Request for Information on Person-Centered Care Planning for Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC), 56950-56953 [2022-20027]
Download as PDF
56950
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2022 / Notices
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[DA 22–844; FR ID 104382]
Announcement of Renewal of Charter
of the FCC Consumer Advisory
Committee
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of intent to renew the
Charter for the FCC Consumer Advisory
Committee
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) hereby announces that the
charter of the Consumer Advisory
Committee (hereinafter Committee) will
be renewed for a two-year period
pursuant to the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) and following
consultation with the Committee
Management Secretariat, General
Services Administration.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L St. NE, Washington,
DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Mendelsohn, Designated Federal
Officer, Federal Communications
Commission, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, CAC@
fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
After
consultation with the General Services
Administration, the Commission
intends to renew the charter on or
before October 13, 2022, providing the
Committee with authorization to operate
for two years. In keeping with its
advisory role, the FCC Consumer
Advisory Committee will continue to
provide recommendations to the
Commission on consumer topics, as
specified by the Commission, gather
data and information, and perform
analyses that are necessary to respond to
the questions or matters before it. The
mission of the Committee is to make
recommendations to the Commission on
topics specified by the Commission
relating to the needs and interests of
consumers. The Commission will
specify topics the Committee may
consider, which may include: Consumer
protection and education;
Implementation of statutes, Commission
rules, and policies to protect consumers;
Promoting consumer participation and
input into Commission rulemaking
proceedings and other decision-making
processes; and, Impact of new and
emerging communications technologies
on consumers, including those in
underserved populations.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 15, 2022
Jkt 256001
Advisory Committee
The Committee will be organized
under, and will operate in accordance
with, the provisions of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5
U.S.C. app. 2). The Committee will be
solely advisory in nature. Consistent
with FACA and its requirements, each
meeting of the Committee will be open
to the public unless otherwise noticed.
A notice of each meeting will be
published in the Federal Register at
least fifteen (15) days in advance of the
meeting. Records will be maintained of
each meeting and made available for
public inspection. All activities of the
Committee will be conducted in an
open, transparent, and accessible
manner. The Committee shall terminate
two (2) years from the filing date of its
charter, or earlier upon the completion
of its work as determined by the Chair
of the FCC, unless its charter is renewed
prior to the termination date.
During the Committee’s next term, it
is anticipated that the Committee will
meet in Washington, DC at the
discretion of the Commission,
approximately three (3) times a year.
The first meeting date and agenda topics
will be described in a Public Notice
issued and published in the Federal
Register at least fifteen (15) days prior
to the first meeting date.
In addition, as needed, subcommittees
will be established to facilitate the
Committee’s work between meetings of
the full Committee. Meetings of the
Committee will be fully accessible to
individuals with disabilities.
Portions Open to the Public
Federal Communications Commission.
Robert A. Garza,
Legal Advisor, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2022–20110 Filed 9–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
The hearing will be held on
September 21, 2022, beginning at 1:00
p.m. in the Hearing Room of the Surface
Transportation Board’s headquarters
(not at the Federal Maritime
Commission) and will be open for
public observation. If technical issues
prevent the Commission from live
streaming, the Commission will post a
recording of the public portion of the
meeting on the Commission’s YouTube
Channel. Any person wishing to attend
the meeting in-person should report to
Surface Transportation Board
headquarters with enough time to clear
building security procedures.
Additional meeting guidance can be
found on www.fmc.gov.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Commissioner Bentzel, Update on
Maritime Transportation Data
Initiative
2. Staff Briefing on Ocean Shipping
Reform Act of 2022
Portions Closed to the Public
3. Staff Briefing on Demurrage and
Detention Billing Requirements
4. Staff Briefing on Charge Complaints
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
William Cody, Secretary, (202) 523–
5725.
William Cody,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–20161 Filed 9–14–22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–02–P
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Request for Information on PersonCentered Care Planning for Multiple
Chronic Conditions (MCC)
Sunshine Act Meetings
AGENCY:
TIME AND DATE:
September 21, 2022; 1:00
p.m.
This meeting will be held at the
Surface Transportation Board at the
address below and also streamed live at
www.fmc.gov.
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street SW, Room #1042 (Hearing Room),
Washington, DC 20423.
STATUS: Part of the meeting will be open
to the public: held in-person at the
Surface Transportation Board for public
attendants and also available to view
streamed live, accessible from
www.fmc.gov. The rest of the meeting
will be closed to the public.
PLACE:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of request for
information.
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) seeks
public comment about comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care
planning for people with Multiple
Chronic Conditions (MCC). Specifically,
the RFI seeks comment on the current
state of comprehensive, longitudinal,
person-centered care planning for
people at risk for or living with MCC
across settings of care (e.g., health
systems, primary care, home, and other
ambulatory practices), including
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2022 / Notices
existing models of person-centered care
planning, their current scale, and
barriers and facilitators to
implementation. In addition, the RFI
seeks comments about innovative
models of care, approaches, promising
strategies and solutions in order for
clinicians and practices to routinely
engage in comprehensive, longitudinal,
person-centered care planning to
improve the care of people at risk for or
living with MCC. This request for
information will inform AHRQ’s work
in improving care for people at risk for
or living with MCC.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by November 15, 2022. AHRQ
will not respond individually to
responders but will consider all
comments submitted by the deadline.
ADDRESSES: Please submit all responses
via email to: MCC@ahrq.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Poonam Pardasaney, ScD, DPT, MS,
Staff Fellow, Phone: (301) 427–1121;
Email: Poonam.Pardasaney@
ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AHRQ is
seeking public comment about
comprehensive, longitudinal, personcentered care planning for people at risk
for or living with Multiple Chronic
Conditions (MCC). Specifically, AHRQ
seeks comment on the current state of
comprehensive, longitudinal, personcentered care planning for people at risk
for or living with MCC across settings of
care (e.g., health systems, primary care,
home, and other ambulatory practices)
including existing models of personcentered care planning, their current
scale, and barriers and facilitators to
implementation. In addition, AHRQ
seeks information about innovative
models of care, approaches, and
promising strategies and solutions, in
order for clinicians and practices to
routinely engage in comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care
planning to improve the care of people
at risk for or living with MCC. Because
it may be possible to prevent or delay
the onset of MCC, AHRQ is interested in
care planning for those at risk for MCC
in addition to those who have MCC.
Evidence for effectiveness of strategies
for implementation and delivery of
person-centered care planning, their
impact on improving health outcomes,
as well as evidence on how to adapt,
scale, and spread the intervention are of
interest.
For the purposes of this RFI, the
following working definitions apply:
Comprehensive, Longitudinal, PersonCentered Care Planning (also known as
shared care planning): A process of
collaboration among people at risk for or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 15, 2022
Jkt 256001
living with MCC, clinicians, and
healthcare teams to proactively discuss
and record: (1) roles and tasks among
care team members, including the
individual, their family and caregivers;
(2) plans for coordinating care within
and across organizations and settings;
(3) strategies for supporting and
empowering patients to manage their
own health; (4) plans for engaging in
shared decision making.1 The care plan
should: include all conditions including
biomedical and behavioral health
conditions; facilitate screening for and/
or diagnosing co-existing conditions
that impact care management and
outcomes, as well as social risks and
supports; support evidence-based care;
include an individual’s goals and
preferences; be dynamic and
incorporate an approach to updating, as
necessary.
Person-Centered Care Plan: A single
record of care shared among people at
risk for or living with MCC and their
clinicians that: (1) is accessible to
persons with MCC and their caregivers;
(2) puts the person’s goals at the center
of decision-making; (3) is holistic,
including somatic and behavioral
health, clinical and nonclinical data,
including the social determinants of
health; (4) follows the person through
both high-need episodes and periods of
health improvement and maintenance;
(5) allows care team coordination.2
Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC)
are defined here as the co-occurrence of
two or more chronic physical or
behavioral health conditions (including
mental health and/or substance use
disorders). Some use the term
multimorbidity as synonymous with
MCC, while others define MCC as
including additional factors that
contribute to the burden of illness,
including disease severity, functional
impairments and disabilities,
syndromes such as frailty, and
sometimes social factors such as
homelessness.
Importance of Care Planning for People
at Risk for or Living With MCC
Comprehensive, longitudinal, personcentered care planning is central to
models of care that deliver high quality
care that meet the needs of people at
risk for or living with MCC. Personcentered care planning should be
designed to achieve the following
objectives:
• Prioritize care that maximizes
benefits and minimizes harms.
1 Burt, J., et al., Care plans and care planning in
long-term conditions: a conceptual model. Prim
Health Care Res Dev, 2014. 15(4): p. 342–54.
2 Baker, A., et al., Making the Comprehensive
Shared Care Plan a Reality. NEJM Catalyst, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56951
• Incorporate and prioritize
competing demands and people’s
preferences (e.g., morbidity, mortality,
burden of care, quality of life).
• Identify roles and tasks among care
team members, including the person
with MCC.
• Coordinate planning, management
and treatment with the whole care
network across time and setting (e.g., a
multi-disciplinary team, specialty care,
community and social services, people
with MCC and caregivers) to create and
maintain a single plan for each person.
• Elicit and reflect choices and values
of people at risk for or living with MCC
in the context of their lives.
• Share decision making in a manner
that is preferred by people at risk for or
living with MCC and caregivers,
considering individual values,
preferences, cultural, and social
contexts.
• Support and empower people at
risk for or living with MCC to manage
their own health and initiate and
sustain behavior change, with the
support of their health care team.
• Document specific goals of both
people at risk for or living with MCC
and their clinicians and health care
team and reconcile when necessary.
• Continuously monitor and track
progress on goals and preferences
through high-need episodes, as well as
during periods of health improvement
and maintenance, with modification as
necessary.
• Is supported by evidence-based
clinical guidelines that optimize care for
coexisting conditions.
• Ensure equity is adequately
addressed to deliver effective personcentered care to all and actively reduce
health inequities including among
Black, Indigenous, and people of color
(BIPOC); socioeconomically
disadvantaged individuals; across
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
(SOGI)); for those with low levels of
health literacy or limited English
proficiency; and for persons with
disabilities.
Implementing comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care
planning requires fundamental changes
in the way care is organized and
delivered in order to ensure: the active
engagement and shared learning of
diverse stakeholders; the capacity for
timely implementation of rapidly
evolving evidence; and innovative
approaches to care transformation.
While person-centered care planning is
practiced in some care settings, it is not
routine practice and there are significant
evidence gaps regarding the most
effective approaches for
implementation, scale, and spread.
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
56952
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2022 / Notices
Additionally, the use of shared
electronic care plans (e-care plans) can
facilitate coordination and
communication among people at risk for
or living with MCC and their clinicians
and health care teams, and provide a
shared resource for documenting goals,
treatments and supports, education and
self-management, along with other
patient-generated health data to support
care management.3
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Who should respond?
AHRQ seeks information from:
• Clinicians and other health care
personnel who perform some or all key
components of comprehensive,
longitudinal person-centered care
planning for people at risk for or living
with MCC, including clinicians and
personnel from across all care settings
(primary care, specialty care, mental
and behavioral health, post-acute care,
rehabilitative care, and home and
community-based services).
• Researchers and implementers
developing interventions to implement
person-centered care planning in
practice.
• Clinical decision support
developers who develop tools for
comprehensive, longitudinal personcentered care planning.
• Quality and other measure
developers (e.g., metrics, indicators) of
person-centered care planning,
including process, implementation, and
outcomes.
• Patient advocacy groups and
organizations.
• Clinical professional societies.
• Payers.
• Healthcare delivery organizations.
• IT Directors who implement and
manage health IT and other systems that
may support person-centered care
planning by people with MCC and their
clinicians and health care teams.
• Vendors who develop health IT
solutions that facilitate person-centered
care planning, including traditional
EHR systems, care planning platforms,
consumer apps, and other products.
• Organizations that facilitate health
information exchange (i.e., regional or
local health information exchanges,
vendor-driven networks, and others)
who may support sharing of care plan
information across systems.
• Device developers who incorporate
comprehensive longitudinal personcentered care planning into device
software.
• People at risk for or living with
MCC, their families and caregivers.
3 AHRQ. eCare Plan Joint NIH/NIDDK AHRQ
Project. 9/22/2021; Available from: https://
ecareplan.ahrq.gov/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 15, 2022
Jkt 256001
• Representatives from human service
agencies and/or community
organizations, or people with
experience in addressing the social
determinants of health and reducing
disparities for people at risk for or living
with MCC.
• Higher education institutions that
train clinicians and healthcare
personnel and/or train those involved in
community health and education.
Specific questions of interest to
AHRQ include, but are not limited to,
the following:
• What terms, strategies, and models
of care are used to describe and deliver
care planning for the whole person (not
just for individual health conditions)
that records: (1) roles and tasks among
care team members, including the
individual, their family and caregivers;
(2) plans for coordinating care within
and across organizations and settings;
(3) strategies for supporting and
empowering patients to manage their
own health; (4) plans for engaging in
shared decision making?
• What key components are necessary
to fully deliver on the promise of
person-centered care planning?
• How is comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care
planning for people at risk for or living
with MCC currently being done in
health systems, primary care, and other
ambulatory practices?
• Which organizations are
successfully engaged in person-centered
care planning for people at risk for or
living with MCC?
• Who are the thought leaders in this
area and/or where would leaders go to
seek information about how to begin
this work?
• What are examples of innovative
models of care, approaches, promising
strategies and solutions that could
support clinicians and practices in
routinely engaging in comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care
planning to improve the care of people
at risk for or living with MCC?
• How are health systems, primary
care, and other ambulatory care
practices using innovative approaches
to implement person-centered care
planning for people at risk for or living
with MCC?
• What are best practices for
designing, implementing, and
evaluating person-centered care
planning for people at risk for or living
with MCC? What implementation
challenges are clinicians and systems
likely to face?
• What are suggested strategies for
effective implementation of personcentered care planning at multiple
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
levels (e.g., policy, system, practice,
clinical team, people with MCC)?
• What kinds of information, tools,
resources, or support are most needed to
address barriers and challenges to
implementation?
• Which payment models might
enable and sustain person-centered care
planning?
• What quality of care measurements
(e.g., metrics, indicators) exist or are
emerging for assessing process,
implementation, and outcomes
associated with person-centered care
planning?
• Which personnel or roles within
systems or practice settings would know
most about person-centered care
planning efforts, challenges, and
successes (e.g., IT directors, c-suite, care
coordinators, etc.)?
• Within systems/practice settings,
who takes the lead, or would be
expected to take the lead, in
coordinating efforts to implement
person-centered care planning?
• What credentials and/or training of
the team members, including
paraprofessionals such as community
health workers and/or persons with
lived experience such as peer recovery
specialists are necessary?
• Are there or should there be
competency requirements for people
engaged in facilitating person-centered
planning processes, and what should
those entail?
• What are suggested methods for
recruiting and retaining the workforce to
staff such programs?
• What are the impacts of different
models of person-centered care
planning on the experience of clinicians
and other healthcare personnel, and are
increased demands posed by some
models precipitating practitioner
burnout?
• How have shared electronic care
plans (e-care plans) been developed,
implemented, and shared with the care
team? What are best practices for
sharing e-care plans across sites and
settings of care?
• What existing and emerging data
standards are effectively supporting the
interoperability of e-care plans? What
key standards gaps around e-care plans
should be prioritized by industry and
other stakeholders?
• What policy levers should HHS use
to further advance the adoption of
standards-based e-care plans?
• How can technical approaches
using Fast Healthcare Interoperability
Resources (FHIR) standards better
support sharing of e-care plans across
care teams? What are major barriers to
advancing these approaches?
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2022 / Notices
• What are best practices for using ecare plans to facilitate communication
among people at risk for or living with
MCC, their caregivers, clinicians, and
health care teams, and provide a shared
resource for documenting goals,
treatments and supports, education and
self-management, along with other
patient-generated health data?
• What are promising approaches for
systematically identifying and
addressing social determinants of
health?
• Are there any programmatic
adaptations that would address the
cultural and linguistic considerations
when working with minority
populations?
• How can equity be ensured in
person-centered care planning?
• What are active areas of research
and gaps in knowledge?
AHRQ is interested in all of the
questions listed above, but respondents
are welcome to address as many or as
few as they choose and to address
additional areas of interest regarding
comprehensive longitudinal personcentered care planning not listed. It is
helpful to identify the question to which
a particular answer corresponds.
This RFI is for planning purposes
only and should not be construed as a
policy, solicitation for applications, or
as an obligation on the part of the
Government to provide support for any
ideas in response to it. AHRQ will use
the information submitted in response
to this RFI at its discretion and will not
provide comments to any respondent’s
submission. However, responses to this
RFI may be reflected in future
solicitation(s) or policies. The
information provided will be analyzed
and may appear in reports. Respondents
will not be identified in any published
reports. Respondents are advised that
the Government is under no obligation
to acknowledge receipt of the
information received or provide
feedback to respondents with respect to
any information submitted. No
proprietary, classified, confidential or
sensitive information should be
included in your response. The contents
of all submissions will be made
available to the public upon request.
Submitted materials must be publicly
available or able to be made public.
Dated: September 12, 2022.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2022–20027 Filed 9–15–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Sep 15, 2022
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–22–22IU; Docket No. CDC–2022–
0110]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. This notice invites
comment on a proposed information
collection project titled Evaluation of
the CDC/NIOSH Health Worker Mental
Health Campaign. This project will
collect data through the administration
of online surveys to health workers and
their employers prior to campaign
launch and 12 months afterward to
assess changes in relevant knowledge,
attitudes, and beliefs to help inform
recommendations.
SUMMARY:
CDC must receive written
comments on or before November 15,
2022.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2022–
0110 by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS H21–8, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
www.regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all comments
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
(www.regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to
the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56953
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS
H21–8, Atlanta, Georgia 30329;
Telephone: 404–639–7570; Email: omb@
cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses; and
5. Assess information collection costs.
Proposed Project
National Education and Awareness
Social Marketing Campaign: Employer
Efforts to Support the Mental Health of
Health Workers—New—National
Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
As part of the COVID–19 American
Rescue Plan of 2021, in response to a
congressional mandate, and on the heels
of the passage of the Dr. Lorna Breen
Health Care Provider Protection Act, the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), within the
Centers for Disease Control and
E:\FR\FM\16SEN1.SGM
16SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56950-56953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-20027]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Request for Information on Person-Centered Care Planning for
Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC)
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) seeks
public comment about comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care
planning for people with Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC).
Specifically, the RFI seeks comment on the current state of
comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care planning for people
at risk for or living with MCC across settings of care (e.g., health
systems, primary care, home, and other ambulatory practices), including
[[Page 56951]]
existing models of person-centered care planning, their current scale,
and barriers and facilitators to implementation. In addition, the RFI
seeks comments about innovative models of care, approaches, promising
strategies and solutions in order for clinicians and practices to
routinely engage in comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care
planning to improve the care of people at risk for or living with MCC.
This request for information will inform AHRQ's work in improving care
for people at risk for or living with MCC.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by November 15, 2022.
AHRQ will not respond individually to responders but will consider all
comments submitted by the deadline.
ADDRESSES: Please submit all responses via email to: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Poonam Pardasaney, ScD, DPT, MS, Staff
Fellow, Phone: (301) 427-1121; Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AHRQ is seeking public comment about
comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care planning for people
at risk for or living with Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC).
Specifically, AHRQ seeks comment on the current state of comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care planning for people at risk for or
living with MCC across settings of care (e.g., health systems, primary
care, home, and other ambulatory practices) including existing models
of person-centered care planning, their current scale, and barriers and
facilitators to implementation. In addition, AHRQ seeks information
about innovative models of care, approaches, and promising strategies
and solutions, in order for clinicians and practices to routinely
engage in comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care planning to
improve the care of people at risk for or living with MCC. Because it
may be possible to prevent or delay the onset of MCC, AHRQ is
interested in care planning for those at risk for MCC in addition to
those who have MCC. Evidence for effectiveness of strategies for
implementation and delivery of person-centered care planning, their
impact on improving health outcomes, as well as evidence on how to
adapt, scale, and spread the intervention are of interest.
For the purposes of this RFI, the following working definitions
apply:
Comprehensive, Longitudinal, Person-Centered Care Planning (also
known as shared care planning): A process of collaboration among people
at risk for or living with MCC, clinicians, and healthcare teams to
proactively discuss and record: (1) roles and tasks among care team
members, including the individual, their family and caregivers; (2)
plans for coordinating care within and across organizations and
settings; (3) strategies for supporting and empowering patients to
manage their own health; (4) plans for engaging in shared decision
making.\1\ The care plan should: include all conditions including
biomedical and behavioral health conditions; facilitate screening for
and/or diagnosing co-existing conditions that impact care management
and outcomes, as well as social risks and supports; support evidence-
based care; include an individual's goals and preferences; be dynamic
and incorporate an approach to updating, as necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Burt, J., et al., Care plans and care planning in long-term
conditions: a conceptual model. Prim Health Care Res Dev, 2014.
15(4): p. 342-54.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Person-Centered Care Plan: A single record of care shared among
people at risk for or living with MCC and their clinicians that: (1) is
accessible to persons with MCC and their caregivers; (2) puts the
person's goals at the center of decision-making; (3) is holistic,
including somatic and behavioral health, clinical and nonclinical data,
including the social determinants of health; (4) follows the person
through both high-need episodes and periods of health improvement and
maintenance; (5) allows care team coordination.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Baker, A., et al., Making the Comprehensive Shared Care Plan
a Reality. NEJM Catalyst, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) are defined here as the co-
occurrence of two or more chronic physical or behavioral health
conditions (including mental health and/or substance use disorders).
Some use the term multimorbidity as synonymous with MCC, while others
define MCC as including additional factors that contribute to the
burden of illness, including disease severity, functional impairments
and disabilities, syndromes such as frailty, and sometimes social
factors such as homelessness.
Importance of Care Planning for People at Risk for or Living With MCC
Comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care planning is
central to models of care that deliver high quality care that meet the
needs of people at risk for or living with MCC. Person-centered care
planning should be designed to achieve the following objectives:
Prioritize care that maximizes benefits and minimizes
harms.
Incorporate and prioritize competing demands and people's
preferences (e.g., morbidity, mortality, burden of care, quality of
life).
Identify roles and tasks among care team members,
including the person with MCC.
Coordinate planning, management and treatment with the
whole care network across time and setting (e.g., a multi-disciplinary
team, specialty care, community and social services, people with MCC
and caregivers) to create and maintain a single plan for each person.
Elicit and reflect choices and values of people at risk
for or living with MCC in the context of their lives.
Share decision making in a manner that is preferred by
people at risk for or living with MCC and caregivers, considering
individual values, preferences, cultural, and social contexts.
Support and empower people at risk for or living with MCC
to manage their own health and initiate and sustain behavior change,
with the support of their health care team.
Document specific goals of both people at risk for or
living with MCC and their clinicians and health care team and reconcile
when necessary.
Continuously monitor and track progress on goals and
preferences through high-need episodes, as well as during periods of
health improvement and maintenance, with modification as necessary.
Is supported by evidence-based clinical guidelines that
optimize care for coexisting conditions.
Ensure equity is adequately addressed to deliver effective
person-centered care to all and actively reduce health inequities
including among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC);
socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals; across Sexual Orientation
and Gender Identity (SOGI)); for those with low levels of health
literacy or limited English proficiency; and for persons with
disabilities.
Implementing comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care
planning requires fundamental changes in the way care is organized and
delivered in order to ensure: the active engagement and shared learning
of diverse stakeholders; the capacity for timely implementation of
rapidly evolving evidence; and innovative approaches to care
transformation. While person-centered care planning is practiced in
some care settings, it is not routine practice and there are
significant evidence gaps regarding the most effective approaches for
implementation, scale, and spread.
[[Page 56952]]
Additionally, the use of shared electronic care plans (e-care plans)
can facilitate coordination and communication among people at risk for
or living with MCC and their clinicians and health care teams, and
provide a shared resource for documenting goals, treatments and
supports, education and self-management, along with other patient-
generated health data to support care management.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ AHRQ. eCare Plan Joint NIH/NIDDK AHRQ Project. 9/22/2021;
Available from: https://ecareplan.ahrq.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who should respond?
AHRQ seeks information from:
Clinicians and other health care personnel who perform
some or all key components of comprehensive, longitudinal person-
centered care planning for people at risk for or living with MCC,
including clinicians and personnel from across all care settings
(primary care, specialty care, mental and behavioral health, post-acute
care, rehabilitative care, and home and community-based services).
Researchers and implementers developing interventions to
implement person-centered care planning in practice.
Clinical decision support developers who develop tools for
comprehensive, longitudinal person-centered care planning.
Quality and other measure developers (e.g., metrics,
indicators) of person-centered care planning, including process,
implementation, and outcomes.
Patient advocacy groups and organizations.
Clinical professional societies.
Payers.
Healthcare delivery organizations.
IT Directors who implement and manage health IT and other
systems that may support person-centered care planning by people with
MCC and their clinicians and health care teams.
Vendors who develop health IT solutions that facilitate
person-centered care planning, including traditional EHR systems, care
planning platforms, consumer apps, and other products.
Organizations that facilitate health information exchange
(i.e., regional or local health information exchanges, vendor-driven
networks, and others) who may support sharing of care plan information
across systems.
Device developers who incorporate comprehensive
longitudinal person-centered care planning into device software.
People at risk for or living with MCC, their families and
caregivers.
Representatives from human service agencies and/or
community organizations, or people with experience in addressing the
social determinants of health and reducing disparities for people at
risk for or living with MCC.
Higher education institutions that train clinicians and
healthcare personnel and/or train those involved in community health
and education.
Specific questions of interest to AHRQ include, but are not limited
to, the following:
What terms, strategies, and models of care are used to
describe and deliver care planning for the whole person (not just for
individual health conditions) that records: (1) roles and tasks among
care team members, including the individual, their family and
caregivers; (2) plans for coordinating care within and across
organizations and settings; (3) strategies for supporting and
empowering patients to manage their own health; (4) plans for engaging
in shared decision making?
What key components are necessary to fully deliver on the
promise of person-centered care planning?
How is comprehensive, longitudinal, person-centered care
planning for people at risk for or living with MCC currently being done
in health systems, primary care, and other ambulatory practices?
Which organizations are successfully engaged in person-
centered care planning for people at risk for or living with MCC?
Who are the thought leaders in this area and/or where
would leaders go to seek information about how to begin this work?
What are examples of innovative models of care,
approaches, promising strategies and solutions that could support
clinicians and practices in routinely engaging in comprehensive,
longitudinal, person-centered care planning to improve the care of
people at risk for or living with MCC?
How are health systems, primary care, and other ambulatory
care practices using innovative approaches to implement person-centered
care planning for people at risk for or living with MCC?
What are best practices for designing, implementing, and
evaluating person-centered care planning for people at risk for or
living with MCC? What implementation challenges are clinicians and
systems likely to face?
What are suggested strategies for effective implementation
of person-centered care planning at multiple levels (e.g., policy,
system, practice, clinical team, people with MCC)?
What kinds of information, tools, resources, or support
are most needed to address barriers and challenges to implementation?
Which payment models might enable and sustain person-
centered care planning?
What quality of care measurements (e.g., metrics,
indicators) exist or are emerging for assessing process,
implementation, and outcomes associated with person-centered care
planning?
Which personnel or roles within systems or practice
settings would know most about person-centered care planning efforts,
challenges, and successes (e.g., IT directors, c-suite, care
coordinators, etc.)?
Within systems/practice settings, who takes the lead, or
would be expected to take the lead, in coordinating efforts to
implement person-centered care planning?
What credentials and/or training of the team members,
including paraprofessionals such as community health workers and/or
persons with lived experience such as peer recovery specialists are
necessary?
Are there or should there be competency requirements for
people engaged in facilitating person-centered planning processes, and
what should those entail?
What are suggested methods for recruiting and retaining
the workforce to staff such programs?
What are the impacts of different models of person-
centered care planning on the experience of clinicians and other
healthcare personnel, and are increased demands posed by some models
precipitating practitioner burnout?
How have shared electronic care plans (e-care plans) been
developed, implemented, and shared with the care team? What are best
practices for sharing e-care plans across sites and settings of care?
What existing and emerging data standards are effectively
supporting the interoperability of e-care plans? What key standards
gaps around e-care plans should be prioritized by industry and other
stakeholders?
What policy levers should HHS use to further advance the
adoption of standards-based e-care plans?
How can technical approaches using Fast Healthcare
Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standards better support sharing of
e-care plans across care teams? What are major barriers to advancing
these approaches?
[[Page 56953]]
What are best practices for using e-care plans to
facilitate communication among people at risk for or living with MCC,
their caregivers, clinicians, and health care teams, and provide a
shared resource for documenting goals, treatments and supports,
education and self-management, along with other patient-generated
health data?
What are promising approaches for systematically
identifying and addressing social determinants of health?
Are there any programmatic adaptations that would address
the cultural and linguistic considerations when working with minority
populations?
How can equity be ensured in person-centered care
planning?
What are active areas of research and gaps in knowledge?
AHRQ is interested in all of the questions listed above, but
respondents are welcome to address as many or as few as they choose and
to address additional areas of interest regarding comprehensive
longitudinal person-centered care planning not listed. It is helpful to
identify the question to which a particular answer corresponds.
This RFI is for planning purposes only and should not be construed
as a policy, solicitation for applications, or as an obligation on the
part of the Government to provide support for any ideas in response to
it. AHRQ will use the information submitted in response to this RFI at
its discretion and will not provide comments to any respondent's
submission. However, responses to this RFI may be reflected in future
solicitation(s) or policies. The information provided will be analyzed
and may appear in reports. Respondents will not be identified in any
published reports. Respondents are advised that the Government is under
no obligation to acknowledge receipt of the information received or
provide feedback to respondents with respect to any information
submitted. No proprietary, classified, confidential or sensitive
information should be included in your response. The contents of all
submissions will be made available to the public upon request.
Submitted materials must be publicly available or able to be made
public.
Dated: September 12, 2022.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-20027 Filed 9-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P