Worker Safety and Health Program, 54178-54183 [2022-18719]
Download as PDF
54178
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
EPA List 3 and List 4, unforeseen legal
and regulatory challenges not
mentioned in this ANPR, estimated
impacts to industry of each option, and
preferred method (or combination of
methods) for addressing these listings.
When possible, comments should be
accompanied by citations of supporting
sources.
Comments received in response to
this ANPR would inform AMS’s
approach on this topic regarding the
allowance of inert ingredients in organic
production. Substantive, well-reasoned,
constructive comments would assist in
identifying if there are unforeseen
challenges or a viable alternative to
move forward into rulemaking.
Comments generally in support or
opposition to alternatives identified in
the ANPR would assist AMS in
identifying the acceptability of the
presented options in the absence of
other alternatives.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2022–18928 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 851
[EHSS–RM–20–WSHP]
RIN 1992–AA61
Worker Safety and Health Program
Office of Environment, Health,
Safety and Security, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department) is
proposing to amend its current worker
safety and health program regulation.
The proposed amendment would make
corrections to the worker safety and
health program regulation requirements
related to beryllium and beryllium
compounds for purposes of accuracy
and consistency with DOE’s Chronic
Beryllium Disease Prevention Program
regulation, and to clarify that DOE did
not intend to adopt the 2016 American
Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists threshold limit value for
beryllium and beryllium compounds.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rulemaking must be received
by the Department on or before October
3, 2022. Please refer to section IV
(Public Participation—Submission of
Comments) for additional information
on the comment period.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
You may submit comments
identified by docket number EHSS–RM–
20–WSHP and/or Regulation
Identification Number (RIN) 1992–
AA61, in one of two ways (please
choose only one of the ways listed):
1. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions in the portal for submitting
comments.
2. Email: Rulemaking.851@
hq.doe.gov. Include docket number
EHSS–RM–20–WSHP and/or RIN 1992–
AA61 in the subject line of the email.
Please include the full body of your
comments in the text of the message or
as an attachment. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see section IV of
this document.
Docket: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available. A link to
the docket web page can be found at:
www.energy.gov/ehss/worker-safetyand-health-program-10-cfr-851doe-o4401b. This web page contains a link to
the docket for this notice on the
www.regulations.gov site. The
www.regulations.gov web page contains
instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section IV of this
document for further information on
how to submit comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James Dillard, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environment, Health,
Safety and Security, Mailstop EHSS–11,
1000 Independence Ave. SW,
Washington, DC 20585, Telephone:
301–903–1165, or by Email at:
james.dillard@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE
incorporates by reference into part 851
the following publication:
American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH®), Threshold Limit Values for
Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents and Biological Exposure Indices
(2016), excluding beryllium and
beryllium compounds.
A copy of this publication can be
obtained from: ACGIH®, 1330 Kemper
Meadow Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45240;
telephone number 513–742–2020; or go
to: https://www.acgih.org.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For a further discussion of this
publication, see section III.M of this
document.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
B. Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
G. Review Under Executive Order 13175
H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
L. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
M. Materials Incorporated by Reference
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments
V. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of
Energy
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
DOE has broad authority to regulate
worker safety and health with respect to
its nuclear and nonnuclear functions
pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of
1954 (AEA), 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.; the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974
(ERA), 42 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.; and the
Department of Energy Organization Act
(DOEOA), 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Specifically, the AEA authorized and
directed the Atomic Energy Commission
(AEC) to protect health and promote
safety during the performance of
activities under the AEA. (See Sec.
31a.(5) of the AEA, 42 U.S.C. 2051(a)(5);
Sec. 161b. of the AEA, 42 U.S.C.
2201(b); Sec. 161i.(3) of the AEA, 42
U.S.C. 2201(i)(3); and Sec. 161p. of the
AEA, 42 U.S.C. 2201(p)). In addition,
Congress amended the AEA in 2002 by
adding section 234C, 42 U.S.C. 2282c,
which, among other things, directed
DOE to ‘‘promulgate regulations for
industrial and construction health and
safety at Department of Energy facilities
that are operated by contractors covered
by agreements of indemnification under
section 2210(d) of’’ title 42 of the United
States Code. In 1974, the ERA abolished
the AEC and replaced it with the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),
which became responsible for the
licensing of commercial nuclear
activities, and the Energy Research and
Development Administration (ERDA),
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
which became responsible for the other
functions of the AEC under the AEA, as
well as several nonnuclear functions.
The ERA authorized ERDA to use the
regulatory authority under the AEA to
carry out its nuclear and nonnuclear
functions, including those functions
that might become vested in ERDA in
the future. (See Sec. 105(a) of the ERA,
42 U.S.C. 5815(a); and Sec. 107 of the
ERA, 42 U.S.C. 5817.) In 1977, the
DOEOA transferred the functions and
authorities of ERDA to DOE. (See Sec.
301(a) of the DOEOA, 42 U.S.C. 7151(a);
Sec. 641 of the DOEOA, 42 U.S.C. 7251;
and Sec. 644 of the DOEOA, 42 U.S.C.
7254).
B. Background
On February 9, 2006, when DOE
promulgated 10 CFR part 851, Worker
Safety and Health Program (71 FR
6858), it adopted several industry
standards and guidelines to establish
the baseline industrial and construction
safety and health requirements for DOE
workplace operations. The standards
and guidelines with which DOE
contractors performing work on DOE
sites were required to comply included
certain Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) regulations and
threshold limit values (TLVs®)
published by the ACGIH®. Compliance
with these standards and guidelines
were already required by DOE Order
440.1A, Worker Protection Management
for DOE Federal and Contractor
Employees, which established a
comprehensive worker protection
program that provided the basic
framework necessary for contractors to
ensure the safety and health of their
workforce. Title 10 CFR 851.23(a)
requires DOE contractors to comply
with 10 CFR part 850, Chronic
Beryllium Disease Prevention Program,
and certain OSHA regulations at 29 CFR
parts 1910, 1915, and 1926, among
others. In 2015, DOE amended 10 CFR
part 851 and added § 851.2(d) to clarify
DOE’s intent to adopt only OSHA’s
permissible exposure limit for beryllium
found in 29 CFR 1910.1000, and that the
ancillary provisions (e.g., exposure
assessment, personal protective clothing
and equipment, medical surveillance,
medical removal, training, and regulated
areas or access control) of OSHA’s
standard do not apply to DOE and DOE
contractors and their employees (80 FR
69564, November 10, 2015).
On January 9, 2017, OSHA
promulgated new regulations in 29 CFR
parts 1910, 1915, and 1926 for the
protection of workers from the effects of
beryllium and beryllium compounds in
the workplace (82 FR 2470). These new
provisions had the potential to conflict
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
with or overlap DOE’s beryllium safety
and health requirements in 10 CFR part
850.
On December 18, 2017 (82 FR 59947),
DOE issued a technical amendment to
10 CFR part 851 that replaced the
existing references to safety and health
standards and guidelines with the latest
versions of the standards and
guidelines. In the December 2017
amendment, DOE updated the safety
and health standards and guidelines
that were incorporated by reference in
10 CFR part 851, including the ACGIH®
TLVs® in the ‘‘Threshold Limit Values
for Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents and Biological Exposure
Indices’’ (2016). The TLVs® included
those for beryllium and beryllium
compounds.
In this proposed rule, DOE is
proposing to make corrections to 10 CFR
part 851 with respect to the
requirements for beryllium and
beryllium compounds that would: (1)
ensure accuracy and consistency with
10 CFR part 850, Chronic Beryllium
Disease Prevention Program; (2) clarify
that in adopting certain OSHA
regulations and ACGIH® TLVs® in 10
CFR part 851, DOE did not intend to
adopt OSHA’s ancillary beryllium safety
requirements and ACGIH® values for
beryllium and beryllium compounds;
and (3) clarify in § 851.2(d) that 10 CFR
part 851 does not require compliance by
DOE contractors with any OSHA
requirements for beryllium or beryllium
compounds except as provided in 10
CFR part 850. DOE believes these
corrections are necessary to avoid
potential conflicts with DOE’s beryllium
safety and health requirements in 10
CFR part 850 and to avoid potential
confusion among DOE contractors as to
the requirements with which they must
comply at DOE sites.
This proposed rule would also make
minor corrections to clarify the meaning
of § 851.23(b) regarding contractor
compliance with additional safety and
health requirements that are necessary
to protect workers at their covered
workplace.
II. Discussion
Section 851.2(d) currently provides
that part 851 does not require
compliance with any OSHA beryllium
requirement except for any permissible
exposure limit for beryllium in 29 CFR
1910.1000. The proposed text in
§ 851.2(d) would modify the current
language by instead referring to DOE’s
beryllium rule and stating that part 851
does not require compliance with any
OSHA requirements for beryllium and
beryllium compounds except as
provided in 10 CFR part 850, Chronic
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54179
Beryllium Disease Prevention Program.
DOE notes that 10 CFR 850.22,
Permissible exposure limit, states that
the responsible employer must assure
that no worker is exposed to an airborne
concentration of beryllium greater than
the permissible exposure limit
established in 29 CFR 1910.1000, as
measured in the worker’s breathing zone
by personal monitoring, or a more
stringent time weighted average
permissible exposure limit that may be
promulgated by OSHA as a health
standard. The proposed change to
§ 851.2(d) would ensure consistency
between the language in 10 CFR parts
850 and 851 with respect to beryllium
and beryllium compounds.
Section 851.23(a) currently requires
contractors to comply with safety and
health standards and guidelines that are
applicable to the hazards at their
covered workplace, including those
identified at paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(4),
and (a)(7) of that section. DOE’s
proposed changes in § 851.23(a) would
clarify that while DOE currently adopts
OSHA’s permissible exposure limit for
beryllium, it is not DOE’s intention to
adopt OSHA’s remaining beryllium
requirements in 29 CFR parts 1910,
1915, and 1926.
The current language in § 851.23(a)(3)
refers to 29 CFR part 1910,
Occupational Safety and Health
Standards, excluding 29 CFR
1910.1096, Ionizing Radiation, and 29
CFR 1910.1000, Beryllium. The
proposed language in § 851.23(a)(3)
would correct the reference to OSHA’s
regulations and refer instead to 29 CFR
part 1910, Occupational Safety and
Health Standards, excluding 29 CFR
1910.1096, Ionizing Radiation; 29 CFR
1910.1000, Air Contaminants, Tables Z–
1 and Z–2, as they relate to beryllium
and beryllium compounds; and 29 CFR
1910.1024, Beryllium.
The current language in § 851.23(a)(4)
refers to 29 CFR part 1915, Shipyard
Employment. The proposed language in
§ 851.23(a)(4) would refer instead to 29
CFR part 1915, Occupational Safety and
Health Standards for Shipyard
Employment, except for 29 CFR
1915.1024, Beryllium. In addition, the
current language in § 851.23(a)(7) refers
to 29 CFR part 1926, Safety and Health
Regulations for Construction. The
proposed language in § 851.23(a)(7)
would refer instead to 29 CFR part 1926,
Safety and Health Regulations for
Construction, except for 29 CFR
1926.1124, Beryllium.
In 2017, DOE adopted and
incorporated by reference the ACGIH®
Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents and
Biological Exposure Indices, (2016), but
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
54180
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
did not intend to adopt the ACGIH®
TLV® for beryllium and beryllium
compounds. This proposed rule would
amend § 851.23(a)(9) to exclude the
ACGIH® TLV® for beryllium and
beryllium compounds. In addition,
§ 851.23(a)(9) currently only refers to
two of OSHA’s health standards for
beryllium and beryllium compounds, 29
CFR part 1910 (general industry) and 29
CFR part 1926 (construction). The
proposed language in § 851.23(a)(9)
would also include references to 29 CFR
part 1915, the OSHA standard for
shipyards.
In this proposed rule, DOE is also
proposing minor editorial changes that
would clarify the Department’s intent
with respect to § 851.23(b). Currently,
§ 851.23(b) states that nothing in this
part must be construed as relieving a
contractor from complying with any
additional specific safety and health
requirement that it determines to be
necessary to protect the safety and
health of workers. The proposed
amendment to § 851.23(b) would state
that nothing in this part relieves
contractors from the responsibility to
comply with any additional safety and
health requirements that are necessary
to protect the safety and health of
workers.
In addition to the proposed
amendment to § 851.23(a)(9) to exclude
the ACGIH® TLV® for beryllium and
beryllium compounds, this proposed
rule would also clarify DOE’s intent in
§ 851.27(b)(1) that the incorporation by
reference of ACGIH®, Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and
Physical Agents and Biological
Exposure Indices, 2016, excludes
beryllium and beryllium compounds.
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
This regulatory action has been
determined not to be ‘‘a significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action is not subject to
review under that Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that an
agency prepare an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for any regulation for
which a general notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, unless the
agency certifies that the rule, if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (5 U.S.C.
605(b)). As required by Executive Order
13272, Proper Consideration of Small
Entities in Agency Rulemaking, 67 FR
53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s website (https://energy.gov/
gc/office-general-counsel).
DOE reviewed this proposed rule
under the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. DOE certifies that the proposed
rule, if adopted, would not have
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification is
set forth below.
This proposed rule would update
DOE’s worker safety and health program
regulation and clarify DOE’s ongoing
intent to exempt DOE contractors from
specified OSHA regulations and the
ACGIH® TLV® pertaining to beryllium
and beryllium compounds. This
proposed rule would apply only to
activities conducted by DOE’s
contractors who would be responsible
for implementing the rule requirements.
DOE expects that any potential
economic impact of this proposed rule
on small businesses would be minimal
because work performed at DOE sites is
under contracts with DOE or the prime
contractor at the site. DOE contractors
are reimbursed through their contracts
for the costs of complying with worker
safety and health program requirements.
Therefore, they would not be adversely
impacted by the requirements in this
proposed rule. For these reasons, DOE
certifies that this proposed rule, if
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
and therefore, no regulatory flexibility
analysis has been prepared.
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose a
collection of information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), DOE has analyzed this
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed action in accordance with
NEPA and DOE’s NEPA implementing
regulations (10 CFR part 1021). DOE’s
regulations include a categorical
exclusion (CX) for rulemakings
interpreting or amending an existing
rule or regulation that does not change
the environmental effect of the rule or
regulation being amended. 10 CFR part
1021, subpart D, appendix A5. DOE has
determined that this proposed rule is
covered under the CX found in DOE’s
NEPA regulations at paragraph A.5 of
appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part
1021, because it is an amendment to an
existing regulation that does not change
the environmental effect of the amended
regulation and, therefore, meets the
requirements for the application of this
CX. See 10 CFR 1021.410. Therefore,
DOE has determined that this proposed
rule is not a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment within the meaning
of NEPA and does not require an
Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement.
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, Section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for the affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; (6) specifies whether
administrative proceedings are to be
required before parties may file suit in
court and, if so, describes those
proceedings and requires the exhaustion
of administrative remedies; and (7)
addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines
issued by the Attorney General. Section
3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
unreasonable to meet one or more of the
standards. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to
the extent permitted by law, this
proposed rule meets the relevant
standards of Executive Order 12988.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an
accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy
describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR
13735. DOE has examined this proposed
rule and has tentatively determined that
it would not preempt State law and
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order
13132.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
G. Review Under Executive Order 13175
Under Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) on
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments,’’ DOE may
not issue a discretionary rule that has
‘‘Tribal’’ implications and imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments. DOE has
determined that the proposed rule
would not have such effects and
concluded that Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this proposed rule.
H. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of a Federal regulatory
action on State, local, and Tribal
governments, and the private sector.
(Pub. L. 104–4, sec. 201 et seq. (codified
at 2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)). For a proposed
regulatory action likely to result in a
rule that may cause the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits,
and other effects on the national
economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)). UMRA
also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State,
local, and Tribal governments on a
proposed ‘‘significant Federal
intergovernmental mandate,’’ and
requires an agency plan for giving notice
and opportunity for timely input to
potentially affected small governments
before establishing any requirements
that might significantly or uniquely
affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its
process for intergovernmental
consultation under UMRA. (62 FR
12820) (This policy is also available at:
https://www.energy.gov/gc/guidanceopinions under ‘‘Guidance & Opinions’’
(Rulemaking)). DOE examined the
proposed rule according to UMRA and
its statement of policy and has
determined that the rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate,
nor a mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year. Accordingly, no further
assessment or analysis is required under
UMRA.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive
Order 12630, ‘‘Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights’’ 53 FR 8859
(March 18, 1988), that this proposed
regulation would not result in any
takings that might require compensation
under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the OIRA, which
is part of OMB, a Statement of Energy
Effects for any proposed significant
energy action. A ‘‘significant energy
action’’ is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgates or is expected
to lead to promulgation of a final rule,
and that: (1)(i) is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, or
any successor order; and (ii) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, or
(2) is designated by the Administrator of
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54181
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This proposed regulatory action is not a
significant energy action. Accordingly,
DOE has not prepared a Statement of
Energy Effects.
K. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any
proposed rule that may affect family
well-being (5 U.S.C. 601, note). This
proposed rule would not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
L. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note)
provides for Federal agencies to review
most disseminations of information to
the public under guidelines established
by each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). Pursuant to
OMB Memorandum M–19–15,
Improving Implementation of the
Information Quality Act (April 24,
2019), DOE published updated
guidelines which are available at:
www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/
12/f70/DOE%20Final%
20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%
20Dec%202019.pdf.
DOE has reviewed this proposed rule
under the OMB and DOE guidelines and
has concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
M. Materials Incorporated by Reference
DOE is proposing to restrict the
TLVs® for chemical substances and
physical agents and biological exposure
indices (BEIs®) published by the
ACGIH® titled Threshold Limit Values
for Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents and Biological Exposure Indices,
(2016), the currently-approved for
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
54182
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
incorporation by reference, by excluding
beryllium and beryllium compounds.
The TLVs® and BEIs® are guidelines
that are intended for use by industrial
hygienists in making decisions
regarding safe levels of exposure to
various chemical and physical agents
found in the workplace. Each year
ACGIH® publishes its TLVs® and BEIs®.
Copies of the ACGIH® TLVs® and BEIs®
are available on ACGIH®’s website at:
www.acgih.org.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments
DOE will accept comments, data and
information regarding this proposed
rule before or no later than the date
provided in the DATES section at the
beginning of this proposed rule.
Interested individuals are invited to
participate in this proceeding by
submitting data, views, or arguments
with respect to this proposed rule using
the method described in the ADDRESSES
section at the beginning of this proposed
rule. To help the Department review the
submitted comments, commenters are
requested to reference the paragraph(s),
e.g., § 851.2(d), to which they refer
where possible.
1. Submitting comments to
www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact
information will be viewable by DOE’s
Office of Worker Safety and Health
Policy staff only. Your contact
information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment cannot be processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment. Your
contact information will be publicly
viewable if you include it in the
comment itself or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Persons viewing comments will see only
first and last names, organization
names, correspondence containing
comments, and any documents
submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov
information for which disclosure is
restricted by statute, such as trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information (hereinafter referred to as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
Confidential Business Information
(CBI)). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through
www.regulations.gov will waive any CBI
claims for the information submitted.
For information on submitting CBI, see
the Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be
posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of
comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not
be viewable for up to several weeks.
Please keep the comment tracking
number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully
uploaded your comment.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, that are written in English, and
that are free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special
characters or any form of encryption
and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
2. Submitting comments via email.
Comments and documents submitted
via email also will be posted to
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information in a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments. Include contact information
each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to
DOE.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel file format. Provide documents
that are not secured, that are written in
English, and that are free of any defects
or viruses. Documents should not
contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should
carry the electronic signature of the
author.
3. Confidential Business Information.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR
1004.11, anyone submitting information
or data he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from
public disclosure should submit two
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
well-marked copies: one copy of the
document marked ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL’’
including all the information believed to
be confidential, and one copy of the
document marked ‘‘NONCONFIDENTIAL’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email. DOE
will make its own determination as to
the confidentiality of the information
and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
4. Campaign form letters. Please
submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of
between 50 to 500 form letters per PDF
or as one form letter with a list of
supporters’ names compiled into one or
more PDFs. This reduces comment
processing and posting time.
V. Approval by the Office of the
Secretary of Energy
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this notice of proposed
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 851
Civil penalty, Incorporation by
reference, Occupational safety and
health, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on August 20, 2022,
by Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of
Energy. That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only,
and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 25,
2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Energy
proposes to amend part 851 of chapter
III of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2022 / Proposed Rules
(b) Nothing in this part relieves
contractors from the responsibility to
comply with any additional safety and
health requirements that are necessary
to protect the safety and health of
workers.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 851.27 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
PART 851—WORKER SAFETY AND
HEALTH PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 851
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201(i)(3), (p); 42
U.S.C. 2282c; 42 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.; 42
U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.;
28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
2. Amend § 851.2 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 851.2
§ 851.27 Materials incorporated by
reference.
Exclusions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) This part does not require
compliance with any Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
requirements for beryllium or beryllium
compounds except as provided in 10
CFR part 850, ‘‘Chronic Beryllium
Disease Prevention Program.’’
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 851.23 by revising
paragraphs (a)(3), (4), (7), (9) and (b) to
read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 851.23
Safety and health standards.
(a) * * *
(3) Title 29 CFR, Part 1910,
‘‘Occupational Safety and Health
Standards,’’ excluding 29 CFR
1910.1096, ‘‘Ionizing Radiation’’; 29
CFR 1910.1000, ‘‘Air Contaminants,’’
Tables Z–1 and Z–2, as they relate to
beryllium and beryllium compounds;
and 29 CFR 1910.1024, ‘‘Beryllium.’’
(4) Title 29 CFR, Part 1915,
‘‘Occupational Safety and Health
Standards for Shipyard Employment,’’
except for 29 CFR 1915.1024,
‘‘Beryllium.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Title 29 CFR, Part 1926, ‘‘Safety
and Health Regulations for
Construction,’’ except for 29 CFR
1926.1124, ‘‘Beryllium.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(9) American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH®), Threshold Limit Values for
Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents and Biological Exposure Indices,
(2016) (incorporated by reference, see
§ 851.27), excluding those for beryllium
and beryllium compounds, when the
ACGIH® Threshold Limit Values
(TLVs®) are lower (more protective)
than permissible exposure limits in 29
CFR part 1910 for general industry, 29
CFR part 1915 for shipyards, and/or 29
CFR part 1926 for construction. When
the ACGIH® TLVs® are used as
exposure limits, contractors must
comply with the other provisions of any
applicable expanded health standard
found in 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, and
1926.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 01, 2022
Jkt 256001
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this subpart with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce
any edition other than that specified in
this section, the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) must publish a document
in the Federal Register and the material
must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for
inspection at the DOE and at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact DOE at
the: U.S. Department of Energy, Office
of Environment, Health, Safety and
Security, Office of Worker Safety and
Health Policy, 1000 Independence Ave.
SW, Washington, DC 20585, (301) 903–
1165. For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email:
fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html. The material may be
obtained from the sources in the
following paragraphs of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2022–18719 Filed 9–1–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2022–1066; Project
Identifier MCAI–2022–00622–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020–21–11, which applies to certain
Airbus SAS Model A318 series
airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113,
–114, –115, –131, –132, –133, –151N,
and –153N airplanes; and Model A320
and A321 series airplanes. AD 2020–21–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54183
11 requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations.
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–21–11,
the FAA has determined that new or
more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. This proposed
AD would continue to require the
actions in AD 2020–21–11 and require
revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate additional new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is
proposed for incorporation by reference.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by October 17,
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
website easa.europa.eu. You may find
this material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195. It is also available in
the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2022–1066.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2022–1066; or
in person at Docket Operations between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54178-54183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18719]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 851
[EHSS-RM-20-WSHP]
RIN 1992-AA61
Worker Safety and Health Program
AGENCY: Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, U.S.
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) is
proposing to amend its current worker safety and health program
regulation. The proposed amendment would make corrections to the worker
safety and health program regulation requirements related to beryllium
and beryllium compounds for purposes of accuracy and consistency with
DOE's Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program regulation, and to
clarify that DOE did not intend to adopt the 2016 American Conference
of Governmental Industrial Hygienists threshold limit value for
beryllium and beryllium compounds.
DATES: Written comments on this proposed rulemaking must be received by
the Department on or before October 3, 2022. Please refer to section IV
(Public Participation--Submission of Comments) for additional
information on the comment period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number EHSS-RM-
20-WSHP and/or Regulation Identification Number (RIN) 1992-AA61, in one
of two ways (please choose only one of the ways listed):
1. Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions in the portal for submitting comments.
2. Email: [email protected]. Include docket number EHSS-RM-
20-WSHP and/or RIN 1992-AA61 in the subject line of the email. Please
include the full body of your comments in the text of the message or as
an attachment. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see section IV of
this document.
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the
index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available. A link to the docket web
page can be found at: www.energy.gov/ehss/worker-safety-and-health-program-10-cfr-851doe-o-4401b. This web page contains a link to the
docket for this notice on the www.regulations.gov site. The
www.regulations.gov web page contains instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section IV of
this document for further information on how to submit comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Dillard, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, Mailstop
EHSS-11, 1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20585, Telephone:
301-903-1165, or by Email at: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE incorporates by reference into part 851
the following publication:
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH[supreg]), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices (2016), excluding
beryllium and beryllium compounds.
A copy of this publication can be obtained from: ACGIH[supreg],
1330 Kemper Meadow Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45240; telephone number 513-
742-2020; or go to: https://www.acgih.org.
For a further discussion of this publication, see section III.M of
this document.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
B. Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
G. Review Under Executive Order 13175
H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
L. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
M. Materials Incorporated by Reference
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments
V. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
DOE has broad authority to regulate worker safety and health with
respect to its nuclear and nonnuclear functions pursuant to the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.; the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974 (ERA), 42 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.; and the
Department of Energy Organization Act (DOEOA), 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Specifically, the AEA authorized and directed the Atomic Energy
Commission (AEC) to protect health and promote safety during the
performance of activities under the AEA. (See Sec. 31a.(5) of the AEA,
42 U.S.C. 2051(a)(5); Sec. 161b. of the AEA, 42 U.S.C. 2201(b); Sec.
161i.(3) of the AEA, 42 U.S.C. 2201(i)(3); and Sec. 161p. of the AEA,
42 U.S.C. 2201(p)). In addition, Congress amended the AEA in 2002 by
adding section 234C, 42 U.S.C. 2282c, which, among other things,
directed DOE to ``promulgate regulations for industrial and
construction health and safety at Department of Energy facilities that
are operated by contractors covered by agreements of indemnification
under section 2210(d) of'' title 42 of the United States Code. In 1974,
the ERA abolished the AEC and replaced it with the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), which became responsible for the licensing of
commercial nuclear activities, and the Energy Research and Development
Administration (ERDA),
[[Page 54179]]
which became responsible for the other functions of the AEC under the
AEA, as well as several nonnuclear functions. The ERA authorized ERDA
to use the regulatory authority under the AEA to carry out its nuclear
and nonnuclear functions, including those functions that might become
vested in ERDA in the future. (See Sec. 105(a) of the ERA, 42 U.S.C.
5815(a); and Sec. 107 of the ERA, 42 U.S.C. 5817.) In 1977, the DOEOA
transferred the functions and authorities of ERDA to DOE. (See Sec.
301(a) of the DOEOA, 42 U.S.C. 7151(a); Sec. 641 of the DOEOA, 42
U.S.C. 7251; and Sec. 644 of the DOEOA, 42 U.S.C. 7254).
B. Background
On February 9, 2006, when DOE promulgated 10 CFR part 851, Worker
Safety and Health Program (71 FR 6858), it adopted several industry
standards and guidelines to establish the baseline industrial and
construction safety and health requirements for DOE workplace
operations. The standards and guidelines with which DOE contractors
performing work on DOE sites were required to comply included certain
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations and
threshold limit values (TLVs[supreg]) published by the ACGIH[supreg].
Compliance with these standards and guidelines were already required by
DOE Order 440.1A, Worker Protection Management for DOE Federal and
Contractor Employees, which established a comprehensive worker
protection program that provided the basic framework necessary for
contractors to ensure the safety and health of their workforce. Title
10 CFR 851.23(a) requires DOE contractors to comply with 10 CFR part
850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program, and certain OSHA
regulations at 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, and 1926, among others. In
2015, DOE amended 10 CFR part 851 and added Sec. 851.2(d) to clarify
DOE's intent to adopt only OSHA's permissible exposure limit for
beryllium found in 29 CFR 1910.1000, and that the ancillary provisions
(e.g., exposure assessment, personal protective clothing and equipment,
medical surveillance, medical removal, training, and regulated areas or
access control) of OSHA's standard do not apply to DOE and DOE
contractors and their employees (80 FR 69564, November 10, 2015).
On January 9, 2017, OSHA promulgated new regulations in 29 CFR
parts 1910, 1915, and 1926 for the protection of workers from the
effects of beryllium and beryllium compounds in the workplace (82 FR
2470). These new provisions had the potential to conflict with or
overlap DOE's beryllium safety and health requirements in 10 CFR part
850.
On December 18, 2017 (82 FR 59947), DOE issued a technical
amendment to 10 CFR part 851 that replaced the existing references to
safety and health standards and guidelines with the latest versions of
the standards and guidelines. In the December 2017 amendment, DOE
updated the safety and health standards and guidelines that were
incorporated by reference in 10 CFR part 851, including the
ACGIH[supreg] TLVs[supreg] in the ``Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices''
(2016). The TLVs[supreg] included those for beryllium and beryllium
compounds.
In this proposed rule, DOE is proposing to make corrections to 10
CFR part 851 with respect to the requirements for beryllium and
beryllium compounds that would: (1) ensure accuracy and consistency
with 10 CFR part 850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program; (2)
clarify that in adopting certain OSHA regulations and ACGIH[supreg]
TLVs[supreg] in 10 CFR part 851, DOE did not intend to adopt OSHA's
ancillary beryllium safety requirements and ACGIH[supreg] values for
beryllium and beryllium compounds; and (3) clarify in Sec. 851.2(d)
that 10 CFR part 851 does not require compliance by DOE contractors
with any OSHA requirements for beryllium or beryllium compounds except
as provided in 10 CFR part 850. DOE believes these corrections are
necessary to avoid potential conflicts with DOE's beryllium safety and
health requirements in 10 CFR part 850 and to avoid potential confusion
among DOE contractors as to the requirements with which they must
comply at DOE sites.
This proposed rule would also make minor corrections to clarify the
meaning of Sec. 851.23(b) regarding contractor compliance with
additional safety and health requirements that are necessary to protect
workers at their covered workplace.
II. Discussion
Section 851.2(d) currently provides that part 851 does not require
compliance with any OSHA beryllium requirement except for any
permissible exposure limit for beryllium in 29 CFR 1910.1000. The
proposed text in Sec. 851.2(d) would modify the current language by
instead referring to DOE's beryllium rule and stating that part 851
does not require compliance with any OSHA requirements for beryllium
and beryllium compounds except as provided in 10 CFR part 850, Chronic
Beryllium Disease Prevention Program. DOE notes that 10 CFR 850.22,
Permissible exposure limit, states that the responsible employer must
assure that no worker is exposed to an airborne concentration of
beryllium greater than the permissible exposure limit established in 29
CFR 1910.1000, as measured in the worker's breathing zone by personal
monitoring, or a more stringent time weighted average permissible
exposure limit that may be promulgated by OSHA as a health standard.
The proposed change to Sec. 851.2(d) would ensure consistency between
the language in 10 CFR parts 850 and 851 with respect to beryllium and
beryllium compounds.
Section 851.23(a) currently requires contractors to comply with
safety and health standards and guidelines that are applicable to the
hazards at their covered workplace, including those identified at
paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(7) of that section. DOE's proposed
changes in Sec. 851.23(a) would clarify that while DOE currently
adopts OSHA's permissible exposure limit for beryllium, it is not DOE's
intention to adopt OSHA's remaining beryllium requirements in 29 CFR
parts 1910, 1915, and 1926.
The current language in Sec. 851.23(a)(3) refers to 29 CFR part
1910, Occupational Safety and Health Standards, excluding 29 CFR
1910.1096, Ionizing Radiation, and 29 CFR 1910.1000, Beryllium. The
proposed language in Sec. 851.23(a)(3) would correct the reference to
OSHA's regulations and refer instead to 29 CFR part 1910, Occupational
Safety and Health Standards, excluding 29 CFR 1910.1096, Ionizing
Radiation; 29 CFR 1910.1000, Air Contaminants, Tables Z-1 and Z-2, as
they relate to beryllium and beryllium compounds; and 29 CFR 1910.1024,
Beryllium.
The current language in Sec. 851.23(a)(4) refers to 29 CFR part
1915, Shipyard Employment. The proposed language in Sec. 851.23(a)(4)
would refer instead to 29 CFR part 1915, Occupational Safety and Health
Standards for Shipyard Employment, except for 29 CFR 1915.1024,
Beryllium. In addition, the current language in Sec. 851.23(a)(7)
refers to 29 CFR part 1926, Safety and Health Regulations for
Construction. The proposed language in Sec. 851.23(a)(7) would refer
instead to 29 CFR part 1926, Safety and Health Regulations for
Construction, except for 29 CFR 1926.1124, Beryllium.
In 2017, DOE adopted and incorporated by reference the
ACGIH[supreg] Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, (2016), but
[[Page 54180]]
did not intend to adopt the ACGIH[supreg] TLV[supreg] for beryllium and
beryllium compounds. This proposed rule would amend Sec. 851.23(a)(9)
to exclude the ACGIH[supreg] TLV[supreg] for beryllium and beryllium
compounds. In addition, Sec. 851.23(a)(9) currently only refers to two
of OSHA's health standards for beryllium and beryllium compounds, 29
CFR part 1910 (general industry) and 29 CFR part 1926 (construction).
The proposed language in Sec. 851.23(a)(9) would also include
references to 29 CFR part 1915, the OSHA standard for shipyards.
In this proposed rule, DOE is also proposing minor editorial
changes that would clarify the Department's intent with respect to
Sec. 851.23(b). Currently, Sec. 851.23(b) states that nothing in this
part must be construed as relieving a contractor from complying with
any additional specific safety and health requirement that it
determines to be necessary to protect the safety and health of workers.
The proposed amendment to Sec. 851.23(b) would state that nothing in
this part relieves contractors from the responsibility to comply with
any additional safety and health requirements that are necessary to
protect the safety and health of workers.
In addition to the proposed amendment to Sec. 851.23(a)(9) to
exclude the ACGIH[supreg] TLV[supreg] for beryllium and beryllium
compounds, this proposed rule would also clarify DOE's intent in Sec.
851.27(b)(1) that the incorporation by reference of ACGIH[supreg],
Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and
Biological Exposure Indices, 2016, excludes beryllium and beryllium
compounds.
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been determined not to be ``a
significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action is not subject to review under that Executive
Order by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires that an agency prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any regulation for which a general notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, unless the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities (5 U.S.C. 605(b)). As required by
Executive Order 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and
policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of
its rules on small entities are properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and
policies available on the Office of the General Counsel's website
(https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel).
DOE reviewed this proposed rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. DOE certifies that the proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The factual basis for this certification is set forth
below.
This proposed rule would update DOE's worker safety and health
program regulation and clarify DOE's ongoing intent to exempt DOE
contractors from specified OSHA regulations and the ACGIH[supreg]
TLV[supreg] pertaining to beryllium and beryllium compounds. This
proposed rule would apply only to activities conducted by DOE's
contractors who would be responsible for implementing the rule
requirements. DOE expects that any potential economic impact of this
proposed rule on small businesses would be minimal because work
performed at DOE sites is under contracts with DOE or the prime
contractor at the site. DOE contractors are reimbursed through their
contracts for the costs of complying with worker safety and health
program requirements. Therefore, they would not be adversely impacted
by the requirements in this proposed rule. For these reasons, DOE
certifies that this proposed rule, if promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
and therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose a collection of information
requirement subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
DOE has analyzed this proposed action in accordance with NEPA and DOE's
NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR part 1021). DOE's regulations
include a categorical exclusion (CX) for rulemakings interpreting or
amending an existing rule or regulation that does not change the
environmental effect of the rule or regulation being amended. 10 CFR
part 1021, subpart D, appendix A5. DOE has determined that this
proposed rule is covered under the CX found in DOE's NEPA regulations
at paragraph A.5 of appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021, because
it is an amendment to an existing regulation that does not change the
environmental effect of the amended regulation and, therefore, meets
the requirements for the application of this CX. See 10 CFR 1021.410.
Therefore, DOE has determined that this proposed rule is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment within the meaning of NEPA and does not require an
Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement.
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, Section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order
12988 specifically requires that executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for the affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; (6) specifies whether administrative proceedings are
to be required before parties may file suit in court and, if so,
describes those proceedings and requires the exhaustion of
administrative remedies; and (7) addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued
by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations in light of applicable
standards in section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they
are met or it is
[[Page 54181]]
unreasonable to meet one or more of the standards. DOE has completed
the required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by
law, this proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999) imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have federalism implications. Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has
tentatively determined that it would not preempt State law and would
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
No further action is required by Executive Order 13132.
G. Review Under Executive Order 13175
Under Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) on
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' DOE
may not issue a discretionary rule that has ``Tribal'' implications and
imposes substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal
governments. DOE has determined that the proposed rule would not have
such effects and concluded that Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this proposed rule.
H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-4) requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of a
Federal regulatory action on State, local, and Tribal governments, and
the private sector. (Pub. L. 104-4, sec. 201 et seq. (codified at 2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)). For a proposed regulatory action likely to
result in a rule that may cause the expenditure by State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100
million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation),
section 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency to publish a written
statement that estimates the resulting costs, benefits, and other
effects on the national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)). UMRA also
requires a Federal agency to develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State, local, and Tribal
governments on a proposed ``significant Federal intergovernmental
mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving notice and
opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small governments
before establishing any requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA.
(62 FR 12820) (This policy is also available at: https://www.energy.gov/gc/guidance-opinions under ``Guidance & Opinions''
(Rulemaking)). DOE examined the proposed rule according to UMRA and its
statement of policy and has determined that the rule contains neither
an intergovernmental mandate, nor a mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year.
Accordingly, no further assessment or analysis is required under UMRA.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this proposed regulation
would not result in any takings that might require compensation under
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
OIRA, which is part of OMB, a Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A ``significant energy action'' is
defined as any action by an agency that promulgates or is expected to
lead to promulgation of a final rule, and that: (1)(i) is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, or any successor order;
and (ii) is likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, or (2) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. For any proposed
significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed statement of
any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use should the
proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to the action
and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This proposed regulatory action is not a significant energy action.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
K. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule that may affect family
well-being (5 U.S.C. 601, note). This proposed rule would not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a
Family Policymaking Assessment.
L. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note) provides for Federal agencies to
review most disseminations of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines
issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February
22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October
7, 2002). Pursuant to OMB Memorandum M-19-15, Improving Implementation
of the Information Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE published updated
guidelines which are available at: www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%20Dec%202019.pdf.
DOE has reviewed this proposed rule under the OMB and DOE
guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
M. Materials Incorporated by Reference
DOE is proposing to restrict the TLVs[supreg] for chemical
substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices
(BEIs[supreg]) published by the ACGIH[supreg] titled Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological
Exposure Indices, (2016), the currently-approved for
[[Page 54182]]
incorporation by reference, by excluding beryllium and beryllium
compounds. The TLVs[supreg] and BEIs[supreg] are guidelines that are
intended for use by industrial hygienists in making decisions regarding
safe levels of exposure to various chemical and physical agents found
in the workplace. Each year ACGIH[supreg] publishes its TLVs[supreg]
and BEIs[supreg]. Copies of the ACGIH[supreg] TLVs[supreg] and
BEIs[supreg] are available on ACGIH[supreg]'s website at:
www.acgih.org.
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data and information regarding this
proposed rule before or no later than the date provided in the DATES
section at the beginning of this proposed rule. Interested individuals
are invited to participate in this proceeding by submitting data,
views, or arguments with respect to this proposed rule using the method
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this proposed
rule. To help the Department review the submitted comments, commenters
are requested to reference the paragraph(s), e.g., Sec. 851.2(d), to
which they refer where possible.
1. Submitting comments to www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable by DOE's
Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy staff only. Your contact
information will not be publicly viewable except for your first and
last names, organization name (if any), and submitter representative
name (if any). If your comment cannot be processed properly because of
technical difficulties, DOE will use this information to contact you.
If DOE cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and
cannot contact you for clarification, DOE may not be able to consider
your comment. Your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment itself or in any documents attached to your
comment. Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable
should not be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to
your comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last
names, organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received through
www.regulations.gov will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, that are written in English, and that are free of any
defects or viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible, they should carry the
electronic signature of the author.
2. Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted
via email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not
want your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments. Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents, and other information to DOE.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel file format. Provide documents that are not secured, that are
written in English, and that are free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
3. Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to the provisions of
10 CFR 1004.11, anyone submitting information or data he or she
believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit two well-marked copies: one copy of the document marked
``CONFIDENTIAL'' including all the information believed to be
confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``NON-CONFIDENTIAL''
with the information believed to be confidential deleted. Submit these
documents via email. DOE will make its own determination as to the
confidentiality of the information and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
4. Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by
the originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form
letters per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and
posting time.
V. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 851
Civil penalty, Incorporation by reference, Occupational safety and
health, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 20,
2022, by Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the
Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer
has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic
format for publication, as an official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect
of this document upon publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 25, 2022.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Energy
proposes to amend part 851 of chapter III of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
[[Page 54183]]
PART 851--WORKER SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 851 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201(i)(3), (p); 42 U.S.C. 2282c; 42
U.S.C. 5801 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.;
28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Amend Sec. 851.2 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 851.2 Exclusions.
* * * * *
(d) This part does not require compliance with any Occupational
Safety and Health Administration requirements for beryllium or
beryllium compounds except as provided in 10 CFR part 850, ``Chronic
Beryllium Disease Prevention Program.''
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 851.23 by revising paragraphs (a)(3), (4), (7), (9) and
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 851.23 Safety and health standards.
(a) * * *
(3) Title 29 CFR, Part 1910, ``Occupational Safety and Health
Standards,'' excluding 29 CFR 1910.1096, ``Ionizing Radiation''; 29 CFR
1910.1000, ``Air Contaminants,'' Tables Z-1 and Z-2, as they relate to
beryllium and beryllium compounds; and 29 CFR 1910.1024, ``Beryllium.''
(4) Title 29 CFR, Part 1915, ``Occupational Safety and Health
Standards for Shipyard Employment,'' except for 29 CFR 1915.1024,
``Beryllium.''
* * * * *
(7) Title 29 CFR, Part 1926, ``Safety and Health Regulations for
Construction,'' except for 29 CFR 1926.1124, ``Beryllium.''
* * * * *
(9) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH[supreg]), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and
Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, (2016) (incorporated
by reference, see Sec. 851.27), excluding those for beryllium and
beryllium compounds, when the ACGIH[supreg] Threshold Limit Values
(TLVs[supreg]) are lower (more protective) than permissible exposure
limits in 29 CFR part 1910 for general industry, 29 CFR part 1915 for
shipyards, and/or 29 CFR part 1926 for construction. When the
ACGIH[supreg] TLVs[supreg] are used as exposure limits, contractors
must comply with the other provisions of any applicable expanded health
standard found in 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, and 1926.
* * * * *
(b) Nothing in this part relieves contractors from the
responsibility to comply with any additional safety and health
requirements that are necessary to protect the safety and health of
workers.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 851.27 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 851.27 Materials incorporated by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other
than that specified in this section, the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material
must be available to the public. All approved material is available for
inspection at the DOE and at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). Contact DOE at the: U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, Office of Worker
Safety and Health Policy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC
20585, (301) 903-1165. For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, email: [email protected], or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. The material
may be obtained from the sources in the following paragraphs of this
section.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-18719 Filed 9-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P