Safety Zone; Green River, Henderson, KY, 60267-60269 [2022-21626]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11G,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and
effective September 15, 2022, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY D Niagara Falls, NY [Amended]
Niagara Falls International Airport, NY
(Lat. 43°06′27″ N, long. 78°56′45″ W)
Niagara Falls Intl: RWY 28R–LOC
(Lat. 43°06′34″ N, long. 78°58′19″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,100 feet MSL
within a 4.6-mile radius of Niagara Falls
International Airport, and within 1 mile each
side of the 090° bearing from the Niagara
Falls Intl: RWY 28R–LOC extending from the
4.6-mile radius to 4.8 miles east of the
airport, excluding the portion outside the
United States and that airspace which
coincides with the Buffalo, NY, Class C
airspace. This Class D airspace area is
effective during specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be published continuously in the
Chart Supplement.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES
*
*
*
16:20 Oct 04, 2022
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E5 Buffalo, NY [Amended]
Buffalo Niagara International Airport, NY
(Lat. 42°56′26″ N, long. 78°43′50″ W)
Niagara Falls International Airport, NY
(Lat. 43°06′27″ N, long. 78°56′45″ W)
KATHI NDB
(Lat. 43°06′33″ N, long. 78°50′18″ W)
Akron Airport/Jesson Field, NY
(Lat. 43°01′16″ N, long. 78°28′57″ W)
Buffalo-Lancaster Regional Airport, NY
(Lat. 42°55′19″ N, long. 78°36′43″ W)
Buffalo Airfield, NY
(Lat. 42°51′43″ N, long. 78°43′00″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.5-mile
radius of the Buffalo Niagara International
Airport, and within a 7.1-mile radius of
Niagara Falls International Airport, and
within 8.2 miles north and 7 miles south of
the 090° bearing from the KATHI NDB
extending from the KATHI NDB to 16.8 miles
east of the KATHI NDB, and within a 6.3mile radius of Akron Airport/Jesson Field,
and within a 6.3-mile radius of BuffaloLancaster Regional Airport, and within a 6.3mile radius of Buffalo Airfield.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September
28, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022–21433 Filed 10–4–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG–2022–0796]
Safety Zone; Green River, Henderson,
KY
*
AEA NY E2 Niagara Falls, NY [Amended]
Niagara Falls International Airport, NY
(Lat. 43°06′27″ N, long. 78°56′45″ W)
Niagara Falls Intl: RWY 28R–LOC
(Lat. 43°06′34″ N, long. 78°58′19″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 4.6-mile radius of Niagara
Falls International Airport, and within 1 mile
each side of the 090° bearing from the
Niagara Falls Intl: RWY 28R–LOC extending
from the 4.6-mile radius to 4.8 miles east of
the airport, excluding the portion outside the
United States and that airspace which
coincides with the Buffalo, NY, Class C
airspace. This Class E airspace area is
effective during specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air
Missions. The effective date and time will
thereafter be published continuously in the
Chart Supplement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
RIN 1625–AA00
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as Surface Areas.
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters from Mile Marker 7.0
to 9.0 on the Green River, outside of
Henderson, KY. The safety zone is
needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by the bridge
demolition. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from October 5, 2022,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60267
through 6 p.m. October 31, 2022. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from 6 a.m. October 3,
2022, through October 5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022–
0796 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer William Miller,
Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 502–779–5347, email
William.R.Miller@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an
agency to issue a rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
when the agency for good cause finds
that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
demolition is planned for the US 60 East
bridge across Green River, and a date
was not decided until recently. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM
because we must establish this safety
zone by October 3, 2022.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule is impracticable because
immediate action is needed to protect
personnel and vessels from potential
safety hazards associated with the
demolition of the US 60 East Green
River Bridge.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60268
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the bridge demolition
starting October 3, 2022, will be a safety
concern for anyone within Mile Marker
(MM) 7.0 to MM 9.0 of the Green River.
This rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety
zone while the bridge is being
demolished.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 6 a.m. on October 3rd, 2022,
through 6 p.m. on October 31st, 2022.
The safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within MM 7.0 to MM 9.0 of the
Green River. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while the bridge is
being repaired. No vessel or person will
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the temporary safety zone.
Vessel traffic will be allowed to transit
safely when the closure is not in effect,
and will only be stopped for short
periods while bridge demolition is
underway, as well as during cleanup of
any debris fallout that may cause a
hazard to navigation. Specific dates of
closure will be listed in the Broadcast
Notice to Mariners closer to the date of
the demolition.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Oct 04, 2022
Jkt 259001
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization,
or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone lasting 28 days
that will prohibit entry within MM 7.0
to MM 9.0 on the Green River, while
operations involving demolition and
cleanup are underway. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(d) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination will be
produced in the docket the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0199]
RIN 1625–AA11
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Regulated Navigation Area;
Environmental Protection Agency
Superfund Site, Point Ruston,
Commencement Bay, Tacoma, WA
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
AGENCY:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Add § 165.T08–0796 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0796 Safety Zone; Green River,
Henderson, KY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Green
River, from surface to bottom, from Mile
Marker 7.0 to Mile Marker 9.0.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in § 165.23, you
may not enter the safety zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Ohio River (COTP) or the COTP’s
designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units
under the operational control of USCG
Sector Ohio Valley.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative via Channel 16 on VHF
radio. Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6 a.m. October 3,
2022, to 6 p.m. October 31, 2022.
Dated: September 28, 2022.
Heather R. Mattern,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2022–21626 Filed 10–4–22; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a permanent regulated
navigation area (RNA) for all navigable
waters within the area of lines drawn
from Dune Park downward to the Point
Ruston Historic Ferry dock on
Commencement Bay, WA. This RNA is
necessary to preserve the integrity of
protective sediment caps placed in
multiple areas within this waterway as
part of the remediation process at the
Commencement Bay, Nearshore/
Tideflats Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Superfund Cleanup Site.
This RNA prohibits activities which
would disturb the seabed, such as
anchoring, dragging, trawling, spudding,
or other activities that involve
disrupting the integrity of the sediment
cap, unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Puget Sound or their
Designated Representative. The RNA
will not affect vessels transiting or
navigating within this waterway.
DATES: This rule is effective November
4, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022–
0199 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Rob Nakama, Sector Puget
Sound Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
206–217–6089, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
§ Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Oct 04, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
U.S.C.
60269
United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On December 6, 2021, the United
States EPA Region 10 notified the Coast
Guard that it requests the establishment
of an RNA or ‘‘No Anchor Zone’’ for
commercial vehicles within the
Operable Unit 6 (OU6) Asarco sediment
cap in the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflat (CB–NT) Superfund
Site. This RNA will prohibit activities
that could disrupt the integrity of the
engineered sediment caps that have
been placed within the OU6 Asarco
sediment cap. These activities include
vessel grounding, anchoring, dragging,
trawling, spudding or other such
activities that would disturb the
integrity of the sediment caps.
In response, on June 8, 2022, the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
‘‘Regulated Navigation Area;
Environmental Protection Agency
Superfund Site, Point Ruston,
Commencement Bay, Tacoma, WA’’ (87
FR 34834). There we stated why we
issued the NPRM, and invited
comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this RNA. During the
comment period that ended August 8,
2022, we received one comment.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP)
has determined that establishing a
permanent regulation restricting
activities such as anchoring, dragging,
trawling, or other activities will prevent
disrupting the integrity of sediment caps
located within the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflat, WA.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received one
comment on our NPRM published June
8, 2022. The comment was in support of
the proposed rule. There are no changes
in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a RNA to
prohibit certain activities including
anchoring, dragging, trawling, and other
activities that involve disrupting the
integrity of sediment caps located
within the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflat, WA. No vessel or
person would be permitted to perform
the aforementioned activities without
obtaining permission from the Captain
of the Port, Puget Sound (COTP) or a
designated representative.
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 5, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60267-60269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21626]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[USCG-2022-0796]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Green River, Henderson, KY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters from Mile Marker 7.0 to 9.0 on the Green River,
outside of Henderson, KY. The safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards
created by the bridge demolition. Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 5,
2022, through 6 p.m. October 31, 2022. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from 6 a.m. October 3, 2022, through October
5, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0796 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer William Miller, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 502-779-5347, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because demolition is planned for the US 60
East bridge across Green River, and a date was not decided until
recently. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by October 3, 2022.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule is impracticable because immediate action is needed to
protect personnel and vessels from potential safety hazards associated
with the demolition of the US 60 East Green River Bridge.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
[[Page 60268]]
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the bridge demolition starting October 3, 2022,
will be a safety concern for anyone within Mile Marker (MM) 7.0 to MM
9.0 of the Green River. This rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the
safety zone while the bridge is being demolished.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 6 a.m. on October 3rd,
2022, through 6 p.m. on October 31st, 2022. The safety zone will cover
all navigable waters within MM 7.0 to MM 9.0 of the Green River. The
duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable waters while the bridge is being
repaired. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the temporary safety zone. Vessel traffic
will be allowed to transit safely when the closure is not in effect,
and will only be stopped for short periods while bridge demolition is
underway, as well as during cleanup of any debris fallout that may
cause a hazard to navigation. Specific dates of closure will be listed
in the Broadcast Notice to Mariners closer to the date of the
demolition.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone lasting 28 days that will prohibit entry within
MM 7.0 to MM 9.0 on the Green River, while operations involving
demolition and cleanup are underway. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(d) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination will be produced in the
docket the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
[[Page 60269]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0796 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0796 Safety Zone; Green River, Henderson, KY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Green River, from surface to bottom, from Mile Marker 7.0 to Mile
Marker 9.0.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
Sec. 165.23, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio
River (COTP) or the COTP's designated representative. A designated
representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) assigned to units under the operational control of
USCG Sector Ohio Valley.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative via Channel 16 on VHF radio. Those in the safety zone
must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
October 3, 2022, to 6 p.m. October 31, 2022.
Dated: September 28, 2022.
Heather R. Mattern,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2022-21626 Filed 10-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P