Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT, 53377-53380 [2022-18823]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
Dated: August 24, 2022.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Columbia River.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[FR Doc. 2022–18843 Filed 8–30–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
2. Add § 165.T13–0641 to read as
follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0682]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle
Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule and
request for comments.
ACTION:
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Willamette River, from surface to
bottom, in a 300-yard radius from the
fireworks barge located between the
Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge,
Portland, OR.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Columbia River
(COTP) in the enforcement of the
regulations in this section.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by calling (503) 209–2468
or the Sector Columbia River Command
Jkt 256001
Coast Guard
AGENCY:
§ 165.T13–0641 Safety Zone; Willamette
River, Portland, OR.
15:59 Aug 30, 2022
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
Authority: 46. U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Center on Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those
in the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative.
(3) The COTP will provide advanced
notice of the regulated area via
broadcast notice to mariners and by onscene designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on September 3, 2022. It will be
subject to enforcement this entire period
unless the COTP determines it is no
longer needed, in which case the Coast
Guard will inform mariners via Notice
to Mariners.
The Coast Guard is extending
the effective period of the temporary
safety zone for the navigable waters
within a 50 yard radius from the center
of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on
Lake Champlain, VT. This rules extends
the effective period of the existing safety
zone for an additional two years. The
safety zone will now end on September
1, 2024. When enforced, this regulation
will continue to prohibit entry of vessels
or persons into the safety zone unless
authorized by Captain of the Port for
Sector Northern New England or a
designated representative. The safety
zone is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and marine environment from
potential hazards created by the
demolition, subsequent removal, and
replacement of the North Hero-Grand
Isle Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective from
September 2, 2022, through September
1, 2024.
Comments and related material must
be received by the Coast Guard on or
before October 31, 2022.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53377
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0682 using the Federal Decision
Making Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Marine Science Technician
Zachary Wetzel, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Northern
New England, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone 207–347–5003, email
Zachary.R.Wetzel@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Northern
New England
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
TIR Temporary Interim Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On October 9, 2018, the Coast Guard
published a temporary interim rule
(TIR) establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters within a 50 yard radius
from the center of the North Hero-Grand
Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain, VT for
the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge
replacement project (83 FR 50503). We
received no comments on the published
TIR. No public meeting was requested
and none was held. Construction on the
North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge began in
October 2018.
The Coast Guard originally published
this rule to be effective, and enforceable,
through September 1, 2022, but is
extending it to September 1, 2024, to
complete all remaining contract
operations in and over Lake Champlain,
including, but not limited to steel
erection, concrete bridge deck
placements, installations of navigation
lighting, and removal of the original
North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge. This rule
extends the effective period of the safety
zone for two years until September 1,
2024, due to delays of the North HeroGrand Isle Bridge replacement project.
The Captain of the Port Sector
Northern New England (COTP) has
determined that the potential hazards
associated with the bridge replacement
project will be a safety concern for
anyone within a 50 yard radius from the
center of the North Hero-Grand Isle
Bridge, on Lake Champlain, VT. No
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
53378
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. If the project
is completed prior to September 1, 2024,
enforcement of the safety zone will be
suspended and notice given via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local
Notice to Mariners, or both.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary interim rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
NPRM with respect to this rule because
doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The
Coast Guard will consider comments in
issuing a subsequent temporary interim
rule or temporary final rule.
The notice allowing the construction
project to proceed and providing
updated timelines for the project was
only recently finalized and provided to
the Coast Guard, which did not give the
Coast Guard enough time to publish a
NPRM, take public comments, and issue
a final rule before the existing regulation
expires. Timely action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with removal of the original
bridge and construction of a new
replacement bridge. It would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to publish a NPRM because we
must extend the effective period of the
safety zone as soon as possible to
protect the safety of the waterway users,
construction crew, and other personnel
associated with the bridge project. A
delay of the project to accommodate a
full notice and comment period would
delay necessary operations, result in
increased costs, and delay the
completion date of the bridge project
and subsequent reopening of the North
Hero-Grand Island Bridge for normal
operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because
timely action is needed to respond to
the potential safety hazards associated
with the removal of the original bridge
and construction of a new replacement
bridge. It would be impracticable and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 30, 2022
Jkt 256001
contrary to the public interest to publish
to delay effectiveness because we must
protect the safety of the waterway users,
construction crew, and other personnel
associated with the bridge project.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP
has determined that potential hazards
associated with this bridge construction,
and removal project that has already
commenced, and will continue through
September 1, 2024, will be a safety
concern for anyone within the work
zone. The construction and removal of
the bridge continues to be extremely
complex and presents many safety
hazards including overhead crane
operations, overhead cutting operations,
potential falling debris, and barges
positioned along the length of the
bridge. In order to mitigate the inherent
risks involved with the removal of a
bridge, and installation of the new
bridge, it is necessary to control vessel
movement through the area. The
purpose of this TIR is to ensure the
safety of the waterway users, the public,
and construction workers for the
duration of the new bridge construction
and demolition. Heavy-lift operations
are sensitive to water movement, and
wake from passing vessels could pose
significant risk of injury or death to
construction workers. In order to
minimize such unexpected or
uncontrolled movement of water, any
expeditous passage. No vessel may stop,
moor, anchor, or loiter within the safety
zone at any time unless they are
working on the bridge construction
operations. The rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the bridge
construction project.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule extends the effective period
of the temporary interim rule for the
navigable waters of Lake Champlain,
VT, surrounding the North Hero-Grand
Isle bridge for two additional years until
September 1, 2024. There are no other
changes to the regulatory text of this
rule as cited in 33 CFR 165.T01–0682.
This rule will continue to prohibit all
persons and vessel traffic from the
safety zone unless exceptions are
authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the following reasons: (1)
The safety zone only impacts a small
designated area of Lake Champlain, (2)
the safety zone will only be enforced
when work equipment is present in the
navigable channel as a result of bridge
removal and replacement operations or
if there is an emergency, (3) persons or
vessels desiring to enter the safety zone
may do so with permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The Coast Guard will notify the public
of the enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners via marine channel 16
(VHF–FM).
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 30, 2022
Jkt 256001
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
involves a temporary safety zone that
will prohibit entry within a 50 yard
radius from the center of the North
Hero-Grand Isle Bridge during its
removal and replacement. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locationg the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
VI. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53379
Submitting comments. We encourage
you to submit comments through the
Federal Decision Making Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. To do so,
go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
USCG–2018–0682 in the search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this
document in the Search Results column,
and click on it. Then click on the
Comment option. If you cannot submit
your material by using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this proposed rule
for alternate instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view
documents mentioned in this proposed
rule as being available in the docket,
find the docket as described in the
previous paragraph, and then select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the
Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our
online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the https://
www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept
anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and submissions to the docket in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Amend § 165.T01–0682 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0682 Safety Zone; North HeroGrand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Effective and enforcement period.
This section is effective from September
2, 2022, through September 1, 2024, and
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
53380
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations
subject to enforcement 24 hours a day.
When enforced, as deemed necessary by
the COTP, vessels and persons will be
prohibited from entering the safety zone
unless granted permission from the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 26, 2022.
A.E. Florentino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2022–18823 Filed 8–30–22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 1
RIN 2900–AR19
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs is amending its regulations
implementing the Privacy Act. These
revisions clarify and update the
language of procedural requirements
pertaining to the inclusion of Social
Security account numbers (SSN) on
documents that the Department sends
by mail. These revisions are also
required by the Social Security Number
Fraud Prevention Act of 2017, which
restricts the inclusion of SSNs on
documents sent by mail by the Federal
Government.
DATES: This rule is effective September
30, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy L. Rose, Program Analyst, VA
Privacy Service, 005R1A, 811 Vermont
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202)
237–5070. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 6, 2021, VA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(86 FR 55547) that would establish VA’s
statutory authority to implement the
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017 (the Act) (Pub
L.115–59; 42 U.S.C. 405 note). The
public comment period ended on
December 6, 2021, and VA received two
comments in response to the proposed
rule.
One comment supported the proposed
rule but inquired if there would be any
overlap between the proposed rule and
the VA mail management policy (VA
Directive and Handbook 6340). VA
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Aug 30, 2022
Jkt 256001
Directive 6340 broadly states that ‘‘VA
mail facilities must ensure all mail is
handled appropriately to conform to the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and/
or the Privacy Act.’’ However, neither
the Directive nor VA Handbook 6540
specifically address Public Law 115–59,
which is the statutory authority for
promulgating the proposed rule. There
is no statutory overlap between VA mail
management policy and the proposed
rule at present (although VA may
eventually update VA Directive and
Handbook 6340 to reflect the final rule).
For this reason, VA will make no
changes to the rulemaking based on this
comment.
One comment suggested that there
should be an ‘‘opt in’’ option for ‘‘older
Veterans who rely on paperwork from
the VA that has their SSN on it for
different matters’’ so that older Veterans
could continue to receive mail with
their SSN on it. The proposed rule
includes the addition of sections to 38
CFR 1.575 that would enable VA to
truncate SSNs for outgoing mail where
it is not possible to eliminate the SSN
(such as in the case of older Veterans
whose case number contains their
SSNs). This provision would address
the concerns of providing smooth,
continuous service better than placing
the burden on older Veterans to
specifically ‘‘opt in’’ to continue to
receive mail with their SSN on it. For
this reason, VA will make no changes to
the rulemaking based on this comment.
Accordingly, the proposed rule is
adopted as a final rule without change.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
There are no Assistance Listing
numbers and titles for this rule.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612). The factual basis for
this certification is that the regulation
only governs the circumstances under
which the Department includes SSNs in
mail issued by the Department. The
behavior of small entities is not
addressed in the regulation and is
therefore not impacted. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Assistance Listing
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on August 25, 2022, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR 1.575, as set
forth below:
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53377-53380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18823]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2018-0682]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the
temporary safety zone for the navigable waters within a 50 yard radius
from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain,
VT. This rules extends the effective period of the existing safety zone
for an additional two years. The safety zone will now end on September
1, 2024. When enforced, this regulation will continue to prohibit entry
of vessels or persons into the safety zone unless authorized by Captain
of the Port for Sector Northern New England or a designated
representative. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel,
vessels, and marine environment from potential hazards created by the
demolition, subsequent removal, and replacement of the North Hero-Grand
Isle Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective from September 2, 2022, through September
1, 2024.
Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard
on or before October 31, 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0682 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Marine Science Technician Zachary Wetzel, Waterways
Management Division, Sector Northern New England, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone 207-347-5003, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
TIR Temporary Interim Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On October 9, 2018, the Coast Guard published a temporary interim
rule (TIR) establishing a safety zone on the navigable waters within a
50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on
Lake Champlain, VT for the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge replacement
project (83 FR 50503). We received no comments on the published TIR. No
public meeting was requested and none was held. Construction on the
North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge began in October 2018.
The Coast Guard originally published this rule to be effective, and
enforceable, through September 1, 2022, but is extending it to
September 1, 2024, to complete all remaining contract operations in and
over Lake Champlain, including, but not limited to steel erection,
concrete bridge deck placements, installations of navigation lighting,
and removal of the original North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge. This rule
extends the effective period of the safety zone for two years until
September 1, 2024, due to delays of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge
replacement project.
The Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England (COTP) has
determined that the potential hazards associated with the bridge
replacement project will be a safety concern for anyone within a 50
yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on
Lake Champlain, VT. No
[[Page 53378]]
vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. If
the project is completed prior to September 1, 2024, enforcement of the
safety zone will be suspended and notice given via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or both.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with
respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard will consider comments
in issuing a subsequent temporary interim rule or temporary final rule.
The notice allowing the construction project to proceed and
providing updated timelines for the project was only recently finalized
and provided to the Coast Guard, which did not give the Coast Guard
enough time to publish a NPRM, take public comments, and issue a final
rule before the existing regulation expires. Timely action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with removal of the
original bridge and construction of a new replacement bridge. It would
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to publish a NPRM
because we must extend the effective period of the safety zone as soon
as possible to protect the safety of the waterway users, construction
crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project. A delay
of the project to accommodate a full notice and comment period would
delay necessary operations, result in increased costs, and delay the
completion date of the bridge project and subsequent reopening of the
North Hero-Grand Island Bridge for normal operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because timely action is needed to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with the removal of the original bridge and
construction of a new replacement bridge. It would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest to publish to delay effectiveness
because we must protect the safety of the waterway users, construction
crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP has determined that
potential hazards associated with this bridge construction, and removal
project that has already commenced, and will continue through September
1, 2024, will be a safety concern for anyone within the work zone. The
construction and removal of the bridge continues to be extremely
complex and presents many safety hazards including overhead crane
operations, overhead cutting operations, potential falling debris, and
barges positioned along the length of the bridge. In order to mitigate
the inherent risks involved with the removal of a bridge, and
installation of the new bridge, it is necessary to control vessel
movement through the area. The purpose of this TIR is to ensure the
safety of the waterway users, the public, and construction workers for
the duration of the new bridge construction and demolition. Heavy-lift
operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake from passing
vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to construction
workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or uncontrolled movement
of water, any expeditous passage. No vessel may stop, moor, anchor, or
loiter within the safety zone at any time unless they are working on
the bridge construction operations. The rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the bridge construction project.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule extends the effective period of the temporary interim
rule for the navigable waters of Lake Champlain, VT, surrounding the
North Hero-Grand Isle bridge for two additional years until September
1, 2024. There are no other changes to the regulatory text of this rule
as cited in 33 CFR 165.T01-0682. This rule will continue to prohibit
all persons and vessel traffic from the safety zone unless exceptions
are authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the following
reasons: (1) The safety zone only impacts a small designated area of
Lake Champlain, (2) the safety zone will only be enforced when work
equipment is present in the navigable channel as a result of bridge
removal and replacement operations or if there is an emergency, (3)
persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety zone may do so with
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast
Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via marine channel 16 (VHF-FM).
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the
[[Page 53379]]
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
involves a temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within a 50
yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge during
its removal and replacement. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locationg
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2018-0682 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.T01-0682 by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0682 Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake
Champlain, VT.
* * * * *
(c) Effective and enforcement period. This section is effective
from September 2, 2022, through September 1, 2024, and
[[Page 53380]]
subject to enforcement 24 hours a day. When enforced, as deemed
necessary by the COTP, vessels and persons will be prohibited from
entering the safety zone unless granted permission from the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
* * * * *
Dated: August 26, 2022.
A.E. Florentino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2022-18823 Filed 8-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P