Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA, 58997-58999 [2022-21093]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 188 / Thursday, September 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
display location. From 7:45 p.m. to 7:55
p.m. on October 8, 2022 the loaded
fireworks barge will transit from the
Dutra Group, Oly Yard 615 River Road,
Rio Vista, CA to the launch site off of
Rio Vista, CA in approximate position
38°09′16.00″ N, 121°41′17.00″ W (NAD
83), where it will remain until the
conclusion of the fireworks display.
During the 15-minute fireworks display,
scheduled to begin at approximately
8:45 p.m. on October 8, 2022, and 30
minutes after the conclusion of the
fireworks display, the safety zone will
increase in size and encompass all
navigable waters of the Sacramento
River, from surface to bottom, within a
circle formed by connecting all points
1000 feet out from the fireworks barge
near Rio Vista, CA in approximate
position 38°09′16.00″ N, 121°41′17.00″
W (NAD 83). This safety zone will be
enforced from 10 a.m. until 9:30 p.m. on
October 8, 2022, or as announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
In addition to this notification of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring in
the safety zone during all applicable
effective dates and times, unless
authorized to do so by the PATCOM or
other Official Patrol defined as a federal,
state, or local law enforcement agency
on scene to assist the Coast Guard in
enforcing the regulated area.
Additionally, each person who receives
notice of a lawful order or direction
issued by the PATCOM or Official
Patrol shall obey the order or direction.
The PATCOM or Official Patrol may,
upon request, allow the transit of
commercial vessels through regulated
areas when it is safe to do so.
If the Captain of the Port determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners may be used to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: September 23, 2022.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2022–21098 Filed 9–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Sep 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2022–0483]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San
Francisco, CA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a security zone in the
navigable waters of the San Francisco
Bay near Yerba Buena Island within the
San Francisco Captain of the Port
(COTP) zone. This security zone is
necessary to provide for the security of
military service members onboard
vessels moored at the pier and the
government property associated with
these valuable national assets. This
regulation will prohibit the entry of,
transiting through, or anchoring within
a portion of the San Francisco Bay
extending from Yerba Buena Island
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port San Francisco.
DATES: This rule is effective October 31,
2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022–
0483 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LT William
Harris, Sector San Francisco, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 415–399–7443, email
SFWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
In October 2021, the Captain of the
Port (COTP) San Francisco identified a
need for clearer Aids to Navigation to
inform the boating public of restricted
areas near Yerba Buena Island. Further
discussion discovered that current
regulations established a Restricted
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58997
Area, but not a Security Zone. The
COTP has determined that potential
security concerns associated with the
mooring of Coast Guard Cutters
necessitate a Coast Guard Security Zone.
In response, on July 18, 2022 the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
‘‘Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San
Francisco, CA’’ (87 FR 42665). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this
fireworks display. During the comment
period that ended August 17, 2022, we
received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
purpose of this rule is to ensure the
security of Coast Guard facilities,
personnel, and vessels, at all times
within the navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba
Buena Island from a point along the
southeastern shore of Yerba Buena
Island at 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′44″ W;
east to 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′35″ W; north
to 37°48′49″ N, 122°21′35″ W, a point on
the northeastern side of Yerba Buena
Island.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published July
18, 2022. There are no changes in the
regulatory text of this rule from the
regulatory text in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a security zone
within the navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba
Buena Island from a point along the
southeastern shore of Yerba Buena
Island at 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′44″ W;
east to 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′35″ W; north
to 37°48′49″ N, 122°21′35″ W, a point on
the northeastern side of Yerba Buena
Island. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the security zone
unless authorized by the COTP.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
58998
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 188 / Thursday, September 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and location of the
security zone. The effect of this rule will
not be significant because vessel traffic
can pass safely around the area, and this
rule will encompass only a small
portion of the waterway.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Sep 28, 2022
Jkt 256001
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone that would prohibit entry
within navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Buena Island from a point along the
southeastern shore of Yerba Buena
Island at 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′44″ W;
east to 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′35″ W; north
to 37°48′49″ N, 122°21′35″ W, a point on
the northeastern side of Yerba Buena
Island. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
■
2. Add § 165.1189 to read as follows:
§ 165.1189 Security Zone; San Francisco
Bay, San Francisco, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: all navigable waters of the
San Francisco Bay on the east side of
Yerba Buena Island from a point along
the southeastern shore of Yerba Buena
Island at 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′44″ W;
east to 37°48′27″ N, 122°21′35″ W; north
to 37°48′49″ N, 122°21′35″ W, a point on
the northeastern side of Yerba Buena
Island. These coordinates are based on
North American Datum (NAD) 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general security zone
regulations in subpart D of this part,
entry into the area of the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San
Francisco.
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 188 / Thursday, September 29, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The security zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP.
(3) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP by VHF Marine Radio
channel 16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone (415)
399–3547. Those in the security zone
must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement. The Captain of the
Port will enforce the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section and may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of this security zone by
any Federal, State, county, municipal,
or private agency.
Dated: September 23, 2022.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
I. General Information
[FR Doc. 2022–20983 Filed 9–28–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (21–2.5e)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0494; FRL–7584–03–
OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (19–4.F);
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
EPA issued a final rule in the
Federal Register of Monday, June 27,
2022, concerning significant new use
rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This document corrects a
typographical error in an amendatory
instruction.
DATES: This correction is effective
September 29, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Wysong, New Chemicals
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–4163;
email address: wysong.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2022–13338 appearing on page 37999 in
the Federal Register of Monday, June
27, 2022 (87 FR 37999 (FRL–7584–01–
OCSPP)), the following correction is
made to correct a typographical error in
amendatory instruction 2:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Dated: September 23, 2022.
Tala Henry,
Deputy Director, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
RIN 2070–AB27
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
16:48 Sep 28, 2022
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2021–0030; FRL–8805–02–
OCSPP]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1. On page 38003, in the third column,
in amendatory instruction 2 amending
§ 9.1, in the fourth and fifth lines,
‘‘721.11404 through 721.11410, and
721.11411’’ is corrected to read
‘‘721.11404 through 721.11409, and
721.11411’’.
■
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[FR Doc. 2022–21093 Filed 9–28–22; 8:45 am]
Jkt 256001
58999
EPA is issuing significant new
use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for
chemical substances that were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). The SNURs require persons
who intend to manufacture (defined by
statute to include import) or process any
of these chemical substances for an
activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this rule to notify
EPA at least 90 days before commencing
that activity. The required notification
initiates EPA’s evaluation of the use,
under the conditions of use for that
chemical substance, within the
applicable review period. Persons may
not commence manufacture or
processing for the significant new use
until EPA has conducted a review of the
notice, made an appropriate
determination on the notice, and has
taken such actions as are required by
that determination.
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 28, 2022. For purposes of
judicial review, this rule shall be
promulgated at 1 p.m. (e.s.t.) on October
13, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact:
William Wysong, New Chemicals
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
telephone number: (202) 564–4163;
email address: wysong.william@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, process,
or use the chemical substances
contained in this rule. The following list
of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Manufacturers or processors of one
or more subject chemical substances
(NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum
refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import provisions
promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through
12.127 and 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical
importers must certify that the shipment
of the chemical substance complies with
all applicable rules and Orders under
TSCA, which would include the SNUR
requirements. The EPA policy in
support of import certification appears
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance
that is the subject of this rule are subject
to the export notification provisions of
TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b))
(see 40 CFR 721.20), and must comply
with the export notification
requirements in 40 CFR part 707,
subpart D.
B. How can I access the dockets?
The dockets include information
considered by the Agency in developing
the proposed and final rules. The docket
for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2021–0030, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov and at the
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM
29SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 188 (Thursday, September 29, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58997-58999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21093]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0483]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a security zone in the
navigable waters of the San Francisco Bay near Yerba Buena Island
within the San Francisco Captain of the Port (COTP) zone. This security
zone is necessary to provide for the security of military service
members onboard vessels moored at the pier and the government property
associated with these valuable national assets. This regulation will
prohibit the entry of, transiting through, or anchoring within a
portion of the San Francisco Bay extending from Yerba Buena Island
unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port San
Francisco.
DATES: This rule is effective October 31, 2022.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0483 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LT William Harris, Sector San Francisco, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 415-399-7443, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
In October 2021, the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco
identified a need for clearer Aids to Navigation to inform the boating
public of restricted areas near Yerba Buena Island. Further discussion
discovered that current regulations established a Restricted Area, but
not a Security Zone. The COTP has determined that potential security
concerns associated with the mooring of Coast Guard Cutters necessitate
a Coast Guard Security Zone.
In response, on July 18, 2022 the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Security Zone; San Francisco Bay,
San Francisco, CA'' (87 FR 42665). There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to
this fireworks display. During the comment period that ended August 17,
2022, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The purpose of this rule is to
ensure the security of Coast Guard facilities, personnel, and vessels,
at all times within the navigable waters of the San Francisco Bay on
the east side of Yerba Buena Island from a point along the southeastern
shore of Yerba Buena Island at 37[deg]48'27'' N, 122[deg]21'44'' W;
east to 37[deg]48'27'' N, 122[deg]21'35'' W; north to 37[deg]48'49'' N,
122[deg]21'35'' W, a point on the northeastern side of Yerba Buena
Island.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published July
18, 2022. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from
the regulatory text in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a security zone within the navigable waters
of the San Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba Buena Island from a
point along the southeastern shore of Yerba Buena Island at
37[deg]48'27'' N, 122[deg]21'44'' W; east to 37[deg]48'27'' N,
122[deg]21'35'' W; north to 37[deg]48'49'' N, 122[deg]21'35'' W, a
point on the northeastern side of Yerba Buena Island. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the security zone unless authorized
by the COTP.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
[[Page 58998]]
approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the security zone. The effect of this rule will not be
significant because vessel traffic can pass safely around the area, and
this rule will encompass only a small portion of the waterway.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
security zone that would prohibit entry within navigable waters of the
San Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba Buena Island from a point
along the southeastern shore of Yerba Buena Island at 37[deg]48'27'' N,
122[deg]21'44'' W; east to 37[deg]48'27'' N, 122[deg]21'35'' W; north
to 37[deg]48'49'' N, 122[deg]21'35'' W, a point on the northeastern
side of Yerba Buena Island. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1189 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1189 Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: all navigable
waters of the San Francisco Bay on the east side of Yerba Buena Island
from a point along the southeastern shore of Yerba Buena Island at
37[deg]48'27'' N, 122[deg]21'44'' W; east to 37[deg]48'27'' N,
122[deg]21'35'' W; north to 37[deg]48'49'' N, 122[deg]21'35'' W, a
point on the northeastern side of Yerba Buena Island. These coordinates
are based on North American Datum (NAD) 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general security zone
regulations in subpart D of this part, entry into the area of the
security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco.
[[Page 58999]]
(2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the COTP.
(3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP by VHF Marine
Radio channel 16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399-3547. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful
orders or directions given to them by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement. The Captain of the Port will enforce the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section and may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of this security zone by any Federal, State,
county, municipal, or private agency.
Dated: September 23, 2022.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2022-21093 Filed 9-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P