Washington Apricots; Termination of Marketing Order, 63433-63436 [2022-22695]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2022 / Proposed Rules
requirements. Rather, it is anticipated
this action would have a beneficial
impact by exempting pummelo
handlers, primarily small entities, from
regulation, assessment, and reporting
requirements.
Exemption from assessments would
create a minimal loss of revenue. Using
the current assessment rate and
pummelo shipments estimated by
Committee members (200,000 cartons),
there would be about $3,000 lost per
year. Developing an alternative
reporting process and maintaining
compliance would likely cost the
Committee more than that amount in
staff time. Pummelo growers and
handlers should benefit from this
change regardless of their size.
The Committee discussed an
alternative to this action. It considered
whether there was a need to establish
grade and size requirements for
pummelo and track the shipments as
they do for other citrus fruits.
Committee members indicated the
pummelo market is not experiencing
quality concerns, and there is no
industry interest in creating such
requirements. Therefore, the Committee
rejected this alternative.
Committee meetings were widely
publicized throughout the citrus
industry. All interested persons were
invited to attend Committee meetings
and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the November 30,
2021, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
Interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational collection impacts of this
action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Fruit
Crops. No changes in those
requirements would be necessary as a
result of this proposed rule. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large citrus handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. All written
comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination
is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 905
Grapefruit, Marketing agreements,
Oranges, Pummelos, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tangelos,
Tangerines.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
905 as follows:
PART 905—ORANGES, GRAPEFRUIT,
TANGERINES, AND PUMMELOS
GROWN IN FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for part 905
continues to read as follows:
■
■
2. Add § 905.130 to read as follows:
§ 905.130
Exemptions for Pummelo.
The handling of pummelo fruit or
pummelo hybrids shall be exempt from
the provisions of §§ 905.7, 905.41,
905.70, 905.71 and the regulations
issued thereunder: Provided, That, if the
handler ships other fruit subject to
Order requirements, the handler must
comply with all sections of the Order
applicable to such fruit, including
handler registration.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–22702 Filed 10–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–21–0061]
Washington Apricots; Termination of
Marketing Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
comments on a recommendation from
the Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) to terminate the
Federal marketing order regulating the
handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington
(Marketing Order No. 922). The
Committee determined the marketing
order is no longer necessary to maintain
orderly marketing conditions and
unanimously recommended its
termination. Following the Committee’s
recommendation, the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) suspended the
remaining reporting and assessment
collection requirements under the
marketing order while it considered
termination of the marketing order.
After reviewing the Committee’s
recommendation and other information
submitted, AMS determined that the
marketing order no longer tends to
effectuate the declared policy of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937. If implemented, this proposed
rule would remove Marketing Order No.
922 from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
December 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or via internet at:
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register. All
comments will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public on
the internet at the address provided
above. Please be advised that the
DATES:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
63433
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
63434
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2022 / Proposed Rules
identity of individuals or entities
submitting comments will be made
public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua R. Wilde, Marketing Specialist,
or Gary Olson, Regional Director,
Western Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503)
326–2724 or Email: Joshua.R.Wilde@
usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491 or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 922, as amended (7 CFR part 922),
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington. Part 922 (referred to as the
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
and handlers operating within the
production area.
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866 and 13563. Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has
been reviewed under Executive Order
13175—Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether
their rulemaking actions would have
tribal implications. AMS has
determined this proposed rule is
unlikely to have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to a marketing order
may file with the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating
that the marketing order, any provision
of the marketing order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the
marketing order is not in accordance
with law and request a modification of
the marketing order or to be exempted
therefrom. A handler is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing, USDA would
rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would terminate
the Order regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in
Washington. Following its meeting on
May 11, 2021, the Washington Apricot
Marketing Committee (Committee)
unanimously recommended this action
after determining the Order is no longer
necessary to maintain orderly marketing
conditions. AMS suspended,
indefinitely, reporting and assessment
collection requirements under the Order
while it considered the Committee’s
recommendation and information
submitted (87 FR 21741). After
reviewing the Committee’s
recommendation, years without
marketing program activity, the decline
in apricot production, and the decision
to indefinitely suspend reporting and
assessment collection requirements,
AMS determined that the Order no
longer tends to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. This proposed rule
invites comments on proposed
termination of the Order and, if
implemented, would remove the Order
from the Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 922.64(b) of the Order
provides that United States Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) may terminate or
suspend any or all provisions of the
Order when a finding is made that the
Order does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. In addition,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides
that the Secretary terminate or suspend
the operation of any order whenever the
order or any provision thereof obstructs
or does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
The Order has been in effect since
1957 and has provided the apricot
industry in Washington with authority
for grade, size, quality, maturity, pack,
and container regulations, as well as
authority for mandatory product
inspection.
The Committee, which locally
administers the Order, meets regularly
to consider recommendations for
modification, suspension, or
termination of the Order’s regulatory
requirements. Committee meetings are
open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these
meetings. AMS reviews Committee
recommendations, including
information provided by the Committee
and from other available sources, and
determines whether modification,
suspension, or termination would tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act.
In 2006, the Committee unanimously
recommended AMS suspend container
regulations after determining they were
no longer necessary to ensure orderly
marketing and that suspension would
provide greater flexibility to handlers
for packing and shipping apricots.
Following the Committee’s
recommendation, AMS suspended
container regulations for apricots for
one year in 2006 (71 FR 16979), and
subsequently extended that suspension
indefinitely in 2007 (72 FR 16263).
In 2013, the Committee unanimously
recommended AMS suspend handling
regulations after determining the cost of
complying with the Order’s handling
and inspection requirements
outweighed its benefits to both
producers and handlers of apricots.
Based on the Committee’s
recommendation, AMS issued an
interim rule suspending the handling
regulations for apricots on October 23,
2013 (78 FR 62963). A final rule
affirming the indefinite suspension
published in the Federal Register on
March 20, 2014 (79 FR 15539).
Following these regulatory
suspensions, the Committee continued
to levy assessments to maintain its
functionality. The Committee believed
that it should continue to fund its full
operational capability, collect industry
statistics on an ongoing basis, and
maintain the program in the event
market conditions warranted regulation.
On May 11, 2021, the Committee met
and discussed current market dynamics,
budget and assessments, and deliberated
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2022 / Proposed Rules
the continuance of the Order. During the
meeting, the Committee discussed that
the volume of apricots produced in
Washington has declined over the years,
and in 2020, the industry experienced a
significant drop in crop produced from
the prior year’s production. In addition,
management and administrative costs to
maintain the Order have also increased.
Staff management hours includes a
greater quantity of hours worked than in
previous years.
The Committee discussed the
alternative, that to maintain the Order
would require an assessment rate
increase of approximately over 300
percent, from $2.86 to $13.30 per ton.
However, the Committee determined
that the decrease in the 2020 crop
suggests an overall decline in apricot
production, and an assessment rate
increase of over 300 percent would not
benefit apricot producers and handlers.
The Committee discussed that the
industry has functioned without
container and handling regulations for a
combined period of more than 14 years.
It was the belief of the Committee that
the suspension of container and
handling requirements had not
adversely affected the marketing of
Washington apricots and, therefore,
terminating the Order would not
negatively impact the industry. The
Committee concluded that the Order is
no longer necessary to maintain orderly
marketing conditions and that the cost
to maintain the Order outweighs its
benefit to industry. Following this
meeting, the Committee voted
unanimously to terminate the Order.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee
formally recommended AMS terminate
the Order. In preparing to terminate the
Order, the Committee recommended
AMS suspend the collection of
assessments and reporting requirements.
The Committee also recommended a
budget of expenditures of $5,508 for the
period beginning April 1, 2021, and
ending with the termination of the
Order. Following the Committee’s
recommendation, AMS suspended,
indefinitely, the remaining reporting
and assessment collection requirements
under the Order while it considered the
recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee to
terminate the Order. A proposed rule to
suspend reporting and assessment
collection requirements published in
the Federal Register on November 23,
2021 (86 FR 66462). AMS received one
comment that did not address the merits
of the rule. Accordingly, no changes
were made to the rule as proposed and
the final rule published on April 13,
2022 (87 FR 21741). The suspension of
regulations, reporting requirements, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
assessment collections continued while
AMS evaluated the Committee’s
recommendation for terminating the
Order. After reviewing the Committee’s
recommendation, years without
marketing program activity, the decline
in apricot production, and the decision
to indefinitely suspend reporting and
assessment collection requirements,
AMS determined that the Order no
longer tends to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
This proposed rule is intended to
solicit input and any additional
information available from interested
parties regarding whether the Order
should be terminated. AMS will
evaluate all available information prior
to making a final determination on this
matter. If implemented, this proposed
rule would terminate the Order and the
rules and regulations issued thereunder.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this proposed
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act are unique in that they are brought
about through group action of
essentially small entities acting on their
own behalf.
There are approximately 315 growers
of Washington apricots and
approximately 8 apricot handlers in the
production area subject to regulation
under the Order. Small agricultural
service firms (postharvest crop activities
(except cotton ginning), NAICS code
115114) are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of $30,000,000 or
less, and small agricultural producers
(other non-citrus fruit farming, NAICS
code 111339) are defined as those
having annual receipts of $3,000,000 or
less (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on USDA National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) data, and
given the number of Washington apricot
growers, average grower revenue is well
below $3,000,000. NASS’s 2020 value of
utilized Washington apricot crop
production was $3.866 million.
Dividing the $3.866 million crop value
by 315 growers equals average annual
receipts per grower of $12,273. Thus,
most Washington apricot growers would
be considered small businesses under
the SBA definition.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63435
In addition, according to data from
AMS’s Market News, the estimated
Washington apricot 2020 season average
Free on Board (f.o.b.) shipper (handler)
price per carton was approximately
$31.59 (for Washington apricots, 2-layer
tray pack carton, all sizes, June–July
2020, midpoint of the ‘‘mostly low’’ and
‘‘mostly high’’ prices). With a standard
Market News weight of 18 pounds per
tray pack carton of apricots, the f.o.b.
price was approximately $1.755 per
pound, ($31.59 divided by 18 pounds),
or $3,510 per ton. The Committee
reported that the industry shipped 1,628
tons for the 2020 season. Total 2020
estimated handler receipts are $5.714
million (1,628 tons times $3,510 per
ton). Average annual receipts per
handler are approximately $714,000
($5.714 million divided by 8 handlers).
Thus, most Washington apricot handlers
would be considered small businesses
under the SBA definition.
This rule proposes to terminate the
Order, and the rules and regulations
issued thereunder. Termination would
remove the Order from the Code of
Federal Regulations.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee made
the recommendation to terminate the
Order. The alternative, to maintain the
Order, would require the Committee to
increase the assessment rate by
approximately 300%, from $2.86 to
$13.30 per ton. However, the 2020–2021
crop production was the smallest crop
on record, and evidence suggests that
this decline is a continuation of an
industry trend.
In addition, the prior suspension of
the container and handling regulations,
effectuated by a separate rulemaking
published on April 5, 2006 (71 FR
16979), has not adversely affected the
marketing of Washington apricots in any
of the subsequent years. AMS confirmed
data from the past 7 years shows that
apricots can be marketed from the
production area in the absence of the
Order’s requirements without a negative
economic impact on the industry.
After considering the alternative, the
Committee concluded that regulating
the handling of apricots under the Order
is no longer necessary to ensure orderly
marketing of Washington apricots, that
the costs associated with the
administration of the Order outweigh
the benefits, and that termination of the
Order would not have a negative impact
on industry. Therefore, following its
meeting on May 11, 2021, the
Committee unanimously voted to
terminate the Order. The suspension of
regulations, reporting requirements, and
assessments collections continued for
an indefinite period while USDA
evaluated the Committee’s
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
63436
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 19, 2022 / Proposed Rules
recommendation to proceed with the
termination of the Order.
This proposed rule is intended to
solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on
whether the Order should be
terminated. AMS will evaluate all
available information prior to making a
final determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Fruit
Crops. AMS will extract the remaining
apricot marketing order-related forms
from the forms package during the next
three-year renewal process, should the
Order be terminated.
This rule would effectuate the
removal of reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on apricot handlers, both
small and large. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, AMS has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Committee’s meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Meetings were held virtually or in a
hybrid style with participants having a
choice on whether to attend in person
or virtually.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on the
proposed termination of Marketing
Order No. 922, which regulates the
handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington. A
60-day comment period is provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 18, 2022
Jkt 259001
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant
to § 608c(16)(A) of the Act and § 922.64
of the Order, AMS is considering
termination of the Order. If AMS
decides to terminate the Order, trustees
would be appointed to conclude and
liquidate the Committee affairs and
would continue in that capacity until
discharged by AMS. In addition, AMS
would notify Congress 60 days in
advance of termination pursuant to
§ 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 922—[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to remove
part 922.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–22695 Filed 10–18–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 107 and 121
RIN 3245–AH90
Small Business Investment Company
Investment Diversification and Growth
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (‘‘SBA’’ or ‘‘Agency’’) is
proposing to revise the regulations for
the Small Business Investment
Company (‘‘SBIC’’) program to
significantly reduce barriers to program
participation for new SBIC fund
managers and funds investing in
underserved communities and
geographies, capital intensive
investments, and technologies critical to
national security and economic
development. This proposed rule
introduces an additional type of SBIC
(‘‘Accrual SBICs’’) to increase program
investment diversification and patient
capital financing for small businesses
and modernize rules to lower financial
barriers to program participation. This
proposed rule will help SBA implement
the Executive Order (‘‘E.O.’’),
Advancing Racial Equity and Support
for Underserved Communities Through
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Federal Government, by reducing
financial and administrative barriers to
participate in the SBIC program and
modernizing the program’s license
offerings to align with a more
diversified set of private funds investing
in underserved small businesses. The
proposed rule also incorporates the
statutory requirements of the Spurring
Business in Communities Act of 2017,
which was enacted on December 19,
2018.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3245–AH90, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Bailey G. DeVries, Associate
Administrator for the Office of
Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small
Business Administration, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. If you wish
to submit confidential business
information (‘‘CBI’’), as defined in the
User Notice at https://
www.regulations.gov, please submit the
information to Bailey G. DeVries,
Associate Administrator of the Office of
Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small
Business Administration, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, or
send an email to oii.frontoffice@sba.gov
with ‘‘RIN 3245–AH90 Proposed Rule’’
in the subject heading. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI
and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final
determination on whether it will
publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Policy: Bailey G. DeVries, Associate
Administrator of the Office of
Investment and Innovation, Small
Business Administration,
oii.frontoffice@sba.gov, 202–941–6064.
This phone number can also be reached
by individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, or who have speech
disabilities, through the Federal
Communications Commission’s TTYBased Telecommunications Relay
Service teletype service at 711.
Regulatory Comments/Federal
Register Docket: Louis Cupp, Office of
Investment and Innovation, Small
Business Administration,
oii.frontoffice@sba.gov, 202–699–1746.
This phone number can also be reached
by individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, or who have speech
E:\FR\FM\19OCP1.SGM
19OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 19, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63433-63436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22695]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-21-0061]
Washington Apricots; Termination of Marketing Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on a recommendation from
the Washington Apricot Marketing Committee (Committee) to terminate the
Federal marketing order regulating the handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington (Marketing Order No. 922). The
Committee determined the marketing order is no longer necessary to
maintain orderly marketing conditions and unanimously recommended its
termination. Following the Committee's recommendation, the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) suspended the remaining reporting and
assessment collection requirements under the marketing order while it
considered termination of the marketing order. After reviewing the
Committee's recommendation and other information submitted, AMS
determined that the marketing order no longer tends to effectuate the
declared policy of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937. If
implemented, this proposed rule would remove Marketing Order No. 922
from the Code of Federal Regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 19, 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax:
(202) 720-8938; or via internet at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the document number and the date and page
number of this issue of the Federal Register. All comments will be made
available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available
to the public on the internet at the address provided above. Please be
advised that the
[[Page 63434]]
identity of individuals or entities submitting comments will be made
public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua R. Wilde, Marketing Specialist,
or Gary Olson, Regional Director, Western Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone:
(503) 326-2724 or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491 or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under
Marketing Order No. 922, as amended (7 CFR part 922), regulating the
handling of apricots grown in designated counties in Washington. Part
922 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers
operating within the production area.
AMS is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. This action falls within a category of
regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their
rulemaking actions would have tribal implications. AMS has determined
this proposed rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to a marketing order may file with the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the marketing
order, any provision of the marketing order, or any obligation imposed
in connection with the marketing order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the marketing order or to be exempted
therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the United States in any district
in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the
petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would terminate the Order regulating the
handling of apricots grown in designated counties in Washington.
Following its meeting on May 11, 2021, the Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) unanimously recommended this action after
determining the Order is no longer necessary to maintain orderly
marketing conditions. AMS suspended, indefinitely, reporting and
assessment collection requirements under the Order while it considered
the Committee's recommendation and information submitted (87 FR 21741).
After reviewing the Committee's recommendation, years without marketing
program activity, the decline in apricot production, and the decision
to indefinitely suspend reporting and assessment collection
requirements, AMS determined that the Order no longer tends to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act. This proposed rule invites
comments on proposed termination of the Order and, if implemented,
would remove the Order from the Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 922.64(b) of the Order provides that United States
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) may terminate or suspend any or
all provisions of the Order when a finding is made that the Order does
not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. In addition,
section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that the Secretary terminate or
suspend the operation of any order whenever the order or any provision
thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
The Order has been in effect since 1957 and has provided the
apricot industry in Washington with authority for grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container regulations, as well as authority for
mandatory product inspection.
The Committee, which locally administers the Order, meets regularly
to consider recommendations for modification, suspension, or
termination of the Order's regulatory requirements. Committee meetings
are open to the public and interested persons may express their views
at these meetings. AMS reviews Committee recommendations, including
information provided by the Committee and from other available sources,
and determines whether modification, suspension, or termination would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
In 2006, the Committee unanimously recommended AMS suspend
container regulations after determining they were no longer necessary
to ensure orderly marketing and that suspension would provide greater
flexibility to handlers for packing and shipping apricots. Following
the Committee's recommendation, AMS suspended container regulations for
apricots for one year in 2006 (71 FR 16979), and subsequently extended
that suspension indefinitely in 2007 (72 FR 16263).
In 2013, the Committee unanimously recommended AMS suspend handling
regulations after determining the cost of complying with the Order's
handling and inspection requirements outweighed its benefits to both
producers and handlers of apricots. Based on the Committee's
recommendation, AMS issued an interim rule suspending the handling
regulations for apricots on October 23, 2013 (78 FR 62963). A final
rule affirming the indefinite suspension published in the Federal
Register on March 20, 2014 (79 FR 15539).
Following these regulatory suspensions, the Committee continued to
levy assessments to maintain its functionality. The Committee believed
that it should continue to fund its full operational capability,
collect industry statistics on an ongoing basis, and maintain the
program in the event market conditions warranted regulation.
On May 11, 2021, the Committee met and discussed current market
dynamics, budget and assessments, and deliberated
[[Page 63435]]
the continuance of the Order. During the meeting, the Committee
discussed that the volume of apricots produced in Washington has
declined over the years, and in 2020, the industry experienced a
significant drop in crop produced from the prior year's production. In
addition, management and administrative costs to maintain the Order
have also increased. Staff management hours includes a greater quantity
of hours worked than in previous years.
The Committee discussed the alternative, that to maintain the Order
would require an assessment rate increase of approximately over 300
percent, from $2.86 to $13.30 per ton. However, the Committee
determined that the decrease in the 2020 crop suggests an overall
decline in apricot production, and an assessment rate increase of over
300 percent would not benefit apricot producers and handlers. The
Committee discussed that the industry has functioned without container
and handling regulations for a combined period of more than 14 years.
It was the belief of the Committee that the suspension of container and
handling requirements had not adversely affected the marketing of
Washington apricots and, therefore, terminating the Order would not
negatively impact the industry. The Committee concluded that the Order
is no longer necessary to maintain orderly marketing conditions and
that the cost to maintain the Order outweighs its benefit to industry.
Following this meeting, the Committee voted unanimously to terminate
the Order.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee formally recommended AMS terminate
the Order. In preparing to terminate the Order, the Committee
recommended AMS suspend the collection of assessments and reporting
requirements. The Committee also recommended a budget of expenditures
of $5,508 for the period beginning April 1, 2021, and ending with the
termination of the Order. Following the Committee's recommendation, AMS
suspended, indefinitely, the remaining reporting and assessment
collection requirements under the Order while it considered the
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee to terminate
the Order. A proposed rule to suspend reporting and assessment
collection requirements published in the Federal Register on November
23, 2021 (86 FR 66462). AMS received one comment that did not address
the merits of the rule. Accordingly, no changes were made to the rule
as proposed and the final rule published on April 13, 2022 (87 FR
21741). The suspension of regulations, reporting requirements, and
assessment collections continued while AMS evaluated the Committee's
recommendation for terminating the Order. After reviewing the
Committee's recommendation, years without marketing program activity,
the decline in apricot production, and the decision to indefinitely
suspend reporting and assessment collection requirements, AMS
determined that the Order no longer tends to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
This proposed rule is intended to solicit input and any additional
information available from interested parties regarding whether the
Order should be terminated. AMS will evaluate all available information
prior to making a final determination on this matter. If implemented,
this proposed rule would terminate the Order and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared
this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant
to the Act are unique in that they are brought about through group
action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 315 growers of Washington apricots and
approximately 8 apricot handlers in the production area subject to
regulation under the Order. Small agricultural service firms
(postharvest crop activities (except cotton ginning), NAICS code
115114) are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of $30,000,000 or less, and small agricultural
producers (other non-citrus fruit farming, NAICS code 111339) are
defined as those having annual receipts of $3,000,000 or less (13 CFR
121.201).
Based on USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data,
and given the number of Washington apricot growers, average grower
revenue is well below $3,000,000. NASS's 2020 value of utilized
Washington apricot crop production was $3.866 million. Dividing the
$3.866 million crop value by 315 growers equals average annual receipts
per grower of $12,273. Thus, most Washington apricot growers would be
considered small businesses under the SBA definition.
In addition, according to data from AMS's Market News, the
estimated Washington apricot 2020 season average Free on Board (f.o.b.)
shipper (handler) price per carton was approximately $31.59 (for
Washington apricots, 2-layer tray pack carton, all sizes, June-July
2020, midpoint of the ``mostly low'' and ``mostly high'' prices). With
a standard Market News weight of 18 pounds per tray pack carton of
apricots, the f.o.b. price was approximately $1.755 per pound, ($31.59
divided by 18 pounds), or $3,510 per ton. The Committee reported that
the industry shipped 1,628 tons for the 2020 season. Total 2020
estimated handler receipts are $5.714 million (1,628 tons times $3,510
per ton). Average annual receipts per handler are approximately
$714,000 ($5.714 million divided by 8 handlers). Thus, most Washington
apricot handlers would be considered small businesses under the SBA
definition.
This rule proposes to terminate the Order, and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder. Termination would remove the Order from
the Code of Federal Regulations.
On July 7, 2021, the Committee made the recommendation to terminate
the Order. The alternative, to maintain the Order, would require the
Committee to increase the assessment rate by approximately 300%, from
$2.86 to $13.30 per ton. However, the 2020-2021 crop production was the
smallest crop on record, and evidence suggests that this decline is a
continuation of an industry trend.
In addition, the prior suspension of the container and handling
regulations, effectuated by a separate rulemaking published on April 5,
2006 (71 FR 16979), has not adversely affected the marketing of
Washington apricots in any of the subsequent years. AMS confirmed data
from the past 7 years shows that apricots can be marketed from the
production area in the absence of the Order's requirements without a
negative economic impact on the industry.
After considering the alternative, the Committee concluded that
regulating the handling of apricots under the Order is no longer
necessary to ensure orderly marketing of Washington apricots, that the
costs associated with the administration of the Order outweigh the
benefits, and that termination of the Order would not have a negative
impact on industry. Therefore, following its meeting on May 11, 2021,
the Committee unanimously voted to terminate the Order. The suspension
of regulations, reporting requirements, and assessments collections
continued for an indefinite period while USDA evaluated the Committee's
[[Page 63436]]
recommendation to proceed with the termination of the Order.
This proposed rule is intended to solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on whether the Order should be
terminated. AMS will evaluate all available information prior to making
a final determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189 Fruit Crops.
AMS will extract the remaining apricot marketing order-related forms
from the forms package during the next three-year renewal process,
should the Order be terminated.
This rule would effectuate the removal of reporting and
recordkeeping requirements on apricot handlers, both small and large.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, AMS
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry, and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Meetings were held virtually or in a hybrid style with
participants having a choice on whether to attend in person or
virtually.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on the proposed termination of Marketing
Order No. 922, which regulates the handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington. A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond to this proposal. All written
comments timely received will be considered before a final
determination is made on this matter.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the
Act and Sec. 922.64 of the Order, AMS is considering termination of
the Order. If AMS decides to terminate the Order, trustees would be
appointed to conclude and liquidate the Committee affairs and would
continue in that capacity until discharged by AMS. In addition, AMS
would notify Congress 60 days in advance of termination pursuant to
Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 922--[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under the authority
of 7 U.S.C. 601-674, the Agricultural Marketing Service proposes to
remove part 922.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-22695 Filed 10-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P