Request for Information; Equitable Data Engagement and Accountability, 54269-54270 [2022-19007]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Notices
notice is published in the Federal
Register.
Signed at Washington, DC.
George C. Cosby,
Director, Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2022–19000 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Information; Equitable
Data Engagement and Accountability
Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Notice of request for
information (RFI).
AGENCY:
The White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP),
on behalf of the Subcommittee on
Equitable Data of the National Science
and Technology Council, requests
information on how Federal agencies
can better support collaboration with
other levels of government, civil society,
and the research community around the
production and use of equitable data.
This RFI will support Federal equitable
data efforts described in the Executive
Order on Advancing Racial Equity and
Support for Underserved Communities
Through the Federal Government (E.O.
13985), including the Vision for
Equitable Data issued to the President
in April 2022.
DATES: Interested persons and
organizations are invited to submit
comments on or before 5 p.m. ET,
October 3, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: equitabledata@ostp.eop.gov,
include Engagement and Accountability
RFI in the subject line of the message.
Email submissions should be machinereadable [PDF, Word] and should not be
copy-protected.
• Mail: Attn: NSTC Subcommittee on
Equitable Data, Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Eisenhower
Executive Office Building, 1650
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20504.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is
voluntary. Respondents may answer as
many or as few questions as they wish.
Each individual or institution is
requested to submit only one response.
Electronic responses must be provided
as attachments to an email rather than
a link. Please identify your answers by
responding to a specific question or
topic if possible. Comments of seven
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
pages or fewer (3,500 words) are
requested; longer responses will not be
considered. Responses should include
the name of the person(s) or
organization(s) filing the response.
Responses containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published
should include copies of or electronic
links to the referenced materials.
Responses containing profanity,
vulgarity, threats, or other inappropriate
language or content will not be
considered.
Any information obtained from this
RFI is intended to be used by the
Government on a non-attribution basis
for planning and strategy development.
OSTP will not respond to individual
submissions. A response to this RFI will
not be viewed as a binding commitment
to develop or pursue the project or ideas
discussed. This RFI is not accepting
applications for financial assistance or
financial incentives.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice are subject to the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). No business
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information should be submitted in
response to this RFI. Please be aware
that comments submitted in response to
this RFI, including the submitter’s
identification (as noted above), may be
posted, without change, on OSTP’s or
another Federal website or otherwise
released publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denice Ross, U.S. Chief Data Scientist,
at equitabledata@ostp.eop.gov or 202–
456–6121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of
the President’s Executive Order on
Advancing Racial Equity and Support
for Underserved Communities Through
the Federal Government (E.O. 13985),
the Administration convened a Federal
Equitable Data Working Group to study
existing Federal data collection policies,
programs, and infrastructure to identify
inadequacies and provide
recommendations that lay out a strategy
for increasing data available for
measuring equity and representing the
diversity of the American people.
In its final report in April 2022—
Vision for Equitable Data—the Equitable
Data Working Group emphasized the
need for the Federal government to use
equitable data to (1) encourage diverse
collaborations across levels of
government, civil society, and the
research community and (2) be
accountable to the American public. By
equitable data, we mean data that allow
for rigorous assessment of the extent to
which government programs and
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54269
policies yield consistently fair, just, and
impartial treatment of all individuals,
including those who have been
historically underserved, marginalized,
and adversely affected by persistent
poverty and inequality. Equitable data
can illuminate opportunities for targeted
actions that will result in demonstrably
improved outcomes for underserved
communities. One key characteristic of
equitable data is that it is disaggregated
by demographic information (e.g., race,
ethnicity, gender, language spoken,
etc.), geographic information (e.g., rural/
urban), or other variables, enabling
insights on disparities in access to, and
outcomes from, government programs,
policies, and services.
Durable, equitable data infrastructure
requires fostering collaborations across
all levels of government, as well as with
a diverse community of external
organizations to advance outcomes for
underserved communities. Constructing
such infrastructure will likely require
new incentives and pathways, including
to ensure greater data sharing and
capacity building across different levels
of government and to broaden the
research community involved in
producing and analyzing equitable data.
Furthermore, providing tools that
allow civil society organizations and
communities to use and visualize
Federal data and chart government’s
progress toward equitable outcomes is
crucial for strengthening accountability
and credibility with the American
public. Such tools can encourage
community participation in government
equity efforts, but these tools must be
designed and administered in ways that
meet community members where they
are in terms of data analysis capacity
and resources. These tools should
ideally enable members of the public to
easily find meaningful and actionable
data about the well-being of their
communities and the services provided
to them.
In this notice, the White House OSTP
is providing an opportunity for
members of the public to provide
perspectives on how to best to
encourage collaborations between the
Federal government and (a) state, local,
territorial, and Tribal governments; (b)
researchers and research institutions;
and (c) local communities that facilitate
producing, accessing, and using
equitable data.
Responses to this Request for
Information (RFI) will be used to inform
the development of case studies, best
practices, and new strategies for Federal
agencies, including establishing:
(1) mutually beneficial collaborations
between Federal agencies and other
levels of government, civil society, and
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
54270
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Notices
the research community around the
production and use of equitable data,
and
(2) tools that allow civil society
organizations and communities to use
and visualize Federal data and chart
government’s progress toward equitable
outcomes in order to strengthen
accountability and credibility.
Responses to this RFI will also inform
development of the United States’ Open
Government Partnership National
Action Plan that furthers the principles
of open government.
We invite members of the public to
share perspectives on how the Federal
government can better realize the
objectives of collaboration between all
levels of government, engagement of
communities that access or participate
in Federal programs in data collection
and research, and create broader public
access to equitable data. Responses may
help inform the development of case
studies, best practices, strategies, plans,
and other tools for Federal agencies to
pursue equitable data partnerships and
collaboration, including Federal
government plans around open
government.
OSTP seeks responses to one, some,
or all of the following questions:
1. What are examples of successful
collaborations involving equitable data
between the Federal government and (a)
Tribal, territorial, local, and State
governments, or (b) local communities?
2. Among examples of existing
Federal collaborations with (a) Tribal,
territorial, local, and State governments
or (b) local communities involving
equitable data, what lessons or best
practices have been learned from such
collaborations?
3. What resources, programs, training,
or other tools can facilitate increased
data sharing between different levels of
government (Tribal, territorial, local,
State, or Federal) related to equitable
data?
4. What resources, programs, training,
or other tools can expand opportunities
for historically underrepresented
scholars and research institutions to
access and use equitable data across
levels of government?
5. What resources, programs, training,
or tools can increase opportunities for
community-based organizations to use
equitable data to hold government
accountable to the American public?
6. What resources, programs, training,
or tools can make equitable data more
accessible and useable for members of
the public?
7. In which agencies, programs,
regions, or communities are there unmet
needs, broken processes, or problems
related to participation and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
accountability that could be remedied
through stronger collaborations and
transparency around equitable data?
Dated: August 30, 2022.
Stacy Murphy,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 2022–19007 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270–F2–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–405, OMB Control No.
3235–0462]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Extension: Display
of Customer Limit Orders (17 CFR
242.604)
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 604 (17 CFR 242.604) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17
U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (‘‘Exchange Act’’).
Rule 604 requires specialists and
market makers to publish customer limit
orders that are priced superior to the
bids or offers being displayed by each
such specialist or market maker.1
Customer limit orders that match the
bid or offer being displayed by a
specialist or market maker must be
published if the limit price also matches
the national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’)
and the size of the customer limit order
is more than de minimis (i.e., more than
10% of the specialist’s or market
maker’s displayed size).
The information collected pursuant to
Rule 604 is necessary to facilitate the
establishment of a national market
system for securities. The publication of
trading interests that improve
specialists’ and market makers’ quotes
presents investors with improved
execution opportunities and improved
access to the best available prices when
they buy or sell securities.
The Commission estimates that
approximately 318 respondents will
respond to the collection of information
1 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
37619A (September 6, 1996), 61 FR 48290
(September 12, 1996).
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements each time they receive a
displayable customer limit order. The
Commission further estimates that a
respondent will receive a customer limit
order, on average, 15,136.767 times per
trading day with an estimate average
time of 0.1 second per quote update.
Accordingly, assuming 252 days in a
trading year, an average 105.957 hours
per year per respondent, the
Commission estimates that the total
annual burden for all respondents is
33,694 hours.
The collection of information in Rule
604 is mandatory for all respondents,
but does not require the collection of
confidential information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
>www.reginfo.gov<. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent by
October 3, 2022 to (i)
>MBX.OMB.OIRA.SEC_desk_officer@
omb.eop.gov < and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: August 29, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022–18981 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–95622; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2022–031]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change To List and Trade Shares
of the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4),
Commodity-Based Trust Shares
August 29, 2022.
On May 13, 2022, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54269-54270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19007]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Information; Equitable Data Engagement and
Accountability
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Notice of request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP), on behalf of the Subcommittee on Equitable Data of the National
Science and Technology Council, requests information on how Federal
agencies can better support collaboration with other levels of
government, civil society, and the research community around the
production and use of equitable data. This RFI will support Federal
equitable data efforts described in the Executive Order on Advancing
Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the
Federal Government (E.O. 13985), including the Vision for Equitable
Data issued to the President in April 2022.
DATES: Interested persons and organizations are invited to submit
comments on or before 5 p.m. ET, October 3, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected], include Engagement and
Accountability RFI in the subject line of the message. Email
submissions should be machine-readable [PDF, Word] and should not be
copy-protected.
Mail: Attn: NSTC Subcommittee on Equitable Data, Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office Building,
1650 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20504.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is voluntary. Respondents may
answer as many or as few questions as they wish. Each individual or
institution is requested to submit only one response. Electronic
responses must be provided as attachments to an email rather than a
link. Please identify your answers by responding to a specific question
or topic if possible. Comments of seven pages or fewer (3,500 words)
are requested; longer responses will not be considered. Responses
should include the name of the person(s) or organization(s) filing the
response. Responses containing references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely published should include copies of
or electronic links to the referenced materials. Responses containing
profanity, vulgarity, threats, or other inappropriate language or
content will not be considered.
Any information obtained from this RFI is intended to be used by
the Government on a non-attribution basis for planning and strategy
development. OSTP will not respond to individual submissions. A
response to this RFI will not be viewed as a binding commitment to
develop or pursue the project or ideas discussed. This RFI is not
accepting applications for financial assistance or financial
incentives.
Comments submitted in response to this notice are subject to the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). No business proprietary information,
copyrighted information, or personally identifiable information should
be submitted in response to this RFI. Please be aware that comments
submitted in response to this RFI, including the submitter's
identification (as noted above), may be posted, without change, on
OSTP's or another Federal website or otherwise released publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denice Ross, U.S. Chief Data
Scientist, at [email protected] or 202-456-6121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of the President's Executive Order
on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities
Through the Federal Government (E.O. 13985), the Administration
convened a Federal Equitable Data Working Group to study existing
Federal data collection policies, programs, and infrastructure to
identify inadequacies and provide recommendations that lay out a
strategy for increasing data available for measuring equity and
representing the diversity of the American people.
In its final report in April 2022--Vision for Equitable Data--the
Equitable Data Working Group emphasized the need for the Federal
government to use equitable data to (1) encourage diverse
collaborations across levels of government, civil society, and the
research community and (2) be accountable to the American public. By
equitable data, we mean data that allow for rigorous assessment of the
extent to which government programs and policies yield consistently
fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including those
who have been historically underserved, marginalized, and adversely
affected by persistent poverty and inequality. Equitable data can
illuminate opportunities for targeted actions that will result in
demonstrably improved outcomes for underserved communities. One key
characteristic of equitable data is that it is disaggregated by
demographic information (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, language
spoken, etc.), geographic information (e.g., rural/urban), or other
variables, enabling insights on disparities in access to, and outcomes
from, government programs, policies, and services.
Durable, equitable data infrastructure requires fostering
collaborations across all levels of government, as well as with a
diverse community of external organizations to advance outcomes for
underserved communities. Constructing such infrastructure will likely
require new incentives and pathways, including to ensure greater data
sharing and capacity building across different levels of government and
to broaden the research community involved in producing and analyzing
equitable data.
Furthermore, providing tools that allow civil society organizations
and communities to use and visualize Federal data and chart
government's progress toward equitable outcomes is crucial for
strengthening accountability and credibility with the American public.
Such tools can encourage community participation in government equity
efforts, but these tools must be designed and administered in ways that
meet community members where they are in terms of data analysis
capacity and resources. These tools should ideally enable members of
the public to easily find meaningful and actionable data about the
well-being of their communities and the services provided to them.
In this notice, the White House OSTP is providing an opportunity
for members of the public to provide perspectives on how to best to
encourage collaborations between the Federal government and (a) state,
local, territorial, and Tribal governments; (b) researchers and
research institutions; and (c) local communities that facilitate
producing, accessing, and using equitable data.
Responses to this Request for Information (RFI) will be used to
inform the development of case studies, best practices, and new
strategies for Federal agencies, including establishing:
(1) mutually beneficial collaborations between Federal agencies and
other levels of government, civil society, and
[[Page 54270]]
the research community around the production and use of equitable data,
and
(2) tools that allow civil society organizations and communities to
use and visualize Federal data and chart government's progress toward
equitable outcomes in order to strengthen accountability and
credibility.
Responses to this RFI will also inform development of the United
States' Open Government Partnership National Action Plan that furthers
the principles of open government.
We invite members of the public to share perspectives on how the
Federal government can better realize the objectives of collaboration
between all levels of government, engagement of communities that access
or participate in Federal programs in data collection and research, and
create broader public access to equitable data. Responses may help
inform the development of case studies, best practices, strategies,
plans, and other tools for Federal agencies to pursue equitable data
partnerships and collaboration, including Federal government plans
around open government.
OSTP seeks responses to one, some, or all of the following
questions:
1. What are examples of successful collaborations involving
equitable data between the Federal government and (a) Tribal,
territorial, local, and State governments, or (b) local communities?
2. Among examples of existing Federal collaborations with (a)
Tribal, territorial, local, and State governments or (b) local
communities involving equitable data, what lessons or best practices
have been learned from such collaborations?
3. What resources, programs, training, or other tools can
facilitate increased data sharing between different levels of
government (Tribal, territorial, local, State, or Federal) related to
equitable data?
4. What resources, programs, training, or other tools can expand
opportunities for historically underrepresented scholars and research
institutions to access and use equitable data across levels of
government?
5. What resources, programs, training, or tools can increase
opportunities for community-based organizations to use equitable data
to hold government accountable to the American public?
6. What resources, programs, training, or tools can make equitable
data more accessible and useable for members of the public?
7. In which agencies, programs, regions, or communities are there
unmet needs, broken processes, or problems related to participation and
accountability that could be remedied through stronger collaborations
and transparency around equitable data?
Dated: August 30, 2022.
Stacy Murphy,
Operations Manager.
[FR Doc. 2022-19007 Filed 9-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270-F2-P