the end of
the 180-day period beginning on the
date on which the contractor submitted
the qualifying proposal as defined in
217.7401, the profit allowed on the
contract shall accurately reflect the cost
risk of the contractor as such risk
existed on the date the contractor
submitted the qualifying proposal.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING
METHODS
3. Amend section 217.7404–3 by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
217.7404–3
*
E:\FR\FM\28OCP2.SGM
*
Definitization schedule.
*
28OCP2
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 208 / Friday, October 28, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(b)(1) Submission of a qualifying
proposal in accordance with the
definitization schedule is a material
element of the contract. If the contractor
does not submit a qualifying proposal in
accordance with the contract
definitization schedule,
notwithstanding FAR 52.216–26,
Payments of Allowable Costs Before
Definitization, the contracting officer
may withhold an amount necessary to
protect the interests of the Government,
not to exceed 5 percent of all
subsequent financing requests, or take
other appropriate actions (e.g.,
documenting the noncompliance in the
contractor’s past performance
evaluation or terminating the contract
for default).
(2) Contracting officers shall
document in the contract file the
justification for withholding or not
withholding payments if the qualifying
proposal was not submitted in
accordance with the contract
definitization schedule.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
4. Revise section 252.217–7027 to
read as follows:
■
252.217–7027
Contract definitization.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS2
As prescribed in 217.7406(b), use the
following clause:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:51 Oct 27, 2022
Jkt 259001
Contract Definitization (Date)
(a) A lll [insert specific type of contract
action] is contemplated. The Contractor
agrees to begin promptly negotiating with the
Contracting Officer the terms of a definitive
contract that will include—
(1) All clauses required by the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) on the date of
execution of the undefinitized contract
action;
(2) All clauses required by law on the date
of execution of the definitive contract action;
and
(3) Any other mutually agreeable clauses,
terms, and conditions.
(b) The Contractor agrees to submit a
lll [insert type of proposal; e.g., fixedprice or cost-and-fee] proposal and certified
cost or pricing data supporting its proposal.
Notwithstanding FAR 52.216–26, Payments
of Allowable Costs Before Definitization,
failure to meet the qualifying proposal date
in the contract definitization schedule could
result in the Contracting Officer withholding
an amount up to 5 percent of all subsequent
requests for financing until the Contracting
Officer determines that a proposal is
qualifying.
(c) The schedule for definitizing this
contract action is as follows [insert target
date for definitization of the contract action
and dates for submission of proposal,
beginning of negotiations, and, if
appropriate, submission of the make-or-buy
and subcontracting plans and certified cost
or pricing data]:
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllll
(d) If agreement on a definitive contract
action to supersede this undefinitized
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
65509
contract action is not reached by the target
date in paragraph (c) of this clause, or within
any extension of it granted by the Contracting
Officer, the Contracting Officer may, with the
approval of the head of the contracting
activity, determine a reasonable price or fee
in accordance with FAR subpart 15.4 and
part 31, subject to Contractor appeal as
provided in the Disputes clause. In any
event, the Contractor shall proceed with
completion of the contract, subject only to
the Limitation of Government Liability
clause.
(1) After the Contracting Officer’s
determination of price or fee, the contract
shall be governed by—
(i) All clauses required by the FAR on the
date of execution of this undefinitized
contract action for either fixed-price or costreimbursement contracts, as determined by
the Contracting Officer under this paragraph
(d);
(ii) All clauses required by law as of the
date of the Contracting Officer’s
determination; and
(iii) Any other clauses, terms, and
conditions mutually agreed upon.
(2) To the extent consistent with paragraph
(d)(1) of this clause, all clauses, terms, and
conditions included in this undefinitized
contract action shall continue in effect,
except those that by their nature apply only
to an undefinitized contract action.
(e) The definitive contract resulting from
this undefinitized contract action will
include a negotiated lll [insert ‘‘cost/
price ceiling’’ or ‘‘firm-fixed price’’] in no
event to exceed lll [insert the not-toexceed amount].
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2022–23280 Filed 10–27–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\28OCP2.SGM
28OCP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 208 (Friday, October 28, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65507-65509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23280]
[[Page 65507]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 215, 217, and 252
[Docket DARS-2022-0026]
RIN 0750-AL22
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Undefinitized
Contract Actions (DFARS Case 2021-D003)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) as recommended by the DoD Inspector
General to refine the management of undefinitized contract actions.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before December 27, 2022, to be
considered in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2021-D003, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2021-D003.'' Select ``Comment'' and follow the
instructions to submit a comment. Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ``DFARS Case 2021-D003'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2021-D003 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Johnson, telephone 202-913-
5764.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to implement recommendations
to refine management of undefinitized contract actions (UCAs) as
addressed in the DoD Inspector General Audit of Military Department
Management of Undefinitized Contract Actions (Report No. DODIG-2020-
084). This report recommends changes to the DFARS to encourage
contractors to provide timely qualifying proposals, including the
possibility of the Government withholding a percentage of payments yet
to be paid under a UCA until it receives a qualifying proposal from the
contractor.
This proposed rule reinforces the contracting officer's existing
authority, notwithstanding FAR 52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs
Before Definitization, to withhold up to 5 percent of all subsequent
financing requests or take other appropriate actions when the
contractor does not submit qualifying proposals in accordance with the
contract definitization schedule. DoD contracting officers will
appropriately document contract files and apply contract risk factors
on DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines, under this proposed
rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DFARS 215.404-71-3, Contract type risk and working capital
adjustment, generally regards the contract type risk to be in the low
end of the designated range when costs have been incurred prior to
definitization. This proposed rule adds, at 215.404-71-3, paragraph
(d)(2)(i), that when considering the reduced cost risks associated with
allowable incurred costs on an undefinitized contract action, it is
appropriate to apply separate contract risk factors for allowable
incurred costs and estimated costs to complete when completing the
contract risk factors section of DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted
Guidelines.
DFARS subpart 217.74 prescribes policies and procedures for the
management and oversight of undefinitized contract actions and related
approval requirements. DFARS 217.7404-3(b) currently states that if the
contractor does not submit a timely qualifying proposal, the
contracting officer may suspend or reduce progress payments or take
other appropriate action. This proposed rule revises the withholding
guidance to specify ``an amount necessary to protect the interests of
the Government, not to exceed 5 percent of all subsequent financing
requests,'' if the qualifying proposal is not submitted in accordance
with the contract definitization schedule. This proposed rule provides
examples of other appropriate actions to include documenting the
noncompliance in the contractor's past performance evaluation or
terminating the contract for default. This proposed rule adds that
contracting officers must ensure contract files are documented with
justification for withholding or not withholding payments when the
qualifying proposal was not submitted in accordance with the contract
definitization schedule.
This proposed rule adds to the clause at DFARS 252.217-7027,
Contract Definitization, that failure to meet the qualifying proposal
date in the contract definitization schedule could result in the
Government withholding an amount of up to 5 percent of all subsequent
requests for financing until the contracting officer determines that a
proposal is qualifying.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Services and Commercial Products,
Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule amends the clause at DFARS 252.217-7027, Contract
Definitization. However, this rule does not impose any new requirements
on contracts at or below the SAT or for commercial services or
commercial products, including COTS items. The clause will continue to
not apply to acquisitions at or below the SAT and to acquisitions of
commercial services and commercial products, including COTS items.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule will incentivize contractors to submit qualifying
proposals according to the contract definitization schedule to avoid
the withholding of an amount of up to 5 percent of all subsequent
financing requests. DoD contracting officers will be required to
consider applying separate and differing contract risk factors to costs
incurred and estimated costs to complete, when completing the DD Form
1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines. Contracting officers will also be
required to document the contract file to show justification for
withholding or not withholding a portion of financing payment when the
qualifying proposal was not submitted according to the contract
definitization schedule.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of
[[Page 65508]]
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a
significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review
under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808)
before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of
the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules
under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not
anticipated to be a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because no additional administrative burdens will be placed on small
entities. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been
performed and is summarized as follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) as recommended by the DoD Inspector
General Audit of Military Department Management of Undefinitized
Contract Actions (Report No. DODIG-2020-084) to refine the management
of undefinitized contract actions. This report recommends changes to
the DFARS to encourage contractors to provide timely qualifying
proposals, including the possibility of the Government withholding a
percentage of payments yet to be paid under an undefinitized contract
action until it receives a qualifying proposal from the contractor.
This proposed rule incentivizes contractors to submit qualifying
proposals in accordance with the contract definitization schedule; and,
notwithstanding FAR 52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs Before
Definitization, allows contracting officers to withhold an amount
necessary to protect the interests of the Government, not to exceed 5
percent of all subsequent financing requests, or take other appropriate
actions if a qualifying proposal is not submitted in accordance with
the contract definitization schedule. Contracting officers will
document in the contract file the justification for withholding or not
withholding payments if the qualifying proposal was not submitted in
accordance with the contract definitization schedule. This proposed
rule clarifies that, when considering the reduced cost risks associated
with allowable incurred costs on an undefinitized contract action, it
is appropriate to apply separate and differing contract risk factors
for allowable incurred costs and estimated costs to complete when
documenting the contract risk sections of DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines.
The objective of the proposed rule is to implement the
recommendations of the DoD Inspector General. The legal basis for the
rule is 41 U.S.C 1303.
This proposed rule will likely affect small entities that will be
awarded undefinitized contract actions. Data was obtained from the
Procurement Business Intelligence Service (PBIS) for all contracts and
modifications containing DFARS clause 252.217-7027, Contract
Definitization. Data from PBIS revealed DoD awarded a total of 2,162
contracts to 971 small businesses from fiscal year 2019 through fiscal
year 2021, which averages out to 324 small businesses per year.
Therefore, this proposed rule may apply to approximately 324 unique
small entities.
The rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant alternatives that would
minimize or reduce the significant economic impact on small entities,
because this proposed rule is not expected to have a significant impact
on small entities.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021-D003), in
correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215, 217, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 215, 217, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 215, 217, and 252 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
2. Amend section 215.404-71-3 by revising paragraph (d)(2)(i) to read
as follows:
215.404-71-3 Contract type risk and working capital adjustment.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall assess the extent to which costs
have been incurred prior to definitization of the contract action (also
see 217.7404-6(a) and 243.204-70-6). When considering the reduced cost
risks associated with allowable incurred costs on an undefinitized
contract action, it is appropriate to apply separate contract risk
factors for allowable incurred costs and estimated costs to complete
when completing the contract risk sections of DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines. When costs have been incurred prior to
definitization, generally regard the contract type risk to be in the
low end of the designated range. If a substantial portion of the costs
has been incurred prior to definitization, the contracting officer may
assign a value as low as zero percent, regardless of contract type.
However, if a contractor submits a qualifying proposal to definitize an
undefinitized contract action and the contracting officer for such
action definitizes the contract after the end of the 180-day period
beginning on the date on which the contractor submitted the qualifying
proposal as defined in 217.7401, the profit allowed on the contract
shall accurately reflect the cost risk of the contractor as such risk
existed on the date the contractor submitted the qualifying proposal.
* * * * *
PART 217--SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
0
3. Amend section 217.7404-3 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
217.7404-3 Definitization schedule.
* * * * *
[[Page 65509]]
(b)(1) Submission of a qualifying proposal in accordance with the
definitization schedule is a material element of the contract. If the
contractor does not submit a qualifying proposal in accordance with the
contract definitization schedule, notwithstanding FAR 52.216-26,
Payments of Allowable Costs Before Definitization, the contracting
officer may withhold an amount necessary to protect the interests of
the Government, not to exceed 5 percent of all subsequent financing
requests, or take other appropriate actions (e.g., documenting the
noncompliance in the contractor's past performance evaluation or
terminating the contract for default).
(2) Contracting officers shall document in the contract file the
justification for withholding or not withholding payments if the
qualifying proposal was not submitted in accordance with the contract
definitization schedule.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. Revise section 252.217-7027 to read as follows:
252.217-7027 Contract definitization.
As prescribed in 217.7406(b), use the following clause:
Contract Definitization (Date)
(a) A ___ [insert specific type of contract action] is
contemplated. The Contractor agrees to begin promptly negotiating
with the Contracting Officer the terms of a definitive contract that
will include--
(1) All clauses required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) on the date of execution of the undefinitized contract action;
(2) All clauses required by law on the date of execution of the
definitive contract action; and
(3) Any other mutually agreeable clauses, terms, and conditions.
(b) The Contractor agrees to submit a ___ [insert type of
proposal; e.g., fixed-price or cost-and-fee] proposal and certified
cost or pricing data supporting its proposal. Notwithstanding FAR
52.216-26, Payments of Allowable Costs Before Definitization,
failure to meet the qualifying proposal date in the contract
definitization schedule could result in the Contracting Officer
withholding an amount up to 5 percent of all subsequent requests for
financing until the Contracting Officer determines that a proposal
is qualifying.
(c) The schedule for definitizing this contract action is as
follows [insert target date for definitization of the contract
action and dates for submission of proposal, beginning of
negotiations, and, if appropriate, submission of the make-or-buy and
subcontracting plans and certified cost or pricing data]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) If agreement on a definitive contract action to supersede
this undefinitized contract action is not reached by the target date
in paragraph (c) of this clause, or within any extension of it
granted by the Contracting Officer, the Contracting Officer may,
with the approval of the head of the contracting activity, determine
a reasonable price or fee in accordance with FAR subpart 15.4 and
part 31, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the Disputes
clause. In any event, the Contractor shall proceed with completion
of the contract, subject only to the Limitation of Government
Liability clause.
(1) After the Contracting Officer's determination of price or
fee, the contract shall be governed by--
(i) All clauses required by the FAR on the date of execution of
this undefinitized contract action for either fixed-price or cost-
reimbursement contracts, as determined by the Contracting Officer
under this paragraph (d);
(ii) All clauses required by law as of the date of the
Contracting Officer's determination; and
(iii) Any other clauses, terms, and conditions mutually agreed
upon.
(2) To the extent consistent with paragraph (d)(1) of this
clause, all clauses, terms, and conditions included in this
undefinitized contract action shall continue in effect, except those
that by their nature apply only to an undefinitized contract action.
(e) The definitive contract resulting from this undefinitized
contract action will include a negotiated ___ [insert ``cost/price
ceiling'' or ``firm-fixed price''] in no event to exceed ___ [insert
the not-to-exceed amount].
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2022-23280 Filed 10-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P