Air Plan Approval; Delaware; Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From Solvent Cleaning and Drying, 60102-60104 [2022-21254]
Download as PDF
60102
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
James F. Lane,
Senior Advisor, Office of the Secretary
Delegated the Authority to Perform the
Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for the Office Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2022–21634 Filed 10–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2021–0944; FRL–9174–02–
R3]
Air Plan Approval; Delaware; Control
of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions From Solvent Cleaning and
Drying
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Delaware.
These revisions pertain to the reduction
of volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emissions from cold solvent cleaning
operations. EPA is approving these
revisions to the Delaware SIP in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 3, 2022.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2021–0944. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov,
or please contact the person identified
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section for additional
availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mallory Moser, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, Four
Penn Center, 1600 John F. Kennedy
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. The telephone number is (215)
814–2030. Ms. Moser can also be
reached via electronic mail at
Moser.Mallory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On June 27, 2022 (87 FR 38044), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of
Delaware. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of a SIP revision that updates
the solvent cleaning control
requirements based upon the 2012
Ozone Transport Commission (OTC)
Model Rule. The SIP revision was
submitted by Delaware on October 13,
2021, requesting that EPA incorporate
the Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Control’s (DNREC’s)
revisions to Title 7 of Delaware’s
Administrative Code (7 DE Admin.
Code) 1124 Section 33.0—Solvent
Cleaning and Drying into the Delaware
SIP (Section 33.0). In response to the
NPRM, EPA received one comment on
its June 27, 2022, proposed rulemaking,
which is addressed below.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
The SIP revision consists of an
amendment to Section 33.0.
Specifically, the amendment updates
the solvent cleaning control
requirements based upon the 2012
Ozone Transport Commission Model
Rule.
The OTC, of which Delaware is a
member, is an organization established
by Congress under the CAA. Among
other things, the OTC develops model
rules for the member states to use to
reduce the emissions of ground level
ozone precursors. In 2001 the OTC
released the 2001 Model Rule for
Solvent Cleaning, (2001 Model Rule).
The 2001 Model Rule is that basis for
the version of 7 DE Admin. Code 1124,
Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions, Section 33.0—Solvent
Cleaning and Drying that were
previously approved in the Delaware
SIP.1 After a release of the Control
Techniques Guideline (CTG): Industrial
Cleaning Solvents by the EPA in 2006,
proposing new VOC limits for solvent
1 See
PO 00000
67 FR 70315 (November 22, 2002).
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cleaning, the OTC convened a group of
experts that suggested a more stringent
model rule than what is provided in the
CTG and the 2001 Model Rule. The OTC
then developed the 2012 Model Rule for
Solvent Degreasing. The provisions set
forth in Section 33.0, which is based on
the 2012 Model Rule, are more stringent
than those previously included in the
Delaware SIP and form the basis of the
regulation we are approving to include
in the Delaware SIP in this rule. For
instance, the provisions eliminate an
existing exemption by adding
provisions that apply to owners or
operators of a solvent cleaning machine
that uses any volume of solvent
containing VOC. The provisions also
reduce the solvent VOC concentration
from 100 percent to 25 grams per liter
of non-VOC solution for most
applications.
By removing an applicability
exemption and decreasing the allowable
solvent VOC concentration, the 2012
model rule is expected to decrease
emissions of VOCs. This reduction of
VOC emissions from solvent cleaning
operations will further reduce the
formation of ground-ozone because
ground-level ozone is formed through
the reaction of VOCs and other
compounds in the air in the presence of
sunlight. High levels of ground-level
ozone can cause or worsen difficulty in
breathing, asthma and other serious
respiratory problems. In addition to
improving public health and the
environment, decreased emissions of
VOCs, and therefore subsequently
ground-level ozone, will contribute to
the attainment of the ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
Delaware is amending its SIP to add
Section 33.0.
III. EPA’s Response to Comments
Received
EPA provided a 30-day review and
comment period for this action in the
Proposal. The comment period ended
on July 27, 2022. EPA received one
comment, which is summarized and
addressed below.
Comment: The comment requests
additional background on the
development and interpretation of the
‘‘Federal’’ 2012 OTC model rule in the
context of the commenter seeking
advice with regard to acquiring a piece
of equipment. In addition, the
commenter claims there could be an
economic impact to businesses if
affected devices cannot efficiently
operate at the 25 grams per liter criteria
set forth in the rule. The commenter
speculates using a solvent solution with
lower VOC could lead to longer run
time of the cleaning devices, which may
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
result in an increase of fugitive
emissions. The commenter asks if EPA
has certified that the rule does not have
a Significant Economic Impact on a
Substantial Number of Small Entities
(SISNOSE) and if so, if that certification
is based on studies that evaluated how
effective or ineffective the reduced VOC
solution will be for the purposes it is
used for (i.e. parts cleaning).
Response: Initially, the comment is
incorrect that the OTC model rule is a
Federal rule. As explained by the OTC,
the OTC model rules and programs are
developed by the OTC (not EPA) and are
not effective in an individual state until
‘‘taken by the individual states through
their own rule adoption processes
conforming to their state’s
requirements.’’ 2
The technical issues raised by the
commenter raise issues that appear to be
unique to the commenter’s specific
interest of how the rule will apply to its
acquiring and operating a parts cleaner,
are not relevant to EPA’s approval of
Section 33.0 as being more stringent
than solvent cleaning rules in the
current Delaware SIP. EPA therefore
does not consider these to be significant
adverse comments on this action and
consequently EPA will not be
responding to the technical
implementation questions in this rule.
The commenter’s request for SISNOSE
information is also not relevant because
neither the promulgation of Section
33.0, nor the development of the 2012
Model Rule by the OTC was a Federal
rule. Because the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., only applies
to Federal rulemakings, neither the OTC
or the state of Delaware were required
to prepare a SISNOSE for either
promulgation of Section 33.0 or the
2012 Model Rule.3 EPA does not need
to prepare a SISNOSE for this rule,
because the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
since this action merely approves state
law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those already
imposed by state law.
The commenter, while not asserting
that EPA should disapprove Section
33.0 as a SIP revision, does however
assert that they ‘‘have been told that in
some types of solvent solutions, too low
of a VOC will lead to poor results
2 See
otcair.org/OTC_process.asp.
approval of Section 33.0 as a revision to
the SIP is a Federal rulemaking, however, a SIP
approval merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law, which does not trigger obligations under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
3 EPA’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
regardless of how long the batch is run
for. Even if extended operations of
degreasers/parts cleaners can be equally
effective, it does raise the question in
my mind that businesses may end up
generating more fugitive emissions by
nature of the prolonged device
operations (?).’’ The commenter does
not offer any factual support for, or data
to back up an increase of fugitive
emissions or indicate a baseline from
which the commenter believes a
baseline should be measured.
Additionally, the commenter does not
indicate that the 40.87 tons/year
emission reduction calculated by
Delaware, and included in the docket
for this rule, are incorrect or that
Section 33.0 would be less stringent
than the rule in the current Delaware
SIP.4 Comments, that are no more than
broad assertions that an agency ‘‘got it
wrong,’’ do not provide a basis for EPA
to change its decision. See, e.g.,
International Fabricare Institute v.
E.P.A., 972 F.2d 384 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
Therefore, this comment provides no
basis for EPA to change its decision that
Section 33.0 is an approvable revision to
the Delaware SIP.5
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving, as a revision, the
State of Delaware’s October 13, 2021,
SIP submittal reducing VOC emissions
from cold solvent cleaning operations.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of Delaware’s solvent
cleaning and drying regulation,
described in 7 DE Admin. Code 1124
Section 33.0. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
4 See the Department Response to Comment 3 in
Delaware’s Technical Response Memorandum for
more information on Delaware’s emissions
reduction calculation.
5 EPA nevertheless notes that if equipment cannot
efficiently operate at the VOC content criteria
included in DE’s SIP revision, a higher VOC content
concentration for cleaning solution may be used
with a VOC capture and control device that would
control the VOC air emissions to no more than
would be experienced if the cleaning solution were
VOC compliant in absence of the capture and
control device. See 7 DE Admin Code 1124 Section
33.3.7.3. Therefore, the operator has the option to
use lower VOC content cleaning solutions or deploy
appropriate control devices. There are several lowVOC solvent studies referenced in Delaware’s
technical support document, which can be found in
the docket for this rule. These studies identify low
VOC solvent alternatives that performed effectively
for various industries and were cost effective.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60103
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.6
INFORMATION CONTACT
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
6 62
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
04OCR1
60104
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 5, 2022. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action, which
pertains to the reduction of VOC
emissions from cold solvent cleaning
operations in Delaware, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart I—Delaware
2. In § 52.420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Section 33.0’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS AND STATUTES IN THE DELAWARE SIP
State regulation
(7 DNREC 1100)
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Additional explanation
*
*
1124 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
*
*
Section 33.0 ...............................
*
*
*
*
Solvent Metal Cleaning and Drying.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–21254 Filed 10–3–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
08/11/2021
*
*
October 4, 2022, [INSERT FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION].
*
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 9
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
[PS Docket Nos. 18–261, 17–239; GN Docket
No. 11–117; DA 22–952; FR ID 105354]
Implementing Kari’s Law and RAY
BAUM’S Act; Inquiry Concerning 911
Access, Routing, and Location in
Enterprise Communications Systems;
Amending the Definition of
Interconnected VoIP Service;
Correction
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
On December 5, 2019, the
Federal Communications Commission
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 03, 2022
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
revised Commission rules. That
document incorrectly listed a crossreference. This document corrects the
final regulations.
DATES: Effective October 4, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, contact Jill
Coogan, Attorney Advisor, Policy and
Licensing Division, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418–
1499 or via email at Jill.Coogan@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Erratum, in PS Docket Nos. 18–261, 17–
239; GN Docket No. 11–117; DA 22–952,
released on September 13, 2022. This
document corrects the Commission’s
final rules document, published
December 5, 2019 (84 FR 66716). This
is the second set of corrections. The first
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60102-60104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21254]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0944; FRL-9174-02-R3]
Air Plan Approval; Delaware; Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions From Solvent Cleaning and Drying
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Delaware.
These revisions pertain to the reduction of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) emissions from cold solvent cleaning operations. EPA is approving
these revisions to the Delaware SIP in accordance with the requirements
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 3, 2022.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0944. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mallory Moser, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Four Penn Center, 1600
John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814-2030. Ms. Moser can also be reached via
electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On June 27, 2022 (87 FR 38044), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Delaware. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of a SIP revision that updates the solvent cleaning control
requirements based upon the 2012 Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) Model
Rule. The SIP revision was submitted by Delaware on October 13, 2021,
requesting that EPA incorporate the Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control's (DNREC's) revisions to Title 7 of Delaware's
Administrative Code (7 DE Admin. Code) 1124 Section 33.0--Solvent
Cleaning and Drying into the Delaware SIP (Section 33.0). In response
to the NPRM, EPA received one comment on its June 27, 2022, proposed
rulemaking, which is addressed below.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
The SIP revision consists of an amendment to Section 33.0.
Specifically, the amendment updates the solvent cleaning control
requirements based upon the 2012 Ozone Transport Commission Model Rule.
The OTC, of which Delaware is a member, is an organization
established by Congress under the CAA. Among other things, the OTC
develops model rules for the member states to use to reduce the
emissions of ground level ozone precursors. In 2001 the OTC released
the 2001 Model Rule for Solvent Cleaning, (2001 Model Rule). The 2001
Model Rule is that basis for the version of 7 DE Admin. Code 1124,
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions, Section 33.0--Solvent
Cleaning and Drying that were previously approved in the Delaware
SIP.\1\ After a release of the Control Techniques Guideline (CTG):
Industrial Cleaning Solvents by the EPA in 2006, proposing new VOC
limits for solvent cleaning, the OTC convened a group of experts that
suggested a more stringent model rule than what is provided in the CTG
and the 2001 Model Rule. The OTC then developed the 2012 Model Rule for
Solvent Degreasing. The provisions set forth in Section 33.0, which is
based on the 2012 Model Rule, are more stringent than those previously
included in the Delaware SIP and form the basis of the regulation we
are approving to include in the Delaware SIP in this rule. For
instance, the provisions eliminate an existing exemption by adding
provisions that apply to owners or operators of a solvent cleaning
machine that uses any volume of solvent containing VOC. The provisions
also reduce the solvent VOC concentration from 100 percent to 25 grams
per liter of non-VOC solution for most applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 67 FR 70315 (November 22, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By removing an applicability exemption and decreasing the allowable
solvent VOC concentration, the 2012 model rule is expected to decrease
emissions of VOCs. This reduction of VOC emissions from solvent
cleaning operations will further reduce the formation of ground-ozone
because ground-level ozone is formed through the reaction of VOCs and
other compounds in the air in the presence of sunlight. High levels of
ground-level ozone can cause or worsen difficulty in breathing, asthma
and other serious respiratory problems. In addition to improving public
health and the environment, decreased emissions of VOCs, and therefore
subsequently ground-level ozone, will contribute to the attainment of
the ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Delaware is
amending its SIP to add Section 33.0.
III. EPA's Response to Comments Received
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for this action in
the Proposal. The comment period ended on July 27, 2022. EPA received
one comment, which is summarized and addressed below.
Comment: The comment requests additional background on the
development and interpretation of the ``Federal'' 2012 OTC model rule
in the context of the commenter seeking advice with regard to acquiring
a piece of equipment. In addition, the commenter claims there could be
an economic impact to businesses if affected devices cannot efficiently
operate at the 25 grams per liter criteria set forth in the rule. The
commenter speculates using a solvent solution with lower VOC could lead
to longer run time of the cleaning devices, which may
[[Page 60103]]
result in an increase of fugitive emissions. The commenter asks if EPA
has certified that the rule does not have a Significant Economic Impact
on a Substantial Number of Small Entities (SISNOSE) and if so, if that
certification is based on studies that evaluated how effective or
ineffective the reduced VOC solution will be for the purposes it is
used for (i.e. parts cleaning).
Response: Initially, the comment is incorrect that the OTC model
rule is a Federal rule. As explained by the OTC, the OTC model rules
and programs are developed by the OTC (not EPA) and are not effective
in an individual state until ``taken by the individual states through
their own rule adoption processes conforming to their state's
requirements.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See otcair.org/OTC_process.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The technical issues raised by the commenter raise issues that
appear to be unique to the commenter's specific interest of how the
rule will apply to its acquiring and operating a parts cleaner, are not
relevant to EPA's approval of Section 33.0 as being more stringent than
solvent cleaning rules in the current Delaware SIP. EPA therefore does
not consider these to be significant adverse comments on this action
and consequently EPA will not be responding to the technical
implementation questions in this rule. The commenter's request for
SISNOSE information is also not relevant because neither the
promulgation of Section 33.0, nor the development of the 2012 Model
Rule by the OTC was a Federal rule. Because the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., only applies to Federal rulemakings, neither
the OTC or the state of Delaware were required to prepare a SISNOSE for
either promulgation of Section 33.0 or the 2012 Model Rule.\3\ EPA does
not need to prepare a SISNOSE for this rule, because the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities since this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
already imposed by state law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA's approval of Section 33.0 as a revision to the SIP is a
Federal rulemaking, however, a SIP approval merely approves state
law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law, which does not
trigger obligations under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenter, while not asserting that EPA should disapprove
Section 33.0 as a SIP revision, does however assert that they ``have
been told that in some types of solvent solutions, too low of a VOC
will lead to poor results regardless of how long the batch is run for.
Even if extended operations of degreasers/parts cleaners can be equally
effective, it does raise the question in my mind that businesses may
end up generating more fugitive emissions by nature of the prolonged
device operations (?).'' The commenter does not offer any factual
support for, or data to back up an increase of fugitive emissions or
indicate a baseline from which the commenter believes a baseline should
be measured. Additionally, the commenter does not indicate that the
40.87 tons/year emission reduction calculated by Delaware, and included
in the docket for this rule, are incorrect or that Section 33.0 would
be less stringent than the rule in the current Delaware SIP.\4\
Comments, that are no more than broad assertions that an agency ``got
it wrong,'' do not provide a basis for EPA to change its decision. See,
e.g., International Fabricare Institute v. E.P.A., 972 F.2d 384 (D.C.
Cir. 1992). Therefore, this comment provides no basis for EPA to change
its decision that Section 33.0 is an approvable revision to the
Delaware SIP.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the Department Response to Comment 3 in Delaware's
Technical Response Memorandum for more information on Delaware's
emissions reduction calculation.
\5\ EPA nevertheless notes that if equipment cannot efficiently
operate at the VOC content criteria included in DE's SIP revision, a
higher VOC content concentration for cleaning solution may be used
with a VOC capture and control device that would control the VOC air
emissions to no more than would be experienced if the cleaning
solution were VOC compliant in absence of the capture and control
device. See 7 DE Admin Code 1124 Section 33.3.7.3. Therefore, the
operator has the option to use lower VOC content cleaning solutions
or deploy appropriate control devices. There are several low-VOC
solvent studies referenced in Delaware's technical support document,
which can be found in the docket for this rule. These studies
identify low VOC solvent alternatives that performed effectively for
various industries and were cost effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving, as a revision, the State of Delaware's October
13, 2021, SIP submittal reducing VOC emissions from cold solvent
cleaning operations.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Delaware's
solvent cleaning and drying regulation, described in 7 DE Admin. Code
1124 Section 33.0. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for
inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's
approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to
the SIP compilation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because
[[Page 60104]]
application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA;
and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 5, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action, which pertains to the reduction of VOC emissions
from cold solvent cleaning operations in Delaware, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart I--Delaware
0
2. In Sec. 52.420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Section 33.0'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Regulations and Statutes in the Delaware SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State regulation (7 DNREC State EPA approval
1100) Title/subject effective date date Additional explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1124 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 33.0.................. Solvent Metal 08/11/2021 October 4, 2022, ...........................
Cleaning and [INSERT FEDERAL
Drying. REGISTER
CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-21254 Filed 10-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P