Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation, 64167-64169 [2022-23062]
Download as PDF
64167
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(c) * * *
TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED TENNESSEE REGULATIONS
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
Section 1200–3–9–.01 .....
*
Construction Permits.
*
*
Section 1200–3–21–.01 ...
*
General Alternate
Emission Standard.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4/22/2021
4/22/2021
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
10/24/2022, [Insert
citation of publication].
*
*
*
Except
for
1200–03–09–.01(1)(a),
(1)(d),
(4)(b)24(i)(XVII), (4)(b)29, (4)(b)47(i)(IV), (4)(j)3,
(5)(b)1(x) (VII), and (5)(b)2(iii)(II), which have a state
effective date of 4/24/2013; 1200–3–9–.01(1)(j), which
is not incorporated into the SIP; and the PM2.5 SILs
(found in 1200–3–9–.01(5)(b)1(xix)) and the SMC
(found in 1200–3–9–.01(4)(d)6(i)(III)) provisions.
*
10/24/2022, [Insert
citation of publication]..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of
non-regulatory SIP provision
*
*
110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2015 8Hour Ozone NAAQS.
State
effective
date
*
Tennessee ........
4/9/2021
EPA
approval date
*
*
*
*
10/24/2022, [Insert
Addressing the PSD requirements of Section
citation of publi110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and (J).
cation].
The rule is effective October 24,
2022. Comments, if any, are requested
by November 23, 2022.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2022–22357 Filed 10–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Submit comments, if any,
through the Federal e-rulemaking portal,
https://www.regulations.gov. In the
body of your comment, please indicate
that it is in response to ‘‘RIN 3145–
AA66–Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017
Implementation.’’ If you are unable to
submit your comment through the
portal, please see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document to obtain alternate
submission instructions. Comments may
be made publicly available for routine
viewing, inspection, and copying on
https://www.regulations.gov and/or on
the NSF website, https://www.nsf.gov,
and are subject to disclosure under
NSF’s Freedom of Information Act
regulations at 45 CFR part 612. For this
reason, do not include in your comment
information of a confidential nature,
such as sensitive personal information
or proprietary information, or any other
information that you would not want
publicly disclosed.
ADDRESSES:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 613
RIN 3145–AA66
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation
AGENCY:
National Science Foundation
(NSF).
Final rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
NSF is adding a section to its
Privacy Act regulations to implement
restrictions on the use of Social Security
numbers in documents mailed by NSF.
These restrictions are required by the
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017. The rule is
intended to help reduce the potential
risk of identity theft from fraudulent or
other unauthorized acquisition of Social
Security numbers from any NSF
mailings.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Explanation
Sfmt 4700
Alex
Tang, Assistant General Counsel,
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, (703) 292–8547.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Social
Security Number Fraud Prevention Act
of 2017, Public Law 115–59, 131 Stat.
1152 (Sept. 15, 2017), codified at 42
U.S.C. 405 note, restricts federal
agencies from including Social Security
numbers (SSNs) of individuals on
documents sent by mail unless the head
of the agency determines that including
the SSN on the mailing is necessary.
The Act requires agency heads to issue
regulations, within five years of the Act,
specifying the circumstances under
which including an SSN on a document
sent by mail is necessary. The Act
requires that the regulations include
instructions for the partial redaction of
SSNs where feasible, and requires that
SSNs not be visible on the outside of
any package sent by mail.
To implement these requirements,
NSF is amending its existing Privacy
Act regulations (45 CFR part 613) to add
a new § 613.7, and to make a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
64168
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
conforming amendment to § 613.1,
which describes the scope of part 613,
to accommodate the new rule. The rule
prohibits including an individual’s SSN
on any document that NSF sends by
mail unless it is necessary, as
determined by the Director of NSF (or
other agency official whom the Director
may designate). If so, the rule requires
that the SSN be truncated to display no
more than the last four digits or, if such
truncation is not feasible, the document
may include additional SSN digits or
the full SSN, as needed, but only under
certain circumstances, i.e.: if required
by law (e.g., statute, court order, or other
legal mandate); to identify a specific
individual where no adequate substitute
is available; or to fulfill some other
compelling NSF business need. In all
cases, the rule prohibits any SSN,
truncated or not, from being visible on
the outside of any NSF mailing.
Consistent with the language of the
Act, and with the legislative intent and
examples discussed in the House report
(H.R. Rep. No. 115–150, pt. 1)
accompanying the Act, the rule is
limited to printed documents or
correspondence mailed by NSF,
including printed documents or
correspondence mailed by a contractor
acting on NSF’s behalf. The rule does
not apply to emails or other documents,
correspondence, or communications
transmitted by electronic means (e.g.,
via web portals). The rule is also not
intended to apply to mailings, if any, by
NSF award recipients or other
individuals or entities using financial or
other support or assistance from NSF, as
their award terms and conditions do not
normally direct or authorize them to
send mailings or otherwise take any
actions on NSF’s behalf.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule of agency organization,
procedure, or practice is exempt from
the prior public notice and comment
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
Accordingly, it is not being published in
proposed form before being published
as final and effective. There is also no
need to delay the effective date of the
rule by 30 days, as normally required for
substantive rules. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
Instead, there is good cause to make the
rule effective immediately, as it is
merely procedural and reflects a
statutory requirement that is already in
effect (i.e., documents mailed by the
agency may not include an SSN unless
the agency head determines it is
necessary). Id. Nonetheless, NSF will
accept comments, if any, on the rule
from interested parties, as provided in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
NSF will consider such comments, if
any, and may modify the rule on the
basis of such comments, or as the
agency may otherwise deem necessary
or appropriate.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by the Office of Management &
Budget (OMB), Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) under
Executive Order 12866, section 6(a).
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or the rule preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
final rule does not have any federalism
implications, as described above.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NSF hereby certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The factual basis for this
certification is that the rule governs only
the circumstances under which NSF
includes SSNs in documents mailed by
the NSF. The rule does not apply to
mailings by small entities, other than
any contractors who may be engaged to
send mailings on NSF’s behalf. Even in
those cases, the economic impact would
fall on NSF, not on the contractor, to
determine to what extent, if any, a
mailing needs to include an SSN in
whole or part, and to pay mailing costs.
In any event, NSF does not expect the
volume of such mailings, if any, to be
significant. Accordingly, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires that agencies prepare a
written statement analyzing and
estimating anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule that may result
in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more (adjusted annually for inflation) in
any one year. See 2 U.S.C. 1532. The
Act further requires that the agency
publish a summary of such statement
with the agency’s proposed and final
rules. No statement or summary is
required, since the rule will not result
in the above-stated expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, or
by the private sector.
Section 1 of Executive Order 12785
requires the agency to submit a
description of the extent of its prior
consultation with representatives of
affected State, local, and tribal
governments, together with the agency’s
position, to OMB to support the need for
any regulation that is not required by
statute, if the direct compliance costs
incurred by such governments will not
be funded by the Federal Government
(i.e., an unfunded mandate). The
Executive order does not apply, since
the rule is required by statute and, in
any event, imposes no mandate or
compliance obligations, unfunded or
otherwise, on any State, local, or tribal
government.
Congressional Review Act
A major rule cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This rule is not a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 801.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information
collection, recordkeeping, or disclosure
provisions that would constitute
information collection activities subject
to the OMB clearance requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 613
Personally identifiable information,
Privacy, Social security.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, NSF amends part 613, title 45
of the Code of Federal Regulations, as
set forth below:
PART 613—PRIVACY ACT
REGULATIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
613 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; for § 613.7, 42
U.S.C. 405 note, Pub L. 115–59, 131 Stat.
1152.
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
2. In § 613.1, add a sentence at the end
to read as follows:
■
§ 613.1
General Provisions.
* * * This part also includes
regulations required by the Social
Security Fraud Prevention Act of 2017
to limit the use of Social Security
numbers on documents mailed by the
National Science Foundation (NSF or
Foundation).
■ 3. Add § 613.7 to read as follows:
§ 613.7 Social Security numbers on
documents mailed by NSF.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
(a) A document that NSF sends by
mail shall not include the Social
Security number (SSN) of an individual,
except where the NSF Director (or other
agency official whom the NSF Director
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
may designate) determines that it is
necessary. If so, the SSN must be
truncated to the extent feasible, as
follows—
(1) The document shall include no
more than the last four digits of the
SSN; or
(2) If the document needs to include
more digits, then only where they are:
(i) Required by law (including, but not
limited to, a statute, court order, or
other legal mandate);
(ii) Needed to identify a specific
individual when no adequate substitute
is available; or
(iii) Needed to fulfill some other
compelling NSF business need.
(b) No portion of an SSN may be
visible on the outside of any NSF
mailing.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
64169
(c) For purposes of this section,
‘‘mail’’ and ‘‘mailing’’ means printed
documents or correspondence, and does
not include emails or any other
documents, correspondence, or
communications in electronic form.
(d) The requirements of this section
shall apply to mail sent by NSF,
including mailings by a contractor on
NSF’s behalf, on or after October 24,
2022.
Dated: October 17, 2022.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2022–23062 Filed 10–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64167-64169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23062]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 613
RIN 3145-AA66
Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017
Implementation
AGENCY: National Science Foundation (NSF).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NSF is adding a section to its Privacy Act regulations to
implement restrictions on the use of Social Security numbers in
documents mailed by NSF. These restrictions are required by the Social
Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017. The rule is intended to
help reduce the potential risk of identity theft from fraudulent or
other unauthorized acquisition of Social Security numbers from any NSF
mailings.
DATES: The rule is effective October 24, 2022. Comments, if any, are
requested by November 23, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, if any, through the Federal e-rulemaking
portal, https://www.regulations.gov. In the body of your comment,
please indicate that it is in response to ``RIN 3145-AA66-Social
Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation.'' If you
are unable to submit your comment through the portal, please see the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document to obtain
alternate submission instructions. Comments may be made publicly
available for routine viewing, inspection, and copying on https://www.regulations.gov and/or on the NSF website, https://www.nsf.gov, and
are subject to disclosure under NSF's Freedom of Information Act
regulations at 45 CFR part 612. For this reason, do not include in your
comment information of a confidential nature, such as sensitive
personal information or proprietary information, or any other
information that you would not want publicly disclosed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Tang, Assistant General Counsel,
National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, (703) 292-8547.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Social Security Number Fraud Prevention
Act of 2017, Public Law 115-59, 131 Stat. 1152 (Sept. 15, 2017),
codified at 42 U.S.C. 405 note, restricts federal agencies from
including Social Security numbers (SSNs) of individuals on documents
sent by mail unless the head of the agency determines that including
the SSN on the mailing is necessary. The Act requires agency heads to
issue regulations, within five years of the Act, specifying the
circumstances under which including an SSN on a document sent by mail
is necessary. The Act requires that the regulations include
instructions for the partial redaction of SSNs where feasible, and
requires that SSNs not be visible on the outside of any package sent by
mail.
To implement these requirements, NSF is amending its existing
Privacy Act regulations (45 CFR part 613) to add a new Sec. 613.7, and
to make a
[[Page 64168]]
conforming amendment to Sec. 613.1, which describes the scope of part
613, to accommodate the new rule. The rule prohibits including an
individual's SSN on any document that NSF sends by mail unless it is
necessary, as determined by the Director of NSF (or other agency
official whom the Director may designate). If so, the rule requires
that the SSN be truncated to display no more than the last four digits
or, if such truncation is not feasible, the document may include
additional SSN digits or the full SSN, as needed, but only under
certain circumstances, i.e.: if required by law (e.g., statute, court
order, or other legal mandate); to identify a specific individual where
no adequate substitute is available; or to fulfill some other
compelling NSF business need. In all cases, the rule prohibits any SSN,
truncated or not, from being visible on the outside of any NSF mailing.
Consistent with the language of the Act, and with the legislative
intent and examples discussed in the House report (H.R. Rep. No. 115-
150, pt. 1) accompanying the Act, the rule is limited to printed
documents or correspondence mailed by NSF, including printed documents
or correspondence mailed by a contractor acting on NSF's behalf. The
rule does not apply to emails or other documents, correspondence, or
communications transmitted by electronic means (e.g., via web portals).
The rule is also not intended to apply to mailings, if any, by NSF
award recipients or other individuals or entities using financial or
other support or assistance from NSF, as their award terms and
conditions do not normally direct or authorize them to send mailings or
otherwise take any actions on NSF's behalf.
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice is exempt
from the prior public notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Accordingly, it
is not being published in proposed form before being published as final
and effective. There is also no need to delay the effective date of the
rule by 30 days, as normally required for substantive rules. See 5
U.S.C. 553(d). Instead, there is good cause to make the rule effective
immediately, as it is merely procedural and reflects a statutory
requirement that is already in effect (i.e., documents mailed by the
agency may not include an SSN unless the agency head determines it is
necessary). Id. Nonetheless, NSF will accept comments, if any, on the
rule from interested parties, as provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document. NSF will consider such comments, if any, and may modify
the rule on the basis of such comments, or as the agency may otherwise
deem necessary or appropriate.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
This rule is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by
the Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) under Executive Order 12866, section 6(a).
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This final rule does not have any
federalism implications, as described above.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
NSF hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The
factual basis for this certification is that the rule governs only the
circumstances under which NSF includes SSNs in documents mailed by the
NSF. The rule does not apply to mailings by small entities, other than
any contractors who may be engaged to send mailings on NSF's behalf.
Even in those cases, the economic impact would fall on NSF, not on the
contractor, to determine to what extent, if any, a mailing needs to
include an SSN in whole or part, and to pay mailing costs. In any
event, NSF does not expect the volume of such mailings, if any, to be
significant. Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and
final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and
604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires that agencies
prepare a written statement analyzing and estimating anticipated costs
and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. See 2 U.S.C. 1532. The Act further requires
that the agency publish a summary of such statement with the agency's
proposed and final rules. No statement or summary is required, since
the rule will not result in the above-stated expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector.
Section 1 of Executive Order 12785 requires the agency to submit a
description of the extent of its prior consultation with
representatives of affected State, local, and tribal governments,
together with the agency's position, to OMB to support the need for any
regulation that is not required by statute, if the direct compliance
costs incurred by such governments will not be funded by the Federal
Government (i.e., an unfunded mandate). The Executive order does not
apply, since the rule is required by statute and, in any event, imposes
no mandate or compliance obligations, unfunded or otherwise, on any
State, local, or tribal government.
Congressional Review Act
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published
in the Federal Register. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
801.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information collection, recordkeeping, or
disclosure provisions that would constitute information collection
activities subject to the OMB clearance requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 613
Personally identifiable information, Privacy, Social security.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, NSF amends part 613, title
45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 613--PRIVACY ACT REGULATIONS
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 613 to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; for Sec. 613.7, 42 U.S.C. 405 note,
Pub L. 115-59, 131 Stat. 1152.
[[Page 64169]]
0
2. In Sec. 613.1, add a sentence at the end to read as follows:
Sec. 613.1 General Provisions.
* * * This part also includes regulations required by the Social
Security Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 to limit the use of Social
Security numbers on documents mailed by the National Science Foundation
(NSF or Foundation).
0
3. Add Sec. 613.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 613.7 Social Security numbers on documents mailed by NSF.
(a) A document that NSF sends by mail shall not include the Social
Security number (SSN) of an individual, except where the NSF Director
(or other agency official whom the NSF Director may designate)
determines that it is necessary. If so, the SSN must be truncated to
the extent feasible, as follows--
(1) The document shall include no more than the last four digits of
the SSN; or
(2) If the document needs to include more digits, then only where
they are:
(i) Required by law (including, but not limited to, a statute,
court order, or other legal mandate);
(ii) Needed to identify a specific individual when no adequate
substitute is available; or
(iii) Needed to fulfill some other compelling NSF business need.
(b) No portion of an SSN may be visible on the outside of any NSF
mailing.
(c) For purposes of this section, ``mail'' and ``mailing'' means
printed documents or correspondence, and does not include emails or any
other documents, correspondence, or communications in electronic form.
(d) The requirements of this section shall apply to mail sent by
NSF, including mailings by a contractor on NSF's behalf, on or after
October 24, 2022.
Dated: October 17, 2022.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2022-23062 Filed 10-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P