U.S. Treasury Securities-State and Local Government Series, 59353-59363 [2022-21173]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lands, Mineral royalties, Oil and gas
exploration, Public lands—mineral
resources, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
the audit by one or more of the methods
specified in 30 CFR 1217.10.
*
*
*
*
*
30 CFR Part 1208
Subpart J—Indian Coal
Continental shelf, Government
contracts, Mineral royalties, Public
lands—minerals resources, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
■
4. Amend § 1206.450 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 1206.450 What is the purpose and scope
of this subpart?
*
30 CFR Part 1217
Coal, Government contracts, Mineral
royalties, Oil and gas exploration,
Public lands—mineral resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
30 CFR Part 1220
*
*
*
*
(d) ONRR may audit and order you to
adjust all royalty payments. ONRR or an
authorized Tribe may require you to
provide records for the audit pursuant
to 30 CFR 1217.10.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1208—SALE OF FEDERAL
ROYALTY OIL
Accounting, Continental shelf,
Government contracts, Mineral
royalties, Oil and gas exploration,
Public lands—mineral resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
5. The authority citation for part 1208
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, ONRR proposes to amend 30
CFR parts 1206, 1208, 1217, and 1220 as
set forth below:
PART 1206—PRODUCT VALUATION
Authority 5 U.S.C. 301 et seq.; 30 U.S.C.
181 et seq., 351 et seq., 1701 et seq.; 31 U.S.C.
9701; 41 U.S.C. 601 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1301
et seq., 1331 et seq., and 1801 et seq.
Subpart A—General Provisions
■
6. Revise § 1208.15 to read as follows:
§ 1208.15
1. The authority citation for part 1206
continues to read as follows:
■
Audits.
2. Amend § 1206.250 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Audits of the accounts and books of
lessees, operators, payors, and/or
purchasers of royalty oil taken in kind
may be made annually or at such other
times as may be directed by ONRR.
Such audits will be for the purpose of
determining compliance with applicable
statutes, regulations, and royalty oil
contracts. ONRR may require you to
provide records for the audit pursuant
to 30 CFR 1217.10.
§ 1206.250 What is the purpose and scope
of this subpart?
PART 1217—AUDITS AND
INSPECTIONS
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 et seq.; 25 U.S.C.
396 et seq., 396a et seq., 2101 et seq.; 30
U.S.C. 181 et seq., 351 et seq., 1001 et seq.,
1701 et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 9701.; 43 U.S.C. 1301
et seq., 1331 et seq., and 1801 et seq.
Subpart F—Federal Coal
■
*
*
*
*
(d) ONRR may audit and order you to
adjust all royalty payments. ONRR or an
authorized State may require you to
provide records for the audit by one or
more of the methods specified in 30
CFR 1217.10.
3. Amend § 1206.350 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 1206.350 What is the purpose and scope
of this subpart?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) ONRR may audit and order you to
adjust all royalty and fee payments.
ONRR or an authorized State or Tribe
may require you to provide records for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
7. The authority citation for part 1217
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 35 Stat. 312; 35 Stat. 781, as
amended; secs. 32, 6, 26, 41 Stat. 450, 753,
1248; secs. 1, 2, 3, 44 Stat. 301, as amended;
secs. 6, 3, 44 Stat. 659, 710; secs. 1, 2, 3, 44
Stat. 1057; 47 Stat. 1487; 49 Stat. 1482, 1250,
1967, 2026; 52 Stat. 347; sec. 10, 53 Stat.
1196, as amended; 56 Stat. 273; sec. 10, 61
Stat. 915; sec. 3, 63 Stat. 683; 64 Stat. 311;
25 U.S.C. 396, 396a–f, 30 U.S.C. 189, 271,
281, 293, 359. Interpret or apply secs. 5, 5,
44 Stat. 302, 1058, as amended; 58 Stat. 483–
485; 5 U.S.C. 301, 16 U.S.C. 508b, 30 U.S.C.
189, 192c, 271, 281, 293, 359, 43 U.S.C. 387,
unless otherwise noted.
8. Add subpart A, consisting of
§ 1217.10, to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 1217.10
audit.
Providing records during an
(a) The Office of Natural Resources
Revenue (ONRR) or an authorized State
or Tribe may specify the method an
auditee must use to provide records for
all audits conducted under this chapter,
statute, or agreement. The methods may
include one or more of the following:
(1) Inspect records at an auditee’s
place of business during normal
business hours;
(2) Send records using secure
electronic means. When requesting that
records be provided electronically,
ONRR or the authorized State or Tribe
will specify the format in which the
records shall be produced, directions for
electronic transmission, and
instructions to ensure secure
transmission; or
(3) Deliver hard copy records using
the U.S. Postal Service, special courier,
overnight mail, or other delivery service
to an address specified by ONRR or an
authorized State or Tribe.
(b) [Reserved]
PART 1220—ACCOUNTING
PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING
NET PROFIT SHARE PAYMENT FOR
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL
AND GAS LEASE
9. The authority citation for part 1220
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 205, Pub. L. 95–372, 92
Stat. 643 (43 U.S.C. 1337).
10. Amend § 1220.033 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 1220.033
Audits.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) ONRR or its authorized agent may
require you to provide records for the
audit by one or more of the methods
specified in 30 CFR 1217.10.
[FR Doc. 2022–20495 Filed 9–29–22; 8:45 am]
*
Subpart H—Geothermal Resources
59353
BILLING CODE 4335–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
31 CFR Part 344
[FISCAL–2022–0002]
RIN 1530–AA25
U.S. Treasury Securities—State and
Local Government Series
Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
with request for comments.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
59354
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
The Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) is issuing this
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend the regulations governing
State and Local Government Series
(SLGS) securities. Treasury is proposing
to amend the SLGS regulations to
address misuse of the SLGS program,
most notably the use of program
flexibilities by tax-advantaged entities,
usually a state or local government,
investing in SLGS securities to create
impermissible cost-free options. This
NPRM proposes amendments to existing
regulations to help stop such activity. In
addition, this NPRM proposes
administrative changes to increase
efficiencies in the program.
DATES: To be considered, comments
must be received on or before November
29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov
(via the online comment form for this
NPRM as posted within Docket ID No.
FISCAL–2022–0002 at
www.regulations.gov, the Federal erulemaking portal);
U.S. Mail: Mike Goodwin, Division
Director, or Jared Waters, Program
Manager, Bureau of the Fiscal Service,
P.O. Box 396, Parkersburg, WV 26106–
1328.
All submissions received must be
addressed to the Bureau of the Fiscal
Service and include the Docket ID
Number FISCAL–2022–0002. All
comments received will be posted
without change to www.regulations.gov.
The posting will include any personal
information that you provide in the
submission.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Goodwin, Division Director, Jared
Waters, Program Manager, Brian Metz,
Senior Counsel, or Elizabeth Spears,
Senior Counsel, at SLGS@
fiscal.treasury.gov or (304) 480–5299.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Background
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
A. SLGS Program
SLGS securities are non-marketable
Treasury securities that are available
only for purchase by an Issuer, as
defined in 31 CFR 344.1, of taxadvantaged securities (Issuers). The
purpose of the SLGS program is to assist
Issuers when investing proceeds from
bond issuances in complying with yield
restriction and rebate requirements
applicable to tax-advantaged securities
under the Internal Revenue Code.
Because an Issuer’s bond issuance
process is characterized by several
variables that may take a number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
weeks to resolve, flexibility has been
built into the SLGS program to allow
Issuers to customize the SLGS security
terms such as interest rate, maturity,
and issue date. Over the years, Treasury
has amended the SLGS regulations in an
effort to maintain SLGS securities as an
attractive investment alternative to
marketable securities for Issuers, while
also preventing the program from being
misused by Issuers and from becoming
burdensome to Treasury financing
operations.
Treasury has repeatedly stated that
speculation by Issuers in interest rate
movements between marketable
Treasury securities and/or SLGS
securities is both inconsistent with the
purpose of the SLGS program and is
prohibited by the SLGS regulations.
Despite Treasury’s prohibition on such
speculation, impermissible transactions
have been observed within the SLGS
program. Treasury attributes the
impermissible transactions to the
exploitation of certain flexibilities in the
program. The proposed amendments to
the regulations are to reinforce to Issuers
the prohibition on these transactions
and to make it less likely that SLGS
investors can use the flexibilities to
impermissibly create cost-free options
based on interest rate movements. This
NPRM identifies in Section E the
observed cost-free options that are
prohibited and proposes amendments to
reduce Issuers’ flexibility in structuring
the terms of SLGS securities to create
such cost-free options. Treasury is also
proposing other changes that are
designed to improve the administration
of the SLGS program.
B. Flexibilities Added to the SLGS
Program in 1996
In 1996, Treasury revised the
regulations governing SLGS securities to
make the program a more flexible and
competitive investment vehicle for
Issuers in a manner that was intended
to be cost effective for them. 61 FR
55690 (October 28, 1996). The 1996
final rule eliminated several
requirements such as the Issuer’s
certifications to purchase SLGS
securities. In addition, the regulations
were amended to permit an Issuer to
subscribe for SLGS securities and
subsequently cancel the subscription,
without a monetary penalty, under
certain circumstances
C. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 1997
In 1997, Treasury amended the
regulations to clarify that certain
transactions in which Issuers previously
used subscriptions for SLGS securities
to provide a cost-free interest rate hedge
or option were prohibited. 62 FR 46444
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(September 3, 1997). The 1997 final rule
added §§ 344.2(f)(1) and (f)(2), stating
that it is impermissible to subscribe for
SLGS securities for deposit in a
defeasance escrow or fund if: (1) the
amount of SLGS securities subscribed
for, plus the securities already in the
escrow or fund, plus the amount the
Issuer has acquired or has a right to
acquire for deposit in the escrow or
fund, exceeds the total amount of
securities needed to fund such escrow
or fund, and (2) the securities in the
escrow or fund are subject to an
agreement conditioned on changes in
the interest rate on marketable Treasury
securities.
D. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 2004
Treasury has often noted that the
prices established for SLGS securities
do not include the cost of an option.
Although Treasury considered whether
to allow optionality on SLGS securities
if Treasury were compensated, Treasury
concluded in a 2004 NPRM that there
was no practical way to charge for the
value of an option. 69 FR 58756
(September 30, 2004).
E. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 2005
In a 2005 final rule, Treasury
amended the regulations to prohibit
practices that were variations on the use
of SLGS securities to create some form
of a cost-free option. These practices
included: (1) the redemption before
maturity or sale of securities to reinvest
in a higher yielding SLGS or marketable
security, and (2) the cancellation of
SLGS subscriptions upon rising interest
rates and re-subscribing for SLGS
securities at a higher yield. 70 FR 37904
(June 30, 2005). In an attempt to stop
recurring misuse of the SLGS program,
the preamble reaffirmed that it is
‘‘inappropriate to use the SLGS
securities program as an option’’ and
that such practice is ‘‘contrary to the
purpose of the program.’’
Under current regulations, Issuers are
not allowed to create a cost-free option.
31 CFR 344.2(f) provides: ‘‘What are
some practices involving SLGS
securities that are not permitted? (1) In
General. For SLGS securities subscribed
for on or after August 15, 2005, it is
impermissible: (i) To use the SLGS
program to create a cost-free
option. . . .’’
II. Treasury’s Proposals To Address
Creation of Impermissible Cost-Free
Options
During escrow restructurings, Issuers
often redeem SLGS securities before
maturity (early redemption) and
reinvest the proceeds in SLGS or
marketable securities at a higher yield to
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
eliminate ‘‘negative arbitrage’’ under the
Internal Revenue Code. Negative
arbitrage occurs when bond proceeds
are invested by an Issuer at a yield that
is less than the yield on the bond issue,
often as a result of market conditions
where the maximum SLGS rates
available are lower than what would be
permissible under arbitrage provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.
148). Such restructuring transactions to
eliminate negative arbitrage generally
are allowed under the current SLGS
regulations, so long as a cost-free option
is not created. However, changing the
terms of or early redemption of SLGS
securities to take advantage of
infrequent pricing of SLGS securities is
prohibited under the current regulations
even when undertaken to eliminate
negative arbitrage. Section 244.2(f)(1)(i)
of the current regulations makes it
impermissible ‘‘to use the SLGS
program to create a cost-free option.’’
The rationale for this prohibition was
previously explained in two prior
Federal Register publications, in which
Treasury specifically stated that costfree options are impermissible, even if
used to eliminate negative arbitrage. 69
FR 58756 (September 30, 2004) and 70
FR 37904 (June 30, 2005). Furthermore,
section 244.2(f)(2) of the current
regulations includes examples of
negative arbitrage situations that are
prohibited.
To further clarify the boundaries of
the cost-free option prohibition,
Treasury proposes modest reductions in
the current flexibilities available under
the SLGS regulations to eliminate the
following three types of practices that
create cost-free options in violation of
the SLGS regulations:
(1) Purchasing a long-term SLGS
security and redeeming the security
before maturity to capture redemption
premium;
(2) Establishing or changing the
maturity and associated interest rate on
SLGS securities already subscribed for
to take advantage of interest rate
movements, either to capture
redemption premiums or to minimize
losses or
(3) Establishing or changing the SLGS
subscription amount to maximize
redemption premiums or minimize
potential losses.
Any of these practices, alone or in
combination, creates a cost-free option.
Treasury has repeatedly stated that
manipulating the administrative
flexibility designed in the SLGS
regulations to create a cost-free option is
an inappropriate use of the program and
inconsistent with its purpose even when
undertaken to eliminate negative
arbitrage. Treasury incurs a direct cost
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
from such manipulation because it is
not compensated for the value of the
cost-free option, which may generate
large gains in the hands of the SLGS
purchasers. In addition, SLGS
transactions motivated by cost-free
options result in volatility in Treasury’s
cash balances and difficulty in
forecasting cash balances, which
increases Treasury’s borrowing and
administrative costs, as previously
identified in 2004 and in 2005. 69 FR
58756 (September 30, 2004) and 70 FR
37904 (June 30, 2005). The three
practices identified above create
features that are not available in
marketable Treasury securities and
result in additional costs to the Federal
taxpayer.
For these reasons, this NPRM
proposes the amendments described
below to the SLGS regulations to
eliminate these practices. Treasury
believes that the proposed amendments
retain sufficient flexibility for Issuers to
be able to select maturities and interest
payment dates, thereby continuing to
make SLGS securities an attractive
investment vehicle for Issuers. The
proposed rule amendments will apply
only to SLGS subscriptions started on or
after the effective date of the final rule.
Treasury anticipates that the effective
date will be six months after the final
rule’s publication in the Federal
Register.
A. Purchasing and Early Redemption of
a Long-Term SLGS Security
The first type of cost-free option
identified in this NPRM is ‘‘purchasing
a long-term SLGS security and
redeeming the security before maturity
in order to capture redemption
premium.’’ To eliminate this cost-free
option, Treasury proposes imposing a
requirement that the Issuer match the
maturity of the SLGS security with an
underlying governmental purpose and
hold Time Deposit securities, as defined
by 31 CFR 344.4, for a minimum
amount of time before requesting an
early redemption. The meaning of the
phrase ‘‘governmental purpose’’ is
intended to be consistent with its
meaning pursuant to the Income Tax
Regulations under section 148 of the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 148).
Thus, an underlying governmental
purpose generally refers to the Issuer’s
expected use of the invested funds; for
example, financing a construction
project, repaying a prior issue of bonds,
or funding a debt service reserve.
1. No Maturity Longer Than
Necessary. In a 2004 NPRM, Treasury
proposed a provision that would make
it impermissible for an Issuer to
purchase a SLGS security with a
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59355
maturity longer than was reasonably
necessary to accomplish a governmental
purpose of the Issuer. The provision was
intended to address a practice where the
Issuer, acting on movements of interest
rates, would redeem the SLGS security
before maturity to capture a premium.
69 FR 58756 (September 30, 2004).
Based on public comments received,
Treasury decided not to include the
provision in the 2005 final rule. 70 FR
37904 (June 30, 2005).
However, due to more recently
observed early redemption requests and
changes to SLGS subscriptions that
appear to have been made without a
legitimate governmental purpose,
Treasury is revisiting the previous
proposal. Treasury believes that the
costs to Treasury of early redemptions
and changes to SLGS subscriptions have
the potential to outweigh any
administrative burden imposed on
either Treasury or the Issuer. To help
ensure clarity, Treasury has added
specific examples explaining the
proposed amendment.
Treasury proposes two provisions that
will require the Issuer to match the
maturity of the SLGS security with an
underlying governmental purpose in
order to preclude the Issuer from
purchasing a long-term SLGS security
and redeeming it prior to maturity in
order to capture redemption premium.
First, Treasury proposes adding a new
‘‘duration’’ certification in § 344.2(e)(3),
requiring the Issuer to certify that the
length of the maturity of a SLGS
security subscribed for is no longer than
reasonably necessary for the underlying
governmental purpose of the
investment. Because Demand Deposit
securities, defined at 31 CFR 344.7, are
one-day certificates of indebtedness,
they will not be subject to the duration
certification.
Second, Treasury proposes amending
the non-exhaustive list of impermissible
transactions in § 344.2(f)(1) by adding a
new functional description in
subsection (iv) that will make it an
impermissible practice to purchase or
redeem prior to maturity a SLGS
security with a maturity that is longer
than is reasonably necessary to
accomplish the Issuer’s governmental
purpose. This functional description is
meant to encompass the policy behind
the amendments Treasury is proposing
in this NPRM while acknowledging that
impermissible activity could occur in a
variety of ways, including ways not
described in the non-exhaustive list. To
illustrate how the duration certification
will apply to refunding escrow funds,
bond debt service reserve funds, and
project construction funds, new
examples of impermissible transactions
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
59356
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
will be added to § 344.2(f)(2)(vii). Other
examples will provide guidance on how
the certification will apply to purchases
and early redemptions of SLGS
securities. Even with the addition of the
new examples of impermissible
practices, Treasury considers the list of
examples to be non-exhaustive. There
may be other transactions where
manipulative practices create a cost-free
option using the flexibilities afforded to
Issuers in the SLGS program. All such
practices are prohibited. Conforming
technical amendments will be made
throughout the regulation.
2. Minimum Holding Period and
Notification for Early Redemption of
Time Deposit Securities. Under the
current regulations, the Issuer may
request early redemption of a Time
Deposit security as early as the day after
Treasury issues the SLGS security.
Proposed § 344.6(a)(3) requires a 14-day
minimum holding period after the
security has been issued before the
Issuer may request early redemption of
a Time Deposit note or bond. Increasing
the minimum holding period from 1 day
to 14 days will increase the Issuer’s
interest rate risk and help to address the
type of cost-free option described in this
NPRM as ‘‘purchasing a long-term SLGS
security and redeeming the security
before maturity in order to capture
redemption premium.’’
The SLGS rate table on the date a
subscription is ‘‘started’’ establishes the
maximum interest rate applied to a
SLGS security based on the term of the
security. The SLGS rate table in effect
on the date of the early redemption
request is used in determining if the
SLGS security will be redeemed at a
discount or premium. A premium might
be earned under the current regulations
if the Issuer impermissibly creates a
cost-free option by either: (a) starting a
subscription and redeeming the security
prior to maturity in response to a fall in
interest rates occurring between the
subscription and issuance dates, or (b)
changing the term of a SLGS security in
a subscription and redeeming the
security prior to maturity in response to
a fall in interest rates occurring between
the subscription and issuance dates. For
instance, if the Issuer subscribes for a
shorter-term SLGS security, changes the
subscription to a longer-term security,
and submits an early redemption
request on the day after the issue date
in response to interest rate movements,
an impermissible cost-free option has
been created, unless Treasury grants the
Issuer a waiver in accordance with
§ 344.2(n). Increasing the minimum
holding period before an Issuer may
request early redemption will deter the
creation of this type of impermissible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
cost-free option by increasing the
interest rate risk to a more meaningful
level than exists under current
regulations. It is Treasury’s view that
even more than de minimis risk to the
Issuer does not change the fact that this
is still a cost-free option and, either with
or without risk, this is an impermissible
practice.
Treasury does not believe that the
proposed new holding period will
impose undue hardship on Issuers that
have a need for cash proceeds sooner
than the maturity date that was chosen
when the subscription was started. If
new or intervening circumstances arise
before issuance of the SLGS securities,
the Issuer could take steps to change the
subscription by adjusting the maturity
to a shorter-term SLGS security.
Additionally, if circumstances change
after issuance of the SLGS securities, the
Issuer may seek a waiver of the
minimum holding period from Treasury
as detailed in the regulations. The
proposed new holding period would not
apply to Time Deposit certificates of
indebtedness or Demand Deposit
securities, as these are short-term
securities.
B. Establishing or Changing the Maturity
and Interest Rate on SLGS Securities
The second type of cost-free option
identified in this NPRM is referred to as
‘‘establishing or changing the maturity
and associated interest rate on SLGS
securities already subscribed for to take
advantage of interest rate movements,
either to capture redemption premiums
or to minimize losses.’’ To eliminate
this cost-free option, Treasury proposes
that the Issuer be required to specify the
maturity of Time Deposit securities
when a subscription is started and be
limited in adjustments that can be made
to the maturity of Time Deposit
securities.
1. Specifying the Maturity of Time
Deposit Securities
Current regulations permit Issuers to
subscribe for SLGS up to 60 days in
advance of issuance and until 3 p.m.
Eastern Time on the day of issuance to
specify the maturity for Time Deposit
securities. This flexibility makes it
possible for the Issuer to impermissibly
create the cost-free option described in
this NPRM as ‘‘establishing or changing
the maturity and associated interest rate
on SLGS securities already subscribed
for to take advantage of interest rate
movements, either to capture
redemption premiums or to minimize
losses.’’
Treasury’s research reveals that
approximately 99 percent of SLGS
subscriptions are started with a stated
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maturity date. Only a small percentage
of subscriptions have had changes made
by Issuers to the maturity dates of the
securities following the start of a
subscription. Given that the
overwhelming majority of Issuers have
identified the maturity date at the start
of the SLGS subscription process,
Treasury proposes that all Issuers must
provide a maturity date at the start of a
subscription, rather than by the time of
completion of the subscription.
Treasury proposes that when starting a
Time Deposit security subscription
under § 344.5(b)(5) and completing a
subscription under § 344.5(e)(2), the
Issuer must separately itemize the
maturity date(s) by individual Time
Deposit security. Issuers will have the
ability to adjust the maturities, within
certain parameters, if necessary.
2. Limiting Maturity Adjustments on
Time Deposit Securities
Additionally, Treasury proposes to
limit Issuer adjustments to the maturity
of a Time Deposit security before
issuance. The current SLGS regulations
permit the Issuer to make unrestricted
changes to the maturity of a Time
Deposit security and choose any term
from 30 days to 40 years (31 CFR
344.4(a)). This flexibility is an attractive
feature of the SLGS program. However,
when this flexibility results in the Issuer
‘‘establishing or changing the maturity
and associated interest rate on SLGS
securities already subscribed for to take
advantage of interest rate movements,
either to capture redemption premiums
or to minimize losses,’’ an
impermissible cost-free option is
created.
Proposed § 344.5(d)(4), governing how
to change a subscription, and
§ 344.5(e)(7), governing when a
subscription is completed, state that the
Issuer cannot change the maturity date
on a Time Deposit security by more than
30 days for certificates of indebtedness,
6 months for notes, and 1 year for
bonds. The proposed amendments
retain flexibility in setting maturity of
SLGS securities, while removing the
ability to alter maturities beyond the
time required to accomplish a
governmental purpose.
C. Establishing or Changing the SLGS
Subscription Amount
The third type of cost-free option
identified in this NPRM is referred to as
‘‘establishing or changing the SLGS
subscription amount in order to
maximize redemption premiums or
minimize potential losses.’’ Treasury
proposes to limit principal amount
changes to Time Deposit securities at
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
the individual security level to address
this cost-free option.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Changing Principal Amounts on Time
Deposit Securities
Before 2005, the Issuer could change
the aggregate principal amount specified
in the initial subscription by up to $10
million or 10 percent, whichever was
greater. In a 2004 NPRM, Treasury
proposed a size amendment provision to
permit a change in the aggregate
principal amount by 10 percent above or
below the amount originally specified in
the subscription. 69 FR 58756
(September 30, 2004). The provision
was adopted in the 2005 final rule. 70
FR 37904 (June 30, 2005).
The current regulation provides that
the aggregate principal amount
originally specified in the SLGS
subscription cannot be changed by more
than 10 percent. Because a single
subscription may be used to purchase
multiple Time Deposit securities with
different principal and maturity terms,
the current size provision at the
aggregate subscription level is
inadequate to address Treasury’s
concerns about the creation of cost-free
options at the individual security level.
Treasury proposes to limit the amount
of principal that each Time Deposit
security in a subscription can be
changed. Proposed § 344.5(d)(2) applies
the 10 percent limit at the individual
SLGS security level instead of at the
case level, which may be composed of
multiple SLGS securities.
Notwithstanding the above, even if a
principal adjustment within 10 percent
of the original subscription amount of a
particular Time Deposit security
complies with proposed § 344.5(d)(2),
that adjustment would violate the
current prohibition in § 344.2(f)(1)(i) if
the change is motivated by interest rate
movements. In that case, the Issuer
would be creating a cost-free option by
‘‘establishing or changing the SLGS
subscription amount in order to
maximize redemption premiums or
minimize potential losses.’’
2. Changing Principal Amounts on
Demand Deposit Securities
Treasury does not propose to amend
§ 344.8(d) pertaining to Demand Deposit
securities. Demand Deposit securities
will remain subject to the current rule
that the aggregate principal amount may
not be changed by more than 10 percent
above or below the amount originally
specified in the subscription.
III. Administrative Changes
On October 7, 2012, the Secretary of
the Treasury issued Treasury Order
136–01, establishing within the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
Department of the Treasury, the Bureau
of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).
The new bureau consolidated the
bureaus formerly known as the
Financial Management Service (FMS)
and the Bureau of the Public Debt
(BPD). 78 FR 31629 (May 24, 2013).
On October 2, 2013, Treasury
published a final rule entitled
‘‘Regulatory Reorganization;
Administrative Changes to Regulations
Due to the Consolidation of the
Financial Management Service and the
Bureau of the Public Debt Into the
Bureau of the Fiscal Service.’’ This final
rule renamed subchapter A, transferred
parts 306 through 391 of subchapter B
to subchapter A, and removed and
reserved subchapter B in 31 CFR
chapter II. This had the effect of moving
the SLGS regulations from subchapter B
to subchapter A; removing all references
to ‘‘Bureau of the Public Debt’’ and
adding, in their place, ‘‘Bureau of the
Fiscal Service’’; removing all references
to ‘‘BPD’’ and ‘‘Public Debt’’ and
adding, in their place, ‘‘Fiscal Service’’;
and, removing all references to
‘‘www.publicdebt.treas.gov’’ and adding,
in each place,
‘‘www.fiscal.treasury.gov’’, but did not
make any corresponding changes to the
current requirements of the SLGS
regulations. 78 FR 60695 (October 2,
2013).
This NPRM makes other minor
administrative or technical changes.
See, e.g., proposed §§ 344.0(a), 344.1,
344.2(d), (e)(2)(i), (e)(4), (f)(2)(iv),
(f)(2)(v), (g), 344.3(e), 344.4(b)(1),
344.5(a)–(b), (d)–(f), 344.6(a)(3), (g),
344.7(b)(1)–(2), 344.8(a)–(b), (e), and
344.9(a). Some of these changes are
noted below.
A. Purpose of the SLGS Program
Previously § 344.0(a) provided that
SLGS securities may be issued to assist
Issuers in complying with the yield
restriction and rebate requirements
applicable to tax-exempt securities
under the Internal Revenue Code (26
U.S.C. 148). Treasury issued a final rule
in 2005 deleting the language relating to
amounts that ‘‘assist in complying with
applicable provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code relating to the tax
exemption’’ stating that this language
was somewhat vague and proved too
difficult to administer. 70 FR 37904,
37909, June 30, 2005. This deletion has
had the unintended consequence of
confusing some Issuers about the
purpose of the SLGS program. Treasury
proposes to amend § 344.0(a) by
reinserting language that the purpose of
the SLGS program is ‘‘to assist in
complying with applicable provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59357
B. Definitions Updates.
The 2005 final rule amended the
regulations to require certifications
under § 344.2(e)(2)(A) if Issuers
purchase SLGS securities with any
amount received from the sale or
redemption before maturity of any
marketable security, that the yield on
such SLGS security does not exceed the
yield at which such marketable security
was sold or redeemed. The preamble of
the 2005 final rule explained that
‘‘marketable securities’’ was a broader
category than Treasury securities and
could include ‘‘marketable securities
that have a lower credit rating than
Treasury securities.’’ 70 FR 37904,
37906 (June 30, 2005).
Since 2005, the SLGS Frequently
Asked Questions have explained that a
‘‘marketable security’’ is ‘‘any security
other than a State or Local Government
Series (SLGS) security. Examples of
marketable securities include Treasury
securities (other than SLGS securities),
guaranteed investment contracts, and
federal agency securities.’’ https://
www.slgs.gov. While this definition may
appear broad, given that owners of
SLGS securities are generally restricted
in the types of investments they may
purchase with tax-advantaged bond
proceeds, this definition has served to
clarify how the term ‘‘marketable
security’’ is used in the context of the
SLGS regulations.
Treasury proposes adding a definition
of ‘‘marketable security’’ under § 344.1
that closely aligns with the example in
the SLGS Frequently Asked Questions.
The proposed definition states,
‘‘Marketable security, with reference to
the types of securities that issuers of taxadvantaged securities are permitted to
purchase with tax-advantaged proceeds,
means any security other than a SLGS
security. Examples of marketable
securities include Treasury securities
(other than SLGS securities) and federal
agency securities.’’ Treasury is not
incorporating ‘‘guaranteed investment
contracts’’ within the proposed
definition of ‘‘marketable security.’’
This change is not because Treasury
intends to allow guaranteed investment
contracts to be used to create cost-free
options, but is meant to keep the
definition of ‘‘marketable security’’
more in line with industry use. For the
avoidance of doubt, Treasury affirms
that the use of guaranteed investment
contracts, any other nonmarketable
security, or any other means to create a
cost-free option, is prohibited. The
definition would apply throughout the
rule whenever the term ‘‘marketable
security’’ is used.
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
59358
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
Additionally, Treasury proposes
adding a new definition of ‘‘cost-free
option’’ under § 344.1 that states that
the use of any provision(s) in the SLGS
program to exploit movements in
interest rates, including, but not limited
to, those designed to provide marginal
flexibility to Issuers in structuring their
SLGS investments constitutes the
creation of an impermissible cost-free
option. Treasury has intentionally
drafted the definition of cost-free option
broadly to encompass all situations in
which exploitation of the movement in
interest rates is an impermissible
practice.
Treasury further proposes adding a
new definition of ‘‘governmental
purpose’’ under § 344.1 that clarifies
that using the SLGS program to create
cost-free options is not a permitted
governmental purpose. A permitted
governmental purpose includes but is
not limited to financing a construction
project, repaying a prior issue of bonds,
or funding a debt service reserve. The
governmental purpose must be
consistent with the purposes of the
Income Tax Regulations under section
148 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Treasury also proposes adding a new
definition of ‘‘tax-advantaged bond’’
under § 344.1 that corresponds with the
definition of the types of bonds to
which the relevant portions of the
Internal Revenue Code and the Income
Tax Regulations (generally 26 U.S.C.
148 and 26 CFR 1.148–0 through 1.148–
11) apply. The Internal Revenue Code is
dynamic and new types tax-advantaged
bonds have been created and could be
created in the future. The definition of
‘‘tax-advantaged bond’’ includes (i) a
tax-exempt bond, (ii) a taxable bond that
provides a federal tax credit to the
investor with respect to the Issuer’s
borrowing costs, (iii) a taxable bond that
provides a refundable federal tax credit
payable directly to the Issuer for its
borrowing cost, and (iv) any future
similar bond that provides a federal tax
benefit that reduces an Issuers’
borrowing cost. (26 CFR 1.150–1(b)).
Treasury proposes amending the
definition of ‘‘business day’’ under
§ 344.1 to clarify which days normal
processing of SLGS securities
transactions will occur. Section 6103 of
Title 5 of the United States Code sets
forth which days are considered ‘‘legal
public holidays.’’ Generally, federal
agencies are closed for business on legal
public holidays and such holidays are
non-workdays for federal employees.
However, while federal agencies may be
closed on such days, the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York may still be
open and conducting payment
transactions. Because payment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
transactions are still possible, even
though the Bureau of the Fiscal Service
may be closed for most transactions,
scheduled payments for SLGS securities
still occur those days when the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York is open. The
revision to the definition of ‘‘business
day’’ clarifies when normal SLGS
transactions may occur and payments
will be processed.
Finally, Treasury proposes amending
the definition of ‘‘eligible source of
funds’’ under § 344.1 to better align with
the relevant portions of the Internal
Revenue Code and the Income Tax
Regulations. New types of taxadvantaged bonds have been and can be
added to the Internal Revenue Code.
Treasury is amending the definition of
‘‘eligible source of funds’’ to include
proceeds of all types of tax-advantaged
bonds as defined in 26 CFR 1.150–1(b),
including those created after the date of
any SLGS final rule.
C. Certification of Eligibility To
Purchase
Given that the purpose of the SLGS
program is to assist Issuers in complying
with the yield restriction and rebate
requirements applicable to taxadvantaged securities under the Internal
Revenue Code, Treasury views it
prudent to provide for what are
currently rare situations when bonds
lose their tax-advantaged status. In such
cases, the proceeds used by the Issuer to
purchase SLGS may no longer be
considered an ‘‘eligible source of
funds.’’
Treasury proposes a new § 344.2(e)(4)
that would add an Issuer certification as
to its eligibility to purchase SLGS
securities. Under this new section, the
Issuer would certify that it will notify
Treasury if the funds used to purchase
SLGS securities were no longer
considered ‘‘an eligible source of
funds.’’ The notification requirement
would apply to all outstanding SLGS
securities (e.g., Time Deposit, Demand
Deposit, and special 90-day certificates
of indebtedness). Treasury would deem
the notification as a request to redeem
those outstanding Demand Deposit
securities that are affected by the
ineligibility under § 344.9, as amended.
The Issuer would not be required to
redeem Time Deposit securities that are
outstanding at the time of the
notification because Time Deposit
securities are longer-term securities that
would have been purchased with an
eligible source of funds. Special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness containing
funds that are no longer considered ‘‘an
eligible source of funds’’ would be
redeemed either upon maturity (i.e.,
would not be rolled into a new special
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
90-day certificate of indebtedness) or
upon reversion to Demand Deposit
securities.
D. SLGS Rate Table
Under the current regulation,
§ 344.4(b)(1), if the SLGS rate table is
not released to the public by 10 a.m.
Eastern Time on a particular business
day, then the SLGS rate table for the
preceding business day applies.
Treasury proposes amending
§ 344.4(b)(1) to state that Treasury will
post the SLGS rate table ‘‘by 10 a.m.
Eastern Time each business day or as
soon as practicable thereafter.’’ Under
this proposed amendment, Treasury
would have more flexibility in those
instances where the SLGS rate table
could not be released to the public by
10 a.m. Eastern Time. However, if no
SLGS rate table has been published by
11 a.m. Eastern Time, then the SLGS
rate table for the preceding business day
would apply. This provides Issuers with
more accurate pricing when there is a
slight delay in publishing the SLGS rate
table, while carrying over the previous
day’s rate if circumstances prevent
publication of a new SLGS rate table.
E. Establishment of the Issue Date
Under the current rule in § 344.5(a)
and § 344.8(a), the issue date for Time
Deposit and Demand Deposit securities
cannot be more than 60 calendar days
after the date Treasury receives the
subscription. Our data analysis reveals
that less than 4 percent of SLGS
subscriptions are started more than 45
days in advance of the issue date.
Treasury proposes to amend these
provisions to reduce the lead time for an
Issuer to subscribe for SLGS securities
from 60 to 45 calendar days. The
subscription date controls which SLGS
rate table applies to the subscription for
securities. Moving the subscription date
closer to the issue date would provide
more accurate pricing for SLGS
securities. Additionally, this proposed
amendment has the added benefit of
narrowing the window of time in which
an impermissible cost-free option could
be created. Conforming amendments
would also be made to § 344.2(f)(2)(iv).
F. Subscription Process
The current regulation specifies the
information the Issuer must provide to
start and complete the subscription
process for both Time Deposit and
Demand Deposit securities. The current
rule in § 344.5 and § 344.8 specifies the
information that the Issuer must provide
when starting the SLGS subscription
process (§ 344.5(b) and § 344.8(b)), how
the Issuer may change a subscription
(§ 344.5(d) and § 344.8(d)), and how the
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Issuer completes the subscription
(§ 344.5(e) and § 344.8(e)). To
implement Treasury’s proposed
amendments discussed in Sections
II(A)(1) (duration certification regarding
matching the SLGS maturity to the
governmental purpose), II(B)(1)
(specifying the maturity of each Time
Deposit security in the subscription),
II(C) (changing the principal amounts),
III(C) (eligibility certification), and III(G)
(including the EMMA® registration in
the SLGS case, discussed below),
Treasury proposes amending § 344.5
and § 344.8 to include these
requirements.
Additionally, Treasury proposes
amending § 344.5 and § 344.8 to more
specifically identify currently required
information such as the Issuer’s address
and banking information, while
removing the requirement to specify the
‘‘title of an official authorized to
purchase SLGS securities’’ as the title is
no longer needed. In addition, the
reference to the ‘‘proceeds that are
derived, directly or indirectly, from the
redemption before maturity of SLGS
securities subscribed for on or before
December 27, 1976,’’ would be deleted
as none of these securities remain
outstanding.
G. Identification of the Tax-Advantaged
Bond Issue
Under the current rule in § 344.5(b)(5)
and § 344.8(b)(5), the underlying taxadvantaged bond issue must be
identified when the Issuer ‘‘starts’’ and
‘‘completes’’ the subscription for SLGS
securities. The Issuer starts the
subscription process by entering certain
information in required data fields in
SLGSafe, the secure internet site
through which SLGS transactions are
submitted. When starting a subscription,
the Issuer typically enters information
on the new or ‘‘refunding bonds,’’ and
not the ‘‘refunded bonds’’ or the ‘‘prior
issue’’ being refinanced.
This requirement has been in the
current regulation since the 2005 final
rule required the Issuer to enter a
description of the Issuer’s tax-exempt
bond issue such as ‘‘Water and Sewer
Revenue Bonds Series 2004’’ (70 FR
37904, 37907, June 30, 2005).
Subsequently, the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (MSRB) launched its
Electronic Municipal Market Access
(EMMA®) system, and EMMA® has now
become the official repository for
municipal securities disclosures.
Given that EMMA® generally contains
information about state and local
government bonds, Treasury proposes to
amend the regulation to require that if
a bond issue is registered in EMMA®,
the Issuer must adhere to the naming
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
convention supplied in the ‘‘issue
description’’ field on the ‘‘Security
Information’’ tab in EMMA® at https://
emma.msrb.org when describing the
tax-advantaged bond in SLGSafe. If the
EMMA® website revises its naming
convention, the Issuer would supply the
updated registration as it is presented in
EMMA®, or its successor system.
The Issuer would be able to input the
‘‘EMMA® registration’’ into SLGSafe at
the time the subscription is started
(§ 344.5(b)(4) and § 344.8(b)(4)), but that
information would not be required until
such time as the subscription is
completed (§ 344.5(e)(3) and
§ 344.8(e)(2)). This would allow
additional time for the Issuer to update
the description field if the bond issue
has not yet been registered with
EMMA® when the subscription is
started. Conforming the underlying
bond issuance field in SLGSafe with the
EMMA®’s naming convention would
assist Treasury in determining if the
amounts are an ‘‘eligible source of
funds’’ under § 344.1 that may be used
to purchase SLGS securities.
H. Special Zero Interest Securities and
Subscriptions on or Before December 27,
1976
Special zero interest securities were
discontinued by Treasury on October
28, 1996. Therefore, Treasury proposes
removing Subpart D of the current rule.
In addition, all outstanding SLGS
securities issued on or before December
27, 1976, matured by November 1, 2013.
Therefore, Treasury proposes removing
§ 344.5(e)(4) and § 344.6(g) of the
current rule.
I. Debt Limit Contingency
1. Treasury’s Discretion to Leave
Demand Deposit Securities Invested or
to Invest in Special 90-day Certificates
of Indebtedness. The current regulation
states that at any time the Secretary
determines that issuance of obligations
sufficient to conduct the orderly
financing operations of the United
States cannot be made without
exceeding the statutory debt limit,
Treasury must invest any unredeemed
Demand Deposit securities in special
90-day certificates of indebtedness.
Treasury proposes to amend § 344.7(b)
to provide the Secretary with the
flexibility to exercise discretion to either
leave the unredeemed Demand Deposit
securities invested or to invest them in
special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness.
2. Terms Applying to Invested
Demand Deposit Securities. Treasury
proposes to clarify § 344.7(b)(1) to
provide that Demand Deposit securities
during a debt limit contingency remain
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59359
subject to the normal terms and
conditions that apply to Demand
Deposit securities.
3. Terms Applying to Special 90-day
Certificates of Indebtedness. Treasury
proposes to clarify § 344.7(b)(2) to
provide that special 90-day certificates
of indebtedness that are issued during a
debt limit contingency remain subject to
the same redemption rules as Demand
Deposit securities. Treasury would roll
over special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness, along with accrued
interest, into new special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness when a debt
limit contingency period lasts longer
than 90 days.
4. End of a Debt Limit Contingency. At
the end of a debt limit contingency, the
Issuer currently has the option to keep
the special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness until maturity, redeem
them before maturity, or reinvest them
in Demand Deposit securities. Treasury
proposes to amend § 344.7(b)(2) to
provide that when regular Treasury
borrowing operations resume, Treasury
would redeem any special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness and reinvest
the proceeds, along with accrued
interest, in Demand Deposit securities.
As a result, the Issuer would once again
hold the investment that the Issuer
originally requested.
J. Notice Period for Redemption of
Demand Deposit Securities
The current regulation § 344.9(a)
requires notice of 1 business day for
redemption of Demand Deposit
securities in the amount of $10 million
or less and notice of 3 business days for
redemptions of more than $10 million.
To aid in Treasury’s cash forecasting
and cash management, Treasury
proposes amending § 344.9(a) to require
notice of 5 business days for redemption
of Demand Deposit securities and
special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness in the principal amount of
$500 million or more. Some Issuers hold
numerous securities in multiple
SLGSafe cases. To determine which
notice period applies, the Issuer would
calculate the total amount of proceeds to
be derived from redemption of Demand
Deposit securities and special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness at the
‘‘owner,’’ and not the ‘‘case,’’ level.
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This NPRM is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment of anticipated
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
59360
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
benefits, costs, and regulatory
alternatives is not required.
B. Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Because this NPRM relates to United
States securities, which are contracts
between Treasury and the owner of the
security, this rule falls within the
contract exception to the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2).
As a result, the notice, public comment,
and delayed effective date provisions of
the APA are inapplicable to this rule.
However, although not required under
the APA, Treasury is seeking public
comment on this NPRM.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Although this NPRM is being issued
in proposed form to secure the benefit
of public comment, it relates to matters
of public contract and procedures for
United States securities. Because a
NPRM is not required, the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq., do not apply. However,
Treasury will consider the potential
impact of this proposed rule on small
entities and will evaluate any proposed
alternatives that would allow Treasury
to accomplish the objectives of this
proposed rule without unduly
burdening small entities by imposing a
significant economic impact on them.
Therefore, Treasury will accept
comments pertaining to the potential
impact and proposed alternatives during
the comment period.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR
part 1320, do not apply to this NPRM
because there are no new or revised
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements. The existing OMB
Paperwork Reduction Act control
numbers for Part 344 are 1530–0044 and
1530–0065.
V. Proposed Regulations
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 344
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Bonds, Government securities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, Treasury proposes to
amend 31 CFR part 344 as follows:
PART 344—U.S. TREASURY
SECURITIES—STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENT SERIES.
1. The authority citation for part 344
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 141 note; 31 U.S.C.
3102, 3103, 3104, and 3121.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
2. Amend § 344.0, by revising
paragraph (a) and removing paragraph
(b)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 344.0
What does this part cover?
(a) What is the purpose of the SLGS
securities offering? The Secretary of the
Treasury (the Secretary) offers for sale
non-marketable State and Local
Government Series (SLGS) securities to
provide issuers of tax-advantaged bonds
with investments from any eligible
source of funds (as defined in § 344.1)
to assist issuers in complying with
applicable provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 344.1, by:
■ a. Revising the definition of ‘‘Business
day(s)’’;
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order a
definition for ‘‘Cost-free option’’;
■ c. Revising the definition of ‘‘Eligible
source of funds’’;
■ d. Adding in alphabetical order a
definition for ‘‘Governmental purpose’’;
■ e. Revising the definition of ‘‘Issuer’’;
■ f. Adding in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘Marketable security’’;
and ‘‘Tax-advantaged bond.’’
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 344.1 What special terms do I need to
know to understand this part?
*
*
*
*
*
Business day(s) means any day other
than a Saturday or Sunday that the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York is
open for business.
Cost-free option means the use of any
provision(s) in the SLGS program to
exploit movements in interest rates,
including, but not limited to, those
designed to provide marginal flexibility
to issuers in structuring their SLGS
investments.
*
*
*
*
*
Eligible source of funds means:
(1) Any amounts that are gross
proceeds of an issue of tax-advantaged
bonds or are reasonably expected to
become gross proceeds of such an issue
of tax-advantaged bonds;
(2) Any amounts that formerly were
gross proceeds of a tax-advantaged bond
issue, but no longer are treated as gross
proceeds of such issue as a result of the
operation of the universal cap on the
maximum amount treated as gross
proceeds under 26 CFR 1.148–6(b)(2);
(3) Amounts held or to be held
together with gross proceeds of one or
more tax-advantaged bond issues in a
refunding escrow, defeasance escrow,
parity debt service reserve fund, or
commingled fund (as defined in 26 CFR
1.148–1(b));
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) Proceeds of a bond issue that is not
an issue of tax-advantaged bonds but
that refunds, or is refunded by, an issue
of tax-advantaged bonds; or
(5) Any other amounts that are subject
to yield limitations under the rules
applicable to tax-advantaged bonds
under the Internal Revenue Code.
Governmental purpose, under this
part, means the issuer’s expected use of
the invested funds, including but not
limited to, financing a construction
project, repaying a prior issue of bonds,
or funding a debt service reserve. Such
use must be consistent with the
purposes of the Income Tax Regulations
under section 148 of the Internal
Revenue Code. Generating gain on the
proceeds of a bond issue through the
use of a cost-free option in purchasing
and redeeming SLGS is not a permitted
governmental purpose.
Issuer refers to the government body
or other entity that issues taxadvantaged bonds, or to a conduit
borrower.
Marketable security, with reference to
the types of securities that issuers are
permitted to purchase with an eligible
source of funds, means any security
other than a SLGS security. Examples of
marketable securities include Treasury
securities (other than SLGS securities)
and federal agency securities.
*
*
*
*
*
Tax-advantaged bond means taxadvantaged bond as defined in 26 CFR
1.150–1(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 344.2 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (d) and
paragraph (e)(2)(i) introductory text;
■ b. Adding paragraphs (e)(3) and (e)(4);
■ c. Revising paragraph (f)(1), the
second sentence of paragraph (f)(2)(iv),
and the first sentence of paragraph
(f)(2)(v);
■ d. Adding paragraph (f)(2)(vii);and
■ e. Revising the last sentence of
paragraph (g).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 344.2 What general provisions apply to
SLGS securities?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Can SLGS securities be
transferred? No. SLGS securities issued
as any one type, i.e., Time Deposit or
Demand Deposit, cannot be transferred
for other securities of that type or any
other type. Transfer of securities by sale,
exchange, assignment, pledge, or
otherwise is not permitted.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Purchase of SLGS securities. Upon
submitting a subscription, or performing
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
any other transaction for a SLGS
security, a subscriber must certify that:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Duration certification. For each
subscription to purchase a Time Deposit
SLGS security, the subscriber must
certify that the term of the SLGS
security subscribed for is no longer than
reasonably necessary for the underlying
governmental purpose of the
investment.
(4) Eligibility certification. For each
subscription to purchase a SLGS
security, the subscriber must certify that
if, at any point while SLGS securities
are outstanding, the issuer becomes
ineligible to purchase SLGS securities or
the funds used to purchase SLGS
securities are no longer an eligible
source of funds, the issuer or agent
thereof must, as soon as practicable,
notify Treasury of such ineligibility.
Such notification will be deemed to be
a request for redemption of those
outstanding Demand Deposit securities
that are affected by the ineligibility.
(f) * * *
(1)Impermissible Transactions:
(i) To use the SLGS program to create
a cost-free option (while the following
examples may specifically use
marketable securities for illustration,
creating a cost-free option via any
means is prohibited);
(ii) To purchase a SLGS security with
any amount received from the sale or
redemption (at the option of the holder)
before maturity of any marketable
security, if the yield on such SLGS
security exceeds the yield at which such
marketable security is sold or redeemed;
(iii) To invest any amount received
from the redemption before maturity of
a Time Deposit security (other than a
Zero Percent Time Deposit security) at
a yield that exceeds the yield that is
used to determine the amount of
redemption proceeds for such Time
Deposit security; or
(iv) To purchase a SLGS security with
a maturity that is longer than is
reasonably necessary to accomplish the
issuer’s governmental purpose for its
purchase of the SLGS security or to
purchase a SLGS security with an
intention to redeem such SLGS security
earlier than is reasonably necessary to
accomplish the issuer’s governmental
purpose for its purchase of the SLGS
security.
(2) * * *
(iv) * * * To reduce or eliminate this
negative arbitrage, the issuer subscribes
for SLGS securities for purchase in 45
days. * * *
(v) * * * On February 6, 2006, an
issuer purchases a Time Deposit
security using an eligible source of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
funds from a debt service reserve fund.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(vii) Purchase of SLGS security with
maturity longer than reasonably
necessary. An issuer may purchase
SLGS securities to facilitate compliance
with arbitrage yield restrictions for
investments of various types of proceeds
of tax-advantaged bonds, including
investments in refunding escrow funds,
bond debt service reserve funds, or
project construction funds, respectively.
The determination of whether a
maturity for a SLGS security is longer
than is reasonably necessary depends on
the issuer’s governmental purpose for
the issuance. Thus, the maturities of
SLGS securities invested in a refunding
escrow fund are reasonably necessary if
they are no longer than those necessary
to accomplish the defeasance of the
underlying refunded bonds until the
applicable redemption date or
retirement date of the refunded bonds.
Maturities of SLGS securities invested
in a project construction fund are
reasonably necessary if they are no
longer than the reasonably expected
construction period for the financed
project, and early redemptions of such
securities are reasonably necessary if
they are reasonably related to
construction draws for the financed
project. Maturities of SLGS securities
invested in a debt service reserve fund
are reasonably necessary if they are no
longer than the earlier of the permitted
term of investments in that reserve fund
under the bond documents or the term
of the secured bonds. Early redemptions
of SLGS securities with reasonably
necessary maturities are permissible for
the above bona fide business reasons,
including changes in market interest
rates. By contrast, the purchase of SLGS
securities with maturities that are longer
than the reasonably necessary maturities
described above and associated early
redemptions of those SLGS securities to
obtain the funds within periods that
would correspond to an issuer’s bona
fide governmental purpose for a SLGS
investment constitute impermissible
practices under paragraph (f)(1)(iv).
Thus, for example, if an issuer
purchases SLGS securities to fund a
refunding escrow to be used to defease
and call refunded bonds at the first call
date in five years, the issuer’s purchase
of SLGS securities with maturities
beyond that five-year period and
corresponding early redemptions of
those SLGS securities within that
five-year period constitute an
impermissible use of the SLGS program.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59361
(g) * * * Fiscal Service’s ABA
Routing Number can be found on Fiscal
Service’s website under the SLGS FAQs.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 344.3 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 344.3 What provisions apply to the
SLGSafe Service?
*
*
*
*
*
(e) How do I apply for SLGSafe
access? Submit to Fiscal Service a
completed SLGSafe Application for
internet Access, which is found on
Fiscal Service’s website.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 344.4 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 344.4
What are Time Deposit securities?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) When is the SLGS rate table
released? We release the SLGS rate table
to the public by 10 a.m. Eastern time
each business day or as soon as
practicable thereafter. If the SLGS rate
table is not available by 11 a.m. Eastern
time on any given business day, the
SLGS rate table for the preceding
business day applies.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 344.5 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f), to
read as follows:
§ 344.5 What other provisions apply to
subscriptions for Time Deposit securities?
(a) When is my subscription due? The
subscriber must set the issue date for the
securities in the subscription. The issue
date must be a business day. The issue
date cannot be more than 45 days after
the date we receive the subscription. If
the subscription is for $10 million or
less, we must receive a subscription at
least 5 days before the issue date. If the
subscription is for over $10 million, we
must receive the subscription at least 7
days before the issue date.
Example 1 to paragraph (a): If SLGS
securities totaling $10 million or less
will be issued on May 16th, we must
receive the subscription no later than
May 11th. If SLGS securities totaling
more than $10 million will be issued on
May 16th, we must receive the
subscription no later than May 9th. In
all cases, if SLGS securities will be
issued on May 16th, we will not accept
the subscription before April 1st.
(b) How do I start the subscription
process? A subscriber starts the
subscription process by entering into
SLGSafe the following information:
(1) The issue date;
(2) The total principal amount;
(3) The issuer’s name and Taxpayer
Identification Number;
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
59362
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(4) A description of the taxadvantaged bond issue;
(5) Separately itemized securities to
be purchased, specifying principal
amount, maturity date, interest rate, and
first interest payment date (in the case
of notes and bonds) for each; and
(6) The certifications required by
§ 344.2(e).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) How do I change a subscription?
You can change a subscription on or
before 3 p.m. Eastern time, on the issue
date. Changes to a subscription are
acceptable with the following
exceptions:
(1) You cannot change the issue date;
provided, however, you may change the
issue date up to 7 days after the original
issue date if you establish to the
satisfaction of Treasury that such
change is required as a result of
circumstances that were unforeseen at
the time of the subscription and are
beyond the issuer’s control (for
example, a natural disaster);
(2) You cannot change the principal
amount originally specified for any
security in the subscription by more
than ten percent;
(3) You cannot change an interest rate
to exceed the maximum interest rate in
the SLGS rate table that was in effect for
a security of comparable maturity on the
business day that you began the
subscription process; and
(4) You cannot change the maturity
date originally specified for any security
in the subscription by more than 30
days for certificates of indebtedness, 6
months for notes, and 1 year for bonds.
(e) How do I complete the
subscription process? The completed
subscription must:
(1) Be dated and submitted
electronically by an official authorized
to make the purchase;
(2) Separately itemize securities
specifying principal amount, maturity
date, interest rate, and first interest
payment date (in the case of notes and
bonds) for each;
(3) Describe the bond issue. If the taxadvantaged bond issue referenced in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section is, or
will be, registered or disclosed in the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board’s (MSRB) Electronic Municipal
Market Access (EMMA®) system,
describe the issue exactly as designated
in the ‘‘issue description’’ field of
EMMA®, or successor system;
(4) Include the issuer’s address;
(5) Include information on the
financial institution that will transmit
the funds for the purchase of the
securities and information on the
financial institution that will receive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
security principal and interest
payments;
(6) Not be more than ten percent
above or below the aggregate principal
amount originally specified in the
subscription and not be more than ten
percent above or below the originally
subscribed for amount for each
individual security;
(7) Not deviate from the original
subscribed for maturity date specified
for any security in the subscription by
more than 30 days for certificates of
indebtedness, 6 months for notes, and 1
year for bonds;
(8) Include the information required
under paragraph (b) of this section, if
not already provided; and
(9) Include the certifications required
by § 344.2(e).
(f) When must I complete the
subscription? We must receive a
completed subscription on or before 3
p.m. Eastern time on the issue date.
■ 8. Amend § 344.6 by revising
paragraph (a)(3); and removing
paragraph (g).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 344.6 How do I redeem a Time Deposit
security before maturity?
(a) * * *
(3) Notes or bonds. A note or bond
can be redeemed, at the owner’s option,
no earlier than 30 days after the issue
date. Any request for redemption
received within 14 days of the issue
date will be rejected.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 344.7 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 344.7 What are Demand Deposit
securities?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) What happens to Demand Deposit
securities during a Debt Limit
Contingency? At any time the Secretary
determines that issuance of obligations
sufficient to conduct the orderly
financing operations of the United
States cannot be made without
exceeding the statutory debt limit, we
may invest any unredeemed Demand
Deposit securities in special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness.
(1) Funds left invested in Demand
Deposit securities remain subject to the
normal terms and conditions for such
securities as set forth in this part.
(2) Funds invested in 90-day
certificates of indebtedness earn simple
interest equal to the daily factor in effect
at the time Demand Deposit security
issuance is suspended, multiplied by
the number of days outstanding. Ninetyday certificates of indebtedness are
subject to the same request for
redemption notification requirements as
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
those for Demand Deposit securities and
will be redeemed at par value plus
accrued interest. If a 90-day certificate
of indebtedness reaches maturity during
a debt limit contingency, we will
automatically roll it into a new 90-day
certificate of indebtedness, along with
accrued interest, that earns simple
interest equal to the daily factor in effect
at the time that the new 90-day
certificate of indebtedness is issued,
multiplied by the number of days
outstanding. When regular Treasury
borrowing operations resume, the 90day certificates of indebtedness, along
with accrued interest, will be reinvested
in Demand Deposit securities.
■ 10. Amend § 344.8 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), and (e) to read as
follows:
§ 344.8 What other provisions apply to
subscriptions for Demand Deposit
securities?
(a) When is my subscription due? The
subscriber must set the issue date in the
subscription. You cannot change the
issue date to require issuance earlier or
later than the issue date originally
specified; provided, however, you may
change the issue date up to 7 days after
the original issue date if you establish
to the satisfaction of Treasury that such
change is required as a result of
circumstances that were unforeseen at
the time of the subscription and are
beyond the issuer’s control (for
example, a natural disaster). The issue
date must be a business day. The issue
date cannot be more than 45 days after
the date we receive the subscription. If
the subscription is for $10 million or
less, we must receive the subscription at
least 5 days before the issue date. If the
subscription is for more than $10
million, we must receive the
subscription at least 7 days before the
issue date.
(b) How do I start the subscription
process? A subscriber starts the
subscription process by entering into
SLGSafe the following information:
(1) The issue date;
(2) The total principal amount;
(3) The issuer’s name and Taxpayer
Identification Number;
(4) A description of the taxadvantaged bond issue; and
(5) The certifications required by
§ 344.2(e)(1), if the subscription is
submitted by an agent of the issuer.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) How do I complete the
subscription process? The completed
subscription must:
(1) Be dated and submitted
electronically by an official authorized
to make the purchase;
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 189 / Friday, September 30, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(2) Describe the bond issue. If the taxadvantaged bond issue referenced in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section is, or
will be, registered or disclosed in the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board’s (MSRB) Electronic Municipal
Market Access (EMMA®) system,
describe the issue exactly as designated
in the ‘‘issue description’’ field of
EMMA®, or successor system;
(3) Include the issuer’s address;
(4) Include the information on the
financial institution that will transmit
the funds for the purchase of the
securities;
(5) Not be more than ten percent
above or below the aggregate principal
amount originally specified in the
subscription;
(6) Include the information required
under paragraph (b) of this section, if
not already provided; and
(7) Include the certifications required
by § 344.2(e)(1) (agent certification),
§ 344.2(e)(2)(i) (yield certification), and
§ 344.2(e)(4) (eligibility certification).
■ 11. Amend § 344.9 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 344.9 How do I redeem a Demand
Deposit security?
(a) When must I notify Treasury to
redeem a security? Demand Deposit
securities can be redeemed at the
owner’s option, if we receive a request
for redemption not less than:
(1) One business day before the
requested redemption date for total
redemptions by an owner of $10 million
or less;
(2) Three business days before the
requested redemption date for total
redemptions by an owner of more than
$10 million but less than $500 million;
and
(3) Five business days before the
requested redemption date for total
redemptions by an owner of $500
million or more.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart D [Removed]
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS
■
12. Remove Subpart D.
By the Department of the Treasury.
David Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–21173 Filed 9–29–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 29, 2022
Jkt 256001
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3055
[Docket Nos. RM2022–7; Order No. 6275]
RIN 3211–AA32
Service Performance and Customer
Satisfaction Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is proposing
rules related to service performance and
customer satisfaction reporting. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 31,
2022.
ADDRESSES: For additional information,
Order No. 6275 can be accessed
electronically through the Commission’s
website at https://www.prc.gov. Submit
comments electronically via the
Commission’s Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot
submit comments electronically should
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Relevant Statutory Requirements
II. Background
III. Basis and Purpose of Proposed Rules
I. Relevant Statutory Requirements
Section 3652(e)(1) of title 39 of the
United States Code requires the
Commission to prescribe the content
and form of the public reports that the
Postal Service files with the
Commission. 39 U.S.C. 3652(e)(1). In
doing so, the Commission must attempt
to provide the public with timely
information that is adequate to allow it
to assess the lawfulness of Postal
Service rates, should attempt to avoid
unnecessary or unwarranted Postal
Service effort and expense, and must
endeavor to protect the confidentiality
of commercially sensitive information.
See id. The Commission may initiate
proceedings to improve the quality,
accuracy, or completeness of Postal
Service reporting whenever it
determines that the service performance
data have become significantly
inadequate, could be significantly
improved, or otherwise require revision
as necessitated by the public interest. 39
U.S.C. 3652(e)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59363
Additionally, section 3692 directs the
Postal Service to develop and maintain
a publicly available online ‘‘dashboard’’
that provides weekly service
performance data for Market Dominant
products and mandates that the
Commission provide reporting
requirements for this Postal Service
dashboard as well as ‘‘recommendations
for any modifications to the Postal
Service’s measurement systems
necessary to measure and publish the
performance information’’ located on
the dashboard. 39 U.S.C. 3692(b)(2), (c).
The Postal Service is also authorized to
provide certain nonpostal services to the
public and other Governmental agencies
and consequently required to
periodically report the quality of service
for these nonpostal services. See 39
U.S.C. 3703–3705.
II. Background
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 503, 3652, 3653,
3692 and 3705, the Commission
initiated Docket No. RM2022–7 to
update the service performance
reporting requirements codified in 39
CFR part 3055 and make the
aforementioned additions for dashboard
and nonpostal product reporting. On
April 26, 2022, the Commission issued
Order No. 6160, proposing several
modifications to the reporting
requirements, providing an opportunity
for interested persons to comment, and
appointing a Public Representative.1
Included among these suggested
modifications were proposals to require
the Postal Service to report average
actual days to delivery and point impact
data, information regarding the
performance for each national operating
plan target, and data about mail
excluded from measurement. Order No.
6160 at 5–6. The Commission also
solicited comments on how best to
effectuate the statutes requiring the
Postal Service to report on nonpostal
products and implement a performance
dashboard. Id. at 6–8.
The Commission received a wide
range of comments in response to Order
No. 6160, both discussing the suggested
revisions and proposing additional
amendments to the reporting
requirements.
III. Basis and Purpose of Proposed
Rules
After reviewing the commenters’
suggestions and analysis, the
Commission proposes the following
rules.
1 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
Revise Periodic Reporting of Service Performance,
April 26, 2022 (Order No. 6160).
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Agencies
- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59353-59363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21173]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
31 CFR Part 344
[FISCAL-2022-0002]
RIN 1530-AA25
U.S. Treasury Securities--State and Local Government Series
AGENCY: Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 59354]]
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) is issuing this
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend the regulations governing
State and Local Government Series (SLGS) securities. Treasury is
proposing to amend the SLGS regulations to address misuse of the SLGS
program, most notably the use of program flexibilities by tax-
advantaged entities, usually a state or local government, investing in
SLGS securities to create impermissible cost-free options. This NPRM
proposes amendments to existing regulations to help stop such activity.
In addition, this NPRM proposes administrative changes to increase
efficiencies in the program.
DATES: To be considered, comments must be received on or before
November 29, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov (via the online comment form
for this NPRM as posted within Docket ID No. FISCAL-2022-0002 at
www.regulations.gov, the Federal e-rulemaking portal);
U.S. Mail: Mike Goodwin, Division Director, or Jared Waters,
Program Manager, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, P.O. Box 396,
Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.
All submissions received must be addressed to the Bureau of the
Fiscal Service and include the Docket ID Number FISCAL-2022-0002. All
comments received will be posted without change to www.regulations.gov.
The posting will include any personal information that you provide in
the submission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Goodwin, Division Director, Jared
Waters, Program Manager, Brian Metz, Senior Counsel, or Elizabeth
Spears, Senior Counsel, at [email protected] or (304) 480-5299.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory Background
A. SLGS Program
SLGS securities are non-marketable Treasury securities that are
available only for purchase by an Issuer, as defined in 31 CFR 344.1,
of tax-advantaged securities (Issuers). The purpose of the SLGS program
is to assist Issuers when investing proceeds from bond issuances in
complying with yield restriction and rebate requirements applicable to
tax-advantaged securities under the Internal Revenue Code. Because an
Issuer's bond issuance process is characterized by several variables
that may take a number of weeks to resolve, flexibility has been built
into the SLGS program to allow Issuers to customize the SLGS security
terms such as interest rate, maturity, and issue date. Over the years,
Treasury has amended the SLGS regulations in an effort to maintain SLGS
securities as an attractive investment alternative to marketable
securities for Issuers, while also preventing the program from being
misused by Issuers and from becoming burdensome to Treasury financing
operations.
Treasury has repeatedly stated that speculation by Issuers in
interest rate movements between marketable Treasury securities and/or
SLGS securities is both inconsistent with the purpose of the SLGS
program and is prohibited by the SLGS regulations. Despite Treasury's
prohibition on such speculation, impermissible transactions have been
observed within the SLGS program. Treasury attributes the impermissible
transactions to the exploitation of certain flexibilities in the
program. The proposed amendments to the regulations are to reinforce to
Issuers the prohibition on these transactions and to make it less
likely that SLGS investors can use the flexibilities to impermissibly
create cost-free options based on interest rate movements. This NPRM
identifies in Section E the observed cost-free options that are
prohibited and proposes amendments to reduce Issuers' flexibility in
structuring the terms of SLGS securities to create such cost-free
options. Treasury is also proposing other changes that are designed to
improve the administration of the SLGS program.
B. Flexibilities Added to the SLGS Program in 1996
In 1996, Treasury revised the regulations governing SLGS securities
to make the program a more flexible and competitive investment vehicle
for Issuers in a manner that was intended to be cost effective for
them. 61 FR 55690 (October 28, 1996). The 1996 final rule eliminated
several requirements such as the Issuer's certifications to purchase
SLGS securities. In addition, the regulations were amended to permit an
Issuer to subscribe for SLGS securities and subsequently cancel the
subscription, without a monetary penalty, under certain circumstances
C. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 1997
In 1997, Treasury amended the regulations to clarify that certain
transactions in which Issuers previously used subscriptions for SLGS
securities to provide a cost-free interest rate hedge or option were
prohibited. 62 FR 46444 (September 3, 1997). The 1997 final rule added
Sec. Sec. 344.2(f)(1) and (f)(2), stating that it is impermissible to
subscribe for SLGS securities for deposit in a defeasance escrow or
fund if: (1) the amount of SLGS securities subscribed for, plus the
securities already in the escrow or fund, plus the amount the Issuer
has acquired or has a right to acquire for deposit in the escrow or
fund, exceeds the total amount of securities needed to fund such escrow
or fund, and (2) the securities in the escrow or fund are subject to an
agreement conditioned on changes in the interest rate on marketable
Treasury securities.
D. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 2004
Treasury has often noted that the prices established for SLGS
securities do not include the cost of an option. Although Treasury
considered whether to allow optionality on SLGS securities if Treasury
were compensated, Treasury concluded in a 2004 NPRM that there was no
practical way to charge for the value of an option. 69 FR 58756
(September 30, 2004).
E. Cost-Free Options Addressed in 2005
In a 2005 final rule, Treasury amended the regulations to prohibit
practices that were variations on the use of SLGS securities to create
some form of a cost-free option. These practices included: (1) the
redemption before maturity or sale of securities to reinvest in a
higher yielding SLGS or marketable security, and (2) the cancellation
of SLGS subscriptions upon rising interest rates and re-subscribing for
SLGS securities at a higher yield. 70 FR 37904 (June 30, 2005). In an
attempt to stop recurring misuse of the SLGS program, the preamble
reaffirmed that it is ``inappropriate to use the SLGS securities
program as an option'' and that such practice is ``contrary to the
purpose of the program.''
Under current regulations, Issuers are not allowed to create a
cost-free option. 31 CFR 344.2(f) provides: ``What are some practices
involving SLGS securities that are not permitted? (1) In General. For
SLGS securities subscribed for on or after August 15, 2005, it is
impermissible: (i) To use the SLGS program to create a cost-free
option. . . .''
II. Treasury's Proposals To Address Creation of Impermissible Cost-Free
Options
During escrow restructurings, Issuers often redeem SLGS securities
before maturity (early redemption) and reinvest the proceeds in SLGS or
marketable securities at a higher yield to
[[Page 59355]]
eliminate ``negative arbitrage'' under the Internal Revenue Code.
Negative arbitrage occurs when bond proceeds are invested by an Issuer
at a yield that is less than the yield on the bond issue, often as a
result of market conditions where the maximum SLGS rates available are
lower than what would be permissible under arbitrage provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 148). Such restructuring transactions
to eliminate negative arbitrage generally are allowed under the current
SLGS regulations, so long as a cost-free option is not created.
However, changing the terms of or early redemption of SLGS securities
to take advantage of infrequent pricing of SLGS securities is
prohibited under the current regulations even when undertaken to
eliminate negative arbitrage. Section 244.2(f)(1)(i) of the current
regulations makes it impermissible ``to use the SLGS program to create
a cost-free option.'' The rationale for this prohibition was previously
explained in two prior Federal Register publications, in which Treasury
specifically stated that cost-free options are impermissible, even if
used to eliminate negative arbitrage. 69 FR 58756 (September 30, 2004)
and 70 FR 37904 (June 30, 2005). Furthermore, section 244.2(f)(2) of
the current regulations includes examples of negative arbitrage
situations that are prohibited.
To further clarify the boundaries of the cost-free option
prohibition, Treasury proposes modest reductions in the current
flexibilities available under the SLGS regulations to eliminate the
following three types of practices that create cost-free options in
violation of the SLGS regulations:
(1) Purchasing a long-term SLGS security and redeeming the security
before maturity to capture redemption premium;
(2) Establishing or changing the maturity and associated interest
rate on SLGS securities already subscribed for to take advantage of
interest rate movements, either to capture redemption premiums or to
minimize losses or
(3) Establishing or changing the SLGS subscription amount to
maximize redemption premiums or minimize potential losses.
Any of these practices, alone or in combination, creates a cost-
free option. Treasury has repeatedly stated that manipulating the
administrative flexibility designed in the SLGS regulations to create a
cost-free option is an inappropriate use of the program and
inconsistent with its purpose even when undertaken to eliminate
negative arbitrage. Treasury incurs a direct cost from such
manipulation because it is not compensated for the value of the cost-
free option, which may generate large gains in the hands of the SLGS
purchasers. In addition, SLGS transactions motivated by cost-free
options result in volatility in Treasury's cash balances and difficulty
in forecasting cash balances, which increases Treasury's borrowing and
administrative costs, as previously identified in 2004 and in 2005. 69
FR 58756 (September 30, 2004) and 70 FR 37904 (June 30, 2005). The
three practices identified above create features that are not available
in marketable Treasury securities and result in additional costs to the
Federal taxpayer.
For these reasons, this NPRM proposes the amendments described
below to the SLGS regulations to eliminate these practices. Treasury
believes that the proposed amendments retain sufficient flexibility for
Issuers to be able to select maturities and interest payment dates,
thereby continuing to make SLGS securities an attractive investment
vehicle for Issuers. The proposed rule amendments will apply only to
SLGS subscriptions started on or after the effective date of the final
rule. Treasury anticipates that the effective date will be six months
after the final rule's publication in the Federal Register.
A. Purchasing and Early Redemption of a Long-Term SLGS Security
The first type of cost-free option identified in this NPRM is
``purchasing a long-term SLGS security and redeeming the security
before maturity in order to capture redemption premium.'' To eliminate
this cost-free option, Treasury proposes imposing a requirement that
the Issuer match the maturity of the SLGS security with an underlying
governmental purpose and hold Time Deposit securities, as defined by 31
CFR 344.4, for a minimum amount of time before requesting an early
redemption. The meaning of the phrase ``governmental purpose'' is
intended to be consistent with its meaning pursuant to the Income Tax
Regulations under section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.
148). Thus, an underlying governmental purpose generally refers to the
Issuer's expected use of the invested funds; for example, financing a
construction project, repaying a prior issue of bonds, or funding a
debt service reserve.
1. No Maturity Longer Than Necessary. In a 2004 NPRM, Treasury
proposed a provision that would make it impermissible for an Issuer to
purchase a SLGS security with a maturity longer than was reasonably
necessary to accomplish a governmental purpose of the Issuer. The
provision was intended to address a practice where the Issuer, acting
on movements of interest rates, would redeem the SLGS security before
maturity to capture a premium. 69 FR 58756 (September 30, 2004). Based
on public comments received, Treasury decided not to include the
provision in the 2005 final rule. 70 FR 37904 (June 30, 2005).
However, due to more recently observed early redemption requests
and changes to SLGS subscriptions that appear to have been made without
a legitimate governmental purpose, Treasury is revisiting the previous
proposal. Treasury believes that the costs to Treasury of early
redemptions and changes to SLGS subscriptions have the potential to
outweigh any administrative burden imposed on either Treasury or the
Issuer. To help ensure clarity, Treasury has added specific examples
explaining the proposed amendment.
Treasury proposes two provisions that will require the Issuer to
match the maturity of the SLGS security with an underlying governmental
purpose in order to preclude the Issuer from purchasing a long-term
SLGS security and redeeming it prior to maturity in order to capture
redemption premium. First, Treasury proposes adding a new ``duration''
certification in Sec. 344.2(e)(3), requiring the Issuer to certify
that the length of the maturity of a SLGS security subscribed for is no
longer than reasonably necessary for the underlying governmental
purpose of the investment. Because Demand Deposit securities, defined
at 31 CFR 344.7, are one-day certificates of indebtedness, they will
not be subject to the duration certification.
Second, Treasury proposes amending the non-exhaustive list of
impermissible transactions in Sec. 344.2(f)(1) by adding a new
functional description in subsection (iv) that will make it an
impermissible practice to purchase or redeem prior to maturity a SLGS
security with a maturity that is longer than is reasonably necessary to
accomplish the Issuer's governmental purpose. This functional
description is meant to encompass the policy behind the amendments
Treasury is proposing in this NPRM while acknowledging that
impermissible activity could occur in a variety of ways, including ways
not described in the non-exhaustive list. To illustrate how the
duration certification will apply to refunding escrow funds, bond debt
service reserve funds, and project construction funds, new examples of
impermissible transactions
[[Page 59356]]
will be added to Sec. 344.2(f)(2)(vii). Other examples will provide
guidance on how the certification will apply to purchases and early
redemptions of SLGS securities. Even with the addition of the new
examples of impermissible practices, Treasury considers the list of
examples to be non-exhaustive. There may be other transactions where
manipulative practices create a cost-free option using the
flexibilities afforded to Issuers in the SLGS program. All such
practices are prohibited. Conforming technical amendments will be made
throughout the regulation.
2. Minimum Holding Period and Notification for Early Redemption of
Time Deposit Securities. Under the current regulations, the Issuer may
request early redemption of a Time Deposit security as early as the day
after Treasury issues the SLGS security. Proposed Sec. 344.6(a)(3)
requires a 14-day minimum holding period after the security has been
issued before the Issuer may request early redemption of a Time Deposit
note or bond. Increasing the minimum holding period from 1 day to 14
days will increase the Issuer's interest rate risk and help to address
the type of cost-free option described in this NPRM as ``purchasing a
long-term SLGS security and redeeming the security before maturity in
order to capture redemption premium.''
The SLGS rate table on the date a subscription is ``started''
establishes the maximum interest rate applied to a SLGS security based
on the term of the security. The SLGS rate table in effect on the date
of the early redemption request is used in determining if the SLGS
security will be redeemed at a discount or premium. A premium might be
earned under the current regulations if the Issuer impermissibly
creates a cost-free option by either: (a) starting a subscription and
redeeming the security prior to maturity in response to a fall in
interest rates occurring between the subscription and issuance dates,
or (b) changing the term of a SLGS security in a subscription and
redeeming the security prior to maturity in response to a fall in
interest rates occurring between the subscription and issuance dates.
For instance, if the Issuer subscribes for a shorter-term SLGS
security, changes the subscription to a longer-term security, and
submits an early redemption request on the day after the issue date in
response to interest rate movements, an impermissible cost-free option
has been created, unless Treasury grants the Issuer a waiver in
accordance with Sec. 344.2(n). Increasing the minimum holding period
before an Issuer may request early redemption will deter the creation
of this type of impermissible cost-free option by increasing the
interest rate risk to a more meaningful level than exists under current
regulations. It is Treasury's view that even more than de minimis risk
to the Issuer does not change the fact that this is still a cost-free
option and, either with or without risk, this is an impermissible
practice.
Treasury does not believe that the proposed new holding period will
impose undue hardship on Issuers that have a need for cash proceeds
sooner than the maturity date that was chosen when the subscription was
started. If new or intervening circumstances arise before issuance of
the SLGS securities, the Issuer could take steps to change the
subscription by adjusting the maturity to a shorter-term SLGS security.
Additionally, if circumstances change after issuance of the SLGS
securities, the Issuer may seek a waiver of the minimum holding period
from Treasury as detailed in the regulations. The proposed new holding
period would not apply to Time Deposit certificates of indebtedness or
Demand Deposit securities, as these are short-term securities.
B. Establishing or Changing the Maturity and Interest Rate on SLGS
Securities
The second type of cost-free option identified in this NPRM is
referred to as ``establishing or changing the maturity and associated
interest rate on SLGS securities already subscribed for to take
advantage of interest rate movements, either to capture redemption
premiums or to minimize losses.'' To eliminate this cost-free option,
Treasury proposes that the Issuer be required to specify the maturity
of Time Deposit securities when a subscription is started and be
limited in adjustments that can be made to the maturity of Time Deposit
securities.
1. Specifying the Maturity of Time Deposit Securities
Current regulations permit Issuers to subscribe for SLGS up to 60
days in advance of issuance and until 3 p.m. Eastern Time on the day of
issuance to specify the maturity for Time Deposit securities. This
flexibility makes it possible for the Issuer to impermissibly create
the cost-free option described in this NPRM as ``establishing or
changing the maturity and associated interest rate on SLGS securities
already subscribed for to take advantage of interest rate movements,
either to capture redemption premiums or to minimize losses.''
Treasury's research reveals that approximately 99 percent of SLGS
subscriptions are started with a stated maturity date. Only a small
percentage of subscriptions have had changes made by Issuers to the
maturity dates of the securities following the start of a subscription.
Given that the overwhelming majority of Issuers have identified the
maturity date at the start of the SLGS subscription process, Treasury
proposes that all Issuers must provide a maturity date at the start of
a subscription, rather than by the time of completion of the
subscription. Treasury proposes that when starting a Time Deposit
security subscription under Sec. 344.5(b)(5) and completing a
subscription under Sec. 344.5(e)(2), the Issuer must separately
itemize the maturity date(s) by individual Time Deposit security.
Issuers will have the ability to adjust the maturities, within certain
parameters, if necessary.
2. Limiting Maturity Adjustments on Time Deposit Securities
Additionally, Treasury proposes to limit Issuer adjustments to the
maturity of a Time Deposit security before issuance. The current SLGS
regulations permit the Issuer to make unrestricted changes to the
maturity of a Time Deposit security and choose any term from 30 days to
40 years (31 CFR 344.4(a)). This flexibility is an attractive feature
of the SLGS program. However, when this flexibility results in the
Issuer ``establishing or changing the maturity and associated interest
rate on SLGS securities already subscribed for to take advantage of
interest rate movements, either to capture redemption premiums or to
minimize losses,'' an impermissible cost-free option is created.
Proposed Sec. 344.5(d)(4), governing how to change a subscription,
and Sec. 344.5(e)(7), governing when a subscription is completed,
state that the Issuer cannot change the maturity date on a Time Deposit
security by more than 30 days for certificates of indebtedness, 6
months for notes, and 1 year for bonds. The proposed amendments retain
flexibility in setting maturity of SLGS securities, while removing the
ability to alter maturities beyond the time required to accomplish a
governmental purpose.
C. Establishing or Changing the SLGS Subscription Amount
The third type of cost-free option identified in this NPRM is
referred to as ``establishing or changing the SLGS subscription amount
in order to maximize redemption premiums or minimize potential
losses.'' Treasury proposes to limit principal amount changes to Time
Deposit securities at
[[Page 59357]]
the individual security level to address this cost-free option.
1. Changing Principal Amounts on Time Deposit Securities
Before 2005, the Issuer could change the aggregate principal amount
specified in the initial subscription by up to $10 million or 10
percent, whichever was greater. In a 2004 NPRM, Treasury proposed a
size amendment provision to permit a change in the aggregate principal
amount by 10 percent above or below the amount originally specified in
the subscription. 69 FR 58756 (September 30, 2004). The provision was
adopted in the 2005 final rule. 70 FR 37904 (June 30, 2005).
The current regulation provides that the aggregate principal amount
originally specified in the SLGS subscription cannot be changed by more
than 10 percent. Because a single subscription may be used to purchase
multiple Time Deposit securities with different principal and maturity
terms, the current size provision at the aggregate subscription level
is inadequate to address Treasury's concerns about the creation of
cost-free options at the individual security level. Treasury proposes
to limit the amount of principal that each Time Deposit security in a
subscription can be changed. Proposed Sec. 344.5(d)(2) applies the 10
percent limit at the individual SLGS security level instead of at the
case level, which may be composed of multiple SLGS securities.
Notwithstanding the above, even if a principal adjustment within 10
percent of the original subscription amount of a particular Time
Deposit security complies with proposed Sec. 344.5(d)(2), that
adjustment would violate the current prohibition in Sec.
344.2(f)(1)(i) if the change is motivated by interest rate movements.
In that case, the Issuer would be creating a cost-free option by
``establishing or changing the SLGS subscription amount in order to
maximize redemption premiums or minimize potential losses.''
2. Changing Principal Amounts on Demand Deposit Securities
Treasury does not propose to amend Sec. 344.8(d) pertaining to
Demand Deposit securities. Demand Deposit securities will remain
subject to the current rule that the aggregate principal amount may not
be changed by more than 10 percent above or below the amount originally
specified in the subscription.
III. Administrative Changes
On October 7, 2012, the Secretary of the Treasury issued Treasury
Order 136-01, establishing within the Department of the Treasury, the
Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service). The new bureau
consolidated the bureaus formerly known as the Financial Management
Service (FMS) and the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD). 78 FR 31629 (May
24, 2013).
On October 2, 2013, Treasury published a final rule entitled
``Regulatory Reorganization; Administrative Changes to Regulations Due
to the Consolidation of the Financial Management Service and the Bureau
of the Public Debt Into the Bureau of the Fiscal Service.'' This final
rule renamed subchapter A, transferred parts 306 through 391 of
subchapter B to subchapter A, and removed and reserved subchapter B in
31 CFR chapter II. This had the effect of moving the SLGS regulations
from subchapter B to subchapter A; removing all references to ``Bureau
of the Public Debt'' and adding, in their place, ``Bureau of the Fiscal
Service''; removing all references to ``BPD'' and ``Public Debt'' and
adding, in their place, ``Fiscal Service''; and, removing all
references to ``www.publicdebt.treas.gov'' and adding, in each place,
``www.fiscal.treasury.gov'', but did not make any corresponding changes
to the current requirements of the SLGS regulations. 78 FR 60695
(October 2, 2013).
This NPRM makes other minor administrative or technical changes.
See, e.g., proposed Sec. Sec. 344.0(a), 344.1, 344.2(d), (e)(2)(i),
(e)(4), (f)(2)(iv), (f)(2)(v), (g), 344.3(e), 344.4(b)(1), 344.5(a)-
(b), (d)-(f), 344.6(a)(3), (g), 344.7(b)(1)-(2), 344.8(a)-(b), (e), and
344.9(a). Some of these changes are noted below.
A. Purpose of the SLGS Program
Previously Sec. 344.0(a) provided that SLGS securities may be
issued to assist Issuers in complying with the yield restriction and
rebate requirements applicable to tax-exempt securities under the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 148). Treasury issued a final rule in
2005 deleting the language relating to amounts that ``assist in
complying with applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
relating to the tax exemption'' stating that this language was somewhat
vague and proved too difficult to administer. 70 FR 37904, 37909, June
30, 2005. This deletion has had the unintended consequence of confusing
some Issuers about the purpose of the SLGS program. Treasury proposes
to amend Sec. 344.0(a) by reinserting language that the purpose of the
SLGS program is ``to assist in complying with applicable provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code.''
B. Definitions Updates.
The 2005 final rule amended the regulations to require
certifications under Sec. 344.2(e)(2)(A) if Issuers purchase SLGS
securities with any amount received from the sale or redemption before
maturity of any marketable security, that the yield on such SLGS
security does not exceed the yield at which such marketable security
was sold or redeemed. The preamble of the 2005 final rule explained
that ``marketable securities'' was a broader category than Treasury
securities and could include ``marketable securities that have a lower
credit rating than Treasury securities.'' 70 FR 37904, 37906 (June 30,
2005).
Since 2005, the SLGS Frequently Asked Questions have explained that
a ``marketable security'' is ``any security other than a State or Local
Government Series (SLGS) security. Examples of marketable securities
include Treasury securities (other than SLGS securities), guaranteed
investment contracts, and federal agency securities.'' https://www.slgs.gov. While this definition may appear broad, given that owners
of SLGS securities are generally restricted in the types of investments
they may purchase with tax-advantaged bond proceeds, this definition
has served to clarify how the term ``marketable security'' is used in
the context of the SLGS regulations.
Treasury proposes adding a definition of ``marketable security''
under Sec. 344.1 that closely aligns with the example in the SLGS
Frequently Asked Questions. The proposed definition states,
``Marketable security, with reference to the types of securities that
issuers of tax-advantaged securities are permitted to purchase with
tax-advantaged proceeds, means any security other than a SLGS security.
Examples of marketable securities include Treasury securities (other
than SLGS securities) and federal agency securities.'' Treasury is not
incorporating ``guaranteed investment contracts'' within the proposed
definition of ``marketable security.'' This change is not because
Treasury intends to allow guaranteed investment contracts to be used to
create cost-free options, but is meant to keep the definition of
``marketable security'' more in line with industry use. For the
avoidance of doubt, Treasury affirms that the use of guaranteed
investment contracts, any other nonmarketable security, or any other
means to create a cost-free option, is prohibited. The definition would
apply throughout the rule whenever the term ``marketable security'' is
used.
[[Page 59358]]
Additionally, Treasury proposes adding a new definition of ``cost-
free option'' under Sec. 344.1 that states that the use of any
provision(s) in the SLGS program to exploit movements in interest
rates, including, but not limited to, those designed to provide
marginal flexibility to Issuers in structuring their SLGS investments
constitutes the creation of an impermissible cost-free option. Treasury
has intentionally drafted the definition of cost-free option broadly to
encompass all situations in which exploitation of the movement in
interest rates is an impermissible practice.
Treasury further proposes adding a new definition of ``governmental
purpose'' under Sec. 344.1 that clarifies that using the SLGS program
to create cost-free options is not a permitted governmental purpose. A
permitted governmental purpose includes but is not limited to financing
a construction project, repaying a prior issue of bonds, or funding a
debt service reserve. The governmental purpose must be consistent with
the purposes of the Income Tax Regulations under section 148 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Treasury also proposes adding a new definition of ``tax-advantaged
bond'' under Sec. 344.1 that corresponds with the definition of the
types of bonds to which the relevant portions of the Internal Revenue
Code and the Income Tax Regulations (generally 26 U.S.C. 148 and 26 CFR
1.148-0 through 1.148-11) apply. The Internal Revenue Code is dynamic
and new types tax-advantaged bonds have been created and could be
created in the future. The definition of ``tax-advantaged bond''
includes (i) a tax-exempt bond, (ii) a taxable bond that provides a
federal tax credit to the investor with respect to the Issuer's
borrowing costs, (iii) a taxable bond that provides a refundable
federal tax credit payable directly to the Issuer for its borrowing
cost, and (iv) any future similar bond that provides a federal tax
benefit that reduces an Issuers' borrowing cost. (26 CFR 1.150-1(b)).
Treasury proposes amending the definition of ``business day'' under
Sec. 344.1 to clarify which days normal processing of SLGS securities
transactions will occur. Section 6103 of Title 5 of the United States
Code sets forth which days are considered ``legal public holidays.''
Generally, federal agencies are closed for business on legal public
holidays and such holidays are non-workdays for federal employees.
However, while federal agencies may be closed on such days, the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York may still be open and conducting payment
transactions. Because payment transactions are still possible, even
though the Bureau of the Fiscal Service may be closed for most
transactions, scheduled payments for SLGS securities still occur those
days when the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is open. The revision to
the definition of ``business day'' clarifies when normal SLGS
transactions may occur and payments will be processed.
Finally, Treasury proposes amending the definition of ``eligible
source of funds'' under Sec. 344.1 to better align with the relevant
portions of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax Regulations.
New types of tax-advantaged bonds have been and can be added to the
Internal Revenue Code. Treasury is amending the definition of
``eligible source of funds'' to include proceeds of all types of tax-
advantaged bonds as defined in 26 CFR 1.150-1(b), including those
created after the date of any SLGS final rule.
C. Certification of Eligibility To Purchase
Given that the purpose of the SLGS program is to assist Issuers in
complying with the yield restriction and rebate requirements applicable
to tax-advantaged securities under the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury
views it prudent to provide for what are currently rare situations when
bonds lose their tax-advantaged status. In such cases, the proceeds
used by the Issuer to purchase SLGS may no longer be considered an
``eligible source of funds.''
Treasury proposes a new Sec. 344.2(e)(4) that would add an Issuer
certification as to its eligibility to purchase SLGS securities. Under
this new section, the Issuer would certify that it will notify Treasury
if the funds used to purchase SLGS securities were no longer considered
``an eligible source of funds.'' The notification requirement would
apply to all outstanding SLGS securities (e.g., Time Deposit, Demand
Deposit, and special 90-day certificates of indebtedness). Treasury
would deem the notification as a request to redeem those outstanding
Demand Deposit securities that are affected by the ineligibility under
Sec. 344.9, as amended. The Issuer would not be required to redeem
Time Deposit securities that are outstanding at the time of the
notification because Time Deposit securities are longer-term securities
that would have been purchased with an eligible source of funds.
Special 90-day certificates of indebtedness containing funds that are
no longer considered ``an eligible source of funds'' would be redeemed
either upon maturity (i.e., would not be rolled into a new special 90-
day certificate of indebtedness) or upon reversion to Demand Deposit
securities.
D. SLGS Rate Table
Under the current regulation, Sec. 344.4(b)(1), if the SLGS rate
table is not released to the public by 10 a.m. Eastern Time on a
particular business day, then the SLGS rate table for the preceding
business day applies. Treasury proposes amending Sec. 344.4(b)(1) to
state that Treasury will post the SLGS rate table ``by 10 a.m. Eastern
Time each business day or as soon as practicable thereafter.'' Under
this proposed amendment, Treasury would have more flexibility in those
instances where the SLGS rate table could not be released to the public
by 10 a.m. Eastern Time. However, if no SLGS rate table has been
published by 11 a.m. Eastern Time, then the SLGS rate table for the
preceding business day would apply. This provides Issuers with more
accurate pricing when there is a slight delay in publishing the SLGS
rate table, while carrying over the previous day's rate if
circumstances prevent publication of a new SLGS rate table.
E. Establishment of the Issue Date
Under the current rule in Sec. 344.5(a) and Sec. 344.8(a), the
issue date for Time Deposit and Demand Deposit securities cannot be
more than 60 calendar days after the date Treasury receives the
subscription. Our data analysis reveals that less than 4 percent of
SLGS subscriptions are started more than 45 days in advance of the
issue date. Treasury proposes to amend these provisions to reduce the
lead time for an Issuer to subscribe for SLGS securities from 60 to 45
calendar days. The subscription date controls which SLGS rate table
applies to the subscription for securities. Moving the subscription
date closer to the issue date would provide more accurate pricing for
SLGS securities. Additionally, this proposed amendment has the added
benefit of narrowing the window of time in which an impermissible cost-
free option could be created. Conforming amendments would also be made
to Sec. 344.2(f)(2)(iv).
F. Subscription Process
The current regulation specifies the information the Issuer must
provide to start and complete the subscription process for both Time
Deposit and Demand Deposit securities. The current rule in Sec. 344.5
and Sec. 344.8 specifies the information that the Issuer must provide
when starting the SLGS subscription process (Sec. 344.5(b) and Sec.
344.8(b)), how the Issuer may change a subscription (Sec. 344.5(d) and
Sec. 344.8(d)), and how the
[[Page 59359]]
Issuer completes the subscription (Sec. 344.5(e) and Sec. 344.8(e)).
To implement Treasury's proposed amendments discussed in Sections
II(A)(1) (duration certification regarding matching the SLGS maturity
to the governmental purpose), II(B)(1) (specifying the maturity of each
Time Deposit security in the subscription), II(C) (changing the
principal amounts), III(C) (eligibility certification), and III(G)
(including the EMMA[supreg] registration in the SLGS case, discussed
below), Treasury proposes amending Sec. 344.5 and Sec. 344.8 to
include these requirements.
Additionally, Treasury proposes amending Sec. 344.5 and Sec.
344.8 to more specifically identify currently required information such
as the Issuer's address and banking information, while removing the
requirement to specify the ``title of an official authorized to
purchase SLGS securities'' as the title is no longer needed. In
addition, the reference to the ``proceeds that are derived, directly or
indirectly, from the redemption before maturity of SLGS securities
subscribed for on or before December 27, 1976,'' would be deleted as
none of these securities remain outstanding.
G. Identification of the Tax-Advantaged Bond Issue
Under the current rule in Sec. 344.5(b)(5) and Sec. 344.8(b)(5),
the underlying tax-advantaged bond issue must be identified when the
Issuer ``starts'' and ``completes'' the subscription for SLGS
securities. The Issuer starts the subscription process by entering
certain information in required data fields in SLGSafe, the secure
internet site through which SLGS transactions are submitted. When
starting a subscription, the Issuer typically enters information on the
new or ``refunding bonds,'' and not the ``refunded bonds'' or the
``prior issue'' being refinanced.
This requirement has been in the current regulation since the 2005
final rule required the Issuer to enter a description of the Issuer's
tax-exempt bond issue such as ``Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Series
2004'' (70 FR 37904, 37907, June 30, 2005). Subsequently, the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) launched its Electronic Municipal
Market Access (EMMA[supreg]) system, and EMMA[supreg] has now become
the official repository for municipal securities disclosures.
Given that EMMA[supreg] generally contains information about state
and local government bonds, Treasury proposes to amend the regulation
to require that if a bond issue is registered in EMMA[supreg], the
Issuer must adhere to the naming convention supplied in the ``issue
description'' field on the ``Security Information'' tab in EMMA[supreg]
at https://emma.msrb.org when describing the tax-advantaged bond in
SLGSafe. If the EMMA[supreg] website revises its naming convention, the
Issuer would supply the updated registration as it is presented in
EMMA[supreg], or its successor system.
The Issuer would be able to input the ``EMMA[supreg] registration''
into SLGSafe at the time the subscription is started (Sec. 344.5(b)(4)
and Sec. 344.8(b)(4)), but that information would not be required
until such time as the subscription is completed (Sec. 344.5(e)(3) and
Sec. 344.8(e)(2)). This would allow additional time for the Issuer to
update the description field if the bond issue has not yet been
registered with EMMA[supreg] when the subscription is started.
Conforming the underlying bond issuance field in SLGSafe with the
EMMA[supreg]'s naming convention would assist Treasury in determining
if the amounts are an ``eligible source of funds'' under Sec. 344.1
that may be used to purchase SLGS securities.
H. Special Zero Interest Securities and Subscriptions on or Before
December 27, 1976
Special zero interest securities were discontinued by Treasury on
October 28, 1996. Therefore, Treasury proposes removing Subpart D of
the current rule. In addition, all outstanding SLGS securities issued
on or before December 27, 1976, matured by November 1, 2013. Therefore,
Treasury proposes removing Sec. 344.5(e)(4) and Sec. 344.6(g) of the
current rule.
I. Debt Limit Contingency
1. Treasury's Discretion to Leave Demand Deposit Securities
Invested or to Invest in Special 90-day Certificates of Indebtedness.
The current regulation states that at any time the Secretary determines
that issuance of obligations sufficient to conduct the orderly
financing operations of the United States cannot be made without
exceeding the statutory debt limit, Treasury must invest any unredeemed
Demand Deposit securities in special 90-day certificates of
indebtedness. Treasury proposes to amend Sec. 344.7(b) to provide the
Secretary with the flexibility to exercise discretion to either leave
the unredeemed Demand Deposit securities invested or to invest them in
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness.
2. Terms Applying to Invested Demand Deposit Securities. Treasury
proposes to clarify Sec. 344.7(b)(1) to provide that Demand Deposit
securities during a debt limit contingency remain subject to the normal
terms and conditions that apply to Demand Deposit securities.
3. Terms Applying to Special 90-day Certificates of Indebtedness.
Treasury proposes to clarify Sec. 344.7(b)(2) to provide that special
90-day certificates of indebtedness that are issued during a debt limit
contingency remain subject to the same redemption rules as Demand
Deposit securities. Treasury would roll over special 90-day
certificates of indebtedness, along with accrued interest, into new
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness when a debt limit
contingency period lasts longer than 90 days.
4. End of a Debt Limit Contingency. At the end of a debt limit
contingency, the Issuer currently has the option to keep the special
90-day certificates of indebtedness until maturity, redeem them before
maturity, or reinvest them in Demand Deposit securities. Treasury
proposes to amend Sec. 344.7(b)(2) to provide that when regular
Treasury borrowing operations resume, Treasury would redeem any special
90-day certificates of indebtedness and reinvest the proceeds, along
with accrued interest, in Demand Deposit securities. As a result, the
Issuer would once again hold the investment that the Issuer originally
requested.
J. Notice Period for Redemption of Demand Deposit Securities
The current regulation Sec. 344.9(a) requires notice of 1 business
day for redemption of Demand Deposit securities in the amount of $10
million or less and notice of 3 business days for redemptions of more
than $10 million. To aid in Treasury's cash forecasting and cash
management, Treasury proposes amending Sec. 344.9(a) to require notice
of 5 business days for redemption of Demand Deposit securities and
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness in the principal amount of
$500 million or more. Some Issuers hold numerous securities in multiple
SLGSafe cases. To determine which notice period applies, the Issuer
would calculate the total amount of proceeds to be derived from
redemption of Demand Deposit securities and special 90-day certificates
of indebtedness at the ``owner,'' and not the ``case,'' level.
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This NPRM is not a significant regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment of anticipated
[[Page 59360]]
benefits, costs, and regulatory alternatives is not required.
B. Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Because this NPRM relates to United States securities, which are
contracts between Treasury and the owner of the security, this rule
falls within the contract exception to the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). As a result, the notice, public comment, and
delayed effective date provisions of the APA are inapplicable to this
rule. However, although not required under the APA, Treasury is seeking
public comment on this NPRM.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Although this NPRM is being issued in proposed form to secure the
benefit of public comment, it relates to matters of public contract and
procedures for United States securities. Because a NPRM is not
required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq., do not apply. However, Treasury will consider the
potential impact of this proposed rule on small entities and will
evaluate any proposed alternatives that would allow Treasury to
accomplish the objectives of this proposed rule without unduly
burdening small entities by imposing a significant economic impact on
them. Therefore, Treasury will accept comments pertaining to the
potential impact and proposed alternatives during the comment period.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, do not apply
to this NPRM because there are no new or revised recordkeeping or
reporting requirements. The existing OMB Paperwork Reduction Act
control numbers for Part 344 are 1530-0044 and 1530-0065.
V. Proposed Regulations
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 344
Bonds, Government securities, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, Treasury
proposes to amend 31 CFR part 344 as follows:
PART 344--U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES--STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SERIES.
0
1. The authority citation for part 344 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 141 note; 31 U.S.C. 3102, 3103, 3104, and
3121.
0
2. Amend Sec. 344.0, by revising paragraph (a) and removing paragraph
(b)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 344.0 What does this part cover?
(a) What is the purpose of the SLGS securities offering? The
Secretary of the Treasury (the Secretary) offers for sale non-
marketable State and Local Government Series (SLGS) securities to
provide issuers of tax-advantaged bonds with investments from any
eligible source of funds (as defined in Sec. 344.1) to assist issuers
in complying with applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 344.1, by:
0
a. Revising the definition of ``Business day(s)'';
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order a definition for ``Cost-free option'';
0
c. Revising the definition of ``Eligible source of funds'';
0
d. Adding in alphabetical order a definition for ``Governmental
purpose'';
0
e. Revising the definition of ``Issuer'';
0
f. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``Marketable
security''; and ``Tax-advantaged bond.''
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 344.1 What special terms do I need to know to understand this
part?
* * * * *
Business day(s) means any day other than a Saturday or Sunday that
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is open for business.
Cost-free option means the use of any provision(s) in the SLGS
program to exploit movements in interest rates, including, but not
limited to, those designed to provide marginal flexibility to issuers
in structuring their SLGS investments.
* * * * *
Eligible source of funds means:
(1) Any amounts that are gross proceeds of an issue of tax-
advantaged bonds or are reasonably expected to become gross proceeds of
such an issue of tax-advantaged bonds;
(2) Any amounts that formerly were gross proceeds of a tax-
advantaged bond issue, but no longer are treated as gross proceeds of
such issue as a result of the operation of the universal cap on the
maximum amount treated as gross proceeds under 26 CFR 1.148-6(b)(2);
(3) Amounts held or to be held together with gross proceeds of one
or more tax-advantaged bond issues in a refunding escrow, defeasance
escrow, parity debt service reserve fund, or commingled fund (as
defined in 26 CFR 1.148-1(b));
(4) Proceeds of a bond issue that is not an issue of tax-advantaged
bonds but that refunds, or is refunded by, an issue of tax-advantaged
bonds; or
(5) Any other amounts that are subject to yield limitations under
the rules applicable to tax-advantaged bonds under the Internal Revenue
Code.
Governmental purpose, under this part, means the issuer's expected
use of the invested funds, including but not limited to, financing a
construction project, repaying a prior issue of bonds, or funding a
debt service reserve. Such use must be consistent with the purposes of
the Income Tax Regulations under section 148 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Generating gain on the proceeds of a bond issue through the use
of a cost-free option in purchasing and redeeming SLGS is not a
permitted governmental purpose.
Issuer refers to the government body or other entity that issues
tax-advantaged bonds, or to a conduit borrower.
Marketable security, with reference to the types of securities that
issuers are permitted to purchase with an eligible source of funds,
means any security other than a SLGS security. Examples of marketable
securities include Treasury securities (other than SLGS securities) and
federal agency securities.
* * * * *
Tax-advantaged bond means tax-advantaged bond as defined in 26 CFR
1.150-1(b).
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 344.2 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d) and paragraph (e)(2)(i) introductory text;
0
b. Adding paragraphs (e)(3) and (e)(4);
0
c. Revising paragraph (f)(1), the second sentence of paragraph
(f)(2)(iv), and the first sentence of paragraph (f)(2)(v);
0
d. Adding paragraph (f)(2)(vii);and
0
e. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (g).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 344.2 What general provisions apply to SLGS securities?
* * * * *
(d) Can SLGS securities be transferred? No. SLGS securities issued
as any one type, i.e., Time Deposit or Demand Deposit, cannot be
transferred for other securities of that type or any other type.
Transfer of securities by sale, exchange, assignment, pledge, or
otherwise is not permitted.
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Purchase of SLGS securities. Upon submitting a subscription, or
performing
[[Page 59361]]
any other transaction for a SLGS security, a subscriber must certify
that:
* * * * *
(3) Duration certification. For each subscription to purchase a
Time Deposit SLGS security, the subscriber must certify that the term
of the SLGS security subscribed for is no longer than reasonably
necessary for the underlying governmental purpose of the investment.
(4) Eligibility certification. For each subscription to purchase a
SLGS security, the subscriber must certify that if, at any point while
SLGS securities are outstanding, the issuer becomes ineligible to
purchase SLGS securities or the funds used to purchase SLGS securities
are no longer an eligible source of funds, the issuer or agent thereof
must, as soon as practicable, notify Treasury of such ineligibility.
Such notification will be deemed to be a request for redemption of
those outstanding Demand Deposit securities that are affected by the
ineligibility.
(f) * * *
(1)Impermissible Transactions:
(i) To use the SLGS program to create a cost-free option (while the
following examples may specifically use marketable securities for
illustration, creating a cost-free option via any means is prohibited);
(ii) To purchase a SLGS security with any amount received from the
sale or redemption (at the option of the holder) before maturity of any
marketable security, if the yield on such SLGS security exceeds the
yield at which such marketable security is sold or redeemed;
(iii) To invest any amount received from the redemption before
maturity of a Time Deposit security (other than a Zero Percent Time
Deposit security) at a yield that exceeds the yield that is used to
determine the amount of redemption proceeds for such Time Deposit
security; or
(iv) To purchase a SLGS security with a maturity that is longer
than is reasonably necessary to accomplish the issuer's governmental
purpose for its purchase of the SLGS security or to purchase a SLGS
security with an intention to redeem such SLGS security earlier than is
reasonably necessary to accomplish the issuer's governmental purpose
for its purchase of the SLGS security.
(2) * * *
(iv) * * * To reduce or eliminate this negative arbitrage, the
issuer subscribes for SLGS securities for purchase in 45 days. * * *
(v) * * * On February 6, 2006, an issuer purchases a Time Deposit
security using an eligible source of funds from a debt service reserve
fund. * * *
* * * * *
(vii) Purchase of SLGS security with maturity longer than
reasonably necessary. An issuer may purchase SLGS securities to
facilitate compliance with arbitrage yield restrictions for investments
of various types of proceeds of tax[hyphen]advantaged bonds, including
investments in refunding escrow funds, bond debt service reserve funds,
or project construction funds, respectively. The determination of
whether a maturity for a SLGS security is longer than is reasonably
necessary depends on the issuer's governmental purpose for the
issuance. Thus, the maturities of SLGS securities invested in a
refunding escrow fund are reasonably necessary if they are no longer
than those necessary to accomplish the defeasance of the underlying
refunded bonds until the applicable redemption date or retirement date
of the refunded bonds. Maturities of SLGS securities invested in a
project construction fund are reasonably necessary if they are no
longer than the reasonably expected construction period for the
financed project, and early redemptions of such securities are
reasonably necessary if they are reasonably related to construction
draws for the financed project. Maturities of SLGS securities invested
in a debt service reserve fund are reasonably necessary if they are no
longer than the earlier of the permitted term of investments in that
reserve fund under the bond documents or the term of the secured bonds.
Early redemptions of SLGS securities with reasonably necessary
maturities are permissible for the above bona fide business reasons,
including changes in market interest rates. By contrast, the purchase
of SLGS securities with maturities that are longer than the reasonably
necessary maturities described above and associated early redemptions
of those SLGS securities to obtain the funds within periods that would
correspond to an issuer's bona fide governmental purpose for a SLGS
investment constitute impermissible practices under paragraph
(f)(1)(iv). Thus, for example, if an issuer purchases SLGS securities
to fund a refunding escrow to be used to defease and call refunded
bonds at the first call date in five years, the issuer's purchase of
SLGS securities with maturities beyond that five-year period and
corresponding early redemptions of those SLGS securities within that
five[hyphen]year period constitute an impermissible use of the SLGS
program.
(g) * * * Fiscal Service's ABA Routing Number can be found on
Fiscal Service's website under the SLGS FAQs.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 344.3 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 344.3 What provisions apply to the SLGSafe Service?
* * * * *
(e) How do I apply for SLGSafe access? Submit to Fiscal Service a
completed SLGSafe Application for internet Access, which is found on
Fiscal Service's website.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 344.4 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 344.4 What are Time Deposit securities?
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) When is the SLGS rate table released? We release the SLGS rate
table to the public by 10 a.m. Eastern time each business day or as
soon as practicable thereafter. If the SLGS rate table is not available
by 11 a.m. Eastern time on any given business day, the SLGS rate table
for the preceding business day applies.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 344.5 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), (d), (e), and
(f), to read as follows:
Sec. 344.5 What other provisions apply to subscriptions for Time
Deposit securities?
(a) When is my subscription due? The subscriber must set the issue
date for the securities in the subscription. The issue date must be a
business day. The issue date cannot be more than 45 days after the date
we receive the subscription. If the subscription is for $10 million or
less, we must receive a subscription at least 5 days before the issue
date. If the subscription is for over $10 million, we must receive the
subscription at least 7 days before the issue date.
Example 1 to paragraph (a): If SLGS securities totaling $10 million
or less will be issued on May 16th, we must receive the subscription no
later than May 11th. If SLGS securities totaling more than $10 million
will be issued on May 16th, we must receive the subscription no later
than May 9th. In all cases, if SLGS securities will be issued on May
16th, we will not accept the subscription before April 1st.
(b) How do I start the subscription process? A subscriber starts
the subscription process by entering into SLGSafe the following
information:
(1) The issue date;
(2) The total principal amount;
(3) The issuer's name and Taxpayer Identification Number;
[[Page 59362]]
(4) A description of the tax-advantaged bond issue;
(5) Separately itemized securities to be purchased, specifying
principal amount, maturity date, interest rate, and first interest
payment date (in the case of notes and bonds) for each; and
(6) The certifications required by Sec. 344.2(e).
* * * * *
(d) How do I change a subscription? You can change a subscription
on or before 3 p.m. Eastern time, on the issue date. Changes to a
subscription are acceptable with the following exceptions:
(1) You cannot change the issue date; provided, however, you may
change the issue date up to 7 days after the original issue date if you
establish to the satisfaction of Treasury that such change is required
as a result of circumstances that were unforeseen at the time of the
subscription and are beyond the issuer's control (for example, a
natural disaster);
(2) You cannot change the principal amount originally specified for
any security in the subscription by more than ten percent;
(3) You cannot change an interest rate to exceed the maximum
interest rate in the SLGS rate table that was in effect for a security
of comparable maturity on the business day that you began the
subscription process; and
(4) You cannot change the maturity date originally specified for
any security in the subscription by more than 30 days for certificates
of indebtedness, 6 months for notes, and 1 year for bonds.
(e) How do I complete the subscription process? The completed
subscription must:
(1) Be dated and submitted electronically by an official authorized
to make the purchase;
(2) Separately itemize securities specifying principal amount,
maturity date, interest rate, and first interest payment date (in the
case of notes and bonds) for each;
(3) Describe the bond issue. If the tax-advantaged bond issue
referenced in paragraph (b)(4) of this section is, or will be,
registered or disclosed in the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's
(MSRB) Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA[supreg]) system,
describe the issue exactly as designated in the ``issue description''
field of EMMA[supreg], or successor system;
(4) Include the issuer's address;
(5) Include information on the financial institution that will
transmit the funds for the purchase of the securities and information
on the financial institution that will receive security principal and
interest payments;
(6) Not be more than ten percent above or below the aggregate
principal amount originally specified in the subscription and not be
more than ten percent above or below the originally subscribed for
amount for each individual security;
(7) Not deviate from the original subscribed for maturity date
specified for any security in the subscription by more than 30 days for
certificates of indebtedness, 6 months for notes, and 1 year for bonds;
(8) Include the information required under paragraph (b) of this
section, if not already provided; and
(9) Include the certifications required by Sec. 344.2(e).
(f) When must I complete the subscription? We must receive a
completed subscription on or before 3 p.m. Eastern time on the issue
date.
0
8. Amend Sec. 344.6 by revising paragraph (a)(3); and removing
paragraph (g).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 344.6 How do I redeem a Time Deposit security before maturity?
(a) * * *
(3) Notes or bonds. A note or bond can be redeemed, at the owner's
option, no earlier than 30 days after the issue date. Any request for
redemption received within 14 days of the issue date will be rejected.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 344.7 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 344.7 What are Demand Deposit securities?
* * * * *
(b) What happens to Demand Deposit securities during a Debt Limit
Contingency? At any time the Secretary determines that issuance of
obligations sufficient to conduct the orderly financing operations of
the United States cannot be made without exceeding the statutory debt
limit, we may invest any unredeemed Demand Deposit securities in
special 90-day certificates of indebtedness.
(1) Funds left invested in Demand Deposit securities remain subject
to the normal terms and conditions for such securities as set forth in
this part.
(2) Funds invested in 90-day certificates of indebtedness earn
simple interest equal to the daily factor in effect at the time Demand
Deposit security issuance is suspended, multiplied by the number of
days outstanding. Ninety-day certificates of indebtedness are subject
to the same request for redemption notification requirements as those
for Demand Deposit securities and will be redeemed at par value plus
accrued interest. If a 90-day certificate of indebtedness reaches
maturity during a debt limit contingency, we will automatically roll it
into a new 90-day certificate of indebtedness, along with accrued
interest, that earns simple interest equal to the daily factor in
effect at the time that the new 90-day certificate of indebtedness is
issued, multiplied by the number of days outstanding. When regular
Treasury borrowing operations resume, the 90-day certificates of
indebtedness, along with accrued interest, will be reinvested in Demand
Deposit securities.
0
10. Amend Sec. 344.8 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (e) to read
as follows:
Sec. 344.8 What other provisions apply to subscriptions for Demand
Deposit securities?
(a) When is my subscription due? The subscriber must set the issue
date in the subscription. You cannot change the issue date to require
issuance earlier or later than the issue date originally specified;
provided, however, you may change the issue date up to 7 days after the
original issue date if you establish to the satisfaction of Treasury
that such change is required as a result of circumstances that were
unforeseen at the time of the subscription and are beyond the issuer's
control (for example, a natural disaster). The issue date must be a
business day. The issue date cannot be more than 45 days after the date
we receive the subscription. If the subscription is for $10 million or
less, we must receive the subscription at least 5 days before the issue
date. If the subscription is for more than $10 million, we must receive
the subscription at least 7 days before the issue date.
(b) How do I start the subscription process? A subscriber starts
the subscription process by entering into SLGSafe the following
information:
(1) The issue date;
(2) The total principal amount;
(3) The issuer's name and Taxpayer Identification Number;
(4) A description of the tax-advantaged bond issue; and
(5) The certifications required by Sec. 344.2(e)(1), if the
subscription is submitted by an agent of the issuer.
* * * * *
(e) How do I complete the subscription process? The completed
subscription must:
(1) Be dated and submitted electronically by an official authorized
to make the purchase;
[[Page 59363]]
(2) Describe the bond issue. If the tax-advantaged bond issue
referenced in paragraph (b)(4) of this section is, or will be,
registered or disclosed in the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's
(MSRB) Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA[supreg]) system,
describe the issue exactly as designated in the ``issue description''
field of EMMA[supreg], or successor system;
(3) Include the issuer's address;
(4) Include the information on the financial institution that will
transmit the funds for the purchase of the securities;
(5) Not be more than ten percent above or below the aggregate
principal amount originally specified in the subscription;
(6) Include the information required under paragraph (b) of this
section, if not already provided; and
(7) Include the certifications required by Sec. 344.2(e)(1) (agent
certification), Sec. 344.2(e)(2)(i) (yield certification), and Sec.
344.2(e)(4) (eligibility certification).
0
11. Amend Sec. 344.9 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 344.9 How do I redeem a Demand Deposit security?
(a) When must I notify Treasury to redeem a security? Demand
Deposit securities can be redeemed at the owner's option, if we receive
a request for redemption not less than:
(1) One business day before the requested redemption date for total
redemptions by an owner of $10 million or less;
(2) Three business days before the requested redemption date for
total redemptions by an owner of more than $10 million but less than
$500 million; and
(3) Five business days before the requested redemption date for
total redemptions by an owner of $500 million or more.
* * * * *
Subpart D [Removed]
0
12. Remove Subpart D.
By the Department of the Treasury.
David Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-21173 Filed 9-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AS-P