CHAMPVA Coverage of Audio-Only Telehealth, Mental Health Services, and Cost Sharing for Certain Contraceptive Services and Contraceptive Products Approved, Cleared, or Granted by FDA, 64190-64196 [2022-22905]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
64190
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Navigation (water).
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2021–0475 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 544; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 147.875 to read as follows:
§ 147.875 Safety Zone; Horn Mountain
Spar, Outer Continental Shelf Facility,
Mississippi Canyon 127.
(a) Description. The area within 500
meters of the Horn Mountain Spar in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at
Mississippi Canyon 127 is a safety zone.
The Horn Mountain Spar is located at:
Latitude N 28.8660
Longitude W 88.0562
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except for the
following:
(1) An attending vessel as defined in
147.20;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length
overall not engaged in towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
(c) Requests for Permission. Persons
or vessels requiring authorization to
enter the safety zone must request
permission from the Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative. If permission
is granted, all persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Commander or designated
representative.
Dated: October 18, 2022.
Richard Timme,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast
Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2022–23044 Filed 10–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AR55
CHAMPVA Coverage of Audio-Only
Telehealth, Mental Health Services,
and Cost Sharing for Certain
Contraceptive Services and
Contraceptive Products Approved,
Cleared, or Granted by FDA
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
■
■
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes amending its
medical regulations regarding Civilian
Health and Medical Program of the
Department of Veterans Affairs
(CHAMPVA) coverage. This rulemaking
would align with the Department of
Defense for benefits administered
through TRICARE and more closely
align with requirements of other Federal
programs. This rulemaking would
remove the exclusion from CHAMPVA
coverage for audio-only telehealth. In
addition, we propose removing
limitations on outpatient mental health
visits as well as removing cost sharing
requirements for certain contraceptive
services and contraceptive products
approved, cleared, or granted by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
VA on or before November 23, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments
received before the close of the
comment period will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copying, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post the comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following
website as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. VA will not post
on Regulations.gov public comments
that make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the
commenter will take actions to harm the
individual. VA encourages individuals
not to submit duplicative comments. We
will post acceptable comments from
multiple unique commenters even if the
content is identical or nearly identical
to other comments. Any public
comment received after the comment
period’s closing date is considered late
and will not be considered in the final
rulemaking.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Duran, Director, Policy, Office of
Integrated Veteran Care (OIVC),
Veterans Health Administration (VHA),
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Ptarmigan at Cherry Creek, Denver, CO
80209; 303–370–1637 (this is not a tollfree number).
The
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
proposes amending Civilian Health and
Medical Program of the Department of
Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA)
exclusions to allow coverage of
telephonic (audio-only) medical visits
and to remove limits on mental health
coverage to be consistent with the
Department of Defense (DoD) TRICARE
program and current standards of
practice in mental health and substance
use care as well as the Mental Health
Parity and Addiction Equity Act of
2008. In addition, we propose removing
cost-sharing requirements for
contraceptive services and contraceptive
products approved, cleared, or granted
by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration
(FDA). VA believes these proposed
changes are consistent with the goals
and objectives of Executive Order (E.O.)
14070 (April 5, 2022) titled,
‘‘Continuing to Strengthen Americans’
Access to Affordable, Quality Health
Coverage.’’ The E.O. directs federal
agencies ‘‘with responsibilities related
to Americans’ access to health
coverage’’ to ‘‘review agency actions to
identify ways to continue to expand the
availability of affordable health
coverage.’’
Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1781,
CHAMPVA is a health benefits program
in which VA shares the cost of covered
medical care services and supplies with
certain spouses, children, survivors, and
caregivers of veterans who meet specific
eligibility criteria. Under section
1781(b), VA ‘‘shall provide for medical
care in the same or similar manner and
subject to the same or similar
limitations as medical care is furnished
to certain dependents and survivors of
active duty and retired members of the
Armed Forces under chapter 55 of title
10 [United States Code] (CHAMPUS).’’
VA has implemented this requirement
through the promulgation of its
regulations at 38 CFR 17.270 et seq. We
note that VA has consistently
interpreted the ‘‘same or similar’’
language in 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to mean
that CHAMPVA is not required to
provide coverage identical to that
provided by TRICARE. When
warranted, CHAMPVA coverage and
exclusions may differ from TRICARE
due to factors such as dissimilarities in
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
the respective patient populations, or
policy considerations.
We note that CHAMPUS was the
original program administered by DoD
to provide civilian health benefits for
active duty military personnel, military
retirees, and their dependents. 32 CFR
199.1. Although the CHAMPUS program
is still referenced in DoD regulations,
DoD effectively replaced the CHAMPUS
program with what was commonly
known as the ‘‘TRICARE Standard’’ plan
(‘‘TRICARE’’). See 32 CFR 199.1(r),
199.17(a)(6)(ii)(D) (identifying
‘‘TRICARE Standard’’ as the basic
CHAMPUS program available prior to
January 1, 2018). In December 2017,
Section 701 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,
Public Law 114–328, required inter alia
the termination of TRICARE Standard as
a distinct plan and the establishment of
the TRICARE Select healthcare option.
The CHAMPUS basic program benefits
under 32 CFR 199.4 continue as the
baseline of benefits for TRICARE Select.
VA, therefore, administers CHAMPVA
in the same or similar manner as
TRICARE Select and, except where we
discuss laws or regulations generally
applicable to all TRICARE program
options, references in this rulemaking to
‘‘TRICARE’’ are to TRICARE Select.
Audio-Only Telehealth
Historically, TRICARE regulations
excluded audio-only telehealth. 32 CFR
199.4(g)(52) (2019). Similarly, the
CHAMPVA regulations at 38 CFR
17.272(a)(44) specifically exclude
coverage for audio-only telehealth.
However, on January 31, 2020, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS) determined that a public health
emergency existed since January 27,
2020. On March 13, 2020, the President
declared a national emergency due to
COVID–19. In light of the spread of
COVID–19, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) urged
Americans to work and engage in
schooling from home whenever possible
as well as to avoid congregating in
groups. Various States and localities
imposed more rigid restrictions on
gatherings, requiring many businesses to
restrict or close their operations, to
prevent further spread of the disease. To
prevent the spread of COVID–19 in
accordance with local restrictions and
guidelines, and to prioritize in-person
treatments for seriously ill patients,
health care professionals around the
country limited in-person medical
appointments. While in-person
appointments were converted to video
telehealth visits when possible, some
patients were limited to audio-only
telehealth appointments because either
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64191
they or their providers didn’t have
access to the communications
equipment, internet service, or internet
bandwidth required for video telehealth.
DoD published an interim final rule
(IFR) on May 12, 2020, effective that
same day, to temporarily remove the
exclusion for audio-only telehealth. 85
FR 27927. DoD temporarily removed the
exclusion because doing so was
necessary to ensure the health and
safety of TRICARE beneficiaries.
Allowing audio-only telehealth would
permit beneficiaries to have their
symptoms (which include COVID–19
symptoms, or symptoms of other
covered illness or injury) evaluated by
a provider over the telephone before, or
in lieu of, obtaining an in-person
appointment, which ultimately may not
be necessary. In 2022, DoD provided
that this temporary removal of the
exclusion would cease to be in effect
upon termination of the national
emergency declared by the President in
Proclamation 9994, in accordance with
applicable law and regulation (e.g., 50
U.S.C. 1622(a)).
Following publication of the IFR, DoD
reviewed claims data from TRICARE
private sector care as well as published
industry information from the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS), health insurance plans, and
statements from physicians’
professional organizations regarding
telephonic office visits to determine if
this should be a permanent telehealth
benefit. 87 FR 33002 (June 1, 2022). This
data reflected utilization rates for
telehealth services including telephonic
(audio-only) medical visits, while
statements from physicians’
professional organizations reflected
opinions of many health care provider
regarding telehealth. The TRICARE
claims data between mid-March and
mid-September 2020 indicated
beneficiary utilization of telephonic
office visits was a small portion of all
telehealth claims. Medicare and health
insurance plans reported data indicating
substantial utilization of telephonic
office visits. Physicians’ professional
organizations issued statements
indicating that physicians had a
favorable experience with telephonic
office visits.
DoD published a final rule on June 1,
2022 (87 FR 33013) revising 32 CFR
199.4(g)(52)(i) to provide that services or
advice rendered by telephone are
excluded with the exception of
medically necessary and appropriate
telephonic office visits which are
covered as authorized in 32 CFR
199.4(c)(1)(iii). That provision states in
pertinent part that ‘‘Health care services
covered by TRICARE and provided
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
64192
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
through the use of telehealth modalities
including telephone services for:
telephonic office visits; telephonic
consultations; electronic transmission of
data or biotelemetry or remote
physiologic monitoring services and
supplies, are covered services to the
same extent as if provided in person at
the location of the patient if those
services are medically necessary and
appropriate for such modalities.’’ The
final rule made these provisions
permanent and not limited to the
duration of the public health
emergency. We note that, effective
January 1, 2022, CMS rules have also
permanently changed to allow for
Medicare coverage of audio-only
telehealth for mental health services or
substance use disorders (MH/SUD) in
certain circumstances. See 42 CFR
405.2463(b)(3) and 410.67(b)(4) as well
as discussion at 86 FR 65059,
(November 19, 2021). Additionally,
states have broad flexibility to cover and
pay for Medicaid services delivered via
telehealth, including to determine
which telehealth modalities may be
used to deliver Medicaid-covered
services. Nothing in federal Medicaid
law or policy prevents states from
covering and paying for Medicaid
services that are delivered via audioonly technologies. This broad flexibility
to cover and pay for Medicaid services
delivered via telehealth, including via
audio-only technologies, was in place
prior to the COVID–19 public health
emergency. CMS states that this
flexibility will remain in place after the
public health emergency ends. See
https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/
benefits/downloads/medicaid-chiptelehealth-toolkit.pdf.
HHS Office of Civil Rights has issued
guidance on how covered health care
providers and health plans can use
remote communication technologies to
provide audio-only telehealth services
when such communications are
conducted in a manner that is consistent
with the applicable requirements of the
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
Privacy, Security, and Breach
Notification Rule (collectively, the
‘‘HIPAA Rules’’). This guidance
explains how the HIPAA Rules permit
health care providers and plans to offer
audio telehealth while protecting the
privacy and security of individuals’
health information. See https://
www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/06/13/
hhs-issues-guidance-hipaa-audiotelehealth.html.
VA proposes amending its regulations
at 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44) to remove the
exclusion of audio-only telehealth for
CHAMPVA beneficiaries for services
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
provided on or after May 12, 2020. This
proposed amendment would align the
administration of CHAMPVA to be the
same or similar as TRICARE. VA
believes this proposed change
appropriate in order to ensure the safety
of CHAMPVA beneficiaries as well as
others in the community. The TRICARE
rulemaking on audio-only telehealth
was initially based on the need to
respond to a new reality for clinical care
delivery due to the declared COVID–19
public health emergency. DoD later
determined that this exception should
remain in place. As explained by DoD
in its rulemaking, while existing
telehealth platforms that incorporate
both audio and video/visual two-way
communication are preferred and
already allowable for beneficiaries, there
may be instances when this is not
possible. For example, a provider,
especially in a rural or medically
underserved area, may not have access
to broadband capability, or a beneficiary
may not have in-home technology to
support two-way audio/video
communication. VA shares these
concerns relative to CHAMPVA
beneficiaries, many of whom live in
rural areas or may have insufficient
disposable income to purchase and
maintain two-way audio/video
communication in the home. As
discussed below, demand by
CHAMPVA beneficiaries for audio-only
telehealth remains steady (per 2021
data).
We note that this proposed
amendment does not expand the
services available to CHAMPVA
beneficiaries; instead, it would make
otherwise-covered services, when
rendered via telephone (audio-only),
eligible for reimbursement and cost
sharing when care is medically
necessary and appropriate and meets all
other requirements.
This proposed amendment would
apply retroactively to episodes of health
care rendered during the President’s
declared national emergency in the US.
Retroactivity would allow
reimbursement of medically necessary
audio-only telehealth services dating
back to the date TRICARE published its
rulemaking, if such claims are timely
filed within 180 days of publication of
the final rulemaking, in accordance with
the provisions of 38 CFR 17.276(a)(3).
VA intends to provide notice to affected
beneficiaries and providers when the
final rule publishes, stating that claims
for payment or reimbursement must be
filed within 180 days of the effective
date of the final rule. Retroactivity
provides the greatest benefit to
CHAMPVA beneficiaries and is
consistent with the requirement under
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to provide medical
care in a manner that is the same or
similar to TRICARE, whose dates of
coverage began on May 12, 2020.
Additionally, audio-only telehealth
claims submitted to the program were
denied, requiring the beneficiary to pay
for their audio-only telehealth visit,
further exacerbating the financial
burden of the beneficiary. Allowing
retrospective reimbursement up to the
CHAMPVA allowable amount will
provide the beneficiary compensation
for their payment for medically
necessary care during the declared
national emergency.
CHAMPVA claims data indicate that
audio-only telehealth visits appear to be
utilized to a greater extent by
CHAMPVA beneficiaries than usage
reflected in TRICARE claims data as
reported at 87 FR 33002. Claims data
indicate that the greatest financial
burden to CHAMPVA beneficiaries due
to denials of audio-only telehealth
claims occurred early in the pandemic
before they and their health care
providers were able to adapt to the
pandemic-caused shift towards
conducting business online. The highest
demand for CHAMPVA coverage of
audio-only telehealth occurred in April
2020 when approximately 18,400 audioonly visits were billed to CHAMPVA.
Claims data indicates that demand for
audio-only telehealth has continued
throughout the pandemic period but
tapered off in 2021 to a monthly average
of approximately 3,000 audio-only
telehealth visits.
Therefore, in this rulemaking, we
would revise 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44) to
state that services or advice rendered by
telephone (audio only) are not excluded
when otherwise covered CHAMPVA
services are provided to a beneficiary
through this modality if the services are
medically necessary and appropriate.
Specifically, section 17.272(a)(44)
would be amended to read: ‘‘Telephone
Services, with the following
exceptions:’’ Section 17.272(a)(44)(i)
would be redesignated as 38 CFR
17.272(a)(44)(ii)(A) and 17.272(a)(44)(i)
would read: ‘‘Services or advice
rendered by telephone (audio only) on
or after May 12, 2020, are not excluded
when the services are otherwise covered
CHAMPVA services provided through
this modality and are medically
necessary and appropriate.’’ Section
17.272(a)(44)(ii) would be redesignated
as 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44)(ii)(B) and
17.272(a)(44)(ii) would read: ‘‘A
diagnostic or monitoring procedure
which incorporates electronic
transmission of data or remote detection
and measurement of a condition,
activity, or function (biotelemetry) is
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
covered when:’’. Current section
17.272(a)(44)(iii) would be redesignated
as 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44)(ii)(C) without
change to the text.
Parity for Mental Health Services
The first federal law specifically
related to the coverage of mental health
services by private health insurers and
group health plans was the Mental
Health Parity Act (MHPA) of 1996 (Title
VII, § 702 of Pub. L. 104–204, September
26, 1996) which required annual or
lifetime dollar limits on mental health
benefits to be no lower than any such
dollar limits for medical and surgical
benefits offered by a group health plan
or health insurance issuer offering
coverage in connection with a group
health plan.
The MHPA was largely superseded by
the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici
Mental Health Parity and Addiction
Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) (Title V,
Subtitle B, §§ 511 and 512 of Pub. L.
110–343, October 3, 2008). MHPAEA
generally prevents group health plans
and health insurance issuers that
provide mental health and/or substance
use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits from
imposing less favorable (e.g., separate
costs or more restrictive) benefit
limitations on those benefits than those
imposed on medical/surgical benefits.
The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (Pub. L. 111–148, March 23,
2010), as amended by the Health Care
and Education Reconciliation Act of
2010 (Pub. L. 111–152, March 30, 2010),
collectively referred to as the
‘‘Affordable Care Act’’ or the ACA,
extended this requirement by operation
of law to individual health insurance
coverage. See also E.O. 13625 August
31, 2012; E.O. 14009 (January 28, 2021);
E.O. 14070 (April 5, 2022).
In general, under these laws, financial
requirements (such as coinsurance and
copayments) and treatment limits (such
as visit limits) imposed on MH/SUD
benefits must be no more restrictive
than the predominant financial
requirements or treatment limitations
that apply to substantially all medical/
surgical benefits in a classification of
benefits (this is referred to as the
‘‘substantially all/predominant test’’).
MH/SUD benefits also may not be
subject to any separate cost sharing
requirements or treatment limitations
that only apply to such benefits.
The above-referenced legal provisions
related to MH/SUD benefits parity with
medical/surgical benefits are not
applicable to CHAMPVA or TRICARE
benefits. On August 26, 2014, VA and
DoD issued a joint fact sheet in
conjunction with issuance of a series of
Executive Orders regarding mental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
health services for veterans, service
members, and their families. DoD stated
that it had initiated action to do what it
can under its authority to eliminate
unnecessary quantitative limits under
TRICARE for MH/SUD coverage, thus
achieving parity between MH/SUD and
medical/surgical benefits. With
publication of a final rule on September
2, 2016 (81 FR 61085), TRICARE
established parity for MH/SUD
coverage, similar to that required of
plans covered by the ACA. CHAMPVA’s
current practice is to routinely waive
day limitations/exclusions on mental
health services to ensure that
beneficiaries receive needed mental
health care. VA recognizes that the
existing regulatory language regarding
quantitative limits on mental health care
should be amended to remove any
ambiguity. In the past this was not a
high priority for VA, as the practical end
result of CHAMPVA waiving such
limitations and exclusions is that a
beneficiary experienced no
discontinuity in care. In addition, we
note that CHAMPVA has responded to
several Congressional inquiries related
to removal of the day limitations for
mental health care, stating we plan to
amend the existing regulation following
publication of the final rulemaking that
published July 13, 2022 (87 FR 41599).
We are now addressing this oversight, in
conjunction with making proposed
changes to cost sharing for contraceptive
care and services that would more
closely align with ACA requirements for
private health insurers.
Current 38 CFR 17.272(a)(57)–(62)
addresses exclusions from CHAMPVA
coverage related to mental health
services. These provisions cover
exclusions for inpatient and outpatient
mental health service, residential
treatment care, institutional services for
partial hospitalization, detoxification in
a hospital setting or rehabilitation
facility, outpatient substance abuse
services, and family therapy for
substance abuse. The exclusions vary by
mental health service provided, some
exclusions are per fiscal year while
others are per benefit period, and all
have exclusions for specific services in
excess of certain time periods. Some
exclusions apply unless a waiver for
extended coverage is granted in
advance. CHAMPVA does not apply
similar quantitative limits on the receipt
of outpatient, residential, or inpatient
services for other classes of medical care
provided to eligible beneficiaries.
VA is required in 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to
provide medical care in a manner that
is the same or similar to TRICARE
medical benefits and subject to the same
or similar limitations. VA supports
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64193
parity in CHAMPVA coverage between
MH/SUD benefits and other medical
benefits. There are no CHAMPVA
quantitative limits on non-MH/SUD
medical benefits, and limitations on the
number of mental health visits without
the need for further approval is
inconsistent with establishing parity.
VA believes there are no dissimilarities
in the respective TRICARE and
CHAMPVA patient populations that
would support continuation of
quantitative limits on MH/SUD visits,
and no similar limitation is imposed on
mental health care for eligible veterans
receiving health care from VA. Although
the current regulatory allowance for
waivers on the quantitative limits is
imposed on outpatient, inpatient, and
institutional MH coverage based on
medical need, we acknowledge
regulatory waivers based on medical
need do not apply to SUD services
described in current § 17.272(a)(57)–
(62). We therefore seek to remove
unnecessary quantitative limits on MH/
SUD coverage so that CHAMPVA is
fully aligned with TRICARE MH/SUD
coverage. More important, this change is
in the best health care interests of our
beneficiaries. VA proposes removing
current paragraphs (a)(57) through (62)
and redesignating subsequent
paragraphs accordingly. In addition, we
would remove current § 17.273(c) which
requires preauthorization for outpatient
mental health visits in excess of 23 per
calendar year and/or more than two (2)
sessions per week. Current § 17.273(d)
through (f) would be redesignated
paragraphs (c) through (e).
Cost sharing for contraceptive
services, and contraceptive products
approved, cleared, or granted by FDA.
Under the ACA, contraceptive care is
considered to be a preventive health
service for women and as such most
private health plans in the United States
must cover the full range of
contraceptive methods, services, and
counseling without patient out-ofpocket costs like coinsurance,
copayments, or deductibles. See 42
U.S.C. 300gg–13(a)(4), 45 CFR
147.130(a)(1)(iv), 29 CFR 2590.715–
2713(a)(1)(iv), 26 CFR 54.9815–
2713(a)(1)(iv), and Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA)
Women’s Preventive Services
Guidelines https://www.hrsa.gov/
womens-guidelines. As noted in a letter
dated June 27, 2022, issued jointly by
HHS, the Department of the Treasury,
and the Department of Labor, ‘‘The ACA
requires that all FDA-approved, cleared,
or granted contraceptive products that
are determined by an individual’s
medical provider to be medically
appropriate for the individual must be
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
64194
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
covered under the individual’s nongrandfathered group health plan or
health insurance coverage without cost
sharing.’’ The ACA provisions cited
above do not apply to TRICARE or
CHAMPVA.
The scope of TRICARE’s family
planning benefit is found at 32 CFR
199.4(e)(3), and is consistent with that
provided through CHAMPVA, including
plan exclusions. TRICARE Policy
Manual 6010.60–M (April 1, 2015)
Chapter 7, section 2.3 provides that
certain family planning procedures and
methods are subject to cost sharing.
CHAMPVA is established as a cost
sharing program. See 38 CFR 17.270(a).
VA shares the cost of medically
necessary services and supplies for
eligible beneficiaries as set forth in 38
CFR 17.271 through 17.278. With the
exception of services obtained through
VA facilities, CHAMPVA pays the
CHAMPVA-determined allowable
amount less the deductible, if
applicable, and less the beneficiary cost
share. 38 CFR 17.274.
As noted, VA is required to furnish
medical care in CHAMPVA in the same
or similar manner as TRICARE and
subject to the same or similar
limitations as TRICARE. However, as
previously stated, VA has not
interpreted the ‘‘same or similar’’
language in 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to mean
that CHAMPVA coverage must be
identical per service item or limitation
to that provided under TRICARE,
particularly in light of the differing size
and composition of our two beneficiary
populations. The words ‘‘or similar’’
would be surplusage if CHAMPVA
coverage had to be identical to that
under TRICARE. Rather, VA interprets
the statutory phrase ‘‘or similar’’ to
allow it to deviate from TRICARE when
VA determines that a deviation would
best serve the needs of CHAMPVA
beneficiaries. The CHAMPVA
beneficiary population is a fraction of
that covered by TRICARE, and the
average age of those receiving
CHAMPVA benefits is higher than that
for TRICARE. A primary focus of
CHAMPVA is providing such health
care that would better promote the longterm health of CHAMPVA beneficiaries.
As such, not every aspect of CHAMPVA
will be identical to TRICARE. VA has
regulated services covered by
CHAMPVA to mean those medical
services that are medically necessary
and appropriate for the treatment of a
condition and that are not specifically
excluded. 38 CFR 17.270 et seq.
An example of CHAMPVA exclusions
differing from TRICARE is coverage for
annual physical exams. TRICARE does
not include an annual physical exam
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
benefit for all TRICARE beneficiaries
while CHAMPVA determined that this
benefit should be available to all
CHAMPVA beneficiaries. 38 CFR
17.272(a)(30)(xiii). VA did not believe
that limiting the provision of annual
exams was appropriate from a clinical
perspective because these types of
comprehensive physical examinations
may identify incipient medical
problems. 83 FR 2401 (January 17,
2018).
Additionally, VA has previously
deviated from TRICARE in amending its
CHAMPVA regulations to provide care
that is broader than that offered by
TRICARE when it determined that these
deviations were necessary to best
provide services to the CHAMPVA
population while remaining ‘‘similar’’ to
TRICARE. For instance, Public Law
110–417 § 711(b) prohibits waiver of
copayments for preventive care
provided to Medicare-eligible TRICARE
beneficiaries. Conversely, CHAMPVA
waives cost-sharing requirements for
preventive services for Medicare-eligible
beneficiaries. 38 CFR 17.274. VA
determined that enforcing cost-sharing
requirements for Medicare-eligible
beneficiaries for preventive services
would unfairly disadvantage them as
compared to CHAMPVA beneficiaries
with other health insurance. 83 FR
2396, 2404 (January 17, 2018).
In these examples, VA provided
CHAMPVA benefits beyond those
benefits offered by TRICARE when it
determined that providing such health
care would better promote the long-term
health of CHAMPVA beneficiaries. In so
doing, VA is providing for health care
in a manner similar to TRICARE, but the
care is being provided in a manner that
best serves the CHAMPVA population.
Similarly, here, VA is aligning
CHAMPVA benefits with TRICARE
benefits in certain ways, but VA is also
providing benefits beyond those offered
by TRICARE to better promote the longterm health of CHAMPVA beneficiaries.
While TRICARE currently requires
cost sharing for certain family planning
care and services not provided by a
military treatment facility, CHAMPVA
beneficiaries are a smaller population
comprised of dependents of service
members who died in service, veterans
who are permanently and totally
disabled, or veterans who are severely
injured and qualify for a VA-recognized
caregiver and who are not otherwise
eligible for TRICARE. In contrast to
TRICARE dependents, these
beneficiaries’ family planning goals or
objectives may be affected by these
eligibility-based life circumstances.
Some CHAMPVA beneficiaries may not
have other health insurance through
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
which they could receive this type of
care or service at no cost to them. If so,
current CHAMPVA cost sharing
obligations may constitute a barrier to
access. For these reasons, VA believes
that contraceptive care should be
exempt from CHAMPVA cost share
requirements, and, in this regard, more
closely aligned with the ACA.
VA proposes amending § 17.274 to
exempt contraceptive services, and
contraceptive products approved,
cleared, or granted by FDA from cost
sharing requirements. We would amend
§ 17.274 by adding a new paragraph (f)
to state that cost sharing and annual
deductible requirements under 38 CFR
17.274(a) and (b) do not apply to: (1)
surgical insertion, removal, and
replacement of intrauterine systems and
contraceptive implants; (2)
measurement for, and purchase of,
contraceptive diaphragms or similar
FDA approved, cleared, or granted
medical devices, including
remeasurement and replacement; (3)
prescription contraceptives, and
prescription or nonprescription
contraceptives used as emergency
contraceptives; (4) surgical sterilization;
and (5) outpatient care or evaluation
associated with provision of services
listed in proposed paragraph (f)(1)–(4).
We would also amend § 17.272(a)(28)
to conform to proposed § 17.274(f)(3).
Currently, § 17.272(a)(28) excludes nonprescription contraceptives from
CHAMPVA coverage. We would amend
that paragraph to state that
nonprescription contraceptives are
excluded, except those non-prescription
contraceptives used as emergency
contraceptives.
30-Day Comment Period
The Administrative Procedure Act
requires federal agencies to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register and give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making through submission of
written data, views, or arguments with
or without opportunity for oral
presentation. 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c).
There is no minimum period specified
in the statute for the comment period to
remain open, and it often varies with
the complexity of the rule. Most
comment periods last between 30 and
60 days, and some are re-opened if the
agency believes that there was
insufficient time for the public to
respond or that the agency did not
receive as much feedback as it would
like. The agency must then consider all
comments that are submitted in
determining the content of the final
rulemaking. Executive Order 12866
Regulatory Planning and Review
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(September 30, 1993) provides at section
6(a)(1) that ‘‘each agency should afford
the public a meaningful opportunity to
comment on any proposed regulation,
which in most cases should include a
comment period of not less than 60
days.’’
VA has determined that a 30-day
public comment period should be
provided for this proposed rulemaking.
VA believes the proposed changes to
CHAMPVA program exclusions and cost
sharing are not complex and would
align the program with longstanding
legislative initiatives. If, after the close
of the public comment period, VA
determines that additional public input
is necessary, we will provide additional
opportunity for public comment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis
associated with this rulemaking can be
found as a supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by state, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes
provisions constituting a revised
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521) that require approval
by OMB. Accordingly, under 44 U.S.C.
3507(d), VA has submitted a copy of
this rulemaking action to OMB for
review and approval.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
OMB assigns control numbers to
collections of information it approves.
In this case, OMB assigned OMB
Control Number 2900–0219 for this
approved information collection. VA
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. If OMB does not approve the
revised collection of information as
requested, VA will immediately remove
the provisions containing the collection
of information or take such other action
as is directed by OMB.
Comments on the revised collection of
information contained in this
rulemaking should be submitted
through www.regulations.gov.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AR55 CHAMPVA coverage of audioonly telehealth, mental health services,
and cost sharing for certain
contraceptive services and contraceptive
products approved, cleared, or granted
by FDA’’ should be sent within 30 days
of publication of this rulemaking. The
collection of information associated
with this rulemaking can be viewed at:
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the revised collection of
information contained in this
rulemaking between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this rulemaking in
the Federal Register (FR). Therefore, a
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. This does
not affect the deadline for the public to
comment on the provisions of this
rulemaking.
The Department considers comments
by the public on new collections of
information in—
• Evaluating whether the new
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the new collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64195
The collection of information
associated with this rulemaking
contained in 38 CFR 17.272 is described
immediately following this paragraph,
under its respective title. The paragraph
below addresses only the revised
number of respondents attributable to
this rulemaking. OMB has previously
approved information collection related
to filing of CHAMPVA health benefits
claims based on an estimate of 55,000
respondents annually.
Title: Civilian Health and Medical
Program of the Department of Veterans
Affairs (CHAMPVA) Benefits Forms.
OMB Control No: 2900–0219.
CFR Provision: 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44).
• Summary of collection of
information: Proposed 38 CFR
17.272(a)(44) would remove the
exclusion of CHAMPVA benefits
coverage for audio-only telehealth.
Previously denied claims for audio-only
telehealth would have to be resubmitted
by the provider, or by the CHAMPVA
beneficiary if the beneficiary has already
paid for that medical service. To receive
payment or reimbursement, submission
of a VA Form 10–5979a CHAMPVA
claim form is required with supporting
evidence.
• Description of need for information
and proposed use of information: VA
cannot pay for medical benefits, or
reimburse a CHAMPVA beneficiary for
previously paid medical expenses, in
the absence of a filed claim. In this case,
that claim would be related to a
previously denied claim for an audioonly telehealth visit.
• Description of likely respondents:
Health care providers and CHAMPVA
beneficiaries.
• Estimated number of respondents:
74,914 in FY2022. This represents
health care providers and CHAMPVA
beneficiaries with denied claims for
audio-only telehealth.
• Estimated frequency of responses:
One time.
• Estimated average burden per
response: 10 minutes for respondents.
• Estimated total annual reporting
and recordkeeping burden: Using the
annual number of 74,914 respondents,
VA estimates a total annual reporting
and recordkeeping burden of 12,486
hours for respondents.
• Estimated cost to respondents per
year: VA estimates the annual cost to
respondents to be $349,732.86. This is
based on Bureau of Labor Statistics
mean hourly wage data for BLS wage
code ‘‘00–0000 All Occupations’’ of
$28.01 per hour × 12,486 hours.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
64196
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 204 / Monday, October 24, 2022 / Proposed Rules
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would allow for payment
or reimbursement of audio-only
telehealth services on behalf of
CHAMPVA beneficiaries, provide for
parity between mental health and
substance use disorder care and other
medical care, and eliminate cost sharing
for certain contraceptive services and
contraceptive products approved,
cleared, or granted by FDA. Therefore,
it would only affect individuals who are
CHAMPVA beneficiaries. Without this
rulemaking, health care providers who
may be small entities would still receive
payment for services, the payment
would be from the CHAMPVA
beneficiary and not from VA. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Assistance Listing
The Assistance listing number and
titles for the program affected by this
document is 64.039—CHAMPVA.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant
programs-veterans, Health care, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health
records, Homeless, Medical and dental
schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs,
Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on October 4, 2022, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend 38 CFR
part 17 as follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The general authority citation for
part 17 continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Oct 21, 2022
Jkt 259001
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
2. Amend § 17.272 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(28) and
(a)(44);
■ b. Removing paragraphs (a)(57)
through (62);
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(63)
through (83) as paragraphs (a)(57)
through (77).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 17.272
Benefits limitations/exclusions.
(a) * * *
(28) Nonprescription contraceptives,
except those nonprescription
contraceptives used as emergency
contraceptives.
*
*
*
*
*
(44) Telephone Services, with the
following exceptions:
(i) Services or advice rendered by
telephone (audio only) on or after May
12, 2020, are not excluded when the
services are otherwise covered
CHAMPVA services provided through
this modality and are medically
necessary and appropriate.
(ii) A diagnostic or monitoring
procedure which incorporates electronic
transmission of data or remote detection
and measurement of a condition,
activity, or function (biotelemetry) is
covered when:
(A) The procedure, without electronic
data transmission, is a covered benefit;
and
(B) The addition of electronic data
transmission or biotelemetry improves
the management of a clinical condition
in defined circumstances; and
(C) The electronic data or
biotelemetry device has been classified
by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, either separately or as
part of a system, for use consistent with
the medical condition and clinical
management of such condition.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 17.273
[Amended]
3. Amend § 17.273 by removing
paragraph (c), and redesignating
paragraphs (d) through (f) as paragraphs
(c) through (e).
■ 4. Amend § 17.274 by adding a new
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 17.274
Cost sharing.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Cost sharing and annual deductible
requirements under paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this section do not apply to:
(1) Surgical insertion, removal, and
replacement of intrauterine systems and
contraceptive implants;
(2) Measurement for, and purchase of,
contraceptive diaphragms or similar
FDA approved, cleared, or granted
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
medical devices, including
remeasurement and replacement;
(3) Prescription contraceptives, and
prescription or nonprescription
contraceptives used as emergency
contraceptives;
(4) Surgical sterilization; and
(5) Outpatient care or evaluation
associated with provision of family
planning services listed in paragraph
(f)(1) through (4) of this section.
[FR Doc. 2022–22905 Filed 10–21–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0053; FRL–9410–06–
OCSPP]
Receipt of a Pesticide Petition Filed for
Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or
on Various Commodities September
2022
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petition and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of an initial filing of a
pesticide petition requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 23, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0053,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rosenblatt, Registration Division (RD)
(7505T), main telephone number: (202)
566–2875, email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov. The mailing
address for each contact person is Office
of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
As part of the mailing address, include
the contact person’s name, division, and
mail code. The division to contact is
listed at the end of each application
summary.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM
24OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64190-64196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22905]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AR55
CHAMPVA Coverage of Audio-Only Telehealth, Mental Health
Services, and Cost Sharing for Certain Contraceptive Services and
Contraceptive Products Approved, Cleared, or Granted by FDA
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes amending its
medical regulations regarding Civilian Health and Medical Program of
the Department of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) coverage. This rulemaking
would align with the Department of Defense for benefits administered
through TRICARE and more closely align with requirements of other
Federal programs. This rulemaking would remove the exclusion from
CHAMPVA coverage for audio-only telehealth. In addition, we propose
removing limitations on outpatient mental health visits as well as
removing cost sharing requirements for certain contraceptive services
and contraceptive products approved, cleared, or granted by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before November 23, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted through www.regulations.gov.
Except as provided below, comments received before the close of the
comment period will be available at www.regulations.gov for public
viewing, inspection, or copying, including any personally identifiable
or confidential business information that is included in a comment. We
post the comments received before the close of the comment period on
the following website as soon as possible after they have been
received: https://www.regulations.gov. VA will not post on
Regulations.gov public comments that make threats to individuals or
institutions or suggest that the commenter will take actions to harm
the individual. VA encourages individuals not to submit duplicative
comments. We will post acceptable comments from multiple unique
commenters even if the content is identical or nearly identical to
other comments. Any public comment received after the comment period's
closing date is considered late and will not be considered in the final
rulemaking.
[[Page 64191]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Duran, Director, Policy, Office
of Integrated Veteran Care (OIVC), Veterans Health Administration
(VHA), Department of Veterans Affairs, Ptarmigan at Cherry Creek,
Denver, CO 80209; 303-370-1637 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
proposes amending Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department
of Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) exclusions to allow coverage of
telephonic (audio-only) medical visits and to remove limits on mental
health coverage to be consistent with the Department of Defense (DoD)
TRICARE program and current standards of practice in mental health and
substance use care as well as the Mental Health Parity and Addiction
Equity Act of 2008. In addition, we propose removing cost-sharing
requirements for contraceptive services and contraceptive products
approved, cleared, or granted by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration
(FDA). VA believes these proposed changes are consistent with the goals
and objectives of Executive Order (E.O.) 14070 (April 5, 2022) titled,
``Continuing to Strengthen Americans' Access to Affordable, Quality
Health Coverage.'' The E.O. directs federal agencies ``with
responsibilities related to Americans' access to health coverage'' to
``review agency actions to identify ways to continue to expand the
availability of affordable health coverage.''
Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1781, CHAMPVA is a health benefits program in
which VA shares the cost of covered medical care services and supplies
with certain spouses, children, survivors, and caregivers of veterans
who meet specific eligibility criteria. Under section 1781(b), VA
``shall provide for medical care in the same or similar manner and
subject to the same or similar limitations as medical care is furnished
to certain dependents and survivors of active duty and retired members
of the Armed Forces under chapter 55 of title 10 [United States Code]
(CHAMPUS).'' VA has implemented this requirement through the
promulgation of its regulations at 38 CFR 17.270 et seq. We note that
VA has consistently interpreted the ``same or similar'' language in 38
U.S.C. 1781(b) to mean that CHAMPVA is not required to provide coverage
identical to that provided by TRICARE. When warranted, CHAMPVA coverage
and exclusions may differ from TRICARE due to factors such as
dissimilarities in the respective patient populations, or policy
considerations.
We note that CHAMPUS was the original program administered by DoD
to provide civilian health benefits for active duty military personnel,
military retirees, and their dependents. 32 CFR 199.1. Although the
CHAMPUS program is still referenced in DoD regulations, DoD effectively
replaced the CHAMPUS program with what was commonly known as the
``TRICARE Standard'' plan (``TRICARE''). See 32 CFR 199.1(r),
199.17(a)(6)(ii)(D) (identifying ``TRICARE Standard'' as the basic
CHAMPUS program available prior to January 1, 2018). In December 2017,
Section 701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2017, Public Law 114-328, required inter alia the termination of
TRICARE Standard as a distinct plan and the establishment of the
TRICARE Select healthcare option. The CHAMPUS basic program benefits
under 32 CFR 199.4 continue as the baseline of benefits for TRICARE
Select. VA, therefore, administers CHAMPVA in the same or similar
manner as TRICARE Select and, except where we discuss laws or
regulations generally applicable to all TRICARE program options,
references in this rulemaking to ``TRICARE'' are to TRICARE Select.
Audio-Only Telehealth
Historically, TRICARE regulations excluded audio-only telehealth.
32 CFR 199.4(g)(52) (2019). Similarly, the CHAMPVA regulations at 38
CFR 17.272(a)(44) specifically exclude coverage for audio-only
telehealth. However, on January 31, 2020, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (HHS) determined that a public health emergency existed
since January 27, 2020. On March 13, 2020, the President declared a
national emergency due to COVID-19. In light of the spread of COVID-19,
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged Americans to
work and engage in schooling from home whenever possible as well as to
avoid congregating in groups. Various States and localities imposed
more rigid restrictions on gatherings, requiring many businesses to
restrict or close their operations, to prevent further spread of the
disease. To prevent the spread of COVID-19 in accordance with local
restrictions and guidelines, and to prioritize in-person treatments for
seriously ill patients, health care professionals around the country
limited in-person medical appointments. While in-person appointments
were converted to video telehealth visits when possible, some patients
were limited to audio-only telehealth appointments because either they
or their providers didn't have access to the communications equipment,
internet service, or internet bandwidth required for video telehealth.
DoD published an interim final rule (IFR) on May 12, 2020,
effective that same day, to temporarily remove the exclusion for audio-
only telehealth. 85 FR 27927. DoD temporarily removed the exclusion
because doing so was necessary to ensure the health and safety of
TRICARE beneficiaries. Allowing audio-only telehealth would permit
beneficiaries to have their symptoms (which include COVID-19 symptoms,
or symptoms of other covered illness or injury) evaluated by a provider
over the telephone before, or in lieu of, obtaining an in-person
appointment, which ultimately may not be necessary. In 2022, DoD
provided that this temporary removal of the exclusion would cease to be
in effect upon termination of the national emergency declared by the
President in Proclamation 9994, in accordance with applicable law and
regulation (e.g., 50 U.S.C. 1622(a)).
Following publication of the IFR, DoD reviewed claims data from
TRICARE private sector care as well as published industry information
from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), health
insurance plans, and statements from physicians' professional
organizations regarding telephonic office visits to determine if this
should be a permanent telehealth benefit. 87 FR 33002 (June 1, 2022).
This data reflected utilization rates for telehealth services including
telephonic (audio-only) medical visits, while statements from
physicians' professional organizations reflected opinions of many
health care provider regarding telehealth. The TRICARE claims data
between mid-March and mid-September 2020 indicated beneficiary
utilization of telephonic office visits was a small portion of all
telehealth claims. Medicare and health insurance plans reported data
indicating substantial utilization of telephonic office visits.
Physicians' professional organizations issued statements indicating
that physicians had a favorable experience with telephonic office
visits.
DoD published a final rule on June 1, 2022 (87 FR 33013) revising
32 CFR 199.4(g)(52)(i) to provide that services or advice rendered by
telephone are excluded with the exception of medically necessary and
appropriate telephonic office visits which are covered as authorized in
32 CFR 199.4(c)(1)(iii). That provision states in pertinent part that
``Health care services covered by TRICARE and provided
[[Page 64192]]
through the use of telehealth modalities including telephone services
for: telephonic office visits; telephonic consultations; electronic
transmission of data or biotelemetry or remote physiologic monitoring
services and supplies, are covered services to the same extent as if
provided in person at the location of the patient if those services are
medically necessary and appropriate for such modalities.'' The final
rule made these provisions permanent and not limited to the duration of
the public health emergency. We note that, effective January 1, 2022,
CMS rules have also permanently changed to allow for Medicare coverage
of audio-only telehealth for mental health services or substance use
disorders (MH/SUD) in certain circumstances. See 42 CFR 405.2463(b)(3)
and 410.67(b)(4) as well as discussion at 86 FR 65059, (November 19,
2021). Additionally, states have broad flexibility to cover and pay for
Medicaid services delivered via telehealth, including to determine
which telehealth modalities may be used to deliver Medicaid-covered
services. Nothing in federal Medicaid law or policy prevents states
from covering and paying for Medicaid services that are delivered via
audio-only technologies. This broad flexibility to cover and pay for
Medicaid services delivered via telehealth, including via audio-only
technologies, was in place prior to the COVID-19 public health
emergency. CMS states that this flexibility will remain in place after
the public health emergency ends. See https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/downloads/medicaid-chip-telehealth-toolkit.pdf.
HHS Office of Civil Rights has issued guidance on how covered
health care providers and health plans can use remote communication
technologies to provide audio-only telehealth services when such
communications are conducted in a manner that is consistent with the
applicable requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy, Security, and Breach
Notification Rule (collectively, the ``HIPAA Rules''). This guidance
explains how the HIPAA Rules permit health care providers and plans to
offer audio telehealth while protecting the privacy and security of
individuals' health information. See https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/06/13/hhs-issues-guidance-hipaa-audio-telehealth.html.
VA proposes amending its regulations at 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44) to
remove the exclusion of audio-only telehealth for CHAMPVA beneficiaries
for services provided on or after May 12, 2020. This proposed amendment
would align the administration of CHAMPVA to be the same or similar as
TRICARE. VA believes this proposed change appropriate in order to
ensure the safety of CHAMPVA beneficiaries as well as others in the
community. The TRICARE rulemaking on audio-only telehealth was
initially based on the need to respond to a new reality for clinical
care delivery due to the declared COVID-19 public health emergency. DoD
later determined that this exception should remain in place. As
explained by DoD in its rulemaking, while existing telehealth platforms
that incorporate both audio and video/visual two-way communication are
preferred and already allowable for beneficiaries, there may be
instances when this is not possible. For example, a provider,
especially in a rural or medically underserved area, may not have
access to broadband capability, or a beneficiary may not have in-home
technology to support two-way audio/video communication. VA shares
these concerns relative to CHAMPVA beneficiaries, many of whom live in
rural areas or may have insufficient disposable income to purchase and
maintain two-way audio/video communication in the home. As discussed
below, demand by CHAMPVA beneficiaries for audio-only telehealth
remains steady (per 2021 data).
We note that this proposed amendment does not expand the services
available to CHAMPVA beneficiaries; instead, it would make otherwise-
covered services, when rendered via telephone (audio-only), eligible
for reimbursement and cost sharing when care is medically necessary and
appropriate and meets all other requirements.
This proposed amendment would apply retroactively to episodes of
health care rendered during the President's declared national emergency
in the US. Retroactivity would allow reimbursement of medically
necessary audio-only telehealth services dating back to the date
TRICARE published its rulemaking, if such claims are timely filed
within 180 days of publication of the final rulemaking, in accordance
with the provisions of 38 CFR 17.276(a)(3). VA intends to provide
notice to affected beneficiaries and providers when the final rule
publishes, stating that claims for payment or reimbursement must be
filed within 180 days of the effective date of the final rule.
Retroactivity provides the greatest benefit to CHAMPVA beneficiaries
and is consistent with the requirement under 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to
provide medical care in a manner that is the same or similar to
TRICARE, whose dates of coverage began on May 12, 2020. Additionally,
audio-only telehealth claims submitted to the program were denied,
requiring the beneficiary to pay for their audio-only telehealth visit,
further exacerbating the financial burden of the beneficiary. Allowing
retrospective reimbursement up to the CHAMPVA allowable amount will
provide the beneficiary compensation for their payment for medically
necessary care during the declared national emergency.
CHAMPVA claims data indicate that audio-only telehealth visits
appear to be utilized to a greater extent by CHAMPVA beneficiaries than
usage reflected in TRICARE claims data as reported at 87 FR 33002.
Claims data indicate that the greatest financial burden to CHAMPVA
beneficiaries due to denials of audio-only telehealth claims occurred
early in the pandemic before they and their health care providers were
able to adapt to the pandemic-caused shift towards conducting business
online. The highest demand for CHAMPVA coverage of audio-only
telehealth occurred in April 2020 when approximately 18,400 audio-only
visits were billed to CHAMPVA. Claims data indicates that demand for
audio-only telehealth has continued throughout the pandemic period but
tapered off in 2021 to a monthly average of approximately 3,000 audio-
only telehealth visits.
Therefore, in this rulemaking, we would revise 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44)
to state that services or advice rendered by telephone (audio only) are
not excluded when otherwise covered CHAMPVA services are provided to a
beneficiary through this modality if the services are medically
necessary and appropriate. Specifically, section 17.272(a)(44) would be
amended to read: ``Telephone Services, with the following exceptions:''
Section 17.272(a)(44)(i) would be redesignated as 38 CFR
17.272(a)(44)(ii)(A) and 17.272(a)(44)(i) would read: ``Services or
advice rendered by telephone (audio only) on or after May 12, 2020, are
not excluded when the services are otherwise covered CHAMPVA services
provided through this modality and are medically necessary and
appropriate.'' Section 17.272(a)(44)(ii) would be redesignated as 38
CFR 17.272(a)(44)(ii)(B) and 17.272(a)(44)(ii) would read: ``A
diagnostic or monitoring procedure which incorporates electronic
transmission of data or remote detection and measurement of a
condition, activity, or function (biotelemetry) is
[[Page 64193]]
covered when:''. Current section 17.272(a)(44)(iii) would be
redesignated as 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44)(ii)(C) without change to the text.
Parity for Mental Health Services
The first federal law specifically related to the coverage of
mental health services by private health insurers and group health
plans was the Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) of 1996 (Title VII, Sec.
702 of Pub. L. 104-204, September 26, 1996) which required annual or
lifetime dollar limits on mental health benefits to be no lower than
any such dollar limits for medical and surgical benefits offered by a
group health plan or health insurance issuer offering coverage in
connection with a group health plan.
The MHPA was largely superseded by the Paul Wellstone and Pete
Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA)
(Title V, Subtitle B, Sec. Sec. 511 and 512 of Pub. L. 110-343,
October 3, 2008). MHPAEA generally prevents group health plans and
health insurance issuers that provide mental health and/or substance
use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits from imposing less favorable (e.g.,
separate costs or more restrictive) benefit limitations on those
benefits than those imposed on medical/surgical benefits. The Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148, March 23, 2010),
as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111-152, March 30, 2010), collectively referred to as the
``Affordable Care Act'' or the ACA, extended this requirement by
operation of law to individual health insurance coverage. See also E.O.
13625 August 31, 2012; E.O. 14009 (January 28, 2021); E.O. 14070 (April
5, 2022).
In general, under these laws, financial requirements (such as
coinsurance and copayments) and treatment limits (such as visit limits)
imposed on MH/SUD benefits must be no more restrictive than the
predominant financial requirements or treatment limitations that apply
to substantially all medical/surgical benefits in a classification of
benefits (this is referred to as the ``substantially all/predominant
test''). MH/SUD benefits also may not be subject to any separate cost
sharing requirements or treatment limitations that only apply to such
benefits.
The above-referenced legal provisions related to MH/SUD benefits
parity with medical/surgical benefits are not applicable to CHAMPVA or
TRICARE benefits. On August 26, 2014, VA and DoD issued a joint fact
sheet in conjunction with issuance of a series of Executive Orders
regarding mental health services for veterans, service members, and
their families. DoD stated that it had initiated action to do what it
can under its authority to eliminate unnecessary quantitative limits
under TRICARE for MH/SUD coverage, thus achieving parity between MH/SUD
and medical/surgical benefits. With publication of a final rule on
September 2, 2016 (81 FR 61085), TRICARE established parity for MH/SUD
coverage, similar to that required of plans covered by the ACA.
CHAMPVA's current practice is to routinely waive day limitations/
exclusions on mental health services to ensure that beneficiaries
receive needed mental health care. VA recognizes that the existing
regulatory language regarding quantitative limits on mental health care
should be amended to remove any ambiguity. In the past this was not a
high priority for VA, as the practical end result of CHAMPVA waiving
such limitations and exclusions is that a beneficiary experienced no
discontinuity in care. In addition, we note that CHAMPVA has responded
to several Congressional inquiries related to removal of the day
limitations for mental health care, stating we plan to amend the
existing regulation following publication of the final rulemaking that
published July 13, 2022 (87 FR 41599). We are now addressing this
oversight, in conjunction with making proposed changes to cost sharing
for contraceptive care and services that would more closely align with
ACA requirements for private health insurers.
Current 38 CFR 17.272(a)(57)-(62) addresses exclusions from CHAMPVA
coverage related to mental health services. These provisions cover
exclusions for inpatient and outpatient mental health service,
residential treatment care, institutional services for partial
hospitalization, detoxification in a hospital setting or rehabilitation
facility, outpatient substance abuse services, and family therapy for
substance abuse. The exclusions vary by mental health service provided,
some exclusions are per fiscal year while others are per benefit
period, and all have exclusions for specific services in excess of
certain time periods. Some exclusions apply unless a waiver for
extended coverage is granted in advance. CHAMPVA does not apply similar
quantitative limits on the receipt of outpatient, residential, or
inpatient services for other classes of medical care provided to
eligible beneficiaries.
VA is required in 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to provide medical care in a
manner that is the same or similar to TRICARE medical benefits and
subject to the same or similar limitations. VA supports parity in
CHAMPVA coverage between MH/SUD benefits and other medical benefits.
There are no CHAMPVA quantitative limits on non-MH/SUD medical
benefits, and limitations on the number of mental health visits without
the need for further approval is inconsistent with establishing parity.
VA believes there are no dissimilarities in the respective TRICARE and
CHAMPVA patient populations that would support continuation of
quantitative limits on MH/SUD visits, and no similar limitation is
imposed on mental health care for eligible veterans receiving health
care from VA. Although the current regulatory allowance for waivers on
the quantitative limits is imposed on outpatient, inpatient, and
institutional MH coverage based on medical need, we acknowledge
regulatory waivers based on medical need do not apply to SUD services
described in current Sec. 17.272(a)(57)-(62). We therefore seek to
remove unnecessary quantitative limits on MH/SUD coverage so that
CHAMPVA is fully aligned with TRICARE MH/SUD coverage. More important,
this change is in the best health care interests of our beneficiaries.
VA proposes removing current paragraphs (a)(57) through (62) and
redesignating subsequent paragraphs accordingly. In addition, we would
remove current Sec. 17.273(c) which requires preauthorization for
outpatient mental health visits in excess of 23 per calendar year and/
or more than two (2) sessions per week. Current Sec. 17.273(d) through
(f) would be redesignated paragraphs (c) through (e).
Cost sharing for contraceptive services, and contraceptive products
approved, cleared, or granted by FDA.
Under the ACA, contraceptive care is considered to be a preventive
health service for women and as such most private health plans in the
United States must cover the full range of contraceptive methods,
services, and counseling without patient out-of-pocket costs like
coinsurance, copayments, or deductibles. See 42 U.S.C. 300gg-13(a)(4),
45 CFR 147.130(a)(1)(iv), 29 CFR 2590.715-2713(a)(1)(iv), 26 CFR
54.9815-2713(a)(1)(iv), and Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) Women's Preventive Services Guidelines https://www.hrsa.gov/womens-guidelines. As noted in a letter dated June 27,
2022, issued jointly by HHS, the Department of the Treasury, and the
Department of Labor, ``The ACA requires that all FDA-approved, cleared,
or granted contraceptive products that are determined by an
individual's medical provider to be medically appropriate for the
individual must be
[[Page 64194]]
covered under the individual's non-grandfathered group health plan or
health insurance coverage without cost sharing.'' The ACA provisions
cited above do not apply to TRICARE or CHAMPVA.
The scope of TRICARE's family planning benefit is found at 32 CFR
199.4(e)(3), and is consistent with that provided through CHAMPVA,
including plan exclusions. TRICARE Policy Manual 6010.60-M (April 1,
2015) Chapter 7, section 2.3 provides that certain family planning
procedures and methods are subject to cost sharing. CHAMPVA is
established as a cost sharing program. See 38 CFR 17.270(a). VA shares
the cost of medically necessary services and supplies for eligible
beneficiaries as set forth in 38 CFR 17.271 through 17.278. With the
exception of services obtained through VA facilities, CHAMPVA pays the
CHAMPVA-determined allowable amount less the deductible, if applicable,
and less the beneficiary cost share. 38 CFR 17.274.
As noted, VA is required to furnish medical care in CHAMPVA in the
same or similar manner as TRICARE and subject to the same or similar
limitations as TRICARE. However, as previously stated, VA has not
interpreted the ``same or similar'' language in 38 U.S.C. 1781(b) to
mean that CHAMPVA coverage must be identical per service item or
limitation to that provided under TRICARE, particularly in light of the
differing size and composition of our two beneficiary populations. The
words ``or similar'' would be surplusage if CHAMPVA coverage had to be
identical to that under TRICARE. Rather, VA interprets the statutory
phrase ``or similar'' to allow it to deviate from TRICARE when VA
determines that a deviation would best serve the needs of CHAMPVA
beneficiaries. The CHAMPVA beneficiary population is a fraction of that
covered by TRICARE, and the average age of those receiving CHAMPVA
benefits is higher than that for TRICARE. A primary focus of CHAMPVA is
providing such health care that would better promote the long-term
health of CHAMPVA beneficiaries. As such, not every aspect of CHAMPVA
will be identical to TRICARE. VA has regulated services covered by
CHAMPVA to mean those medical services that are medically necessary and
appropriate for the treatment of a condition and that are not
specifically excluded. 38 CFR 17.270 et seq.
An example of CHAMPVA exclusions differing from TRICARE is coverage
for annual physical exams. TRICARE does not include an annual physical
exam benefit for all TRICARE beneficiaries while CHAMPVA determined
that this benefit should be available to all CHAMPVA beneficiaries. 38
CFR 17.272(a)(30)(xiii). VA did not believe that limiting the provision
of annual exams was appropriate from a clinical perspective because
these types of comprehensive physical examinations may identify
incipient medical problems. 83 FR 2401 (January 17, 2018).
Additionally, VA has previously deviated from TRICARE in amending
its CHAMPVA regulations to provide care that is broader than that
offered by TRICARE when it determined that these deviations were
necessary to best provide services to the CHAMPVA population while
remaining ``similar'' to TRICARE. For instance, Public Law 110-417
Sec. 711(b) prohibits waiver of copayments for preventive care
provided to Medicare-eligible TRICARE beneficiaries. Conversely,
CHAMPVA waives cost-sharing requirements for preventive services for
Medicare-eligible beneficiaries. 38 CFR 17.274. VA determined that
enforcing cost-sharing requirements for Medicare-eligible beneficiaries
for preventive services would unfairly disadvantage them as compared to
CHAMPVA beneficiaries with other health insurance. 83 FR 2396, 2404
(January 17, 2018).
In these examples, VA provided CHAMPVA benefits beyond those
benefits offered by TRICARE when it determined that providing such
health care would better promote the long-term health of CHAMPVA
beneficiaries. In so doing, VA is providing for health care in a manner
similar to TRICARE, but the care is being provided in a manner that
best serves the CHAMPVA population. Similarly, here, VA is aligning
CHAMPVA benefits with TRICARE benefits in certain ways, but VA is also
providing benefits beyond those offered by TRICARE to better promote
the long-term health of CHAMPVA beneficiaries.
While TRICARE currently requires cost sharing for certain family
planning care and services not provided by a military treatment
facility, CHAMPVA beneficiaries are a smaller population comprised of
dependents of service members who died in service, veterans who are
permanently and totally disabled, or veterans who are severely injured
and qualify for a VA-recognized caregiver and who are not otherwise
eligible for TRICARE. In contrast to TRICARE dependents, these
beneficiaries' family planning goals or objectives may be affected by
these eligibility-based life circumstances. Some CHAMPVA beneficiaries
may not have other health insurance through which they could receive
this type of care or service at no cost to them. If so, current CHAMPVA
cost sharing obligations may constitute a barrier to access. For these
reasons, VA believes that contraceptive care should be exempt from
CHAMPVA cost share requirements, and, in this regard, more closely
aligned with the ACA.
VA proposes amending Sec. 17.274 to exempt contraceptive services,
and contraceptive products approved, cleared, or granted by FDA from
cost sharing requirements. We would amend Sec. 17.274 by adding a new
paragraph (f) to state that cost sharing and annual deductible
requirements under 38 CFR 17.274(a) and (b) do not apply to: (1)
surgical insertion, removal, and replacement of intrauterine systems
and contraceptive implants; (2) measurement for, and purchase of,
contraceptive diaphragms or similar FDA approved, cleared, or granted
medical devices, including remeasurement and replacement; (3)
prescription contraceptives, and prescription or nonprescription
contraceptives used as emergency contraceptives; (4) surgical
sterilization; and (5) outpatient care or evaluation associated with
provision of services listed in proposed paragraph (f)(1)-(4).
We would also amend Sec. 17.272(a)(28) to conform to proposed
Sec. 17.274(f)(3). Currently, Sec. 17.272(a)(28) excludes non-
prescription contraceptives from CHAMPVA coverage. We would amend that
paragraph to state that nonprescription contraceptives are excluded,
except those non-prescription contraceptives used as emergency
contraceptives.
30-Day Comment Period
The Administrative Procedure Act requires federal agencies to
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and
give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule
making through submission of written data, views, or arguments with or
without opportunity for oral presentation. 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c).
There is no minimum period specified in the statute for the comment
period to remain open, and it often varies with the complexity of the
rule. Most comment periods last between 30 and 60 days, and some are
re-opened if the agency believes that there was insufficient time for
the public to respond or that the agency did not receive as much
feedback as it would like. The agency must then consider all comments
that are submitted in determining the content of the final rulemaking.
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review
[[Page 64195]]
(September 30, 1993) provides at section 6(a)(1) that ``each agency
should afford the public a meaningful opportunity to comment on any
proposed regulation, which in most cases should include a comment
period of not less than 60 days.''
VA has determined that a 30-day public comment period should be
provided for this proposed rulemaking. VA believes the proposed changes
to CHAMPVA program exclusions and cost sharing are not complex and
would align the program with longstanding legislative initiatives. If,
after the close of the public comment period, VA determines that
additional public input is necessary, we will provide additional
opportunity for public comment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking
can be found as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
state, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This rule will have no such effect on
State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule includes provisions constituting a revised
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3521) that require approval by OMB. Accordingly, under 44
U.S.C. 3507(d), VA has submitted a copy of this rulemaking action to
OMB for review and approval.
OMB assigns control numbers to collections of information it
approves. In this case, OMB assigned OMB Control Number 2900-0219 for
this approved information collection. VA may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. If OMB does
not approve the revised collection of information as requested, VA will
immediately remove the provisions containing the collection of
information or take such other action as is directed by OMB.
Comments on the revised collection of information contained in this
rulemaking should be submitted through www.regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AR55
CHAMPVA coverage of audio-only telehealth, mental health services, and
cost sharing for certain contraceptive services and contraceptive
products approved, cleared, or granted by FDA'' should be sent within
30 days of publication of this rulemaking. The collection of
information associated with this rulemaking can be viewed at:
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the revised
collection of information contained in this rulemaking between 30 and
60 days after publication of this rulemaking in the Federal Register
(FR). Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not
affect the deadline for the public to comment on the provisions of this
rulemaking.
The Department considers comments by the public on new collections
of information in--
Evaluating whether the new collections of information are
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of the Department's estimate of
the burden of the new collection of information, including the validity
of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The collection of information associated with this rulemaking
contained in 38 CFR 17.272 is described immediately following this
paragraph, under its respective title. The paragraph below addresses
only the revised number of respondents attributable to this rulemaking.
OMB has previously approved information collection related to filing of
CHAMPVA health benefits claims based on an estimate of 55,000
respondents annually.
Title: Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of
Veterans Affairs (CHAMPVA) Benefits Forms.
OMB Control No: 2900-0219.
CFR Provision: 38 CFR 17.272(a)(44).
Summary of collection of information: Proposed 38 CFR
17.272(a)(44) would remove the exclusion of CHAMPVA benefits coverage
for audio-only telehealth. Previously denied claims for audio-only
telehealth would have to be resubmitted by the provider, or by the
CHAMPVA beneficiary if the beneficiary has already paid for that
medical service. To receive payment or reimbursement, submission of a
VA Form 10-5979a CHAMPVA claim form is required with supporting
evidence.
Description of need for information and proposed use of
information: VA cannot pay for medical benefits, or reimburse a CHAMPVA
beneficiary for previously paid medical expenses, in the absence of a
filed claim. In this case, that claim would be related to a previously
denied claim for an audio-only telehealth visit.
Description of likely respondents: Health care providers
and CHAMPVA beneficiaries.
Estimated number of respondents: 74,914 in FY2022. This
represents health care providers and CHAMPVA beneficiaries with denied
claims for audio-only telehealth.
Estimated frequency of responses: One time.
Estimated average burden per response: 10 minutes for
respondents.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden:
Using the annual number of 74,914 respondents, VA estimates a total
annual reporting and recordkeeping burden of 12,486 hours for
respondents.
Estimated cost to respondents per year: VA estimates the
annual cost to respondents to be $349,732.86. This is based on Bureau
of Labor Statistics mean hourly wage data for BLS wage code ``00-0000
All Occupations'' of $28.01 per hour x 12,486 hours.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a
[[Page 64196]]
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This proposed rule would allow for payment or reimbursement of
audio-only telehealth services on behalf of CHAMPVA beneficiaries,
provide for parity between mental health and substance use disorder
care and other medical care, and eliminate cost sharing for certain
contraceptive services and contraceptive products approved, cleared, or
granted by FDA. Therefore, it would only affect individuals who are
CHAMPVA beneficiaries. Without this rulemaking, health care providers
who may be small entities would still receive payment for services, the
payment would be from the CHAMPVA beneficiary and not from VA.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Assistance Listing
The Assistance listing number and titles for the program affected
by this document is 64.039--CHAMPVA.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs-health, Grant programs-veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on October 4, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of
General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend 38 CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The general authority citation for part 17 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in specific sections.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.272 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(28) and (a)(44);
0
b. Removing paragraphs (a)(57) through (62);
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(63) through (83) as paragraphs (a)(57)
through (77).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 17.272 Benefits limitations/exclusions.
(a) * * *
(28) Nonprescription contraceptives, except those nonprescription
contraceptives used as emergency contraceptives.
* * * * *
(44) Telephone Services, with the following exceptions:
(i) Services or advice rendered by telephone (audio only) on or
after May 12, 2020, are not excluded when the services are otherwise
covered CHAMPVA services provided through this modality and are
medically necessary and appropriate.
(ii) A diagnostic or monitoring procedure which incorporates
electronic transmission of data or remote detection and measurement of
a condition, activity, or function (biotelemetry) is covered when:
(A) The procedure, without electronic data transmission, is a
covered benefit; and
(B) The addition of electronic data transmission or biotelemetry
improves the management of a clinical condition in defined
circumstances; and
(C) The electronic data or biotelemetry device has been classified
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, either separately or as part
of a system, for use consistent with the medical condition and clinical
management of such condition.
* * * * *
Sec. 17.273 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 17.273 by removing paragraph (c), and redesignating
paragraphs (d) through (f) as paragraphs (c) through (e).
0
4. Amend Sec. 17.274 by adding a new paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.274 Cost sharing.
* * * * *
(f) Cost sharing and annual deductible requirements under
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to:
(1) Surgical insertion, removal, and replacement of intrauterine
systems and contraceptive implants;
(2) Measurement for, and purchase of, contraceptive diaphragms or
similar FDA approved, cleared, or granted medical devices, including
remeasurement and replacement;
(3) Prescription contraceptives, and prescription or
nonprescription contraceptives used as emergency contraceptives;
(4) Surgical sterilization; and
(5) Outpatient care or evaluation associated with provision of
family planning services listed in paragraph (f)(1) through (4) of this
section.
[FR Doc. 2022-22905 Filed 10-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P