Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT, 53377-53380 [2022-18823]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. Dated: August 24, 2022. M. Scott Jackson, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Columbia River. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: [FR Doc. 2022–18843 Filed 8–30–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ 2. Add § 165.T13–0641 to read as follows: ■ lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 [Docket Number USCG–2018–0682] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary interim rule and request for comments. ACTION: (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Willamette River, from surface to bottom, in a 300-yard radius from the fireworks barge located between the Marquam Bridge and Hawthorne Bridge, Portland, OR. (b) Definitions. As used in this section— Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Columbia River (COTP) in the enforcement of the regulations in this section. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s representative by calling (503) 209–2468 or the Sector Columbia River Command Jkt 256001 Coast Guard AGENCY: § 165.T13–0641 Safety Zone; Willamette River, Portland, OR. 15:59 Aug 30, 2022 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 33 CFR Part 165 Authority: 46. U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. VerDate Sep<11>2014 Center on Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the designated representative. (3) The COTP will provide advanced notice of the regulated area via broadcast notice to mariners and by onscene designated representatives. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on September 3, 2022. It will be subject to enforcement this entire period unless the COTP determines it is no longer needed, in which case the Coast Guard will inform mariners via Notice to Mariners. The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the temporary safety zone for the navigable waters within a 50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain, VT. This rules extends the effective period of the existing safety zone for an additional two years. The safety zone will now end on September 1, 2024. When enforced, this regulation will continue to prohibit entry of vessels or persons into the safety zone unless authorized by Captain of the Port for Sector Northern New England or a designated representative. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and marine environment from potential hazards created by the demolition, subsequent removal, and replacement of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge. DATES: This rule is effective from September 2, 2022, through September 1, 2024. Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before October 31, 2022. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 53377 You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2018–0682 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Chief Marine Science Technician Zachary Wetzel, Waterways Management Division, Sector Northern New England, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone 207–347–5003, email Zachary.R.Wetzel@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section TIR Temporary Interim Rule U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On October 9, 2018, the Coast Guard published a temporary interim rule (TIR) establishing a safety zone on the navigable waters within a 50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain, VT for the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge replacement project (83 FR 50503). We received no comments on the published TIR. No public meeting was requested and none was held. Construction on the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge began in October 2018. The Coast Guard originally published this rule to be effective, and enforceable, through September 1, 2022, but is extending it to September 1, 2024, to complete all remaining contract operations in and over Lake Champlain, including, but not limited to steel erection, concrete bridge deck placements, installations of navigation lighting, and removal of the original North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge. This rule extends the effective period of the safety zone for two years until September 1, 2024, due to delays of the North HeroGrand Isle Bridge replacement project. The Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England (COTP) has determined that the potential hazards associated with the bridge replacement project will be a safety concern for anyone within a 50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain, VT. No E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 53378 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. If the project is completed prior to September 1, 2024, enforcement of the safety zone will be suspended and notice given via Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or both. The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard will consider comments in issuing a subsequent temporary interim rule or temporary final rule. The notice allowing the construction project to proceed and providing updated timelines for the project was only recently finalized and provided to the Coast Guard, which did not give the Coast Guard enough time to publish a NPRM, take public comments, and issue a final rule before the existing regulation expires. Timely action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with removal of the original bridge and construction of a new replacement bridge. It would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to publish a NPRM because we must extend the effective period of the safety zone as soon as possible to protect the safety of the waterway users, construction crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project. A delay of the project to accommodate a full notice and comment period would delay necessary operations, result in increased costs, and delay the completion date of the bridge project and subsequent reopening of the North Hero-Grand Island Bridge for normal operations. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because timely action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the removal of the original bridge and construction of a new replacement bridge. It would be impracticable and VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Aug 30, 2022 Jkt 256001 contrary to the public interest to publish to delay effectiveness because we must protect the safety of the waterway users, construction crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with this bridge construction, and removal project that has already commenced, and will continue through September 1, 2024, will be a safety concern for anyone within the work zone. The construction and removal of the bridge continues to be extremely complex and presents many safety hazards including overhead crane operations, overhead cutting operations, potential falling debris, and barges positioned along the length of the bridge. In order to mitigate the inherent risks involved with the removal of a bridge, and installation of the new bridge, it is necessary to control vessel movement through the area. The purpose of this TIR is to ensure the safety of the waterway users, the public, and construction workers for the duration of the new bridge construction and demolition. Heavy-lift operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake from passing vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to construction workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or uncontrolled movement of water, any expeditous passage. No vessel may stop, moor, anchor, or loiter within the safety zone at any time unless they are working on the bridge construction operations. The rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone during the bridge construction project. IV. Discussion of the Rule This rule extends the effective period of the temporary interim rule for the navigable waters of Lake Champlain, VT, surrounding the North Hero-Grand Isle bridge for two additional years until September 1, 2024. There are no other changes to the regulatory text of this rule as cited in 33 CFR 165.T01–0682. This rule will continue to prohibit all persons and vessel traffic from the safety zone unless exceptions are authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the following reasons: (1) The safety zone only impacts a small designated area of Lake Champlain, (2) the safety zone will only be enforced when work equipment is present in the navigable channel as a result of bridge removal and replacement operations or if there is an emergency, (3) persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety zone may do so with permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine channel 16 (VHF–FM). B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Aug 30, 2022 Jkt 256001 will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves involves a temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within a 50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge during its removal and replacement. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locationg the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 53379 Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–0682 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, look for this document in the Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment option. If you cannot submit your material by using https:// www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate instructions. Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as described in the previous paragraph, and then select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the Document Type column. Public comments will also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following instructions on the https:// www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive. Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions to the docket in response to this document, see DHS’s eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. 2. Amend § 165.T01–0682 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: ■ § 165.T01–0682 Safety Zone; North HeroGrand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT. * * * * * (c) Effective and enforcement period. This section is effective from September 2, 2022, through September 1, 2024, and E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 53380 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2022 / Rules and Regulations subject to enforcement 24 hours a day. When enforced, as deemed necessary by the COTP, vessels and persons will be prohibited from entering the safety zone unless granted permission from the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. * * * * * Dated: August 26, 2022. A.E. Florentino, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Northern New England. [FR Doc. 2022–18823 Filed 8–30–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 1 RIN 2900–AR19 Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule AGENCY: ACTION: The Department of Veterans Affairs is amending its regulations implementing the Privacy Act. These revisions clarify and update the language of procedural requirements pertaining to the inclusion of Social Security account numbers (SSN) on documents that the Department sends by mail. These revisions are also required by the Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017, which restricts the inclusion of SSNs on documents sent by mail by the Federal Government. DATES: This rule is effective September 30, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy L. Rose, Program Analyst, VA Privacy Service, 005R1A, 811 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 237–5070. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 6, 2021, VA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (86 FR 55547) that would establish VA’s statutory authority to implement the Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 (the Act) (Pub L.115–59; 42 U.S.C. 405 note). The public comment period ended on December 6, 2021, and VA received two comments in response to the proposed rule. One comment supported the proposed rule but inquired if there would be any overlap between the proposed rule and the VA mail management policy (VA Directive and Handbook 6340). VA lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Aug 30, 2022 Jkt 256001 Directive 6340 broadly states that ‘‘VA mail facilities must ensure all mail is handled appropriately to conform to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and/ or the Privacy Act.’’ However, neither the Directive nor VA Handbook 6540 specifically address Public Law 115–59, which is the statutory authority for promulgating the proposed rule. There is no statutory overlap between VA mail management policy and the proposed rule at present (although VA may eventually update VA Directive and Handbook 6340 to reflect the final rule). For this reason, VA will make no changes to the rulemaking based on this comment. One comment suggested that there should be an ‘‘opt in’’ option for ‘‘older Veterans who rely on paperwork from the VA that has their SSN on it for different matters’’ so that older Veterans could continue to receive mail with their SSN on it. The proposed rule includes the addition of sections to 38 CFR 1.575 that would enable VA to truncate SSNs for outgoing mail where it is not possible to eliminate the SSN (such as in the case of older Veterans whose case number contains their SSNs). This provision would address the concerns of providing smooth, continuous service better than placing the burden on older Veterans to specifically ‘‘opt in’’ to continue to receive mail with their SSN on it. For this reason, VA will make no changes to the rulemaking based on this comment. Accordingly, the proposed rule is adopted as a final rule without change. Regulatory Flexibility Act Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 There are no Assistance Listing numbers and titles for this rule. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking can be found as a supporting document at www.regulations.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). The factual basis for this certification is that the regulation only governs the circumstances under which the Department includes SSNs in mail issued by the Department. The behavior of small entities is not addressed in the regulation and is therefore not impacted. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply. Unfunded Mandates The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector. Paperwork Reduction Act This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). Assistance Listing List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1 Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans. Signing Authority Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on August 25, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Luvenia Potts, Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans Affairs amends 38 CFR 1.575, as set forth below: E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53377-53380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0682]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake Champlain, VT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the effective period of the 
temporary safety zone for the navigable waters within a 50 yard radius 
from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on Lake Champlain, 
VT. This rules extends the effective period of the existing safety zone 
for an additional two years. The safety zone will now end on September 
1, 2024. When enforced, this regulation will continue to prohibit entry 
of vessels or persons into the safety zone unless authorized by Captain 
of the Port for Sector Northern New England or a designated 
representative. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, 
vessels, and marine environment from potential hazards created by the 
demolition, subsequent removal, and replacement of the North Hero-Grand 
Isle Bridge.

DATES: This rule is effective from September 2, 2022, through September 
1, 2024.
    Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard 
on or before October 31, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0682 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Chief Marine Science Technician Zachary Wetzel, Waterways 
Management Division, Sector Northern New England, U.S. Coast Guard, 
telephone 207-347-5003, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
TIR Temporary Interim Rule
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On October 9, 2018, the Coast Guard published a temporary interim 
rule (TIR) establishing a safety zone on the navigable waters within a 
50 yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on 
Lake Champlain, VT for the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge replacement 
project (83 FR 50503). We received no comments on the published TIR. No 
public meeting was requested and none was held. Construction on the 
North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge began in October 2018.
    The Coast Guard originally published this rule to be effective, and 
enforceable, through September 1, 2022, but is extending it to 
September 1, 2024, to complete all remaining contract operations in and 
over Lake Champlain, including, but not limited to steel erection, 
concrete bridge deck placements, installations of navigation lighting, 
and removal of the original North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge. This rule 
extends the effective period of the safety zone for two years until 
September 1, 2024, due to delays of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge 
replacement project.
    The Captain of the Port Sector Northern New England (COTP) has 
determined that the potential hazards associated with the bridge 
replacement project will be a safety concern for anyone within a 50 
yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, on 
Lake Champlain, VT. No

[[Page 53378]]

vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without 
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. If 
the project is completed prior to September 1, 2024, enforcement of the 
safety zone will be suspended and notice given via Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or both.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without 
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under 
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without 
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause 
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or 
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with 
respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard will consider comments 
in issuing a subsequent temporary interim rule or temporary final rule.
    The notice allowing the construction project to proceed and 
providing updated timelines for the project was only recently finalized 
and provided to the Coast Guard, which did not give the Coast Guard 
enough time to publish a NPRM, take public comments, and issue a final 
rule before the existing regulation expires. Timely action is needed to 
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with removal of the 
original bridge and construction of a new replacement bridge. It would 
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to publish a NPRM 
because we must extend the effective period of the safety zone as soon 
as possible to protect the safety of the waterway users, construction 
crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project. A delay 
of the project to accommodate a full notice and comment period would 
delay necessary operations, result in increased costs, and delay the 
completion date of the bridge project and subsequent reopening of the 
North Hero-Grand Island Bridge for normal operations.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest 
because timely action is needed to respond to the potential safety 
hazards associated with the removal of the original bridge and 
construction of a new replacement bridge. It would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest to publish to delay effectiveness 
because we must protect the safety of the waterway users, construction 
crew, and other personnel associated with the bridge project.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP has determined that 
potential hazards associated with this bridge construction, and removal 
project that has already commenced, and will continue through September 
1, 2024, will be a safety concern for anyone within the work zone. The 
construction and removal of the bridge continues to be extremely 
complex and presents many safety hazards including overhead crane 
operations, overhead cutting operations, potential falling debris, and 
barges positioned along the length of the bridge. In order to mitigate 
the inherent risks involved with the removal of a bridge, and 
installation of the new bridge, it is necessary to control vessel 
movement through the area. The purpose of this TIR is to ensure the 
safety of the waterway users, the public, and construction workers for 
the duration of the new bridge construction and demolition. Heavy-lift 
operations are sensitive to water movement, and wake from passing 
vessels could pose significant risk of injury or death to construction 
workers. In order to minimize such unexpected or uncontrolled movement 
of water, any expeditous passage. No vessel may stop, moor, anchor, or 
loiter within the safety zone at any time unless they are working on 
the bridge construction operations. The rule is needed to protect 
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters 
within the safety zone during the bridge construction project.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule extends the effective period of the temporary interim 
rule for the navigable waters of Lake Champlain, VT, surrounding the 
North Hero-Grand Isle bridge for two additional years until September 
1, 2024. There are no other changes to the regulatory text of this rule 
as cited in 33 CFR 165.T01-0682. This rule will continue to prohibit 
all persons and vessel traffic from the safety zone unless exceptions 
are authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this 
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the following 
reasons: (1) The safety zone only impacts a small designated area of 
Lake Champlain, (2) the safety zone will only be enforced when work 
equipment is present in the navigable channel as a result of bridge 
removal and replacement operations or if there is an emergency, (3) 
persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety zone may do so with 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast 
Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via 
appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners via marine channel 16 (VHF-FM).

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this proposed rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule 
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please call or email the

[[Page 53379]]

person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
involves a temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within a 50 
yard radius from the center of the North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge during 
its removal and replacement. It is categorically excluded from further 
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction 
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. 
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of 
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this 
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locationg 
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through 
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To 
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2018-0682 in the 
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the 
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment 
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate 
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this 
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as 
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting & 
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will 
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following 
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked 
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only 
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may 
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that 
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we 
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal 
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions 
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking 
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.


0
2. Amend Sec.  165.T01-0682 by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0682   Safety Zone; North Hero-Grand Isle Bridge, Lake 
Champlain, VT.

* * * * *
    (c) Effective and enforcement period. This section is effective 
from September 2, 2022, through September 1, 2024, and

[[Page 53380]]

subject to enforcement 24 hours a day. When enforced, as deemed 
necessary by the COTP, vessels and persons will be prohibited from 
entering the safety zone unless granted permission from the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
* * * * *

    Dated: August 26, 2022.
A.E. Florentino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Northern New England.
[FR Doc. 2022-18823 Filed 8-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.