Comparability Protocols for Postapproval Changes to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in a New Drug Application, Abbreviated New Drug Application, or Biologics License Application; Guidance for Industry; Availability, 62417-62419 [2022-22334]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Giaquinto Friedman, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 4162,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–402–
7930, Elizabeth.Giaquinto@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Advanced manufacturing is a general
term for an innovative pharmaceutical
manufacturing technology or approach
that has the potential to improve the
reliability and robustness of the
manufacturing process and supply
chain, and increase timely access to
quality medicines for the American
public. For the purposes of the
discussion paper, all references to drugs
include both human drugs and
biological products (including those
regulated by CBER), unless otherwise
specified. Advanced manufacturing can:
(1) integrate novel technological
approaches, (2) use established
techniques in an innovative way, or (3)
apply production methods in a new
domain. Advanced manufacturing can
potentially be used for new or existing
and large or small molecule drugs.
FDA has recognized and embraced the
potential of advanced manufacturing for
many years. CDER established the
Emerging Technology Program in 2014
to work collaboratively with companies
to support the use of advanced
manufacturing. CDER has observed a
rapid emergence of advanced
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
manufacturing technologies through the
Emerging Technology Program and
recognizes that regulatory policies and
programs may need to evolve to enable
the timely adoption of these
technologies. The National Academies
of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
issued a 2021 report entitled
‘‘Innovation in Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing on the Horizon:
Technical Challenges, Regulatory Issues,
and Recommendations’’, noting
potential innovations in integrated,
flexible, and distributed manufacturing.
These potential innovations include
modular approaches to streamline drug
development and production, and the
deployment and use of highly portable
manufacturing units. A range of drug
manufacturers have recently engaged
CDER through the Emerging Technology
Program specifically regarding the
development of portable and distributed
manufacturing platforms.
CBER established the CBER Advanced
Technologies Team in 2019 to promote
dialogue, education, and input between
CBER and prospective innovators and
developers of advanced manufacturing
technologies. Through these
interactions, CBER has observed interest
from manufacturers in the
implementation of novel manufacturing
approaches for CBER-regulated
products. CBER also recognizes the need
to consider developing a regulatory
framework to facilitate the adoption of
these emerging technologies. CBER
expects the development of advanced
manufacturing technologies associated
with DM and POC manufacturing for
products that it regulates.
The discussion paper (available on
FDA’s website at: CDER’s Framework
for Regulatory Advanced Manufacturing
Evaluation (FRAME) Initiative | FDA)
presents areas for consideration and
policy development identified by CDER
scientific and policy experts associated
with DM and POC manufacturing that
would be valuable as FDA considers
developing a regulatory framework that
contemplates these technologies for
CDER- and CBER-regulated drug and
biological products. For the purposes of
the discussion paper, CDER and CBER
define DM to be a decentralized
manufacturing strategy consisting of a
manufacturing platform of
manufacturing units deployed to
multiple locations; POC manufacturing
is defined as a subset of DM that uses
manufacturing units distributed to host
sites in proximity to patient care (e.g.,
healthcare facilities). Regulatory areas of
consideration include applicable
statutory provisions, regulations, and
guidance related to quality assessment
and inspections that could affect an
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62417
applicant’s ability to comply with the
current regulatory framework or FDA’s
assessment of a marketing application.
II. Requested Information and
Comments
Interested persons are invited to
provide detailed comments to CDER and
CBER (see ADDRESSES) on all aspects
described in the discussion paper. The
discussion paper is available on FDA’s
website for the FRAME initiative at:
CDER’s Framework for Regulatory
Advanced Manufacturing Evaluation
(FRAME) Initiative | FDA. To facilitate
input, FDA has developed a series of
questions after each technology
described in the discussion paper. The
questions are not meant to be
exhaustive, and FDA is also interested
in any other pertinent information
stakeholders would like to share on this
topic. This feedback will help inform
the Agency’s policy development
regarding the technologies described in
the discussion paper. FDA encourages
stakeholders to provide the specific
rationale and basis for their comments,
including any available supporting data
and information.
Dated: October 11, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–22386 Filed 10–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–0973]
Comparability Protocols for
Postapproval Changes to the
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and
Controls Information in a New Drug
Application, Abbreviated New Drug
Application, or Biologics License
Application; Guidance for Industry;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a final
guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Comparability Protocols for
Postapproval Changes to the Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls
Information in an NDA, ANDA, or
BLA.’’ This final guidance is intended to
assist original applicants and holders of
approved new drug applications
(NDAs), abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs), and biologics
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
62418
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
license applications (BLAs) on
implementing a chemistry,
manufacturing, and controls (CMC)
postapproval change(s) through the use
of a comparability protocol (CP). In
many cases, submission and approval of
a CP will facilitate the subsequent
implementation and reporting of CMC
changes, which could result in moving
a drug or biological product into
distribution or facilitating a proactive
approach to reinforcing the supply of a
product sooner than if a CP were not
used. This final guidance recommends a
framework to promote continuous
improvement in the manufacturing of
quality drug and biological products.
This document finalizes a revised draft
guidance that published on April 20,
2016, entitled ‘‘Comparability Protocols
for Human Drugs and Biologics:
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
Information.’’ A related draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Comparability Protocols—
Protein Drug Products and Biological
Products—Chemistry, Manufacturing,
and Controls Information’’ that
published in September 2003, was
withdrawn on May 6, 2015.
DATES: The announcement of the
guidance is published in the Federal
Register on October 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either
electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as
follows:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–0973 for ‘‘Comparability
Protocols for Postapproval Changes to
the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and
Controls Information in an NDA, ANDA,
or BLA.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://govinfo.gov/
content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single
copies of this guidance to the Division
of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002 or the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Office of
Communication, Outreach, and
Development, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., WO71, Room 3128, Silver Spring,
MD 20903. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Moore, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, Bldg. 51, Rm.
4159, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD, 20993–0002, 301–
796–7579 or Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–
402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Comparability Protocols for
Postapproval Changes to the Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls
Information in an NDA, ANDA, or
BLA.’’ The final guidance is intended to
assist original applicants and holders of
approved applications for human drugs
and biological products on
implementing a CMC postapproval
change(s) through the use of a CP. In
this guidance, a comparability protocol
is synonymous with a postapproval
change management protocol in the
International Council for Harmonisation
(ICH) Q12 guidance ‘‘Technical and
Regulatory Considerations for
Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle
Management’’ (May 2021). The final
guidance is not applicable to blood and
blood components; biological products
that also meet the definition of a device
in section 201(h) of the Federal Food,
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2022 / Notices
Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or human cells,
tissues, or cellular or tissue-based
products regulated solely under section
361 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 264) and 21 CFR part 1271.
On April 20, 2016, (81 FR 23303),
FDA announced the availability of a
revised draft guidance entitled
‘‘Comparability Protocols for Human
Drugs and Biologics: Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls
Information.’’ This was a revised draft of
a draft guidance published in February
2003. We revised the February 2003
draft guidance in 2016 for the following
reasons:
• To include current pharmaceutical
quality concepts.
• To provide more flexibility
regarding filing procedures for a
notification of modifications to an
approved CP in less burdensome
reporting categories than a prior
approval supplement.
• To add an appendix to address
commonly asked questions.
The Center for Veterinary Medicine,
which was included in the February
2003 draft guidance, published
recommendations for animal drugs in a
separate guidance.
We received a number of comments
on the revised draft guidance, which the
Agency considered carefully as it
prepared this final guidance. Additional
information has been included in the
final guidance on proposing an
appropriate reporting category for
implementation of changes under a CP
once approved. Additional examples
have been included for notification of
modifications to an approved CP in less
burdensome reporting categories than a
prior approval supplement. Information
has been included in the appendix on
cross-referencing of a master file,
including a Drug Master File, in a CP
and submitting a CP to a master file.
Also, the recommendations in the
guidance for industry ICH Q12 have
been carefully considered when revising
this guidance to maximize consistency.
We also have made clarifications and
editorial changes to the final guidance
document.
This final guidance provides
recommendations to original applicants
and holders of approved applications
for human drugs and certain biological
products on implementing CMC
postapproval change(s) through the use
of a CP. In many cases, submission and
approval of a CP will facilitate the
subsequent implementation and
reporting of CMC changes, which could
result in moving a drug or biological
product into distribution or facilitating
a proactive approach to reinforcing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Oct 13, 2022
Jkt 259001
supply of a product sooner than if a CP
were not used.
The final guidance recommends a
framework to promote continuous
improvement in the manufacturing of
quality drug and biological products by
encouraging applicants to employ the
following:
• Effective use of knowledge and
understanding of the product and
manufacturing process;
• Risk management activities over the
life cycle of a product; and
• An effective pharmaceutical quality
system
This final guidance incorporates the
modern regulatory concepts stated in
the guidance for industry entitled
‘‘PAT—A Framework for Innovative
Pharmaceutical Development,
Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance,’’
the Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st
Century—A Risk Based Approach, the
Critical Path Initiative, and the quality
by design principles described in the
guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Q8(R2)
Pharmaceutical Development.’’
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on ‘‘Comparability
Protocols for Postapproval Changes to
the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and
Controls Information in an NDA, ANDA,
or BLA.’’ It does not establish any rights
for any person and, with the exception
of section V, is not binding on FDA or
the public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
As noted, insofar as section V of this
guidance sets forth that certain
modifications to an approved CP must
be submitted in a changes being effected
supplement or annual report rather than
a prior approval supplement, it has
binding effect, as indicated by the use
of the words must, shall, or required.
Such binding effect derives from section
506A of the FD&C Act, as implemented
in 21 CFR 314.70 and 601.12.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
While this guidance contains no
collection of information, it does refer to
previously approved FDA collections of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521) is not required for this guidance.
The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by
OMB under the PRA. The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 314 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0001. The collections of
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62419
information in 21 CFR part 601 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0338. The collections of
information in 21 CFR parts 210 and
211 relating to current good
manufacturing practices have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0139. The collections of
information relating to section 351(k) of
the PHS Act have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0718.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain the guidance at https://
www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecompliance-regulatory-information/
guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/
regulatory-information/search-fdaguidance-documents, or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 7, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022–22334 Filed 10–13–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2022–N–2335]
Prescription Drug User Fee Act VII;
Independent Assessment of
Communication Through Product
Quality Information Requests During
Application Review; Statement of
Work; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice; establishment of a
public docket; request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing an opportunity for public
comment on the Statement of Work to
assess communication between FDA
and sponsors through product quality
information requests during application
review and to identify best practices and
areas of improvement. The independent
assessment is part of FDA performance
commitments under the recent
reauthorization of the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act (PDUFA). The
independent assessment of FDA and
sponsors in communicating through
product quality information requests is
described in detail in the document
entitled ‘‘PDUFA Reauthorization
Performance Goals and Procedures
Fiscal Years 2023 Through 2027.’’ As
part of FDA performance commitments
described in this document, the
assessment will be conducted by an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62417-62419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22334]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2016-D-0973]
Comparability Protocols for Postapproval Changes to the
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in a New Drug
Application, Abbreviated New Drug Application, or Biologics License
Application; Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled
``Comparability Protocols for Postapproval Changes to the Chemistry,
Manufacturing, and Controls Information in an NDA, ANDA, or BLA.'' This
final guidance is intended to assist original applicants and holders of
approved new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs), and biologics
[[Page 62418]]
license applications (BLAs) on implementing a chemistry, manufacturing,
and controls (CMC) postapproval change(s) through the use of a
comparability protocol (CP). In many cases, submission and approval of
a CP will facilitate the subsequent implementation and reporting of CMC
changes, which could result in moving a drug or biological product into
distribution or facilitating a proactive approach to reinforcing the
supply of a product sooner than if a CP were not used. This final
guidance recommends a framework to promote continuous improvement in
the manufacturing of quality drug and biological products. This
document finalizes a revised draft guidance that published on April 20,
2016, entitled ``Comparability Protocols for Human Drugs and Biologics:
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information.'' A related draft
guidance entitled ``Comparability Protocols--Protein Drug Products and
Biological Products--Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
Information'' that published in September 2003, was withdrawn on May 6,
2015.
DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on October 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-D-0973 for ``Comparability Protocols for Postapproval Changes
to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in an NDA,
ANDA, or BLA.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management
Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 or the Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Office of Communication, Outreach,
and Development, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71, Room 3128, Silver
Spring, MD 20903. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Moore, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 51, Rm.
4159, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 301-796-
7579 or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Comparability Protocols for Postapproval Changes to the
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in an NDA, ANDA, or
BLA.'' The final guidance is intended to assist original applicants and
holders of approved applications for human drugs and biological
products on implementing a CMC postapproval change(s) through the use
of a CP. In this guidance, a comparability protocol is synonymous with
a postapproval change management protocol in the International Council
for Harmonisation (ICH) Q12 guidance ``Technical and Regulatory
Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management'' (May
2021). The final guidance is not applicable to blood and blood
components; biological products that also meet the definition of a
device in section 201(h) of the Federal Food,
[[Page 62419]]
Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or human cells, tissues, or cellular or tissue-
based products regulated solely under section 361 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) and 21 CFR part 1271.
On April 20, 2016, (81 FR 23303), FDA announced the availability of
a revised draft guidance entitled ``Comparability Protocols for Human
Drugs and Biologics: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
Information.'' This was a revised draft of a draft guidance published
in February 2003. We revised the February 2003 draft guidance in 2016
for the following reasons:
To include current pharmaceutical quality concepts.
To provide more flexibility regarding filing procedures
for a notification of modifications to an approved CP in less
burdensome reporting categories than a prior approval supplement.
To add an appendix to address commonly asked questions.
The Center for Veterinary Medicine, which was included in the
February 2003 draft guidance, published recommendations for animal
drugs in a separate guidance.
We received a number of comments on the revised draft guidance,
which the Agency considered carefully as it prepared this final
guidance. Additional information has been included in the final
guidance on proposing an appropriate reporting category for
implementation of changes under a CP once approved. Additional examples
have been included for notification of modifications to an approved CP
in less burdensome reporting categories than a prior approval
supplement. Information has been included in the appendix on cross-
referencing of a master file, including a Drug Master File, in a CP and
submitting a CP to a master file. Also, the recommendations in the
guidance for industry ICH Q12 have been carefully considered when
revising this guidance to maximize consistency. We also have made
clarifications and editorial changes to the final guidance document.
This final guidance provides recommendations to original applicants
and holders of approved applications for human drugs and certain
biological products on implementing CMC postapproval change(s) through
the use of a CP. In many cases, submission and approval of a CP will
facilitate the subsequent implementation and reporting of CMC changes,
which could result in moving a drug or biological product into
distribution or facilitating a proactive approach to reinforcing the
supply of a product sooner than if a CP were not used.
The final guidance recommends a framework to promote continuous
improvement in the manufacturing of quality drug and biological
products by encouraging applicants to employ the following:
Effective use of knowledge and understanding of the
product and manufacturing process;
Risk management activities over the life cycle of a
product; and
An effective pharmaceutical quality system
This final guidance incorporates the modern regulatory concepts
stated in the guidance for industry entitled ``PAT--A Framework for
Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing, and Quality
Assurance,'' the Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century--A Risk
Based Approach, the Critical Path Initiative, and the quality by design
principles described in the guidance for industry entitled ``Q8(R2)
Pharmaceutical Development.''
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Comparability Protocols for Postapproval
Changes to the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information in an
NDA, ANDA, or BLA.'' It does not establish any rights for any person
and, with the exception of section V, is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
As noted, insofar as section V of this guidance sets forth that
certain modifications to an approved CP must be submitted in a changes
being effected supplement or annual report rather than a prior approval
supplement, it has binding effect, as indicated by the use of the words
must, shall, or required. Such binding effect derives from section 506A
of the FD&C Act, as implemented in 21 CFR 314.70 and 601.12.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does
refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 314 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0001. The collections of information in 21 CFR part 601
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0338. The collections
of information in 21 CFR parts 210 and 211 relating to current good
manufacturing practices have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0139. The collections of information relating to section 351(k) of
the PHS Act have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0718.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 7, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-22334 Filed 10-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P