Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for a Wilderness Stewardship Plan for Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, 64091-64093 [2022-22971]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2022 / Notices
Additional documentation has been
received for the following resources:
ALABAMA
Covington County
Andalusia Commercial Historic District
(Additional Documentation), Court Sq.,
O’Neal Ct., Central, Church, Coffee, North
Cotton, South Cotton, Crescent, Dunson,
Historic Central, Pear, East Three Notch,
and South Three Notch Sts., Andalusia,
AD88003238
IOWA
Greene County
Jefferson Square Commercial Historic District
(Additional Documentation), Courthouse
Sq. East Lincoln Way, and the 100 blks. of
North Wilson, North Chestnut, East State
and the NW and NE 1/4 blocks, & 115
South Wilson Sts., Jefferson, AD11000503
Linn County
Cornell College-Mount Vernon Historic
District (Additional Documentation),
Bounded by RR tracks, College Blvd.,
North 10th, North 8th, and South 3rd
Aves., North. 2nd and South. 4th Sts.,
Mount Vernon, AD80001456
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Action
Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR
part 60.
Dated: October 12, 2022.
Sherry A. Frear,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
[FR Doc. 2022–22832 Filed 10–20–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–MWR–ISRO–33985; PPWONRADE2,
PMP00EI05.YP0000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Wilderness Stewardship Plan for Isle
Royale National Park, Michigan
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) is preparing an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) for a Wilderness
Stewardship Plan (WSP) for Isle Royale
National Park (ISRO or the park).
DATES: The NPS requests comments
concerning the scope of the analysis,
and identification of relevant
information, studies, and analyses. All
comments must be received or
postmarked by November 21, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Information will be
available for public review and
comment will only be accepted at
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Oct 20, 2022
Jkt 259001
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/
ISROWilderness. Information will also
be available at Isle Royale National Park,
800 East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton,
Michigan and by request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent Denice Swanke, Isle
Royale National Park, Wilderness
Stewardship Plan, 800 East Lakeshore
Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, or by
telephone at (906) 482–0984, or email at
denice_swanke@nps.gov. Individuals in
the United States who are deaf,
deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a
speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The purpose of this plan is to outline
strategies for preserving wilderness
character, including the treatment of
cultural resources in wilderness, while
also providing for the use and
enjoyment of the park by current and
future generations. This plan would
determine preservation and use of
historic structures in potential and
designated wilderness.
The NPS identified the following
needs for this WSP/EIS:
• NPS Management Policies 2006
requires that each park containing
wilderness maintain an up-to-date and
approved wilderness management plan
(NPS 2006, section 6.3.4.2).
• The previous ISRO Backcountry
Wilderness Plan and Final EIS (2011; no
Record of Decision) did not provide a
decision for treatments and use of
historic structures in potential and
designated wilderness.
• The 1998 General Management Plan
(GMP) specified that a wilderness and
backcountry management plan is
needed to guide the management of
wilderness resources and ensure
consistency in such management over
time.
• Preliminary inventory and
monitoring of wilderness and
backcountry resources indicate a
difference between existing conditions
and desired conditions. Changes in
backcountry use, management actions,
increasing visitation, and associated
human-caused adverse impacts suggest
an underlying need to more proactively
manage human activities that directly or
indirectly affect wilderness conditions.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64091
Preliminary Proposed Action and
Alternatives
The NPS’s proposed action is to
prepare and implement a Wilderness
Stewardship Plan that provides the park
with tools to enhance wilderness
character with specific emphasis on
improving the visitors’ wilderness
experience while maintaining the park’s
natural and wilderness qualities. This
proposed action also provides for access
opportunities consistent with the public
purposes of wilderness. Treatment of
historic structures in wilderness could
include: preservation, stabilization or
mouldering, or demolition.
Actions Common to All Alternatives
• Vegetation Clearing. In select
locations, the park may clear vegetation
around installations and structures for
historic preservation. Vegetation would
continue to be cleared around mine
shaft fencing. Hazard trees would be
removed in the vicinity of Senter Point
powder house and steam hoist, and
limited vegetation removal would be
performed at Island Mine and Island
Mine Cemetery. Vegetation overgrowth
would be removed to maintain visibility
at cemeteries and burial sites.
• Damaged or Destroyed Historic
Structures. Damaged or destroyed
historic structures may be removed
following NPS Management Policies
2006.
• Management of Public Use in
Wilderness. The park would continue to
use boardwalks in order to minimize
damage to wetlands and other natural
wilderness qualities. The park may
maintain picnic tables in some
campgrounds when they are determined
necessary for the protection of nearby
vegetation and soils. Interpretive,
educational and outreach programs
would be provided to encourage park
visitors to minimize their impacts to
park resources and visitor experiences
by applying the following principles of
Leave No Trace.
Actions Common to All Action
Alternatives
The following actions are being
considered within the WSP/EIS
• Trail Maintenance. Protecting
fragile habitats from trampling, trail
widening, and erosion as well as
minimizing hazardous trail conditions
would remain a primary objective of
trail construction and maintenance.
• Administrative Overnight Use of
Historic Structures in Wilderness
(except Amygdaloid and Davidson).
Historic structures in wilderness or
potential wilderness may periodically
be utilized for administrative overnight
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
64092
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2022 / Notices
use by NPS staff, tribal partners,
volunteers, park partners, researchers,
and roving caretakers.
• Fire Management for Historic
Structures. The park would develop
Defensible Spaces standard operating
procedures as it relates to protecting
NPS infrastructure from wildfire.
• Backcountry Office and Processing
Fees. A mainland-based backcountry
office would be established.
• Campground/Campfire
Management. Campfires contained
within designated campfire rings may
be allowed in designated areas provided
that enough down and dead wood is
available within a collectable distance
and campfire rings may be rotated
periodically.
• Human Waste Management. Privies
would be retained for use and the
appropriate number and location would
be determined through this process.
Privies are associated with existing
campgrounds, administrative sites or
historic structures and are necessary for
the health and safety of wilderness users
and to limit impacts from human waste
on the natural quality of wilderness.
• Wilderness Interpretation and
Public Signage. The NPS would review
current signage and limit to only those
necessary for safety or protection of
resources, such as route markers,
distance and directions, and hazard
signage. Some signage would be
removed.
Alternative A—No Action Alternative—
Current Management
The ‘‘no-action alternative’’ describes
the continuation of existing
management practices as described in
the 1998 GMP and as implemented
through the compendium. The GMP
does not include an overarching
stewardship component designed to
enhance wilderness character. There
would be no formal priority or treatment
distinction for historic structures in
wilderness.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Alternative B—Enhancing Wilderness
Character While Improving the Visitor
Wilderness Experience (Proposed
Action)
Alternative B focuses on enhancing
wilderness character with specific
emphasis on improving the wilderness
experience while maintaining Isle
Royale’s natural and untrammeled
wilderness qualities. This alternative
would provide for additional access
opportunities consistent with the public
purposes of wilderness, including
additional trails, a new campground,
and additional campsites in existing
campgrounds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Oct 20, 2022
Jkt 259001
The alternative designates day use
group size limitations by zones to
enhance opportunities for unconfined
recreation and solitude, while providing
opportunities and access for more
family groups. The alternative would
provide flexibility for managers to
reroute trails and bridges in order to
avoid sensitive species and address
changes in the environment, benefiting
Isle Royale’s natural quality.
Isle Royale wilderness includes a
number of historic structures, most of
which are Nationally Significant and
listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. Many of these structures
contribute to the cultural and historic
value of Isle Royale’s wilderness.
Treatment of historic structures in
wilderness would include preservation,
stabilization, mouldering, or demolition.
Groups of 9 to 12 people would be
required to register for group campsite
reservations in advance. Groups from
the same organization would not be
allowed to camp in the same
campground at the same time. Tents
would be required to be placed within
designated tent pads. If a group exceeds
12 people they must split into 2 parties,
each independent and traveling on
separate itineraries. Organizations may
not have more than 24 people camping
on the island at one time. The park
would implement monitoring to
determine if changes to the group size
limits should be adjusted.
In order to reduce visitor conflict and
provide for opportunities for solitude in
the pristine and backcountry zone, the
following day use groups size limits
would apply:
• Front Country Zone: Group size
limit of 40. The Front Country Zone
includes limited areas within
wilderness and most of the areas outside
of wilderness. Attractions such as
Edisen Fishery, Scoville Point,
Raspberry Island, Passage Island trail,
and Suzy’s Cave are in this zone.
• Wilderness Portal, Backcountry,
and Primitive Zone Trails: Group size
limit of 24 (2 groups of 12 or fewer).
This includes most trails and
campgrounds. Group sizes of up to 40
people would be allowed at the
following locations: Hidden Lake,
Lookout Louise, McCargoe Cove, and
the Minong.
Alternative C—Enhancing Wilderness
Character While Improving Solitude
Like alternative B, alternative C
focuses on enhancing wilderness
character, but does so by focusing
primarily on improving solitude.
Solitude is generally preserved or
improved by management actions that
reduce visitor encounters, signs of
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
modern civilization inside wilderness,
facilities, and management restrictions
on visitor behavior. The alternative
emphasizes solitude by decreasing day
use group size, reducing the number of
campsites within campgrounds,
eliminating trails, allowing winter
public use, and implementing a
camping permit system. The alternative
proposes eliminating commercial use
within Isle Royale wilderness which
would enhance solitude through
reducing visitor encounters with large
groups. The alternative would also
remove shelters and structures in
wilderness to improve the primitive and
unconfined recreation qualities, natural,
and undeveloped qualities of wilderness
character. Like alternative B, historic
structures in wilderness could be
classified for treatment as preservation,
stabilization, mouldering, or demolition.
Under this alternative, overnight
group size would remain unchanged
from current conditions (alternative A).
Day use group size limits would be
limited to:
• Front Country Zones: Group size
limit of 20. The Front Country Zone
includes limited areas within
wilderness and most of the areas outside
of wilderness including attractions such
as Edisen Fishery, Scoville Point,
Raspberry Island, Passage Island trail,
and Suzy’s Cave.
• Wilderness Portal, Backcountry,
and Primitive Zone: Group size limit of
10. This includes most trails and
campgrounds. Hidden Lake, Lookout
Louise, McCargoe Cove and the Minong
Mine would be exceptions, with group
sizes of up to 20 people allowed.
Summary of Expected Impacts
The proposed action alternatives are
expected to result in improvements to
wilderness character. Changes to
camping practices, including proposed
permitting changes, additional trails,
and changes in campgrounds would
improve the opportunity for solitude in
the wilderness, reduce visitor conflicts
and address overcrowding and capacity
concerns. Some of the alternatives
include elements that detract from
opportunities for unconfined recreation,
including reservations systems,
permitting, designated camping areas,
and other features associated with
campgrounds. However, these generally
improve other aspects of wilderness
character, including the opportunity for
solitude and they reduce the extent of
impacts to natural and cultural features
in the park. Alternatives including the
retention and preservation of Nationally
Significant historic structures enhance
cultural and historic values of
wilderness. The preservation of these
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 203 / Friday, October 21, 2022 / Notices
Request for Identification of Potential
Alternatives, Information, and
Analyses Relevant to the Proposed
Action
structures, however, detract from the
undeveloped quality of wilderness.
Seasonal closure of the Park detracts
from the opportunity for unconfined
wilderness recreation.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The NPS anticipates informally
consulting with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act for unlikely
impacts to threatened and endangered
species. The NPS will use and
coordinate the NEPA public scoping
process to help fulfill the public
involvement requirements under the
National Historic Preservation Act (54
U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3).
NPS initiated consultation for this
undertaking in compliance with Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act regarding the
treatments of historic properties in
wilderness beginning in 2010. These
consultation efforts and documented
meetings will be used to inform this
effort, as well as continuing
consultation efforts.
Schedule for the Decision-Making
Process
• Agencies have two years from the
date of the issuance of the notice of
intent, to the date a record of decision
is signed, to complete an Environmental
Impact Statement (40 CFR 1501.10).
• The NPS expects to make the Draft
EIS available to the public in Fall 2022.
• After public review and comment,
the NPS expects to make the Final EIS
available to the public in Spring 2023.
• At least 30 days after the Final EIS
is available, the record of decision will
be completed in accordance with
applicable timeframes established in 40
CFR 1506.11.
Public Scoping Process
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the EIS. Written
comments may be submitted at any time
during the scoping process. See the
ADDRESSES section (above) and the
Submitting Comments section (below)
for more information. There will be no
public meetings during the public
scoping period.
Reasonable Accommodations
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations should contact the
park, using one of the methods listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as soon as possible.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Oct 20, 2022
Jkt 259001
The NPS requests possible
alternatives, information, and analyses
from all interested parties. The NPS will
consider these comments in developing
the Draft EIS. Specifically, the NPS is
seeking:
• Potential effects that the
alternatives could have on other aspects
of the human environment, including
ecological, aesthetic, historic, cultural,
economic, social, environmental justice,
or health effects;
• Other possible reasonable
alternatives that the NPS should
consider, including additional or
alternative avoidance, minimization,
and mitigation measures;
• Other information relevant to the
Wilderness Stewardship Plan and its
impacts on the human environment.
Submitting Comments
If you wish to comment, you may
submit comments by the methods listed
above in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will not be accepted by fax,
email, or by any method other than
those specified above. Bulk comments
in any format (hard copy or electronic)
submitted on behalf of others will not be
accepted. Comments must be provided
prior to the close of the comment period
and should clearly articulate the
reviewer’s concerns and contentions.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered.
Decision Maker
The Decision Maker is the NPS
Regional Director for Interior Regions 3,
4, and 5.
Termination of 2001 EIS Process
This notice also terminates the EIS for
a Wilderness Management Plan initiated
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64093
by the NPS on October 2, 2001 (66 FR
50207).
Herbert Frost,
Regional Director, DOI Interior Regions 3, 4,
and 5.
[FR Doc. 2022–22971 Filed 10–20–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
[Docket No. BOEM–2022–0017]
Pacific Wind Lease Sale 1 (PACW–1)
for Commercial Leasing for Wind
Power on the Outer Continental Shelf
in California—Final Sale Notice
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final sale notice.
AGENCY:
This Final Sale Notice (FSN)
contains information pertaining to the
areas available for commercial wind
energy leasing on the Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) offshore California.
Specifically, this FSN details certain
provisions and conditions of the leases,
auction details, the lease form, criteria
for evaluating competing bids, award
procedures, appeal procedures, and
lease execution. The Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management (BOEM) will offer
five leases for sale using a multiplefactor bidding auction format: Lease
OCS–P 0561, Lease OCS–P 0562, Lease
OCS–P 0563, Lease OCS–P 0564, and
Lease OCS–P 0565 (Lease Areas). The
issuance of any lease resulting from this
sale would not constitute approval of
project-specific plans to develop
offshore wind energy. Such plans, if
submitted by the Lessee, would be
subject to subsequent environmental,
technical, and public reviews prior to a
BOEM decision on whether the
proposed development should be
authorized.
DATES: BOEM will hold an online mock
auction for potential bidders starting at
7:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (PST)/
10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on
December 5, 2022. The monetary
auction will be held online and will
begin at 7 a.m. PST/10 a.m. EST on
December 6, 2022. Additional details
are provided in the section entitled
‘‘Deadlines and Milestones for Bidders.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Guiltinan, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Pacific Regional Office,
Mail Stop CM 102, 760 Paseo Camarillo
(Suite 102), Camarillo, California
93010–6002, (805) 384–6345, or
sara.guiltinan@boem.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 203 (Friday, October 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64091-64093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-MWR-ISRO-33985; PPWONRADE2, PMP00EI05.YP0000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
a Wilderness Stewardship Plan for Isle Royale National Park, Michigan
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is preparing an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) for a Wilderness Stewardship Plan (WSP) for Isle
Royale National Park (ISRO or the park).
DATES: The NPS requests comments concerning the scope of the analysis,
and identification of relevant information, studies, and analyses. All
comments must be received or postmarked by November 21, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Information will be available for public review and comment
will only be accepted at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/ISROWilderness.
Information will also be available at Isle Royale National Park, 800
East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, Michigan and by request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Denice Swanke, Isle
Royale National Park, Wilderness Stewardship Plan, 800 East Lakeshore
Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, or by telephone at (906) 482-0984, or
email at [email protected]. Individuals in the United States who
are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may
dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay
services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay
services offered within their country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of this plan is to outline strategies for preserving
wilderness character, including the treatment of cultural resources in
wilderness, while also providing for the use and enjoyment of the park
by current and future generations. This plan would determine
preservation and use of historic structures in potential and designated
wilderness.
The NPS identified the following needs for this WSP/EIS:
NPS Management Policies 2006 requires that each park
containing wilderness maintain an up-to-date and approved wilderness
management plan (NPS 2006, section 6.3.4.2).
The previous ISRO Backcountry Wilderness Plan and Final
EIS (2011; no Record of Decision) did not provide a decision for
treatments and use of historic structures in potential and designated
wilderness.
The 1998 General Management Plan (GMP) specified that a
wilderness and backcountry management plan is needed to guide the
management of wilderness resources and ensure consistency in such
management over time.
Preliminary inventory and monitoring of wilderness and
backcountry resources indicate a difference between existing conditions
and desired conditions. Changes in backcountry use, management actions,
increasing visitation, and associated human-caused adverse impacts
suggest an underlying need to more proactively manage human activities
that directly or indirectly affect wilderness conditions.
Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives
The NPS's proposed action is to prepare and implement a Wilderness
Stewardship Plan that provides the park with tools to enhance
wilderness character with specific emphasis on improving the visitors'
wilderness experience while maintaining the park's natural and
wilderness qualities. This proposed action also provides for access
opportunities consistent with the public purposes of wilderness.
Treatment of historic structures in wilderness could include:
preservation, stabilization or mouldering, or demolition.
Actions Common to All Alternatives
Vegetation Clearing. In select locations, the park may
clear vegetation around installations and structures for historic
preservation. Vegetation would continue to be cleared around mine shaft
fencing. Hazard trees would be removed in the vicinity of Senter Point
powder house and steam hoist, and limited vegetation removal would be
performed at Island Mine and Island Mine Cemetery. Vegetation
overgrowth would be removed to maintain visibility at cemeteries and
burial sites.
Damaged or Destroyed Historic Structures. Damaged or
destroyed historic structures may be removed following NPS Management
Policies 2006.
Management of Public Use in Wilderness. The park would
continue to use boardwalks in order to minimize damage to wetlands and
other natural wilderness qualities. The park may maintain picnic tables
in some campgrounds when they are determined necessary for the
protection of nearby vegetation and soils. Interpretive, educational
and outreach programs would be provided to encourage park visitors to
minimize their impacts to park resources and visitor experiences by
applying the following principles of Leave No Trace.
Actions Common to All Action Alternatives
The following actions are being considered within the WSP/EIS
Trail Maintenance. Protecting fragile habitats from
trampling, trail widening, and erosion as well as minimizing hazardous
trail conditions would remain a primary objective of trail construction
and maintenance.
Administrative Overnight Use of Historic Structures in
Wilderness (except Amygdaloid and Davidson). Historic structures in
wilderness or potential wilderness may periodically be utilized for
administrative overnight
[[Page 64092]]
use by NPS staff, tribal partners, volunteers, park partners,
researchers, and roving caretakers.
Fire Management for Historic Structures. The park would
develop Defensible Spaces standard operating procedures as it relates
to protecting NPS infrastructure from wildfire.
Backcountry Office and Processing Fees. A mainland-based
backcountry office would be established.
Campground/Campfire Management. Campfires contained within
designated campfire rings may be allowed in designated areas provided
that enough down and dead wood is available within a collectable
distance and campfire rings may be rotated periodically.
Human Waste Management. Privies would be retained for use
and the appropriate number and location would be determined through
this process. Privies are associated with existing campgrounds,
administrative sites or historic structures and are necessary for the
health and safety of wilderness users and to limit impacts from human
waste on the natural quality of wilderness.
Wilderness Interpretation and Public Signage. The NPS
would review current signage and limit to only those necessary for
safety or protection of resources, such as route markers, distance and
directions, and hazard signage. Some signage would be removed.
Alternative A--No Action Alternative--Current Management
The ``no-action alternative'' describes the continuation of
existing management practices as described in the 1998 GMP and as
implemented through the compendium. The GMP does not include an
overarching stewardship component designed to enhance wilderness
character. There would be no formal priority or treatment distinction
for historic structures in wilderness.
Alternative B--Enhancing Wilderness Character While Improving the
Visitor Wilderness Experience (Proposed Action)
Alternative B focuses on enhancing wilderness character with
specific emphasis on improving the wilderness experience while
maintaining Isle Royale's natural and untrammeled wilderness qualities.
This alternative would provide for additional access opportunities
consistent with the public purposes of wilderness, including additional
trails, a new campground, and additional campsites in existing
campgrounds.
The alternative designates day use group size limitations by zones
to enhance opportunities for unconfined recreation and solitude, while
providing opportunities and access for more family groups. The
alternative would provide flexibility for managers to reroute trails
and bridges in order to avoid sensitive species and address changes in
the environment, benefiting Isle Royale's natural quality.
Isle Royale wilderness includes a number of historic structures,
most of which are Nationally Significant and listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. Many of these structures contribute to the
cultural and historic value of Isle Royale's wilderness. Treatment of
historic structures in wilderness would include preservation,
stabilization, mouldering, or demolition.
Groups of 9 to 12 people would be required to register for group
campsite reservations in advance. Groups from the same organization
would not be allowed to camp in the same campground at the same time.
Tents would be required to be placed within designated tent pads. If a
group exceeds 12 people they must split into 2 parties, each
independent and traveling on separate itineraries. Organizations may
not have more than 24 people camping on the island at one time. The
park would implement monitoring to determine if changes to the group
size limits should be adjusted.
In order to reduce visitor conflict and provide for opportunities
for solitude in the pristine and backcountry zone, the following day
use groups size limits would apply:
Front Country Zone: Group size limit of 40. The Front
Country Zone includes limited areas within wilderness and most of the
areas outside of wilderness. Attractions such as Edisen Fishery,
Scoville Point, Raspberry Island, Passage Island trail, and Suzy's Cave
are in this zone.
Wilderness Portal, Backcountry, and Primitive Zone Trails:
Group size limit of 24 (2 groups of 12 or fewer). This includes most
trails and campgrounds. Group sizes of up to 40 people would be allowed
at the following locations: Hidden Lake, Lookout Louise, McCargoe Cove,
and the Minong.
Alternative C--Enhancing Wilderness Character While Improving Solitude
Like alternative B, alternative C focuses on enhancing wilderness
character, but does so by focusing primarily on improving solitude.
Solitude is generally preserved or improved by management actions that
reduce visitor encounters, signs of modern civilization inside
wilderness, facilities, and management restrictions on visitor
behavior. The alternative emphasizes solitude by decreasing day use
group size, reducing the number of campsites within campgrounds,
eliminating trails, allowing winter public use, and implementing a
camping permit system. The alternative proposes eliminating commercial
use within Isle Royale wilderness which would enhance solitude through
reducing visitor encounters with large groups. The alternative would
also remove shelters and structures in wilderness to improve the
primitive and unconfined recreation qualities, natural, and undeveloped
qualities of wilderness character. Like alternative B, historic
structures in wilderness could be classified for treatment as
preservation, stabilization, mouldering, or demolition.
Under this alternative, overnight group size would remain unchanged
from current conditions (alternative A). Day use group size limits
would be limited to:
Front Country Zones: Group size limit of 20. The Front
Country Zone includes limited areas within wilderness and most of the
areas outside of wilderness including attractions such as Edisen
Fishery, Scoville Point, Raspberry Island, Passage Island trail, and
Suzy's Cave.
Wilderness Portal, Backcountry, and Primitive Zone: Group
size limit of 10. This includes most trails and campgrounds. Hidden
Lake, Lookout Louise, McCargoe Cove and the Minong Mine would be
exceptions, with group sizes of up to 20 people allowed.
Summary of Expected Impacts
The proposed action alternatives are expected to result in
improvements to wilderness character. Changes to camping practices,
including proposed permitting changes, additional trails, and changes
in campgrounds would improve the opportunity for solitude in the
wilderness, reduce visitor conflicts and address overcrowding and
capacity concerns. Some of the alternatives include elements that
detract from opportunities for unconfined recreation, including
reservations systems, permitting, designated camping areas, and other
features associated with campgrounds. However, these generally improve
other aspects of wilderness character, including the opportunity for
solitude and they reduce the extent of impacts to natural and cultural
features in the park. Alternatives including the retention and
preservation of Nationally Significant historic structures enhance
cultural and historic values of wilderness. The preservation of these
[[Page 64093]]
structures, however, detract from the undeveloped quality of
wilderness. Seasonal closure of the Park detracts from the opportunity
for unconfined wilderness recreation.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The NPS anticipates informally consulting with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for
unlikely impacts to threatened and endangered species. The NPS will use
and coordinate the NEPA public scoping process to help fulfill the
public involvement requirements under the National Historic
Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3).
NPS initiated consultation for this undertaking in compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act regarding the
treatments of historic properties in wilderness beginning in 2010.
These consultation efforts and documented meetings will be used to
inform this effort, as well as continuing consultation efforts.
Schedule for the Decision-Making Process
Agencies have two years from the date of the issuance of
the notice of intent, to the date a record of decision is signed, to
complete an Environmental Impact Statement (40 CFR 1501.10).
The NPS expects to make the Draft EIS available to the
public in Fall 2022.
After public review and comment, the NPS expects to make
the Final EIS available to the public in Spring 2023.
At least 30 days after the Final EIS is available, the
record of decision will be completed in accordance with applicable
timeframes established in 40 CFR 1506.11.
Public Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the EIS. Written comments may be submitted at any
time during the scoping process. See the ADDRESSES section (above) and
the Submitting Comments section (below) for more information. There
will be no public meetings during the public scoping period.
Reasonable Accommodations
Persons needing reasonable accommodations should contact the park,
using one of the methods listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section as soon as possible.
Request for Identification of Potential Alternatives, Information, and
Analyses Relevant to the Proposed Action
The NPS requests possible alternatives, information, and analyses
from all interested parties. The NPS will consider these comments in
developing the Draft EIS. Specifically, the NPS is seeking:
Potential effects that the alternatives could have on
other aspects of the human environment, including ecological,
aesthetic, historic, cultural, economic, social, environmental justice,
or health effects;
Other possible reasonable alternatives that the NPS should
consider, including additional or alternative avoidance, minimization,
and mitigation measures;
Other information relevant to the Wilderness Stewardship
Plan and its impacts on the human environment.
Submitting Comments
If you wish to comment, you may submit comments by the methods
listed above in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will not be accepted by
fax, email, or by any method other than those specified above. Bulk
comments in any format (hard copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of
others will not be accepted. Comments must be provided prior to the
close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the
reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered.
Decision Maker
The Decision Maker is the NPS Regional Director for Interior
Regions 3, 4, and 5.
Termination of 2001 EIS Process
This notice also terminates the EIS for a Wilderness Management
Plan initiated by the NPS on October 2, 2001 (66 FR 50207).
Herbert Frost,
Regional Director, DOI Interior Regions 3, 4, and 5.
[FR Doc. 2022-22971 Filed 10-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P