Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Understanding the Relationship Between Poverty, Well-Being and Food Security, 61561-61564 [2022-22149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2022 / Notices
Grade, ‘‘High Moisture.’’ Contrasting
Chickpeas over 2.0 percent will no
longer be considered U.S. Substandard
Chickpea/Garbanzo Beans, but instead
would grade no higher than U.S. No. 3
Chickpea/Garbanzo Beans. AMS would
revise the Bean Inspection Handbook to
reflect these changes.
AMS is accepting comments on this
proposed action for 60 days. All
comments received within the comment
period will be made part of the public
record maintained by AMS, will be
available to the public for review, and
will be considered by AMS before a
final action is taken on this proposal.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–22109 Filed 10–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Doc. No. AMS–FGIS–21–0017]
United States Standards for Wheat
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) is making no
changes regarding the U.S. Standards for
Wheat under the U.S. Grain Standards
Act, as amended (USGSA).
DATES: Applicable: October 12, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry Gomoll, USDA AMS; Telephone:
(202) 720–8286; Email: Barry.L.Gomoll@
usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4
of the USGSA (7 U.S.C. 76(a)) grants the
Secretary of Agriculture the authority to
establish standards for grain regarding
kind, class, quality, and condition. AMS
published a request for information on
April 20, 2021, in the Federal Register
(86 FR 20480), inviting interested
parties to comment on whether the
current wheat standards and grading
practices need to be changed. Current
U.S. Standards for Wheat can be found
at 7 CFR 810.2201–5.
AMS received a total of five
comments on the U.S. Standards for
Wheat during the comment period.
Four commenters, representing grain
merchandisers, exporters, and traders,
responded that they are satisfied with
the standards as currently written,
stating that changes may create
confusion and uncertainty for the
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Oct 11, 2022
Jkt 259001
market and should only be made if they
significantly improve the marketing of
U.S. wheat. Three of these commenters
further stated a desire for further
research into the marketing of Hard
White Wheat (HDWH), either by
differentiating between winter and
spring varieties, merging HDWH with
the class Hard Red Winter Wheat (HRW)
to create a Hard Winter Wheat class, or
increasing the allowable amount of
HDWH in HRW.
One commenter, representing a wheat
growing group, suggested changing the
standards, either by merging HDWH and
HRW to create a Hard Winter Wheat
class or by increasing the allowable
Wheat of Other Classes in HRW to 25%.
The commenter mentioned that such a
standards change could help remove
barriers to growers hoping to market
HDWH for export markets.
Based on the balance of comments
received in response to the request,
AMS has decided to make no changes
to the wheat standards at this time.
However, AMS will collaborate with the
wheat industry to consider any data and
research from interested stakeholders
regarding the possibilities, impacts, and
potential market acceptance of either
merging HDWH and HRW to create a
Hard Winter Wheat class, or increasing
the allowable Wheat of Other Classes in
HRW to 25%.
Final Action
Based on the comments received,
AMS–FGIS is making no changes to the
U.S Standards for Wheat at this time.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k.
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–22113 Filed 10–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Understanding the
Relationship Between Poverty, WellBeing and Food Security
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This new collection will provide the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61561
and Nutrition Service with new
information about food security and
individual and family circumstances
and environmental factors related to
poverty in six persistently poor
counties.
Written comments must be
received on or before December 12,
2022.
DATES:
Comments may be mailed to
Michael Burke, Senior Social Science
Research Analyst, Food and Nutrition
Service, Braddock Metro Center II, 1320
Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Comments may also be submitted via
email to michael.burke@usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.), Monday through Friday at
Braddock Metro Center II, 1320
Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collected
should be directed to Michael Burke by
email at michael.burke@usda.gov or by
phone at (703) 305–4369.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on the following topics: (1)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden on the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions that were used; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Understanding the Relationship
Between Poverty, Well-Being, and Food
Security.
Form Number: Not applicable.
OMB Number: 0584–NEW.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
61562
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2022 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
Abstract: This is a new information
collection request. The Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is
the nation’s largest federal program
aimed at reducing food insecurity and
increasing access to healthy food. SNAP
is administered by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture’s (USDA), Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) and provides
nutrition assistance benefits to program
participants, the majority of whom are
children, the elderly, or people with
disabilities. Through this data collection
effort, FNS seeks to understand the
interrelated factors that lead to
household food insecurity. Data will be
collected in six counties experiencing
persistent intergenerational poverty
through a study titled Understanding
the Relationship Between Poverty, WellBeing, and Food Security.
Understanding the Relationship
Between Poverty, Well-Being, and Food
Security will allow FNS to gain a deeper
understanding of the interrelated factors
that affect the food security status of
SNAP beneficiaries and SNAP-eligible
nonparticipants, information which has
not previously collected in persistently
poor counties. The USDA’s Economic
Research Service (ERS) defines counties
as being persistently poor if 20 percent
or more of county residents were poor
at each of several points in time over a
30-year period, measured by the 1980,
1990, and 2000 censuses and the 2007–
2011 American Community Survey.
Examining food insecurity and poverty
in these populations will help FNS
better understand the association
between SNAP, other USDAadministered programs, and
community-based assistance with wellbeing and the food environment. Study
objectives include:
• Objective 1: Produce descriptive
statistics on key sociodemographic and
economic variables, including
household food security in a
representative sample of all residents in
each of six persistent-poverty counties.
• Objective 2: Produce descriptive
statistics on key sociodemographic and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Oct 11, 2022
Jkt 259001
economic variables, including
household food insecurity in two
representative stratified subsamples of
low and very low food-secure residents,
in each county of six persistent-poverty
counties.
• Objective 3: Produce descriptive
statistics for each subgroup in each
county on key social, geospatial, and
other policy-actionable elements of
well-being and material deprivation
associated with both household food
security and SNAP participation.
• Objective 4: Characterize the social
context and the life course of
individuals, within a multigenerational
family unit, as they define their
experiences with food insecurity
through In-Depth Interviews (IDIs).
To ensure a representative probability
sample of households in each of the six
persistent poverty counties (each
located within six different states) we
propose a two-stage address-based
sampling (ABS) approach in which the
primary sampling units (PSUs) will be
small geographic clusters consisting of
census-defined blocks or groups of
blocks within the country, and the
secondary sampling units will be
residential addresses within the selected
PSUs. We will use American
Community Survey (ACS) and SNAP
administrative data to obtain an
estimate of SNAP-eligibility by PSU.
The study includes several data
collection activities: (1) SNAP
administration data; (2) a household
survey; (3) in-depth interviews with
household survey respondents; and (4)
focus groups with community
stakeholders.
Affected Public: Respondent groups
identified include: (a) Individual/
Households (county residents in the six
selected counties); (b) Business—Profit,
Non-Profit, or Farm (community
stakeholder focus group participants);
(c) State, Local, or Tribal Government
(State/County SNAP agencies).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15,997. The total estimated number of
individuals/households (I/H) initially
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacted is 15,840. Out of the initial
number of I/H contacted 6,600
respondents will be surveyed, and a
subsample of 156 respondents will
participate in an in-depth interview. A
total of 48 community stakeholders will
participate in focus groups—36
Business (Profit, Non-Profit, or Farm)
and 12 State, Local, or Tribal
Government. 38 police stations (State,
Local, or Tribal Government) will
receive notifications that field staff are
working in the area. In addition, 6 State
SNAP agencies and 1 County SNAP
agency (State, Local, or Tribal
Government) will be asked to provide
SNAP administrative data once to
support development of the survey
sampling frame. All 7 are expected to
respond.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: All respondents will be
asked to respond to each specific data
collection activity only once. County
residents will be asked to participate in
one survey; a subset of interview
respondents will be asked to participate
in one in-depth interview. Community
stakeholders will be asked to participate
in one focus group, and SNAP agency
will be asked to complete one data
request. The estimated number of
responses is 5.8 responses per
respondent, including all contact
materials.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
The estimate total annual responses is
115,347 (86,894 respondents and 28,453
non-respondents).
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated time of response varies from
1 minute (0.0167 hours) to 8 hours,
depending on respondent group, as
shown in the table below, with an
average estimated time of 0.0673 hours
for all participants.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 465,761 minutes (7,763
hours). See the table below (Table 1) for
estimated total annual burden for each
type of respondent.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Jkt 259001
ft-Category
-
Type-of resp.ondenu
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
11taticns1aff
1
Tribal
Go11ernr1'1ffflt
h.'X:'JJS,gro.ups
(hounj
...... ....
,....._,
Hout._
Cott
15,840
0.033<
S29'
a,96ll
1
3,960
0.0334
132.264
661
$
7.25 $
1
15,840
529
3.900
1
S,960
0.0364
132.264
661 $
7.25 $
4,795
£ru,fOf'MUNMLettat'
l>l/l)2
l9M<
15,84(
1
15,840
o.ra,,
o.Ol!S,
529
3.96(1
1
3,960
0.0884
132.264
661$
7.25 $
4,795
Fittt Survay Rtminderlftar
£1,/E2
17,325
10,395
1
10,395
0.03a'
347
6.930
1
~30
0.-
231.462
579
S.eoru!S....,._......,
f'1/F2
13.86(
5,S44
1
5,544
O.Ol!S•
:185
~316
1
8,316
0.088'4
277.154
G
10.$95
!!,815
1
9,ll7S
0.0161
165
520
i
520
00167
8.fil!O
Sunity Refusal laltef
l1Jl2
3,'W
3,168
1
3,168
0.M'«
]06
7!12
1
792
O.ma4
ThmnkY-ot.Lener
Jl/J2
2,l7E
2,178
1
2,178
0.0161
36
~
(
-
How.l!Jhoid~w,
lU
6,60C
66m
1
6,liOO
0.584'
3,858
(I
(
62
0
101 l " ' i - C..11 Script
K!/K2
62◄
562
1
562
0.100,
56
tOi CoftilmaltiOfl Ltmarj£maJI
u;u
624
156
1
156
0.016
3
LUJM2
62~
156
1
156
o.ra,,
5
10l"'"""'1foan
lU/N2
62~
156
1
156
0.£83.<
5
!Oil-Guide
01/02
62~
156
1
156
2.000(
312
---
(
0
0
461!
0
19,l!O(
15,840
SA6
86,466
0.077l
6,666
3,!lfill
7.18
'"'""G,-Cor,santfoan
P1
9E
36
1
48
O.(B'I;
2
Ell
0
F:«w i2r.oup0i~Gufd6
P2
9E
3E
l
48
1.smc
72
8J
R>tus ll
Q
9E
96
1
96
5
-
.
$
4,195
3,356
174 $
7.25 $
1,259
26.453
:132 $
7.25 $
959
0.0167
-
36 $
0.5845
-
$
7.25 $
27,968
$
408
0.0167
-
(10/<'i,4
2.00X
$
3)!58
-.:141
l9
7.25 $
38
5
S
7.25
$
38
312
$
7.25 $
2,262
7,6D6.710
0.0i!a1
0.0:134
-
0
1.5aX
-
(l
0
.
0.0167
-
~
0
-
0.0054
.
78
.
8,CJD!
-
2
$ 25.94 $
42
$ 25.94
$
83
56
$78.88
$
4,417
$78.88
$
$78.88 $
100
9E
3.000
288
78
60
;
7
1
7
s.moc
56.0000
0
0
Poi'i<:Ei SGtionlatter
H
3li
30
l
.!!(
0.016,
1
7.6
1
8
0.0167
!1127
1
Studyo..c,;pt!a,
Q
3li
3C
1
3C
O.OSS<
1
7.6
1
8
O.l'.m4
0.254
1.3
0.l'.m4
.
.
P1
2◄
12
1
12
0.()33;
0
12
C
R>t"' l l < o u p - &.'Ide
P2
2•
12
1
12
1.500!:
18
12
C
Fow•tlt""I>-
l'3
2•
24
1
2◄
0.016,
0
0
C
Stl.ldy~
Q
2•
24
1
24
O.tm,
lj
C
0
61,
61
139.8
0,55;
10
0.776
15.2
19,!lli!i
lS,997
4,04(]
8
2il,4SS
Stat•, Uu:~t otlri'baJ Govwnment:Sub-Total
(l)M8111£0Tl>TAI.
2.28
Sli,194
77.121!,
6,821
.
-
1.500C
0.0167
0,0167
0.625
0
18
-
.
42
1)!68
3
9E
"""' ll•T<>tal
N(;r)..P,,rofit;~ Qt
._..........
Aftnual
19,ll'lC
101 - C a l l Script
914lnaa (Prdh;,
lhld
ftumbero.f
Sampla
S1"o
~Mive
_,
Bl/112
Sutw!ytf'lltitatiML«mr
l'ldMdual/
t.
--- _,._ ~--· -- - --
$ 2,034.1)3
$78.88
1,420
$
$
32
$18.88
1
$18.88
77.sm
942
7,762.fi!I
32
$78.88 $
0
ll.ll81
s
so
63
$ 4U3.95
$ 68,297.IM
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2022 / Notices
18:37 Oct 11, 2022
Table 1: Respondent Burden Estimate Table
61563
EN12OC22.014
61564
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 12, 2022 / Notices
Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–22149 Filed 10–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
El Dorado County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The El Dorado County
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
will hold a virtual meeting by phone
and/or video conference. The committee
is authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The
purpose of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with title II of
the Act, as well as make
recommendations on recreation fee
proposals for sites on the Eldorado
National Forest and Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit within El Dorado
county, consistent with the Federal
Lands Recreation Enhancement Act.
General information and meeting details
can be found at the following website:
www.fs.usda.gov/main/eldorado/
workingtogether/advisorycommittees.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
November 2, 2022, from 3:30 p.m.–5:30
p.m., Pacific daylight time.
All RAC meetings are subject to
cancellation. For the status of the
meeting prior to attendance, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting is open to the
public and will be held virtually via
telephone and/or video conference.
Virtual meeting participation details can
be found on the website listed under
SUMMARY or by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received upon request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Bacon, Acting Designated Federal
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Oct 11, 2022
Jkt 259001
Officer (DFO), by phone at 530–303–
2412 or email at james.bacon@usda.gov
or Jennifer Chapman, RAC Coordinator
at 530–957–9660 or email at
jennifer.chapman@usda.gov.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
and hard of hearing (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339, 24 hours a day, every day of
the year, including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is to:
1. Discuss RAC projects and program
updates;
2. Discuss the recent county
allocations process for the Secure Rural
Schools program;
3. Schedule the next meeting.
The meeting is open to the public.
The agenda will include time for people
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should make a request in
writing at least three days prior to the
meeting date to be scheduled on the
agenda. Anyone who would like to
bring related matters to the attention of
the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time to make
oral comments must be sent to Jennifer
Chapman, 100 Forni Road, Placerville,
CA 95667; or by email to
jennifer.chapman@usda.gov.
USDA programs are prohibited from
discriminating based on race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, gender
identity (including gender expression),
sexual orientation, disability, age,
marital status, family/parental status,
income derived from a public assistance
program, political beliefs, or reprisal or
retaliation for prior civil rights activity,
in any program or activity conducted or
funded by USDA (not all bases apply to
all programs). Remedies and complaint
filing deadlines vary by program or
incident.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means of communication for
program information (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, American Sign
Language, etc.) should contact the
responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET
Center at 1–202–720–2600 (voice and
TTY) or contact USDA through the
Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–
8339. Additionally, program
information may be made available in
languages other than English.
Equal opportunity practices in
accordance with USDA’s policies will
be followed in all appointments to the
Committee. To ensure that the
recommendations of the Committee
have taken in account the needs of the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
diverse groups served by USDA,
membership shall include to the extent
possible, individuals with demonstrated
ability to represent minorities, women,
and person with disabilities. USDA is
an equal opportunity provider,
employer, and lender.
Dated: October 5, 2022.
Cikena Reid,
USDA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022–22111 Filed 10–11–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
of Partially Closed Meeting
The Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC)
will meet on Tuesday, October 25, 2022,
1:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, in the
Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room
48019, 14th Street between Constitution
and Pennsylvania Avenues NW,
Washington, DC The Committee advises
the Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Export Administration on technical
questions that affect the level of export
controls applicable to sensors and
instrumentation equipment and
technology.
Agenda
Open Session
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Remarks from the Bureau of
Industry and Security Management.
3. Industry Presentations.
4. New Business.
Closed Session
5. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov no later than October 18,
2022.
A limited number of seats will be
available during the public session of
the meeting. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent that time
permits, members of the public may
present oral statements to the
Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that the
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61561-61564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Understanding the Relationship Between Poverty, Well-
Being and Food Security
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This new collection will
provide the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
with new information about food security and individual and family
circumstances and environmental factors related to poverty in six
persistently poor counties.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 12,
2022.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Michael Burke, Senior Social
Science Research Analyst, Food and Nutrition Service, Braddock Metro
Center II, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. Comments may also
be submitted via email to [email protected]. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday at Braddock Metro
Center II, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collected should be directed to Michael
Burke by email at [email protected] or by phone at (703) 305-4369.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on the following
topics: (1) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (2) the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of the burden on the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
that were used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Title: Understanding the Relationship Between Poverty, Well-Being,
and Food Security.
Form Number: Not applicable.
OMB Number: 0584-NEW.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
[[Page 61562]]
Abstract: This is a new information collection request. The
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the nation's
largest federal program aimed at reducing food insecurity and
increasing access to healthy food. SNAP is administered by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture's (USDA), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
and provides nutrition assistance benefits to program participants, the
majority of whom are children, the elderly, or people with
disabilities. Through this data collection effort, FNS seeks to
understand the interrelated factors that lead to household food
insecurity. Data will be collected in six counties experiencing
persistent intergenerational poverty through a study titled
Understanding the Relationship Between Poverty, Well-Being, and Food
Security.
Understanding the Relationship Between Poverty, Well-Being, and
Food Security will allow FNS to gain a deeper understanding of the
interrelated factors that affect the food security status of SNAP
beneficiaries and SNAP-eligible nonparticipants, information which has
not previously collected in persistently poor counties. The USDA's
Economic Research Service (ERS) defines counties as being persistently
poor if 20 percent or more of county residents were poor at each of
several points in time over a 30-year period, measured by the 1980,
1990, and 2000 censuses and the 2007-2011 American Community Survey.
Examining food insecurity and poverty in these populations will help
FNS better understand the association between SNAP, other USDA-
administered programs, and community-based assistance with well-being
and the food environment. Study objectives include:
Objective 1: Produce descriptive statistics on key
sociodemographic and economic variables, including household food
security in a representative sample of all residents in each of six
persistent-poverty counties.
Objective 2: Produce descriptive statistics on key
sociodemographic and economic variables, including household food
insecurity in two representative stratified subsamples of low and very
low food-secure residents, in each county of six persistent-poverty
counties.
Objective 3: Produce descriptive statistics for each
subgroup in each county on key social, geospatial, and other policy-
actionable elements of well-being and material deprivation associated
with both household food security and SNAP participation.
Objective 4: Characterize the social context and the life
course of individuals, within a multigenerational family unit, as they
define their experiences with food insecurity through In-Depth
Interviews (IDIs).
To ensure a representative probability sample of households in each
of the six persistent poverty counties (each located within six
different states) we propose a two-stage address-based sampling (ABS)
approach in which the primary sampling units (PSUs) will be small
geographic clusters consisting of census-defined blocks or groups of
blocks within the country, and the secondary sampling units will be
residential addresses within the selected PSUs. We will use American
Community Survey (ACS) and SNAP administrative data to obtain an
estimate of SNAP-eligibility by PSU. The study includes several data
collection activities: (1) SNAP administration data; (2) a household
survey; (3) in-depth interviews with household survey respondents; and
(4) focus groups with community stakeholders.
Affected Public: Respondent groups identified include: (a)
Individual/Households (county residents in the six selected counties);
(b) Business--Profit, Non-Profit, or Farm (community stakeholder focus
group participants); (c) State, Local, or Tribal Government (State/
County SNAP agencies).
Estimated Number of Respondents: 15,997. The total estimated number
of individuals/households (I/H) initially contacted is 15,840. Out of
the initial number of I/H contacted 6,600 respondents will be surveyed,
and a subsample of 156 respondents will participate in an in-depth
interview. A total of 48 community stakeholders will participate in
focus groups--36 Business (Profit, Non-Profit, or Farm) and 12 State,
Local, or Tribal Government. 38 police stations (State, Local, or
Tribal Government) will receive notifications that field staff are
working in the area. In addition, 6 State SNAP agencies and 1 County
SNAP agency (State, Local, or Tribal Government) will be asked to
provide SNAP administrative data once to support development of the
survey sampling frame. All 7 are expected to respond.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: All respondents will
be asked to respond to each specific data collection activity only
once. County residents will be asked to participate in one survey; a
subset of interview respondents will be asked to participate in one in-
depth interview. Community stakeholders will be asked to participate in
one focus group, and SNAP agency will be asked to complete one data
request. The estimated number of responses is 5.8 responses per
respondent, including all contact materials.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: The estimate total annual
responses is 115,347 (86,894 respondents and 28,453 non-respondents).
Estimated Time per Response: The estimated time of response varies
from 1 minute (0.0167 hours) to 8 hours, depending on respondent group,
as shown in the table below, with an average estimated time of 0.0673
hours for all participants.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 465,761 minutes
(7,763 hours). See the table below (Table 1) for estimated total annual
burden for each type of respondent.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
[[Page 61563]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12OC22.014
[[Page 61564]]
Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-22149 Filed 10-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C