Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 64818 [2022-23305]
Download as PDF
64818
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 26, 2022 / Notices
public is invited to submit comments
concerning: (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
execution of the function of the agency,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimate of the burden of
the collection of information, including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of the information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
By Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board, the National
Credit Union Administration, on
October 20, 2022.
Dated: October 21, 2022.
Dawn D. Wolfgang,
NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022–23267 Filed 10–25–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This is the
second notice for public comment; the
first was published in the Federal
Register, and no comments were
received. NSF is forwarding the
proposed submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance simultaneously with the
publication of this second notice.
DATES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAmain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation,
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria,
VA 22314, or send email to splimpto@
nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Oct 25, 2022
Jkt 259001
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including federal holidays).
Copies of the submission may be
obtained by calling 703–292–7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number,
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: ‘‘National Science
Foundation Proposal/Award
Information—NSF Proposal and Award
Policies and Procedures Guide.’’
OMB Approval Number: 3145–0080.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to reinstate with revisions an
information collection for three years.
The primary purpose of this
reinstatement is outlined below.
Proposed Project: The National
Science Foundation Act of 1950 at 42
U.S.C. 1862(a)(1) allows the National
Science Foundation to issue ‘‘other
arrangements’’ to ’’ . . . support
scientific, engineering, and educational
activities and to appraise the impact of
research upon industrial development
and upon the general welfare.’’ Issuing
other arrangements necessarily includes
preparing and issuing requests for other
arrangement proposals. Because these
are unique to NSF’s mission, we are
seeking to reinstate this information
collection.
Use of the Information: Requests for
Other Arrangement Proposals (RFOAPs)
are used to competitively solicit
proposals in response to NSF science
and engineering needs. Impact will be
on those individuals or organizations
who elect to submit proposals in
response to an RFOAP. Information
gathered will be evaluated in light of
NSF other arrangement requirements to
determine who will be awarded an
‘‘other arrangement.’’
The NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 1870, Sec. II, states that NSF has
the authority to:
‘‘(c) enter into contracts or other
arrangements, or modifications thereof,
for the carrying on, by organizations or
individuals in the United States and
foreign countries, including other
government agencies of the United
States and of foreign countries, of such
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
scientific or engineering activities as the
Foundation deems necessary to carry
out the purposes of this Act, and, at the
request of the Secretary of Defense,
specific scientific or engineering
activities in connection with matter
relating to international cooperation or
national security, and, when deemed
appropriate by the Foundation, such
contracts or other arrangements or
modifications thereof, may be entered
into without legal consideration,
without performance or other bonds and
without regard to section 5 of title 41,
U.S.C.’’
Where NSF chooses to issue an ‘‘other
arrangement,’’ NSF must receive and
evaluate proposals to support NSF’s
program requirements.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation
estimates that an average of 250 hours
will be expended for each proposal
submitted. An estimated 70 respondents
are expected to answer a request for
‘‘other arrangements’’ during the course
of one year for a total of 17,500 burden
hours annually.
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Dated: October 17, 2022.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2022–23305 Filed 10–25–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Advisory Committee for Polar
Programs; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: Advisory
Committee for Polar Programs (1130).
E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM
26OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 64818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23305]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This is the second
notice for public comment; the first was published in the Federal
Register, and no comments were received. NSF is forwarding the proposed
submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance
simultaneously with the publication of this second notice.
DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAmain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Alexandria, VA 22314, or send email to [email protected]. Individuals
who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is
accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year (including
federal holidays).
Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling 703-292-7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless
the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control
number, and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: ``National Science Foundation Proposal/Award
Information--NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide.''
OMB Approval Number: 3145-0080.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
Type of Request: Intent to seek approval to reinstate with
revisions an information collection for three years. The primary
purpose of this reinstatement is outlined below.
Proposed Project: The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 at 42
U.S.C. 1862(a)(1) allows the National Science Foundation to issue
``other arrangements'' to '' . . . support scientific, engineering, and
educational activities and to appraise the impact of research upon
industrial development and upon the general welfare.'' Issuing other
arrangements necessarily includes preparing and issuing requests for
other arrangement proposals. Because these are unique to NSF's mission,
we are seeking to reinstate this information collection.
Use of the Information: Requests for Other Arrangement Proposals
(RFOAPs) are used to competitively solicit proposals in response to NSF
science and engineering needs. Impact will be on those individuals or
organizations who elect to submit proposals in response to an RFOAP.
Information gathered will be evaluated in light of NSF other
arrangement requirements to determine who will be awarded an ``other
arrangement.''
The NSF Act of 1950, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1870, Sec. II, states
that NSF has the authority to:
``(c) enter into contracts or other arrangements, or modifications
thereof, for the carrying on, by organizations or individuals in the
United States and foreign countries, including other government
agencies of the United States and of foreign countries, of such
scientific or engineering activities as the Foundation deems necessary
to carry out the purposes of this Act, and, at the request of the
Secretary of Defense, specific scientific or engineering activities in
connection with matter relating to international cooperation or
national security, and, when deemed appropriate by the Foundation, such
contracts or other arrangements or modifications thereof, may be
entered into without legal consideration, without performance or other
bonds and without regard to section 5 of title 41, U.S.C.''
Where NSF chooses to issue an ``other arrangement,'' NSF must
receive and evaluate proposals to support NSF's program requirements.
Burden on the Public: The Foundation estimates that an average of
250 hours will be expended for each proposal submitted. An estimated 70
respondents are expected to answer a request for ``other arrangements''
during the course of one year for a total of 17,500 burden hours
annually.
Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: October 17, 2022.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2022-23305 Filed 10-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P